Next Article in Journal
Resource Endowments, Value Cognition, and Strategic Risk-Taking: Explaining Carbon-Reduction Investments in Port Enterprises
Previous Article in Journal
A Data Envelopment Analysis of Inland Ports’ Efficiency: Evidence from the Romanian Danube Ports
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dynamic Governance of Electric Vehicle Supply Chain Network Resilience Under Disruption Risks

School of Management, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2026, 14(2), 202; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14020202
Submission received: 10 January 2026 / Revised: 7 February 2026 / Accepted: 11 February 2026 / Published: 13 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Supply Chain Management)

Abstract

In the context of multiple overlapping uncertainties, upstream disruptions in electric vehicle supply chain networks are becoming increasingly frequent. Given the dynamic and sudden nature of disruption risks, this paper introduces a stochastic stopping model to incorporate disruption risks into resilience governance. This study constructs a differential game model for resilience governance in electric vehicle supply chain networks, involving governments, suppliers, and core manufacturers. This study proposes a dynamic resilience differential equation, which integrates resilience investment efforts. Then, this study explores optimal resilience strategies and dynamic equilibrium trajectories of resilience levels under three game models. The results indicate that optimal resilience investment efforts are negatively correlated with the effort-cost coefficients, resilience decay rates, disruption probability, and damage rate. Conversely, these efforts are positively correlated with supply chain network resilience, benefits, and the resilience influence coefficients. Disruption probability and damage rate are negatively correlated with benefits. Disruption risks distort the time preferences of governance entities, causing them to overvalue immediate gains and undervalue future returns. Finally, both supply chain resilience and total benefits reach their optimal levels under the collaborative game model.
Keywords: electric vehicle supply chain networks; differential games; resilience governance; disruption risk; resilience investment efforts electric vehicle supply chain networks; differential games; resilience governance; disruption risk; resilience investment efforts

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, M. Dynamic Governance of Electric Vehicle Supply Chain Network Resilience Under Disruption Risks. Systems 2026, 14, 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14020202

AMA Style

Wang X, Zhou X, Zhu M. Dynamic Governance of Electric Vehicle Supply Chain Network Resilience Under Disruption Risks. Systems. 2026; 14(2):202. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14020202

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xuan, Xiaoye Zhou, and Meilin Zhu. 2026. "Dynamic Governance of Electric Vehicle Supply Chain Network Resilience Under Disruption Risks" Systems 14, no. 2: 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14020202

APA Style

Wang, X., Zhou, X., & Zhu, M. (2026). Dynamic Governance of Electric Vehicle Supply Chain Network Resilience Under Disruption Risks. Systems, 14(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14020202

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop