Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Endoglucanase Production from Lignocellulosic Waste Through Fungal Co-Culture Technology: A Step Towards Circular Economy
Previous Article in Journal
The Biological Significance of Calmodulin Binding to Lipids
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatio-Temporal Variability Description of the Rare Species Lilium martagon L. in Different Habitat Conditions

by
Tomasz Wójcik
1,
Kinga Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt
2,* and
Maria Ziaja
3
1
Department of Nature Protection and Landscape Ecology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Environment Management and Protection, Faculty of Technology and Life Sciences, University of Rzeszów, Zelwerowicza 4, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland
2
Department of Tourism Geography and Ecology, Institute of Tourism, Faculty of Tourism and Recreation, University of Physical Education in Kraków, Jana Pawła II 78, 31-571 Kraków, Poland
3
Department of Tourism and Recreation, Faculty of Physical Culture Sciences, University of Rzeszów, Cicha 2A, 35-312 Rzeszów, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2026, 15(5), 398; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15050398
Submission received: 19 January 2026 / Revised: 24 February 2026 / Accepted: 26 February 2026 / Published: 28 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Conservation Biology and Biodiversity)

Simple Summary

The investigations of the spatio-temporal variability of the rare species Lilium martagon L. were conducted in three populations: population 1 (located in Wolski Forest), population 2 (in Mount Chełm), and population 3 (in Hrabeński Forest). All aforementioned localities were situated in Southern Poland. The field studies were conducted in the years 2018–2023 in permanent study patches that differed regarding habitat conditions, as well as population abundance, structure, and individual traits. The greatest number of Lilium martagon stems and their substantial dimensions were recorded in population 3. The lack of juvenile stems was found in population 3, while in less abundant populations—1 and 2—juvenile, immature, virginile, and generative stems were found. The investigations performed suggest the favourable impact of weather conditions during the meteorological spring and summer of 2019 on the growth of Lilium martagon stems. Nevertheless, the lack of a unified trend in the studied populations indicates the occurrence of site-specific temporal variability of individual traits. Considering the obtained results, it can be concluded that population 3 presents a much better state and prospects for persistence in the occupied site than populations 1 and 2.

Abstract

Martagon Lily, Lilium martagon, belongs to geophytes inhabiting mainly forest communities in temperate regions of Europe and Asia and it is considered as a rare and endangered species in many regions. The presented investigations were conducted in three populations, occurring in forest habitats in Southern Poland: Wolski Forest (population 1), Mount Chełm (population 2), and Hrabeński Forest (population 3). At each site, 10 phytosociological relevés covering an area of 100 m2 were taken. For each phytosociological relevé, the Shannon–Wiener, Pielou, and Simpson indices, as well as the number of species, were calculated. The detailed field studies were conducted in permanent study patches measuring 20 m × 20 m. The measurements of habitat conditions (e.g., number of species, soil moisture, light intensity at ground level, height of plant cover) were carried out in 2018. The observations of the abundance and developmental structure of stems, as well as selected traits (e.g., height, number and dimensions of leaves, number of flowers) were conducted in 2018–2023. The analysis of phytosociological relevés showed that the study sites in Wolski Forest and Mount Chełm were located in the Tilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli oak-hornbeam forest association, while the study site in Hrabeński Forest was situated in the Dentario glandulosae–Fagetum mountain beech forest association. The statistical analysis confirmed that the greatest Shannon and Simpson index values, number of species, soil humidity, light intensity at ground level, and height of plant cover were recorded in Hrabeński forest. The greatest number of Lilium martagon stems and a lack of juvenile stems was found in population 3, while in less abundant populations—1 and 2—juvenile, immature, virginile, and generative stems were found. The statistical analysis showed that the highest immature and virginile stems with the greatest number of whorl leaves, as well as the substantial height of generative stems and number of whorl leaves observed in population 3, might be the result of growing in conditions of lateral shading provided by adjacent plants. The lowest height of immature and virginile stems recorded in population 1 and generative stems noticed in population 2 might be caused by them being overshaded by the canopy of surrounding trees. Moreover, the obtained results suggest the favourable impact of weather conditions during the meteorological spring and summer of 2019 on the growth of Lilium martagon stems. Nevertheless, the lack of a unified trend in the studied populations indicates the occurrence of site-specific temporal variability of individual traits. Considering the obtained results, it can be concluded that population 3 presents a much better state and prospects for persistence in the occupied site than populations 1 and 2. At the same time, it should be pointed out that further long-term observations of populations of Lilium martagon located in different habitat conditions are still strongly desired.

1. Introduction

The genus Lilium consists of approximately 100 species and thousands of cultivars. These plants are found in temperate areas such as East Asia, Europe, and North America in the northern hemisphere, including 22 species in Europe. The genus is divided into seven sections, according to their bulb characteristics, leaf inflorescence, flower pattern, and origin, including Martagon, Archelirion, Sinomartagon, Daurolirion, Leucolirion, Pseudolirium, and Liriotypus [1,2]. Lilium is widely cultivated as an ornamental plant in Europe, North America, and Eastern Asia, playing a special role in garden design [3,4].
Lilium martagon L. (Martagon Lily) belongs to the Martagon section of the large Liliaceae family [5]. It is a 40–150 cm tall perennial with an underground golden-yellow, scaly bulb. In the central part of the stem, the leaves are arranged in characteristic whorls, usually one, sometimes two or three, while the remaining single oblong-ovate leaves, 8–12 cm long and 2–5 cm wide, are arranged spirally. It blooms from June to July. The fragrant, pendulous flowers are gathered in loose clusters at the top of the stem, numbering 3–12. The perianth tepals are 3–4 cm long, recurved upward, and pinkish-purple with darker spots. The fruit is an elongated, ribbed capsule bursting with three slits. The seeds are flat, broadly winged. It reproduces both generatively and vegetatively by producing new bulbs at the base of the mother bulb [5,6]. Lilium martagon is a geophyte, preferring partial shade and thermal conditions ranging from moderately warm to moderately cold. It grows in fresh, eutrophic soils with neutral and alkaline pH [7,8].
The aforementioned species has a wide range, covering temperate regions of Europe and Asia, extending from western, central, and eastern Europe to Mongolia (except Great Britain, Belgium, the Netherlands, the Scandinavian countries, and northern Russia) [9,10,11,12]. In Poland, it occurs quite often, except in the northwestern and western parts of the country [13]. Due to its wide distribution range, Lilium martagon grows in numerous plant communities. It is most frequently recorded in eutrophic and mesotrophic deciduous forests. In Poland, it is widespread in the Carpathians and Sudetes, from the foothills to the subalpine zone [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], and is less common in the lowlands [23,24]. It is a characteristic species of meso- and eutrophic deciduous forests of the order Fagetalia sylvaticae and a distinctive species of the Bupleuro–Calamagrostietum arundinaceae association, a group of high-mountain herbaceous plants from the Calamagrostion alliance [25]. Moreover, it also occurs in beech forests in the Eastern Alps, the Bohemian Massif and the Western Carpathians [26], subalpine beech forests in the Julian Alps, and in the northern Dinaric Alps [27], as well as in southeastern Europe in the Balkan Peninsula, from the southeastern areas of the Alps in Slovenia, through Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, and the Republic of Macedonia to northern and northeastern Greece and Bulgaria (alliance Aremonio-Fagion and Fagion moesiacae) [28]. Furthermore Lilium martagon occurs in oak-hornbeam forests, including the subcontinental oak-hornbeam forest Tilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli [14,21,29] and the Central European Galio silvatici–Carpinetum [23], and is recorded in riparian forests of the Alno–Ulmion alliance [19,30,31] and in the subcontinental oak-hornbeam forest association Potentillo albae–Quercetum [32]. Additionally, it was noted in Carpathian mountain grasslands in the associations Festucetum saxatilis, Ranunculo platanifolii–Adenostyletum alliariae, Hyperico alpigeni–Calamagrostietum villosae [33,34], and Alpine pastures [35]. This species can also be found sporadically in anthropogenic habitats, such as old parks and cemeteries [36,37].
In Poland, Lilium martagon is under strict species protection [38] and classified in various threat categories depending on the region. It is considered as an endangered species (EN) in the Suwałki Lakeland [39], a vulnerable species (VU) in Western Pomerania [40] and the South Podlasie Lowland [41], whilst a near threatened species (NT) in Gdańsk Pomerania [42] and in the Silesian Voivodeship [43]. Moreover, Martagon Lily is considered as a species of least concern (LC) in Lower Silesia [44], in the Opole Voivodeship [45], and in Greater Poland [46], and as a low-risk species (LR) in the Proszowice Plateau [47]. It is also listed as endangered in neighbouring countries. Lilium martagon is included in the Red List of Vascular Plants of the Czech Republic with the NT category [48], the Red List of Vascular Plants of the Ukrainian flora with the LC category [49], the Red List of Vascular Plants of the Carpathians with the LC category [50], and the Red Book of Vascular Flora of Croatia with the VU category [51]. It has also been included in the European Red List of Medicinal Plants [52].
To date, the majority of investigations have focused on taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships among particular taxa representing the genus Lilium [11,14] or have addressed the issue of reproduction or development of individuals [53,54,55,56,57,58,59].
Due to the threat of extinction of Lilium martagon, studies of its population abundance and structure, as well as observations of individual traits, are particularly important because they allow for an evaluation of the prospects for persistence of the population in the occupied habitat and are the basis for undertaking specific protective actions. So far, such studies have been conducted among others in Poland [23,24,60,61,62,63,64,65,66], Ukraine [67], Russia [68], and Latvia [10,69]. Nevertheless, the aforementioned studies addressed solely selected individual traits and were conducted over one [16,23,29,60,65], two [62,66], or three [10] growing seasons in a low number of study sites. Longer observations lasting at least four years were carried out by Balode [69] and Pindel [63]. The longest six-year investigations of individual traits of Lilium martagon were carried out by Miciniak and Zątek [24]. However, the aforementioned research was conducted in selected years of a six-year period. All these authors analysed the influence of habitat conditions, such as light intensity and soil conditions as well as floristic and phytocoenotic variability of ecosystems on the state of Lilium martagon. The influence of weather conditions on Martagon Lily population was investigated exclusively by Truchan and Sobisz [64]. Based on three-year observations conducted at an anthropogenic locality, they confirmed the negative effect of precipitation on population abundance. Despite growing interest in the aforementioned issues, the present state of knowledge is still insufficient. Therefore, the presented six-year study was undertaken to evaluate the spatial and temporal variability of population and individual traits of Lilium martagon. The specific aims focused on assessing: (i) habitat conditions at all study sites, (ii) weather conditions in the study period, (iii) abundance and structure of the studied populations of Lilium martagon, and (iv) selected traits of stems of Lilium martagon representing different developmental stages.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The investigations were conducted in three Lilium martagon localities in Southern Poland. Site 1 is located in Wolski Forest in the western part of Kraków (50.057617° N, 19.885717° E), within the Bielańsko-Tyniecki Landscape Park. In terms of physico-geographical regionalisation, this area is located in the Kraków Bridge mesoregion of the Kraków Gate macroregion [70]. A characteristic feature of this area is its varied relief, within which various landforms can be distinguished. The highest parts of the hills are occupied by a plateau, covered with loess deposits, on which a Pino–Quercetum mixed coniferous forest has developed. The slopes are cut by deep valleys; brown soils and rendzinas occurring here are covered by Tilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli and Dentario glandulosae–Fagetum associations. On limestone rocks and in their surroundings, xerothermic grasslands representing the Festuco–Brometea class and shrubs of the Rhamno–Prunetea class can be found [71,72]. The observed Lilium martagon population (called in this study population 1) occurs in the Tilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli association at an altitude of 243 m above sea level in the eastern part of Wolski Forest.
Site 2 is located on Mount Chełm in the village of Jaszczurowa (49.888957° N, 21.559002° E). This area is situated within the Mount Chełm Nature Reserve and the Czarnorzecko-Strzyżowski Landscape Park. In terms of physico-geographical regionalisation, site 2 is located in the Strzyżów Foothills mesoregion, in the Mid-Beskidy Foothills macroregion [70]. Mount Chełm is composed of Carpathian flysch, with thick-bedded sandstones in the substrate. The aforementioned reserve protects an extrazonal site of the Dentario glandulosae–Fagetum association, an area of springs with the Carici remotae–Fraxinetum association, the Tilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli association, and an abandoned quarry [73,74]. The population of Lilium martagon (labelled population 2) occurs in the top part of the Mount Chełm (520 m above sea level) in a Dentario glandulosae–Fagetum association.
Site 3 is located in Hrabeński Forest in the village of Besko (49.594234° N, 21.920799° E), situated in the Jasło–Krosno Basin mesoregion, in the Mid-Beskidy Foothills macroregion [70] and is protected within the Natura 2000 Hrabeński Forest PLH180039 site. The substrate consists of Carpathian flysch composed of a series of alternating shales and sandstones. Hrabeński Forest occupies the hills between the Wisłok and Tabor river valleys, where the elevation differences reach up to 100 m. In the lowest part of the forest, on gentle slopes, the Tilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli association is found. In the higher parts of the hills, on slopes with greater inclination and varied exposure, Carpathian beech forest occurs in the rank of two subassociations: Dentario glandulosae–Fagetum typicum and Dentario glandulosae–Fagetum lunarietosum [21]. The population of Lilium martagon (called population 3) occurs throughout the whole forest complex; however, it is most abundant in the Tilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli association at an altitude of 255 m above sea level.

2.2. Data Collection

In 2018, the investigations of plant cover and habitat conditions were conducted at three study sites: Wolski Forest, Mount Chełm, and Hrabeński Forest. At each site, 10 phytosociological relevés covering an area of 100 m2 were taken using the Braun-Blanquet method [75]. The names of vascular plants are given according to Mirek et al [76]. The description of vegetation includes species covering more than 5% of a given plant layer. Syntaxonomic classification was based on the Matuszkiewicz system [25]. For each phytosociological relevé, the Shannon–Wiener diversity index [77], Pielou index [78], Simpson index [79], and number of species were calculated using JUICE 7.1 software [80]. Then, mean values of diversity indices for plant communities occurring in the three study sites were calculated.
Subsequently, within each study site one permanent research patch measuring 20 m × 20 m was established. Altogether, in each permanent patch, 10 measurements of soil pH, 20 measurements of soil moisture (%), and herbaceous vegetation height (cm), as well as 30 measurements of light intensity (lx) were taken. Soil pH was measured with a soil acidimeter (RIM KOWALCZYK SP.J., Janki, Poland) using Hellig’s solution, soil moisture with an Extech MO750 hygrometer (Extech Instruments Corporation, Maastricht, Netherlands), and light intensity at ground level with a TES1335 luxmeter (TES Electrical Electronic Corp., Taipei, Taiwan). The aforementioned measurements were conducted from 10 to 15 June 2018, from 12:00 to 15:00 in full sunlight. Additional analyses of habitat conditions were conducted using Ellenberg indicators [81]. Ellenberg indicators were calculated for each phytosociological relevé in JUICE programme [80] and then mean values for the plant communities occurring in particular study sites were computed.
In order to describe the temporal variability of weather conditions in the study period, monthly sum of precipitation [mm] and monthly mean temperature [°C] data from Kraków and Krosno stations (situated near the Mount Chełm and Hrabeński Forest sites) were taken from the website TuTiempo (Accessed on 21 March 2025) [82].
The investigations of populations of Lilium martagon were conducted in the years 2018–2023 within the aforementioned permanent plots measuring 20 m × 20 m. In each study year, all stems of Lilium martagon occurring within the permanent patches were counted. Taking into account the fact that the accurate determination of age of individuals in clonal, strictly protected populations of Lilium martagon in Poland [38] is possible only on the basis of bulb morphology, instead of age, the developmental stage of the stems was determined on the basis of the number of leaves [29,61,62]. Considering this, each stem was assigned to one of the following stages: (i) juvenile stage (stem with 1–2 leaves), (ii) immature stage (3–12 leaves), (iii) virginile (mature vegetative) stage (more than 12 leaves and lack of inflorescence), or (iv) generative stage (with developed inflorescence).
Next, observations of selected individual traits of the stems of Lilium martagon were carried out. The height, number of leaves in the whorl, and length and width of the longest leaf in the whorl were observed in immature stems. The height, number of leaves in the lower whorl, and length and width of the longest leaf in this whorl were observed in virginile stems. The height, number of leaves in the lowest whorl, length and width of the longest leaf in this whorl, number of spiral leaves, and length and width of the spiral leaf placed above the highest whorl, as well as the number of flowers, were recorded in generative stems. When the number of stems representing a particular stage reached no more than 30, all stems were measured; meanwhile, if they occurred more abundantly (at least 31 stems), the number of examined stems was limited to 30. The stems were randomly selected based on 30 throws with an iron rim, 20 cm in diameter. Each time, one stem occurring in the centre of the rim was measured and labelled.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis H test for multiple comparisons was applied to check the statistical significance of differences in values of:
-
Shannon index, Simpson index, Pielou index, number of species, soil moisture, soil pH, height of plant cover and light intensity at ground level, as well as values of Ellenberg indices among study sites;
-
Individual traits of immature stems of Lilium martagon (height, number of leaves in the whorl, and dimensions of the longest one) among populations in the years 2018–2023;
-
Individual traits of virginile stems (height, number of leaves in the lower whorl, and dimensions of the longest one) among populations in the years 2020–2023;
-
Individual traits of generative stems (height, number of flowers, number of whorls, number of leaves in the lowest whorl and dimensions of the longest one, number of spiral leaves, and dimensions of spiral leaf placed above the highest whorl) among populations in the years 2018–2023.
The non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test was used to check the statistical significance of differences in values of height, number of leaves in the lower whorl and dimensions of the longest leaf in virginile stems among populations in the years 2018 and 2019. Moreover, the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis H test for multiple comparisons was applied to check the statistical significance of differences in values of individual traits of stems in the study years. Additionally, the d-Cohen coefficient was calculated to check the scale of practical significance of differences among pairs of data referring to habitat conditions at the study sites, as well as individual traits of stems representing different populations. The scale of practical significance of differences based on absolute values of the d-Cohen coefficient was as follows: <0.2—negligible, 0.21–0.49—small, 0.5–0.79—moderate, and >0.8—substantial difference. The χ2 test was used to test the statistical significance of spatial and temporal differences in the share of stems at various developmental stages. The analyses were conducted using Statistica 13.3 software and an interactive χ2 test calculator [83].

3. Results

3.1. Habitat Conditions

Analysis of phytosociological relevés showed that the studied sites differed in terms of vegetation cover. At sites 1 (Wolski Forest) and 3 (Hrabeński Forest), the Tilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli oak-hornbeam forest association was observed, while at site 2 (Mount Chełm) the Dentario glandulosae–Fagetum mountain beech forest association was recorded (Table 1, Figure 1). At all sites, the tree layer was well developed, reaching an average cover of 77 to 88%. At site 1, the tree layer was dominated by Tilia cordata and Quercus robur, at site 2 Fagus sylvatica and Acer pseudoplatanus prevailed, while at site 3 Carpinus betulus, Acer pseudoplatanus, and Quercus robur were represented most abundantly. The shrub layer was relatively well developed in the Tilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli association, where its average cover was 34% (site 3) and 45% (site 1). At site 2, the shrub layer was poorly developed, with an average cover of only 5%. The herbaceous vegetation layer achieved high, but varied, coverage across sites. It was most developed at site 3 (91% coverage), where as many as eight species achieved coverage exceeding 5%, including Lilium martagon and Stellaria holostea, a characteristic species of the oak-hornbeam forest. At site 2, the herbaceous vegetation was dominated by Dentaria glandulosa, a characteristic species of the Dentario glandulosae–Fagetum association, but Galeobdolon luteum and Rubus hirtus also had significant cover. Herbaceous vegetation at site 1 was slightly less developed (68%). Five species achieved high coverage in this layer, including Stellaria holostea, a species of the oak-hornbeam forest. The highest species richness was observed at site 3, where an average of 34 species per phytosociological relevé was recorded. This site also had the highest values of the Shannon–Wiener, Simpson, and Evenness indices (Figure 2), as confirmed by the values of the d-Cohen coefficient (Table A1).
The study sites differed in terms of habitat conditions. The highest values of soil moisture, light intensity at ground level, as well as height of plant cover were noticed at site 3. The values of the d-Cohen coefficient confirmed the substantial differences, especially in the case of soil moisture and light intensity (Table A1). At sites 1 and 3, located in the oak-hornbeam forests, the soil pH was neutral, while at site 2, situated in a beech forest, it was slightly acidic (Figure 3). The substantial differences in soil reaction between the oak-hornbeam and beech forests were confirmed by the d-Cohen coefficient values (Table A1). Analysis of Ellenberg’s climatic indicators revealed significantly higher L and T values at sites 1 and 3 than at site 2. In the case of edaphic indicators, significant differences were observed for F and N. They reached much greater values at sites 2 and 3 than at site 1. Additionally, the K indicator was greater at site 1 than at the sites 2 and 3 (Figure 4). All aforementioned differences were confirmed by the values of the d-Cohen coefficient (Table A2).

3.2. The Selected Weather Conditions in the Study Period

Weather conditions in the study site where population 1 occurred were evaluated on the basis of data from the Kraków station, where measurements were taken (Figure 5 and Figure 6). The annual sum of precipitation ranged from 615.1 mm (in the year 2022) to 781.5 mm (2021). The mean annual air temperatures achieved values ranging from 8.9 °C (in the year 2021) to 10.4 °C (2019, 2023). During the meteorological spring occurring from 1 March till 31 May, the sum of precipitation ranged from 61.5 mm (in the year 2022) to 214.1 mm (2019), while the mean air temperatures ranged from 7.4 °C (in the year 2021) to 10.5 °C (2018). During the meteorological summer (from 1 June to 31 August), the sum of precipitation rose from 159.3 mm (2019) to 394.0 mm (2021), while the air temperatures achieved values ranging from 19.1 °C (2020) to 20.5 °C (2019).
Weather conditions at the study sites where populations 2 and 3 occurred were evaluated on the basis of data from the Krosno station, where measurements were taken (Figure 7 and Figure 8). The annual sum of precipitation rose from 623.6 mm (in the year 2018) to 1483.6 mm (2023). The mean annual air temperatures achieved values ranging from 8.7 °C (2020) to 12.0 (2018). During the meteorological spring, the sum of precipitation ranged from 123.0 mm (2023) to 254.5 mm (2019), while the mean air temperatures ranged from 6.4 °C (2023) to 9.0 °C (2019). During the meteorological summer, the sum of precipitation rose from 207.5 mm (2022) to 334.7 mm (2023), while the measured mean air temperatures ranged from 17.9 °C (2020) to 19.7 °C (2019).

3.3. Spatio-Temporal Variability of Abundance and Structure of Developmental Stages of Populations

The abundance of stems of Lilium martagon in the study patches and structure of their developmental stages showed both spatial and temporal. The total number of stems was the greatest in population 3, where it ranged from 85 to 237 in particular study years. A much lower number of stems, ranging from 52 to 163, was recorded in population 2, while in population 1 34 to 93 stems were noted (Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11).
During the whole study period in populations 1 and 2, juvenile, immature, virginile, and generative stems occurred. In population 1, the greatest share of juvenile stems (comparing other populations) especially in the year 2019 was observed, while the contribution of stems representing the remaining stages differ in particular years (Figure 9). In population 2, a share of immature stems greater than at other study sites was noted. Also, the percentage of generative stems was substantial during almost all study years (Figure 10). In population 3, juvenile stems were absent and the contribution of generative stems was much greater than in other populations (Figure 11). The temporal variability among the populations was statistically significant and ranged from χ2 = 47.00 (p < 0.001) in 2021 to 266.4 (p < 0.001) in 2023.

3.4. The Spatial Variability of Selected Individual Traits of Lilium martagon

The mean height of immature stems increased from population 1, where it achieved from 11.02 cm to 17.56 cm, via population 2 (11.53–17.12 cm), to population 3 (13.71–18.77 cm). The mean number of leaves in the whorl ranged from 5.58 to 9.40 in population 1, from 6.63 to 7.85 in population 2, and from 7.30 to 8.95 in population 3. Such phenomena were confirmed by the values of the Kruskal–Wallis H test for multiple comparisons (Table 2) and the d-Cohen coefficient (Table A3). The mean length of the longest leaf exhibited the lowest values (94.15–119.14 mm) in population 3 and was the greatest (97.90–139.28 mm) in population 1. Also, the mean width of the aforementioned leaf was the lowest (32.96–38.77 mm) in population 3 and the greatest (35.70–39.75 mm) in population 1 (Table 2). These tendencies were also confirmed by the statistical analysis (Table 2 and Table A3).
The mean height of the virginile stem was the lowest (13.14–22.86 cm) in population 1 and the greatest (22.17–31.25 cm) in population 3. The mean number of leaves in the lower whorl was the lowest (5.33–7.80) in population 1 and the greatest (8.29 to 11.00) in population 3. The differences among the populations were confirmed by small, moderate, or substantial values of the d-Cohen coefficient (Table A4). The mean length of the longest leaf ranged from 103.43 mm to 128.71 mm, while the mean width of this leaf varied from 29.40 mm to 45.57 mm, with limited variation among the populations confirmed by the Kruskal–Wallis H test (Table 3). Interestingly, the substantial values of the d-Cohen coefficient indicated a remarkable size effect in some study years (Table A4).
The mean height of generative stems achieved the lowest values (55.27–72.93 cm) in population 2 and was the greatest (58.67–97.00 cm) in population 1 (Table 4). The significant differences between populations 1 and 2 were confirmed by the d-Cohen coefficient values (Table A5). The mean number of flowers ranged from 2.17 to 2.68 in population 2, from 3.03 to 4.58 in population 3, and from 1.67 to 6.20 in population 1. The mean number of whorls reached the lowest values (1.40–1.82) in population 2, whereas the greatest number (1.44–3.00) was recorded in population 1. In the case of the number of flowers and whorls, the statistical analysis confirmed the moderate level of the d-Cohen coefficient between populations 1 and 2 (Table A5). The mean number of leaves in the lowest whorl had the lowest values in population 1 (5.57–7.00) and the greatest values in population 3 (8.00–9.47). This phenomenon was confirmed by the substantial values of the Kruskal–Wallis H test (Table 5) and the d-Cohen coefficient (Table A6).
The mean length of the longest leaf in the lowest whorl was the lowest (109.67–126.13 mm) in population 3 and the greatest (119.57–147.80 mm) in population 1. The mean width of the longest leaf achieved the lowest values (35.03–39.63 cm) in population 3 but was the greatest (34.93–43.00) in population 2. The mean number of spiral leaves ranged from 3.73 to 5.20 in population 2, from 4.30 to 5.26 in population 3, and from 4.00 to 8.50 in population 1. The values of the Kruskal–Wallis H test (Table 5) and the d-Cohen coefficient (Table A6) indicated small or moderate differences in the aforementioned leaf dimensions among the populations.
The mean number of spiral leaves reached the lowest values (3.59–5.20) in population 2 but was the greatest (4.00–8.50) in population 1 (Table 5). This phenomenon was confirmed by the values of the Kruskal–Wallis H test (Table 5) and the d-Cohen coefficient (Table A6).
The mean length of the spiral leaf above the highest whorl achieved the lowest values (81.83–94.68 mm) in population 3 and was the greatest (97.67–113.33 mm) in population 1. The mean width of the aforementioned leaf exhibited a similar tendency, ranging from 16.73 mm to 23.68 mm in population 3, from 21.10 mm to 25.13 mm in population 2, and from 20.20 mm to 30.53 mm in population 1. The greatest leaf dimensions observed in population 1 were confirmed by the values of the Kruskal–Wallis H test (Table 5) and the d-Cohen coefficient (Table A6).

3.5. The Temporal Variability of Selected Individual Traits of Lilium martagon

The height of immature stems in population 1 presented significantly lower values in the years 2018–2020 than in subsequent years, while in population 2 and in population 3 the highest stems were noted in the year 2019 (Figure S1, Table S1). The number of leaves in the whorl was significantly greater in the year 2019 than in other study seasons solely in population 1, while in the remaining populations this trait did not show temporal variability. The length of the longest leaf was significantly greater in the year 2019 than in other study seasons solely in population 1. In population 2, the length was lower in the years 2018–2020 than in the years 2021–2023, whereas in population 3 much lower values were observed in the years 2020, 2021, and 2023 than in other study seasons. The width of the longest leaf in population 1 was much lower in the years 2020 and 2022 than in other years; in population 2, it was much lower in the years 2018–2020 than in subsequent study seasons, while in population 3 the aforementioned trait did not present temporal variability.
The individual traits of virginile stems did not present temporal variability in population 2 or in population 3. In population 1, the height of virginile stems and the length of the longest leaf in the lower whorl reached the greatest values in the year 2021 and the lowest values in the year 2018 (Figure S2). The moderate and substantial values of the d-Cohen coefficient indicate remarkable differences in the height of stems and leaf dimensions, particularly in population 1 (Table S2).
The height of generative stems in population 1 achieved much greater values in the year 2019 than in remaining study seasons (Figure S3). In population 2, the greatest values of the aforementioned trait were observed in the years 2022, while in population 3 this trait reached its greatest values in the years 2022 and 2023. The number of flowers and whorls showed temporal variability in population 1, where this trait reached its greatest values in the year 2019, as well as in population 3, where it achieved the greatest values in the years 2022 and 2023. The substantial values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the height, number of flowers, and number of generative whorls indicate significant differences between 2019 and the other years (Table S3).
The number of leaves in the lowest whorl presented temporal variability solely in population 3, where it achieved the greatest values in the year 2019. This phenomenon was confirmed by the values of the Kruskal–Wallis H test (Figure S4) and the d-Cohen coefficient (Table S4). The length of the longest leaf in the lowest whorl showed temporal variability in population 2 and in population 3. In population 2, it reached the greatest values in the years 2022 and 2023, while in population 3 the greatest values were observed in the year 2019. This phenomenon was confirmed by the small and moderate values of the d-Cohen coefficient (Table S4). The width of the aforementioned leaf in population 2 was significantly greater in the years 2021 and 2022 than in other study seasons, whereas in other populations the values of this trait were similar in individual years. The number of spiral leaves showed temporal variability in population 1 and in population 2 (Figure S5, Table S4). The lowest values were observed in the year 2023 in the case of population 1 and in the year 2020 in the case of population 2. The length and width of the spiral leaf did not exhibit temporal variability.

4. Discussion

4.1. Habitat Conditions

Lilium martagon occurs at various geographical latitudes, both in the warmer regions of southern and western Europe and in central Asia, where the climate is distinctly continental [9,11], indicating that it is a species neutral to continentality with a wide range of climatic tolerance. In cooler regions, it prefers partially wooded ecosystems [68,84], whereas in sunnier and drier areas, it finds optimal growth conditions in dense and shaded forests [14,27,28]. The investigated populations are located within forest communities with diverse light conditions. In Hrabeński Forest, light intensity measured at the ground was more than twice as high as at the other sites. This was the most numerous population, characterised by a high proportion of flowering and fruiting individuals in all years of the study. Urbaniec and Bach [16] and Pindel [63] reported the positive effect of light on the development of Lilium martagon, finding that optimal conditions for the development of this species occur at light levels approaching 60%. In turn, according to Jańczyk-Węglarska and Węglarski [61], the optimal conditions for the occurrence of this species range from 5 to 20% of light reaching the herbaceous vegetation layer. According to Pindel [63], increasing stand density and reduced light access negatively impact the flowering process, and at light levels below 5% the process is completely inhibited. We observed a similar relationship at the other two sites, where lower light intensity may have negatively impacted the number of flowering individuals.
According to the literature on the subject, Lilium martagon can occur on various soil types (including podzolic soils, brown soils, leached brown soils, gley soils, and rendzinas) and on various formations (including loess formations and calcareous clay soils), but their common feature is a high humus content and high or moderate nitrogen content [10,16,23,61,69,85]. Such findings are consistent with the results of the presented investigations, particularly Ellenberg N index values suggesting soils moderately rich in nitrogen. However, the content of available compounds can reach diverse values. Moreover, Lilium martagon has a wide amplitude in relation to soil pH and it occurs in habitats ranging from very acidic to alkaline. However, many authors emphasise that the optimal pH for this species ranges from 5 to 7 [16,23,58,60,61,62,63]. The aforementioned findings are supported by the performed investigations showing that average pH value of the study sites ranged from 5.15 to 6.10.
Analysis of moisture conditions showed twice as high humidity in Hrabeński Forest, whose habitat can be described as moderately moist. At the other two sites, the soils were fresh, and during prolonged periods without rainfall in the summer, they dried out. Some authors have pointed out that individuals of Lilium martagon develop best in fresh habitats [7,8], but other literature data indicate that it can also occur in seasonally moist habitats, such as riparian forests [19,30,31,69]. At the same time, it is worth mentioning that excessive humidity in spring, resulting from high rainfall totals and the formation of ponds, can lead to bulb rot and the decline of entire populations [63]. A similar relationship in this type of habitat was also observed in the case of the Arum alpinum species [73,86].
In the temperate climate zone, individuals of Lilium martagon have optimal conditions for development in fertile and mesotrophic deciduous forests; therefore, this species is recognised as a characteristic species of the order Fagetalia [25,27]. In the lowlands and foothills, it occurs mainly in oak-hornbeam forests, including in the Tilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli and Galio sylvatici–Carpinetum betuli associations [14,23,29,60,85,87], while it grows much less frequently in pine forests and mixed forests [69,78,88], light oak forests, [24,32] and riparian forests [19,30,31]. In the montane zone and extrazonally in the foothills, it is a frequent component of beech forests, especially the Dentario glandulosae–Fagetum association [14,15,16,26,27,62,85], while in higher locations it occurs in alpine grassland communities [16,33,34]. Interestingly, this species can establish itself in anthropogenic habitats, such as manor parks and cemeteries, where it was intentionally introduced [10,36,37,69]. Our study results confirm the literature data regarding the preferences of Lilium martagon for the phytocoenoses it occupies. Two of the sites we studied were located in the oak-hornbeam forest Tilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli, while the third site was in the mountain beech forest Dentario glandulosae–Fagetum.
Natural forest phytocoenoses with Lilium martagon are characterised by high species richness, and a particularly high share of characteristic species from the order Fagetalia. In such communities, Lilium martagon populations are usually more numerous and stable [23,30,32,85,87]. We observed similar relationships in our studies. The highest species richness and the highest diversity indices were recorded in Hrabeński Forest, where well-developed and properly preserved natural habitats are protected [21]. The smaller number of species and lower diversity indices on Mount Chełm can be explained by the habitat type. The Carpathian beech forest Dentario glandulosae–Fagetum occurs here, which, unlike oak-hornbeam forests, is characterised by lower species richness [20]. The lowest Shannon–Wiener diversity index in the case of Wolski Forest can be explained by the high intensity of anthropopressure at this site, resulting in heavy trampling of the forest floor and the penetration of synanthropic species [89]. Other authors have also pointed out the negative impact of anthropopressure manifesting itself with a decrease in abundance or complete disappearance of the population of Lilium martagon [58,62].

4.2. The Spatial and Temporal Variability of Abundance and Structure of Population Lilium martagon

The greatest abundance of population of Lilium martagon was found at site 3 (Hrabeński Forest), where the highest values of soil moisture, light intensity at ground level, and height of plant cover were noticed. Despite the substantial share of generative stems in population 3 during whole study period, exceeding those recorded in populations 1 and 2, as well as many others [23,24,60,61,62,63], a lack of juvenile stems was noted. Considering the successful germination of the seed of Lilium martagon in laboratory conditions [90], the absence of juvenile stems in population 3 presumably might be caused by the dense vegetation cover and the absence of gaps in continuous plant cover acting as safe sites for seedling recruitment sensu Harper et al. [91]. The presence of juvenile stems in population 1 and population 2, exceeding values recorded by other authors [29,65], might be linked to the occurrence of openings in the plant cover, causing, among other things, the death of senile plants or ramets (in the case of clonal species), as well as disturbances caused by the natural activity of forest mammals, such as burrowing and digging. Furthermore, the presence of natural gaps at site 2 might be linked to the occurrence of shallow soil with a significant content of skeletal elements, such as gravel, cobbles, stones, and rock fragments, whose spontaneous subsidence causes the removal of plants. Additionally, the high tourist pressure documented at site 1 (Wolski Forest) by Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt et al. [89] might contribute to gap appearance. The aforementioned authors argued that trampling by people frequently accompanied by dogs might affect the creation of gaps in the plant cover of the forest floor.
The recorded temporal differences in the abundance of populations and their structure might be connected, on the one hand, with the recruitment of new individuals in a generative or vegetative way and their subsequent growth, and, on the other hand, with the prolonged bulb dormancy or mortality of individuals. The latter might be a consequence of the natural senescence process of individuals or be triggered by external factors such as people or herbivorous animal activity. The recreational activities of people, such as walking, jogging or biking, as well as divergence from formal trails and spontaneous creation of informal pathways, recorded among others in Wolski Forest [89], might contribute to damage or/and mortality of juvenile stems of Lilium martagon. Additionally, the blooming stems of Lilium martagon might be picked, while the bulbs might be dug out by visitors due to the ornamental value. Furthermore, herbivorous animals including wild boars, whose occurrence has been documented in Wolski Forest [92], might contribute to bulbs being dug up, affecting the mortality of individuals of the studied species. Moreover, deer, whose presence has been confirmed on Mount Chełm and in Hrabeński Forest (personal observation) may browse on the stems of Lilium martagon, contributing to a decline in the population abundance. The damage and mortality of individuals of Lilium martagon might also be caused by the activity of the scarlet lily beetle (Lilioceris lilii), traces of whose feeding activity were recorded in the studied populations, as well as in many other locations [23,65].
Furthermore, the recorded temporal differences in the abundance of populations and their structure might be linked to weather conditions. The greatest share of juvenile stems in population 1 observed in the year 2019 comparing to other study seasons might be connected with favourable weather conditions, such as considerable precipitation during the meteorological spring (especially in May) and substantial values of air temperatures during the meteorological spring and summer (particularly in June). Such observations remain in accordance with the findings of Truchan and Sobisz [64], who claimed that substantial precipitation and air temperature from May to July favour the growth and development of Lilium martagon individuals. On the other hand, in the year 2019 in populations 2 and 3, the lowest number of stems in the whole study period were recorded despite substantial precipitation and considerable air temperatures. Additionally, the share of juvenile stems in population 2 was rather similar to the share noted in other study years.

4.3. Spatial Variability of Traits of Stems of Lilium martagon

The highest number of immature and virginile stems with the greatest number of whorl leaves, as well as the substantial height of generative stems and number of whorl leaves observed in population 3 might be the result of growing in conditions of lateral shading by adjacent plants. As stated by Fiorucci and Fankhauser [93], shading by neighbouring herbaceous species reduces energy for photosynthesis and contributes to stem elongation. Under crowding conditions, the height increment is advantageous because it allows neighbours to be overtopped and contributes to more effective light interception. At the same time, it should be noted that gaps in tree canopy enabled successful light assimilation by overgrowing adjacent plants of Lilium martagon stems and might explain the lowest dimensions of whorl and spiral leaves in population 3. The lowest height of immature and virginile stems recorded in population 1 and generative stems noticed in population 2 might be caused by their over shading by the canopy of surrounding trees, which might contribute to elongation suppression. Such findings seem to correspond with the observations of Miciniak and Zątek [24], who demonstrated that individuals of Lilium martagon growing in the dry-mesic oak forest reached greater height on average than those occurring in the oak-hornbeam forest. Also, the findings of Pindel [63] demonstrated that the stems of Lilium martagon are much shorter in localities where light availability is slight than in not shaded stands.
Although the increase in flower number observed from population 2 via population 3 to population 1 increased the visibility of inflorescences and chances for successful pollination and seed production, it should be pointed out that the recorded mean number of flowers in the studied populations was rather low and corresponds with the observations of Bednorz [23] and Gazda and Gazda [29], while the greater number of flowers observed in the year 2019 in population 1 was close to mean values which were noted by Truchan [65] in a manor park. At the same time, it is worth adding that in populations occurring in manor parks [64] and in grasslands [10,69], the mean values of number of flowers per stems are much greater.

4.4. The Temporal Variability of Traits of Stems of Lilium martagon

The significantly greater values of selected individual traits observed in the year 2019 in immature stems (height of stems in populations 2 and 3, number, length and width of whorl leaves in population 1) and in generative stems (height of stems, number of flowers and whorls in population 1, number and length of whorl leaves in population 3) might suggest the favourable impact of weather conditions (specifically substantial precipitation and air temperatures) during the meteorological spring and summer on the growth of Lilium martagon stems. The aforementioned findings seem to correspond with the experimental studies of Khashroum et al. [94], who demonstrated the positive effect of substantial water irrigation among others on the length of Lilium martagon stems and flower number.
On the other hand, performed investigations showed that several traits did not exhibit temporal variability at least in one population. The lack of a unified trend in the studied populations might suggest the occurrence of site-specific temporal variability of individual traits. Micro-environmental soil conditions, such as nutrient availability (determined by the interplay of various nutrients and soil characteristics such as pH, texture and organic matter) might fluctuate during the growing season and may differ among sites. The seasonal fluctuations in nutrient availability were evidenced by Díaz-Raviña et al. [95], while variability among study sites was confirmed among others in pine forests [96] and beech forests [97].

5. Conclusions

The observed spatial variability of the studied populations allows the conclusion to be drawn that substantial soil moisture, considerable light intensity at ground level, as well as slightly acidic soil pH and moderate nitrogen content favour the development and growth of Lilium martagon individuals. On the other hand, factors negatively affecting its growth are represented by the lack of microsites suitable for seedling recruitment, over shading of stems by the tree canopy, the presence of shallow soils, as well as human and herbivorous animal activity contributing to damage of the above- and/or belowground parts of individuals. The study observations suggested that considerable precipitation during the meteorological spring (especially in May) and substantial values of air temperatures during the meteorological spring and summer (particularly in June) contribute to the growth of Lilium martagon stems. However, the lack of a unified trend in all the studied populations might indicate the occurrence of site-specific temporal variability of individual traits.
Moreover, the obtained results allow us to evaluate the state of the observed populations. The most abundant population, population 3, located in an oak-hornbeam forest Tilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli in Hrabeński Forest, presents the greatest prospects for persistence in the occupied site. However, it is highly necessary for artificial openings to be made in the dense plant cover to create suitable microsites for seedling recruitment and development of juvenile individuals. Although stems representing all developmental stages were noticed in population 1, situated in the oak-hornbeam forest Tilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli in Wolski Forest, and in population 2 in the beech forest Dentario glandulosae–Fagetum in Mount Chełm, the state of these populations seems unsatisfactory due to their much lower abundance. Furthermore, in more shaded areas, it is recommended to remove individual trees and shrubs to ensure 5–25% light availability for the herb layer.
All studied populations are located in protected areas, although their protection regimes vary. In the case of Mount Chełm Nature Reserve and Hrabeński Forest (Natura 2000 Hrabeński Forest PLH180039 site), passive conservation protection appears to be an effective strategy for the preservation of the Lilium martagon population, especially since these sites are located far from built-up areas. However, in Wolski Forest (Bielańsko-Tyniecki Landscape Park), a low protection regime is ineffective in counteracting the increased human impact. Unfortunately, the proximity of a large urban area contributes to the excessive trampling and destruction of vegetation, including the Lilium martagon population. Therefore, it is necessary to implement constant monitoring and channel tourist traffic through appropriately designated paths and trails that would bypass the Lilium martagon site.
Considering the obtained results, it can be concluded that long-term (covering at least several years) observations of populations of Lilium martagon should be continued. Such laborious, demanding, and time-consuming investigations provide the essential data supplementing the current state of knowledge and are crucial for better protection of this rare species. Of particular value would be comparisons of population and individual traits of Lilium martagon occurring in different habitats, including forests, grasslands, and anthropogenic localities.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology15050398/s1, Supplementary Figure S1: Mean height (A), number of leaves in the whorl (B), length (C), and width (D) of the longest leaf in the whorl of immature stems in population 1 located in Wolski Forest (P1), population 2 located in Mount Chełm (P2), and population 3 located in Hrabeński Forest (P3) in the years 2018–2023. The asterisks mean statistical significance level: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (The Kruskal–Wallis H test). The different letters below H values mean the significant differences among populations; Supplementary Figure S2: Mean height (A), number of leaves in the lower whorl (B), length (C), and width (D) of the longest leaf in the lower whorl of virginile stems in the observed populations. The explanations of abbreviations P1–P3 and description of statistical significance levels—as in Figure S1. Supplementary Figure S3: Mean height (A), number of flowers (B), and number of whorls (C) in generative stems in the observed populations. The explanations of abbreviations P1–P3 and description of statistical significance levels—as in Figure S1. Supplementary Figure S4: Mean number of leaves in the lowest whorl (A), length (B), and width (C) of the longest leaf in the lowest whorl in generative stems in the observed populations. The explanations of abbreviations P1–P3 and description of statistical significance levels—as in Figure S1. Supplementary Figure S4: Mean number of leaves in the lowest whorl (A), length (B), and width (C) of the longest leaf in the lowest whorl in generative stems in the observed populations. The explanations of abbreviations P1-P3 and description of statistical significance levels—as in Figure S1. Supplementary Figure S5: Mean number of spiral leaves (A), length (B), and width (B) of spiral leaf above the highest whorl in generative stems in the observed populations. The explanations of abbreviations P1–P3 and description of statistical significance levels—as in Figure S1. Supplementary Table S1: Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the height, number of leaves in the whorl, and length and width of the longest leaf in the whorl of immature stems among pairs of study years in population 1 located in Wolski Forest, population 2 located on Mount Chełm, and population 3 located in Hrabeński Forest. Moderate (absolute value d > 0.5) and substantial (absolute value d > 0.8) differences in the d-Cohen coefficient among the populations are highlighted in bold. Supplementary Table S2: Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the height, number of leaves in the whorl, and length and width of the longest leaf in the whorl of virginile stems among pairs of study years in the observed populations. Population localities and description of d-Cohen coefficient values—as in Table S1. Supplementary Table S3: Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the height, number of flowers, and number of whorls of generative stems among pairs of study years in the observed populations. Population localities and description of d-Cohen coefficient values—as in Table S1. Supplementary Table S4: Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the number of leaves in the lowest whorl, length and width of the longest leaf in the lowest whorl, number of spiral leaves, and length and width of the spiral leaf above the highest whorl of generative stems among pairs of study years in the observed populations. Population localities and description of d-Cohen coefficient values—as in Table S1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.W. and K.K.-G.; methodology, T.W. and K.K.-G.; validation, T.W., K.K.-G. and M.Z.; formal analysis, T.W., K.K.-G. and M.Z.; investigation, T.W., K.K.-G. and M.Z.; resources, T.W., K.K.-G. and M.Z.; data curation, T.W., K.K.-G. and M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, T.W., K.K.-G. and M.Z.; writing—review and editing, T.W., K.K.-G. and M.Z.; visualisation, T.W. and K.K.-G.; supervision, T.W. and K.K.-G.; project administration, T.W.; funding acquisition, T.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The field studies were financially supported by the Department of Nature Protection and Landscape Ecology, University of Rzeszów.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Values of d- the Cohen coefficient regarding the values of the Shannon index, Simpson index, Pielou index and the number of species, soil moisture (%), soil pH, height of plant cover, and light intensity at ground level (lx) at study site 1 (Wolski Forest), study site 2 (Mount Chełm), and study site 3 (Hrabeński Forest). The moderate (absolute value d > 0.5) and substantial (absolute value d > 0.8) differences in d-Cohen coefficient calculated for pairs of study sites are highlighted in bold.
Table A1. Values of d- the Cohen coefficient regarding the values of the Shannon index, Simpson index, Pielou index and the number of species, soil moisture (%), soil pH, height of plant cover, and light intensity at ground level (lx) at study site 1 (Wolski Forest), study site 2 (Mount Chełm), and study site 3 (Hrabeński Forest). The moderate (absolute value d > 0.5) and substantial (absolute value d > 0.8) differences in d-Cohen coefficient calculated for pairs of study sites are highlighted in bold.
Compared Study SitesShannon IndexSimpson IndexPielou IndexNumber of SpeciesSoil MoistureSoil ReactionHeight of Plant CoverLight Intensity
1–2−0.050.00−0.130.09−0.400.77−0.28−0.39
1–3−1.09−0.84−0.61−1.45−2.710.14−0.46−1.53
2–3−1.13−0.69−0.30−1.89−1.91−0.97−0.30−1.78
Table A2. Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the values of Ellenberg indicators of light, temperature, continentalism, moisture, soil reaction, and nitrogen content at the study sites. Localities of the study sites and description of d-Cohen coefficient values—as in Table A1.
Table A2. Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the values of Ellenberg indicators of light, temperature, continentalism, moisture, soil reaction, and nitrogen content at the study sites. Localities of the study sites and description of d-Cohen coefficient values—as in Table A1.
Compared Study SitesLightTemperatureContinentalismMoistureSoil ReactionNitrogen Content
1–2−0.391.601.410.66−1.380.39
1–3−1.530.32−0.180.67−0.760.35
2–3−1.78−1.33−1.92−0.130.22−0.09
Table A3. Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the height, number of leaves in the whorl, and length and width of the longest leaf in the whorl of immature stems in population 1 located in Wolski Forest, population 2 located on Mount Chełm, and population 3 located in Hrabeński Forest. The moderate (absolute value d > 0.5) and substantial (absolute value d > 0.8) differences calculated for pairs of populations are highlighted in bold.
Table A3. Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the height, number of leaves in the whorl, and length and width of the longest leaf in the whorl of immature stems in population 1 located in Wolski Forest, population 2 located on Mount Chełm, and population 3 located in Hrabeński Forest. The moderate (absolute value d > 0.5) and substantial (absolute value d > 0.8) differences calculated for pairs of populations are highlighted in bold.
YearCompared PopulationsHeight of Stem [cm]Number of Leaves in the WhorlLength of the Longest Leaf in the Whorl [mm]Width of the Longest Leaf in the Whorl [mm]
20181–2−0.1−0.56−0.09−0.04
1–3−0.57−0.67−0.29−0.14
2–3−0.58−0.06−0.27−0.06
20191–20.700.591.220.35
1–3−0.130.100.720.20
2–3−0.90−0.58−0.66−0.16
20201–2−0.06−0.37−0.0050.002
1–3−0.28−0.730.16−0.39
2–3−0.23−0.270.19−0.44
20211–2−0.40−0.50−0.38−0.27
1–3−0.19−0.720.210.17
2–30.27−0.280.760.69
20221–2−0.50−0.10−0.17−0.70
1–3−0.52−0.31−0.08−0.05
2–30.003−0.140.110.59
20231–2−0.65−0.25−0.23−0.64
1–3−0.90−0.560.530.27
2–3−0.19−0.280.920.32
Table A4. Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the number of leaves in the lower whorl and length and width of the longest leaf in the whorl of virginile stems in the observed populations. Population localities and description of d-Cohen coefficient values—as in Table A3.
Table A4. Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the number of leaves in the lower whorl and length and width of the longest leaf in the whorl of virginile stems in the observed populations. Population localities and description of d-Cohen coefficient values—as in Table A3.
YearCompared PopulationsHeight of Stem [cm]Number of Leaves in the Lower WhorlLength of Leaves in the Lower Whorl [mm]Width of Leaves in the Lower Whorl [mm]
20181–2−0.36−0.27−0.62−0.64
20191–3−1.34−0.65−0.59−0.06
20201–2−0.83−0.050.06−0.81
1–3−0.94−0.710.050.03
2–3−7.08−6.17−9.17−6.70
20211–2−0.030.040.16−0.32
1–3−0.86−1.190.95−0.19
2–3−0.79−1.600.840.11
20221–2−0.56−0.660.07−0.65
1–3−0.63−0.860.440.04
2–3−0.11−0.370.360.72
20231–2−0.68−1.130.20−0.86
1–3−0.95−1.170.240.25
2–30.440.26−0.07−1.14
Table A5. Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the height, number of flowers, and number of whorls of generative stems in the observed populations. Population localities and description of d-Cohen coefficient values—as in Table A3.
Table A5. Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the height, number of flowers, and number of whorls of generative stems in the observed populations. Population localities and description of d-Cohen coefficient values—as in Table A3.
YearCompared PopulationsHeight of Stem [cm]Number of FlowersNumber of Whorls
20181–20.490.300.63
1–30.070.090.61
2–3−0.31−0.24−0.02
20191–20.660.470.40
1–30.030.160.35
2–3−0.33−0.25−0.05
20201–20.200.14−0.26
1–3−0.22−0.33−0.49
2–3−5.49−2.32−3.62
20211–2−0.020.21−0.32
1–3−0.37−0.06−0.09
2–3−0.41−0.300.23
20221–20.54−0.68−0.16
1–30.00−1.26−0.35
2–3−0.32−0.64−0.26
20231–20.11−0.05−0.03
1–3−0.99−0.79−0.34
2–31.030.700.34
Table A6. Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the number of leaves in the lowest whorl, length and width of the longest leaf in the lowest whorl, number of spiral leaves, and length and width of the spiral leaf above the highest whorl of generative stems in the observed populations. Population localities and description of d-Cohen coefficient values—as in Table A3.
Table A6. Values of the d-Cohen coefficient regarding the number of leaves in the lowest whorl, length and width of the longest leaf in the lowest whorl, number of spiral leaves, and length and width of the spiral leaf above the highest whorl of generative stems in the observed populations. Population localities and description of d-Cohen coefficient values—as in Table A3.
YearCompared PopulationsNumber of Leaves in the Lowest WhorlLength of the Longest Leaf in the Lowest Whorl [mm]Width of the Longest Leaf in the Lowest Whorl [mm]Number of Spiral LeavesLength of Spiral Leaf Above the Highest Whorl [mm]Width of the Spiral Leaf Above the Highest Whorl [mm]
20181–2−0.300.41−0.300.470.300.07
1–3−0.720.27−0.300.520.330.17
2–3−0.44−0.08−0.01−0.020.000.09
20191–2−0.230.18−0.301.060.470.17
1–3−0.670.12−0.210.600.640.73
2–3−0.20−0.020.02−0.180.050.23
20201–2−0.420.29−0.131.400.730.54
1–3−0.830.04−0.161.250.720.35
2–3−4.72−8.48−3.89−2.85−4.57−1.63
20211–2−0.43−0.03−0.500.640.270.17
1–3−0.780.430.000.450.520.39
2–3−0.340.560.46−0.200.410.35
20221–2−0.350.07−0.191.710.740.56
1–3−0.690.400.251.001.301.24
2–3−0.380.340.51−0.170.350.37
20231–2−0.82−0.11−0.42−0.290.180.11
1–3−0.810.04−0.10−0.280.350.34
2–3−0.02−0.23−0.600.01−0.16−0.24

References

  1. Zhou, J.; An, R.; Huang, X. Genus Lilium: A review on traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. J. Etnopharmacol. 2021, 270, 113852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhou, N.; Miao, K.; Liu, C.; Jia, L.; Hu, J.; Huang, J.; Ji, Y. Historical biogeography and evolutionary diversification of Lilium (Liliaceae): New insights from plastome phylogenomics. Plant Divers. 2024, 46, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fornaris, A.; Chiavazza, P.M.; Devecchi, M. The importance of lilium in garden design: History and future. Acta Hortic. 2011, 900, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Marasek-Ciolakowska, A.; Sochacki, D.; Marciniak, P. Breeding Aspects of Selected Ornamental Bulbous Crops. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. van Tuyl, J.M.; Arens, P.; Shahin, A.; Marasek-Ciołakowska, A.; Barba-Gonzalez, R.; Kim, H.T.; Lim, K.-B. Lilium. In Ornamental Crops, Handbook of Plant Breeding; Van Huylenbroeck, J., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 481–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Piękoś-Mirkowa, H.; Mirek, Z. Flora Polski. Atlas Roślin Chronionych; Multico Oficyna Wydawnicza: Warszawa, Poland, 2003; pp. 1–584. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zarzycki, K.; Trzcińska-Tacik, H.; Różański, W.; Szeląg, Z.; Wołek, J.; Korzeniak, U. Ecological Indicator Values of Vascular Plants of Poland. In Biodiversity of Poland; Mirek, Z., Ed.; W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences: Krakow, Poland, 2002; Volume 2, pp. 1–183. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chytrý, M.; Tichý, L.; Dřevojan, P.; Sádlo, J.; Zelený, D. Ellenberg-type indicator values for the Czech flora. Preslia 2018, 90, 83–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meusel, H.; Jäger, E.; Rauschert, S.; Weinert, E. Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentraleuropäischen Flora; Gustav Fischer Verlag: Jena, Germany, 1978; Volume 2, pp. 1–258. [Google Scholar]
  10. Balode, A. Variabilityof wild Martagon Lily (Lilium martagon L.) in the region of Kurzeme. In Proceedings of the Research for Rural Development 2007 International Scientific Conference Proceedings, Jelgava, Latvia, 16–18 May 2007; Latvia University of Agriculture: Jelgava, Latvia, 2007; pp. 50–56. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pelkonen, V.-P.; Pairttilä, A.-M. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Lilium. Floric. Ornam. Biotechnol. 2012, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Global Biodiversity Information Facility Online. Lilium martagon L. 2025. Available online: https://www.gbif.org/pl/species/2753146 (accessed on 29 July 2025).
  13. Zając, A.; Zając, M. Distribution Atlas of Vascular Plants in Poland; Pracownia Chorologii Komputerowej Instytutu Botaniki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego: Cracow, Poland, 2001; pp. 1–332. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kozłowska, A. The forest communities in the Przemyśl Foothills, south-east Poland. Fragm. Flor. Geobot. 2000, 45, 345–372. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jędrzejko, K.; Walusiak, E. Charakterystyka florystyczno-fitosocjologiczna unikatowego stanowiska rzadkich i chronionych roślin naczyniowych w Lanckoronie (Pogórze Wielickie). Fragm. Flor. Geobot. Pol. 2008, 15, 239–251. [Google Scholar]
  16. Urbaniec, M.; Bach, A. Charakterystyka ekologiczna populacji lilii złotogłów (Lilium martagon L.) na północnym stoku Babiej Góry. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 2010, 551, 399–405. [Google Scholar]
  17. Smoczyk, M. Rzadkie i zagrożone rośliny naczyniowe Pogórza Orlickiego (Sudety Środkowe)—Część 1. Przyr. Sudet. 2010, 13, 53–70. [Google Scholar]
  18. Paszkiewicz-Jasińska, A. Chronione i rzadkie gatunki roślin użytków zielonych w Sudetach. Inżynieria I Ochr. Sr. 2015, 18, 259–270. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pielech, R. Formalised classification and environmental controls of riparian forest communities in the Sudetes (SW Poland). Tuexenia 2015, 35, 155–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wójcik, T.; Ziaja, M. Występowanie Lilium martagon L. w buczynie karpackiej Dentario glandulosae-Fagetum w rezerwacie Góra Chełm na Pogórzu Strzyżowskim (Karpaty Zachodnie). Park. Nar. I Rezerwaty Przyr. 2017, 36, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wójcik, T.; Ziaja, M. Zróżnicowanie zbiorowisk leśnych obszaru Natura 2000 “Las Hrabeński” PLH 180039 na Pogórzu Bukowskim (Karpaty Zachodnie). Fragm. Flor. Geobot. Pol. 2020, 27, 409–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Świerkosz, K.; Reczyńska, K. Zbiorowiska roślinne rezerwatu przyrody “Nad Groblą” (Pogórze Kaczawskie, Sudety). Przyr. Sudet. 2022, 24, 49–70. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bednorz, A. Charakterystyka ekologiczna populacji lilii złotogłów (Lilium martagon L.) w leśnictwie Bieniszew koło Konina. Roczniki AR Pozn. Bot. 1999, 316, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  24. Miciniak, E.; Zątek, W. Zmiana liczebności populacji lilii złotogłów (Lilium martagon L.) w Wielkopolskim Parku Narodowym. Rocz. AR Pozn. Bot. 1999, 316, 87–96. [Google Scholar]
  25. Matuszkiewicz, W. Przewodnik do Oznaczania Zbiorowisk Roślinnych Polski; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2005; pp. 1–537. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ujházyová, M.; Uyházy, K.; Chytry, M.; Willner, W.; Čiliak, M.; Máliš, F.; Slezák, M. Diversity of beech forest vegetation in the Eastern Alps, Bohemian Massif and the Western Carpathians. Preslia 2016, 88, 435–457. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dakskobler, I.; Rozman, A. Vegetation analysis of the subalpine beech forest on the upper forest line in the Julian Alps (NW Slovenia and NW Italy) and in the northern Dinaric Alps. Hacquetia 2021, 20, 373–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Marinšek, A.; Šilc, U.; Čarni, A. Geographical and ecological differentiation of Fagus forest vegetation in SE Europe. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2013, 16, 131–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gazda, A.; Gazda, M. Wielkość osobników lilii złotogłów Lilium martagon na przykładzie populacji rosnącej na terenie użytku ekologicznego “as Krzyszkowicki” koło Krakowa. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojczystą 2010, 66, 376–383. [Google Scholar]
  30. Nowak, S.; Nowak, A. Carici remotae-Fraxinetum Koch 1926 ex Faber 1936 in Opole Silesia. Opole Sci. Soc. Nat. J. 2010, 43, 13–22. [Google Scholar]
  31. Vukelić, J.; Šapić, I.; Alegro, A.; Šegota, V.; Stankić, I.; Baričević, D. Phytocoenological analysis of grey alder (Alnus incana L.) forests in the Dinarides of Croatia and their relationship with affiliated communities. Tuexenia 2017, 37, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brzeg, A.; Wika, S. Świetlista dąbrowa Potentillo albae-Quercetum Libbert 1933 nom. invers. w środkowej części Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej. Badania Fizjogr. Ser. Bot. 2017, 65, 7–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kricsfalusy, V.V. Mountain grasslands of high conservation value in the Eastern Carpathians: Syntaxonomy, biodiversity, protection and management. Thaiszia–J. Bot. 2013, 23, 67–112. [Google Scholar]
  34. Diviaková, A.; Stašiov, S.; Pondelík, R.; Pätoprstý, V.; Novikmec, M. Environmental and Management Control over the Submontane Grassland Plant Communities in Central Slovakia. Diversity 2021, 13, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ravetto Enri, S.; Petrella, F.; Ungaro, F.; Zavattaro, L.; Mainetti, A.; Lombardi, G.; Lonati, M. Relative Importance of Plant Species Composition and Environmental Factors in Affecting Soil Carbon Stocks of Alpine Pastures (NW Italy). Agriculture 2021, 11, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sobisz, Z.; Truchan, M. Lilium martagon L. in former manor parks and Protestant cemeteries in the central part of Polish Pomerania. Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 2006, 3–4, 308–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sigiel-Dopierała, A.; Jagodziński, A.M. Materials to the vascular flora of the neglected evangelical cemeteries of the western part of the Drawsko Landscape Park (Poland). Botanika–Steciana 2011, 15, 57–64. [Google Scholar]
  38. Regulation of the Minister of Environment of 9th October 2014 Concerning Plant Species Protection (Polish). 2014. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20140001409 (accessed on 28 July 2025).
  39. Pliszko, A. Red list of vascular plants of the Western Suwałki Lakeland, north-eastern Poland. Acta Musei Silesiae Sci. Nat. 2017, 66, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  40. Żukowski, W.; Jackowiak, B. Lista roślin naczyniowych ginących i zagrożonych na Pomorzu Zachodnim i w Wielkopolsce. In Ginące i Zagrożone Rośliny Naczyniowe Pomorza Zachodniego i Wielkopolski; Prace Zakładu Taksonomii Roślin UAM w Poznaniu 3; Żukowski, W., Jackowiak, B., Eds.; Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe: Poznań, Polska, 1995; pp. 9–96. [Google Scholar]
  41. Głowacki, Z.; Falkowski, M.; Krechowski, J.; Marciniuk, J.; Marciniuk, P.; Nowicka-Falkowska, K.; Wierzba, M. Czerwona lista roślin naczyniowych Niziny Południowopodlaskiej. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojczystą 2003, 59, 5–41. [Google Scholar]
  42. Markowski, R.; Buliński, M. Ginące i Zagrożone Rośliny Naczyniowe Pomorza Gdańskiego; Acta Botanica Cassubica Monographiae; Katedra Taksonomii Roślin i Ochrony Przyrody Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego: Gdańsk, Poznań, 2004; Volume 1, pp. 1–94. [Google Scholar]
  43. Parusel, J.B.; Urbisz, A. Czerwona lista roślin naczyniowych województwa śląskiego. In Raporty Opinie 6. Strategia Ochrony Przyrody Województwa Śląskiego do Roku 2030. Raport o Stanie Przyrody Województwa Śląskiego 2. Czerwone Listy Wybranych Grup Grzybów i Roślin Województwa Śląskiego; Parusel, J.B., Ed.; Centrum Dziedzictwa Przyrody Górnego Śląska: Katowice, Poland, 2012; pp. 105–177. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kącki, Z.; Dajdok, Z.; Szczęśniak, E. Czerwona lista roślin naczyniowych. In Zagrożone Gatunki Flory Naczyniowej Dolnego Śląska; Kącki, Z., Ed.; Instytut Biologii Roślin Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego & Polskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Przyrody “pro Natura”: Wrocław, Poland, 2003; pp. 9–65. [Google Scholar]
  45. Nowak, A.; Nowak, S.; Spałek, K. Red list of vascular plants of Opole province. Opole Sci. Soc. Nat. J. 2008, 41, 141–158. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jackowiak, B.; Celka, Z.; Chmiel, J.; Latowski, K.; Żukowski, W. Red list of vascular flora of Wielkopolska (Poland). Biodivers. Res. Conserv. 2007, 5–8, 95–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Towpasz, K.; Kotańska, M. Endangered and threatened vascular plants in the Proszowice Plateau (Małopolska Upland, Southern Poland). Nat. Conserv. 2001, 68, 69–81. [Google Scholar]
  48. Grulich, V. Red list of vascular plants of the Czech Republic. 3rd edition. Preslia 2012, 84, 631–645. [Google Scholar]
  49. Onyshchenko, V.A.; Mosyakin, S.L.; Korotchenko, I.A.; Danylyk, I.M.; Burlaka, M.D.; Fedoronchuk, M.M.; Chorney, I.I.; Kish, R.Y.; Olshanskyi, I.H.; Shiyan, N.M.; et al. IUCN Red List Categories of Vascular Plant Species of the Ukrainian Flora; FOP Huliaeva V.M.: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2022; pp. 1–198. [Google Scholar]
  50. Turis, P.; Eliáš, P.; Schmotzer, A.; Király, G.; Schneider, E.; Kuciel, H.; Szewczyk, M.; Kozurak, A.; Antosyak, T.; Voloshchuk, M.; et al. Red list of vascular plants of the Carpathians. In Carpathian Red List of Forest Habitats and Species Carpathian List of Invasive Alien Species; Kadlečik, J., Ed.; The State Nature Conservancy of The Slovak Republic: Banská Bystrica, Slowakije, 2014; pp. 44–105. [Google Scholar]
  51. Regula-Bevilacqua, L. Red Book of Vascular Flora of Croatia: Categories EX, RE, CR, EN and VU; Nicolić, T., Topić, J., Eds.; Ministry of Culture, State Institute for Nature Protection, Republic of Croatia: Zagreb, Croatia, 2005; pp. 468–470. [Google Scholar]
  52. Allen, D.; Bilz, M.; Leaman, D.J.; Miller, R.M.; Timoshyna, A.; Window, J. European Red List of Medicinal Plants; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2014; pp. 1–76. [Google Scholar]
  53. Duan, Q.; Liu, F.; Gui, D.; Fan, W.; Cui, G.; Jia, W.; Zhu, A.; Wang, J. Phylogenetic Analysis of Wild Species and the Maternal Origin of Cultivars in the Genus Lilium Using 114 Plastid Genomes. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 865606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pelkonen, V.-P. Biotechnological Approaches in Lily (Lilium) Production; Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, University of Oulu: Oulu, Finland, 2005; pp. 1–65. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kędra, M.; Bach, A. Morphogenesis of Lilium martagon L. explants in callus culture. Acta Biol. Cracoviensia. Ser. Bot. 2005, 47, 65–73. [Google Scholar]
  56. Glamočlija, U.; Haverić, S.; Čakar, J.; Rahamović, A.; Marjanović, D. In vitro propagation of Lilium martagon L. var. cattaniae Vis. and evaluation of genotoxic potential of its leaves and bulbs extracts. Acta Biol. Slov. 2010, 53, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. van Tuyl, J.M.; Arens, P. Lilium: Breeding, History of the Modern Cultivar Assortment. Acta Hortic. 2011, 900, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nawrocka-Grześkowiak, U.; Frydel, K. Występowanie i rozmnażanie lilii złotogłów (Lilium martagon L.) w Nadleśnictwie Kaliska. Zarządzanie Ochr. Przyr. W Lasach 2011, 5, 103–109. [Google Scholar]
  59. Guney, K.; Cetin, M.; Guney, K.B.; Melekoglu, A. The Effects of Some Hormone Applications on Lilium martagon L. Germination and Morpholgical Characters. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2017, 26, 2533–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kuczyńska, I.; Sarosiek, J.; Szymańska, E. Populacje Lilium martagon L. Acta Univ. Wratislaviensis. Pr. Bot. 1985, 28, 155–178. [Google Scholar]
  61. Jańczyk-Węglarska, J.; Węglarski, K. Ekologiczna i morfologiczna charakterystyka Lilium martagon L. na obszarze Wielkopolskiego Parku Narodowego. Biul. Ogrodów Bot. 1992, 5, 31–45. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kolon, K.; Krawczyk, A. Ekologiczna organizacja populacji Lilium martagon L. z Grudna koło Bolkowa na Dolnym Śląsku. Acta Univ. Wratisl. 1835 Pr. Bot. 1996, 68, 91–104. [Google Scholar]
  63. Pindel, Z. Wpływ warunków środowiskowych na populację i wzrost lilii złotogłów (Lilium martagon L.). Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 2002, 483, 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  64. Truchan, M.; Sobisz, Z. Characteristics of Lilium martagon L. population in Łasin Koszaliński (Western Pomerania, Poland). Bot.-Steciana 2009, 13, 85–95. [Google Scholar]
  65. Truchan, M. Population structure of Lilium martagon L. in Ciemino (Central Pomerania, Poland). Botanika-Steciana 2010, 14, 83–91. [Google Scholar]
  66. Truchan, M.; Sobisz, Z. Population structure of Lilium martagon L. in Zaleskie (Central Pomerania). J. Ecol. Prot. Coastaline. Balt. Coast. Zone 2012, 16, 113–129. [Google Scholar]
  67. Klymenko, H.; Artemenko, D.; Klymenko, I.; Kovalenko, N.; Melnyk, A.; Butenko, S.; Horbas, S.; Tovstukha, O. Criteria for evaluating the state of rare plant species populations. Mod. Phytomorphology 2023, 17, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Khapugin, A.; Senchugova, M. The floristic lists as a source to characterize environment conditions of habitats using phytoindication methods: A case study for Iris aphylla (Iridaceae) and Lilium martagon (Liliaceae) in central Russia. Arnaldoa 2018, 25, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Balode, A. Diversity of the Martagon Lily (Lilium martagon L.) in Latvia. Scr. Horti Bot. Univ. Vytauti Magni 2013, 17, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  70. Solon, J.; Borzyszkowski, J.; Bidłasik, M.; Richling, A.; Badora, K.; Balon, J.; Brzezińska-Wójcik, T.; Chabudziński, Ł.; Dobrowolski, R.; Grzegorczyk, I.; et al. Physico-geographical mesoregions of Poland: Verification and adjustment of boundaries on the basis of contemporary spatial data. Geogr. Pol. 2018, 91, 143–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dubiel, E. Mapa roślinności rzeczywistej miasta Krakowa. Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Jagiellońskiego Pr. Bot. 1991, 22, 121–133. [Google Scholar]
  72. Medwecka-Kornaś, A. The association Pino-Quercetum in the past and at present in the forest „Wolski Forest” (Kraków, Southern Poland). In Geobotanist and Taxonomist. A Volume Dedicated to Professor Adam Zając on the 70th Anniversary of His Birth; Zemanek, B., Ed.; Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University: Cracov, Poland, 2011; pp. 91–115. [Google Scholar]
  73. Wójcik, T.; Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, K. Trait Variability in the Rare Plant Species Arum alpinum in Carpathian Beech Forest Dentario glandulosae-Fagetum (Western Carpathians, Poland). Pol. J. Ecol. 2020, 68, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wójcik, T.; Ziaja, M. New locality of Botrychium matricariifolium in south-eastern Poland—Characteristics of the habitat and some plant traits. Ecol. Quest. 2023, 34, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Braun-Blanquet, J. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde; Springer: Wien, Austria, 1964; pp. 1–865. [Google Scholar]
  76. Mirek, Z.; Piękoś-Mirkowa, H.; Zając, A.; Zając, M.; Bernacki, L.; Danielewicz, W.; Hügin, G.; Marciniuk, M.; Marciniuk, P.; Mitka, J.; et al. Vascular Plants of Poland. An Annotated Checklist; W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences: Kraków, Poland, 2020; pp. 1–526. [Google Scholar]
  77. Pielou, E.C. Population and Community Ecology: Principles and Methods; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 1974; pp. 1–424. [Google Scholar]
  78. Pielou, E.C. Ecological Diversity; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1975; pp. 1–165. [Google Scholar]
  79. Simpson, E.H. Measurement of diversity. Nature 1949, 163, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tichý, L. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. J. Veg. Sci. 2002, 13, 451–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ellenberg, H.; Leuschner, C. Vegetation Mitteleuropasmit den Alpen. In Ökologischer, Dynamischer und Historischer Sicht; Eugen Ulmer UTB: Stuttgart, Germany, 2010; p. 1333. [Google Scholar]
  82. TuTiempo.net. Available online: https://en.tutiempo.net/climate/poland.html (accessed on 30 July 2025).
  83. Preacher, K.J. Calculation for the Chi-Square Test. 2001. Available online: https://www.quantpsy.org/chisq/chisq.htm (accessed on 30 July 2025).
  84. Senchugova, M.; Khapugin, A. Possibility of co-protection for populations of steppe and forest plants in alone location: A case study in Republic of Mordovia, Russia. Biodiversitas 2018, 19, 1387–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Michalik, S.; Michalik, R. Szata roślinna użytku ekologicznego Stanowisko Lilii Złotogłów na Garbie Tenczyńskim. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojczystą 2001, 57, 5–15. [Google Scholar]
  86. Wójcik, T.; Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, K. The influence of habitat conditions on abundance and selected individual traits of Arum alpinum in the communities Populetum albae and Tilio cordatae-Carpinetum betuli (Western Carpathians). J. Plant Ecol. 2024, 16, rtad034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zlinská, J.; Šomšák, L.; Holecová, M. Ecological characteristics of the studied forest communities of an oak-hornbeam tier in SW Slovakia. Ekológia 2005, 24, 3–19. [Google Scholar]
  88. Klymenko, G.; Kovalenko, I.; Lykholat, Y.; Khromykh, N.; Didur, O.; Alekseeva, A. The integral assessment of the rare plant populations. Ukr. J. Ecol. 2017, 7, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, K.; Pliszko, A.; Gmyrek, K. The effect of informal tourist trails on the abiotic conditions and floristic composition of deciduous forest undergrowth in an urban area. Forests 2021, 12, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mascarello, C.; Sacco, E.; Carasso, V.; Zappa, E.; Suffia, G.; Mariotti, M.G.; Ruffoni, B. Evaluation of the Seed Germination of Two Protected Species: Lilium pomponium L. and Lilium martagon L. ISHS Acta Hort. 2010, 900, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Harper, J.P.; Williams, J.T.; Sagar, G.R. The behavior of seeds in soil. I. The heterogeneityc of soil surfaces and its role in determining the establishment of plants from seed. J. Ecol. 1965, 53, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Baś, G.; Bojarska, K.; Śnieżko, S.; Król, W.; Kurek, K.; Okarma, H. Wykorzystanie siedlisk przez dziki Sus scrofa na terenie Krakowa. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojczystą 2017, 73, 354–362. [Google Scholar]
  93. Fiorucci, A.-S.; Fankhauser, C. Plant strategies for enhancing access to sunlight. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, 931–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Khashroum, A.O.; Al Omari, Y.; Dalo, A.A.; Al-Aloosi, A.A.K.; Al-Najjar, K.A. Growth and floral characteristics of three Lilium cultivars under varying levels of treated wastewater irrigation. J. Tianjin Univ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 58, 144–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Díaz-Raviña, M.; Acea, M.J.; Carballas, T. Seasonal fluctuations in microbial populations and available nutrients in forest soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1993, 16, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. van Sundert, K.; Radujković, D.; Cools, N.; De Vos, B.; Etzold, S.; Fernández-Martínez, M.; Janssens, I.; Merilä, P.; Peñuelas, J.; Sardans, J.; et al. Towards comparable assessment of the soil nutrient status across scales—Review and development of nutrient metrics. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 392–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Brumme, R.; Khanna, P.K. Stand, soil and nutrient factors determining the functioning and management of beech forest ecosystems: A synopsis. In Functioning and Management of European Beech Ecosystems; Brumme, R., Khanna, P.K., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 459–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Plant communities with Lilium martagon stems at the study sites: (A)—site 1 (Wolski Forest), (B)—site 2 (Mount Chełm), and (C)—site 3 (Hrabeński Forest).
Figure 1. Plant communities with Lilium martagon stems at the study sites: (A)—site 1 (Wolski Forest), (B)—site 2 (Mount Chełm), and (C)—site 3 (Hrabeński Forest).
Biology 15 00398 g001
Figure 2. Mean (±SD) values of Shannon index (A), Simpson index (B), Pielou index (C), and number of species (D) at study site 1 (Wolski Forest), study site 2 (Mount Chełm), and study site 3 (Hrabeński Forest). The asterisks indicate statistical significance level: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns-not significant (Kruskal–Wallis H test). The different letters below H values indicate significant differences among populations.
Figure 2. Mean (±SD) values of Shannon index (A), Simpson index (B), Pielou index (C), and number of species (D) at study site 1 (Wolski Forest), study site 2 (Mount Chełm), and study site 3 (Hrabeński Forest). The asterisks indicate statistical significance level: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns-not significant (Kruskal–Wallis H test). The different letters below H values indicate significant differences among populations.
Biology 15 00398 g002
Figure 3. Mean (±SD) values of soil moisture (%) (A), soil pH (B), plant cover height (cm) (C), and light intensity at ground level (lx) (D) at the study sites. The explanations of abbreviations S1–S3 and description of statistical significance levels—as in Figure 2.
Figure 3. Mean (±SD) values of soil moisture (%) (A), soil pH (B), plant cover height (cm) (C), and light intensity at ground level (lx) (D) at the study sites. The explanations of abbreviations S1–S3 and description of statistical significance levels—as in Figure 2.
Biology 15 00398 g003
Figure 4. Mean (±SD) values of Ellenberg indicators of light (A), temperature (B), continentalism (C), moisture (D), soil reaction (E), and nitrogen content (F) at the study sites. The explanations of abbreviations S1–S3 and description of statistical significance levels—as in Figure 2.
Figure 4. Mean (±SD) values of Ellenberg indicators of light (A), temperature (B), continentalism (C), moisture (D), soil reaction (E), and nitrogen content (F) at the study sites. The explanations of abbreviations S1–S3 and description of statistical significance levels—as in Figure 2.
Biology 15 00398 g004
Figure 5. Mean monthly temperatures (°C) measured in 2018–2023 at a meteorological station located in Kraków.
Figure 5. Mean monthly temperatures (°C) measured in 2018–2023 at a meteorological station located in Kraków.
Biology 15 00398 g005
Figure 6. Monthly sums of precipitation (mm) measured in 2018–2023 at a meteorological station located in Kraków.
Figure 6. Monthly sums of precipitation (mm) measured in 2018–2023 at a meteorological station located in Kraków.
Biology 15 00398 g006
Figure 7. Mean monthly temperatures (°C) measured in 2018–2023 at a meteorological station located in Krosno.
Figure 7. Mean monthly temperatures (°C) measured in 2018–2023 at a meteorological station located in Krosno.
Biology 15 00398 g007
Figure 8. Monthly sums of precipitation (mm) measured in 2018–2023 at a meteorological station located in Krosno.
Figure 8. Monthly sums of precipitation (mm) measured in 2018–2023 at a meteorological station located in Krosno.
Biology 15 00398 g008
Figure 9. Percentage of juvenile, immature, virginile, and generative stems in population 1 located in Wolski Forest. The asterisks indicate statistical significance levels: ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (χ2 test).
Figure 9. Percentage of juvenile, immature, virginile, and generative stems in population 1 located in Wolski Forest. The asterisks indicate statistical significance levels: ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (χ2 test).
Biology 15 00398 g009
Figure 10. Percentage of immature, virginile, and generative stems in population 2 located on Mount Chełm. Statistical significance levels—as in Figure 9.
Figure 10. Percentage of immature, virginile, and generative stems in population 2 located on Mount Chełm. Statistical significance levels—as in Figure 9.
Biology 15 00398 g010
Figure 11. Percentage of immature, virginile, and generative stems in population 3 located in Hrabeński Forest. Statistical significance levels—as in Figure 9.
Figure 11. Percentage of immature, virginile, and generative stems in population 3 located in Hrabeński Forest. Statistical significance levels—as in Figure 9.
Biology 15 00398 g011
Table 1. Characteristics of vegetation at study site 1 (Wolski Forest), study site 2 (Mount Chełm) and study site 3 (Hrabeński Forest).
Table 1. Characteristics of vegetation at study site 1 (Wolski Forest), study site 2 (Mount Chełm) and study site 3 (Hrabeński Forest).
SitesSite 1
Wolski Forest
Site 2
Mount Chełm
Site 3
Hrabeński Forest
CommunityTilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuliDentario glandulosae–FagetumTilio cordatae–Carpinetum betuli
Average value of tree layer cover [%]847788
Average value of shrub layer cover [%]45534
Average value of herb layer cover [%]687691
Dominant species in the tree layerTilia cordata
Quercus robur
Fagus sylvatica
Acer pseudoplatanus
Carpinus betulus
Acer pseudoplatanus
Quercus robur
Dominant species in the shrub layerAcer pseudoplatanus
Acer platanoides
Corylus avellana
-Tilia cordata
Fagus sylvatica
Sambucus nigra
Dominant species in the herb layerStellaria holostea
Asarum europaeum
Galeobdolon luteum
Polygonatum multiflorum
Anemone nemorosa
Dentaria glandulosa
Galeobdolon luteum
Rubus hirtus
Stellaria holostea
Asarum eropaeum
Galeobdolon luteum
Galium odoratum
Lilium martagon
Primula elatior
Pulmonaria obscura
Aegopodium podagraria
Table 2. Mean (±SD) height, number of leaves in the whorl, length and width of the longest leaf in the whorl of immature stems in population 1 located in Wolski Forest, population 2 located on Mount Chełm, and population 3 located in Hrabeński Forest in the years 2018–2023. The asterisks indicate statistical significance level: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns-not significant. The different letters below H values indicate significant differences among populations.
Table 2. Mean (±SD) height, number of leaves in the whorl, length and width of the longest leaf in the whorl of immature stems in population 1 located in Wolski Forest, population 2 located on Mount Chełm, and population 3 located in Hrabeński Forest in the years 2018–2023. The asterisks indicate statistical significance level: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns-not significant. The different letters below H values indicate significant differences among populations.
YearPopulationHeight of Stem [cm]Number of Leaves in the WhorlLength of the Longest Leaf in the Whorl [mm]Width of the Longest Leaf in the Whorl [mm]
2018112.50 (±3.75)6.10 (±1.20) a97.90 (±32.49)35.70 (±6.20)
212.65 (±4.56)7.85 (±1.81) a102.56 (±19.08)36.37 (±10.10)
315.86 (±2.10)8.09 (±1.76) b112.55 (±17.80)37.55 (±6.17)
Kruskal–Wallis H test5.95 ns8.65 *2.13 ns0.51 ns
2019117.56 (±4.44) b9.40 (±2.52) b139.28 (±15.52) c39.72 (±6.30)
211.53 (±3.38) a6.73 (±1.95) a97.00 (±18.88) a35.67 (±5.23)
318.77 (±4.64) b8.95 (±1.86) b119.14 (±12.39) b37.36 (±5.19)
Kruskal–Wallis H test31.63 ***17.54 ***42.97 ***5.66 ns
2020111.40 (±3.96)5.58 (±1.61) a101.46 (±25.90)33.00 (±8.32) a
211.88 (±3.54)6.92 (±1.70) b101.69 (±19.96)32.96 (±6.72) a
313.71 (±4.15)7.79 (±1.47) b95.17 (±12.92)38.75 (±6.25) b
Kruskal–Wallis H test4.29 ns19.13 ***3.13 ns10.13 **
2021112.33 (±7.64) a5.23 (±2.35) a102.77 (±24.18) a38.61 (±16.56) a
217.12 (±4.21) b7.43 (±1.96) b119.05 (±17.65) b45.43 (±8.08) b
314.73 (±4.53) ab8.69 (±2.43) b94.15 (±15.02) a34.46 (±7.60) a
Kruskal–Wallis H test13.36 **24.20 ***20.59 ***18.18 ***
2022112.30 (±2.86) a6.20 (±1.42)99.57 (±29.99)32.33 (±5.30) a
216.37 (±5.22) b6.63 (±2.67)108.26 (±20.31)40.74 (±6.56) b
316.33 (±4.86) b7.30 (±2.08)103.70 (±18.23)32.96 (±6.56) a
Kruskal–Wallis H test9.24 **2.69 ns1.05 ns14.69 ***
2023111.02 (±3.27) a5.78 (±1.80) a111.44 (±22.41) ab34.48 (±7.16) a
216.30 (±4.77) b6.74 (±1.91) a119.57 (±12.66) b44.09 (±7.85) b
318.15 (±4.62) b7.77 (±1.74) b96.31 (±12.45) a38.77 (±8.33) ab
Kruskal–Wallis H test24.55 ***9.90 **12.91 **15.27 ***
Table 3. Mean (±SD) height, number of leaves in the lower whorl, length and width of the longest leaf in the whorl of virginile stems in the observed populations in 2018–2023. The lack of data for population 3 in 2018 and in population 2 in 2019 is caused by the absence of virginile stems within the study patches. The population localities and the description of statistical significance levels—as in Table 2.
Table 3. Mean (±SD) height, number of leaves in the lower whorl, length and width of the longest leaf in the whorl of virginile stems in the observed populations in 2018–2023. The lack of data for population 3 in 2018 and in population 2 in 2019 is caused by the absence of virginile stems within the study patches. The population localities and the description of statistical significance levels—as in Table 2.
YearPopulationHeight of Stem [cm]Number of Leaves in the Lower WhorlLength of Leaves in the Lower Whorl [mm]Width of Leaves in the Lower Whorl [mm]
2018113.14 (±4.41)6.57 (±1.72)102.00 (±12.88)36.43 (±9.24)
224.83 (±4.19)7.33 (±1.15)115.67 (±9.29)43.67 (±2.08)
3----
Mann–Whitney U test0.00 *7.50 ns4.0 ns6.50 ns
2019119.40 (±4.49)7.80 (±1.79)126.60 (±13.85)29.40 (±0.89)
2----
326.38 (±5.48)9.75 (±3.20)118.88 (±15.66)37.38 (±7.95)
Mann–Whitney U test6.0 *13.00 ns14.00 nsU = 5.0 *
2020115.17 (±3.71) a6.17 (±1.17) a110.83 (±13.20)35.00 (±6.60)
220.13 (±2.25) ab6.25 (±0.50) ab109.50 (±8.35)45.75 (±6.65)
322.17 (3.72) b8.33 (1.86) b109.33 (15.53)34.67 (5.35)
Kruskal–Wallis H test7.20 *7.51 *0.5 ns5.96 ns
2021122.86 (±3.39)6.57 (±1.90)a128.71 (±11.83)38.43 (±7.46)
223.06 (±3.97)6.44 (±1.01)a125.22 (±10.24)42.11 (±4.23)
331.25 (±6.40)11.00 (±1.83)b109.75 (±8.14)41.00 (±6.22)
Kruskal–Wallis H test5.84 ns8.67 *5.97 ns1.07 ns
2022119.58 (±6.40)5.54 (±0.78)a117.92 (±14.92)34.62 (±6.28) a
226.00 (±5.08)6.91 (±1.30)ab115.64 (±15.69)43.73 (±7.81) b
327.14 (±5.61)8.29 (±2.43)b103.43 (±17.89)34.14 (±5.58) a
Kruskal–Wallis H test7.21 ns9.38 **3.42 ns8.24 *
2023119.67 (±2.08)5.33 (±0.58)123.00 (±14.73)38.00 (±2.65)
223.14 (±3.02)7.57 (±1.40)118.57 (±6.92)45.57 (±6.13)
327.00 (±5.66)8.50 (±2.12)117.50 (±7.78)37.00 (±1.41)
Kruskal–Wallis H test4.23 ns5.80 ns0.9 ns5.67 ns
Table 4. Mean (±SD) height, number of flowers, number of whorls of generative stems in the observed populations in 2018–2023. The population localities and the description of statistical significance levels—as in Table 2.
Table 4. Mean (±SD) height, number of flowers, number of whorls of generative stems in the observed populations in 2018–2023. The population localities and the description of statistical significance levels—as in Table 2.
YearPopulationHeight of Stem [cm]Number of FlowersNumber of Whorls
2018178.39 (±20.71) b3.56 (±1.82) b2.28 (±0.89) b
268.75 (±13.06) a2.60 (±1.40) a1.40 (±0.50) a
376.29 (±11.05)b3.26 (±1.41) b1.42 (±0.51) a
Kruskal–Wallis H test12.43 **13.04 **14.18 ***
2019197.00 (±11.34) b6.20 (±1.10) b3.00 (±0.71) b
255.27 (±14.42) a2.27 (±0.90) a1.73 (±0.47) a
377.45 (±11.76) b3.10 (±1.09) a1.83 (±0.38) a
Kruskal–Wallis H test20.40 ***16.34 ***15.96 ***
2020167.10 (±24.40) ab2.60 (±2.03) a1.37 (±0.49) a
259.79 (±12.27) a2.17 (±0.93) a1.62 (±0.49) ab
375.20 (±12.30) b3.80 (±1.65) b1.83 (±0.46) b
Kruskal–Wallis H test15.57 **20.65 ***13.81 **
2021161.17 (±13.60) a2.89 (±1.32)1.44 (±0.51)
261.53 (±9.98) a2.43 (±0.82)1.77 (±0.50)
370.27 (±11.18) b3.03 (±1.16)1.53 (±0.51)
Kruskal–Wallis H test12.47 **5.90 ns4.97 ns
2022181.33 (±13.65)1.67 (±0.58)a1.67 (±0.58)
272.93 (±11.32)2.68 (±0.90)a1.82 (±0.39)
381.30 (±14.61)4.13 (±1.38)b2.10 (±0.66)
Kruskal–Wallis H test4.68 ns19.67 ***3.98 ns
2023158.67 (±9.87) ab2.33 (±0.58) a1.67 (±0.58)
256.30 (±11.29) a2.40 (±0.84) a1.70 (±0.48)
385.43 (±17.08) b4.53 (±2.21) b2.07 (±0.58)
Kruskal–Wallis H test18.07 ***11.60 **3.80 ns
Table 5. Mean (±SD) number of leaves in the lowest whorl, length and width of the longest leaf in the lowest whorl, number of spiral leaves, length and width of the spiral leaf above the highest whorl of generative stems in the observed populations in 2018–2023. The population localities and the description of statistical significance levels—as in Table 2.
Table 5. Mean (±SD) number of leaves in the lowest whorl, length and width of the longest leaf in the lowest whorl, number of spiral leaves, length and width of the spiral leaf above the highest whorl of generative stems in the observed populations in 2018–2023. The population localities and the description of statistical significance levels—as in Table 2.
YearPopulationNumber of Leaves in the Lowest WhorlLength of the Longest Leaf in the Lowest Whorl [mm]Width of the Longest Leaf in the Lowest Whorl [mm]Number of Spiral LeavesLength of Spiral Leaf Above the Highest Whorl [mm]Width of the Spiral Leaf Above the Highest Whorl [mm]
201816.50 (±1.72) a129.72 (±19.04)35.72 (±6.80)7.17 (±2.15) b103.33 (±12.01)26.17 (±6.95)
27.50 (±1.66) a116.93 (±12.53)39.53 (±5.81)5.20 (±2.02) a94.73 (±16.35)25.13 (±7.89)
39.00 (±1.76) b119.42 (±18.68)39.63 (±6.23)5.26 (±1.48) a94.63 (±14.42)23.68 (±7.54)
Kruskal–Wallis H test27.02 ***4.56 ns3.25 ns12.71 *4.28 ns4.39 ns
201916.60 (±2.70) a147.80 (±22.86)40.60 (±9.86)7.20 (±2.77) b102.60 (±9.13)20.20 (±1.79)
27.45 (±2.38) a123.27 (±16.03)39.36 (±5.52)3.73 (±1.10) a89.09 (±18.24)23.45 (±8.86)
39.47 (±2.69) b126.13 (±11.99)38.63 (±6.89)4.73 (±1.91) ab83.37 (±19.35)16.73 (±5.94)
Kruskal–Wallis H test10.95 **5.33 ns0.40 ns10.30 **4.99 ns5.81 ns
202015.57 (±1.43)119.57 (±13.68)32.93 (±6.86)8.50 (±2.05) b112.43 (±17.07) b30.53 (±7.62) b
26.86 (±1.64)110.69 (±16.91)34.93 (±8.90)3.59 (±1.45) a83.59 (±22.41) a21.38 (±9.20) a
38.00 (±1.51)118.50 (±10.11)35.43 (±9.17)4.30 (±1.32) a89.10 (±15,34) a21.83 (±17.25) a
Kruskal–Wallis H test4.73 ns4.17 ns2.94 ns55.90 ***28.98 ***23.87 ***
202116.00 (±1.37) a124.50 (±19.31) b36.78 (±6.23) a6.83 (±3.47) b105.72 (±25.77)b25.89 (±11.25) b
27.27 (±1.57) b125.63 (±13.84) b42.70 (±5.62) b3.80 (±1.30) a95.37 (±13.02)b23.07 (±5.62) b
38.37 (±1.67) b109.67 (±14.92) a36.73 (±7.23) a4.43 (±1.91) a81.83 (±20.05)a18.00 (±9.01) a
Kruskal–Wallis H test19.41 ***15.96 ***13.97 ***15.51 ***13.06 **9.11 *
202216.33 (±0.58) a134.00 (±19.31) b40.00 (±8.66) ab7.67 (±0.58) b113.33 (±7.64)b28.33 (±2.89) b
27.21 (±1.91) a131.39 (±18.40) b43.00 (±6.73) b4.11 (±1.50) a95.50 (±16.51)b23.04 (±6.60) ab
39.37 (±3.80) b119.67 (±16.10) a36.33 (±6.29) a4.77 (±2.31) a84.90 (±14.16)a18.90 (±4.71) a
Kruskal–Wallis H test10.71 **8.69 *12.28 **8.37 *11.24 **9.44 **
202317.00 (±0.00)120.67 (±29.96)33.00 (±14.80) ab4.00 (±1.00)97.67 (±28.99)23.00 (±9.54)
28.40 (±1.71)125.20 (±12.00)41.30 (±5.01) b4.70 (±1.42)88.60 (±22.07)21.10 (±7.64)
38.33 (±1.65)118.80 (±15.56)35.03 (±5.51) a4.73 (±1.60)83.13 (±12.91)18.03 (±5.22)
Kruskal–Wallis H test3.33 ns2.11 ns6.87 *0.57 ns3.36 ns2.85 ns
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wójcik, T.; Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, K.; Ziaja, M. Spatio-Temporal Variability Description of the Rare Species Lilium martagon L. in Different Habitat Conditions. Biology 2026, 15, 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15050398

AMA Style

Wójcik T, Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt K, Ziaja M. Spatio-Temporal Variability Description of the Rare Species Lilium martagon L. in Different Habitat Conditions. Biology. 2026; 15(5):398. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15050398

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wójcik, Tomasz, Kinga Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, and Maria Ziaja. 2026. "Spatio-Temporal Variability Description of the Rare Species Lilium martagon L. in Different Habitat Conditions" Biology 15, no. 5: 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15050398

APA Style

Wójcik, T., Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, K., & Ziaja, M. (2026). Spatio-Temporal Variability Description of the Rare Species Lilium martagon L. in Different Habitat Conditions. Biology, 15(5), 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15050398

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop