Next Article in Journal
Influence and Optimization of Process Parameters on Surface Roughness of Selective Laser Melting of 316L Stainless Steel
Next Article in Special Issue
Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Considering Time-Varying Factors Based on Different Models
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Electromagnetic Ultrasonic Testing Technology in Pipeline Defects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hierarchical Design of EA ZnCo-LDH/NCS Electrode for Enhanced Electrochemical Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Research on the Mechanism of Steel Slag Fine Aggregate Damaging the Volume Stability of Cement-Based Materials

1
School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
2
Shandong Hi-Speed Urban & Rural Development Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China
3
Shandong Provincial Department of Finance, Jinan 250002, China
4
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2026, 16(1), 132; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010132
Submission received: 5 December 2025 / Revised: 6 January 2026 / Accepted: 7 January 2026 / Published: 20 January 2026

Abstract

With the depletion of natural sand and gravel resources and increasing emphasis on environmental protection, natural aggregates suitable for concrete production are becoming increasingly scarce. Steel slag, a by-product of steelmaking, is produced in substantial quantities yet remains underutilized due to its low recycling rate. Owing to the high strength and excellent compatibility of steel slag particles with cementitious materials, they demonstrate significant potential as a replacement for natural river sand in fine aggregate applications. However, the volumetric instability of steel slag has long been a major impediment to its widespread adoption in cement-based composites. This study examines the stability performance of cement mortar containing steel slag aggregate, with the objective of clarifying the mechanisms responsible for dimensional instability resulting from steel slag incorporation. When the replacement level exceeds 40%, the dimensional stability of the mortar deteriorates markedly. The initial contents of free CaO (f-CaO) and free MgO (f-MgO) in the steel slag were determined to be 1.58% and 1.14%, respectively. Following 50 h of hydrothermal treatment, 69.6% of f-CaO and 44.3% of f-MgO had hydrated, causing internal volumetric expansion and subsequent particle fracturing. Under elevated temperature conditions, over-burned lime demonstrated 220% volumetric expansion and completed its reaction within 40 min, consequently impairing early-age stability. In contrast, periclase (dead-burned MgO) exhibited 34% expansion and attained a reaction degree of merely 13.3%, suggesting a more substantial impact on long-term stability. For each mixture, linear expansion measurements were performed on n = 5 independent specimens, and results are reported as mean ± standard deviation.

1. Introduction

Steel slag is a by-product of the steelmaking process, generally accounting for 8%–15% of crude steel production [1]. In 2024, China’s steel production reached 840 million tons, steel slag emission was 153 million tons, and the accumulated stockpile was 1.446 billion tons. The utilization rate of steel slag in China is still less than 30% [2], which is far from the 90% utilization rate in developed countries. Steel slag that is not reasonably utilized is often piled up in the open air or buried underground, resulting in a serious waste of land resources [3]. The metal elements in steel slag can leach into soil and waterways, causing harm to the environment [4]. In addition, steel slag produces a large amount of dust during transportation, which can harm human health if not handled properly [5]. Therefore, it is necessary to implement effective resource utilization strategies to solve the problem of the massive accumulation of steel slag.
Currently, the most widely used metallurgical technologies in China are converter steelmaking and electric furnace steelmaking. The steel slag produced is primarily basic oxygen furnace slag (BOFS) and electric arc furnace slag (EAFS). The main chemical components of steel slag include CaO, SiO2, FeO, Al2O3, MgO, along with trace amounts of MnO, P2O5, and other constituents [6]. The primary minerals present in steel slag include C2S, C3S, the RO phase (composed of MgO, FeO, and MnO, and characterized by its high hardness and density), as well as f-CaO and f-MgO [7]. Variations in raw materials, smelting technology, and steel types used by different manufacturers result in distinct chemical and mineral compositions of steel slag [8]. Due to its high strength and excellent wear resistance, steel slag can be utilized as a paving material in road construction [9]. Steel slag contains C2S, C3S, C4AF, and other components similar to those found in cement clinker, and it possesses agglutinative properties, making it suitable as a supplementary cementitious material [10]. However, the hydration activity of steel slag is inferior to that of cement clinker, and its high iron content contributes to poor grindability. Certain minerals in steel slag exhibit stability issues, which limit its utilization as a cement material.
With the expanding global infrastructure, concrete and mortar are widely used, leading to over-exploitation of natural sand and gravel. Natural aggregate resources for concrete and mortar are becoming more and more limited in some regions, making it necessary to find a material similar to natural sand as a substitute [11]. The appearance of steel slag is similar to natural fine aggregate. It has high iron content, high hardness, small particle size after crushing, and excellent corrosion resistance. Therefore, it can be used as concrete aggregate or mortar fine aggregate, which alleviates the problem of shortage of natural sand and gravel resources and solves the problem of low utilization of steel slag [12,13]. Goyal et al. [14] showed that replacing natural coarse aggregate in concrete with different proportions of steel slag can improve the compressive and flexural strengths. Wang et al. [15] further demonstrated that with the substitution of fine aggregate by steel slag, the peak strength of concrete can be increased. Moreover, the ratio increases, and the peak stress of concrete increases and then decreases. Abu-Eishah et al. [16] suggested that the use of steel slag aggregate in concrete structures has the potential to improve the mechanical properties of these structures.
The use of steel slag as aggregate creates the problem of poor volume stability. This is mainly due to the presence of f-CaO and f-MgO in steel slag. These react with water to form Ca(OH)2 and Mg(OH)2, resulting in volumetric expansion of 98% and 148% [17], which can lead to cracking or even fracture of the mortar [18]. Xue et al. [19] found that hydration and expansion of steel slag is the main cause of mortar deterioration, which is manifested by volumetric expansion and cracking of the mortar surface. The main reason affecting the expansion of steel slag aggregate is the content of f-CaO and f-MgO. Zhou et al. [20] found that heating accelerates the hydration of free oxides present in the steel slag in the mortar surface layer, which results in high localized expansion stresses in the mortar, leading to mortar damage or fracture damage.
To enhance the engineering applicability of steel slag aggregates, a number of mitigation approaches have been reported in the literature, including (i) natural aging/weathering or hot-water/steam conditioning to promote the pre-hydration of free oxides, (ii) accelerated carbonation (or wet carbonation) to convert CaO/Ca(OH)2 into stable carbonates and to stabilize reactive phases, and (iii) chemical/alkali-based modification to reduce expansion and improve volumetric stability [2,10,21,22]. Despite these advances, the effectiveness of each treatment depends strongly on the form, distribution and hydration kinetics of f-CaO and f-MgO within slag particles, which motivates a systematic mechanistic investigation.
Therefore, when using steel slag as fine aggregate in mortar, attention must be paid to the problem of poor volume stability. In this study, steel slag produced by an iron and steel plant in Hebei Province will be analyzed, and its volume stability will be investigated. Although prior studies have recognized that free CaO and free MgO contribute to volumetric instability of steel slag aggregates, quantitative evidence linking time-resolved free-oxide hydration to particle cracking evolution and mortar-scale failure remains limited. In this work, we establish a multi-scale framework combining (i) accelerated boiling expansion tests, (ii) quantitative tracking of particle cracking rate, (iii) titration-based determination of f-CaO and f-MgO consumption with time, and (iv) hydrothermal simulations using over-burnt lime and dead-burnt magnesia to decouple the distinct kinetics and expansion capacities of CaO- and MgO-bearing phases. This integrated approach provides mechanistic insight into why f-CaO dominates early-age instability while f-MgO is more relevant to long-term stability. The 100 °C boiling regime is an accelerated protocol intended to promote rapid hydration of free oxides and enable comparative evaluation within a practical timeframe; accordingly, the measured expansion/damage evolution should be interpreted as a conservative (accelerated) scenario rather than a direct simulation of typical field temperatures.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

2.1.1. Steel Slag Aggregate

This study utilizes steel slag produced in Lingshou County, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province. This steel slag is basic oxygen furnace slag obtained after magnetic separation and purchased after one year of open storage without any further pretreatment before discharge. It is gray and resembles ordinary natural sand in appearance. The morphology of the steel slag particles is illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows SEM images of steel slag particles. As can be seen from the figure, the surface pores and cracks of the steel slag particles are relatively few. The dense surface of the steel slag aggregate makes its water absorption rate similar to that of natural sand. The interface transition zone structure and performance of it are not affected by the cement paste. This study investigated BOF steel slag fine aggregate obtained from a single source. Given that the composition and mineralogy of steel slag can vary with feedstock and steelmaking conditions, the quantitative stability thresholds reported herein may not be universally transferable. Future work will include multi-source slag datasets to evaluate variability and improve generalization. To characterize the gradation of the steel slag fine aggregate, sieve analysis was conducted in accordance with ASTM C136/C136M. The particle size distribution is presented in Table 1 (fineness modulus = 2.63). In addition, the apparent density and water absorption reported in Table 2 were determined following ASTM C128.

2.1.2. Characterization Methods

The chemical composition of the steel slag was determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF). Phase composition was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using Cu Kα radiation, and the crystalline phases were identified by matching the diffraction patterns with the ICDD PDF database. The morphology and elemental distribution of the steel slag aggregate were examined by scanning electron microscopy equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDS).
X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis was conducted using a wavelength-dispersive XRF spectrometer (ZSX Primus IV, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan; element range B–Cm). Powder samples were ground to ~200 mesh and prepared as pressed pellets (30 t) and/or fused glass beads (fusion temperature ~1050 °C) depending on the target oxides/elements. The instrument was operated under typical conditions of 40–60 kV and 50–150 mA, with vacuum/He purge selected according to the measured elements. Quantification was performed based on instrument calibration using reference materials with appropriate matrix corrections. SEM observations and EDS microanalyses were conducted using a high-resolution field-emission scanning electron microscope (Apreo S Hi, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an EDS detector. Imaging was performed mainly in high-vacuum mode, while low-vacuum/ESEM modes were used when required by sample charging behavior. The nominal spatial resolution of the instrument is 1.0 nm at 30 kV (SE) and 3.0 nm at 1 kV (SE) in high vacuum; 1.4 nm at 30 kV (SE) in low vacuum; and 1.4 nm at 30 kV (SE) in ESEM mode. For SEM imaging, an accelerating voltage of 5–15 kV was typically used, and EDS analyses were acquired at 15–20 kV with a working distance of ~10 mm and a live time of 30–60 s. Prior to observation, samples were mounted on conductive carbon tape and sputter-coated with a thin Au/Pd (or carbon) layer when necessary. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to qualitatively identify the mineralogical phases of the steel slag fine aggregates using a polycrystalline X-ray diffractometer (D8-02, Bruker AXS, Ettlingen, Germany). Data were collected over a 2θ range of 5–90° with a step size of 0.02° and a scanning speed of 10°/min; the goniometer accuracy was within ±0.01° (2θ). The diffractometer was operated under standard conditions using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) with a tube voltage of 40 kV and tube current of 40 mA. Phase identification was performed by matching the diffraction patterns with standard PDF/ICDD databases.
Table 3 presents the primary oxides and elements of steel slag as analyzed by XRF. The XRF analysis of steel slag reveals that its primary chemical components include CaO, Fe2O3, SiO2, MnO, MgO, along with trace amounts of Al2O3, P2O5, and other elements.
The steel slag was analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) with a D6000 diffractometer. The mineral composition of steel slag fine aggregate was qualitatively analyzed by D8-02 polycrystalline X-ray diffractometer produced by Bruker-AXS company in Germany. The mineral composition of the steel slag was determined using the ICDD international standard PDF card. Figure 3 presents the XRD pattern of steel slag aggregate. The diffraction reflections indicate that steel slag aggregate contains dicalcium silicate (C2S), tricalcium silicate (C3S), tricalcium aluminate (C3A), free calcium oxide (f-CaO), free magnesium oxide (f-MgO), the RO phase (a solid solution of iron, magnesium, and manganese), iron oxides (FeO, Fe2O3), and other silicate minerals. RO phase is an inert mineral in steel slag and consists of a solid solution of magnesium, manganese, and iron oxides [21]. The presence of iron oxides and RO phase makes the steel slag aggregate denser and harder than natural sand [23]. f-CaO and f-MgO lead to volume expansion of 98% [24] and 148% [25] upon hydration, resulting in cracking of building materials and structural damage [22]. In Figure 3, the most intense reflections of each identified crystalline phase have been labelled explicitly. The minor reflections at approximately 23°, 35°, 40°, and 48° 2θ are attributed to iron oxides and the RO solid-solution phase. No pronounced amorphous hump was detected in the background of the diffraction pattern, indicating that the amorphous content of this slag is relatively low; therefore, only the crystalline phases are discussed in this work.
The physical properties of steel slag are summarized in Table 2. The apparent density of steel slag aggregate is approximately 3481 kg/m3, which is higher than that of natural aggregates due to the presence of dense iron compounds in steel slag particles [26]. The water absorption of steel slag aggregate is 2.6%, which is higher than that of natural sand. In Table 2, SS and NA denote the mixtures prepared with steel slag aggregate and natural sand, respectively.

2.1.3. Over-Burnt Lime and Dead-Burnt Magnesia

To investigate the destruction of steel slag particles caused by the hydration reactions of free calcium oxide and free magnesia, the interactions of these substances with water in steel slag were simulated using over-burnt lime and dead-burnt magnesia. The XRD of over-burnt lime and dead-burnt magnesia is shown in Figure 4. The crystal spacing of over-burnt lime at (111), (200), and (220) is 2.7707, 2.3995, and 1.6967, and the crystal spacing of dead-burnt magnesia at (111), (200), and (220) is 2.4312, 2.1055, and 1.4888. The over-burnt lime was 97% pure, with traces of incompletely sintered CaCO3, and the dead-burnt magnesia was 99% pure. The relative intensities of the reflections in Figure 4 differ slightly from those in the corresponding PDF cards because of preferred orientation of the crystallites and differences in instrumental conditions. The standard patterns are therefore used only for phase identification and not for quantitative evaluation of phase proportions.

2.2. Testing Method

2.2.1. Linear Expansion of Steel Slag Aggregate Mortar

The hydration process of f-CaO and f-MgO is very slow at room temperature but accelerates significantly under heating conditions [27]. Since monitoring the expansion rate of the specimens at ambient temperature would greatly extend the experimental time, boiling was used to accelerate the hydration of f-CaO and f-MgO for stability assessment. The 100 °C boiling regime is used as an accelerated protocol to promote hydration of free oxides within a practical timeframe. Therefore, the measured expansion and damage evolution should be interpreted as accelerated/conservative behavior for comparative assessment and mechanism clarification, rather than a direct replication of typical field thermal histories. For each mixture, linear expansion measurements were performed on n = 5 independent specimens, and results are reported as mean ± SD.
Mortar specimens measuring 25 × 25 × 280 mm were prepared according to the mortar ratios in Table 4. In this table, the groups labelled 100%, 80%, 60%, 40%, and 20% correspond to mixtures in which steel slag fine aggregate replaces 100%, 80%, 60%, 40%, and 20% of the total volume of fine aggregate, respectively, while NA1 is the reference mortar prepared with only natural sand. Because steel slag has a higher density and different packing characteristics than natural sand, the total mass of fine aggregate (steel slag plus natural sand) is not exactly constant among groups, although the aggregate volume was kept comparable. After 7 days of demolding and curing, the lengths were measured using a specific length meter, and the length of the mortar was measured every 5 h of boiling. A total of 10 measurements were taken, and the test procedure is shown in Figure 5. The linear expansion of the mortar was calculated according to Equation (1). In Table 4 and Table 5, “Water reducer/%” denotes the dosage of a polycarboxylate-based water-reducing admixture expressed as a mass percentage of cement.
L A = L 1 L 0 280 × 100
where LA represents the linear expansion rate (%); l0 denotes the initial reading (mm); l1 refers to the reading after boiling (mm); and 280 represents the initial length of the specimen (mm).

2.2.2. Compression and Flexure Resistance Test

Make 40 × 40 × 160 mm mortar specimens with the ratios shown in Table 5. Group SA denotes the mortar prepared with steel slag fine aggregate, whereas group NA2 is the corresponding reference mortar prepared with natural sand only. After demolding and curing for 28 days, the specimens were subjected to boiling in water at 100 °C for 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 h, respectively. After each designated boiling duration, specimens were cooled to room temperature, and then tested for flexural and compressive strengths following the standard procedure. This accelerated protocol was adopted to evaluate the evolution of internal damage induced by slag aggregate expansion. Compressive and flexural strength tests were conducted on n = 5 independent specimens per mixture and age; results are reported as mean ± SD.

2.2.3. Steel Slag Aggregate Particle Cracking Rate

A specific number of steel slag particles were placed in a 100 °C constant-temperature water bath, and the cracking of the particles was observed every 5 h. Particle cracking rate was quantified from independent batches (n = 5), and the reported values represent mean ± SD.

2.2.4. Determination of Free Calcium and Magnesium by Titration

The determination of f-CaO and f-MgO in steel slag was carried out by complexometric titration. The experimental procedure is outlined below (Figure 6).
The method specified in GB/T 38216.3-2023, was used to determine the free calcium oxide content in steel slag [28].
The chemical reactions are shown in reactions (2) to (4).
CaO + C6H6O2→(CH2O)2Ca + H2O
Ca(OH)2 + C6H6O2→(CH2O)2Ca + H2O
C10H14N2NaO8+(CH2O)2Ca→C10H14N2CaO8+HOCH2CH2OH
The total amount of calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide was calculated using Equation (5).
ω 1 = T C a O × V 1 m × 1000 × 100
ω1 represents the mass fraction of combined free calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide (%); TCaO is the mass equivalent of calcium oxide per milliliter of EDTA standard solution (mg/mL); V1 is the volume of solution consumed by free total calcium (mL); m is the mass of the sample (g); and 1000 is the unit conversion factor.
The calcium hydroxide content was determined using thermogravimetric analysis. The percentage of mass loss during the weight loss step in the interval from 400 °C to 550 °C on the thermogravimetric curve is denoted as ω2. The calcium hydroxide content in the steel slag, denoted as ω3, was calculated using Equation (6):
ω 3 = 4.111 × 0.7567 × ω 2
The free calcium oxide content in steel slag was calculated using Equation (7):
ω = ω 1 ω 3
ω1 is the mass fraction (%) of free calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide; ω3 is the mass fraction (%) of calcium hydroxide (as calcium oxide).
The free magnesium oxide content was determined using EDTA titration, and the test procedure is shown in Figure 7:
The chemical reactions are shown in reactions (8) to (11).
CaO + C6→Ca (CH2O)2 + H2O
C10H14N2NaO8 + (CH2O)Ca→C10H14N2CaO8 + HOCH2CH2OH
MgO + C6H6O2→Mg(CH2O)2 + H2O
C10H14N2NaO8 + Mg(CH2O)2→C10H14N2MgO8 + HOCH2CH2OH
Finally, the f-MgO content was calculated using Equation (12).
ω M g O = T M g O × ( V 2 V 1 ) m × 1000 × 100
TMgO is the mass of magnesium oxide equivalent per milliliter of EDTA standard solution (g·L−1); m is the sample mass (g); and V2 is the total volume of solution consumed by calcium and magnesium (mL).

2.2.5. Determination of Hydration Expansion of Over-Burnt Lime and Dead-Burnt Magnesia

Over-burnt lime and dead-burnt magnesia were poured into a 100 mL measuring cylinder and mixed thoroughly at a water to ash ratio of 0.8, and the initial height was measured after settling. Place the measuring cylinder into a 100 °C water bath and measure the height of the slurry at intervals until no further change in slurry height is observed. Calculate the volume expansion using Equation (13).
L = V 1 V 0 V 0 × 100
where L is the expansion rate (%), V1 is the post-reaction volume (mm2), and V0 is the initial volume (mm2).

2.2.6. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis

Unless otherwise stated, all quantitative measurements were conducted using n = 5 independent specimens/batches per condition. Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and error bars in figures represent one standard deviation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mortar Linear Expansion

Figure 8 shows the influence of steel slag aggregate substitution rate on the linear expansion rate of mortar. The NA specimens had the lowest linear expansion of 0.045%, and the natural sand mortar specimens exhibited significant structural integrity after boiling with no cracking. However, the mortar specimens containing 20% steel slag aggregate admixture showed micro-cracks on the surface due to particle expansion.
The specimens with steel slag aggregate dosage of 40% and higher showed fracture during boiling (Figure 9), and the higher the dosage, the earlier all the specimens fractured. This further illustrates that the use of steel slag aggregate as aggregate creates serious stability problems.
Notably, Figure 8 and Figure 9 indicate that the 60% replacement group fractured slightly earlier than the 80% group in this test series. This apparent non-monotonic trend is attributed to specimen-to-specimen variability and the heterogeneous distribution of expansive slag particles (e.g., an expansive particle located close to the surface or near the mid-span can trigger earlier cracking). When considering the overall linear expansion level and the observed damage severity, the deterioration still becomes more pronounced with increasing steel slag replacement. We have clarified this point in Section 3.1 to avoid over-interpreting the fracture time as a sole stability indicator.
The addition of steel slag aggregates to mortar leads to stability problems, mainly in the form of volume expansion, surface deterioration, and fracture. This expansion originates from the hydration of f-CaO and f-MgO, which causes expansion of the steel slag aggregate, leading to expansion and cracking of the mortar.
Crack formation plays a critical role in the observed morphological changes in the mortar strips. When steel slag aggregate is located near the surface, the thinner cementitious layer offers reduced restraint against expansion. This insufficient confinement results in stress concentration at the surface, initiating microcrack development. With continued hydration of f-CaO and f-MgO, steel slag aggregate expansion intensifies, eventually leading to the detachment of the overlying material from the deformed surface region, as illustrated in Figure 10a.
When the steel slag aggregate located near the mortar’s center interface expands, the surrounding cement matrix develops transverse cracks in response to the expansion forces. With continued expansion, these cracks gradually extend to the entire mortar cross-section, eventually leading to complete fragmentation of the mortar bar [29] (Figure 10b). Examination of the fractured mortar cross-section reveals visible particles of steel slag aggregate, as shown in Figure 11.

3.2. Compressive Strength of Mortar

The use of linear expansion rates does not adequately reflect the internal damage to the mortar caused by steel slag cracking. Internal cracks in mortar affect its overall strength, but internal cracks are not readily detectable in the mortar’s appearance. The steel slag aggregate mortar specimens and natural mortar specimens were made in 40 × 40 × 160 mm molds. The compressive and flexural strengths of natural sand and steel slag aggregate mortars were determined after different boiling times, and the stability of steel slag aggregate was assessed by observing the strength changes. Figure 12 shows the compressive and flexural strengths of steel slag aggregate mortar and natural sand mortar after different boiling times.
The compressive strength of the steel slag aggregate mortar is slightly better than that of the conventional mortar. Steel slag aggregate has higher hardness than typical mineral admixtures, which increases the resistance to crack extension [30]. The roughness of the steel slag aggregate surface promotes mechanical interlocking within the interfacial transition zone, which results in a stronger bond between the steel slag aggregate and the cement matrix [31]. These combined effects contribute to improved mechanical properties.
The steel slag aggregate mortar maintained a stable compressive strength at the beginning of boiling, but after 50 h, the compressive strength was significantly reduced by 27.5% compared to the conventional mortar. Similarly, the flexural strength also decreased gradually and finally decreased by 59% after 50 h of boiling. The reason for the decrease in strength is the accelerated hydration of the swelling components in the steel slag particles under boiling conditions. Upon hydration, these components undergo volume expansion, which leads to cracking and internal stresses in the steel slag aggregate. When these stresses exceed the bearing capacity of the mortar, microcracks appear in the matrix [32]. This fracture process gradually weakens the internal bond structure and eventually leads to a decrease in mechanical properties.

3.3. Cracking of Steel Slag Aggregate Particles

f-CaO and f-MgO cause cracking of steel slag aggregates, which generates stresses and leads to expansion and cracking of the mortar. Therefore, it is essential to analyze the effect of f-CaO and f-MgO hydration and swelling on the particles. Figure 13 show the increasing trend of cracking of steel slag aggregates during the water bath process, with a final cracking rate of 5%. As shown in Figure 14, with the increase in boiling time, the contents of these two substances showed an increasing trend, which proved that more and more f-CaO and f-MgO were involved in the hydration to produce Ca(OH)2 and Mg(OH)2 with the increase in boiling time.
Figure 15 and Figure 14 show the changes in f-CaO and f-MgO contents in the steel slag aggregate and the reaction rates of f-CaO and f-MgO in the steel slag aggregate for different water bath times. After 5 h of water bath, 36% of f-CaO and 5.8% of f-MgO were consumed in the steel slag aggregate, at which time cracking phenomenon appeared in the steel slag aggregate, and the number of cracks increased with the time of the water bath, which lasted until 35 h, at which time 66.4% of f-CaO and 31.7% of f-MgO had already been reacted, and the steel slag aggregate did not continue to be cracked. Finally, after 50 h of water bath, the f-CaO content in the steel slag aggregate decreased significantly from the original 1.58% to 0.48%, with a reaction rate of 69.6%, while the f-MgO content decreased from 1.14% to 0.64%, with a reaction rate of 44.3%.
From the reaction rate after the water bath, the hydration activity of f-CaO is stronger, which has a greater impact on the initial stability, while the reaction rate of f-MgO is less than 50% after 50 h of water bath, which has poor hydration activity, and the hydration of f-MgO inside the steel slag aggregate is still difficult, which has a greater impact on the long-term stability.
Figure 16 illustrates the microscopic morphology inside the cracked steel slag aggregate. It can be seen that there are obvious hydration products gathered at the cracks of the particles, which are Ca(OH)2 and Mg(OH)2 formed by the reaction of f-CaO and f-MgO with water. This reaction leads to the cracking of the steel slag particles due to the expansion of their volume.
It should be noted that SEM–EDS provides elemental distribution rather than definitive phase identification. The co-location of Ca (or Mg) and O signals may be associated with Ca-/Mg-bearing phases or hydration products, but EDS alone cannot uniquely distinguish free CaO/free MgO from other Ca-/Mg-containing minerals (e.g., silicates, ferrites) in the complex slag system. Therefore, EDS results in this study are used as supportive spatial evidence and are interpreted together with XRD/titration results and the observed cracking evolution. Elemental analysis via EDS (Figure 17) reveals the chemical composition of different steel slag aggregates. While the slag contains substantial CaO (>30%), most calcium exists in mineral-bound forms rather than as free oxides. The observed spatial correlation between Ca and O signals does not exclusively indicate f-CaO presence. Magnesium shows limited distribution in steel slag aggregate minerals, with low overall content, making Mg-O coincident signals more likely to represent f-MgO locations.
These findings suggest that the stability problem stems mainly from the localized accumulation of the swelling phases rather than their overall content. Therefore, mitigation strategies should prioritize addressing the uneven distribution of f-CaO and f-MgO rather than focusing only on controlling their overall concentrations.

3.4. Mechanism of Poor Stability of Steel Slag Fine Aggregate

To strengthen the mechanistic interpretation, the present study integrates a multi-scale evidence chain linking macroscopic instability to meso-/micro-scale damage evolution and to the underlying chemical driving forces. Specifically, (i) the boiling expansion response of mortar bars provides a macroscopic manifestation of volumetric instability under accelerated hydration conditions and defines the damage severity and threshold behavior; (ii) the particle cracking rate directly quantifies the evolution of meso-scale damage in steel slag particles, serving as the structural “bridge” between mortar-scale expansion/failure and microstructural cracking; (iii) the titration-based tracking of f-CaO and f-MgO consumption with time offers a quantitative measure of the hydration degree (kinetics) of free oxides, allowing the temporal correspondence between chemical reactions and cracking/expansion to be evaluated; and (iv) the hydrothermal simulations using over-burnt lime and dead-burnt magnesia decouple the contributions of CaO- and MgO-bearing systems under controlled conditions, thereby supporting causal attribution of early-age damage to faster f-CaO hydration while highlighting the potential for residual long-term expansion associated with sluggish f-MgO hydration. By combining these datasets, the mechanism is not inferred from a single observation but is supported by consistent trends across scales: chemical consumption to localized damage evolution to macroscopic instability.

3.4.1. Expansion and Reaction Rates of f-CaO and f-MgO

To avoid ambiguity, we distinguish the kinetic effect from the total expansion capacity of free oxides. The kinetic effect refers to the hydration rate (i.e., how quickly f-CaO/f-MgO reacts and generates expansive products within a given exposure time), which primarily controls the timing and intensity of early-age damage under accelerated conditions. In contrast, the total expansion capacity denotes the ultimate volumetric expansion potential if hydration proceeds toward completion over a sufficiently long time. Therefore, a phase with fast kinetics (e.g., f-CaO) may dominate early cracking/expansion even if its ultimate capacity is limited, whereas a phase with slow kinetics but considerable capacity (e.g., f-MgO) may contribute less to early-age distress, yet remains a potential source of long-term expansion.
To study the mechanism of mortar damage caused by poor steel slag stability, the reactions of f-CaO and f-MgO in steel slag with water were simulated using over-burnt lime and dead-burnt magnesia.
The volumetric expansion of the hydration reaction of over-burnt lime and dead-burnt magnesia is shown in Figure 18. The reaction expansion of over-burnt lime reached 220% and ceased after 30 min, while the expansion of dead-burnt magnesia reached 35% and stopped increasing after 6 h. Figure 19 shows the change in the physical phase. After 40 min, the diffraction reflection corresponding to f-CaO disappears and only the reflection of calcium hydroxide remains, indicating that the over-burnt lime has completely reacted. Over-burnt lime undergoes a rapid hydration reaction under heating conditions, which can seriously affect stability. The diffraction reflection of f-MgO remains prominent even after 7 h of reaction, while the magnesium hydroxide peak is weak. This suggests that the hydration reaction of dead-burnt magnesia proceeds very slowly in the water bath, leaving most of it unreacted. Additionally, the produced magnesium hydroxide is poorly crystalline and present in low quantities.
Figure 20 illustrates the hydration product content of the two substances over time. After heating the reaction for 30 min, the conversion of the over-burnt lime was close to 100%, and the reaction was carried out for 40 min of complete reaction, when the reaction rate reached 100%. While the dead-burnt magnesia in the water bath reaction after 7 h, the sample contained only 19% of the generated Mg (OH)2, 81% of the roasted magnesium is still not reacted, and the reaction rate was only 13.3%. Dead-burnt magnesia does not undergo complete hydration under heating conditions alone.
Dead-burnt magnesia is typically calcined at temperatures between 1450 °C and 2200 °C [33], with the dead-burnt magnesia in this test calcined at 1650 °C. This calcination temperature is similar to that of magnesia formed during the calcination of steel slag. Higher calcination temperatures and longer durations produce larger grains with reduced water reactivity, resulting in a prolonged hydration process. Dead-burnt magnesia calcined at temperatures above 1500 °C exhibits longer hydration times compared to ordinary magnesia. The hydration of f-MgO is a pivotal factor in the long-term stability of steel slag due to the sluggish hydration process of dead burnt magnesia, which can span months or years. The above macroscopic expansion and cracking observations provide the phenomenological basis; in the following, we correlate these damage evolutions with the time-resolved consumption of f-CaO and f-MgO to identify the dominant chemical driving force at each stage.

3.4.2. Analysis of Hydration Products of f-CaO and f-MgO

Figure 21 shows the microscopic morphology of over-burnt lime at different heating hydration times between 0 and 40 min. As shown in Figure 21a, the observed crystals are f-CaO, with no detectable Ca(OH)2 crystals. In Figure 21b, flaky Ca(OH)2 crystals are visible on the crystal surfaces. Additionally, large, flaky Ca(OH)2 crystals were observed at the bottom, indicating that f-CaO reacted under the heating conditions of the water bath. This reaction produced flaky Ca(OH)2, which deposited on the particle surfaces.
In Figure 21c, many Ca(OH)2 crystals grow outward from the interior of the particles, indicating that f-CaO inside the particles is involved in the reaction. A large number of Ca(OH)2 crystals can be seen in Figure 21d. Combined with the XRD image in Figure 19, there is no longer any obvious diffraction reflections associated with f-CaO after 40 min of reaction, indicating that all the f-CaO is hydrated, which can be proved from the conversion of over-burnt lime in Figure 22. F-CaO reacts with water to form Ca(OH)2, which results in the agglomeration of the reaction products, a process that produces porosity and leads to volume expansion.
The evolution of microscopic crystal morphology in dead-burnt magnesia during hydration is presented in Figure 22a–e, showing progressive changes after 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 h of reaction, respectively. Figure 22a reveals the presence of a prominent f-MgO crystal before hydration. Consistent with established literature [34], elevated calcination temperatures and extended durations promote grain growth in magnesia. The experimental material, calcined at 1650 °C, consequently developed characteristically large f-MgO crystals.
The hydration process reveals distinct morphological changes as observed in Figure 22b,c, where initial plate-like Mg(OH)2 crystals appear and progressively increase in volume. Subsequent stages (Figure 22d,e) show significant surface accumulation of Mg(OH)2 crystals, though their particle size remains relatively small. XRD analysis demonstrates a weak Mg(OH)2 diffraction reflection alongside a dominant diffraction reflection of f-MgO, suggesting both limited crystallization of Mg(OH)2 and incomplete hydration of the dead-burnt magnesia. These observations are in agreement with previous findings that f-MgO particles under pressurized conditions show rupture and swelling after 12 h and take 144 h for complete dissolution [35]. This suggests that the hydration kinetics of f-MgO are very slow. While titration quantifies the hydration degree of free oxides in the complex slag system, controlled hydrothermal simulations are further employed to decouple CaO and MgO-bearing contributions and to rationalize why similar total contents may lead to different damage timings.

3.4.3. Mechanistic Explanation

The observation that f-CaO is associated with early-age instability while f-MgO is linked to long-term behavior should be interpreted in terms of timescale-dependent hydration. Under the accelerated boiling regime, f-CaO typically exhibits a higher hydration degree within short durations, leading to rapid accumulation of expansive products and stress concentration near particle defects. Meanwhile, f-MgO hydration is comparatively sluggish; thus, its contribution to expansion may be limited within the early observation window even though its residual expansion capacity may persist. In other words, our results primarily indicate a kinetics-controlled dominance of f-CaO at early ages and a capacity-retaining role of f-MgO at longer timescales, rather than implying that f-MgO is irrelevant to early behavior or that f-CaO has no long-term effect.
The hydration reaction of f-CaO and f-MgO in steel slag is the key factor leading to the volume expansion and structural damage of mortar. As shown in Figure 23, the hydration reaction of f-CaO and f-MgO in steel slag aggregate starts to occur after contacting with water, and the hydration reaction speed is accelerated with the increase in temperature. According to the reaction rate in Figure 22, the hydration activity of f-CaO is higher, and the hydration reaction is fast in a short time, which leads to early volume expansion and directly destroys the initial structural stability of mortar; the hydration reaction of f-MgO is slower, which needs a longer time to be completely hydrated, and it has a greater impact on the long-term stability problem. With the hydration reaction, the hydration products Ca(OH)2 and Mg(OH)2 are accumulated in the steel slag aggregate, which ultimately leads to the cracking phenomenon of the steel slag aggregate. When steel slag aggregate is mixed into mortar for use, cracking of the aggregate will lead to cracking of the mortar, causing volume stability problems. Therefore, the mechanism is supported by a coherent multi-scale consistency: the reaction kinetics quantified by titration/simulation temporally aligns with the onset of particle cracking, which in turn governs the macroscopic expansion/failure response under accelerated conditions.

4. Conclusions

To optimize the utilization of steel slag, its existing stability issues were investigated, and the stability of steel slag aggregate was evaluated. The reaction expansion, reaction rate, and product changes of over-burnt lime and dead-burnt magnesia were analyzed using a heated water bath. The study reached the following conclusions:
(1) Under the boiling condition of 100 °C, the expansion component in the steel slag aggregate undergoes a hydration reaction, and the mortar specimen mixed with steel slag aggregate has a higher linear expansion rate than the natural sand mortar, and the higher the doping amount of steel slag aggregate, the higher the linear expansion rate. When the dosage of steel slag aggregate reaches or exceeds 40%, the mortar will show different degrees of cracking and fracture.
(2) After boiling, the compressive strength of steel slag aggregate mortar specimens was 27.5% lower, and the flexural strength was 59% lower, compared to NA mortar specimens. Cracks formed within the boiled steel slag aggregate specimens caused reductions in compressive and flexural strength, highlighting the poor stability of steel slag.
(3) After 50 h of water bath, the cracking rate of steel slag particles was 5%, and the contents of f-CaO and f-MgO in steel slag decreased from 1.58% and 1.14% before boiling to 0.48% and 0.64%. 69.6% of f-CaO and 44.3% of f-MgO were involved in the hydration reaction, and the volumetric expansion led to cracking of the particles, which ultimately led to cracking and fracture of the mortar.
(4) Under heated conditions, over-burnt lime and dead-burnt magnesia accelerate hydration. The over-burnt lime expands by 220% in volume and reacts completely within 40 min, giving a reaction rate of 100%. In contrast, dead-burnt magnesium oxide increases in volume by 34%, and after 7 h, only 19% of the magnesium hydroxide is formed, a reaction rate of 13.3%. Even at high temperatures, the reaction rate of dead burned magnesium remains slow. It can be concluded that f-CaO has a great influence on the pre-stability of steel slag, while f-MgO has a greater influence on the long-term stability of steel slag. More attention should be paid to the long-term stability issues related to f-MgO than to f-CaO.
Under accelerated boiling conditions, mortar containing steel slag fine aggregate exhibited pronounced stability deterioration and even fracture at high replacement levels. Based on the observed damage evolution, a conservative upper limit (e.g., ≤20%–30%) is recommended for fine aggregate replacement unless stabilization pretreatments (such as aging, controlled hydration, or carbonation-based treatments) are implemented. The proposed framework combining expansion, cracking evolution, and free-oxide consumption can serve as a rapid screening tool to support mix-design decisions and potential acceptance criteria for steel slag aggregates.
Novelty of this study: (i) the dimensional instability of mortar incorporating unprocessed BOF steel slag fine aggregate was quantified through accelerated boiling expansion and strength degradation; (ii) the reaction degrees of f-CaO and f-MgO were determined and correlated with the cracking of individual slag particles; and (iii) a comparative hydration simulation using over-burnt lime and dead-burnt magnesia clarified the distinct roles of f-CaO (dominant in early-age instability) and f-MgO (dominant in long-term instability).
Future work: (1) investigate practical stabilization/pretreatment routes for steel slag sand (e.g., aging, carbonation, steam/hydrothermal treatment) and establish performance-based acceptance criteria; (2) perform long-term expansion monitoring under ambient curing and realistic service environments to validate the accelerated assessment; and (3) employ 3D techniques (e.g., micro-CT) to track the evolution of internal cracking and its coupling with transport properties and durability.

Author Contributions

H.Z.: Writing—review and editing, Writing—original draft, Visualization, Validation, Software, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. A.L.: Writing—review and editing, Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Resources, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization. H.Y.: Writing—review and editing, Writing—original draft, Visualization, Validation, Methodology. D.G.: Writing—review and editing, Writing—original draft, Visualization, Validation, Methodology. C.L.: Writing—review and editing, Writing—original draft, Visualization, Validation, Methodology. W.Y.: Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. W.D.: Writing—review and editing, Writing—original draft, Visualization, Validation, Methodology. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Aizhu Liu, Huiqing Yang, Dong Gao, Chunguang Liu were employed by the company Shandong Hi-Speed Urban & Rural Development Group Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, S.; Kim, J.; Qin, T. Mineral carbonation of iron and steel by-products: State-of-the-art techniques and economic, environmental, and health implications. J. CO2 Util. 2024, 81, 102707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guo, J.; Bao, Y.; Wang, M. Steel slag in China: Treatment, recycling, and management. Waste Manag. 2018, 78, 318–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhu, H.; Ma, M.; He, X.; Zheng, Z.; Su, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhao, H. Effect of wet-grinding steel slag on the properties of Portland cement: An activated method and rheology analysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 286, 122823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gan, Y.; Li, C.; Zou, J.; Wang, W.; Yu, T. Evaluation of the impact factors on the leaching risk of steel slag and its asphalt mixture. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e01067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gao, W.; Zhou, W.; Lyu, X.; Liu, X.; Su, H.; Li, C.; Wang, H. Comprehensive utilization of steel slag: A review. Powder Technol. 2023, 422, 118449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Z.; Ouyang, J.; Liu, J. Exploration of steel slag by lignin and sodium citrate modification for mechanical properties and stability of steel slag-cement cementitious materials. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 478, 143971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, Z.; Li, R.; Zheng, X.; Liu, J. Carbon sequestration of steel slag and carbonation for activating RO phase. Cem. Concr. Res. 2021, 139, 106271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mombelli, D.; Mapelli, C.; Barella, S.; Di Cecca, C.; Le Saout, G.; Garcia-Diaz, E. The effect of chemical composition on the leaching behaviour of electric arc furnace (EAF) carbon steel slag during a standard leaching test. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 1050–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aziz, M.M.A.; Hainin, M.R.; Yaacob, H.; Ali, Z.; Chang, F.L.; Adnan, A.M. Characterisation and utilisation of steel slag for the construction of roads and highways. Mater. Res. Innov. 2014, 18, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rui, Y.; Qian, C.; Zhang, X.; Ma, Z. Different carbon treatments for steel slag powder and their subsequent effects on properties of cement-based materials. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 362, 132407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kumar, P.; Shukla, S. Utilization of steel slag waste as construction material: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 78, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, Y.; Xie, J.; Zhao, J.; Zuo, K. Utilization of unprocessed steel slag as fine aggregate in normal- and high-strength concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 204, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, H.-B.; Yang, B. Effect of heat treatment on microstructures and mechanical properties of a bulk nanostructured Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. Engl. Ed. 2009, 16, 672–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Goyal, P.K.; Mudgal, M.; Ghosh, P.K. Assessing the viability of using BOF steel slag treated with tartaric acid as coarse aggregate in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 436, 136912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, C.; Ye, G.; Jin, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Hu, D.; Wei, Y. The uniaxial compressive stress-strain relations of steel slag fine aggregate concrete under steam curing. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 459, 139820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Abu-Eishah, S.I.; El-Dieb, A.S.; Bedir, M.S. Performance of concrete mixtures made with electric arc furnace (EAF) steel slag aggregate produced in the Arabian Gulf region. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 34, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Andrade, H.D.; de Carvalho, J.M.F.; Costa, L.C.B.; Elói, F.P.F.; do Carmo e Silva, K.D.; Peixoto, R.A.F. Mechanical performance and resistance to carbonation of steel slag reinforced concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 298, 123910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Choi, S.Y.; Yang, E.I. An experimental study on alkali silica reaction of concrete specimen using steel slag as aggregate. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xue, J.-C.; Wang, W.-C.; Wu, C.-H.; Hong, T.-J.; Chen, T.-H.; Huang, C.-Y. Deterioration analysis and expansion behavior prediction of electric arc furnace slag as fine aggregate in mortar. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 85, 108717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, Z.; Jin, Q.; Hu, D.; Zhu, L.; Li, Z.; Su, W. Long-term volume stability of steel slag sand mortar and concrete. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2025, 22, e04197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, W.; Cao, M.; Wang, D.; Zhao, J.; Chang, J. Improving the hydration activity and volume stability of the RO phases in steel slag by combining alkali and wet carbonation treatments. Cem. Concr. Res. 2023, 172, 107236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pang, B.; Zhou, Z.; Xu, H. Utilization of carbonated and granulated steel slag aggregate in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 84, 454–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yan, J.; Wu, S.; Yang, C.; Zhao, Z.; Xie, J. Influencing mechanisms of RO phase on the cementitious properties of steel slag powder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 350, 128926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, M.; Cheng, X.; Chen, X. Studies on the volumetric stability and mechanical properties of cement-fly-ash-stabilized steel slag. Materials 2021, 14, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jiang, Q.; Liu, W.; Wu, S. Analysis on factors affecting moisture stability of steel slag asphalt concrete using grey correlation method. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 397, 136490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, X.; Bao, Y.-P. Separation and extraction of iron resources from hazardous electric arc furnace (EAF) steel slag: Aggregation of Fe-rich layers, magnetic separation, powder characterization. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 190, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Q.; Wang, D.; Zhuang, S. The soundness of steel slag with different free CaO and MgO contents. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 151, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. GB/T 38216.3-2023; Determination of Free Calcium Oxide Content in Steel Slag by EDTA Titration and Thermogravimetric Analysis. State Administration for Market Regulation: Beijing, China, 2023.
  29. Albostami, A.S.; Al-Hamd, R.K.S.; Al-Matwari, A.A. Data-driven predictive modeling of steel slag concrete strength for sustainable construction. Buildings 2024, 14, 2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qiao, C.; Suraneni, P.; Weiss, J. Damage in cement pastes exposed to NaCl solutions. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 171, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Skaf, M.; Ortega-López, V.; Fuente-Alonso, J.A.; Santamaría, A.; Manso, J.M. Ladle furnace slag in asphalt mixes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 122, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, C.; Huang, Z.; Wu, S.; He, X.; Su, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, H.; Wang, F.; Zhang, L. Recycling steel slag as aggregate in developing an ultra-thin friction course with high comprehensive road performance. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 449, 138539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Canterford, J.H. Magnesia—An important industrial mineral: A review of processing options and uses. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2007, 2, 57–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ilango, N.K.; Nguyen, H.; German, A.; Winnefeld, F.; Kinnunen, P. Role of magnesium acetate in hydration and carbonation of magnesium oxide-based cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 2024, 175, 107357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Park, S.; Ma, J.; Yun, T.S.; Jeon, S.; Byeun, Y.; Kang, D.; Jang, J. Pore-scale swelling mechanism of magnesium oxide granules during hydration. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 251, 119101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Steel slag particles.
Figure 1. Steel slag particles.
Coatings 16 00132 g001
Figure 2. SEM image of the surface of steel slag particles.
Figure 2. SEM image of the surface of steel slag particles.
Coatings 16 00132 g002
Figure 3. XRD diagram of steel slag.
Figure 3. XRD diagram of steel slag.
Coatings 16 00132 g003
Figure 4. XRD plots of over-burnt lime (a) and dead-burnt magnesia (b).
Figure 4. XRD plots of over-burnt lime (a) and dead-burnt magnesia (b).
Coatings 16 00132 g004
Figure 5. Test process of mortar linear expansion.
Figure 5. Test process of mortar linear expansion.
Coatings 16 00132 g005
Figure 6. Flow of titrimetric determination of free calcium oxide content.
Figure 6. Flow of titrimetric determination of free calcium oxide content.
Coatings 16 00132 g006
Figure 7. Flow chart of the titrimetric determination of free magnesium oxide content.
Figure 7. Flow chart of the titrimetric determination of free magnesium oxide content.
Coatings 16 00132 g007
Figure 8. The influence of steel slag aggregate substitution rate on the linear expansion rate of mortar.
Figure 8. The influence of steel slag aggregate substitution rate on the linear expansion rate of mortar.
Coatings 16 00132 g008
Figure 9. Cracking diagram of specimens with different substitution rates.
Figure 9. Cracking diagram of specimens with different substitution rates.
Coatings 16 00132 g009
Figure 10. Two forms of damage to specimens by steel slag aggregates: surface spalling (a) and fracture (b).
Figure 10. Two forms of damage to specimens by steel slag aggregates: surface spalling (a) and fracture (b).
Coatings 16 00132 g010
Figure 11. Mortar section with cracked steel slag aggregate.
Figure 11. Mortar section with cracked steel slag aggregate.
Coatings 16 00132 g011
Figure 12. Compressive strength of mortar.
Figure 12. Compressive strength of mortar.
Coatings 16 00132 g012
Figure 13. Cracking rate of steel Slag aggregate.
Figure 13. Cracking rate of steel Slag aggregate.
Coatings 16 00132 g013
Figure 14. The reaction rate of f-CaO and f-MgO..
Figure 14. The reaction rate of f-CaO and f-MgO..
Coatings 16 00132 g014
Figure 15. Content of f-CaO and f-MgO in steel slag.
Figure 15. Content of f-CaO and f-MgO in steel slag.
Coatings 16 00132 g015
Figure 16. Micro-morphology of cracked steel slag aggregate.
Figure 16. Micro-morphology of cracked steel slag aggregate.
Coatings 16 00132 g016
Figure 17. Steel slag aggregate cross-section element distribution.
Figure 17. Steel slag aggregate cross-section element distribution.
Coatings 16 00132 g017
Figure 18. Expansion of over-burnt lime (a) and dead-burnt magnesia (b) hydration reaction.
Figure 18. Expansion of over-burnt lime (a) and dead-burnt magnesia (b) hydration reaction.
Coatings 16 00132 g018
Figure 19. Material changes during hydration of over-burnt lime (a) and dead-burnt magnesia (b).
Figure 19. Material changes during hydration of over-burnt lime (a) and dead-burnt magnesia (b).
Coatings 16 00132 g019
Figure 20. Trends in the content of hydration reaction products of over-burnt lime (a) and dead-burnt magnesia (b).
Figure 20. Trends in the content of hydration reaction products of over-burnt lime (a) and dead-burnt magnesia (b).
Coatings 16 00132 g020
Figure 21. Microscopic morphology evolution of over-burnt lime during heating hydration at 100 °C for (a) 0 min, (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min, and (d) 40 min.
Figure 21. Microscopic morphology evolution of over-burnt lime during heating hydration at 100 °C for (a) 0 min, (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min, and (d) 40 min.
Coatings 16 00132 g021
Figure 22. Changes in the microscopic morphology of dead-burnt magnesia during heating hydration at 100 °C for (a) 0 h, (b) 1 h, (c) 3 h, (d) 5 h, and (e) 7 h.
Figure 22. Changes in the microscopic morphology of dead-burnt magnesia during heating hydration at 100 °C for (a) 0 h, (b) 1 h, (c) 3 h, (d) 5 h, and (e) 7 h.
Coatings 16 00132 g022
Figure 23. Cracking of steel slag due to hydration products.
Figure 23. Cracking of steel slag due to hydration products.
Coatings 16 00132 g023
Table 1. Particle size distribution of steel slag aggregate.
Table 1. Particle size distribution of steel slag aggregate.
Sieve Size (mm)Cumulative Passing (%)Cumulative Retained (%)
4.751000
2.368614
1.186832
0.64852
0.32674
Table 2. Physical performance index of steel slag.
Table 2. Physical performance index of steel slag.
Apparent Density (kg/m3)Water Absorption (%)
SS34812.6
NA26001.7
Table 3. XRF analysis table of steel slag.
Table 3. XRF analysis table of steel slag.
CompoundCaOFe2O3SiO2MnOMgOAl2O3P2O5TiO2Cr2O3V2O5Others
Wt/%37.1437.069.845.492.992.331.321.270.910.561.09
Table 4. Mortar mix ratio.
Table 4. Mortar mix ratio.
GroupWater/gSteel Slag Sand/gSand/gCement/gWater Reducer/%
100%157.5125003151
80%157.510001893150.8
60%157.57503783150.6
40%157.55005673150.4
20%157.52507563150.2
NA1157.509453150
Table 5. Mortar mix ratio.
Table 5. Mortar mix ratio.
GroupWater/gSteel Slag Sand/gSand/gCement/gWater Reducer/%
SA225178604501
NA2225013504500
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhai, H.; Liu, A.; Yang, H.; Gao, D.; Liu, C.; Yan, W.; Du, W. Research on the Mechanism of Steel Slag Fine Aggregate Damaging the Volume Stability of Cement-Based Materials. Coatings 2026, 16, 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010132

AMA Style

Zhai H, Liu A, Yang H, Gao D, Liu C, Yan W, Du W. Research on the Mechanism of Steel Slag Fine Aggregate Damaging the Volume Stability of Cement-Based Materials. Coatings. 2026; 16(1):132. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010132

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhai, Haoran, Aizhu Liu, Huiqing Yang, Dong Gao, Chunguang Liu, Wenda Yan, and Whengyu Du. 2026. "Research on the Mechanism of Steel Slag Fine Aggregate Damaging the Volume Stability of Cement-Based Materials" Coatings 16, no. 1: 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010132

APA Style

Zhai, H., Liu, A., Yang, H., Gao, D., Liu, C., Yan, W., & Du, W. (2026). Research on the Mechanism of Steel Slag Fine Aggregate Damaging the Volume Stability of Cement-Based Materials. Coatings, 16(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010132

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop