Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Antibody Responses against Two Molecules from Ascaris lumbricoides: The Allergen Asc l 5 and the Immunomodulatory Protein Al-CPI
Previous Article in Journal
Bioinformatic Analysis Reveals the Role of Translation Elongation Efficiency Optimisation in the Evolution of Ralstonia Genus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Purification and Characterization of Polyphenol Oxidase in the Fruits of Opuntia ficus-indica

Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(10), 1339; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12101339
Submission received: 12 September 2023 / Revised: 10 October 2023 / Accepted: 12 October 2023 / Published: 16 October 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. (OFI) is a member of the Cactaceae family. Its fruits are available in a wide range of colors, including orange, lime green, purple, and red. In many countries, the cacti are cultivated and used as foods and medicinal plants. They can grow in dry and semi-arid environments and have substantial economic potential. In the current study, for the first time, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) was purified from the fruits of O. ficus-indica, whose color was orange, through utilizing the Sepharose 4B–L-tyrosine–p-aminobenzoic acid column, and the purified enzyme was characterized.

Abstract

Firstly, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) was purified from the fruits of Opuntia ficus-indica using Sepharose 4B–L-tyrosine–p-aminobenzoic acid affinity chromatography, and the enzyme was characterized. The PPO was purified 20.59-fold. Thereafter, PPO was performed on sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The kinetic parameters, optimum pHs, and optimum temperatures were investigated for three substrates. Opuntia ficus-indica PPO’s optimum pH and optimum temperature were 9.0 and 20 °C; 7.5 and 20 °C; and 7.5 and 30 °C, respectively, when using pyrogallol, catechol, and 4-methyl catechol as substrates. For the pyrogallol, catechol, and 4-methyl catechol, the Km, Vmax, and Vmax/Km values were determined as 16.67 mM, 833.33 U/mLmin, and 50 U/mLminmM; 6.33 mM, 126.58 U/mLmin, and 20 U/mLminmM; and 5.38 mM, 107.53 U/mLmin, and 20 U/mLminmM, respectively. As a result, pyrogallol was a more appropriate substrate than catechol and 4-methyl catechol for the PPO from Opuntia ficus-indica.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. is a dicotyledonous angiosperm plant that is known as the nopal cactus or prickly pear. It is a Cactaceae family member, which has approximately 130 genera and 1500 species. This plant has significant economic potential and can thrive in dry and semi-arid environments all over the world [1]. There are many places in the world where the soil and climate are ideal for the growth of cacti. The true jewels of arid and semiarid climates are cactus fruits [2]. This cactus (OFI) originated in Mexico and spread to Central America and the southern United States. Eventually, it also appeared in Africa, Asia, and southern Europe. In more than 30 countries, this cactus is cultivated and used as a food and medicinal plant; in South Africa and Australia, it is considered a poisonous weed. Cactus cultivation occupies large areas in Chile, Algeria, Mexico, and Brazil. Cacti are considered an alternative or substitute food during periods of drought, as they remain juicy and fresh for a long time [3]. As a result of the presence of some bioactive substituents, the pulp’s sweet and juicy texture offers intriguing health-promoting properties [2]. Opuntia ficus-indica is mostly utilized as a food plant in the Mediterranean basin due to its edible fruit and as a supplement to animal feed [1]. There are numerous uses for plants in the genus Opuntia. Carminic acid production is followed by food use, functional qualities, and other uses. The fruits, sometimes known as prickly pears and nopal, are two plant parts that have been eaten as food. The prickly pears can be eaten raw, dried in the sun, or made into marmalades. Mexican regions utilize nopal as an ingredient in salads [4]. For the treatment of diarrhea, rheumatism, ulcers, asthma, gonorrhea, wounds, indigestion, and burns, every vegetative part of Opuntia sp. has traditionally been utilized as a valuable nutrient and in folkloric medicines. In modern nutrition, medicine, and pharmacology, they are seldom used, though [5]. Several parts of O. ficus-indica species have been found to have diuretic and antigonococcal properties, according to scientific studies [4,6]. Opuntia ficus-indica species fruits have analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties [4,7]. Research has shown that the nopal of O. ficus-indica has anti-ulcer properties [4,8]. Additionally, the fruits of Opuntia dillenii and the nopal of O. ficus-indica have been shown to have hypocholesterolemic and antihyperglycemic properties [4,9,10]. Opuntia is a significant source of bioactive pigments, such as betalines, betateinines, and anthocyanins [11]. In semi-arid parts of California, South America, the Mediterranean, and Mexico, cultivated cultivars of cactus pears (Opuntia ficus-indica L. Mill.) and associated species produce 120–180 g fruits with total soluble solid values of 12–16%. The fruits are available in a wide range of colors, including orange, lime green, purple, and red [12].
Polyphenol oxidase enzymes are preferred in nutritional, environmental, biomedical, and pharmaceutical applications, for example, personal care, paper, cosmetics, food, textiles, wastewater treatment, analyses of biological fluids, the production of biofuel cells, and biosensors using the detection of pesticide residues [13]. PPO enzymes, which are present in large quantities in all vegetables and fruits, are one of the most crucial enzymes in plants [14]. According to their distinct substrates and mechanisms of action, PPOs can be divided into three primary categories: catecholase (EC 1.10.3.1), laccase (EC 1.10.3.2), and tyrosinase (EC 1.14.18.1) [15]. The copper-containing oxidoreductase enzyme polyphenol oxidase catalyzes o-hydroxylation of monophenols to o-diphenols and also exhibits additional catalytic oxidation of o-dihydroxy phenols to o-quinones [14]. Polyphenol oxidase is also responsible for browning in plants and animal melanization [16]. Enzymatic browning is a known and significant problem due to the decreasing shelf-life, flavor, appearance, and nutrient value of many fruits, including Opuntia ficus-indica. Thus, it is substantial to characterize the PPO enzyme that causes browning. Polyphenol oxidase enzymes have been extracted, purified, and characterized in various fruits and vegetables, such as mulberry (Morus alba L.) [17], Cimin Grape (Vitis vinifera spp., Cimin) [18], royal date fruit [19], Musa acuminata fruit pulp [20], myrtle berries (Myrtus communis L.) [21], Damson plum [13], and dried Volvariella bombycina [22]. Although studies about the PPO enzymes of many fruits have been found, the purification and characterization of O. ficus-indica fruits’ PPO are not present in the literature. With our research, the PPO from OFI was studied for the first time.
The objective of this research was to extract, purify, and characterize the PPO enzyme from O. ficus-indica fruits. Following the PPO enzyme’s purification by utilizing Sepharose 4B–L-tyrosine–p-aminobenzoic acid column chromatography, its biochemical properties, such as its kinetic characteristics (Km and Vmax), substrate specificity, optimum pH, and temperature, were established. The PPO enzyme of O. ficus-indica was subjected to SDS-PAGE.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Plant Material

Fruits of O. ficus-indica, whose color was orange, were obtained from a field in the Kepez district of Antalya province in Türkiye. The fruit was harvested, immediately transported to the laboratory (avoiding all physical damage) and used fresh for PPO.

2.2. Chemicals

Sodium chloride (NaCl), di-potassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4), polyethylene glycol 4000 (PEG), tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (TRIS), hydrochloric acid 37% (HCl), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4), glycerol, di-sodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4), bovine serum albumin (BSA), β-mercaptoethanol, acetic acid (CH3CO2H), catechol, ortho-phosphoric acid 85% (H3PO4), ethanol, sodium nitrite (NaNO2), and Coomassie Brilliant Blue G 250 were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Bromophenol blue (3′, 3″, 5′, 5″-Tetrabromo phenolsulfonphthalein) was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, UK). The protein molecular weight marker was purchased from Thermo Scientific (Vilnius, Lithuania). Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 was purchased from Amresco Inc. (Solon, OH, USA). Sepharose 4B, L-tyrosine, p-aminobenzoic acid, L-ascorbic acid, cyanogen bromide solution (CNBr), glycine, ammonium persulfate, sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), dialysis sack (dialysis tubing cellulose membrane avg. flat width 25 mm (1.0 in.)), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 30% solution of acrylamide/bis-acrylamide, N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl ethylenediamine (TEMED), pyrogallol, and 4-methyl catechol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd. (Saint Louis, MO, USA). To purify the PPO enzyme in this research, Sepharose 4B–L-tyrosine–p-aminobenzoic acid gel was synthesized in the Enzyme and Microbial Biotechnology Laboratory at Isparta University of Applied Sciences (Isparta, Türkiye) according to the method by Arslan et al. [17].

2.3. Extraction and Purification of the Enzyme

O. ficus-indica fruits’ PPO extraction and purification were performed using a method modified from Arslan et al. [17]. The polyphenol oxidase enzyme was purified from cactus by utilizing a Sepharose 4B–L-tyrosine–p-aminobenzoic acid column. Firstly, the fruit samples were washed with sufficient sterile distilled water, the air-dried cactus fruits were quickly peeled thinly, and the study continued with the flesh of the cactus fruits for preparing the crude extract. The flesh of cactus fruits (50 g) was separated quickly into thin slices and homogenized by a stick blender for 2 min with 100 mL of a 0.5 M (pH 7.3) phosphate buffer solution, including 10 mM ascorbic acid and 0.5% polyethylene glycol. The homogenate was filtered through a cheesecloth to remove the core and plant cell walls and the cellulosic fibrous part, and then the filtrate was centrifuged for 30 min at 4 °C at 15,000 rpm. After the centrifugation process, the precipitate containing the plant cell walls and the cellulosic fibrous part remaining from the filtration process was discarded, and the supernatant part obtained was used as the crude extract. The supernatant was precipitated with solid ammonium sulfate at 80% saturation, and the precipitate was collected through centrifugation for 40 min at 15,000 rpm at 4 °C, redissolved in a 5 mM (pH 6.30) phosphate buffer solution, and dialyzed against the same buffer solution. This solution was applied to the affinity column, which was pre-equilibrated with a 50 mM (pH 5.0) phosphate buffer solution. This buffer solution was utilized to wash out the gel. The PPO enzyme was eluted with a 50 mM (pH 7.0) phosphate buffer solution/1 M NaCl.

2.4. PPO Activity Test

Using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Spectramax-Plus 384, Molecular Devices, LLC., San Jose, CA, USA), the PPO activity of O. ficus-indica was determined by measuring the absorbance increase for one minute according to the modified method of Arslan et al. [17]. Pyrogallol, catechol, and 4-methyl catechol were used as test substrates. The sample cuvette contained 0.83 mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution, 0.13 mL of 0.1 M substrate solution, and 0.04 mL of the enzyme solution. The blank solution included only the substrate solution (1.0 mL). The measurement was performed to an absorbance of 320 nm for pyrogallol [23] and 420 nm for 4-methyl catechol and catechol [17] by using a spectrophotometer. In triplicate measurements, the PPO activity was assayed. One unit of PPO activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that caused a change in absorbance of 0.001 mL−1min−1.

2.5. Detection of Protein Concentration

The protein concentration was detected using the Bradford method at 595 nm. Bovine serum albumin was used as the standard [24]. In affinity chromatography, the protein was determined by absorbance at 280 nm [17].

2.6. Electrophoresis of PPO

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the purified PPO from O. ficus-indica was applied according to the Laemmli method [25]. The purified PPO of O. ficus-indica was subjected to SDS-PAGE in a Mini Protean Tetra Cell Electrophoresis Unit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), with 3% stacking gel and 10% running gel. The purified PPO by affinity gel from O. ficus-indica and standard proteins were run on the SDS-PAGE gel. The purified PPO and marker were loaded in lanes, and the slab gels were 1 mm thick. The PPO and marker were run at 80 V in the stacking gel and 150 V in the separating gel (running gel). After the electrophoresis, the protein bands were visualized using Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. The protein molecular weight marker (Thermo Scientific, Lithuania), which was used for comparison to the molecular weight, included lysozyme (14.4 kDa), β-lactoglobulin (18.4 kDa), REase Bsp98l (25.0 kDa), lactate dehydrogenase (35.0 kDa), ovalbumin (45.0 kDa), bovine serum albumin (66.2 kDa), and β-galactosidase (116.0 kDa).

2.7. Effects of pH on the PPO Activity

To determine the optimum pH for the PPO activity of O. ficus-indica, the PPO activities were measured at different pH values: 0.1 M Tris-base buffers (pH 8.5–9.0), 0.1 M phosphate buffers (pH 6.0–8.0), and 0.1 M sodium acetate buffers (pH 4.5–5.5) at different temperatures in the range of 15–45 °C using three different substrates (0.1 M of pyrogallol, 0.1 M of 4-methyl catechol, and 0.1 M of catechol). Each measurement was repeated in triplicate, and the values were averaged.

2.8. Effects of Temperature on the PPO Activity

The optimum temperature for the PPO activity of O. ficus-indica was detected to range from 15 to 45 °C utilizing three different substrates (0.1 M of pyrogallol, 0.1 M of catechol, and 0.1 M of 4-methyl catechol) and different pH values in the range of 4.5–9.0. Each measurement was repeated in triplicate, and the values were averaged.

2.9. Enzyme Kinetics Studies

The maximum velocity (Vmax) and Michaelis–Menten constant (Km) values for the PPO of O. ficus-indica were detected by measuring the enzyme activity under optimum temperature and pH conditions at different concentrations of substrates for pyrogallol, 4-methyl catechol, and catechol through Lineweaver-Burk plots [26]. Each measurement was repeated in triplicate, and the values were averaged.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Extraction and Purification of the Enzyme

Although PPO has been purified and characterized from many species’ fruits, there is no report on PPO from O. ficus-indica fruit. After the research on this topic was examined, Sepharose 4B–L-tyrosine–p-aminobenzoic acid chromatography was utilized for the first time to purify PPO from O. ficus-indica fruit. The polyphenol oxidase purification steps are provided in Table 1. The most commonly used chromatographic technique is affinity chromatography because it is practical. The degree of purification offered by chromatographic techniques is also very high. A more efficient technique is affinity chromatography based on immobilized (through 4-aminobenzoic acid) tyrosine–Sepharose [22]. The specific activity of the PPO enzyme found 1575.72 U/mg protein in the crude extract, whereas it had 32,449.13 U/mg protein in the affinity purification. These findings show a 20.59-fold purification of the enzyme. Using the same chromatographic method previously, the PPO enzyme was purified 74-fold from mulberry (Morus alba L.) [17], 11.2-fold from Cimin grape (Vitis vinifera spp., Cimin) [18], 93.88-fold from Damson plum [13], and 33.85-fold from dried Volvariella bombycina [22]. Using the same chromatographic technique, different purification levels from several plant species were achieved.
Furthermore, PPO can be purified from a variety of sources using a variety of chromatography methods. PPO was purified 8-fold by Sepharcyl S-200 from royal date fruit [19], 4.04-fold by gel filtration chromatography from Musa acuminata fruit pulp [20], 10.46-fold through Sepharose 6B–L-tyrosine–p-aminobenzoic acid affinity gel from Damson plum [13], and 5.5-fold by DEAE–Sephacel chromatography from myrtle berries (Myrtus communis L.) [21].
The PPO from O. ficus-indica that was eluted in the chromatographic separations was assessed by SDS-PAGE. Figure 1 displays the results of the Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 protein staining. According to that, many bands were observed in each lane. The appearance of many bands may have arisen from the presence of polyphenol oxidase and other enzymes (lanes 1, 2, and 3). The bands in lane 1 in the SDS-PAGE appeared as thin strips due to the low concentration of crude extract. Generally, the amount of protein was minimal, which describes the appearance of thin strips. The amount of total protein (3.7126 mg) was abundant in the crude enzyme step due to containing many protein types and a high volume (130 mL). Further, the amount of total protein was 1.1007 mg in the ammonium sulfate precipitation step. However, the concentration of the protein in the crude enzyme step was lower than in the ammonium sulfate precipitation step. Because the protein was precipitated in the ammonium sulfate precipitation step and redissolved in the minimum volume of buffer (5 mL), it could dissolve. The lower volume increased the protein concentration.
During the purification steps, the types of proteins gradually decreased. Hence, the number of bands was gradually reduced. Figure 1 shows that the number of bands in lane 4 was the lowest. A few bands were observed, of which two bands slightly smaller than 35 kDa and slightly larger than 45 kDa were much more prominent in lane 4. According to SDS-PAGE studies on other plants, the molecular weights of three isoenzymes of royal date PPO were 20 kDa, 45 kDa, and 64 kDa [19]. The three novel active PPO isoforms of banana were detected to be 28 kDa, 45 kDa, and 65 kDa by gel filtration chromatography and SDS-PAGE [20]. The molecular weight of PPO from the Kirmizi Kismis grape was found to be approximately 38.1 kDa by SDS-PAGE as a single band [27]. Looking at the results in the literature, it is seen that there are bands with different molecular weights depending on the source of the PPO enzyme.

3.2. Effects of Temperature and pH on the PPO Activity

Conditions like temperature and pH have a significant impact on the activity of enzymes. The activity of O. ficus-indica PPO was measured at different temperatures and pHs using pyrogallol, 4-methyl catechol, and catechol as test substrates. pH is a determinant factor for the statement of enzymatic activity. The pH profile of PPO was measured in this study at 4.5–9.0 with 0.5 pH unit intervals. Another significant element that affects the effectiveness of enzyme catalysis is temperature. Due to thermal denaturation, which occurs as the temperature rises, the reaction rate often decreases at high temperatures. The effect of temperature on O. ficus-indica PPO activity was studied in the range of 15–45 °C with 5 °C unit intervals. Pyrogallol, catechol, and 4-methyl catechol substrates were utilized to detect the O. ficus-indica PPO’s optimum pH and temperature. Table 2 displays O. ficus-indica PPO’s enzymatic profile at various pH levels and temperatures. The optimum pH and temperature values of the PPO enzyme of O. ficus-indica were obtained to be 9.0 and 20 °C; 7.5 and 30 °C; and 7.5 and 20 °C, respectively, by utilizing pyrogallol, 4-methyl catechol, and catechol as substrates, as summarized in Table 2. According to the results, PPO activity tended to decrease and then increase, and the optimal pH changed rapidly even with a temperature difference of 5 degrees. The variability in the pH and temperature could be explained as effects of the existence of PPO isoenzymes. The differential enzymatic properties of these isoforms propose that they might have various physiological functions [19]. The findings in this study have similarities with the results obtained by [17,19,21,23,28,29].
The values changed according to the substrate used. The enzyme activity and changes exhibited a significant dependency on the pH and temperature values and the type of substrate [19,21]. Substrates with different structures were used in this study. For instance, the structures of two o-diphenolic substrates utilized (4-methyl catechol and catechol) differ from the structure of pyrogallol as a polyphenolic substrate (1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene). The values of the optimum pH and temperature are relative to the binding, complementarity, and catalysis degree of the enzyme towards its substrate in the transition state [19]. The optimum pH and temperature were found to be 6.8 and 30 °C for myrtle berries PPO [21], 6.5 and 40 °C for Musa acuminata fruit pulp PPO [20], and 7.2 and 25 °C for Damson plum PPO [13], in the presence of catechol as a substrate; 5.0 and 30 °C for Kirmizi Kismis grape PPO [27], and 4.5 and 10 °C for Damson plum PPO [13], in the presence of 4-methyl catechol as a substrate; 7.0 and 25 °C for pomegranate arils (Punica granatum L. cv. Wonderful) PPO [30], and 6.8 and 5 °C for Damson plum PPO [13], in the presence of pyrogallol as a substrate. It is reported that royal date PPOs with pyrocatechol (catechol), pyrogallol, and 4-methyl catechol substrates had maximum activity at pH 5.6, 5.6 and 8, and 4–5.6, respectively [19]. As can be seen here, when the results in the literature are searched, it can be seen that the optimum pH and optimum temperature values differ according to the substrate and the PPO enzyme source.

3.3. Kinetic Parameters

Lineweaver–Burk plots for 4-methyl catechol, pyrogallol, and catechol were utilized to calculate the maximum velocity Vmax, Michaelis–Menten constant Km, and Vmax/Km value of PPO in O. ficus-indica under optimum temperature and optimum pH conditions (Figure 2). Utilizing catechol, 4-methyl catechol, and pyrogallol substrates, Km, Vmax, and Vmax/Km of O. ficus-indica’s PPO were detected to be 6.33 mM, 126.58 U/mLmin, and 20 U/mLminmM; 5.38 mM, 107.53 U/mLmin, and 20 U/mLminmM; and 16.67 mM, 833.33 U/mLmin, and 50 U/mLminmM, respectively (Table 3). In the literature, Km values for the PPO enzyme have been found to be in the range of 1–10 mM [31]. According to the results, the Km values for the catechol and 4-methyl catechol substrates of the PPO enzyme correspond with many studies in the literature. In contrast, the Km value for the pyrogallol substrate of the PPO enzyme was found to be higher than the value range. A higher Km indicates a lower substrate affinity, and a lower Km indicates a higher substrate affinity for the enzyme. The results show that among the three substrates, 4-methyl catechol had the lowest Km value towards O. ficus-indica’s PPO (5.38 mM), and the enzyme had a higher affinity for 4-methyl catechol. This was followed by the catechol substrate, with a Km value of 6.33 mM. Pyrogallol had the highest Km value and lowest affinity among the used substrates. The Vmax of an enzyme represents its catalytic activity. Vmax is directly proportional to its activity. A higher Vmax indicates a higher catalytic activity, and a lower Vmax indicates a lower catalytic activity for the enzyme. Pyrogallol had the highest Vmax value towards O. ficus-indica’s PPO (833.33 U/mLmin), followed by catechol (126.58 U/mLmin) and 4-methyl catechol (107.53 U/mLmin). Accordingly, pyrogallol had the highest catalytic activity among the substrates. The substrates appropriate for an enzyme can be assessed with the highest catalytic efficiency (Vmax/Km). Accordingly, the Vmax/Km (U/mLminmM) ratio for pyrogallol was 50.00, followed by 20.00 for catechol and 4-methyl catechol. Therefore, pyrogallol appears to be the most suitable substrate for PPO from OFI. The Vmax and Km values were determined to be 4.1 U/mLmin and 3.34 mM for myrtle PPO [21]; 37.7 mM and 20,534.1 U/mLmin for royal date fruit PPO [19], with catechol as a substrate; 4.8 mM and 2000.0 U/mLmin for Kirmizi Kismis grape PPO [27]; 1.9 mM and 13,414.8 U/mLmin for royal date fruit PPO [19], with 4-methyl catechol as a substrate; 35.3 mM and 3796.7 U/mLmin for royal date fruit PPO [19], with pyrogallol as a substrate. The large range in the PPO’s Km and Vmax values found in this research and reported in the literature may be due to a number of factors, including the substrate, different extraction pHs, variety, nutrient sources, buffer solution, purity of the enzyme extract, and different assay methods used.

4. Conclusions

The objective of this research was to purify and characterize the PPO enzyme in the fruits of O. ficus-indica, whose color was orange. The PPO from O. ficus-indica was isolated and purified. The purification processes included extraction, ammonium sulfate precipitation, dialysis, and affinity column chromatography. In this study, the optimum temperature and pH were determined for each of the pyrogallol, catechol, and 4-methyl catechol substrates. The optimum pH and temperature for O. ficus-indica PPO were found to be 7.5 and 20 °C; 7.5 and 30 °C; and 9.0 and 20 °C, respectively, when utilizing catechol, 4-methyl catechol, and pyrogallol as substrates. In the research, Lineweaver–Burk plots were plotted, showing the activity of O. ficus-indica PPO as a function of various concentrations of catechol, 4-methyl catechol, and pyrogallol as substrates and under optimum conditions (pH and temperature). For catechol, 4-methyl catechol, and pyrogallol, the Km and Vmax values were determined to be 6.33 mM and 126.58 U/mLmin; 5.38 mM and 107.53 U/mLmin; and 16.67 mM and 833.33 U/mLmin, respectively. To our knowledge, this study reports, for the first time, the purification of PPO from O. ficus-indica by affinity column chromatography and the determination of Km and Vmax kinetic values in the world. As a result, the presence of PPO in the OFI was proven and the PPO activity was high. The PPO can be considered useful for many applications, such as nutritional, environmental, biomedical, and pharmaceutical. The information in this report on O. ficus-indica PPO purification will make it possible to study this enzyme in more detail.

Author Contributions

D.D.: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing—original draft, and review and editing. S.K.: Methodology, investigation, and formal analysis. K.Ç.: Methodology, investigation, and formal analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK) ARDEB 2209 (grant number 1919B012003988).

Institutional Review Board Statement

No applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

No applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data obtained in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Missaoui, M.; D’Antuono, I.; D’Imperio, M.; Linsalata, V.; Boukhchina, S.; Logrieco, A.F.; Cardinali, A. Characterization of Micronutrients, Bioaccessibility and Antioxidant Activity of Prickly Pear Cladodes as Functional Ingredient. Molecules 2020, 25, 2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Coria Cayupan, Y.S.; Ochoa, M.J.; Nazareno, M.A. Health-promoting Substances and Antioxidant Properties of Opuntia sp. Fruits. Changes in Bioactive-compound Contents during Ripening Process. Food Chem. 2011, 126, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Isaac, A.A. Overview of Cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica (L): A Myriad of Alternatives. Stud. Ethno-Med. 2016, 10, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Medina, E.M.D.; Rodríguez, E.M.R.; Romero, C.D. Chemical Characterization of Opuntia dillenii and Opuntia ficus-indica Fruits. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zeghbib, W.; Boudjouan, F.; Bachir-bey, M. Optimization of Phenolic Compounds Recovery and Antioxidant Activity Evaluation from Opuntia ficus-indica Using Response Surface Methodology. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2022, 16, 1354–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Galati, E.M.; Tripodo, M.M.; Trovato, A.; Miceli, N.; Monforte, M.T. Biological Effect of Opuntia ficus indica (L.) Mill. (Cactaceae) Waste Matter Note I: Diuretic Activity. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 79, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Loro, J.F.; del Rio, I.; Perez-Santana, L. Preliminary Studies of Analgesic and Anti-inflammatory Properties of Opuntia dillenii Aqueous Extract. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1999, 67, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Galati, E.M.; Monforte, M.T.; Tripodo, M.M.; d’Aquino, A.; Mondello, M.R. Antiulcer Activity of Opuntia ficus indica (L.) Mill. (Cactaceae): Ultrastructural Study. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 76, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Frati, A.C.; Jimenez, E.; Ariza, R.C. Hypoglycemic Effect of Opuntia ficus indica in Non-insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Phytother. Res. 1990, 4, 195–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Roman-Ramos, R.; Flores-Saenz, J.L.; Alarcon-Aguilar, F.J. Anti-hyperglycemic Effect of Some Edible Plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1995, 48, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mansour, R.; Ben Ali, H. Exploring Chitosan as an Ecofriendly Agent to Improve Sustainable Dyeing Properties of Cotton Fabric Dyed with (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) Fruit Peel and Its UV Protection Activity. J. Nat. Fibers 2023, 20, 2134263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Felker, P.; Stintzing, F.C.; Müssig, E.; Leitenberger, M.; Carle, R.; Vogt, T.; Bunch, R. Colour Inheritance in Cactus Pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) Fruits. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2008, 152, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yıldız, S.; Bilen, Ç.; Karakuş, E. Purification of Damson plum Polyphenol Oxidase by Affinity Chromatography and Investigation of Metal Effects on Enzyme Activity. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2022, 52, 1019–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nixha, A.R.; Arslan, M.; Atalay, Y.; Gençer, N.; Ergün, A.; Arslan, O. Synthesis and Theoretical Calculations of Carbazole Substituted Chalcone Urea Derivatives and Studies Their Polyphenol Oxidase Enzyme Activity. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Ch. 2013, 28, 808–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Demir, D.; Eken, C.; Çelik, E.; Alkan, N. Effect of Rhizoctonia spp. On Polyphenol Oxidase Enzyme Activity in Alfalfa Seedling. Res. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 16, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nixha, A.R.; Ergun, A.; Gencer, N.; Arslan, O.; Arslan, M. Development of Carbazole-bearing Pyridopyrimidine-substituted Urea/Thiourea as Polyphenol Oxidase Inhibitors: Synthesis, Biochemistry, and Theoretical Studies. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 125, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arslan, O.; Erzengin, M.; Sinan, S.; Ozensoy, O. Purification of Mulberry (Morus alba L.) Polyphenol Oxidase by Affinity Chromatography and Investigation of Its Kinetic and Electrophoretic Properties. Food Chem. 2004, 88, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ozlem, F. Purification and Characterization of a Polyphenol Oxidase from Cimin Grape (Vitis vinifera spp., Cimin). Res. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 11, 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  19. Farouk, B.; Aref, N.; Rachid, C.; Mourad, L.; Emna, K.; Fethi, B.; Rania, B.; Wafa, N.; Kenza, B.; Boumediene, M.; et al. Characterization of Three Polyphenol Oxidase Isoforms in Royal dates and Inhibition of Its Enzymatic Browning Reaction by Indole-3-acetic acid. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 145, 894–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sajjad, N.; Naqvi, S.M.S.; Asad, M.J.; Raja, N.I.; Pusztai-Carey, M.; Ahmad, M.S. Biochemical, Purification, Sequencing and Alignment Studies of The Novel Polyphenol Oxidase Isoforms from Musa Acuminata Fruit Pulp. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2021, 31, 542–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Çınar, F.; Aksay, S. Purification and Characterization of Polyphenol Oxidase from Myrtle berries (Myrtus communis L.). J. Food Meas. Charact. 2022, 16, 2282–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sarsenova, A.; Demir, D.; Çağlayan, K.; Abiyev, S.; Darbayeva, T.; Eken, C. Purification and Properties of Polyphenol Oxidase of Dried Volvariella bombycina. Biology 2023, 12, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Doğan, S.; Salman, Ü. Partial characterization of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Polyphenol Oxidase. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2007, 226, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bradford, M.A. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitaion of Microgram Quantites of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-dye Binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavege of Structural Proteins During in Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lineweaver, H.; Burk, D. The Determination of Enzyme Dissociation Constant. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1934, 56, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kaya, E.D.; Bağci, O. Purification and Biochemical Characterization of Polyphenol Oxidase Extracted from Kirmizi Kismis grape (Vitis vinifera L.). J. Food Biochem. 2021, 45, e13627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oktay, M.; Kufrevioglu, I.; Kocacaliskan, I.; Sakirolu, H. Polyphenol Oxidase from Amasya apple. J. Food Sci. 1995, 60, 495–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Atrooz, O.M.; AlKhamaisa, N.K.; AlRawashdeh, I.M. Determination of the Activity and Kinetic Parameters of Polyphenol Oxidase Enzyme in Crude Extracts of Some Jordanian Plants. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rayan, A.; Morsy, N. Thermal Inactivation Kinetics of Peroxidase and Polyphenol Oxidase from Pomegranate arils (Punica granatum L. cv. Wonderful). J. Food Biochem. 2020, 44, e13428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mazzafera, P.; Robinson, S.P. Characterization of Polyphenol Oxidase in Coffee. Phytochemistry 2000, 55, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Analysis of the O. ficus-indica PPO SDS-PAGE: (1) crude enzyme extract; (2) after ammonium sulfate; (3) after dialysis; (4) after affinity purification; (5) molecular marker.
Figure 1. Analysis of the O. ficus-indica PPO SDS-PAGE: (1) crude enzyme extract; (2) after ammonium sulfate; (3) after dialysis; (4) after affinity purification; (5) molecular marker.
Biology 12 01339 g001
Figure 2. Lineweaver–Burk plots of O. ficus-indica (a) catechol; (b) 4-methyl catechol; (c) pyrogallol.
Figure 2. Lineweaver–Burk plots of O. ficus-indica (a) catechol; (b) 4-methyl catechol; (c) pyrogallol.
Biology 12 01339 g002
Table 1. Purification table of O. ficus-indica PPO.
Table 1. Purification table of O. ficus-indica PPO.
Purification StepsVolume (mL)Activity (U/mLmin)Total
Activity
Total
Protein (mg)
Specific Activity (U/mg Protein)Purification Fold
Crude Extract13045.005850.003.71261575.72
Ammonium sulfate precipitation5793.753968.751.10073605.682.29
Dialysis7217.501522.500.17488710.655.53
Affinity
chromatography
2105.00210.000.006532,449.1320.59
Table 2. Optimum temperature and pH values for the substrates.
Table 2. Optimum temperature and pH values for the substrates.
Temperature (°C)Catechol4-Methyl CatecholPyrogallol
Optimum pHActivity
(U/mLmin)
Optimum pHActivity (U/mLmin)Optimum pHActivity
(U/mLmin)
157.5108.756.0150.004.5293.75
207.5173.335.5140.759.02466.25
256.5132.507.050.007.01640.00
305.083.337.5330.006.5131.25
359.035.006.541.688.5442.50
408.5125.007.597.506.0172.50
455.0162.506.585.006.5201.25
Table 3. Km and Vmax values for the substrates.
Table 3. Km and Vmax values for the substrates.
SubstratesKm (mM)Vmax (U/mLmin)Vmax/Km (U/mLminmM)
Catechol6.33126.5820.00
4-methyl catechol5.38107.5320.00
Pyrogallol16.67833.3350.00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Demir, D.; Kabak, S.; Çağlayan, K. Purification and Characterization of Polyphenol Oxidase in the Fruits of Opuntia ficus-indica. Biology 2023, 12, 1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12101339

AMA Style

Demir D, Kabak S, Çağlayan K. Purification and Characterization of Polyphenol Oxidase in the Fruits of Opuntia ficus-indica. Biology. 2023; 12(10):1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12101339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Demir, Dudu, Selda Kabak, and Kardelen Çağlayan. 2023. "Purification and Characterization of Polyphenol Oxidase in the Fruits of Opuntia ficus-indica" Biology 12, no. 10: 1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12101339

APA Style

Demir, D., Kabak, S., & Çağlayan, K. (2023). Purification and Characterization of Polyphenol Oxidase in the Fruits of Opuntia ficus-indica. Biology, 12(10), 1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12101339

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop