Next Article in Journal
Raphanus sativus Linne Protects Human Nucleus Pulposus Cells against H2O2-Induced Damage by Inhibiting TREM2
Previous Article in Journal
The A226D Mutation of OmpC Leads to Increased Susceptibility to β-Lactam Antibiotics in Escherichia coli
Previous Article in Special Issue
Testing the Role of Natural and Sexual Selection on Testes Size Asymmetry in Anurans
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/biology13080601
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Evolutionary Fate of the Opine Synthesis Genes in the Arachis L. Genomes

by
Olesja D. Bogomaz
1,
Victoria D. Bemova
2,
Nikita A. Mirgorodskii
3 and
Tatiana V. Matveeva
4,*
1
Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia
2
Department of Oil and Fibre Crops, N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), Saint Petersburg 190031, Russia
3
Field of Study Plant Genetics and Biotechnology, University “Sirius” Krasnodar Region, Federal Territory, Sirius 354340, Russia
4
Department of Genetic and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2024, 13(8), 601; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080601
Submission received: 28 July 2024 / Accepted: 7 August 2024 / Published: 9 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2nd Edition: Macro-Ecology, Macro-Evolution and Conservation of Animals and Plants)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The ancestors of modern peanuts underwent genetic transformation under natural conditions millions of years ago to acquire genes for opine synthesis. Eventually, the genes for the agropine synthesis pathway were lost in most of the studied samples or remained in the form of small fragments. Conversely, the genes for cucumopine synthesis remained intact and functional in most species, probably due to being under a regime of stabilizing selection. The variability of natural transgenes can be used in phylogenetic studies.

Abstract

Naturally transgenic plants are plants that have undergone Agrobacterium-mediated transformation under natural conditions without human involvement. Among Arachis hypogaea L., A. duranensis Krapov. & W.C. Greg, A. ipaensis Krapov. & W.C. Greg, A. monticola Krapov. & Rigoni, and A. stenosperma Krapov. & W.C. Greg are known to contain sequences derived from the T-DNA of “Agrobacterium”. In the present study, using molecular genetics and bioinformatic methods, we characterized natural transgenes in 18 new species from six sections of the genus Arachis. We found that small fragments of genes for enzymes of the agropine synthesis pathway were preserved only in some of the studied samples and were lost in the majority of the species during evolution. At the same time, genes, similar to cucumopine synthases (cus-like), remained intact in almost all of the investigated species. In cultivated peanuts, they are expressed in a tissue-specific manner. We demonstrated the intraspecific variability of the structure and expression of the cus-like gene in cultivated peanuts. The described diversity of gene sequences horizontally transferred from Agrobacterium to plants helps to shed light on the phylogeny of species of the genus Arachis and track possible hybridization events. Data on the ability of certain species to hybridize are useful for planning breeding schemes aimed at transferring valuable traits from wild species into cultivated peanuts.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, now referred to as Rhizobium-mediated transformation, is a commonly used method for obtaining genetically modified crops. This involves the transfer of a fragment of the bacterium’s plasmid, called T-DNA (transferred DNA), into the plant’s chromosome. The T-DNA genes contain eukaryotic promoters that allow for their expression in the plant. This expression leads to the development of crown gall or hairy root diseases, as well as the production of opines, which serve as a source of nutrition for the bacterium. Crown galls and hairy roots are transgenic tissues that form on non-transgenic plants. Over time, scientists have learned how to replace the internal T-DNA sequence with the genes of interest, and these genes can be transferred into plant cells, resulting in the regeneration of whole transgenic plants [1]. At the same time, some plant species have undergone transformation by Agrobacterium or Rhizobium naturally, without any human involvement. They were first described inside the genus Nicotiana and are referred to as naturally transgenic or natural genetically modified organisms (nGMOs) [2,3,4]. These plants contain sequences in their genomes called cellular T-DNAs (cT-DNAs), which are homologous to “agrobacterial” T-DNAs. These cT-DNAs are passed down to their offspring from generation to generation [5]. Since 2019, many nGMOs have been identified among various crop species, and most of them contain genes for opine synthesis in their genomes [6,7,8].
One example of such nGMOs is a group of species that includes cultivated peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) and their ancestors: A. duranensis Krapov. & W.C. Greg and A. ipaensis Krapov. & W.C. Greg. This group also includes two other species: A. monticola Krapov. & Rigoni and A. stenosperma Krapov. & W.C. Greg [6,9]. Cultivated peanuts and A. monticola are tetraploid and contain ancestral genomes known as A and B. Genome A is also present in A. duranensis and A. stenosperma, while A. ipaensis contains genome B [10]. The homolog of the Agrobacterium or Rhizobium cucumopine synthase gene (cus) [11,12] has been found in the genomes of all these Arachis species [6]. In this text, we will refer to this homolog as the cus-like gene. In the A genome of these species, the transgene is intact, whereas in the B genome, it is truncated. In addition to the mutated cus-like gene, remnants of the mas’2 gene, which is involved in mannopine synthesis [13,14,15], are also found in the B genome of A. ipaensis and related tetraploid species [6]. All of the above species belong to the Arachis section [16]. In addition to it, the genus includes the sections Erectoides (genome E), Extranervosae (genome EX), Procumbentes (genome PR), Caulorrhizae (genome C), Heteranthae (genome H), Rhizomatosae (genome R), Trierectoides (genome TE), and Triseminatae (genome T) [16]. Until recently, species from these sections had not been examined for the presence of cT-DNA. Our research aims to fill this knowledge gap and shed light on the widespread occurrence of naturally occurring GMOs among cultivated Arachis species and their close relatives. The idea that transgenic plants have been consumed as food throughout history is particularly significant in supporting GMOs in countries where their cultivation is prohibited. Moreover, the examination of polymorphisms in recently acquired cT-DNA sequences can help to resolve contentious issues in peanut phylogeny. These sequences offer numerous advantages for investigating the origins and evolution of nGMO species. cT-DNAs are well-defined, highly specific, and easily identifiable DNA fragments that are distinct from plant sequences. Integration at a specific chromosomal site in the plant genome indicates a founder event, thereby establishing a clear starting point for a new clade. Additionally, cT-DNAs can be of sufficient size and age to produce a range of variants, which allow for the construction of phylogenetic trees. By analyzing the evolutionary trajectory of transgenes in a closely related group of species, researchers can gain insights into how they evolve [15]. Phasing T-DNA alleles allows for the reconstruction of more accurate phylogenetic relationships and the detection of hybridization events during plant species evolution. These methods have been effectively applied in studying the genera Camellia and Vaccinium [17,18]. In this study, the same approaches were used to characterize the natural transgenes of Arachis and their contribution to phylogenetic research.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

A. hypogaea lines from the VIR collection were used to study the biodiversity and expression of the cus-like gene. The characteristics of the lines are presented in Table S1. The NCBI SRA database was used to search for T-DNA in other species.

2.2. DNA and RNA Isolation

High-molecular-weight DNA was extracted from fresh 2-week-old seedlings of A. hypogaea cultivated aseptically in vitro, according to the CTAB protocol for DNA isolation from plant tissues [19].
Three-week-old aseptic A. hypogaea plants were used for RNA extraction (three plants per line). All plants were approximately the same size and were in equally healthy conditions in terms of leaf color and the absence of signs of wilting. For each plant, a total of three RNA samples were isolated from the leaves, roots, and internodes. Immediately after collection, the samples were flash-frozen and homogenized in liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted from leaves, roots, and internodes using an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity and quantity of RNA in the samples were measured using the spectrophotometer NanoDrop 2000/2000c (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.3. PCR

The cus-like gene sequence was PCR-amplified using gene-specific primers (Supplementary Table S2). The amplification reactions (40 μL) contained a DNA sample, 20 μL of DreamTaq PCR Master Mix (2×) (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), and 10 pmol of each primer. Primers are listed in Table S2. PCR was performed using a “Tertsyk” DNA amplifier (“DNA technology”, Moscow, Russia) according to the following program: 5 min at 94 °C, 35 cycles of 15 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 60 s at 72 °C, followed by 10 min at 72 °C. PCR products were separated on an agarose gel in 1× TBE buffer, visualized using GelDoc Go (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA), and used for further Sanger DNA sequencing.

2.4. DNA Sequencing

PCR fragments were sequenced using the Sanger method and the BrilliantDye™ Terminator (v3.1) Cycle Sequencing Kit (NimaGen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands). Then, sequencing mixtures were analyzed using an ABI Prism 3500 xl sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.5. Reverse Transcription and Real-Time qPCR

Before cDNA synthesis, the amounts of RNA in different tissues were normalized. For each sample, cDNA was synthesized with 330 ng of total RNA using an iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA synthesis reaction (20 μL) was performed in 0.2 mL tubes on a Bio-Rad C1000 Thermal Cycler apparatus as follows: 5 min at 25 °C, 25 min at 46 °C, and 1 min at 95 °C. Real-time qPCR reactions (20 μL) were performed in optical 8-tube strips with a Bio-Rad CFX96 apparatus using an iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix 2× ((both from Bio-Rad), Hercules, CA, USA) and gene-specific primers (Table S2). The A. hypogaea glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (gapdh) was used as a reference for the equalization of RNA levels. All primers were synthesized by Evrogen (Moscow, Russia). PCR was performed according to the following program: 5 min at 94 °C, 30 cycles of 20 s at 94 °C, 20 s at 55 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C, followed by 10 min at 72 °C.
Quantification was performed in triplicate. Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method [20] for each sample, and average values for three plants were calculated.

2.6. Allele Reconstruction from SRA Data

The NCBI SRA database was used to search for T-DNA in the Arachis genus. The search was performed using BLAST against a reference (OL840910.1). Resulting reads were aligned to the reference using BWA 0.7.17 [21]. The processing of SAM files was performed using SAMtools 1.7 [22]. The alignment visualization for the ploidy estimation was performed using IGV 2.12.3 [23]. Allele phasing was performed using variant calling with GATK 4.2 [24], followed by WhatsHap 1.0 [25]. In cases of small coverage, alleles were phased manually, and some were partially successful. Based on the assumption that SNPs are artificial, their presence was verified using other samples.

2.7. Phylogenetic Analysis

Nucleotide sequences of separate alleles of the cus-like gene (listed in Table S3) were aligned using MUSCLE v.5, with default parameters [26]. The evolutionary history was inferred using the maximum-likelihood method and the Kimura 1980 model [27] using PhyML 3.0 [28] with smart model selection [29]. The operation of this tool included selecting the best model using the BIC criterion. The initial trees for heuristic search in the ML method were obtained automatically using the BioNJ algorithm. To test the support for the topology of the tree, 100 bootstrap replicates were obtained [30]. The final tree was visualized in MEGA 11. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 70% of bootstrap replicates were collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together were shown next to the branches [31].

3. Results

3.1. Naturally Transgenic Species of the Arachis Genus

Until recently, cT-DNA has only been described in cultivated peanuts (A. hypogaea), its ancestors A. duranensis and A. ipaensis, and in closely related A. monticola and A. stenosperma. In the framework of this study, using the BLAST algorithm, cT-DNA sequences were described in the WGS data for six accessions of A. hypogaea, five accessions of A. duranensis, four accessions of A. ipaensis, and, finally, one accession each of A. monticola, A. stenosperma, and A. cardenasii. Sequences homologous to the cus gene were present in all of these genomes and were located on chromosome 8 in a common integration site, indicating that all these sequences were the result of a single transformation event. In addition, the 8th chromosome of the species with the B genome contained remnants of the mas2′ gene, but they were located in different sites. A. cardenasii, in addition to an intact copy of the cus-like gene, contained remnants of the mas1′ gene in different localization sites as a result of an independent transformation event.
In summary, our search for homologs of the opine biosynthesis genes in the SRA database revealed new species of naturally transgenic plants in the Arachis genus. They contain sequences homologous to cus, mas1′, mas2′, and ags genes (Table 1).
Natural GMOs were found in the sections Arachis, Erectoides, Extranervosae, Procumbentes, Caulorrhizae, and Heteranthae, indicating that their common ancestor was transformed before these sections diverged. Genomic data for different species varied in terms of coverage quality. In some cases, the presence of a transgene could be inferred from single reads. Sequences with good coverage were further used to assemble full-length genes. The cus-like gene was found in all species, as listed in Table 1. In addition, the gene was sequenced in eight lines of peanuts from the VIR collection. In SRA data of several species, we also found remains of mas1′, mas2′, and ags-like genes.

3.2. Intra- and Interspecific Variability of the Cus-like Gene

To assess the intraspecific variability of the cus-like gene, we used sequences of alleles reconstructed from SRA reads or Sanger sequencing data of independent samples of A. hypogaea according to procedures previously described for the Vaccinium species [17]. The cultivated peanuts included in the study consisted of eight lines from the VIR collection and sequences from the SRA database for 19 genotypes. We reconstructed 29 cus-like gene variants from the A genome, which we will refer to as alleles. These alleles corresponded to 23 amino acid sequences. Surprisingly, even though peanuts are self-pollinating, there was a high proportion of heterozygotes for the cus-like gene. The reason for this phenomenon is still unclear, due to the lack of sufficient data. It could be the result of hybridization and selection in favor of heterozygotes, or there may be a probability of having two copies of the gene organized as tandem repeats that mutate independently. The variability of the transgene copy number can be illustrated using WGS data for different varieties of the diploid species A. duranensis. Thus, there are two copies of the transgene in the genome assembly of cultivar PI475845. At the same time, each of the cultivars, K30060 and V14167, contain one copy of the transgene.
The frequencies of the different alleles were not the same. The most common allele, designated as A, was found in 12 genotypes from both subspecies. When analyzing the amino acid sequence of the gene product, taking into account the degeneracy of the genetic code, allele A was found in 13 lines of cultivated peanuts and the ancestral form of A. duranensis. Alleles B and C were found in three accessions each, while D was found in two accessions. The remaining alleles were unique. Only three of the twenty-nine cus-like alleles in the A genome contained mutations inconsistent with function (Table S4). The rest can be considered intact. It is worth noting that we found common alleles in both the SRA assembly data and the Sanger sequencing results of samples from the VIR collection, indicating consistent results from these methods. The alleles from the B genome of cultivated peanuts were all truncated and unique. The presence of the common intact alleles from the A genome in half of the studied genotypes of A. hypogaea and ancestral A. duranensis suggests that there is stabilizing selection in favor of the intact allele. However, such selection is absent for the alleles from the B genome, causing them to accumulate mutations. All reconstructed sequences of the cus-like genes from other species can also be considered intact, except for one allele of A. hoehnei.
Since not all alleles of the gene under study were intact, their phylogenetic relationship was reconstructed based on nucleotide sequences. The phylogenetic analysis showed two distinct clades in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1A), corresponding to the A and B genomes of cultivated peanuts. Clade β included sequences from A. ipaensis and the B genome of A. hypogaea and A. monticola. Clade α was more complex, including sequences from the A genome of A. hypogaea, A. monticola, A. duranensis, and A. paraguariensis (E genome). The sequence closest to clade α was obtained from A. valida with the B genome. Both sequences of A. stenophylla with the E genome and A. pintoi with the C genome were closer to clade β. The two sequences of A. helodes (genome A) clustered together. Clade γ included all analyzed alleles of cus-like genes from the PR genomes and A.villosa with the A genome. The sequences from two plants of A. diogoi and one plant of A. hoechnei formed clade ε, while two other alleles from these species were located outside of this clade. This suggests that interspecific hybridization may have occurred during the course of their evolution. The lower diversity of sequences from the A genome of cultivated peanuts may be due to gene functionality and stabilizing selection in favor of intact alleles, indicating potential gene expression. Therefore, we assessed the expressions in several peanut lines from the VIR collection.

3.3. Expression of the Cus-like Gene

The cus-like gene was expressed in cultivated peanuts (Figure 1B). Gene expression levels varied between lines during the juvenile stage. The analysis included two lines with allele A and two lines with allele B. In both cases, we observed lines with the same gene sequence but differing expression levels. This indicates that they differed in the genetic environment but not in the structure of the coding sequence of the transgene. In addition, there was a tendency for higher transgene expression in roots than in other plant organs, which is consistent with literature data for other species [32].

4. Discussion

In the presented work, we described cellular T-DNAs in the genomes of Arachis species from the sections Arachis, Erectoides, Extranervosae, Procumbentes, Caulorrhizae, and Heteranthae, supporting the idea of their monophyletic origin [31]. In all of the studied genomes, sequences homologous to cucumopine synthase were identified.
Among the currently known strains of Agrobacterium, the strain that has a gene with the highest similarity to the cus-like sequence of Arachis is A. salinitolerans LMG 29287 (JAPZLN010000006.1). A. salinitolerans is an aerobe and is a mesophilic, Gram-negative bacterium that forms circular colonies and was isolated from surface-sterilized effective root nodules of Sesbania cannabina, demonstrating the fine line between parasitism and mutualism [33].
In addition to the cus-like gene, species with genome B contained remains of the mas2′ gene, species with genome PR contained remains of the mas1′ gene, A. macedoi contained remains of the ags gene, and A. pusilla contained remains of both the mas2′ and ags genes. All of these genes encode enzymes belonging to the same biosynthetic pathway. They catalyze a chain of reactions leading to the synthesis of agropine and are found clustered together in the same agrobacterial T-DNA [34]. The common ancestor of the Arachis species was probably transformed by a strain containing all three genes, but at some point, these genes ceased to provide selective advantages to their owners, accumulated mutations, and were lost, remaining in the form of separate fragments in representatives of different clades. One may speculate that the same fate awaits transgenes introduced into plants by humans in the absence of selection in their favor.
A completely different picture is typical for the cucumopine synthase gene. It has remained intact in most of the studied species. In cultivated peanuts, among the 29 described alleles of the gene, only 3 contained mutations that were incompatible with the function. The cultivated peanut is divided into two subspecies, hypogaea and fastigiata [35,36,37]. The most common allele A of the cus-like gene of A. hypogaea was found in representatives of both subspecies, as well as in A. duranensis, confirming the close relationship of these species. However, this allele has not yet been identified in A. monticola. Alleles of the cus-like gene of A. monticola were distributed among distinct subclades within clade α. A similar mosaic arrangement of A. monticola and A. hypogaea sequences on the tree was observed by Tian and co-authors during the chloroplast phylogenomic analysis of Arachis [38].
It is well accepted that A. duranensis and A. ipaensis are the progenitor species of A. hypogaea [36,39]. In recent years, the scientific community has accepted the idea of a common origin for A. hypogaea and A. monticola. However, there is no complete clarity regarding the rank of differences between them. Yin et al., based on a comparative analysis of NGS data, proposed that wild tetraploid A. monticola was formed by hybridization between two diploid species, A. duranensis and A. ipaensis, and then evolved into A. hypogaea by artificial selection [40]. Tian and co-authors [38] reported that A. monticola could be a weedy subspecies of cultivated peanuts, since A. hypogaea is able to hybridize with A. monticola and produce fertile hybrids. Thus, A. monticola may have been derived from a more ancient hybridization event, while the accessions of A. hypogaea may have evolved later. Our data are more consistent with the second hypothesis because the alternation of sequences of A. hypogaea and A. monticola within one clade on the tree is most logically explained through hybridization events and therefore the absence of a complete interspecific barrier.
There are several studies showing that cultivated peanuts may have been derived from more than two progenitor species, including such species as A. diogoi, A. cardenasii, and A. batizocoi, in addition to well-accepted ones [41,42,43,44,45]. Within our study, there is no evidence in favor of the participation of the species mentioned above in the formation of cultivated peanuts. However, it cannot be ruled out that the genetic material of A. paraguariensis was involved in the formation of at least some varieties of A. hypogaea. Data from other researchers support the close relationship between A. paraguariensis and A. duranensis [46]. The locations of other species on the tree do not agree well with the classical division of the genus into sections. For example, some alleles of A. diogoi and A. hoechnei form a common clade, while others are located outside of this clade. A similar pattern was previously observed by Tian and co-authors, who studied chloroplast sequences of Arachis species [38]. This can be explained by hybridization in the context of incomplete speciation.
Comparing our data with those of other researchers [38,44,45,46,47,48,49], it can be noted that the discrepancy in results between different studies is most likely due to the different breadth of material covered and different samples of representatives of the studied species. Thus, the origination and evolution of the Arachis species remain elusive, and it is extremely difficult to demarcate the boundaries of some peanut species, due to gene introgression, ancestral polymorphism, and various speciation rates in different species [46,47,48,49]. Further research necessitates the inclusion of additional lines, varieties, and species of Arachis. When examining a vast number of samples from different species, it is essential to employ cost-effective and efficient research methods for phylogenetic analyses. In addition to other techniques, incorporating a molecular marker based on a recently evolved sequence can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the phylogeny of Arachis.
Intact sequences of natural transgenes have now been described for many species [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Such sequences have attracted attention from the very beginning for studying their functions [50,51,52,53]. We also demonstrated the expression of the cus-like gene at the RNA level in this study. Our data show that expression can be considered tissue-specific, as the highest transcript content in most lines was observed in the roots. The same trend was noted earlier for tobacco [32]. It is interesting to note that the level of transgene expression varies among lines. Further studies on the functioning of natural transgenes using genetic material that contrasts in transgene expression will allow us to gain a better understanding of their function. Since it is known that opines can be secreted into the environment from plant cells [54,55] and can attract certain groups of microorganisms [56,57], it is logical to expect the influence of opines on the biological environment of natural GMOs. This could be an interesting area for further research. In addition, being derivatives of amino and keto acids [58], opines can affect protein metabolism, which also requires attention in future studies of this crop. Moreover, the fact that residents of South and North America, Africa, and Eurasia have been using GMOs with intact functional transgenes for centuries without harm to their health should alleviate the fears of modern society regarding the unnaturalness of GMOs. In laboratory conditions, people replicate the processes that have occurred and are occurring in nature. Therefore, it makes sense to test the effects of specific transgenes on humans and the environment rather than fearing transgenesis as a process.

5. Conclusions

Thus, in the present study, we characterized natural transgenes in A. batizocoi, A. cardenasii, A. correntina, A. diogoi, A. duranensis, A. glandulifera, A. helodes, A. hoehnei, A. hypogaea, A. ipaensis, A. magna, A. monticola, A. stenosperma, A. trinitensis, A. valida, A. villosa, A. paraguariensis, A. stenophylla, A. macedoi, A. appressipila, A. pintoi, A. pusilla Benth., and A. rigonii. We demonstrated the different evolutionary fates of the genes for agropine synthesis and cucumopine synthesis in Arachis. We showed the tissue-specific expression of cucumopine synthase in cultivated peanuts and characterized the intraspecific variability of the structure and the expression of the cus-like gene in Arachis. The described diversity of gene sequences horizontally transferred from Agrobacterium to plants helps shed light on the phylogeny of species of the genus Arachis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology13080601/s1, Table S1: Plant material and SRA data of the Arachis species; Table S2: Sequences of primers; Table S3: Reconstructed alleles of the cus-like gene; Table S4: Functional descriptions of alleles of the cus-like gene from the A genome of cultivated peanut.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.V.M.; software, O.D.B.; formal analysis, N.A.M.; investigation, O.D.B., V.D.B. and T.V.M.; writing—original draft preparation, T.V.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was performed with the support of the c in accordance with agreement No. 075-15-2022-322, dated 22 April 2022, on the provision of a grant in the form of a subsidy from the Federal budget of the Russian Federation. The grant was provided as part of the state support for the creation and development of the world-class Scientific Center “Agrotechnologies for the Future”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences obtained during the work were deposited into the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 26 December 2023) with accession numbers OL840908.1–OL840912.1 and OR905615.1–OR905616.1).

Acknowledgments

The work was performed using the equipment of the Resource Center of Saint Petersburg State University “Development of Molecular and Cellular Technologies”. We are grateful to Gavrilova V.A. for her valuable comments at all stages of manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nester, E.W. Agrobacterium: Nature’s genetic engineer. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 5, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. White, F.F.; Garfinkel, D.J.; Huffman, G.A.; Gordon, M.P.; Nester, E.W. Sequence homologous to Agrobacterium rhizogenes T-DNA in the genomes of uninfected plants. Nature 1983, 301, 348–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Matveeva, T.V.; Bogomaz, D.I.; Pavlova, O.A.; Nester, E.W.; Lutova, L.A. Horizontal gene transfer from genus Agrobacterium to the plant Linaria in nature. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 1542–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kyndt, T.; Quispe, D.; Zhai, H.; Jarret, R.; Ghislain, M.; Liu, Q.; Gheysen, G.; Kreuze, J.F. The genome of cultivated sweet potato contains Agrobacterium T-DNAs with expressed genes: An example of a naturally transgenic food crop. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 5844–5849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Matveeva, T.V. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in the evolution of plants. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immun. 2018, 418, 421–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Matveeva, T.V.; Otten, L. Widespread occurrence of natural transformation of plants by Agrobacterium. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 101, 415–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Matveeva, T.V. New naturally transgenic plants: 2020 up-date. Biol. Commun. 2021, 66, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lipatov, P.Y.; Bogomaz, F.D.; Gosudarev, K.D.; Kondrashova, S.A.; Kuchevsky, M.V.; Malyuga, N.L.; Myagkiy, E.V.; Sergeenkova, M.V.; Tverdokhlebova, V.R.; Shtina, A.D.; et al. New cellular T-DNAs in naturally transgenic plants. Ecol. Genet. 2022, 20, 40–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Matveeva, T.V.; Otten, L. Opine biosynthesis in naturally transgenic plants: Genes and products. Phytochemistry 2021, 189, 112813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kochert, G.; Stalker, H.T.; Gimenes, M.; Galgaro, L.; Lopes, C.R.; Moore, K. RFLP and cytogenetic evidence on the origin and evolution of allotetraploid domesticated peanut, Arachis hypogaea (Leguminosae). Am. J. Bot. 1996, 83, 1282–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. do Nascimento, E.F.M.B.; Dos Santos, B.V.; Marques, L.O.; Guimarães, P.M.; Brasileiro, A.C.; Leal-Bertioli, S.C.; Bertioli, D.J.; Araujo, A.C. The genome structure of Arachis hypogaea (Linnaeus, 1753) and an induced Arachis allotetraploid revealed by molecular cytogenetics. Comp. Cytogenet. 2018, 12, 111–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tong, X.; Li, Y.; Xiang, T.; Chen, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhang, C.; Feng, M.; Wu, L. The complete genome sequence of cucumopine-type Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain K599 (NCPPB2659), a nature’s genetic engineer inducing hairy roots. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2018, 20, 1167–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Valdes Franco, J.A.; Collier, R.; Wang, Y.; Huo, N.; Gu, Y.; Thilmony, R.; Thomson, J.G. Draft genome sequence of Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain NCPPB2659. Genome Announc. 2016, 4, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bouchez, D.; Tourneur, J. Organization of the agropine synthesis region of the T-DNA of the Ri plasmid from Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Plasmid 1991, 25, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Weisberg, A.J.; Davis, E.W.; Tabima, J.; Belcher, M.S.; Miller, M.; Kuo, C.H.; Loper, J.E.; Grünwald, N.J.; Putnam, M.L.; Chang, J.H. Unexpected conservation and global transmission of agrobacterial virulence plasmids. Science 2020, 368, eaba5256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stalker, H.T. Utilizing Wild Species for Peanut Improvement. Crop Sci. 2017, 57, 1102–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, K.; Zhurbenko, P.M.; Danilov, L.G.; Matveeva, T.V.; Otten, L. Conservation of an Agrobacterium cT-DNA insert in Camellia section Thea reveals the ancient origin of tea plants from a genetically modified ancestor. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 997762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhidkin, R.R.; Zhurbenko, P.M.; Bogomaz, O.; Gorodilova, E.Y.; Katsapov, I.S.; Antropov, D.N.; Matveeva, T.V. Biodiversity of rolB/C-like Natural Transgene in the Genus Vaccinium L. and Its Application for Phylogenetic Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Murray, M.G.; Thompson, W. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8, 4321–4326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1303.3997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Danecek, P.; Bonfield, J.K.; Liddle, J.; Marshall, J.; Ohan, V.; Pollard, M.O.; Whitwham, A.; Keane, T.; McCarthy, S.A.; Davies, R.M.; et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 2021, 10, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Robinson, J.T.; Thorvaldsdóttir, H.; Winckler, W.; Guttman, M.; Lander, E.S.; Getz, G.; Mesirov, J.P. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 24–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Van der Auwera, G.A.; O’Connor, B.D. Genomics in the Cloud: Using Docker, GATK, and WDL in Terra, 1st ed.; O’Reilly Media: Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2020; pp. 191–222. [Google Scholar]
  25. Martin, M.; Patterson, M.; Garg, S.; OFischer, S.; Pisanti, N.; WKlau, G.; Schöenhuth, A.; Marschall, T. WhatsHap: Fast and accurate read-based phasing. bioRxiv 2016, 085050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE v5 enables improved estimates of phylogenetic tree confidence by ensemble bootstrapping. bioRxiv 2021, 449169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980, 16, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lefort, V.; Longueville, J.-E.; Gascuel, O. SMS: Smart Model Selection in PhyML. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 2422–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lemoine, F.; Domelevo Entfellner, J.B.; Wilkinson, E.; Correia, D.; Dávila Felipe, M.; De Oliveira, T.; Gascuel, O. Renewing Felsenstein’s phylogenetic bootstrap in the era of big data. Nature 2018, 556, 452–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA 11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 58, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, K.; Dorlhac de Borne, F.; Julio, E.; Obszynski, J.; Pale, P.; Otten, L. Root-specific expression of opine genes and opine accumulation in some cultivars of the naturally occurring GMO Nicotiana tabacum. Plant J. 2016, 87, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yan, J.; Li, Y.; Yan, H.; Chen, W.F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, E.T.; Han, X.Z.; Xie, Z.H. Agrobacterium salinitolerans sp. nov., a saline-alkaline-tolerant bacterium isolated from root nodule of Sesbania cannabina. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1906–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ellis, J.G.; Ryder, M.M.; Tate, M.E. Agrobacterium tumefaciens TR-DNA encodes a pathway for agropine biosynthesis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1984, 195, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bertioli, D.J.; Seijo, G.; Freitas, F.O.; Valls, J.F.M.; Leal-Bertioli, S.C.M.; Moretzsohn, M.C. An overview of peanut and its wild relatives. Plant Genet. Resour. 2011, 9, 134–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Carvalho, P.V.; Brasileiro, A.C.M.; GuimarÃ, P.M.; da Silva, J.P.; Gimenes, M.A. Evidences that polyploidization and hybridization affected resveratrol content in Arachis interspecific hybrids. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 2019, 11, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Krapovickas, A.; Gregory, W.C.; Williams, D.E.; Simpson, C.E. Taxonomy of the genus Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 2007, 16, 1–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tian, X.; Shi, L.; Guo, J.; Fu, L.; Du, P.; Huang, B.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z. Chloroplast Phylogenomic Analyses Reveal a Maternal Hybridization Event Leading to the Formation of Cultivated Peanuts. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 804568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Koppolu, R.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Dwivedi, S.L.; Hoisington, D.A.; Varshney, R.K. Genetic relationships among seven sections of genus Arachis studied by using SSR markers. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yin, D.; Ji, C.; Song, Q.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, K.; Chen, C.Y.; Wang, C.; He, G.; Liang, Z.; et al. Comparison of Arachis monticola with Diploid and Cultivated Tetraploid Genomes Reveals Asymmetric Subgenome Evolution and Improvement of Peanut. Adv. Sci. 2019, 7, 1901672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stalker, H.T.; Dhesi, J.S.; Parry, D.C.; Hahn, J.H. Cytological and Interfertility Relationships of Arachis Section Arachis. Am. J. Bot. 1991, 78, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Singh, A.K.; Gurtu, S.; Jambunathan, R. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Arachis based on seed protein profiles. Euphytica 1994, 74, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Leal-Bertioli, S.C.M.; Santos, S.P.; Dantas, K.M.; Inglis, P.W.; Nielen, S.; Araujo, A.C.G.; Silva, J.P.; Cavalcante, U.; Guimaraes, P.M.; Brasileiro, A.C.M.; et al. Arachis batizocoi: A study of its relationship to cultivated peanut (A. hypogaea) and its potential for introgression of wild genes into the peanut crop using induced allotetraploids. Ann. Bot. 2014, 115, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Yan, C.; Zhao, X.; Yuan, C.; Sun, Q.; Shi, C.; Shan, S. Twelve complete chloroplast genomes of wild peanuts: Great genetic resources and a better understanding of Arachis phylogeny. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhuang, W.; Wang, X.; Paterson, A.H.; Chen, H.; Yang, M.; Zhang, C.; Sun, P.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, L.; Xie, W.; et al. Reply to: Evaluating two different models of peanut’s origin. Nat. Genet. 2020, 52, 560–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Moretzsohn, M.C.; Gouvea, E.G.; Inglis, P.W.; Leal-Bertioli, S.C.M.; Valls, J.F.M.; Bertioli, D.J. A study of the relationships of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and its most closely related wild species using intron sequences and microsatellite markers. Ann. Bot. 2013, 111, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bertioli, D.J.; Jenkins, J.; Clevenger, J.; Dudchenko, O.; Gao, D.; Seijo, G.; Leal-Bertioli, S.C.; Ren, L.; Farmer, A.D.; Pandey, M.K.; et al. The genome sequence of segmental allotetraploid peanut Arachis hypogaea. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pan, Y.; Zhuang, Y.; Liu, T.; Chen, H.; Wang, L.; Varshney, R.K.; Zhuang, W.; Wang, X. Deciphering peanut complex genomes paves a way to understand its origin and domestication. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 2173–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Grabiele, M.; Chalup, L.; Robledo, G.; Seijo, G. Genetic and geographic origin of domesticated peanut, as evidenced by 5S rDNA and chloroplast DNA sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. 2012, 298, 1151–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, K.; Otten, L. Natural Agrobacterium Transformants: Recent Results and Some Theoretical Considerations. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aoki, S.; Syono, K. Function of Ngrol genes in the evolution of Nicotiana glauca: Conservation of the function of NgORF13 and NgORF14 after ancient infection by an Agrobacterium rhizogenes-like ancestor. Plant Cell Physiol. 1999, 40, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Aoki, S.; Kawaoka, A.; Sekine, M.; Ichikawa, T.; Fujita, T.; Shinmyo, A.; Syono, K. Sequence of the cellular T-DNA in the untransformed genome of Nicotiana glauca that is homologous to ORFs 13 and 14 of the Ri plasmid and analysis of its expression in genetic tumors of N. glauca × N. langsdorffii. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1994, 243, 706–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Meyer, A.D.; Ichikawa, T.; Meins, F. Horizontal gene transfer: Regulated expression of tobacco homologue of the Agrobacterium rhizogenes rolC gene. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1995, 249, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Messens, E.; Lenaerts, A.; Hedges, R.W.; Van Montagu, M. Agrocinopine A, a phosphorylated opine is secreted from crown gall cells. EMBO J. 1985, 4, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Messens, E.; Lenaerts, A.; Van Montagu, M.; Hedges, R.W. Genetic basis for opine secretion from crown gall tumour cells. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1985, 199, 344–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Oger, P.M.; Mansouri, H.; Nesme, X.; Dessaux, Y. Engineering root exudation of Lotus toward the production of two novel carbon compounds leads to the selection of distinct microbial populations in the rhizosphere. Microb. Ecol. 2003, 47, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mondy, S.; Lenglet, A.; Beury-Cirou, A.; Libanga, C.; Ratet, P.; Faure, D.; Dessaux, Y. An increasing opine carbon bias in artificial exudation systems and genetically modified plant rhizospheres leads to an increasing reshaping of bacterial populations. Mol. Ecol. 2014, 23, 4846–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Moore, L.W.; Chilton, W.S.; Canfield, M.L. Diversity of opines and opine-catabolizing bacteria isolated from naturally occurring crown gall tumors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biology 13 00601 g001
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships between cus -like sequences from different Arachis species and the intraspecific variability of cus-like gene expression in cultivated peanuts. (A) The evolutionary history of Arachis inferred based on the cus-like gene, using the maximum-likelihood method and the Kimura 1980 model. (B) Expression of the transgene in the lines of the VIR collection. The asterisks show the colors marking the different lines and their correspondence to alleles on the tree.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships between cus -like sequences from different Arachis species and the intraspecific variability of cus-like gene expression in cultivated peanuts. (A) The evolutionary history of Arachis inferred based on the cus-like gene, using the maximum-likelihood method and the Kimura 1980 model. (B) Expression of the transgene in the lines of the VIR collection. The asterisks show the colors marking the different lines and their correspondence to alleles on the tree.
Biology 13 00601 g001
Table 1. Natural transgenes of the Arachis species, based on NGS data.
Table 1. Natural transgenes of the Arachis species, based on NGS data.
Section [16]Genome
[16]		SpeciesNGS Data Transgenes Found SRR Accession
Number(s)
ArachisKA. batizocoi Krapov. & W.C. Greg.cT-DNA is present in the genome, but coverage is not sufficient for assemblycusSRX5286222, SRX5286221
AA. cardenasii Krapov. & W.C. GregcT-DNA was found in WGS data, and in new SRA data, coverage is sufficient to assemble full-length genescusDRX231922, SRX5574006
AA. correntina (Burkart) Krapov. & W.C. Greg.cT-DNA is present in the genome, but coverage is not sufficient for assemblycusSRX5874118
AA. diogoi HoehnecT-DNA is present in the genome, but coverage is not sufficient for assemblycusSRX1382040, SRX51458279
AA. duranensis Krapov. & W.C. Greg.cT-DNA was described earlier, and in new SRA data, coverage is sufficient to assemble full-length genescusSRX5574003
DA. glandulifera Stalker,cT-DNA is present in the genome, but coverage is not sufficient for assemblycusSRX15154171
AA. helodes Mart. ex Krapov. & RigonicT-DNA is present in the genome, but coverage is not sufficient for assemblycusSRX5874120
AA. hoehnei Krapov. & W.C. Greg.cT-DNA is present in the genome, and coverage is sufficient to assemble a full-length genecusSRX5286219
ABA. hypogaea L.cT-DNA was described earlier, and in new SRA data, coverage is sufficient to assemble full-length genescus, mas2′SRX2105338, SRX2105345,
SRX2105341, SRX2105349,
SRX2105334, SRX2105351,
SRX2105347, SRX2105352,
SRX2105333, SRX2105343,
SRX2105344, SRX2105342,
SRX2105348, SRX2105335,
SRX2105337, SRX2105350,
SRX2105340, SRX2105346,
SRX2105336, SRX2105339,
SRX4393155, SRX4393154,
SRX4393152, SRX4393153
BA. ipaensis Krapov. & W.C. Greg.cT-DNA was described earlier, and in new SRA data, coverage is sufficient to assemble full-length genescus, mas2′
BA. magna Krapov. et al.cT-DNA is present in the genome, but coverage is not sufficient for assemblycus, mas2′SRX5286220, SRX5573999
ABA. monticola Krapov. & Rigoni cT-DNA was described earlier, and in new SRA data, coverage is sufficient to assemble full-length genescus, mas2′SRX3755563, SRX3802089
AA. stenosperma Krapov. & W.C. Greg.cT-DNA was described earlier, and in new SRA data, coverage is sufficient to assemble full-length genescusSRX5286218
FA. trinitensis Krapov. & W.C. Greg.cT-DNA is present in the genome, but coverage is not sufficient for assemblycusSRX15154170
BA. valida Krapov. & W.C. Greg.cT-DNA is present in the genome, and coverage is sufficient to assemble a full-length genecus, mas2′SRX5574002
AA. villosa Benth. cT-DNA is present in the genome, and coverage is sufficient to assemble a full-length genecusSRX5874123
ErectoidesEA.paraguariensis Chodat & Hassl cT-DNA is present in the genome, and coverage is sufficient to assemble a full-length genecusSRX5874114
EA. stenophylla Krapov. & W.C. Greg.cT-DNA is present in the genome, but coverage is not sufficient for assemblycusSRX5286218
ExtranervosaeEXA. macedoi Krapov. & W.C. Greg.cT-DNA is present in the genome, and coverage is sufficient to assemble a full-length genecus, agsSRX5145834
ProcumbentesPRA.appressipila Krapov. & W. C. Greg.cT-DNA is present in the genome, and coverage is sufficient to assemble a full-length genecus, mas1′SRX5145828
PRA. rigonii Krapov. & W.C. Greg.cT-DNA is present in the genome, and coverage is sufficient to assemble a full-length genecus, mas1′SRX9622591
CaulorrhizaeCA. pintoi Krapov. & W.C. Greg.cT-DNA is present in the genome, and coverage is sufficient to assemble a full-length genecusSRX11087450
HeteranthaeHA. pusilla Benth.cT-DNA is present in the genome, but coverage is not sufficient for assemblycus, mas2′, agsSRX5145826
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bogomaz, O.D.; Bemova, V.D.; Mirgorodskii, N.A.; Matveeva, T.V. Evolutionary Fate of the Opine Synthesis Genes in the Arachis L. Genomes. Biology 2024, 13, 601. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080601

AMA Style

Bogomaz OD, Bemova VD, Mirgorodskii NA, Matveeva TV. Evolutionary Fate of the Opine Synthesis Genes in the Arachis L. Genomes. Biology. 2024; 13(8):601. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080601

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bogomaz, Olesja D., Victoria D. Bemova, Nikita A. Mirgorodskii, and Tatiana V. Matveeva. 2024. "Evolutionary Fate of the Opine Synthesis Genes in the Arachis L. Genomes" Biology 13, no. 8: 601. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080601

APA Style

Bogomaz, O. D., Bemova, V. D., Mirgorodskii, N. A., & Matveeva, T. V. (2024). Evolutionary Fate of the Opine Synthesis Genes in the Arachis L. Genomes. Biology, 13(8), 601. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080601

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop