Next Article in Journal
Efficacy of Daptomycin-Containing Regimen for Treatment of Staphylococcal or Enterococcal Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Prospective Clinical Experience
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of the Staphylococcal Chromosome Cassette (SCC) mec in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Non-aureus Staphylococci (MRNAS) from Animals and Humans
Previous Article in Journal
Finding the Dose for Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Critically Ill Children with and without Acute Kidney Injury
Previous Article in Special Issue
Alternative Anti-Infective Treatments to Traditional Antibiotherapy against Staphylococcal Veterinary Pathogens
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/antibiotics9120888
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Staphylococcus spp. Isolated from Bovine Subclinical Mastitis in Different Regions of Brazil: Molecular Typing and Biofilm Gene Expression Analysis by RT-qPCR

by
Priscila Luiza Mello
1,2,
Danilo Flávio Moraes Riboli
1,
Lisiane de Almeida Martins
3,
Maria Aparecida Vasconcelos Paiva Brito
4,
Cassiano Victória
5,
Letícia Calixto Romero
1 and
Maria de Lourdes Ribeiro de Souza da Cunha
1,*
1
Departamento de Ciências Químicas e Biológicas, Setor Microbiologia e Imunologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista—UNESP, Botucatu, SP 18618-689, Brazil
2
Docente no Programa de Pós Graduação em Enfermagem, Universidade Guarulhos—UNG, Guarulhos, SP 07023-070, Brazil
3
Universidade Paranaense—UNIPAR, Umuarama, PR 87502-210, Brazil
4
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária—EMBRAPA, Juiz de Fora, MG 36038-330, Brazil
5
Departamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista—UNESP, Botucatu, SP 18618-681, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2020, 9(12), 888; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120888
Submission received: 25 September 2020 / Revised: 5 December 2020 / Accepted: 7 December 2020 / Published: 10 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Staphylococcus spp. in Animals: Resistance to Antimicrobials, Virulence and Genetic Lineages)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bovine mastitis is mainly caused by bacteria of the genus Staphylococcus spp., which possess different virulence factors, including the capacity for biofilm formation that provides enhanced protection against the action of immune system components and serves as a barrier against the penetration of antimicrobial agents. This study aimed to characterize 181 Staphylococcus spp. Strains—including Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis in six Brazilian states—by molecular methods. RT-qPCR was used to verify the expression of genes of the ica operon—mainly responsible for biofilm formation—as well as bap and bhp. Chromosome similarity among the isolates was investigated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The icaA gene was detected in 79 (43.6%) isolates, icaB in 24 (13.2%), icaC in 57 (31.4%), and icaD in 127 (70.1%). The bap gene was identified in 66 (36.4%) isolates, while the bhp gene was found in nine (4.9%). RT-qPCR confirmed the expression of the icaA gene in 60 (75.9%) isolates, of icaB in six (25%), of icaC in 26 (45.6%), and of icaD in 80 (63%). Clonal typing of the isolates by PFGE permitted the identification of eight Staphylococcus aureus clusters that simultaneously included ≥3 strains, with a similarity of ≥80%. Regarding the other species studied, three clusters were observed for Staphylococcus chromogenes and four clusters for Staphylococcus epidermidis. Only one cluster each was identified for Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Staphylococcus simulans, while the other species did not form any cluster. With respect to MLST, ST126 and ST1 were the prevalent sequence types in S. aureus, while in S. epidermidis all sequence types were different. These results reveal strains with the same evolutionary origin as other isolates, which might cause infections in humans and animals, suggesting their ability to spread between these species.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Inadequate handling of livestock can trigger inflammatory processes in the mammary gland, known as mastitis, the most prevalent and costly disease in the dairy industry. Mastitis is caused by different microorganisms that directly influence the physicochemical characteristics, composition and cellularity of milk [1,2]. The economic consequences of both clinical and subclinical mastitis include losses due to the costs of treatment, lower milk production, changes in product quality, and culling [2]. Besides the economic losses, mastitis is a public health hazard since it can cause zoonoses and food poisoning [3,4].
Brazil is the world’s fourth-largest milk producer and the south is the main production region, responsible for 35% of the milk produced and for 30.6% of the total number of herds in the country (Table S1), followed by the southeast region [5,6]. Few studies report the prevalence of subclinical mastitis in Brazilian dairy herds [5]. At any rate, wide variation exists in the cow-level prevalence of this disease.
Epidemiological studies have demonstrated the presence of the genus Staphylococcus in approximately 50% of cases of bovine mastitis [7]. Bovine mastitis can be caused by different microorganisms and bacteria of the genus Staphylococcus are the most common [7,8]. Staphylococcus aureus is the main etiological agent of contagious bovine mastitis. However, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are a group of microorganisms that are increasingly being isolated from bovine subclinical intramammary infections in several countries [8,9,10]. Strains of Staphylococcus chromogenes, Staphylococcus simulans, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus xylosus and Staphylococcus epidermidis can persist in the udder, causing a low to moderate increase in somatic cell count and possibly a slight reduction of milk production [11]. Despite the common isolation of these species from secretions of the bovine mammary glands, little is known about the molecular characteristics of CoNS [12].
Staphylococcus species possess different virulence factors, including the capacity for biofilm formation [13]. The biofilm protects the bacteria against the action of immune system components by blocking phagocyte activity [14], and serves as a barrier that impairs the penetration of antimicrobial agents [15]. Moreover, chronic bacterial infections are often attributable to biofilms due to their high tolerance to conventional antibiotic therapies [16]. Fox et al. (2005) drew attention to the role of biofilms as a selective advantage in the pathogenesis of mastitis, which might be due to a strain characteristic or genetically linked to traits [14].
The proliferation of cells to adhere and form a biofilm is mediated by the production of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA). This adhesin is encoded by the gene product of the ica locus of the icaADBC operon, which is essential for biofilm formation and virulence of the microorganisms [17]. Another important gene that also regulates biofilm formation is biofilm-associated protein (bap), which encodes the bap surface protein. Unlike PIA which only seems to be involved in intercellular adhesion [18], this protein promotes primary binding to abiotic surfaces and intercellular adhesion. In addition to bap, the bhp gene is also related to biofilm formation irrespective of the presence of the ica operon. The presence and expression of biofilm genes can be analyzed by RT-qPCR, which permits to quantify the genes expressed.
A variety of molecular techniques based on chromosome similarity have been developed over the last decades, including pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) [19,20]. PFGE has become an important method and is considered the gold standard for the molecular typing and characterization of bacterial clusters, detecting genetic variations between phylogenetically and epidemiologically related isolates [21]. MLST has been proposed by Maiden et al. (1998) for molecular characterization and epidemiological investigation and has been widely used for phylogenetic interference of bacterial species. The set of alleles at the different loci studied by MLST determines the allelic profile or sequence type (ST) of a bacterial strain. The STs found within a population permit the comparison of its strains, as well as phylogenetic inference of its members [20].
Molecular typing is essential to determine the source of transmission and to study the evolution and molecular organization of these bacteria. Genotyping permits to distinguish between clonal or horizontal dissemination of resistance and is used to monitor the global distribution of resistant bacteria [22]. Within this context, the objective of the present study was to molecularly characterize S. aureus and CoNS isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis cases in herds from different Brazilian regions and states, and to analyze biofilm formation by qRT-PCR in order to increase our understanding of these isolates. The findings will contribute to establishing measures to prevent and control the dissemination of pathogenic Staphylococcus spp. clusters in Brazil.

2. Results

2.1. Detection of Genes Involved in Biofilm Formation

The presence of biofilm formation-related genes was investigated in the genomic DNA of all 181 isolates of the study. The icaA gene was detected in 79 (43.6%) isolates, icaB in 24 (13.2%), icaC in 57 (31.4%), and icaD in 127 (70.1%). The bap gene was detected in 66 (36.4%) isolates, while the bhp gene was found in nine (4.9%).

2.2. Expression Analysis of Genes of the Ica ADBC Operon by RT-qPCR

Based on the results of genomic DNA analysis, the expression of these genes was analyzed by RT-qPCR using cDNA of the isolates as a template. The icaA gene was expressed in 60 (75.9%) isolates, icaB was expressed in six (25%), icaC was expressed in 26 (45.6%), and icaD was expressed in 80 (63%). Figure 1 shows the comparison of detection in genomic DNA and cDNA expression by RT-qPCR. The distribution of the expressed genes according to Staphylococcus spp. is shown in Table 1.
Among the 82 S. aureus isolates analyzed, the most expressed genes were icaA in 58 (70.7%) isolates and icaD in 62 (75.6%). Fifty-two isolates (63.4%) simultaneously expressed the two genes. The least expressed gene was icaB, which was only expressed in four isolates, while icaC was found in 18 isolates. The frequency of genes of the icaADBC operon was lower in CoNS. Six S. chromogenes isolates expressed some of the biofilm genes and the expression was also observed in seven S. epidermidis isolates.

2.3. Interpretation of Susceptibility to Oxacillin and Vancomycin by the E-Test

Interpretation of the E-test results according to the breakpoints defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [23] for determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of oxacillin revealed that 99% of the S. aureus isolates were susceptible to this antibiotic, while 32% of the CoNS isolates were resistant, with MIC50 of 0.25 µg/mL and MIC90 of 1.5 µg/mL for the two groups (Table 2). Analysis of the vancomycin MIC revealed MIC50 and MIC90 of 0.50 and 1.5 µg/mL, respectively, for S. aureus and 1.0 and 1.5 µg/mL for CoNS (Table 2). All Staphylococcus spp. isolates analyzed were susceptible to vancomycin.

2.4. Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis

Molecular typing by PFGE permitted the identification of eight clusters of S. aureus isolates that simultaneously included ≥3 strains, with a similarity of ≥80% (Figure 2). A similarity coefficient of 80% was selected to define the pulsed-field type (PFT) clusters after reviewing the epidemiological data associated with each of the clusters of isolates [24]. The largest cluster Staphylococcus aureus (CSA1) comprises 31 isolates from São Paulo (SP) or Minas Gerais (MG). This cluster includes isolates from seven different farms, indicating dissemination of this cluster in the region studied. This heterogeneity in the origin of strains was also observed for the other S. aureus clusters.
With respect to the other species studied, the formation of three clusters was observed for S. chromogenes (Figure 3), with cluster Staphylococcus chromogenes (CSC1) comprising the largest number of isolates (11) that originated from seven different farms. Four clusters could be identified for S. epidermidis (Figure 4), with isolates of the same cluster originating from different states, such as cluster Staphylococcus epidermidis (CSE1) that includes isolates from Santa Catarina (SC) and Paraná (PR) and cluster 2 (CSE2) that includes isolates from MG, SC and SP. On the other hand, only one cluster each was observed for S. saprophyticus and S. simulans (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Table 3 shows the distribution of species according to the electrophoretic pattern, their origin, and biofilm gene expression. The remaining CoNS species did not form clusters according to the criteria adopted.
The spatial analysis made it possible to verify the cluster distribution around the area studied (Figure 7).

2.5. Multilocus Sequence Typing

A group of 10 S. aureus and five S. epidermidis isolates were selected for MLST according to the criterion that at least one strain of each cluster described by PFGE would be included.
Six different STs were identified in S. aureus. The most prevalent STs were ST126 and ST1, which belonged to CC126 and CC1, respectively. Regarding the geographic distribution of the STs, ST126 (CC126) was detected in isolates from MG and SP, ST1 (CC1) only in isolates from PR, ST746 (CC97) in isolates from RS and SC, and ST8 and ST188 only in isolates from SC.
For S. epidermidis, the STs were all different even when the isolates were clustered by PFGE. In the case of one isolate, no exact combination was found for its set of alleles, probably because it is a new ST. The sequence of the combination of alleles was therefore reported to the curator of the pubmlst.org/multilocus-sequence-typing site for the addition of the new ST.
Table 4 and Table 5 show the origin of the isolates, the PFGE cluster to which they belong, and the combination of alleles for S. aureus and S. epidermidis, respectively. The susceptibility profile of the isolates according to sequence type is given in Table 6.

3. Discussion

The genes of the ica operon were investigated in the genomic DNA of all isolates studied. A high percentage of these genes was detected in S. aureus, in which the icaD gene was the most common, followed by icaA. Based on these results, gene expression analysis was performed, which confirmed that the icaD gene was the most expressed in the isolates of the present study. Fifty-two (63.4%) of the isolates simultaneously expressed the icaA and icaD genes. Vasudevan et al. (2003), investigating 35 S. aureus isolates from bovine mastitis cases, detected biofilm formation in 91.4% of the isolates; 100% were positive for the icaA and icaD genes [25]. A high frequency of icaD-positive isolates has been reported in other studies investigating S. aureus from mastitis. In the study of Krewer et al. (2015), 92.8% of the isolates exhibiting adherence to microplates carried the icaD gene [26].
Comparison of the frequency of icaADBC genes present in CoNS showed a major difference between detection in genomic DNA and cDNA. The presence of a gene does not indicate that it will be expressed. According to Rode et al. (2007), expression of the ica operon and biofilm formation are highly variable and biofilm-positive staphylococcal strains (genomic DNA) may not produce a biofilm in some situations but can become biofilm producers in others as a result of changes in environmental factors [27], such as high osmolarity and subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. In the study by Kot et al. (2018), the transcription levels were significantly higher in the first hours of biofilm growth compared to planktonic growth, suggesting that these genes are important in the early stage of biofilm growth in which bacterial cells interact with extracellular ligands of the host [28].
The bhp gene was only detected in S. epidermidis (4.9%), while the bap gene was found in 36.4% of all isolates studied, most of them being S. aureus. Our findings contrast with Akshatha et al. (2020) who evaluated biofilm formation in S. aureus strains obtained from the milk of cows with mastitis and detected the bap gene in 12.9% of the isolates [29]. Tormo et al. (2005) observed that Staphylococcus strains carrying the bap gene were strong biofilm producers even when they did not carry the icaADBC genes [30]. In cases of mastitis, this virulence factor can facilitate the capacity of these bacteria to adhere to the mammary epithelium and to the formation of multiple layers of cells surrounded by the biofilm matrix [31].
Analysis of the clonal profile revealed the formation of eight clusters for S. aureus, with the largest cluster (CSA1) comprising isolates from SP and MG. This cluster includes isolates from seven different farms, indicating dissemination of this cluster in the region studied. Among the CoNS, the S. epidermidis strains formed four clusters and the S. chromogenes strains formed three clusters. Epidemiological studies on S. aureus in cattle have shown a large number of molecular profiles to be involved in the etiology of mastitis worldwide, but some profiles tend to predominate in certain geographic regions [32,33].
In the study by Tondo et al. (2000) conducted in Nova Petrópolis, Rio Grande do Sul, PFGE analysis revealed 42 different patterns among 48 S. aureus strains isolated from food handlers, raw milk and milk products, demonstrating the diversity of this microorganism in the processing plant [34]. These findings show the lack of an endemic strain among the personnel, although they have worked together for years in the same area. In contrast, we found a large number of isolates that formed clusters with a similarity of 80% or higher, even when the isolates were from different farms and different states.
According to Buzolla et al. (2001) [35], strains with identical genotypes can possess characteristics that confer advantages in terms of their survival in the environment, colonization of the udder and causing disease, such as biofilm expression which was observed in the present study. It can also be indicative of clonal dissemination due to the possible lack of adequate hygiene conditions during milking. Mechanical milking lines are an important source of Staphylococcus transmission between dairy herds since these machines can be contaminated with microorganisms originating from the skin of the animal, milk, or the milker’s hands [36].
The prevalent STs in S. aureus were ST126 (CC126; 30%) and ST1 (CC1; 30%). MLST has been used to characterize and investigate the distribution of S. aureus clones in human infections [37] and in bovine mastitis [38]. However, MLST data for bovine isolates are still sparse.
ST1 (CC1) is widely found in humans, in different animal species, and in cases of bovine mastitis [39,40]. An important association between this clonal complex and infection with S. aureus in humans is reported worldwide, including in Brazil. This finding indicates the possible transmission of strains between humans and cattle, although it does not seem to be a frequent event [41].
CC126, together with CC97, has been reported in the literature to be associated with bovine mastitis in different herds and countries. These complexes are rarely isolated from humans [41]. Isolates belonging to CC126 were among those most frequently recovered in this study, a finding showing that different clonal complexes can predominate in different geographic areas. A Brazilian study conducted by Rossi et al. (2019) analyzed and monitored cattle herds with subclinical mastitis over a period of 12 months. The authors demonstrated the persistence of ST126, CC126 in four animals for 4 months [42]. Although few studies have analyzed S. aureus isolates in Brazil, all clonal complexes found in the present study were also identified in S. aureus strains isolated from mastitis cases in other countries [43].
Regarding the other STs found in our S. aureus isolates, we may cite ST8, ST188 and ST746. Boss et al. [44] analyzed 456 bovine strains of S. aureus isolated from milk of bovine intramammary infections and bulk tanks obtained from 12 European countries, revealed five major genotypic clusters where one of these clusters with 80 samples presented 83% of ST8 strains [44]. We found ST8 in a sample derived from a cluster with eight isolates typified by PFGE from the state of SC. This finding draws attention because the ST8 belongs to CC8 and according to the studies by Boos et al. [44], animal strains of S. aureus evolve from human-adapted strains such that every human strain may be the ancestor of a novel animal- adapted.
For S. epidermidis, each cluster exhibited a different ST, with the observation of ST59, ST81, ST48, and ST575, while no exact combination was found for the set of alleles of one isolate. This was a new ST, which was reported to the curator of the MLST site and received the nomenclature ST639. The isolate typed as ST59 and that typed as ST81 are closely related. Staphylococcus epidermidis ST59 was previously isolated from bovine mastitis in Germany, from a nasal swab in the Republic of Ireland, and from an animal handler in India (MLST database), demonstrating that this strain can spread to cows and humans. ST81 was isolated from the environment in Poland and from a human wound in Denmark (MLST database).
Taken together, these data reveal the identification of strains with the same evolutionary origin as other isolates around the world, which are known to cause infections in humans and animals, suggesting their ability to spread between these species.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Herds and Sampling

The Staphylococcus spp. isolates tested were obtained from a previous longitudinal study that monitored the antimicrobial resistance of udder pathogens in 6 Brazilian states (Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Santa Catarina (SC), Paraná (PR), São Paulo (SP), Minas Gerais (MG), and Pernambuco (PE)) and maintained in the bacterial collection of Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA Gado de Leite, Brazil). In that study, 91 dairy herds were visited four times and the samples were collected on all farms at intervals of 6 months over a period of 2 years. In each sampling, milk samples were collected from all lactating cows of the herd. The total number of collected samples was 28,672. Cows treated with antimicrobial agents were excluded from the sampling. A total of 1365 S. aureus and 1484 CoNS were isolated and submitted to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the disk diffusion method.

4.2. Samples Included in the Study

All isolates were submitted to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the disk diffusion method. After this initial screening conducted by EMBRAPA, 181 Staphylococcus spp. that were resistant to oxacillin by this method were selected for the present study.

4.3. Bacterial Isolation and Identification

The isolates were identified by biochemical tests and the catalase and coagulase tube tests and biochemical tests (maltose, trehalose, and mannitol) were then carried out to differentiate S. aureus from other Staphylococcus species [45]. The biochemical tests proposed by Cunha et al. [46] were used for the phenotypic identification of CoNS species and these species were confirmed using the internal transcribed spacer-PCR (ITS-PCR) technique described by Couto et al. (2001) [47].
A total of 181 strains were studied; of these, 82 (45.3%) were identified as S. aureus and 99 (54.7%) as CoNS, including 27 (14.9%) Staphylococcus chromogenes, 26 (14.4%) Staphylococcus epidermidis, 17 (9.4%) Staphylococcus saprophyticus, 6 (3.3%) Staphylococcus warneri, 6 (3.3%) Staphylococcus simulans, 6 (3.3%) Staphylococcus haemolyticus, 2 (1.1%) Staphylococcus xylosus, 4 (2.2%) Staphylococcus hominis, and 5 (2.8%) Staphylococcus hyicus.

4.4. Detection of the Genes Involved in Biofilm Formation

Genomic DNA was extracted from samples cultured on blood agar, followed by individual inoculation into brain-heart infusion broth and incubation for 24 h at 37 °C. Genomic DNA was extracted using the Illustra® Kit (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK). PCR for amplification of the genes of the icaADBC operon was performed according to Arciola et al. (2005) [48]. The parameters described by Cucarellas et al. (2004) [18] were used for amplification of the bap gene and the method described by Qin et al. (2007) [49] for amplification of the bhp gene. This screening was performed to identify which strains carried genes of the operon in their genomic DNA. Next, RT-qPCR using complementary DNA (cDNA) as a template was used to determine whether these genes were expressed.

4.5. Expression Analysis of the Genes of the icaADBC Operon by RT-qPCR

The isolates carrying any gene of the icaADBC operon were submitted to RT-qPCR for the analysis of expression and relative quantification of biofilm genes compared to the reference strain.

4.5.1. RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from samples cultured on blood agar, followed by individual inoculation into brain-heart infusion broth and incubation for 24 h at 37 °C. Total RNA was extracted using the Illustra RNAspin® (GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK) Kit. Possible DNA residues were eliminated by treatment with RNase-free DNAse® (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The concentration and purity of RNA in the samples were determined in a NanoDrop 2000® spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and A260/A280 and A260/230 ratios, respectively, of approximately 2 were considered adequate for inclusion in the study. Complementary DNA was synthesized with the Superscript VILO® Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using 1 µg RNA according to manufacturer instructions.

4.5.2. Standardization of the Reaction and Primers

RT-qPCR was performed in a StepOne Plus® thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The reaction mixture contained 10 μL SYBR Green PCR Master Mix, 1.5 μL cDNA, 0.5 pMol/µL forward and reverse primers, and nuclease-free water in a total volume of 20 μL. The reactions were run in duplicate for each target and the level of gene expression was calculated based on the threshold cycle (CT), in which the gene encoding the 16S rRNA was used as normalizer (endogenous control) and the genes of the ica operon (icaADBC) as calibrators. The reaction for standardization of the primers showed amplification of a single product for all genes tested in the absence of contamination or background noise. Melting curves were constructed for each gene studied and each curve had only one peak where the variation in temperature was not greater than 0.5 °C per sample in each group of genes analyzed. The primers described by Vandecasteele et al. (2003) [50] were used for the icaA gene, those described by Klug et al. (2003) [51] for icaB, and the primers described by Tan et al. (2012) [52] for icaC and icaD.

4.5.3. Relative Standard Curve

The data of the cDNA curves for each target were obtained in reactions performed in triplicate and serially diluted 1:10, resulting in 150, 15, 1.5, 0.15 and 0.015 ng per reaction. The following parameters were considered: variation in CT less than 0.5 between triplicates, R2 > 0.9, efficiency of 90 to 105%, and a slope of 3.32. The threshold of each primer pair was established from the standard curves.

4.5.4. Analysis of Gene Expression in the Isolates

The cDNA of all isolates carrying genes of the ica operon detected by conventional PCR in genomic DNA was submitted to RT-qPCR for detection of the 16SrRNA gene used as an endogenous control. Once the positivity for the 16S rRNA gene was confirmed, the expression of the genes was also analyzed. Relative quantification of biofilm gene expression by each isolate was compared to the expression of reference strains (ATCC 35985: biofilm producer and ATCC 1222: non-biofilm producer). The ΔΔCT value was calculated for relative quantification [53].

4.6. Determination of Oxacillin and Vancomycin Inhibitory Concentrations by the E-Test

In vitro susceptibility of the isolates to oxacillin and vancomycin was tested. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of these drugs was determined by the E-test. Inocula adjusted to a turbidity corresponding to a 0.5 McFarland standard were inoculated into Mueller-Hinton medium and incubated at 35 °C. The results were read at the intersection of the MIC scale on the strip and the ellipse-shaped bacterial growth inhibition zone. An international reference strain (S. aureus ATCC 29213) was included as a control.

4.7. Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis

PFGE of the Staphylococcus spp. isolates was performed according to the modified protocol of McDougal et al. (2003) [24]. For similarity analysis, the Dice correlation coefficient was calculated and a dendrogram was generated by the UPGMA method (unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages) using the BioNumerics® software (version 7.0; Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium, 2015). A similarity coefficient of 80% was chosen for the definition of the clusters.

4.8. Geographic Distribution of Staphylococcus spp. Clones

For the classification of the PFGE clusters, the strains were analyzed regarding their location and distribution across the different states included in the study (PR, SC, SP, RS, MG, and PE). The geographic coordinates of each farm were used, with the milking room serving as a reference. These data were extracted from the questionnaires applied in previous epidemiological studies conducted on these farms. The image was generated with the Arcgis program. The farms were georeferenced and imported to the software using the Geographic Coordinates System GCS Sirgas 2000 and Datum planimetric Sirgas 2000.

4.9. Multilocus Sequence Typing

MLST was performed as described by Enright et al. (2000) [54]. After amplification and sequencing of the seven housekeeping genes, the sequences were analyzed with the BioNumerics® software (version 7.0; Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium, 2015) and compared with the online database (http://www.mlst.net) to obtain the identification number of each allele. The combination of these alleles indicates the ST to which the isolates belong.

5. Conclusions

The determination of the resistance of S. aureus and CoNS to oxacillin by the E-test demonstrated that CoNS had higher resistance rates. When analyzing resistance to vancomycin, all samples were sensitive. The presence and expression of the genes encoding the biofilm were more present in S. aureus, with the most expressed genes being icaA and icaD. Molecular typing by PFGE revealed a large cluster of S. aureus that includes isolates from different properties and locations. In other species it was also possible to verify the formation of clusters with these characteristics. With respect to MLST, ST126 and ST1 were the prevalent sequence types in S. aureus, while in S. epidermidis all sequence types were different, with a new ST, which received the nomenclature ST639. The identification of strains with the same evolutionary origin as other isolates around the world, which are known to cause infections in humans and animals, suggesting their ability to spread between these species. The present study highlights the need to evaluate the microbiological and molecular characteristics of bovine mastitis isolates so that effective infection control measures.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/12/888/s1, Table S1: Brazilian state of origin (Minas Gerais−MG; Pernambuco−PE; Paraná−PR; Rio Grande do Sul−RS; Santa Catarina−SC), identification number of the farm, geographic coordinates, number of the isolate, cluster, and sequence type (ST).

Author Contributions

P.L.M., L.d.A.M., M.A.V.P.B. and M.d.L.R.d.S.d.C. designed the study. P.L.M., L.C.R. and M.d.L.R.d.S.d.C. wrote the manuscript. P.L.M. and D.F.M.R. performed the experiments. P.L.M., L.d.A.M. and M.A.V.P.B. collected the samples. C.V. performed statistical analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the State funding agency São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Grants 2012/24135-0 and 2015/01401-4) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq; grant 304051/2017-9).

Acknowledgments

We thank the State funding agency São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP−Grants 2012/24135-0 and 2015/01401-4), the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq; grant 304051/2017-9) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES/PROEX 0708/2018) for the financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gottardi, C.P.T.; Muricy, R.F.; Cardoso, M.; Schmidt, V. Qualidade higiênica do leite caprino por contagem de coliformes e estafilococos. Ciência Rural 2008, 38, 743–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Halasal, T.; Huijpsl, K.; Osterds, O.; Hogeveen, H. Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: A review. Vet. Q. 2007, 29, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fernandes, J.B.C.; Zanardo, L.G.; Galvão, N.N.; Carvalho, I.A.; Nero, L.A.; Moreira, M.A.S. Escherichia coli from clinical mastitis: Serotypes and virulence factors. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2011, 23, 1146–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Gomes, F.; Saavedra, M.J.; Henriques, M. Bovine mastitis disease/pathogenicity: Evidence of the potential role of microbial biofilms. Pathog. Dis. 2016, 74, ftw006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Busanello, M.; Rossi, R.S.; Cassoli, L.D.; Pantoja, J.C.F.; Machado, P.F. Estimation of prevalence and incidence of subclinical mastitis in a large population of Brazilian dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 6545–6553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. ANUÁRIO leite 2018: Indicadores, Tendências e Oportunidades Para Quem Vive no Setor Leiteiro; Embrapa Gado de Leite: São Paulo, Brazil, 2018; p. 114.
  7. Radostitis, O.M.; Gay, C.C.; Hinchcliff, K.W.; Constable, P.D. Veterinary Medicine: A Textbook of the Disease of Cattle, Horses, Sheep, Pigs and Goats, 10th ed.; Saunders Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007; p. 2156. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, R.W. Intramammary infections produced by various strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus. Cornell Vet. 1973, 63, 630–645. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Brown, R.W.; Scherer, R.K. Classification of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus strains isolated from bovine milk. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1978, 39, 767. [Google Scholar]
  10. Edwards, S.J.; Jones, G.W. The distribution and characteristics of coagulase-negative staphylococci of the bovine udder. J. Dairy Res. 1966, 33, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hogan, J.S.; White, D.G.; Pankey, J.W. Effects of teat dipping on intramammary infections by staphylococci other than Staphylococcus aureus. J. Dairy Sci. 1987, 70, 873–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tomazi, T.; Gonçalves, J.L.; Barreiro, J.R.; Arcari, M.A.; Santos, M.V. Bovine subclinical intramammary infection caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci increases somatic cell count but has no effect on milk yield or composition. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 3071–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Aguilar, B.; Amorena, B.; Iturralde, M. Effect of slime on adherence of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine and ovine mastitis. Vet. Microbiol. 2001, 78, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fox, L.K.; Zadoks, R.N.; Gaskins, C.T. Biofilm production by Staphylococcus aureus associated with intramammary infection. Vet. Microbiol. 2005, 107, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Stewart, P.S. Theoretical aspects of antibiotic diffusion into microbial biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1996, 40, 2517–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Costerton, J.W.; Stewart, P.S.; Greenberg, E.P. Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections. Science 1999, 284, 1318–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. O’Toole, G.; Kaplan, H.B.; Kolter, R. Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2000, 54, 49–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cucarella, C.; Tormo, M.A.; Úbeda, C.; Trotonda, M.P.; Monzón, M.; Peris, C.; Amorena, B.; Lasa, I.; Penadés, J.R. Role of biofilm-associated protein bap in the pathogenesis of bovine Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 2177–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Schwartz, D.C.; Saffran, W.; Welsh, J.; Haas, R.; Goldenberg, M.; Cantor, C.R. New Techniques for Purifying Large DNAs and Studying Their Properties and Packaging. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1983, 47, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maiden, M.C.; Bygraves, J.A.; Feil, E.; Morelli, G.; Russel, J.E.; Urwin, R.; Zhang, Q.; Zhow, J.; Zurth, K.; Caugant, D.A.; et al. Multilocus sequence typing: A portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 3140–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Said, K.B.; Ismail, J.; Campbell, J.; Mulvey, M.R.; Bourgault, A.M.; Messier, S.; Zhao, X. Regional profiling for determination of genotype diversity of mastitis-specific Staphylococcus aureus lineage in Canada by use of clumping factor a, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and spa typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Aarts, H.J.M.; Boumedine, K.S.; Nesme, X.; Cloeckaert, A. Molecular tools for the characterization of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Vet. Res. 2001, 32, 363–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-CLSI. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, Approved Standard-Tenth ed.; CLSI Document M07-A10; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  24. McDougal, L.K.; Steward, C.D.; Killgore, G.E.; Chaitram, J.M.; McAllister, S.K.; Tenover, F.C. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: Establishing a national database. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 5113–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Vasudevan, P.; Nair, M.K.; Annamalai, T.; Venkitanarayanan, K.S. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of bovine mastitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus for biofilm formation. Vet. Microbiol. 2003, 92, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Krewer, C.C.; Amanso, E.S.; Gouveia, G.V.; Souza, R.L.; Costa, M.M.; Mota, R.A. Resistance to antimicrobials and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus spp. isolated from bovine mastitis in the Northeast of Brazil. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2015, 47, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rode, M.T.; Langsrud, S.; Holck, A.; Moretro, T. Different patterns of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus under food-related stress conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 116, 372–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kot, B.; Sytykiewicz, H.; Sprawka, I. Expression of the Biofilm-Associated Genes in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Biofilm and Planktonic Conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Akshatha, B.M.; Isloor, S.; Sundareshan, S.; Veeresh, B.H.; Nuthanalakshmi, V.; Sinha, A.Y.; Rathnamma, D.; Veeregowda, B.M.; Upendra, H.A.; Bhat, A.S.; et al. Biofilm production, antibiotic resistance and the presence of ica, bap, agr and blaz genes in bovine mastitis-associated Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Karnataka. Indian J. Comp. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 41, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tormo, M.A.; Knecht, E.; Gotz, F.; Lasa, I.; Penade, J.R. Bap-dependent biofilm formation by pathogenic species of Staphylococcus: Evidence of horizontal gene transfer? Microbiology 2005, 151, 2465–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Baselga, R.; Albizu, I.; De La Cruz, M.; Del Cacho, E.; Barberan, M.; Amorena, B. Phase variation of slime production in Staphylococcus aureus: Implications in colonization and virulence. Infect. Immun. 1993, 61, 4857–4862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zadoks, R.; van Leeuwen, W.; Barkema, H.; Sampimon, O.; Verbrugh, H.; Schukken, Y.H.; van Belkum, A. Application of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and binary typing as tools in veterinary clinical microbiology and molecular epidemiologic analysis of bovine and human Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 1931–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Akineden, O.; Annemüller, C.; Hassan, A.A.; Lämmler, C.; Wolter, W.; Zschöck, M. Toxin genes and other characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from milk of cows with mastitis. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2001, 8, 959–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Tondo, E.C.; Guimarães, M.C.; Henriques, J.A.; Ayub, M.A. Assessing and analysing contamination of a dairy products processing plant by Staphylococcus aureus using antibiotic resistance and PFGE. Can. J. Microbiol. 2000, 46, 1108–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Buzzola, F.R.; Quelle, L.; Gomez, M.I.; Catalano, M.; Steele-Moore, L.; Berg, D.; Gentilini, E.; Denamiel, G.; Sordelli, D.O. Genotypic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus from milk of dairy cows with mastitis in Argentina. Epidemiol. Infect. 2001, 126, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Almeida, L.M.D.; Mamizuka, E.M.; Cunha, M.L.R.S.C.; Zafalon, L.F. Fatores de Virulência e Genes Regulatórios agr de Staphylococcus aureus e Outras Espécies Coagulase Positivas Isoladas de Mastites Bovina e Ovina. Master’s Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo—USP, São Pulo, Brazil, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Vivoni, A.M.; Diep, B.A.; De Gouveia Magalhães, A.C.; Santos, K.R.; Riley, L.W.; Sensabaugh, G.F.; Moreira, B.M. Clonal composition of Staphylococcus aureus isolates at a Brazilian university hospital: Identification of international circulating lineages. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 1686–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kwon, N.H.; Park, K.T.; Moon, J.S.; Jung, W.K.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, J.M.; Hong, S.K.; Koo, H.C.; Joo, Y.S.; Park, Y.O. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) characterization and molecular analysis for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and novel SCCmec subtype IVg isolated from bovine milk in Korea. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 56, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Rabello, R.F.; Moreira, B.M.; Lopes, R.M.M.; Teixeira, L.M.; Riley, L.W.; Castro, A.C.D. Multilocus sequence typing of Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from cows with mastitis in Brazilian dairy herds. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 56, 1505–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Pilla, R.; Castiglioni, V.; Gelain, M.E.; Scanziani, E.; Lorenzi, V.; Anjum, M.; Piccinini, R. Long-term study of MRSA ST1, t127 mastitis in a dairy cow. Vet. Record. 2012, 170, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Zadoks, R.N.; Middleton, J.R.; McDougall, S.; Katholm, J.; Schukken, Y.H. Molecular epidemiology of mastitis pathogens of dairy cattle and comparative relevance to humans. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2011, 16, 357–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Rossi, B.F.; Bonsaglia, E.C.R.; Castilho, I.G.; Dantas, S.T.A.; Salina, A.; Langoni, H.; Pantoja, J.C.F.; Budri, P.E.; Fitzgerald-Hughes, D.; Júnior, A.F.; et al. Genotyping of long term persistent Staphylococcus aureus in bovine subclinical mastitis. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 132, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Smith, E.M.; Green, L.E.; Medley, G.F.; Bird, H.E.; Fox, L.K.; Schukken, Y.H.; Kruze, J.V.; Bradley, A.J.; Zadoks, R.N.; Dowson, C.G. Multilocus sequence typing of intercontinental bovine Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 4737–4743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Boss, R.; Cosandey, A.; Luini, M.; Artursson, K.; Bardiau, M.; Breitenwieser, F.; Hehenberger, E.; Lam, T.; Mansfeld, M.; Michel, A.; et al. Bovine Staphylococcus aureus: Subtyping, evolution, and zoonotic transfer. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 515–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Koneman, E.W.; Allen, S.D.; Janda, W.M.; Schreckenberger, P.C.; Winn, W.C., Jr. Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, 5th ed.; Lippincott: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  46. Cunha, M.L.R.S.; Sinzato, Y.K.; Silveira, L.V.A. Comparison of methods for identification of coagulase-negative Staphylococci. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2004, 99, 855–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Couto, I.; Pereira, S.; Miragaia, M.; Sanches, I.S.; Lencastre, H. Identification of clinical staphylococcal isolates from humans by Internal Transcribed Spacer PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 3099–3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Arciola, C.R.; Gamberini, S.; Campoccia, D.; Visai, L.; Speziale, P.; Baldassari, L.; Montanaro, L. A multiplex PCR method for the detection of all five individual genes of ica locus in Staphylococcus epidermidis. A survey on 400 clinical isolates from prosthesis-associated infections. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2005, 75, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Qin, Z.; Yang, X.; Yang, L.; Jiang, J.; Ou, Y.; Molin, S.; Qu, D. Formation and properties of in vitro biofilms of ica-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 56, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Vandecasteele, S.J.; Peetermans, W.E.; Merckx, R.; Van Eldere, J. Expression of biofilm-associated genes in Staphylococcus epidermidis during in vitro and in vivo foreign body infections. J. Infect. Dis. 2003, 1, 730–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Klug, D.; Wallet, F.; Kacet, S.; Courcol, R.J. Involvement of adherence and adhesion Staphylococcus epidermidis genes in pacemaker lead-associated infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 3348–3350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Tan, H.; Peng, Z.; Li, Q.; Xu, X.; Guo, S.; Tang, T. The use of quaternised chitosan-loaded PMMA to inhibit biofilm formation and downregulate the virulence-associated gene expression of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yuan, J.S.; Reed, A.; Chen, F.; Stewart, C.N., Jr. Statistical analysis of real-time PCR data. BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Enright, M.C.; Day, N.P.J.; Davies, C.E.; Peacock, S.J.; Spratt, B.G. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin- resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 1008–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Antibiotics 09 00888 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparison of the detection of genes of the icaADBC operon by conventional PCR (genomic DNA, gDNA) and expression analysis by RT-qPCR (complementary DNA, cDNA).
Figure 1. Comparison of the detection of genes of the icaADBC operon by conventional PCR (genomic DNA, gDNA) and expression analysis by RT-qPCR (complementary DNA, cDNA).
Antibiotics 09 00888 g001
Antibiotics 09 00888 g002 550
Figure 2. Dendrogram generated from the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis PFGE pattern of Staphylococcus aureus isolates (Dice similarity coefficient; clustering method: Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean- UPGMA).
Figure 2. Dendrogram generated from the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis PFGE pattern of Staphylococcus aureus isolates (Dice similarity coefficient; clustering method: Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean- UPGMA).
Antibiotics 09 00888 g002
Antibiotics 09 00888 g003 550
Figure 3. Dendrogram generated from the PFGE pattern of Staphylococcus chromogenes isolates (Dice similarity coefficient; clustering method: UPGMA). All Staphylococcus chromogenes isolates were negative for the bhp gene.
Figure 3. Dendrogram generated from the PFGE pattern of Staphylococcus chromogenes isolates (Dice similarity coefficient; clustering method: UPGMA). All Staphylococcus chromogenes isolates were negative for the bhp gene.
Antibiotics 09 00888 g003
Antibiotics 09 00888 g004 550
Figure 4. Dendrogram generated from the PFGE pattern of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates (Dice similarity coefficient; clustering method: UPGMA).
Figure 4. Dendrogram generated from the PFGE pattern of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates (Dice similarity coefficient; clustering method: UPGMA).
Antibiotics 09 00888 g004
Antibiotics 09 00888 g005 550
Figure 5. Dendrogram generated from the PFGE pattern of Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates (Dice similarity coefficient; clustering method: UPGMA). All Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates were negative for the bhp gene.
Figure 5. Dendrogram generated from the PFGE pattern of Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates (Dice similarity coefficient; clustering method: UPGMA). All Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates were negative for the bhp gene.
Antibiotics 09 00888 g005
Antibiotics 09 00888 g006 550
Figure 6. Dendrogram generated from the PFGE pattern of Staphylococcus simulans isolates (Dice similarity coefficient; clustering method: UPGMA). All Staphylococcus simulans isolates were negative for the bhp gene.
Figure 6. Dendrogram generated from the PFGE pattern of Staphylococcus simulans isolates (Dice similarity coefficient; clustering method: UPGMA). All Staphylococcus simulans isolates were negative for the bhp gene.
Antibiotics 09 00888 g006
Antibiotics 09 00888 g007 550
Figure 7. Map with the spatial distribution of the clusters of different Staphylococcus species analyzed by PFGE. CSA: cluster S. aureus; CSC: cluster S. chromogenes; CSE: cluster S. epidermidis; CSS: cluster S. saprophyticus.
Figure 7. Map with the spatial distribution of the clusters of different Staphylococcus species analyzed by PFGE. CSA: cluster S. aureus; CSC: cluster S. chromogenes; CSE: cluster S. epidermidis; CSS: cluster S. saprophyticus.
Antibiotics 09 00888 g007
Table
Table 1. Distribution of detection (gDNA) and expression (cDNA) of genes involved in biofilm formation according to Staphylococcus species.
Table 1. Distribution of detection (gDNA) and expression (cDNA) of genes involved in biofilm formation according to Staphylococcus species.
Species (N)gDNA 1
icaA		cDNA 2
icaA		gDNA
icaB		cDNA
icaB		gDNA
icaC		cDNA
icaC		gDNA
icaD		cDNA
icaD
S. aureus (82)71584426186962
S. chromogenes (27)004161124
S. epidermidis (26)5180123173
S. saprophyticus (17)20402080
S. haemolyticus (6)11004243
S. simulans (6)00113050
S. warneri (6)00301045
S. hyicus (5)00002041
S. hominis (4)00000020
S. xylosus (2)00001022
Total (181)7960246572412780
1 genomic DNA; 2 co mplementary DNA.
Table
Table 2. Interpretation of susceptibility to oxacillin and vancomycin by the E-test.
Table 2. Interpretation of susceptibility to oxacillin and vancomycin by the E-test.
Antimicrobial
OxacillinVancomycin
SpeciesMIC50MIC90ResistantMIC50MIC90Resistant
S. aureus0.0940.2510.501.00
CoNS0.251.5321.01.50
Oxacillin breakpoint: Staphylococcus aureus: susceptible ≤2; resistant ≥4 µg/mL. CoNS (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus): susceptible ≤0.25; resistant ≥0.5 µg/mL. Vancomycin breakpoint: Staphylococcus spp.: susceptible <4 [23]. MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration.
Table
Table 3. Electrophoretic pattern and expression of genes of the icaADBC operon in Staphylococcus spp. clones isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis cases in different Brazilian states.
Table 3. Electrophoretic pattern and expression of genes of the icaADBC operon in Staphylococcus spp. clones isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis cases in different Brazilian states.
SpeciesClusterNo. of IsolatesExpression of icaADBC GenesOrigin
S. aureusCSA131icaA (23); icaB (0); icaC (4); icaD (23)SP; MG
CSA23icaA (1); icaB (0); icaC (0); icaD (1)SP; RS
CSA37icaA (5); icaB (2); icaC (5); icaD (7)PR
CSA45icaA (3); icaB (0); icaC (2); icaD (4)PR; SC; SP
CSA56icaA (5); icaB (0); icaC (1); icaD (5)SC
CSA65icaA (4); icaB (0); icaC (2); icaD (5)SC
CSA73icaA (2); icaB (0); icaC (2); icaD (2)RS; SC; SP
CSA84icaA (3); icaB (1); icaC (0); icaD (3)SC
S. chromogenesCSC111icaA (0); icaB (1); icaC (0); icaD (2)SC; SP
CSC24icaA (0); icaB (0); icaC (0); icaD (0)SC; SP
CSC36icaA (0); icaB (0); icaC (0); icaD (2)PR; SC; SP
S. epidermidisCSE14icaA (0); icaB (0); icaC (0); icaD (1)PR; SC
CSE23icaA (0); icaB (0); icaC (1); icaD (1)MG; SC; SP
CSE33icaA (0); icaB (0); icaC (0); icaD (0)SC
CSE43icaA (1); icaB (0); icaC (1); icaD (1)PR
S. saprophyticusCSS13icaA (0); icaB (0); icaC (0); icaD (0)SP
S. simulansCSI13icaA (0); icaB (1); icaC (0); icaD (0)RS; SC
CSA: cluster Staphylococcus aureus; CSC: cluster Staphylococcus chromogenes; CSE: cluster Staphylococcus epidermidis; CSS: cluster Staphylococcus saprophyticus; CSS: Cluster Staphylococcus simulans. SP: São Paulo; MG: Minas Gerais; RS: Rio Grande do Sul; PR: Paraná; SC: Santa Catarina.
Table
Table 4. Identification of the sequence type (ST) of Staphylococcus aureus isolates.
Table 4. Identification of the sequence type (ST) of Staphylococcus aureus isolates.
OriginPFGE ClusterIsolatesAllelesST
arcCaroEglpFgmkptatpiyqiL
MGCSA12368141540126
SPCSA191368141540126
SPCSA288368141540126
PRCSA31811111111
PRCSA317811111111
SCCSA44011111111
SCCSA5543118111188
SCCSA64331111592746
RSCSA617031111592746
PRCSA72411111111
SCCSA87133114438
PFGE: Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis; MG: Minas Gerais; SP: São Paulo; PR: Paraná; SC: Santa Catarina, RS: Rio Grande do Sul; CSA: Cluster Staphylcoccus aureus.
Table
Table 5. Identification of the sequence type (ST) of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates.
Table 5. Identification of the sequence type (ST) of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates.
OriginPFGE Cluster IsolatesAllelesST
arcCaroEgtrmutpyrtpiyqiL
PRCSE1161116217575
SCCSE1752171121181
MGCSE21211121159
SCCSE3817126211639
PRCSE411712241448
CSE: cluster Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Table
Table 6. Susceptibility profile of the isolates according to sequence type (ST).
Table 6. Susceptibility profile of the isolates according to sequence type (ST).
SpeciesStrainSTOxacillinVancomycin
S. epidermidis159RS
S. aureus2126SS
S. epidermidis1148RS
S. epidermidis16575SS
S. aureus181SS
S. aureus241SS
S. aureus43746SS
S. aureus54188SS
S. aureus718SS
S. epidermidis7581RS
S. epidermidis81639SS
S. aureus88126SS
S. aureus91126SS
S. aureus170746SS
S. aureus1781SS
R: resistant; S: susceptible.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mello, P.L.; Riboli, D.F.M.; Martins, L.d.A.; Brito, M.A.V.P.; Victória, C.; Calixto Romero, L.; Ribeiro de Souza da Cunha, M.d.L. Staphylococcus spp. Isolated from Bovine Subclinical Mastitis in Different Regions of Brazil: Molecular Typing and Biofilm Gene Expression Analysis by RT-qPCR. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 888. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120888

AMA Style

Mello PL, Riboli DFM, Martins LdA, Brito MAVP, Victória C, Calixto Romero L, Ribeiro de Souza da Cunha MdL. Staphylococcus spp. Isolated from Bovine Subclinical Mastitis in Different Regions of Brazil: Molecular Typing and Biofilm Gene Expression Analysis by RT-qPCR. Antibiotics. 2020; 9(12):888. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120888

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mello, Priscila Luiza, Danilo Flávio Moraes Riboli, Lisiane de Almeida Martins, Maria Aparecida Vasconcelos Paiva Brito, Cassiano Victória, Letícia Calixto Romero, and Maria de Lourdes Ribeiro de Souza da Cunha. 2020. "Staphylococcus spp. Isolated from Bovine Subclinical Mastitis in Different Regions of Brazil: Molecular Typing and Biofilm Gene Expression Analysis by RT-qPCR" Antibiotics 9, no. 12: 888. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120888

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop