A 17-Year Study of the Response of Populations to Different Patterns in Antlerless Proportion of Imposed Culls: Antlerless Culling Reduces Overabundant Deer Population
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Areas
2.2. Sika Deer Culling Data
2.3. Sika Deer Density Data
2.4. Effect of Antlerless Culling on Deer Density
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gerhardt, P.; Arnold, J.M.; Hackländer, K.; Hochbichler, E. Determinants of deer impact in European forests—A systematic literature analysis. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 310, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putman, R.; Apollonio, M.; Andersen, R. Ungulate Management in Europe: Problems and Practices; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Côté, S.D.; Rooney, T.P.; Tremblay, J.-P.; Dussault, C.; Waller, D.M. Ecological Impacts of Deer Overabundance. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2004, 35, 113–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Takatsuki, S. Effects of sika deer on vegetation in Japan: A review. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142, 1922–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whigham, D.F. Ecology of Woodland Herbs in Temperate Deciduous Forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2004, 35, 583–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ramirez, J.I.; Jansen, P.A.; Poorter, L. Effects of wild ungulates on the regeneration, structure and functioning of temperate forests: A semi-quantitative review. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 424, 406–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harada, K.; Ann, J.A.M.; Suzuki, M. Legacy effects of sika deer overpopulation on ground vegetation and soil physical properties. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 474, 118346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanentzap, A.J.; Burrows, L.E.; Lee, W.G.; Nugent, G.; Maxwell, J.M.; Coomes, D.A. Landscape-level vegetation recovery from herbivory: Progress after four decades of invasive red deer control. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46, 1064–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Royo, A.A.; Carson, W.P. Stasis in forest regeneration following deer exclusion and understory gap creation: A 10-year experiment. Ecol. Appl. 2022, e2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCullough, D.R.; Takatsuki, S.; Kaji, K. Sika Deer: Biology and Management of Native and Introduced Populations; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Apollonio, M.; Andersen, R.; Putman, R. European Ungulates and Their Management in the 21st Century; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Hewitt, D.G. Biology and Management of White-Tailed Deer; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Milner, J.M.; Nilsen, E.B.; Andreassen, H.P. Demographic Side Effects of Selective Hunting in Ungulates and Carnivores. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Allendorf, F.W.; Hard, J.J. Human-induced evolution caused by unnatural selection through harvest of wild animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 9987–9994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solberg, E.J.; Saether, B.-E.; Strand, O.; Loison, A. Dynamics of a harvested moose population in a variable environment. J. Anim. Ecol. 1999, 68, 186–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaillard, J.-M.; Festa-Bianchet, M.; Yoccoz, N.G. Population dynamics of large herbivores: Variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1998, 13, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaillard, J.-M.; Festa-Bianchet, M.; Yoccoz, N.G.; Loison, A.; Toïgo, C. Temporal Variation in Fitness Components and Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2000, 31, 367–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ueno, M.; Iijima, H.; Takeshita, K.; Takahashi, H.; Yoshida, T.; Uehara, H.; Igota, H.; Matsuura, Y.; Ikeda, T.; Azumaya, M.; et al. Robustness of adult female survival maintains a high-density sika deer (Cervus nippon) population following the initial irruption. Wildl. Res. 2018, 45, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, W.F.; Mathews, N.E.; Underwood, H.B.; Sage, R.W.; Behrend, D.F. Social organization in deer: Implications for localized management. Environ. Manag. 1991, 15, 809–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindström, J. Harvesting and sex differences in demography. Wildl. Biol. 1998, 4, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milner, J.M.; Bonenfant, C.; Mysterud, A.; Gaillard, J.-M.; Csányi, S.; Stenseth, N.C. Temporal and spatial development of red deer harvesting in Europe: Biological and cultural factors. J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43, 721–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Buskirk, A.N.; Rosenberry, C.S.; Wallingford, B.D.; Domoto, E.J.; McDill, M.E.; Drohan, P.J.; Diefenbach, D.R. Modeling how to achieve localized areas of reduced white-tailed deer density. Ecol. Model. 2021, 442, 109393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ueno, M.; Kaji, K.; Saitoh, T. Culling versus Density Effects in Management of a Deer Population. J. Wildl. Manag. 2010, 74, 1472–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McNulty, S.A.; Porter, W.F.; Mathews, N.E.; Hill, J.A. Localized Management for Reducing White-Tailed Deer Populations. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 1997, 1997, 265–271. [Google Scholar]
- Oyer, A.M.; Porter, W.F. Localized Management of White-Tailed Deer in the Central Adirondack Mountains, New York. J. Wildl. Manag. 2004, 68, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, S.C.; Denicola, A.J.; Almendinger, T.; Maddock, J. Evaluation of organized hunting as a management technique for overabundant white-tailed deer in suburban landscapes. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2013, 37, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almendinger, T.; Van Clef, M.; Kelly, J.F.; Allen, M.C.; Barreca, C. Restoring Forests in Central New Jersey through Effective Deer Management. Ecol. Restor. 2020, 38, 246–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giles, B.G.; Findlay, C.S. Effectiveness of a Selective Harvest System in Regulating Deer Populations in Ontario. J. Wildl. Manag. 2004, 68, 266–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simard, M.A.; Dussault, C.; Huot, J.; Côté, S.D. Is hunting an effective tool to control overabundant deer? A test using an experimental approach. J. Wildl. Manag. 2013, 77, 254–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, K.K.; Yasuda, M.; Sonoda, M. Spatially biased reduction of browsing damage by sika deer through culling. J. Wildl. Manag. 2022, 2022, e22251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putman, R.J.; Moore, N.P. Impact of deer in lowland Britain on agriculture, forestry and conservation habitats. Mammal Rev. 1998, 28, 141–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abernethy, K. The establishment of a hybrid zone between red and sika deer (genus Cervus). Mol. Ecol. 1994, 3, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putman, R.J.; Hunt, E.J. Hybridization between Red and Sika Deer in Britain. Deer 1993, 9, 104–110. [Google Scholar]
- Bartoš, L. Sika Deer in Continental Europe. In Sika Deer; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 573–594. [Google Scholar]
- Pérez-Espona, S.; Pemberton, J.M.; Putman, R. Red and sika deer in the British Isles, current management issues and management policy. Mamm. Biol. 2009, 74, 247–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohashi, H.; Yoshikawa, M.; Oono, K.; Tanaka, N.; Hatase, Y.; Murakami, Y. The Impact of Sika Deer on Vegetation in Japan: Setting Management Priorities on a National Scale. Environ. Manag. 2014, 54, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suzuki, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Kubota, T.; Kuwano, Y.; Kawauchi, Y.; Yamagawa, H.; Yasuda, M.; Kondoh, H.; Nomiya, H.; Oka, T. Large-scale spatial distribution of deer browsing damage to young tree plantations. Forest. Biogeosci. For. 2021, 14, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, K.K.; Oka, T.; Yasuda, M. Spatiotemporal changes in antlerless proportion of culled Sika deer in relation to deer density. J. For. Res. 2022, 33, 1095–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartmann, R.M.; White, G.C.; Carpenter, L.H. Compensatory Mortality in a Colorado Mule Deer Population. Wildl. Monog. 1992, 1992, 3–39. [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki, K.K.; Kuwano, Y.; Kanamori, Y.; Kawauchi, Y.; Uchimura, Y.; Yasuda, M.; Kondoh, H.; Oka, T. A 25-Year Study of the Population Dynamics of a Harvested Population of Sika Deer on Kyushu Island, Japan. Forests 2022, 13, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Japan Meteorological Agency. Historical Weather Data Search [Kako no Kisyou Data Kensaku]. Available online: https://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/index.php (accessed on 20 April 2022).
- Iwamoto, T.; Sakata, T.; Nakazono, T.; Utaoka, H.; Ikeda, K.; Nishishita, Y.; Tokita, K.; Doi, T. Improvement of the Pellet Count Method for the Estimation of Sika Deer Density. Mammal Sci. 2000, 40, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Muff, S.; Nilsen, E.B.; O’Hara, R.B.; Nater, C.R. Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2021, 37, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, K.K.; Yasuda, M.; Kuwano, Y. Consideration for Further Improvement of the Quality of Sika Deer Harvesting. Ann. Rep. Kyushu Res. Cent. FFPRI 2020, 32, 15–16. [Google Scholar]
- Bhat, M.G.; Huffaker, R.G. Management of a transboundary wildlife population: A self-enforcing cooperative agreement with renegotiation and variable transfer payments. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2007, 53, 54–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nathan, R.; Getz, W.M.; Revilla, E.; Holyoak, M.; Kadmon, R.; Saltz, D.; Smouse, P.E. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 19052–19059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abrahms, B.; Aikens, E.O.; Armstrong, J.B.; Deacy, W.W.; Kauffman, M.J.; Merkle, J.A. Emerging Perspectives on Resource Tracking and Animal Movement Ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2021, 36, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Allen, A.M.; Singh, N.J. Linking Movement Ecology with Wildlife Management and Conservation. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 3, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leibold, M.A.; Chase, J.M.; Shurin, J.B.; Downing, A.L. Species Turnover and the Regulation of Trophic Structure. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1997, 28, 467–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gruner, D.S.; Smith, J.E.; Seabloom, E.W.; Sandin, S.A.; Ngai, J.T.; Hillebrand, H.; Harpole, W.S.; Elser, J.J.; Cleland, E.E.; Bracken, M.E.S.; et al. A cross-system synthesis of consumer and nutrient resource control on producer biomass. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11, 740–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brett, M.T.; Goldman, C.R. Consumer Versus Resource Control in Freshwater Pelagic Food Webs. Science 1997, 275, 384–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Uno, H.; Kaji, K. Survival and cause-specific mortality rates of female sika deer in eastern Hokkaido, Japan. Ecol. Res. 2006, 21, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kautz, T.M.; Belant, J.L.; Beyer Jr, D.E.; Strickland, B.K.; Duquette, J.F. Influence of Body Mass and Environmental Conditions on Winter Mortality Risk of a Northern Ungulate: Evidence for a Late-Winter Survival Bottleneck. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 1666–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- DelGiudice, G.D.; Riggs, M.R.; Joly, P.; Pan, W. Winter Severity, Survival, and Cause-Specific Mortality of Female White-Tailed Deer in North-Central Minnesota. J. Wildl. Manag. 2002, 66, 698–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bishop, C.J.; Unsworth, J.W.; Garton, E.O. Mule Deer Survival among Adjacent Populations in Southwest Idaho. J. Wildl. Manag. 2005, 69, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mysterud, A.; Tryjanowski, P.; Panek, M. Selectivity of harvesting differs between local and foreign roe deer hunters: Trophy stalkers have the first shot at the right place. Biol. Lett. 2006, 2, 632–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pozo, R.A.; Schindler, S.; Cubaynes, S.; Cusack, J.J.; Coulson, T.; Malo, A.F. Modeling the impact of selective harvesting on red deer antlers. J. Wildl. Manag. 2016, 80, 978–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bhandari, P.; Stedman, R.C.; Luloff, A.E.; Finley, J.C.; Diefenbach, D.R. Effort versus Motivation: Factors Affecting Antlered and Antlerless Deer Harvest Success in Pennsylvania. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2006, 11, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kramer, D.B.; Mitterling, A.; Frank, K.A. Understanding Peer Influence in Hunter Harvest Decisions Using Social Network Theory and Analysis. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2016, 21, 414–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitterling, A.M.; Rudolph, B.A.; Kramer, D.B. The Influence of Private Land Deer Management Cooperatives on Harvest Outcomes and Hunter Satisfaction. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2021, 45, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fattorini, N.; Lovari, S.; Watson, P.; Putman, R. The scale-dependent effectiveness of wildlife management: A case study on British deer. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 276, 111303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swihart, R.K.; Caudell, J.N.; Brooke, J.M.; Ma, Z. A Flexible Model-based Approach to Delineate Wildlife Management Units. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2020, 44, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, M.; Karukome, T.; Fujihira, K.; Mitsugi, M.; Hisamoto, Y. Clear-cutting triggers regeneration of abandoned secondary forests but risks alternative successional trajectories with high deer density. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2021, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, T.L.; Decker, D.J.; Riley, S.J.; Enck, J.W.; Lauber, T.B.; Curtis, P.D.; Mattfeld, G.F. The Future of Hunting as a Mechanism to Control White-Tailed Deer Populations. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2000, 28, 797–807. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, B.F.; Campbell, T.A.; Laseter, B.R.; Ford, W.M.; Miller, K.V. Test of Localized Management for Reducing Deer Browsing in Forest Regeneration Areas. J. Wildl. Manag. 2010, 74, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | Coefficient | SE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
3.094 | 1.605 | 0.028 | ||
0.004 | 0.203 | 0.435 | ||
1.155 | 2.694 | 0.004 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Suzuki, K.K.; Kuwano, Y.; Yasuda, M. A 17-Year Study of the Response of Populations to Different Patterns in Antlerless Proportion of Imposed Culls: Antlerless Culling Reduces Overabundant Deer Population. Biology 2022, 11, 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111607
Suzuki KK, Kuwano Y, Yasuda M. A 17-Year Study of the Response of Populations to Different Patterns in Antlerless Proportion of Imposed Culls: Antlerless Culling Reduces Overabundant Deer Population. Biology. 2022; 11(11):1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111607
Chicago/Turabian StyleSuzuki, Kei K., Yasumitsu Kuwano, and Masatoshi Yasuda. 2022. "A 17-Year Study of the Response of Populations to Different Patterns in Antlerless Proportion of Imposed Culls: Antlerless Culling Reduces Overabundant Deer Population" Biology 11, no. 11: 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111607
APA StyleSuzuki, K. K., Kuwano, Y., & Yasuda, M. (2022). A 17-Year Study of the Response of Populations to Different Patterns in Antlerless Proportion of Imposed Culls: Antlerless Culling Reduces Overabundant Deer Population. Biology, 11(11), 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111607