Next Article in Journal
A Sustainable Approach to Paper Production from Eichhornia crassipes to Strengthen the Non-Wood Fiber Industry
Previous Article in Journal
CFRP Side Milling: Matched Comparison of WC-Co and PCD Tool Concepts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Freeze–Thaw Durability and Damage Evolution of High-Strength Concrete Reinforced with Steel–Polypropylene Hybrid Fibers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Copper Slag Content and Hybrid Steel Fiber Addition on the Mechanical Response of an Alkali-Activated Geopolymer Composite

by
Maciej Kaźmierowski
1,*,
Jakub Sławiński
1,
Jarosław Rybak
1 and
Jolanta Dąbrowska
1,2
1
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Norwida 25, 50-365 Wrocław, Poland
2
Department of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Stanisława Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fibers 2026, 14(6), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/fib14060067
Submission received: 22 April 2026 / Revised: 2 June 2026 / Accepted: 4 June 2026 / Published: 8 June 2026

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of copper slag (CS), dosed relative to the mass of fly ash (FA; CS = 0, 7.5, 15, and 22.5%), and the volume fraction of hybrid steel fibers (Vf = 0.0, 0.5, and 1.0%) on the mechanical response of an alkali-activated geopolymer composite. The tests were performed using a two-factor CS × Vf design (4 × 3), with compressive strength (fc) and splitting tensile strength (fct.sp) determined as the response variables. Statistical analysis showed significant effects of CS, Vf, and CS × Vf on fc, and a significant CS × Vf interaction for fct.sp, confirming that the fiber effect depended on the CS content. The greatest increases in fc relative to fiber-free composites were obtained for CS = 7.5%: +73% (Vf = 0.5%) and +102% (Vf = 1.0%), and for CS = 22.5%: +75% (Vf = 1.0%). For fct.sp, a decrease was found at CS = 0% and Vf = 0.5% (−34%), whereas an increase was observed at CS = 22.5% and Vf = 1.0% (+49%). The interpretation of the mechanical response was extended by DIC-based strain analysis in compression and splitting tests, together with σct.spεx curves, indicating differences in strain/damage localization and post-cracking response.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Alkali-activated materials are binder materials obtained through the alkaline activation of aluminosilicate precursors. In the literature, composites based on such binders are often referred to as geopolymer composites [1]. The research interest in this type of composite can be explained, among other factors, by their potential to reduce CO2 emissions compared with Portland cement-based composites, which is associated with the possibility of using industrial by-products as cement substitutes [2,3,4,5].
The precursors commonly used in geopolymer composites include fly ash (FA) [6,7], ground granulated blast-furnace slag [8,9], and metakaolin [10], whereas the activators commonly used in geopolymer formation include NaOH and alkali silicates, such as Na2SiO3, as well as other sodium- and potassium-based compounds used as activators [11]. The mechanical properties of geopolymer composites depend on the reactivity of the precursor, which is governed, among other factors, by its oxide composition and SiO2/Al2O3 ratio [12], the content of the amorphous/reactive fraction [13], and the degree of fineness [11], which affects the dissolution kinetics of active components in the solution [14]. Activation parameters, including the activator concentration [15,16] and sodium silicate content [17,18], are also important.
To accelerate setting during geopolymerization, many studies apply curing/heat treatment at elevated temperature, for example, 140 °C for 24 h [16] or 60 °C for 24 h [19], which may be particularly important for fly ashes with a lower calcium content [20].
The increasing demand for alkali-activated materials has led to substantial consumption of typical precursors, i.e., FA and ground granulated blast-furnace slag, which justifies the investigation of alternative precursor materials, such as copper slag [21]. Copper slag (CS) is a by-product of metallurgical processes whose oxide composition and phase characteristics, including the presence of silica and components richer in Ca and Fe, indicate its potential for use in alkali-activated systems after appropriate material preparation [22,23,24]. At the same time, in many studies, CS has mainly been analyzed as an aggregate or filler in geopolymer composites [25,26,27,28,29], whereas the number of studies in which CS has been considered a controlled component of the precursor system in alkali-activated materials remains limited [22,29,30].
One approach to reducing the brittleness of geopolymer composites and controlling crack propagation is the use of steel fibers, primarily due to their bridging action [4,31]. The effectiveness of this action depends, among other factors, on fiber geometry, volume fraction (Vf), spatial distribution, and the conditions of fiber–matrix interaction. The bridging effect may reduce stress concentration in the cracked zone and stabilize crack development [5]. For this reason, steel fibers are widely used in geopolymer composites as dispersed reinforcement, and their effect is also analyzed with respect to properties determined at maximum load, including fc and fct.sp. It has been reported that fiber addition (Vf = 1%) increased fc by 5–23% in the investigated geopolymer composites [4]. The greatest improvement was achieved with hooked-end fibers, whereas for crimped and straight fibers the strengthening effect was less pronounced and did not show a clear trend [32,33,34,35]. A similar relationship was observed for fct.sp, for which the increase ranged from 19% to 43% relative to unreinforced composites [4].
Short straight fibers are generally associated with limiting the development of microcracks [36], whereas longer hooked-end fibers are associated with more effective crack bridging due to more favorable mechanical anchorage in the matrix [37]. For this reason, the hybrid approach is often indicated as potentially beneficial [38,39]. However, the effectiveness of fibers as reinforcement may depend on the properties of the matrix, and thus also on the precursor composition and activation parameters, which modify the conditions of fiber–matrix interaction, including bond/interfacial behavior [40]. Consequently, it is justified to conduct studies in a design that enables the effects of matrix composition and fiber content on fc and fct.sp to be separated [41]. In particular, the number of studies that simultaneously analyze the effect of CS content in the FA–CS precursor system and the content of steel fibers using a design that allows the interaction effects of these factors to be identified remains limited.
The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the effects of copper slag (CS) content in the fly ash–copper slag (FA–CS) system and the volume fraction of hybrid steel fibers (Vf) on the fc and fct.sp of an alkali-activated geopolymer composite. The novelty of the study lies in the use of a factorial design enabling the identification of the CS × Vf interaction for both responses (fc and fct.sp) and in demonstrating that the effect of fibers on fct.sp depends on the CS content (CS × Vf interaction). Deformation and damage in compression and splitting tests were also analyzed using digital image correlation (DIC).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Program

The experimental program was designed as a two-factor CS × Vf design. Four levels of copper slag content were adopted (CS = 0, 7.5, 15, and 22.5% relative to the mass of FA), together with three levels of the volume fraction of hybrid steel fibers (Vf = 0, 0.5, and 1.0% of the mixture volume). The factor levels were selected as planned comparative levels, enabling the mechanical response of the composites to be assessed with increasing CS content and different steel fiber dosages. Each CS level was combined with each Vf level, which made it possible to verify whether the fiber effect depended on the CS content. The adopted range was not intended to provide full mixture optimization, but rather to analyze the relationships within the predefined CS × Vf design. In total, 12 mixture variants and 72 specimens were prepared. For each variant, three specimens were prepared for compressive strength (fc) testing and three specimens for splitting tensile strength (fct.sp) testing. The obtained results were used to evaluate the effects of CS content and Vf on the analyzed mechanical properties (fc, fct.sp).

2.2. Materials and Specimen Preparation

Commercially supplied class A FA [42] from lignite combustion and CS were used as components of the geopolymer binder for preparing the mixtures (Figure 1a). The specific densities of these materials were ρ = 2200 kg/m3 and ρ = 2900 kg/m3, respectively. CS was introduced as an additional component of the FA–CS precursor system and was dosed at four levels defined relative to the mass of FA, 0%, 7.5%, 15%, and 22.5%, corresponding to mCS/mFA ratios of 0, 0.075, 0.15, and 0.225. Sand with a particle size of 0–2 mm and a specific density of ρ = 2650 kg/m3 was used as fine aggregate. The constant binder-to-sand mass ratio was 1.0, with the binder defined as the sum of FA and CS.
An alkaline solution prepared from an aqueous NaOH solution and sodium water glass was used as the activator. The molar concentration of the NaOH solution was 8 M. The NaOH solution was prepared using tap water and NaOH with a purity of >98% (Dragon, Skawina, Poland). The sodium water glass (Dragon, Skawina, Poland) was characterized by a molar modulus Ms = SiO2/Na2O > 3 and a density of 1400 kg/m3. The mass ratio of the alkaline solution to the binder was 0.5, whereas the mass ratio of the sodium water glass solution to the NaOH solution was maintained at 2.0. The slight differences in the absolute values of the activator components presented in Table 1 resulted from converting the mixture compositions to 1 m3 while maintaining the specified constant design proportions.
Hybrid dispersed reinforcement consisting of two types of uncoated steel fibers (Figure 1b), dosed at a constant 1:1 mass ratio and with a Young’s modulus of E = 210 GPa, was used (Bekaert, Zwevegem, Belgium). The straight DRAMIX OL fibers had a length of l = 13 mm, a diameter of d = 0.2 mm, an aspect ratio of λ = 65 (λ = l/d), and a tensile strength of ft = 2000 MPa, whereas the hooked-end DRAMIX 3D fibers had l = 60 mm, d = 0.75 mm, λ = 80, and ft = 1225 MPa. The total fiber volume fraction was adopted as 0%, 0.5%, or 1.0% relative to the mixture volume (Vf). The mixture compositions are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Mixture compositions of the geopolymer composite per 1 m3 (kg/m3) for four CS dosage levels.
Table 1. Mixture compositions of the geopolymer composite per 1 m3 (kg/m3) for four CS dosage levels.
SeriesFACSSandAlkaline SolutionVf (%)
Water *NaOH PelletsSodium Silicate
CS-0850.00.0850.0107.334.3283.30; 0.5; 1
CS-7.5796.059.7855.7108.034.6285.2
CS-15749.0112.4861.4108.834.8287.1
CS-22.5707.0159.1866.1109.435.0288.7
* Water denotes the mass of water used to prepare the NaOH solution.
Figure 1. Materials used to prepare the geopolymer composite mixtures: (a) mixture components: 1—fly ash, 2—copper slag, 3—sand, 4—water, 5—NaOH pellets, 6—sodium water glass solution; (b) steel fibers used in the study.
Figure 1. Materials used to prepare the geopolymer composite mixtures: (a) mixture components: 1—fly ash, 2—copper slag, 3—sand, 4—water, 5—NaOH pellets, 6—sodium water glass solution; (b) steel fibers used in the study.
Fibers 14 00067 g001
CS was obtained from a commercial supplier in Poland as a waste material from metallurgical/copper-processing operations. In its initial state, CS had a particle size of 100–400 µm. Before milling, the material was preliminarily sieved to remove the coarser fraction and homogenize the feed. Milling was then carried out in a laboratory ball mill (320 rpm, 8 h), using ceramic grinding media at a 2:1 volume ratio relative to the material (Figure 2). The particle size distribution of the powder materials (milled CS and FA) was determined by laser diffraction using a Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer with a Hydro wet dispersion unit (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK), with demineralized water used as the dispersing liquid (range: 0.02–2000 µm, ISO 13320 [43]), and is presented in Figure 3.
For CS, the cumulative curve indicated a median particle size of D50 ≈ 20.5 μm, with D10 ≈ 2.6 μm and D90 ≈ 69.5 μm. The cumulative data also show that approximately 97% of the particle volume had a diameter smaller than approximately 105 μm, and that the cumulative curve approached 100% at a diameter of approximately 209 μm, indicating no substantial contribution of coarser fractions within the analyzed measurement range. For FA, the characteristic values of the particle size distribution were shifted toward larger diameters, and the distribution was clearly broader: D50 ≈ 25.1 μm, D10 ≈ 2.8 μm, and D90 ≈ 162.4 μm. The cumulative curve for FA reached approximately 99.8% only at a diameter of approximately 1069 μm, whereas 100% was reached at diameters on the order of 1.4 mm. This indicates that FA contained a higher proportion of coarser fractions, which is reflected in the higher D90 value and the longer “tail” of the cumulative curve. Compared with FA, the milled CS was characterized by a narrower particle size distribution in the fine fraction range. The reduction in particle size, the associated increase in specific surface area, and the mechanical activation of precursors are recognized in the literature as factors that promote increased reactivity, among other mechanisms, by accelerating the dissolution of glassy phases and the progress of binding reactions [22,44].
Figure 2. Preparation of CS for testing: (a) material after preliminary sieving (feed for milling); (b) laboratory ball mill used for grinding; (c) CS powder after milling.
Figure 2. Preparation of CS for testing: (a) material after preliminary sieving (feed for milling); (b) laboratory ball mill used for grinding; (c) CS powder after milling.
Fibers 14 00067 g002
Figure 3. Particle size distribution of FA and CS, presented as the cumulative curve (right axis) and the differential curve dV/dlog10(D) (left axis) as a function of particle diameter (logarithmic X-axis), where D10, D50, and D90 denote the diameters corresponding to 10%, 50%, and 90% of the cumulative particle volume, respectively.
Figure 3. Particle size distribution of FA and CS, presented as the cumulative curve (right axis) and the differential curve dV/dlog10(D) (left axis) as a function of particle diameter (logarithmic X-axis), where D10, D50, and D90 denote the diameters corresponding to 10%, 50%, and 90% of the cumulative particle volume, respectively.
Fibers 14 00067 g003
The chemical compositions of FA and CS, expressed as oxide contents (wt.%), were determined by wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (WD-XRF), and the results are summarized in Table 2. The materials were ground to a particle size of 50 μm in a disc mill with a zirconia grinding disc and then pressed into pellets. The analysis was performed using a Rigaku Supermini200 spectrometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan).
The WD-XRF results indicate that FA and CS differed substantially in their overall oxide composition. FA was dominated by SiO2 and Al2O3, whose combined content was approximately 78 wt.%, whereas the CaO content was low. This compositional profile is typical of fly ashes used as aluminosilicate precursors in alkali-activated systems. In the case of CS, the contents of SiO2 and Al2O3 were considerably lower, whereas the material was characterized by markedly higher contents of Fe2O3 and CaO, amounting to approximately 24 wt.% and 23 wt.%, respectively. This means that increasing the CS content in the CS-0–CS-22.5 series involved introducing into the binder fraction a component with a different oxide composition, particularly one richer in Ca and Fe. At the same time, the overall oxide composition is only one element in assessing the suitability of a precursor for alkaline activation, because its reactivity is also governed by physical and phase characteristics, including particle size distribution, the proportion of amorphous and crystalline phases, and the solubility of components in an alkaline environment [45,46].
The geopolymer mixtures were prepared in the following sequence. The NaOH solution was prepared by dissolving sodium hydroxide in water and then left to cool to approximately 20 °C. The alkaline activator was prepared 60 min before mixing by combining the cooled NaOH solution with sodium water glass and mixing for 3 min. This procedure limited the influence of exothermic effects on the solution temperature at the time of dosing.
FA and CS were mixed in a pan mixer without liquid addition for 3 min. The alkaline activator was then added, and mixing was continued for another 3 min until a homogeneous binder mixture was obtained. In the next step, sand was added and mixing was continued for 5 min. In the steel fiber-reinforced series, the fibers were introduced gradually during mixing, over approximately 3 min, to limit the formation of fiber clusters and ensure the most uniform possible distribution within the mixture volume.
The mixture was placed in molds and compacted on a vibrating table for approximately 20 s. The specimens were heat-cured at 80 °C [47] for 24 h, then cooled to room temperature, demolded, and cured under laboratory conditions until the age of 14 days (T = 20 ± 2 °C; RH = 50 ± 5%).

2.3. Research Methodology

The fc and fct.sp tests were performed on cubes with a side length of a = 150 mm. The fc and fct.sp values were determined based on the maximum load Fmax according to Equations (1) and (2). Before the main loading stage, a preload of 2 kN was applied to stabilize the contact between the specimen and the loading platens. The tests were conducted in accordance with [48,49] using a hydraulic testing machine with a maximum load capacity of 3000 kN (ToniNORM, Berlin, Germany; Figure 4), under piston displacement control at 0.6 mm/min for compression and 0.4 mm/min for splitting. In the splitting test, the specimen was loaded along two opposite generatrices, producing line loading. Along the contact lines, fiberboard strips with a density of ρ > 900 kg/m3, a width of 15 mm, and a thickness of 4 mm were used to reduce local crushing and homogenize the applied pressure. Statistical analyses of the fc and fct.sp results were performed using Statistica 13 software (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).
f c = F m a x A c
f ct . sp = 2 F m a x π L d
where Ac—loaded surface area of the specimen in compression (for cubes, Ac = a2); L—length of the loading line in the splitting test (for cubes, L = a); and d—specimen dimension perpendicular to the loading line (for cubes, d = a).
Digital image correlation (DIC) was used to determine the surface displacement field of the specimens, using the Aramis system (GOM/ZEISS, Braunschweig, Germany). Images were recorded at a frequency of 1 Hz. The camera was positioned approximately 300 mm from the specimen surface, and the image resolution was 4096 × 3000 pixels. The surface was prepared by applying a random high-contrast speckle pattern [50,51]. Virtual extensometers, defined on the specimen surface, were also used to determine average strains over the adopted gauge length.
The displacement field was estimated based on image matching within facets, and the strain fields were then calculated using the engineering strain measure. In this study, maps of the maximum principal strain ε1 were analyzed and used for qualitative identification of deformation and damage localization zones (Section 3.2). The analyzed area (ROI) was limited using a mask by excluding near-edge zones approximately 5 mm wide, in order to reduce the influence of edge effects and areas with reduced correlation quality.
The DIC analysis parameters were selected separately for compression and splitting: a facet size of 15 × 15 px with a step of 10 px, and a facet size of 21 × 21 px with a step of 7 px, respectively. Here, the facet denotes the subset used for image matching, whereas the step denotes the spacing between measurement points, i.e., the distance between the centers of adjacent facets. These settings were adopted as a compromise between the spatial resolution of the strain maps and correlation stability, including sensitivity to measurement noise and loss of correlation, given the different character of localization and local strain gradients in the two tests.
For the exported ε1 maps of the compressed specimens selected for the subsequent DIC-based strain analysis, an additional auxiliary image-thresholding analysis was performed using ImageJ.JS. This analysis was used to quantitatively compare the fraction of pixels corresponding to zones of intense ε1 localization on the observed specimen surface. All four maps were cropped to the same size of 1506 × 1484 px, without image scaling, in order to avoid introducing pixel interpolation. The same thresholding settings were then applied in the HSB color space (Hue–Saturation–Brightness), covering the red range of the common color scale of the ε1 maps. The adopted indicator was the fraction of pixels satisfying the thresholding criterion relative to the total number of pixels in the analyzed image. This indicator was treated as an auxiliary comparative parameter for ε1 maps processed according to the same procedure.
Figure 4. Test setup with the DIC system in the compression configuration; in the splitting test, only the testing machine fixture was changed.
Figure 4. Test setup with the DIC system in the compression configuration; in the splitting test, only the testing machine fixture was changed.
Fibers 14 00067 g004

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Compressive and Splitting Tensile Strength

The results of compressive strength fc and splitting tensile strength fct.sp are summarized in Table 3 as individual test results (n = 3 for each CS × Vf combination), whereas Figure 5 presents the mean values with standard deviations (s). Already at the level of mean-value comparison, no consistent trend in the response to increasing fiber volume fraction Vf can be observed across all CS levels. This indicates a possible interaction between the factors, i.e., that the effect of fibers depends on the CS content.
Relative to the fiber-free series (Vf = 0%), the largest increases in the mean fc values after fiber addition were recorded for the CS-7.5 series, amounting to approximately +73% for Vf = 0.5% and +102% for Vf = 1%, followed by the CS-22.5 series (+24% and +75%, respectively). In the CS-15 series, no clear improvement was observed for Vf = 1% (+5%). For fct.sp, a decrease was recorded in the CS-0 series at Vf = 0.5% (−34%), whereas a pronounced increase was observed in the CS-22.5 series at Vf = 1% (+49%). At the intermediate CS levels (CS-7.5 and CS-15), the changes did not show a clear trend within the investigated Vf range (Figure 5).
Table 3. Results of fc and fct.sp (MPa) for composites with different CS contents and Vf values.
Table 3. Results of fc and fct.sp (MPa) for composites with different CS contents and Vf values.
fcfct.sp
Vf0%0.5%1%0%0.5%1%
 10.4412.1415.131.691.211.31
CS-013.8011.1814.361.771.311.44
 12.0211.7713.801.610.801.38
 9.2214.0818.461.211.711.49
CS-7.58.6614.7917.561.091.631.39
 8.9417.5518.071.341.241.74
 10.7613.6410.951.241.280.76
CS-1510.8111.6611.930.800.930.83
 11.1313.1711.350.710.900.82
 10.0514.8618.301.111.171.72
CS-22.510.6611.2017.761.281.301.65
 9.9611.9517.561.071.111.76
Figure 5. Mean values (±s, n = 3) of (a) fc and (b) fct.sp for composites with different CS contents and Vf values.
Figure 5. Mean values (±s, n = 3) of (a) fc and (b) fct.sp for composites with different CS contents and Vf values.
Fibers 14 00067 g005
To quantitatively assess the effects of CS content and Vf, a two-factor model with interaction was used (Equation (3)), with both factors treated as categorical variables. The model parameters were estimated using ordinary least squares (OLS), whereas the significance of the effects was evaluated using two-way analysis of variance with type II sums of squares (Table 4). For fc, significant effects of CS and Vf were found, together with a significant CS × Vf interaction, confirming that the fiber effect depended on the CS level. For fct.sp, the effects of CS and the CS × Vf interaction were significant, whereas the main effect of Vf was not significant. This means that the fiber effect on fct.sp changed with the CS level, which justifies including the CS × Vf interaction in the model (Table 4).
y = μ + C S + V f + C S × V f + ε
where y is the analyzed response variable (fc or fct.sp); μ is the intercept; CS and Vf are the factor effects; CS × Vf is the interaction effect; and ε is the random error term with an expected value equal to zero.
The model fits were assessed using basic goodness-of-fit measures and residual diagnostics (Table 5). For fc, a high goodness of fit was obtained (R2 ≈ 0.92) with RMSE ≈ 1.02 MPa, indicating that the model explained a substantial part of the response variability within the investigated design. For fct.sp, the fit was weaker (R2 ≈ 0.81); however, RMSE ≈ 0.17 MPa corresponded to approximately 10% of the mean level of this response in the entire dataset, indicating a moderate fitting error relative to the measurement scale. The maximum Cook’s D values were <1, which did not indicate observations with an excessively dominant influence on the fit and supported the suitability of the applied model for comparative analysis of the factors.
To assess the adequacy of the linear model described by Equation (3), residual diagnostics were performed, including Q–Q (quantile–quantile) plots of raw residuals and plots of raw residuals versus fitted values (Figure 6). In the Q–Q plots, zi denotes the theoretical quantiles of the normal distribution, whereas ei denotes the raw residuals for the i-th observation. This diagnostics was used for qualitative verification of the basic model assumptions, i.e., approximate normality of the residual distribution and the absence of clear variance heterogeneity, which are important for interpreting the ANOVA results. In the plots of residuals versus fitted values, no ordered residual structure and no clear dependence of residual scatter (variance) on the level of fitted values were observed. Therefore, the model assumptions were considered sufficiently satisfied for the purpose of interpreting the ANOVA results.
Because a significant CS × Vf interaction was demonstrated, the interpretation of the results was supplemented with planned comparisons within individual CS levels, treated as an analysis of simple effects relative to the reference level Vf = 0% (Table 6; contrasts: 0.5–0 and 1–0). Mean differences are presented as Δ together with 90% confidence intervals (CI90). The significance of the comparisons was assessed based on pHolm values, i.e., p-values adjusted using Holm’s method within the set of contrasts for a given response, applied to reduce the risk of Type I error in multiple comparisons. The CI90 intervals for Δ were determined within each CS level based on Student’s t-distribution and the residual error (MSE), with df = 6.
The planned comparisons confirmed that the effect of Vf depended on the CS level. For fc, after Holm correction, the most pronounced positive differences were found in the CS-7.5 series for Vf = 0.5% and Vf = 1%, and in the CS-22.5 series for Vf = 1%. In the CS-15 series, no improvement was confirmed for Vf = 1%, whereas for Vf = 0.5% only a borderline effect was observed (pHolm = 0.064). For fct.sp, the differences that remained significant after Holm correction were limited to the CS-0 series, where a decrease was observed for Vf = 0.5%, and the CS-22.5 series, where an increase was observed for Vf = 1%. This indicates that the beneficial fiber effect in the splitting test became clearly evident only at the highest CS content.
Because fc and fct.sp were determined in separate tests, no paired observations were obtained for the two parameters; therefore, their correlation was not analyzed at the level of individual results. The comparison was limited to evaluating the effects of CS and Vf within the same factorial design. The obtained results indicate that, within the investigated range of compositions, fiber addition increased fc only at selected CS levels, whereas the effect on fct.sp was conditional and became significant only at the highest slag content (CS-22.5). In addition, for the 12 points corresponding to the mean values of the series from Table 3, a linear fit between fct.sp and fc yielded R2 = 0.44.
The literature emphasizes that steel fibers exert their primary effect in the post-cracking response, i.e., in controlling crack opening and in the response after Fmax is reached, whereas their effect on fc and fct.sp may vary and depend on matrix properties and production technology [52,53], including mixture consistency, compaction, and fiber dispersion [54]. In this context, the varied fct.sp response is consistent with the fact that, in the splitting test, the contribution of fibers may be reflected not only at the Fmax level, but also in the mode of crack localization and development and in the effective number of fibers crossing the cracked zone [55].
Studies on the alkaline activation of CS indicate that the alkali level, expressed as Na2Oeq relative to the precursor mass, and the silicate modulus control the intensity of dissolution and the formation of reaction products, which translates into the strength development of alkali-activated composites [56]. In the FA + CS system investigated in this study, the alkali level was close to the value of 6% indicated in [22] as favorable for systems containing CS. At the same time, changing the CS content changed the composition of the binder fraction: FA was richer in SiO2 and Al2O3, whereas CS introduced higher amounts of CaO and Fe2O3 (Table 2). In fly ash-based systems of this type, activated with NaOH and sodium silicate solution, the reaction products are usually described as being dominated by N-A-S-H gel, whereas greater calcium availability may lead to the coexistence of C-A-S-H or C-(N)-A-S-H type products [57,58,59]. However, the direction of this effect does not follow directly from the CaO content alone, as determined by WD-XRF, because it depends on the phase form of calcium, its solubility, the activator composition, and the Si–Al–Ca proportions in the reacting system [58,59]. In the case of CS, the high Fe2O3 content may also be important, because studies on the alkaline activation of copper slag and reviews of Fe-rich precursors indicate a possible contribution of Fe to reaction products, depending on the type of Fe phases, the degree of amorphousness/reactivity of the raw material, and the activation parameters [22,60]. The cited literature background indicates possible factors governing the differentiation of matrix properties in FA–CS systems; however, it does not provide a direct basis for identifying reaction products in the composites investigated in this study. Because no phase or microstructural analyses were performed in the present study, the observed differences in fc and fct.sp are not attributed to specific matrix phases, reaction products, or quantitatively determined CS reactivity.
Within this interpretative scope, the differences in the fc and fct.sp responses after fiber addition between CS levels may be considered in relation to matrix properties, which may have affected both the contribution of fibers to load transfer after cracking and the initiation, localization, and development of cracking. The CS × Vf interaction demonstrated in the statistical analysis therefore means that the effect of fibers on fc and fct.sp differed between CS levels and cannot be interpreted as a constant effect across the entire investigated composition range. Since the number of observations in each CS × Vf combination was n = 3, the conclusions were limited to the investigated ranges of CS and Vf, and the interpretation was based on the direction of the effects and on the interaction revealed by model (3).

3.2. Post-Failure Surface Images and DIC-Based Strain Analysis

To supplement the interpretation of the mechanical results with an analysis of strain fields determined by DIC, maps of the maximum principal strain ε1 are presented for selected specimens tested in compression (Figure 7) and splitting tension (Figure 8). The ε1 maps were used to identify and qualitatively compare strain localization zones associated with crack development and damage [50]. The DIC examples were selected deliberately on the basis of planned comparisons relative to the Vf = 0% level within individual CS levels, as presented in Section 3.1 and summarized in Table 6. This selection was intended to enable comparison between specimens without fibers and specimens with fibers within the same CS level for selected cases showing different effects of fiber addition. In compression, one pair corresponding to a pronounced and statistically confirmed increase in fc after fiber addition and one pair for which such an increase was not statistically confirmed were included. In splitting tension, pairs corresponding to statistically confirmed changes in fct.sp in opposite directions were selected: a decrease at CS = 0% and an increase at CS = 22.5%. For each specimen, the ε1 map at the state corresponding to Fmax was compared with the post-failure surface image.
In the ε1 maps for the specimens subjected to compression (Figure 7a), strain localization bands corresponding to zones of increased ε1 values are visible. In the specimens without fibers (CS-7.5/Vf = 0%, CS-15/Vf = 0%), localization takes the form of a smaller number of distinct, continuous or partially continuous bands. In the specimens with fibers (CS-7.5/Vf = 1%, CS-15/Vf = 1%), the localization pattern is more dispersed and includes a larger number of shorter bands with different orientations, visible in different parts of the analyzed surface. To supplement this observation with a quantitative element, the relative area fraction of pixels assigned to zones of intense ε1 localization was determined for the ε1 maps presented in Figure 7a. This fraction was 1.25% for CS-7.5/Vf = 0% and 1.62% for CS-7.5/Vf = 1%, whereas for the CS-15 series it was 0.90% for Vf = 0% and 2.48% for Vf = 1%. These results support the qualitative observation that, after fiber addition, strain localization on the observed specimen surface had a more dispersed character. This indicator was treated as an auxiliary comparative parameter determined in ImageJ.JS for ε1 maps processed according to the same thresholding procedure. The distribution of bands with increased ε1 values remains qualitatively consistent with the damage morphology observed in the post-failure surface images (Figure 7b). In addition, for the same pairs of specimens, the compressive strain εy at the state corresponding to Fmax was analyzed based on the readings from a virtual extensometer with a 60 mm gauge length, located centrally on the specimen surface. For the CS-7.5 series, εy increased from 2.11‰ to 3.24‰ after the introduction of fibers, whereas in the CS-15 series it increased from 2.88‰ to 3.50‰. This value was treated only as a supplement to the interpretation of the ε1 maps, because the compressive strain of the composite determined in DIC measurements may strongly depend on the location and length of the adopted gauge length, as well as on the boundary conditions of the test, which affect the local distribution of displacements and strains [61].
In the ε1 maps for the specimens subjected to splitting tension (Figure 8a), the localization of increased ε1 values takes the form of a narrow zone with a generally vertical course, consistent with the typical splitting line. The differences between the variants mainly concern the continuity and local branching of this zone. In the post-failure surface images (Figure 8b), complete separation of the specimen is visible in the fiber-free variants, whereas in the fiber-reinforced variants crack opening is limited, which is consistent with the expected effect of fibers on load transfer after cracking, i.e., the bridging mechanism.
It should be emphasized that, in the DIC analysis used in this study, the strain field was determined from the gradient of the displacement field in the measurement plane, according to the adopted strain measure. In DIC, the displacement field is estimated discretely on a grid of points based on image matching within facets, i.e., subsets, and the strains are then determined numerically from the derivatives of this field. Consequently, the ε1 field was interpreted as a description of deformation and damage localization at the scale defined by the DIC calculation parameters, including facet size and grid step, and not as a direct measurement of crack geometry in the sense of a discrete crack opening.
Figure 7. fc test: (a) ε1 maps at the state corresponding to Fmax, presented using a common color scale; (b) post-failure surface images of the specimens.
Figure 7. fc test: (a) ε1 maps at the state corresponding to Fmax, presented using a common color scale; (b) post-failure surface images of the specimens.
Fibers 14 00067 g007
Figure 8. fct.sp test: (a) ε1 maps at the state corresponding to Fmax, presented using a common color scale; (b) post-failure surface images.
Figure 8. fct.sp test: (a) ε1 maps at the state corresponding to Fmax, presented using a common color scale; (b) post-failure surface images.
Fibers 14 00067 g008aFibers 14 00067 g008b
To supplement the qualitative analysis of the ε1 maps for the fct.sp test, an additional analysis of εx strains, i.e., strains transverse to the loading direction of the specimen, was performed using virtual extensometers (VEs). The engineering strain definition εx = Δl/L was adopted. Nine VEs with a gauge length of 80 mm were used to determine εx, arranged at different height levels of the specimen (Figure 9). A detailed presentation of the VE arrangement and the variation in εx along the specimen height is provided for the CS-0/Vf = 0.5% specimen, treated as an example of using virtual extensometers to describe the development of transverse strains in the splitting test.
The adopted VE arrangement enabled εx to be recorded at different height levels of the specimen. The purpose of this arrangement was to capture changes in the sign and magnitude of εx along the specimen height, because in the splitting test tensile strains, i.e., positive strains, develop in the central part, whereas the influence of compressive strains, i.e., negative strains, becomes evident near the load application zones [62].
The strain–time histories εx(t) recorded by the individual VEs are shown in Figure 10. Up to the moment immediately preceding the attainment of Fmax by the specimen, the histories showed a similar, approximately linear character. Positive εx values were recorded by the extensometers located in the central part of the specimen height, whereas near the upper and lower edges the influence of strains with the opposite sign was evident. After Fmax was reached, at approximately t = 110 s, a rapid increase in εx was observed, associated with crack propagation in the specimen. In the subsequent part of the response, εx continued to increase; however, after the initial jump, a period of less intensive growth followed, and at approximately t = 160 s a renewed increase in the intensity of changes was visible. In the final range of the test, the rate of εx increase decreased again.
The variations in εx along the specimen height at selected test times are shown in Figure 11. Before cracking, the εx curves had an approximately symmetric arrangement, with tension in the central part and compression near the upper and lower edges, as observed for t = 50 and 100 s. As Fmax was approached, εx values increased in the central region. This is particularly evident for t = 110 s, when a rapid increase in εx was observed in the central part of the specimen after cracking. This indicates that, after cracking, further deformation was concentrated primarily in the central zone, consistent with the course of the splitting line. This observation is consistent with the ε1 maps in Figure 8a, where the localization of increased ε1 values takes the form of a narrow, generally vertical zone.
Figure 9. Arrangement of VE-1–VE-9 used to record εx strains in the fct.sp test of the CS-0/Vf = 0.5% specimen; arrows indicate the force direction; grid spacing is given in mm; εx values for VE-1–VE-9 are shown at the state immediately before Fmax was reached.
Figure 9. Arrangement of VE-1–VE-9 used to record εx strains in the fct.sp test of the CS-0/Vf = 0.5% specimen; arrows indicate the force direction; grid spacing is given in mm; εx values for VE-1–VE-9 are shown at the state immediately before Fmax was reached.
Fibers 14 00067 g009
Figure 10. Changes in εx strains recorded by VE-1–VE-9 as a function of time during the fct.sp test of the CS-0/Vf = 0.5% specimen.
Figure 10. Changes in εx strains recorded by VE-1–VE-9 as a function of time during the fct.sp test of the CS-0/Vf = 0.5% specimen.
Fibers 14 00067 g010
Figure 11. Changes in εx strains along the height of the CS-0/Vf = 0.5% specimen at selected times during the fct.sp test, determined from VE readings.
Figure 11. Changes in εx strains along the height of the CS-0/Vf = 0.5% specimen at selected times during the fct.sp test, determined from VE readings.
Fibers 14 00067 g011
Figure 12 presents the relationship between the splitting tensile stress σct.sp, determined according to Equation (2), and εx for the specimens for which the ε1 maps were analyzed previously (Figure 8), with the location and gauge length being the same as for VE-5 in Figure 9. After cracking, εx no longer describes material strain in a continuum sense; therefore, these curves were treated as a supplementary record of the specimen response over the adopted gauge length. In the pre-cracking range (Figure 12a), the curves showed a similar, approximately linear character, while differing in slope and in the εx value corresponding to the maximum stress σct.sp.max. In the specimens without fibers, the εx values corresponding to σct.sp.max were clearly lower than in the fiber-reinforced variants: they were 0.28‰ for CS-0/Vf = 0% and 0.33‰ for CS-22.5/Vf = 0%, whereas for CS-0/Vf = 0.5% and CS-22.5/Vf = 1% they were 3.76‰ and 0.81‰, respectively. For the fiber-reinforced specimens, σct.sp values were then read at εx = 4‰, 8‰, and 10‰. For CS-0/Vf = 0.5%, these values were 1.20, 0.75, and 0.70 MPa, corresponding to 98.2%, 61.2%, and 57.6% of σct.sp.max, respectively. For CS-22.5/Vf = 1%, the corresponding values were 1.43, 1.07, and 0.90 MPa, i.e., 81.1%, 60.5%, and 51.4% of σct.sp.max. These readings indicate that, in the analyzed examples, the fiber-reinforced specimens retained part of their load after reaching Fmax over the further εx range, which is consistent with the failure morphology shown in Figure 8.

4. Conclusions

Based on the presented test results and the conducted analyses, the following conclusions were formulated:
-
The applied 4 × 3 factorial design (CS × Vf) revealed a significant CS × Vf interaction for both compressive strength fc and splitting tensile strength fct.sp. This means that the effect of steel fiber dosage depends on the content of copper slag (CS) in the fly ash–copper slag (FA–CS) precursor system.
-
For fc, the effects of CS, Vf, and CS × Vf were significant. The most clearly confirmed increases relative to Vf = 0, after Holm correction, were obtained for CS = 7.5%—+73% (Vf = 0.5%; Δ = +6.53 MPa) and +102% (Vf = 1.0%; Δ = +9.09 MPa)—and for CS = 22.5%—+75% (Vf = 1.0%; Δ = +7.65 MPa).
-
The use of steel fibers did not lead to an increase in fct.sp across the entire investigated CS range. The direction and magnitude of the changes depended on the CS level, as indicated by the CS × Vf interaction. After Holm correction, the statistically confirmed effects were limited to a 34% decrease for CS = 0% at Vf = 0.5% (Δ = −0.58 MPa) and a 49% increase for CS = 22.5% at Vf = 1.0% (Δ = +0.56 MPa).
-
Due to the significant CS × Vf interaction, the conclusions regarding the effect of fibers on the mechanical properties of the composite were formulated separately for each CS level, i.e., by comparing Vf levels relative to Vf = 0 at constant CS. This approach avoids generalizations that would disregard the dependence of the fiber effect on CS content.
-
The DIC analysis and post-failure images supplemented the interpretation of the mechanical results by providing a qualitative assessment of deformation/damage localization in selected specimens. The ε1 maps at Fmax indicated that, in compression, the fiber-reinforced specimens exhibited a more dispersed pattern of increased-strain bands, whereas in splitting, a narrow localization zone consistent with the course of the splitting line dominated. The εx analysis based on virtual extensometers showed variation in transverse strains along the specimen height, with positive values in the central part and strains of the opposite sign near the load application zones. The σct.spεx relationships for the central VE-5 gauge showed that the fiber-reinforced specimens maintained the ability to carry load at higher εx values after Fmax was reached, which was consistent with the greater specimen integrity visible in the post-failure images.
-
Within the investigated range of CS content relative to the mass of FA, alkali-activated composites with different mechanical responses in compression and splitting were obtained. The results define the mechanical effects of using CS in the FA–CS system, but they do not allow its contribution to the formation of reaction products to be unequivocally assessed. A full evaluation of the function of CS as a component of the precursor system requires further phase and microstructural studies, as well as analysis of the fiber–matrix interfacial zone. The obtained relationships, including the CS × Vf interaction, should also be interpreted with reference to the adopted specimen preparation and curing conditions, which comprised exposure at 80 °C for 24 h and testing after 14 days. Under different curing conditions or at a different testing age, the course of these relationships may differ; therefore, their generalization requires separate experimental verification.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.; methodology, M.K.; software, M.K.; validation, M.K.; formal analysis, M.K.; investigation, J.S., M.K. and J.D.; data curation, J.S. and J.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K.; writing—review and editing, M.K., J.S. and J.R.; visualization, M.K., J.S. and J.R.; supervision, M.K.; project administration, M.K.; funding acquisition, J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research is financed/co-financed under the individual student research project „Młode umysły—Young Minds Project” from the subsidy increased for the period 2020–2026 in the amount of 2% of the subsidy referred to Art. 387 (3) of the Law of 20 July 2018 on Higher Education and Science, obtained in 2019.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The deformation measurements presented in this study were performed using the 3D optical system for strength testing and deformation analysis of research elements, purchased under a special-purpose subsidy from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland for an investment supporting the scientific activity of the Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences (No. 7360/IA/SP/2023; project manager: M.K.). The WDXRF Rigaku Supermini 200 used in the research is a part of the research facility of Innovation and Technology Center (Center of Research on Plant Production Technologies) in Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The main abbreviations used in this manuscript are listed below.
FmaxMaximum load
ANOVAanalysis of variance
CI9090% confidence interval
CScopper slag
DICdigital image correlation
FAfly ash
fccompressive strength
fct.spsplitting tensile strength
NaOHsodium hydroxide
Na2SiO3sodium silicate (water glass)
OLSordinary least squares
Q–Qquantile–quantile
RMSEroot mean square error
ROIregion of interest
VEvirtual extensometer
Vftotal fiber volume fraction
ε1maximum principal strain

References

  1. Provis, J.L. Alkali-Activated Materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 114, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, W.; Shumuye, E.D.; Tang, S.; Wang, Z.; Zerfu, K. Eco-Friendly Fibre Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete: A Critical Review on the Microstructure and Long-Term Durability Properties. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e00894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Danish, A.; Ozbakkaloglu, T.; Mosaberpanah, M.A.; Salim, M.U.; Bayram, M.; Yeon, J.H.; Jafar, K. Sustainability Benefits and Commercialization Challenges and Strategies of Geopolymer Concrete: A Review. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 58, 105005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, T.; Fan, X.; Gao, C.; Qu, C.; Liu, J.; Yu, G. The Influence of Fiber on the Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Concrete: A Review. Polymers 2023, 15, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Adam, R.; Zuaiter, H.; ElMaoued, D.; Tamimi, A.; AlHamaydeh, M. Mechanical Properties Quantification of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete with Slag and Fly Ash. Buildings 2025, 15, 3533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khan, Q.S.; Ahmad, R.H.; Qazi, A.U.; Kazmi, S.M.S.; Munir, M.J.; Javed, M.H. Integrated Mechanical and Eco-Economical Assessments of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. Buildings 2025, 15, 2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luhar, I.; Luhar, S. A Comprehensive Review on Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Myers, R.J.; Bernal, S.A.; Provis, J.L. Phase Diagrams for Alkali-Activated Slag Binders. Cem. Concr. Res. 2017, 95, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fu, Q.; Bu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, W.; Yuan, Q.; Niu, D. Hydration Characteristics and Microstructure of Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete: A Review. Engineering 2023, 20, 162–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Furtos, G.; Prodan, D.; Sarosi, C.; Popa, D.; Moldovan, M.; Korniejenko, K. The Precursors Used for Developing Geopolymer Composites for Circular Economy—A Review. Materials 2024, 17, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rajczyk, K.; Janus, G. Microstructure and Properties of Geopolymers Formed in the Alkali Activation Process of Fly Ash. Cem. Lime Concr. 2021, 26, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dehghani, A.; Aslani, F.; Panah, N.G. Effects of Initial SiO2/Al2O3 Molar Ratio and Slag on Fly Ash-Based Ambient Cured Geopolymer Properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 293, 123527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kuenzel, C.; Ranjbar, N. Dissolution Mechanism of Fly Ash to Quantify the Reactive Aluminosilicates in Geopolymerisation. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 150, 104421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hajimohammadi, A.; van Deventer, J.S.J. Dissolution Behaviour of Source Materials for Synthesis of Geopolymer Binders: A Kinetic Approach. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2016, 153, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, N.K.; Lee, H.K. Setting and Mechanical Properties of Alkali-Activated Fly Ash/Slag Concrete Manufactured at Room Temperature. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 47, 1201–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Palomo, A. Composition and Microstructure of Alkali Activated Fly Ash Binder: Effect of the Activator. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1984–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vikas, G.; Rao, T.D.G. Setting Time, Workability and Strength Properties of Alkali Activated Fly Ash and Slag Based Geopolymer Concrete Activated with High Silica Modulus Water Glass. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 2021, 45, 1483–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Ma, X.; Li, Y.; Jin, W. Effect of Water Glass on Compressive Strength and Pore Structure of Geopolymers. Non-Met. Mines 2017, 40, 46–49. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Nagalia, G.; Park, Y.; Abolmaali, A.; Aswath, P. Compressive Strength and Microstructural Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2016, 28, 04016144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grzeszczyk, S. The Truth about the Geopolymers. Cem. Lime Concr. 2021, 26, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, C.; Li, N.; Jiao, D.; Yuan, Q. Rheology of Alkali-Activated Materials: A Review. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 121, 104061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mahajan, D.S.; Meena, S.S.; Muhammad, S. Alkali-Activation of Copper Slag: Characterization and Mechanical Properties of Inorganic Polymer Binder. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 515, 163615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nieświec, M.; Niewiadomski, P.; Sadowski, Ł.; Schroefl, C. Waste Copper Slag in Special Concrete: Current Research and Future Applications. Mater. Des. 2025, 253, 113970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rybak, J.; Kongar-Syuryun, C.; Tyulyaeva, Y.; Khayrutdinov, A.M. Creation of Backfill Materials Based on Industrial Waste. Minerals 2021, 11, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ayano, T.; Kuramoto, O.; Sakata, K. Concrete with Copper Slag Fine Aggregate. J. Soc. Mater. Sci. Jpn. 2000, 49, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Al-Jabri, K.S.; Al-Saidy, A.H.; Taha, R. Effect of Copper Slag as a Fine Aggregate on the Properties of Cement Mortars and Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Velumani, M.; Kumar, K.N. Effect of Copper Slag on Mechanical and Durability Aspects for Different Strength Concretes. Cem. Lime Concr. 2021, 26, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shi, C.; Meyer, C.; Behnood, A. Utilization of Copper Slag in Cement and Concrete. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2008, 52, 1115–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Deep, A.; Sarkar, P. Enhancing Sustainability in Concrete Construction: Utilizing Copper Slag for Improved Properties of Geopolymer Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 453, 139044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, M.; Fan, X.; Chang, S.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Li, L.; Cai, X.; Liu, S. Preparation of High-Strength and Rapid-Hardening Alkali-Activated Copper Slag-Fly Ash-Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Ternary Cementitious Material and Its Carbonation Resistance Performance. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 22124–22140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Samal, S.; Blanco, I. An Application Review of Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer Composite. Fibers 2021, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ganesan, N.; Abraham, R.; Deepa Raj, S. Durability Characteristics of Steel Fibre Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 93, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Farhan, N.A.; Sheikh, M.N.; Hadi, M.N.S. Engineering Properties of Ambient Cured Alkali-Activated Fly Ash-Slag Concrete Reinforced with Different Types of Steel Fiber. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 04018142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rabiaa, E.; Mohamed, R.A.S.; Sofi, W.H.; Tawfik, T.A. Developing Geopolymer Concrete Properties by Using Nanomaterials and Steel Fibers. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 2020, 5186091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bellum, R.R. Influence of Steel and PP Fibers on Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of Fly Ash-GGBFS Based Geopolymer Composites. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 6808–6818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kaźmierowski, M.; Jaskulski, R.; Drzazga, M.; Nalepka, M.; Kordasz, M. Effects of the Addition of Short Straight Steel Fibers on the Strength and Strains of High-Strength Concrete during Compression. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 6989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shaikh, F.U.A. Pullout Behavior of Hook End Steel Fibers in Geopolymers. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2019, 31, 04019068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gao, X.; Yu, Q.L.; Yu, R.; Brouwers, H.J.H. Evaluation of Hybrid Steel Fiber Reinforcement in High Performance Geopolymer Composites. Mater. Struct. 2017, 50, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. El-Hassan, H.; Elkholy, S. Enhancing the Performance of Alkali-Activated Slag-Fly Ash Blended Concrete through Hybrid Steel Fiber Reinforcement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 311, 125313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Al-Majidi, M.H.; Lampropoulos, A.; Cundy, A.B. Steel Fibre Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete (SFRGC) with Improved Microstructure and Enhanced Fibre-Matrix Interfacial Properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 139, 286–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ranjbar, N.; Zhang, M. Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer Composites: A Review. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2020, 107, 103498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. PN-EN 450-1:2012; Fly Ash for Concrete—Part 1: Definition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria. Polish Committee for Standardization (PKN): Warsaw, Poland, 2012.
  43. ISO 13320:2020; Particle Size Analysis—Laser Diffraction Methods. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020.
  44. Briki, Y.; Zajac, M.; Haha, M.B.; Scrivener, K. Factors Affecting the Reactivity of Slag at Early and Late Ages. Cem. Concr. Res. 2021, 150, 106604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Z.; Provis, J.L.; Zou, J.; Reid, A.; Wang, H. Toward an Indexing Approach to Evaluate Fly Ashes for Geopolymer Manufacture. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 85, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ambikakumari Sanalkumar, K.U.; Lahoti, M.; Yang, E.-H. Investigating the Potential Reactivity of Fly Ash for Geopolymerization. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 225, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nurruddin, M.F.; Sani, H.; Mohammed, B.S.; Shaaban, I. Methods of Curing Geopolymer Concrete: A Review. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 2018, 5, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. PN-EN 12390-3:2020; Testing Hardened Concrete—Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens. Polish Committee for Standardization (PKN): Warsaw, Poland, 2020.
  49. PN-EN 12390-6:2011; Testing Hardened Concrete—Part 6: Tensile Splitting Strength of Test Specimens. Polish Committee for Standardization (PKN): Warsaw, Poland, 2011.
  50. Borito, S.M.; Zhu, H.; Ibrahim, Y.E.; Haruna, S.I.; Bo, Z. Synergistic Use of Nanosilica and Basalt Fibers on Mechanical Properties of Internally Cured Concrete with SAP: An Experimental Analysis and Optimization via Response Surface Methodology. Fibers 2025, 13, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Al-shawafi, A.; Zhu, H.; Haruna, S.I.; Ibrahim, Y.E.; Luqsum, S.A. Enhanced Impact Strength of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Using Steel Fiber and Polyurethane Grout Materials: A Comparative Study. Fibers 2024, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhou, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Gu, A.; Lu, Z. Dispersion, Workability and Mechanical Properties of Different Steel-Microfiber-Reinforced Concretes with Low Fiber Content. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ferrara, L.; Meda, A. Relationships between Fibre Distribution, Workability and the Mechanical Properties of SFRC Applied to Precast Roof Elements. Mater. Struct. 2006, 39, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. de la Rosa, Á.; Ruiz, G.; Poveda, E. Study of the Compression Behavior of Steel-Fiber Reinforced Concrete by Means of the Response Surface Methodology. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, S.; Zhang, C.; Liao, L. Investigation on the Relationship between the Steel Fibre Distribution and the Post-Cracking Behaviour of SFRC. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 200, 539–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lu, X.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, S.; Liu, J.; Li, Q.; Fan, J.; Wei, S. Mechanical Properties and Hydration of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers Modified by Copper Slag. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 39, 108914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Garcia-Lodeiro, I.; Palomo, A.; Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Macphee, D.E. Compatibility Studies between N-A-S-H and C-A-S-H Gels. Study in the Ternary Diagram Na2O-CaO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yip, C.K.; Lukey, G.C.; van Deventer, J.S.J. The Coexistence of Geopolymeric Gel and Calcium Silicate Hydrate at the Early Stage of Alkaline Activation. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1688–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Walkley, B.; San Nicolas, R.; Sani, M.-A.; Rees, G.J.; Hanna, J.V.; van Deventer, J.S.J.; Provis, J.L. Phase Evolution of C-(N)-A-S-H/N-A-S-H Gel Blends Investigated via Alkali-Activation of Synthetic Calcium Aluminosilicate Precursors. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 89, 120–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ponomar, V.; Yliniemi, J.; Adesanya, E.; Ohenoja, K.; Illikainen, M. An Overview of the Utilisation of Fe-Rich Residues in Alkali-Activated Binders: Mechanical Properties and State of Iron. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 330, 129900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mehrpay, S.; Hu, X.; Zhu, Z.; Shumuye, E.D.; Wan-Wendner, R.; Zhu, M.; Wang, J.; Wei, Z.; Ueda, T. The Influence of Testing Conditions on Damage Zone of Concrete in Uniaxial Compression: Insights from Stereo-DIC and Computational Modeling. Mater. Des. 2025, 253, 113981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jianhong, Y.; Wu, F.Q.; Sun, J.Z. Estimation of the Tensile Elastic Modulus Using Brazilian Disc by Applying Diametrically Opposed Concentrated Loads. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. 2009, 46, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 6. Residual diagnostic plots for the two-factor linear models with interaction, fitted according to Equation (3), for fc and fct.sp: (a) Q–Q plot of raw residuals for fc, (b) raw residuals versus fitted values for fc, (c) Q–Q plot of raw residuals for fct.sp, and (d) raw residuals versus fitted values for fct.sp. The red line denotes the reference line in the Q–Q plots and the level e = 0 in the residuals-versus-fitted plots.
Figure 6. Residual diagnostic plots for the two-factor linear models with interaction, fitted according to Equation (3), for fc and fct.sp: (a) Q–Q plot of raw residuals for fc, (b) raw residuals versus fitted values for fc, (c) Q–Q plot of raw residuals for fct.sp, and (d) raw residuals versus fitted values for fct.sp. The red line denotes the reference line in the Q–Q plots and the level e = 0 in the residuals-versus-fitted plots.
Fibers 14 00067 g006
Figure 12. Relationship between σct.sp and εx, where εx = Δl/L was determined for VE-5: (a) pre-cracking range and (b) full recorded response.
Figure 12. Relationship between σct.sp and εx, where εx = Δl/L was determined for VE-5: (a) pre-cracking range and (b) full recorded response.
Fibers 14 00067 g012
Table 2. Chemical composition of FA and CS, expressed as oxide contents (wt.%).
Table 2. Chemical composition of FA and CS, expressed as oxide contents (wt.%).
SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOK2ONa2OTiO2P2O5SO3ClCuOZnOPbO∑MO*
FA 50.5427.808.342.981.984.090.941.470.580.380.0080.030.04n.r.0.81
CS28.779.1824.3223.344.153.320.340.700.15n.r.0.0101.261.921.081.47
n.r.—not reported in the WD-XRF output; ∑MO*—sum of minor oxides not listed separately in the table.
Table 4. Results of the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for fc and fct.sp.
Table 4. Results of the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for fc and fct.sp.
fc
EffectdfSSMSFp
CS330.4710.169.732.20 × 10−4
Vf2144.2272.1169.051.11 × 10−10
CS × Vf698.2816.3815.692.97 × 10−7
Residual error2425.061.04
fct.sp
CS31.5230.5117.63.0 × 10−6
Vf20.1350.072.350.117
CS × Vf61.2410.217.161.83 × 10−4
Residual error240.6930.03
df—degrees of freedom; SS—sum of squares; MS—mean square (SS/df); F—test statistic (effect MS/residual MS); p—significance level.
Table 5. Model fit measures (Equation (3)) and residual diagnostics (OLS) for fc and fct.sp.
Table 5. Model fit measures (Equation (3)) and residual diagnostics (OLS) for fc and fct.sp.
ResponseR2R2adjRMSEStandardized Residuals
(min-max)
Cook’s D
fc0.920.881.022−1.97 to 2.620.287
fct.sp0.810.720.17−2.21 to 2.330.226
R2, R2adj—coefficients of determination; RMSE—root mean square error (MPa); max Cook’s D—maximum value of the measure of the influence of an individual observation on the model fit.
Table 6. Planned comparisons relative to Vf = 0% within CS levels for fc and fct.sp.
Table 6. Planned comparisons relative to Vf = 0% within CS levels for fc and fct.sp.
ResponseCSContrast (vs. 0%)Δ (MPa)CI90 *
(MPa)
pHolm
fcCS-00.5–0−0.39[−2.11, 1.33]0.777
CS-01–02.34[0.63, 4.06]0.151
CS-7.50.5–06.53[4.79, 8.28]0.002
CS-7.51–09.09[7.34, 10.84]<0.001
CS-150.5–01.92[0.86, 2.99]0.064
CS-151–00.51[−0.56, 1.58]0.777
CS-22.50.5–02.45[0.61, 4.29]0.151
CS-22.51–07.65[5.81, 9.49]0.001
fct.spCS-00.5–0−0.58[−0.85, −0.32]0.037
CS-01–0−0.31[−0.58, −0.05]0.368
CS-7.50.5–00.31[0.01, 0.62]0.416
CS-7.51–00.33[0.02, 0.63]0.416
CS-150.5–00.12[−0.21, 0.45]1
CS-151–0−0.11[−0.44, 0.21]1
CS-22.50.5–00.04[−0.10, 0.18]1
CS-22.51–00.56[0.41, 0.70]0.002
* CI90 is reported without multiplicity adjustment; formal significance was assessed using pHolm.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaźmierowski, M.; Sławiński, J.; Rybak, J.; Dąbrowska, J. Effect of Copper Slag Content and Hybrid Steel Fiber Addition on the Mechanical Response of an Alkali-Activated Geopolymer Composite. Fibers 2026, 14, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib14060067

AMA Style

Kaźmierowski M, Sławiński J, Rybak J, Dąbrowska J. Effect of Copper Slag Content and Hybrid Steel Fiber Addition on the Mechanical Response of an Alkali-Activated Geopolymer Composite. Fibers. 2026; 14(6):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib14060067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaźmierowski, Maciej, Jakub Sławiński, Jarosław Rybak, and Jolanta Dąbrowska. 2026. "Effect of Copper Slag Content and Hybrid Steel Fiber Addition on the Mechanical Response of an Alkali-Activated Geopolymer Composite" Fibers 14, no. 6: 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib14060067

APA Style

Kaźmierowski, M., Sławiński, J., Rybak, J., & Dąbrowska, J. (2026). Effect of Copper Slag Content and Hybrid Steel Fiber Addition on the Mechanical Response of an Alkali-Activated Geopolymer Composite. Fibers, 14(6), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib14060067

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop