Next Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity in Invasive Populations of Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl. and Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden.
Next Article in Special Issue
Selenium Nanoparticles with Prodigiosin Rescue Hippocampal Damage Associated with Epileptic Seizures Induced by Pentylenetetrazole in Rats
Previous Article in Journal
PPARα, δ and FOXO1 Gene Silencing Overturns Palmitate-Induced Inhibition of Pyruvate Oxidation Differentially in C2C12 Myotubes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Developments in Diagnosis of Epilepsy: Scope of MicroRNA and Technological Advancements

1
Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, Punjab, India
2
Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Bryan, TX 77807, USA
3
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, AlMaarefa University, Ad Diriyah 13713, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
6
Neuropharmacology Research Strength, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Subang Jaya 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
7
Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Najran University, Najran 11001, Saudi Arabia
8
Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
9
Vaccines and Immunotherapy Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
10
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)—Guwahati, Changsari, Guwahati 781101, Assam, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2021, 10(11), 1097; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10111097
Submission received: 27 September 2021 / Revised: 21 October 2021 / Accepted: 21 October 2021 / Published: 25 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Epilepsy, Neurotransmission and Synaptic Function)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Through epilepsy is one of the leading causes of poor mental health, increased school dropout, and socioeconomic burden, yet the diagnosis remains a challenging concern especially in developing countries. There has been a significant advancement in the diagnosis of different epileptic conditions. Therefore, the present work is focused on analyzing the technological advancement and scope of microRNA in the development of effective diagnostic tools and developing effective clinical management of epilepsy.

Abstract

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, characterized by recurrent seizures, resulting from abnormally synchronized episodic neuronal discharges. Around 70 million people worldwide are suffering from epilepsy. The available antiepileptic medications are capable of controlling seizures in around 60–70% of patients, while the rest remain refractory. Poor seizure control is often associated with neuro-psychiatric comorbidities, mainly including memory impairment, depression, psychosis, neurodegeneration, motor impairment, neuroendocrine dysfunction, etc., resulting in poor prognosis. Effective treatment relies on early and correct detection of epileptic foci. Although there are currently a few well-established diagnostic techniques for epilepsy, they lack accuracy and cannot be applied to patients who are unsupportive or harbor metallic implants. Since a single test result from one of these techniques does not provide complete information about the epileptic foci, it is necessary to develop novel diagnostic tools. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current diagnostic tools of epilepsy, including electroencephalography (EEG) as well as structural and functional neuroimaging. We further discuss recent trends and advances in the diagnosis of epilepsy that will enable more effective diagnosis and clinical management of patients.
Keywords:
epilepsy; diagnosis; EEG; CT; MRI; PET; SPECT

1. Introduction

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder, characterized by the tendency of recurrent seizures, which may take a variety of forms and result in abnormally synchronized neuronal discharges. Seizure types depend on the specific brain circuit being affected. Epilepsy affects 0.5–1% of the population, corresponding approximately to 70 million people worldwide. It may be genetic in origin (idiopathic) or may develop after brain damage, such as trauma, stroke, infection, tumor growth, or other structural or metabolic causes [1,2,3,4,5].
Epilepsy treatment is highly demanded since the continuous abnormal neuronal discharges and subsequent recurrent seizures may cause damage to various brain regions, leading to the development of several neurological or other disorders, such as neurodegeneration, motor impairment, abnormal hormone release (such as ACTH, prolactin, FSH, TSH, etc.), psychosis, etc. [6]. Hence, prompt, and proper diagnosis of epilepsy is essential for effective treatment. Traditional diagnostic methods include electroencephalography (EEG), structural and functional neuroimaging (CT scan, MRI, PET, SPECT, etc.), and blood tests for the detection of the abnormal electrical activity of the brain or the potential identification of specific serum biomarkers. Although these methods are very helpful in detecting abnormal electrical discharges in the brain or identifying potential causes of epilepsy, they might lead to false positive or false negative results [7]. Epilepsy can be difficult to be diagnosed, even for experienced clinicians. Upon clinical suspicion, the gold standard diagnostic method of epilepsy is EEG, which can detect abnormal electrical discharges in the brain. However, these abnormalities may or may not be associated with epilepsy. Some other conditions, such as infections, CNS medications (psychotic drugs such as antidepressants, antipsychotic, antiparkinsonian, etc.) as well as trauma and excessive stress can affect the results of EEG. Additionally, non-epileptic seizures (NES) due to psychological and physiological paroxysmal events, such as epileptic manifestations, can considerably complicate diagnosis [8].
The detection of serum biomarkers is not a reliable strategy since they may be associated with other non-epileptic medical conditions, raising concerns about their specificity. For instance, the levels of antidiuretic hormone, which is a biomarker of hypothalamic activity, may be reduced or elevated in response to drugs or alcohol and may increase in response to emotional and physical exercise or pain [9]. Hence, this hypothalamic hormone cannot be used as a specific serum biomarker. In addition, prolactin which is secreted from the hypothalamus and is sometimes used as a biomarker of epilepsy can be often related to other conditions, such as milk production, breast development, and pituitary tumors [9].
Poor diagnosis often results in inappropriate pharmacotherapy leading to high morbidity of patients with epilepsy. Herein, we summarize diverse approaches to the diagnosis of epilepsy and discuss recent advances in this field, which may facilitate prompt and accurate diagnosis, leading to a more effective clinical management.

2. Diagnostic Techniques

Epilepsy in children remains poorly diagnosed and contributes to school dropout, mental retardation, and poor quality of life. The current diagnostic pattern mostly relies on the conventional EEG recording. Antiepileptics provide satisfactory control only in up to 60% of patients with epilepsy, with the rest remaining refractory. In these refractory epileptic cases, surgical removal of lesions remains a putative approach for satisfactory seizure control. For ablation surgery, the success depends on the extent of effective demarcation of the epileptic lesion area. In these cases, the use of advanced diagnostic techniques or a combination of other diagnostic tools, such as CT, MRI, PET/SPECT, MEG, MRS, etc., is required. Different diagnostic tools for epilepsy have been illustrated in Figure 1 and discussed herein.

2.1. Electroencephalogram (EEG)

EEG measures abnormalities in the brain’s electrical activity or the dynamics of the brainwaves. The cerebral cortex of the human brain consists of two hemispheres, and each one of them has four lobes: frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital. In most clinical applications, during EEG, 19 electrodes (plus system reference and ground) are usually used to detect and record the electrical discharge activities in the brain. There are two types of electrodes, including surface and deep ones. The surface or scalp electrodes are affixed to the surface of the scalp and can detect the discharge patterns originating at the superficial region of the cerebral cortex. They can be unipolar (where the active terminal is placed on the cerebral cortex while the indifferent terminal is placed at another part of the body away from the cortex) or bipolar (where the two terminals are placed on different parts of the cortex). The deep electrodes are inserted under the scalp for recording the electrical activity in subcortical brain regions [10].
For EEG recording, the electrodes are placed on different parts of the brain and the activation of a bunch of electrodes reflects the activation of the cortex part that is proximal to these specific electrodes [10]. EEG can confirm a diagnosis, and can also clarify the type of epilepsy, i.e., when only a certain part or a hemisphere is affected, then it denotes a partial seizure, whereas when the whole cerebral cortex is affected then it denotes a generalized seizure. The electrodes with odd numbering are placed in the right hemisphere, while the electrodes with even numbering are placed in the left hemisphere. The CZ and PZ electrodes (ground or common reference points) are placed in the median line [10]. Additionally, in the cases of refractory or drug-resistant epilepsy, the part of the cortex affected can be detected and the surgical removal facilitated. In EEG, four types of waves are studied: “beta” waves (15–60 Hz); “Alpha” waves (8–12 Hz); “Theta” waves (6–7 Hz); and “Delta” waves (1–5 Hz) [11]. In normal physiological conditions, the amplitude and frequencies of these waves are known. In the case of epilepsy, EEG obtained during the asymptomatic period may show an abnormal wave pattern, including spikes, or spikes followed by slow-wave and poly-spikes, among others. These abnormalities are known as interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) [12].
There are some characteristic features of the paroxysmal discharge patterns in epileptic patients; the discharges have an abrupt onset, with a progressive increase in amplitude and frequency, followed by isoelectric EEG. These abnormal discharges occur for a short period, usually 5–10 s [12]. The appearance of median sharp waves of high frequency (they are in the normal EEG pattern and not in the paroxysmal discharge pattern) for 1–2 s under normal conditions, does not indicate epilepsy but rather a higher future risk of epilepsy (Leach et al., 2006). There are different protocols of EEG measurement, including routine (standard) EEG (20–30 min), prolonged EEG (1–2 h), long-term monitoring (24 h–3 days), ambulatory EEG, and video-EEG monitoring.
Along with the data obtained from these EEG monitoring methods, the medical history of the patient is of great importance to differentiate NES from ES. There are various indications for EEG, including the clinical doubt of epilepsy or seizure, reconsideration of the preliminary diagnosis of epilepsy, categorization of an epileptic patient to different epilepsy types, variations in seizure patterns, SE (status epilepticus) monitoring, seizure frequency monitoring, pathophysiology of NES, loss or disturbance of awareness, encephalopathy, encephalitis, dementia, cerebral vascular disease, paroxysmal behavior variations, psychic or supplementary behavioral changes, coma, brain death, genetic disorders, metabolic disorders, regression, etc. [13].
Electrocorticography (ECoG) is basically an invasive procedure, in which the measurement of electrical activities of the cortex is performed. First, the skull over the interested area of cortex is surgically removed and then electrodes are placed directly over the bare surface of the cortex, followed by the measurement of the electrical activities. It consists of two types, i.e., intraoperative ECoG and extraoperative ECoG. Insertion of ECoG for the management and diagnostic purpose of epilepsy has proven to be advantageous. The use of ECoG has depicted that verbal insufficiency in epileptic patients was associated with neuronal activation in the spatiotemporal region of the brain [14]. Although, there is a considerable progress in the implementation of non-invasive systems for the localization of epileptic foci, in a few cases the localization is not conclusive enough to identify the origin of epileptic discharges. In these cases, ECoG is utilized to direct the surgical removal of epileptic abrasions, in order to achieve a better surgical outcome. Anesthesiologists also make use of the ECoG techniques for the selection of suitable anesthetics for epileptic surgery [15]. Successful accomplishment of the surgical removal of the seizure-affected region of the brain relies on the appropriate identification of the seizure loci and on the comprehensive amputation of epileptic abrasion. Both can be achieved effectively after implementing intraoperative ECoG. In another study, it was observed that epileptic patients that were undergoing intraoperative ECoG-guided epileptic surgery demonstrated an improved post-surgical outcome, compared to patients getting normal or non-guided epileptic surgery [16]. Extraoperative ECoG can also be very useful in non-surgical epileptic treatments to identify the epileptic foci and to track the disease progression.
Advantages: This is a very accurate, relatively low-cost, non-invasive (in the case of scalp EEG) method of diagnosing epilepsy, as the epileptic abnormal paroxysmal discharges are easily detectable with a high temporal resolution. Many neurological disorders can be evaluated by this method, enabling the identification of epilepsy type, seizure circuitry, and appropriate treatment. It can further allow the quantification of the frequency of seizures in a patient. EEG is also useful in drug-resistant epilepsy for the surgical removal of the affected part of the cortex, while it can also help differentiate NES from ES, and thus reduce the occurrence of misdiagnosis.
Disadvantages: Although there are several indications, as mentioned above, the EEG reading by itself may be inadequate for epilepsy diagnosis. However, misdiagnosis can occur when the discharge pattern is not well understood. It also provides poor spatial resolution, since it can only grossly identify the part of the cortex being affected. EEG cannot effectively record neuronal activity in the deeper layers of the brain cortex.

2.2. Computed Tomography (CT SCAN)

A CT scan is a type of radiological imaging technique that produces a detailed 2D image. The Greek meaning of the word “tomo” is section, so tomography means sectional radiology. Computer tomography is a special type of radiological imaging technique in which a computer is used for the mathematical reconstruction of a tomographic plane or slice. It is also known as computerized axial tomography. Generally, the scans are obtained in an axial or transverse plane, and via a computer they are converted into coronal and sagittal planes to get a 3D image from a 2D CT scan image. A contrast material is often used for better visualization, appearing white (hyperdense) in the image. The epileptic foci in the cortex can be initially identified via EEG, and then structural deformities of that part of the brain can be visualized via a CT scan. Basically, CT scans reconstruct the internal structure of an object by superimposing the images obtained from the multiple projections [17]. In the CT scan, an x-ray is applied to the brain from different angles and the collected images are combined to produce a cross section image or slices taking the attenuation coefficient (µ) as a base.
The CT has the benefit of being available in most hospitals worldwide, with a low operational expense. Moreover, CT can more easily be performed in unbalanced and critically ill patients than MRI. The CT scan can diagnose most of the tumors (apart from some low-grade ones), along with substantial AV (arteriovenous) deformities, neuronal abnormalities, stroke, and infectious wounds [18]. The CT is more responsive for the discovery of calcified lesions and bone lesions, compared to MRI, but less sensitive for little cortical abrasions along with predominantly abrasions at the base of the skull, orbitofrontal and medial temporal areas [18]. The general effectiveness of CT in distinguishing lesions in focal epilepsy is less, around 30%. Thus, CT is a promising diagnostic technique for newly originated seizures in an urgent situation, but it will not be able to substitute MRI for epileptic studies.
Advantages: Painless, non-invasive, and accurate method. Short study time (15–20 min) with a high-quality image. Bones, soft tissues, and blood vessels can be imaged at the same time.
Disadvantages: Radiation exposure is a hazard and can be harmful to the fetus. Contrast materials can cause allergic reactions and renal impairment in some individuals. Furthermore, when it comes to quick diagnosis, CT scanning is ideal but detailed analysis requires MRI.

2.3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

MRI is a neuroimaging method used in radioscopy to depict the detailed structure of several body parts. It uses strong magnetic fields, magnetic field gradients and radio waves for the creation of pictures of high resolution. This method does not involve X-rays such as CT or PET scans. During the examination, the patient is placed inside of an MRI scanner containing a large magnet, and radio waves are applied from all directions, resulting in the production of a 3D image.
The basic hypothesis of MRI relies on the fact that a certain atomic nucleus can absorb some of the radio’s energy when placed in an external magnetic field; the flexible effect of spin polarization can generate an RF signal on a radio frequency coil and be detected. In clinical and research MRI, hydrogen atoms are widely used to produce several microscopic polarizations obtained by the antennas near the test subject. Most hydrogen atoms contain a lot of fat and water molecules. By changing the parameters of the pulse sequence, the differences between the tissues can be compared depending on the relaxing characteristics of the hydrogen atoms [19].
There are basically two types of weighted images in MRI, T1 and T2. T1 refers to a spin–lattice interaction, i.e., magnetization occurs in the same way as the static magnetic field, while T2 refers to a spin–spin interaction, i.e., transverse magnetic field breaks down into static magnetic forces. T1 is useful in assessing the cerebral cortex, fatty tissue, and the overall anatomy of the examined portion. T2 is useful in identifying edema, inflammation and white matter lesions [20,21]. These T1 and T2 signals can be high/bright or low/dark.
Dark signal in a T1 image may be due to increased water in the tissue, such as edema, tumor, inflammation, hemorrhage (hyperacute or chronic), and flow void. A bright T1 signal can be due to fat, subacute hemorrhage, melanin, slow blood flow, calcification, and cerebral infarction [17,18]. A bright T2 signal can be obtained due to increased water content in the tissue, edema, tumor, infarction, inflammation, subdural collection, and methemoglobin in subacute hemorrhage. A dark T2 signal is obtained due to low protein density, calcification, fibrous tissue, protein-rich fluid, and flow void [20,21].
MRI is preferred over CT procedure for the detection of posterior cranial fossa, which contains the brainstem and cerebellum. The MRI is the best choice for a neurological diagnosis [22]. Functional MRI (fMRI) may also depict the response of the brain to different stimuli, allowing researchers to learn both the structural and the functional abnormalities of epilepsy [23]. MRI is also used in the shepherded surgical procedure of epilepsy [24]. MRI can also be used for the diagnosis of temporal lobe epilepsy, neocortical lesions, multiple sclerosis, focal corticoid dysplasia, tuberous sclerosis, and Sturge–Weber syndrome [1,25,26].
Advantages: It is an advanced and accurate method. The images obtained are of very high quality, allowing proper identification and diagnosis of the cause of epilepsy. MRI also helps to determine the blood flow rate along with the white and gray matter distribution in the brain. It enables decision making for the surgical removal of the part of the cortex affected in the case of refractory or drug-resistant epilepsy while there are no radiation exposure hazards.
Disadvantages: It is an expensive procedure, and it requires very sophisticated instruments and a well-trained operator. Although it is not a painful or invasive procedure, the patients must remain still in a closed space, which can be uncomfortable. MRI cannot always distinguish between malignant and benign tumors. It cannot be used in patients with pacemakers or harboring a metallic object inside their body.

2.4. Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

A position emission tomography (PET) scan is an imaging technique that helps to reveal the function of tissues and organs. It is an effective way to examine the chemical activity in the brain. A PET scan uses a radioactive tracer element that appears as a bright spot reflecting chemical activity. The tracer element may be injected, swallowed, or inhaled, and then traced inside the body by radio imaging. For labeling, radioisotopes are used to detect disease before it becomes visible in other imaging tests. The PET scan was developed in the 1970s [27]. It commonly employs the radiotracer 2-deoxy-2(18F) Fluro-D-glucose(18F-FDG), which maps glucose uptake and metabolism in the brain, known as FDG-PET. The PET provides virtually unlimited possibilities regarding the study and diagnosis of epilepsy since it can trace large numbers of molecules. Its applications include the investigation of receptor–ligand/protein–protein interactions, enzymatic activities, gene expression studies, and cell and gene therapy [28].
Positron emission tomography with 18F-FDG integrated with computed tomography is used to effectively identify the epileptic foci. In this case, a fluorine-18 labeled D-glucose analog is used to produce the PET image and then a CT scan can be performed. By using advanced software, PET and CT scan images can be integrated to produce a high-quality image that gives both structural as well as functional information of a brain lesion or damage [29]. It can demonstrate both the metabolic and structural abnormalities of the lesion and it can be used in the diagnosis of epilepsy types induced by brain damage or shock [29].
The PET has great potential for the in vivo investigation of neurological changes that occur during epilepsy. Its application is still under validation phase [30,31]. In most cases, the 18F-FDG-PET is used for diagnostic purposes, evaluating metabolic changes that occur during seizures. The FDG is taken up by cells in a very similar manner as that of glucose; however, after phosphorylation by hexokinase, the FDG is not metabolized further, but rather gets trapped inside the cell. This provides a glucose utilization pattern in the brain. FDG uptake is increased in several parts of the brain during seizures [32]. Since there is elevated brain activity during seizures, more glucose is required. Therefore, the investigation of glucose uptake by different brain regions, along with MRI imaging, aids in the identification of an epileptic focus in the brain.
The PET can also identify changes in receptor expression in cases of epilepsy. By using FMZ-PET (flumazenil-PET), the activity of the GABA/CBZ receptor complex, which is a well-known receptor contributing to epileptogenesis, can be determined [33]. The PET using (18F) 2’-Methoxyphenyl-(N-2’-pyridinyl)-p-18F-fluoro-benzamidoethylpiperazine (MPPF) has also revealed that the bioavailability of 5-HT1A receptors in the epileptogenic zone is decreased [34].
However, PET images are difficult to interpret, as they contain poor structural details. Thus, PET analysis should be accompanied with MRI brain imaging. A frequently used technique contains the co-registering of MRI and PET images for the association of structural and functional data. The accuracy and dependability of the co-registering method critically disturb the accuracy of the results and therefore need to be properly validated. Currently, the development of tracers that would allow for the concurrent procurement of PET and MRI images is in progress [35,36,37].
Advantages: It is a highly accurate technique with many applications in the field of gene expression, gene mapping, receptor interaction, and receptor pharmacology. Detailed images of the function of different brain parts can be obtained and the acquisition of data is very fast and dynamic, while it can detect pico- and femtomolar concentrations of ligands [38].
Disadvantages: Radiolabeled probes are used to detect brain functions, imposing a risk of radiation hazards. Some probes are trapped inside the cell after metabolism [28]. PET images often capture poor analytical details and thus integration of MRI is needed. It can lead to misdiagnosis in the case of metabolic disorders and results can be questionable since there is a large number of individual variations.

2.5. Single Photon Emission Tomography (SPECT)

SPECT is a special type of PET test where metabolic uptake, along with blood flow, is monitored in a specific part of the brain. SPECT is a well-recognized method for evaluating neuronal activities in epilepsy through the quantification of regional cerebral blood flow [39]. The SPECT is used to evaluate the pathology when the neurological symptoms are not detectable by structural neuroimaging findings.
In this technique, a radiological tracer is administered intravenously. Through blood circulation, these elements can enter the brain cells due to their hydrophobic nature and remain there because of their conversion into hydrophilic scaffolds. However, in the case of brain disorders, the hydrophilic and lipophilic balance is disturbed. In this way, proper distribution of these tracers is not possible. The areas of improper distribution are identified as epileptic foci. Technetium-99m-hexamethyl propylene amine oxime (99mTc-HMPAO) and technetium-99m-ethylcysteinate dimer (99mTc-ECD) are used as tracers in SPECT [40,41]. The 99mTc-HMPAO reflects the blood flow arrival to specific cerebral regions and the 99mTc-ECD reflects the cellular metabolism uptake [42]. The higher gray matter concentrations, compared to white matter, contribute to better image quality. The retention of these two tracers is not linear with rCBF into the brain cells because of the initial back diffusion [43]. The high blood flow may be underrated, and the low blood flow may be overemphasized in the case of these two tracers [44]. The SPECT has applications in the diagnosis of ADHD, OCD, schizophrenia, anxiety and depression, epilepsy, neurodegenerative disorders, movement disorders, traumatic brain injury, dementia, cerebrovascular disease, brain tumors, and brain infections [45].
Advantages: This is a very sophisticated and accurate method. It provides detailed and high-resolution images. Quick determination is possible.
Disadvantages: It is a very expensive procedure; radiation hazards are possible, and a proper diet should be maintained to obtain high-quality images.

3. Recent Developments in PET Radiotracers

There are a lot of recent developments in the diagnosis of epilepsy, including various developments of PET, high-resolution MRI (HRMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and the development of various data analytical techniques.

3.1. Translocator Protein (TSPO)—PET

The radioligand of the so-called translocator protein (mostly benzodiazepine receptors) can also be used for PET analysis. The BDZ receptors, i.e., GABA receptors, are of great importance in the pathophysiology of epilepsy. A radiolabeled ligand is used that binds to the BDZ receptor, and its activity is monitored. The TSPO, which is 18 kDa in size, is situated on the outer side of the mitochondrial membrane in the central and peripheral nervous system cells. It binds with cholesterol and various kinds of drugs. High TSPO expression is found in macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and activated microglia cells [46]. The amount of TSPO is very little in the normal human brain, but increases in epilepsy due to microglia activation [47]. Activated microglia cells are associated with many CNS disorders, including epilepsy [48]. TSPO elevation is easily detected by TSPO-PET analysis [49] and can be used to visualize activated microglia cells and to a lesser extent astrocyte [50]. The newer generations of ligands are 18F-GE180 and 18F-PBR111. The 18F-GE180 is used to reveal the neuroinflammation duration and helps to identify neuronal abnormalities involved in epilepsy [51]. The 18F-PBR111 is used to predict the frequency of later spontaneous recurrent seizures [52]. However, given the fact that neuroinflammation may accompany many neurological processes, caution is needed regarding the specificity of this technique

3.2. Flumazenil PET

Flumazeline is a GABAA receptor ligand, also known as 11C-flumazeline, which is vigorously used for ectopic focus determination [53]. The GABA receptor plays an important role in the pathology of epilepsy. The radiolabeled flumazenil molecule gets attached to the GABA-A receptor, detecting its abnormalities very easily [54]. Proper visualization of the hippocampus is possible due to this modification in PET [55]. Another ligand that is used for the visualization of NMDA receptors is 18F-GE179. Along with FMZ-PET, it enables the proper assessment of the role of the neurotransmitter system in epileptogenesis and chronic epilepsy [56].

3.3. 11C-Verapamil PET

One-third of epileptic patients are resistant to AEDs because of a specialized transporter protein called p-glycoprotein. In some cases, the intracellular concentration of AEDs can be limited by the transporter protein that pumps them out of the cell, leading to drug resistance [57]. Increased expression of p-glycoprotein is noticed in epilepsy [58]. The 11C-Verapamil is a radiolabeled substrate for p-glycoprotein and its uptake in the brain is correlated to the activity of p-glycoprotein. There is a uniform distribution of p-glycoprotein activity in healthy patients [59]. However, by evaluating the p-glycoprotein activity in patients with epilepsy, we could identify the epileptic center. This method can be specifically useful in refractory or drug-resistant epilepsy.

3.4. 11C-α-Methyl-L-Tryptophan (AMT) PET

The uptake of the radiolabel 11C-AMT is increased in epilepsy and associated with increased serotonin synthesis [60]. Serotonin plays a central role in epilepsy and the regulation of p-glycoprotein activity. Increased tracer requisite was constantly proved in tubers and correlated with ictal EEG findings [61].

3.5. 5-HT1A Receptor Ligands and Serotonin Transporter(5-HTT)-Based PET

The 18F MPPF is a selective antagonist of 5-HT1A, exhibiting affinity towards serotonin. Hence, it can sensitively reflect serotonin variations inside the body. The 11C-WAY100635 and 18F-FCWAY are two highly potent agonists of the 5-HT1A receptor [62]. They do not compete with endogenous serotonin, and therefore are devoid of any kind of interactions. Decreased expression of 5-HT1A receptors in the seizure focus is a consistent finding in temporal epilepsy (TLE) studies [63,64]. These effects are marked in the hippocampus and areas involved in seizure generation [64,65]. Therefore, this 5-HT1A receptor PET could be very useful in presurgical epilepsy evaluation for the detection of the seizure’s place of origin.
The 11C-DASB can measure the 5-HTT availability, which plays a major role in the termination of the synaptic serotonin effect [66]. During epilepsy 5-HTT expression is reduced. Thus, by measuring the reduction in 5-HTT, the epileptic foci might be effectively detected.

3.6. Dopamine-Based PET

The role of dopamine in epilepsy is complex and unresolved. Dopaminergic neurons in the striatum and substantia nigra play a crucial role in the termination of seizures [67]. Various types of ligands can be used for the assessment of dopaminergic pathway involvement in epilepsy, such as the presynaptic dopaminergic deficit using (18F)-fluoro-L-DOPA [68], decreased D2/D3- receptor binding using 18F-fallypride [69], decreased D1 receptor binding using 11C-SCH23390 [70] and reduced dopamine transporter activity using11C-PE2I [71]. In these cases, decreased uptake of these tracers can be observed in the epileptogenic zone of the patients with TLE [69]. These methods are used to diagnose a wide-range of epilepsy forms, including TLE, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, idiopathic generalized epilepsy, autosomal nighttime frontal lobe epilepsy (ADNFLE), and ring chromosome 20 syndrome [69].

3.7. Cannabinoid-Based PET

Most of the PET ligands developed in this group have been focused on cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1). CB1 exhibits an anticonvulsant phenomenon by modulation of neuroprotective mechanisms [72]. The downregulation of CB1 during epileptogenesis impairs this effect and promotes seizures [73]. The radioligand used for the detection of CB1 activity is 18F-MK-9470 [73]. There is an increase in the uptake at the ipsilateral temporal lobe and a decrease at the bilateral insula [74].
Along with the above analysis, radioligand labeled analysis may also aid in the identification of the effect of opioids and acetylcholine. For opioids, μ, δ, and κ receptors are examined with a radiolabeled ligand, while acetylcholine nicotinic Ach receptors (nAChR) are evaluated with a radioligand named 18F-fluoro-A-85380. In ADNFLE, epilepsy occurs during sleep due to the activation of the α4β2 subtype of nAChR [75]. Therefore, by increasing the uptake of 18F-fluoro-A-85380 (potent agonist at α4β2), the activation of α4β2 is determined in the human brain, facilitating the determination of epileptic foci of ADNFLE [76,77].

4. Recent Advancements in Diagnostic Techniques

The recent advancement in diagnostic strategies using various tools has been summarized in Table 1.

4.1. High-Resolution MRI (HRMRI)

HRMRI is a very sensitive and specific form of MRI. Image quality on MRI depends on many factors such as the thickness of the slice, the viewing angle, signal-to-noise ratio, matrix size, magnetic field strength, etc. [78]. The operational definition of HRMRI is restricted to MR attainments using clinically relevant 1.5–3.0 Tesla magnetic field strengths battered to intracranial arterial pathology. This technique can separate the arterial wall from the lumen of the proximal circle of Willis vessels. HRMRI can be performed by applying a 1.5 T magnetic field and restraining the field of view to focus on the point of concern. However, a higher field intensity at 3T has many benefits over orthodox 1.5 T MRI. The advantages of 3 T MRI involve faster image acquirement [79], increased signal-to-noise ratio [80], increased contrast-to-noise ratios, and better image quality [81,82].
Furthermore, this method is used in black-blood imaging, where the improved signal and distinction provided by 3 T, improves the detection of various complex blood flow abnormalities in the brain and can identify plaques in bigger arteries [79]. The 2D HRMRI is time-consuming and must be conducted by a neuroradiologist, who will ensure that enough sampling of the lesions of interest is obtained. High-resolution T1 image inversion recovery (IR) and high-resolution T2 image fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) is used [83].

4.2. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

DTI is a special MRI technique that uses anisotropic diffusion to estimate the organization of white matter. Fiber tractography (FT) is a 3D reconstruction technique that uses the DTI data and assesses neuronal tracts. The DTI details provide information regarding the direction of water distribution in each voxel and can be used to measure the alignment of areas with white matter. Based on these data, it is possible to locate large, myelinated tracts, which provide additional surgical information. It can be used to detect optic radiation and predict visual field defects after surgery [84]. In addition, DTI may contribute to the acquisition of other numerical data, such as partial anisotropy, diffusivity, and connectivity indices, which could suggest subtle lesions of white matter, aiding in epilepsy diagnosis.

4.3. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS)

Proton-MRS evaluates neuronal robustness by measuring the peak of N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), a neuronal indicator, employed generally by contrasting its concentration with choline and creatine crests. The whole brain is not involved in conventional MRS measurements, unlike MRI, PET, and SPECT. Currently, only a few large voxels have been sampled by the proton MRS [85,86]. The comparatively poor signal-to-noise ratio of MRS and the relatively long time required to detect spectra make this technique slow. Localized EEG assessment and surgery results have demonstrated a reduction in the intensity of NAA. This, indeed, may prove helpful in localizing the epileptogenic foci in mTLE patients [87].

4.4. Magnetoencephalography (MEG)

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a process by which neurophysiological changes could be recorded. It is mainly used in human studies for systems-level brain function. The first MEG implemented brain activity recording took place over 40 years ago [88]. However, the refinement of the field has dramatically increased over the past decade [88]. MEG is a non-invasive high-resolution imaging technique that does not rely on direct neurophysiological measurements. It is the only practical brain tomography technique to offer both (a) high spatial (2–5 mm) and (b) temporal resolution (<1 ms) [85]. Another exclusive advantage of MEG over EEG is that there is no need for a reference electrode, which simplifies interpretation and network modeling along with connection analysis.
Table 1. Advanced diagnostic techniques for epilepsy.
Table 1. Advanced diagnostic techniques for epilepsy.
Name of Imaging Technique Study Population/Disease ModelIndicationLocation/Tissue ExaminedEffect in EpilepsyAUCRef.
T1 and T2 weighted MRI4-AP-induced seizures in ratsDiagnostic biomarker of epilepsyBrain In the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, and medial thalamus, T2 relaxation time changes (recovered completely after 3 days) -------[3]
TSPO-PETKainic acid-induced SE in rats Predictive biomarker of SE and SRSBrain Unregulated TSPO expression 14 days post-SE predicts SRS frequency and comorbidities associated with chronic SE-------[52]
iECEEG scalp EEGEpileptic foci vs. other brain areas in humans assessed during epilepsy surgery Diagnostic biomarker to identify epileptic fociBrain Existence of HFOs
Conventional HFOs with waveform similarity Spikes
--------[89]
fMRIPatients with IGE vs. healthy controlsDiagnostic and predictive biomarker of IGEBrainReduced DNM functional connectivity between anterior and posterior cortical seeds, seizure duration is positively associated with RSFC between Para hippocampal gyri and the PCC and negatively associated with connectivity between PCC and frontal lobe---------[90]
TARC/sICAM5 ratio assisted with video-EEG monitoringPatients with focal epilepsy Diagnostic biomarker for drug-resistant focal epilepsyBlood/plasmaIncreased TARC/sICAM5 ratio of these two proteins serves a vital role in epileptogenesis, as one is inducer of inflammation and the other inhibits it. 1.000[91]
PETKainic acid-induced SE in ratsDiagnostic biomarker of SEBrain Decreased GABA receptor density and affinity in the hippocampus ---------[92]
MRIHyperthermia-induced SE rats, with or without epilepsyDiagnostic biomarker of epilepsy or prognostic biomarker of epilepsy development in hyperthermia-induced SE ratsBrain tissue regions–
amygdala, thalamus
T2 relaxation time decreased in basolateral and medial amygdala0.910
(Basolateral amygdala)
0.820
(Medial amygdala)
[93]
FDG-PETPilocarpine-induced SEDiagnostic biomarker of SEBrain Decreased glucose metabolism, along with decreased brain connectivity---------[94]
PETPilocarpine-induced SE in rats Diagnostic biomarker of SEBrain Decrease in global mGluR5 metabotropic glutamate receptor.
Decreased focal in amygdala and hippocampus during chronic SE
--------[95]
MRIPTZ-induced seizures test in seizure susceptible or non-susceptible rats after TBI induction Diagnostic biomarker of augmented seizure susceptibility after TBIBrain tissue–cortex,
hippocampus, thalamus
Decreased T2 relaxation time in medial thalamus 0.780[96]
Appearance of T1σ in S1 cortex, S1 HC, and Prh cortex0.881 (S1 cortex)
0.857 (S1 HC)
0.929 (Prh cortex)
Appearance of T2 in the thalamus 0.893
DTI-MRIPatients with h benign vs. refractory
mTLE (age and sex-harmonized)
Diagnostic biomarker for drug-resistant mTLEBrain tissue–temporal
lobe gray and white
matter
Increased ipsilateral MD0.670[97]
Decreased ipsilateral FA0.770
Decreased ipsilateral HC volume0.670
FDG-PETPilocarpine-induced TLEPrognostic biomarker of TLEBrain Decreased glucose metabolism in the hippocampus at the latent phase of the disease and neuronal loss -------[98]
DTI/DWI-MRIRight and left TLE patients vs. healthy individualsDiagnostic biomarker for TLEBrain tissue–anterior
corpus callosum
Reduced local diffusion homogeneity RmTLE 0.935
LmTLE 0.919
[99]
MRSKainic acid-induced SE and amygdala kindling in ratsBiomarker of epilepsyBrain Sodium selenate prevents changes in mIns, NAA levels, volumetric changes, and FA ---------[100]
T1 and T2 weighted MRI Lithium–pilocarpine-induced SE in ratsDiagnostic biomarker of SEBrain T2 in the amygdala after 30 days of SE induction, strongly correlated with hyperactivity in the novel open field --------[101]
T1 and T2 weighted MRIKainic acid-induced MTLE in mouseDiagnostic biomarker of MTLEBrain Hippocampal paroxysmal discharges (number and duration) are associated with T2 relaxation time --------[102]
Gadolinium-MRIPatients with epilepsy vs. without epilepsy after TBIDiagnostic biomarker for PTE in patients with TBICerebral cortexArea of gadolinium leakage around
cortical lesion after TBI
0.850[103]
Intracortical
EEG
Rats having epilepsy vs. rats deprived of epilepsy after lateral fluid-percussion-induced TBIDiagnostic biomarker for PTE in rats after lateral fluid-percussion induced TBIBrain Incidence of perilesional pHFOs and
rHFOSs throughout the first 2 post-TBI weeks only in rats that will grow PTE
---------[104]
MRSPilocarpine-induced SE -P21 rats which develop epilepsy vs. P21 rats which does not develop epilepsyDiagnostic and prognostic biomarker for epilepsy and SESeptal pole of the
hippocampus
Augmented hippocampal mIns/tCr after 72 days of SE induction 0.830[105]
MRSPilocarpine-induced SE in ratsBiomarker of SEBrain Increased expression of mIns post SE induction -------[105]
Combination of EEG and fMRIKainic acid-induced SE in Rhesus MonkeyDiagnostic biomarker of SEBrainFunctional brain network disruption in chronic SE------[106]
MRIRats with or deprived of epilepsy after
paraoxan-induced SE
Diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for epilepsy and SEBBB pathology in the piriform networkAmplified T2- weighted signal 0.720[107]
HMGB1- acetylated65 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and electrically induced rat SE modelDiagnostic biomarker for drug refractorinessplasmaActs on RAGE and TLR and increased expression in epilepsy1[108]
HMGB1- total65 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and electrically induced rat SE modelDiagnostic biomarker for epileptogenesisplasmaActs on RAGE and TLR and increased expression in epilepsy1[108]
HMGB1- bisulfide65 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and electrically induced rat SE modelPrognostic biomarker for SEplasmaActs on RAGE and TLR and increased expression in epilepsy1[108]
Diffusion MRIKainic acid and pilocarpine-induced SE in rats Diagnostic biomarker of SEBrain Longitudinal changes in hippocampal diffusion due to astrocyte processes-------[109]
Diffusion MRISpontaneous recurrent seizures in cats Diagnostic biomarker of epilepsyBrain Microstructural changes and hypoperfusion in the hippocampus and parietal cortex during ictal periods in cats-------[110]
Sleep EEGRats having epilepsy vs. rats deprived of epilepsy after
lateral fluid-percussion-induced TBI
Diagnostic biomarker for PTE in rats after lateral fluid-percussion-induced TBIBrain Decrease of the extend of sleep occurrence of spindles at conversion from N3 to REM0.907[111]
Electrophysiology Interictal
VEP-visual hyper excitability
assessed using contrast response
function
Patients having idiopathic generalized epilepsy vs. healthy individuals Diagnostic biomarker for idiopathic generalized
epilepsy
BrainRelative lack of gain control at high contrasts0.870[112]
fMRI17 patients with drug-resistant TLE with good post-operative seizure control vs. healthy controlsDiagnostic biomarker of TLEBrain fALFF reduction in ipsilateral amygdala -------[113]
Diffusion MRISpontaneous recurrent seizures in catsDiagnostic biomarker of epilepsyBrain Decreased postictal hippocampal perfusion compared to ictal state -------[114]
TSPO-PETElectrically induced SE in ratsPrognostic biomarker of SEBrain Unregulated TSPO expression up to 10 weeks after SE induction-------[115]
Theta dynamics in EEGRats with or without epilepsy after photo thrombotic stroke,Rats with or without epilepsy after bilateral hippocampal electrical stimulation-induced SEDiagnostic biomarker of epilepsy or prognostic biomarker of epilepsy development in rodents having a brain injuryBrain Absolute slope value of dynamic change in theta band0.910[116]
PETPilocarpine-induced SE in ratsPrognostic and diagnostic biomarker of SEBrain 48 h after SE induction, the permeability of BBB gets increased in the hippocampus, piriform cortex, thalamus, and amygdala------[117]
EEGPatients having acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke, which developed into epilepsy vs. not developed into epilepsyDiagnostic biomarker of epilepsy or prognostic biomarker of acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke developing into epilepsyBrain Background asymmetry, Interictal epileptiform activity0.810[118]
EEGTwo cohort studies with- Patients having idiopathic generalized epilepsy and generalized spike-wave discharges on EEG, who are drug-resistant vs. drug-responsive Diagnostic biomarker of drug resistance in idiopathic generalized epilepsyBrain Appearance of generalized polyspikes (burst of generalized rhythmic spikes lasting less than 1 s) in EEG during sleep------[119]
MEG coupled with behavioral evaluation Human and animal models TLE Early diagnostic biomarker of TLEBrain Coherence and alteration of theta and gamma rhythms --------[120]
EEGThree different rodent models of epilepsyDiagnostic and prognostic biomarker of epilepsyBrain Decrease in the non-linear dynamics dimension in EEG≥0.886 in different models[121]
EEGA child with type 1 RCDPDiagnostic biomarker of impending epilepsy BrainTransition from normal background to the appearance of focal epileptiform abnormality-------[122]
Interictal scalp EEG22 children having CSWSPredictive biomarker of seizures and cognitive outcome in CSWSBrain Presence of interictal HFOs around 80–250 Hz range (ripple band) and they are negatively associated with average IQ -------[123]
intracranial and scalp EEG11 patients (6 M, 5 F; age range 21–41 years)Diagnostic biomarker of postictal generalized EEG suppressionBrain Delta- gamma phase-amplitude coupling (gradual decrease of phase-frequency in the coupling between delta, 0.5–4 Hz and gamma, 30+ Hz, followed by an increased coupling between the phase of 0.5–1.5 Hz signal and amplitude of 30–50 Hz signal)-------[124]
Scalp EEG30 patients, suspected to have infantile spasmsObjective biomarker for active epileptic spasm Brain Increased HFO rates and coupling were identified between HFOs and SWA. 0.80–0.98[125]
iEEG11 patients having TLE (6 M, 5 F)Diagnostic biomarker of SOZBrain High amplitude of HFOs was observed in SOZs, and measuring the amplitude of HFOs serves a greater advantage over measuring the rate of HFOs, in the case of SOZ identification 0.948–0.960[126]
MRS35 patients with IGE (avg. age-32) vs. 35 healthy individuals (avg. age-31)Diagnostic biomarker of IGEBrain Upregulated Cr expression in left thalamus (no difference in right thalamus).
Downregulated NAA expression in right and left thalamus.
Downregulated NAA/Cr ration in right and left thalamus.
-------[127]
18F-FDG-PET/rs-fMRIPatients with mTLE-HS vs. healthy individuals Biomarker of epilepsy surgery in patients having mTLE-HSBain Positive correlation between SUVR and rs-fMRI metrics, spatial correlation between SUVR and fMRI across the gray matter, and Higher fALFF/SUVR couplings, suggested altered bioenergetic coupling across gray matter and it was also found to be associated with seizure outcome.------[128]
[11 C] UCB-J PET12 patients having TLE vs. 12 healthy controlsDiagnostic and predictive biomarker of TLE Reduced [11 C] UCB-J binding in the seizure onset zone of patients having TLE [129]
MRSKainic acid-induced MTLE in mouse (KA-MTLE model)Biomarker of epileptic zone in MTLEBrain Upregulated GABA expression in the epileptic zone of mouse------[130]
iEEG27 patients with SOZ in different parts of the hemispherePredictive biomarker of seizures Brain Temporal trends in HFO rates can predict preictal state and can differentiate between preictal and interictal periods for a few patients.0.80[131]
AUC: area under the curve; RCDP: rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata; HFO: high-frequency oscillations; SWA: slow-wave activity; iEEG: intracranial electroencephalogram; SOZ: seizure onset zone; CSWS: continuous spike-and-wave during sleep; fALFF: fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations; IGE: idiopathic generalized epilepsy; DNM: default mode network; RSFC: resting-state functional connectivity; PCC: posterior cingulate cortex; 4-AP: 4-aminopyridine; SRS: spontaneous recurrent seizures; Cr: creatine; NAA: N-acetyl aspartate; mTLE-HS: medial temporal lobe epilepsy patients with hippocampal sclerosis; rs-fMRI: resting-state functional MRI; SUVR: 18 F-FDG standardized uptake value ratio; fALFF: fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations.
The physical signal measured in MEG consists of the added magnetic fields generated by ionic currents inside the working neuronal zones, just like an electrical stream passing through a wire that produces magnetic fields around it. Currents inside the brain tissue, produced by ion flow, also generate magnetic fields corresponding to the same physical principles [132]. These magnetic fields in the neurons are smaller (10–15 T) in nature than the other magnetic fields that occur naturally, such as Earth’s magnetic field, which is about 10–5 T. Therefore, MEG recording is usually performed in magnetic-protected rooms using unique sensors and noise suppression software [133]. According to the neurological basis of the currents, MEG is mainly sensitive to dendritic currents in the pyramidal neurons of the neocortex [134]. Other cortical neurons in the brain also play a role in the signal, such as neural cells found in the subcortical and cerebellar regions [133]. The alignment depth and inherent synchronization of neuronal population also impacts the strength of MEG signals, although the most advanced high-density MEG systems are not affected by them [135].
In MEG, signal quantification occurs at the sensor level using typical systems with many sensors arranged in a helmet-like orientation. Therefore, a transformation of the sensor/channel measurements to source space (anatomical coordinates) are needed, generally achieved by using head models and optimized algorithms and related source estimation methods. This process is often termed MEG source modernization. Six types of waves are obtained: Delta (1–4 Hz), Theta (4–7 Hz), Alpha (8–14 Hz), Beta (14–26 Hz), Gamma (30–50 Hz), and High gamma (>50 Hz).
After performing MEG, a map of the magnetic activity of the brain is obtained. In the case of epilepsy, this magnetic map is distorted. By finding the location of the magnetic abnormality, the epileptogenic foci are determined. MES is used in the diagnosis of ADHD, PTSD, ASD, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND), and epilepsy [88].

4.5. Quantitative Analysis of PET and MRI

PET is a visual assessment tool, but it can also be used for quantitative analysis to find the hypometabolic patterns in the brain as well as to quantify the degree of hypometabolism. In the past, there were concerns regarding the reliability of Quantitative PET (Q-PET) analysis, but at present, there is substantial evidence in the literature to support its reliability.
Q-PET analysis revealed that, during refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (rTLE), the amount of glucose metabolism gets decreased mainly in the inferior lateral temporal, inferior mesial temporal, and inferior frontal areas, as well as the thalamus areas, of the brain. Interestingly, after surgical treatment, glucose metabolism gets markedly increased in these regions [136]. A study demonstrated that FDG-PET and FMZ-PET were able to identify SOZs by quantifying the reduced uptake/binding of FDG and FMZ radiopharmaceuticals. Moreover, the results matched 86% and 71% with the stereo-electro-encephalography (SEEG)-obtained data, which is considered the gold standard for localizing the seizure onset zone (SOZ) in the epileptic brain [137]. In another study, Q-PET analysis revealed that patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) showed reduced dopamine uptake due to hindered dopamine transporter activities [138]. Epileptic patients suffering from hippocampal sclerosis (HS) are difficult to treat. Therefore, early, and accurate detection of HS is essential for providing proper care. Another study showed that Q-PET analysis of hippocampal volume or glucose uptake can increase the detection of HS [139]. Thus, Q-PET analysis can be a very useful tool to identify HS in epileptic patients.
Semiquantitative analysis by using standardized uptake value is the most accurate measure of hypometabolic areas, since quantitative analysis is associated with interobserver and intraobserver variability [140]. Semi-quantitative brain FDG-PET analysis was shown to increase the sensitivity of the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Thus, it can be used in the future as a diagnostic tool for the early detection of AE [141].
Furthermore, some other studies integrated Q-PET analysis with other neuroimaging techniques to provide an accurate and well-quantifiable result. The MRI and PET techniques were merged to identify focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs). The combined use of MRI and PET was shown to increase the accuracy and demolish the false-positive results in this experiment [142]. Additionally, Q-PET analysis showed that, in the case of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with HS (mTLE-HS), there is a decreased expression of benzodiazepine receptor density in the brain [143]. In this case, the findings were further confirmed with SPECT and MRI imaging to get an accurate result. Another study using the combination of MRI and Q-PET analysis revealed the hypometabolic regions in the brain of patients with non-lesioned extratemporal lobe epilepsy (ETLE) and mapped the hypermetabolic areas. These hypermetabolic areas were associated with a frequently spiking cortex and were rarely acknowledged in clinical readings. As these hypermetabolic areas may also present an epileptic focus, their detection can be helpful in the proper treatment of patients with ETLE [144].

4.6. EEG Analyses Methods

EEG analysis is a mathematical-based exploratory signal analysis, with software-based technologies being employed to extract the data from an electroencephalograph. The main prospect of these methods is to ease clinicians and basic researchers for gaining better knowledge of the brain and to assist in diagnosis and treatment choices. EEG analytical methods can be divided into five types as follows: first, the “frequency domain analysis” (spectral analysis) is one of the most convenient and powerful EEG analysis methods. It extorts the information from the frequency domain of EEG using Fourier transform and various statistical methods [145]. Another often-used frequency-domain method is “Power spectral analysis”. This method depicts the dispersal of signal power onto frequency [146]. The “Fast Fourier transform method” is another type of frequency-based analyses method where the characterization of obtained EEG waves is done by power spectral density estimation for the selective representation of EEG sample signals [147].
In the Time domain analysis, the analysis is based on time factor; however, it can also be obtained from the power spectrum. Thus, this method builds a link between time-based interpretation and conventional spectral interpretation [148]. In addition, it provides a way to measure the basic properties of signals online, using time-based calculations, which require less sophisticated equipment compared to classical frequency analysis [148]. This analysis is based on two aspects “Linear Prediction” and “Component Analysis”. Linear prediction is based on the estimated value equivalent to past outcomes, while component analysis is an unsupervised method in which the data set is mapped to a feature set [149].
The time-frequency domain method is a method by which the extraction and representation of transient biological signals can be achieved in two ways—wavelet transform and Hilbert–Huang transform. In wavelet transform, transitory factors can be precisely recorded (frequency and time context) through the wavelet decomposition of EEG records [150]. It is like a mathematical microscope that can analyze different scales of neuronal patterns and then investigate the slightest degeneration of brain patterns, ignoring other scales of collision [150]. It provides a more adaptable approach for the representation of the time-frequency of a signal for analysis. In wavelet transforms, long time frames are used to provide a finer low-frequency resolution and short time frames for high-frequency information [151]. Generally, wavelet transform can be in a continuous or discrete format [152]. On the other hand, Hilbert–Huang transform decomposes the EEG signals in different sets of oscillatory components, mainly Intrinsic Mode Function for recording instantaneous frequency data [153,154]. “Smooth pseudo-Wigner-Ville (SPWV)” distribution is another modified time frequency domain technique that includes “flattening by independent windows in time and frequency, namely, W w(τ) and W t(t)” [154].
Non-linear methods, non-linearity, and non-stationarity exist everywhere in nature, with EEG waves being no exception. The existence of non-linearity results in the interpretation of EEG waveforms as complex, and it also limits the application of linear methods. The interpretation of non-linear EEG patterns depends on the theory of non-linear dynamic systems (chaos theory). Several parameters are included for the analysis of non-linear waveforms viz., lyapunov exponent, correlation dimension, and entropies [155].
Artificial neural networks (ANNs), an analytical technique composed of a computerized neuronal network that is persuaded by the neuronal networks in the brain to segregate EEG data. Before putting the EEG data into the ANN, wavelet transform is mandatory [156]. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) were used in the studies involving ANN implementations in EEG analysis. However, now, after the emergence of deep learning, it has been largely replaced by convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNN is now the preferred method in EEG analysis employing deep learning. CNN is a special class of ANN that is mostly applied in the analysis of visual imagery. This method is mainly based on “the shared-weight architecture of the convolution kernels or filters that slide along the input features and provide translation equivariant responses known as feature maps” [157]. Deep CNN has proven to be a superior decoding choice since the cropped training deep CNN has reached competitive accuracies on the data sets [158]. Data entry and processing in the ANN compile large amount of data, and require high configuration data processing units for real-time processing. To overcome this challenge, cloud-based deep learning procedures may be utilized for hefty EEG data [159].

4.7. Other Advances in Data Analytical Techniques

CURRY analysis: This is a specialized technique that integrates the results of MRI and EEG. In this technique, the data obtained from the EEG are projected into the MRI in such a way that the detailed coordination of structural and functional data can be accomplished. By using this method, the location of a seizure can be easily determined.
Statistical parametric mapping (SPM): In this method, different parts of the brain with increased metabolic activity are compared, facilitating the determination of epileptic foci.
SISCOM: The Subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI (SISCOM) was first created with “Analyse” at the Mayo Foundation. The basic function of SISCOM is to equate the patient ictal scan with an interictal scan to create a subtraction image that is later inserted into and visualized on the patient’s MRI [160,161,162]. To nullify the dose variation, both ictal and interictal scans are normalized based on the intensity. In this way, individual data are co-registered collectively using a set method, and data subtraction can be further conducted. The resulting images are co-registered to MRI. Usually, 2 standard deviations are applied, even though some studies demonstrate better results with 1.5 SD [163]. Final brain maps obtained by SISCOM are known as perfusion maps, which depict areas of local hyper perfusion, indicating enhanced neuronal action in parts of the brain that are involved in seizure activity [163]. This is helpful in identifying the seizure onset zones in FCDs [164] and extra-temporal epilepsy [165].
STATISCOM: SISCOM has been proved to be a treasured data tool in epilepsy surgery, but its algorithm does not contain the physiologic inconsistency evaluation. STATISCOM involves a statistical ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI. The method is similar to SISCOM, but includes an additional step of data normalization by contrasting it with a control group using a statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analysis [166]. Ictal SPECT recognizes a single explicit region of seizure onset in 71% of mesial temporal and 83% of neocortical epilepsy case diagnoses [167]. STATISCOM is better than SISCOM for the identification of seizure foci before TLE surgery [166].

5. Limitations of Neuroimaging Techniques

Neuroimaging is one of the most advanced techniques of the healthcare sector. Daily technological advancements are making it more acceptable and devoid of error. However, neuroimaging also comes with some shortcomings and limitations which mainly involve. certain conditions under which the imaging techniques cannot be performed. These include the presence of a pacemaker, otic implant, aneurysm clip, metal in the eye, claustrophobia, implanted defibrillator, pregnancy, obesity, stents, and coils. The presence of any one of the above-mentioned factors can lead to false results; thus, before opting for neuroimaging techniques as a diagnostic tool, these factors are verified. Patient co-operation is also necessary in the case of neuroimaging [168]. If a patient is non-co-operative, the proper conduction of neuroimaging is not possible, since the altered emotional state of the patient can lead to false results. Inter-individual differences in the biochemical composition, processing of various life events, and basic emotions are probably co-responsible for inconsistent findings across different studies [169,170]. Therefore, before subjecting a patient to neuroimaging, their physio-psychiatric state is necessary to be evaluated, in order to avoid variation and false results.
Various artifacts can also affect the quality of the image produced. Aliasing or “wraparound” artifact occurs when the body part to be examined is larger than the field of view and the excess part can get projected in the other side of the image, which leads to masking of the underlying pathology. Motion artifact can also take place from arterial pulsation, CSF pulsation, patient movement, and respiration. Patient movement may occur even due to simple coughing or eye movement. Ferromagnetic substances present on the body of the patients, pillows, sheets, and in the air can lead to distortion of the image and can also conceal the areas of localized interest. Thus, the removal of various ferromagnetic substances from the experimental setup is necessary to avoid any kind of variation and false results [171,172,173].
Operator errors are also the most common and significant errors in neuroimaging techniques. Poor quality or a poorly ordered study could yield negative results, but the pathology may still exist and remain “image-able.” Common operator-induced errors include the lack of fat suppression for orbital MRI, lack of gadolinium administration, or improper voltage supply, misplacement of the detection sensors, false localization, and improper calibration of the instruments, affecting the ultimate result obtained. Therefore, an experienced and cautious experimenter is required for instrument operation, in order to minimize operator errors. Furthermore, nowadays, a few computer-guided lead placement instruments have also been developed to minimize the false localization and sensor placement errors.
Proper interpretation of the obtained results is also equally important, requiring a well-trained and experienced radiologist. Proper clinical localization or medical history records are also required to enable the radiologist to avoid overlooking any intracranial or intraorbital pathologies. Furthermore, there are some limitations in the neuroimaging techniques, which sometimes may not be able to differentiate between pathological processes. For instance, patients with a history of CNS malignancies can develop a focal neurologic change, such as homonymous hemianopia, after radiotherapy. Moreover, neuroimaging techniques cannot properly distinguish between necrotic and tumor recurrence lesions because it is very difficult for a radiologist to identify the type of lesion [174,175]. More research and developments are required to overcome these shortcomings and make neuroimaging error-free.

6. Biomarkers Associated with Diagnosis of Epileptogenesis

The identification of reliable biomarkers is the most practical solution for developing an economically feasible diagnostic technique [176,177]. It will provide a suitable screening tool that can identify potential subjects most likely to develop epilepsy due to genetic and structural deformities and help in its reduction at an early stage [178]. The FDA-NIH Joint Leadership Council, in 2015, Developed the Biomarkers, Endpoints, and other Tools (BEST, 2016) for better understanding and use of biomarker terminology. According to BEST, “A biomarker is a characteristic that is measured as an indicator of normal biologic processes, pathogenic processes, or responses to an exposure or intervention, including therapeutic interventions. Biomarkers may have molecular, histologic, radiographic, and physiologic characteristics.” The BEST biomarkers are divided into six categories: (a) risk or susceptibility biomarkers, (b) diagnostic biomarkers, (c) monitoring biomarkers, (d) prognostic biomarkers, (e) predictive biomarkers, and (f) safety biomarkers.
Biomarkers in epilepsy can be broadly divided into two types, i.e., “prognostic” (indicates epilepsy after a brain insult) and “diagnostic” (indicates ongoing epileptogenesis at that time). These biomarkers can serve various objectives, including (a) the use of risk biomarkers for the identification of a given epilepsy syndrome, e.g., genetic biomarkers, (b) prognostic biomarkers to predict the likelihood of accruing epilepsy, e.g., at a 2-year timepoint after traumatic brain injury (TBI), and (c) diagnostic biomarkers to identify ongoing epileptogenesis, even without the precise timing that the earlier brain insult occurred [176]. Table 2 summarizes the various types of biomarkers associated with epilepsy.

6.1. miRNAs as Biomarkers of Epileptogenesis

miRNAs (micro RNAs) are a special kind of RNA, controlling the post-translational gene expressions of various genes. About 60% of all gene expressions are directly controlled by miRNAs [179]. A single miRNA can affect the expression of several genes in a single pathway or a single gene in multiple pathways [180]. As an example, genetic deletion of miR-128 in mice resulted in the upregulation of more than a thousand mRNA transcripts, amongst which 154 were its predicted targets [181]. The effect of miRNAs in humans with epilepsy was first studied in 2010, reporting the upregulation of miR-146 expression in patients with TLE and hippocampal sclerosis [182].
Early functional studies have revealed that miRNAs are linked to seizure development, neuroinflammation, and changes in neuronal microstructure. For example, miR-134, which regulates LIM domain kinase 1, plays a vital role in altering the number and volume of dendritic spines on excitatory neurons [183,184]. On the other hand, miR-146a, miR-221, and mir-222 control immune response through the targeting of IL-1β and cell adhesion molecules [182,185,186]. miRNAs can also control cell differentiation, proliferation, and migration, which play a critical role in the epileptogenic pathway [187].
There is emerging evidence that miRNAs can serve as potential biomarkers of brain injuries, including epilepsy. A pool of brain-expressed micro RNAs may leak into the extracellular fluid from controlled exoplasm release or damage or even disruption of the BBB, allowing their passage into the blood. These miRNAs form a stable complex with blood proteins or get encapsulated in extracellular vesicles, remaining in the circulation for some time after their release [188]. Thus, a molecular biomarker of epilepsy is of great importance since it may enable diagnosis, assessing the risk of developing epilepsy, monitoring, and treatment (Figure 2).
Early animal studies suggested that a specific miRNA profile exists for different types of brain injuries, including epilepsy. A study has identified a set of circulating miRNAs, which includes the upregulated expression of miR-146 (a miRNA already linked with epileptogenesis) in blood [189]. In another study, a set of upregulated miRNAs’ expression was identified in the serum, which was observed to induce neuroinflammation, the dysregulation of protein synthesis, and neurodegeneration in epilepsy [190]. In that same study, two more miRNAs, miR-15a-5p and miR-194-5p, were identified to be downregulated in serum [190]. A set of downregulated miRNAs, including miR-301a-3p, miR-194p, miR-301a-3p, miR-30b-5p, and miR-4446-3p, were also detected in a different study serving as biomarkers of drug-resistant epilepsy [191]. Additionally, miR-323a-5p was found upregulated in serum as well as in the cerebral cortex of focal cortical dysplasia and drug-resistant epilepsy patients [187]. For temporal lobe epilepsy and mTLE-HS, several studies have identified a wide range of circulating miRNAs to be dysregulated, which can serve as a potential biomarker for epileptogenesis [192,193,194,195,196].
Table 2. MicroRNA-based diagnostic biomarkers for epilepsy.
Table 2. MicroRNA-based diagnostic biomarkers for epilepsy.
BiomarkerDescription Role in EpilepsyIndication Specimen ExpressionRef.
miR-34, miR-132,
miR-134, miR-181a,
miR-199a, miR-210
miRNAs associated with epilepsy play a vital role in epilepsy by targeting apoptosis, neuronal
microstructure, transcriptional
regulation, inhibitory
neurotransmission, excitatory
neurotransmission and by regulating transcription.
Antagomir of them reduces SE and protects the hippocampus Diagnostic biomarker of SE and possible therapeutic targets of SE treatment Serum, hippocampusIncreased [187]
miR-128, miR-219,
miR-23b, miR-124
miRNAs associated with epilepsy plays a vital role in epilepsy by targeting apoptosis, neuronal
microstructure, transcriptional
regulation, inhibitory
neurotransmission, excitatory neurotransmission and by regulating transcription.
Agomir reduces SE and protects the hippocampusDiagnostic biomarker of SE and possible therapeutic targets of SE treatmentSerum, hippocampusDecreased [187]
miR-134, miR-203miRNAs associated with epilepsy plays a vital role in epilepsy by targeting apoptosis, neuronal
microstructure, transcriptional
regulation, inhibitory
neurotransmission, excitatory
neurotransmission and by regulating transcription.
Antagomir reduces SRS Diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic target for SRSSerum, hippocampusIncreased [187]
miR-22miRNAs associated with epilepsy plays a vital role in epilepsy by targeting apoptosis, neuronal
microstructure, transcriptional
regulation, inhibitory
neurotransmission, excitatory
neurotransmission and by regulating transcription.
Agomir reduces SRSDiagnostic biomarker of SRS and possible therapeutic targets of SRS treatmentSerum, hippocampusIncreased [187]
miR-106b-5p A type of miRNA.
MiR-106b-5p
is an oncogene to attenuate the tumor suppressor CDKN1A
Inflammation, dysregulation of protein synthesis, and neurodegenerationDiagnostic biomarker for epilepsySerumIncreased[190]
miR-7d-5pA type of miRNA,
represses ER α expression
Inflammation, dysregulation of protein synthesis, and neuro degenerationDiagnostic biomarker for epilepsySerumIncreased[190]
miR-130a-3pA type of miRNA targets HMGA1 regulationInflammation, dysregulation of protein synthesis and neuro degenerationDiagnostic biomarker for epilepsySerumIncreased[190]
miR-146a-5pmiRNA functions as a control switch between angiogenesis and cell deathInflammation, dysregulation of protein synthesis and neuro degenerationDiagnostic biomarker for epilepsySerumIncreased[190]
miR-15a-5p miRNA acts as a post-translational modifier of proto-oncogene MYB and can also target VEGFRegulates: Fibrosis, inflammation, viability, and matrix degenerationDiagnostic biomarker for epilepsySerum Decreased [190]
miR-194-5pTumour suppresser miRNAAltered Nucleic and cytoplasmic functions, altered metal binding, and motif foldingDiagnostic biomarker for epilepsySerumDecreased[190]
miR-301a-3p Supresses estrogen signaling, reduces the expression of ERαDecreases the ESR1 mRNA and modulates inflammationDiagnostic biomarker for drug-refractory epilepsySerumDecreased [191]
Combination of miR-194p, miR-301a-3p, miR-30b-5p, miR-4446-3pThese are various types of miRNAs affecting inflammation Dysregulation of protein synthesisDiagnostic biomarker for drug-refractory epilepsySerumDecreased[191]
miR-19b-3pmiRNA associated with epilepsyPlays a role in epilepsy by inducing proteins that regulate apoptosis, tissue remodeling, gliosis, and neuroinflammationDiagnostic biomarker for TLECSFDecreased[192]
miR-451a and miR-21-5pmiRNA associated with epilepsyPlays a role in epilepsy by inducing proteins that regulate apoptosis, tissue remodeling, gliosis, and neuroinflammationDiagnostic biomarker for SECSFIncreased[192]
miR-134miR-134 is a family of MicroRNA precursors found in mammals, including humansTargets Lim kinase 1, a protein involved in dendritic spine dynamics 22 and doublecortinDiagnostic biomarker for mTLEplasmaDecreased[193]
miR-27a-3p, miR-328-3p and miR-654-3pmiRNAs associated with epilepsyAssociation with growth factor and apoptosis signaling (p53 pathway) Diagnostic biomarker of TLEBlood plasma Increased [194]
circ-EFCAB2 Circular RNAs, long noncoding RNAs, acts as templates and regulates transcription Have a role in epilepsy as they regulate gene expression as microRNA spongesDiagnostic biomarker and potential treatment target in TLETemporal corticesIncreased [195]
circ-DROSHACircular RNAs, long noncoding RNAs, acts as templates and regulates transcription Have a role in epilepsy as they regulate gene expression as microRNA spongesDiagnostic biomarker and potential treatment target in TLETemporal corticesDecreased [195]
miR-145miRNA associated with macrophage differentiation, phagocyte migration, proliferationReduced expression in the hippocampus of epileptic brain Diagnostic biomarker of mTLE-HSBlood, hippocampus Decreased (hippocampus),
increased (blood)
[196]
miR-181cmiRNA targets dopaminergic, serotonergic synapses, and has a role in BBB disruption and breast cancer cell metastasis Overexpressed in the hippocampal region of mice after epileptic seizures Diagnostic biomarker of mTLE-HSBlood, hippocampusIncreased in hippocampus and blood[196]
miR-199aEspecially expressed in the olfactory bulb, cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus, brain stem, dorsal root gangliaOver-expression in epileptic brain tissues Diagnostic biomarker of mTLE-HSBlood, hippocampusIncreased in hippocampus and blood[196]
miR-1183miRNA which was observed to lose its function in breast tumors, and it was observed to be downregulated in Kaposi sarcoma biopsies. Although, upregulation was observed in colorectal tumors and RHD. It targets genes-CXCR4, EGF, and EGFR. Thus, it is considered a potential biomarker. Diagnostic biomarker of mTLE-HSBlood, hippocampusIncreased in hippocampus and blood[196]
miR-106b
miR-146a
miR-301a
Epilepsy related miRNARegulation of TLR, IL-1, receptor associated kinases and TRAF6Diagnostic biomarker for epilepsySerumIncreased[197]
miR-194-5p,
Combination of miR-106b and miR-146a
Epilepsy related miRNAInhibits cell proliferationDiagnostic biomarker for epilepsySerumDecreased[197]
miR-129-2-3pNon-invasive miRNA biomarker for epilepsyRepress cell growth, colony formation and targets BCL2L2Diagnostic biomarker for drug refractory TLE with FCDCortical tissue and plasmaIncreased[198]
miR-4521Promising
Ovel biomarkers
Nucleic and cytoplasmic functions altered, altered metal binding and motif foldingDiagnostic biomarker for FCD with refractory TLECortical brain tissue, serumIncreased[199]
MMP2, MMP3MMP2, MMP3Epileptic focus formation and stimulation of seizuresDiagnostic biomarker for EpilepsybrainDecreased[200,201]
miR-30, miR-378, miR-106b and mir-15amiRNA associated with epilepsyExpression is positively associated with seizure frequency, however, miR-30 expression gradual declines with the progression of the disease and negatively affects the CAMK4 expressionDiagnostic and prognostic biomarker of epilepsySerum Increased [202]
miR-211miRNA which shifts the threshold for spontaneous and pharmacologically induced seizuresDownregulation induces hyper synchronization and nonconvulsive, convulsive seizures along with alterations in cholinergic and TGFBR2 signaling pathwaysDiagnostic biomarker of epilepsyForebrain Decreased [203]
miR-134miRNA associated with epilepsy serves an important role in inter-neuronal signaling by targeting dendrites Upregulation of miR-134 was found in the rodent models of SE.Diagnostic biomarker of epilepsyPlasma and CSFIncreased [204]
miR-323a-5pmiRNA associated with epilepsyAssociated with duration of epilepsy and seizure frequency Diagnostic biomarker of FCD and DRECerebral cortex, blood plasmaIncreased [205]
miR-3613-5P
miR-4668-5P
miR-8071,
miR-197-5P
miRNA associated with epilepsyInflammation in brain and neuronal tissuesDiagnostic biomarker for mTLE-HS Plasma exosomesDecreased[206]
miR-146a and miR-106bmiRNA associated with epilepsyImportant regulators of the innate immune response in the modulation of astrocyte-mediated inflammationDiagnostic biomarker of childhood epilepsy Plasma Increased [207]
miR-106bBelongs to the miR-17 family and are associated with CVDs and tumorsHighly expressed in the serum of epilepsy patientsDiagnostic and prognostic biomarker of epilepsy in childrenSerum Increased [208]
miR-15a-5pmiRNA associated with epilepsy and acts as a regulator in endometrial cancer Upregulation reduced the apoptosis and increases the cell viability of hippocampal neurons, which were dysregulated by TLE Diagnostic biomarker of TLE in children Serum Decreased [209]
miR-135b-5pmiRNA associated with epilepsy and cancer cell proliferation, migration. Reduces post epileptic dysregulation of cell viability and apoptosis of hippocampal neurons by targeting SIRT1. Diagnostic biomarker of TLE in childrenPlasma Decreased [210]
miR-93-5p, miR-199a-3p and miR-574-3pmiRNA associated with epilepsyFound to be dysregulated in epilepsy Diagnostic biomarker of TLEPlasma Increased [211]
miR194-2-5p, miR15a-5p, miR-132-3p, and miR-145-5pmiRNA associated with epilepsyPlays important role in the pathogenesis of FCD and refractory epilepsy by regulating mTOR, P13K-Akt, P53, TGF- β signaling pathways, and cell cycle.Diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for refractory epilepsy Serum Increased [212]
miR-328-3pmiRNA associated with epilepsyImportant peripheral biomarker of epilepsy Diagnostic biomarker of mTLE-HSSerumIncreased[213]
miR-654-3pmiRNA associated with epilepsyImportant peripheral biomarker of epilepsy with statistical power to differentiate between Engel I (good surgical prognosis) and Engel III-IV (unfavorable surgical prognosis) patientssurgical prognosis biomarker of MTLE-HSSerum Increased[213]
miR-134 and miR-146amiRNA associated with epilepsy, and they also had a role in neuroinflammation, dendritic functionality Their upregulated expression indicates a higher risk of developing DRE, independent of temporal lobe sclerosis, epilepsy duration, familial history, age at first seizure, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking behavior, and genderPredictive and prognostic biomarker of DRESerumIncreased [214]
miR-182miRNA associated with epilepsy, neuroinflammation, and apoptosis Upregulation inhibited the expression of APLN, which serves a neuroprotective role in epilepsy. Moreover, it’s upregulation induces apoptosis. Diagnostic biomarker of epilepsyHippocampal neurons Increased [215]
MiR-146a, miR-155 and miR-132miRNA associated with epilepsyPlays important role in neuroinflammation, neuroprotection, neurodegeneration, and neuronal growth, related to epilepsyDiagnostic and prognostic biomarker of GGESerum Increased [216]
miR-194-5pmiRNA associated with epilepsyHyperexpression increases cell viability which was reduced by TLE. Targets the IGF1R gene directly and reduces apoptosis of hippocampal neurons.Diagnostic biomarker and treatment target of TLE in children Plasma Decreased [217]
miR-142miRNA associated with epilepsyExpression is associated with anti-inflammatory signaling in epileptogenic tubers from a tuberous sclerosis complexDiagnostic biomarker of TLE and prognostic biomarker for drug-resistant TLESerum Increased [218]
miR-146amiRNA associated with epilepsyDiagnostic miRNA in genetically generalized epilepsy because of its role in propagating inflammation of the hippocampusDiagnostic biomarker of TLESerumIncreased[218]
miR-223miRNA associated with epilepsyExpression is associated with anti-inflammatory signaling in epileptogenic tubers from a tuberous sclerosis complexDiagnostic biomarker of TLE and prognostic biomarker for drug-resistant TLESerumIncreased[218]
TARC: thymus and activation-regulated chemokine; RAGE: receptor for advanced glycation end products; TLR: toll-like receptor; mTLE: mesial temporal lobe epilepsy; HS: hippocampal sclerosis; IGF1R: insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor; SIRT1: sirtuin (silent mating type information regulation 2 homologs) 1; FCD: focal cortical dysplasia; MTLE-HS: mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis; DRE: drug-resistant epilepsy; APLN: apelin; GGE: genetic generalized epilepsy; RHD: rheumatic heart disease; CAMK4: calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type IV; SRS: spontaneous recurrent seizures.
The evidence of miRNAs as a potential biomarker of epilepsy is largely preclinical, and clinical evidence with significant results is still missing. miRNAs have great potential to be served as a potential biomarker, but more research is required to solidify their application in real life.

6.2. Genetic Biomarkers

A few genetic biomarkers have been identified that indicate an increased risk of structural epileptogenesis. Two markers associated with post-stroke epilepsy are mutations in CD-40-1C/T or Rs671 genes [219].

6.3. Molecular Analysis

Two biomarkers have been identified in epileptogenesis diagnosis. Increased plasma levels of high-mobility group box 1 protein have been reported after unilateral hippocampal electrical stimulation-induced status epilepticus [108]. A 1.5-fold increase in cortisol levels in a 3 cm scalp hair sample was reported in a 6–12-year-old child with benign childhood epilepsy syndromes when the sample was analyzed within 24 h of the first seizure [220]. Generally, under normal physiological conditions, cortisol accumulation in hair takes several weeks [221,222,223]. Therefore, these studies suggest increased hair cortisol levels and dysfunction of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis is a potent indicator of epileptogenesis.

6.4. Molecular Profiling after Surgery

It had been reported that there is a relative reduction in ZNF852, CDCP2, PRRT1, FLJ41170, and 7RNA probes in patients who become seizure-free, after lobectomy for interactable TLE patients [224]. An amplified hippocampal myoinositol/total creatine ratio is a potential diagnostic biomarker for epileptogenesis in the case of lithium–pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus [105]. Another potential biomarker of diagnosis of status epilepticus is upregulation of miR-451a or miR-21p, or downregulation of miR-19b in the CSF [192]. The SE unit involved patients with focal SE, nonconvulsive SE, and generalized tonic-clonic SE, although, after TBI or stroke, the diagnosis of nonconvulsive SE becomes difficult [192]. Risk biomarkers, including a CD1 background or carrying an APP/PS1 mutation, indicate a greater susceptibility towards epilepsy [225,226]. These groups need better surveillance and care.

7. Conclusions and Future Aspects

The diagnosis of epilepsy is quite complex and subjected to many variations in the patients or the experimental environment. Patient variations may occur on an individual population scale, such as drug intake, treatment protocols, physiological and pathological conditions leading to misdiagnosis, and several serious issues. For the effective treatment of epilepsy, the location of epileptic foci, as well as the spread to the other parts of the brain, should be properly identified, especially for drug-resistant cases. The EEG can help determine whether a patient suffers from epilepsy or not by detecting abnormal paroxysmal discharge patterns. Following the preliminary examination with EEG, the foci of epileptogenesis can be determined by various techniques, including MRI, PET, SPECT, and CT scans. The basis of these techniques is different, but they may provide high-quality images that significantly contribute to the facilitation of the diagnosis of epilepsy. Currently, the research is focused on the targeting of various receptors and transporters affected during epilepsy, such as 5-HTT and 5-HTR. This molecular imaging of the brain holds great potential in the future for better determination of epileptic foci as well as epileptogenesis. To achieve an accurate diagnosis of epilepsy, all findings must be incorporated into one image. Thus, producing a 3D image and video of the brain depicting the areas of epileptogenesis and the spread into the other parts of the brain could be substantially helpful. Some recent advances in this kind of integration are discussed in this review. Along with these, the development of novel biomarkers for the diagnosis of epileptogenesis is gaining considerable interest in the field of research. Before the application of neuroimaging instruments, the detection of potential biomarkers is a cheap and useful tool to confirm epilepsy before the implication of expensive procedures. The development of these techniques will significantly aid in the deep understanding of several changes occurring inside the brain as well as during and between seizures, eventually improving diagnosis and effective clinical management.

Author Contributions

R.B., T.S. & A.M.: conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation and resources. M.M.G., S.A., E.A., Y.N.P., C.P., J.A., N.A.A., M.A.A.: Writing—review and editing. N.A.A. & M.A.A.: Project Administration, analysis, and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, has funded this project, under grant no. (FP-033-43).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the infrastructure and facility provided by the National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Guwahati and Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Government of India. The images in the manuscript are “Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 19 October 2021)”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there was no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CT scan—Computed Tomography; MRI—Magnetic Resonance Imaging; PET—Position Emission Tomography; SPET—Single Photon Emission Tomography; EEG—Electroencephalography; MEG—Magnetoencephalography; MRS—Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; DTI—Diffusion Tensor Imaging; HRMRI—High-Resolution MRI

References

  1. Singh, T.; Joshi, S.; Williamson, J.M.; Kapur, J. Neocortical injury–induced status epilepticus. Epilepsia 2020, 61, 2811–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mishra, A.; Goel, R.K. Modulatory Effect of Serotonergic System in Pentylenetetrazole-Induced Seizures and Associated Memory Deficit: Role of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A/2C. J. Epilepsy Res. 2019, 9, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Sharma, P.; Wright, D.K.; Johnston, L.A.; Powell, K.L.; Wlodek, M.E.; Shultz, S.R.; O’Brien, T.J.; Gilby, K.L. Differences in white matter structure between seizure prone (FAST) and seizure resistant (SLOW) rat strains. Neurobiol. Dis. 2017, 104, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mishra, A.; Goel, R.K. Chronic 5-HT3 receptor antagonism ameliorates seizures and associated memory deficit in pentylenetetrazole-kindled mice. Neuroscience 2016, 339, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shorvon, S.D. The causes of epilepsy: Changing concepts of etiology of epilepsy over the past 150 years. Epilepsia 2011, 52, 1033–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shorvon, S.D.; Andermann, F.; Guerrini, R. (Eds.) The Causes of Epilepsy: Common and Uncommon Causes in Adults and Children; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  7. Xu, Y.; Nguyen, D.; Mohamed, A.; Carcel, C.; Li, Q.; Kutlubaev, M.A.; Anderson, C.S.; Hackett, M.L. Frequency of a false positive diagnosis of epilepsy: A systematic review of observational studies. Seizure 2016, 41, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Smith, D.; Defalla, B.A.; Chadwick, D.W. The misdiagnosis of epilepsy and the management of refractory epilepsy in a specialist clinic. QJM 1999, 92, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Vilar, L.; Vilar, C.F.; Lyra, R.; Freitas, M.D.C. Pitfalls in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Hyperprolactinemia. Neuroendocrinology 2019, 109, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Allen, P.J. EEG Instrumentation and Safety; InEEG-fMRI 2009; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2009; pp. 115–133. [Google Scholar]
  11. Priyanka, A.; Abhang, B.W.; Gawali, S.C.; Mehrotra, S.C. (Eds.) Chapter 2—Technological Basics of EEG Recording and Operation of Apparatus. In Introduction to EEG-and Speech-Based Emotion Recognition; Academic Press: London, UK, 2016; pp. 19–50. ISBN 9780128044902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Leach, J.P.; Stephen, L.J.; Salveta, C.; Brodie, M.J. Which electroencephalography (EEG) for epilepsy? The relative usefulness of different EEG protocols in patients with possible epilepsy. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006, 77, 1040–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Beniczky, S.; Aurlien, H.; Brøgger, J.C.; Hirsch, L.J.; Schomer, D.L.; Trinka, E.; Pressler, R.M.; Wennberg, R.; Visser, G.H.; Eisermann, M.; et al. Standardized computer-based organized reporting of EEG: SCORE-Second version. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2017, 128, 2334–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Williams Roberson, S.; Shah, P.; Piai, V.; Gatens, H.; Krieger, A.M.; Lucas, T.H., 2nd; Litt, B. Electrocorticography reveals spatiotemporal neuronal activation patterns of verbal fluency in patients with epilepsy. Neuropsychologia 2020, 141, 107386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pacreu, S.; Vilà, E.; Moltó, L.; Bande, D.; Rueda, M.; Fernández Candil, J.L. Anaesthesia management in epilepsy surgery with intraoperative electrocorticography. Rev. Esp. Anestesiol. Reanim. 2018, 65, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ravat, S.; Iyer, V.; Panchal, K.; Muzumdar, D.; Kulkarni, A. Surgical outcomes in patients with intraoperative Electrocorticography (EcoG) guided epilepsy surgery-experiences of a tertiary care centre in India. Int. J. Surg. 2016, 36, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Türedi, S.; Hasanbasoglu, A.; Gunduz, A.; Yandi, M. Clinical decision instruments for CT scan in minor head trauma. J. Emerg. Med. 2008, 34, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kuzniecky, R.I. Neuroimaging of epilepsy: Therapeutic implications. NeuroRx 2005, 2, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Andica, C.; Hagiwara, A.; Hori, M.; Kamagata, K.; Koshino, S.; Maekawa, T.; Suzuki, M.; Fujiwara, H.; Ikeno, M.; Shimizu, T.; et al. Review of synthetic MRI in pediatric brains: Basic principle of MR quantification, its features, clinical applications, and limitations. J. Neuroradiol. 2019, 46, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Odéen, H.; Parker, D.L. Magnetic resonance thermometry and its biological applications—Physical principles and practical considerations. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2019, 110, 34–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Heim, B.; Krismer, F.; De Marzi, R.; Seppi, K. Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neural Transm. Vienna 2017, 124, 915–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Risacher, S.L.; Saykin, A.J. Neuroimaging in aging and neurologic diseases. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2019, 167, 191–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sidhu, M.K.; Duncan, J.S.; Sander, J.W. Neuroimaging in epilepsy. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2018, 31, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Heilbrun, M.P.; Sunderland, P.M.; McDonald, P.R.; Wells, T.H., Jr.; Cosman, E.; Ganz, E. Brown-Roberts-Wells stereotactic frame modifications to accomplish magnetic resonance imaging guidance in three planes. Appl. Neurophysiol. 1987, 50, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cendes, F.; Theodore, W.H.; Brinkmann, B.H.; Sulc, V.; Cascino, G.D. Neuroimaging of epilepsy. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2016, 136, 985–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Yoo, J.G.; Jakabek, D.; Ljung, H.; Velakoulis, D.; van Westen, D.; Looi, J.C.L.; Källén, K. MRI morphology of the hippocampus in drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: Shape inflation of left hippocampus and correlation of right-sided hippocampal volume and shape with visuospatial function in patients with right-sided TLE. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2019, 67, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Phelps, M.E.; Hoffman, E.J.; Mullani, N.A.; Ter-Pogossian, M.M. Application of annihilation coincidence detection to transaxial reconstruction tomography. J. Nucl. Med. 1975, 16, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Herschman, H.R. Micro-PET imaging and small animal models of disease. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2003, 15, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zukotynski, K.; Kuo, P.H.; Mikulis, D.; Rosa-Neto, P.; Strafella, A.P.; Subramaniam, R.M.; Black, S.E. PET/CT of Dementia. AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2018, 211, 246–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jupp, B.; Binns, D.; Willams, J.; Hicks, R.; O’Brien, T. Serial FDG-pet during epileptogenesis in the rat kainic acid model of tle reveals persistent cerebral hypometabolism: 3.044. Epilepsia 2005, 46, 289. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jupp, B.; Williams, J.; Binns, D.; Vosmanski, M.; Hicks, R.; O’Brien, T.J. MRI and FDG-PET show progressive hippocampal changes during epileptogenesis in the amygdale kindling rat model of TLE. Epilepsia 2004, 45, 19. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kornblum, H.I.; Araujo, D.M.; Annala, A.J.; Tatsukawa, K.J.; Phelps, M.E.; Cherry, S.R. In vivo imaging of neuronal activation and plasticity in the rat brain by high resolution positron emission tomography (microPET). Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 655–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liefaard, L.C.; Ploeger, B.A.; Molthoff, C.F.; de Jong, H.W.; Dijkstra, J.; van der Weerd, L.; Lammertsma, A.A.; Danhof, M.; Voskuyl, R.A. Changes in GABAA receptor properties in amygdala kindled animals: In vivo studies using [11C]flumazenil and positron emission tomography. Epilepsia 2009, 50, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Merlet, I.; Ostrowsky, K.; Costes, N.; Ryvlin, P.; Isnard, J.; Faillenot, I.; Lavenne, F.; Dufournel, D.; Le Bars, D.; Mauguière, F. 5-HT1A receptor binding and intracerebral activity in temporal lobe epilepsy: An [18F]MPPF-PET study. Brain 2004, 127, 900–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Catana, C.; Wu, Y.; Judenhofer, M.S.; Qi, J.; Pichler, B.J.; Cherry, S.R. Simultaneous acquisition of multislice PET and MR images: Initial results with a MR-compatible PET scanner. J. Nucl. Med. 2006, 47, 1968–1976. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Lucas, A.J.; Hawkes, R.C.; Ansorge, R.E.; Williams, G.B.; Nutt, R.E.; Clark, J.C.; Fryer, T.D.; Carpenter, T.A. Development of a combined microPET-MR system. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2006, 5, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Raylman, R.R.; Majewski, S.; Lemieux, S.K.; Velan, S.S.; Kross, B.; Popov, V.; Smith, M.F.; Weisenberger, A.G.; Zorn, C.; Marano, G.D. Simultaneous MRI and PET imaging of a rat brain. Phys. Med. Biol. 2006, 51, 6371–6379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Myers, R.; Hume, S. Small animal PET. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002, 12, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Catafau, A.M. Brain SPECT in clinical practice. Part I: Perfusion. J. Nucl. Med. 2001, 42, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Lassen, N.A.; Blasberg, R.G. Technetium-99m-d,l-HM-PAO, the development of a new class of 99mTc-labeled tracers: An overview. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1988, 8, S1–S3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Walovitch, R.C.; Hill, T.C.; Garrity, S.T.; Cheesman, E.H.; Burgess, B.A.; O’Leary, D.H.; Watson, A.D.; Ganey, M.V.; Morgan, R.A.; Williams, S.J. Characterization of technetium-99m-L,L-ECD for brain perfusion imaging, Part 1: Pharmacology of technetium-99m ECD in nonhuman primates. J. Nucl. Med. 1989, 30, 1892–1901. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Léveillé, J.; Demonceau, G.; Walovitch, R.C. Intrasubject comparison between technetium-99m-ECD and technetium-99m-HMPAO in healthy human subjects. J. Nucl. Med. 1992, 33, 480–484. [Google Scholar]
  43. Moretti, J.L.; Defer, G.; Cinotti, L.; Cesaro, P.; Vigneron, N.; Pethe, C. Comparative tomoscintigraphic study of strokes using ECD Tc-99m,HMPAO Tc-99m and IMP I-123, preliminary results. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1988, 14, 311. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kim, S.; Mountz, J.M. SPECT Imaging of Epilepsy: An Overview and Comparison with F-18 FDG PET. Int. J. Mol. Imaging 2011, 2011, 813028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. McArthur, C.; Jampana, R.; Patterson, J.; Hadley, D. Applications of cerebral SPECT. Clin. Radiol. 2011, 66, 651–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hannestad, J.; Gallezot, J.D.; Schafbauer, T.; Lim, K.; Kloczynski, T.; Morris, E.D.; Carson, R.E.; Ding, Y.S.; Cosgrove, K.P. Endotoxin-induced systemic inflammation activates microglia: (¹¹C)PBR28 positron emission tomography in nonhuman primates. Neuroimage 2012, 63, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Ory, D.; Planas, A.; Dresselaers, T.; Gsell, W.; Postnov, A.; Celen, S.; Casteels, C.; Himmelreich, U.; Debyser, Z.; Van Laere, K.; et al. PET imaging of TSPO in a rat model of local neuroinflammation induced by intracerebral injection of lipopolysaccharide. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2015, 42, 753–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Devinsky, O.; Vezzani, A.; Najjar, S.; De Lanerolle, N.C.; Rogawski, M.A. Glia and epilepsy: Excitability and inflammation. Trends Neurosci. 2013, 36, 174–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sandiego, C.M.; Gallezot, J.D.; Pittman, B.; Nabulsi, N.; Lim, K.; Lin, S.F.; Matuskey, D.; Lee, J.Y.; O’Connor, K.C.; Huang, Y.; et al. Imaging robust microglial activation after lipopolysaccharide administration in humans with PET. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 12468–12473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Lavisse, S.; Guillermier, M.; Hérard, A.S.; Petit, F.; Delahaye, M.; Van Camp, N.; Ben Haim, L.; Lebon, V.; Remy, P.; Dollé, F.; et al. Reactive astrocytes overexpress TSPO and are detected by TSPO positron emission tomography imaging. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 10809–10818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Liu, B.; Le, K.X.; Park, M.A.; Wang, S.; Belanger, A.P.; Dubey, S.; Frost, J.L.; Holton, P.; Reiser, V.; Jones, P.A.; et al. In Vivo Detection of Age- and Disease-Related Increases in Neuroinflammation by 18F-GE180 TSPO MicroPET Imaging in Wild-Type and Alzheimer’s Transgenic Mice. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 15716–15730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Bertoglio, D.; Verhaeghe, J.; Santermans, E.; Amhaoul, H.; Jonckers, E.; Wyffels, L.; Van Der Linden, A.; Hens, N.; Staelens, S.; Dedeurwaerdere, S. Non-invasive PET imaging of brain inflammation at disease onset predicts spontaneous recurrent seizures and reflects comorbidities. Brain Behav. Immun. 2017, 61, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Scott, P.J.; Shao, X.; Desmond, T.J.; Hockley, B.G.; Sherman, P.; Quesada, C.A.; Frey, K.A.; Koeppe, R.A.; Kilbourn, M.R.; Bohnen, N.I. Investigation of Proposed Activity of Clarithromycin at GABAA Receptors Using [(11)C]Flumazenil PET. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 746–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. la Fougère, C.; Rominger, A.; Förster, S.; Geisler, J.; Bartenstein, P. PET and SPECT in epilepsy: A critical review. Epilepsy Behav. 2009, 15, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vibholm, A.K.; Landau, A.M.; Møller, A.; Jacobsen, J.; Vang, K.; Munk, O.L.; Orlowski, D.; Sørensen, J.C.; Brooks, D.J. NMDA receptor ion channel activation detected in vivo with [18F]GE-179 PET after electrical stimulation of rat hippocampus. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2021, 41, 1301–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. McGinnity, C.J.; Koepp, M.J.; Hammers, A.; Riaño Barros, D.A.; Pressler, R.M.; Luthra, S.; Jones, P.A.; Trigg, W.; Micallef, C.; Symms, M.R.; et al. NMDA receptor binding in focal epilepsies. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2015, 86, 1150–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Feldmann, M.; Koepp, M. P-glycoprotein imaging in temporal lobe epilepsy: In vivo PET experiments with the Pgp substrate [11C]-verapamil. Epilepsia 2012, 53 (Suppl. 6), 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hartz, A.M.; Pekcec, A.; Soldner, E.L.; Zhong, Y.; Schlichtiger, J.; Bauer, B. P-gp Protein Expression and Transport Activity in Rodent Seizure Models and Human Epilepsy. Mol. Pharm. 2017, 14, 999–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Gidal, B.E. P-glycoprotein Expression and Pharmacoresistant Epilepsy: Cause or Consequence? Epilepsy Curr. 2014, 14, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chugani, D.C. α-methyl-L-tryptophan: Mechanisms for tracer localization of epileptogenic brain regions. Biomark. Med. 2011, 5, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Kagawa, K.; Chugani, D.C.; Asano, E.; Juhász, C.; Muzik, O.; Shah, A.; Shah, J.; Sood, S.; Kupsky, W.J.; Mangner, T.J.; et al. Epilepsy surgery outcome in children with tuberous sclerosis complex evaluated with alpha-[11C]methyl-L-tryptophan positron emission tomography (PET). J. Child Neurol. 2005, 20, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Garibotto, V.; Picard, F. Nuclear medicine imaging in epilepsy. Epileptologie 2013, 30, 109–121. [Google Scholar]
  63. Hasler, G.; Bonwetsch, R.; Giovacchini, G.; Toczek, M.T.; Bagic, A.; Luckenbaugh, D.A.; Drevets, W.C.; Theodore, W.H. 5-HT1A receptor binding in temporal lobe epilepsy patients with and without major depression. Biol. Psychiatry 2007, 62, 1258–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Didelot, A.; Ryvlin, P.; Lothe, A.; Merlet, I.; Hammers, A.; Mauguière, F. PET imaging of brain 5-HT1A receptors in the preoperative evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain 2008, 131, 2751–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sarikaya, I. PET studies in epilepsy. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2015, 5, 416–430. [Google Scholar]
  66. Martinez, A.; Finegersh, A.; Cannon, D.M.; Dustin, I.; Nugent, A.; Herscovitch, P.; Theodore, W.H. The 5-HT1A receptor and 5-HT transporter in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 2013, 80, 1465–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Velísková, J.; Moshé, S.L. Update on the role of substantia nigra pars reticulata in the regulation of seizures. Epilepsy Curr. 2006, 6, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Bouilleret, V.; Semah, F.; Chassoux, F.; Mantzaridez, M.; Biraben, A.; Trebossen, R.; Ribeiro, M.J. Basal ganglia involvement in temporal lobe epilepsy: A functional and morphologic study. Neurology 2008, 70, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Bernedo Paredes, V.E.; Buchholz, H.G.; Gartenschläger, M.; Breimhorst, M.; Schreckenberger, M.; Werhahn, K.J. Reduced D2/D3 Receptor Binding of Extrastriatal and Striatal Regions in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fedi, M.; Berkovic, S.F.; Scheffer, I.E.; O’Keefe, G.; Marini, C.; Mulligan, R.; Gong, S.; Tochon-Danguy, H.; Reutens, D.C. Reduced striatal D1 receptor binding in autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 2008, 71, 795–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Odano, I.; Varrone, A.; Savic, I.; Ciumas, C.; Karlsson, P.; Jucaite, A.; Halldin, C.; Farde, L. Quantitative PET analyses of regional [11C]PE2I binding to the dopamine transporter--application to juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Neuroimage 2012, 59, 3582–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Karlócai, M.R.; Tóth, K.; Watanabe, M.; Ledent, C.; Juhász, G.; Freund, T.F.; Maglóczky, Z. Redistribution of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the acute and chronic phases of pilocarpine-induced epilepsy. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Goffin, K.; Van Paesschen, W.; Van Laere, K. In vivo activation of endocannabinoid system in temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Brain 2011, 134, 1033–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Riaño Barros, D.A.; McGinnity, C.J.; Rosso, L.; Heckemann, R.A.; Howes, O.D.; Brooks, D.J.; Duncan, J.S.; Turkheimer, F.E.; Koepp, M.J.; Hammers, A. Test-retest reproducibility of cannabinoid-receptor type 1 availability quantified with the PET ligand [¹¹C]MePPEP. Neuroimage 2014, 97, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Weltzin, M.M.; George, A.A.; Lukas, R.J.; Whiteaker, P. Sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy associated mutations uncover important kinetic roles of α4β2-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor intracellular structures. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Picard, F.; Bruel, D.; Servent, D.; Saba, W.; Fruchart-Gaillard, C.; Schöllhorn-Peyronneau, M.A.; Roumenov, D.; Brodtkorb, E.; Zuberi, S.; Gambardella, A.; et al. Alteration of the in vivo nicotinic receptor density in ADNFLE patients: A PET study. Brain 2006, 129, 2047–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Wang, Y.; Tan, B.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z. Cholinergic Signaling, Neural Excitability, and Epilepsy. Molecules 2021, 26, 2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bodle, J.D.; Feldmann, E.; Swartz, R.H.; Rumboldt, Z.; Brown, T.; Turan, T.N. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: An emerging tool for evaluating intracranial arterial disease. Stroke 2013, 44, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Bammer, R.; Hope, T.A.; Aksoy, M.; Alley, M.T. Time-resolved 3D quantitative flow MRI of the major intracranial vessels: Initial experience and comparative evaluation at 1.5T and 3.0T in combination with parallel imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007, 57, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Li, M.; Le, W.J.; Tao, X.F.; Li, M.H.; Li, Y.H.; Qu, N. Advantage in Bright-blood and Black-blood Magnetic Resonance Imaging with High-resolution for Analysis of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques. Chin. Med. J. 2015, 128, 2478–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Chen, L.; Liu, Q.; Shi, Z.; Tian, X.; Peng, W.; Lu, J. Interstudy reproducibility of dark blood high-resolution MRI in evaluating basilar atherosclerotic plaque at 3 Tesla. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 2018, 24, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yarnykh, V.L.; Terashima, M.; Hayes, C.E.; Shimakawa, A.; Takaya, N.; Nguyen, P.K.; Brittain, J.H.; McConnell, M.V.; Yuan, C. Multicontrast black-blood MRI of carotid arteries: Comparison between 1.5 and 3 tesla magnetic field strengths. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006, 23, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Anumula, S.; Song, H.K.; Wright, A.C.; Wehrli, F.W. High-resolution black-blood MRI of the carotid vessel wall using phased-array coils at 1.5 and 3 Tesla. Acad. Radiol. 2005, 12, 1521–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Winston, G.P.; Yogarajah, M.; Symms, M.R.; McEvoy, A.W.; Micallef, C.; Duncan, J.S. Diffusion tensor imaging tractography to visualize the relationship of the optic radiation to epileptogenic lesions prior to neurosurgery. Epilepsia 2011, 52, 1430–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Cendes, F.; Knowlton, R.C.; Novotny, E.; Min, L.L.; Antel, S.; Sawrie, S.; Laxer, K.D.; Arnold, D. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in epilepsy: Clinical issues. Epilepsia 2002, 43, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Rhodes, C.J. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Sci. Prog. 2017, 100, 241–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Riederer, F.; Bittsanský, M.; Lehner-Baumgartner, E.; Baumgartner, C.; Mlynárik, V.; Gruber, S.; Moser, E.; Kaya, M.; Serles, W. Decrease of NAA with aging outside the seizure focus in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy—A proton-MRS study at 3 Tesla. Brain Res. 2007, 1179, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Wilson, T.W.; Heinrichs-Graham, E.; Proskovec, A.L.; McDermott, T.J. Neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography: A dynamic view of brain pathophysiology. Transl. Res. 2016, 175, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Andrade-Valenca, L.P.; Dubeau, F.; Mari, F.; Zelmann, R.; Gotman, J. Interictal scalp fast oscillations as a marker of the seizure onset zone. Neurology 2011, 77, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. McGill, M.L.; Devinsky, O.; Kelly, C.; Milham, M.; Castellanos, F.X.; Quinn, B.T.; DuBois, J.; Young, J.R.; Carlson, C.; French, J.; et al. Default mode network abnormalities in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2012, 23, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Pollard, J.R.; Eidelman, O.; Mueller, G.P.; Dalgard, C.L.; Crino, P.B.; Anderson, C.T.; Brand, E.J.; Burakgazi, E.; Ivaturi, S.K.; Pollard, H.B. The TARC/sICAM5 Ratio in Patient Plasma is a Candidate Biomarker for Drug Resistant Epilepsy. Front. Neurol. 2013, 3, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Vivash, L.; Gregoire, M.C.; Bouilleret, V.; Berard, A.; Wimberley, C.; Binns, D.; Roselt, P.; Katsifis, A.; Myers, D.E.; Hicks, R.J.; et al. In vivo measurement of hippocampal GABAA/cBZR density with [18F]-flumazenil PET for the study of disease progression in an animal model of temporal lobe epilepsy. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Choy, M.; Dubé, C.M.; Patterson, K.; Barnes, S.R.; Maras, P.; Blood, A.B.; Hasso, A.N.; Obenaus, A.; Baram, T.Z. A novel, noninvasive, predictive epilepsy biomarker with clinical potential. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 8672–8684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Choi, H.; Kim, Y.K.; Kang, H.; Lee, H.; Im, H.J.; Hwang, D.W.; Kim, E.E.; Chung, J.K.; Lee, D.S. Abnormal metabolic connectivity in the pilocarpine-induced epilepsy rat model: A multiscale network analysis based on persistent homology. Neuroimage 2014, 99, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Choi, H.; Kim, Y.K.; Oh, S.W.; Im, H.J.; Hwang, D.W.; Kang, H.; Lee, B.; Lee, Y.S.; Jeong, J.M.; Kim, E.E.; et al. In vivo imaging of mGluR5 changes during epileptogenesis using [11C]ABP688 PET in pilocarpine-induced epilepsy rat model. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Pitkänen, A.; Immonen, R. Epilepsy related to traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics 2014, 11, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Labate, A.; Cherubini, A.; Tripepi, G.; Mumoli, L.; Ferlazzo, E.; Aguglia, U.; Quattrone, A.; Gambardella, A. White matter abnormalities differentiate severe from benign temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2015, 56, 1109–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Zhang, L.; Guo, Y.; Hu, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, Z.; Gao, F. FDG-PET and NeuN-GFAP immunohistochemistry of hippocampus at different phases of the pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2015, 12, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Liu, H.H.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.M.; Li, J.P.; Ye, W.; Zheng, J. Reduced local diffusion homogeneity as a biomarker for temporal lobe epilepsy. Medicine 2016, 95, e4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Liu, S.J.; Zheng, P.; Wright, D.K.; Dezsi, G.; Braine, E.; Nguyen, T.; Corcoran, N.M.; Johnston, L.A.; Hovens, C.M.; Mayo, J.N.; et al. Sodium selenate retards epileptogenesis in acquired epilepsy models reversing changes in protein phosphatase 2A and hyperphosphorylated tau. Brain 2016, 139, 1919–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Suleymanova, E.M.; Gulyaev, M.V.; Abbasova, K.R. Structural alterations in the rat brain and behavioral impairment after status epilepticus: An MRI study. Neuroscience 2016, 315, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Dietrich, Y.; Eliat, P.A.; Dieuset, G.; Saint-Jalmes, H.; Pineau, C.; Wendling, F.; Martin, B. Structural and functional changes during epileptogenesis in the mouse model of medial temporal lobe epilepsy. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2016, 2016, 4005–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Pitkänen, A.; Löscher, W.; Vezzani, A.; Becker, A.J.; Simonato, M.; Lukasiuk, K.; Gröhn, O.; Bankstahl, J.P.; Friedman, A.; Aronica, E.; et al. Advances in the development of biomarkers for epilepsy. Lancet Neurol. 2016, 15, 843–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Bragin, A.; Li, L.; Almajano, J.; Alvarado-Rojas, C.; Reid, A.Y.; Staba, R.J.; Engel, J., Jr. Pathologic electrographic changes after experimental traumatic brain injury. Epilepsia 2016, 57, 735–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Pascente, R.; Frigerio, F.; Rizzi, M.; Porcu, L.; Boido, M.; Davids, J.; Zaben, M.; Tolomeo, D.; Filibian, M.; Gray, W.P.; et al. Cognitive deficits and brain myo-Inositol are early biomarkers of epileptogenesis in a rat model of epilepsy. Neurobiol. Dis. 2016, 93, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Cleeren, E.; Premereur, E.; Casteels, C.; Goffin, K.; Janssen, P.; Van Paesschen, W. The effective connectivity of the seizure onset zone and ictal perfusion changes in amygdala kindled rhesus monkeys. Neuroimage Clin. 2016, 12, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Bar-Klein, G.; Lublinsky, S.; Kamintsky, L.; Noyman, I.; Veksler, R.; Dalipaj, H.; Senatorov, V.V., Jr.; Swissa, E.; Rosenbach, D.; Elazary, N.; et al. Imaging blood-brain barrier dysfunction as a biomarker for epileptogenesis. Brain 2017, 140, 1692–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Walker, L.E.; Frigerio, F.; Ravizza, T.; Ricci, E.; Tse, K.; Jenkins, R.E.; Sills, G.J.; Jorgensen, A.; Porcu, L.; Thippeswamy, T.; et al. Molecular isoforms of high-mobility group box 1 are mechanistic biomarkers for epilepsy. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 2118–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Salo, R.A.; Miettinen, T.; Laitinen, T.; Gröhn, O.; Sierra, A. Diffusion tensor MRI shows progressive changes in the hippocampus and dentate gyrus after status epilepticus in rat—histological validation with Fourier-based analysis. Neuroimage 2017, 152, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Mizoguchi, S.; Hasegawa, D.; Hamamoto, Y.; Yu, Y.; Kuwabara, T.; Fujiwara-Igarashi, A.; Fujita, M. Interictal diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging features of cats with familial spontaneous epilepsy. Am. J. Vet Res. 2017, 78, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Andrade, P.; Nissinen, J.; Pitkänen, A. Generalized Seizures after Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury Occur at the Transition from Slow-Wave to Rapid Eye Movement Sleep. J. Neurotrauma 2017, 34, 1482–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Won, D.; Kim, W.; Chaovalitwongse, W.A.; Tsai, J.J. Altered visual contrast gain control is sensitive for idiopathic generalized epilepsies. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2017, 128, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Maccotta, L.; Lopez, M.A.; Adeyemo, B.; Ances, B.M.; Day, B.K.; Eisenman, L.N.; Dowling, J.L.; Leuthardt, E.C.; Schlaggar, B.L.; Hogan, R.E. Postoperative seizure freedom does not normalize altered connectivity in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2017, 58, 1842–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Hamamoto, Y.; Hasegawa, D.; Mizoguchi, S.; Yu, Y.; Wada, M.; Kuwabara, T.; Fujiwara-Igarashi, A.; Fujita, M. Changes in the interictal and early postictal diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance parameters in familial spontaneous epileptic cats. Epilepsy Res. 2017, 133, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Russmann, V.; Brendel, M.; Mille, E.; Helm-Vicidomini, A.; Beck, R.; Günther, L.; Lindner, S.; Rominger, A.; Keck, M.; Salvamoser, J.D.; et al. Identification of brain regions predicting epileptogenesis by serial [18F]GE-180 positron emission tomography imaging of neuroinflammation in a rat model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroimage Clin. 2017, 15, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Milikovsky, D.Z.; Weissberg, I.; Kamintsky, L.; Lippmann, K.; Schefenbauer, O.; Frigerio, F.; Rizzi, M.; Sheintuch, L.; Zelig, D.; Ofer, J.; et al. Electrocorticographic Dynamics as a Novel Biomarker in Five Models of Epileptogenesis. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 4450–4461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Breuer, H.; Meier, M.; Schneefeld, S.; Härtig, W.; Wittneben, A.; Märkel, M.; Ross, T.L.; Bengel, F.M.; Bankstahl, M.; Bankstahl, J.P. Multimodality imaging of blood-brain barrier impairment during epileptogenesis. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017, 37, 2049–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Bentes, C.; Martins, H.; Peralta, A.R.; Morgado, C.; Casimiro, C.; Franco, A.C.; Fonseca, A.C.; Geraldes, R.; Canhão, P.; Pinho EMelo, T.; et al. Early EEG predicts poststroke epilepsy. Epilepsia Open 2018, 3, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Sun, Y.; Seneviratne, U.; Perucca, P.; Chen, Z.; Tan, M.K.; O’Brien, T.J.; D’Souza, W.; Kwan, P. Generalized polyspike train: An EEG biomarker of drug-resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Neurology 2018, 91, e1822–e1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kitchigina, V.F. Alterations of Coherent Theta and Gamma Network Oscillations as an Early Biomarker of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy and Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Rizzi, M.; Brandt, C.; Weissberg, I.; Milikovsky, D.Z.; Pauletti, A.; Terrone, G.; Salamone, A.; Frigerio, F.; Löscher, W.; Friedman, A.; et al. Changes of dimension of EEG/ECoG nonlinear dynamics predict epileptogenesis and therapy outcomes. Neurobiol. Dis. 2019, 124, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Samanta, D. Rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata: Role of EEG as a biomarker of impending epilepsy. eNeurologicalSci 2019, 18, 100218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Cao, D.; Chen, Y.; Liao, J.; Nariai, H.; Li, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Hu, Y.; Wen, F.; Zhai, Q. Scalp EEG high frequency oscillations as a biomarker of treatment response in epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spike-and-wave during sleep (CSWS). Seizure 2019, 71, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Grigorovsky, V.; Jacobs, D.; Breton, V.L.; Tufa, U.; Lucasius, C.; Del Campo, J.M.; Chinvarun, Y.; Carlen, P.L.; Wennberg, R.; Bardakjian, B.L. Delta-gamma phase-amplitude coupling as a biomarker of postictal generalized EEG suppression. Brain Commun. 2020, 2, fcaa182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Nariai, H.; Hussain, S.A.; Bernardo, D.; Motoi, H.; Sonoda, M.; Kuroda, N.; Asano, E.; Nguyen, J.C.; Elashoff, D.; Sankar, R.; et al. Scalp EEG interictal high frequency oscillations as an objective biomarker of infantile spasms. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2020, 131, 2527–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Charupanit, K.; Sen-Gupta, I.; Lin, J.J.; Lopour, B.A. Amplitude of high frequency oscillations as a biomarker of the seizure onset zone. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2020, 131, 2542–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Abedi-Firouzjah, R.; Rostamzadeh, A.; Banaei, A.; Shafiee, M.; Moghaddam, Z.M.; Vafapour, H. Exploring Changes in Thalamus Metabolites as Diagnostic Biomarkers in Idiopathic Generalised Epilepsy Patients Using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Malay. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 27, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wang, J.; Shan, Y.; Dai, J.; Cui, B.; Shang, K.; Yang, H.; Chen, Z.; Shan, B.; Zhao, G.; Lu, J. Altered coupling between resting-state glucose metabolism and functional activity in epilepsy. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2020, 7, 1831–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Finnema, S.J.; Toyonaga, T.; Detyniecki, K.; Chen, M.K.; Dias, M.; Wang, Q.; Lin, S.F.; Naganawa, M.; Gallezot, J.D.; Lu, Y.; et al. Reduced synaptic vesicle protein 2A binding in temporal lobe epilepsy: A [11 C]UCB-J positron emission tomography study. Epilepsia 2020, 61, 2183–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Hamelin, S.; Stupar, V.; Mazière, L.; Guo, J.; Labriji, W.; Liu, C.; Bretagnolle, L.; Parrot, S.; Barbier, E.L.; Depaulis, A.; et al. In vivo γ-aminobutyric acid increase as a biomarker of the epileptogenic zone: An unbiased metabolomics approach. Epilepsia 2021, 62, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Scott, J.M.; Gliske, S.V.; Kuhlmann, L.; Stacey, W.C. Viability of Preictal High-Frequency Oscillation Rates as a Biomarker for Seizure Prediction. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2021, 14, 612899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Niedermeyer, E.; Da Silva, F.L. Electroencephalography--Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  133. Hari, R.; Baillet, S.; Barnes, G.; Burgess, R.; Forss, N.; Gross, J.; Hämäläinen, M.; Jensen, O.; Kakigi, R.; Mauguière, F.; et al. IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG). Clin. Neurophysiol. 2018, 129, 1720–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Martínez-Cañada, P.; Ness, T.V.; Einevoll, G.T.; Fellin, T.; Panzeri, S. Computation of the electroencephalogram (EEG) from network models of point neurons. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2021, 17, e1008893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Baillet, S. Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging. Nat. Neurosci. 2017, 20, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Spanaki, M.V.; Kopylev, L.; DeCarli, C.; Gaillard, W.D.; Liow, K.; Fazilat, S.; Fazilat, S.; Reeves, P.; Sato, S.; Kufta, C.; et al. Postoperative changes in cerebral metabolism in temporal lobe epilepsy. Arch. Neurol. 2000, 57, 1447–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Avendaño-Estrada, A.; Velasco, F.; Velasco, A.L.; Cuellar-Herrera, M.; Saucedo-Alvarado, P.E.; Marquez-Franco, R.; Rivera-Bravo, B.; Ávila-Rodríguez, M.A. Quantitative Analysis of [18F]FFMZ and [18F]FDG PET Studies in the Localization of Seizure Onset Zone in Drug-Resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 2019, 97, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Loucks, C.M.; Park, K.; Walker, D.S.; McEwan, A.H.; Timbers, T.A.; Ardiel, E.L.; Grundy, L.J.; Li, C.; Johnson, J.L.; Kennedy, J.; et al. EFHC1, implicated in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, functions at the cilium and synapse to modulate dopamine signaling. Elife 2019, 8, e37271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Hu, W.H.; Liu, L.N.; Zhao, B.T.; Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; Shao, X.Q.; Zhang, K.; Ma, Y.S.; Ai, L.; Li, J.J.; et al. Use of an Automated Quantitative Analysis of Hippocampal Volume, Signal, and Glucose Metabolism to Detect Hippocampal Sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Peter, J.; Houshmand, S.; Werner, T.J.; Rubello, D.; Alavi, A. Applications of global quantitative 18F-FDG-PET analysis in temporal lobe epilepsy. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2016, 37, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Lv, R.J.; Pan, J.; Zhou, G.; Wang, Q.; Shao, X.Q.; Zhao, X.B.; Liu, J. Semi-quantitative FDG-PET Analysis Increases the Sensitivity Compared with Visual Analysis in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Encephalitis. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Tan, Y.L.; Kim, H.; Lee, S.; Tihan, T.; Ver Hoef, L.; Mueller, S.G.; Barkovich, A.J.; Xu, D.; Knowlton, R. Quantitative surface analysis of combined MRI and PET enhances detection of focal cortical dysplasias. Neuroimage 2018, 166, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Van Paesschen, W. Qualitative and quantitative imaging of the hippocampus in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 2004, 14, 373–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Traub-Weidinger, T.; Muzik, O.; Sundar, L.K.S.; Aull-Watschinger, S.; Beyer, T.; Hacker, M.; Hahn, A.; Kasprian, G.; Klebermass, E.M.; Lanzenberger, R.; et al. Utility of Absolute Quantification in Non-lesional Extratemporal Lobe Epilepsy Using FDG PET/MR Imaging. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Acharya, U.R.; Sree, S.V.; Swapna, G.; Martis, R.J.; Suri, J.S. Automated EEG analysis of epilepsy: A review. Knowl.-Based Systems 2013, 45, 147–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Dressler, O.; Schneider, G.; Stockmanns, G.; Kochs, E.F. Awareness and the EEG power spectrum: Analysis of frequencies. Br. J. Anaesth. 2004, 93, 806–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Subasi, A.; Kiymik, M.K.; Alkan, A.; Koklukaya, E. Neural network classification of EEG signals by using AR with MLE preprocessing for epileptic seizure detection. Math. Comput. Appl. 2005, 10, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Hjorth, B. EEG analysis based on time domain properties. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1970, 29, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Sharanreddy, M.; Kulkarni, P.K. Automated EEG signal analysis for identification of epilepsy seizures and brain tumour. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2013, 37, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Adeli, H.; Zhou, Z.; Dadmehr, N. Analysis of EEG records in an epileptic patient using wavelet transform. J. Neurosci. Methods 2003, 123, 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kousarrizi, M.R.N.; Ghanbari, A.A.; Teshnehlab, M.; Aliyari, M.; Gharaviri, A. Feature extraction and classification of EEG signals using wavelet transform, SVM and artificial neural networks for brain computer interfaces. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Bioinformatics, Systems Biology and Intelligent Computing (IJCBS ‘09), Shanghai, China, 3–5 August 2009; pp. 352–355. [Google Scholar]
  152. Cvetkovic, D.; Übeyli, E.D.; Cosic, I. Wavelet transform feature extraction from human PPG, ECG, and EEG signal responses to ELF PEMF exposures: A pilot study. Digit. Signal Process. 2008, 18, 861–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Pigorini, A.; Casali, A.G.; Casarotto, S.; Ferrarelli, F.; Baselli, G.; Mariotti, M.; Massimini, M.; Rosanova, M. Time-frequency spectral analysis of TMS-evoked EEG oscillations by means of Hilbert-Huang transform. J. Neurosci. Methods 2011, 198, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Guerrero-Mosquera, C.; Vazquez, A.N. New approach in features extraction for EEG signal detection. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2009, 2009, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Stam, C.J. Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: Review of an emerging field. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2005, 116, 2266–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Subasi, A.; Erçelebi, E. Classification of EEG signals using neural network and logistic regression. Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed. 2005, 78, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Zhang, W.; Itoh, K.; Tanida, J.; Ichioka, Y. Parallel distributed processing model with local space-invariant interconnections and its optical architecture. Appl. Opt. 1990, 29, 4790–4797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Schirrmeister, R.; Gemein, L.; Eggensperger, K.; Hutter, F.; Ball, T. Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for decoding and visualization of EEG pathology. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2 December 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Hosseini, M.-P.; Soltanian-Zadeh, H.; Elisevich, K.; Pompili, D. Cloud-based deep learning of big EEG data for epileptic seizure prediction. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP), Washington, WA, USA, 7–9 December 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. O’Brien, T.J.; O’Connor, M.K.; Mullan, B.P.; Brinkmann, B.H.; Hanson, D.; Jack, C.R.; So, E.L. Subtraction ictal SPET co-registered to MRI in partial epilepsy: Description and technical validation of the method with phantom and patient studies. Nucl. Med. Commun. 1998, 19, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. O’Brien, T.J.; So, E.L.; Mullan, B.P.; Hauser, M.F.; Brinkmann, B.H.; Bohnen, N.I.; Hanson, D.; Cascino, G.D.; Jack, C.R., Jr.; Sharbrough, F.W. Subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI improves clinical usefulness of SPECT in localizing the surgical seizure focus. Neurology 1998, 50, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. O’Brien, T.J.; So, E.L.; Mullan, B.P.; Hauser, M.F.; Brinkmann, B.H.; Jack, C.R., Jr.; Cascino, G.D.; Meyer, F.B.; Sharbrough, F.W. Subtraction SPECT co-registered to MRI improves postictal SPECT localization of seizure foci. Neurology 1999, 52, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Newey, C.R.; Wong, C.; Wang, Z.I.; Chen, X.; Wu, G.; Alexopoulos, A.V. Optimizing SPECT SISCOM analysis to localize seizure-onset zone by using varying z scores. Epilepsia 2013, 54, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Dupont, P.; Van Paesschen, W.; Palmini, A.; Ambayi, R.; Van Loon, J.; Goffin, J.; Weckhuysen, S.; Sunaert, S.; Thomas, B.; Demaerel, P.; et al. Ictal perfusion patterns associated with single MRI-visible focal dysplastic lesions: Implications for the noninvasive delineation of the epileptogenic zone. Epilepsia 2006, 47, 1550–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Chen, T.; Guo, L. The role of SISCOM in preoperative evaluation for patients with epilepsy surgery: A meta-analysis. Seizure 2016, 41, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Kazemi, N.J.; Worrell, G.A.; Stead, S.M.; Brinkmann, B.H.; Mullan, B.P.; O’Brien, T.J.; So, E.L. Ictal SPECT statistical parametric mapping in temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. Neurology 2010, 74, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. McNally, K.A.; Paige, A.L.; Varghese, G.; Zhang, H.; Novotny, E.J., Jr.; Spencer, S.S.; Zubal, I.G.; Blumenfeld, H. Localizing value of ictal-interictal SPECT analyzed by SPM (ISAS). Epilepsia 2005, 46, 1450–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Lenkov, D.N.; Volnova, A.B.; Pope, A.R.; Tsytsarev, V. Advantages and limitations of brain imaging methods in the research of absence epilepsy in humans and animal models. J. Neurosci. Methods 2013, 212, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Eugène, F.; Lévesque, J.; Mensour, B.; Leroux, J.M.; Beaudoin, G.; Bourgouin, P.; Beauregard, M. The impact of individual differences on the neural circuitry underlying sadness. Neuroimage 2003, 19, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Peres, J.; Nasello, A.G. Psychotherapy and neuroscience: Towards closer integration. Int. J. Psychol. 2008, 43, 943–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Goldmann, A.; Chien, D.; Edelman, R.R. Image artifacts in fast magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn. Reson. Imaging 1992, 4, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Weiss, R.A.; Saint-Louis, L.A.; Haik, B.G.; McCord, C.D.; Taveras, J.L. Mascara and eyelining tattoos: MRI artifacts. Ann. Ophthalmol. 1989, 21, 129–131. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  173. Watzke, O.; Kalender, W.A. A pragmatic approach to metal artifact reduction in CT: Merging of metal artifact reduced images. Eur. Radiol. 2004, 14, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Giglio, P.; Gilbert, M.R. Cerebral radiation necrosis. Neurologist 2003, 9, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Schussler, G. Neurobiologie und Psychotherapie [Neurobiology and psychotherapy]. Z. Psychosom. Med. Psychother. 2004, 50, 406–429. [Google Scholar]
  176. Engel, J., Jr.; Pitkänen, A.; Loeb, J.A.; Dudek, F.E.; Bertram, E.H., 3rd; Cole, A.J.; Moshé, S.L.; Wiebe, S.; Jensen, F.E.; Mody, I.; et al. Epilepsy biomarkers. Epilepsia 2013, 54 (Suppl. S4), 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Pitkänen, A.; Engel, J., Jr. Past and present definitions of epileptogenesis and its biomarkers. Neurotherapeutics 2014, 11, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Pitkänen, A.; EkolleNdode-Ekane, X.; Lapinlampi, N.; Puhakka, N. Epilepsy biomarkers—Toward etiology and pathology specificity. Neurobiol. Dis. 2019, 123, 42–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Friedman, R.C.; Farh, K.K.; Burge, C.B.; Bartel, D.P. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  180. Ebert, M.S.; Sharp, P.A. Roles for microRNAs in conferring robustness to biological processes. Cell 2012, 149, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Tan, C.L.; Plotkin, J.L.; Venø, M.T.; von Schimmelmann, M.; Feinberg, P.; Mann, S.; Handler, A.; Kjems, J.; Surmeier, D.J.; O’Carroll, D.; et al. MicroRNA-128 governs neuronal excitability and motor behavior in mice. Science 2013, 342, 1254–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Aronica, E.; Fluiter, K.; Iyer, A.; Zurolo, E.; Vreijling, J.; van Vliet, E.A.; Baayen, J.C.; Gorter, J.A. Expression pattern of miR-146a, an inflammation-associated microRNA, in experimental and human temporal lobe epilepsy. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 31, 1100–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Jimenez-Mateos, E.M.; Engel, T.; Merino-Serrais, P.; McKiernan, R.C.; Tanaka, K.; Mouri, G.; Sano, T.; O’Tuathaigh, C.; Waddington, J.L.; Prenter, S.; et al. Silencing microRNA-134 produces neuroprotective and prolonged seizure-suppressive effects. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Jimenez-Mateos, E.M.; Engel, T.; Merino-Serrais, P.; Fernaud-Espinosa, I.; Rodriguez-Alvarez, N.; Reynolds, J.; Reschke, C.R.; Conroy, R.M.; McKiernan, R.C.; deFelipe, J.; et al. Antagomirs targeting microRNA-134 increase hippocampal pyramidal neuron spine volume in vivo and protect against pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus. Brain Struct. Funct. 2015, 220, 2387–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Kan, A.A.; van Erp, S.; Derijck, A.A.; de Wit, M.; Hessel, E.V.; O’Duibhir, E.; de Jager, W.; Van Rijen, P.C.; Gosselaar, P.H.; de Graan, P.N.; et al. Genome-wide microRNA profiling of human temporal lobe epilepsy identifies modulators of the immune response. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 3127–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Iyer, A.; Zurolo, E.; Prabowo, A.; Fluiter, K.; Spliet, W.G.; van Rijen, P.C.; Gorter, J.A.; Aronica, E. MicroRNA-146a: A key regulator of astrocyte-mediated inflammatory response. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Henshall, D.C.; Hamer, H.M.; Pasterkamp, R.J.; Goldstein, D.B.; Kjems, J.; Prehn, J.H.M.; Schorge, S.; Lamottke, K.; Rosenow, F. MicroRNAs in epilepsy: Pathophysiology and clinical utility. Lancet Neurol. 2016, 15, 1368–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Turchinovich, A.; Weiz, L.; Burwinkel, B. Extracellular miRNAs: The mystery of their origin and function. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2012, 37, 460–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Spain, E.; Jimenez-Mateos, E.M.; Raoof, R.; ElNaggar, H.; Delanty, N.; Forster, R.J.; Henshall, D.C. Direct, non-amplified detection of microRNA-134 in plasma from epilepsy patients. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 90071–90078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Wang, J.; Yu, J.T.; Tan, L.; Tian, Y.; Ma, J.; Tan, C.C.; Wang, H.F.; Liu, Y.; Tan, M.S.; Jiang, T.; et al. Genome-wide circulating microRNA expression profiling indicates biomarkers for epilepsy. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Wang, J.; Tan, L.; Tan, L.; Tian, Y.; Ma, J.; Tan, C.C.; Wang, H.F.; Liu, Y.; Tan, M.S.; Jiang, T.; et al. Circulating microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers for drug-resistant epilepsy. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  192. Raoof, R.; Jimenez-Mateos, E.M.; Bauer, S.; Tackenberg, B.; Rosenow, F.; Lang, J.; Onugoren, M.D.; Hamer, H.; Huchtemann, T.; Körtvélyessy, P.; et al. Cerebrospinal fluid microRNAs are potential biomarkers of temporal lobe epilepsy and status epilepticus. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Avansini, S.H.; de Sousa Lima, B.P.; Secolin, R.; Santos, M.L.; Coan, A.C.; Vieira, A.S.; Torres, F.R.; Carvalho, B.S.; Alvim, M.K.; Morita, M.E.; et al. MicroRNA hsa-miR-134 is a circulating biomarker for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Raoof, R.; Bauer, S.; El Naggar, H.; Connolly, N.M.C.; Brennan, G.P.; Brindley, E.; Hill, T.; McArdle, H.; Spain, E.; Forster, R.J.; et al. Dual-center, dual-platform microRNA profiling identifies potential plasma biomarkers of adult temporal lobe epilepsy. EBioMedicine 2018, 38, 127–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  195. Li, J.; Lin, H.; Sun, Z.; Kong, G.; Yan, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wen, Y.; Liu, X.; Zheng, H.; et al. High-Throughput Data of Circular RNA Profiles in Human Temporal Cortex Tissue Reveals Novel Insights into Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Cell PhysiolBiochem. 2018, 45, 677–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Antônio, L.G.L.; Freitas-Lima, P.; Pereira-da-Silva, G.; Assirati, J.A., Jr.; Matias, C.M.; Cirino, M.L.A.; Tirapelli, L.F.; Velasco, T.R.; Sakamoto, A.C.; Carlotti, C.G., Jr.; et al. Expression of MicroRNAs miR-145, miR-181c, miR-199a and miR-1183 in the Blood and Hippocampus of Patients with Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 69, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. An, N.; Zhao, W.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Chen, P. Elevated serum miR-106b and miR-146a in patients with focal and generalized epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2016, 127, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Sun, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Che, N.; Luo, X.; Tan, Z.; Sun, X.; Li, X.; Yang, K.; et al. Expression of microRNA-129-2-3p and microRNA-935 in plasma and brain tissue of human refractory epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2016, 127, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Wang, X.; Sun, Y.; Tan, Z.; Che, N.; Ji, A.; Luo, X.; Sun, X.; Li, X.; Yang, K.; Wang, G.; et al. Serum MicroRNA-4521 is a Potential Biomarker for Focal Cortical Dysplasia with Refractory Epilepsy. Neurochem. Res. 2016, 41, 905–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Wang, R.; Zeng, G.Q.; Liu, X.; Tong, R.Z.; Zhou, D.; Hong, Z. Evaluation of serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 as a biomarker for diagnosis of epilepsy. J. Neurol. Sci. 2016, 367, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Wang, R.; Zeng, G.Q.; Tong, R.Z.; Zhou, D.; Hong, Z. Serum matrix metalloproteinase-2: A potential biomarker for diagnosis of epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2016, 122, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Sun, J.; Cheng, W.; Liu, L.; Tao, S.; Xia, Z.; Qi, L.; Huang, M. Identification of serum miRNAs differentially expressed in human epilepsy at seizure onset and post-seizure. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 14, 5318–5324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  203. Bekenstein, U.; Mishra, N.; Milikovsky, D.Z.; Hanin, G.; Zelig, D.; Sheintuch, L.; Berson, A.; Greenberg, D.S.; Friedman, A.; Soreq, H. Dynamic changes in murine forebrain miR-211 expression associate with cholinergic imbalances and epileptiform activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E4996–E5005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. McArdle, H.; Jimenez-Mateos, E.M.; Raoof, R.; Carthy, E.; Boyle, D.; ElNaggar, H.; Delanty, N.; Hamer, H.; Dogan, M.; Huchtemann, T.; et al. “TORNADO”—Theranostic One-Step RNA Detector; microfluidic disc for the direct detection of microRNA-134 in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Che, N.; Zu, G.; Zhou, T.; Wang, X.; Sun, Y.; Tan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, D.; Luo, X.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Aberrant Expression of miR-323a-5p in Patients with Refractory Epilepsy Caused by Focal Cortical Dysplasia. Genet. Test Mol. Biomark. 2017, 21, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Yan, S.; Zhang, H.; Xie, W.; Meng, F.; Zhang, K.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J. Altered microRNA profiles in plasma exosomes from mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 4136–4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Elnady, H.G.; Abdelmoneam, N.; Eissa, E.; Hamid, E.R.A.; Zeid, D.A.; Abo-Shanab, A.M.; Atta, H.; Kholoussi, N.M. MicroRNAs as Potential Biomarkers for Childhood Epilepsy. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 7, 3965–3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Zhao, J.; Sang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Chen, J.; Liu, X. Efficacy of levetiracetam combined with sodium valproate on pediatric epilepsy and its effect on serum miR-106b in children. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019, 18, 4436–4442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  209. Li, N.; Pan, J.; Liu, W.; Li, Y.; Li, F.; Liu, M. MicroRNA-15a-5p serves as a potential biomarker and regulates the viability and apoptosis of hippocampus neuron in children with temporal lobe epilepsy. Diagn. Pathol. 2020, 15, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Li, R.; Hu, J.; Cao, S. The Clinical Significance of miR-135b-5p and Its Role in the Proliferation and Apoptosis of Hippocampus Neurons in Children with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Dev. Neurosci. 2020, 42, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Brennan, G.P.; Bauer, S.; Engel, T.; Jimenez-Mateos, E.M.; Del Gallo, F.; Hill, T.D.M.; Connolly, N.M.C.; Costard, L.S.; Neubert, V.; Salvetti, B.; et al. Genome-wide microRNA profiling of plasma from three different animal models identifies biomarkers of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020, 144, 105048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Chen, S.D.; Pan, H.Y.; Huang, J.B.; Liu, X.P.; Li, J.H.; Ho, C.J.; Tsai, M.H.; Yang, J.L.; Chen, S.F.; Chen, N.C.; et al. Circulating MicroRNAs from Serum Exosomes May Serve as a Putative Biomarker in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Focal Cortical Dysplasia. Cells 2020, 10, 1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Ioriatti, E.S.; Cirino, M.L.A.; Lizarte Neto, F.S.; Velasco, T.R.; Sakamoto, A.C.; Freitas-Lima, P.; Tirapelli, D.P.C.; Carlotti, C.G., Jr. Expression of circulating microRNAs as predictors of diagnosis and surgical outcome in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Epilepsy Res. 2020, 166, 106373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Leontariti, M.; Avgeris, M.; Katsarou, M.S.; Drakoulis, N.; Siatouni, A.; Verentzioti, A.; Alexoudi, A.; Fytraki, A.; Patrikelis, P.; Vassilacopoulou, D.; et al. Circulating miR-146a and miR-134 in predicting drug-resistant epilepsy in patients with focal impaired awareness seizures. Epilepsia 2020, 61, 959–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Dong, H.; Dong, B.; Zhang, N.; Liu, S.; Zhao, H. microRNA-182 Negatively Influences the Neuroprotective Effect of Apelin Against Neuronal Injury in Epilepsy. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2020, 16, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  216. Martins-Ferreira, R.; Chaves, J.; Carvalho, C.; Bettencourt, A.; Chorão, R.; Freitas, J.; Samões, R.; Boleixa, D.; Lopes, J.; Ramalheira, J.; et al. Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for genetic generalized epilepsies: A three microRNA panel. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020, 27, 660–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Niu, X.; Zhu, H.L.; Liu, Q.; Yan, J.F.; Li, M.L. MiR-194-5p serves as a potential biomarker and regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of hippocampus neuron in children with temporal lobe epilepsy. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2021, 1, 510–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. De Benedittis, S.; Fortunato, F.; Cava, C.; Gallivanone, F.; Iaccino, E.; Caligiuri, M.E.; Castiglioni, I.; Bertoli, G.; Manna, I.; Labate, A.; et al. Circulating microRNA: The Potential Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers to Predict Drug Resistance in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy, a Pilot Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 12, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Pitkänen, A.; Roivainen, R.; Lukasiuk, K. Development of epilepsy after ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2016, 15, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Stavropoulos, I.; Pervanidou, P.; Gnardellis, C.; Loli, N.; Theodorou, V.; Mantzou, A.; Soukou, F.; Sinani, O.; Chrousos, G.P. Increased hair cortisol and antecedent somatic complaints in children with a first epileptic seizure. Epilepsy Behav. 2017, 68, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Wester, V.L.; van Rossum, E.F. Clinical applications of cortisol measurements in hair. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2015, 173, M1–M10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Russell, E.; Koren, G.; Rieder, M.; Van Uum, S. Hair cortisol as a biological marker of chronic stress: Current status, future directions and unanswered questions. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2012, 37, 589–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Stalder, T.; Kirschbaum, C. Analysis of cortisol in hair--state of the art and future directions. Brain Behav. Immun. 2012, 26, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Gallek, M.J.; Skoch, J.; Ansay, T.; Behbahani, M.; Mount, D.; Manziello, A.; Witte, M.; Bernas, M.; Labiner, D.M.; Weinand, M.E. Cortical gene expression: Prognostic value for seizure outcome following temporal lobectomy and amygdalohippocampectomy. Neurogenetics 2016, 17, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  225. Guo, D.; Zeng, L.; Brody, D.L.; Wong, M. Rapamycin attenuates the development of posttraumatic epilepsy in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  226. Miszczuk, D.; Dębski, K.J.; Tanila, H.; Lukasiuk, K.; Pitkänen, A. Traumatic Brain Injury Increases the Expression of Nos1, Aβ Clearance, and Epileptogenesis in APP/PS1 Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 7010–7027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Current methods and techniques available for the diagnosis of epilepsy. The main diagnosis of epilepsy relies majorly in the physical examination followed by EEG analysis. However, the identification of the epileptic locus might be ambiguous with these methods. Therefore, the use of more elaborative techniques, such as CT, MRI/HRMRI, PET/SPECT, MRS, and MEG, is recommended for demarcation of the epileptic foci.
Figure 1. Current methods and techniques available for the diagnosis of epilepsy. The main diagnosis of epilepsy relies majorly in the physical examination followed by EEG analysis. However, the identification of the epileptic locus might be ambiguous with these methods. Therefore, the use of more elaborative techniques, such as CT, MRI/HRMRI, PET/SPECT, MRS, and MEG, is recommended for demarcation of the epileptic foci.
Biology 10 01097 g001
Figure 2. Role of microRNAs in diagnosis and personalized medicine in epilepsy. microRNAs (miRs) have been recognized as important tools for assessing the diagnosis of epileptic foci in patients. Changes in the expression levels of various circulatory/tissue specific miRs may differentiate epileptic phenomena such as epileptogenesis or drug responsive/drug-resistant epilepsy. Further, expression of a specific RNA may be altered using nucleic acid-based approaches (miR mimics, anti-miR, short hairpin RNA, small interfering RNA, aptamers, antisense oligonucleotide) for pursuing personalized medicine approaches to patients with epilepsy.
Figure 2. Role of microRNAs in diagnosis and personalized medicine in epilepsy. microRNAs (miRs) have been recognized as important tools for assessing the diagnosis of epileptic foci in patients. Changes in the expression levels of various circulatory/tissue specific miRs may differentiate epileptic phenomena such as epileptogenesis or drug responsive/drug-resistant epilepsy. Further, expression of a specific RNA may be altered using nucleic acid-based approaches (miR mimics, anti-miR, short hairpin RNA, small interfering RNA, aptamers, antisense oligonucleotide) for pursuing personalized medicine approaches to patients with epilepsy.
Biology 10 01097 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bandopadhyay, R.; Singh, T.; Ghoneim, M.M.; Alshehri, S.; Angelopoulou, E.; Paudel, Y.N.; Piperi, C.; Ahmad, J.; Alhakamy, N.A.; Alfaleh, M.A.; et al. Recent Developments in Diagnosis of Epilepsy: Scope of MicroRNA and Technological Advancements. Biology 2021, 10, 1097. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10111097

AMA Style

Bandopadhyay R, Singh T, Ghoneim MM, Alshehri S, Angelopoulou E, Paudel YN, Piperi C, Ahmad J, Alhakamy NA, Alfaleh MA, et al. Recent Developments in Diagnosis of Epilepsy: Scope of MicroRNA and Technological Advancements. Biology. 2021; 10(11):1097. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10111097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bandopadhyay, Ritam, Tanveer Singh, Mohammed M. Ghoneim, Sultan Alshehri, Efthalia Angelopoulou, Yam Nath Paudel, Christina Piperi, Javed Ahmad, Nabil A. Alhakamy, Mohamed A. Alfaleh, and et al. 2021. "Recent Developments in Diagnosis of Epilepsy: Scope of MicroRNA and Technological Advancements" Biology 10, no. 11: 1097. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10111097

APA Style

Bandopadhyay, R., Singh, T., Ghoneim, M. M., Alshehri, S., Angelopoulou, E., Paudel, Y. N., Piperi, C., Ahmad, J., Alhakamy, N. A., Alfaleh, M. A., & Mishra, A. (2021). Recent Developments in Diagnosis of Epilepsy: Scope of MicroRNA and Technological Advancements. Biology, 10(11), 1097. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10111097

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop