Next Article in Journal
d-Serine Increases Release of Acetylcholine in Rat Submandibular Glands
Previous Article in Journal
The Designer Drug αPHP Affected Cell Proliferation and Triggered Deathly Mechanisms in Murine Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Selection and Evaluation of mRNA and miRNA Reference Genes for Expression Studies (qPCR) in Archived Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Colon Samples of DSS-Induced Colitis Mouse Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue on Differential Gene Expression and Coexpression

by
Vasileios L. Zogopoulos
1,2,
Apostolos Malatras
3,* and
Ioannis Michalopoulos
1,*
1
Centre of Systems Biology, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
2
Section of Cell Biology and Biophysics, Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15701 Athens, Greece
3
Biobank.cy Centre of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, University of Cyprus, 2029 Nicosia, Cyprus
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(9), 1226; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12091226
Submission received: 6 September 2023 / Accepted: 8 September 2023 / Published: 11 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Differential Gene Expression and Coexpression)
The most common approach in transcriptomics (RNA-seq and microarrays) is differential gene expression analysis (DGEA). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) may be responsible for phenotypic differences between various biological conditions. An alternative approach is gene coexpression analysis, which detects groups of genes with similar expression patterns across unrelated sets of transcriptomic data from the same organism. Coexpressed genes tend to be involved in similar biological processes. This Special Issue includes 12 research articles and one review on the topic of differential gene expression and coexpression. This review is an introduction to the basic methods of coexpression analysis, while the research articles describe both software and tools that assist in the execution of differential gene expression and coexpression analysis, as well as computational workflows that reveal new biological knowledge.
Through a microarray-based comparison of dcap-1 knockout and wild type roundworms, Borbolis et al. [1] revealed the role of mRNA DeCAPping enzyme (dcap-1) in the silencing of spermatogenic genes during late oogenesis and in the suppression of aberrant immune gene rise during aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Yoon et al. [2] revealed that high levels of procollagen C-endopeptidase enhancer 2 (PCOLCE2) in Tonsil-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (TMSCs) were highly effective in potentiating ROS generation in co-cultured differentiated HL-60 (dHL-60) cells through an RNA-seq-based DGEA. By performing CAGE-seq on two types of atrophic rat muscle samples and through a bioinformatics pipeline centred on Transcription Start Site (TSS) analysis, Pintus et al. [3] identified non-coding transcribed regulatory elements controlling the skeletal muscle disuse-mediated atrophy. Otálora-Otálora et al. [4] used a bioinformatics workflow which includes differential expression, and coexpression network and coregulatory network analyses of microarray samples to discover possible unique lung cancer biomarkers, as well as possible common biomarkers in tumours (lung, breast, and leukaemia). Through an integrative bioinformatics pipeline, including the DGEA of hepatocellular carcinoma and normal liver microarray samples, and Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis (WGCNA), Nguyen et al. [5] identified five hub genes as potential prognostic biomarkers in liver cancer. Singh et al. [6] were able to identify four Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC)-specific hub genes, using a bioinformatics workflow including a DGEA of selected RNA-seq samples from TCGA, the construction of a weighted protein–protein interaction network and, through module discovery, the identification of a single module of 12 genes as significant. Through a pipeline composed of expression stability and a subsequent quantitative PCR analysis of reference genes, Unkovič et al. [7] showed that archived formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) colon samples of DSS-induced colitis mouse samples are a reliable source of RNA. Pyatnitskiy et al. [8] assessed the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) Long-read Direct RNA-seq as a platform suitable for the estimation of gene abundance by comparing an ONT analysis pipeline with an Illumina RNA-seq-based one. Their results showed that at least 2 ONT replicates are needed to detect expressions of most genes and transcripts. Zogopoulos et al. [9] offered a review on all available types of gene coexpression analysis using transcriptomics data, as well as a presentation of the most popular web and standalone gene coexpression software tools. They also listed additional downstream analyses, including biological term enrichment analysis tools. One such tool is FLAME [10], a web app developed to simplify handling multiple gene lists during functional enrichment analysis. It enables intersections and unions among gene lists, with results displayed interactively via heatmaps, bar charts, Manhattan plots, and networks. BioTEA [11] is a Linux command line tool that performs microarray-based DGEAs. BioTEA facilitates data retrieval from microarray studies as well as the automatic parsing of their metadata, followed by differential analysis steps using simple commands up to the production of DEG lists, which could then be used for subsequent analysis. ARGEOS [12] is a web tool to streamline dataset discovery from GEO and ArrayExpress public transcriptomics repositories while also offering in-depth dataset analysis, encompassing protocol collection, dataset count, and supplementary reference details. Finally, MAGE [13] is an open-source tool for gene expression data meta-analysis. It features probe-to-gene conversion, standard analysis and meta-analysis with bootstrap errors, multi-outcome meta-analysis, and functional enrichment. Comprehensive visualisations accompany each function while standalone and webserver versions of MAGE are offered.
Τhe guest editors are grateful to all authors for their contributions to this Special Issue. Their works enlighten various aspects of differential gene expression and coexpression analyses, starting from transcriptomics data production and automated data acquisition from public repositories, followed by comprehensive analysis and meta-analysis applications and downstream analysis tools. Some publications presented bioinformatics pipelines used for the discovery of cancer biomarkers. We are looking forward to the presentation of novel computational pipelines and biological discoveries in the Special Issue “Differential Gene Expression and Coexpression 2.0”.

Author Contributions

V.L.Z., A.M. and I.M. wrote the main manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the project “ELIXIR-GR: Managing and Analysing Life Sciences Data” (MIS: 5002780) which is implemented under the Action “Reinforcement of the Research and Innovation Infrastructure”, funded by the Operational Programme “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014–2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund). Part of this work was supported by the CY-Biobank project, under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under Grant agreements n. 857122 (CY-Biobank).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Borbolis, F.; Ranti, D.; Papadopoulou, M.D.; Dimopoulou, S.; Malatras, A.; Michalopoulos, I.; Syntichaki, P. Selective Destabilization of Transcripts by mRNA Decapping Regulates Oocyte Maturation and Innate Immunity Gene Expression during Ageing in C. elegans. Biology 2023, 12, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yoon, H.S.; Kim, H.Y.; Cho, K.A.; Kim, Y.H.; Woo, S.Y.; Kim, H.S.; Kang, J.L.; Ryu, K.H.; Park, J.W. Procollagen C-Endopeptidase Enhancer 2 Secreted by Tonsil-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Increases the Oxidative Burst of Promyelocytic HL-60 Cells. Biology 2022, 11, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pintus, S.S.; Akberdin, I.R.; Yevshin, I.; Makhnovskii, P.; Tyapkina, O.; Nigmetzyanov, I.; Nurullin, L.; Devyatiyarov, R.; Shagimardanova, E.; Popov, D.; et al. Genome-Wide Atlas of Promoter Expression Reveals Contribution of Transcribed Regulatory Elements to Genetic Control of Disuse-Mediated Atrophy of Skeletal Muscle. Biology 2021, 10, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Otalora-Otalora, B.A.; Osuna-Garzon, D.A.; Carvajal-Parra, M.S.; Canas, A.; Montecino, M.; Lopez-Kleine, L.; Rojas, A. Identifying General Tumor and Specific Lung Cancer Biomarkers by Transcriptomic Analysis. Biology 2022, 11, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nguyen, T.B.; Do, D.N.; Nguyen-Thanh, T.; Tatipamula, V.B.; Nguyen, H.T. Identification of Five Hub Genes as Key Prognostic Biomarkers in Liver Cancer via Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis. Biology 2021, 10, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Singh, P.; Rai, A.; Verma, A.K.; Alsahli, M.A.; Rahmani, A.H.; Almatroodi, S.A.; Alrumaihi, F.; Dev, K.; Sinha, A.; Sankhwar, S.; et al. Survival-Based Biomarker Module Identification Associated with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC). Biology 2021, 10, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Unkovic, A.; Bostjancic, E.; Belic, A.; Perse, M. Selection and Evaluation of mRNA and miRNA Reference Genes for Expression Studies (qPCR) in Archived Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Colon Samples of DSS-Induced Colitis Mouse Model. Biology 2023, 12, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pyatnitskiy, M.A.; Arzumanian, V.A.; Radko, S.P.; Ptitsyn, K.G.; Vakhrushev, I.V.; Poverennaya, E.V.; Ponomarenko, E.A. Oxford Nanopore MinION Direct RNA-Seq for Systems Biology. Biology 2021, 10, 1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zogopoulos, V.L.; Saxami, G.; Malatras, A.; Papadopoulos, K.; Tsotra, I.; Iconomidou, V.A.; Michalopoulos, I. Approaches in Gene Coexpression Analysis in Eukaryotes. Biology 2022, 11, 1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Thanati, F.; Karatzas, E.; Baltoumas, F.A.; Stravopodis, D.J.; Eliopoulos, A.G.; Pavlopoulos, G.A. FLAME: A Web Tool for Functional and Literature Enrichment Analysis of Multiple Gene Lists. Biology 2021, 10, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Visentin, L.; Scarpellino, G.; Chinigo, G.; Munaron, L.; Ruffinatti, F.A. BioTEA: Containerized Methods of Analysis for Microarray-Based Transcriptomics Data. Biology 2022, 11, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gavrish, G.E.; Chistyakov, D.V.; Sergeeva, M.G. ARGEOS: A New Bioinformatic Tool for Detailed Systematics Search in GEO and ArrayExpress. Biology 2021, 10, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tamposis, I.A.; Manios, G.A.; Charitou, T.; Vennou, K.E.; Kontou, P.I.; Bagos, P.G. MAGE: An Open-Source Tool for Meta-Analysis of Gene Expression Studies. Biology 2022, 11, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zogopoulos, V.L.; Malatras, A.; Michalopoulos, I. Special Issue on Differential Gene Expression and Coexpression. Biology 2023, 12, 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12091226

AMA Style

Zogopoulos VL, Malatras A, Michalopoulos I. Special Issue on Differential Gene Expression and Coexpression. Biology. 2023; 12(9):1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12091226

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zogopoulos, Vasileios L., Apostolos Malatras, and Ioannis Michalopoulos. 2023. "Special Issue on Differential Gene Expression and Coexpression" Biology 12, no. 9: 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12091226

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop