Next Article in Journal
The Spatial Precision of Contextual Feedback Signals in Human V1
Previous Article in Journal
TAFPred: Torsion Angle Fluctuations Prediction from Protein Sequences
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spodoptera exigua Multiple Nucleopolyhedrovirus Increases the Susceptibility to Insecticides: A Promising Efficient Way for Pest Resistance Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biological Fitness Cost, Demographic Growth Characteristics, and Resistance Mechanism in Alpha-Cypermethrin-Resistant Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae)

by
Abdulwahab M. Hafez
*,† and
Naeem Abbas
*,†
Pesticides and Environmental Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Plant Protection, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biology 2023, 12(7), 1021; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12071021
Submission received: 19 May 2023 / Revised: 12 July 2023 / Accepted: 18 July 2023 / Published: 19 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evolution of Insecticide Resistance Mechanisms in Insect Pests)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The house fly is a pest of animals and humans that has developed resistance to alpha-cypermethrin, a commonly used pyrethroid insecticide used to control medically important pests in Saudi Arabia. This study demonstrated that the alpha-cypermethrin selected strain of house fly had a 405.93-fold increase in resistance to alpha-cypermethrin compared with the alpha-cypermethrin–susceptible strain; the increased resistance was attributed to the presence of glutathione S-transferases, specific esterases, and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases. The alpha-cypermethrin resistant strain exhibited lower relative fitness (0.50), longevity, survival rate, life expectancy, reproductive values, intrinsic rate of increase, net reproductive rate, fecundity, maternity, and finite rate of increase, along with shorter larval, female preadult, and adult durations than the susceptible strain. These results demonstrated that alpha-cypermethrin resistance may pose fitness costs in house flies. These findings will aid in the development of rational house fly control methods.

Abstract

Musca domestica L., a pest of animals and humans, has developed resistance to alpha-cypermethrin, a pyrethroid insecticide commonly used to control medically important pests in many countries, including Saudi Arabia. We investigated the mechanism underlying the development of alpha-cypermethrin resistance and life history characteristics of alpha-cypermethrin–susceptible (Alpha-SS) and alpha-cypermethrin-resistant (Alpha-RS) M. domestica using the age-stage, two-sex life table theory, which is crucial for developing a future rational management strategy and minimizing the negative effects of alpha-cypermethrin on the environment. Our results showed that Alpha-RS M. domestica had a 405.93-fold increase in resistance to alpha-cypermethrin relative to Alpha-SS M. domestica. This increase in the resistance toward insecticide was attributed to metabolic enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferases, specific esterases, and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases. Furthermore, Alpha-RS M. domestica exhibited lower relative fitness (0.50), longevity, survival rate, life expectancy, reproductive values, intrinsic rate of increase, net reproductive rate, fecundity, maternity, and finite rate of increase, along with shorter larval, female preadult, and adult durations than Alpha-SS M. domestica, indicating fitness costs associated with most parameters. However, no significant differences were found between the strains in the following parameters: egg, pupa, and male preadult durations; adult preoviposition, total preoviposition, and oviposition periods; female ratio; and total generation time. Additionally, Alpha-RS M. domestica had a markedly lower intrinsic rate of increase, net reproductive rate, and finite rate of increase than Alpha-SS M. domestica. The results of this study suggest that alpha-cypermethrin resistance may lead to dominant fitness costs in M. domestica. Overall, these findings will aid in the development of rational control strategies for M. domestica as well as help to reduce pesticide pollution.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae), the common house fly, is a globally distributed insect pest that transmits diseases to humans and animals [1,2]. The adult stage of M. domestica not only causes annoyance but also serves as a carrier for approximately 200 pathogens responsible for several life-threatening diseases, such as avian influenza, diarrhea, bovine respiratory diseases, typhoid fever, aspergillosis, tuberculosis, cholera, poliomyelitis, and hepatitis [2,3,4,5]. These pathogens are attached to the body of M. domestica adults either through direct contact or while feeding on garbage and animal waste in filthy habitats [5,6]. Subsequently, the pathogens are transmitted to humans and animals through physical contact when the flies enter sanitary settings [7].
Various measures, including the maintenance of proper waste hygiene around dairies and homes, chemical control, and biological agents such as predators and parasitoids, are taken to manage M. domestica [1]. Among these measures, chemical control is a common practice due to its knockdown effects. Alpha-cypermethrin, a synthetic pyrethroid insecticide, is used worldwide to control various insect pests, including M. domestica [8,9,10]. Unfortunately, overreliance on alpha-cypermethrin can lead to resistance development, increased control costs, and environmental pollution [11,12]. In fact, alpha-cypermethrin resistance has previously been observed in M. domestica, Bactrocera oleae Rossi., Rhipicephalus microplus Canestrini, and Stomoxys calcitrans L. [11,13,14,15]. As a result, increasing the dose of insecticide has become inevitable, which exerts adverse effects on the environment.
Insecticide resistance mechanisms are often associated with metabolic detoxification, reduced cuticular penetration, and target site insensitivity [16,17]. Metabolic detoxification and/or sodium channel-facilitated target site insensitivity have been recognized as major mechanisms underlying the resistance to insecticides in M. domestica [18,19,20,21,22]. Pyrethroid resistance in M. domestica is often linked with mutations (kdr) as well as increased activities of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, glutathione S-transferases, and/or general esterases [17,22,23,24,25].
Fitness is an individual’s ability to reproduce in a particular environment and pass on their reproductive traits to subsequent generations [26,27]. Fitness costs are exhibited in insecticide-resistant individuals of pest strains that are less fit than insecticide-susceptible individuals in the absence of insecticides. These costs tremendously contribute to delaying the evolution of insecticide resistance and reducing its extent in the absence of insecticides [28]. The discontinuation of insecticide selective pressure can prevent the occurrence and spread of insecticide resistance when insecticide-resistant pests exhibit dominant fitness costs [29]. Insecticide resistance affects the fitness of insects, resulting in lower survival rates, fecundity (number of eggs per female), finite or intrinsic rates of increase, and net reproductive rates, along with longer developmental durations and generation times in insecticide-resistant pests than in insecticide-susceptible pests [29,30]. The fitness costs of resistance to various insecticide classes have been described in M. domestica [29,31], Dysdercus koenigii Fabricius [32], Aedes aegypti L. [33], Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) [34], and Oxycarenus hyalinipennis Costa [35]. These insecticide-resistant strains have shown unfavorable biological and demographic growth characteristics compared with their susceptible counterpart strains. However, the fitness cost of alpha-cypermethrin resistance in M. domestica is still unknown.
Understanding fitness costs and mechanisms of insecticide resistance is crucial for the development of effective strategies to manage insecticide resistance. In our previous study, we assessed the resistance risk, quantitative genetics, and cross-resistance patterns in alpha-cypermethrin-resistant M. domestica [14]. However, the fitness costs and the mechanisms of alpha-cypermethrin resistance in M. domestica remain unknown. Therefore, in this study, the fitness costs of alpha-cypermethrin-resistant (Alpha-RS) and alpha-cypermethrin-susceptible (Alpha-SS) M. domestica were investigated based on the age-stage, two-sex life table theory. Furthermore, the mechanisms of alpha-cypermethrin resistance were explored using three synergists.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains of M. domestica

The rearing protocol for M. domestica strains is outlined in our previous studies [10,14,36]. Briefly, we collected a population of M. domestica from a dairy facility in Dirab, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (24.49° N, 46.60° E) and divided it into two groups: Alpha-SS, which was maintained for 41 generations with no insecticide exposure; and Alpha-RS, which was continuously exposed to various concentrations of alpha-cypermethrin (90–1000 ppm) for 41 generations. Selection pressure was maintained by exposing subsequent generations to increased concentrations of alpha-cypermethrin while ensuring sufficient survival of adults for offspring production. The median lethal concentration (LC50) of alpha-cypermethrin in the field strain (90 ppm) was used for the first eight generations. In each generation, approximately 1000 mixed-sex adults (2–3 days old) were screened with alpha-cypermethrin using a feeding method (IRAC method# 026) [37], and mortality data were recorded after exposure to insecticide for 48 h. Surviving adults were transferred to rearing cages (40 × 40 cm2) for obtaining the next generation. Both strains were reared in the laboratory under controlled conditions: 27 °C ± 2 °C, 65% ± 5% relative humidity, and a 12:12 h light:dark photoperiod.

2.2. Chemicals

Alpha-cypermethrin (Alphaquest, 100EC, 10% a.i., Astrachem Company, Dammam, Saudi Arabia) was used for bioassay and selection experiments. Synergistic bioassays were performed using common inhibitors of major metabolic enzymes: piperonyl butoxide (PBO; 97%, Rhawn Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), which is a cytochrome P450 monooxygenases inhibitor; S,S,S-tri-n-butyl phosphorotrithioate (DEF; Chem. Service Inc., West Chester, PA, USA), an esterase-specific inhibitor; and diethyl maleate (DEM; 97%, Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), a glutathione S-transferase inhibitor.

2.3. Concentration–Response Bioassay

Concentration–response bioassays were conducted to determine the resistance levels in the tested M. domestica following the selection pressure by alpha-cypermethrin over 41 generations. We used a concentration–response bioassay that has been described in our previous studies [10,14,36], with slight modifications. Briefly, the toxicity of alpha-cypermethrin against M. domestica adults was assessed using a feeding bioassay. Seven alpha-cypermethrin concentrations, whose mortality rates ranged from >0% to <100%, were prepared in 20% sugar solution through serial dilution and replicated three times. Each desired concentration was prepared by diluting a specific amount from the stock solution of alpha-cypermethrin into the relevant volume of the 20% sugar solution. We used alpha-cypermethrin concentrations ranging from 0.977 to 62.5 μg mL−1 and from 125 to 8000 μg mL−1 for Alpha-SS and Alpha-RS, respectively. For each replicate, concentration, and bioassay, 10, 30, and 210 mixed-sex adults were used, respectively. Thirty adults were used as controls, with ten adults included in each replicate. These adults were starved for 2 h in perforated plastic jars (11 cm diameter; 15 cm height) prior to the bioassay. Cotton wicks (3 cm in length) soaked in each insecticide concentration were placed in Petri dishes (9 cm in diameter); these Petri dishes were kept in plastic jars for feeding the insects. For the control group, cotton wicks soaked in 20% sugar solution were provided for feeding. Concentration–response bioassays were performed under the laboratory conditions mentioned in Section 2.1. Mortality was assessed after 48 h of exposure, considering the fast action of alpha-cypermethrin.

2.4. Synergism Experiment

Synergism bioassays were conducted to identify the possible mechanism of alpha-cypermethrin resistance in the tested M. domestica following the selection pressure by alpha-cypermethrin over 41 generations. In these synergism bioassays, analytical-grade acetone (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) was used to dissolve PBO, DEF, and DEM. The resulting solutions were mixed with serially diluted concentrations of alpha-cypermethrin. The concentrations of alpha-cypermethrin that were mixed with PBO, DEF or DEM ranged from 0.977 to 62.5 μg mL−1 and from 62.5 to 4000 μg mL−1 for Alpha-SS and Alpha-RS, respectively. Based on the results of preliminary tests, a nonlethal concentration of 2 mg/L for PBO and DEF was used against both Alpha-RS and Alpha-SS M. domestica, and a nonlethal concentration of 0.5 mg/L was used for DEM against both strains. The control consisted of acetone mixed with deionized water only. Synergism bioassays were performed under the laboratory conditions mentioned in Section 2.1. Mortality was recorded after 48 h of exposure, and the synergism ratios (SRs) were calculated as the LC50 of alpha-cypermethrin alone divided by the LC50 of alpha-cypermethrin plus PBO, DEF, or DEM. The 95% confidence limits (CLs) were determined using the method described by Robertson et al. [38].

2.5. Assessment of Life Tables of Alpha-RS and Alpha-SS M. domestica

The life table parameters of Alpha-SS and Alpha-RS M. domestica were studied to assess the fitness cost of alpha-cypermethrin resistance. Beginning with the 41st generation, three replications of 150 randomly selected freshly hatched first instar larvae (50 larvae per replicate) from Alpha-SS and Alpha-RS M. domestica were used as experimental populations. The larvae were placed in 1000 mL glass beakers containing artificial diet (described in detail by Abbas and Hafez [14] and protected with a fine mesh cloth to prevent larvae from escaping. Larvae were allowed to pupate in glass jars, and the durations of larval and pupal stages as well as mortality rates were recorded for both strains. Within 24 h, the emerged males and females were paired in plastic jars (15 cm height; 11 cm diameter). Adult diet (1 mg of dry powdered milk and 1 mg of sugar) and water-soaked cotton wicks (~3 cm) were placed in separate Petri dishes and provided to adult flies for feeding. To examine fecundity, 50 ♂ × 50 ♀ (1:1 ratio) and 30 ♂ × 30 ♀ (1:1 ratio) pairs of Alpha-SS and Alpha-RS, respectively, were made based on the availability of adults. One pair of M. domestica was used as one replication for both strains. After 2 days of adult pairing, Petri dishes containing larval diet were provided for egg laying. Petri dishes were removed from jars daily, and eggs were counted using a fine hair brush. All life history parameters were recorded for both strains under the aforementioned laboratory conditions.
The demographic life table parameters were calculated using methods outlined in our previous studies [1,32,39].
“The age-stage survival rate” (sxj), i.e., the probability that a newly laid egg will survive to age x and stage j, was calculated using the method described by Chi and Liu [40]. The age-specific survival rate (lx), i.e., the pooled probability that a newly laid egg will survive to age x, was determined as follows:
l x = j = 1 m s x j .
Stage differentiation is not possible because lx represents the pooled survival rates of all stages at age x. The age-specific fecundity (mx), i.e., the mean fecundity of all individuals at age x, was determined as follows:
m x = j = 1 m s x j f x j j = 1 m s x j ,
where fxj is the mean fecundity of individuals at age x and stage j, and m is the number of stages. The net reproductive rate (R0), i.e., the total number of offspring that an individual can produce during its lifetime, was determined as follows:
R 0 = x = 0 l x m x .
The intrinsic rate of increase (r), i.e., the population growth rate when the time approaches infinity and the population reaches the stable age-stage distribution, was calculated using the Euler–Lotka equation [41,42] with an age index of zero [43] as follows:
x = 0 e r ( x + 1 ) l x m x = 1 .
The finite rate of increase (λ) was determined using the following equation:
λ = er.
The mean generation time (T), i.e., the length of time that a population requires to increase R0-fold in its size at the stable age-stage distribution, was calculated as follows:
T = l n   R 0 r
The life expectancy (exj), i.e., the expected duration of time that an individual of age x and stage j will survive after age x, was determined using the following equation:
e x j =   i = x n y = j m s i y ,
where s i y is the probability that an individual of age x and stage j will survive until age i and stage y [44]. The reproductive value (vxj), i.e., the value of an individual at age x and stage j to future offspring [45], was calculated as follows:
v x j = e r ( x + 1 ) s x j i = x e r ( i + 1 ) y = i m s i y f i y
The curves for lx, sxj, mx, age-stage specific maternity (lxmx), exj, and vxj were plotted using Sigma Plot 11.0.
Relative fitness (Rf) was calculated as follows:
R f = R 0 o f A l p h a - R S R 0 o f A l p h a - S S .

2.6. Data Analysis

Mortality and life table data analyses were conducted using methods outlined in our previous studies [1,14,32,39]. Probit analysis was performed using Polo Plus Software to analyze mortality data [46] and obtain LC50 values, fiducial limits (FLs), slopes (±standard errors (SEs)), and chi-square values (χ2). Abbott’s formula [47] was used to correct for control treatment mortality. Resistance ratios (RRs) were calculated by dividing the LC50 of alpha-cypermethrin in Alpha-RS M. domestica by that in Alpha-SS M. domestica. SRs were calculated by dividing the LC50s of alpha-cypermethrin alone in Alpha-SS and Alpha-RS M. domestica by the LC50s of alpha-cypermethrin +PBO, DEF, or DEM in Alpha-SS and Alpha-RS M. domestica. The 95% CLs of RRs and SRs were assessed using the method described by Robertson et al. [38], and RRs were considered significantly different if the CLs were not 1. The life table data were analyzed using the TWO-SEX-MS Chart program using 100,000 replicates and a paired bootstrap test [48] to calculate the means and SEs. The differences in life table traits between Alpha-RS and Alpha-SS M. domestica were compared using confidence intervals (CIs) calculated via the paired bootstrap test [44,49,50]. A significant difference among life history traits of strains was indicated by CIs that did not include the value 0 at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Toxicity and Resistance of Alpha-RS M. domestica to Alpha-Cypermethrin

After 41 generations of selection in the laboratory, Alpha-RS had 405.93-fold increase in resistance to alpha-cypermethrin relative to Alpha-SS (Table 1).

3.2. Effect of Synergists on Alpha-Cypermethrin Toxicity in Alpha-RS and Alpha-SS M. domestica

The synergists PBO, DEF, and DEM did not exhibit any synergistic effect on alpha-cypermethrin toxicity in Alpha-SS M. domestica (Table 2). However, PBO, DEF, and DEM significantly reduced alpha-cypermethrin LC50 values in Alpha-RS M. domestica from 1530.36 ppm to 412.18 ppm, 254.23 ppm, and 439.71 ppm, respectively, with SRs of 3.71, 6.02, and 3.48, respectively. These findings suggested that mechanisms of alpha-cypermethrin resistance in Alpha-RS M. domestica may be associated with specific esterases, glutathione S-transferases, and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (Table 2).

3.3. Biological and Demographic Parameters of Alpha-RS and Alpha-SS M. domestica

The egg duration, pupal duration, ♂ preadult duration, adult preoviposition period, total preoviposition period, oviposition period, generation time, and female ratio were not significantly different between Alpha-RS and Alpha-SS M. domestica. However, the larval duration, ♀ preadult duration, overall adult duration, ♂ total longevity, ♀ total longevity, and overall total longevity were significantly shorter in Alpha-RS M. domestica than in Alpha-SS M. domestica. Additionally, reproductive female ratio, fecundity, r, and λ were considerably lower in Alpha-RS M. domestica than in Alpha-SS M. domestica. Ro of Alpha-RS M. domestica was negatively affected when compared with that of Alpha-SS M. domestica. Compared with Alpha-SS M. domestica, the relative fitness value of Alpha-RS M. domestica was 0.50 (Table 3).

3.4. Age-Stage Survival and Reproduction Parameters of Alpha-RS and Alpha-SS M. domestica

Compared with Alpha-SS M. domestica, the sxj of male, female, pupa, and larva were negatively affected in Alpha-RS M. domestica (p < 0.05). However, the peak value of sxj for egg in Alpha-RS M. domestica was similar to that in Alpha-SS M. domestica (p > 0.05). The highest sxj values in the larva (0.92), pupa (0.92), female (0.21), and male (0.21) of Alpha-RS M. domestica were lower than those in the larva (1.00), pupa (0.98), female (0.31), and male (0.34) of Alpha-SS M. domestica (Figure 1).
The peak value of lx in Alpha-RS M. domestica was similar to that in Alpha-SS M. domestica (p > 0.05). However, the maximum peak of age-stage specific female fecundity (fx), mx, and lxmx peak values were significantly lower in Alpha-RS M. domestica than those in Alpha-SS M. domestica (p < 0.05). A comparison of the lx curves for Alpha-RS and Alpha-SS M. domestica revealed that Alpha-SS M. domestica aged 9–35 days and Alpha-RS M. domestica aged 9–30 days had low lx (Figure 2). Alpha-RS M. domestica aged 15 days had an fx of 28.86 eggs/female/day, which was lower than that in Alpha-SS M. domestica aged 18 days (53.25 eggs/female/day) (Figure 2). The maximum peak of mx (25 eggs/day) was observed in Alpha-SS M. domestica females aged 24 days, which was higher than the mx peak (14.11 eggs/day) in Alpha-RS M. domestica females aged 15 days (Figure 2). Both Alpha-SS M. domestica (9.33 offspring/day) and Alpha-RS M. domestica (4.23 offspring/day) exhibited maximum lxmx peaks (9.33 offspring/day and 4.23 offspring/day, respectively) when they were 15 days old (Figure 2).
The exj of egg, larva, and pupa of female and male Alpha-RS M. domestica was worse than that of Alpha-SS M. domestica (p < 0.05). Alpha-SS M. domestica had a higher maximum exj value for egg (18.10 days) than Alpha-RS M. domestica (13.63 days). The peak exj value for larva was 17.10 days in Alpha-SS M. domestica, which was higher than that of Alpha-RS M. domestica (12.64 days). Similarly, the peak exj value for pupa of Alpha-SS M. domestica (13.43 days) was significantly higher than that of Alpha-RS M. domestica (9.64 days). In both species, male and female M. domestica had significantly different peak exj values, with Alpha-SS M. domestica male and female having a longer life expectancy than Alpha-RS M. domestica (11.36 days and 11.08 days, respectively) (Figure 3).
Alpha-SS M. domestica had higher maximum vxj values than Alpha-RS M. domestica for egg, larva, pupa, and female, with values of 1.29, 5.96, 9.86, and 106.68 per day, respectively, compared with vxj values of 1.23, 3.78, 7.04, and 103.95 per day, respectively, for Alpha-RS M. domestica (p < 0.05). The durations were also shorter in Alpha-RS M. domestica than in Alpha-SS M. domestica (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

Alpha-cypermethrin is a relatively modern pyrethroid insecticide used in Saudi Arabia for controlling medically important pest species, including M. domestica [10,14]. In this study, Alpha-RS M. domestica had 405.93-fold resistance to alpha-cypermethrin after 41 generations of selection than Alpha-SS M. domestica. This rapid increase in the resistance of M. domestica to alpha-cypermethrin suggests that continuous exposure to this insecticide enhanced their insecticide resistance. Enzymatic detoxification is the most likely reason for the increase in alpha-cypermethrin resistance, as found in this study. The involvement of metabolically mediated resistance to insecticides can be preliminarily assessed using enzyme inhibitors such as DEF, PBO, and DEM [17,51]. The current findings revealed that the LC50 of alpha-cypermethrin in Alpha-RS M. domestica was significantly decreased in the presence of PBO, DEF, or DEM compared to when alpha-cypermethrin was used alone, indicating a possible involvement of the specific esterases, glutathione S-transferases, and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in the development of alpha-cypermethrin resistance in Alpha-RS M. domestica. This result suggests that specific esterases, glutathione S-transferases, and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases can be used to mitigate the toxicity of alpha-cypermethrin. Previous studies have indicated that M. domestica has developed pyrethroid resistance through cytochrome P450–mediated detoxification [18,21,52,53]. Our results are in agreement with those of Abbas et al. [17] and Khan et al. [54], who found that cytochrome P450 monooxygenases and specific esterases were involved in mitigating the toxicity of lambda-cyhalothrin and deltamethrin in M. domestica. However, Zhang et al. [55] reported no involvement of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases and glutathione S-transferases in mitigating the toxicity of beta-cypermethrin in M. domestica.
It is crucial to understand the fitness costs that accompany insecticide resistance in pest strains for developing effective strategies to manage insecticide resistance [26,28]. Insecticide-resistant individuals often exhibit unfavorable biological traits [39]. In this study, Alpha-RS M. domestica had a relative fitness of 0.50 when compared with Alpha-SS M. domestica; it also had shorter larval and adult durations, female preadult period, lower male and female total longevity, smaller reproductive female ratio, and lower fecundity than Alpha-SS, which shows the fitness costs associated with alpha-cypermethrin resistance. Previous studies also suggest that if the selection pressure of alpha-cypermethrin is discontinued for a period, the population of Alpha-RS M. domestica does not increase as rapidly as that of Alpha-SS M. domestica. Previous studies have also detected fitness costs in different insecticide-resistant strains, such as M. domestica [29,31,56,57,58], Phlebotomus papatasi (Scopoli) [59], Ae. aegypti [60,61], O. hyalinipennis [62,63], Plutella xylostella L. [64], Chrysodeixis includens Walker [65], Rhopalosiphum padi L. [66], and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) [67].
Demographic growth features, such as r, λ, and Ro, are indicators of potential population growth in certain environments. Changes in these features can disrupt the growth rate of insects [39]. In this study, r, λ, and Ro were significantly lower among Alpha-RS M. domestica than among Alpha-SS M. domestica, indicating the effect of alpha-cypermethrin selection on the reproduction and growth of M. domestica. The decrease in the number of eggs produced by a female in Alpha-RS M. domestica may be responsible for the reduced r, λ, and Ro values and subsequent decrease in relative fitness. Previous studies have also reported significantly reduced r and Ro in pyrethroid-resistant M. domestica, C. includens, C. capitata, Anopheles funestus Giles, Ae. aegypti, P. papatasi, and O. hyalinipennis compared with their pyrethroid-susceptible counterparts [29,59,61,62,65,67,68]. Additionally, sxj, mx, lxmx, exj, and vxj were markedly reduced in Alpha-RS M. domestica compared with Alpha-SS M. domestica, indicating fitness costs associated with alpha-cypermethrin resistance. Consistent with our results, previous studies have reported significant reductions in these age-stage, two-sex life table traits in different insecticide-resistant insect pests [32,69]. Due to time constraints, we were not able to perform the required crosses of Alpha-SS and Alpha-RS to ascertain whether the fitness costs were due to a heterosis effect relative to deleterious resistant alleles or genetic drift in the heterozygotes leading to recovery of biological parameters [30,70]. In general, our results support the common notion that insecticide-resistant strains exhibit fitness costs compared with their insecticide-susceptible counterparts. Furthermore, our study provides a comprehensive understanding of fitness traits in both Alpha-RS and Alpha-SS M. domestica.
The presence of deleterious life table parameters in Alpha-RS M. domestica highlights the negative impact of resistant alleles on the fitness and mechanisms of insect resistance, which may result from a trade-off between resources and energy. The selection pressure of insecticides, including alpha-cypermethrin, on pest strains requires significant consumption of resources and energy [30] contributing to fitness costs and adverse biological and reproduction parameters in Alpha-RS M. domestica. To address this issue, temporary withdrawal of alpha-cypermethrin, and the use of insect growth regulators, which are effective against M. domestica [1], can help in restoring the susceptibility of these insects to pyrethroids and aid successful M. domestica management. Rational insect resistance management plans, including limited use of insecticides, biological control agents, and cultural practices, should also be considered while planning M. domestica management.

5. Conclusions

After 41 generations, Alpha-RS M. domestica developed a 405.93-fold higher resistance to alpha-cypermethrin than Alpha-SS M. domestica, primarily via specific esterases, cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, and glutathione S-transferases. However, fitness costs were observed in this strain, as evinced by its unfavorable life history parameters compared with those of Alpha-SS M. domestica, indicating that the development of alpha-cypermethrin resistance could be delayed by withdrawing the use of insecticide for a given period of time. Hence, implementing resistance management strategies, such as alternating the use of alpha-cypermethrin with new insecticides exhibiting different chemistry, could delay alpha-cypermethrin resistance development. Moreover, integrated pest management (such as chemical, cultural, and biological control) should be implemented for the management of M. domestica. These findings provide valuable insights for developing effective pyrethroid resistance management against M. domestica, ultimately preserving the environmental fauna by minimizing the use of higher insecticide doses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.H. and N.A.; methodology, A.M.H. and N.A.; software, A.M.H. and N.A.; validation, A.M.H. and N.A.; formal analysis, A.M.H. and N.A.; investigation, A.M.H. and N.A.; resources, A.M.H.; data curation, N.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.H. and N.A.; writing—review and editing, A.M.H. and N.A.; visualization, A.M.H. and N.A.; supervision, A.M.H.; project administration, A.M.H.; funding acquisition, A.M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education, in Saudi Arabia through project number (IFKSUDR-H212).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education, Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number (IFKSUDR-H212).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abbas, N.; Hafez, A.M. Resistance to insect growth regulators and age-stage, two-sex life table in Musca domestica from different dairy facilities. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nayduch, D.; Neupane, S.; Pickens, V.; Purvis, T.; Olds, C. House flies are underappreciated yet important reservoirs and vectors of microbial threats to animal and human health. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nielsen, A.A.; Skovgard, H.; Stockmarr, A.; Handberg, K.J.; Jorgensen, P.H. Persistence of low-pathogenic avian influenza H5N7 and H7N1 subtypes in house flies (Diptera: Muscidae), J. Med. Entomol. 2011, 48, 608–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Butler, J.F.; Garcia-Maruniak, A.; Meek, F.; Maruniak, J.E. Wild Florida house flies (Musca domestica) as carriers of pathogenic bacteria. Fla. Entomol. 2010, 93, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nayduch, D.; Burrus, R.G. Flourishing in filth: House fly–microbe interactions across life history. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2017, 110, 6–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Geden, C.J.; Nayduch, D.; Scott, J.G.; Burgess IV, E.R.; Gerry, A.; Kaufman, P.E.; Thomson, J.; Pickens, V.; Machtinger, E.T. House fly (Diptera: Muscidae): Biology, pest status, current management prospects, and research needs. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2021, 12, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jacques, B.J.; Bourret, T.J.; Shaffer, J. Role of fly cleaning behavior on carriage of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Med. Entomol. 2017, 54, 1712–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ngufor, C.; Agbevo, A.; Fagbohoun, J.; Fongnikin, A.; Rowland, M. Efficacy of Royal Guard, a new alpha-cypermethrin and pyriproxyfen treated mosquito net, against pyrethroid-resistant malaria vectors. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pessoa, G.C.D.; Lopes, J.V.; Rocha, M.F.; Pinheiro, L.C.; Rosa, A.C.L.; Michalsky, É.M.; Dias, E.S. Baseline susceptibility to alpha-cypermethrin in Lutzomyia longipalpis (Lutz & Neiva, 1912) from Lapinha Cave (Brazil). Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 469. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hafez, A.M. First evaluation of field evolved resistance to commonly used insecticides in house fly populations from Saudi Arabian dairy farms. Insects 2021, 12, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kampouraki, A.; Stavrakaki, M.; Karataraki, A.; Katsikogiannis, G.; Pitika, E.; Varikou, K.; Vlachaki, A.; Chrysargyris, A.; Malandraki, E.; Sidiropoulos, N. Recent evolution and operational impact of insecticide resistance in olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae populations from Greece. J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 1429–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mironidis, G.K.; Kapantaidaki, D.; Bentila, M.; Morou, E.; Savopoulou-Soultani, M.; Vontas, J. Resurgence of the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera in northern Greece associated with insecticide resistance. Insect Sci. 2013, 20, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lorn, S.; Klakankhai, W.; Nusen, P.; Sumarnrote, A.; Tainchum, K. Pyrethroid susceptibility in Stomoxys calcitrans and Stomoxys indicus (Diptera: Muscidae) collected from cattle farms in Southern Thailand. Insects 2022, 13, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Abbas, N.; Hafez, A.M. Alpha-cypermethrin resistance in Musca domestica: Resistance instability, realized heritability, risk assessment, and insecticide cross-resistance. Insects 2023, 14, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rodríguez-Hidalgo, R.; Pérez-Otáñez, X.; Garcés-Carrera, S.; Vanwambeke, S.O.; Madder, M.; Benítez-Ortiz, W. The current status of resistance to alpha-cypermethrin, ivermectin, and amitraz of the cattle tick (Rhipicephalus microplus) in Ecuador. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Scott, J.G. Cytochrome P450 Monooxygenases and Insecticide Resistance: Lessons from CYP6D1 in Biochemical Sites of Insecticide Action and Resistance; Ishaaya, I., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 255–267. [Google Scholar]
  17. Abbas, N.; Khan, H.A.A.; Shad, S.A. Resistance of the house fly Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) to lambda-cyhalothrin: Mode of inheritance, realized heritability, and cross-resistance to other insecticides. Ecotoxicology 2014, 23, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tian, L.; Cao, C.; He, L.; Li, M.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.; Liu, H.; Liu, N. Autosomal interactions and mechanisms of pyrethroid resistance in house flies, Musca domestica. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2011, 7, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Roca-Acevedo, G.; Boscaro, I.; Toloza, A.C. Global pattern of kdr-type alleles in Musca domestica (L.). Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2022, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Soderlund, D.M.; Knipple, D.C. The molecular biology of knockdown resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003, 33, 563–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. You, C.; Zhang, L.; Song, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhen, C.; Gao, X. The variation of a cytochrome P450 gene, CYP6G4, drives the evolution of Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) resistance to insecticides in China. Int. J. Biol. Macromol 2023, 236, 123399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Riaz, B.; Kashif Zahoor, M.; Malik, K.; Ahmad, A.; Majeed, H.N.; Jabeen, F.; Zulhussnain, M.; Ranian, K. Frequency of Pyrethroid Insecticide Resistance kdr Gene and Its Associated Enzyme Modulation in Housefly, Musca domestica L. Populations from Jhang, Pakistan. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 9, 806456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, M.; Feng, X.; Reid, W.R.; Tang, F.; Liu, N. Multiple-P450 gene co-up-regulation in the development of permethrin resistance in the house fly, Musca domestica. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bass, C.; Field, L.M. Gene amplification and insecticide resistance. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 886–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, N.; Pridgeon, J.W.J.P.b. Metabolic detoxication and the kdr mutation in pyrethroid resistant house flies, Musca domestica (L.). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2002, 73, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abbas, N.; Shad, S.A.; Razaq, M. Fitness cost, cross resistance and realized heritability of resistance to imidacloprid in Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2012, 103, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, S.; Yang, L.; He, M.; Xia, F.; Shi, Y.; Chen, H.; Liao, X.; Li, R. Inheritance mode and fitness costs of acetamiprid resistance in brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål). Crop Prot. 2022, 156, 105958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gassmann, A.J. Chapter fourteen—Fitness costs of resistance and their potential application for insect resistance management. In Insect Resistance Management, 3rd ed.; Onstad, D.W., Knolhoff, L.M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 465–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abbas, N.; Shah, R.M.; Shad, S.A.; Iqbal, N.; Razaq, M. Biological trait analysis and stability of lambda-cyhalothrin resistance in the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 2073–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kliot, A.; Ghanim, M. Fitness costs associated with insecticide resistance. Pest Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 1431–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khan, H.A.A. Spinosad resistance affects biological parameters of Musca domestica Linnaeus. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Saeed, R.; Abbas, N.; Hafez, A.M. Biological fitness costs in emamectin benzoate-resistant strains of Dysdercus koenigii. Entomol. Gen. 2021, 41, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gonzalez-Santillan, F.J.; Contreras-Perera, Y.; Davila-Barboza, J.A.; Juache-Villagrana, A.E.; Gutierrez-Rodriguez, S.M.; Ponce-Garcia, G.; Lopez-Monroy, B.; Rodriguez-Sanchez, I.P.; Lenhart, A.E.; Mackenzie-Impoinvil, L. Fitness cost of sequential selection with deltamethrin in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2022, 59, 930–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ran, W.; Zhang, J.S.; Che, W.N.; Wang, J.D.; Chen, L.U.O. Genetics and fitness costs of resistance to flupyradifurone in Bemisia tabaci from China. J. Integr. Agric. 2022, 21, 1436–1443. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wazir, S.; Shad, S.A. Development of fipronil resistance, fitness cost, cross-resistance to other insecticides, stability, and risk assessment in Oxycarenus hyalinipennis (Costa). Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 803, 150026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Abbas, N.; Abubakar, M.; Hassan, M.W.; Shad, S.A.; Hafez, A.M. Risk assessment of flonicamid resistance in Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae): Resistance monitoring, inheritance, and cross-resistance potential. J. Med. Entomol. 2021, 58, 1779–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. IRAC. IRAC Susceptibility Test Methods Series Method No: 026. 2011. Available online: https://irac-online.org/methods/musca-domestica-adults/ (accessed on 16 April 2019).
  38. Robertson, J.L.; Savin, N.E.; Preisler, H.K.; Russell, R.M. Bioassays with Arthropods; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  39. Saeed, R.; Abbas, N.; Hafez, A.M. Fitness cost of imidacloprid resistance in the cotton-staining bug, Dysdercus koenigii. Chemosphere 2021, 265, 129118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chi, H.; Liu, H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sin 1985, 24, 225–240. [Google Scholar]
  41. Euler, L. Demonstratio theorematis Fermatiani omnem numerum sive integrum sive fractum esse summam quatuor pauciorumve quadratorum. Novi Comment. Acad. Sci. Petropolitanae 1760, 5, 13–58. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lotka, A.J. Studies on the mode of growth of material aggregates. Am. J. Sci. 1907, 24, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Goodman, D. Optimal life histories, optimal notation, and the value of reproductive value. Am. Nat. 1982, 119, 803–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chi, H.; Su, H.-Y. Age-stage, two-sex life tables of Aphidius gifuensis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its host Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) with mathematical proof of the relationship between female fecundity and the net reproductive rate. Environ. Entomol. 2006, 35, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Huang, Y.-B.; Chi, H. Assessing the application of the jackknife and bootstrap techniques to the estimation of the variability of the net reproductive rate and gross reproductive rate: A case study in Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Agric. For. 2012, 61, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  46. Software, L. POLO for Windows. LeOra Software: Petaluma, CA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  47. Abbott, W.S. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 1925, 18, 265–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chi, H. TWOSEX-MSChart: A Computer Program for the Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table Analysis. 2019. Available online: https://140.120.197.173/Ecol./Prod02.Htm (accessed on 9 June 2022).
  49. Chi, H. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environ. Entomol. 1988, 17, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chi, H.; Yang, T.-C. Two-sex life table and predation rate of Propylaea japonica Thunberg (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) fed on Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ. Entomol. 2003, 32, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Afzal, M.B.S.; Ijaz, M.; Farooq, Z.; Shad, S.A.; Abbas, N. Genetics and preliminary mechanism of chlorpyrifos resistance in Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2015, 119, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Scott, J.G. Evolution of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Musca domestica. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 716–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gao, Q.; Li, M.; Sheng, C.; Scott, J.G.; Qiu, X. Multiple cytochrome P450s overexpressed in pyrethroid resistant house flies (Musca domestica). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2012, 104, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Khan, H.A.A.; Akram, W.; Haider, M.S. Genetics and mechanism of resistance to deltamethrin in the house fly, Musca domestica L., from Pakistan. Ecotoxicology 2015, 24, 1213–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, L.; Gao, X.; Liang, P. Beta-cypermethrin resistance associated with high carboxylesterase activities in a strain of house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2007, 89, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Abbas, N.; Khan, H.; Shad, S.A. Cross-resistance, stability, and fitness cost of resistance to imidacloprid in Musca domestica L., (Diptera: Muscidae). Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shah, R.M.; Shad, S.A. Inheritance, stability, cross-resistance, and life history parameters of a clothianidin-selected strain of house fly, Musca domestica Linnaeus. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 278, 116880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rinkevich, F.D.; Leichter, C.A.; Lazo, T.A.; Hardstone, M.C.; Scott, J.G. Variable fitness costs for pyrethroid resistance alleles in the house fly, Musca domestica, in the absence of insecticide pressure. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2013, 105, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fawaz, E.Y.; Zayed, A.B.; Fahmy, N.T.; Villinski, J.T.; Hoel, D.F.; Diclaro, J.W. Pyrethroid insecticide resistance mechanisms in the adult Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2016, 53, 620–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Saingamsook, J.; Yanola, J.; Lumjuan, N.; Walton, C.; Somboon, P. Investigation of relative development and reproductivity fitness cost in three insecticide-resistant strains of Aedes aegypti from Thailand. Insects 2019, 10, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Smith, L.B.; Silva, J.J.; Chen, C.; Harrington, L.C.; Scott, J.G. Fitness costs of individual and combined pyrethroid resistance mechanisms, kdr and CYP-mediated detoxification, in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Banazeer, A.; Shad, S.A.; Afzal, M.B.S. Laboratory induced bifenthrin resistance selection in Oxycarenus hyalinipennis (Costa) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae): Stability, cross-resistance, dominance and effects on biological fitness. Crop Prot. 2020, 132, 105107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Khan, H.M.U.; Banazeer, A.; Afzal, M.B.S.; Shad, S.A. Evaluation of resistance stability and fitness costs in dimethoate-selected strain of Oxycarenus hyalinipennis Costa (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). J. Asia-Pacif. Entomol. 2021, 24, 798–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, R.; Qu, C.; Wang, Z.; Yang, G. Cross-resistance, biochemical mechanism and fitness costs of laboratory-selected resistance to pyridalyl in diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 163, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Stacke, R.F.; Godoy, D.N.; Halberstadt, S.A.; Bronzatto, E.S.; Giacomelli, T.; Hettwer, B.L.; Muraro, D.S.; Guedes, J.V.; Bernardi, O. Inheritance of lambda-cyhalothrin resistance, fitness costs and cross-resistance to other pyrethroids in soybean looper, Chrysodeixis includens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Crop. Prot. 2020, 131, 105096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, K.; Zhao, J.N.; Bai, J.Y.; Shang, Y.Z.; Zhang, S.Q.; Hou, Y.F.; Chen, M.H.; Han, Z.J. Pyrethroid resistance and fitness cost conferred by the super-kdr mutation M918L in Rhopalosiphum padi (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2021, 114, 1789–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Castells-Sierra, J.; Guillem-Amat, A.; López-Errasquín, E.; Sánchez, L.; Ortego, F. First detection of resistance to deltamethrin in Spanish populations of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. J. Pest Sci. 2023, 96, 1229–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tchouakui, M.; Mugenzi, L.M.J.; Wondji, M.J.; Tchoupo, M.; Njiokou, F.; Wondji, C.S. Combined over-expression of two cytochrome P450 genes exacerbates the fitness cost of pyrethroid resistance in the major African malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2021, 173, 104772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Chen, X.D.; Ebert, T.A.; Pelz-Stelinski, K.S.; Stelinski, L.L. Fitness costs associated with thiamethoxam and imidacloprid resistance in three field populations of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) from Florida. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2020, 110, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Pekkala, N.; Knott, K.E.; Kotiaho, J.S.; Nissinen, K.; Puurtinen, M. The effect of inbreeding rate on fitness, inbreeding depression and heterosis over a range of inbreeding coefficients. Evol. Appl. 2014, 7, 1107–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Age-stage survival rates (sxj) in alpha-cypermethrin-susceptible (Alpha-SS) and alpha-cypermethrin-resistant (Alpha-RS) strains of Musca domestica.
Figure 1. Age-stage survival rates (sxj) in alpha-cypermethrin-susceptible (Alpha-SS) and alpha-cypermethrin-resistant (Alpha-RS) strains of Musca domestica.
Biology 12 01021 g001
Figure 2. Age-specific survival rate (lx), age-specific female fecundity (fx), age-specific fecundity of the total population (mx), and age specific maternity (lxmx) in the alpha-cypermethrin-susceptible (Alpha-SS) and alpha-cypermethrin-resistant (Alpha-RS) Musca domestica.
Figure 2. Age-specific survival rate (lx), age-specific female fecundity (fx), age-specific fecundity of the total population (mx), and age specific maternity (lxmx) in the alpha-cypermethrin-susceptible (Alpha-SS) and alpha-cypermethrin-resistant (Alpha-RS) Musca domestica.
Biology 12 01021 g002
Figure 3. Age-stage life expectancy (exj) in the alpha-cypermethrin-susceptible (Alpha-SS) and alpha-cypermethrin-resistant (Alpha-RS) strains of Musca domestica.
Figure 3. Age-stage life expectancy (exj) in the alpha-cypermethrin-susceptible (Alpha-SS) and alpha-cypermethrin-resistant (Alpha-RS) strains of Musca domestica.
Biology 12 01021 g003
Figure 4. Age-stage reproductive values (vxj) in the alpha-cypermethrin-susceptible (Alpha-SS) and alpha-cypermethrin-resistant (Alpha-RS) Musca domestica.
Figure 4. Age-stage reproductive values (vxj) in the alpha-cypermethrin-susceptible (Alpha-SS) and alpha-cypermethrin-resistant (Alpha-RS) Musca domestica.
Biology 12 01021 g004
Table 1. Toxicity and resistance of Musca domestica against alpha-cypermethrin.
Table 1. Toxicity and resistance of Musca domestica against alpha-cypermethrin.
StrainLC50 (ppm) a95% Fiducial LimitsFit of Probit LineRR (95% CL) b
Slope ± SEχ2Dfp
Alpha-SS (G41)3.772.52–5.281.33 ± 0.180.6650.981
Alpha-RS (G41)1530.361193.24–1992.021.98 ± 0.233.4250.64405.93 (260.73–631.56)
a Median lethal concentration. b Resistance ratio (RR) and 95% confidence limits (CLs).
Table 2. Effects of synergists on the toxicity of alpha-cypermethrin in Alpha-SS and Alpha-RS Musca domestica.
Table 2. Effects of synergists on the toxicity of alpha-cypermethrin in Alpha-SS and Alpha-RS Musca domestica.
StrainInsecticideLC50 (ppm) a95% Fiducial Limits (ppm)Fit of Probit LineSR (95% CL) b
Slope ± SEχ2dfp
Alpha-SS (G41)Alpha-cypermethrin3.772.52–5.281.33 ± 0.180.6650.981
+PBO3.572.40–4.961.36 ± 0.192.4750.781.06 (0.64–1.76)
+DEF3.092.16–4.161.58 ± 0.212.7350.741.22 (0.75–1.99)
+DEM3.282.10–4.661.27 ± 0.182.6850.751.15 (0.68–1.95)
Alpha-RS (G41)Alpha-cypermethrin1530.361193.24–1992.021.98 ± 0.233.4250.641
+PBO412.18258.79–559.982.37 ± 0.431.0450.953.71 (2.39–5.77) *
+DEF254.23168.98–354.181.61 ± 0.221.3250.936.02 (3.87–9.37) *
+DEM439.71328.48–585.101.63 ± 0.201.1950.943.48 (2.37–5.11) *
a Median lethal concentration. b Synergism ratio (SR) and 95% confidence limits (CLs). * SR differed significantly if the CLs did not include 1.
Table 3. Fitness cost and demographic life table features of alpha-cypermethrin-resistant (Alpha-RS) and counterpart susceptible (Alpha-SS) Musca domestica strains.
Table 3. Fitness cost and demographic life table features of alpha-cypermethrin-resistant (Alpha-RS) and counterpart susceptible (Alpha-SS) Musca domestica strains.
ParametersAlpha-SS (Mean ± SE)Alpha-RS (Mean ± SE)95% CIp
Egg duration (d)1.00 ± 0.00 a1.00 ± 0.00 a->0.05
Larval duration (d)4.56 ± 0.04 a4.27 ± 0.04 b0.18–0.41<0.0001
Pupal duration (d)4.24 ± 0.04 a4.28 ± 0.04 a−0.08–0.160.52
Adult duration (d)10.47 ± 0.65 a6.65 ± 0.60 b2.07–5.55<0.0001
♂ Preadult duration (d)9.95 ± 0.10 a9.74 ± 0.06 a−0.02–0.440.08
♀ Preadult duration (d)9.55 ± 0.10 a9.07 ± 0.04 b0.28–0.69<0.0001
♂ Total longevity (d)20.02 ± 0.85 a15.93 ± 0.76 b1.86–6.31<0.0001
♀ Total longevity (d)20.47 ± 1.02 a16.30 ± 0.94 b1.44–6.880.003
Overall total longevity (d)20.23 ± 0.65 a16.10 ± 0.59 b2.40–5.860.00
APOP (d)3.54 ± 0.17 a3.76 ± 0.17 a−0.24–0.690.35
TPOP (d)13.08 ± 0.23 a12.76 ± 0.17 a−0.24–0.880.27
Oviposition period (d)4.64 ± 0.47 a3.76 ± 0.38 a−0.31–2.070.15
Female ratio (%)0.47 ± 0.05 a0.44 ± 0.05 a−0.11–0.160.71
Reproductive female ratio (%)0.76 ± 0.06 a0.54 ± 0.07 b0.03–0.410.02
Fecundity (eggs produced per female)205.18 ± 32.10 a114.13 ± 22.11 b14.28–167.250.02
r (d−1)0.25 ± 0.01 a0.21 ± 0.01 b1.08–7.920.01
λ (d−1)1.29 ± 0.01 a1.23 ± 0.02 b1.38–9.920.01
T (d)16.84 ± 0.35 a17.13 ± 0.27 a−0.58–1.170.51
Ro (offspring individual−1)69.76 ± 13.48 a35.00 ± 7.99 b3.98–65.400.03
Rf1.000.50//
♂, males; ♀, females; APOP, adult preoviposition period; TPOP, total preoviposition period; r, intrinsic rate of increase; λ, finite rate of increase; T, generation time; Ro, net reproductive rate; Rf, relative fitness; d, days; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error (calculated using bootstrapping with resampling 100,000 times). Differences between strains were determined using the paired bootstrap test (p < 0.05). Means with different lowercase letters in rows are significantly different.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hafez, A.M.; Abbas, N. Biological Fitness Cost, Demographic Growth Characteristics, and Resistance Mechanism in Alpha-Cypermethrin-Resistant Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Biology 2023, 12, 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12071021

AMA Style

Hafez AM, Abbas N. Biological Fitness Cost, Demographic Growth Characteristics, and Resistance Mechanism in Alpha-Cypermethrin-Resistant Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Biology. 2023; 12(7):1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12071021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hafez, Abdulwahab M., and Naeem Abbas. 2023. "Biological Fitness Cost, Demographic Growth Characteristics, and Resistance Mechanism in Alpha-Cypermethrin-Resistant Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae)" Biology 12, no. 7: 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12071021

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop