Next Article in Journal
Cross-Scale Mechanical Contact Analysis from Asperities to Rough Surfaces: A Critical Review
Previous Article in Journal
Fog-Proof and Anti-Reflection Nano-Coating Prepared by Atmosphere Plasma Spraying
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chrome Doped Hydroxyapatite Enriched with Amoxicillin Layers for Biomedical Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Insights into Biomaterials and Coatings

by
Richard Drevet
1,* and
Hicham Benhayoune
2
1
Department of Plasma Physics and Technology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-61137 Brno, Czech Republic
2
Institut de Thermique, Mécanique et Matériaux (ITheMM), EA 7548, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), Bât.6, Moulin de la Housse, BP 1039, 51687 Reims Cedex 2, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2025, 15(3), 332; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15030332
Submission received: 3 March 2025 / Accepted: 7 March 2025 / Published: 13 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Biomaterials and Coatings)
Global life expectancy is constantly rising throughout the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) predicts that the world population aged 80 years or over will triple by 2050 to reach 426 million [1]. The constant aging of the population implies an increasing demand for new solutions in bone tissue engineering [2,3]. Innovative biomaterials and bioactive coatings are constantly in development to produce new bone implants with better properties and an extended lifetime [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Biocompatibility and bioactivity are two major requirements for bone implants. Biocompatibility is the ability of a material to be in contact with a biological system without producing any adverse effects [12,13,14]. The bioactivity of bone implants defines their ability to develop a direct, adherent, and strong bonding with bone tissue [15,16,17,18,19]. This Special Issue on “Advanced Biomaterials and Coatings” gathers recent research articles dealing with the latest developments on this research topic [20].
The article by Ciobanu et al. describes an innovative chromium-doped hydroxyapatite coating deposited by the dip coating technique [21]. The low temperature of this deposition process allows the coating to be enriched with an antibiotic such as amoxicillin. The biocompatibility of the obtained coatings was studied in contact with bone cells (MG63 cell line) and the antibacterial activity of the coating was evaluated against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
In another article, Alhotan et al. used 3D printing to produce a synthetic polymer material (polyamide 12) commonly used to reconstruct bony defects. To make its surface bioactive, the 3D-printed polymer was coated with hydroxyapatite using light-cured resin cement [22].
In their work, Kang et al. synthesized a composite material made of a glass ionomer cement named calcium fluoroaluminosilicate (CFAS) filled with nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA). This composite material shows enhanced cytocompatibility and histocompatibility, which make it suitable for dental repairs [23].
Dhiflaoui et al. developed a composite coating made of titanium oxide (TiO2) and hydroxyapatite (HaP) deposited by spray pyrolysis on titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V). They studied the morphology, chemical composition, phase composition, and mechanical properties of this innovative composite coating. They used electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to show that the coating improves the corrosion resistance of Ti6Al4V in simulated body fluids [24].
In their article, Golubchikov et al. used precipitation to produce a bioceramic powder from an aqueous solution containing calcium, sodium, phosphate, and silicate ions. Different annealing temperatures were studied to crystallize and densify the precipitated bioceramic powder. The biocompatible and bioresorbable phases in the powder make it suitable for the treatment of bone defects [25].
In another article, Ferroni et al. developed a composite material made of polycaprolactone (PCL) combined with reduced graphene oxide (rGO). This innovative material is biocompatible, supports the adhesion and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and shows good antibacterial properties [26].
Handral et al. studied the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of nanoparticles of zinc oxide (ZnO), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and silicon dioxide (SiO2). These experiments were conducted with pluripotent human embryonic stem cell-derived fibroblasts (hESC-Fib) [27].
The article by Drevet et al. comprehensively reviews the electrophoretic deposition of bioactive glass coatings on metallic bone implants. Bioactive glasses are highly reactive materials in physiological environments. They are commonly used to support bone repair. The mechanisms involved in the electrophoretic deposition process are thoroughly described [28].
The contribution by Robert B. Heimann is a detailed review of the literature dealing with the physicochemical and biomedical properties of plasma-sprayed hydroxylapatite (HAp) coatings. These bioactive coatings are routinely deposited on the surface of metallic endoprosthetic and dental root implants [29].
Sergey V. Dorozhkin reviews preparation methods, properties, and applications of calcium orthophosphate (CaPO4)-based bioceramics used for biomedical applications such as artificial bone grafting, bone augmentation, maxillofacial reconstruction, spinal fusion, periodontal disease repair, and bone filling after tumor surgery. Prospective future applications of calcium orthophosphate are also comprehensively discussed [30].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.D. and H.B.; validation, R.D. and H.B.; resources, R.D. and H.B.; writing—original draft preparation, R.D. and H.B.; writing—review and editing, R.D. and H.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  2. Gheno, R.; Cepparo, J.M.; Rosca, C.E.; Cotton, A. Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Elderly. J. Clin. Imaging Sci. 2012, 2, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dai, K.; Geng, Z.; Zhang, W.; Wei, X.; Wang, J.; Nie, G.; Liu, C. Biomaterial design for regenerating aged bone: Materiobiological advances and paradigmatic shifts. Nat. Sci. Rev. 2024, 11, nwae076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Drevet, R.; Zhukova, Y.; Kadirov, P.; Dubinskiy, S.; Kazakbiev, A.; Pustov, Y.; Prokoshkin, S. Tunable Corrosion Behavior of Calcium Phosphate Coated Fe-Mn-Si Alloys for Bone Implant Applications. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2018, 49, 6553–6560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, Q.; Thouas, G.A. Metallic implant biomaterials. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2015, 87, 1–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kloster, G.A.; Rivero, G.; Ballarre, J.; Herrera Seitz, M.K.; Ceré, S.M.; Abraham, G.A. Innovative pH-triggered antibacterial nanofibrous coatings for enhanced metallic implant properties. Front. Mater. 2024, 11, 1484465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhou, K.; Simonassi-Paiva, B.; Fehrenbach, G.; Yan, G.; Portela, A.; Pogue, R.; Cao, Z.; Fournet, M.B.; Devine, D.M. Investigating the Promising P28 Peptide-Loaded Chitosan/Ceramic Bone Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration. Molecules 2024, 29, 4208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lanzino, M.C.; Le, L.Q.R.V.; Wilbig, J.; Rheinheimer, W.; Seidenstuecker, M.; Günster, J.; Killinger, A. Thin GB14 coatings on implants using HVSFS. Front. Mater. 2024, 11, 1522447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alluhaidan, T.; Qaw, M.; Garcia, I.M.; Montoya, C.; Orrego, S.; Melo, M.A. Seeking Endurance: Designing Smart Dental Composites for Tooth Restoration. Designs 2024, 8, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Balasubramani, G.; Premkumar, J.; Paul Pradeep, J. Optimizing bone-metal implant interfaces: The role of bio-ceramic coatings in improving stability and tissue metabolism. Front. Mater. 2025, 11, 1514559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lallukka, M.; Miola, M.; Verné, E.; Baino, F. Silver-doped glass-ceramic scaffolds with antibacterial and bioactive properties for bone substitution. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 30997–31005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Williams, D.F. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 2941–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Williams, D.F. Biocompatibility pathways and mechanisms for bioactive materials: The bioactivity zone. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 10, 306–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nirwan, V.P.; Filova, E.; Al-Kattan, A.; Kabashin, A.V.; Fahmi, A. Smart Electrospun Hybrid Nanofibers Functionalized with Ligand-Free Titanium Nitride (TiN) Nanoparticles for Tissue Engineering. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Modelski Schatkoski, V.; Larissa do Amaral Montanheiro, T.; Rossi Canuto de Menezes, B.; Monteiro Pereira, R.; Faquine Rodrigues, K.; Guimarães Ribas, R.; Morais da Silva, D.; Patrocínio Thim, G. Current advances concerning the most cited metal ions doped bioceramics and silicate-based bioactive glasses for bone tissue engineering. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 2999–3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Drevet, R.; Fauré, J.; Benhayoune, H. Calcium Phosphates and Bioactive Glasses for Bone Implant Applications. Coatings 2023, 13, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shaikh, M.S.; Fareed, M.A.; Zafar, M.S. Bioactive Glass Applications in Different Periodontal Lesions: A Narrative Review. Coatings 2023, 13, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lukaviciute, L.; Ganceviciene, R.; Tsuru, K.; Ishikawa, K.; Yang, J.C.; Grigoraviciute, I.; Kareiva, A. Cationic substitution effects in phosphate-based bioceramics—A way towards superior bioproperties. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 34479–34509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tripathi, S.; Raheem, A.; Dash, M.; Kumar, P.; Elsebahy, A.; Singh, H.; Manivasagam, G.; Sekhar Nanda, H. Surface engineering of orthopedic implants for better clinical adoption. J. Mater. Chem. B 2024, 12, 11302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Drevet, R.; Benhayoune, H. Advanced Biomaterials and Coatings. Coatings 2022, 12, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ciobanu, C.S.; Predoi, D.; Iconaru, S.L.; Rokosz, K.; Raaen, S.; Negrila, C.C.; Ghegoiu, L.; Bleotu, C.; Predoi, M.V. Chrome Doped Hydroxyapatite Enriched with Amoxicillin Layers for Biomedical Applications. Coatings 2025, 15, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alhotan, A.; Alhijji, S.; Abdalbary, S.A.; Bayoumi, R.E.; Matinlinna, J.P.; Hamdy, T.M.; Abdelraouf, R.M. An Advanced Surface Treatment Technique for Coating Three-Dimensional-Printed Polyamide 12 by Hydroxyapatite. Coatings 2024, 14, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kang, S.; Park, S.J.; Kim, S.; Kang, I.-K. Chemical Bonding of Nanorod Hydroxyapatite to the Surface of Calciumfluoroaluminosilicate Particles for Improving the Histocompatibility of Glass Ionomer Cement. Coatings 2024, 14, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dhiflaoui, H.; Ben Salem, S.; Salah, M.; Dabaki, Y.; Chayoukhi, S.; Gassoumi, B.; Hajjaji, A.; Ben Cheikh Larbi, A.; Amlouk, M.; Benhayoune, H. Influence of TiO2 on the Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Resistance of Hydroxyapatite HaP + TiO2 Nanocomposites Deposited Using Spray Pyrolysis. Coatings 2023, 13, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Golubchikov, D.; Safronova, T.V.; Nemygina, E.; Shatalova, T.B.; Tikhomirova, I.N.; Roslyakov, I.V.; Khayrutdinova, D.; Platonov, V.; Boytsova, O.; Kaimonov, M.; et al. Powder Synthesized from Aqueous Solution of Calcium Nitrate and Mixed-Anionic Solution of Orthophosphate and Silicate Anions for Bioceramics Production. Coatings 2023, 13, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferroni, L.; Gardin, C.; Rigoni, F.; Balliana, E.; Zanotti, F.; Scatto, M.; Riello, P.; Zavan, B. The Impact of Graphene Oxide on Polycaprolactone PCL Surfaces: Antimicrobial Activity and Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell. Coatings 2022, 12, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Handral, H.K.; Ashajyothi, C.; Sriram, G.; Kelmani, C.R.; Dubey, N.; Cao, T. Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Fibroblasts. Coatings 2021, 11, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Drevet, R.; Fauré, J.; Benhayoune, H. Electrophoretic Deposition of Bioactive Glass Coatings for Bone Implant Applications: A Review. Coatings 2024, 14, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Heimann, R.B. Plasma-Sprayed Osseoconductive Hydroxylapatite Coatings for Endoprosthetic Hip Implants: Phase Composition, Microstructure, Properties, and Biomedical Functions. Coatings 2024, 14, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dorozhkin, S.V. Calcium Orthophosphate (CaPO4)-Based Bioceramics: Preparation, Properties, and Applications. Coatings 2022, 12, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Drevet, R.; Benhayoune, H. New Insights into Biomaterials and Coatings. Coatings 2025, 15, 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15030332

AMA Style

Drevet R, Benhayoune H. New Insights into Biomaterials and Coatings. Coatings. 2025; 15(3):332. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15030332

Chicago/Turabian Style

Drevet, Richard, and Hicham Benhayoune. 2025. "New Insights into Biomaterials and Coatings" Coatings 15, no. 3: 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15030332

APA Style

Drevet, R., & Benhayoune, H. (2025). New Insights into Biomaterials and Coatings. Coatings, 15(3), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15030332

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop