Next Article in Journal
Research on the Corrosion Behaviors of Austenitic Steel in Molten Aluminum Alloy
Next Article in Special Issue
Layer by Layer Optimization of Langmuir–Blodgett Films for Surface Acoustic Wave (SAW) Based Sensors for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Detection
Previous Article in Journal
A Bioactive Enamel Sealer Can Protect Enamel during Orthodontic Treatment: An In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Luminescence Properties of PVDF/ZnS:Mn Flexible Thin-Film Sensors
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Solvent Effects on the Structural and Optical Properties of MAPbI3 Perovskite Thin Film for Photovoltaic Active Layer

Coatings 2022, 12(5), 549; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12050549
by Saif M. H. Qaid *, Hamid M. Ghaithan, Bandar Ali Al-Asbahi and Abdullah S. Aldwayyan
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Coatings 2022, 12(5), 549; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12050549
Submission received: 8 March 2022 / Revised: 29 March 2022 / Accepted: 1 April 2022 / Published: 19 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thick and Thin Films for Functional Device Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Qaid et al. investigated the solvent effects on the structural and optical properties of MAPbI3 perovskite films. This work provides some information about the influence of solvent on quality of perovskite films. It is recommended to be accepted by Coatings after the following issues are addressed.

  1. The authors calculated the optical bandgaps using the Tauc plots. However, strong scattering signal can be observed from the Abs. spectra, which can affect the results of Tauc plots. The real bandgap of MAPbI3 films should be around 1.5 eV. I think the Tauc plot should be deleted to avoid misleading.
  2. In Figure 6, the widths for the PL peaks are much narrower than the reported results. According to our experience, this may be the wrong signal, which can be verified by changing the excitation wavelength. I recommend the authors to confirm the PL measurement, or delete the data.
  3. The authors discussed the effect of annealing and deposition methods on film morphology. I think this related paper should be cited: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 11242. For the effect of solvent on film morphology, I think the authors can explain the difference in film morphology by using the crystal growth theory, see the related paper: J. Semicond., 2021, 42, 072201.

Author Response

Please check the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Review Coatings

            The manuscript entitled “Solvent Effects on the Structural and Optical Properties of  MAPbI3 Perovskite Thin Film for Photovoltaic Active Layer”, authors Saif M. H. Qaid, Hamid M. Ghaithan, Bandar Ali Al-Asbahi, and Abdullah S. Aldwayyan, describe the solvent effects in the MAPbI3 thin films. Apart from the novelty of the topic, some things must be improved before going further.

  1. a) The problem of solvation is quite complicate. The usage of these three solvents has been discussed in many papers. For example, in the following paper: Molecules 2021, 26, 7541.

https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247541, all kinds of perovskites were discussed and the solvation is discussed in terms of donor numbers of each solvent. GBL has DN=18 while DMF has 26.6 and DMSO has 29.8. Besides, the donor number of halide ions plays an important role. A higher donor number of solvents together with a higher donor number of halides increases the solubility. The authors should underline what is new in this paper??

  1. b) Correction of beta. The parameters are correlated with beta.

In the XRD, the instrumental broadening should be accounted, for especially for the large perovskite crystallites. No difference of 0.001 in the halfwidth is significant.

Because the parameters are connected, a much proper conclusion can be obtained from the representation of βcosθ=f(sinƟ). Otherwise, it is a propagation of errors. 

  1. c) Use particle size in SEM instead of crystals. A particle could include several nanocrystalline.
  2. d) The absorbance is affected by the layer thickness in figure 4. It is better to use figure 5 a) to discuss the efficiency of the photon’s absorption.

Besides it a problem with the determined optical gap. The authors suggest an increase in the bandgap with increase in the solvent polarity. However, from the table 1 and 3:

DMF=3.86 D and 1.25 eV band gap

DMSO=3.96 D and 1.49 eV band gap

GBL=4.27 D and 1.47 eV band gap


As can be seen, it was not a direct connection here.

Author Response

Please check the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript entitled "Solvent Effects on the Structural and Optical Properties of MAPbI3 Perovskite Thin Film for Photovoltaic Active Layer", reports a research on MAPBI3 perovskite films which were deposited on glass substrates. In particular, the effect of three specific solvents, such as GBL, DMF, DMSO, on the final characteristics of the products were studied. The prepared samples were extensively characterized. The authors conclude that the results show how the optical qualities of the films can be related to crystallinity based on the different solvents used. The subject matter is consistent with the purpose of the journal. The manuscript is well organized and the reported results are interesting. I have no particular suggestions to send to the authors other than an improvement in the conclusions, which are too vague and generic ,and an improvement in Figure 1 by including the solvent, the latter being the main protagonist of the research.

Author Response

Please check the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The comments are attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please check the attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop