Numerical Study of Thermal Radiation Phenomenon and Its Influence on Amelioration of the Heat Transfer Mechanism through MHD Non-Newtonian Casson Model
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
1. Abstracts need to be clarified again regarding the background, research objectives, research methods, results and discussions, conclusions.
2. Introduction is not clear about novelty and previous literature studies and the purpose of the research is not clear.
3. The research method written needs major improvement. Write down the step by step research carried out, including boundary conditions, collect data and data analysis.
4. The results presented need to be improved with good data and a comparison of the results and methods with the previous paper should be made.
5. Conclusion is the answer to the research objectives in this paper.
Author Response
Reviewer #1:
Thank you very much for your suggestions and comments.
Point 1: Abstracts need to be clarified again regarding the background, research objectives, research methods, results and discussions, conclusions.
Response 1: We revised and modified the abstract section to cover these points (Revised version).
Point 2: Introduction is not clear about novelty and previous literature studies and the purpose of the research is not clear.
Response 2: Done. We modified this section.
Point 3: The research method written needs major improvement. Write down the step by step research carried out, including boundary conditions, collect data and data analysis.
Response 3: Done. Please, see the revised version.
Point 4: The results presented need to be improved with good data and a comparison of the results and methods with the previous paper should be made.
Response 4: Thank you very much for your suggestion, of course, we have added a new section in the revised version related to the validation of our results.
Point 5: Conclusion is the answer to the research objectives in this paper.
Response 5: We modified this section as you need.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
- The paper contains some of English errors;
- Authors should correct grammatical error at few stage of paper.
- I recommend a revision of the introduction. In my opinion, you should
explain your results in more detail in the introduction.
- What is the variable xx in the line 4 in section 3.
- All references must write as the style of the Journal;
- What is the robustness of the proposed method?
- Revise the writing of some equations such as (6), (12);
- Update some of your references, such as, ([6]-[10]).
- Correct the writing-error in the attached PDF file of the paper.
- The authors should improve their introduction with latest papers in the field
Author Response
Reviewer #2:
Thank you very much for your suggestions and comments.
Point 1: The paper contains some of English errors;
Response 1: We revised the paper and corrected more of typo-errors. Please, see the revised version.
Point 2: Authors should correct grammatical error at few stage of paper.
Response 2: Done. Please, see the revised version.
Point 3: I recommend a revision of the introduction. In my opinion, you should explain your results in more detail in the introduction.
Response 3: Done. We modified this section.
Point 4: What is the variable xx in the line 4 in section 3?
Response 4: We corrected and changed it.
Point 5: All references must write as the style of the Journal;
Response 5: We will write the references as the style of the Journal once we have acceptance.
Point 6: What is the robustness of the proposed method?
Response 6: The main advantage of this technique is its capability to occur accurate outcomes by applying a few terms of the series solution. The proposed method is much faster than the other methods. Chebyshev functions are widely used because of their good properties in the approximation of functions. We added these comments in the text in the revised version of the paper, please, see page 2, lines 16-20.
Point 7: Revise the writing of some equations such as (6), (12);
Response 7: We revised and there are no any mistakes.
Point 8: Update some of your references, such as, ([6]-[10]).
Response 8: Done. We changed it with recent references.
Point 9: Correct the writing-error in the attached PDF file of the paper.
Response 9: Please, see the revised version. We modified and corrected more of typo-errors.
Point 10: The authors should improve their introduction with latest papers in the field.
Response 10: Done. We added some recent references in the field. Please, see the list of references in the revised version ([11]-[21]).
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
After being corrected by the author. This paper is getting better and deserves to be published.
