Next Article in Journal
Timing and Amplitude of Light Exposure, Not Photoperiod, Predict Blood Lipids in Arctic Residents: A Circadian Light Hypothesis
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Oncogenic Viruses on Cancer Development: A Narrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Metabolic Responses, Uptake, and Export of Copper in Cyanobacteria

by
Jean Coutinho Oder
1,
Thamires Emidio Sateles
1,
Laila Barros de Souza
1,
Adriano Nunes-Nesi
1,
Wagner L. Araújo
1 and
Luna Alvarenga-Lucius
2,*
1
Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil
2
Institute of Biosciences, Department of Plant Physiology, University of Rostock, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2025, 14(7), 798; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070798
Submission received: 26 May 2025 / Revised: 27 June 2025 / Accepted: 29 June 2025 / Published: 1 July 2025

Simple Summary

Copper (Cu) is an essential micronutrient for cyanobacteria, participating in important cellular processes such as photosynthesis. However, at elevated concentrations, Cu becomes toxic to these organisms. This dual nature has led to the hypothesis that Cu could serve as an effective algaecide for controlling cyanobacterial blooms in aquatic environments. Cyanobacteria possess various cellular mechanisms for Cu uptake, homeostasis, and detoxification. Despite recent research efforts, many of these mechanisms remain incompletely understood, and the available results are fragmented across the literature. This review aims to compile and analyze current knowledge on the Cu uptake required for cellular function and the detoxification responses to excess environmental copper, particularly focusing on Cu extrusion mechanisms. These insights may contribute to the development of Cu-based strategies for the management of cyanobacteria blooms, as well as the use of cyanobacteria bioremediation of Cu-contaminated environments.

Abstract

Copper (Cu) is an essential micronutrient for cyanobacteria, where it functions as a cofactor in key proteins involved in photosynthesis and antioxidant defense. However, at elevated concentrations, Cu becomes toxic, exhibiting algicidal effects by disrupting metal homeostasis and competing for metal-binding sites on critical cellular proteins. Due to the considerable morphological and physiological diversity within the phylum Cyanobacteria, the thresholds for Cu deficiency or toxicity vary considerably among strains. Maintaining Cu homeostasis in cyanobacterial cells is a complex process involving multiple layers of regulation. It begins at the extracellular polysaccharide layer, involves specialized membrane-bound proteins (in the outer, plasma, and thylakoid membranes), and results in transcriptional regulation in response to intracellular Cu status. This review summarizes the current understanding of Cu uptake and efflux pathways in cyanobacteria and explores how these mechanisms contribute to maintaining cellular Cu balance. The knowledge gained may contribute to the application of cyanobacteria in bioremediation strategies and/or the targeted use of Cu in the control of harmful cyanobacterial blooms.

1. Introduction

Cyanobacteria, formerly known as blue-green algae, are a monophyletic group of oxygenic photosynthetic prokaryotes [1]. They exhibit extensive physiological and morphophysiological diversity, which enables them to colonize nearly all photic environments on Earth [2]. Due to their metabolic versatility, cyanobacteria have gained attention for their potential in various biotechnological and industrial applications, including the production of biodiesel and biofertilizers [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Cyanobacterial strains also exhibit variable yet consistent bioabsorption and bioaccumulation capacities for a range of toxic metals, including copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), zinc (Zn), chromium (Cr), and manganese (Mn) [10]. These traits make them promising candidates for targeted bioremediation and the removal of organic and inorganic contaminants from wastewater [7,10,11,12]. Furthermore, the potential to repurpose cyanobacterial biomass for industrial applications creates new opportunities for integrated waste treatment in effluents from sugarcane processing [13], dairy industries [14], rice [15], maize [16], paper [17], and textiles [8].
Cu is an essential micronutrient for cyanobacteria, playing a critical role in fundamental metabolic pathways. It acts as a cofactor in several enzymes involved in redox reactions, notably in photosynthesis, where it is crucial for the proper function of plastocyanin (PC) [18]. In the respiratory chain, Cu is a critical component of cytochrome c oxidase enzyme, which catalyzes the reduction of oxygen to water [19]. In addition, Cu contributes to the oxidative stress response through its association with Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn-SOD), which catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide radicals into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide [20]. However, despite its biological importance, at elevated concentrations, Cu can exert toxic effects on cyanobacteria [21]. Anthropogenic activities, including mining and paint manufacturing, have significantly increased Cu levels in aquatic environments [22]. At elevated concentrations, Cu competes with other ions, particularly iron, for binding sites within the context of Fe-S containing enzymes. This can result in metabolic imbalances and subsequent cellular stress [11].
Here, we explored the molecular and physiological mechanisms underlying Cu uptake and response in cyanobacteria, with an emphasis on their potential contributions and applications in environmental remediation strategies.

2. Cu Essentiality, Deficiency, and Toxicity

Given its classification as a micronutrient, minimal quantities of Cu are required for its supply to cyanobacteria. Due to their important role in redox reactions, the absence of Cu can result in deficiencies in processes such as photosynthesis and cellular respiration in cyanobacterial cells. Furthermore, there is the possibility that it will influence environmental responses due to the disruption of the homeostasis of this element.
To date, the scarcity of research in this area is evident, with the majority of studies conducted on Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. For example, it was observed that in the absence of Cu, the strain reduced the expression of PC, which contains Cu ions coordinated by amino acid residues, and increased the expression of cytochrome c6 (Cyt c6), which contains iron [23]. This substitution enables the cell to sustain electron transport under copper-deficient conditions by utilizing cytochrome c6 as an alternative electron donor to photosystem I (PSI), thereby supporting growth rates comparable to those observed under copper-sufficient conditions. Researchers further explored the regulation of the PC/Cyt c6 switch in the absence of Cu in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, which is regulated by the BlaI/CopY-family transcription factor PetR and the BlaR-membrane protease PetP [24]. PetP is a Cu-sensing membrane protease that regulates PetR. In the presence of Cu, PetP degrades PetR, thereby enabling elevated expression of PC. Conversely, in the absence of Cu, PetP becomes inactive and can no longer degrade PetR. Thus, PetR represses the expression of petE (the gene encoding PC) under limiting Cu, while simultaneously activating the transcription of petJ (the gene encoding Cyt c6) [24]. By varying its concentration, copper can be used in metal-regulated promoters responsive to this element to induce or repress the expression of specific genes, making it a highly functional tool for research routines. In addition to the “pet” system in cyanobacteria, copper-inducible genes have also been described in fungi and Escherichia coli [24,25,26]. While metal-regulated promoters are theoretically effective, practical applications often encounter challenges due to unintended basal expression. Even in media lacking added copper, trace amounts of copper can be present from residuals on glassware or in filtered water, leading to partial activation of the petE promoter. This phenomenon has been documented in various studies, highlighting the difficulty in achieving tight control over gene expression using this system. To address these challenges, researchers have employed strategies such as acid-washing glassware to eliminate residual copper and incorporating chelators, such as bathocuproinedisulfonic acid disodium salt, to sequester trace amounts of copper in the growth medium. In summary, while the petE promoter offers a copper-inducible mechanism for gene expression in cyanobacteria, careful consideration of experimental conditions and the implementation of appropriate control measures are essential to minimize unintended basal expression and ensure precise regulation [27].
The absence of literature on suboptimal doses of Cu indicates a potential area for further exploration in the cyanobacterial field. Moreover, the copper concentrations employed in various culture media may offer valuable insights into optimizing the use of suboptimal levels for growth and metabolic activity. The BG-11 medium, the most well-known and commonly used medium for culturing freshwater, non-nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria, contains 0.316 μM of CuSO4·5H2O [28]. The ASN-III medium, utilized to replicate the marine environment for cyanobacteria from such environments, also contains 0.316 μM of CuSO4·5H2O [29]. The Z8 medium, which does not contain NaCl and is ideal for cyanobacteria that do not tolerate salinity, contains 5.01 µM of CuSO4·5H2O [30]. Finally, the Zarrouk medium, an alkaline medium used as a standard for Arthrospira platensis to promote growth and maximum biomass gain, also contains 0.316 μM of CuSO4·5H2O [31].
In the strain Leptolyngbya sp. GUEco1015, the capacity for Cu bioaccumulation and documented the consequences of elevated Cu doses [21]. The LC50 of Cu2+ for this strain was determined to be 14.17 μM (0.9 ppm). Excessive doses of 23.6 µM (1.5 ppm) led to severe chlorosis, filament disorganization, and a twofold increase in cellular H2O2 and MDA concentrations when compared to control (standard BG-11) [21]. Moreover, the effects of a 10 µM Cu2+ concentration on the cyanobacterial strain Nostoc muscorum was investigated with similar outcomes, including chlorosis and filament disorganization. This treatment led to an approximate 38% reduction in chlorophyll content, a 20% decrease in total protein content, and a 40% decline in photosynthetic potential [32]. A decrease in total protein content and an increase in free amino acids were also observed in Spirulina platensis. In a separate study, it was found that exposure to 7.87 µM, 15.74 µM, and 47.21 µM (0.5, 1.0, and 3.0 mg) of Cu2+ resulted in a continuous decline in total protein content (from 493.63 mg/L in the control to 182.47 mg/L at 3.0 mg) and a steady increase in free amino acids (~12.5 mg/L in the control to ~30 mg/L at 3.0 mg) [33]. Finally, in the model strain Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, a 3 µM Cu2+ concentration was able to induce a fivefold increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [34].
Advancing technologies for managing harmful cyanobacterial blooms require a detailed understanding of copper’s species-specific effects. Microcystis aeruginosa morphology significantly influences copper tolerance: unicellular strains exhibited over 95% loss in viability after 24 h of exposure to 3.93 µM (0.25 mg/L) Cu2+, while colonial strains retained higher viability under all conditions [35]. Previous findings on M. aeruginosa indicate that unicellular strains are significantly more sensitive to copper than many microalgae [36], reinforcing the potential of copper as a targeted control agent for this harmful species. However, copper-based compounds such as copper sulfate can induce the release of intracellular cyanotoxins, particularly microcystins, into the water column during cell lysis. Although effective in reducing biomass, this treatment does not eliminate toxin risk and may exacerbate water quality concerns [37]. Consequently, integrated management strategies are needed—ones that both control blooms and mitigate toxin release. Alternatives to copper include biological controls (e.g., algicidal bacteria, zooplankton grazers) [38], nutrient reduction (particularly phosphorus and nitrogen), and physical interventions (e.g., ultrasonic treatment, artificial mixing). For toxin removal, effective methods include activated carbon adsorption [39], advanced oxidation processes (e.g., ozonation, UV/H2O2) [40,41], and membrane filtration (e.g., nanofiltration, reverse osmosis) [42]. Combining these approaches provides a more sustainable and environmentally responsible framework for cyanobacterial bloom management.
In summary, while the toxic effects of Cu on cyanobacterial strains are broadly similar, the concentration threshold that elicits these effects varies considerably. This variability reflects the substantial morphological and metabolic diversity within the cyanobacterial phylum, making it likely that different strains exhibit distinct responses to equivalent Cu concentration. As such, determining a specific LD50 for each strain may be required to accurately characterize their sensitivity to Cu toxicity. Importantly, this review highlights an apparent trend of increased Cu sensitivity among unicellular strains compared to filamentous ones. Evidence suggests that Cu concentrations up to 10 µM can induce pronounced metabolic disruptions in unicellular cyanobacteria, whereas filamentous strains typically require higher concentrations to exhibit comparable physiological impairments.

3. Cu Transport: Extracellular to Intracellular Space

In Nostoc calcicola, it was observed that the absorption process of Cu2+ occurs in two phases: (1) a rapid binding of ions to the cell wall through charge interactions (around 10 min) and (2) the slower entry of ions into the intracellular environment (40 min to 1 h) [43]. The uptake and transport of ions across membranes are enhanced in photosynthetically active cells once they are exposed to light, as it has been proven that the ATP responsible for Cu transport is derived from PSII reactions [43].
Porins are well known for facilitating the passive transport of Cu2+ ions from the extracellular environment into the periplasmic space in bacteria [44]. The outer membrane of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 contains several porin-like proteins—such as Slr1841, Slr1908, and Slr0042—that are primarily involved in iron transport but also exhibit high permeability to other inorganic ions. This suggests that ions such as Cu2+ may gain rapid access to the periplasm via these protein channels [45]. These porins possess an N-terminal S-layer homology (SLH) domain, which anchors them to the polysaccharide component of the peptidoglycan layer, and a C-terminal transmembrane domain predicted to form a β-barrel structure [45,46]. The OprB domain of bacterial porins was originally identified as a sugar-specific domain involved in the recognition and transport of carbohydrates [47]. However, in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120, seven mutants lacking different OprB-domain-containing porins exhibited increased resistance to elevated copper concentrations, suggesting that many of these putative porins participate in copper transport [48]. Additionally, the OprB domain has also been shown to mediate the selective uptake of carbohydrates from the extracellular environment into the periplasm in cyanobacteria [49,50].
Copper may also enter cyanobacterial cells as Cu2+ via competitive interactions with other metal transport systems, particularly ABC-type metal transporters such as the Zn/Mn transporters (ZnuABC/MntABC) (Figure 1). The Zn transport system is well-characterized and relatively conserved across various bacterial taxa and has been extensively studied in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 [51,52]. Upon reaching the periplasm, Cu2+ can bind to the high-affinity periplasmic binding protein ZnuA, which subsequently delivers the ion to the inner membrane complex ZnuBC for translocation into the cytoplasm [51]. In both Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and Escherichia coli, Cu2+ has been shown to bind to the histidine-rich region of ZnuA, indicating at least one specific periplasmic interaction between Cu2+ and Zn-transporting proteins [51,53,54]. The transfer of Cu2+ from ZnuA to the membrane permease ZnuB is necessary for its translocation into the cytosol, while the ATPase subunit ZnuC supplies the energy required for active transport [55]. Furthermore, gene expression data from Nostoc punctiforme have shown that this operon is responsive to treatments with copper and other metals [56], suggesting that the Znu system may have a broader substrate range beyond zinc alone. The MntABC system functions via a binding and transport mechanism analogous to that of ZnuABC, as has been previously reported and studied in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 [57]. Although studies quantifying the interaction between Cu2+ and the MntABC system in cyanobacteria are currently lacking, copper uptake via this transporter has been demonstrated in Staphylococcus aureus and Neisseria gonorrhoeae [58,59].
CtaA is the only well-characterized protein known to exclusively mediate the import of Cu2+ from the periplasmic space across the plasma membrane into cyanobacterial cells [60]. It belongs to the P1B-type ATPase family, which includes specialized transporters responsible for the translocation of transition metal ions such as Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, and other essential or potentially toxic heavy metals [61]. The structure of CtaA typically features six to eight membrane-spanning α-helices that form dedicated channels for metal ion transport. Additionally, it contains conserved residues—primarily histidines—in the N-terminal region that coordinate metal ions, functioning as sensors or facilitators of transport, along with ATP-binding domains that provide the energy required for active transport [62,63,64]. Although some studies propose that CtaA primarily functions in the efflux of Cu2+ into the periplasm [65], other evidence—including findings from cyanobacterial systems—suggests that CtaA also contributes to copper uptake, rather than serving solely in detoxification through export. Notably, mutants lacking CtaA typically exhibit increased resistance to excess copper, further supporting its role in copper homeostasis [52,66,67].
In addition to the CtaA protein, the FutABC iron transport system has also been implicated in copper translocation into the cytoplasm (Figure 1) [68]. This system plays a dual role in maintaining both iron and copper homeostasis in cyanobacterial cells. Primarily responsible for the uptake of iron from the periplasm into the cytoplasm, the FutABC transporter is embedded in the plasma membrane and actively contributes to regulating the intracellular Fe/Cu balance. The system comprises several components: FutA1 and FutA2, which bind iron in the periplasm; FutB, which forms the transmembrane channel; and FutC, an ATPase that provides energy for active transport [69]. In Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, mutants lacking the futA2 gene show copper accumulation in the periplasm, suggesting a role for FutA2 in copper handling [70]. Additionally, expression of futB is modulated in response to elevated copper levels in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120, further supporting the involvement of this system in copper homeostasis [71].
The cytoplasmic space is typically a highly reducing environment, where metal ions such as Cu2+ are readily reduced to the Cu+ form by redox-active molecules like glutathione and thioredoxins [72,73]. Once reduced, Cu+ binds to the metallochaperone Atx1, which facilitates its targeted delivery to the P1B-type ATPase complex PacS. PacS is responsible for transporting Cu+ into the thylakoid lumen, where it is essential for the proper functioning of copper-dependent proteins such as plastocyanin [11,60]. Atx1 contains a characteristic ferredoxin-like βαββαβ fold, featuring a conserved CXXC motif—comprising two cysteine residues separated by two variable amino acids—that mediates Cu+ binding. The β-α-β-β-α-β structure stabilizes the protein core and provides an optimal coordination environment for metal ion interaction, while the CXXC motif forms covalent bonds with Cu+, ensuring specific and efficient metal transfer [74,75,76]. Notably, studies in Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 have shown that Atx1 interacts with the amino-terminal domains of both PacS and CtaA, suggesting that it functions as a copper shuttle between these two ATPases. Additionally, evidence indicates that Atx1 may positively regulate the function of Cu-dependent proteins within the thylakoid, further underscoring its critical role in intracellular copper trafficking and homeostasis [52].
A final factor that may impact Cu uptake by cyanobacterial cells is the presence of metallothioneins in the cytoplasm and their interaction with Cu ions. Metallothioneins are metal-binding peptides rich in cysteine and capable of binding a wide range of metal ions [77,78]. Although the classical role of these peptides is the sequestration of metal ions in general to prevent their excess from becoming harmful [79], it has been demonstrated in cyanobacteria that they may also participate in Cu uptake, probably in a “secondary” manner by sequestering free Cu in the cytoplasm and thus creating a favorable gradient for the entry of more Cu into the cell [80].

4. Response to Excess Cu

As elevated Cu levels are toxic to cyanobacterial cells, they have evolved active Cu extrusion systems whose expression is tightly regulated by intracellular Cu concentrations [34]. In Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803—the most extensively studied model—the accumulation of excess cytoplasmic Cu2+ activates a two-component regulatory system known as CopRS, which is part of the Resistance-Nodulation-Cell Division (RND) family. This system plays a central role in conferring Cu resistance by facilitating the export of toxic metal ions [34,60]. CopS, a membrane-associated histidine kinase (HK), serves as the sensor component of this system. It is localized in both the plasma and thylakoid membranes and binds Cu ions with high affinity [55]. Studies in Escherichia coli K-12 suggest that CopS possesses two transmembrane domains with peptide loops extending into the periplasm, allowing it to detect Cu throughout the intermembrane space [81]. Upon sensing elevated Cu levels, CopS is believed to autophosphorylate and subsequently transfer the phosphate group to its cognate response regulator, CopR. Phosphorylated CopR then functions as a transcriptional activator of Cu homeostasis genes [81,82,83]. This activation leads to the upregulation of two key operons involved in copper resistance: copMRS and copBAC, both of which are directly linked to Cu detoxification and export.
In Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, the copMRS and copBAC operons are located on the native plasmid pSYSX, with the copMRS genes also found in the chromosomal genome [84]. Studies have shown that mutants lacking the copR gene exhibit reduced expression of these operons and increased sensitivity to copper stress [34]. As noted earlier, the transcriptional activator CopR enhances expression of both the copRS system and the copM gene [34]. CopM is a metallochaperone identified in the cytosolic, periplasmic, and extracellular compartments of cyanobacterial cells, capable of binding both Cu2+ and Cu+. It is believed to play a protective role against copper toxicity by immobilizing Cu ions, particularly in the extracellular environment [34]. Structural analysis revealed that CopM is a dimeric periplasmic protein composed of six α-helices arranged into a helical bundle [85]. This structure enables the protein to bind multiple Cu ions via its numerous methionine and histidine residues, which serve as coordination sites [86]. Although the mechanism of CopM export was previously unknown, recent findings have shown that CopM is present in extracellular vesicles isolated from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, where it interacts with Cu ions, suggesting a vesicle-mediated pathway for extracellular Cu sequestration (Figure 2) [87].
A higher intracellular concentration of Cu is required for CopR to activate the transcription of the copBAC operon compared to the concentration required to enhance copMRS expression [34]. The copBAC operon encodes a heavy metal efflux system, the CopBAC, classified as an HME-RND (heavy metal efflux/Resistance-Nodulation-Cell Division) type system [34]. This complex span both the plasma and outer membranes of cyanobacterial cells, extending across the periplasmic space [83].
Although detailed subcellular localization studies of each CopBAC subunit are limited, research on Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 has identified CopB as a membrane fusion protein located in the periplasm, while CopA is a P-type ATPase RND associated with the inner membrane [84]. While not fully elucidated in cyanobacteria, CopC is recognized as a periplasmic Cu-binding protein with distinct binding sites for both Cu+ and Cu2+, likely involved in shuttling Cu to the efflux channel [88]. Comparative studies of Cu resistance mechanisms in other bacterial species have contributed to our understanding of such systems; however, the degree of homology between these bacterial and cyanobacterial proteins involved in Cu transport and resistance remains unclear and warrants further investigation [89,90,91,92,93].
The components responsible for Cu response and efflux discussed in this section have been well characterized only in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 within the Cyanobacteria phylum, but it was possible to demonstrate that CopA (and probably CopB and CopC) is present throughout the phylum (Figure 3). Transcripts highly similar to copM have already been identified in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 [94]. Other studies have shown that the CopR, CopS, and CopM components also exist in other bacterial phyla [86,95,96]. Therefore, while the presence of all these proteins requires experimental verification in other cyanobacterial strains, it is plausible that this system is conserved throughout the group.
Another system poorly studied in cyanobacteria but likely widespread in the phylum is the RND Cu and silver efflux system CusCBA (Figure 2), which is well described in the literature for E. coli [97]. The CusA protein is a proton-motive-force-dependent inner membrane RND efflux pump. CusC is a trimeric outer membrane porin that allows Cu to be directly expelled into the extracellular medium, while CusB is a hexameric membrane fusion protein capable of forming a structural bridge between CusA and CusC [98]. Studies in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 have recorded the expression of genes homologous to cusA and cusB from E. coli, indicating that this system may also be present and play a role in Cu homeostasis in cyanobacterial cells [94,99,100].
Metallothioneins, already briefly discussed in the previous section, also play the classical role of Cu detoxification in cyanobacteria. Their binding to metal ions helps the cell reduce the excess of free ions. An example of a metallothionein in cyanobacteria is SmtA, which is composed of 56 amino acids. In Synechococcus PCC 7942, its expression is upregulated in response to excess Zn, Cd, and Cu, showing the highest responsiveness to elevated Zn levels [52].

5. Exopolysaccharides (EPS) Interactions

EPS function as a pivotal interface between cyanobacterial cells and their surrounding environment. While glucose predominates as the sugar-building block in EPS, other sugars, including rhamnose, xylose, arabinose, fucose, mannose, and uronic acids, have also been observed in certain cyanobacterial strains [101]. The classification of EPS is typically performed into two categories: capsular exopolysaccharides (CPS) and released exopolysaccharides (RPS). CPS have been observed to maintain a tight association with the cell surface, manifesting as sheaths, capsules, or slime layers. In contrast, RPS are known to be excreted into the extracellular space as free-floating polymers [102]. It has been demonstrated that both CPS and RPS exhibit distinct chemical and morphological characteristics. However, RPS has garnered greater industrial interest due to their larger production yields and greater independence in environmental interactions, facilitating metal biosorption [103,104,105,106,107].
It has been demonstrated that EPS are implicated in several essential biological functions, including the provision of structural integrity, facilitation of motility, and protection from various abiotic stresses [101]. The matrix of EPS is rich in charged functional groups, including carboxyl and hydroxyl side chains from deoxy-sugars, sulfate, and uronic acids [108]. This property enables EPS to interact with cationic species in solution. This interaction suggests that EPS may serve as a site for metal ion sequestration [109]. The interaction of EPS from various strains (whether bound to cells or isolated) with a wide range of environmental metal ions, including Cu, Pb, As, Cd, Cr, and Zn, has been shown to result in a significant reduction of these ions in the environment [110]. The overall negative charge of cyanobacterial EPS is particularly significant for the chelation of essential metal cations, which are present in trace amounts in the environment, as well as for mitigating direct contact with toxic heavy metals [103,108]. It has been demonstrated that an increase in Cu2+ concentrations can stimulate the production of EPS in Nostoc spongiaeforme [111] and substantial Cu2+ removal via EPS in Cyanospira capsulata and Nostoc PCC 7936 [112]. Furthermore, Microcystis aeruginosa exhibits a high affinity for Cu2+ ion adsorption, primarily through complexation [105].
Cu has been found to be one of the most efficiently adsorbed metals by cyanobacteria, surpassing other metal ions such as Ni and Zn [107]. Cu2+ ions have been observed to form complexes with anions such as CO32−, OH, and Cl, as well as organic complexes with ligands including thiols, EPS, and humic substances [113]. The phenomenon of biosorption is characterized by the rapid, reversible, and passive binding of metal ions to functional groups present on the EPS surface, thereby protecting the cells themselves from the high concentration of metal ions [107]. However, it is important to note that the dynamics of the Cu-EPS interaction may be modified upon interaction with Cu2+ or other metal ions. For instance, alterations in pH have been demonstrated to influence the adsorption capacity and the specific binding sites between Cu2+ and EPS, as evidenced by studies involving EPS extracted from sludge in wastewater treatment [114].

6. Phylogeny and Structure of the CopA Protein

The structure of the CopA protein acting as P-type ATPase in Cu transport is probably the best studied among all the systems discussed in this review, as its primary structure is the most represented in online repositories, such as the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information), and spans a diverse range of prokaryotic groups.
The three-dimensional structure of the protein revealed that CopA is slightly smaller in the cyanobacterial phylum compared to other prokaryotic groups (Figure 4). This is because in cyanobacteria, CopA presents one Heavy-Metal-Associated domain and a P-type ATPase Cu-like domain, while in other organisms, CopA contains two Heavy-Metal-Associated domains and one P-type ATPase Cu-like domain. However, whether this is a unique and universal characteristic of the cyanobacterial phylum still requires further investigation.
The phylogeny of the P-type ATPase Cu-like domain of the CopA protein showed a clear division into three branches: cyanobacteria, other prokaryotes, and Archaeoglobus (Archaea) (Figure 3). This division is consistent with the phylogenetic history of these groups. Moreover, within the cyanobacterial branch, the phylogeny appeared to follow a pattern similar to that observed in trees based on the 16S rRNA molecular clock, indicating that this system is vertically distributed throughout the phylum as an ancient Cu homeostasis mechanism. This view is further supported by its well-conserved structure.

7. Conclusions

This review underscores the critical role of copper (Cu) homeostasis in cyanobacterial physiology, with a focus on the molecular components that mediate Cu uptake—from the extracellular environment to the thylakoid lumen—and Cu efflux under conditions of excess. We highlight key proteins involved in these pathways, their subcellular localization, and the genes regulated in response to both Cu deficiency and toxicity. Particular attention is given to the potential involvement of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in Cu binding and detoxification. These insights provide a more integrated understanding of the complex Cu transport network in cyanobacteria, offering a foundation for future applications in bioremediation and the development of Cu-based strategies for controlling harmful cyanobacterial blooms in aquatic ecosystems.
Additionally, we identified key gaps in current knowledge, including the need for further investigation into Cu limitation and the effects of sub-toxic concentrations, as well as the functional characterization of poorly studied systems such as CusABC. Our phylogenetic and structural analysis of the CopA protein reveals notable findings, including the widespread presence of the CopBAC system across the phylum and the unique feature of cyanobacterial CopA harboring a single functional metal-binding domain—contrasting with the dual-domain structure observed in many other prokaryotes. Importantly, here, we compiled data from a wide range of cyanobacterial strains beyond the commonly used model organisms, aiming to offer a more comprehensive overview of Cu homeostasis across the phylum.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.O.; investigation, J.C.O. and L.A.-L.; resources and data curation, L.A.-L., W.L.A., A.N.-N., L.B.d.S. and T.E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.O.; writing—review and editing, J.C.O., L.A.-L., W.L.A., A.N.-N., L.B.d.S. and T.E.S.; supervision, L.A.-L. and W.L.A.; funding acquisition, L.A.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support was provided by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq-Brazil) [Grant 151020/2024-8; 407276/2021-1 and 406455/2022-8] and the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG-Brazil, [Grants CRA—RED-00060-23, and APQ-01942-22]. Research fellowships granted by CNPq to A.N.-N., W.L.A., and L.A.-L. are gratefully acknowledged. Open access funding was obtained by the Institüt für Biowissenschaften, Abteilung Pflanzenphysiologie, Universität Rostock.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Marcelo Gomes Marçal Vieira Vaz and João Antônio Batista de Siqueira for their insights in the development of Figure 3 and Figure 4, Ana Luiza Viana Silva for her assistance in the revision of the text, and the Department of Plant Physiology, University of Rostock, for funding and contribution.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
Cdcadmium
CPScapsular exopolysaccharides
Crchromium
Cucopper
Cyt c6cytochrome c6
EPSexopolysaccharides
Fe-Siron-sulfur
Hgmercury
HKhistidine kinase
LC50lethal concentration 50
Mnmanganese
Ninickel
NCBINational Center for Biotechnology Information
PCplastocyanin
Pblead
PSIphotosystem I
PSIIphotosystem II
RNDNodulation-Cell Division
ROSreactive oxygen species
RPSreleased exopolysaccharides
SLHS-layer Homologous
SODsuperoxide dismutase
Znzinc

References

  1. Sinha, R.P.; Häder, D.-P. UV-protectants in cyanobacteria. Plant Sci. 2008, 174, 278–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. De Los Ríos, A.; Grube, M.; Sancho, L.G.; Ascaso, C. Ultrastructural and genetic characteristics of endolithic cyanobacterial biofilms colonizing Antarctic granite rocks. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 59, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chisti, Y. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 294–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chittora, D.; Meena, M.; Barupal, T.; Swapnil, P.; Sharma, K. Cyanobacteria as a source of biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2020, 22, 100737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Żymańczyk-Duda, E.; Samson, S.O.; Brzezińska-Rodak, M.; Klimek-Ochab, M. Versatile applications of cyanobacteria in biotechnology. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, H.; Hu, C.; Jia, X.; Xu, Y.; Wu, C.; Chen, L.; Wang, F. Characteristics of γ-hexachlorocyclohexane biodegradation by a nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium, Anabaena azotica. J. Appl. Phycol. 2012, 24, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cepoi, L.; Donţu, N.; Şalaru, V.; Şalaru, V. Removal of organic pollutants from wastewater by cyanobacteria. In Cyanobacteria for Bioremediation of Wastewaters; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 27–43. [Google Scholar]
  8. Parikh, A.; Madamwar, D. Textile dye decolorization using cyanobacteria. Biotechnol. Lett. 2005, 27, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tiwari, A.K.; Tiwari, B.S. Cyanotherapeutics: An emerging field for future drug discovery. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 1, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kalita, N.; Baruah, P.P. Cyanobacteria as a potent platform for heavy metals biosorption: Uptake, responses and removal mechanisms. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2023, 11, 100349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huertas, M.J.; López-Maury, L.; Giner-Lamia, J.; Sánchez-Riego, A.M.; Florencio, F.J. Metals in cyanobacteria: Analysis of the copper, nickel, cobalt and arsenic homeostasis mechanisms. Life 2014, 4, 865–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chevalier, P.; Proulx, D.; Lessard, P.; Vincent, W.F.; De la Noüe, J. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal by high latitude mat-forming cyanobacteria for potential use in tertiary wastewater treatment. J. Appl. Phycol. 2000, 12, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lynch, F.; Santana-Sánchez, A.; Jämsä, M.; Sivonen, K.; Aro, E.M.; Allahverdiyeva, Y. Screening native isolates of cyanobacteria and a green alga for integrated wastewater treatment, biomass accumulation and neutral lipid production. Algal Res. 2015, 11, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kabariya, J.H.; Ramani, V.M. Dairy wastewater treatment by cyanobacteria for removal of nutrients with extraction of high value compounds from biomass. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018, 7, 1527–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mukherjee, C.; Chowdhury, R.; Sutradhar, T.; Begam, M.; Ghosh, S.M.; Basak, S.K.; Ray, K. Parboiled rice effluent: A wastewater niche for microalgae and cyanobacteria with growth coupled to comprehensive remediation and phosphorus biofertilization. Algal Res. 2016, 19, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Del Valle-Real, M.; Franco-Morgado, M.; García-García, R.; Guardado-Félix, D.; Gutiérrez-Uribe, J.A. Wastewater from maize lime-cooking as growth media for alkaliphilic microalgae–cyanobacteria consortium to reduce chemical oxygen demand and produce biomass with high protein content. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 58, 6775–6783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nagasathya, A.; Thajuddin, N. Decolourization of paper mill effluent using hypersaline cyanobacterium. Sci. Alert 2008, 2, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Blaby-Haas, C.E. Cyanobacteria provide a new paradigm in the regulation of cofactor dependence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2100281118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kong, L. Copper requirement and acquisition by marine microalgae. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Boden, J.S.; Konhauser, K.O.; Robbins, L.J.; Sánchez-Baracaldo, P. Timing the evolution of antioxidant enzymes in cyanobacteria. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kalita, N.; Baruah, P.P. Copper removal efficacy and stress tolerance potential of Leptolyngbya sp. GUEco1015. Heliyon 2024, 10, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. National Research Council, Commission on Life Sciences, Board on Environmental Studies; Committee on Copper in Drinking Water. Copper in Drinking Water. 2000. Available online: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/9782/copper-in-drinking-water (accessed on 17 January 2025).
  23. Castielli, O.; De la Cerda, B.; Navarro, J.A.; Hervás, M.; De la Rosa, M.A. Proteomic analyses of the response of cyanobacteria to different stress conditions. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 1753–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. García-Cañas, R.; Giner-Lamia, J.; Florencio, F.J.; López-Maury, L. A protease-mediated mechanism regulates the cytochrome c 6/plastocyanin switch in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2017898118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bellemare, D.R.; Sanschagrin, M.; Beaudoin, J.; Labbé, S. A novel copper-regulated promoter system for expression of heterologous proteins in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Gene 2001, 273, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yamamoto, K.; Ishihama, A. Characterization of copper-inducible promoters regulated by CpxA/CpxR in Escherichia coli. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2006, 70, 1688–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mager, M.; Pineda Hernandez, H.; Brandenburg, F.; López-Maury, L.; McCormick, A.J.; Nürnberg, D.J.; Orthwein, T.; Russo, D.A.; Victoria, J.A.; Wang, X.; et al. Interlaboratory reproducibility in growth and reporter expression in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. ACS Synth. Biol. 2023, 12, 1823–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rippka, R.; Deruelles, J.; Waterbury, J.B.; Herdman, M.; Stanier, R.Y. Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. Microbiology 1979, 111, 1–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Waterbury, J.B.; Stanier, R.Y. Isolation and growth of cyanobacteria from marine and hypersaline environments. In The prokaryotes: A Handbook on Habitats, Isolation, and Identification of Bacteria; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1981; pp. 221–223. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kotai, J. Instruction of preparations of modified nutrient medium Z8 for algae. Norw. Inst. Water Res. Blind. Oslo. 1972, 15, 32–39. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zarrouk, C. Contribution a L’etude D’une Cyanophycee. Influence de Divers Facteurs Physiques et Chimiques sur la Croissance et la Photosynthese de Spirulina mixima. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Paris, Paris, France, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ahad, R.I.A.; Syiem, M.B. Copper and cadmium-induced toxicity on the cyanobacterium Nostoc muscorum Meg 1: A comparative study. EurAsian J. Biosci. 2018, 12, 333–345. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mohy El Din, S. Effect of copper and lead on growth and some metabolic activities of cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis (Nordstedt). Egypt. J. Bot. 2017, 57, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Giner-Lamia, J.; López-Maury, L.; Florencio, F.J. Global transcriptional profiles of the copper responses in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, Z.X.; Gan, N.Q.; Huang, Q.; Song, L.R. Response of Microcystis to copper stress–do phenotypes of Microcystis make a difference in stress tolerance? Environ. Pollut. 2007, 147, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, H.; Ebenezer, V.; Ki, J. Photosynthetic and biochemical responses of the freshwater green algae Closterium ehrenbergii Meneghini (Conjugatophyceae) exposed to the metal coppers and its implication for toxicity testing. J. Microbiol. 2018, 56, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Greenfield, D.I.; Duquette, A.; Goodson, A.; Keppler, C.J.; Williams, S.H.; Brock, L.M.; Stackley, K.D.; White, D.; Wilde, S.B. The effects of three chemical algaecides on cell numbers and toxin content of the cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa and Anabaenopsis sp. Environ. Manag. 2014, 54, 1110–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Coyne, K.J.; Wang, Y.; Johnson, G. Algicidal bacteria: A review of current knowledge and applications to control harmful algal blooms. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 871177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Abbas, T.; Kajjumba, G.W.; Ejjada, M.; Masrura, S.U.; Marti, E.J.; Khan, E.; Jones-Lepp, T.L. Recent advancements in the removal of cyanotoxins from water using conventional and modified adsorbents—A contemporary review. Water 2020, 12, 2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, C.C.; Huang, W.J.; Ji, B.H. Degradation of cyanotoxin cylindrospermopsin by TiO2-assisted ozonation in water. J. Environ. Sci. Health 2015, 50, 1116–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fan, J.; Hobson, P.; Ho, L.; Daly, R.; Brookes, J. The effects of various control and water treatment processes on the membrane integrity and toxin fate of cyanobacteria. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 264, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gijsbertsen-Abrahamse, A.J.; Schmidt, W.; Chorus, I.; Heijman, S.G.J. Removal of cyanotoxins by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 276, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Verma, S.K.; Singh, S.P. Factors regulating copper uptake in a cyanobacterium. Curr. Microbiol. 1990, 21, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Andrei, A.; Öztürk, Y.; Khalfaoui-Hassani, B.; Rauch, J.; Marckmann, D.; Trasnea, P.I.; Daldal, F.; Koch, H.G. Cu homeostasis in bacteria: The ins and outs. Membranes 2020, 10, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kowata, H.; Tochigi, S.; Takahashi, H.; Kojima, S. Outer membrane permeability of cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803: Studies of passive diffusion of small organic nutrients reveal the absence of classical porins and intrinsically low permeability. J. Bacteriol. 2017, 199, 10.1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kojima, S.; Muramoto, K.; Kusano, T. Outer membrane proteins derived from non-cyanobacterial lineage cover the peptidoglycan of Cyanophora paradoxa cyanelles and serve as a cyanelle diffusion channel. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 20198–20209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wylie, J.L.; Worobec, E.A. The OprB porin plays a central role in carbohydrate uptake in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 3021–3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schätzle, H.; Brouwer, E.M.; Liebhart, E.; Stevanovic, M.; Schleiff, E. Comparative phenotypic analysis of Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 mutants of porinlike genes. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 31, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cardoso, D.; Lima, S.; Matinha-Cardoso, J.; Tamagnini, P.; Oliveira, P. The role of outer membrane protein (s) harboring SLH/OprB-domains in extracellular vesicles’ production in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Plants 2021, 10, 2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Coines, J.; Acosta-Gutierrez, S.; Bodrenko, I.; Rovira, C.; Ceccarelli, M. Glucose transport via the pseudomonad porin OprB: Implications for the design of Trojan Horse anti-infectives. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 8457–8463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pederick, V.G.; Eijkelkamp, B.A.; Begg, S.L.; Ween, M.P.; McAllister, L.J.; Paton, J.C.; McDevitt, C.A. ZnuA and zinc homeostasis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cavet, J.S.; Borrelly, G.P.M.; Robinson, N.J. Zn, Cu and Co in cyanobacteria: Selective control of metal availability. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 165–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Banerjee, S.; Wei, B.; Bhattacharyya-Pakrasi, M.; Pakrasi, H.B.; Smith, T.J. Structural determinants of metal specificity in the zinc transport protein ZnuA from Synechocystis 6803. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 333, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yatsunyk, L.A.; Easton, J.A.; Kim, L.R.; Sugarbaker, S.A.; Bennett, B.; Breece, R.M.; Vorontsov, I.I.; Tierney, D.L.; Crowder, M.W.; Rosenzweig, A.C. Structure and metal binding properties of ZnuA, a periplasmic zinc transporter from Escherichia coli. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 13, 271–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Patzer, S.I.; Hantke, K. The ZnuABC high-affinity zinc uptake system and its regulator Zur in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 28, 1199–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hudek, L.; Pearson, L.A.; Michalczyk, A.; Neilan, B.A.; Ackland, M.L. Molecular and cellular characterisation of the zinc uptake (Znu) system of Nostoc punctiforme. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 86, 149–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bartsevich, V.V.; Pakrasi, H.B. Manganese transport in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 26057–26061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Al-Tameemi, H.; Beavers, W.N.; Norambuena, J.; Skaar, E.P.; Boyd, J.M. Staphylococcus aureus lacking a functional MntABC manganese import system has increased resistance to copper. Mol. Microbiol. 2021, 115, 554–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lim, K.H.; Jones, C.E.; Vanden Hoven, R.N.; Edwards, J.L.; Falsetta, M.L.; Apicella, M.A.; Jennings, M.P.; McEwan, A.G. Metal binding specificity of the MntABC permease of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and its influence on bacterial growth and interaction with cervical epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 3569–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Giner-Lamia, J.; López-Maury, L.; Reyes, J.C.; Florencio, F.J. The CopRS two-component system is responsible for resistance to copper in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 1806–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Rosenzweig, A.C.; Argüello, J.M. Toward a molecular understanding of metal transport by P1B-Type ATPases. In Current topics in Membranes; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; pp. 113–136. [Google Scholar]
  62. Williams, L.E.; Mills, R.F. P1B-ATPases–an ancient family of transition metal pumps with diverse functions in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Salustros, N.; Grønberg, C.; Abeyrathna, N.S.; Lyu, P.; Orädd, F.; Wang, K.; Andersson, M.; Meloni, G.; Gourdon, P. Structural basis of ion uptake in copper-transporting P1B-type ATPases. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hederstedt, L.; Lewin, A.; Throne-Holst, M. Heme A synthase enzyme functions dissected by mutagenesis of Bacillus subtilis CtaA. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 8361–8369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Raimunda, D.; González-Guerrero, M.; Leeber, B., III; Argüello, J. The transport mechanism of bacterial Cu+-ATPases: Distinct efflux rates adapted to different function. BioMetals 2011, 24, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Phung, L.T.; Ajlani, G.; Haselkorn, R. P-type ATPase from the cyanobacterium Synechococcus 7942 related to the human Menkes and Wilson disease gene products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 9651–9654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yuan, D.S.; Dancis, A.; Klausner, R.D. Restriction of copper export in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to a late Golgi or post-Golgi compartment in the secretory pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 25787–25793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhen, Z.H.; Qin, S.; Ren, Q.M.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.C. Reciprocal effect of copper and iron regulation on the proteome of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 673402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Katoh, H.; Hagino, N.; Ogawa, T. Iron-binding activity of FutA1 subunit of an ABC-type iron transporter in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42, 823–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Waldron, K.J.; Tottey, S.; Yanagisawa, S.; Dennison, C.; Robinson, N.J. A periplasmic iron-binding protein contributes toward inward copper supply. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 3837–3846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Stevanovic, M.; Hahn, A.; Nicolaisen, K.; Mirus, O.; Schleiff, E. The components of the putative iron transport system in the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7120. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 14, 1655–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Aliaga, M.E.; López-Alarcón, C.; Bridi, R.; Speisky, H. Redox-implications associated with the formation of complexes between copper ions and reduced or oxidized glutathione. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2016, 154, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Rakshit, A.; Khatua, K.; Shanbhag, V.; Comba, P.; Datta, A. Cu2+ selective chelators relieve copper-induced oxidative stress in vivo. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 7916–7930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Markossian, K.A.; Kurganov, B.I. Copper chaperones, intracellular copper trafficking proteins. Function, structure, and mechanism of action. Biochemistry 2003, 68, 827–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Arnesano, F.; Banci, L.; Bertini, I.; Huffman, D.L.; O’Halloran, T.V. Solution structure of the Cu(I) and apo forms of the yeast metallochaperone, Atx1. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 1528–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hu, Q.; Sitsel, O.; Bågenholm, V.; Grønberg, C.; Lyu, P.; Pii Svane, A.S.; Andersen, K.R.; Laursen, N.S.; Meloni, G.; Nissen, P.; et al. Transition metal transporting P-type ATPases: Terminal metal-binding domains serve as sensors for autoinhibitory tails. FEBS J. 2024, 292, 1654–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gounder, P.E.; Davamani, V.; Kalaiselvi, P.; Sebastian, S.P.; Ilakiya, T. Metallothioneins: Diverse Protein Family to Bind Metallic Ions. In Heavy Metals—Their Environmental Impacts and Mitigation; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  78. Bourdineaud, J.P.; Baudrimont, M.; Gonzalez, P.; Moreau, J.L. Challenging the model for induction of metallothionein gene expression. Biochimie 2006, 88, 1787–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dziegiel, P.; Pula, B.; Kobierzycki, C.; Stasiolek, M.; Podhorska-Okolow, M.; Podhorska-Okolow, M. Metallothioneins: Structure and functions. Met. Norm. Cancer Cells 2016, 3, 20. [Google Scholar]
  80. Robinson, N.J.; Wilson, J.R.; Turner, J.S. Expression of the type 2 metallothionein-like gene MT2 from Arabidopsis thaliana in Zn2+-metallothionein-deficient Synechococcus PCC 7942: Putative role for MT2 in Zn2+ metabolism. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996, 30, 1169–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Munson, G.P.; Lam, D.L.; Outten, F.W.; O’Halloran, T.V. Identification of a copper-responsive two-component system on the chromosome of Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 5864–5871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Rouch, D.A.; Brown, N.L. Copper-inducible transcriptional regulation at two promoters in the Escherichia coli copper resistance determinant pco. Microbiology 1997, 143, 1191–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Giner-Lamia, J.; Pereira, S.B.; Bovea-Marco, M.; Futschik, M.E.; Tamagnini, P.; Oliveira, P. Extracellular proteins: Novel key components of metal resistance in cyanobacteria? Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Gittins, J.R. Cloning of a copper resistance gene cluster from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 by recombineering recovery. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 1872–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhao, S.; Wang, X.; Niu, G.; Dong, W.; Wang, J.; Fang, Y.; Lin, Y.; Liu, L. Structural basis for copper/silver binding by the Synechocystis metallochaperone CopM. Biol. Crystallogr. 2016, 72, 997–1005. [Google Scholar]
  86. Yang, J.; Gao, M.; Wang, J.; He, C.; Wang, X.; Liu, L. Structural basis of copper binding by a dimeric periplasmic protein forming a six-helical bundle. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2022, 229, 111728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lima, S.; Matinha-Cardoso, J.; Giner-Lamia, J.; Couto, N.; Pacheco, C.C.; Florencio, F.J.; Wright, P.C.; Tamagnini, P.; Oliveira, P. Extracellular vesicles as an alternative copper-secretion mechanism in bacteria. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 431, 128594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lawton, T.J.; Kenney, G.E.; Hurley, J.D.; Rosenzweig, A.C. The CopC family: Structural and bioinformatic insights into a diverse group of periplasmic copper binding proteins. Biochemistry 2016, 55, 2278–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Gautam, P.; Erill, I.; Cusick, K.D. Linking Copper-Associated Signal Transduction Systems with Their Environment in Marine Bacteria. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Rensing, C.; Fan, B.; Sharma, R.; Mitra, B.; Rosen, B.P. CopA: An Escherichia coli Cu(I)-translocating P-type ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 652–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gómez-Santos, N.; Pérez, J.; Sánchez-Sutil, M.C.; Moraleda-Muñoz, A.; Muñoz-Dorado, J. CorE from Myxococcus xanthus is a copper-dependent RNA polymerase sigma factor. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Cha, J.S.; Cooksey, D.A. Copper resistance in Pseudomonas syringae mediated by periplasmic and outer membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 8915–8919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Cha, J.S.; Cooksey, D.A. Copper hypersensitivity and uptake in Pseudomonas syringae containing cloned components of the copper resistance operon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59, 1671–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Olivan-Muro, I.; Sarasa-Buisan, C.; Guio, J.; Arenas, J.; Sevilla, E.; Fillat, M.F. Unbalancing Zur (FurB)-mediated homeostasis in Anabaena sp. PCC7120: Consequences on metal trafficking, heterocyst development and biofilm formation. Environ. Microbiol. 2023, 25, 2142–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Behlau, F.; Canteros, B.I.; Minsavage, G.V.; Jones, J.B.; Graham, J.H. Molecular characterization of copper resistance genes from Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri and Xanthomonas alfalfae subsp. citrumelonis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 4089–4096. [Google Scholar]
  96. Mills, S.D.; Jasalavich, C.A.; Cooksey, D.A. A two-component regulatory system required for copper-inducible expression of the copper resistance operon of Pseudomonas syringae. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 1656–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Franke, S.; Grass, G.; Rensing, C.; Nies, D.H. Molecular analysis of the copper-transporting efflux system CusCFBA of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 3804–3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Su, C.C.; Long, F.; Zimmermann, M.T.; Rajashankar, K.R.; Jernigan, R.L.; Yu, E.W. Crystal structure of the CusBA heavy-metal efflux complex of Escherichia coli. Nature 2011, 470, 558–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hahn, A.; Stevanovic, M.; Mirus, O.; Lytvynenko, I.; Pos, K.M.; Schleiff, E. The outer membrane TolC-like channel HgdD is part of tripartite resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) efflux systems conferring multiple-drug resistance in the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC7120. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 31192–31205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Nicolaisen, K.; Hahn, A.; Valdebenito, M.; Moslavac, S.; Samborski, A.; Maldener, I.; Wilken, C.; Valladares, A.; Flores, E.; Hantke, K.; et al. The interplay between siderophore secretion and coupled iron and copper transport in the heterocyst-forming cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7120. Biochim. Et. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 2010, 1798, 2131–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cruz, D.; Vasconcelos, V.; Pierre, G.; Michaud, P.; Delattre, C. Exopolysaccharides from cyanobacteria: Strategies for bioprocess development. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tiwari, O.N.; Muthuraj, M.; Bhunia, B.; Bandyopadhyay, T.K.; Annapurna, K.; Sahu, M.; Indrama, T. Biosynthesis, purification and structure-property relationships of new cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides. Polym. Test. 2020, 89, 106592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. De Philippis, R.; Vincenzini, M. Exocellular polysaccharides from cyanobacteria and their possible applications. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 22, 151–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Nogueira, P.F.M.; Melão, M.G.G.; Lombardi, A.T.; Nogueira, M.M.; Vieira, A.A.H. The effects of Anabaena spiroides exopolysaccharides on copper accumulation in an aquatic food chain. Aquat. Toxicol. 2009, 93, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Kuang, X.; Peng, L.; Chen, A.; Zeng, Q.; Luo, S.; Shao, J. Enhancement mechanisms of copper (II) adsorption onto kaolinite by extracellular polymeric substances of Microcystis aeruginosa (cyanobacterium). Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2019, 138, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Paperi, R.; Micheletti, E.; De Philippis, R. Optimization of copper sorbing–desorbing cycles with confined cultures of the exopolysaccharide-producing cyanobacterium Cyanospira capsulata. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 101, 1351–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ciani, M.; Decorosi, F.; Ratti, C.; De Philippis, R.; Adessi, A. Semi-continuous cultivation of EPS-producing marine cyanobacteria: A green biotechnology to remove dissolved metals obtaining metal-organic materials. New Biotechnol. 2024, 82, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pereira, S.; Zille, A.; Micheletti, E.; Moradas-Ferreira, P.; De Philippis, R.; Tamagnini, P. Complexity of cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides: Composition, structures, inducing factors and putative genes involved in their biosynthesis and assembly. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 33, 917–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Pagli, C.; Chamizo, S.; Migliore, G.; Rugnini, L.; De Giudici, G.; Braglia, R.; Canini, A.; Cantón, Y. Isolation of biocrust cyanobacteria and evaluation of Cu, Pb, and Zn immobilisation potential for soil restoration and sustainable agriculture. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 946, 174020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Gupta, P.; Diwan, B. Bacterial exopolysaccharide mediated heavy metal removal: A review on biosynthesis, mechanism and remediation strategies. Biotechnol. Rep. 2017, 13, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Singh, N.; Asthana, R.K.; Kayastha, A.M.; Pandey, S.; Chaudhary, A.K.; Singh, S.P. Thiol and exopolysaccharide production in a cyanobacterium under heavy metal stress. Process Biochem. 1999, 35, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. De Philippis, R.; Paperi, R.; Sili, C. Heavy metal sorption by released polysaccharides and whole cultures of two exopolysaccharide-producing cyanobacteria. Biodegradation 2007, 18, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Leal, P.P.; Hurd, C.L.; Sander, S.G.; Armstrong, E.; Fernández, P.A.; Suhrhoff, T.J.; Roleda, M.Y. Copper pollution exacerbates the effects of ocean acidification and warming on kelp microscopic early life stages. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Comte, S.; Guibaud, G.; Baudu, M. Biosorption properties of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) towards Cd, Cu and Pb for different pH values. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the passage of Cu ions from the extracellular environment into the cyanobacterial cell. Interaction of Cu ions with negative charges present in the EPS layer. Entry by diffusion through porin-like structures into the periplasm and via the CtaA and FutABC (ATP-Binding Cassette transporter—iron ABC) proteins into the cytoplasm. Alternatively, passage into the cytoplasm by competing with other metal import systems, such as Zn (ZnABC) and Mn (MntABC)—ATP-Binding Cassette transporters—ABC. Arrows represent the Cu flux direction.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the passage of Cu ions from the extracellular environment into the cyanobacterial cell. Interaction of Cu ions with negative charges present in the EPS layer. Entry by diffusion through porin-like structures into the periplasm and via the CtaA and FutABC (ATP-Binding Cassette transporter—iron ABC) proteins into the cytoplasm. Alternatively, passage into the cytoplasm by competing with other metal import systems, such as Zn (ZnABC) and Mn (MntABC)—ATP-Binding Cassette transporters—ABC. Arrows represent the Cu flux direction.
Biology 14 00798 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of copper (Cu) ion response and efflux mechanisms in cyanobacteria. This diagram illustrates the cellular processes involved in sensing and transporting Cu ions from the intracellular environment to the extracellular space. CopR/S (copper regulator/sensor proteins) are responsible for sensing Cu excess and increasing the transcription of related operons (copMRS and copBAC). The CopM (copper-binding protein), CopBAC, and CusABC (ABC efflux systems) complexes are directly responsible for the efflux of Cu ions. Arrows represent the Cu flux direction.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of copper (Cu) ion response and efflux mechanisms in cyanobacteria. This diagram illustrates the cellular processes involved in sensing and transporting Cu ions from the intracellular environment to the extracellular space. CopR/S (copper regulator/sensor proteins) are responsible for sensing Cu excess and increasing the transcription of related operons (copMRS and copBAC). The CopM (copper-binding protein), CopBAC, and CusABC (ABC efflux systems) complexes are directly responsible for the efflux of Cu ions. Arrows represent the Cu flux direction.
Biology 14 00798 g002
Figure 3. Phylogeny of the functional domain P-type ATPase Cu exportation CopA protein in cyanobacteria. Sequences with a single chain of approximately 750 amino acids and an identity of >65% among them. Archaea in blue, cyanobacteria in green, and other bacteria in red.
Figure 3. Phylogeny of the functional domain P-type ATPase Cu exportation CopA protein in cyanobacteria. Sequences with a single chain of approximately 750 amino acids and an identity of >65% among them. Archaea in blue, cyanobacteria in green, and other bacteria in red.
Biology 14 00798 g003
Figure 4. 3D model of the CopA protein in Cyanobacteria and other groups of prokaryotes constructed using ChimeraX. (A) Escherichia coli O157:H7 (model obtained from Swiss-model; ~85.9 kDa); (B) Vibrio cholerae serotype O1 strain ATCC 39315 (model obtained from Swiss-model; ~96.4 KDa); (C) Hydrococcus rivularis NIES-593 (model obtained from Swiss-model; ~80.2 kDa); (D) Gloeobacter violaceus (model obtained from Swiss-model; ~77.2 kDa); (E) Acidovorax sp. 99 (model obtained from Swiss-model; ~86.3 kDa); (F) Staphylococcus aureus strain JH9 (model obtained from Swiss-model; ~86.7 kDa); (G) Nodularia spumigena UHCC0039 (model built using AlphaFold2 based on the sequence used for phylogeny; ~82.8 kDa); (H) Nostoc muscorum FACHB395 (model built using AlphaFold2 based on the sequence used for phylogeny; ~83.0 kDa); (I) Superposition of the proteins from a different perspective. The green markings highlight the Heavy-Metal-Associated domain of the proteins. The rest of the protein includes the P-type ATPase Cu-like domain.
Figure 4. 3D model of the CopA protein in Cyanobacteria and other groups of prokaryotes constructed using ChimeraX. (A) Escherichia coli O157:H7 (model obtained from Swiss-model; ~85.9 kDa); (B) Vibrio cholerae serotype O1 strain ATCC 39315 (model obtained from Swiss-model; ~96.4 KDa); (C) Hydrococcus rivularis NIES-593 (model obtained from Swiss-model; ~80.2 kDa); (D) Gloeobacter violaceus (model obtained from Swiss-model; ~77.2 kDa); (E) Acidovorax sp. 99 (model obtained from Swiss-model; ~86.3 kDa); (F) Staphylococcus aureus strain JH9 (model obtained from Swiss-model; ~86.7 kDa); (G) Nodularia spumigena UHCC0039 (model built using AlphaFold2 based on the sequence used for phylogeny; ~82.8 kDa); (H) Nostoc muscorum FACHB395 (model built using AlphaFold2 based on the sequence used for phylogeny; ~83.0 kDa); (I) Superposition of the proteins from a different perspective. The green markings highlight the Heavy-Metal-Associated domain of the proteins. The rest of the protein includes the P-type ATPase Cu-like domain.
Biology 14 00798 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oder, J.C.; Sateles, T.E.; de Souza, L.B.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Araújo, W.L.; Alvarenga-Lucius, L. Metabolic Responses, Uptake, and Export of Copper in Cyanobacteria. Biology 2025, 14, 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070798

AMA Style

Oder JC, Sateles TE, de Souza LB, Nunes-Nesi A, Araújo WL, Alvarenga-Lucius L. Metabolic Responses, Uptake, and Export of Copper in Cyanobacteria. Biology. 2025; 14(7):798. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070798

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oder, Jean Coutinho, Thamires Emidio Sateles, Laila Barros de Souza, Adriano Nunes-Nesi, Wagner L. Araújo, and Luna Alvarenga-Lucius. 2025. "Metabolic Responses, Uptake, and Export of Copper in Cyanobacteria" Biology 14, no. 7: 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070798

APA Style

Oder, J. C., Sateles, T. E., de Souza, L. B., Nunes-Nesi, A., Araújo, W. L., & Alvarenga-Lucius, L. (2025). Metabolic Responses, Uptake, and Export of Copper in Cyanobacteria. Biology, 14(7), 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070798

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop