Next Article in Journal
Leading Innovation in Tourism and Hospitality: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Agility
Previous Article in Journal
Network Position in Global Trade Systems and Cyberattack Risk: Evidence from Country-Level Trade Networks, 2010–2020
Previous Article in Special Issue
How Disaggregated ESG Pillars Enhance Chinese New Energy Vehicle Companies’ Financial Performance?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Does the Market Value Corporate ESG Ratings? A Complex System Driven by Institutional Investors

1
School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
2
School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2026, 14(4), 368; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14040368
Submission received: 12 February 2026 / Revised: 21 March 2026 / Accepted: 30 March 2026 / Published: 30 March 2026

Abstract

Against the backdrop of China’s dual-carbon goals and the growing emphasis on sustainable development, ESG information has become an important non-financial signal in capital markets; yet whether and how it is priced by investors remains unclear. Using a sample of 2018–2024 Chinese A-share listed firms, this study examines the relationship between corporate ESG ratings and firm market value, with a particular focus on the mediating role of institutional ownership and investor heterogeneity. We find that firms with higher ESG ratings exhibit significantly higher market value, indicating that the market assigns a valuation premium to favorable ESG evaluations. Mediation analyses further show that higher ESG ratings are associated with increased institutional ownership, which in turn enhances firm value. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that this mediating effect is primarily driven by long-term institutional investors, whereas medium-term and short-term institutions neither respond systematically to ESG ratings nor transmit ESG rating information into firm valuation. In additional analyses, we show that ESG rating divergence significantly weakens the positive valuation effect of ESG ratings by increasing informational uncertainty and reducing the credibility of ESG rating signals. Overall, this study provides new evidence on the investor-based mechanisms underlying ESG rating-based pricing and highlights the importance of improving the transparency and comparability of ESG ratings in China’s capital market.
Keywords: ESG ratings; market value; institutional investors; ESG rating divergence ESG ratings; market value; institutional investors; ESG rating divergence

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, C.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, Y. Does the Market Value Corporate ESG Ratings? A Complex System Driven by Institutional Investors. Systems 2026, 14, 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14040368

AMA Style

Zhang C, Zhang S, Zhou Z, Yang Y. Does the Market Value Corporate ESG Ratings? A Complex System Driven by Institutional Investors. Systems. 2026; 14(4):368. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14040368

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Changjiang, Sihan Zhang, Zhepeng Zhou, and Yuqi Yang. 2026. "Does the Market Value Corporate ESG Ratings? A Complex System Driven by Institutional Investors" Systems 14, no. 4: 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14040368

APA Style

Zhang, C., Zhang, S., Zhou, Z., & Yang, Y. (2026). Does the Market Value Corporate ESG Ratings? A Complex System Driven by Institutional Investors. Systems, 14(4), 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14040368

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop