Next Article in Journal
Sja-Let-7 Attenuates Carbon Tetrachloride-Induced Liver Fibrosis in a Mouse Model via Col1α2
Next Article in Special Issue
Synbiotic Agents and Their Active Components for Sustainable Aquaculture: Concepts, Action Mechanisms, and Applications
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of the Intestinal Microbiome in Multiple Sclerosis—Lessons to Be Learned from Hippocrates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Analysis Reveals Differential Immune Response to Hirame Novirhabdovirus (HIRRV) Infection in the Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) under Different Temperature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expression and Immune Characterization of Major Histocompatibility Complex in Paralichthys olivaceus after Antigen Stimulation

1
Laboratory of Pathology and Immunology of Aquatic Animals, Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education (KLMME), Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao 266003, China
2
Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266071, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(12), 1464; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12121464
Submission received: 16 October 2023 / Revised: 18 November 2023 / Accepted: 21 November 2023 / Published: 24 November 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The Major histocompatibility complex (Mhc) plays an essential role in antigen presentation as part of the adaptive immune system. To investigate the role of MhcII in adaptive immunity, this study cloned the mhcIIα and mhcIIβ of flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) and examined their distribution and expression patterns, which varied by antigen stimulation or pathogens infection. The analyses showed that they were significantly expressed in gills, spleen, and peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs), and MhcII molecules were co-localized with CD83 and IgM on leukocytes, respectively. The expression of both mhcIIα and mhcIIβ were significantly upregulated in flounder after infection. The percentages of MhcII+ cells, MhcII+/CD83+, and MhcII+/IgM+ cells increased significantly after PHA and ConA stimulation, respectively; they varied significantly in PBLs after polyI:C stimulation and no obvious variations were found after LPS treatment. These results suggested that MhcII, mainly expressed in B cells and dendritic cells, responded significantly to exogenous antigens and T cell-dependent antigens. In conclusion, MhcII was associated with cellular immunity in teleosts.

Abstract

The Major histocompatibility complex (Mhc) is an important molecule for antigen presenting and binds to T cell receptors, activating T lymphocytes and triggering specific immune responses. To investigate the role of MhcII in adaptive immunity, in this study, mhcIIα and mhcIIβ of flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) were cloned, polyclonal antibodies (Abs) against their extracellular regions were produced, respectively, and their distribution on cells and tissues and expression patterns, which varied by antigen stimulation or pathogen infection, were investigated. The results showed that the open reading frame (ORF) of mhcIIα is 708 bp, including 235 amino acids (aa); and the ORF of mhcIIβ is 741 bp, encoding 246aa. The mhcIIα and mhcIIβ were significantly expressed in gills, spleen, and peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs). Their antibodies could specifically recognize eukaryotic expressed MhcIIα and MhcIIβ. MhcIIα+ and MhcIIβ+ cells were 30.2 ± 2.9% of the percentage in peripheral blood leukocytes. MhcII molecules were co-localized with CD83 and IgM on leukocytes, respectively, but not on CD4+ or CD8+ T lymphocyte subpopulations. The expression of both mhcIIα and mhcIIβ were significantly upregulated in flounder after bacteria and virus challenges. The percentages of MhcII+ cells, MhcII+/CD83+, and MhcII+/IgM+ double-positive cells increased significantly after PHA and ConA stimulation, respectively; they varied significantly in PBLs after polyI:C stimulation, and no variations were found after LPS treatment. In the meantime, variations in MhcII+ cells were consistent with that of CD4+ T lymphocytes. These results suggest that MhcII, mainly expressed in B cells and dendritic cells, play an essential role in antigen presentation, and respond significantly to exogenous antigens and T cell-dependent antigens. These results may provide an important reference for the study of cellular immunity in teleosts.

1. Introduction

The Major histocompatibility complex (Mhc) is an important molecule for antigen presenting and binds to T cell receptors, activating T lymphocytes and triggering specific immune responses. In mammals, MhcII molecules have been shown to mediate the presentation of exogenous antigens and are mainly expressed on antigen-presenting cells (APCs), while most studies on fish MhcII have focused on the genetic level [1,2].
MhcII plays a crucial role in fish adaptive immunity; it is characterized by gene cloning, bioinformatics, and expression patterns [3,4,5]. Rarely has the biological role of MhcII been discussed. This gene has been cloned and identified in Chinese longsnout catfish (Leiocassis longirostris), Whitespotted bambooshark (Chiloscyllium plagiosum), swamp eel (Monopterus albus), stone flounder (Kareius bicoloratus), and loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) [6,7,8,9,10]. Afterward, the expressions and distributions of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ in several tissues in large yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea), Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), and spotted halibut (Verasper variegatus), etc. were reported [11,12,13]. The findings demonstrated that the gills, spleen, and kidney had significantly high levels of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ expression. It has been shown that mhcIIα and mhcIIβ genes are significantly upregulated in the kidney of miiuy croaker (Miichthys miiuy) after infection of Vibrio anguillarum and decrease slowly after reaching a peak at 12 h [14]. After treatment with V. anguillarum and polyI:C, the mhcIIα and mhcIIβ genes in the head kidney and spleen of Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis) are highly upregulated [15]. In loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus), mhcIIα and mhcIIβ genes are significantly upregulated in the gills and spleen after infection of Flavobacterium cloumnare G4 and Ichthyophthirius multifiliis [10]. In addition, more studies on the expression of mhcII in Sea Perch (Lateolabrax japonicus), red sea bream (Chrysophrys major), and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) after infection were carried out [16,17,18].
MhcII molecules, which are usually polymorphic and mainly involved in antigen presentation [19,20], have been found to be distributed on certain immune cells, mainly APCs [21]. In addition, after stimulation with CpG oligonucleotide (ODN), an MhcII+ cell subpopulation upregulated CD86 and produced high levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) mRNA, suggesting that these subpopulations of MhcII+ cells are specialized APCs associated with macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) [22]. MhcII molecules contain peptide-binding regions (PBRs) that are responsible for antigen recognition, and the binding of PBRs to antigenic peptides is necessary for the generation of the immune cascade, thus placing MhcII at the center of the immune response [23].
Flounder belongs to an important species of marine culture in northern China, which has high economic value, and the frequent occurrence of diseases has greatly impeded the healthy development of flounder aquaculture; our laboratory has been studying flounder for many years; it will be helpful to provide new ideas and methods for the in-depth study of MhcII molecules. In our previous research, antibodies against the dendritic cell surface antigen CD83, the T cell antigens CD4-1, CD4-2, and CD8β, and the B cell antigen IgM were generated, respectively [24,25,26,27]. In this paper, mhcIIα and mhcIIβ genes in flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) were cloned, and polyclonal antibodies (Abs) against their extracellular region were produced, respectively. Their distribution on cells and tissues was analyzed, and they were defined by their co-localization on T and B cells. In addition, the expression patterns that varied via antigen stimulation or pathogens infection were investigated. The expression of MhcII and its immunological characterization in flounder after antigen stimulation may provide a reference for the cellular immunity of teleost fish.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

An aquafarm in Rizhao, Shandong, China, supplied healthy flounder. The flounder were used for this study after two weeks of acclimation in seawater (salinity of 35‰, pH of 8.7, and depth of 1 m) that circulated (flow rate of 500 L/h) at 20 ± 2 °C. The bait used for flounder breeding was full-value compound feed, which was fed to the flounder twice a day (9:00 a.m. and 17:00 p.m.), and the amount of each feeding was 3% of the flounder’s body weight. There were 14 h of light and 10 h of darkness per day (14 L-10 D). For in vitro leukocyte production and cell stimulation tests, flounder between 40 cm and 45 cm in length were employed. Flounder in size of length 20–25 cm were used for RNA extraction and injection experiments in vivo.
The Qingdao Animal Experimental Center (Shandong, China) provided Balb/C mice and New Zealand white rabbits to produce the Abs.
The flounder were anesthetized with 60 mg/mL MS-222 for 5 min prior to sample collection. Balb/C mice and New Zealand white rabbits were anesthetized with Ethyl ether prior to sample collection. The flounder were euthanized via liquid nitrogen cryogenic freezing. The Balb/C mice were euthanized via the cervical dislocation method. The New Zealand white rabbits were euthanized via bloodletting. The protocols outlined in the Ocean University of China’s Guide for the Use of Experimental Animals were strictly followed throughout the study in compliance with the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals (EU84 2010/63). We used every tool at our disposal to lessen suffering.

2.2. Preparation of Leukocytes, mRNA, and HEK293 Cells

A previously published procedure was used to separate the flounders’ leukocytes from the gills, peripheral blood, head kidney, and spleen [27]. Briefly stated, the caudal vein was used to draw peripheral blood, which was then diluted with solution (65% RPMI-1640 including 20 IU mL−1 heparin, 0.1% w/v NaN3, and 1% w/v BSA). The gills, spleen, and kidney were removed; the gills were immersed in trypsin solution for 30 min at 37 °C, and then the gills, spleen, and kidney were squeezed via a nylon mesh filter with 65% RPMI-1640 solution to prepare cell suspensions. After centrifugation, the supernatants were spread over a discontinuous Percoll density gradient that ranged from 1.020 g/cm3 to 1.070 g/cm3. The Percoll interface’s leukocyte layers were collected after centrifugation.
The mRNA in the muscle, skin, liver, intestine, head kidney, spleen, gills, peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs), gill leukocytes (GLs), spleen leukocytes (SPLs), and head kidney leukocytes (HKLs) were collected from nine flounder, and three flounder were randomly combined as a separate sample, respectively. The Trizol technique was used to extract the total RNA, as directed by the manufacturer. A NanoDrop-8000 spectrophotometer from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) was used to determine the amount and concentration of the RNA. The cDNA was created utilizing the Reverse Transcriptase M-MLV kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), as directed by the manufacturer. The spleen cDNA was used as a template in mhcIIα and mhcIIβ cloned genes. The cDNAs of the muscle, skin, liver, intestine, head kidney, spleen, gills, PBLs, HKLs, SPLs, and GLs were used as templates; three replicate experiments were performed for each individual sample in qPCR.
HEK-293 cells were previously frozen in the laboratory, inoculated in a 25 cm2 cell culture flask, and cultured in MEM medium with 20% FBS, 100 IU/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin.

2.3. Antibodies

Specific mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against flounder CD4-1, CD4-2, and IgM, specific rabbit polyclonal Abs against flounder CD83, and specific mouse polyclonal Abs against flounder CD8β were already stored in our laboratory [24,25,26,27]. Specific rabbit and mouse polyclonal Abs against flounder MhcIIα and MhcIIβ were produced in this study. For utilization in flow cytometry and immunofluorescence staining, respectively, all Abs were diluted 1000 times in PBS.

2.4. Cloning of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ

The mhcIIα and mhcIIβ mRNA sequences for flounder were acquired from the NCBI database by utilizing accession numbers AY997530 and AY848955.1, respectively. The cDNA of the spleen concentration was adjusted to 5 ng/µL and used as the amplification template for the full-length of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ for gene cloning under the subsequent RT-PCR procedures: 95 °C, 5 min, (95 °C, 30 s → 58.5 °C, 30 s) × 35 cycles, 72 °C, 50 s, and 72 °C, 10 min. Amplification primers for the extracellular region of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ were designed based on the cloned full-length genes. Table 1 lists all the primers utilized in this investigation.

2.5. Sequence Analysis

DNAMAN was used to evaluate the full-length mhcIIα and mhcIIβ cDNA. And the protein’s biological traits were explored. Utilizing the SMART program (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) (accessed on 6 January 2022), the transmembrane domain, signal peptide, and conserved protein domain were examined. The MhcIIα and MhcIIβ three-dimensional models were created by Swiss-Model (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/) (accessed on 6 January 2022). The nucleotide and protein sequences homology of flounder MhcIIα (fMhcIIα) and MhcIIβ (fMhcIIβ) were analyzed using BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast) (accessed on 6 January 2022). The multiple amino acid sequence alignment was carried out by DNAMAN. Finally, the phylogenetic trees were created and examined utilizing iqtree-1.6.12 and the 1000 bootstrap attempts of the maxima likelihood method.

2.6. Production of Anti-Flounder MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs

The PCR products of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ extracellular region were purified and introduced into procaryotic expression vectors pET-32a(+). To produce recombinant MhcIIα (rMhcIIα) and MhcIIβ (rMhcIIβ), pET-32a-mhcIIα and pET-32a-mhcIIβ recombinant plasmids were transferred into E. coli Transetta (DE3) (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan) and stimulated with IPTG for 6 h at 30 °C during exponential growth. Following the manufacturer’s instructions, His Trap™ HP Ni-Agarose (GE Healthcare, Shanghai, China) was used to affinity-purify recombinant proteins. Purified rMhcIIα and rMhcIIβ were tested by SDS-PAGE detection, dye Coomassie brilliant blue R-250. Purified protein concentrations were calculated utilizing the Bradford process.
According to earlier procedures, the rMhcIIα and rMhcIIβ proteins were utilized to immunize mice and rabbits, respectively [26]. Their serum was concentrated and purified using protein G agarose affinity chromatography (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and their polyclonal Abs against flounder MhcIIα and MhcIIβ were produced. The Abs titer and specificity were then assessed using ELISA, Western blot, and indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA), respectively.

2.7. Expression of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ in Flounder

The expression levels of fmhcIIα and fmhcIIβ were measured via the LightCycler® 480II Real-Time System (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) using the 2× Universal SYBR Green Fast qPCR Mix (ABclonal, Wuhan, China). The mhcIIα and mhcIIβ gene fragments were amplified utilizing specific primers (Table 1). The internal control utilized “β-actin”; each test was carried out in triplicate. The qPCR program was 95 °C, 3 min, (95 °C, 5 s → 60 °C, 30 s) × 40 cycles, 95 °C, 5 s, and 65 °C, 60 s. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to assess all data.
In our lab, we reserved strains of Vibrio anguillarum, Edwardsiella tarda, and Hirame rhabdovirus (HIRRV). In the infection experiment, bacterial (1.0 × 108 CFU/mL) and HIRRV suspensions (1.0 × 105 TCID50) were employed. A total of 252 flounder were arbitrarily split into four groups, and the flounder were injected with 100 µL of PBS, V. anguillarum, E. tarda, and HIRRV in the abdominal cavity, respectively. Nine fish were included in each group; the PBLs, HKLs, SPLs, and GLs were randomly selected at 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 h, and every three fish randomly selected were combined as a separate sample and then used for RNA extraction. qPCR was utilized to ascertain the modulation of fmhcIIα and fmhcIIβ expression after infection. Three replicate experiments were performed for each individual sample.

2.8. Eukaryotic Transfection

The full-length mhcIIα and mhcIIβ PCR products were purified and cloned into pTag-EGFP eukaryotic expression vectors, respectively. Recombinant pTag-EGFP-mhcIIα and pTag-EGFP-mhcIIβ plasmids were sequenced and then transformed into E. coli Trelief™ 5α, respectively. The plasmids pTag-EGFP, pTag-EGFP-mhcIIα, and pTag-EGFP-mhcIIβ were each transfected into HEK-293 cells that had been grown in minimum essential medium (DMEM) using Lipo8000™ Transfection Reagent (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), and after 48 h, a significant amount of green fluorescence was visible, indicating successful transfection. The transfected HEK-293 cells were collected and used for Western blot and IIFA.

2.9. Western Blot

Lysates from transfected HEK-293 cells with pTag-EGFP-mhcIIα and pTag-EGFP-mhcIIβ and the purified rMhcIIα and rMhcIIβ were spread on SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Merck Millipore, Taufkirchen, Germany). The membranes were then closed with PBS, including 4% BSA, for 1 h. The membranes containing rMhcIIα and rMhcIIβ proteins were treated with MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs to be tested for 1.5 h, respectively, to identify the crossover of MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs. The membranes, including pTag-EGFP-mhcIIα and pTag-EGFP-mhcIIβ, transfected HEK-293 cells lysates were incubated with MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs for 1.5 h, respectively, to identify the specificity of MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs. Serums from no immunized rabbits and mice were used as controls, respectively. Then, PBST (PBS with 0.5% Tween 20) was used to wash three times. Antibodies bindings were tested using HRP Goat–anti-rabbit and Goat–anti-mouse IgG-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (dilution with PBS 1:5000) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 45 min and three PBST washes. The membranes were then dyed using the most recent HRP dye (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) (All incubations were carried out at 37 °C).

2.10. Immunofluorescence Staining (IF)

The transfected HEK-293 cells (5 × 106 cells/mL) and PBLs (5 × 106 cells/mL) were settled onto slides at room temperature for 2 h and were blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h after being fixed for 15 min with 4% paraformaldehyde fixative. The transfected HEK-293 cells were treated in the dark for 1.5 h with MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs, respectively. The negative control was composed of serum from unvaccinated rabbits and mice that took the place of Abs as the primary antibody. Then, in three PBST washes, cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse IgG, respectively, for 45 min in the dark. The compound of rabbit–anti-flounder MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs (MhcII rabbit Abs) were mixed with CD4-1, CD4-2, and IgM mAbs, as well as CD8β Abs, respectively. The compound of mouse–anti-flounder MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs (MhcII mouse Abs) were mixed with CD83 Abs. Those mixed Abs were incubated with PBLs as primary Abs for 1.5 h; after three PBST washes, leukocytes were incubated for 45 min avoided light with a combination of FITC-conjugated goat–anti-rabbit and Alexa Fluor 649-conjugated goat–anti-mouse IgG, and with a combination of FITC-conjugated goat–anti-mouse and Alexa Fluor 649-conjugated goat–anti-rabbit IgG (All Abs from Sigma, dilution with PBS 1:1000), respectively. After three PBST washes, the transfected HEK-293 cells and PBLs were treated with DAPI (Bio-Legend, San Diego, CA, USA) for 15 min and avoided light. After the last washing, the cell-containing slides were examined under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus DP70, Tokyo, Japan) (All incubations were carried out at 37 °C).

2.11. Stimulation of Leukocytes by Antigens

Following the procedure outlined in our prior study, PBLs and GLs were aseptically extracted from flounder using the inconsecutive Percoll (Pharmacia, Sofia, Bulgaria) slope (1.020/1.070) [28]. Then, 1 mL of PBLs and GLs were put into each well of a 24-well culture plate to achieve a cell density of 5 × 106 cells/well. Penicillin/streptomycin and 10% fetal calf serum were added to an L-15 medium for culturing the cells and then supplemented with LPS (10 µg/well), polyI:C (10 µg/well), PHA (5 µg/well), and ConA (5 µg/well). As a negative control, PBS was mixed with the cells. After stimulation for 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h at 22 °C, the leukocytes were collected. And then, the PBLs and GLs were used for flow cytometry analysis.

2.12. Flow Cytometry (FCM)

To identify the expression of MhcIIα and MhcIIβ at the cellular level, MhcIIα rabbit Abs were mixed with CD4-1, CD4-2, CD8β, and IgM Abs, respectively; in addition, MhcIIβ rabbit Abs were mixed with CD4-1, CD4-2, CD8β, and IgM Abs, respectively. For detecting the expression of MhcII after stimulation in vitro, MhcII rabbit Abs were combined with IgM Abs. Mouse anti-MhcII Abs were mixed with CD83 Abs. The combination of Abs instead of primary Abs. Serum from unvaccinated rabbits or mice was utilized as a negative control. And then, cells were treated with Abs for 1.5 h. Three PBST washes later, leukocytes were exposed to the compound of FITC Goat–anti-rabbit and Alexa fluor 649 Goat–anti-mouse IgG for 45 min, avoided light, and washed again. An Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD Accuri, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was utilized to examine the cell suspensions.

2.13. Statistical Analysis

Data in this paper were provided as mean ± SD after the trials were conducted three times in duplicate. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. Utilizing SPSS 26.0 software, the statistical analysis included a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple comparisons.

3. Results

3.1. Characterizations of fMhcIIα and fMhcIIβ

Using online biological analysis software, the fundamental sequences and structures of cloned fMhcIIα and fMhcIIβ proteins were examined. The open reading frame (ORF) length of the mhcIIα gene was 708 bp, encoding 235 amino acids (aa) (Figure 1A); the ORF length of the mhcIIβ gene was 741 bp, encoding 246 aa (Figure 2A). The fMhcIIα and fMhcIIβ have molecular weights of 25.8 kDa and 27.6 kDa and isoelectric points of 4.62 and 6.17, respectively.
According to the results of the alignment of numerous amino acid sequences, the homology of fMhcIIα and fMhcIIβ and other teleosts scopes from 60.3% to 80.9% and 64.2% to 78.0%, and the highest homology is to Kareius bicoloratus (80.9% and 78.0%) (Figure 1B and Figure 2B), respectively. The fMhcIIα and fMhcIIβ clusters are most closely related to K. bicoloratus and Scophthalmus maximus on the part of their genetic evolutionary position (Figure 1C and Figure 2C).
Analysis of the conserved domains shows that both fMhcIIα and fMhcIIβ are transmembrane proteins. The fMhcIIα and fMhcIIβ contain transmembrane domain (aa207-aa229 and aa213-aa232), signal peptide (aa1-aa16 and aa1-aa18), and extracellular region (aa17-aa206 and aa19-aa212), respectively. They both have an IgC domain and an MhcIIα and MhcIIβ domain (Figure 1D and Figure 2D), respectively. Then, three-dimensional fMhcIIα and fMhcIIβ models were constructed; they have a classical organization in two distinct domains, respectively. (Figure 1E and Figure 2E).

3.2. Tissue Distribution of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ

The distribution characteristics of fmhcIIα and fmhcIIβ were detected by RT-qPCR and showed that mhcIIα and mhcIIβ mRNA were expressed in gills, PBLs, spleen, head kidney, intestine, liver, skin, and muscle in healthy flounder (Figure 3). Moreover, fmhcIIα and fmhcIIβ showed similar distribution characteristics in which significant signals were detected in the gill, spleen, PBLs, and head kidney, and poor expression was found in muscle and skin.

3.3. Abs Specificity of MhcIIα and MhcIIβ

The SDS-PAGE revealed the pET-32a-MhcIIα and pET-32a-MhcIIβ recombinant proteins were successfully expressed and had molecular weights of 41.7 kDa and 42.4 kDa (Figure 4A,B, lane 2), respectively, which agreed with the theoretical molecular mass. In addition, high-purity rMhcIIα and rMhcIIβ proteins were detected (Figure 4A,B, lane 3), respectively. To explore the expression of MhcIIα and MhcIIβ in different cell types, specific rabbit and mouse Abs were produced. The titers of all Abs were 1:100,000 detected using ELISA.
After being transfected into the HEK293 cell line, the recombinant plasmids pTag-EGFP-MhcIIα and pTag-EGFP-MhcIIβ were examined under the fluorescent microscope after 48 h. The plasmids were successfully transfected since there was clear green fluorescence in the transfected group but negative in the untransfected group.
The MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs could specifically recognize about 54.8 kDa (Figure 4C,D, lane 7) and 56.6 kDa (Figure 4C,D, lane 9) bands, respectively, in HEK293 cell line lysates transfected with pTag-EGFP-mhcIIα and pTag-EGFP-mhcIIβ eukaryotic plasmid, respectively. They matched the molecular mass that was predicted. Additionally, there was no cross-reactivity among MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs; MhcIIα Abs could uniquely detect rMhcIIα but had no reaction to rMhcIIβ (Figure 4C,D, lane 2, 3). MhcIIβ Abs could uniquely detect rMhcIIβ but no rMhcIIα (Figure 4C,D, lane 5, 6). The negative control yielded no positive results.
IIFA results showed that MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs were able to bind cells that had been transfected with pTag-EGFP-mhcIIα and pTag-EGFP-mhcIIβ eukaryotic plasmids, respectively, but not cells that had been transfected with the pTag-EGFP null plasmid. Both types of cells could not be bound by the negative serum (Figure 5 and Figure S1). According to the findings, the produced Abs have a high degree of specificity and can be applied in further experiments.

3.4. The Localization of MhcIIα and MhcIIβ in T and B Lymphocyte

FCM and IIFA results showed MhcIIα+, MhcIIα+/CD4-1+, MhcIIα+/CD4-2+, MhcIIα+/IgM+, MhcIIα+/CD8+, MhcIIβ+, MhcIIβ+/CD4-1+, MhcIIβ+/CD4-2+, MhcIIβ+/IgM+, and MhcIIβ+/CD8+ cells present in peripheral blood, gills, kidney, and spleen (Figures S2 and S3). MhcIIα+ and MhcIIβ+ leukocytes with the highest percentages in peripheral blood to 30.1 ± 3.0% and 30.2 ± 2.9%, respectively. MhcIIα+ and MhcIIβ+ leukocytes did not colocalize with T lymphocyte subpopulations. Their percentages of MhcIIα+, MhcIIβ+, MhcIIα+/IgM+, and MhcIIβ+/IgM+ cells were 30.1 ± 3.0%, 30.2 ± 2.9%, 20.6 ± 2.7%, and 19.6 ± 1.6% in PBLs, 11.6 ± 1.2%, 11.3 ± 2.7%, 2.3 ± 0.2%, and 2.1 ± 0.6% in the gills, 16.0 ± 1.3%, 17.4 ± 4.2%, 8.7 ± 1.2%, and 8.4 ± 1.3% in the head kidney, 20.7 ± 2.1%, 22.6 ± 1.7%, 11.0 ± 1.1%, and 12.1 ± 1.6% in the spleen, respectively (Figure 6A,B). PBLs had higher percentages of MhcIIα+ and MhcIIβ+ leukocytes than spleen, head kidney, and gills. In addition, there were no significant variations in the percentages of both MhcIIα+ and MhcIIβ+ cells in each tissue, so the subsequent experiments were performed by mixing MhcIIα Abs and MhcIIβ Abs in a 1:1 ratio.
The results of IIFA illustrated the same results as that of FCM; MhcII were co-localized with CD83 and IgM on leukocytes, respectively, but not on CD4 and CD8 T lymphocyte subpopulations (Figure 7). These findings suggested that MhcII mostly distributes on the surface of APCs.

3.5. Gene Expression of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ after Infection

To determine the role of MhcIIα and MhcIIβ in bacteria and virus challenges, their expression was evaluated via qPCR in SPLs, GLs, HKLs, and PBLs at various time intervals after immunization. The findings revealed that mhcIIα (Figure 8A–D) and mhcIIβ (Figure 8E–H) genes were significantly upregulated in all tissue leukocytes of the immunized group against the PBS control group (ANOVA, p < 0.05), and all peaked at 24–48 h post-infection with all types of pathogens then decreased (Figure 8). In addition, mhcIIα and mhcIIβ genes showed similar trends of variation. Early mhcIIα and mhcIIβ expressions were found after E. tarda infection and peaked at 24 and 36 h in all tissue leukocytes, having the most significant expression levels in SPLs (Figure 8A,E). After V. anguillarum and HIRRV infection, the maximum expression level of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ were at 36 and 48 h, with significant expression levels in PBLs and GLs (Figure 8B,D,F,H). After V. anguillarum infection, the expressions of the mhcIIα gene in PBLs and GLs were 5.03-fold and 4.29-fold higher than that in the control group, respectively (Figure 8B,D).

3.6. Variations in MhcII+, MhcII+/IgM+, MhcII+/CD83+, and CD4+ Leukocytes after Antigen Stimulation

After stimulation, PBLs and GLs in vitro with LPS, poly I:C, PHA, and ConA, respectively, MhcII+, MhcII+/IgM+, MhcII+/CD83+, and CD4+ cells were detected using FCM. In PBLs, the percentages of MhcII+, MhcII+/CD83+, MhcII+/IgM+, and CD4+ in the PBS group were 29.2 ± 0.9%, 16.3 ± 0.6%, 6.3 ± 0.5%, and 5.2 ± 0.6%, respectively. In the LPS group, no remarkable rise in MhcII+ and CD4+ cells (Figure 9A,D) was found in peripheral blood, but the MhcII+/CD83+ and MhcII+/IgM+ (Figure 9B,C) showed an increase, and peaked at 48 and 24 h, with proportions of 19.7 ± 1.5% and 11.8 ± 0.5%, respectively. After polyI:C stimulation, the proportions of MhcII+, MhcII+/CD83+, MhcII+/IgM+, and CD4+ cells showed increase followed by decrease, and peaked at 12, 24, 24, and 24 h, with the percentages of 51.7 ± 2.3%, 22.3 ± 1.4%, 15.6 ± 1.1%, and 11.4 ± 1.1%, respectively. The percentages of MhcII+, MhcII+/CD83+, and CD4+ cells in the PHA group exhibited a propensity to steadily rise until the end and peaked at 72 h, with the proportions of 48.3 ± 2.7%, 17.4 ± 0.7%, and 17.4 ± 0.7%, respectively. The ratios of MhcII+/IgM+ cells revealed an increase followed by a decrease and peaked at 48 h with a proportion of 27.9 ± 1.4%. The percentages of MhcII+ and MhcII+/CD83+ cells in the ConA group showed a similar trend, increased, and peaked at 72 h with proportions of 37.9 ± 3.1% and 10.4 ± 1.3%, respectively. The MhcII+/IgM+ cells in the ConA group showed an increase and peaked at 24 h with a percentage of 21.7 ± 1.9%, and there was a tendency for the percentage of CD4+ cells to gradually rise and peaked at 72 h with a proportion of 16.0 ± 1.3%. The proliferation of cells in the polyI:C, PHA, and ConA groups was more significant than that in the LPS group, and the cellular response to polyI:C stimulation was much more rapid (Figure 9A–D).
In GLs, the proportions of MhcII+, MhcII+/IgM+, MhcII+/CD83+, and CD4+ cells in the PBS group were 11.9 ± 1.5%, 2.6 ± 0.4%, 6.5 ± 1.1%, and 29.4 ± 1.3%, respectively; there were no significant proliferative responses of MhcII+ and MhcII+/IgM+ cells (Figure 9E,G) after LPS and polyI:C stimulation; the proportion of MhcII+/CD83+ cells (Figure 9F) showed a rapid decrease but the CD4+ cells (Figure 9H) showed a significant increase at 6–12 h. After PHA and ConA stimulation, MhcII+, MhcII+/IgM+, MhcII+/CD83+, and CD4+ cells proliferated significantly (ANOVA, p < 0.05), exhibited a propensity to rise progressively until the end of the sample period, and all of them peaked at 72 h; in the PHA group, the percentages of MhcII+, MhcII+/IgM+, MhcII+/CD83+, and CD4+ cells were 39.8 ± 3.2%, 16.1 ± 1.0%, 21.2 ± 1.9%, and 52.7 ± 2.9%, respectively; and in the ConA group the proportions of MhcII+, MhcII+/IgM+, MhcII+/CD83+, and CD4+ cells were 31.9 ± 3.2%, 13.5 ± 1.2%, 23.1 ± 1.6%, and 38.5 ± 2.4%, respectively (Figure 9E–H).

4. Discussion

Sequences from fMhcIIα and fMhcIIβ were clone and examined for structural domains in this experiment. The protein’s three-dimensional models showed a classical structure in two distinct domains, which resemble the Chinese longsnout catfish [6]. The MhcIIα and MhcIIβ molecules are transmembrane proteins with an immunoglobulin-like structural domain similar to human MhcIIα and MhcIIβ [29]. Utilizing the maxima likelihood method, phylogenetic research revealed that fMhcIIα and fMhcIIβ were clustered with stone flounder (Kareius bicoloratus) and turbot (S. maximus) (Figure 1C and Figure 2C). The homology with stone flounder were 80.9% and 78.0% (Figure 1B and Figure 2B), respectively, which were the highest. They are distantly related to mammalian MhcIIα and MhcIIβ. This may be because flounder and stone flounder share a common taxonomic status and have undergone conservative gene evolution [9,30].
Tissue distribution analysis showed that mhcIIα and mhcIIβ were primarily discovered in gills, spleen, and PBLs; these were immune-associated tissues (Figure 3). Similar expression patterns were seen in large yellow croaker, European sea bass, and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), with the gills and spleen displaying the highest levels of mhcII expression [11,12,31]. The gills and spleen of Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout are the primary immune-related tissues and play a crucial role in capturing antigens, which might be important for activating adaptive immunity [32,33]. MhcII molecules play an irreplaceable role in antigen presentation, which makes MhcII indispensable to the immune system and are found throughout in immune tissues [34].
In order to rule out the likelihood of the antibody interacting with other antigens, Western blotting was employed to look for cross-reactivity between anti-MhcIIα and anti-MhcIIβ Abs (Figure 4). The results demonstrated that the two Abs did not interact with each other. Additionally, it has been proven that the anti-MhcIIα Abs exclusively identify eukaryotically transfected MhcIIα proteins, and the anti-MhcIIβ Abs exclusively identify eukaryotically transfected MhcIIβ proteins (Figure 5 and Figure S1). This guaranteed the anti-MhcII Abs’ accuracy in identifying MhcII+ cells.
In mammals, MhcIIα and MhcIIβ molecules are predominantly distributed on DCs, B lymphocytes, macrophages, microglia, and epithelial cells; most of them are APCs [35,36]. Expression of mhcII genes and proteins is predominantly found in lymphoid tissues, and functional studies have shown upregulation of mhcII gene expression in response to stimulation in vivo or in vitro. However, this is limited with markers for cell types, and further identification of MhcII+ cells is necessary [37]. In the study, MhcII+ cells were discovered to be more abundantly located in the spleen, gills, PBLs, and kidney, which are immune-associated tissues and similar in yellow catfish (pelteobagrus fulvidraco) and Atlantic salmon [37,38]. So far, studies have shown that monocyte macrophages, B-lymphocytes and DCs, and epithelial cells are APCs in teleosts; MhcII is mainly distributed on APCs, whose function is to present processed exogenous antigen to CD4+ T cells [22,39,40]. In a previous study, Kurata et al. prepared a specific fMhcIIα Abs, and immunohistochemical staining showed that MhcII+ were present in the gills, heart, kidney, spleen, etc. Additionally, these immunopositive cells had rounded or spindly shapes. The morphological characteristics, tissue localization, and the prior literature led to the hypothesis that the MhcII of flounder were expressed by APCs, including DCs, macrophages, B cells, microglia, and epithelial cells [21]. In this study, MhcII was found to co-localize with CD83 and IgM, but not CD4 or CD8, respectively, during FCM (Figure 6) and IIFA (Figure 7) analysis. MhcII was discovered, which was mostly located in DCs and B cells, but not in T lymphocytes. Furthermore, the results showed that MhcII+ cells were not totally DCs and B lymphocytes. However, due to the lack of corresponding monocyte and macrophage-specific Abs, we were unable to characterize the other flounder MhcII+ cells, which will be the focus of subsequent research.
In mammals, MhcII+ cells serve an important function in antigen presentation; MhcII molecules present extracellular antigens such as bacteria, fungi, and parasites. During antigen presentation, MhcII molecules bind to antigenic peptides to form a complex, which is recognized by T-cell receptors and activates CD4+ T-cell immune responses [41]. In this study, HIRRV and E. tarda of intracellular pathogens and V. anguillarum of extracellular pathogens were chosen. Intraperitoneal injections were used to conduct in vivo experiments. Intraperitoneal injections allowed the flounder easy to uptake antigens quickly. Then, the expression of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ in the SPLs, HKLs, GLs, and PBLs illustrated that strong mhcIIα and mhcIIβ expressions were detected in HKLs, GLs, and PBLs after three infections. However, early and strong mhcIIα and mhcIIβ expressions were detected in the SPLs after E. tarda infection but not in the infection of V. anguillarum (Figure 8A,E). This may be due to the characteristic of pathogen V. anguillarum being a kind of opportunistic pathogen, which might provide chronic pathogenicity, while E. tarda is a serious pathogenic bacteria that causes intracellular infection and serious pathological change quickly. This is also the case in previous studies; thus, differences in pathogenicity might result in variations in the expression [42]. In miiuy croaker, significant expressions of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ occurred in the kidney and spleen after 72 h of V. anguillarum challenge. The mhcII expression in the kidney raised from the beginning of the infection to 12 h, decreased to the lowest point at 36 h, and then increased again to its normal level as control after 72 h [14]. In flounder, the highest mhcII expression in SPLs, HKLs, GLs, and PBLs was observed at 24–48 h; most of them regressed to the control at 96 h, except mhcIIα expression in HKLs after HIRRV infection (Figure 8C) and mhcIIα expression in PBLs after E. tarda infection (Figure 8D), which indicated that the infection by E. tarda or HIRRV kept for a longer period until the end of the experiment; additionally, infection progress made mhcIIα expression upregulated. Similar expression patterns of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ that were induced by V. anguillarum were observed in SPLs, GLs, and HKLs, whereas the two mhcII genes showed different patterns in PBLs (Figure 8D,H); this was probably due to the differences in signaling pathways induced by the pathogenic infections. Similarly, in miiuy croaker, after infection of V. anguillarum, mhcIIα and mhcIIβ genes’ expression patterns were different in the liver and intestine [14]. The mhcII expression in GLs and PBLs showed higher growth trends than the study (Figure 8B,D,F,H); the high levels of mhcII expression in GLs and PBLs suggested that MhcII+ cells responded rapidly to the invasion of pathogenic organisms and indicated that immune cells were involved in trafficking and immune response after antigen stimulation.
From an evolutionary point of view, teleosts, as lower vertebrates, possessed an adaptive immune response: the capacity for an immune response that is antigen-specific. After a teleost is stimulated by antigen, the APCs process the peptide to T cells, which are activated to secrete a variety of cytokines and activate B lymphocytes to produce antigen-specific Abs [35,36,37]. In previous experiments, we demonstrated that MhcII molecules can serve as surface marker molecules for APCs and that the expression of MhcII molecules was significantly upregulated after pathogen stimulation. We also found that turbot MhcII molecules were expressed in B lymphocytes, which could co-localize with CD83, a surface marker molecule of DCs, but not in T lymphocytes, suggesting that MhcII were expressed specifically in APCs. Since the results of the experiments in vivo indicated that GLs and PBLs had the most pronounced upregulation of mhcII genes after infection, the circulating tissues were sensitive to capture antigens and might be the place where APC is abundantly accumulated. We further explored in vitro the expression properties of MhcII molecules at the cellular level after stimulation with the pattern antigens LPS, polyI:C, PHA, and ConA, and analyzed their coordinated responses with CD4+ T lymphocytes, thus attempting to explain the immune process of teleost MhcII-presenting antigen-activating CD4+ T lymphocytes. According to the findings, MhcII+/CD83+ and MhcII+/IgM+ cell ratios in the PBLs of flounder were significantly elevated under the stimulation of the thymus-independent antigen LPS (Figure 9B,C), suggesting that B lymphocytes and DCs responded significantly to the stimulation of the thymus-independent antigen. We found that the number of MhcII+/CD83+ cells in the PBLs of flounder increased significantly with time after LPS stimulation, confirming the response process after antigenic stimulation of flounder on DCs. In zebrafish, the LPS activation of isolated DCs resulted in the upregulated expression of mhcII and CD83 [43]. The proportions of MhcII+, MhcII+/IgM+, MhcII+/CD83+, and CD4+ cells in the PBLs of flounder after polyI:C stimulation were significantly elevated at 12–24 h. Similarly, in rainbow trout, polyI:C stimulation significantly upregulated MhcII cell surface expression on IgM+ cells in PBLs; in addition, in the polyI:C activation of isolated DCs, the MhcII expression was also significantly upregulated [44,45]. This demonstrates that stimulation via viral organisms is capable of significantly eliciting an immune response in APCs and T lymphocytes [25]. Similarly, the proportions of MhcII+, MhcII+/IgM+, MhcII+/CD83+, and CD4+ cells in PBLs and GLs were significantly increased at 48–72 h after stimulation with the thymus-dependent antigens PHA and ConA. These studies showed different patterns of antigens, all of which elicited the response of MhcII+ cells in flounder. The response of MhcII+ (Figure 9A,E) and CD4+ cells (Figure 9D,H) correlated positively in teleost. MhcII is predominantly distributed in APCs, implying the possibility for presenting antigens to CD4+ T cells. Consequently, this result indirectly suggests the existence of an immune process involving the activation of CD4+ T cells via antigen delivery via MhcII molecules on APCs present in flounder [46]. However, the process by which fish MhcII presents antigens, the binding of MhcII molecules to CD4 molecules, and the activation process of teleost T lymphocytes remain unclear.
In brief, the present research evaluated the molecular features and tissue location traits of MhcIIα and MhcIIβ, made the polyclonal Abs, revealed that flounder DCs and B lymphocytes expressed MhcII molecules, and investigated the response characteristics of MhcII after pathogenic infection and antigenic stimulation. MhcII responded significantly to exogenous antigens and T cell-dependent antigens, especially playing an essential role in the antigen presentation process, and revealed the existence of the immune process of activation of CD4+ T cells via MhcII molecules on APCs. These results will provide solid references to antigen presentation studies in teleost.

5. Conclusions

The MhcIIα and MhcIIβ of flounder were transmembrane molecules. They are significantly expressed in immunological tissues and mainly expressed in B lymphocytes and dendritic cells. They did not express in T lymphocytes. The MhcIIα and MhcIIβ responded significantly to exogenous antigens and T cell-dependent antigens. These results will provide an important basis for the study of antigen presentation in teleost.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology12121464/s1, Figure S1: Indirect immunofluorescence results of rabbit anti-flounder MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs and HEK293 cell lines transfected with eukaryotic plasmid; Figure S2: Flow cytometry results of the proportion of MhcIIα+, MhcIIα+/CD4-1+, MhcIIα+/CD4-2+, MhcIIα+/IgM+, MhcIIα+/CD8+ cells in peripheral blood, gills, head kidney, and spleen; Figure S3: Flow cytometry results of the proportion of MhcIIβ+, MhcIIβ+/CD4-1+, MhcIIβ+/CD4-2+, MhcIIβ+/IgM+ and MhcIIβ+/CD8+ cells in peripheral blood, gills, head kidney, and spleen.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.X. and W.Z.; methodology, Z.A. and J.X.; software, Z.A.; validation, Z.A.; resources, J.X., X.T., X.S., H.C. and W.Z.; data curation, Z.A.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.A. and J.X.; writing—review and editing, J.X., X.T., X.S., H.C. and W.Z.; funding acquisition, J.X. and W.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32173005; 31730101) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0900503).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All the procedures involving animals were performed according to the OUC-AU joint projects, NBRPC (2012CB114406).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data in this research are accessible upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Neefjes, J.; Jongsma, M.L.M.; Paul, P.; Bakke, O. Towards a Systems Understanding of MHC Class I and MHC Class II Antigen Presentation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 823–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Drozina, G.; Kohoutek, J.; Jabrane-Ferrat, N.; Peterlin, B.M. Expression of MHC II Genes. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2005, 290, 147–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yamaguchi, T.; Dijkstra, J.M. Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Genes and Disease Resistance in Fish. Cells 2019, 8, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Radwan, J.; Babik, W.; Kaufman, J.; Lenz, T.L.; Winternitz, J. Advances in the Evolutionary Understanding of MHC Polymorphism. Trends Genet. 2020, 36, 298–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Grimholt, U. MHC and Evolution in Teleosts. Biology 2016, 5, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shen, T.; Xu, S.; Yang, M.; Pang, S.; Yang, G. Molecular Cloning, Expression Pattern, and 3D Structural Analysis of the MHC Class IIB Gene in the Chinese Longsnout Catfish (Leiocassis Longirostris). Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2011, 141, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ma, Q.; Su, Y.-Q.; Wang, J.; Zhuang, Z.-M.; Tang, Q.-S. Molecular Cloning and Expression Analysis of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class IIB Gene of the Whitespotted Bambooshark (Chiloscyllium Plagiosum). Fish. Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 39, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, W.; Sun, W.-X.; Meng, L.; Hong, D.-W. Molecular Cloning, Genomic Structure, Polymorphism and Expression Analysis of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class IIA Gene of Swamp Eel Monopterus Albus. Biology 2014, 69, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jiang, J.; Li, C.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, X. Cloning and Characterization of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Genes in the Stone Flounder Kareius Bicoloratus (Pleuronectidae). Genet. Mol. Res. 2013, 12, 5820–5832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Huang, Z.; Yu, Y.; Dong, S.; Yin, Y.; Wang, Q.; Yu, W.; Luo, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Y.; et al. Major Histocompatibility Complex Class IIA and IIB Genes of Loach (Misgurnus Anguillicaudatus): Molecular Cloning and Expression Analysis in Response to Bacterial and Parasitic Challenge. Aquaculture 2019, 500, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, S.; Ao, J.; Chen, X. Molecular Characterization and Expression Analysis of MHC Class II Alpha and Beta Genes in Large Yellow Croaker (Pseudosciaena Crocea). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 37, 1295–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pang, J.; Gao, F.; Lu, M.; Ye, X.; Zhu, H.; Ke, X. Major Histocompatibility Complex Class IIA and IIB Genes of Nile Tilapia Oreochromis Niloticus: Genomic Structure, Molecular Polymorphism and Expression Patterns. Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2013, 34, 486–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, H.; Jiang, L.; Han, J.; Su, H.; Yang, Q.; He, C. Major Histocompatibility Complex Class IIA and IIB Genes of the Spotted Halibut Verasper Variegatus: Genomic Structure, Molecular Polymorphism, and Expression Analysis. Fish. Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 37, 767–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xu, T.; Sun, Y.; Shi, G.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, R. Characterization of the Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Genes in Miiuy Croaker. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, X.; Du, H.; Liu, L.; You, X.; Wu, M.; Liao, Z. MHC Class II Alpha, Beta and MHC Class II-Associated Invariant Chains from Chinese Sturgeon (Acipenser Sinensis) and Their Response to Immune Stimulation. Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2017, 70, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lu, X.; Li, W.; Guo, J.; Jia, P.; Zhang, W.; Yi, M.; Jia, K. N Protein of Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia Virus Suppresses STAT1-Mediated MHC Class II Transcription to Impair Antigen Presentation in Sea Perch, Lateolabrax Japonicus. J. Immunol. 2022, 208, 1076–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, S.-L.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Xu, M.-Y.; Ji, X.-S.; Yu, G.-C.; Dong, C.-F. Molecular Polymorphism and Expression Analysis of MHC Class II B Gene from Red Sea Bream (Chrysophrys Major). Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2006, 30, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jørgensen, S.M.; Hetland, D.L.; Press, C.M.; Grimholt, U.; Gjøen, T. Effect of Early Infectious Salmon Anaemia Virus (ISAV) Infection on Expression of MHC Pathway Genes and Type I and II Interferon in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar L.) Tissues. Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2007, 23, 576–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sawayama, E.; Tanizawa, S.; Nakayama, K.; Ito, R.; Akase, Y.; Kitamura, S.-I. Major Histocompatibility IIβ Diversity and Peptide-Binding Groove Properties Associated with Red Sea Bream Iridovirus Resistance. Aquaculture 2022, 552, 738038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cao, Z.; Liu, X.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, L.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, Y. Genetic Polymorphism of MHC Class IIα Alleles and Its Association with Resistance/Susceptibility to Viral Nervous Necrosis Virus (VNNV) in Golden Pompano (Trachinotus Ovatus). Aquaculture 2019, 501, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kurata, O.; Miyashita, S.; Toda, S.; Wada, S.; Sakai, T. Immunohistochemistry for Detection of MHC Class II-Expressing Cells in Japanese Flounder Paralichthys Olivaceus. Fish. Pathol. 2021, 55, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Iliev, D.B.; Thim, H.; Lagos, L.; Olsen, R.; Jørgensen, J.B. Homing of Antigen-Presenting Cells in Head Kidney and Spleen—Salmon Head Kidney Hosts Diverse APC Types. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Piertney, S.B.; Oliver, M.K. The Evolutionary Ecology of the Major Histocompatibility Complex. Heredity 2006, 96, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dong, F.; Song, X.; Xing, J.; Tang, X.; Sheng, X.; Chi, H.; Zhan, W. Immunological Characteristics of Dendritic Cells Marker CD83 in Flounder (Paralichthys Olivaceus). Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. Rep. 2021, 2, 100030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xing, J.; Tian, H.-F.; Tang, X.-Q.; Sheng, X.-Z.; Zhan, W.-B. Kinetics of T Lymphocyte Subsets and B Lymphocytes in Response to Immunostimulants in Flounder (Paralichthys Olivaceus): Implications for CD4+ T Lymphocyte Differentiation. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xing, J.; Ma, J.; Tang, X.; Sheng, X.; Zhan, W. Characterizations of CD4-1, CD4-2 and CD8β T Cell Subpopulations in Peripheral Blood Leucocytes, Spleen and Head Kidney of Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys Olivaceus). Mol. Immunol. 2017, 85, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, Q.; Zhan, W.; Xing, J.; Sheng, X. Production, Characterisation and Applicability of Monoclonal Antibodies to Immunoglobulin of Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys Olivaceus). Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2007, 23, 982–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, M.; Xing, J.; Tang, X.; Sheng, X.; Chi, H.; Zhan, W. Expression of Interleukin-2 Receptor Subunit Gamma (IL-2Rγ) and Its Binding with IL-2 Induced Activation of CD4 T Lymphocytes in Flounder (Paralichthys Olivaceus). Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2022, 122, 426–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jones, E.Y.; Fugger, L.; Strominger, J.L.; Siebold, C. MHC Class II Proteins and Disease: A Structural Perspective. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Jiang, J.; Li, C.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, X. Locus Number Estimation of MHC Class II B in Stone Flounder and Japanese Flounder. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 6000–6017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Buonocore, F.; Randelli, E.; Casani, D.; Costantini, S.; Facchiano, A.; Scapigliati, G.; Stet, R.J.M. Molecular Cloning, Differential Expression and 3D Structural Analysis of the MHC Class-II β Chain from Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus Labrax L.). Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2007, 23, 853–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Morales-Lange, B.; Ramírez-Cepeda, F.; Schmitt, P.; Guzmán, F.; Lagos, L.; Øverland, M.; Wong-Benito, V.; Imarai, M.; Fuentes, D.; Boltaña, S.; et al. Interferon Gamma Induces the Increase of Cell-Surface Markers (CD80/86, CD83 and MHC-II) in Splenocytes From Atlantic Salmon. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 666356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yang, H.; Zhujin, D.; Marana, M.H.; Dalsgaard, I.; Rzgar, J.; Heidi, M.; Asma, K.M.; Per, K.W.; Kurt, B. Immersion Vaccines against Yersinia Ruckeri Infection in Rainbow Trout: Comparative Effects of Strain Differences. J. Fish. Dis. 2021, 44, 1937–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wilson, A.B. MHC and Adaptive Immunity in Teleost Fishes. Immunogenetics 2017, 69, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mildner, A.; Jung, S. Development and Function of Dendritic Cell Subsets. Immunity 2014, 40, 642–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Itano, A.A.; Jenkins, M.K. Antigen Presentation to Naive CD4 T Cells in the Lymph Node. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Koppang, E.O.; Hordvik, I.; Bjerkås, I.; Torvund, J.; Aune, L.; Thevarajan, J.; Endresen, C. Production of Rabbit Antisera against Recombinant MHC Class II Beta Chain and Identification of Immunoreactive Cells in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar). Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2003, 14, 115–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, B.; Zhu, F.; Shi, Z.; Huang, Z.; Sun, R.; Wang, Q.; Ouyang, G.; Ji, W. Molecular Characteristics, Polymorphism and Expression Analysis of Mhc II in Yellow Catfish (Pelteobagrus Fulvidraco) Responding to Flavobacterium Columnare Infection. Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2022, 125, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Iliev, D.B.; Jørgensen, S.M.; Rode, M.; Krasnov, A.; Harneshaug, I.; Jørgensen, J.B. CpG-Induced Secretion of MHCIIβ and Exosomes from Salmon (Salmo Salar) APCs. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2010, 34, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Morales-Lange, B.; Nombela, I.; Ortega-Villaizán, M.D.M.; Imarai, M.; Schmitt, P.; Mercado, L. Induction of Foxp3 during the Crosstalk between Antigen Presenting Like-Cells MHCII+CD83+ and Splenocytes CD4+IgM in Rainbow Trout. Biology 2021, 10, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Roche, P.A.; Furuta, K. The Ins and Outs of MHC Class II-Mediated Antigen Processing and Presentation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tian, H.; Xing, J.; Tang, X.; Chi, H.; Sheng, X.; Zhan, W. Identification and Characterization of a Master Transcription Factor of Th1 Cells, T-Bet, Within Flounder (Paralichthys Olivaceus). Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 704324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Shao, T.; Zhu, L.-Y.; Nie, L.; Shi, W.; Dong, W.-R.; Xiang, L.-X.; Shao, J.-Z. Characterization of Surface Phenotypic Molecules of Teleost Dendritic Cells. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2015, 49, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bassity, E.; Clark, T.G. Functional Identification of Dendritic Cells in the Teleost Model, Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Abós, B.; Castro, R.; González Granja, A.; Havixbeck, J.J.; Barreda, D.R.; Tafalla, C. Early Activation of Teleost B Cells in Response to Rhabdovirus Infection. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 1768–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kjøglum, S.; Larsen, S.; Bakke, H.G.; Grimholt, U. How Specific MHC Class I and Class II Combinations Affect Disease Resistance against Infectious Salmon Anaemia in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar). Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2006, 21, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sequence analysis of Cloned MhcIIα in flounder. (A): The cDNA sequence of mhcIIα in flounder. Red indicates the signal peptide; stop codon is shown by the *; and underlined indicates transmembrane domain. (B): Multiple alignments of MhcIIα in teleosts. The residues = 100% identical among the aligned sequences are in black, ≥75% identical are in red, ≥50% identical are in blue. The letters indicate amino acid sequences. The dots in the amino acid sequences indicate gaps introduced to maximize alignment. Each sequence’s accession number was as follows: Paralichthys olivaceus (AAY18782.1), Scophthalmus maximus (AAZ06134.1), Kareius bicoloratus (AFY98544.1), Sparus aurata (AAY42849.1), Larimichthys crocea (ABV48907.1), Morone saxatilis (AAA49381.1), Oryzias latipes (AGA53806.1), Oreochromis niloticus (AEO44577.1), and Dicentrarchus labrax (ABH09449.1). (C): Phylogenetic tree analysis of MhcIIα between flounder and other species. Red color indicates the MhcIIα of flounder cloned in this experiment. The accession number for each sequence was as follows: Paralichthys olivaceus (AAY18782.1), Scophthalmus maximus (AAZ06134.1), Oncorhynchus mykiss (CAB96452.1), Kareius bicoloratus (AFY98544.1), Ictalurus punctatus (AAD39868.1), Sparus aurata (AAY42849.1), Danio rerio (AAA16369.1), Salmo salar (AGH92604.1), Cyprinus carpio (CAA64708.1), Larimichthys crocea (ABV48907.1), Morone saxatilis (AAA49381.1), Oryzias latipes (AGA53806.1), Oreochromis niloticus (AEO44577.1), Dicentrarchus labrax (ABH09449.1), Odontobutis potamophila (ALB35651.1), Ctenopharyngodon idella (ABW37740.1), Ovis aries (ABV90473.1), Bubalus bubalis (ABA28748.1), Mus musculus (AAB46387.1), and Homo sapiens (QUA12595.1). (D): Conservative structural domain analysis of MhcIIα; red bar represents signal peptide; and blue bar represents transmembrane domain. (E): Tertiary structure prediction result of MhcIIα. Blue indicates α-helix, red indicates β-sheet.
Figure 1. Sequence analysis of Cloned MhcIIα in flounder. (A): The cDNA sequence of mhcIIα in flounder. Red indicates the signal peptide; stop codon is shown by the *; and underlined indicates transmembrane domain. (B): Multiple alignments of MhcIIα in teleosts. The residues = 100% identical among the aligned sequences are in black, ≥75% identical are in red, ≥50% identical are in blue. The letters indicate amino acid sequences. The dots in the amino acid sequences indicate gaps introduced to maximize alignment. Each sequence’s accession number was as follows: Paralichthys olivaceus (AAY18782.1), Scophthalmus maximus (AAZ06134.1), Kareius bicoloratus (AFY98544.1), Sparus aurata (AAY42849.1), Larimichthys crocea (ABV48907.1), Morone saxatilis (AAA49381.1), Oryzias latipes (AGA53806.1), Oreochromis niloticus (AEO44577.1), and Dicentrarchus labrax (ABH09449.1). (C): Phylogenetic tree analysis of MhcIIα between flounder and other species. Red color indicates the MhcIIα of flounder cloned in this experiment. The accession number for each sequence was as follows: Paralichthys olivaceus (AAY18782.1), Scophthalmus maximus (AAZ06134.1), Oncorhynchus mykiss (CAB96452.1), Kareius bicoloratus (AFY98544.1), Ictalurus punctatus (AAD39868.1), Sparus aurata (AAY42849.1), Danio rerio (AAA16369.1), Salmo salar (AGH92604.1), Cyprinus carpio (CAA64708.1), Larimichthys crocea (ABV48907.1), Morone saxatilis (AAA49381.1), Oryzias latipes (AGA53806.1), Oreochromis niloticus (AEO44577.1), Dicentrarchus labrax (ABH09449.1), Odontobutis potamophila (ALB35651.1), Ctenopharyngodon idella (ABW37740.1), Ovis aries (ABV90473.1), Bubalus bubalis (ABA28748.1), Mus musculus (AAB46387.1), and Homo sapiens (QUA12595.1). (D): Conservative structural domain analysis of MhcIIα; red bar represents signal peptide; and blue bar represents transmembrane domain. (E): Tertiary structure prediction result of MhcIIα. Blue indicates α-helix, red indicates β-sheet.
Biology 12 01464 g001
Figure 2. Sequence analysis of Cloned MhcIIβ in flounder. (A): The cDNA sequence of mhcIIβ in flounder. Red indicates the signal peptide; stop codon is shown by the *; and underlined indicates transmembrane domain. (B): Multiple alignments of MhcIIβ in teleosts. The residues = 100% identical among the aligned sequences are in black, ≥75% identical are in red, ≥50% identical are in blue. The letters indicate amino acid sequences. The dots in the amino acid sequences indicate gaps introduced to maximize alignment. Each sequence’s accession number was as follows: Paralichthys olivaceus (AAX52912.1), Scophthalmus maximus (AWO97408.1), Kareius bicoloratus (ADG45932.1), Dicentrarchus labrax (ABH09450.1), Sparus aurata (XP_030269046.1), Larimichthys crocea (ABV48909.1), Morone saxatilis (AAA49380.1), Oryzias latipes (AGA53815.1), and Oreochromis niloticus (AEE73592.1). (C): Phylogenetic tree analysis of MhcIIβ between flounder and other species. Red color indicates the MhcIIβ of flounder cloned in this experiment. The accession number for each sequence was as follows: Paralichthys olivaceus (AAX52912.1), Scophthalmus maximus (AWO97408.1), Oncorhynchus mykiss (AAD53026.1), Salmo salar (CAA49726.1), Kareius bicoloratus (ADG45932.1), Cyprinus carpio (XP_042605849.1), Danio rerio (NP_001007207.2), Dicentrarchus labrax (ABH09450.1), Sparus aurata (XP_030269046.1), Ictalurus punctatus (AAB67871.1), Larimichthys crocea (ABV48909.1), Morone saxatilis (AAA49380.1), Oryzias latipes (AGA53815.1), Oreochromis niloticus (AEE73592.1), Odontobutis potamophila (ALB35650.1), Ctenopharyngodon idella (AEM75094.1), Ovis aries (ABV90472.1), Bubalus bubalis (BAW81733.1), Mus musculus (AKO62645.1), and Homo sapiens (ACX50638.1). (D): Conservative structural domain analysis of MhcIIβ; red bar represents signal peptide; and blue bar represents transmembrane domain. (E): Tertiary structure prediction result of MhcIIβ. Blue indicates α-helix, red indicates β-sheet.
Figure 2. Sequence analysis of Cloned MhcIIβ in flounder. (A): The cDNA sequence of mhcIIβ in flounder. Red indicates the signal peptide; stop codon is shown by the *; and underlined indicates transmembrane domain. (B): Multiple alignments of MhcIIβ in teleosts. The residues = 100% identical among the aligned sequences are in black, ≥75% identical are in red, ≥50% identical are in blue. The letters indicate amino acid sequences. The dots in the amino acid sequences indicate gaps introduced to maximize alignment. Each sequence’s accession number was as follows: Paralichthys olivaceus (AAX52912.1), Scophthalmus maximus (AWO97408.1), Kareius bicoloratus (ADG45932.1), Dicentrarchus labrax (ABH09450.1), Sparus aurata (XP_030269046.1), Larimichthys crocea (ABV48909.1), Morone saxatilis (AAA49380.1), Oryzias latipes (AGA53815.1), and Oreochromis niloticus (AEE73592.1). (C): Phylogenetic tree analysis of MhcIIβ between flounder and other species. Red color indicates the MhcIIβ of flounder cloned in this experiment. The accession number for each sequence was as follows: Paralichthys olivaceus (AAX52912.1), Scophthalmus maximus (AWO97408.1), Oncorhynchus mykiss (AAD53026.1), Salmo salar (CAA49726.1), Kareius bicoloratus (ADG45932.1), Cyprinus carpio (XP_042605849.1), Danio rerio (NP_001007207.2), Dicentrarchus labrax (ABH09450.1), Sparus aurata (XP_030269046.1), Ictalurus punctatus (AAB67871.1), Larimichthys crocea (ABV48909.1), Morone saxatilis (AAA49380.1), Oryzias latipes (AGA53815.1), Oreochromis niloticus (AEE73592.1), Odontobutis potamophila (ALB35650.1), Ctenopharyngodon idella (AEM75094.1), Ovis aries (ABV90472.1), Bubalus bubalis (BAW81733.1), Mus musculus (AKO62645.1), and Homo sapiens (ACX50638.1). (D): Conservative structural domain analysis of MhcIIβ; red bar represents signal peptide; and blue bar represents transmembrane domain. (E): Tertiary structure prediction result of MhcIIβ. Blue indicates α-helix, red indicates β-sheet.
Biology 12 01464 g002
Figure 3. The expression level of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ genes in flounder. “β-actin” was used for internal control. The results are provided as means ± SD. The groups with the same letter are not significantly different from one another. (n = 9, p < 0.05).
Figure 3. The expression level of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ genes in flounder. “β-actin” was used for internal control. The results are provided as means ± SD. The groups with the same letter are not significantly different from one another. (n = 9, p < 0.05).
Biology 12 01464 g003
Figure 4. SDS-PAGE results of recombinant MhcIIα (rMhcIIα) and MhcIIβ (rMhcIIβ) and Western blot results of MhcIIα and MhcIIβ antibodies (Abs). (A): SDS-PAGE of rMhcIIα. Lane (L) M: Marker; L 1: transformed E. coli without IPTG induction; L 2: transformed E. coli induced with IPTG; L 3: purified rMhcIIα. (B): SDS-PAGE of rMhcIIβ. L M: Marker; L 4: transformed E. coli without IPTG induction; L 5: transformed E. coli induced with IPTG; L 6: purified rMhcIIβ. (C): Western-blot results of rabbit anti-flounder MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs. L M: Marker; L 1: MhcIIα Abs to pET-32a empty plasmid protein; L 2: MhcIIα Abs to rMhcIIα; L 3: MhcIIα Abs to rMhcIIβ; L 4: MhcIIβ Abs to pET-32a empty plasmid protein; L 5: MhcIIβ Abs to rMhcIIα; L 6: MhcIIβ Abs to rMhcIIβ; L 7: MhcIIα Abs to HEK293 cell lysates transfected with pTag-EGFP-mhcIIα recombinant plasmid; L 8: Unimmunized rabbits serum to HEK293 cell lysates transfected with pTag-EGFP-mhcIIα recombinant plasmid; L 9: MhcIIβ Abs to HEK293 cell lysates transfected with pTag-EGFP-mhcIIβ recombinant plasmid; L 10: Unimmunized rabbits serum to HEK293 cell lysates transfected with pTag-EGFP-mhcIIβ recombinant plasmid. (D): Western blot results of mouse anti-flounder MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs (Replaced all the rabbit anti-flounder Abs in C with the corresponding mouse anti-flounder Abs).
Figure 4. SDS-PAGE results of recombinant MhcIIα (rMhcIIα) and MhcIIβ (rMhcIIβ) and Western blot results of MhcIIα and MhcIIβ antibodies (Abs). (A): SDS-PAGE of rMhcIIα. Lane (L) M: Marker; L 1: transformed E. coli without IPTG induction; L 2: transformed E. coli induced with IPTG; L 3: purified rMhcIIα. (B): SDS-PAGE of rMhcIIβ. L M: Marker; L 4: transformed E. coli without IPTG induction; L 5: transformed E. coli induced with IPTG; L 6: purified rMhcIIβ. (C): Western-blot results of rabbit anti-flounder MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs. L M: Marker; L 1: MhcIIα Abs to pET-32a empty plasmid protein; L 2: MhcIIα Abs to rMhcIIα; L 3: MhcIIα Abs to rMhcIIβ; L 4: MhcIIβ Abs to pET-32a empty plasmid protein; L 5: MhcIIβ Abs to rMhcIIα; L 6: MhcIIβ Abs to rMhcIIβ; L 7: MhcIIα Abs to HEK293 cell lysates transfected with pTag-EGFP-mhcIIα recombinant plasmid; L 8: Unimmunized rabbits serum to HEK293 cell lysates transfected with pTag-EGFP-mhcIIα recombinant plasmid; L 9: MhcIIβ Abs to HEK293 cell lysates transfected with pTag-EGFP-mhcIIβ recombinant plasmid; L 10: Unimmunized rabbits serum to HEK293 cell lysates transfected with pTag-EGFP-mhcIIβ recombinant plasmid. (D): Western blot results of mouse anti-flounder MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs (Replaced all the rabbit anti-flounder Abs in C with the corresponding mouse anti-flounder Abs).
Biology 12 01464 g004
Figure 5. Indirect immunofluorescence results of mouse anti-flounder MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs and HEK293 cell lines transfected with eukaryotic plasmid. Arrows indicate double positive cells. Bar = 50 μm.
Figure 5. Indirect immunofluorescence results of mouse anti-flounder MhcIIα and MhcIIβ Abs and HEK293 cell lines transfected with eukaryotic plasmid. Arrows indicate double positive cells. Bar = 50 μm.
Biology 12 01464 g005
Figure 6. Flow cytometry results of the proportion of MhcIIα (A) and MhcIIβ (B) in T and B lymphocytes. (A): The percentages of MhcIIα+, MhcIIα+/IgM+, MhcIIα+/CD4-1+, MhcIIα+/CD4-2+ and MhcIIα+/CD8+ cells in peripheral blood, gills, head kidney, and spleen. (B): The percentages of MhcIIβ+, MhcIIβ+/IgM+, MhcIIβ+/CD4-1+, MhcIIβ+/CD4-2+ and MhcIIβ+/CD8+ cells in peripheral blood, gills, head kidney, and spleen. In control groups, unimmunized rabbit and mouse serum were used as primary antibodies. The results are provided as means ± SD. Different letters above the bar represent the statistical significance (n = 9, p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Flow cytometry results of the proportion of MhcIIα (A) and MhcIIβ (B) in T and B lymphocytes. (A): The percentages of MhcIIα+, MhcIIα+/IgM+, MhcIIα+/CD4-1+, MhcIIα+/CD4-2+ and MhcIIα+/CD8+ cells in peripheral blood, gills, head kidney, and spleen. (B): The percentages of MhcIIβ+, MhcIIβ+/IgM+, MhcIIβ+/CD4-1+, MhcIIβ+/CD4-2+ and MhcIIβ+/CD8+ cells in peripheral blood, gills, head kidney, and spleen. In control groups, unimmunized rabbit and mouse serum were used as primary antibodies. The results are provided as means ± SD. Different letters above the bar represent the statistical significance (n = 9, p < 0.05).
Biology 12 01464 g006
Figure 7. Double immunofluorescence staining results of MhcII+/CD4-1+, MhcII+/CD4-2+, MhcII+/CD8+, MhcII+/CD83+, and MhcII+/IgM+ lymphocytes. Arrows indicate double positive cells. The unimmunized serum was utilized as negative control. Bar = 20 µm.
Figure 7. Double immunofluorescence staining results of MhcII+/CD4-1+, MhcII+/CD4-2+, MhcII+/CD8+, MhcII+/CD83+, and MhcII+/IgM+ lymphocytes. Arrows indicate double positive cells. The unimmunized serum was utilized as negative control. Bar = 20 µm.
Biology 12 01464 g007
Figure 8. The expression of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ in spleen leukocytes (SPLs), gill leukocytes (GLs), head kidney leukocytes (HKLs), and peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) of flounder after injection with Vibrio anguillarum, Edwardsiella tarda, and HIRRV. The control group was injected with PBS. (A): mhcIIα in SPLs. (B): mhcIIα in GLs. (C): mhcIIα in HKLs. (D): mhcIIα in PBLs. (E): mhcIIβ in SPLs. (F): mhcIIβ in GLs. (G): mhcIIβ in HKLs. (H): mhcIIβ in PBLs. The results are provided as means ± SD. Different letters above the bar represent the statistical significance (n = 9, p < 0.05).
Figure 8. The expression of mhcIIα and mhcIIβ in spleen leukocytes (SPLs), gill leukocytes (GLs), head kidney leukocytes (HKLs), and peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) of flounder after injection with Vibrio anguillarum, Edwardsiella tarda, and HIRRV. The control group was injected with PBS. (A): mhcIIα in SPLs. (B): mhcIIα in GLs. (C): mhcIIα in HKLs. (D): mhcIIα in PBLs. (E): mhcIIβ in SPLs. (F): mhcIIβ in GLs. (G): mhcIIβ in HKLs. (H): mhcIIβ in PBLs. The results are provided as means ± SD. Different letters above the bar represent the statistical significance (n = 9, p < 0.05).
Biology 12 01464 g008
Figure 9. Flow cytometry analysis of the proliferation of MhcII+, MhcII+/CD83+, MhcII+/IgM+, and CD4+ cells at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after LPS, polyI:C, PHA, and ConA stimulation of flounder PBLs and GLs in vitro. PBS stimulation was used as a control group. (A): MhcII+ cells in PBLs. (B): MhcII+/CD83+ cells in PBLs. (C): MhcII+/IgM+ cells in PBLs. (D): CD4+ cells in PBLs. (E): MhcII+ cells in GLs. (F): MhcII+/CD83+ cells in GLs. (G): MhcII+/IgM+ cells in GLs. (H): CD4+ cells in GLs. The control group of unimmunized rabbit and mouse serum as primary antibody. The results are provided as means ± SD. Different letters above the bar represent the statistical significance (n = 9, p < 0.05).
Figure 9. Flow cytometry analysis of the proliferation of MhcII+, MhcII+/CD83+, MhcII+/IgM+, and CD4+ cells at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after LPS, polyI:C, PHA, and ConA stimulation of flounder PBLs and GLs in vitro. PBS stimulation was used as a control group. (A): MhcII+ cells in PBLs. (B): MhcII+/CD83+ cells in PBLs. (C): MhcII+/IgM+ cells in PBLs. (D): CD4+ cells in PBLs. (E): MhcII+ cells in GLs. (F): MhcII+/CD83+ cells in GLs. (G): MhcII+/IgM+ cells in GLs. (H): CD4+ cells in GLs. The control group of unimmunized rabbit and mouse serum as primary antibody. The results are provided as means ± SD. Different letters above the bar represent the statistical significance (n = 9, p < 0.05).
Biology 12 01464 g009
Table 1. Primers.
Table 1. Primers.
Primer NamePrimer Sequence(5′−3′)Application
mhcIIα-FATGAACGTGAACGTCCTTGFull-length cloning
mhcIIα-RTCAGCTGCACTCGTTCC
mhcIIβ-FATGGCTTCATTCATCCTCAGCTT
mhcIIβ-RTTAGTGGGAACCAGGATCCCG
mhcIIαCO-FGGCCATGGCTGATATCGGATCCGAAGGTCTACATGTGGACCGTC(BamHⅠ)Extracellular domain cloning
mhcIIαCO-RGACGGAGCTCGAATTCGGATCC CGGTCCAACACTGGGCTG(BamHⅠ)
mhcIIβCO-FGGCCATGGCTGATATCGGATCC GATGGATTTCTGCATTATACGG(BamHⅠ)
mhcIIβCO-RGACGGAGCTCGAATTCGGATCCCTTGTTTCTTTCTGACTCAGGC(BamHⅠ)
q mhcIIα-FGACGGTGAAGAGATGTGGTTqPCR
q mhcIIα-RATCGGACTGGAGGGAGGC
q mhcIIβ-FAAGTCTGGAGAGAAGATTTCCTGTG
q mhcIIβ-RGATGAATCCAGCCAGAGATAAGGT
qβ-actin-F GAGGGAAATCGTGCGTGACAT
qβ-actin-R ATTGCCGATGGTGATGACCTG
mhcIIα-GFP-FACTCAGATCTCGAGCTCAAGCTTATGAACGTGAACGTCCTTG(Hind Ⅲ)Eukaryotic transfection
mhcIIα-GFP-RGTCGACTGCAGAATTCGAAGCTTGCTGCACTCGTTCCCTT(Hind Ⅲ)
mhcIIβ-GFP-FACTCAGATCTCGAGCTCAAGCTTATGGCTTCATTCATCCTCAGC(Hind Ⅲ)
mhcIIβ-GFP-RGTCGACTGCAGAATTCGAAGCTTGTGGGAACCAGGATCCCGT(Hind Ⅲ)
Underlines indicate homologousarmprimers.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xing, J.; An, Z.; Tang, X.; Sheng, X.; Chi, H.; Zhan, W. Expression and Immune Characterization of Major Histocompatibility Complex in Paralichthys olivaceus after Antigen Stimulation. Biology 2023, 12, 1464. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12121464

AMA Style

Xing J, An Z, Tang X, Sheng X, Chi H, Zhan W. Expression and Immune Characterization of Major Histocompatibility Complex in Paralichthys olivaceus after Antigen Stimulation. Biology. 2023; 12(12):1464. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12121464

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xing, Jing, Zhaoxia An, Xiaoqian Tang, Xiuzhen Sheng, Heng Chi, and Wenbin Zhan. 2023. "Expression and Immune Characterization of Major Histocompatibility Complex in Paralichthys olivaceus after Antigen Stimulation" Biology 12, no. 12: 1464. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12121464

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop