Next Article in Journal
Dimorphilus gyrociliatus (Annelida: Dinophiliformia) Dwarf Male Nervous System Represents a Common Pattern for Lophotrochozoa
Previous Article in Journal
Similar Characteristics of siRNAs of Plant Viruses Which Replicate in Plant and Fungal Hosts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of Serotonergic Gene Methylation in Regulating Anxiety-Related Personality Traits in Chimpanzees

1
Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
2
Behavioural Ecology and Ecophysiology Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
3
Centre for Research and Conservation, Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, Koningin Astridplein 26, 2018 Antwerp, Belgium
4
Michale E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX 78602, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(11), 1673; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111673
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Revised: 11 November 2022 / Accepted: 16 November 2022 / Published: 17 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurogenetics of Behaviour)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Serotonin is a neurotransmitter known to regulate psychological health (depression, anxiety) and personality in humans. External factors such as early life stress or medication use can impact the serotonin system, for example, through epigenetic modification of the genes that code for its different components. While human studies are currently exploring the effects of serotonergic methylation, an example of epigenetic modification, primate studies are largely lacking. In this study, we investigated to what extent personality traits in captive chimpanzees are associated with methylation levels of two genes that play a major role in serotonin transmission: the gene coding for its receptor subtype 1A (HTR1A) and the gene coding for its transporter (SLC6A4). Using a methylation array identical to human studies, we show that methylation levels are associated with variation in four chimpanzee personality traits linked with a reduction in anxiety and aggression and increase in prosocial and explorative behavior. Different from human studies, early atypical social rearing conditions only had a minor impact on methylation. The results from this study highlight evolutionarily conserved methylation sites that can be targeted in future hypothesis-driven studies across species.

Abstract

While low serotonergic activity is often associated with psychological disorders such as depression, anxiety, mood, and personality disorders, variations in serotonin also contribute to normal personality differences. In this study, we investigated the role of blood DNA methylation levels at individual CpG sites of two key serotonergic genes (serotonin receptor gene 1A, HTR1A; serotonin transporter gene, SLC6A4) in predicting the personalities of captive chimpanzees. We found associations between methylation at 9/48 CpG sites with four personality dimensions: Dominance, Reactivity/Dependability, Agreeableness, and Openness. Directionality of effects were CpG location-dependent and confirmed a role of serotonergic methylation in reducing anxiety (Dominance) and aggression-related personality (Reactivity/Undependability) while simultaneously promoting prosocial (Agreeableness) and exploratory personalities (Openness). Although early-life adversity has been shown to impact serotonergic methylation patterns in other species, here, atypical early social rearing experiences only had a modest impact on CpG methylation levels in this chimpanzee sample. The precise environmental factors impacting serotonergic methylation in chimpanzees remain to be identified. Nevertheless, our study suggests a role in shaping natural variation in animal personalities. The results of this study offer a basis for future hypothesis-driven testing in additional populations and species to better understand the impact of ecology and evolution on complex behavioral traits.

1. Introduction

Serotonin (5-hydroxythalamine or 5-HT) is a chemical produced by nerve cells that has an impact on almost every physiological process throughout the body, including the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and central nervous systems [1]. Reduced serotonin activity plays a major role in the development of a number of psychiatric disorders that are highly prevalent in modern human populations, including depression, anxiety, and mood and personality disorders [1,2]. The levels of 5-HT that are available for neural signaling and regulate its activity are dependent on several factors such as the availability of the rate-limiting enzyme tryptophan hydroxylase-2 (TPH2), the number of serotonin reuptake transporters (5-HTT), and the number of available serotonin receptors [1]. For example, patients with depression typically show increased expression levels of serotonin receptor subtype 1A (HTR1A), and treatment of depression most often involves the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) which block 5-HTT, thereby increasing the amount of available serotonin for neural signaling [1,3]. Serotonin functioning also accounts for normal variation in temperament or personality [4,5,6,7]. Links have been reported in humans between variation in serotonergic signaling and scores on personality traits with high loadings for personality items related to impulsivity, aggression, and stress/anxiety [4,5,6,7]. For example, low serotonin activity typically relates to higher scores on Neuroticism, a personality dimension measured by the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (or NEO-PI-R). The dimension has six underlying facets: anxiety, angry hostility, depression, self-consciousness, impulsiveness, and vulnerability [4,8,9]. Other studies have reported a link with Harm Avoidance, a personality dimension that strongly correlates with Neuroticism [8], but is measured using a different personality assay, the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ) [9]. Individuals scoring high on Harm Avoidance tend to worry more, fear uncertainty more, be shyer with strangers, and are more susceptible to fatigue [9].
Several lines of evidence confirm the association between serotonin and anxiety-related personality dimensions. Serotonergic drugs treat psychopathological disorders with symptoms such as depression and anxiety that reflect high levels of Neuroticism [10,11]. Treatment with SSRIs decreases Neuroticism, which in turn mediates the effects of these drugs on the treatment of depressive symptoms [12]. Neurological evidence from PET (positron emission tomography) scans also shows that Neuroticism can be predicted based on the binding activity of serotonin to its receptor and/or transporter [4,13,14]. While Neuroticism is also estimated to have a significant heritable basis (15%) in humans [15], studies investigating the molecular genetic basis of the association between serotonin and Neuroticism are inconclusive and report rather small genetic effects [16]. Specific variants in the genes coding for the transporter and receptor have been shown to alter gene transcription, as well as protein structure and/or function, making individuals more prone to developing specific personality phenotypes [8,17,18,19,20]. More recent work has shown how external factors, such as early-life stress or trauma, can mediate these effects by influencing epigenetic processes, including DNA methylation [21]. In humans, epigenetic modifications of serotonergic genes contribute substantially to the pathogenicity of major depression and anxiety disorders [22,23]. For example, increased levels of methylation in the proximal promoter region of 5-HTT are associated with lower transporter expression and higher threat-related responsiveness of the amygdala [23], whereas lower methylation is correlated with better stress-adaptive reaction [22].
The role of epigenetic effects on the development of personality is gaining increasing interest but remains understudied in nonhuman primates. Chimpanzees offer an interesting comparative framework as they are, together with bonobos, genetically the most closely related living species to humans and thus show considerable overlap in the neural architecture supporting personality processes and physiology [24,25,26,27]. In chimpanzees, personality dimensions have also been quantified using identical methods to human personality research, yielding similar multidimensional personality models [28]. Comparative work in the two species can thus yield novel insights into the generalizability and functioning of serotonergic personality regulation across species. CpGs that show consistent cross-species effects would provide evidence for an evolutionarily stable regulatory system and can aid in the development of diagnostic tools or offer therapeutic targets for the treatment of serotonin-related psychiatric conditions in humans. Alternatively, if consistency across species is lacking, this potentially implies that neuroanatomical and brain gene expression differences in serotonergic systems might have functional and/or evolutionary significance.
In the current study, we investigated the link between blood CpG methylation levels of two key serotonergic genes (the gene coding for the serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) and the gene coding for its receptor subtype 1A (HTR1A)) and personality scores of captive chimpanzees. Chimpanzee personality data were assessed in a previous study using questionnaires [28]. This approach yielded six personality components: Reactivity/Undependability, Dominance, Openness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Methodical. Different from the human Neuroticism dimension, trait items related to anxiety, depression, and impulsive behavior do not fall within one dimension in chimpanzees, but are scattered among three dimensions: Reactivity, Dominance, and Extraversion (see Table 1 for item loadings for each dimension) [28]. We thus expected to find epigenetic serotonergic effects to primarily target those three dimensions.
Chimpanzee Dominance and Extraversion also showed significant heritability estimates (h2 = 0.195 and h2 = 0.381, respectively), which were dependent on early social rearing conditions, with mother-reared individuals showing higher heritability rates for both dimensions compared to chimpanzees reared by humans in a nursery [29]. Given that stress has been shown to impact serotonergic methylation in other species, with early life stress [21] or mild life stress [30] causing higher SLC6A4 or HTR1A methylation levels in humans or rodents, respectively, we predicted that nursery-reared individuals might have higher serotonergic methylation levels compared to mother-reared individuals. Early social rearing conditions have previously been shown to mediate the association between dopaminergic methylation patterns and Extraversion in chimpanzees, but the effects were modest [31].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

All chimpanzees were housed at the National Center for Chimpanzee Care, which is part of the Michale E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research (KCCMR), UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX. The guidelines from the American Psychological Association for the ethical treatment of animals in research were followed throughout this project. All chimpanzees were housed in social groups of 5–15 individuals with 24 h access to indoor/outdoor enclosures (except during cleaning). All groups were provided with bedding, climbing structures, and daily enrichment and foraging opportunities. All groups had similar feeding schedules, a commercially available primate diet with fresh produce, and ad libitum access to drinking water.

2.2. Personality

A chimpanzee-specific questionnaire was developed to determine personality traits in previous work and was validated using behavioral observations [28]. Personality data were obtained for 99 chimpanzees, 49 of which were included in this study as blood samples were available to determine corresponding methylation profiles (21 females, 29 males, mean age: 25 years, age range at time of personality sampling: 12–51 years). A total of 41 personality items were rated on a Likert scale from 1 to 7 (least to most descriptive) by a total of 17 staff members that had worked with the chimpanzees for at least 6 months and felt confident that they were familiar enough with them to produce accurate ratings (caregiver, trainer, enrichment technician, behavioral research coordinator, and colony manager). Every rated chimpanzee had lived at the facility for a minimum of two years prior to the personality study. Each expert was asked to rate as many chimpanzees as they felt confident rating, leading to each of the 17 raters scoring on average 72 chimpanzees (ranging from 9 to 99). Interrater reliabilities were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients and were found to be high (mean ICC = 0.61; range 0.35–0.85) for all adjectives except for “predictable” (ICC= −0.05), which was therefore excluded from further analysis (for detailed results of ICC analysis, see [28]).
Six personality domains were revealed using principal component analysis on the means across raters: Reactivity/Undependability, Dominance, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Methodical (see Table 1 for item loadings for each factor and Supplementary Table S1 for detailed adjective scores). The validity of the structure of these six factors was then further evaluated independently by three experts in chimpanzee behavior who worked as behavioral researchers with the chimpanzees for at least three years. These experts did not participate in the initial rating process and examined the rating construct for convergent and predictive validity (for more details see [28]). Five out of six dimensions show strong evidence for convergent and predictive validity, meaning they are consistent among raters and among studies, and show expected correlations with independently collected quantitative behavioral observations [28,32,33,34]. Three out of six dimensions (Agreeableness, Dominance, Reactivity/Undependability) showed significant stability up to ten years between ratings, with Dominance showing the strongest stability [35]. Given that the personality dimension “Methodical” tended to differ between studies, and showed poor construct validity and low stability over time, we excluded it here. Construct validity of the personality questionnaire was carried out for individuals of all age ranges included in this study [28,35].

2.3. DNA Extraction and Methylation

Blood samples were used to extract DNA for methylation analysis for 49 chimpanzees with available personality profiles and known early social rearing conditions. Blood sampling was carried out when chimpanzees were between 12 and 51 years old, and the time between blood sampling and collection of personality ratings was on average 2.11 years (SD = 3.96). Blood samples were taken in anaesthetized animals, stored in EDTA, and frozen at −80 °C. Extractions of genomic DNA were performed with the automated QiaCube (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) using the QIAampDNA Mini Kit for 200 μL of whole blood. Extracted DNA samples were brought to a concentration of ~70 ng/μL and concentrations were confirmed with a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) spectrophotometer. Next, samples underwent bisulfite conversion and were then analyzed using the Illumina Infinium Methylation EPIC array at the Yale Center for Genome Analysis (New Haven, CT, USA). This array was designed for measuring methylation levels at over 850,000 CpG sites in the human genome. Therefore, for the purpose of using it in chimpanzees, we limited our dataset to CpG sites targeted by probes that map to the chimpanzee (panTro2.1.4) genome with 0–2 mismatch, with no mismatches within 5 bp of the target CpG, and with no SNPs known in chimpanzees following [36]. We also filtered out probes with spectral intensities not significantly different from background levels, that do not target CpG dinucleotides, that are on the sex chromosomes, and for which fewer than 3 beads were counted for 5% or more of the samples with the ChAMP v2.18.3 R package [37]. Because blood tissue is a composite of multiple cell types with proportions that vary over time and across individuals, we corrected the methylation data for variation in cell type composition using the refbase function in the ChAMP package [37].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

2.4.1. Methylation vs. Personality

All statistical analyses were performed in R (www.r-project.org, version 3.3.2, R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). To test for HTR1A and SLC6A4 methylation effects on personality, we ran linear models using the lm function in the lme4 package in R [38]. Each personality factor was tested as an outcome variable in a separate model. As for fixed effects, we included sex and methylation scores at individual CpG sites for each gene [21]. The age at which blood was collected and individual relatedness coefficients were entered as covariates. Relatedness coefficients were calculated using the degree of relatedness of each individual to all other individuals in the colony and were extracted based on the entire pedigree using the kinship2 package in R (https://cran.r-project.org/package=kinship2, accessed on 27 November 2018). Model selection was performed using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). We examined diagnostic plots (residuals vs. leverage, QQ plots, etc.) and Shapiro–Wilk tests to confirm the assumptions of linear models. As we included individual CpG sites, we employed a p-value correction using a false discovery rate (FDR) correction of 5% for each personality dimension to account for multiple testing [39]. To allow for cross-study comparison of our results, we also included a principal component approach sometimes used in the literature that reduces model complexity by clustering the CpGs that are present for each gene (NHTR1A = 22, NSLC6A4 = 26) in fewer overarching dimensions (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). None of the associations between personality dimensions and PCA scores were significant after FDR correction (Supplementary Table S4).

2.4.2. Rearing vs. Methylation

Finally, differences in methylation scores were tested between individuals with different early social rearing backgrounds for those CpGs that showed a significant association with personality. Mother-reared individuals were tested against individuals that were raised by human care staff in a nursery setting. These models were run separately from the models above, given that we excluded three wild-born individuals from this analysis. This was done because a sample size of three does not allow for meaningful statistical comparison to the other two rearing categories, and because the background of wild-born individuals is often complex as they were partially mother- and human-reared, depending on how old they were when they entered into captivity. For the remaining 13 nursery-reared and 34 mother-reared chimpanzees in our sample, we treated individual CpG methylation scores as outcome variables and rearing backgrounds as fixed effects. A correction for age, sex, and relatedness remains in the model, as similarly described for the linear models above. Both mother- and nursery-reared chimpanzees had access to outdoor enclosures and showed minimal variance in environmental factors outside of rearing conditions. Both were reared in similarly sized social groups with changing composition over the years due to individuals being introduced, passing away, or being moved between social groups for breeding purposes. They also experienced similar feeding routines and access to water, enrichment, bedding, and climbing opportunities.

3. Results

3.1. HTR1A and SLC6A4 Methylation Sites

We identified 21 HTR1A-specific CpG sites and 27 SLC6A4-specific CpG sites and confirmed their presence in the chimpanzee genome. Coordinates and IDs of individual CpG sites in the human and chimpanzee genome are shown in Table 2.

3.2. Associations between CpG Methylation Scores and Personality

Methylation levels of nine CpG sites (three for HTR1A and six for SLC6A4) were significantly associated with four personality traits (Dominance, Agreeableness, Reactivity, and Openness) after FDR correction for multiple testing (Table 3, Figure 1). Higher methylation of SLC6A4 probe cg10901968 predicted lower Dominance (padj = 0.005), Agreeableness (padj = 0.003), and Openness (padj = 0.022) scores. Similarly, the higher methylation of HTR1A probe cg23448729 was related to lower Dominance scores (padj = 0.021) while higher scores for HTR1A probe cg27615388 predicted lower scores for Reactivity (padj = 0.001) and Openness (padj = 0.038). Conversely, higher scores for HTR1A probe cg02266732 predicted higher scores for Openness (padj = 0.038). Finally, Agreeableness scores were further significantly associated with scores for five more SLC6A4 probes, four of which showed positive associations (cg14312898: padj = 0.006; cg22584138: padj = 0.038; cg05016953: padj = 0.003; cg26741280: padj = 0.012), with one showing a negative association (cg26741280: padj = 0.034). For an overview of remaining associations between individual CpGs and personality domains, see Supplementary Tables S5–S9.

3.3. Influence of Rearing on Methylation

Methylation levels of only one out of the nine individual CpG probes that showed significant associations with personality domains were significantly influenced by early rearing history (Table 4), where methylation levels of mother-reared individuals were higher for SLC6A4 probe cg26741280 than for nursery-reared ones (t = −7.345, df = 45, padj = 0.001; Figure 2).

4. Discussion

In this study, we investigated the association between epigenetic modification of two key serotonergic genes (HTR1A and SLC6A4) and the expression of personality in captive chimpanzees. Methylation levels at different CpG sites in both genes showed significant associations with four personality dimensions: Dominance, Reactivity, Agreeableness, and Openness.
While 48 CpG sites were present in both genes combined, only nine showed significant associations with personality, three of which were located on HTR1A, with the remaining six on SLC6A4. For HTR1A, these three CpGs showed associations with three different personality dimensions: Dominance, Reactivity, and Openness. Higher methylation of cg02266732, a CpG located in the CpG island in the 200 bp region upstream of the transcription start site, was associated with higher scores for Openness, indicating that those chimpanzees were rated higher on items such as Human oriented, Inquisitive/Curious, Inventive, Intelligent, Affectionate/Friendly, and Persistent. DNA methylation of CpGs located in or near the promoter region generally results in reduced expression of the gene [40], which indicates that in individuals with higher methylation levels at this site, fewer HTR1A receptors are available.
As HTR1A typically has an inhibitory effect on serotonin production [41], having fewer of them would result in increased serotonergic signaling, which explains the higher levels of explorative and social personality profiles in these chimpanzees through serotonin-induced anxiety relief. For the other two CpG sites, the association between methylation and behavior was reversed. Higher methylation scores for cg23448729, located in the HTR1A exon, were associated with lower Dominance scores. This means that individuals would be scored as more anxious and cautious, while scoring lower for bold and independent. Similarly, higher methylation of cg27615388, also located in exon 1, predicted lower Dominance scores, but also lower Reactivity and Openness scores, meaning individuals would be more irritable, aggressive, or socially inept and less explorative and affectionate. For both CpGs, these results are in line with reduced serotonergic activity and thus likely higher levels of inhibitory HTR1A transcription. The fact that the directionality of the association between serotonergic methylation and behavior changes is dependent on the location of the significant CpG loci is in line with previous findings where positive associations were typically found between methylation and gene expression in probes located in the gene body, whereas negative ones were found for probes closer to the transcription start site [42].
For the serotonin transporter gene, methylation scores for six CpGs were found to be associated with three different personality dimensions. Higher levels of methylation of cg10901968, a CpG site located within the CpG island in the 200 bp region upstream of the transcription start site of the gene, was associated with lower Dominance, Agreeableness, and Openness scores, indicating that these individuals would overall behave more anxious and cautious, less considerate and protective of other chimpanzees, and less explorative, and affectionate. These results are in line with our expectations based on the literature, where in general, higher levels of SLC6A4 methylation result in lower SLC6A4 expression, which results in higher risk for depression and anxiety and reduced behavioral stress reactivity. The higher methylation levels of the remaining five SLC6A4 CpGs were associated with either higher (cg14312898, cg26741280, cg05016953, cg22584138) or lower Agreeableness scores (cg03363743), with no clear pattern for the impact of the location of the CpG inside or outside of the CpG island or gene body.
The Agreeableness dimension only has two item loadings (protective and considerate); chimpanzees scoring highly here are considered to be individuals that show higher levels of concern for other chimpanzees, intervene more often to prevent harm or annoyance coming to them, and console them when in distress to provide reassurance. While this dimension might reflect empathetic capacity and/or prosociality in chimpanzees, this requires confirmation with additional behavioral testing. Data from coded behavioral observations do show that individuals scoring highly on Agreeableness show more affiliative behaviors and were less likely to displace others and solicit other chimpanzees for assistance during fights [28]. While the socio-negative effects of low serotonin are more often emphasized in the literature due to its role in anxiety disorders and depression, its reversed associations with socio-positive behaviors are not unexpected. Although reports are scarcer, studies in both animals and humans have documented links between higher serotonin activity and higher levels of prosocial and affiliative behaviors, and suggest that serotonin might actually function to promote an individual’s potential for self-control of emotional reactivity and increase its aversion to the harming of others [43]. Previously, we showed that in chimpanzees, a genetic mutation causing an amino acid change in HTR1A (Pro248Gln) is associated with both higher levels of socio-negative behaviors (anxiety and aggression) and lower levels of two socio-positive behaviors (grooming and proximity) [44].
Interestingly, no significant associations were found between the HTR1A polymorphism and personality dimension scores in this larger cohort of chimpanzees (N = 214) that included all chimpanzees from the current study [44], confirming the claims that serotonergic genetic effects on personality are modest [16]. Epigenetic effects thus appear to have a bigger impact on chimpanzee personality than genetic ones, but this requires further testing in additional chimpanzee populations. Previous work did report potential genotype effects of a repeat polymorphism in the promoter region of SLC6A4 known as 5-HTTLPR (serotonin transporter-linked promoter region) on methylation levels of specific CpG sites (cg18584905, cg10901968, cg25725890, cg22584138, cg05951817; see [45,46]). Of these CpGs, cg22584138 and cg10901968 showed significant positive associations with chimpanzee personality in our study, which could thus be mediated through underlying 5-HTTLPR genotype differences. While the investigation of genotype by methylation interaction effects on behavioral profiles would offer promising avenues for future work, a larger dataset would be needed to obtain sufficient power to disentangle these effects. Developing large-scale studies in great apes is challenging as they require both blood and/or post-mortem tissue samples, which are collected opportunistically, and matching behavioral profiles.
Despite sample size limitations, our study yields important clues regarding the reproducibility and generalizability of human findings to other species. Especially for SLC6A4, where methods used across studies are less heterogeneous [46], comparisons can be made for CpG site-specific phenotype associations. These show that at least for two of the CpGs associated with chimpanzee Agreeableness (cg05016953 and cg22584138), functional comparative validity with human studies is present. Human studies report links for these CpGs with differential 5-HTT expression patterns [47] and with responsiveness to antidepressant treatment (cg05016953) [48]. This indicates that methylation levels of these CpG sites have robust, evolutionarily conserved effects on 5-HTT functioning. Unfortunately, studies investigating links between individual serotonergic methylation and personality so far tend to focus on personality disorders (antisocial personality disorder, borderline personality disorder) or rather report links with behavioral tendencies (aggressiveness, antisocial behavior) instead of personality dimensions that rely on a similar construct to ours (cf. the Big Five) (for a review, see [2]). More studies are thus needed to confirm the cross-species validity of CpG effects on personality.
The results do clearly support a role of serotonin methylation in chimpanzee personality regulation that differs from that of dopamine. In the same sample of chimpanzees, methylation levels of the dopamine receptor type D2 (DRD2) previously showed strong associations with Extraversion and Openness, two personality dimensions that reflect a tendency to actively explore or engage with novelty [31]. While a modest link with Openness was present in our study for three out of 48 serotonergic CpG sites, no associations were found with Extraversion, while scores for Extraversion were significantly associated with methylation levels of 13 out of 16 DRD2 CpG sites. Although the serotonin system is more involved in self-regulation and emotional stability and targets the limbic system of the brain, dopamine stimulates exploration-related personality traits through reward-center activation [49]. Thus, both neurotransmitters have closely intertwined functions, but methylation patterns in the two systems regulate personality in rather distinct ways.
Finally, we investigated whether atypical early social conditions in nursery-reared individuals accounted for some of the variation in serotonergic methylation patterns in our population of chimpanzees. For those nine CpGs that showed associations with chimpanzee personality, only one was differentially methylated between nursery-reared versus mother-reared chimpanzees. This CpG site, cg26741280, was located in a CpG island, close to the transcription start site of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4), where nursery-reared individuals showed lower methylation levels than mother-reared individuals. These results are in contrast to the general consensus that childhood adversity leads to overall higher levels of SLC6A4 methylation in humans (for a review, see [21]) and rhesus macaques [50], but align with findings where promoter-specific CpG sites were undermethylated in individuals in high-stress environments [51]. The contrast between these studies is likely explained by the heterogeneity in the methods that were used. As evidenced by our results above, the location of the CpG sites is important in determining the direction of the effect, something that average methylation scores across genes do not take into account [42]. It is thus possible that nursery-reared individuals experience reduced long-term stress resistance compared to mother-reared ones, which is associated with decreased methylation of promoter CpG cg26741280 and higher SLC6A4 transcription and results in lower Agreeableness. The effects of rearing are nonetheless modest, as evidenced by only one CpG being affected by rearing background; functional assays are needed to investigate to what extent cg26741280 methylation levels impact SLC6A4 transcription in chimpanzees. The modest effects of the atypical early-rearing conditions on methylation are in line with findings for DRD2 in chimpanzees [31] but contrast with findings in humans and require further investigation. One explanation could be that the impact of nursery rearing on chimpanzees under attentive care from humans is less traumatic and therefore only has modest effects on neural circuitry, a claim that is supported by differences in personality scores for adult chimpanzees from both background conditions. Nursery-reared individuals do not necessarily differ in personality scores for traits related to anxiety or stress (Dominance, Impulsivity) from mother-reared ones, but rather score differently on traits related to affiliative, friendly, human-oriented, and intelligent behavior (Agreeableness, Intellect) [29]. Alternatively, it is possible that factors other than rearing conditions play a more prominent role in determining adult serotonergic methylation patterns in chimpanzees. In humans, for example, links have been documented with prenatal infections, childhood exposure to greenness in the environment, and medicine use [52,53]. In chimpanzees, future studies could therefore investigate what additional factors have an impact on methylation status. Low dominance rank, levels of aggression received, low levels of affiliation received, changing group dynamics, transfers to novel social groups, medical history, and prenatal and maternal effects may impact epigenetic modification, but relatively large sample sizes are required for accurate investigation.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our results confirm an evolutionarily stable role of serotonergic methylation in reducing anxiety- (Dominance) and aggression- (Reactivity/Undependability) related personality aspects while simultaneously promoting prosocial (Agreeableness) and exploratory (Openness) personalities. They also show that methylation effects on chimpanzee personality were CpG-specific and heavily dependent on the location of the CpG [40,42]. This highlights the importance of investigating methylation patterns at the CpG site level as opposed to using average gene methylation scores or technologies such as mass spectrometry that do not allow CpG-specific methylation resolution [21]. These results offer an important basis for future hypothesis-driven work that can target specific CpGs and investigate their role in regulating neuroanatomical and/or behavioral phenotypes in other populations and species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology11111673/s1. Table S1: Factor loadings of chimpanzee personality traits for six varimax-rotated factors; Table S2: HTR1A CpG factor item loadings for varimax-rotated factors; Table S3: SLC6A4 CpG factor item loadings for varimax-rotated factors; Table S4: Model statistics for HTR1A and SLC6A4 CpG composite measure scores and their association with personality dimensions in chimpanzees; Table S5: Model statistics for HTR1A and SLC6A4 individual CpG methylation scores and their association with Dominance scores in chimpanzees; Table S6: Model statistics for HTR1A and SLC6A4 individual CpG methylation scores and their association with Agreeableness scores in chimpanzees; Table S7: Model statistics for HTR1A and SLC6A4 individual CpG scores and their association with Openness scores in chimpanzees; Table S8: Model statistics for HTR1A and SLC6A4 individual CpG scores and their association with Reactivity scores in chimpanzees; Table S9: Model statistics for HTR1A and SLC6A4 individual CpG scores and their association with Extraversion scores in chimpanzees; Table S10: Dataset with individual name, sex, age at personality rating, age at blood, relatedness coefficient, personality dimension scores, Principal Compont scores for each component for HTT or HTR and individual CpG site scores; Table S11: Dataset with individual name, sex, age at personality rating, age at blood sampling, relatedness coefficient, early social rearing conditions, personality dimension scores, Principal Compont scores for each component for HTT or HTR and individual CpG site scores.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.S. and E.E.G.; methodology, N.S. and E.E.G.; software, N.S.; validation, E.E.G.; formal analysis, N.S.; investigation, N.S. and E.E.G.; resources, all authors; data curation, N.S.; writing—original draft preparation, N.S.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, N.S.; supervision, W.D.H., M.E., C.C.S. and B.J.B.; project administration, W.D.H., S.J.S., C.C.S. and B.J.B.; funding acquisition, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grants BCS-1733896, BSC-2127961, EF-2021785) and INSPIRE (Grant SMA-1542848); the James S. McDonnell Foundation (Grant 220020293); and the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO Grant 1124921N). The Keeling Center chimpanzee resource was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH/U42-OD011197).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All aspects of this research adhered to the American Psychological Associations guidelines for the ethical treatment of animals in research. All blood samples were collected prior to changes in US Federal guidelines concerning endangered species in 2015 and are therefore exempt from IACUC ethical requirements.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available in Supplementary Tables S10 and S11.

Acknowledgments

We thank all members of the GW Primate Genomics Lab, the GW Laboratory for Evolutionary Neuroscience, and the Antwerp Primate Ethology and Evolution Lab for helpful feedback. We thank the editor and reviewers for their feedback on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mohammad-Zadeh, L.F.; Moses, L.; Gwaltney-Brant, S.M. Serotonin: A Review. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 31, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gescher, D.M.; Kahl, K.G.; Hillemacher, T.; Frieling, H.; Kuhn, J.; Frodl, T. Epigenetics in Personality Disorders: Today’s Insights. Front. Psychiatry 2018, 9, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Drago, A.; De Ronchi, D.; Serretti, A. HTR1A Gene Variants and Psychiatric Disorders: A Review of Current Literature and Selection of SNPs for Future Studies. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 2053–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Takano, A.; Arakawa, R.; Hayashi, M.; Takahashi, H.; Ito, H.; Suhara, T. Relationship between Neuroticism Personality Trait and Serotonin Transporter Binding. Biol. Psychiatry 2007, 62, 588–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Melke, J.; Landén, M.; Baghei, F.; Rosmond, R.; Göran, H.; Björntorp, P.; Westberg, L.; Hellstrand, M.; Eriksson, E. Serotonin Transporter Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Anxiety-Related Personality Traits in Women. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2001, 105, 458–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Retz, W.; Retz-Junginger, P.; Supprian, T.; Thome, J.; Rösler, M. Association of Serotonin Transporter Promoter Gene Polymorphism with Violence: Relation with Personality Disorders, Impulsivity, and Childhood ADHD Psychopathology. Behav. Sci. Law 2004, 22, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sen, S.; Burmeister, M.; Ghosh, D. Meta-Analysis of the Association between a Serotonin Transporter Promoter Polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and Anxiety-Related Personality Traits. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2004, 127B, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jokela, M.; Lehtimäki, T.; Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. The Serotonin Receptor 2A Gene Moderates the Influence of Parental Socioeconomic Status on Adulthood Harm Avoidance. Behav. Genet. 2007, 37, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cloninger, C.R. A Unified Biosocial Theory of Personality and Its Role in the Development of Anxiety States. Psychiatr. Dev. 1986, 4, 167–226. [Google Scholar]
  10. Du, L.; Bakish, D.; Ravindran, A.V.; Hrdina, P.D. Does Fluoxetine Influence Major Depression by Modifying Five-Factor Personality Traits? J. Affect. Disord. 2002, 71, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tang, T.Z.; DeRubeis, R.J.; Hollon, S.D.; Amsterdam, J.; Shelton, R.; Schalet, B. Personality Change during Depression Treatment. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2009, 66, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Quilty, L.C.; Meusel, L.-A.C.; Bagby, R.M. Neuroticism as a Mediator of Treatment Response to SSRIs in Major Depressive Disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 2008, 111, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Frokjaer, V.G.; Mortensen, E.L.; Nielsen, F.Å.; Haugbol, S.; Pinborg, L.H.; Adams, K.H.; Svarer, C.; Hasselbalch, S.G.; Holm, S.; Paulson, O.B.; et al. Frontolimbic Serotonin 2A Receptor Binding in Healthy Subjects Is Associated with Personality Risk Factors for Affective Disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2008, 63, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lanzenberger, R.R.; Mitterhauser, M.; Spindelegger, C.; Wadsak, W.; Klein, N.; Mien, L.K.; Holik, A.; Attarbaschi, T.; Mossaheb, N.; Sacher, J.; et al. Reduced Serotonin-1A Receptor Binding in Social Anxiety Disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2007, 61, 1081–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Power, R.A.; Pluess, M. Heritability Estimates of the Big Five Personality Traits Based on Common Genetic Variants. Transl. Psychiatry 2015, 5, e604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Munafò, M.R.; Flint, J. Dissecting the Genetic Architecture of Human Personality. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Murphy, D.L.; Lerner, A.; Rudnick, G.; Lesch, K. Serotonin Transporter: Gene, Genetic Disorders, and Pharmacogenetics. Mol. Interv. 2004, 4, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Y.; Ming, Q.; Yi, J.; Wang, X.; Chai, Q.; Yao, S. Gene-Gene-Environment Interactions of Serotonin Transporter, Monoamine Oxidase A and Childhood Maltreatment Predict Aggressive Behavior in Chinese Adolescents. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gunthert, K.C.; Conner, T.S.; Armeli, S.; Tennen, H.; Covault, J.; Kranzler, H.R. Serotonin Transporter Gene Polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and Anxiety Reactivity in Daily Life: A Daily Process Approach to Gene-Environment Interaction. Psychosom. Med. 2007, 69, 762–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hettema, J.M.; An, S.S.; van den Oord, E.J.C.G.; Neale, M.C.; Kendler, K.S.; Chen, X. Association Study Between the Serotonin 1A Receptor (HTR1A) Gene and Neuroticism, Major Depression, and Anxiety Disorders. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2008, 147B, 661–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Palma-Gudiel, H.; Fañanás, L. An Integrative Review of Methylation at the Serotonin Transporter Gene and Its Dialogue with Environmental Risk Factors, Psychopathology and 5-HTTLPR. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, 72, 190–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Schneider, I.; Kugel, H.; Redlich, R.; Grotegerd, D.; Bürger, C.; Bürkner, P.-C.; Opel, N.; Dohm, K.; Zaremba, D.; Meinert, S.; et al. Association of Serotonin Transporter Gene AluJb Methylation with Major Depression, Amygdala Responsiveness, 5-HTTLPR/Rs25531 Polymorphism, and Stress. Neuropsychopharmacology 2018, 43, 1308–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Nikolova, Y.S.; Koenen, K.C.; Galea, S.; Wang, C.-M.; Seney, M.L.; Sibille, E.; Williamson, D.E.; Hariri, A.R. Beyond Genotype: Serotonin Transporter Epigenetic Modification Predicts Human Brain Function. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17, 1153–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Staes, N.; Bradley, B.J.; Hopkins, W.D.; Sherwood, C.C. Genetic Signatures of Socio-Communicative Abilities in Primates. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2018, 21, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Staes, N.; Koski, S.E.; Helsen, P.; Fransen, E.; Eens, M.; Stevens, J.M.G. Chimpanzee Sociability Is Associated with Vasopressin (Avpr1a) but Not Oxytocin Receptor Gene (OXTR) Variation. Horm. Behav. 2015, 75, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Blatchley, B.J.; Hopkins, W.D. Subgenual Cingulate Cortex and Personality in Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes). Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2010, 10, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Hopkins, W.D.; Donaldson, Z.R.; Young, L.J. A Polymorphic Indel Containing the RS3 Microsatellite in the 5??? Flanking Region of the Vasopressin V1a Receptor Gene Is Associated with Chimpanzee (Pan Troglodytes) Personality. Genes Brain Behav. 2012, 11, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Freeman, H.D.; Brosnan, S.F.; Hopper, L.M.; Lambeth, S.P.; Schapiro, S.J.; Gosling, S.D. Developing a Comprehensive and Comparative Questionnaire for Measuring Personality in Chimpanzees Using a Simultaneous Top-down/Bottom-up Design. Am. J. Primatol. 2013, 75, 1042–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Latzman, R.D.; Hopkins, W.D.; Keebaugh, A.C.; Young, L.J. Personality in Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes): Exploring the Hierarchical Structure and Associations with the Vasopressin V1A Receptor Gene. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Le François, B.; Soo, J.; Millar, A.M.; Daigle, M.; Le Guisquet, A.M.; Leman, S.; Minier, F.; Belzung, C.; Albert, P.R. Chronic Mild Stress and Antidepressant Treatment Alter 5-HT1A Receptor Expression by Modifying DNA Methylation of a Conserved Sp4 Site. Neurobiol. Dis. 2015, 82, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Staes, N.; White, C.M.; Guevara, E.E.; Eens, M.; Hopkins, W.D.; Schapiro, S.J.; Stevens, J.M.G.; Sherwood, C.C.; Bradley, B.J. Chimpanzee Extraversion Scores Vary with Epigenetic Modification of Dopamine Receptor Gene D2 (DRD2) and Early Rearing Conditions. Epigenetics 2022, 17, 1701–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dutton, D.M. Subjective Assessment of Chimpanzee (Pan Troglodytes) Personality: Reliability and Stability of Trait Ratings. Primates 2008, 49, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. King, J.E.; Figueredo, A.J. The Five-Factor Model plus Dominance in Chimpanzee Personality. J. Res. Personal. 1997, 31, 257–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Weiss, A.; Inoue-Murayama, M.; Hong, K.W.; Inoue, E.; Udono, T.; Ochiai, T.; Matsuzawa, T.; Hirata, S.; King, J.E. Assessing Chimpanzee Personality and Subjective Well-Being in Japan. Am. J. Primatol. 2009, 71, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rawlings, B.; Flynn, E.; Freeman, H.; Reamer, L.; Schapiro, S.J.; Lambeth, S.; Kendal, R.L. Sex Differences in Longitudinal Personality Stability in Chimpanzees. Evolut. Hum. Sci. 2020, 2, e46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Housman, G.; Quillen, E.E.; Stone, A.C. Intraspecific and Interspecific Investigations of Skeletal DNA Methylation and Femur Morphology in Primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2020, 173, 34–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tian, Y.; Morris, T.J.; Webster, A.P.; Yang, Z.; Beck, S.; Feber, A.; Teschendorff, A.E. ChAMP: Updated Methylation Analysis Pipeline for Illumina BeadChips. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 3982–3984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bates, D.; Machler, M.; Bolker, B.; Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015, 67, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Brenet, F.; Moh, M.; Funk, P.; Feierstein, E.; Viale, A.J.; Socci, N.D.; Scandura, J.M. DNA Methylation of the First Exon Is Tightly Linked to Transcriptional Silencing. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e14524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Altieri, S.C.; Garcia-Garcia, A.L.; Leonardo, E.D.; Andrews, A.M. Rethinking 5-HT1A Receptors: Emerging Modes of Inhibitory Feedback of Relevance to Emotion-Related Behavior. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2013, 4, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wagner, J.R.; Busche, S.; Ge, B.; Kwan, T.; Pastinen, T.; Blanchette, M. The Relationship between DNA Methylation, Genetic and Expression Inter-Individual Variation in Untransformed Human Fibroblasts. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, R37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Crockett, M.J.; Clark, L.; Hauser, M.D.; Robbins, T.W. Serotonin Selectively Influences Moral Judgment and Behavior through Effects on Harm Aversion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 17433–17438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Staes, N.; Sherwood, C.C.; Freeman, H.; Brosnan, S.F.; Schapiro, S.J.; Hopkins, W.D.; Bradley, B.J. Serotonin Receptor 1A Variation Is Associated with Anxiety and Agonistic Behavior in Chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2019, 36, 1418–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vijayendran, M.; Beach, S.R.H.; Plume, J.M.; Brody, G.H.; Philibert, R.A. Effects of Genotype and Child Abuse on DNA Methylation and Gene Expression at the Serotonin Transporter. Front. Psychiatry 2012, 3, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Vinkers, C.H.; Kalafateli, A.L.; Rutten, B.P.; Kas, M.J.; Kaminsky, Z.; Turner, J.D.; Boks, M.P. Traumatic Stress and Human DNA Methylation: A Critical Review. Epigenomics 2015, 7, 593–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vijayendran, M. Integrated Study on the MRNA Expression of the Human Serotonin Transporter; University of Iowa: Iowa City, IA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lisoway, A.; Zai, C.; Tiwari, A.K.; Harripaul, R.; Freeman, N.; French, L.; Kaminsky, Z.; Kennedy, J.L. DNA Methylation and 5-HTTLPR Genotype of the Serotonin Transporter Gene (SLC6A4) in Antidepressant Treatment Response of Major Depressive Disorder. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019, 29, S1001–S1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. DeYoung, C.G. The Neuromodulator of Exploration: A Unifying Theory of the Role of Dopamine in Personality. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kinnally, E.L.; Capitanio, J.P.; Leibel, R.; Deng, L.; Leduc, C.; Haghighi, F.; Mann, J.J. Epigenetic Regulation of Serotonin Transporter Expression and Behavior in Infant Rhesus Macaques. Genes Brain Behav. 2010, 9, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Alasaari, J.S.; Lagus, M.; Ollila, H.M.; Toivola, A.; Kivimäki, M.; Vahtera, J.; Kronholm, E.; Härmä, M.; Puttonen, S.; Paunio, T. Environmental Stress Affects DNA Methylation of a CpG Rich Promoter Region of Serotonin Transporter Gene in a Nurse Cohort. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e45813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Holloway, T.; González-Maeso, J. Epigenetic Mechanisms of Serotonin Signaling. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2015, 6, 1099–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lee, K.-S.; Choi, Y.-J.; Cho, J.-W.; Moon, S.-J.; Lim, Y.-H.; Kim, J.-I.; Lee, Y.-A.; Shin, C.-H.; Kim, B.-N.; Hong, Y.-C. Children’s Greenness Exposure and IQ-Associated DNA Methylation: A Prospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Significant associations between individual CpG methylation scores and personality domains for HTR1A (ad) and SLC6A4 (el).
Figure 1. Significant associations between individual CpG methylation scores and personality domains for HTR1A (ad) and SLC6A4 (el).
Biology 11 01673 g001
Figure 2. Impact of early rearing history on methylation scores for cg26741280.
Figure 2. Impact of early rearing history on methylation scores for cg26741280.
Biology 11 01673 g002
Table 1. Adjective loadings for varimax-rotated chimpanzee personality traits.
Table 1. Adjective loadings for varimax-rotated chimpanzee personality traits.
TraitAdjectives/Behaviors
Reactivity/
Undependability
+ Irritable + Temperamental/moody + Deceptive + Impulsive + Defiant + Mischievous + Jealous + Manipulative + Stingy + Bullying + Aggressive + Eccentric + Socially inept + Excitable + Autistic − Calm
Dominance+Bold + Relaxed + Dominant − Fearful − Timid − Cautious − Dependent − Anxious
Extraversion+Active + Playful + Sexual + Affiliative − Solitary − Depressed
Openness+ Human oriented + Inquisitive/curious + Inventive + Intelligent + Affectionate/ Friendly + Persistent
Agreeableness+ Protective + Considerate
Methodical+ Self-caring + Methodical
Table 2. 48 Chimpanzee serotonergic CpG sites identified and included in this study: 21 in the serotonin receptor gene 1A (HTR1A) and 27 in the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4).
Table 2. 48 Chimpanzee serotonergic CpG sites identified and included in this study: 21 in the serotonin receptor gene 1A (HTR1A) and 27 in the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4).
GeneCpG IDFunctional RegionLocationCHRCoordinate hg19
HTR1Acg11432303TSS1500shore563,259,058
cg20598238TSS1500shore563,258,783
cg08764163TSS1500shore563,258,768
cg27420687TSS1500shore563,258,592
cg16807523TSS1500shore563,258,434
cg10198270TSS200shore563,258,311
cg13666507TSS1500shore563,257,941
cg07839533TSS1500island563,257,885
cg15092168TSS1500island563,257,873
cg11615755TSS1500island563,257,867
cg09698471TSS1500island563,257,847
cg08259925TSS1500island563,257,813
cg16280141TSS1500island563,257,753
cg02266732TSS200island563,257,710
cg04694812TSS200island563,257,554
cg044270031stExonisland563,257,499
cg173861231stExonisland563,257,353
cg276153881stExonisland563,257,092
cg047998381stExonisland563,256,926
cg105884701stExonisland563,256,619
cg234487291stExonshore563,256,285
SLC6A4cg12074493TSS1500shore1728,564,117
cg06841846TSS1500shore1728,564,094
cg14312898TSS1500shore1728,563,979
cg03829016TSS1500shore1728,563,859
cg18584905TSS1500shore1728,563,300
cg10901968TSS200island1728,563,108
cg26741280TSS200island1728,563,089
cg25725890TSS200island1728,563,054
cg050169531stExonisland1728,562,813
cg063736841stExonisland1728,562,751
cg264385541stExonisland1728,562,733
cg146923771stExonisland1728,562,685
cg033637435’UTRisland1728,562,474
cg225841385’UTRshore1728,562,220
cg059518175’UTRshore1728,562,142
cg003866455’UTRshore1728,560,965
cg102414265’UTRshelf1728,558,934
cg166476835’UTRopensea1728,558,098
cg019911005’UTRopensea1728,555,935
cg099213705’UTRopensea1728,555,315
cg013300165’UTRopensea1728,549,806
cg10146136Gene bodyopensea1728,547,550
cg27427014Gene bodyopensea1728,539,980
cg08743901Gene bodyopensea1728,535,556
cg06961290Gene bodyopensea1728,535,040
cg20209182Gene bodyopensea1728,530,849
cg205929953’UTRopensea1728,524,160
CHR—chromosome number; 5′ UTR—5 end untranslated region; TSS1500—1500 bp region upstream of transcription site; TSS200—200 bp region upstream of transcription site; 3′ UTR—3 end untranslated region. Boldface indicates that CpGs are significantly associated with chimpanzee personality in this study.
Table 3. Model statistics for HTR1A and SLC6A4 individual CpG scores and their significant associations with personality dimensions in chimpanzees.
Table 3. Model statistics for HTR1A and SLC6A4 individual CpG scores and their significant associations with personality dimensions in chimpanzees.
PersonalityGeneCg ProbeEstSEtppadjSign.
DominanceHTR1Acg23448729−6.1291.652−3.7100.0010.021*
SLC6A4cg10901968−59.57514.500−4.1090.0000.005**
AgreeablenessSLC6A4cg143128987.5212.0513.6670.0010.006**
cg225841382.3750.8592.7660.0080.038*
cg0501695314.2873.5624.0110.0000.003**
cg03363743−4.5681.587−2.8790.0060.034*
cg10901968−37.4289.303−4.0230.0000.003**
cg2674128015.7934.7403.3310.0020.012*
ReactivityHTR1Acg27615388−7.3451.646−4.4630.0000.001**
OpennessHTR1Acg022667328.6612.8203.0720.0040.038*
cg27615388−5.1841.627−3.1870.0030.038*
SLC6A4cg10901968−38.95510.859−3.5870.0010.022*
* indicates p < 0.05; ** indicates p < 0.01 (after FDR correction for multiple testing).
Table 4. Model statistics for rearing effects on methylation rates of personality-related CpG sites.
Table 4. Model statistics for rearing effects on methylation rates of personality-related CpG sites.
GeneCg probeEstSEtpSign.
HTR1Acg23448729−0.0180.017−1.1030.276
cg27615388−0.0060.013−0.4730.639
cg022667320.0060.0080.7150.479
SLC6A4cg143128980.0070.0070.9320.357
cg225841380.0040.0230.1600.874
cg050169530.0040.0040.9990.323
cg033637430.0090.0120.7870.436
cg109019680.0000.002−0.2560.799
cg26741280−0.0080.003−2.8700.006**
Estimates are for nursery-reared individuals in comparison to mother-reared chimpanzees. ** indicates p < 0.01.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Staes, N.; Guevara, E.E.; Hopkins, W.D.; Schapiro, S.J.; Eens, M.; Sherwood, C.C.; Bradley, B.J. The Role of Serotonergic Gene Methylation in Regulating Anxiety-Related Personality Traits in Chimpanzees. Biology 2022, 11, 1673. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111673

AMA Style

Staes N, Guevara EE, Hopkins WD, Schapiro SJ, Eens M, Sherwood CC, Bradley BJ. The Role of Serotonergic Gene Methylation in Regulating Anxiety-Related Personality Traits in Chimpanzees. Biology. 2022; 11(11):1673. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111673

Chicago/Turabian Style

Staes, Nicky, Elaine E. Guevara, William D. Hopkins, Steven J. Schapiro, Marcel Eens, Chet C. Sherwood, and Brenda J. Bradley. 2022. "The Role of Serotonergic Gene Methylation in Regulating Anxiety-Related Personality Traits in Chimpanzees" Biology 11, no. 11: 1673. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111673

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop