Next Article in Journal
System Interaction and Scenario-Based Simulation of Coupling Coordination Between Low-Carbon Transportation and High-Quality Economic Development in the Yellow River Jiziwan Metropolitan Area
Previous Article in Journal
Configurational Pathways for the Coordinated Development of County Industry and Employment from the Perspective of Inclusive Growth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Entrepreneurship in Digital Environments: New Dynamics in the Spanish Entrepreneurial System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Fiscal Decentralization and SDG6 Achievement: Evidence from AI-Based Estimation for OECD Countries

by
Mehmet Avcı
1,
Aytaç Altan
2,*,
Sedat Polat
1,
Yusuf Bahri Özçelik
2,
Mehmet Pekkaya
3 and
Gökhan Dökmen
1
1
Department of Public Finance, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, 67100 Zonguldak, Türkiye
2
Department of Electrical Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, 67100 Zonguldak, Türkiye
3
Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, 67100 Zonguldak, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2026, 14(6), 716; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060716 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 20 May 2026 / Revised: 16 June 2026 / Accepted: 19 June 2026 / Published: 21 June 2026

Abstract

Water and sanitation governance sits at the intersection of global development ambitions and highly localized service realities. While SDG6 sets universal targets for clean water and sanitation, the institutional and fiscal arrangements that translate those targets into actual service outcomes operate primarily at the subnational level. The discrepancy between globally defined objectives and locally executed delivery creates a structural research gap: how do the fiscal architectures of local governments influence progress towards SDG6? This study addresses this question for a panel of OECD countries by developing a deep learning-based estimation framework that combines bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) networks with Tianji’s horse racing optimization (THRO) algorithm. Three distinct operationalizations of fiscal decentralization are tested against SDG6 outcomes: subnational expenditure share (EFDM), subnational revenue share (RFDM), and a composite index balancing both dimensions (CFDM). Model adequacy is assessed using a layered diagnostic protocol involving regression fit, country-level residual patterns, error density profiles, Bland–Altman limits of agreement and inter-annual error trajectories. Among the three configurations, CFDM consistently records superior performance (; ; ), while even the weakest specification clears , attesting to the overall robustness of the proposed architecture. The margin by which CFDM outperforms its alternatives highlights a key finding: neither spending authority nor revenue capacity alone accurately reflects the fiscal reality of local water and sanitation governance; it is their combined effect that is important. The expenditure dimension is further proven to be the more influential of the two unidimensional proxies, consistent with the capital-intensive and maintenance-heavy nature of water infrastructure. On the other hand, coefficient findings show that fiscal decentralization is positively associated with SDG6 achievement for all models. Beyond its empirical contributions, the study introduces a methodological template for applying hybrid AI optimization to policy-relevant sustainability panels. It also connects two largely parallel bodies of scholarship, fiscal federalism and SDG research, that have rarely been examined together.
Keywords: fiscal decentralization; SDG6; sustainable development; OECD; BiLSTM; THRO algorithm fiscal decentralization; SDG6; sustainable development; OECD; BiLSTM; THRO algorithm

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Avcı, M.; Altan, A.; Polat, S.; Özçelik, Y.B.; Pekkaya, M.; Dökmen, G. Fiscal Decentralization and SDG6 Achievement: Evidence from AI-Based Estimation for OECD Countries. Systems 2026, 14, 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060716

AMA Style

Avcı M, Altan A, Polat S, Özçelik YB, Pekkaya M, Dökmen G. Fiscal Decentralization and SDG6 Achievement: Evidence from AI-Based Estimation for OECD Countries. Systems. 2026; 14(6):716. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060716

Chicago/Turabian Style

Avcı, Mehmet, Aytaç Altan, Sedat Polat, Yusuf Bahri Özçelik, Mehmet Pekkaya, and Gökhan Dökmen. 2026. "Fiscal Decentralization and SDG6 Achievement: Evidence from AI-Based Estimation for OECD Countries" Systems 14, no. 6: 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060716

APA Style

Avcı, M., Altan, A., Polat, S., Özçelik, Y. B., Pekkaya, M., & Dökmen, G. (2026). Fiscal Decentralization and SDG6 Achievement: Evidence from AI-Based Estimation for OECD Countries. Systems, 14(6), 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060716

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop