Study on Mechanical Properties of Fe-Ni-Based TiC Plasma Cladding Layer Modified by Composite Iron Powder
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Process
2.1. Preparation of Materials and Plasma Cladding Layer
2.2. Microstructure Characterization
2.3. Mechanical Properties Test
3. Results and Analysis
3.1. Microstructure Analysis
3.1.1. Phase Analysis
3.1.2. EDS Element Analysis
3.1.3. Micromorphology Analysis
3.2. Mechanical Properties Analysis
3.2.1. Shear Properties Analysis
3.2.2. Hardness Analysis
3.2.3. Friction and Wear Performance Analysis
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- The samples prepared with different proportions of iron powder Y and iron powder R are mainly composed of TiC, FeO, Fe, FeNi, and CrNi, and the phase composition does not change. The microstructure shows a gradual refinement from the bottom to the top of the cladding layer, and TiC particles are distributed in the middle and upper parts of the cladding layer. There is a phenomenon of local element aggregation in different samples. EDS point scanning shows that FeNi and CrNi solid solutions are formed in the cladding layer. At the same time, due to the presence of pore defects on the surface of the cladding layer, some oxygen in the environment will enter the molten pool. The low local oxygen concentration in the high-temperature molten pool will promote the formation of FeO.
- (2)
- The shear strength and hardness of the modified samples are better than those of the sample without iron powder R added. With the increase in the ratio of iron powder R, the bonding strength between the cladding layer and the base metal increases, and the hardness of the wear-resistant layer shows an opposite trend, but it is better than that of the unmodified samples. Sample S2 has both high shear strength and high hardness. Compared with the unmodified samples, the longitudinal shear strength is increased by about 19.34%, the transverse shear strength is increased by 24.71%, and the hardness is increased by 2.41%~9.85%, which achieves the best strength–toughness matching in this study. The wear resistance of the different samples is positively correlated with hardness, and the wear of the matrix increases after TiC particles fall off.
- (3)
- The wear forms of all the samples are abrasive wear and adhesive wear. The wear-resistant skeleton function of TiC in sample S0 is insufficient, and the relative height difference of the wear surface is the smallest, and the wear resistance is the worst. Sample S1 has the best adhesion with TiC. After wear, there are more TiC particles, and the relative height difference of the worn surface is the largest, showing excellent wear resistance. Compared with sample S0, the wear resistance is greatly improved by about 37.78%. Compared with the S0 sample, the wear resistance of sample S2 is improved by about 24.02%, which ensures better wear resistance. Combined with its strength and toughness, sample S2 is the best test sample in this study.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, H.; Sun, R.; Zhang, M.; Gou, B.; Mo, J. Impact-sliding behavior of Ni-based coating prepared on tunnel boring machine disc cutter material produced using a plasma transferred arc welding process. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 442, 128186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Qi, X.; Li, Y.; Li, F.; Du, J.; Li, C.; Wang, K.; Lu, H.; Yang, B. Improving the properties of remanufactured wear parts of shield tunneling machines by novel Fe-based composite coatings. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 6722–6733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, M.; Qu, K.L.; Luo, S.X.; Liu, S.S. Effect of Cr on the microstructure and properties of TiC-TiB2 particles reinforced Fe-based composite coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 316, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Liang, Y.; Ren, L.; Li, X. Fabrication of Fe-based composite coatings reinforced by TiC particles and its microstructure and wear resistance of 40Cr gear steel by low energy pulsed laser cladding. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 119, 105622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lv, J.; Gong, J.; Liang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, R.; Liu, J. Microstructure and Hardness of Fe-Based Alloy Coating Reinforced with WC on Q235 Steel Surface by Plasma Cladding. Mater. Mech. Eng. 2010, 34, 31–33. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, F.; Lv, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shu, F.; He, P.; Xu, B. Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties of Inconel 625 Alloy during Pulsed Plasma Arc Deposition Process. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2013, 29, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, T.; Chang, M.; Cheng, X.; Zeng, X.; Shao, H.; Liu, F. Characteristics of WC reinforced Ni-based alloy coatings prepared by PTA + PMI method. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 383, 125232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xing, Z.; Wang, H.; Lv, Z. Microstructure and properties of NiCrBSi coating by plasma cladding on gray cast iron. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 361, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Arias-González, F.; Del Val, J.; Comesaña, R.; Penide, J.; Lusquiños, F.; Quintero, F.; Riveiro, A.; Boutinguiza, M.; Pou, J. Fiber laser cladding of nickel-based alloy on cast iron. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 374, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, S.; Li, H.; Chen, X.; Chi, J.; Li, M.; Chai, L.; Xu, H. Improving microstructure and wear resistance of plasma clad Fe-based alloy coating by a mechanical vibration technique during cladding. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2010, 528, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yue, J.; Liu, X.; Sui, Y.; Liu, C.; Sun, X.; Chen, W. Combined effect of Y2O3 nanoparticles and Si second-phase oxide on microstructure and wear resistance of plasma-clad steel coating. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 403, 126348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lyu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Jing, F. On the microstructure and wear resistance of Fe- based composite Coatings Processed by plasma cladding with B4C injection. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 10934–10939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xia, J.; Feng, Y.; Ling, Z.; Wang, K. Influence of WC particle content of Fe-based powder-cored wire on microstructure and properties of plasma cladding reinforced layers. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 922, 166148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xu, J.S.; Zhang, X.C.; Xuan, F.Z.; Wang, Z.; Tu, S. Rolling contact fatigue behavior of laser cladded WC/Ni composite coating. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2014, 239, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xie, Z. Preparation and Properties of Plasma Cladding WC Strengthening Co-Based Alloy on Copper Surface. Master’s thesis, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Zou, Y.; Zou, Z.; Wu, D. Microstructure and properties of Fe-based composite coating by laser cladding Fe–Ti–V–Cr–C–CeO2 powder. Opt. Laser Technol. 2015, 65, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, L.; Yu, T.; Li, M.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, J. Microstructure and Wear Resistance of In-situ synthesized Ti(C, N) Ceramic Reinforced Fe-based Coating by Laser Cladding. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 22538–22548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, L.; Yu, T.; Guan, C.; Zhao, Y. Microstructure and properties of metal parts remanufactured by laser cladding TiC and TiB2 reinforced Fe-based coatings. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 14127–14140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, X.; Lai, Y.; Yang, B.; Wang, D.; Sun, M.; Wu, H.; Fan, R.; Sun, S.; Yu, J. Process Optimization and Properties of Fe-Cr-C Alloy Coating Prepared by Plasma Cladding. Surf. Technol. 2020, 49, 177–184. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, X.; Wang, Q.; Chen, C.; Lian, G.; Huang, X. Effects of WC addition on the morphology, microstructure and mechanical roperties of Fe50/TiC/WC laser claddings on AISI 1045 steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 427, 127781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shan, M.; Zhang, C.; Wang, N.; Zhang, L.; Li, W.; Yin, X. Improvement in wear resistance of laser-clad Fe–Cr–Mo–B–C-(TiC) amorphous-nanocrystalline coating. Vacuum 2023, 207, 111676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Emamian, A.; Corbin, S.F.; Khajepour, A. Effect of laser cladding process parameters on clad quality and in-situ formed microstructure of Fe–TiC composite coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2010, 205, 2007–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Feng, Z.; Tang, M.; Liu, Y.; Yan, Z.; Li, G.; Zhang, R. In situ synthesis of TiC-TiN-reinforced Fe-base plasma cladding coatings. Surf. Eng. 2018, 34, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tang, M.; Wang, W.; Li, G.; Feng, Z.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, R. Electrochemical Corrosion Behaviors of TiC Particles Reinforced Fe-based Composite Plasma Cladding Layers. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2019, 14, 1591–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sharifitabar, M.; Khaki, J.V.; Sabzevar, M.H. Microstructure and wear resistance of in-situ TiC–Al2O3 particles reinforced Fe-based coatings produced by gas tungsten arc cladding. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 285, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, D.; Liu, D.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Huang, Z. Microstructure and fretting wear resistance of γ/TiC composite coating in situ fabricated by plasma transferred arc cladding. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2014, 239, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, J.; Wang, L. Wear Resistance of Fe-Cr-C-TiFe Fe-based Composite Coating Prepared by Precursor Carbonization-composition Process and Plasma Cladding. Mater. Sci. Forum 2012, 704–705, 1237–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Panteleenko, F.I.; Sarantsev, V.V.; Stolin, A.M.; Bazhin, P.M.; Azarenko, E.L. Formation of Composite Coatings Based on Titanium Carbide via Electrospark Alloying. Surf. Eng. Appl. Electrochem. 2011, 47, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hui, Z.; Yong, Z.; Zou, Z.; Shi, C. Effects of CeO2 on microstructure and corrosion resistance of TiC-VC reinforced Fe-based laser cladding layers. J. Rare Earths 2014, 32, 1095. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Chong, K.; Zhao, W.; Sun, Z. Effects of pulse parameters on in-situ Ti-V carbides size and properties of Fe-based laser cladding layers. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 344, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhu, Z.; Li, J.; Peng, Y.; Shen, G. In-situ synthesized novel eyeball-like Al2O3/TiC composite ceramics reinforced Fe-based alloy coating produced by laser cladding. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 391, 125671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, X.; Pan, X.; Du, B.; Li, S. Production of in situ TiB2 +TiC/Fe composite coating from precursor containing B4C-TiO2-Al powders by laser cladding. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2013, 23, 1689–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, H.; Zou, Y.; Zou, Z.; Shi, C. Effects of chromium addition on microstructure and properties of TiC–VC reinforced Fe-based laser cladding coatings. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 614, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jiang, S.; Wang, G.; Ren, Q.; Yang, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, Z. In situ synthesis of Fe-based alloy clad coatings containing TiB2 –TiN–(h-BN). International Journal of Minerals. Metall. Mater. 2015, 22, 613. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, F.; He, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Kang, X. Microstructure and high-temperature sliding wear performance of Fe-Co-Mo alloy coating fabricated by plasma cladding. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 444, 128667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, C.; Xu, P.; Zha, G.; Ouyang, Z. Microstructure and properties of a Ti doped Fe-based SMA coating produced by laser cladding. JMRT 2021, 14, 2441–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cheng, J.; Xu, B.; Liang, X.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Z. Effect of electromagnetic stirring on the microstructure and wear behavior of iron-based composite coatings. Materials 2008, 15, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, L.; Sun, D.; Yu, H. Effect of niobium on the microstructure and wear resistance of iron-based alloy coating produced by plasma cladding. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 490, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lu, F.; Li, H.; Ji, Q.; Zeng, R.; Wang, S.; Chi, J.; Li, M.; Chai, L.; Xu, H. Characteristics of the functionally graded coating fabricated by plasma transferred arc centrifugal cladding. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2011, 205, 4441–4446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, B.; Gao, P.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, D.; Wang, W.; Jin, C.; Yang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Liang, M.; Li, J.; et al. Wear Properties of Iron-Based Alloy Coatings Prepared by Plasma Transfer Arc Cladding. Coatings 2022, 12, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]











| Elements | C | Cbc (Dissociative C) | Cr | Si | Mn | O | N | Mo | V | B | Ti | Ni | Fe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H13 | 0.57 | - | 5.36 | 0.94 | 0.39 | - | - | 1.41 | 0.91 | - | - | 0.48 | Bal |
| Y | 3.52 | - | 29.62 | 2.54 | - | 0.02 | - | 3.04 | - | 2.06 | - | 5.09 | Bal |
| R | 0.10 | - | 18.00 | 0.80 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.90 | - | 4.50 | Bal |
| Ni50 | 0.45 | - | 11.00 | 4.00 | 0.30 | - | - | 1.00 | - | 2.20 | - | Bal | ≤2.70 |
| TiC | 19.64 | 0.67 | - | - | - | 0.06 | 0.72 | - | - | - | Bal | - | 0.18 |
| Samples | Fe Base Powder (wt%) | TiC (wt%) | Ni50 (wt%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Y:R | |||
| S0 | 10:0 | 30 | 20 |
| S1 | 9:1 | 30 | 20 |
| S2 | 8:2 | 30 | 20 |
| S3 | 7:3 | 30 | 20 |
| S4 | 6:4 | 30 | 20 |
| Processing Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Cladding current (A) | 160 |
| Powder feeding speed (g/min) | 32 |
| Swing speed (mm/s) | 15 |
| Amplitude of swing (mm) | 36 |
| Ionic gas (m3/h) | 0.2 |
| Powder feeding gas (m3/h) | 0.4 |
| Shielding gas (m3/h) | 1.0 |
| Sample | Point | Fe | N | C | Ti | O | Ni | Cr | Si | B | Mo | Possible Phase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S0 | A | 0.15 | - | 41.53 | 53.37 | 3.34 | 0.14 | 0.38 | - | - | - | TiC |
| B | 37.36 | - | 13.25 | 0.64 | 8.06 | 5.08 | 14.48 | 0.74 | 20.10 | 0.30 | Fe, FeNi, CrNi | |
| C | 19.01 | 3.46 | 7.86 | 0.22 | 64.25 | 4.19 | 0.40 | 0.3 | 0.31 | - | FeO | |
| D | 22.77 | - | 9.86 | 0.61 | 55.95 | 8.48 | - | 1.04 | - | 0.20 | FeO, FeNi | |
| S1 | E | 1.35 | - | 42 | 49.24 | 6.12 | - | 0.21 | 1.08 | - | - | TiC |
| F | 64.11 | - | - | 0.22 | - | 29.69 | 13.37 | 1.61 | - | - | Fe, FeNi, CrNi | |
| G | 23.07 | - | - | 0.59 | 65.42 | 6.57 | 3.91 | - | - | 0.09 | FeO | |
| H | 35.41 | - | - | 0.88 | 50.1 | 10.14 | 3.37 | 0.09 | - | - | FeO, FeNi | |
| S2 | I | 40.37 | - | 2.06 | 0.72 | 54.08 | 1.82 | 0.94 | - | - | - | FeO |
| J | 10.80 | - | 15.51 | 18.53 | 46.11 | 2.89 | 1.87 | 0.38 | 1.12 | 2.67 | TiC, FeO | |
| K | 0.28 | - | 40.88 | 58.79 | - | - | 0.06 | - | - | - | TiC | |
| L | 20.38 | - | 8.44 | 1.85 | 62.71 | 6.05 | 0.56 | - | - | - | FeO, FeNi | |
| M | 42.57 | - | 8.84 | 0.42 | 11.8 | 5.14 | 11.05 | 1.36 | 18.47 | 0.35 | Fe, FeNi, CrNi | |
| N | 25.02 | - | 10.06 | 6.10 | 51.22 | 2.79 | 2.86 | 0.23 | 0.48 | 1.24 | FeO, TiC | |
| S3 | O | 1.40 | - | 40.86 | 52.49 | 5.23 | 0.02 | - | - | - | - | TiC |
| P | 27.44 | - | 6.43 | 0.17 | 61.11 | 3.31 | 0.04 | - | 1.48 | 0.02 | FeO | |
| Q | 32.07 | - | 14.72 | 0.97 | 31.82 | 3.11 | 15.52 | 1.19 | 0.6 | FeO, CrNi | ||
| R | 42.75 | - | 14.77 | 0.02 | 13.83 | 6.35 | 13.98 | 2.17 | 5.95 | 0.18 | Fe, FeNi, CrNi | |
| S | 0.92 | - | 10.10 | 1.67 | 63.55 | - | - | 13.57 | 1.11 | - | FeO | |
| S4 | T | 1.69 | - | 42.92 | 53.09 | 2.08 | - | 0.01 | 0.05 | - | 0.15 | TiC |
| U | 14.78 | 5.01 | 4.90 | - | 64.09 | 4.34 | 0.54 | - | 6.34 | - | FeO | |
| V | 31.13 | - | 16.09 | 0.05 | 25.86 | 2.06 | 19.82 | 0.73 | 3.79 | 0.47 | FeO, FeNi, CrNi | |
| W | 35.64 | - | 15.35 | 0.09 | 10.49 | 3.14 | 27.92 | 1.32 | 5.82 | 0.24 | FeO, CrNi | |
| X | 18.27 | - | 3.71 | 0.61 | 64.17 | 4.15 | - | 0.36 | 8.34 | - | FeO, FeNi |
| Element | S0 | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 2.643 | 2.399 | 2.154 | 1.910 | 1.666 |
| O | 0.014 | 0.013 | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| B | 2.100 | 2.017 | 1.934 | 1.851 | 1.769 |
| Si | 2.957 | 2.833 | 2.709 | 2.584 | 2.460 |
| Cr | 24.300 | 23.470 | 22.640 | 21.810 | 20.980 |
| Ni | 26.021 | 25.979 | 25.937 | 25.895 | 25.853 |
| Mo | 2.457 | 2.240 | 2.023 | 1.806 | 1.589 |
| Fe | 39.421 | 40.964 | 42.506 | 44.048 | 45.590 |
| Longitudinal Shear Value | Average Value | Standard Deviation | Transverse Shear Value | Average Value | Standard Deviation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S0 | 315 | 240 | 268 | 274 | 37.90 | 270 | 240 | 255 | 255 | 15 |
| S1 | 330 | 310 | 315 | 318 | 10.41 | 280 | 320 | 308 | 303 | 20.53 |
| S2 | 325 | 325 | 330 | 327 | 2.89 | 315 | 315 | 323 | 318 | 4.62 |
| S3 | 355 | 305 | 332 | 331 | 25.03 | 330 | 330 | 336 | 332 | 3.46 |
| S4 | 345 | 318 | 337 | 333 | 13.87 | 340 | 350 | 337 | 342 | 6.81 |
| Distance from the Surface/mm | S0 | Average Value | S1 | Average Value | S2 | Average Value | S3 | Average Value | S4 | Average Value | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 50.4 | 50.5 | 50.6 | 50.5 | 55.2 | 54.5 | 54.7 | 54.8 | 51.3 | 52.6 | 50.9 | 51.6 | 50.4 | 50.8 | 50.3 | 50.5 | 46.2 | 45.7 | 47 | 46.3 |
| 0.4 | 51.4 | 51.8 | 51.7 | 51.6 | 59 | 59.2 | 58.6 | 58.9 | 52.9 | 52.3 | 53.8 | 53.0 | 52.8 | 51.7 | 51.6 | 52.0 | 50.8 | 50.5 | 51.6 | 51.0 |
| 0.8 | 51.8 | 51.5 | 51.2 | 51.5 | 58.1 | 58.4 | 58.4 | 58.3 | 56.3 | 55.8 | 56.9 | 56.3 | 51.8 | 51.5 | 51.2 | 51.5 | 51.6 | 51.3 | 52.5 | 51.8 |
| 1.2 | 50.5 | 50.6 | 51.2 | 50.8 | 57.6 | 57.7 | 58.3 | 57.9 | 54.4 | 53.9 | 54.2 | 54.2 | 51.7 | 51.2 | 52.2 | 51.7 | 52.2 | 51.8 | 53.1 | 52.4 |
| 1.6 | 50.6 | 50 | 49.7 | 50.1 | 56.3 | 57.4 | 56.7 | 56.8 | 54.7 | 55.2 | 54.3 | 54.7 | 51.9 | 51.5 | 51.2 | 51.5 | 51.9 | 50.9 | 51.7 | 51.5 |
| 2.0 | 51.2 | 50.1 | 48.9 | 50.1 | 56.1 | 57.2 | 56.3 | 56.5 | 55.2 | 55.9 | 55.5 | 55.5 | 50.4 | 51.5 | 51.9 | 51.3 | 53.9 | 53.6 | 53 | 53.5 |
| 2.4 | 50.1 | 50.9 | 49.9 | 50.3 | 55.1 | 54.2 | 55.2 | 54.8 | 52.9 | 53.9 | 53.5 | 53.4 | 50.7 | 50.2 | 51.2 | 50.7 | 54.3 | 54.7 | 54 | 54.3 |
| 2.8 | 50.2 | 50.6 | 49.7 | 50.2 | 53.7 | 53.6 | 52.4 | 53.2 | 52.3 | 52.8 | 52.8 | 52.6 | 50.9 | 50.3 | 51.3 | 50.8 | 47 | 48.5 | 48.3 | 47.9 |
| Sample | Longitudinal Shear Strength | Transverse Shear Strength | Hardness Value | Total Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 16.06% | 18.82% | 11.46% | 37.78% |
| S2 | 19.34% | 24.71% | 6.52% | 24.02% |
| S3 | 20.80% | 30.20% | 1.38% | 16.22% |
| S4 | 21.53% | 34.12% | 0.99% | 15.20% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Du, K.; Xu, L.; Wang, P.; Li, X.; Wu, Z.; Li, X.; Fan, W. Study on Mechanical Properties of Fe-Ni-Based TiC Plasma Cladding Layer Modified by Composite Iron Powder. Coatings 2024, 14, 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14091180
Du K, Xu L, Wang P, Li X, Wu Z, Li X, Fan W. Study on Mechanical Properties of Fe-Ni-Based TiC Plasma Cladding Layer Modified by Composite Iron Powder. Coatings. 2024; 14(9):1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14091180
Chicago/Turabian StyleDu, Kunda, Lipeng Xu, Peizhuang Wang, Xiantao Li, Zenglei Wu, Xuexian Li, and Weichao Fan. 2024. "Study on Mechanical Properties of Fe-Ni-Based TiC Plasma Cladding Layer Modified by Composite Iron Powder" Coatings 14, no. 9: 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14091180
APA StyleDu, K., Xu, L., Wang, P., Li, X., Wu, Z., Li, X., & Fan, W. (2024). Study on Mechanical Properties of Fe-Ni-Based TiC Plasma Cladding Layer Modified by Composite Iron Powder. Coatings, 14(9), 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14091180

