Next Article in Journal
Livestock Antibiotics Use and Antimicrobial Resistance
Next Article in Special Issue
Global Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Burkholderia pseudomallei in Melioidosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Potential of Metal–Organic Compounds ZIF-8 and F300 in a Membrane Filtration–Adsorption Process for the Removal of Antibiotics from Water
Previous Article in Special Issue
Outbreak of NDM-5-Producing Proteus mirabilis During the COVID-19 Pandemic in an Argentine Hospital
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First Report in the Americas of S. enterica Var. Enteritidis Carrying blaNDM-1 in a Putatively New Sub-Lineage of IncC2 Plasmids

1
Unidad Académica de Bacteriología y Virología, Instituto de Higiene, Facultad de Medicina, Av. Alfredo Navarro 3051, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
2
Unidad de Genómica y Bioinformática, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto 50000, Uruguay
3
Departamentos de Laboratorios de Salud Pública, Ministerio de Salud Pública, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
4
Sanatorio Círculo Católico, Montevideo 11800, Uruguay
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2025, 14(6), 620; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060620
Submission received: 9 May 2025 / Revised: 16 June 2025 / Accepted: 17 June 2025 / Published: 18 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multidrug-Resistance Patterns in Infectious Pathogens)

Abstract

Background: Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales have steadily multiplied over time, becoming a major threat to healthcare systems due to limited therapeutic options and high case-fatality rates. Case report: We studied a patient who, after being discharged from an ICU, developed salmonellosis caused by an antibiotic-susceptible S. enteritidis. After undergoing treatment with ciprofloxacin, the patient presented an episode of asymptomatic bacteriuria originated by a carbapenem and ciprofloxacin-resistant S. enteritidis. Results: Whole genome sequencing analysis revealed that both Salmonella isolates belonged to the same strain, and that isolate SEn_T2 acquired a plasmid carrying both blaNDM-1 and qnrA1 genes (pIncCSEn) which was previously present in the patient’s gut in at least one Enterobacter cloacae isolate. Additionally, pIncCSEN was identified as a putatively new sub-lineage of IncC2 plasmids which lacked the first copy of the methyltransferase gene dcm and the rhs gene. The resistance genes blaNDM-1 and qnrA1 were incorporated into a Tn21-derived transposon that included a complex class 1 integron whose genetic arrangement was: intI1- dfrA12- orfF- aadA2- qacEΔ1-sul1-ISCR1- trpF- ble- blaNDM-1 (in reverse direction)- ISAba125-ISCR1- qnrA- cmlA1- qacEΔ1-sul1. Conclusions: Antimicrobial persistence and co-selection of antibiotic resistance play an important role in the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance genes; in this regard, a joint effort involving the infection control team, effective antibiotic stewardship, and genomic surveillance could help mitigate the spread of these multidrug resistant microorganisms.

1. Introduction

Human salmonellosis can be divided into three main diseases, typhoid fever, paratyphoid fever and non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) infections [1]. In the United States alone, NTS is responsible for 1.35 million cases, 26,500 hospitalizations, and 420 deaths, annually (https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/, accessed on 18 June 2024). Current guidelines indicate that only groups at increased risk for invasive NTS infections (e.g., neonates, elderly patients, persons with cardiac disease, and immunocompromised patients, etc.) should be treated [2]. Ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or amoxicillin are the recommended primary treatment options for invasive salmonellosis [2]. Antimicrobial resistance in NTS is variable, and is related to factors such as serotype, source, and geographical location [3]. Accordingly, considering that the reservoir for most Salmonella enterica strains that cause human infections is the digestive tract of livestock, it is not surprising that the resistance profile and resistance genes present in this species resemble those detected in other enteric microorganisms present in livestock [3,4,5]. In this regard, transferable resistance to tetracycline, streptomycin, quinolones, and even oxyimino cephalosporins (mediated by ESBLs or plasmid-borne AmpC enzymes) is quite frequent [5,6].
Although carbapenems should not be administered to food-producing animals [7], in recent years the emergence of carbapemase-producing Salmonella enterica isolates, especially metallo-carbapenemases, is a matter of concern [8]. Among the various types of transferable metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), NDM enzymes stand out for showing a faster and wider range of dissemination [9]; so far, the presence of this MBL has been reported in over 90 countries, including Uruguay [10,11]. Although NDM alleles have been mainly reported in Enterobacterales isolates of clinical origin, other sources include the environment [12,13], wild animals, pets, livestock [14,15] as well as food [16,17].
Several genetic platforms have been associated with blaNDM alleles. In Enterobacterales, these genes have been identified on plasmids belonging to at least 20 different incompatibility groups, with IncX3, IncFII, and IncC being the most common [10]. Among these, IncC plasmids-broad-host-range plasmids with sizes ranging approximately 68–330 kb- have been extensively studied for their role in mobilizing extended-spectrum β-lactamase and carbapenemase genes, along with other resistance determinants [18,19]. Notably, the occurrence of blaNDM alleles in IncC plasmids has been primarily associated with type 1a variants [20]. In our country, blaNDM-1 has been previously detected in various species within the Enterobacteriaceae and Morganellaceae families, predominantly carried by IncC plasmids [11,21].
The recent detection of a carbapenem-resistant S. enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. enteritidis) harboring blaNDM-1 on a type 2 IncC2 plasmid, in Uruguay and possibly in the Americas, represents a significant public health concern. Accordingly, our objective was to analyze said isolate, and to gain some insight into the different factors underlying the plasmid mediated dissemination of blaNDM genes across species.

2. Results

2.1. Case Report

A 78-year-old male with a history of hypertension, type-2 diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, and a stroke episode in 2021, was admitted into a moderate-care setting with radiological and antigenic diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonitis. On day 5, he was transferred to the ICU due to worsening dyspnea which required invasive mechanical ventilation. Routine rectal swabbing in search of carbapenemase-producing pathogens yielded an NDM-producing E. cloacae (hereinafter Eclo_NDM). Due to prolonged stay in the ICU, the patient developed a K. pneumoniae-induced purulent tracheobronchitis and received ceftriaxone for 7 days. Later, the subject also developed a catheter-related bloodstream infection due to A. baumannii, undergoing treatment with double-dose ampicillin-sulbactam for 7 days.
On day 35, the patient was transferred from the ICU into a moderate-care room, and on day 42 developed malaise, fever, and diarrhea. Bacteriological cultures both from blood and stool samples yielded Salmonella enterica var. Enteritidis, isolate T1 (hereinafter SEn_T1). On day 45, antibiotic treatment with ciprofloxacin was initiated, lasting for 14 days. The patient was finally discharged on day 54.
Twenty-four days after discharge (day 82), the patient was readmitted to the Emergency Department with fever and malaise lasting 72 h. General assessment and paraclinical studies, including a bacteriological round, revealed an upper respiratory syndrome, with chest X-ray findings suggestive of acute pneumonia. Additionally, a urine culture revealed the presence of Salmonella enterica var. Enteritidis isolate T2 (hereafter SEn_T2). Finally, after empirical ceftriaxone treatment, the patient achieved clinical recovery.

2.2. Susceptibility Testing and Antibiotic Resistance Genes

SEn_T1 showed susceptibility to all the antibiotics tested. Conversely, SEn_T2 displayed resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, oxyimino-cephalosporins and carbapenems, while showing intermediate susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. Similarly, Eclo_NDM exhibited a similar resistance profile to SEn_T2 but was resistant to ciprofloxacin (Table 1).
Both SEn_T2 and Eclo_NDM displayed a DDST result consistent with metallo-β-lactamase production, which was confirmed as blaNDM by PCR. The quinolone resistance gene qnrA was also detected in both isolates by PCR.

2.3. Plasmid Transfer Assays

Conjugation assays yielded positive results using either Eclo_NDM or SEn_T2 as donors. The conjugation frequency for both plasmids was ~4 × 10−3 (transconjugants/donors), which constitutes a high transfer efficiency for this type of plasmids (see below). Transconjugants (hereinafter designated as TcEclo_NDM and TcSEn_T2, respectively) showed resistance to carbapenems, ceftazidime and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and intermediate susceptibility to ciprofloxacin; furthermore, both transconjugants exhibited an 8-fold increase in MIC levels to ciprofloxacin, compared to the recipient strain (Table 1). DDST results were also compatible with metallo-β-lactamase production. Moreover, PCR assays confirmed the transfer of resistance genes blaNDM and qnrA.

2.4. In Silico Analysis

After being assembled and polished, genomic DNA sequences of isolates Eclo_NDM, SEn_T1 and SEn_T2 were analyzed by online servers and standalone bioinformatic software. Carbapenem and quinolone resistance genes blaNDM-1 and qnrA1 respectively, were detected in both Eclo_NDM and SEn_T2, confirming PCR findings. Both strains also harbored IncC and IncFIB plasmids, which will be discussed later. All other relevant data are summarized in Table 2.

2.5. Comparative Genomics

A genome comparison between isolates SEn_T1 and SEn_T2 revealed that both belonged to sequence-type ST11 and differed by only two mutations: one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and a 777 bp insertion in the chromosome of SEn_T2. Additionally, wgMLST analysis revealed the SEn_T1 and SEn_T2 differed in 5/21,056 loci and thus belong to the same clone/strain [22]. Given that both isolates were recovered 40 days apart, these findings suggest that such minor changes between SEn_T1 and SEn_T2 likely arose within the patient’s gut.
Additionally, while both isolates carried an IncF plasmid (pIncFSEn), SEn_T2 also harbored an IncC plasmid (pIncCSEn) encoding blaNDM-1 and qnrA1, along with other antibiotic resistance genes. These findings suggest that SEn_T1 and SEn_T2 represent the same clone and that the occurrence of plasmid pIncCSEn in SEn_T2 could be the outcome of a horizontal genetic transfer (HGT) event between Eclo_NDM and SEn_T1.
To investigate this possibility, we conducted a comparative genomic analysis between the IncC plasmids found in Eclo_NDM and SEn_T2. The analysis revealed that both plasmids were identical, strongly supporting the hypothesis that the HGT event occurred within the patient’s gut.

2.6. Description of Plasmid pIncCSEn

In S. Enterica SEn_T2 and in E. cloacae Eclo_NDM, both blaNDM-1 and qnrA1 were encoded in identical type-2 IncC plasmids, hereinafter designated pIncCSEn. Overall pIncCSEn was ∼168 kb in size, had a GC% content of 52.75 and featured 210 open reading frames. The backbone of plasmid pIncCSEn spanned 122.8 kb and harbored all the necessary genes required for plasmid replication, maintenance, partitioning and conjugal transfer.
Comparison with other type-2 IncC plasmids showed that the closest match corresponded to pEc8791 (accession n MZ465532), obtained from a clinical E. coli isolate from Argentina. In this regard, pEc8791 featured different beta-lactam and fluoroquinolone resistance genes (i.e., blaPER-2, aac(6′)-Ib-cr) and lacked the entire mercury resistance operon and the chromate transport-encoding gene chrA. The second closest match corresponded to plasmid pEC8-NDM-1 (accession n CP060954), obtained from a carbapenem-resistant E. coli clinical isolate from China. Although this plasmid also carried blaNDM-1 in a complex class 1 integron, its variable regions featured different resistance genes, suggesting a different origin for such a mobile genetic element. Furthermore, pEC8-NDM-1 lacked the mercury resistance operon and a group II intron gene (ltrA) downstream the plasmid transfer gene traC, both of which are present in pIncCSEn (Figure 1).
In contrast with typical IncC plasmids which generally feature three copies of the methyltransferase gene dcm, pIncCSEn is missing dcm1. Furthermore, the backbone section corresponding to the insertion site of ARI-A, usually located in the vicinity or within the rhs gene in type-2 IncC plasmids, is also absent in pIncCSEn. In this regard, close inspection of nucleotide sequences of other type-2 IncC plasmids, showed that plasmids pEc8791, and pEc61B (accession n CP053105) also lacked rhs. Interestingly, both plasmids were described in our neighboring countries Argentina and Brazil, respectively, albeit harboring completely different resistance islands.
Furthermore, we conducted a phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide sequences of the alleles employed in the IncC pMLST scheme (i.e., repA, parA, parB, A053). In this sense, the resulting dendrogram showed that plasmid pIncCSEn, clustered with both pEc8791 and pEc61B, forming an offshoot of the type-2 IncC clade (Figure 2).

2.7. Resistance Region

Like other type-2 IncC plasmids, pIncCSEn featured two resistance islands (ARI-A and ARI-B). The latter was inserted upstream of plasmid stability genes parAB and consisted of sulfonamide resistance gene sul2 preceded by a phosphoglucosamine mutase gene and ISCR2. Conversely, ARI-A spanned ~42.3 kb and encoded multiple ARGs. It was inserted between the DNA primase gene (pri) and an integrase/recombinase gene (xerD) and was constituted by a new Tn21-derived transposon designated Tn8710 (see below), whose IRL and IRR were interrupted by two copies of IS4321-like. Accordingly, Tn7810 was 39269 bp and was bracketed by DRL and DRR direct repeats (5’-TAATA-3’). Additionally, it was flanked by two copies of IS1-family insertion sequences, namely IS1R and IS1X4-like, at the left and right flank respectively. Additionally, adjacent to IS1R there was the chloramphenicol resistance gene catA1.
The remnants of Tn21 that are part of Tn8710 in plasmid pIncSEn are divided into two fragments and will be described in accordance with the sequence and structure reported by Liebert et al. (accession number AF071413) [24]. The left segment consists of the transposition elements of Tn21, comprising tnpA, tnpR, res sites I, II and III, and tnpM, followed by class 1 integron integrase gene intI1. Unlike In2, which carries aadA1 as gene cassette, the class 1 integron associated with Tn8710 carries dfrA12 and aadA2 in its variable region. On the other hand, the right segment of Tn2, conserved in Tn8710, includes a fragment of the Tn21-tniA gene, followed by the mer operon (merEDACPTR). Moreover, the central region of Tn21, comprising the class 1 integron accessory genes (orf5, tniB and part of tniA) and IS1326, IS1353, is missing in Tn8710, likely as the result of several insertion/deletion events probably occurred instead (Figure 3).
The class 1 integron featured by Tn8710 was associated with a tandem of two copies of ISCR1 and their respective variable regions, thus constituting a complex class 1 integron. Accordingly, the first variable region consisted of dfrA12-orfF-aadA2, and was followed by the qacEΔ1 and sul1 tandem; the latter were continued by the first copy of ISCR1 interrupting the gene dsbC, along with trpF, ble, blaNDM-1 (in reverse direction) and ΔISAba125. This IS was truncated by the insertion of a second ISCR1 followed by the genes qnrA1-cmlA1 and another copy of qacEΔ1-sul1. BLASTn analysis of this structure yielded only partial matches, suggesting that this constitutes a novel genetic environment for blaNDM-1.
Downstream this complex class 1 integron, Tn8710 carried other mobile elements, including IS5075-like in reverse orientation associated with the chrA gene, and IS6100 followed by the macrolide resistance gene mph(A) and its regulators mphR(A) and mrx. Further downstream we detected Tn4352, formed by two copies of IS26 flanking the kanamycin and neomycin resistance gene aphA1.
Overall, the whole resistance island encompassed multiple genes conferring resistance to several antibiotics, including β-lactams (blaNDM-1), quinolones (qnrA1), aminoglycosides (aadA2, aphA1), trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole (dfrA1 and sul1), chloramphenicol (catA1, cmlA1) and macrolides [mph(A)-mphR(A)-mrx]; moreover, this island also harbored resistance determinants to other antimicrobial compounds such as mercury (mer operon), quaternary ammonium (qacEΔ1) and bleomycin (ble).

3. Discussion

The success of NDM enzymes (in terms of global widespread) seems to be associated with the intracellular localization of these MBLs. In this regard, contrary to other soluble periplasmic metallo-β-lactamases, NDM is a lipoprotein that remains anchored to the inner leaflet of the outer membrane in Gram negative bacteria [25]. This peculiar localization serves two distinct functions; on the one hand, it prevents apo-enzymes (i.e., Zn2+-devoid NDM) from being degraded since soluble variants of NDM are less stable. On the other hand, another benefit of being anchored to the outer membrane is the secretion of NDM in outer membrane vesicles (OMV), which in turn, relieves the stress in the periplasmic space [26], and protects these enzymes against extracellular proteases and chelating agents [27]. Furthermore, these NDM-containing OMV can also alter the antimicrobial resistance profile of other bacterial populations [28].
Previous studies have suggested that the production of class B β-lactamases entailed a fitness reduction in S. enterica, which in turn could alter the ability of this microorganism to colonize the human gut; such biological cost could also explain the low frequency of MBL-producing Salmonella isolates [29]. Nevertheless, Lopez et al. argued that NDM enzymes appear to be molded by evolution to avoid imposing a biological cost on their microbial hosts, thus resulting in a rapid and widespread dissemination of these MBLs [26]. Furthermore, several authors have pointed out that blaNDM-harboring plasmids are stably maintained even in absence of selective pressure (i.e., antibiotics) [30,31].
Although NDM-producing Salmonella enterica isolates have already been reported [32,33,34], the presence of blaNDM-1 in S. enteritidis is exceptional. Interestingly, Beukers et al. described the dissemination of a blaNDM-1-carrying plasmid among different isolates of different Enterobacteriaceae species (including an isolate of S. enteritidis); nevertheless, the authors were unable to obtain the susceptible receptor isolate (prior to the acquisition of the resistance plasmid) or to disclose the prescribed antibiotics that resulted in the selection or co-selection of such resistant microorganisms [34]. One of the strengths of our work is that it documents, step-by-step, the different factors, including the various selection and co-selection processes that may have ultimately led to the emergence of the carbapenem resistant SEn_T2 strain. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, this is also the first report of an NDM-1-producing S. Enteritidis isolate in the Americas.
As previously stated, numerous plasmid incompatibility groups have been associated with blaNDM genes in Enterobacterales, including type 1 and 2 IncC plasmids [35]; besides having a broad host range, these mobile genetic elements have been frequently associated with the dissemination of resistance genes within Enterobacterales [36]. In this context, the 122.8 kb backbone of plasmid pIncCSEn was slightly shorter than similar plasmids previously reported by our group [37], however it harbored the necessary genes for plasmid replication, conjugal transfer and partitioning. Among the typical IncC features, pIncCSEn lacked dcm1, probably on account of an ARI-B-related deletion, an event already described with no deleterious consequences for the plasmid [35]. Another absent element was the rhs gene, a common ARI-A insertion site. However, its absence does not appear to be detrimental to the plasmid, as it constitutes a hotspot for the insertion of resistance islands. Additionally, partial rhs deletions have been previously reported in type-1 IncC plasmids without adverse effects [38]. In the case of pIncCSEn, the resistance island was inserted upstream of the integrase/recombinase gene xerD, also defined as a hotspot for antibiotic resistance island site in type 2 IncC plasmids [35].
Almost every blaNDM-carrying IncC plasmid described so far belongs either to ST1 or ST3 in the pMLST scheme [10], however, pIncCSEn could not be assigned to a specific sequence type on account of variations in genes parB2 and repA4. This, in conjunction with the absence of rhs2 suggests that pIncCSEn (along with pEC8791 and pEc61B) could belong to a new sub-lineage of IncC plasmids. However, more studies are required to corroborate such a statement.
The blaNDM-1 gene present in pIncCSEn, was embedded in a multidrug resistance island, consisting of a novel Tn21-derived transposon designated Tn7810. The Tn21-family has classically been involved in the accumulation and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes [24]. On the other hand, blaNDM has been found associated with a variety of genetic contexts, which usually involve diverse genetic elements such as insertion sequences and composite transposons. This gene has been found associated with the ISCR1 element, mainly as part of complex class 1 integrons, along with other antibiotic resistance genes, as those described in this work [39]. In this regard, the complex class 1 integron harboring blaNDM-1 described in the present study, constitutes a novel genetic arrangement which includes dfrA12-aadA2, qnrA1, cmlA1 and sul1 in a single platform. Noticeably, this resistance island contains resistance genes to all the usually prescribed antibiotics for invasive non-typhoidal salmonellosis, i.e., ampicillin, third-generation cephalosporins (blaNDM-1), fluoroquinolones (qnrA1), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (dfrA12, sul1), chloramphenicol (catA1, cmlA1), and azithromycin [mph(A)] [40].
The Tn21-terminal inverted repeats in Tn7810 were interrupted by IS4321R. This insertion sequence, along with IS4321L and IS5075, is usually found inserted in the same position within Tn21-family transposons, impairing their capability for mobilization [41]. However, the excision of IS4321 may restore the inverted repeats, allowing the Tn21 transposition [42]. On the other hand, besides this Tn21-derived structure, other putative composite transposons were detected, flanked by homologous or identical insertion sequences such as IS4321R and IS5075, or IS26 and IS6100. These elements may be able to mobilize blaNDM-1 and other antibiotic resistance genes by forming cointegrates, promoting multiple gene transfer and co-selection [39]. The complex structure displayed by Tn7810 makes it difficult to trace the probable genetic events that originated such genetic element; in this regard, blaNDM-1 was probably mobilized by a transposon along with ISAba125 and then “captured” by the complex class 1 integron, in association with ISCR1. Other events probably involved the insertion of IS4321R in the Tn21 terminal repeats, and the acquisition of other insertion sequences or composite transposons.
Finally, the detection of an NDM-1-producing S. Enteritidis in the Americas highlights the ongoing evolution of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacterales. Our findings reveal a probably new IncC sub-lineage carrying blaNDM-1 within a novel Tn21-derived transposon, emphasizing the role of mobile genetic elements in resistance dissemination.
The detailed reconstruction of selection and co-selection events, fueled by usage of critically important antibiotics, provides key insights into the stability and spread of blaNDM-1, thus reinforcing the need for improved antimicrobial stewardship, and continuous genomic surveillance to track and mitigate the expansion of carbapenem resistance, and antimicrobial resistance in general. Additionally, this case took place during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period marked by significant strain on healthcare systems. Among several contributing factors, the increased workload of infection control teams (focused primarily on limiting the spread of COVID-19 within medical facilities) led to a reduced attention to the prevention and surveillance of other infectious diseases [43]. For instance, although the patient received controlled feeding during an extended hospital stay, and bearing in mind that no other cases were detected during the same period, it is plausible that the source of his hospital-acquired salmonellosis was the introduction of contaminated food or snacks, potentially brought in by relatives or visitors following the patient’s transfer to a moderate care unit.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patient

The patient was a 78-year-old male admitted to a moderate-care setting with diagnosis of COVID-19. Clinical data were collected retrospectively by reviewing the medical records. The patient signed an informed consent allowing access to such data.

4.2. Strains, Identification, and Antibiotic Susceptibility

Bacterial identification was performed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Antibiotic susceptibility was determined using the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France).
Phenotypic detection of metallo-β-lactamases, class A carbapenemases and extended-spectrum β-lactamases were performed by double-disk synergy tests (DDST) with the corresponding combination of antimicrobial agents and specific inhibitor disks [44]. Minimum inhibitory concentration assays were carried out and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines [45]. Carbapenemase genes and plasmid mediated quinolone resistance genes were sought by PCR as previously described [11].

4.3. Plasmid Transfer

Plasmid transfer was assessed by conjugation assays, using E. coli J53-2 (pro met Rifr Nalr) as recipient. Briefly, log-phase LB broth cultures of recipient and donor strains were mixed in a 10:1 ratio and then incubated statically overnight at 37 °C [46]. Transconjugants were selected on Luria-Bertani agar plates supplemented with ceftazidime (2 µg/mL) and rifampicin (150 µg/mL), and transfer of blaNDM and qnrA was verified by PCR [11] Conjugation frequencies were determined according to Rozwandowicz M et al. [47].

4.4. Whole Genome Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted with the NZY microbial gDNA Isolation kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions (NZYTech Genes & Enzymes, Lisbon, Portugal). DNA quality was assessed using a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, Wilmington, DE, USA), and later quantified with Qubit® 3.0 fluorometer and the dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Illumina libraries were prepared with the Nextera XT kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and later sequenced using an Illumina MiniSeq device with a MiniSeq High-output reagent kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and a 2 × 151 bp paired-end strategy. Conversely, Nanopore libraries were prepared using the Rapid Sequencing Kit-SQK-RAD004, following the manufacturer’s instructions; libraries were later loaded onto R.9.4.1 flow cells (FLOMIN106) and sequenced (singleplex) for 10 h on a MinION Mk1B device (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). Basecalling was performed with the standalone Guppy version 6.5.7 (https://community.nanoporetech.com) using the high-accuracy model.

4.5. Genome Assembly

We obtained 1,998,218 Illumina reads for strain Sen_T1 (296 Mb, Cov 62,8), and 1,265,878 reads for strain Sen_T2 (183 Mb, Cov 37,5), with a Q30 = 92.2. Illumina reads were then filtered with the Fastp software v0.23.2 [48]. On the other hand, we obtained Nanopore reads equivalent to 3,2 Gb bases, with a depth ≈ 300X, for both strains, (mean read quality 7,92 (SEn_T1), and 13.2 (SEn_T2)). Accordingly, Nanopore reads were filtered using Filtlong v0.2.1 (https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong, accessed on 1 November 2023), to remove reads <1000 bp and reads with a mean quality score <95. Genome hybrid assembly (using short and long reads) was carried out using the Trycycler software v0.5.3 along with Flye v2.9-b1768, Canu v2.2, Raven v1.8.1 and Unicycler v0.5.0 for subsample assembly [49,50,51,52]. The assembled consensus genomes were first polished with Medaka v1.6.1 (https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka, accessed on 16 June 2024) and later with Polypolish v0.5.0 [53].

4.6. In Silico Analysis

Serotype prediction of Salmonella enterica isolates was done in silico with SeqSero2 v1.3.1 pipeline using the corresponding genome assemblies [54]; furthermore, the results were double checked by tetra correlation search using the JSpeciesWS web service (https://jspecies.ribohost.com/jspeciesws/#analyse, accessed on 16 June 2024). On the other hand, prediction of antimicrobial resistance genes was carried out using the AMRFinderPlus software v3.11.18, with default parameters [55], whereas mobile genetic elements (i.e., plasmids) were detected with ABRicate v1.01 using the PlasmidFinder database (selection criteria-minimum coverage: 70%, minimum identity: 70%) (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate, accessed on 1 November 2023). Multilocus sequence-typing for both S. enterica isolates and the E. cloacae strain, and pMLST were predicted with the MLST 2.0 (https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/MLST/, accessed on 16 June 2024) and the pMLST 2.0 suites, respectively (https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/pMLST/, accessed on 16 June 2024). Furthermore, wgMLST profiles for both Salmonella enterica isolates were obtained using the Enterobase v1.2.0 suite (https://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/species/index/senterica, accessed on 11 June 2025); in this sense, long and short fastq reads of both isolates were uploaded onto and assembled using the Enterobase webpage, and profiled using a 21,056-loci scheme. Conversely, genome annotation and plasmid annotation using the RAST 2.0 webpage [56] and manually curated with the Artemis software [57]. Finally, identification of putative orthologs and pangenome analysis was performed with the Roary v.3.11.2 package [58], whereas mutation assessment (i.e., detection of SNPs and/or insertions/deletions) was carried out with the breseq/gdtools v0.38.1 pipeline, using the default parameters [59].
Comparisons with nucleotide sequences available in public databases were performed with BLASTn v2.16.0 (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 15 July 2024), and physical maps were generated using EasyFig 2.1 and the Proksee-Genome Analysis web tool (https://proksee.ca/).
Raw Fastq sequences were deposited in Genbank under Bioproject accession number PRJNA950342.

4.7. Phylogenetic Analysis

Nucleotide sequences of genes repA, parA, parB and locus A053 were extracted, and conjoined, from plasmids publicly available online. Sequence alignment, and dendrogram were performed with MEGA X [60]. In this regard, the evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method, with a 500-replicate bootstrap test [61,62]; the evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method considering the number of base substitutions per site [63].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.F.C. and R.V.; methodology, N.F.C., I.B., M.N.C. and R.V.; software, N.F.C. and G.T.; validation, R.P.-E. and I.B.; formal analysis, N.F.C. and G.T.; investigation, N.F.C., M.L., P.H., M.N.C., M.L.-V., A.O., V.G.-F. and L.C.; resources, C.M., R.V., P.H., M.L. and L.C.; data curation, N.F.C., G.T., M.N.C. and M.L.-V.; writing—original draft preparation, N.F.C., R.V., R.P.-E., V.G.-F., I.B., A.O., M.L. and L.C.; writing—review and editing, N.F.C., I.B., R.V., R.P.-E. and C.M.; visualization, V.G.-F., R.P.-E. and N.F.C.; supervision, R.V. and C.M.; project administration, R.V. and C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Since no additional interventions were performed in the study or patient treatment and the patient’s anonymity was maintained at all times, ethical review and approval for this study were waived.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from the patient involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Raw Fastq sequence are openly available in Genbank under Bioproject accession number PRJNA950342 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA950342/ (accessed on 16 June 2024)), and in Enterobase with the same accession number (https://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/species/index/senterica (accessed on 16 June 2024)).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andino, A.; Hanning, I. Salmonella Enterica: Survival, Colonization, and Virulence Differences among Serovars. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 520179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shane, A.L.; Mody, R.K.; Crump, J.A.; Tarr, P.I.; Steiner, T.S.; Kotloff, K.; Langley, J.M.; Wanke, C.; Warren, C.A.; Cheng, A.C.; et al. 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Infectious Diarrhea. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 65, e45–e80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Medalla, F.; Gu, W.; Mahon, B.E.; Judd, M.; Folster, J.; Griffin, P.M.; Hoekstra, R.M. Estimated Incidence of Antimicrobial Drug–Resistant Nontyphoidal Salmonella Infections, United States, 2004–2012. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016, 23, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Coppola, N.; Freire, B.; Umpiérrez, A.; Cordeiro, N.F.; Ávila, P.; Trenchi, G.; Castro, G.; Casaux, M.L.; Fraga, M.; Zunino, P.; et al. Transferable Resistance to Highest Priority Critically Important Antibiotics for Human Health in Escherichia Coli Strains Obtained From Livestock Feces in Uruguay. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 588919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cordeiro, N.F.; Nabón, A.; García-Fulgueiras, V.; Álvez, M.; Sirok, A.; Camou, T.; Vignoli, R. Analysis of Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone and Oxyimino-Cephalosporin Resistance Mechanisms in Uruguayan Salmonella Enterica Isolates from 2011–2013. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2016, 6, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Casaux, M.L.; D’Alessandro, B.; Vignoli, R.; Fraga, M. Phenotypic and Genotypic Survey of Antibiotic Resistance in Salmonella Enterica Isolates from Dairy Farms in Uruguay. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1055432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. World Organisation for Animal Health. Eighth Annual Report on Antimicrobial Agents Intended for Use in Animals; World Organisation for Animal Health: Paris, France, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mthembu, T.P.; Zishiri, O.T.; El Zowalaty, M.E. Genomic Characterization of Antimicrobial Resistance in Food Chain and Livestock-Associated Salmonella Species. Animals 2021, 11, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dortet, L.; Poirel, L.; Nordmann, P. Worldwide Dissemination of the NDM-Type Carbapenemases in Gram-Negative Bacteria. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 249856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, W.; Feng, Y.; Tang, G.; Qiao, F.; McNally, A.; Zong, Z. NDM Metallo-β-Lactamases and Their Bacterial Producers in Health Care Settings. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00115–e00118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Papa-Ezdra, R.; Caiata, L.; Palacio, R.; Outeda, M.; Cabezas, L.; Bálsamo, A.; Vignoli, R.; Bado, I.; Seija, V. Prevalence and Molecular Characterisation of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales in an Outbreak-Free Setting in a Single Hospital in Uruguay. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 24, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sekizuka, T.; Inamine, Y.; Segawa, T.; Kuroda, M. Characterization of NDM-5- and CTX-M-55-Coproducing Escherichia coli GSH8M-2 Isolated from the Effluent of a Wastewater Treatment Plant in Tokyo Bay. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 2243–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Walsh, T.R.; Weeks, J.; Livermore, D.M.; Toleman, M.A. Dissemination of NDM-1 Positive Bacteria in the New Delhi Environment and Its Implications for Human Health: An Environmental Point Prevalence Study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2011, 11, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lincopan, N.; Fuentes-Castillo, D.; Espinoza-Muñoz, M.; Gonzales-Zubiate, F.; Gonzales-Escalante, E.; Maturrano, L.; Vignoli, R.; Di Conza, J.; Gutkind, G. WHO Critical Priority Escherichia Coli in Latin America: A One Health Challenge for a Post-Pandemic World. In Trending Topics in Escherichia coli Research; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  15. Köck, R.; Daniels-Haardt, I.; Becker, K.; Mellmann, A.; Friedrich, A.W.; Mevius, D.; Schwarz, S.; Jurke, A. Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Wildlife, Food-Producing, and Companion Animals: A Systematic Review. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24, 1241–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, X.; Geng, S.; Chan, E.W.-C.; Chen, S. Increased Prevalence of Escherichia Coli Strains from Food Carrying BlaNDM and Mcr-1-Bearing Plasmids That Structurally Resemble Those of Clinical Strains, China, 2015 to 2017. Eurosurveillance 2019, 24, 1800113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Briet, A.; Helsens, N.; Delannoy, S.; Debuiche, S.; Brisabois, A.; Midelet, G.; Granier, S.A. NDM-1-Producing Vibrio Parahaemolyticus Isolated from Imported Seafood. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 2578–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zeng, Z.; Lei, L.; Li, L.; Hua, S.; Li, W.; Zhang, L.; Lin, Q.; Zheng, Z.; Yang, J.; Dou, X.; et al. In Silico Characterization of BlaNDM-Harboring Plasmids in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1008905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ambrose, S.J.; Harmer, C.J.; Hall, R.M. Evolution and Typing of IncC Plasmids Contributing to Antibiotic Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Plasmid 2018, 99, 40–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Lei, C.-W.; Chen, X.; Yao, T.-G.; Yu, J.-W.; Hu, W.-L.; Mao, X.; Wang, H.-N. Characterization of IncC Plasmids in Enterobacterales of Food-Producing Animals Originating from China. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 580960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Romina, P.-E.; Lucía, A.; Leticia, C.; Federica, F.; Pablo, Á.; Verónica, S.; Antonio, G.; Inés, B.; Rafael, V. In Vitro Effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Combination with Aztreonam on Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2023, 35, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schürch, A.C.; Arredondo-Alonso, S.; Willems, R.J.L.; Goering, R.V. Whole Genome Sequencing Options for Bacterial Strain Typing and Epidemiologic Analysis Based on Single Nucleotide Polymorphism versus Gene-by-Gene–Based Approaches. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24, 350–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Grant, J.R.; Enns, E.; Marinier, E.; Mandal, A.; Herman, E.K.; Chen, C.; Graham, M.; Van Domselaar, G.; Stothard, P. Proksee: In-Depth Characterization and Visualization of Bacterial Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W484–W492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liebert, C.A.; Hall, R.M.; Summers, A.O. Transposon Tn21, Flagship of the Floating Genome. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999, 63, 507–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. González, L.J.; Bahr, G.; Nakashige, T.G.; Nolan, E.M.; Bonomo, R.A.; Vila, A.J. Membrane Anchoring Stabilizes and Favors Secretion of New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016, 12, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. López, C.; Ayala, J.A.; Bonomo, R.A.; González, L.J.; Vila, A.J. Protein Determinants of Dissemination and Host Specificity of Metallo-β-Lactamases. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pasteran, F.; Gonzalez, L.J.; Albornoz, E.; Bahr, G.; Vila, A.J.; Corso, A. Triton Hodge Test: Improved Protocol for Modified Hodge Test for Enhanced Detection of NDM and Other Carbapenemase Producers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 640–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yoon, H. Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles as a Delivery System for Virulence Regulation. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 26, 1343–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cordeiro, N.F.; Chabalgoity, J.A.; Yim, L.; Vignoli, R. Synthesis of Metallo-β-Lactamase VIM-2 Is Associated with a Fitness Reduction in Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 6528–6535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Paul, D.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Bhattacharjee, D.; Dhar, D.; Maurya, A.P.; Chakravarty, A. Transcriptional Analysis of Bla NDM-1 and Copy Number Alteration under Carbapenem Stress. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2017, 6, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hadziabdic, S.; Fischer, J.; Borowiak, M.; Malorny, B.; Juraschek, K.; Kaesbohrer, A.; Guerra, B.; Deneke, C.; Gonzalez-Zorn, B.; Szabo, I. The BlaNDM-1-Carrying IncA/C2 Plasmid Underlies Structural Alterations and Cointegrate Formation In Vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e00380-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Mei, C.-Y.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Zhong, F.-G.; Zhang, X.-X.; Lv, L.-C.; Lu, M.-J.; Wu, H.; Jiao, X. Characterization of an Extensively Drug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Indiana Strain Harboring Chromosomal BlaNDM-9 in China. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 2015–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, Y.; Ma, X.; Zeng, S.; Fu, L.; Xu, H.; Li, X. Emergence of a Salmonella Rissen ST469 Clinical Isolate Carrying BlaNDM-13 in China. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 936649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Beukers, A.G.; John, M.A.; Davis, R.; Lee, A.; van Hal, S.J. Hospital Outbreak of New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase Type-1 (NDM-1) in Salmonella Enterica with Inter-Species Plasmid Transmission. J. Hosp. Infect. 2021, 117, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Harmer, C.J.; Hall, R.M. The A to Z of A/C Plasmids. Plasmid 2015, 80, 63–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sarkar, A.; Pazhani, G.P.; Chowdhury, G.; Ghosh, A.; Ramamurthy, T. Attributes of Carbapenemase Encoding Conjugative Plasmid PNDM-SAL from an Extensively Drug-Resistant Salmonella Enterica Serovar Senftenberg. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Papa-Ezdra, R.; Cordeiro, N.F.; Di Pilato, V.; Chiarelli, A.; Pallecchi, L.; Garcia-Fulgueiras, V.; Vignoli, R. Description of Novel Resistance Islands Harbouring BlaCTX-M-2 in IncC Type 2 Plasmids. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 26, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Harmer, C.J.; Hall, R.M. PRMH760, a Precursor of A/C2 Plasmids Carrying BlaCMY and BlaNDM Genes. Microb. Drug Resist. 2014, 20, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Acman, M.; Wang, R.; van Dorp, L.; Shaw, L.P.; Wang, Q.; Luhmann, N.; Yin, Y.; Sun, S.; Chen, H.; Wang, H.; et al. Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Global Dissemination of the Carbapenem Resistance Gene BlaNDM. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hajra, D.; Nair, A.V.; Chakravortty, D. Decoding the Invasive Nature of a Tropical Pathogen of Concern: The Invasive Non-Typhoidal Salmonella Strains Causing Host-Restricted Extraintestinal Infections Worldwide. Microbiol. Res. 2023, 277, 127488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Partridge, S.R.; Hall, R.M. The IS1111 Family Members IS4321 and IS5075 Have Subterminal Inverted Repeats and Target the Terminal Inverted Repeats of Tn21 Family Transposons. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 6371–6384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tijet, N.; Andres, P.; Chung, C.; Lucero, C.; Low, D.E.; Galas, M.; Corso, A.; Petroni, A.; Melano, R.G. RmtD2, a New Allele of a 16S RRNA Methylase Gene, Has Been Present in Enterobacteriaceae Isolates from Argentina for More than a Decade. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 904–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Thomas, G.R.; Corso, A.; Pasterán, F.; Shal, J.; Sosa, A.; Pillonetto, M.; de Souza Peral, R.T.; Hormazábal, J.C.; Araya, P.; Saavedra, S.Y.; et al. Increased Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales Bacteria in Latin America and the Caribbean during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2022, 28, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Martinez-Martinez, L.; Cantón Spain, R.; Stefani, S.; Skov, R.; Glupczynski, Y.; Nordmann, P.; Wootton, M.; Miriagou, V.; Skov Simonsen, G. EUCAST Guidelines for Detection of Resistance Mechanisms and Specific Resistances of Clinical and/or Epidemiological Importance; EUCAST: Växjö, Sweden, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  45. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2023; Volume 33, ISBN 0956-4624. [Google Scholar]
  46. Shin, S.Y.; Kwon, K.C.; Park, J.W.; Song, J.H.; Ko, Y.H.; Sung, J.Y.; Shin, H.W.; Koo, S.H. Characteristics of Aac(6′)-Ib-Cr Gene in Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Chungnam Area. Ann. Lab. Med. 2009, 29, 541–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rozwandowicz, M.; Brouwer, M.S.M.; Mughini-Gras, L.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Gonzalez-Zorn, B.; Mevius, D.J.; Hordijk, J. Successful Host Adaptation of IncK2 Plasmids. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. Fastp: An Ultra-Fast All-in-One FASTQ Preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i884–i890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Cerdeira, L.T.; Hawkey, J.; Méric, G.; Vezina, B.; Wyres, K.L.; Holt, K.E. Trycycler: Consensus Long-Read Assemblies for Bacterial Genomes. Genome Biol. 2021, 22, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Gorrie, C.L.; Holt, K.E. Unicycler: Resolving Bacterial Genome Assemblies from Short and Long Sequencing Reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kolmogorov, M.; Yuan, J.; Lin, Y.; Pevzner, P.A. Assembly of Long, Error-Prone Reads Using Repeat Graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vaser, R.; Šikić, M. Time- and Memory-Efficient Genome Assembly with Raven. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2021, 1, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wick, R.R.; Holt, K.E. Polypolish: Short-Read Polishing of Long-Read Bacterial Genome Assemblies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2022, 18, e1009802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, S.; den Bakker, H.C.; Li, S.; Chen, J.; Dinsmore, B.A.; Lane, C.; Lauer, A.C.; Fields, P.I.; Deng, X. SeqSero2: Rapid and Improved Salmonella Serotype Determination Using Whole-Genome Sequencing Data. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e01746-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Feldgarden, M.; Brover, V.; Gonzalez-Escalona, N.; Frye, J.G.; Haendiges, J.; Haft, D.H.; Hoffmann, M.; Pettengill, J.B.; Prasad, A.B.; Tillman, G.E.; et al. AMRFinderPlus and the Reference Gene Catalog Facilitate Examination of the Genomic Links among Antimicrobial Resistance, Stress Response, and Virulence. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations Using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Carver, T.; Harris, S.R.; Berriman, M.; Parkhill, J.; McQuillan, J.A. Artemis: An Integrated Platform for Visualization and Analysis of High-Throughput Sequence-Based Experimental Data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Page, A.J.; Cummins, C.A.; Hunt, M.; Wong, V.K.; Reuter, S.; Holden, M.T.G.; Fookes, M.; Falush, D.; Keane, J.A.; Parkhill, J. Roary: Rapid Large-Scale Prokaryote Pan Genome Analysis. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3691–3693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Deatherage, D.E.; Barrick, J.E. Identification of Mutations in Laboratory-Evolved Microbes from Next-Generation Sequencing Data Using Breseq. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1151, 165–188. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Felsenstein, J. Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The Neighbor-Joining Method: A New Method for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tamura, K.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. Prospects for Inferring Very Large Phylogenies by Using the Neighbor-Joining Method. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 11030–11035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Nucleotide Identity analysis of type 2 IncC plasmids. The innermost circle corresponds to pIncCSEn. The different features are depicted in their corresponding DNA strand (violet arrows: CDS; cyan blocks: repeat regions; magenta blocks: miscellaneous features; orange blocks: miscellaneous RNA). The remaining plasmids are depicted as concentric circles. Filled blocks correspond to regions of homology. The image was generated using the Proksee webpage (https://proksee.ca/) [23].
Figure 1. Nucleotide Identity analysis of type 2 IncC plasmids. The innermost circle corresponds to pIncCSEn. The different features are depicted in their corresponding DNA strand (violet arrows: CDS; cyan blocks: repeat regions; magenta blocks: miscellaneous features; orange blocks: miscellaneous RNA). The remaining plasmids are depicted as concentric circles. Filled blocks correspond to regions of homology. The image was generated using the Proksee webpage (https://proksee.ca/) [23].
Antibiotics 14 00620 g001
Figure 2. Evolutionary relationships of IncC plasmids. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) are shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The blue-shaded box corresponds to type-1 IncC plasmids, the green-shaded box corresponds to type-2 IncC plasmids, and the yellow-shaded box corresponds to a putative sub-lineage of IncC plasmids (the star indicates the plasmid described in this work).
Figure 2. Evolutionary relationships of IncC plasmids. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) are shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The blue-shaded box corresponds to type-1 IncC plasmids, the green-shaded box corresponds to type-2 IncC plasmids, and the yellow-shaded box corresponds to a putative sub-lineage of IncC plasmids (the star indicates the plasmid described in this work).
Antibiotics 14 00620 g002
Figure 3. Linear map of ARI-A in pIncCSEn, compared with the original structure of Tn21. Homologous segments are shown as grey blocks as indicated in the reference.
Figure 3. Linear map of ARI-A in pIncCSEn, compared with the original structure of Tn21. Homologous segments are shown as grey blocks as indicated in the reference.
Antibiotics 14 00620 g003
Table 1. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (in mg/L) and its interpretation according to CLSI 2023 (33rd Edition) breakpoints, for clinical strains, transconjugants and receptor strain.
Table 1. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (in mg/L) and its interpretation according to CLSI 2023 (33rd Edition) breakpoints, for clinical strains, transconjugants and receptor strain.
E. cloacae Eclo_NDMS. enteritidis SEn_1S. enteritidis SEn_2E. coli TcEclo_NDME. coli TcSEn_2E. coli
J53-2
Ampicillin-Sulbactam-≤2 (S)≥32 (R)≥32 (R)≥32 (R)≤2 (S)
Piperacillin-Tazobactam≥128 (R)≤4 (S)64 (R)≥128 (R)≥128 (R)≤4 (S)
Ceftazidime≥64 (R)0.25 (S)≥64 (R)≥64 (R)≥64 (R)0.5 (S)
Ceftazidime-Tazobactam≥16 (R)≤0.12 (S)≥16 (R)≥16 (R)≥16 (R)≤0.12 (S)
Ceftolozane-Tazobactam≥32 (R)≤0.25 (S)16 (R)≥32 (R)≥32 (R)≤0.25 (S)
Cefepime≥32 (R)≤0.12 (S)16 (R)0.5 (S)0.5 (S)≤0.12 (S)
Aztreonam≥64 (R)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)
Ertapenem≥8 (R)≤0.12 (S)≥8 (R)≥8 (R)≥8 (R)≤0.12 (S)
Imipenem8 (R)≤0.25 (S)8 (R)8 (R)4 (R)≤0.25 (S)
Meropenem≥16 (R)≤0.25 (S)≥16 (R)8 (R)8 (R)≤0.25 (S)
Amikacin≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)
Ciprofloxacin≥4 (R)≤0.06 (S)0.25 (I)0.5 (I)0.5 (I)≤0.06 (S)
R, resistant; S, susceptible; I, intermediate.
Table 2. Data of the microorganisms discussed in this work.
Table 2. Data of the microorganisms discussed in this work.
Eclo_NDMSEn_T1SEn_T2
AMR genesaadA2, aph(3)-Ia, sul1, sul2, dfrA12, qnrA1, qacE∆1, catA1, cmlA1, blaNDM-1fosA, blaACT-7,aac(6)-IaaaadA2, aph(3)-Ia, sul1, sul2, dfrA12, qnrA1, qacE∆1, catA1, cmlA1, blaNDM-1aac(6)-Iaa,
Plasmid incompatibility groupsIncC, IncFIB, IncRIncFIBIncC, IncFIB
MLSTST146ST11ST11
wgMLSTNAST733989ST733988
pMLSTIncFIB:ST NT
IncC: ST3,9 *
IncFIB: ST_22IncFIB: ST_22
IncC: ST3,9 *
SerovarNAEnteritidisEnteritidis
* Both IncC plasmids show identical point mutations in genes parB2 and repA4; numbers indicate the nearest ST matches. NT: Not typeable. NA: Not applicable.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cordeiro, N.F.; Papa-Ezdra, R.; Traglia, G.; Bado, I.; García-Fulgueiras, V.; Cortinas, M.N.; Caiata, L.; López-Vega, M.; Otero, A.; López, M.; et al. First Report in the Americas of S. enterica Var. Enteritidis Carrying blaNDM-1 in a Putatively New Sub-Lineage of IncC2 Plasmids. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060620

AMA Style

Cordeiro NF, Papa-Ezdra R, Traglia G, Bado I, García-Fulgueiras V, Cortinas MN, Caiata L, López-Vega M, Otero A, López M, et al. First Report in the Americas of S. enterica Var. Enteritidis Carrying blaNDM-1 in a Putatively New Sub-Lineage of IncC2 Plasmids. Antibiotics. 2025; 14(6):620. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060620

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cordeiro, Nicolás F., Romina Papa-Ezdra, Germán Traglia, Inés Bado, Virginia García-Fulgueiras, María N. Cortinas, Leticia Caiata, Mariana López-Vega, Ana Otero, Martín López, and et al. 2025. "First Report in the Americas of S. enterica Var. Enteritidis Carrying blaNDM-1 in a Putatively New Sub-Lineage of IncC2 Plasmids" Antibiotics 14, no. 6: 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060620

APA Style

Cordeiro, N. F., Papa-Ezdra, R., Traglia, G., Bado, I., García-Fulgueiras, V., Cortinas, M. N., Caiata, L., López-Vega, M., Otero, A., López, M., Hitateguy, P., Mogdasy, C., & Vignoli, R. (2025). First Report in the Americas of S. enterica Var. Enteritidis Carrying blaNDM-1 in a Putatively New Sub-Lineage of IncC2 Plasmids. Antibiotics, 14(6), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060620

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop