Next Article in Journal
Cognitive Functions in Scuba, Technical and Saturation Diving
Previous Article in Journal
Projected Effects of Climate Change on Species Range of Pantala flavescens, a Wandering Glider Dragonfly
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Different Exosome Secretion Pattern Characterizes Patient-Derived Colorectal Cancer Multicellular Spheroids and Their Mouse Xenografts
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Biochemical Characterization of Human Salivary Extracellular Vesicles as a Valuable Source of Biomarkers

Biology 2023, 12(2), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12020227
by Valentina Mangolini 1,2, Alice Gualerzi 1,*, Silvia Picciolini 1, Francesca Rodà 1,3, Angela Del Prete 1, Luana Forleo 1, Rudy Alexander Rossetto 4 and Marzia Bedoni 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Biology 2023, 12(2), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12020227
Submission received: 16 January 2023 / Revised: 27 January 2023 / Accepted: 30 January 2023 / Published: 31 January 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled “Biochemical characterization of human salivary extracellular vesicles as a valuable source of biomarkers” by Mangolini and collaborators deals with the exploitation of Raman microspectroscopy to assess the biochemical characterization of EVs for diagnostics purposes.

In my opinion, the manuscript successfully addresses the question proposed by the authors, by an approach that seems correct and reliable.

Both the simple summary and the abstract adequately present a minimum background and the rationale of the manuscript. The results are clear and well-discussed.

Throughout all the manuscript, English is correct, and sentences are clear, even for a non-expert reader.

 

I suggest some minor improvements that should be applied to the manuscript before acceptance:

1.     The number of volunteers enrolled in the study is quite low. Are the authors sure (by a statistical approach) that the results they obtained are significant and reliable?

2.     A deeper focus should be dedicated to RS application: my suggestion for the authors is to better pinpoint the advantages of the application of RS in this field, and to clarify how useful their results could be.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear V. Mangolini, I find your study very interesting with a very sound methodology and interesting findings. I can see your group has made quite an impact in the field of extracellular vesicles and I am delighted to see such an attempt for novel diagnostic methods.

When evaluating the study, I cannot find any major flaws. I might ask, what is the effect of a small sample size? In such experiments the participants numbers are usually small, but could this lead to some bias?

Additionally, for such a study where participants samples were collected and analysed, some ethical approval is usually required. Please include some reference.

Otherwise, congratulations on the study. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop