Cryopreservation of Endangered Ornamental Plants and Fruit Crops from Tropical and Subtropical Regions

Simple Summary

The protection of biodiversity, i.e., the biological variety and variability of life on Earth, is of great importance for the present and future generations. Maintaining variation at the genetic and ecosystem levels is indispensable in breeding programs and creation of new cultivars. Currently, numerous plant species, wild varieties, and local forms of ornamental and fruit plants are endangered with extinction. Cryopreservation, i.e., the storage of biological samples in tanks filled with liquid nitrogen is considered as the most effective long-term preservation method of plant genetic resources. Nonetheless, the establishment of efficient cryogenic procedures is a difficult task, requiring consideration of several factors. The impact of cryopreservation on the stability and homogeneity of the stored samples is of particular interest. The aim of this article is to evaluate some traditional and modern cryopreservation methods and their utility for the storage and exchange of genetic sources of tropical and subtropical horticultural crops.

Abstract

Horticultural crops comprise various economic species extending from fruits, nuts, vegetables, spices and condiments, ornamentals, aromatic, and medicinal plants. Ornamental and fruit plants are produced mainly for their nutritional and aesthetic values, respectively. Unfortunately, many tropical and subtropical species are in danger of extinction because of climate change and (a)biotic stresses. It is imperative to preserve the germplasms of these species for the present and future genetic improvement programs. Cryopreservation, i.e., maintenance of tissues at the ultralow temperature of liquid nitrogen, is a promising long-term preservation technique, alternative to seed or in vitro banks, which can be applied for both vegetatively and generatively (through seeds) propagated crops, including those with recalcitrant seeds. It is a technology of choice not only for the preservation of plant biodiversity but also for virus elimination in the proficient administration of large-scale micropropagation. The main advantages of cryopreservation are the lowering of in vitro culture expenditures, needed space, contamination risk, and operator errors. However, tropical species are temperature delicate and one of the foremost challenging issues is preconditioning treatments that stimulate physiological reactions to sufficiently enhance tolerance to dehydration and cryogenic procedures. In recent years, several cryopreservation methods based on encapsulation-vitrification, droplet-vitrification, the use of aluminum cryo-plates, and cryo-mesh have been established. Combined cryo-techniques, gene/DNA conservation, as well as studies on perceiving bio-molecular events and exploring the multistage process from the beginning to end of cryopreservation are receiving more emphasis. The development of cryobiomics delivers a conceptual framework to assess the significance of cell signaling mechanisms on cellular functions, the influence of cryoinjury factors on sample viability, and the implications for genetic stability following cryo-storage. The aim of this mini-review article is to provide a succinct synthesis of the developed cryogenic procedures and their use for the storage and exchange of genetic resources of tropical and subtropical horticultural crops, particularly fruit crops and ornamental plants under the threat of extinction.

1. Introduction

It is estimated that approximately 13% of higher plants are on the brink of extinction. Many of those endangered species are fruit and ornamental plants. Several environmental and endogenous factors alter the level of plant biodiversity in natural populations, which is the basis of evolution and adaptation [1]. The rapid development of proper approaches for the long-term preservation of genetic resources seems to be necessary. Germplasm is a live information source for all the genes present in the respective plant, which can be conserved for long time spans and regenerated whenever it is required (particularly for crop breeding and improvement) [2,3]. Conventional in situ and ex situ conservation of germplasms through seed storage, clonal means, gene banks, national parks, sanctuaries, natural habitats, botanical gardens, and cold storage have some limitations regarding efficacy, genetic erosion, security, costs, and long-term maintenance [4]. Conservation of plant biodiversity through innovative biotechnology techniques includes cryopreservation.

Cryopreservation refers to the storage of tissues in liquid nitrogen (LN, −196 °C) or, less frequently, LN vapor (approximately −165 to −190 °C) [5,6]. In LN, the metabolic and biochemical processes (including respiration and enzymatic activity that would lead to cell aging and cell death), as well as cell division are effectively arrested, which makes this long-term storage possible [5,7,8,9]. Cryopreservation is the only feasible technique for the long-term preservation of genetic material from different categories of plants, i.e., non-orthodox (dehydration-sensitive) seed species, vegetatively propagated plants, rare and endangered species, as well as valuable plant cell lines [8,10,11,12,13].

Fast and easy access to high-quality gene banks is the key for breeders and producers. Currently, cryopreservation procedures are available for more than 200 plant species and over 10,000 accessions started from in vitro cultures are safely stored in LN [5]. Over 80% of these belong to five major crops: i.e., potato (38%), cassava (22%), banana and plantains (11%), mulberry (12%), and garlic (5%) [14]. Other vital cryostored plant collections, representing thousands of accessions, are those of dormant apple buds [5]. At the same time, about half of the world’s top 10 endangered plant species are ornamentals. Among the endangered ornamental plants, one can mention the following genera: Fritillaria, Buxus, Lilium, Taxus, Agave, cycads, Zamia, bromeliads, pines, orchids, and many others. Some of these species have medicinal properties in addition to aesthetic value. To date, cryopreservation has been successfully used for several ornamental and fruit plants [5,12,15,16]. The first report on cryostorage of those species was described by Fukai [17] on carnation hybrid and by Sakai [18] on mulberry, respectively.

Various types of explants can be cryopreserved, including mature seeds, apical or axillary shoot tips, embryogenic cultures, pollen, zygotic and somatic embryos, embryonic axes, shoot primordia, roots, protocorms, protocorm-like bodies (PLBs), cell suspensions, callus, protoplasts, spores, bulblets, tiny leaf square-bearing adventitious buds (SLS-BABs), stem disc-bearing adventitious buds (SD-BABs), microtubers induced from nodal segments, rhizome buds, dormant buds, plumules, and in vitro derived explants [1,15]. Among them, shoot tips are used most often with tropical and subtropical fruit and ornamental species. On the other hand, the LN-storage of embryogenic cultures is a vital tool that supports the advancement of breeding programs based on somatic hybridization [19]. LN-recovered embryogenic tissues have been also applied for genetic transformation in a great number of economically significant (sub)tropical crops, e.g., banana, cassava, and citrus [20].

Cryopreservation, i.e., the whole in vitro culture–cryoprotection–regeneration process, results in the exposure of cells to chemical, physical, and physiological stress-causing cryoinjury, though its impact on the genome is often unidentified [21]. Therefore, it is essential to verify that the genotype and/or phenotype of cryopreserved germplasm are true-to-type [22]. Cryobiomics is a novel study of cryoinjury, genetic stability, dynamics, and behavior of cryopreserved cells, tissues, or organisms [21]. Advances in cryobiomics’ technologies facilitate the development of robust cryopreservation procedures. Those studies connect causal factors related to cryoinjury and loss of explant viability to the risks of genetic instability [22].

The objective of this article is to evaluate some traditional and modern cryopreservation methods and their utility for the storage and exchange of genetic sources of tropical and subtropical horticultural crops, particularly fruit and ornamental plants under the threat of extinction. The article also highlights the general principles adapted for cryopreservation of plant tissues by using omics technology.

2. Tropical and Subtropical Ornamental and Fruit Plants

Tropical and subtropical plants are grown in the equatorial zones of the world. Horticulture in those parts of the world includes perennial woody plants (arboriculture), fruits (pomology), vegetables (olericulture), and ornamentals (floriculture). The origin of many of these crops is in the temperate regions and their adoption to tropical and subtropical climate conditions is a goal of breeding. Several important crops, however, are indigenous to the tropics and subtropics. Since the tropical zone represents 36% of the Earth’s surface (and 20% of its land surface), the potential of tropical horticulture is noticeable.

The ornamental plants sector is developing at the global level, in both production and trade [23]. In 2019, the value of the floricultural market on the largest global flower exchange, Royal FloraHolland, reached EUR 4.8 billion. In 2021, despite the problems related to the global pandemics of SARS-CoV-2, the annual value of the flower trade increased to EUR 5.6 billion and it is predicted to continue expanding [24]. Many of the most popular ornamentals are endangered tropical plants, such as orchids or members of the Araceae, Heliconiaceae, or Bromeliaceae families [13].

As for the tropical and subtropical fruits, most of them have nutritional, medicinal, and industrial properties [25,26]. Their production has been increasing significantly faster than that of temperate fruits in recent years (Figure 1). Unfortunately, many of the (old) cultivars and landraces of the most important tropical and subtropical fruit plants can perish [13,27]. The reason for their dithering numbers comes down to climate change, land development, urbanization, and deforestation. Therefore, it is of utmost significance to establish effective preservation procedures for those genetic resources.

3. Importance and General Principles of Cryopreservation

Among some of the most significant advantages of cryopreservation, one can mention: preserving the genetic diversity by storing wild and endangered species (especially for breeding), eliminating viruses from infested plants by shoot apex cryotherapy, minimum storage requirements, maintenance of phenotype and genotype stability, safe conditions from diseases or damage triggered by the environment, negating the need for continual and serial sub-culturing, and facilitating the international germplasm exchange [13,19].

However, the development of effective cryogenic procedures is not an easy task. Problems caused by exposing the biological material to low and ultra-low temperatures include effects on all kinds of processes, i.e., slow down or stop of the biochemical reactions (and thus the metabolism), instability and loss of semi-permeability of membranes, breaking of tissues, and disconnection of cells, non-reversible plasmolysis and, finally, cell death [29,30]. Avoidance of chemical and physical injuries during cryopreservation is the main objective of cryoprotection [31]. Extracellular ice formation can be harmful to the integrity of cellular structures, but intracellular ice is lethal. Therefore, in all cryopreservation procedures, the removal of water plays a key role in avoiding freezing damage and in securing the post-thaw viability of LN-derived samples [32]. This can be obtained with the use of the so-called cryoprotectants. Cryoprotectors are chemical compounds that interact and modulate water distribution inside/outside cells and dehydrate them [33]. These substances enhance the stability of the plasma membrane, lower the freezing point and increase the viscosity of the cytosol and, at the same time, protect the cells from injury throughout cooling. There are two main types of cryoprotectants: (1) penetrating cryoprotectants to the cell, mainly with colligative properties (such as DMSO, glycerol, EG, and propylene glycol-PG); and (2) non-penetrating cryoprotectants with osmotic activity (such as sucrose, dextrans, and proline) [34]. ‘Colligative acting’ is a more accurate term to describe both penetrating and non-cell-penetrating cryoprotectants that can alter solute concentration during cryopreservation [35]. In some types of tropical and subtropical plant germplasms, a mixture of both cell-penetrating and non-penetrating cryoprotectants can be employed [31,36,37], although the effect of cryoprotectors, including their permeability and toxicity, is species-specific.

The efficiency of any cryopreservation method is highly determined by balancing the plant’s intrinsic tolerance to stress with the capability to endure cryogenic treatments that must be optimized [32]. Generally, six critical factors need to be considered when developing a cryoprotocol: 1. pretreatment, manipulating the in vitro culture conditions to increase the explant’s tolerance to low temperatures; 2. treatment with osmoregulating and cryoprotecting compounds to enable the cells to withstand freezing, the precautions are mainly associated with the toxicity of cryoprotectants; 3. cooling or freezing (slowly or rapidly); 4. storage in LN; 5. rewarming of the stored material; and 6. recovery, which evaluates the viability of the biological material. A cryopreserved collection may be used for the establishment of a safety backup for crops propagated clonally. An additional benefit of such backup, compared to the traditional seed bank, is that it can serve hundreds or even thousands of years and does not require regeneration after a few years of storage [38]. However, despite cryogenic storage having evident strategic merit, the resulting injuries from the cooling and rewarming cycles (affecting the membranes structure, cellular functions, and recovery potential) can cause unacceptable declines in the cell’s viability and regrowth of complete plants, which remains a major limiting factor [32]. Chimerism, i.e., composition of cells with more than one distinct genotype, is an additional difficulty in the long-term storage of ornamental plants [30].

4. Cryopreservation of Endangered Ornamentals and Fruit Crops

Cryopreservation can become the most efficient strategy for the safe long-term maintenance of rare and endangered ornamental plants [15,16]. It is also useful with tropical and subtropical fruit species, especially those that produce desiccation-sensitive, recalcitrant (non-storable) or intermediate seeds (e.g., cocoa, citrus, cacao, coffee, coconut, avocado), root and tuber crops, sterile crops that do not produce seeds (banana), or species which are predominantly propagated clonally (e.g., cassava), as well rare and overexploited species [8,39,40,41]. It is estimated that approximately 100,000 unique accessions of clonally propagated fruit tree species and recalcitrant seed crops require long-term preservation through cryostorage, while currently only around 10,000 accessions are stored in LN [14]. Therefore, more work in this area is needed.

Tropical plants do not have special protective mechanisms that allow them to survive at sub-zero temperatures [15]. Therefore, cryopreservation of these species is a critical process and some criteria (such as the content of intracellular water, applied cryopreservation method, and the difficulties with explant handling) should be considered with particular scrupulosity. Step-by-step optimization of cryopreservation techniques is fundamental to achieving satisfying results, i.e., at least 30–40% recovery of the LN-stored specimens. Two types of cryopreservation protocols can be distinguished that vary in their physical mechanisms: (i) conventional (classical) or two-step procedures, in which cooling takes place slowly in the presence of ice (based on freeze-drying); and (ii) modern or one-step procedures based on vitrification, during which rapid cooling is performed without ice formation [42]. Cryopreservation protocols of some important tropical and subtropical ornamental and fruit species by various techniques are presented in Table 1 and Table 2.

4.1. Conventional Methods (Two-Step Cooling)

Various methods are used to lower the temperature for cryogenic storage depending on the cooling rate (Figure 2 and Figure 3); ultra-rapid, rapid, and slow cooling [19]. A programmable freezing apparatus is used most often in the slow cooling technique (two-step or controlled-rate freezing) to obtain precise and reproducible thermal conditions. During the slow temperature decrease, ice is primarily formed in the extracellular solution that promotes the efflux of water from the cytoplasm and vacuoles to the outside compartments of the cell where it finally freezes [19]. This freeze-dehydration aims at promoting the formation of an amorphous semi-solid-state in the cells if the amount of remaining intracellular water at the moment of plunging the specimens in LN is so low that it vitrifies [19,43]. Classical methods involve the pretreatment of biological material with solutions composed of a single or a mixture of cryoprotective substances (usually DMSO), proceeded by the slow cooling (0.1–2.0 °C·min⁻¹) down to a pre-freezing temperature (usually −40 °C) prior to rapid immersion of samples packed in straw or cryotube in LN [15,19]. The rate of the temperature decrease in LN is in the range of 1000 °C·min⁻¹. Studies on over 700 cell lines from around 600 plant species revealed that this approach is most successful with undifferentiated materials, i.e., callus and cell suspension [15,44]. Among more differentiated explants, only the shoot tips of species tolerant to low temperatures can be cryoconserved with this technique [45]. Effective cryopreservation of shoot tips from tropical plant species (such as cassava) is an exceptional example [46]. Moreover, two-step freezing is expensive and, therefore, is becoming less and less used [15].

4.2. Modern Methods (One-Step Cooling or Vitrification-Based Methods)

The only way to prevent ice crystallization in the cell at ultra-low temperatures of LN without an extreme reduction in water content is by vitrification, i.e., quasi-solidification of a solution into a “glassy” state [5]. Vitrification can be obtained by increasing the viscosity of a cell to the critical point at which ice formation is hindered; both inside and outside the cell, when the available residual water becomes vitrified on exposure to liquid nitrogen [31]. All modern cryogenic approaches rely on this phase transition.

Rapid and ultra-rapid cooling rates are typical for vitrification-based cryoprotocols that involve some level of dehydration by exposure of tissues to highly concentrated solutions of cryoprotectants and/or too strong physical drying (desiccation) [19]. Consequently, most or all freezable water is removed, and the internal solutes vitrify when the explant is plunged into LN [46]. A plant vitrification solution (PVS), which is a mixture of two, three, or four cryoprotectors, provides a transition of the remaining intracellular water to the amorphous “biological glass” state [6]. Different modern methods (vitrification, droplet-vitrification, encapsulation-dehydration, encapsulation-vitrification, and cryo-plates) have been adapted for the cryopreservation of complex organs such as shoot tips/apices and somatic embryos [19] (Figure 3). Most of these methods have been derived from the two most basic cryogenic strategies, vitrification, and encapsulation-dehydration [13].

A typical vitrification-based protocol consists of explant preculture, encapsulation, and/or treatment with a loading solution (LS—a mixture of diluted non-toxic cryoprotective agents), proceeded by either dehydration with PVS or desiccation, and then rapid immersion in liquid nitrogen. After rewarming and washing off the cryoprotectors, explants are transferred to a recovery medium [15]. The use of modern techniques is increasing steadily in genebanks worldwide, particularly for the improvement in the cryopreservation of tropical and subtropical fruit and ornamental plant germplasms [13]. Modern techniques are superior to slow cooling as they allow for the storage of more differentiated plant materials of both cold- and desiccation-susceptible/tolerant species, guarantee higher cooling rates, and are cheaper than the traditional techniques [15].

4.2.1. Desiccation

Desiccation is the easiest cryopreservation technique and consists of explant dehydration and, then, their direct plunge in LN [10]. Meristematic cells with only a few small vacuoles and relatively low water content show high tolerance to ultra-freezing, while the cells containing large vacuoles do not survive and must be dehydrated. Desiccation or drying of the plant samples is performed under a stream of sterile air (in an air-flow cabinet) or, more precisely, over a silica gel (in a desiccator) for 1–5 h (possibly preceded by osmotic dehydration in a sucrose solution), prior to rapid immersion in liquid nitrogen (Figure 3). Sometimes, desiccation is the sole requirement for establishing a successful cryoprotocol [15]. However, the simplicity of this technique is accompanied by its limited use. The method can be applied for pollen, embryos, orthodox seeds, and the shoot tips of desiccation-resistant plants [15], e.g., some endangered, rare, ancient, and wild Citrus species [47].

4.2.2. Pregrowth or Preculture

The pregrowth technique (Figure 2a and Figure 3) consists of in vitro culturing the explants in media containing sugars (sucrose, glucose, and fructose) or sugar alcohols (mannitol and sorbitol) proceeded by exposure to cryoprotectants and rapid immersion in LN [10]. Preculturing the explants is often the first and fundamental step in several cryoprotocols developed for ornamental plants and in cold-sensitive tropical and subtropical fruit species. It is an important factor in the cryostorage of gentians, some lilies, and orchids [15,48]. Preculture stimulates the accumulation of endogenous sugars, polypeptides, abscisic acid (ABA), proline, and bounded water, which enhance the plant’s tolerance to stress [49]. Medium composition, culture duration, and exposure temperature to osmotically active substances are the critical factors for successful cryopreservation [50]. Sucrose (mainly 0.3–0.5 M) applied for a few hours until a few days is the most commonly applied to induce cryo-tolerance and osmotic dehydration. However, extremely strong dehydration can result in the death of a cell as a result of progressing plasmolysis and osmotic shock, as reported with Vanilla planifolia Andrews [51,52]. Using a two-step preculture with increasing sugar content may minimize this adverse effect [15]. Besides sugar addition, low temperature (0–5 °C) and light quantity in the growth room, as well as application of some exogenous compounds such as ABA and proline can be effectively used. These factors stimulate the hardening of plants and alter the dynamics of water crystallization by lowering its freezing point and preventing ice nucleation [15].

4.2.3. Pregrowth-Desiccation

Pregrowth-desiccation (Figure 3) is a combination of the preculture and desiccation methods. The use of an appropriate concentration of cryoprotectants in the culture medium protects the plant cell from hydrodynamic damage and cryoinjury. This technique is primarily used for the cryostorage of meristems, small-sized seeds, zygotic embryos, polyembryonic cultures, or embryonic axes [13].

4.2.4. Encapsulation-Dehydration

The encapsulation-dehydration technique (Figure 2b–d and Figure 3) is based on the technology developed in the 1970s for the production of manufactured (artificial/synthetic) seeds. Plant material is encapsulated in alginate beads (mainly sodium alginate), dehydrated in a liquid medium enriched with sucrose, partially desiccated to a water content of around 20–30%, and then plunged rapidly in LN [13]. A standard encapsulation-dehydration procedure involves the incubation of explants in 2–4% alginate (10 min), proceeded by bead polymerization in 0.1 M CaCl₂ (20–45 min), and dehydration (osmotic and physical) [15]. Preferably, 0.1–0.75 M sucrose can be used for a few hours until a few days for rapid or gradual osmotic dehydration. The optimal physical dehydration (drying) duration is 4–6 h. Concentration and incubation time during the following steps may be manipulated. The presence of alginate bead reduces the pace of the dehydration process and allows the application of subsequent dehydration processes to lower the cells’ moisture content before LN-storage, which would be highly damaging or even lethal to non-encapsulated explants [13,53]. Moreover, the alginate matrix provides enhanced physical protection of the samples from mechanical and oxidative stress during storage and ease of handling during pre- and post-LN-storage steps [54]. The presence of sucrose in the capsule, besides dehydration, may stimulate faster recovery of the explants after rewarming [55]. The addition of some secondary metabolites into the capsule, e.g., salicylic acid (SA), may also greatly improve the protocol success [7,56,57]. Adding glycerol into the bead matrix, on the other hand, was effective for Dendrobium nobile PLBs [58]. Several reports highlighted that encapsulation-dehydration may provide better protection than PVS or sucrose pretreatment alone [59,60,61,62]. This technique is the most frequently used with ornamental plants [12,15,16,63]. It is widely used, for example, with orchids (seeds and PLBs) [64,65]. Encapsulation-dehydration has been also employed to Arabidopsis and shoot tips of some fruit tree species including apple, pear, and Prunus [66,67]. Moreover, this technique is highly effective with the storage of cell suspensions and calli [51]. Despite some advantages, the encapsulation-dehydration method is time-consuming, and coating the material in an alginate matrix increases the risk of hyperhydricity of the tissues and callus regeneration after LN-storage [15,60]. Therefore, other cryopreservation techniques are also used.

4.2.5. Vitrification

The vitrification technique (Figure 3) has been employed for more than 100 plant species and is now the most widely applied plant cryopreservation protocol, especially with shoot tips of numerous tropical and subtropical fruit tree species [67]. It is often referred to as ‘complete vitrification’ as vitrification takes place in both intra- and extracellular solutions [5]. This technique involves treatment (loading) of samples with a diluted mixture of cryoprotectors (LS) to elevate the explant’s resistance to more concentrated and toxic chemicals, dehydration with highly concentrated and efficient PVS, rapid cooling and rewarming, unloading (removing) cryoprotectants, and recovery [13]. The selection of a proper LS and its exposure time is important because of its impact on the dehydration tolerance of the tissues [68,69,70]. The most applicable LS consists of 2.0 M glycerol and 0.4 M sucrose. Studies on Lilium japonicum [71] and Colocasia esculenta [72] showed that incubation time in LS both longer and shorter than 20 min decreased the explants regeneration capacity. As for the plant vitrification solutions, PVS2 is the most popular one and consists of 30% (w/v) glycerol + 15% (w/v) DMSO + 15% (w/v) ethylene glycol (EG) + 0.4 M sucrose. The optimal exposure time to PVS2 varies between 15 and 25 min for shoot tips [73,74], although, 1–2 h incubation was effective in some orchid species [75]. Moreover, successful cryopreservation of tropical orchids was reported when the donor plants were precultured on a medium with a high concentration of sucrose for several days before vitrification and plunging in LN [76]. A study on around 20 tropical monocotyledonous plant species (e.g., banana, taro, and pineapple) revealed that cryopreservation of shoot tips through PVS2-based vitrification provided 100% shoot recovery if the mother plants were precultured on MS medium with 60–120 g·L⁻¹ sucrose for 30 days before plunging in LN [76]. Conversely, PVS2-induced vitrification was lethal for the protocorms of Paralophia epipyhtica—a very rare orchid [77]. Other solutions, such as PVS3—50% glycerol (w/v) + 1.46 M sucrose, and PVS4—35% glycerol (w/v) + 20% (w/v) EG + 0.6 M sucrose, with no toxic DMSO, are also used with ornamental plant species [15,78]. “Toxicity” or “excessive dehydration effect” is the greatest problem of the concentrated vitrification solutions. This can sometimes be overcome by cold and osmotic hardening of plants and/or of the excised meristems and the application of PVS at 0 °C instead of at room temperature [5]. Another limitation is the very small size of the explants (1–4 mm), which can get easily injured during handling and transferring from one solution to another. Straw vitrification can be an interesting modification of the existing approach. In this protocol, rapid freezing rates are obtained by transferring the meristem into plastic straws together with the vitrification solution, followed by an LN immersion [5]. Future studies should focus on the utilization of this technique with ornamentals and fruit crops.

4.2.6. Encapsulation-Vitrification

Encapsulation-vitrification, i.e., one of the so-called combined techniques (Figure 2e and Figure 3), is a combination of encapsulation-dehydration and vitrification techniques, in which explants are embedded in an alginate matrix and then treated with LS and PVS [13,79]. Due to the presence of the capsule, the incubation time in PVS has to be prolonged, though the dehydration process is more mild and safe for the samples [15]. The encapsulation-vitrification technique was efficiently used for Lilium ledebourii [61], Saintpaulia ionantha [72], Dendrobium candidum [80], Grammatophyllum speciosum [59], Dendrobium nobile [58], and an increasing number of tropical and subtropical fruit trees species [67]. Unfortunately, the combined techniques, especially with the use of DMSO (PVS2), are less popular with ornamental plants, because the long exposure to DMSO causes a breakdown of the alginate bead, and therefore, limited protection of the biological material. The application of these techniques could become more popular in the future, after optimizing the procedures [15].

4.2.7. Droplet-Vitrification

Droplet-vitrification is a relatively new cryopreservation technique (Figure 2f,g and Figure 3), based on a method of cryopreserving cassava shoot tips (Manihot esculenta) in droplets of DMSO [6]. It can be considered the first “generic” cryopreservation method for hydrated tissues as it combines droplet-freezing and vitrification procedures [81]. The first report related to the PVS2-based droplet-vitrification method was presented by Pennycooke and Towill [82] on cryopreservation of sweet potato shoot tips. Panis et al. [36] optimized the droplet-vitrification procedure in a study with shoot tips of banana (Musa spp.). In the droplet-vitrification method, samples (incubated previously in LS and PVS) are placed in a drop of PVS (approximately 15 µL) on aluminum foil strips (approximately 5 × 20 mm) prior to direct plunging in LN. A detailed procedure of droplet-vitrification has been presented by Wang et al. [6]. The technique is based on the high cooling and warming rates (about 130 °C·s⁻¹) obtained due to the good thermal conductivity of aluminum [15,36] and because of the direct contact between the explants and LN/unloading solution during cooling/rewarming, respectively [67]. In comparison, the cooling rates in a cryovial or artificial seed are about 6 °C·s⁻¹ [83,84]. Other advantages of the droplet-vitrification method are as follows: avoiding the manipulation of the explant alone when inserting or extracting the foil strip from the cryovial (i.e., minimizing the risk of explant injury), placing the samples in droplets of vitrification solution already on the foil strips for dehydration and reducing the exposure time to PVS2 which is toxic to the cells, achieving vitrified state and avoiding devitrification during the cooling and rewarming, maintaining cell integrity of biological material and high regrowth percentage after LN-storage [6,15,36,85]. On the other hand, some of the most important problems of this cryopreservation technique include the requirement for a high level of technical skill, damage to or loss of samples due to the use of pipettes/tweezers for adding or removing solutions, and the need of precise control of the exposure time to PVS [6,36,86,87]. Droplet-vitrification was successfully applied for the cryopreservation of several endangered tropical and subtropical ornamental plants (Table 1) such as lilies, orchids, and redwood [59,88]. Moreover, this protocol has now been used with 1117 Musa accessions [6], 111 vegetable plant species such as potato and its wild relatives, Diospyros, cassava, yam, sweet potato, and some other tropical and subtropical fruit trees [13,39]. It is currently the most widely used storage technique for plant germplasm within cryobanks [5,6,79,89].

4.2.8. Cryo-Plates and Cryo-Mesh

Recently, new cryogenic techniques using cryo-plates have been developed: V cryo-plate or vitrification cryo-plate (based on PVS2-vitrification of explants on a cryo-plate [90]) and D cryo-plate or dehydration cryo-plate (based on air dehydration [91]). In these techniques, explants, especially shoot tips, are placed on aluminum cryo-plates containing tiny wells [6]. The V cryo-plate technique combines encapsulation-vitrification with droplet-vitrification and the D cryo-plate combines alginate encapsulation with air drying (Figure 3). Cooling and warming rates in the cryo-plate methods are very high. Easy handling of samples kept in aluminum plates and high regrowth rates are two main advantages of those techniques [91]. However, the exposure time to PVS is longer in the V cryo-plate compared to droplet-vitrification, since the samples are encapsulated [90,91,92]. The D cryo-plate method may be used for larger explants and it is less laborious than the other cryostorage techniques. Moreover, this approach minimizes the risks of chemical stress, damage to biological material during manipulation, and possible genetic variation that could be induced by exposure to PVS [6,92]. The V and D cryo-plate methods have been used for cryopreservation of more than 25 and 15 tropical and subtropical ornamental and fruit plants, respectively [90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99], with comparable shoot regrowth percentages for both methods [91,96,97,98].

An alternative method for cryopreservation of shoot tips of tropical and subtropical ornamental and fruit plants may be a cryo-mesh. The main principles of the cryo-mesh cryopreservation method are similar to the V cryo-plate technique [90]. The major difference is that a stainless-steel mesh strip is used for cryo-mesh. Detailed procedures of cryo-mesh cryopreservation have been presented by Yamamoto et al. [90], Funnekotter et al. [100], and Wang et al. [6]. Another possibility is the user-friendly vitrification of tissues on electron microscope grids (made of copper) for cryopreservation, which so far has been successfully used with animal specimens (oocytes) [101].

4.2.9. Dormant Bud Cryopreservation

Cryo-storage of dormant buds is a recent cryopreservation technique (Figure 3) [39]. Unfortunately, the number of species that can be stored via cryopreservation of dormant buds is limited as two main requirements must be met for this technique: (i) the species must produce buds that go into a dormant phase induced by a photoperiod and/or prolonged period of low temperature before being prepared for cryo-storage, and (ii) the LN-recovered buds must respond to bud grafting [39]. Dormant buds’ cryopreservation is based on the natural cold acclimatization of mother plants and controlled dehydration (by air dehydration and slow freezing) of scions holding dormant buds [6,102]. A significant advantage of this approach over the other cryopreservation techniques is that the in vitro culture phase is not involved during the whole procedure; the samples for conservation are transferred directly from the field to the LN tank and, at the time of recovery, back from the Dewar tank to the field [39]. This technique spares much time, resources, and reduces the risk of contamination [39,103]. Nonetheless, it applies to moderately to very cold-hardy woody species [67]. To date, only Malus, Pyrus, Prunus, and Morus have been cryopreserved with this technique [39,104]. The detailed dormant bud cryopreservation method has precisely been presented by Panis et al. [39].

Table 1. Cryopreservation of different tropical and subtropical ornamental plant species by various techniques.

Species and/or Cultivar	Explant Used	Method Applied	Survival (Recovery) [%]	Reference
Bletilla striata	Immature seeds	Direct immersion in LN vitrification	8 81–92	[105]
Bletilla striata	Mature seeds a, Germinating seeds b, Protocormsc	Droplet-vitrification	93 a 91 b 84 c	[106]
Brassidium Shooting Star	PLBs	Droplet-vitrification	30	[85]
Brassidium Shooting Star	PLBs	Vitrification	No data	[107]
Brassidium Shooting Star	PLBs	Vitrification	No data	[108]
Buxus hyrcana	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-dehydration	60.00	[16]
Buxus sempervirens	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-dehydration a Encapsulation-vitrification b	66.30 a 60.00 b	[109]
Cattleya spp.	Seeds	Vitrification	No data	[110]
Celisostoma areitinum	Protocorms	Encapsulation-dehydration	49	[111]
Centaurium rigualii	Nodes	Encapsulation-dehydration	70	[112]
Cymbidium hookerianum	PLBs	Preculture	70	[113]
Cyrtopodium hatschbachii	Immature seeds	Encapsulation-dehydration	64	[114]
Dendrobium cruentum	Protocorms	Vitrification Encapsulation-dehydration	33 27	[115]
Dendrobium candidum	PLBs	Encapsulation-vitrification	85–89	[80]
Dendrobium cariniferum	Protocorms	Encapsulation-vitrification	15	[115]
Dendrobium heterocarpum	Protocorms	Encapsulation-dehydration	8	[116]
Dendrobium nobile	PLBs	Encapsulation-dehydration	53 (50)	[58]
Dendrobium nobile	PLBs	Encapsulation-vitrification	78 (76)	[58]
Dendrobium Walter Oumae	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-dehydration	16 (13)	[117]
Doritis pulcherrima	Seeds	Vitrification	62	[118]
Fritillaria imperialis Lubra Maxima	Bulb scale	Encapsulation-dehydration a Encapsulation-vitrification b	74.30 a 81.6 b	[119]
Gentiana cruciata	Proembryogenic masses	Droplet-vitrification	82	[120]
Gentiana cruciata	Proembryogenic masses	Slow cooling	2.5–2.7	[121]
Gentiana cruciata	Proembryogenic masses	Vitrification	86–91	[121]
Gentiana scabra	Axillary buds	Preculture-desiccation	5–90	[49]
Gentiana sp.	Shoot tips a Axillary buds b	Vitrification	74 a 78 b	[79] a, [49] b
Grammatophyllum speciosum	Protocorms	Droplet-vitrification	38	[59]
Grammatophyllum speciosum	Protocorms	Encapsulation-dehydration	24	[59]
Grammatophyllum speciosum	Protocorms	Encapsulation-vitrification	14	[59]
Lilium japonicum	Apical meristems	Vitrification	68	[71]
Lilium sp.	Shoot tips	Vitrification	60–90	[122]
Lilium spp.	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	42–87	[123]
Lilium ledebourii	Seeds a,c,d,e Embryogenic axes a,b,c Lateral buds a,c Bulblet a,c Shoot tips f	Direct immersion in LN a/Vitrification b/Encapsulation-vitrificationc/Encapsulation-dehydration d/Preculture-desiccation e Droplet-vitrification f	0 a/10 c/50 d/75 e 0 a/b/10 c 0 a/c 0 a/c 58–90 (53–88) f	[48,60,61] a–e, [124] f
Lilium× siberia	Apical meristems	Vitrification/Droplet-vitrification	35–45/35–84	[88]
Magnolia macrophylla	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	30	[125]
Magnolia sinica	Seeds	Desiccation	58	[126]
Magnolia sirindhorniae	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-vitrification	33	[127]
Oncidium sp.	PLBs	Preculture-desiccation	30	[128]
Oncidium bifolium	Seeds Protocorms	Encapsulation-dehydration	67 (5) 82 (11)	[129]
Oncidium flexuosum	Seeds	Vitrification	78	[130]
Phaius tankervillae	Seeds	Vitrification	62	[131]
Phalaenopsis bellina	PLBs	Encapsulation-dehydration	47	[64]
		Preculture-desiccation	30	[64]
Pinus nigra	Proembryogenic masses	Slow cooling	88	[132]
Rhynchostylis gigantean	Protocorms	Vitrification	19	[115]
Rosa × hybrida	Shoot tips Axillary buds	Droplet-vitrification a Encapsulation-dehydration b	(58–64) a (12) a (0) b	[133] a, [134] b
Seidenfadenia mitrata	Protocorms	Vitrification	67	[115]
Vanda coerulea	PLBs	Droplet-vitrification	5	[135]
Vanda coerulea	Protocorms	Encapsulation-dehydration	40	[136]
Vanda coerulea	Seeds	Vitrification	67	[137]
Vanda tricolor	Mature seeds	Direct immersion in LN vitrification	10 14	[68]
Vanilla planifolia Andrews	Shoot apices	Droplet-vitrification	30 (10)	[138]

Upper lowercase letter refers to the explant type, the cryopreservation technique used, and its effectiveness.

Table 1. Cryopreservation of different tropical and subtropical ornamental plant species by various techniques.

Species and/or Cultivar	Explant Used	Method Applied	Survival (Recovery) [%]	Reference
Bletilla striata	Immature seeds	Direct immersion in LN vitrification	8 81–92	[105]
Bletilla striata	Mature seeds a, Germinating seeds b, Protocormsc	Droplet-vitrification	93 a 91 b 84 c	[106]
Brassidium Shooting Star	PLBs	Droplet-vitrification	30	[85]
Brassidium Shooting Star	PLBs	Vitrification	No data	[107]
Brassidium Shooting Star	PLBs	Vitrification	No data	[108]
Buxus hyrcana	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-dehydration	60.00	[16]
Buxus sempervirens	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-dehydration a Encapsulation-vitrification b	66.30 a 60.00 b	[109]
Cattleya spp.	Seeds	Vitrification	No data	[110]
Celisostoma areitinum	Protocorms	Encapsulation-dehydration	49	[111]
Centaurium rigualii	Nodes	Encapsulation-dehydration	70	[112]
Cymbidium hookerianum	PLBs	Preculture	70	[113]
Cyrtopodium hatschbachii	Immature seeds	Encapsulation-dehydration	64	[114]
Dendrobium cruentum	Protocorms	Vitrification Encapsulation-dehydration	33 27	[115]
Dendrobium candidum	PLBs	Encapsulation-vitrification	85–89	[80]
Dendrobium cariniferum	Protocorms	Encapsulation-vitrification	15	[115]
Dendrobium heterocarpum	Protocorms	Encapsulation-dehydration	8	[116]
Dendrobium nobile	PLBs	Encapsulation-dehydration	53 (50)	[58]
Dendrobium nobile	PLBs	Encapsulation-vitrification	78 (76)	[58]
Dendrobium Walter Oumae	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-dehydration	16 (13)	[117]
Doritis pulcherrima	Seeds	Vitrification	62	[118]
Fritillaria imperialis Lubra Maxima	Bulb scale	Encapsulation-dehydration a Encapsulation-vitrification b	74.30 a 81.6 b	[119]
Gentiana cruciata	Proembryogenic masses	Droplet-vitrification	82	[120]
Gentiana cruciata	Proembryogenic masses	Slow cooling	2.5–2.7	[121]
Gentiana cruciata	Proembryogenic masses	Vitrification	86–91	[121]
Gentiana scabra	Axillary buds	Preculture-desiccation	5–90	[49]
Gentiana sp.	Shoot tips a Axillary buds b	Vitrification	74 a 78 b	[79] a, [49] b
Grammatophyllum speciosum	Protocorms	Droplet-vitrification	38	[59]
Grammatophyllum speciosum	Protocorms	Encapsulation-dehydration	24	[59]
Grammatophyllum speciosum	Protocorms	Encapsulation-vitrification	14	[59]
Lilium japonicum	Apical meristems	Vitrification	68	[71]
Lilium sp.	Shoot tips	Vitrification	60–90	[122]
Lilium spp.	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	42–87	[123]
Lilium ledebourii	Seeds a,c,d,e Embryogenic axes a,b,c Lateral buds a,c Bulblet a,c Shoot tips f	Direct immersion in LN a/Vitrification b/Encapsulation-vitrificationc/Encapsulation-dehydration d/Preculture-desiccation e Droplet-vitrification f	0 a/10 c/50 d/75 e 0 a/b/10 c 0 a/c 0 a/c 58–90 (53–88) f	[48,60,61] a–e, [124] f
Lilium× siberia	Apical meristems	Vitrification/Droplet-vitrification	35–45/35–84	[88]
Magnolia macrophylla	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	30	[125]
Magnolia sinica	Seeds	Desiccation	58	[126]
Magnolia sirindhorniae	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-vitrification	33	[127]
Oncidium sp.	PLBs	Preculture-desiccation	30	[128]
Oncidium bifolium	Seeds Protocorms	Encapsulation-dehydration	67 (5) 82 (11)	[129]
Oncidium flexuosum	Seeds	Vitrification	78	[130]
Phaius tankervillae	Seeds	Vitrification	62	[131]
Phalaenopsis bellina	PLBs	Encapsulation-dehydration	47	[64]
		Preculture-desiccation	30	[64]
Pinus nigra	Proembryogenic masses	Slow cooling	88	[132]
Rhynchostylis gigantean	Protocorms	Vitrification	19	[115]
Rosa × hybrida	Shoot tips Axillary buds	Droplet-vitrification a Encapsulation-dehydration b	(58–64) a (12) a (0) b	[133] a, [134] b
Seidenfadenia mitrata	Protocorms	Vitrification	67	[115]
Vanda coerulea	PLBs	Droplet-vitrification	5	[135]
Vanda coerulea	Protocorms	Encapsulation-dehydration	40	[136]
Vanda coerulea	Seeds	Vitrification	67	[137]
Vanda tricolor	Mature seeds	Direct immersion in LN vitrification	10 14	[68]
Vanilla planifolia Andrews	Shoot apices	Droplet-vitrification	30 (10)	[138]

Upper lowercase letter refers to the explant type, the cryopreservation technique used, and its effectiveness.

Table 2. Cryopreservation of different fruit plant species by various techniques.

Plant Species	Explant	Cryopreservation Technique	Survival (%)	Reference
Actinidia spp.	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	59–88	[139]
		Encapsulation-dehydration	85–95	[140]
Agave peacockii	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	96	[141]
Agave tequilana	Somatic embryos	V cryo-plate technique	83	[142]
Ananas spp.	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	51	[143]
Ananas (wild genus)	Pollen	Dehydration	62	[144]
Citrus sinensis	Callus	Modified aluminum cryo-plate	88	[145]
Citrus spp.	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	56	[146]
Cocos nucifera	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	50	[147]
Diospyros kaki	Shoot tips	D cryo-plate	67–97	[99]
Diospyros kaki	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-droplet-vitrification a Slow freezing b Vitrification c	80 a 70–76 b 86 c	[148] a, [149] b, [150] b, [151] c
Diospyros spp.	Shoot tips	Vitrification a	30 a 100 b	[152] a, [153] b
Musa spp.	Apical meristems	Droplet-vitrification	39	[36]
Musa spp.	Cell suspensions	Classical (slow) freezing	No data	[154]
Passiflora edulis	Zygotic embryos	Dehydration	100	[155]
Passiflora suberosa	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-vitrification	28	[156]
Passiflora pohlii	Nodal segments	Vitrification	65	[157]
Persea americana	Shoot tips	Vitrification	73–80	[158]
Persea americana	Somatic embryos	Cryovial-vitrification a Droplet-vitrification b	73–91 a 85–100 b	[159]
Prunus cerasifera	Shoot tips	V and D cryo-plates	56.1% (V cryo-plate) and 77.5% (D cryo-plate)	[97]
Prunus cerasus	Dormant bud	No data	No data	[160]
Prunus domestica	Shoot tips	V and D cryo-plates	44.6% (V cryo-plate) and 47.5% (D cryo-plate)	[97]
Prunus spp.	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-dehydration a Vitrification b Droplet-vitrification c Two-step freezing d	14–76 a 60–88 b 20–52 c 74 d	[161] a, [162] b, [97] c, [163] c, [163] d
Pyrus spp.	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-dehydration a Vitrification b Two step freezing c	30–82 a 71 b 75–83 c	[164] a, [165] b, [166] c, [167] c

Upper lowercase letter refers to the cryopreservation technique used and its effectiveness.

Table 2. Cryopreservation of different fruit plant species by various techniques.

Plant Species	Explant	Cryopreservation Technique	Survival (%)	Reference
Actinidia spp.	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	59–88	[139]
		Encapsulation-dehydration	85–95	[140]
Agave peacockii	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	96	[141]
Agave tequilana	Somatic embryos	V cryo-plate technique	83	[142]
Ananas spp.	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	51	[143]
Ananas (wild genus)	Pollen	Dehydration	62	[144]
Citrus sinensis	Callus	Modified aluminum cryo-plate	88	[145]
Citrus spp.	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	56	[146]
Cocos nucifera	Shoot tips	Droplet-vitrification	50	[147]
Diospyros kaki	Shoot tips	D cryo-plate	67–97	[99]
Diospyros kaki	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-droplet-vitrification a Slow freezing b Vitrification c	80 a 70–76 b 86 c	[148] a, [149] b, [150] b, [151] c
Diospyros spp.	Shoot tips	Vitrification a	30 a 100 b	[152] a, [153] b
Musa spp.	Apical meristems	Droplet-vitrification	39	[36]
Musa spp.	Cell suspensions	Classical (slow) freezing	No data	[154]
Passiflora edulis	Zygotic embryos	Dehydration	100	[155]
Passiflora suberosa	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-vitrification	28	[156]
Passiflora pohlii	Nodal segments	Vitrification	65	[157]
Persea americana	Shoot tips	Vitrification	73–80	[158]
Persea americana	Somatic embryos	Cryovial-vitrification a Droplet-vitrification b	73–91 a 85–100 b	[159]
Prunus cerasifera	Shoot tips	V and D cryo-plates	56.1% (V cryo-plate) and 77.5% (D cryo-plate)	[97]
Prunus cerasus	Dormant bud	No data	No data	[160]
Prunus domestica	Shoot tips	V and D cryo-plates	44.6% (V cryo-plate) and 47.5% (D cryo-plate)	[97]
Prunus spp.	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-dehydration a Vitrification b Droplet-vitrification c Two-step freezing d	14–76 a 60–88 b 20–52 c 74 d	[161] a, [162] b, [97] c, [163] c, [163] d
Pyrus spp.	Shoot tips	Encapsulation-dehydration a Vitrification b Two step freezing c	30–82 a 71 b 75–83 c	[164] a, [165] b, [166] c, [167] c

Upper lowercase letter refers to the cryopreservation technique used and its effectiveness.

5. Rewarming and Recovery

Optimized rewarming is vital to prevent glass relaxation and devitrification. Ice recrystallization during warming, i.e., merging smaller crystals into larger aggregates, would result in cell death. Consequently, rewarming ought to be done rapidly, either by transferring the vials with samples to a 35–42 °C (usually 38 °C) water bath for 2–3 min or by plunging the aluminum foils containing explants in the unloading solution at room temperature for better post-storage recovery [19]. Occasionally, a two-phase approach can be used: first, a short phase (i.e., 1–2 min at ambient temperature) to allow glass relaxation, proceeded by rapid warming (at +45 °C) to guarantee the rapid transition from biological glass to liquid without passing through an ice phase [19,32].

After rewarming, the used solutions (e.g., PVS) or materials (e.g., capsule) may be removed before the recovery step (Figure 2h). The composition of the recovery medium (RM) is a vital factor affecting the success of a cryopreservation protocol [15]. Rehydration takes place about a few hours after explant inoculation on the RM. In order to enhance the penetration of nutrients, it is advised to inoculate the samples on a semi-solid or sometimes liquid media [15].

One of the drawbacks of cryopreservation is the problem with complete plant recovery. It is sometimes observed that, despite the high survival rate of the LN-stored explants, their further development is arrested [1]. Therefore, the suitable combination of plant growth regulators (PGRs) in RM, particularly an auxin and cytokinin, may be crucial to stimulate the regeneration of LN-derived tissues [15] and to proceed with direct organogenesis and embryogenesis, although callus formation should be avoided due to the risk of somaclonal variation occurrence that is unacceptable in the long-term storage of germplasm. Moreover, exogenous applications of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants, such as catalase (CAT), pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), malate dehydrogenase (MDH), or melatonin can be used to alleviate oxidative stress for improving plant cryopreservation efficacy [168].

6. Cryopreservation and Omics Technologies

The word omics refers to an area of biology studies including genomics, proteomics, or metabolomics. The ending “-ome” is used to highlight the study object of such areas, i.e., the genome, proteome, or metabolome, respectively. Omics science aims to recognize, describe, and quantify all the biological molecules involved in the structure, function, and dynamics of a cell, tissue, organ, or organism. Biomics or bionomics is a biological science focused on organisms’ habitats and modes of life in their natural environment. Cryobiomics or cryobionomics, on the other hand, is a branch of biology dealing with cryopreserved organisms’ behavior, habitats, stability, and function following their reintroduction into the natural environment [31]. Cryobiomics connects causal factors related to cryoinjury and loss of viability to the risks of genetic instability [31]. In other words, cryobiomics is a relationship between cryoinjury and the (epi)genetic integrity of cryopreserved plant cells, as well the potential impact of cryoinjury on the genome, transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome [21]. The general ontological term of omics describes the application of (functional) genomics, and bioinformatics as generating an abundance of DNA sequence data that reveal the complexity of global changes in the expression of genes, additionally supported by profiling through powerful transcriptomics techniques [31]. The array of global changes in proteins via proteomics is a fundamental bridge between the transcriptome and metabolome, with metabolomics providing a global profile of a wide range of metabolites and cell signaling processes. Bioinformatics and gene ontology are central tools that unify omics platforms across biology [169,170]. The implications of cryobiomics have been considered in a number of applications, from algal culture to tropical and subtropical plant biodiversity conservation [40,171].

Plant cryopreservation is related to biomolecular and omics sciences through the understanding of the stability of the stored sample [35,172], as some theoretical and empirical data suggests that molecular, physiological, and biochemical processes may not be entirely stopped at ultra-low temperatures [173]. Cryopreservation results in the exposure of cells to chemical, physical, and physiological stresses. Cryoinjury caused by freezing/thawing (in slow-cooling) and cooling/rewarming (in vitrification-based modern techniques) may influence the DNA, cell membrane structure and function, molecular and subcellular functions, totipotency, and finally regrowth of entire plants and their field performance [174]. Some of the most important problems when exposing cells to cryopreservation include osmotic injury during dehydration, hyperhydration during recovery, toxicity of cryoprotective agents/mixtures, oxidative damage induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS), and secondary lipid peroxidation aldehyde products [35,175,176]. The perception of stress by cells and the linked cascades provoked by signaling molecules activate the expression of transcription factors (TF) that impact numerous stress response genes [172]. Calcium may be a messenger in the signal transduction process that occurs during cold acclimatization and cryopreservation, which cause a complex series of pathways revealed by mutant, (functional) genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics studies [32]. ABA also has a significant role in preventing osmotic stress caused by dehydration prior to cryopreservation [172,177]. Cold acclimation provokes an intrinsic tolerance to desiccation and low temperature by triggering genes related to cold adaptation [178,179]. Through these processes, biosynthesis of ethylene, changes in ROS production (such as the superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals), as well as membrane fluidity may be induced [175,180]. Antioxidant mechanisms can also positively affect the post-storage viability of cells [175,181]. The utilization of carbohydrates, on the other hand, by osmoprotection of the cell membrane (through the interaction with lipid bilayer) promotes its resistance to the toxic effects of PVS and desiccation [88,133,182]. Moreover, the activity of carbohydrates, especially sucrose in the encapsulation-based protocols, results in a reduction in the melting temperature of ice during rewarming [183].

By utilizing high-throughput omics technology to screen two dehydrins of embryogenic callus of Agapanthus praecox subjected to cryopreservation, Yang et al. [184] reported that their expression levels were specifically upregulated at the transcription and protein levels. Chen et al. [185], on the other hand, markedly increased the recovery level of cryopreserved embryogenic cells in this species and enhanced the expressions of stress-responsive genes, including POD, APX, MDHAR, and GPX through the inclusion of 0.08 mM glutathione in PVS2. In the study with Dendrobium nobile, Di et al. [186] reported that protein synthesis, processing, and degradation might be the main strategies to re-establish cell balance in the PLBs following LN-storage. In cryopreservation of Dendrobium PLBs by vitrification, Jiang et al. [187] reported that the preculture and cooling–rewarming cycle induced expression of the autophagy-related protein 8C gene (Atg 8C) and reticulon-like protein B8 gene (Rtnl B8). These results provided evidence on ROS-triggered programmed cell death during cryopreservation. A series of enzymatic and ROS analyses in several orchid species and Passifora suberosa allowed to develop robust cryopreservation protocols by sufficient maintenance of the internal balance of oxidative metabolism [188,189,190,191].

In cryobiomics, it is desirable to determine the genetic integrity, gene expression, as well as growth and development of the cryopreserved plants to evaluate the possible cellular and/or biochemical damage, impairment of metabolism, loss of reproductive functions, and, ultimately, to assess if they are true-to-type. This can be performed at the phenotypic, cytological, histological, physiological, genetic, epigenetic, and molecular levels [21,40]. Another perspective of cryobiomics is that molecular alternations, especially at the epigenetic level, may be indicative of a beneficial adaptive response to the stresses incurred during LN-storage and which can be advantageous to post-storage survival [192]. Genomics and molecular markers (e.g., amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), and simple sequence repeat (SSR)) have an important role in cryobiomics [6,92]. Previous studies have shown no or small genetic differences between cryopreserved and non-cryopreserved samples under optimized conditions [193,194,195]. However, more sensitive and powerful tools, such as whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) and methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP), may be applied to validate more comprehensively the (epi)genetic homogeneity in the germplasms recovered from LN [6,25,92,195]. Histone acetylation, small interfering RNA (siRNA), microRNAs, and the role of the association between somaclonal variation and DNA methylation, are new candidate markers for variation detection [31]. Likewise, the combination of genetic engineering and cryopreservation techniques can be helpful to study genes involved in the tolerance to dehydration and low temperatures [19].

7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Currently, about 22,000 plant species and cultivars are on the red list of the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, including extinct, extinct in the wild, critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable, and near-threatened species [196]. Advances in plant biotechnology improve the long-term conservation and management of biodiversity. Cryopreservation may play a central role in the safe storage of important genetic resources of tropical and subtropical ornamental and fruit crops. Nonetheless, additional research on recalcitrant species of tropical and subtropical fruit and ornamental plants is needed. Droplet-vitrification and cryo-plate techniques have the mutual characteristic of providing higher cooling and warming rates than the other vitrification-based methods because explants are placed on aluminum foil strips or cryo-plates (with a very high thermal conductivity) and are in direct contact with LN during cooling and with the unloading solution during rewarming.

Obviously, cryopreservation is a complimentary method to other in situ and ex situ conservation strategies and has certain drawbacks. Among the demerits of plant cryopreservation one can mention: it does not work efficiently with all plant material, hence cryostorage protocols for many plant species are not available; ice crystallization inside the cells cause injury to the organelles, whereas cellular dehydration can induce stress; high intracellular concentration of solutes can be very damaging to cells but also cryoprotectants affect the viability of cells; successful cryogenics currently mostly succeed for very small organs and structures, and this is still a constraint; finally, the physiological status of the donor plant material is of high importance.

Nowadays, the use of high-throughput omics technologies aids to identify functions of the specific genes and proteins in protecting the cells against cryopreservation-induced stress. Future research may lead toward the: improvement in post-LN-storage recovery of plants; metabolic, genetic, and epigenetic stability; survey of cryopreserved-mediated genes; detection of precise molecular markers; improvement in combined techniques (especially encapsulation-vitrification, cryo-plates, cryo-mesh, and straw vitrification); the use of SD-BAB, SLS-BABs, microtubers, dormant buds, and rhizome buds as alternative explants in cryopreservation; better adaptation of cryo-derived plants to native conditions; improving the tolerance of explants to dehydration, vitrification, and cold stress; introduction of newer PVS, and supplementation of different types of antioxidants; optimizing universal protocols for a wider group of plants; understanding the different protective mechanisms and stress conditions involved in cryostorage; development of protocols for pathogen eradication by means of cryotherapy; and extending the current status of long-term conservation for economically important plant species that fall out of the ‘model system’ framework.