Next Article in Journal
Associations of Biotic and Abiotic Factors with Phylogenetic Community Structure Across Temperate Forests in South Korea
Previous Article in Journal
Autonomic Nervous System Activity in Young Subjects Exposed to Orthostatic Posture and Emotional Visual Stimuli: A Pilot Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/biology15030267
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Do Plants Need to Be Sprayed? New Insights into VOC-Mediated Biostimulation by Wood Vinegar

by
Riccardo Fedeli
1,* and
Stefano Loppi
1,2
1
BioAgryLab, Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
2
National Biodiversity Future Center, 90133 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2026, 15(3), 267; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15030267
Submission received: 7 January 2026 / Revised: 27 January 2026 / Accepted: 30 January 2026 / Published: 2 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Science)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Simple Summary

Wood vinegar is a natural liquid obtained during the production of charcoal and is rich in organic substances that can help plants grow. It is usually sprayed directly onto leaves, but because it also releases vapors, it may affect plants through the air as well. This study explored whether wood vinegar can improve plant growth not only by touching the leaves, but also through its vapors alone. Lettuce plants were used as a model crop and were either sprayed with a very diluted wood vinegar solution, exposed only to vapors coming from the same solution, or left untreated. The results showed that plants exposed only to the vapors grew just as well as those sprayed directly. In both cases, plants were heavier, greener, richer in beneficial plant compounds, and contained higher levels of important nutrients such as calcium, potassium, phosphorus, sulfur, and zinc. The plants also showed controlled water loss and no signs of stress. These findings show that wood vinegar vapors alone can stimulate plant growth, revealing a new way this natural product works.

Abstract

Wood vinegar (WV), a by-product of biomass pyrolysis rich in organic acids and phenolic compounds, has gained increasing attention as a sustainable input for crop production, mainly through foliar application. However, its high content of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) suggests that WV may (also) interact with plants through the gaseous phase, a pathway that has so far been overlooked. This study tested the hypothesis that WV can modulate plant physiological performance, metabolic status, and nutrient accumulation not only via direct foliar contact but also through exposure to WV-derived VOCs. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) was used as a model crop and grown under controlled environmental conditions. Plants were subjected to weekly treatments consisting of either foliar spraying with a 0.2% (v/v) WV solution or exposure to VOCs released from the same solution in a sealed chamber, without direct contact between the liquid and plant tissues, and were compared with untreated controls. Notably, plants exposed exclusively to WV-derived VOCs showed responses similar to those observed following foliar application. Both treatments significantly increased fresh weight, the content of chlorophyll, total polyphenols and the accumulation of key macro- and micronutrients, including Ca, K, P, S, and Zn. For both treatments, the efficiency of photosystem II remained stable, indicating the absence of photochemical stress, while stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, intercellular CO2 concentration, and net photosynthetic rate were markedly reduced, suggesting a regulated stomatal response. Physiological, biochemical, and mineral parameters were assessed using non-destructive optical techniques, gas exchange measurements, spectrophotometric assays, and X-ray fluorescence analysis. These findings indicate that exposure to the volatile fraction released from WV under the exposure conditions adopted in this study can elicit biostimulant-like responses comparable to those observed after foliar application.

1. Introduction

In the context of sustainable agriculture and circular bioeconomy, there has been growing interest in the valorisation of biomass by-products as a functional solution for agricultural production [1,2,3]. Among these by-products, wood vinegar (WV), also known as wood distillate or pyroligneous acid, has garnered attention due to its chemical composition and the reported biological effects on crops [4,5]. Wood vinegar is obtained through the condensation of vapors produced during the pyrolysis of woody biomass and consists of an aqueous solution rich in organic acids, phenolic compounds, alcohols, ketones, and other low-molecular-weight organic substances [6,7]. While the use of WV has primarily focused on foliar applications [8,9,10], the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) suggests that its interaction with plants may also occur through the gaseous phase, without any direct contact.
Several studies have documented the potential of low concentrations (around 0.2%) of WV when applied to leaves by spraying [8,11,12], highlighting its capacity to increase plant growth [13], nutrient availability [14], microbial activity [15], and resistance to abiotic stress [16]. These effects have been attributed to its high content of organic acids, particularly acetic acid, and to a complex mixture of phenolic compounds [17]. Organic acids can influence intracellular pH regulation [18], enhance nutrient availability within tissues [19], and support metabolic activity [20], while phenolic compounds may function as signalling molecules or elicitors activating adaptive physiological and biochemical responses in plants [21]. However, most existing research implicitly assumes that these effects require direct contact between WV and plant tissues, overlooking the potential contribution of VOCs released into the surrounding environment.
Plants are highly sensitive to VOCs and can detect and respond to a wide variety of these compounds [22,23,24]. Airborne compounds emitted by plants, microorganisms, or abiotic sources can function as signalling agents, influencing plant physiology, metabolism, and defense mechanisms [25,26]. Well-documented examples include green leaf volatiles and other low-molecular-weight organic compounds that induce defense responses [27,28], prime plants against stresses [29,30], or alter growth patterns even at very low concentrations [31,32]. In this framework, the VOC fraction of WV represents a potentially important, yet unexplored, pathway of interaction with plants.
Chemical characterization of WV typically reveals a high concentration of acetic acid, along with other short-chain organic acids and a variety of phenolic compounds [17]. Acetic acid is highly volatile and readily partitions into the gas phase under ambient conditions, especially when the solution is exposed over a large surface area or maintained at elevated temperatures [33]. Recent research has demonstrated that vapor of acetic acid can influence plant physiological processes; however, in the present study the specific contribution of individual WV-derived volatile compounds was not directly assessed [34,35]. Although phenolic compounds are generally less volatile, their continuous release in closed environments may still contribute to the overall chemical atmosphere surrounding plants [36,37].
The importance of atmospheric exposure to WV VOCs may become particularly interesting in closed or semi-closed environments, such as greenhouses and growth chambers. Unlike conditions in the open field, where dispersion rapidly dissolves airborne compounds, enclosed environments amplify the persistence and intensity of VOC exposure [38,39]. Most available research implicitly assumes that the beneficial effects of WV require direct foliar contact, overlooking the potential contribution of VOCs released into the surrounding atmosphere. Moreover, foliar spraying, although widely adopted, is inherently inefficient due to substantial losses caused by evaporation, droplet drift, runoff, and uneven leaf coverage, particularly under greenhouse or field conditions. These factors reduce the actual amount of applied product reaching the target tissues, limiting the efficiency and reproducibility of WV treatments.
In this context, the volatile fraction of WV represents a completely unexplored and potentially more efficient pathway of interaction with plants, capable of bypassing the physical constraints associated with spray applications. To date, no studies have experimentally disentangled the effects of WV-derived VOCs from those resulting from direct foliar contact, and their relative contribution to plant physiological and metabolic responses remains unknown. Addressing this gap is particularly relevant for controlled or semi-closed environments, where VOC accumulation may enhance treatment efficiency while reducing product losses and application inputs.
Based on this evidence, the present study tested the hypothesis that WV can modulate plant physiological performance, biochemical status, and nutrient accumulation not only through direct foliar application but also via exposure to VOCs released into the surrounding environment. Specifically, we hypothesized that atmospheric exposure to WV-derived VOCs is sufficient to induce changes in photosynthetic activity, stomatal regulation, antioxidant metabolism, and mineral composition of plant tissues, comparable to those observed following foliar application, thereby indicating that direct contact between the WV solution and plant tissues is not required for its biological activity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Wood Vinegar

Wood pyrolysis generates two main residual fractions: a solid phase, known as biochar, and a liquid phase referred to as WV. To enhance WV yield relative to biochar, fast pyrolysis represents the most effective approach and is typically performed at temperatures between 350 and 500 °C. This technique involves rapid heating of lignocellulosic biomass followed by immediate cooling. Under these conditions, the liquid fraction accounts for approximately 60–75% of the total products, while the solid fraction represents about 15–25% and the gaseous fraction 10–20%.
WV is mainly composed of water (80–90%) and contains more than 300 water-soluble organic compounds, including organic acids, alkanes, phenolic compounds, alcohols, and esters. It should be noted that the chemical composition of WV is highly variable, as it depends on both the type of feedstock and the operational parameters adopted during the pyrolysis process, resulting in products with distinct chemical properties.
The selection of the 0.2% (v/v) WV treatment concentration was based on evidence from previous studies and on preliminary dose–response experiments. Several works have reported that low WV concentrations, typically ranging between 0.1% and 0.5%, are effective in eliciting biological activity while avoiding phytotoxic effects, which may occur at higher doses due to the acidity and the presence of phenolic compounds. In particular, concentrations around 0.2% have been shown to provide a favorable balance between efficacy and safety, making them suitable for experimental applications. Therefore, the 0.2% WV concentration adopted in this study was selected as a representative and literature-supported dose to ensure comparability with previous findings and to minimize potential adverse effects [40,41].
The WV used in the present study (Distillato di Legno, produced by BioDea®, Arezzo, Italy [42]) was obtained from the pyrolysis of sweet chestnut [(Castanea sativa Mill., Robinia pseudoacacia L., Fraxinus ornus L., Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn., and Quercus robur L.).] wood derived from forest management residues. This product has already been widely investigated for soil-based crop cultivation, showing significant improvements in both crop yield and nutritional quality. The chemical features of this WV are reported in Table S2.

2.2. Experimental Setup

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) was used as a model crop plant, for its well-known reactions to foliar application of WV [43,44,45]. Seedlings of L sativa (n = 30), purchased from a local nursery, were initially grown in polystyrene trays under greenhouse conditions for two weeks. Plants were then transferred to the laboratory and transplanted into plastic pots (10 × 10 × 10 cm) filled with commercial potting soil (VigorPlant Srl, Piacenza, Italy; characteristics are reported in Fedeli et al. [16] and in Table S1). Following transplantation, seedlings were allowed to acclimate for one week in a controlled-environment growth chamber set at 20 ± 1° C, 70 ± 2% relative humidity, a photosynthetic photon flux density of 400 μmol m−2 s−1, and a 16/8 h photoperiod. Subsequently, plants were subjected to three different treatments (10 plants per treatment) applied once per week: (i) control plants sprayed with deionized water (C); (ii) plants treated with a 0.2% WV solution applied by foliar spraying (F-WV); and (iii) plants sprayed with deionized water and exposed to VOCs released from a 0.2% WV solution placed inside a closed chamber (VOC-WV) (Figure 1).
The chamber-based exposure system was adopted to specifically evaluate the effects of WV-derived VOCs while excluding any direct contact between the liquid solution and plant tissues. The exposure chamber consisted of a rigid, transparent enclosure (40 × 20 × 20 cm; total internal volume ≈ 16 L), constructed to allow full sealing during the exposure period. This approach allowed the volatile fraction of WV to be assessed independently from foliar uptake under controlled conditions. For VOC generation, 250 mL of a 0.2% WV solution were placed inside the chamber in an open 250 mL glass beaker, allowing passive volatilization. The exposed liquid surface corresponded to the open beaker mouth. The chamber was kept fully sealed throughout the 5 h exposure period, with no active air exchange, in order to allow VOC accumulation in the headspace.
The exposure duration was set at 5 h to ensure sufficient accumulation of WV-derived VOCs in the chamber atmosphere while avoiding prolonged confinement that could induce secondary effects unrelated to VOC exposure, such as alterations in humidity, gas composition, or plant microclimate. The exposure window (9:00–13:00) was selected to coincide with the central part of the photoperiod, when stomatal conductance and leaf gas exchange are typically high under controlled environmental conditions. This timing is commonly adopted in plant physiological studies to minimize diurnal variability and to investigate gas-mediated processes under stable and physiologically active conditions [46,47,48].
During the exposure period, temperature, relative humidity, and light conditions inside the chamber were the same as those set for the controlled-environment growth chamber (20 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 2% RH, PPFD 400 μmol m−2 s−1), as the sealed chamber was placed directly within the growth chamber.
Specifically, for the VOC-WV treatment, plants were placed inside a sealed exposure chamber, allowing passive release of VOCs. Exposure was carried out for 5 h, from 9:00 to 13:00, without direct contact between the solution and the plant tissue. After the treatments, all 30 pots were positioned again inside the controlled-environment growth chamber and randomly rotated every two days to reduce potential micro-environmental variability. This rotation procedure was adopted to minimize spatial heterogeneity in light distribution, air circulation, temperature, and humidity within the growth chamber, thereby limiting microclimate-related effects on plant growth and physiology. At the end of the experiment (5 weeks after transplantation), the fresh weight of the above-ground part of the plants was recorded using a professional balance.

2.3. Photosynthetic Parameters

The photosynthetic parameters were recorded before the harvest of the plants. Specifically, the total chlorophyll content was determined using a non-destructive chlorophyll content meter (CCM-300, Opti-Science, Hudson, IN, USA [49]). Measurements were performed on the apical regions of the three fully expanded leaves of each plant, avoiding the main nerves [50]. Chlorophyll content values were expressed on a leaf surface basis (mg/cm2). For chlorophyll fluorescence analysis, plants were dark-adapted for 15 min and subsequently exposed to a 1-s saturating pulse of red light (650 nm) at an intensity of 2400 μmol m−2 s−1 [51]. Chlorophyll fluorescence was recorded using a plant efficiency analyzer (Handy PEA, Hansatech Ltd., Norfolk, UK [52]). The maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) and the performance index (PIabs) were used as indicators of photosynthetic performance and plant physiological status.

2.4. Gas Exchange Parameters

Leaf gas exchange measurements were carried out before plant harvest on fully developed leaves using a LI-6800 portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). A single measurement was taken from each plant, on a randomly selected fully expanded leaf. Measurements were performed between 11:00 and 14:00. During measurements, CO2 concentration inside the instrument chamber was maintained at 400 μmol mol−1 and air flow was set to 600 μmol s−1 [53]. Gas exchange parameters were recorded once steady-state conditions were achieved, as indicated by stable CO2 and H2O fluxes. The parameters measured included net CO2 assimilation rate (A), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (gsw), and transpiration rate (E).

2.5. Antioxidant Compounds

Plant samples were cut into small pieces, oven-dried at 40 ° C for 24 h, and finely ground using an Ultra-Turrax homogenizer (IKA A10, IKA-Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Staufen im Breisgau, Germany). Approximately 0.5 g of dried material were extracted with 5 mL of 80% methanol (1:10 ratio) by homogenization for 30 min, and the extracts were subsequently stored at 4 °C in the dark for 48 h [54]. After extraction, samples were filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper to obtain clear extracts for antioxidants quantification.
The total polyphenol content was determined using a modified Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric assay, following the method reported by Fedeli et al. [55]. Briefly, an aliquot of extract was mixed with distilled water and Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, followed by the addition of sodium carbonate, and incubated in the dark for 90 min before measuring absorbance at 760 nm with a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent 8453, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The concentration of total polyphenols was calculated using a gallic acid calibration curve (5–300 μg mL−1) and expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry weight (mg GAE g−1 DW).
The total flavonoid content was assessed using an aluminum chloride-based colorimetric method, following the method reported by Carullo et al. [56]. An aliquot of the above extract was sequentially reacted with sodium nitrite, aluminum chloride, and sodium hydroxide, with incubation steps carried out in the dark. Absorbance was recorded at 415 nm using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Agilent 8453, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and the concentration of total flavonoids was quantified against a quercetin standard curve (12.5–150 μg mL−1), with results expressed as milligrams of quercetin equivalents per gram of dry weight (mg QE g−1 DW).

2.6. Mineral Content

The mineral content was determined with a portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer (Olympus Vanta Series C, Olympus Corp., Waltham, MA, USA; [57]). The instrument was equipped with a silver-anode X-ray tube operating within an excitation energy range of 15–40 kV and a large-area silicon drift detector, following previously described procedures [58]. Approximately 1 g of finely ground oven-dried plant material was loaded into plastic sample cups and for each sample, three consecutive measurements were performed, with an acquisition time of 20 s per beam. The elements quantified included calcium (Ca), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), potassium (K), manganese (Mn), phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), and zinc (Zn). Method accuracy was verified using 14 certified plant reference materials [59]. All results were reported on a dry weight basis.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data distribution was first evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test to assess normality. As normality assumptions were not met (p > 0.05), differences among treatments were analyzed using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA, followed by Dunn’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. Results are presented as median values ± error, where the error represents a robust dispersion estimate calculated as the median absolute deviation (MAD) divided by the square root of the number of observations, and is intended as an indicator of variability around the median rather than as a parametric standard error. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (Version 2026.01.0+392) [60].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fresh Weight and Photosynthetic Parameters

Fresh weight and chlorophyll content were significantly influenced by the treatments, showing a significant increase in both F-WV (+13% and +8%, respectively) and VOC-WV plants (+16% and +18%, respectively) compared with C (Figure 2A,B). It is noteworthy that the chlorophyll content of VOC-WV plants was even higher than that of F-WV plants. An increase in chlorophyll content does not necessarily translate into higher net photosynthetic rates, particularly when stomatal conductance is concurrently reduced. In this context, enhanced chlorophyll accumulation may reflect an acclimatory or compensatory adjustment aimed at maintaining light-harvesting capacity under conditions of restricted CO2 diffusion, rather than an immediate enhancement of carbon assimilation. Similar dissociations between chlorophyll content and photosynthetic performance have been reported in plants exhibiting regulated stomatal limitation or acclimation responses. In contrast, no significant differences were detected among treatments for the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) or the performance index (PIabs), which remained stable across all treatments (Figure 2C,D).
The increase in fresh weight and chlorophyll content, together with the absence of changes in PSII photochemical efficiency, indicates that WV promoted plant growth and leaf pigment accumulation without inducing photosynthetic stress. Stable values of Fv/Fm and PIabs across treatments suggest that the photosynthetic apparatus remained fully functional, with PSII operating within the optimal range typical of healthy, non-stressed plants [61,62,63]. This response pattern is consistent with previous studies on foliar applications of WV at low concentrations [51,64,65], which have reported enhanced biomass accumulation and chlorophyll content without detrimental effects on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, supporting the interpretation of WV as a mild biostimulant rather than a stress-inducing agent [53,66].
In the absence of direct contact, the comparable response observed in VOC-WV plants suggests that this treatment may elicit growth-related responses independently of foliar treatment. Although no studies have explicitly investigated the effects of WV-derived VOCs, similar results have been reported for VOCs from different sources, including volatiles emitted by plants and microbes, which are known to enhance leaf development and chlorophyll accumulation without affecting PSII efficiency [67,68,69]. Volatile organic acids and other low-molecular-weight airborne compounds have been shown to act as signaling molecules in plants; however, direct identification of the compounds involved in the present system was not performed [70,71].

3.2. Gas Exchange Parameters

All gas exchange parameters were significantly reduced by the treatments (Figure 3) compared to the control, with reductions in the range −14% and −17%, in F-WV and VOC-WV plants, respectively, for net photosynthetic rate (Figure 3A), −32% and −35%, for transpiration rate (Figure 3B), −15% and −12% for intercellular CO2 concentration (Figure 3C), and −80% and −77% for stomatal conductance (Figure 3D).
The strong and consistent reduction in stomatal conductance and transpiration rate observed in both F-WV and VOC-WV plants indicates that WV treatments primarily affect stomatal regulation rather than the photochemical capacity of the photosynthetic apparatus. The concurrent decrease in Ci is compatible with a contribution of stomatal limitation to the observed reduction in A; however, Ci alone does not allow a definitive discrimination between stomatal and non-stomatal limitations. Importantly, the absence of changes in Fv/Fm and PIabs indicates that photochemical efficiency was maintained, supporting the interpretation of a regulated physiological adjustment rather than a stress-induced impairment of the photosynthetic apparatus [72]. Although the magnitude of stomatal conductance reduction was substantial, the maintenance of PSII efficiency and the absence of photochemical impairment suggest that this response reflects a strong but regulated adjustment of gas exchange, rather than a collapse of photosynthetic function typically associated with severe stress.
Similar stomatal responses have been reported in previous studies investigating foliar applications of WV or acetic acid–containing solutions, where reductions in stomatal conductance and transpiration were associated with improved water-use regulation and enhanced tolerance to abiotic stress conditions [53,73]. In these contexts, organic acids have been proposed to influence guard cell behavior either directly, through pH-related effects, or indirectly, via signalling pathways involved in stomatal control [71,74].
Although no studies have directly examined the effects of WV-derived VOCs on plant gas exchange, comparable responses have been widely documented for VOCs of different origins. Volatile organic acids and other low-molecular-weight airborne compounds have been shown to induce partial stomatal closure, reduce transpiration, and modulate photosynthetic rates without causing photoinhibition, often as part of a priming or acclimation response [73,75,76]. Such effects are frequently interpreted as adaptive adjustments that balance carbon gain with water conservation under changing environmental conditions [77,78].
Although the present study was not designed to directly investigate molecular, hormonal, or redox-related signaling pathways, the coordinated changes observed in stomatal conductance, transpiration, and CO2 assimilation indicate a regulated physiological adjustment rather than a collapse of photosynthetic function. However, it must be emphasized that no direct measurements of phytohormones, redox status, or gene expression were performed, and therefore any mechanistic interpretation remains purely inferential.
Previous studies have shown that exposure to volatile organic acids, such as acetic acid, can influence stomatal behavior and stress-related physiological responses in plants [34,35]. In this context, the physiological patterns observed here are consistent with regulatory responses reported in the literature, but the present dataset does not allow attribution of the observed effects to specific signaling molecules or pathways.
Consequently, references to potential hormonal or redox-mediated mechanisms should be interpreted as conceptual frameworks derived from existing studies rather than as direct evidence from the present work. Future investigations integrating targeted analyses of hormonal profiles, redox markers, and molecular responses will be required to elucidate the mechanistic basis underlying the physiological effects observed here.
In particular, the partial stomatal closure observed in both F-WV and VOC-WV, in the absence of photochemical impairment, is consistent with signaling pathways involving abscisic acid or other regulators of guard cell function, which mediate stomatal responses under non-stressful or primed conditions. Phenolic compounds, although less volatile, may also contribute to signaling processes in closed environments, where prolonged exposure could allow biologically relevant concentrations to accumulate. Such compounds have been reported to interact with redox signaling and hormone-mediated regulatory networks, thereby influencing stomatal regulation and secondary metabolism.
Taken together, these considerations support the hypothesis that WV-derived VOCs may act as airborne signaling cues, triggering hormone-related regulatory pathways that modulate stomatal behavior and metabolic allocation without inducing stress-related damage. While the identification of specific signaling molecules and downstream gene expression responses requires targeted molecular analyses, the physiological patterns observed in this study provide a framework for future investigations aimed at dissecting the hormonal and genetic basis of WV-mediated biostimulant effects.

3.3. Antioxidant Compounds

The total polyphenol content was significantly increased by the treatments, with significant increases in both F-WV (+25%) and VOC-WV plants (+30%) compared with C (Figure 4A). Differently, TFC was not significantly influenced by the treatments (Figure 4B).
The increase in TPC, in the absence of significant changes in TFC, suggests that WV treatments activated specific secondary metabolism pathways rather than inducing a generalised production of phenolic compounds. This pattern is consistent with previous studies on foliar applications of WV, which have reported increases in TPC associated with enhanced antioxidant capacity and stress-related metabolic adjustments, often without parallel increases in all phenolic subclasses [12,79,80]. Such responses have been interpreted as indicative of a mild elicitation (eustress) effect, where plants upregulate protective compounds without entering a fully stressed state [66].
The comparable response observed in VOC-WV plants further supports the hypothesis that VOCs released from WV can act as metabolic signals capable of inducing antioxidant-related pathways. Although direct evidence for WV-derived VOCs is currently lacking, similar effects have been widely documented for VOCs of different origin, including plant- and microbe-emitted volatiles, which are known to trigger phenylpropanoid metabolism and polyphenol accumulation through signalling or priming mechanisms [27,69,81]. In addition, volatile organic acids and other low-molecular-weight compounds have been shown to modulate redox homeostasis and activate antioxidant defenses even at low atmospheric concentrations [82].

3.4. Mineral Content

The concentration of several mineral elements resulted significantly increased by the treatments compared to the control (Table 1), with increases in the range +30% and +31% in F-WV and VOC-WV plants, respectively, for Ca, +33% and +40% for K, +23% and +50% for P, +38% and +33% for S. Zinc was higher only in VOC-WV plants (+18%), compared to the control, while F-WV plants showed intermediate values and were not significantly different from either group, while Al, Cu, Fe, and Mn were not significantly influenced by the treatments.
The results of the mineral content indicate that WV treatments influenced nutrient accumulation in a regulated and element-specific manner, rather than causing a generalized increase in mineral content. The enhancement of Ca, K, P, and S in both treatments suggests that WV promotes the accumulation of key macronutrients involved in structural integrity, osmotic regulation, energy metabolism, and redox homeostasis [83,84]. Similar increases in macronutrient content have been reported in studies employing foliar applications of WV, where such effects have been attributed to improved nutrient use efficiency and metabolic demand associated with enhanced growth and physiological activity [79,85].
The results observed in VOC-WV plants further support the hypothesis that VOCs from WV can modulate nutrient dynamics, even in the absence of direct foliar application. This response is consistent with the changes in stomatal regulation, transpiration, and metabolic activity observed in the present study, which can influence nutrient allocation and accumulation within plant tissues [83,86]. Particularly, the increase in K and Ca may reflect adjustments in ionic balance and signalling processes [86,87], while elevated P and S levels are compatible with increased requirements for energy-related compounds and S-containing metabolites involved in stress protection, supporting the hypothesis of the eustress theory [88,89].

3.5. Chamber vs. Foliar Application: Implications for Wood Vinegar Mode of Action

A key aspect of the present study is the direct comparison between the effects of the same WV concentration (0.2%) applied through conventional foliar spraying and those induced by exposure to WV-derived VOCs in a closed chamber. This comparison is particularly relevant because it allows the biological activity of WV to be freed from the physical constraints associated with spray-based applications. Although foliar spraying is the most commonly adopted method for WV application [16,53,66], its efficiency is strongly influenced by losses due to evaporation, droplet drift, runoff, and uneven deposition on leaf surfaces, which may substantially reduce the fraction of applied product that effectively interacts with plant tissues.
The chamber treatment represents a conceptual shift, as it isolates the volatile fraction of WV and enables a more controlled and reproducible exposure of plants to bioactive compounds, independent of spray efficiency. The observation that plants exposed exclusively to WV-derived VOCs exhibited responses comparable to, or in some cases even stronger than, those observed following foliar application highlights that direct liquid contact is not a prerequisite for WV biological activity. This finding is particularly significant because it suggests that a substantial portion of the biostimulant effect attributed to foliar WV applications may be mediated by its volatile components rather than by leaf surface interactions alone.
The urgency of comparing chamber and non-chamber treatments lies in the increasing relevance of controlled and semi-closed cultivation systems, such as greenhouses, vertical farms, and growth chambers, where airborne compounds can persist and accumulate more effectively than in open-field conditions. In such environments, VOC-mediated application strategies could reduce product losses, improve application uniformity, and lower the amount of input required to achieve a physiological response, thereby enhancing both economic and environmental sustainability. By demonstrating that WV-derived VOCs alone are sufficient to trigger growth- and metabolism-related responses, this study provides a mechanistic basis for rethinking WV application strategies beyond conventional spraying.

4. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the biostimulant activity of wood vinegar is not restricted to direct foliar application but can also be mediated by its volatile organic compounds. By experimentally separating foliar and gaseous exposure pathways, we show that atmospheric exposure to the volatile fraction released from WV under enclosed conditions was sufficient to reproduce most of the physiological and biochemical responses observed following foliar spraying.
Both treatments increased biomass and chlorophyll content while maintaining photosystem II efficiency, indicating the absence of photochemical stress. The concomitant reduction in stomatal conductance, transpiration, and CO2 assimilation suggests a regulated physiological adjustment rather than stress-induced impairment, consistent with a mild elicitor effect.
Overall, these findings identify the volatile fraction of WV as an active and previously overlooked component of its mode of action, thereby refining the current understanding of WV–plant interactions and providing a mechanistic framework for interpreting its biostimulant effects.

Future Research Directions

Future research should aim to further elucidate the molecular and biochemical mechanisms underlying the observed physiological responses to WV, with particular attention to the role of specific VOCs and their interaction with hormone-mediated signaling pathways. The characterization of the gaseous phase of WV using analytical techniques, together with targeted analyses of antioxidant enzymes and stress-related genes, would help clarify whether VOC exposure induces a priming effect that enhances plant resilience to abiotic stresses. It should be noted that the present study did not include direct chemical characterization or quantification of VOCs accumulated in the chamber atmosphere. Therefore, attribution of the observed responses to specific volatile compounds remains actually unknown and represents a key objective for future researches.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology15030267/s1, Table S1: Physiochemical characteristics of the growing medium used; Table S2: Main chemical features of wood vinegar.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L.; methodology, R.F.; software, R.F.; validation, R.F., and S.L.; formal analysis, R.F.; investigation, R.F.; resources, S.L.; data curation, R.F.; writing—original draft preparation, R.F.; writing—review and editing, S.L.; visualization, R.F.; supervision, S.L.; funding acquisition, S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded within the project funded under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.4—Call for tender No. 3138 of 16 December 2021, rectified by Decree n.3175 of 18 December 2021 of Italian Ministry of University and Research funded by the European Union—NextGenerationEU. Project code CN_00000033, Concession Decree No. 1034 of 17 June 2022 adopted by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, CUP B63C22000650007”, Project title “National Biodiversity Future Center—NBFC”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on reasonable request by the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thanks Francesco Barbagli for kindly providing the wood vinegar used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Almeida, B.P.; Pavão, L.F.S.; de Farias, M.S.; Nicolodi, N.M.; Petry, M.T.; Leal, M.M.; Zabot, G.L. Agricultural Biomass as a Resource for Biomaterials, Biofertilizers, and Bioproducts: A Systematic Review. Agrochemicals 2025, 4, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kumar Sarangi, P.; Subudhi, S.; Bhatia, L.; Saha, K.; Mudgil, D.; Shadangi, K.P.; Arya, R.K. Utilization of agricultural waste biomass and recycling toward circular bioeconomy. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 8526–8539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Toplicean, I.M.; Datcu, A.D. An overview on bioeconomy in agricultural sector, biomass production, recycling methods, and circular economy considerations. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Grewal, A.; Abbey, L.; Gunupuru, L.R. Production, prospects and potential application of pyroligneous acid in agriculture. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2018, 135, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mhamdi, R. Evaluating the evolution and impact of wood vinegar research: A bibliometric study. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2023, 175, 106190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Z. Characterization of five kinds of wood vinegar obtained from agricultural and forestry wastes and identification of major antioxidants in wood vinegar. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2019, 35, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, M.; Yao, J.; Zhang, C.; Hao, R.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, W. Quantitative analysis of multi-components by single-marker: An effective method for the chemical characterization of wood vinegar. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 182, 114862. [Google Scholar]
  8. Asghari, M.T.; Baghbani-Arani, A.; Fard, S.R.M. Effects of mycorrhiza and wood vinegar foliar application on growth, quality traits, and uptake in garden thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). Iran. J. Med. Aromat. Plants Res. 2025, 41, 598–612. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fedeli, R.; Dichiara, M.; Carullo, G.; Tudino, V.; Gemma, S.; Butini, S.; Loppi, S. Unlocking the potential of biostimulants in sustainable agriculture: Effect of wood distillate on the nutritional profiling of apples. Heliyon 2024, 10, e018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mohd Amnan, M.A.; Teo, W.F.A.; Aizat, W.M.; Khaidizar, F.D.; Tan, B.C. Foliar application of oil palm wood vinegar enhances Pandanus amaryllifolius tolerance under drought stress. Plants 2023, 12, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mirsoleimani, A.; Najafi-Ghiri, M.; Boostani, H.R.; Farrokhzadeh, S. Relationships between soil and plant nutrients of citrus rootstocks as influenced by potassium and wood vinegar application. J. Soils Sediments 2023, 23, 1439–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ofoe, R.; Qin, D.; Gunupuru, L.R.; Thomas, R.H.; Abbey, L. Effect of pyroligneous acid on the productivity and nutritional quality of greenhouse tomato. Plants 2022, 11, 1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zulkarami, B.; Ashrafuzzaman, M.; Husni, M.O.; Ismail, M.R. Effect of pyroligneous acid on growth, yield and quality improvement of rockmelon in soilless culture. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2011, 5, 1508–1514. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yatagai, M.; Nishimoto, M.; Hori, K.; Ohira, T.; Shibata, A. Termiticidal activity of wood vinegar, its components and their homologues. J. Wood Sci. 2002, 48, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mungkunkamchao, T.; Kesmala, T.; Pimratch, S.; Toomsan, B.; Jothityangkoon, D. Wood vinegar and fermented bioextracts: Natural products to enhance growth and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Sci. Hortic. 2013, 154, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fedeli, R.; Celletti, S.; Loppi, S. Wood distillate promotes the tolerance of lettuce in extreme salt stress conditions. Plants 2024, 13, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wei, Q.; Ma, X.; Dong, J. Preparation, chemical constituents and antimicrobial activity of pyroligneous acids from walnut tree branches. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2010, 87, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. De Hemptinne, A.; Marrannes, R.; Vanheel, B. Influence of organic acids on intracellular pH. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 1983, 245, C178–C183. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hinsinger, P. Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: A review. Plant Soil 2001, 237, 173–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sweetlove, L.J.; Beard, K.F.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Fernie, A.R.; Ratcliffe, R.G. Not just a circle: Flux modes in the plant TCA cycle. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cheynier, V.; Comte, G.; Davies, K.M.; Lattanzio, V.; Martens, S. Plant phenolics: Recent advances on their biosynthesis, genetics, and ecophysiology. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 72, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bergman, M.E.; Huang, X.Q.; Baudino, S.; Caissard, J.C.; Dudareva, N. Plant volatile organic compounds: Emission and perception in a changing world. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2025, 85, 102706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Brilli, F.; Loreto, F.; Baccelli, I. Exploiting plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in agriculture to improve sustainable defense strategies and productivity of crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Loreto, F.; D’Auria, S. How do plants sense volatiles sent by other plants? Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Baldwin, I.T.; Halitschke, R.; Paschold, A.; von Dahl, C.C.; Preston, C.A. Volatile signaling in plant-plant interactions: “talking trees” in the genomics era. Science 2006, 311, 812–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vickers, C.E.; Gershenzon, J.; Lerdau, M.T.; Loreto, F. A unified mechanism of action for volatile isoprenoids in plant abiotic stress. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Heil, M.; Karban, R. Explaining evolution of plant communication by airborne signals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Scala, A.; Allmann, S.; Mirabella, R.; Haring, M.A.; Schuurink, R.C. Green leaf volatiles: A plant’s multifunctional weapon against herbivores and pathogens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 17781–17811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Frost, C.J.; Mescher, M.C.; Carlson, J.E.; De Moraes, C.M. Plant defense priming against herbivores: Getting ready for a different battle. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 818–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Conrath, U.; Beckers, G.J.M.; Flors, V.; García-Agustín, P.; Jakab, G.; Mauch, F.; Newman, M.-A.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Poinssot, B.; Pozo, M.J.; et al. Priming in plant–pathogen interactions. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2006, 19, 1062–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kegge, W.; Pierik, R. Biogenic volatile organic compounds and plant competition. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, X.; Wen, H.; Suprun, A.; Zhu, H. Ethylene signaling in regulating plant growth, development, and stress responses. Plants 2025, 14, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sander, R. Compilation of Henry’s law constants (version 4.0) for water as solvent. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 4399–4981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rahman, M.M.; Keya, S.S.; Sahu, A.; Gupta, A.; Dhingra, A.; Tran, L.S.P.; Mostofa, M.G. Acetic acid: A cheap but chief metabolic regulator for abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Stress Biol. 2024, 4, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Utsumi, Y.; Utsumi, C.; Tanaka, M.; Ha, C.V.; Takahashi, S.; Matsui, A.; Seki, M. Acetic acid treatment enhances drought avoidance in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lattanzio, V.; Lattanzio, V.M.; Cardinali, A. Role of phenolics in the resistance mechanisms of plants against fungal pathogens and insects. In Phytochemistry: Advances in Research; Research Signpost: Kerala, India, 2006; pp. 23–67. [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, Z.H.; Wang, Q.; Ruan, X.; Pan, C.D.; Jiang, D.A. Phenolics and plant allelopathy. Molecules 2010, 15, 8933–8952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kesselmeier, J.; Staudt, M. Biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOC): An overview on emission, physiology and ecology. J. Atmos. Chem. 1999, 33, 23–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Loreto, F.; Schnitzler, J.P. Abiotic stresses and induced BVOCs. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fedeli, R.; Fiaschi, T.; Angiolini, C.; Maccherini, S.; Loppi, S.; Fanfarillo, E. Dose-dependent and species-specific effects of wood distillate addition on the germination performance of threatened arable plants. Plants 2023, 12, 3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fanfarillo, E.; Fedeli, R.; Fiaschi, T.; de Simone, L.; Vannini, A.; Angiolini, C.; Loppi, S.; Maccherini, S. Effects of wood distillate on seedling emergence and first-stage growth in five threatened arable plants. Diversity 2022, 14, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. BioDea. Distillato di Legno Bio. 2025. Available online: https://biodea.bio/prodotto/distillato-di-legno-bio/ (accessed on 14 November 2025).
  43. Jeong, S.J.; Oh, J.S.; Seok, W.Y.; Cho, M.Y.; Seo, J.B. The effect of chitosan and wood vinegar treatment on the growth of eggplant and leaf lettuce. Korean J. Org. Agric. 2007, 15, 4. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chen, J.; Wu, J.H.; Si, H.P.; Lin, K.Y. Effects of adding wood vinegar to nutrient solution on the growth, photosynthesis, and absorption of mineral elements of hydroponic lettuce. J. Plant Nutr. 2016, 39, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fedeli, R.; Zhatkanbayeva, Z.; Loppi, S. Wood distillate as a solution for growing crops under water deficiency. Crops 2025, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lambers, H.; Chapin, F.S., III; Pons, T.L. Plant Physiological Ecology, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zeiger, E.; Farquhar, G.D.; Cowan, I.R. (Eds.) Stomatal Function; Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  48. Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E.; Møller, I.M.; Murphy, A. Plant Physiology and Development, 6th ed.; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  49. Opti-Sciences Inc. CCM-300 Chlorophyll Content Meter. Hudson, NH, USA. 2025. Available online: https://opti-sciences.com/products/content-meters/ccm-300/ (accessed on 23 September 2025).
  50. Fedeli, R.; Zhatkanbayeva, Z.; Loppi, S. Soil amendment with biochar from slaughterhouse waste bones enhances soil quality and promotes the growth of crop plants. Plant Biosyst. 2025, 159, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fedeli, R.; Cruz, C.; Loppi, S.; Munzi, S. Hormetic effect of wood distillate on hydroponically grown lettuce. Plants 2024, 13, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hansatech Instruments Ltd. Handy PEA Chlorophyll Fluorimeter: User Manual; Hansatech Instruments Ltd.: King’s Lynn, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  53. Desideri, S.; Grifoni, L.; Fedeli, R.; Loppi, S. One Step Forward in Understanding the Mechanism of Action of Wood Vinegar: Gas Exchange Analysis Reveals New Information. Plants 2026, 15, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Azarnejad, N.; Celletti, S.; Ghorbani, M.; Fedeli, R.; Loppi, S. Dose-dependent effects of a corn starch-based bioplastic on basil (Ocimum basilicum L.): Implications for growth, biochemical parameters, and nutrient content. Toxics 2024, 12, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fedeli, R.; Mazza, I.; Perini, C.; Salerni, E.; Loppi, S. New frontiers in the cultivation of edible fungi: The application of biostimulants enhances the nutritional characteristics of Pleurotus eryngii (DC.) quél. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Carullo, G.; Borghini, F.; Fusi, F.; Saponara, S.; Fontana, A.; Pozzetti, L.; Fedeli, R.; Panti, A.; Gorelli, B.; Aquino, G.; et al. Traceability and authentication in agri-food production: A multivariate approach to the characterization of the Italian food excellence elephant garlic (Allium ampeloprasum L.), a vasoactive nutraceutical. Food Chem. 2024, 444, 138684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Olympus Corporation. X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer; Olympus Corporation: Waltham, MA, USA, 2025; Available online: https://www.olympus-europa.com/company/country-home/ (accessed on 24 September 2025).
  58. Fedeli, R.; Di Lella, L.A.; Loppi, S. Suitability of XRF for routine analysis of multi-elemental composition: A multi-standard verification. Methods Protoc. 2024, 7, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fedeli, R.; Ranzato, E.; Martinotti, S.; Basilicata, M.G.; Marotta, L.; Fava, M.; Campiani, G. Unveiling Wound Healing Properties of Biostimulated Walnut Kernel Extracts via Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition: Switching a Nutritional Matrix into a Therapeutic Remedy. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2025; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 12 October 2025).
  61. Baker, N.R. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 89–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Maxwell, K.; Johnson, G.N. Chlorophyll fluorescence—A practical guide. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Strasser, R.J.; Tsimilli-Michael, M.; Srivastava, A. Analysis of the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. In Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 321–362. [Google Scholar]
  64. Fedeli, R.; Loppi, S.; Cruz, C.; Munzi, S. Evaluating seawater and wood distillate for sustainable hydroponic cultivation. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhou, H.; Fu, K.; Shen, Y.; Li, R.; Su, Y.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, N. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of wood vinegar-induced stress response against tomato Fusarium wilt disease. Plants 2024, 13, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fedeli, R.; Marotta, L.; Frattaruolo, L.; Panti, A.; Carullo, G.; Fusi, F.; Loppi, S. Nutritionally enriched tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) grown with wood distillate: Chemical and biological characterization for quality assessment. J. Food Sci. 2023, 88, 5324–5338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fincheira, P.; Quiroz, A. Microbial volatiles as plant growth inducers. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 208, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kanchiswamy, C.N.; Malnoy, M.; Maffei, M.E. Chemical diversity of microbial volatiles and their potential for plant growth and productivity. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ryu, C.M.; Farag, M.A.; Hu, C.H.; Reddy, M.S.; Wei, H.X.; Paré, P.W.; Kloepper, J.W. Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 4927–4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Calabrese, E.J.; Baldwin, L.A. Hormesis: The dose-response revolution. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2003, 43, 175–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kim, T.H.; Böhmer, M.; Hu, H.; Nishimura, N.; Schroeder, J.I. Guard cell signal transduction network: Advances in understanding abscisic acid, CO2, and Ca2+ signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 561–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Flexas, J.; Medrano, H. Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Ann. Bot. 2002, 89, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kim, J.M.; To, T.K.; Matsui, A.; Tanoi, K.; Kobayashi, N.I.; Matsuda, F.; Seki, M. Acetate-mediated drought survival. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 17097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Roelfsema, M.R.G.; Hedrich, R. In the light of stomatal opening: New insights into ‘the Watergate’. New Phytol. 2005, 167, 665–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Niinemets, Ü.; Reichstein, M. Controls on the emission of plant volatiles through stomata: Differential sensitivity of emission rates to stomatal closure explained. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2003, 108, D7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Qi, X.F.; Wang, X.H.; Wang, Q.; Li, M.; Ma, L.J.; Li, Y.Y.; Wang, L. Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, endogenous hormones and organic acid synergistic regulation in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.) Under elevated CO2. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2021, 19, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Farquhar, G.D.; Sharkey, T.D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1982, 33, 317–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Flexas, J.; Bota, J.; Cifre, J.; Escalona, J.M.; Galmés, J.; Gulías, J.; Medrano, H. Understanding down-regulation of photosynthesis under water stress: Future prospects and searching for physiological tools for irrigation management. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2004, 144, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. De Salvo, R.; Fedeli, R.; Carleo, A.; Bini, L.; Loppi, S.; Bianchi, L. Soil Drenching with Wood Distillate Modifies the Nutritional Properties of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Seeds by Increasing the Protein Content and Inducing Targeted Changes in the Proteomic Profile. Plants 2025, 14, 2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhou, H.; Zhang, N.; Mu, L.; Gao, L.; Bao, L.; Tang, C. New enlightenment on the regulatory effects of acids and phenolic compounds in wood vinegar, a by-product of biomass pyrolysis, on tomato production. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1538998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dixon, R.A.; Paiva, N.L. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 1085–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Vlot, A.C.; Dempsey, D.M.A.; Klessig, D.F. Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2009, 47, 177–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Marschner, H. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants; Academic Press: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  84. White, P.J.; Brown, P. Plant nutrition for sustainable development and global health. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kumar, S.; Rahman, M.; Bouket, A.C.; Ahadi, R.; Meena, M.; Bhupenchandra, I.; Swapnil, P. Unravelling the multifarious role of wood vinegar made from waste biomass in plant growth promotion, biotic stress tolerance, and sustainable agriculture. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2025, 185, 106851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E.; Møller, I.M.; Murphy, A. Plant Physiology and Development; Sinauer: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  87. White, P.J.; Broadley, M.R. Calcium in plants. Ann. Bot. 2003, 92, 487–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Abuelsoud, W.; Hirschmann, F.; Papenbrock, J. Sulfur metabolism and drought stress tolerance in plants. In Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants; Physiology and Biochemistry; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 227–249. [Google Scholar]
  89. Vance, C.P.; Uhde-Stone, C.; Allan, D.L. Phosphorus acquisition strategies. New Phytol. 2003, 157, 423–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biology 15 00267 g001
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the treatments.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the treatments.
Biology 15 00267 g001
Biology 15 00267 g002
Figure 2. Biometric and photosynthetic parameters (median ± error). (A). fresh weight, (B). chlorophyll content, (C). Fv/Fm, (D). PIabs. C = plants untreated with WV; F-WV = plants foliar-sprayed with 0.2% wood vinegar; VOC-WV = plants exposed to VOCs from 0.2% WV. Different letters indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between treatments.
Figure 2. Biometric and photosynthetic parameters (median ± error). (A). fresh weight, (B). chlorophyll content, (C). Fv/Fm, (D). PIabs. C = plants untreated with WV; F-WV = plants foliar-sprayed with 0.2% wood vinegar; VOC-WV = plants exposed to VOCs from 0.2% WV. Different letters indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between treatments.
Biology 15 00267 g002
Biology 15 00267 g003
Figure 3. Leaf gas exchange parameters (median ± error). (A). net CO2 assimilation rate (A), (B). transpiration rate (E), (C). intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), (D). stomatal conductance (gsw). C = plants untreated with WV; F-WV = plants foliar-sprayed with 0.2% wood vinegar; VOC-WV = plants exposed to VOCs from 0.2% wood vinegar. Different letters indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between treatments.
Figure 3. Leaf gas exchange parameters (median ± error). (A). net CO2 assimilation rate (A), (B). transpiration rate (E), (C). intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), (D). stomatal conductance (gsw). C = plants untreated with WV; F-WV = plants foliar-sprayed with 0.2% wood vinegar; VOC-WV = plants exposed to VOCs from 0.2% wood vinegar. Different letters indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between treatments.
Biology 15 00267 g003
Biology 15 00267 g004
Figure 4. Antioxidant compounds (median ± error). (A). Total polyphenol content (TPC), (B). Total flavonoid content (TFC). C = plants untreated with WV; F-WV = plants foliar-sprayed with 0.2% wood vinegar VOC-WV = plants exposed to VOCs from 0.2% wood vinegar. Different letters indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between treatments.
Figure 4. Antioxidant compounds (median ± error). (A). Total polyphenol content (TPC), (B). Total flavonoid content (TFC). C = plants untreated with WV; F-WV = plants foliar-sprayed with 0.2% wood vinegar VOC-WV = plants exposed to VOCs from 0.2% wood vinegar. Different letters indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between treatments.
Biology 15 00267 g004
Table 1. Mineral content (median ± error). C = plants untreated with WV; F-WV = plants foliar sprayed with 0.2% wood vinegar; VOC-WV = plants exposed to VOCs from 0.2% wood vinegar. Different letters indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between treatments.
Table 1. Mineral content (median ± error). C = plants untreated with WV; F-WV = plants foliar sprayed with 0.2% wood vinegar; VOC-WV = plants exposed to VOCs from 0.2% wood vinegar. Different letters indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between treatments.
CF-WVVOC-WV
Al793 ± 33872 ± 90935 ± 63
Ca7682 ± 705 b9982 ± 944 a10,031 ± 418 a
Cu3.5 ± 0.43.6 ± 0.23.2 ± 0.4
Fe94 ± 6076 ± 35123 ± 39
K29,491 ± 2055 b39,205 ± 3459 a41,151 ± 3188 a
Mn109 ± 14120 ± 9109 ± 9
P2643 ± 214 b3257 ± 331 a3952 ± 306 a
S869± 32 b1203 ± 159 a1158 ± 133 a
Zn22.4 ± 1.2 b25.8 ± 2.2 ab26.5 ± 1.0 a
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fedeli, R.; Loppi, S. Do Plants Need to Be Sprayed? New Insights into VOC-Mediated Biostimulation by Wood Vinegar. Biology 2026, 15, 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15030267

AMA Style

Fedeli R, Loppi S. Do Plants Need to Be Sprayed? New Insights into VOC-Mediated Biostimulation by Wood Vinegar. Biology. 2026; 15(3):267. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15030267

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fedeli, Riccardo, and Stefano Loppi. 2026. "Do Plants Need to Be Sprayed? New Insights into VOC-Mediated Biostimulation by Wood Vinegar" Biology 15, no. 3: 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15030267

APA Style

Fedeli, R., & Loppi, S. (2026). Do Plants Need to Be Sprayed? New Insights into VOC-Mediated Biostimulation by Wood Vinegar. Biology, 15(3), 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15030267

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop