Next Article in Journal
Using Colistin as a Trojan Horse: Inactivation of Gram-Negative Bacteria with Chlorophyllin
Next Article in Special Issue
Countering Gram-Negative Antibiotic Resistance: Recent Progress in Disrupting the Outer Membrane with Novel Therapeutics
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of LysBC17, a Lytic Endopeptidase from Bacillus cereus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Carbapenemase-Producing Elizabethkingia Meningoseptica from Healthy Pigs Associated with Colistin Use in Spain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 8
Issue 4
10.3390/antibiotics8040156
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Posing a Dilemma in Effective Healthcare Delivery

by
Angus Nnamdi Oli
1,*,
Chimaobi Johnpaul Itumo
1,
Princeston Chukwuemeka Okam
2,
Ifeanyichukwu U. Ezebialu
3,
Kenneth Nchekwube Okeke
4,
Christian Chukwuemeka Ifezulike
5,
Ifeanyi Ezeobi
6,
George Ogonna Emechebe
5,
Ugochukwu Moses Okezie
1,
Samson A. Adejumo
1 and
Jude Nnaemeka Okoyeh
7
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Agulu, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka 420108, Anambra State, Nigeria
2
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Nnewi 435101, Nigeria
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Awka Campus, Awka 420108, Anambra state, Nigeria
4
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Nnewi 435101, Anambra State, Nigeria
5
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Awka Campus, Awka 420108, Anambra State, Nigeria
6
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Awka Campus, Awka 420108, Anambra State, Nigeria
7
Department of Biology and Clinical Laboratory Science, Division of Arts and Sciences, Neumann University, One Neumann Drive, Aston, PA 19014-1298, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2019, 8(4), 156; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8040156
Submission received: 25 July 2019 / Revised: 27 August 2019 / Accepted: 28 August 2019 / Published: 20 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance in Gram-negative Bacteria)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The emergence and spread of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is seriously posing threats in effective healthcare delivery. The aim of this study was to ascertain the emergence of CRE at Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University Teaching Hospital (COOUTH) Awka. Biological samples were collected from 153 consenting patient from 5 clinics in the hospital. The isolates were identified using standard microbiological protocols. Susceptibility to meropenem was done using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton Agar. A total of 153 patients were recruited in this study. About one half of those from rural, 63.64% from Sub-urban and 42.27% from urban areas had significant E. coli and Klebsiella spp infections. The male: female ratio of the Enterobacteriaceae infection was 1:1. Almost as much inpatient as outpatient study participants had the infections. The infections were observed mostly on participants with lower educational status. The unmarried individuals were most infected compared to their married counterparts. Enterobacteriaceae infection rate was 50.98%. Of this, 28.21% had CRE infection while the overall prevalence of the CRE in the studied population was 14.38% (22/153). This study shows that CRE is quickly emerging in both community and hospital environments. Klebsiella spp was the most common CRE in this hospital especially Klebsiella oxytoca. Hospitalization was a strong risk factor in the CRE infections. Rapid and accurate detection is critical for their effective management and control.

1. Introduction

Enterobacteriaceae are a large family of aerobic Gram-negative rods existing mostly as part of normal flora in the human and animal colons. More than other Gram negative organisms, they are particularly of clinical important in the cause of nosocomial and community acquired bacterial infections [1]. The mainstay for the treatment of enterobacteriaceae infections is the beta-lactam group of antibiotics [2]. Carbapenems are beta-lactams antibiotics used for the treatment of infections known or suspected to be caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Like other beta-lactams antibiotics, they act by binding to penicillin-binding proteins, thereby inhibiting the synthesis of bacterial cell wall. They are primarily used in hospitalized patients. Multidrug resistant, extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and pandrug-resistant (PDR) organisms are rapidly emerging and spreading worldwide [3,4] and at a rate extremely faster than the development of new drug molecules. They have been implicated in community-acquired as well as hospital-acquired infection outbursts such that among the most important contemporary healthcare issues are the emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant infections [4,5]. Also, that Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections are with us now has been a global health challenge and constitutes much concern to public and private health services [6]. Early and efficient detection of CRE in human and animals hosts are critical in controlling the infection and their spread [7]. Carbapenem resistance in enterobacteriaceae may result from one or more of such mechanisms including but not limited to [7,8,9]:
  • production of carbapenemase enzymes (Carbapenem-hydrolysing enzymes) namely: the class A carbapenemases (the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase types), the class B or Metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs), and class D Oxacillinases (e.g., OXA-48-like enzymes)
  • production of extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs)
  • production of AmpC enzymes (mostly, plasmid-mediated)
  • porins loss leading to drug decreased permeability
For many clinicians in Nigeria, carbapenems are the preferred option for treating infections due to multidrug‑resistant enterobacteriaceae. The emergence and spread of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is seriously posing threats in effective healthcare delivery. There is need for a continuous epidemiological monitoring of the prevalence of these Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae isolates. This will aid evidence-based decision for limiting the spread and controlling the infections. It will also serve as a useful baseline for determining the rational and effective chemotherapeutic option for the management of Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae in the center and will serve as a formidable approach to the control of antimicrobial resistance. The aim of this study was to ascertain the emergence of CRE in the tertiary health institution. No results, as yet, exist and clinicians have no scientifically reported proof of the existence of Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae infections in the facility. This study will enable them understand a rational approach to tackle such infections and help offer ways to curtail them. The knowledge of the incidence of organisms harboring the carbapenemase enzymes will aid in rational prescribing and patients’ education.

2. Results

The samples were first processed and the isolates identified (Figure 1). The identified enterobacteriaceae were confirmed by biochemical methods while the confirmed isolates were tested for carbapenemase production using Meropenem (10 µg) disc. Resistance to Meropenem (10 µg) was taken as Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae.

Characteristics of Study Population

A total of 153 patients were recruited in this study (Table 1) and 49.06% of those from rural, 63.64% from Sub-urban and 42.27% from urban areas had significant E. coli and Klebsiella spp infections. The male: female ratio of the enterobacteriaceae infections was 1:1. Almost as much inpatient as outpatient study participants had the infections. The infections were observed mostly on participants with lower educational status. The unmarried individuals were most infected compared to their married counterparts.
The prevalence of enterobacteriaceae in the samples studied was 50.98% (78/153) out of which 28.21% (22/78) showed resistance to Carbapenem (meropenem) antibiotic. Although the percentage of CRE isolated was high (14.38% i.e., 22/153), it is not statistically significant (p value > 0.05). Majority of the CRE were K. oxytoca (9/22). Out of the 12 K. oxytoca isolates, 75% were CRE. A 2-Way ANOVA analysis of the result showed that the chance of isolating enterobacteriaceae is similar at all the locations of residence of the study participants. The species of enterobacteriaceae isolated accounted for 72.44% of the total variance in infection rate. The p value = 0.0342. The species of enterobacteriaceae isolated is considered very significant in relation to infection rate. Also, the location of residence of the study participants accounted for 11.11% of the total variance in infection rate. The x value = 0.3561. Location has no effect overall, and so the effect is considered not quite significant. Gender has no effect on infection rate of enterobacteriaceae. Chi-square value = 0.9354, and p value = 0.6265. It is therefore concluded that both sexes have equal risks of being infected. Also, Chi-square test for trend of CRE among the study participants showed that it is not significant statistically (p value = 0.7811).
Two-Way analysis of the prevalence of the infection by age of the patients showed that the Enterobacteriaceae isolates had the same effect at all levels of age groups of patients. Enterobacteriaceae isolates accounted for 22.21% of the total variance among the age groups. The p value = 0.0506 and so the effect is considered not quite significant. However, age of patients accounted for 64.76% of the total variance in infection rate with a p value = 0.0096. The effects of age on infection rates are considered very significant. However, patients’ age did not affect CRE infections rate.
Two-Way analysis of the prevalence of the infection by the patients’ marital status showed that the Enterobacteriaceae isolates had the same effect at all levels of the patients’ marital status. Enterobacteriaceae infections accounted for 13.04% of the total variance seen in the patients’ marital status with a p value = 0.1227. The effect is considered not significant. However, marital status accounted for 74.08% of the total variance seen in the infection with a P value = 0.0067. The patients’ marital status significantly affected the prevalence of the enterobacteriaceae infections.
Patients’ literacy level accounted for 63.58% of the total variance in enterobacteriaceae infection rate with a p value = 0.0186. Literacy level, therefore, has some effect overall, and is considered significant.
Considering the infection rates of both enterobacteriaceae and CRE in relation to in-patient and out-patient settings, the Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests respectively showed a p value < 0.0001 each. It is therefore concluded that there is a significantly higher relative risk of enterobacteriaceae and CRE infections in hospital setting (in-patients) compared to out-patients.
Table 2 shows infection prevalence by the kind of samples collected. The results of the prevalence of the enterobacteriaceae isolated in relation to the kind of samples studied showed that the chance of isolating enterobacteriaceae is similar across all the samples. The species of enterobacteriaceae isolated accounted for only 11.97% of the total variance in infection rate with a P value of 0.7982. The species of enterobacteriaceae isolated is considered not significant in relation to infection rate with respect to sample type.
The surgical wards and chest clinic contributed most to the resistant isolates (Table 3) while the out-patient clinic, gynecology and antenatal clinics as well as urine samples contributed list. However, there is no significant difference (p > 0.05).
Meropenem—a representative Carbapenem—is shown phenotypically to be liable to carbapenemase enzyme (Figure 2A) produced by isolates and so the isolates were resistant to the Carbapenem. In Figure 2B, the isolate was non-carbapenemase producer and so was susceptible to meropenem.
A great percentage (28.21%) of the enterobacteriaceae isolates was resistant to Carbapenem (Table 4). There was a significant difference in the susceptibility profile of the isolates, Chi-square = 15.36 and p value = 0.0005.

3. Discussion

In this study, a total of 78 Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp were isolated from clinical samples while the prevalence of Carbapenem resistance was 14.38% (22/153) in the hospital. This is quite high for a drug used as last resort in infection treatment. Klebsiella oxytoca was been reported as emerging enterobacteriaceae in hospital community and had shown considerable resistance to antibiotics [10,11,12]. The prevalence Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae found in our study is higher than that recorded in Kano, northern Nigeria (11.8%) [13]; Pune, India (1.6%) [14] and Morocco (2.5%) [15]; similar to that observed in Lagos, western Nigeria (15.2%) [9]; but lower than the report from Uganda (18.4%) [16]. The most common species of the CRE were K. oxytoca (41%, 9/22), followed by K. pneumoniae (32%, 7/22) and then E. coli (27%, 6/22). Contrary trend was observed in a study carried out in Turkey where K. pneumoniae was the most common specie [17].
While our study showed that of the factors investigated, only literacy levels (p value = 0.0058) and hospitalization (p value < 0.0001) actually affected the rate of CRE infections; the infection rates of enterobacteriaceae generally were found to be affected by factors such as age, marital status, level of education and hospital setting. Other studies proved that younger age group and hospitalization are common risk factors for Gram-negative enterobacteriaceae (GNE) infections [18,19] while hospitalization remains the leading cause of CRE infections [20,21,22]. Since hospitalization is a strong risk factor in CRE colonization; clinicians, other health workers and in fact, everyone should join hands to reduce patients’ length of stay in hospitals as this will reduce the risk of spread of CRE as well as control them.
Sputum sample has the highest prevalence of CRE 15% which was in line with that of a study carried out in Indonesia [23] but at variance with that carried out in northern Nigeria where urine had the highest number of CRE [13]. All the resistant isolates in the sputum samples were K. pneumoniae which are well known for causing pneumonia and nosocomial respiratory tract infections [24]. The chest clinic (where these sputum samples were collected) had the highest prevalence rate of CRE (15%) followed by the surgical ward (11.54%). Surgical wards and intensive care units had been established by studies as one of the clinics in hospital where CRE are found, may be because of long term catheterization of bed ridden patients which is one of the risk factors implicated in the infection [21,25]. These infected patients serve as reservoirs for spreading the infection and contaminating the environment. The prevalence of CRE among inpatients 11.11% (17/153) was more when compared to that among outpatients 3.27% (5/153) in the hospital. This also shows that CRE can be both hospital and community acquired and that the transmission of CRE infection is more likely in hospitals [20,21,22].
A greater number of enterobacteriaceae isolates observed in the study came from urine sample (39.74%) followed by sputum (25.64%), wound/pus (19.23%) and anal swab (15.38%). In a comparable study, it was found out that the distribution of the sources of isolates had urine sample as the highest followed by blood while wound discharge and sputum were the least [26]. Urine sample being the highest source of isolates in each case could be due to urinary tract infection which accounts for almost 40% of nosocomial infection [27]. The total number of isolates that showed intermediate susceptibility to carbapenems (20.5%) is of clinical importance as some of them may have the inherent ability of producing carbapenemase enzymes and this may be an indicative of low level resistance which if left undetected may escalate to high level resistance [10,28]. The mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance [29,30] and virulence [31] among Gram-negative enterobacteriaceae and among CRE vary widely (7,8,9). Also, it is not impossible that there could be cross-resistance between the carbapenems, the penicillins and the cephalosporins as they are all beta-lactam antibiotics and are dipeptide mimics [32]. The carbapenems resistance has been attributed to intrinsic and/or acquired resistance mechanisms [7,33].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Area and Site, Study Population, and Ethical Clearance

The study was carried out from May to July 2017 at Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu teaching hospital (COOUTH) Amaku, Anambra state in south east Nigeria. The hospital serves a mixed population—including the urban community of the State capital and large number of rural communities; the low-income, middle-income and high-income populations. It is also a tertiary health institution and is very strategic to the healthcare needs of the state. It provides medical care to patient as well as served for the undergraduate and post-graduate medical training and the training of pharmacy and nursing students.
The study population included 57 inpatients and 96 outpatients (Total 153) who gave their informed consent, aged (1–80) years and are not on antibiotic for at least two weeks before sample collection. Sampling points included: antenatal and gyneacology clinic, Chest clinic, male and female surgical wards and peadiatric medical and surgical wards. Study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the hospital (Approval Code: COOUTH/AA/VOL.X1/045 of 28th March 2017).

4.2. Sample Size Calculation

The total sample size was obtained with the assumptions of power 80%, a confidence interval of 95% and a 5% level of significance (alpha = 0.05). A 10% attrition rate was added in order to get the total sample size of 153 study participants. Report created by GraphPad StatMate version 2.00 on 23-Jan-17 3:28:23 PM.

4.3. Microbiological Investigations

Sample Processing

The working bench was first disinfected with 70% alcohol and the Bunsen burner lit in order to create aseptic environment. The samples were separately and aseptically inoculated on to previously prepared and labeled sterile nutrient broth in test tubes. The tubes were properly with sterile cotton wool and then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The inocula that had growth were aseptically inoculated onto already prepared and sterilized MacConkey agar plates and then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Separate colonies of the isolates were sub-cultured in sterile nutrient agar plates and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. This enabled the isolation of pure cultures.

4.4. Microbial Identification and Characterization

4.4.1. Gram Staining Technique

Smears of the isolates were made on clean grease-free slides, air-dried, and then heat-fixed by passing across a burning flame. These were covered with Giemsa stain for 30–60 s and rinsed off with clean water. Then, Lugol’s iodine was added for 30–60 s and rinsed off with clean water. Next, 70% alcohol was used to decolorize the stain, and the sample was allowed to dry. Safranin red was used to counter-stain for 2 min, and the sample was rinsed off with clean water. The backs of the slides were cleaned with dry filter paper and, thereafter, the fronts were examined using an oil immersion microscope.

4.4.2. Biochemical Tests

Series of biochemical tests were conducted to confirm the results obtained from the macroscopic and microscopic examinations of the isolates. However, only the tests with positive results are reported.

4.4.3. Indole Test

Peptone water (Oxoid, UK) was prepared according to the manufacturer’s specification and sterilized in an autoclave at 115 °C for 15 min. The test organisms were inoculated into test tubes containing 3 mL of the sterile peptone water and were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. After incubation, 0.5mL of Kovac’s reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the test tubes. The production of a red color on the surface layer of the test tube within 10 min suggested the presence of Escherichia coli, Proteus spp., and Klebsiella spp.

4.4.4. Confirmation of the Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Using Sugar Fermentation Tests

This was done using Mannitol Fermentation Test as described previously [34]. Enterobacteriaceae ferment mannitol to change the colour of the broth from red to yellow, indicating acid-gas production.
Again, lactose fermentation was performed as described previously [34] to differentiate lactose fermenting Enterobacteriaceae (such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp) from non-lactose fermenters (such as Salmonella spp and Shigellae spp). All the isolates gave positive results.
The isolates were subjected to sucrose fermentation. Colour changes show presence of Klebsiella pneumoniae and absence of E. coli.

4.4.5. Growth at 10 °C

The Indole-positive, mannitol-fermenting isolates were subjected to growth at 10 °C. The isolates that grew at this temperature after 48 h of incubation were confirmed as Klebsiella oxytoca.

4.4.6. Simmons Citrate Utilization Test

This test differentiates Enterobacteriaceae based on the utilization of citrate and ammonium dihydrogen phosphate as the only carbon and nitrogen sources, respectively. Slants of Simmons citrate agar (HiMedia Laboratories, India) were prepared in a bijou bottle following the manufacturer’s specification. A sterile straight-wire loop was used to firstly streak the test organism on the slant, and then it was stabbed. The slants were incubated at 35 °C for 48 h and were observed for a bright blue color. The Klebsiella spp. were citrate-positive, but E. coli was citrate-negative. Citrate-positive isolates were further incubated for 10 days and observed for H2S production. A positive result confirmed K oxytoca.

4.4.7. Storage of the Isolates

The colonies of the isolated and characterized isolates were stored in well-labeled double-strength nutrient agar slants in bijou bottles and kept in a refrigerator.

4.4.8. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing for the Detection of Carbapenem Resistance

The bacteria isolates were subjected to Meropenem (10 µg) using the Modified Kirby-Bauer Susceptibility testing technique. The decision to use Meropenem to determine Carbapenem resistance was based on the fact that it offers the best balance between sensitivity and specificity when detecting carbapenemase producers in clinical setting [10,35,36]. The pure isolates were first inoculated into sterile nutrient broth and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The inocula were standardized by sub-culturing a loop full into 3 mL sterile nutrient broth and incubating for 1–3 h to allow for growth of organism till the turbidity was equivalent to the turbidity of 0.5 McFarland. The standardized inocula were swabbed aseptically on to previously prepared and sterilized Mueller Hinton Agar plates and were allowed to stand for about 5 minutes. Thereafter, Meropenem (10 µg) disks were aseptically pressed gently down on to the surface of the media, ensuring proper lap with the media. After 24 h incubation at 37 °C, the isolates with inhibition zone diameters of <16 mm were classified as Carbapenem resistant [37].

4.5. Statistical Data Analysis and Interpretation

The data were analysed using GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows, GraphPad Software, Inc. San Diego California USA, www.graphpad.com. One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to establish the mean differences in prevalence of the isolates among various age groups while the Chi Square checked for the relative risks of enterobacteriaceae infections in relation to gender and setting (hospital versus community). Two-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to establish the mean differences in infection rates of the different strains of the enterobacteriaceae isolated. Bonferroni post-tests were used to compare the effects of patients’ place of residence, Age, Marital status, educational level on infection rates. All P values reported are for a two-tailed test. The significance level was chosen at p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

This study shows that Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae are quickly emerging in both community and hospital environments. Klebsiella spp. are the most common species resistant to Carbapenem in this hospital, especially Klebsiella oxytoca. Hospitalization is a strong risk factor in CRE infections. A closer eye should be kept in order to quickly diagnose and to control the CRE infections. Rapid and accurate detection, as well as a reduction in the length of hospital stay, are critical to their effective control.

6. Patients

Patient recruitment and specific sample collection were done by the medical doctors in each clinic/study site. For the sputum and urine samples, appropriate sterile containers were issued to the patients, who were educated on how to collect the samples (i.e., productive cough and clean catch mid-stream urine, respectively). The specimens used for the study included wound swab/pus, anal swab, urine, and sputum containing cough. The demographic data of the patients were collected using a validated questionnaire.

Author Contributions

A.N.O. and J.N.O. conceptualized and designed the study; A.N.O. carried out statistical analysis and participated in manuscript drafting; C.J.I. participated in data acquisition (laboratory work) and interpretation; P.C.O. revised the manuscript for intellectual content; I.U.E., G.O.E., C.C.I., I.E., and K.N.O. participated in patient recruitment and sample collection; U.M.O. participated in data acquisition (laboratory work); S.A.A. participated in manuscript writing.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of the hospital management in granting permission to conduct the study. We also wish to thank all the patients who participated in the study. The authors also wish to acknowledge the peer reviewers whose concerted efforts improved the overall quality of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

I.U.E., G.O.E., I.E., and K.N.O. work for the health institution where the study was done. A.N.O., I.U.E., G.O.E., C.C.I., I.E., K.N.O., P.C.O., and J.N.O. are natives of the Anambra State where the hospital is situated. J.P.O. and U.M.O. have nothing to declare. “The employer had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results”.

References

  1. Pitout, J.D. Multiresistant Enterobacteriaceae: New threat of an old problem. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2008, 6, 657–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Toussaint, K.A.; Gallagher, J.C. β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: From Then to Now. Ann. Pharmacother. 2015, 49, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Basak, S.; Singh, P.; Rajurkar, M. Multidrug Resistant and Extensively Drug Resistant Bacteria: A Study. J. Pathog. 2016, 2016, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Khan, S.N.; Khan, A.U. Breaking the Spell: Combating Multidrug Resistant ‘Superbugs’. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 4636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. WHO. Antibiotic Resistance—World Health Organization. 2018. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance (accessed on 28 May 2018).
  6. Lutgring, J.D.; Limbago, B.M. The problem of carbapenemase-producing- carbapenem-resistant-Enterobacteriaceae detection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Codjoe, F.S.; Donkor, E.S. Carbapenem Resistance: A Review. Med. Sci. 2017, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bonomo, R.A.; Burd, E.M.; Conly, J.; Limbago, B.M.; Poirel, L.; Segre, J.A.; Westblade, L.F. Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms: A Global Scourge. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 66, 1290–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Doumith, M.; Ellington, M.J.; Livermore, D.M.; Woodford, N. Molecular mechanisms disrupting porin expression in ertapenem resistant Klebsiella and Enterobacter spp. clinical isolates from the UK. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009, 63, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Trivedi, M.K.; Patil, S.; Shettigar, H.; Bairwa, K.; Jana, S. Phenotypic and Biotypic Characterization of Klebsiella oxytoca: An Impact of Biofield Treatment. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2015, 7, 202–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Joainig, M.M.; Gorkiewicz, G.; Leitner, E.; Weberhofer, P.; Zollner-Schwetz, I.; Lippe, I.; Feierl, G.; Krause, R.; Hinterleitner, T.; Zechner, E.L.; et al. Cytotoxic Effects of Klebsiella oxytoca Strains Isolated from Patients with Antibiotic-Associated Hemorrhagic Colitis or Other Diseases Caused by Infections and from Healthy Subjects. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Herzog, K.A.T.; Schneditz, G.; Leitner, E.; Feierl, G.; Hoffmann, K.M.; Zollner-Schwetz, I.; Krause, R.; Gorkiewicz, G.; Zechner, E.L.; Högenauer, C. Genotypes of Klebsiella oxytoca Isolates from Patients with Nosocomial Pneumonia Are Distinct from Those of Isolates from Patients with Antibiotic-Associated Hemorrhagic Colitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 1607–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Yusuf, I.; Arzai, A.; Haruna, M.; Sharif, A.; Getso, M. Detection of multi drug resistant bacteria in major hospitals in Kano, North-West, Nigeria. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2014, 45, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bharadwaj, R.; Robinson, M.L.; Balasubramanian, U.; Kulkarni, V.; Kagal, A.; Raichur, P.; Khadse, S.; Kadam, D.; Valvi, C.; Kinikar, A.; et al. Drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae colonization is associated with healthcare utilization and antimicrobial use among inpatients in Pune, India. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wartiti, M.A.; Bahmani, F.Z.; Elouenass, M.; Benouda, A. Prevalence of carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae in a university hospital in Morocco: A 19 months prospective study. Int. Arabic. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 2, 372–377. [Google Scholar]
  16. Okoche, D.; Asiimwe, B.B.; Katabazi, F.A.; Kato, L.; Najjuka, C.F. Prevalence and Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolated from Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Baran, I.; Aksu, N. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in a tertiary-level reference hospital in Turkey. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2016, 15, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sonda, T.; Kumburu, H.; Van Zwetselaar, M.; Alifrangis, M.; Mmbaga, B.T.; Lund, O.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Kibiki, G. Prevalence and risk factors for CTX-M gram-negative bacteria in hospitalized patients at a tertiary care hospital in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 37, 897–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Seni, J.; Mwakyoma, A.A.; Mashuda, F.; Marando, R.; Ahmed, M.; DeVinney, R.; Pitout, J.D.D.; Mshana, S.E. Deciphering risk factors for blood stream infections, bacteria species and antimicrobial resistance profiles among children under five years of age in North-Western Tanzania: A multicentre study in a cascade of referral health care system. BMC Pediatr. 2019, 19, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nicolas-Chanoine, M.H.; Vigan, M.; Laouénan, C.; Robert, J.; E-carb Study Group. Risk factors for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: A French case-control-control study. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 38, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kang, J.S.; Yi, J.; Ko, M.K.; Lee, S.O.; Lee, J.E.; Kim, K.H. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Acquisition in an Emergency Intensive Care Unit in a Tertiary Hospital in Korea: A Case-Control Study. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2019, 34, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chotiprasitsakul, D.; Srichatrapimuk, S.; Kirdlarp, S.; Pyden, A.D.; Santanirand, P. Epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: A 5-year experience at a tertiary care hospital. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Karuniawati, A.; Saharman, Y.R.; Lestari, D. Detection of Carbapenemase Encoding genes in Enterobacteriacae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumanii Isolated from patients at Intensive care unit Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in 2011. Acta Med. Indones. 2013, 45, 101–144. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Michelle, K.; Paczosa, J.M. Klebsiella pneumoniae: Going on the Offense with a Strong Defense. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016, 80, 629–661. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  25. Ridolfo, A.L.; Rimoldi, S.G.; Pagani, C.; Marino, A.F.; Piol, A.; Rimoldi, M.; Olivieri, P.; Galli, M.; Dolcetti, L.; Gismondo, M.R. Diffusion and transmission of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in the medical and surgical wards of a university hospital in Milan, Italy. J. Infect. Public Health 2016, 9, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mohamudha, P.R.; Harish, B.N.; Parija, S.C. Molecular description of plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases among nosocomial isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from six different hospitals in India. Indian. J. Med. Res. 2012, 135, 114–119. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mate, H.; Devi, S.; Devi, M.; Damrolien, S.; Devi, N.L.; Devi, P.P. Prevalence of Carbapenem resistance in a tertiary hospital in north east India. J. Dent. Med. Sci. 2014, 13, 56–60. [Google Scholar]
  28. Adje, D.U.; Oli, A.N. Community Pharmacy in Warri, Nigeria—A Survey of Practice Details. Sch. Acad. J. Pharm. 2013, 2, 391–397. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pfeifer, Y.; Cullik, A.; Witte, W. Nosocomial infections. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 300, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nordmann, P. Gram-negative bacteria with resistance to carbapenems. Med. Sci. (Paris) 2010, 26, 950–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ejiofor, O.S.; Ajunwa, O.M.; Ezeudu, C.E.; Emechebe, G.O.; Okeke, K.N.; Ifezulike, C.C.; Ekejindu, I.M.; Okoyeh, J.N.; Osuala, E.O.; Oli, A.N. The Bacteriology and Its Virulence Factors in Neonatal Infections: Threats to Child Survival Strategies. J. Pathog. 2018, 2018, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Papp-Wallace, K.M.; Endimiani, A.; Taracila, M.A.; Bonomo, R.A. Carbapenems: Past, Present, and Future. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 4943–4960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Nordmann, P.; Cuzon, G.; Naas, T. The real threat of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2009, 9, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Oli, A.N.; Eze, D.E.; Gugu, T.H.; Ezeobi, I.; Maduagwu, U.N.; Ihekwereme, C.P. Multi-antibiotic resistant extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing bacteria pose a challenge to the effective treatment of wound and skin infections. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2017, 27, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nordmann, P.; Gniadkowski, M.; Giske, C.; Poirel, L.; Woodford, N.; Miriagou, V. Identification and screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Vading, M.; Samuelsen, Ø.; Haldorsen, B.; Sundsfjord, A.S.; Giske, C.G. Comparison of disk diffusion, Etest and VITEK2 for detection of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae with the EUCAST and CLSI breakpoint systems. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 668–674. [Google Scholar]
  37. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing—EUCAST. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters, Version 6.0, 2016; EUCAST: Sweden, 2016; Available online: http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/ (accessed on 5 September 2017).
Antibiotics 08 00156 g001 550
Figure 1. A flowchart of the detection of the Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae.
Figure 1. A flowchart of the detection of the Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae.
Antibiotics 08 00156 g001
Antibiotics 08 00156 g002 550
Figure 2. Antibiotic Susceptibility testing for the Detection of Carbapenem resistance.
Figure 2. Antibiotic Susceptibility testing for the Detection of Carbapenem resistance.
Antibiotics 08 00156 g002
Table
Table 1. Prevalence of the enterobacteriaceae isolated (Total number of Samples N = 153).
Table 1. Prevalence of the enterobacteriaceae isolated (Total number of Samples N = 153).
VariablePatients
Tested		Number with
Infection (% Infected)		Number of Resistant
Organisms * (% Resistant)
Location (residence)K. p.
37 (24)		K. o.
12 (9)		E. coli
29 (19)		K. p.
7 (19)		K. o.
9 (75)		E. coli
6 (21)
Rural6717 (25)3 (4)11 (16)2 (12)3 (100)3 (27)
Sub-Urban339 (27)4 (12)8 (24)3 (33)3 (75)1 (25)
Urban5311 (21)5 (9)10 (19)2 (18)3 (60)2 (20)
Sex
Male7521 (28)6 (8)13 (17)3 (11)6 (100)2 (15)
Female7816 (21)6 (8)16 (21)4 (25)3 (50)4 (25)
Age Group (yrs)
1–20216 (29)1 (5)3 (14)2 (33)1 (100)1 (33)
21–408120 (25)6 (7)16 (20)3 (15)4 (67)1 (6)
41–60327 (22)3 (9)7 (22)1 (14)3 (100)2 (29)
61–80184 (22)2 (11)3 (17)1 (25)1 (50)2 (67)
Marital status
Single6316 (25)4 (6)15 (24)2 (13)4 (100)3 (20)
Widowed61 (17)0 (0)1 (17)1 (100)0 (0)1 (100)
Divorced00000 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Still Married8420 (24)8 (10)13 (15)4 (20)5 (63)2 (15)
Highest Education Completed
No formal Education93 (33)0 (0)1 (11)2 (67)0 (0)1 (100)
Primary school244 (17)2 (8)5 (21)1 (25)2 (100)1 (20)
Senior Secondary6620 (33)3 (5)15 (23)1 (5)2 (67)2 (13)
Tertiary Education4710 (21)6 (13)7 (15)3 (30)4 (67)1 (14)
Higher Degree70 (0)1 (14)1 (14)0 (0)1 (100)1 (100)
Clinic Setting
In patients576 (11)10 (18)16 (28)5 (83)7 (70)5 (31)
Out patients9631 (32)2 (2)13 (14)2 (6)2 (100)1 (8)
* Note: Both intermediate susceptibility and resistant strains are classified here as Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae.
Table
Table 2. Percentage (%) Prevalence of Isolates in the samples.
Table 2. Percentage (%) Prevalence of Isolates in the samples.
Enterobacteriaceae IsolatedNumber of SamplesTotal = 153
Urine
N = 55		Sputum
N = 51		Anal Swab
N = 13		Wound/Pus Swab
N = 34
E. coli12 (21.82)2 (3.92)10 (76.92)5 (14.71)29 (18.95)
Klebsiella pneumoniae15 (27.27)18 (35.29)1 (7.69)3 (8.82)37 (24.18)
Klebsiella oxytoca4 (7.27)0 (0.00)1 (7.69)7 (20.59)12 (7.84)
Total31 (39.74)20 (25.64)12 (15.38)15 (19.23)78 (50.98)
Table
Table 3. Carbapenem susceptibility of isolates.
Table 3. Carbapenem susceptibility of isolates.
A. CLINIC SOURCES OF THE SAMPLES
ClinicsResistant (%)Intermediate (%)Susceptible (%)Total (%)
GOPD0 (0.00)6 (33.33)12 (66.67)18 (23.08)
Gyn. & Antenatal clinic0 (0.00)1 (12.50)7 (87.50)8 (10.26)
Medical Ward0 (0.00)2 (33.33)4 (66.67)6 (7.69)
Surgical Ward3 (11.54)5 (19.23)18 (69.23)26 (33.33
Chest Clinic3 (15.00)2 (10.00)15 (75.00)20 (25.64)
Total6 (7.69)16 (20.51)56 (71.79)78 (100)
B. ANATOMICAL SITE SOURCES OF THE SAMPLES
Urine0 (0.00)9 (29.03)22 (70.97)31 (39.74)
Wound/Pus swab2 (13.33)4 (26.67)9 (60.00)15 (19.23)
Sputum3 (15.00)2 (10.00)15 (75.00)20 (25.64)
Anal swab1 (8.33)1 (8.33)10 (83.33)12 (15.38)
Total6 (7.69)16 (20.51)56 (71.79)78 (100)
Table
Table 4. Carbapenem susceptibility of the Enterobacteriaceae Isolated.
Table 4. Carbapenem susceptibility of the Enterobacteriaceae Isolated.
OrganismResistantSusceptibleTotal
E. coli6 (20.69)23 (79.31)29 (37.18)
K. pneumoniae7 (18.92)30 (81.08)37 (47.44)
K. oxytoca9 (75.00)3 (25.00)12 (15.38)
Total22 (28.21)56 (71.79)78 (100)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oli, A.N.; Itumo, C.J.; Okam, P.C.; Ezebialu, I.U.; Okeke, K.N.; Ifezulike, C.C.; Ezeobi, I.; Emechebe, G.O.; Okezie, U.M.; Adejumo, S.A.; et al. Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Posing a Dilemma in Effective Healthcare Delivery. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8040156

AMA Style

Oli AN, Itumo CJ, Okam PC, Ezebialu IU, Okeke KN, Ifezulike CC, Ezeobi I, Emechebe GO, Okezie UM, Adejumo SA, et al. Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Posing a Dilemma in Effective Healthcare Delivery. Antibiotics. 2019; 8(4):156. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8040156

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oli, Angus Nnamdi, Chimaobi Johnpaul Itumo, Princeston Chukwuemeka Okam, Ifeanyichukwu U. Ezebialu, Kenneth Nchekwube Okeke, Christian Chukwuemeka Ifezulike, Ifeanyi Ezeobi, George Ogonna Emechebe, Ugochukwu Moses Okezie, Samson A. Adejumo, and et al. 2019. "Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Posing a Dilemma in Effective Healthcare Delivery" Antibiotics 8, no. 4: 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8040156

APA Style

Oli, A. N., Itumo, C. J., Okam, P. C., Ezebialu, I. U., Okeke, K. N., Ifezulike, C. C., Ezeobi, I., Emechebe, G. O., Okezie, U. M., Adejumo, S. A., & Okoyeh, J. N. (2019). Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Posing a Dilemma in Effective Healthcare Delivery. Antibiotics, 8(4), 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8040156

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop