Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Antimicrobial Activity of Vancomycin, Ceftriaxone, and Gentamicin Against Cutibacterium acnes Strains: An In Vitro Checkerboard Analysis and In Vivo Interaction with Bioactive Glass Using Galleria mellonella
Previous Article in Journal
RETRACTED: Quazi et al. The Discovery of Novel Antimicrobial Agents Through the Application of Isocyanide-Based Multicomponent Reactions. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 849
Previous Article in Special Issue
1,5-Diarylidene-4-Piperidones as Promising Antifungal Candidates Against Cryptococcus neoformans
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic Profiling Reveals Clinically Relevant Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae from Hong Kong Wet Markets

by
Wing Yui Ngan
1,*,†,
Subramanya Rao
2,†,
Aster Hei Yiu Fung
2 and
Olivier Habimana
3,4,*
1
Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PD, UK
2
The School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China
3
Biotechnology and Food Engineering Program, Guangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Shantou 515063, China
4
Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2025, 14(9), 922; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090922
Submission received: 20 August 2025 / Revised: 8 September 2025 / Accepted: 8 September 2025 / Published: 12 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges and Strategies for the Antibiotic Resistance Crisis)

Abstract

Background:Klebsiella pneumoniae is a highly dangerous microorganism that presents significant challenges to effectively eliminate in food production facilities, making it a serious and urgent public health concern. The wet markets of Hong Kong represent a considerable yet insufficiently explored source for the spread of microorganisms. Methods: This investigation employed whole-genome sequencing and comparative genomics to assess the genomic variation and adaptive traits of K. pneumoniae extracted from wooden cutting boards in these marketplaces. We examined four wet market isolates in conjunction with 39 publicly accessible genomes from diverse origins. Results: Pan-genome analysis revealed a diverse and open genetic structure significantly shaped by horizontal gene transfer. Phylogenetic reconstruction did not categorize the wet market isolates into a singular clade, indicating varied contamination sources; nonetheless, certain market isolates exhibited close phylogenetic affiliations with high-risk clinical clones, implying possible spillover events. These isolates exhibited a concerning variety of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), chiefly encoding efflux pumps (acrAB, oqxAB), which confer resistance to numerous drug categories. Moreover, the evaluation for pathogenicity attributes uncovered genes associated with robust biofilm development (fim and mrk operons) and efficient iron procurement strategies. Conclusions: The existence of these genetically adaptable isolates, possessing multidrug resistance and virulence factors, renders wet markets potential amplifiers and reservoirs for the spread of resistant pathogens. These findings present the initial genomic evidence of such risks in Hong Kong’s wet markets and emphasize the immediate necessity for improved hygiene protocols and comprehensive One Health surveillance to reduce transmission at the human–animal–environment interface.

1. Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae is an opportunistic pathogen with notable antimicrobial resistance and adaptability in different environments, emphasizing the need to understand its transmission and survival, particularly in food processing settings [1,2]. Wet markets are prevalent locations globally where individuals purchase fresh produce. They are large and not well-studied places for multidrug-resistant microorganisms to grow and live [3,4]. A combination of factors, such as traditional practices, a wide variety of food products, and poor sanitation, makes it easy for strong microbial communities to grow [5]. The continued reliance on wooden cutting boards across a variety of commercial sectors, especially in developing areas, intensifies this risk [6]. Their porous nature complicates cleaning, allowing bacteria infiltration and organic accumulation in minute fissures [6]. Bacteria serve as a constant nutrient source that enhances biofilm development and stability [4,6]. Consequently, biofilms are recognized to assist bacteria in enduring against pressures such as sanitizers and antimicrobial substances [7].
Biofilms on substrates that engage with alimentary substances, such as these timber boards, constitute a significant mechanism through which cross-contamination occurs [8]. Pathogens embedded within these matrices can easily move to food, which directly puts food safety at risk and could cause foodborne illness outbreaks. The high number of people shopping and the fact that wet markets are close to other sources of contamination make this public health threat even worse [9]. Although many global wet markets have made improvements to hygiene, it is still not clear how well these changes work or how well they are measured.
In Hong Kong, considerable challenges with facilities and hygiene endure in wet markets despite efforts towards modernization [10]. Notwithstanding the above acknowledged difficulties, the enforcement and effectiveness of local hygiene ordinances, including the Food Business Regulation (Cap. 132X) on the cleanliness of market shelves, have not been adequately tested as specific inhibitors of foodborne pathogenic biofilms (https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap132X!en-zh-Hant-HK) (accessed on 7 August 2025) [6,9]. A lot of markets still do not have the tools they need to store, manage, and throw away food properly, and there is not enough information about how well current rules prevent microbial contamination on surfaces like wooden cutting boards. Prior studies indicate that the cleaning protocols in Hong Kong’s wet markets are insufficient for controlling pathogenic microorganisms, including K. pneumoniae [9]. Nonetheless, the exact origins of this contamination and the genetic mechanisms that enable its persistence and resistance in these environments remain predominantly unidentified [4].
We must address these knowledge gaps to develop effective interventions to reduce transmission risk. To address three key questions, genomic insights are essential: First, what are the differences between K. pneumoniae genomes from Hong Kong wet markets and those from clinical and environmental settings? Second, do evolutionary relationship assessments reveal proof of cross-contamination and the spread of resistant clones among healthcare, ecological, and food-manufacturing environments? Third, do these wet marketplace isolates exhibit distinct genetic characteristics—such as enhanced biofilm development or a wider spectrum of antimicrobial resistance genes—that facilitate their endurance in these challenging surroundings?
We suggest that wet market isolates are a genetically varied population shaped by horizontal gene transfer (HGT), showing genomic traits that reflect adaptation to ecological and human-induced stresses, such as disinfectants and antimicrobial agents [11]. This research addresses these critical issues through an extensive genomic analysis of K. pneumoniae isolates, which were systematically collected from various wet markets in the lively and densely populated locale of Hong Kong. We employed whole-genome sequencing in conjunction with comparative genomic analyses to investigate four strains that had been previously isolated, comparing them to a comprehensive array of publicly available genomic data. Our investigations were primarily focused on the identification of genetic indicators correlated with pathogenicity and, of paramount significance, with profiles of antimicrobial resistance. This study seeks to clarify the function of wet markets as potential amplifiers of antimicrobial resistance by synthesizing data on AMR genes, virulence factors, and phylogenetic relationships, thereby informing more effective public health strategies and interventions against this widespread pathogen.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strain Selection and Genome Sequencing

The four K. pneumoniae variants examined in this research were obtained from wooden cutting boards in Hong Kong wet markets during a previous environmental sampling initiative [9]. Sampling targeted high-contact areas (10 cm2) of pork-processing cutting boards using pre-sterilized cotton swabs hydrated with sterile PBS. To account for the porous surface topography, a combined swabbing–friction technique was employed, wherein the swabs were rigorously scrubbed across the cutting boards to maximize microbial recovery. The swabs were promptly placed in Amies Charcoal medium and kept cool during transit to the laboratory.
The swab samples were enriched in TSB at 30 °C for 20 h and then plated onto TSA. After a 20 h incubation at 30 °C, the colonies were transferred to TSB for the purpose of obtaining pure isolates. Genomic DNA was extracted from monocultures with the PureLink Microbiome DNA Purification Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and DNA quality was checked using BioDrop DUO spectrophotometry (BioDrop, Cambridge, UK). Isolates were identified as K. pneumoniae through metagenomic 16S V3-V4 sequencing (Illumina HiSeq PE250 platform at Novogene Co., Beijing, China) and analysis via the Parallel-Meta pipeline [12], with sequence data deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (PRJEB33545).
For the purpose of comparative analysis, 39 publicly accessible K. pneumoniae genomes were carefully chosen from NCBI GenBank to illustrate a wide variety of ecological niches. The public genomes were categorized as follows: 13 clinical, 12 environmental, and 14 animal-associated (further specified in Table 1). This selection criterion prioritized the following: (1) assembly completeness (≥95% BUSCO scores), (2) balanced representation of major niches (13 clinical, 12 environmental, 14 animal-associated, with animal isolates further specified in Table 1), and (3) inclusion of globally prevalent sequence types (e.g., ST258, ST11, ST307). Genomes with ambiguous metadata or fragmented assemblies were excluded to ensure robust comparative analyses.

2.2. Genome Assembly, Annotation, and Quality Control

Raw reads underwent quality control with FastQC 0.11.7, followed by adapter trimming and filtering for a minimum read length of 36 base pairs and quality score of 15 using Trimmomatic v0.36 [13]. De novo genomic assembly was conducted employing SPAdes v3.11.176 [14] with default settings. Genome annotation utilized Prokka v1.7 [15], with the GenBank compliance flag, ensuring standardized gene calls. To mitigate annotation bias, K. pneumoniae retrieved from public databases were re-annotated with Prokka using identical parameters. Genome completeness was assessed using contig ordering and alignment leveraged MAUVE [16], with final genome concatenation accomplished using Artemis [17]. Insertion sequences were identified using ISsaga [18], genomic islands using IslandViewer 4 [19], and multilocus sequence types (MLSTs) assigned using the pubMLST database [20].

2.3. Comparative Genomics and Phylogenetic Analysis

Pan-genome analysis was conducted using Roary v3.13.0 with Prokka-generated GFF3 files [21]. Default settings were employed (95% amino acid identity threshold for ortholog detection). Fundamental genes were delineated as existing in ≥99% of the genomic sequences, whereas supplementary genes included the residual gene assortment. Unique genes were identified using the Roary “gene_presence_absence.csv” output file. This initial pangenome analysis was further refined using Pan-Explorer [22], focusing on the identification and characterization of accessory genes. Pan-Explorer’s output provided valuable information regarding the distribution of accessory genes among different sample types. Subsequently, the core-genome phylogeny was constructed using a concatenated alignment of the core genes identified via Roary, employing RAxML v8.2.12 [23] with the GTRGAMMA model and 100 bootstrap replicates for assessing branch support. Tree visualization was performed using iTOL v6 [24].
To further investigate the evolutionary dynamics of the accessory gene content, TORMES was used [25]. TORMES facilitated the identification of clusters of orthologous genes (COGs) found within the accessory genome, helping to characterize groups of genes potentially acquired through horizontal gene transfer events. The accessory genes were categorized into different groups based on their functional characteristics as identified by TORMES. The results of this analysis informed the selection of specific genes for further investigation (cf. Results Section 3.6), which show phylogenies for three genes chosen because of distinct evolutionary trajectories in the TORMES results; note that these figures are visual representations of these evolutionary dynamics among multiple samples). Four accessory genes (ycgR, sasA, bamA, and fimD) were selected for phylogenetic and synteny analysis due to their distinct evolutionary trajectories indicated in the preliminary TORMES analysis and their potential roles in significant biological processes: ycgR (motility regulation), sasA (response to stress), bamA (development of the outer membrane), and fimD (biofilm formation via fimbrial assembly). The phylogenetic analysis of the genes ycgR, sasA, bamA, and fimD was performed using RAxML, as described previously.
A phylogenetic assessment was performed utilizing 43 genomes, which included four isolates from wet markets alongside 39 genomes sourced from public databases. Whole-genome alignment was performed with Parsnp v1.2 (Harvest Suite) [26]. This generated a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on core-genome single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), after excluding recombinatorial regions identified during the Parsnp analysis. The resulting phylogeny complemented the core-genome phylogeny obtained from Roary and provided additional insights into the evolutionary relationships among the isolates.

2.4. Variant Calling and Functional Analysis

Paired-end reads were aligned with the Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC genome using Bowtie2 2.3.2 [27]. SNPs and indels were identified through SAMtools 1.7 [28], with a quality score threshold of 50. Moreover, SnpEff version 4.3 was employed for variant annotation, forecasting their possible functional consequences [29]. This study provided an extensive examination of the genetic diversity present among the isolates.

2.5. Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Gene Detection

The annotated gbk files from Prokka were screened for antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors using ABRicate (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) (accessed on 7 August 2025). The built-in ResFinder 4.1 database was employed to identify acquired resistance genes [30]. Moreover, the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) (https://card.mcmaster.ca) and ARG-ANNOT [31] were employed to meticulously curate the list of genes. This approach ensured the identification of any resistance genes missed by ResFinder, including those with non-synonymous SNPs.
The existence of pathogenicity determinants was ascertained by evaluating chosen genomic sequences against the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB). The updated VFDB was downloaded from www.mgc.ac.cn/ on 23 September 2024. The results were organized utilizing Python, and heatmaps were produced using R environment (version 4.0.3).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

PCA was performed using R (https://www.R-project.org) to show genetic diversity among the isolates. Network analysis of accessory gene clusters, including the calculation of network properties (e.g., clustering coefficients, betweenness centrality, and modularity), was performed using the Pan-Explorer pipeline [22] to uncover potential horizontal gene transfer patterns. This helped in understanding the spread of acquired genes within the collection of the samples investigated. The results derived from these statistical analyses were utilized to evaluate the statistical significance of any observed associations between genetic characteristics and the sample origin. Specific statistical tests (e.g., likelihood ratio tests) were applied as appropriate, indicated in the corresponding result sections.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analysis

Core-genome SNP phylogeny (Figure 1) split the wet market isolates into two groups: AL202S and SW202T3 clustered with clinical ST258 strains (bootstrap = 92%), whereas SF201T1/SF201T2 formed a separate branch near environmental ST307 (bootstrap = 85%). This bifurcation suggests multiple contamination sources for wet market K. pneumoniae.
Human and clinical isolates form relatively tight clusters, indicative of close genetic relationships. This uniformity implies restricted genetic variability among clinical isolates, potentially resulting from localized spread or shared hospital-associated sources. Animal isolates, especially those identified as poultry and swine isolates, are grouped into moderately tight clusters, suggesting interspecies transmission within agricultural settings. Notably, rabbit and housefly isolates are more dispersed, indicating higher genetic diversity or the influence of distinct ecological niches. Environmental and surface isolates demonstrate broader clustering, especially those from sewage and water, reflecting high genetic diversity. This diversity likely arises from the wide range of potential environmental sources and transmission pathways.
The heatmap identified 12,805 genomic clusters, emphasizing core and accessory genome components. Core clusters exhibit limited variation and are prevalent across most isolates, whereas accessory clusters show greater variability. Environmental and animal isolates exhibit significant heterogeneity in accessory genome content, suggesting adaptation to varying environmental pressures and host environments. Particular attention is drawn to the isolates from wet markets, which form distinct but loose clusters. These isolates exhibit substantial genomic heterogeneity, as highlighted by the heatmap, underscoring the dynamic interchange of genetic material likely facilitated by the diverse microbial and ecological milieu of wet market environments. This heterogeneity is in accordance with the theory that wet markets function as hubs for microbial interchange and development, possibly accelerating the emergence of novel pathogenic variants.
The presented results highlight the variability influenced by host and environmental contexts, with wet market isolates demonstrating significant genetic diversity and adaptability. These findings suggest that to manage Klebsiella pneumoniae spread within ecosystems, continuous monitoring and genetic examination are essential.
The core-genome phylogeny-derived population structure was subsequently corroborated through a multivariate analysis of the accessory genome. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of gene presence/absence patterns offered an additional statistical insight into the genetic affiliations among isolates from various niches.

3.2. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

The PCA of gene presence/absence (Figure 2A) revealed a notable distinction among the niches (PERMANOVA, p = 0.003). Wet market isolates were between the clinical (PC1 = +0.62 ± 0.11) and environmental (PC1 = −0.38 ± 0.09) categories. SF201T2 showed particular proximity to sewage isolates, suggesting potential environmental transmission routes. A PCA was performed on 43 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from various sources to explore correlations between their genetic profiles and origins. Two distinct PCA plots are presented (Figure 2A,B). Figure 2A depicts the PCA based on sample type categories (animal, clinical, environment, wet market), while Figure 2B shows the PCA based on more specific sample source classifications (cutting board, Homo sapiens, housefly, poultry, rabbit, red kangaroo, sewage, surface, swine, water).
Figure 2A reveals a degree of clustering according to sample type. While the separation is not absolute, isolates from clinical sources and those from animal sources tend to cluster somewhat separately from environmental isolates. A notable observation is the distinct clustering of K. pneumoniae isolates from wet markets. These isolates are distinct on the PCA plot from clinical and animal isolates, with some overlap. This suggests that wet market K. pneumoniae strains may possess distinct genomic features compared to those from other sample types. This warrants further investigation into the genetic mechanisms underlying this differentiation. The relatively wide spread of the ‘animal’ samples suggests significant genetic heterogeneity among K. pneumoniae isolates from animal sources, which could be attributed to numerous factors, including host species, geographical locations, and exposure to various environmental stressors.
Figure 2B, with its finer-grained source classification, provides more detail. The grouping arrangement is intricate, and isolates display varying degrees of aggregation. A particularly striking observation is the clear separation of the isolates sourced from cutting boards from those found in other sources, such as swine and sewage. While both groups of isolates partially overlap, the presence of a distinct cutting board cluster highlights the potential for these surfaces to harbor unique K. pneumoniae populations. The arrow in Figure 2B points to a region of overlap between isolates from cutting boards, sewage, and various animal sources. This overlap suggests a potential source–sink dynamic. Possible routes of transmission from animal sources through sewage to cutting boards are suggested by the proximity of the points in the PCA plot. This overlap warrants further epidemiological investigation to confirm possible transmission routes. The clear separation of K. pneumoniae isolates from humans and those from other sources, notably the animal and environmental isolates, also requires further exploration. The overall pattern in both Figure 2A,B suggests a genetic diversity within K. pneumoniae populations that is strongly influenced by their host and environmental origin.
Subsequent analyses, which encompass phylogenetic reconstruction and comprehensive genomic comparison—such as the application of core-genome multilocus sequence typing or whole-genome sequencing—are imperative for elucidating the genetic factors that contribute to the observed clustering patterns. These examinations aim to gain insights into the evolutionary dynamics and transmission pathways in these populations. The data presented here suggest that wet markets and cutting boards might act as reservoirs or hotspots of K. pneumoniae genetic diversity and transmission, particularly concerning the potential for zoonotic spread and subsequent human infection. This aspect requires additional detailed investigation.
Upon reviewing demographic data and ecological classifications, we sought to articulate the essential genetic attributes that facilitate this diversity, guaranteeing a meticulous and well-founded analysis. For this purpose, we conducted a pan-genome examination to clarify the fundamental and supplementary elements that characterize the genetic inventory of this demographic.

3.3. Pan-Genome Analysis of 43 K. pneumoniae Genomes

We analyzed 43 K. pneumoniae genomes, including 4 from wet markets and 39 publicly available, using Roary with a 95% amino acid identity threshold. This examination identified 12,805 genes, classified as core (occurring in ≥99% of genomic sequences), supplementary, and strain-specific components. The core genome plateaued at approximately 4000 genes (Figure 3A), indicating comprehensive sampling of conserved functions, while accessory genes continued to accumulate with each added genome (slope = 12.4 genes/genome), revealing an open pan-genome structure characteristic of extensive horizontal gene transfer potential. This pattern was further supported by the cumulative gene curves (Figure 3B) and the distribution of BLAST hits (ncbi blast+ 2.6.0) (Figure 3C), which showed limited high-identity matches (≥98%), consistent with substantial genomic variability.
The pan-genome encompassed 29.2% core (3742 genes), 35.0% supplementary (4482 genes), and 35.8% strain-specific (4581 genes) components (Figure 4A). Notably, wet market isolates contributed 344 strain-specific genes (7.5% of total), with AL202S harboring the most (183 genes), including putative efflux pumps (acrB, oqxB) and biofilm regulators (bssS), followed by SW202T3 (159 genes) and SF201T1 (2 genes). Conversely, SF201T2 exhibited an absence of unique genes, indicating a recent introduction from a less diverse lineage (Figure 4B). This distribution underscores the significant genetic variation among the species and the specific adaptations of wet market isolates to their ecological context.
Our investigation identified diverse antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) within isolates obtained from the wet market. This pan-genome encompasses genes that enhance adaptive characteristics. Consequently, we meticulously examined this adaptable genomic reservoir for factors affecting antimicrobial resistance, a critical public health concern.

3.4. Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

Regarding antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence factors, ResFinder analysis (Figure 5A) indicated a variety of ARGs among the isolates, including those from the wet market. Notably, AL202S had the highest count of ARGs. Both CARD and ARG_ANNOT (Figure 5B,C) detected ARGs that provide resistance to multiple antibiotic classes. Wet market isolates presented a distinct pattern of resistance genes compared to those from clinical and environmental sources. The provided tables detail the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) identified in horizontal gene transfer regions from four samples: AL202S, SF201T1, SF201T2, and SW202T3. The data indicate a wide variety of ARGs that provide resistance against a large range of antibiotics. Antibiotic expulsion, which is facilitated by various expulsion pump families, encompassing ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS), and Resistance–Nodulation–Cell Division (RND), appears to be the principal mechanism of resistance. Additionally, some ARGs modify antibiotic targets, thereby reducing their effectiveness.
The most prevalent mechanism is antibiotic efflux, particularly via RND pumps (acrA, acrB) present in all four samples. MFS pumps (KpnE, KpnF, KpnG, KpnH, tet(A), tet(E)) are also frequently observed, showcasing the significant role of efflux in multidrug resistance. ABC transporters (msbA) contribute to resistance in several samples. Several ARGs modify the antibiotic target site. Examples include eptB (which modifies the peptidic antibiotic target) and mutations in EF-Tu (which alter elfamycin binding), found in sample SW202T3. Mutations in genes such as ompA, which affect outer membrane permeability, are also observed, reducing antibiotic uptake. FosA6, identified in samples SF201T2 and SW202T3, represents an example of an enzyme responsible for antibiotic inactivation. Each sample exhibits a unique ARG profile. Sample AL202 displays a greater diversity of ARGs and associated resistance mechanisms than the others. Samples SF201T1, SF201T2, and SW202T3 show overlap in some ARGs (e.g., acrB, msbA, tet(E), and ompA), but each also possesses unique ARGs, suggesting diverse acquisition pathways. acrB is consistently present across all samples, indicating a potentially common ancestral source or horizontal transfer event involving this crucial RND efflux pump. Other shared ARGs include ompA, msbA, and tetracycline resistance genes (tet(A), tet(E)). Sample AL202S distinguishes itself with a wider range of ARGs involved in resistance to various drug classes. Samples SF201T1, SF201T2, and SW202T3 have a more focused set of resistance genes, implying different selective pressures or acquisition events.

3.5. Comparative Genomic Analysis of Virulence Factors in Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from Wet Market Samples

Pathogenic efficacy depends on virulence strategies that facilitate host colonization and endurance while concurrently evading antimicrobials. Consequently, we augmented our resistance gene characterization with a comprehensive examination for virulence determinants to assess the complete pathogenic capacity of these isolates.
The virulence factor profiles of four Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (AL202S, SF201T1, SF201T2, and SW202T3) utilizing the VFDB database are presented in Figure 6.
All isolates exhibited the entirety of the fimABCDEFGHIK operon, which encodes type 1 fimbriae, an essential element in the process of biofilm development. Three isolates (AL202S, SF201T1, and SF201T2) also harbored the mrkABCDFHIJ genes associated with type 3 fimbriae production; SW202T3 lacked mrkA but retained the remaining genes. The ecpABCDER gene cluster, involved in biofilm formation, was complete in AL202S but partially incomplete (missing ecpB) in SF201T1, SF201T2, and SW202T3. This suggests potential variations in biofilm production capacity among the isolates.
Wet market K. pneumoniae isolates exhibited genes associated with the type II secretion system (T2SS; gspC-M, gspB, gspN, gspS). Three isolates (AL202S, SF201T1, and SF201T2) possessed a complete T6SS-I gene cluster (tssA-M), while SW202T3 showed a less complete profile, possessing several individual T6SS-related genes (clpV, tle1, tli1, imp, etc.) but lacking the complete cluster. This suggests variations in the functionality and potential of the T6SS among isolates.
All four isolates contained genes involved in iron scavenging, including iutA, iroNE, entABCDEF, Fur, fepABCDG, and Fes. The iucABCD operon, implicated in aerobactin biosynthesis, was detectable solely in SF201T1 and SF201T2. This variation suggests potential differences in iron acquisition strategies.
The isolates demonstrated varied genetic profiles (rfb, rcs, gndA, etc.) linked to capsule biosynthesis. Diversity in capsular polysaccharide architecture may influence immune evasion and survival outcomes.
AL202S contained the most comprehensive set of virulence factors, while SW202T3 exhibited a less extensive profile. The similarities between SF201T1 and SF201T2 indicate a likely shared origin or comparable selective influences. Conversely, the unique virulence factor profile of SW202T3 suggests a distinct origin and potentially different environmental adaptations.
Horizontal gene transfer is vital for pathogen evolution by integrating virulence and resistance genes. We selected key accessory genes for detailed analysis to understand their acquisition and explore the development of adaptive traits.

3.6. Phylogenetic and Genomic Contextualization of Selected Accessory Genes in Klebsiella Isolates

The evolutionary dynamics and genomic distribution of four accessory genes (ycgR, sasA, bamA, and fimD) were separately investigated using phylogenetic analysis (A), network visualization (B), and synteny assessment (C) (Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10).
To investigate the evolutionary relationships and distribution of accessory genes across the diverse Klebsiella strains, phylogenetic trees for four selected genes were constructed for ycgR, sasA, bamA, and the type 1 fimbrin D-mannose-specific adhesin (Figure 7A, Figure 8A, Figure 9A and Figure 10A, respectively). These genes were chosen for their roles and presence in the accessory genome. The phylogenetic tree of the ycgR gene (Figure 7A), encoding a flagellar brake protein, reveals a complex pattern of relationships. Diverse degrees of sequence divergence are denoted by branch lengths. Some strains cluster tightly, suggesting recent common ancestry and potential horizontal gene transfer events. Notably, certain branches exhibit longer lengths, indicating substantial sequence divergence among strains. The lack of a clear, strong phylogenetic signal suggests that ycgR has experienced significant horizontal gene transfer or recombination, leading to a mosaic distribution among the studied Klebsiella isolates. The phylogenetic tree of sasA (Figure 8A), an adaptive response sensory kinase, shows a topology largely congruent with the overall Klebsiella phylogeny. This suggests a primarily vertical inheritance pattern for sasA, with limited evidence of recent widespread horizontal transfer. However, subtle incongruences between the sasA tree and the overall Klebsiella phylogeny remain, indicating some instances of possible horizontal gene transfer or recombination events that have shaped the evolution of sasA in certain lineages. The bamA phylogeny (Figure 9A) demonstrates a mixed pattern. Some clustering indicates vertical inheritance of this gene, similar to the sasA phylogeny. However, several long branches and instances of incongruence with expected Klebsiella phylogeny suggest that horizontal gene transfer has also played a role in the distribution and evolution of this gene. The presence of long branches suggests periods of accelerated evolution in some lineages, potentially driven by selective pressures. The phylogenetic analysis of the type 1 fimbrin D-mannose-specific adhesin gene (Figure 10A) exhibits a notable clustering structure. The tree reveals groups of closely related strains, suggesting potential for clonal expansion or frequent horizontal gene transfer within these specific groups. The phylogenetic dispersion of this adhesin gene seems to be more diverse in comparison to sasA, potentially indicating its participation in host–pathogen dynamics and acclimatization to various ecological environments.
A network analysis explored the accessory gene distribution in Klebsiella isolates. Figure 7B, Figure 8B, Figure 9B and Figure 10B depict networks for four selected accessory genes: ycgR (flagellar brake protein), sasA (adaptive response sensory kinase), bamA (outer membrane protein assembly factor), and the fimD gene (type 1 fimbrin D-mannose specific adhesin). Each node represents a Klebsiella genome, and each edge indicates the co-occurrence of the specific accessory gene in the two connected genomes. The node size is proportional to the number of shared accessory genes with other genomes within the network. The ycgR network (Figure 7B) exhibits a relatively dispersed structure lacking strongly defined clusters. This suggests independent acquisition via multiple horizontal gene transfer events rather than clonal transmission. The predominantly small node sizes reflect low overall genomic similarity among isolates possessing this gene. The sasA network (Figure 8B) displays increased connectivity compared to the ycgR network. While lacking dense, highly connected clusters, some denser groupings are visible, suggesting limited clonal association or increased likelihood of co-acquisition with other genes in this subset of isolates. The bamA network (Figure 9B) shows a topology similar to sasA, with moderate connectivity. This indicates an intermediate level of clonal relationship or co-acquisition, while the largest cluster hints at localized spread or shared ancestry. In contrast to the other genes, the fimD network (Figure 10B) displays prominent, densely connected clusters. This suggests substantial clonal expansion or highly localized horizontal gene transfer within specific isolate subgroups. The large node sizes are consistent with considerable shared genetic material among isolates possessing this gene. This suggests a potentially significant role for fimD in Klebsiella adaptation and transmission. The presence of prominent and dense clusters suggests a more extensive clonal expansion or strong horizontal gene transfer events within subsets of isolates. This gene could play a crucial role in the adjustment and dissemination of particular Klebsiella lineages.
To further elucidate the evolutionary history and potential acquisition mechanisms of the four selected accessory genes (ycgR, sasA, bamA, and fimD), we performed synteny analysis. Figure 7C, Figure 8C, Figure 9C and Figure 10C present the syntenic context of these genes within their respective genomic locations across the four wet market, one clinical, and one swine Klebsiella isolates. Each figure shows the genomic region around the target gene, highlighting gene order conservation and variations. Different colors represent different genes, with the target gene highlighted centrally. The presence or absence of flanking genes provides insight into the potential mode of acquisition (e.g., horizontal gene transfer via mobile genetic elements versus vertical inheritance). The ycgR synteny analysis (Figure 7C) reveals a highly variable genomic context. The absence of conserved flanking genes across two wet market K. pneumoniae isolates strongly suggests that ycgR acquisition occurred primarily through independent horizontal gene transfer events, likely mediated by mobile genetic elements such as plasmids or transposons. The diverse gene arrangements indicate that insertions occurred at different locations and contexts. The combination of a highly dispersed network topology and a complete lack of conserved synteny in the flanking genomic regions provides compelling evidence that the ycgR gene has been independently acquired on multiple occasions across different lineages. This pattern spreads through mobile genetic elements, not from a common ancestor. The synteny surrounding sasA (Figure 8C) shows some degree of conservation in the immediate vicinity of the gene in a subset of isolates, except for the SW202T3 wet market strain. A few isolates exhibit similar flanking genes, suggesting possible clonal relatedness or co-transfer events involving a small genomic island or a specific mobile element. However, significant variability is still present, implying independent horizontal transfer events as a significant contributor to sasA distribution. The moderate network connectivity, coupled with the partial conservation of its immediate syntenic context in a subset of isolates, points to a complex evolutionary history for sasA. This pattern suggests a foundation of vertical inheritance within certain clades, upon which subsequent horizontal gene transfer events have acted to distribute this sensory kinase gene into other, unrelated genetic backgrounds. The bamA synteny (Figure 9C) demonstrates a moderate level of conservation in the immediate flanking regions. The presence of several isolates sharing a similar gene arrangement in proximity to bamA suggests a certain degree of clonal inheritance or co-acquisition via the transfer of larger genomic fragments. Nonetheless, the noted variation suggests that horizontal gene transfer continued to influence the general distribution of bamA. The intermediate patterns observed in both the network analysis and the synteny plot for bamA indicate that its evolutionary history is not easily categorized. The evidence suggests a significant role for vertical inheritance in its propagation, but the presence of incongruent phylogenetic signals and variable genomic contexts also implies that horizontal transfer has contributed to the distribution of this essential outer membrane assembly factor among diverse strains. The synteny analysis for fimD (Figure 10C) reveals a strikingly higher level of conservation among isolates compared to other genes. In a significant number of isolates, a highly conserved gene order is observed in the vicinity of fimD, strongly indicating its acquisition and maintenance via vertical inheritance or relatively recent horizontal transfer of larger genomic regions. The densely interconnected clusters within the network analysis, strongly supported by a strikingly conserved syntenic architecture across the majority of isolates, indicate that the fimD adhesin gene is a stable genomic component propagated primarily through clonal expansion. This high level of conservation suggests that fimD is a core virulence determinant that is vertically inherited within successful and potentially hypervirulent Klebsiella lineages, rather than being frequently exchanged as a mobile element. The conserved synteny suggests a potentially important role for this gene within the overall fitness and virulence of certain Klebsiella clades.
The integrated phylogenetic, network, and synteny examinations elucidate a sophisticated interaction in the evolutionary mechanisms of the four supplementary genes (Figure 7A, Figure 8A, Figure 9A and Figure 10A) (Figure 7B, Figure 8B, Figure 9B and Figure 10B). Synteny analysis (Figure 7C, Figure 8C, Figure 9C and Figure 10C) corroborates this, demonstrating highly variable genomic contexts for ycgR, moderate conservation for bamA, some conservation for sasA, and strong conservation for fimD, indicating diverse acquisition mechanisms ranging from independent horizontal transfer to clonal expansion and vertical inheritance. Thus, the data highlight the diverse evolutionary forces shaping accessory gene distribution in Klebsiella, with horizontal gene transfer playing a particularly significant role in some genes but less so in others.
All of these findings point to K. pneumoniae in Hong Kong’s wet markets as genetically diverse pathogens that are resistant and persistent, which is alarming. We interpret these results in the discussion in light of the larger picture of microbial adaptation and public health.

4. Discussion

This investigation offers unprecedented genomic perspectives regarding the heterogeneity and acclimatization of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains derived from Hong Kong’s aquaculture markets, bearing significant ramifications for alimentary safety and communal health. Our analysis of pan-genome profiling, phylogenetic reconstruction, PCA, and antimicrobial resistance genes clarifies the evolution and transmission of K. pneumoniae in the environment.
Phylogenetic Relationships and Potential Transmission Routes: Phylogenetic analysis based on core-genome SNPs reveals a complex relationship between the wet market isolates and other K. pneumoniae strains. The wet market segregates do not group solely, signifying numerous contamination origins for the humid market. The absence of a unique wet market clade implies that the pollution is not confined to a solitary origin or transmission occurrence. A number of wet market isolates show parallel genetic links to clinical isolates, raising concerns about potential cross-contamination between these surroundings. This likely transfer accentuates the imperative of instituting rigorous hygiene protocols in both settings to alleviate the threat of propagating potentially pathogenic variants. A recent investigation elucidated considerable cross-contamination of pathobionts between aquaculture markets and industrial processing settings, suggesting potential contamination hazards [3]. The observation that animal K. pneumoniae isolates (particularly poultry and swine) form relatively tight clusters suggests transmission pathways within agricultural settings. The dispersal of environmental and surface isolates reflects the inherent diversity of microbial communities in the environment, including sewage and water. The diverse sources mentioned highlight the need for a more comprehensive approach to understand the epidemiology and transmission of Klebsiella pneumoniae within a broader ecosystem context.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA): The observed clustering patterns in both PCA plots (based on broad and specific sample types) align well with the phylogenetic analysis and further reinforce the hypothesis of distinct sources of contamination. The notable separation of wet market isolates in both PCA plots indicates potential for unique genomic adaptations to this environment. The observed clustering suggests that certain genetic factors might be associated with adaptation to specific ecological niches and host organisms. A recent study on the whole-genome sequencing of K. pneumoniae ST101 strains from various sources revealed distinct genetic signatures linked to host adaptation [32]. Hospital-associated strains, in particular, demonstrated higher levels of resistance and virulence compared to those from livestock, indicating adaptation to a specific host. The role of mobile genetic components (MGEs) in disseminating resistance genes was also emphasized by a comparative genomic examination of K. pneumoniae CC147 strains [33]. The dynamic nature of MGEs contributes to genetic diversity and adaptation across various environments. These studies highlight genetic factors in K. pneumoniae adaptation and reveal its evolutionary complexities. The overlapping regions in the finer-grained PCA plot (Figure 2B) highlight potential transmission routes and warrant further investigation, potentially employing advanced epidemiological methods to investigate the transmission routes between animal sources, sewage, and cutting boards.
Pan-genome Architecture and Genetic Diversity: The observation of an open pan-genome structure in our analysis of 43 K. pneumoniae genomes, including 4 isolates from Hong Kong wet markets, underscores the remarkable genetic diversity within this species. The persistent escalation of accessory genes, even subsequent to the incorporation of a considerable number of genomes, underscores the potential for continued horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and adaptation to various ecological niches. This plasticity is expected in a species like K. pneumoniae, known for its capacity to thrive in various environments, ranging from clinical settings to diverse environmental reservoirs [34]. The identification of a significant proportion of strain-specific genes (35.8%) further emphasizes the substantial genomic heterogeneity among these isolates. The presence of unique genes in three of the four wet market isolates (AL202S, SW202T3, and SF201T1) suggests potential adaptations to the specific environmental pressures encountered in wet markets, including the selective pressures exerted by cleaning agents, disinfectants, or the complex interplay of microbial communities within biofilms on wooden cutting boards. A recent study showed that K. pneumoniae Kp13 has significant genome plasticity, with 13 unique regions and specific plasmid genes [35]. This adaptability enables it to thrive in clinical and environmental niches. Research indicates that genomic rearrangements and recombination enhance the evolution of K. pneumoniae, increasing its virulence and resistance and allowing for survival across diverse environmental contexts [35]. The absence of unique genes in SF201T2 warrants further investigation to determine whether this isolate represents a less-adapted or recently introduced strain. The relatively high number of unique genes found in AL202S (183) compared to the other wet market isolates implies potential for a specific adaptation to this unique wet market setting.
Antimicrobial Resistance Genes (ARGs): The detection of a wide array of ARGs in the wet market isolates, especially the high ARG count in AL202S, presents a significant public health concern. The significance of antibiotic efflux as a key mechanism of multidrug resistance in K. pneumoniae from wet markets is highlighted by the prevalence of efflux pump genes in all four isolates. The proficiency of microorganisms to discharge a varied spectrum of antimicrobial compounds, which cultivates resistance, is primarily dependent on efflux mechanisms, especially those delineated by the oqxAB and acrAB genetic sequences [36]. This system presents considerable worries, as it may lead to resistance against various treatment alternatives, thereby complicating management approaches. This raises concern about the potential for widespread dissemination of antibiotic resistance from wet markets into the broader community. The presence of genes associated with modifying antibiotic targets and antibiotic inactivation (like FosA6) underscores the complexity and multi-faceted nature of antibiotic resistance mechanisms in these strains. The unique ARG profiles of each isolate suggest diverse acquisition pathways, highlighting the dynamism of HGT within these environments. The consistent presence of acrB across all isolates may indicate a common ancestral lineage or a highly successful HGT event involving this crucial RND efflux pump. Efflux pumps are a major resistance mechanism, but mutations in antibiotic targets and beta-lactamase genes also contribute to the MDR phenotype of K. pneumoniae [37]. The interplay of these factors, in conjunction with the activity of efflux pumps, establishes a complex resistance landscape that necessitates comprehensive strategies for effective management.

4.1. Virulence Factors in the Wet Market Samples

Biofilm-associated virulence factors in Klebsiella pneumoniae obtained from wet markets signify their pathogenicity. Biofilms help the bacterium resist immune responses and antimicrobial treatments, complicating infection management [38]. This attribute significantly enhances K. pneumoniae’s pathogenic potential when combined with supplementary virulence factors. The dynamic nature of bacterial evolution and the emergence of hypervirulent strains highlight the ongoing challenge in managing infections caused by K. pneumoniae in both clinical and food processing environments, necessitating continuous research and development of novel therapeutic approaches and optimized surface hygiene strategies.
Klebsiella pneumoniae utilizes a variety of intricate strategies and approaches to expertly acquire essential iron, which is crucial in bolstering its pathogenic capabilities by promoting both its proliferation and the formation of biofilms that assist in its endurance and virulence across various settings. These encompass the synthesis of siderophores, altering the functionality of the host’s iron metabolic pathways, and employing vesicles within the external membranes [39,40]. Iron availability significantly affects biofilm formation in K. pneumoniae, with lower iron concentrations promoting denser biofilm structures. This is mediated by metabolic changes, such as the suppression of succinic acid [41]. Such features associated with wet market K. pneumoniae further suggest their potential pathogenicity.
The capsulated phenotype of wet market K. pneumoniae strains is a significant virulence factor that can enhance other virulence traits, including iron acquisition [42]. The capsule’s protective role extends to safeguarding outer membrane receptors and iron-binding proteins, which are crucial for iron uptake, a vital process for bacterial survival and pathogenicity [43]. This enhancement of iron acquisition is part of a broader strategy that includes other virulence factors, such as biofilm formation and hypermucoviscosity, which collectively contribute to the bacterium’s fitness and virulence [44].
The observed variability in the virulence gene profiles of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from wet markets can be attributed to potential contamination from clinical sources and the bacterium’s high genome plasticity, facilitated by horizontal gene transfer [45]. This variability indicates a complex interaction between environmental and clinical strains, potentially leading to more virulent and antibiotic-resistant ones. K. pneumoniae’s genomic flexibility is key to its adaptability and pathogenicity, shown by the variety of virulence and resistance genes in different isolates [46]. The variation in virulence gene profiles emphasizes K. pneumoniae’s adaptability while also revealing the difficulties in managing its spread. The risk of horizontal gene transfer and contamination from clinical environments calls for strong surveillance and control strategies to stop the increase in highly virulent and resistant strains in both clinical and environmental contexts.

4.2. Accessory Genes: Evolutionary Dynamics and Horizontal Gene Transfer

The combined phylogenetic, network, and synteny analyses of four selected accessory genes (ycgR, sasA, bamA, and fimD) reveal distinct evolutionary trajectories influenced by both vertical inheritance and HGT. The highly variable genomic context observed for ycgR strongly supports independent HGT events, whereas the relatively conserved synteny around fimD indicates primarily vertical inheritance. The intermediate patterns for sasA and bamA suggest a complex interplay between both vertical inheritance and HGT in shaping their distribution among isolates. The highly dispersed network topology for ycgR, coupled with its highly variable genomic context, strongly suggests the involvement of mobile genetic elements in its dissemination, potentially via plasmids or transposons. The denser clustering observed in the network for fimD suggests a predominantly clonal spread, highlighting the role of vertical inheritance in maintaining the prevalence of fimD in certain lineages. The network visualizations provide complementary evidence for the conclusions drawn from the phylogenetic analysis, clearly distinguishing the roles of vertical inheritance and horizontal gene transfer for these selected accessory genes. The diversity in evolutionary mechanisms among accessory genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae underscores the complex evolutionary processes that shape its genome across various environments. Numerous determinants affect this heterogeneity, encompassing plasmid recombination, lateral gene transfer, and selective stresses from diverse ecological habitats [34,47]. The complex processes within K. pneumoniae enhance its ability to become more adaptable and dangerously resilient, especially in specific environments where antimicrobial agents fail to work effectively or do not deliver their intended therapeutic effects [47]. The flexible mechanisms discerned in K. pneumoniae are distinguished by their heterogeneity and intricacy, yet they are not solely distinctive to this species of organism. Similar processes are observed in other bacterial pathogens, where horizontal gene transfer and plasmid dynamics also play pivotal roles in shaping genomic diversity and adaptability [48]. An understanding of the mechanisms in K. pneumoniae can yield insights into broader bacterial evolution and inform strategies for the management of antibiotic resistance.

4.3. Integrated Results

Through the integration of the collective findings from our analyses, it becomes apparent that the K. pneumoniae isolates originating from wet markets in Hong Kong constitute a genetically diverse population, exhibiting varying degrees of connection to clinical, environmental, and animal isolates. This diversity is likely driven by a combination of factors, including multiple contamination sources and ongoing HGT events facilitated by the complex ecosystem of wet markets. The presence of ARGs in a significant proportion of the isolates underscores the potential for antimicrobial resistance dissemination from these environments to other settings. The diverse evolutionary mechanisms shaping the accessory genome, encompassing both vertical inheritance and HGT, further highlight the dynamic interplay of evolutionary forces within the wet market environment. The identification of specific accessory genes with distinct evolutionary patterns offers potential targets for future studies aimed at comprehending the adaptive strategies of K. pneumoniae in wet markets.
While our analysis offers the first genomic insights into K. pneumoniae from the wet markets of Hong Kong, it is imperative to consider several limitations. The limited sample size (n = 4 wet market isolates) constrains inferences regarding strain prevalence in these surroundings. However, the inclusion of globally representative public genomes (e.g., ST101/ST147) contextualizes our findings within broader antimicrobial resistance (AMR) dissemination patterns. Of particular concern, the detection of clinical-associated ST258 in wet markets underscores the urgent need for integrated surveillance across human–animal–environment interfaces, as advocated by the One Health framework. These genomic data could directly inform targeted interventions: high-risk stalls exhibiting clinical strain linkages could prioritize replacing wooden cutting boards with non-porous materials and implement enhanced disinfectant protocols, specifically targeting AMR gene reservoirs (blaCTX-M, oqxAB). Such measures would disrupt transmission networks while maintaining market functionality.
Although we provide valuable insights with our observations, the small number of wet market isolates (n = 4) does not allow for conclusions to be made with certainty regarding the prevalence of strains. In addition, the predictive value of virulence and resistance based on genomes should be confirmed by phenotyping, which is the center of our ongoing investigation.

4.4. Limitations

Three limitations warrant consideration. First, the small sample size of wet market isolates (n = 4) limits statistical power to assess gene frequency differences across ecological niches (e.g., clinical vs. environmental). While our inclusion of 39 public genomes contextualizes diversity, larger-scale sampling of wet markets is needed to infer strain prevalence or niche-specific adaptations. Second, despite curating public genomes for ecological representation, database biases toward clinically relevant sequence types (e.g., ST258, ST11) may skew phylogenetic inferences about environmental transmission routes. Third, while genomic predictions highlight putative virulence and resistance traits (e.g., fimD-mediated biofilm formation, acrB-driven efflux), phenotypic validation through microbiological assays (e.g., biofilm quantification, antibiotic susceptibility testing) is critical to confirm functional implications. Future studies should integrate expanded wet market sampling with metagenomics to resolve community-level horizontal gene transfer (HGT) dynamics and niche-specific selection pressures.

5. Conclusions

This genomic research provides essential evidence that the wet markets in Hong Kong act as reservoirs for genetically diverse and potentially dangerous strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae. A troubling pathway for pathogen transmission was highlighted by our analysis, which showed that isolates from this environment are not just environmental saprophytes but also exhibit strong phylogenetic ties to high-risk clinical clones. Most importantly, these strains have a strong set of virulence determinants that promote biofilm formation and persistence on market surfaces, as well as a powerful arsenal of antimicrobial resistance genes, most of which encode efflux pumps that confer multidrug resistance. These populations’ exceptional capacity for adaptation, which allows them to flourish in the face of the intricate ecosystem’s selective pressures, is demonstrated by their open pan-genome structure and evidence of widespread horizontal gene transfer. These results change the perception of wet markets as merely locations where food deteriorates to one that acknowledges them as possible sources of antibiotic resistance in the urban food chain. Therefore, there is a pressing need to incorporate wet markets into a One Health surveillance system and to adopt improved, evidence-based hygiene practices, such as replacing porous cutting surfaces and using disinfectants that are effective against biofilms. Despite the small sample size, this study offers the first high-resolution genomic proof of this serious public health concern, highlighting the need for more extensive epidemiological and metagenomic research to measure the frequency and dynamics of transmission of multidrug-resistant pathogens in these crucial but vulnerable food hubs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.Y.N., S.R., A.H.Y.F. and O.H.; methodology, S.R., A.H.Y.F. and O.H.; formal analysis, W.Y.N., S.R., A.H.Y.F. and O.H.; investigation, W.Y.N. and O.H.; data curation, W.Y.N., S.R. and A.H.Y.F.; writing—original draft, W.Y.N., S.R. and O.H.; writing—review and editing, W.Y.N. and O.H.; supervision, O.H.; project administration, O.H.; funding acquisition, O.H. All authors have approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for their contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and documented in the literature. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by The University of Hong Kong’s University Research Committee Seed Fund for Basic Research (104006142.095798.26000.301.01) and the GTIIT-Changzhou Innovation Institute seed funding (GCII-Seed-202409).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed in this study are available in the NCBI SRA (Sequence Read Archive) under the following BioSample accession numbers: SAMN45810452; SAMN45810453; SAMN45810454; SAMN45810455; SAMN15186438; SAMN13925598; SAMN02602959; SAMN14548317; SAMN23139062; SAMN06019522; SAMN15511588; SAMN23139063; SAMN06909168; SAMN15649164; SAMN26814915; SAMN06909161; SAMN15649146; SAMN27593784; SAMN07609113; SAMN16222891; SAMN28546263; SAMN08932863; SAMN16659219; SAMN23799605; SAMN09691066; SAMN14590646; SAMN26245098; SAMN11650121; SAMN19107302; SAMN30672525; SAMN12741260; SAMN12741260; SAMN30914361; SAMN15186440; SAMN20245095; SAMN15186447; SAMN23139350; SAMN15186444; SAMN15097741; SAMN15186443; SAMN13925581; SAMN15186442; SAMN13925526. The data can be accessed through the NCBI SRA portal at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/ (accessed on 7 August 2025).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff and management of the participating wet markets for facilitating access for sample collection. We also acknowledge the sequencing services provided by Novogene Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen, China).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this research project or manuscript. No funding sources or financial relationships influenced the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of results, or the decision to submit this manuscript for publication. The authors also confirm that no patents or patent applications are associated with the work presented in this manuscript.

References

  1. Riwu, K.H.P.; Effendi, M.H.; Rantam, F.A.; Khairullah, A.R.; Widodo, A. A review: Virulence factors of Klebsiella pneumonia as emerging infection on the food chain. Vet. World 2022, 15, 2172–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Davis, G.S.; Price, L.B. Recent Research Examining Links Among Klebsiella pneumoniae from Food, Food Animals, and Human Extraintestinal Infections. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2016, 3, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, Y.; Wang, N.-l.; Cen, J.-q.; Han, J.-t.; Tang, Y.-x.; Xu, Z.-q.; Zeng, H.; Houf, K.; Yu, Z. Comparative analyses of bacterial contamination and microbiome of broiler carcasses in wet market and industrial processing environments. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2025, 426, 110937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ngan, W.Y.; Rao, S.; Chan, L.C.; Sekoai, P.T.; Pu, Y.; Yao, Y.; Fung, A.H.Y.; Habimana, O. Impacts of Wet Market Modernization Levels and Hygiene Practices on the Microbiome and Microbial Safety of Wooden Cutting Boards in Hong Kong. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ghatak, S.; Srinivas, K.; Milton, A.A.P.; Priya, G.B.; Das, S.; Lindahl, J.F. Limiting the spillover of zoonotic pathogens from traditional food markets in developing countries and a new market design for risk-proofing. Epidemiol. Health 2023, 45, e2023097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sekoai, P.T.; Feng, S.; Zhou, W.; Ngan, W.Y.; Pu, Y.; Yao, Y.; Pan, J.; Habimana, O. Insights into the Microbiological Safety of Wooden Cutting Boards Used for Meat Processing in Hong Kong’s Wet Markets: A Focus on Food-Contact Surfaces, Cross-Contamination and the Efficacy of Traditional Hygiene Practices. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, H.Y.; Prentice, E.L.; Webber, M.A. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in biofilms. npj Antimicrob. Resist. 2024, 2, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Olaimat, A.N.; Ababneh, A.M.; Al-Holy, M.; Al-Nabulsi, A.; Osaili, T.; Abughoush, M.; Ayyash, M.; Holley, R.A. A Review of Bacterial Biofilm Components and Formation, Detection Methods, and Their Prevention and Control on Food Contact Surfaces. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 15, 1973–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lo, M.Y.; Ngan, W.Y.; Tsun, S.M.; Hsing, H.-L.; Lau, K.T.; Hung, H.P.; Chan, S.L.; Lai, Y.Y.; Yao, Y.; Pu, Y.; et al. A Field Study Into Hong Kong’s Wet Markets: Raised Questions Into the Hygienic Maintenance of Meat Contact Surfaces and the Dissemination of Microorganisms Associated With Nosocomial Infections. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Burns, J.P. Administrative reform in Hong Kong: An institutional analysis of food safety. In Comparative Governance Reform in Asia: Democracy, Corruption, and Government Trust; Emerald Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2008; pp. 21–38. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dong, Y.; Liu, H.; Habimana, O. High risk of Vibrio pathogen and antibiotic resistance transfer in live seafood wet markets of Shantou, China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2025, 432, 111098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jing, G.; Sun, Z.; Wang, H.; Gong, Y.; Huang, S.; Ning, K.; Xu, J.; Su, X. Parallel-META 3: Comprehensive taxonomical and functional analysis platform for efficient comparison of microbial communities. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Darling, A.C.E.; Mau, B.; Blattner, F.R.; Perna, N.T. Mauve: Multiple Alignment of Conserved Genomic Sequence With Rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1394–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Carver, T.J.; Rutherford, K.M.; Berriman, M.; Rajandream, M.A.; Barrell, B.G.; Parkhill, J. ACT: The Artemis comparison tool. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3422–3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Varani, A.M.; Siguier, P.; Gourbeyre, E.; Charneau, V.; Chandler, M. ISsaga is an ensemble of web-based methods for high throughput identification and semi-automatic annotation of insertion sequences in prokaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bertelli, C.; Laird, M.R.; Williams, K.P.; Lau, B.Y.; Hoad, G.; Winsor, G.L.; Brinkman, F.S.L. IslandViewer 4: Expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W30–W35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jolley, K.A.; Bray, J.E.; Maiden, M.C.J. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018, 3, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Page, A.J.; Cummins, C.A.; Hunt, M.; Wong, V.K.; Reuter, S.; Holden, M.T.G.; Fookes, M.; Falush, D.; Keane, J.A.; Parkhill, J. Roary: Rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3691–3693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dereeper, A.; Summo, M.; Meyer, D.F.; Marschall, T. PanExplorer: A web-based tool for exploratory analysis and visualization of bacterial pan-genomes. Bioinformatics 2022, 38, 4412–4414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: Recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W78–W82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Quijada, N.M.; Rodríguez-Lázaro, D.; Eiros, J.M.; Hernández, M.; Valencia, A. TORMES: An automated pipeline for whole bacterial genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 4207–4212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Treangen, T.J.; Ondov, B.D.; Koren, S.; Phillippy, A.M. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Danecek, P.; Bonfield, J.K.; Liddle, J.; Marshall, J.; Ohan, V.; Pollard, M.O.; Whitwham, A.; Keane, T.; McCarthy, S.A.; Davies, R.M.; et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 2021, 10, giab008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cingolani, P.; Platts, A.; Wang, L.L.; Coon, M.; Nguyen, T.; Wang, L.; Land, S.J.; Lu, X.; Ruden, D.M. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff. Fly 2014, 6, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Florensa, A.F.; Kaas, R.S.; Clausen, P.T.L.C.; Aytan-Aktug, D.; Aarestrup, F.M. ResFinder—An open online resource for identification of antimicrobial resistance genes in next-generation sequencing data and prediction of phenotypes from genotypes. Microb. Genom. 2022, 8, 000748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gupta, S.K.; Padmanabhan, B.R.; Diene, S.M.; Lopez-Rojas, R.; Kempf, M.; Landraud, L.; Rolain, J.-M. ARG-ANNOT, a New Bioinformatic Tool To Discover Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Bacterial Genomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. De Koster, S.; Rodriguez Ruiz, J.P.; Rajakani, S.G.; Lammens, C.; Glupczynski, Y.; Goossens, H.; Xavier, B.B. Diversity in the Characteristics of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST101 of Human, Environmental, and Animal Origin. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 838207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pajand, O.; Rahimi, H.; Badmasti, F.; Gholami, F.; Alipour, T.; Darabi, N.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Leekitcharoenphon, P. Various arrangements of mobile genetic elements among CC147 subpopulations of Klebsiella pneumoniae harboring blaNDM-1: A comparative genomic analysis of carbapenem resistant strains. J. Biomed. Sci. 2023, 30, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rocha, J.; Henriques, I.; Gomila, M.; Manaia, C.M. Common and distinctive genomic features of Klebsiella pneumoniae thriving in the natural environment or in clinical settings. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ramos, P.I.P.; Picão, R.C.; de Almeida, L.G.P.; Lima, N.C.B.; Girardello, R.; Vivan, A.C.P.; Xavier, D.E.; Barcellos, F.G.; Pelisson, M.; Vespero, E.C.; et al. Comparative analysis of the complete genome of KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Kp13 reveals remarkable genome plasticity and a wide repertoire of virulence and resistance mechanisms. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dawson, C.J.; Bartczak, A.; Hassan, K.A. Mutations in the efflux regulator gene oqxR provide a simple genetic switch for antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microbiology 2024, 170, 001499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mihailovskaya, V.S.; Selivanova, P.A.; Kuznetsova, M.V. Prevalence of qacEΔ1, qacE, oqxA, oqxB, acrA, cepA and zitB genes among multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated in a cardiac hospital. J. Microbiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol. 2024, 101, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Joseph, B.J.; Mathew, M.; Rachel, R.; Mathew, J.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. Klebsiella pneumoniae Virulence Factors and Biofilm Components: Synthesis, Structure, Function, and Inhibitors. In ESKAPE Pathogens; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; pp. 271–295. [Google Scholar]
  39. Grubwieser, P.; Hilbe, R.; Gehrer, C.M.; Grander, M.; Brigo, N.; Hoffmann, A.; Seifert, M.; Berger, S.; Theurl, I.; Nairz, M.; et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae manipulates human macrophages to acquire iron. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1223113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lan, Y.; Zhou, M.; Li, X.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Liu, W. Preliminary Investigation of Iron Acquisition in Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Mediated by Outer Membrane Vesicles. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Liu, K.; Tan, S.; Ye, W.; Hou, L.; Fang, B. Low-concentration iron promotes Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm formation by suppressing succinic acid. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yang, X.; Liu, X.; Chan, E.W.-C.; Zhang, R.; Chen, S.; Zhou, X. Functional Characterization of Plasmid-Borne rmpADC Homologues in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, 03081-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Walker, K.A.; Miner, T.A.; Palacios, M.; Trzilova, D.; Frederick, D.R.; Broberg, C.A.; Sepúlveda, V.E.; Quinn, J.D.; Miller, V.L.; Goldberg, J.B. A Klebsiella pneumoniae Regulatory Mutant Has Reduced Capsule Expression but Retains Hypermucoviscosity. mBio 2019, 10, e00089-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mike, L.A.; Stark, A.J.; Forsyth, V.S.; Vornhagen, J.; Smith, S.N.; Bachman, M.A.; Mobley, H.L.T. A systematic analysis of hypermucoviscosity and capsule reveals distinct and overlapping genes that impact Klebsiella pneumoniae fitness. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 17, e1009376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Samoilova, A.A.; Kraeva, L.A.; Mikhailov, N.V.; Saitova, A.T.; Polev, D.E.; Vashukova, M.A.; Gordeeva, S.A.; Smirnova, E.V.; Beljatich, L.I.; Dolgova, A.S.; et al. Genomic analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains virulence and antibiotic resistance. Russ. J. Infect. Immun. 2024, 14, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Isogai, M.; Kawamura, K.; Yagi, T.; Kayama, S.; Sugai, M.; Doi, Y.; Suzuki, M. Evaluation of Klebsiella pneumoniae pathogenicity through holistic gene content analysis. Microb. Genom. 2024, 10, 001295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dey, S.; Gaur, M.; Sykes, E.M.E.; Prusty, M.; Elangovan, S.; Dixit, S.; Pati, S.; Kumar, A.; Subudhi, E. Unravelling the Evolutionary Dynamics of High-Risk Klebsiella pneumoniae ST147 Clones: Insights from Comparative Pangenome Analysis. Genes 2023, 14, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Morgado, S.; Fonseca, E.; Vicente, A.C. Genomics of Klebsiella pneumoniae Species Complex Reveals the Circulation of High-Risk Multidrug-Resistant Pandemic Clones in Human, Animal, and Environmental Sources. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A phylogenetic tree based on core-genome SNPs that shows the most likely relationships. (Left panel) There are 43 K. pneumoniae isolates in the tree: 4 from Hong Kong wet markets (marked in red) and 39 from public databases. The color of the tips depends on where the sample came from. Key nodes indicate bootstrap support ratings of 80% or higher. (Right Panel) A clustered heatmap of the accessory genome, representing 12,805 genomic clusters. The presence of a gene cluster in an isolate is shown in blue, and absence is shown in white. The dendrogram represents hierarchical clustering based on gene content similarity, illustrating the relatedness of isolates based on their accessory genome.
Figure 1. A phylogenetic tree based on core-genome SNPs that shows the most likely relationships. (Left panel) There are 43 K. pneumoniae isolates in the tree: 4 from Hong Kong wet markets (marked in red) and 39 from public databases. The color of the tips depends on where the sample came from. Key nodes indicate bootstrap support ratings of 80% or higher. (Right Panel) A clustered heatmap of the accessory genome, representing 12,805 genomic clusters. The presence of a gene cluster in an isolate is shown in blue, and absence is shown in white. The dendrogram represents hierarchical clustering based on gene content similarity, illustrating the relatedness of isolates based on their accessory genome.
Antibiotics 14 00922 g001
Figure 2. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showing patterns of gene presence and absence. (A) A PCA plot that shows isolates by their wide ecological niche, such as animal, clinical, environment, or wet market. (B) PCA map with isolates colored by specific sample source, showing more detailed grouping and possible transmission routes (the arrow shows where the cutting board, animal, and sewage isolates overlap).
Figure 2. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showing patterns of gene presence and absence. (A) A PCA plot that shows isolates by their wide ecological niche, such as animal, clinical, environment, or wet market. (B) PCA map with isolates colored by specific sample source, showing more detailed grouping and possible transmission routes (the arrow shows where the cutting board, animal, and sewage isolates overlap).
Antibiotics 14 00922 g002
Figure 3. A pan-genome study of 43 Klebsiella pneumoniae genomes. (A) A graph illustrating the quantity of core genes (present in a minimum of 99% of genomic sequences) as a variable of the quantity of genomes incorporated. (B) Pan-genome trajectory illustrating the cumulative quantity of genes (core + accessory) as genomes are incorporated sequentially. This shows that the pan-genome is open. (C) Distribution of BLAST hit identity percentages for all gene sequences, showing that the genomes are very different from one another.
Figure 3. A pan-genome study of 43 Klebsiella pneumoniae genomes. (A) A graph illustrating the quantity of core genes (present in a minimum of 99% of genomic sequences) as a variable of the quantity of genomes incorporated. (B) Pan-genome trajectory illustrating the cumulative quantity of genes (core + accessory) as genomes are incorporated sequentially. This shows that the pan-genome is open. (C) Distribution of BLAST hit identity percentages for all gene sequences, showing that the genomes are very different from one another.
Antibiotics 14 00922 g003
Figure 4. The parts that make up the Klebsiella pneumoniae pan-genome. (A) A pie chart that shows the distribution of core, accessory, and strain-specific genes across the 43 genomes. (B) A bar graph that illustrates the quantity of distinct (strain-specific) genes identified in each of the four wet market isolates (AL202S, SW202T3, SF201T1, and SF201T2).
Figure 4. The parts that make up the Klebsiella pneumoniae pan-genome. (A) A pie chart that shows the distribution of core, accessory, and strain-specific genes across the 43 genomes. (B) A bar graph that illustrates the quantity of distinct (strain-specific) genes identified in each of the four wet market isolates (AL202S, SW202T3, SF201T1, and SF201T2).
Antibiotics 14 00922 g004
Figure 5. Heatmaps showing the antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) found in the 43 K. pneumoniae isolates. We employed (A) ResFinder, (B) the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD), and (C) ARG-ANNOT for the identification of ARGs. Rows show individual isolates (wet market isolates are marked), while columns show resistance genes. A filled box shows that a gene is present. The isolates are categorized by their sources. Isolates without detected ARGs for a given database are not represented by a row in the respective heatmap.
Figure 5. Heatmaps showing the antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) found in the 43 K. pneumoniae isolates. We employed (A) ResFinder, (B) the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD), and (C) ARG-ANNOT for the identification of ARGs. Rows show individual isolates (wet market isolates are marked), while columns show resistance genes. A filled box shows that a gene is present. The isolates are categorized by their sources. Isolates without detected ARGs for a given database are not represented by a row in the respective heatmap.
Antibiotics 14 00922 g005
Figure 6. A heatmap showing the virulence factors found in the four K. pneumoniae isolates from wet markets. We used the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) to find genes. The four isolates are represented in the columns, while the rows illustrate virulence genes classified by their functionality (for example, fimbriae, secretion mechanisms, and iron acquisition). A filled box shows that a gene is present. The asterisk (*) next to the gene identifiers KPN2242 (locus tag RS16180) and N559 (locus tag RS31025) denotes that these specific genes were annotated with general functional names by Prokka but were manually re-annotated as putative virulence factors based on lower-confidence homology matches to the VFDB, distinguishing them from genes with high-confidence hits or canonical virulence factor annotations.
Figure 6. A heatmap showing the virulence factors found in the four K. pneumoniae isolates from wet markets. We used the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) to find genes. The four isolates are represented in the columns, while the rows illustrate virulence genes classified by their functionality (for example, fimbriae, secretion mechanisms, and iron acquisition). A filled box shows that a gene is present. The asterisk (*) next to the gene identifiers KPN2242 (locus tag RS16180) and N559 (locus tag RS31025) denotes that these specific genes were annotated with general functional names by Prokka but were manually re-annotated as putative virulence factors based on lower-confidence homology matches to the VFDB, distinguishing them from genes with high-confidence hits or canonical virulence factor annotations.
Antibiotics 14 00922 g006
Figure 7. Evolutionary study of the accessory gene ycgR (flagellar brake protein). (A) The ycgR gene sequence’s maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree. (B) Network of co-occurrence for ycgR, where ycgR genes are found together in different genomes. Node size is proportional to the number of shared accessory genes with other nodes in the network. Edges connect genomes that contain the ycgR gene. (C) Synteny plots of the genomic area surrounding ycgR in a selection of isolates, illustrating highly varied flanking regions.
Figure 7. Evolutionary study of the accessory gene ycgR (flagellar brake protein). (A) The ycgR gene sequence’s maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree. (B) Network of co-occurrence for ycgR, where ycgR genes are found together in different genomes. Node size is proportional to the number of shared accessory genes with other nodes in the network. Edges connect genomes that contain the ycgR gene. (C) Synteny plots of the genomic area surrounding ycgR in a selection of isolates, illustrating highly varied flanking regions.
Antibiotics 14 00922 g007
Figure 8. An evolutionary study of the accessory gene sasA (adaptive response sensory kinase). (A) The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the sasA gene sequence. (B) Network of co-occurrence for sasA. Node size is proportional to the number of shared accessory genes with other nodes in the network. Edges connect genomes that contain the sasA gene. (C) Synteny plots of the sasA genomic region, demonstrating a moderate level of conservation in certain isolates.
Figure 8. An evolutionary study of the accessory gene sasA (adaptive response sensory kinase). (A) The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the sasA gene sequence. (B) Network of co-occurrence for sasA. Node size is proportional to the number of shared accessory genes with other nodes in the network. Edges connect genomes that contain the sasA gene. (C) Synteny plots of the sasA genomic region, demonstrating a moderate level of conservation in certain isolates.
Antibiotics 14 00922 g008
Figure 9. Evolutionary study of the bamA accessory gene (outer membrane protein assembly factor). (A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the bamA gene sequence. (B) Network of co-occurrence for bamA. Node size is proportional to the number of shared accessory genes with other nodes in the network. Edges connect genomes that contain the bamA gene. (C) Synteny plots of the bamA genomic area, showing a mix of conservation and change.
Figure 9. Evolutionary study of the bamA accessory gene (outer membrane protein assembly factor). (A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the bamA gene sequence. (B) Network of co-occurrence for bamA. Node size is proportional to the number of shared accessory genes with other nodes in the network. Edges connect genomes that contain the bamA gene. (C) Synteny plots of the bamA genomic area, showing a mix of conservation and change.
Antibiotics 14 00922 g009
Figure 10. Evolutionary study of the accessory gene fimD (type 1 fimbrial adhesin). (A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the fimD gene sequence. (B) Network of co-occurrence for fimD, which shows clusters that are very dense and well-connected. Node size is proportional to the number of shared accessory genes with other nodes in the network. Edges connect genomes that contain the fimD gene. (C) Synteny plots of the fimD genomic area show that most isolates have a very similar genetic background.
Figure 10. Evolutionary study of the accessory gene fimD (type 1 fimbrial adhesin). (A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the fimD gene sequence. (B) Network of co-occurrence for fimD, which shows clusters that are very dense and well-connected. Node size is proportional to the number of shared accessory genes with other nodes in the network. Edges connect genomes that contain the fimD gene. (C) Synteny plots of the fimD genomic area show that most isolates have a very similar genetic background.
Antibiotics 14 00922 g010
Table 1. Sample genome description.
Table 1. Sample genome description.
SampleHostTypeBioSampleID
AL202SFood_proc_surfaceWet marketSAMN45810452
SF201T1Food_proc_surfaceWet marketSAMN45810453
SF201T2Food_proc_surfaceWet marketSAMN45810454
SW202T3Food_proc_surfaceWet marketSAMN45810455
GCA_013349065SurfaceEnvironmentalSAMN15186438
GCA_022354665SewageEnvironmentalSAMN13925598
GCA_000240185Homo-SapiensClinicalSAMN02602959
GCA_013376555WaterEnvironmentalSAMN14548317
GCA_022559765PoultryAnimal-associatedSAMN23139062
GCA_001887985Homo-SapiensClinicalSAMN06019522
GCA_013423825SewageEnvironmentalSAMN15511588
GCA_022559785PoultryAnimal-associatedSAMN23139063
GCA_002164695Homo-SapiensClinicalSAMN06909168
GCA_014041505SurfaceEnvironmentalSAMN15649164
GCA_022749475SwineAnimal-associatedSAMN26814915
GCA_002164855Homo-SapiensClinicalSAMN06909161
GCA_014041845Homo-SapiensClinicalSAMN15649146
GCA_023242905Homo-SapiensClinicalSAMN27593784
GCA_002852995Homo-SapiensClinicalSAMN07609113
GCA_014840955PoultryAnimal-associatedSAMN16222891
GCA_023572965Homo-SapiensClinicalSAMN28546263
GCA_003261955Homo-SapiensClinicalSAMN08932863
GCA_015353095SwineAnimal-associatedSAMN16659219
GCA_023650835SewageEnvironmentalSAMN23799605
GCA_003432405SwineAnimal-associatedSAMN09691066
GCA_017815795Red_KangarooAnimal-associatedSAMN14590646
GCA_024299245Homo-SapiensClinicalSAMN26245098
GCA_006974165RabbitAnimal-associatedSAMN11650121
GCA_018449065SwineAnimal-associatedSAMN19107302
GCA_025152765Homo-SapiensClinicalSAMN30672525
GCA_008632415PoultryAnimal-associatedSAMN12741260
GCA_018487825SwineAnimal-associatedSAMN12741260
GCA_026821715Homo-SapiensClinicalSAMN30914361
GCA_013348885Homo-SapiensClinicalSAMN15186440
GCA_019334625SwineAnimal-associatedSAMN20245095
GCA_013348905SurfaceEnvironmentalSAMN15186447
GCA_020990405HouseflyAnimal-associatedSAMN23139350
GCA_013348985SurfaceEnvironmentalSAMN15186444
GCA_021496545SwineAnimal-associatedSAMN15097741
GCA_013349005SurfaceEnvironmentalSAMN15186443
GCA_022354125SewageEnvironmentalSAMN13925581
GCA_013349025SurfaceEnvironmentalSAMN15186442
GCA_022354365SewageEnvironmentalSAMN13925526
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ngan, W.Y.; Rao, S.; Fung, A.H.Y.; Habimana, O. Genomic Profiling Reveals Clinically Relevant Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae from Hong Kong Wet Markets. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090922

AMA Style

Ngan WY, Rao S, Fung AHY, Habimana O. Genomic Profiling Reveals Clinically Relevant Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae from Hong Kong Wet Markets. Antibiotics. 2025; 14(9):922. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090922

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ngan, Wing Yui, Subramanya Rao, Aster Hei Yiu Fung, and Olivier Habimana. 2025. "Genomic Profiling Reveals Clinically Relevant Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae from Hong Kong Wet Markets" Antibiotics 14, no. 9: 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090922

APA Style

Ngan, W. Y., Rao, S., Fung, A. H. Y., & Habimana, O. (2025). Genomic Profiling Reveals Clinically Relevant Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae from Hong Kong Wet Markets. Antibiotics, 14(9), 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090922

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop