Next Article in Journal
Triple-Antibiotic Combination Exerts Effective Activity against Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis Biofilm and Airway Infection in an In Vivo Murine Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Antifungal Activity of Aniba canelilla (Kunth) Mez Essential Oil and Its Main Compound 1-Nitro-2-Phenylethane against Dermatophytes
Previous Article in Journal
Combinations of Cannabinoids with Silver Salts or Silver Nanoparticles for Synergistic Antibiotic Effects against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Linalool Reduces Virulence and Tolerance to Adverse Conditions of Listeria monocytogenes

CICS-UBI Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Avenida Infante D. Henrique, 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2024, 13(6), 474; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13060474
Submission received: 5 April 2024 / Revised: 17 May 2024 / Accepted: 19 May 2024 / Published: 22 May 2024

Abstract

:
Listeria monocytogenes, a foodborne pathogen causing listeriosis, poses substantial societal, economic, and public health challenges due to its resistance, persistence, and biofilm formation in the food industry. Exploring subinhibitory concentrations of compounds to target virulence inhibition and increase susceptibility to adverse conditions presents a promising strategy to mitigate its impact of L. monocytogenes and unveils new potential applications. Thus, this study aims to explore the effect of linalool on virulence factors of L. monocytogenes and potential use in the reduction in its tolerance to stressful conditions. This action was analysed considering the use of two sub-inhibitory concentrations of linalool, 0.312 and 0.625 mg/mL. We found that even with the lowest tested concentrations, a 65% inhibition of violacein production by Chromobacterium violaceum, 55% inhibition in biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes and 62% reduction on haemolysis caused by this bacterium were observed. In addition to its impact on virulence factors, linalool diminished the tolerance to osmotic stress (up to 4.3 log reduction after 24 h with 12% NaCl), as well as to high (up to 3.8 log reduction after 15 min at 55 °C) and low temperatures (up to 4.6 log reduction after 84 days with 12% NaCl at 4 °C). Thus, this study paves the way to further investigation into the potential utilization of linalool to mitigate the threat posed by L. monocytogenes in the field of food safety and public health.

1. Introduction

Foodborne diseases bring social, economic, and public health burden [1], with Listeria monocytogenes being one of these foodborne pathogens associated with human and animal diseases [2,3,4]. This bacterium causes listeriosis that has high impact in health of immunocompromised, elderly people and pregnant women. Severe infection can cause septicemia, meningitis, endocarditis and spontaneous abortion [5,6], leading to a high hospitalization and mortality rate [7,8]. This pathogen can survive adverse conditions, such as temperatures up to 45 °C, low pH, and high salt concentration and can proliferate at 4 °C [9,10,11]. These capabilities to survive in such conditions along with the various virulence factors, such as biofilm-forming capacity, motility and listeriolysin O [3,12] makes it a problem for the food industry and public health.
The use of natural compounds in the food industry has been highlighted, both to mitigate the harmful effects of foodborne diseases or in food preservation. In this context, they have been studied for their antimicrobial or even anti-virulence properties as alternatives to antibiotics, food preservatives or chemical disinfectants [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Various isolated compounds present in essential oils, herbs, and spices, such as carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, eugenol and thymol have already shown bactericidal and inhibitory effects on toxin production, quorum sensing, motility and biofilm formation against diverse pathogenic bacteria, including L. monocytogenes [13,15,24,25,26,27]. Although some natural compounds have been extensively investigated, there is still a lack of studies concerning their potential as anti-virulence agents or their ability to enhance susceptibility to adverse conditions. One of such compounds is the terpene alcohol, linalool (C10H18O, 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadien-3-ol), which is a component of various essential oils and is generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [28]. This compound has already a high value global production market, mainly due to its numerous applications in various sectors, such as in cosmetology, food industry, production of household products or pharmaceutical industry [29]. Additionally, linalool is known by its bioactive properties, such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticancer, neuroprotective, antidepressant, hepatoprotective and antimicrobial activities [29,30]. Among the described antimicrobial activities, linalool has already demonstrated efficacy against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as fungi. Furthermore, the ability to inhibit virulence factors such as quorum sensing and biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes, Acinetobacter baumannii or Candida albicans has been demonstrated [29,31,32,33]. Despite the properties and potential of linalool in food industry, its physical characteristics can represent certain challenges, mainly associated with its solubility, volatility, and interactions with other components commonly found in the food industry [29].
Considering the mentioned above, we aimed with this work to evaluate the anti-virulence properties of linalool, considering L. monocytogenes motility, biofilm-forming ability or haemolytic capacity. Additionally, the effect of linalool on the tolerance of this bacterium to stress conditions (temperature and osmotic) usually found in the food sector were further evaluated.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of Linalool on Listeria monocytogenes Growth

The use of sub-inhibitory concentrations of compounds, such as linalool in this case, is necessary for assessing anti-virulence properties while avoiding significant effects on bacterial growth. Thus, the effect of subinhibitory concentrations of linalool in L. monocytogenes growth was evaluated (Figure 1). The solvent control (DMSO) had no significant reduction compared to the growth control. A slight reduction in growth can be observed at 0.625 mg/mL of linalool after 6 h of incubation and for both concentrations at 24 h. Given the minimal reduction observed in growth, we followed the assays with these concentrations.

2.2. Inhibition of Quorum Sensing in the Biosensor Bacterium Chromobacterium violaceum, and Motility and Biofilm Formation of Listeria monocytogenes, in the Presence of Linalool

Using a biosensor bacterium for assessing the effect of linalool as a quorum-sensing inhibitor, both defined concentrations of linalool demonstrated relevant inhibition of violacein production and subsequently quorum-sensing inhibition. Thus, the concentrations of 0.625 and 0.312 mg/mL of linalool showed a violacein production inhibition of 77.1% (p < 0.0001) and 64.9% (p < 0.0001), respectively, as well as for cell density (p < 0.01). The solvent (DMSO) showed no significant inhibition when compared with the control (Figure 2).
An inhibitory effect of linalool on L. monocytogenes motility was also observed for the subinhibitory concentrations tested, resulting in a significant reduction in the motility diameter for 48 and 72 h of incubation, when compared to the control (Figure 3), albeit modest. Furthermore, a significant difference was observed at 48 h between both concentrations of linalool used, although no differences were observed at other time points.
When analysing the influence of subinhibitory concentrations of linalool on biofilm formation, a significant reduction in the adhesion of L. monocytogenes and, therefore, in biofilm formation can be observed when compared to the solvent control (Figure 4).

2.3. Study of the Haemolysis Capacity of Linalool in Humans’ Erythrocytes and Study of the Effect of Linalool in Haemolysis Induced by Listeria monocytogenes

Linalool showed low haemolytic activity against human erythrocytes at the subinhibitory concentrations studied in this work, with a maximum haemolysis of 10.1% at a concentration of 0.625 mg/mL (Figure 5).
Pre-exposure of L. monocytogenes to 0.312 and 0.625 mg/mL of linalool was shown to lead to a significant reduction in the haemolysis of humans’ erythrocytes potentially caused by the Listeriolysin O (LLO) of L. monocytogenes, found in the culture supernatant (Figure 6). The concentration of 0.625 mg/mL showed a significant difference by completely inhibiting the haemolysis of human’s erythrocytes (p < 0.00001). The 0.312 mg/mL concentration reduced haemolysis to 37.8% when compared to the total haemolysis of erythrocytes that occurs in the control.

2.4. Evaluation of the Effect of Linalool in the Tolerance to Adverse Conditions

When the tolerance to osmotic stress, in presence and absence of linalool, was tested, a significant decrease in survival of L. monocytogenes when in presence of 0.625 mg/mL and 0.312 mg/mL of linalool (Figure 7A) was observed. This behaviour contrasts from a 4.32 Log10 reduction in presence of 0.625 mg/mL of linalool to the one obtained for the control for which a Log10 reduction of 0.38 occurred.
When subjected to a high temperature of 55 °C, a significant decrease in survival of L. monocytogenes was observed when in presence of linalool comparing with the absence conditions, for all periods of incubation. The higher concentration of linalool had the most remarkable reduction in cell survival (Figure 7B). The lower concentration showed a significant reduction in cell viability but less noticeable in comparison to the previous concentration, ranging from a reduction in 2.02 log10 to 3.66 log10 from 15 to 45 min of incubation.
The cold temperature assays demonstrated a significant effect mainly of the 0.625 mg/mL concentration of linalool in the presence and absence of 12% NaCl at 4 °C (Figure 7C,D). There was also a difference between assays with and without NaCl. A significant decrease in the log count of L. monocytogenes from day 10 to 42 and at 84 days with the concentration of 0.625 mg/mL without NaCl and from day 14 onwards with 12% NaCl was observed.

3. Discussion

Natural compounds have shown in recent years to have noticeable antimicrobial and anti-virulence properties. Among these, linalool exhibits antimicrobial activity against a diversity of microorganisms and even anti-virulence properties, such as antibiofilm formation capacity [14,31,32,34].
Undoubtedly, L. monocytogenes continues to pose a significant public health threat due to its high mortality and hospitalization rates. This situation is exacerbated by the pathogen’s growing resistance to antimicrobial agents, in addition to its inherent resistance and adaptability to adverse environmental conditions encountered throughout food processing and storage, which allows it dissemination along the food chain [35,36]. In fact, the use of linalool has already been described due to its antilisterial properties [14,33,37,38]; however, these studies focused on evaluating its inhibitory activity rather than using subinhibitory concentrations of this compound to counteract the virulence traits or even modify the tolerance to stress conditions of this bacterium to other applications. Taking the above, deeper research about the anti-virulence properties and possible advantages of linalool against foodborne pathogens, such as L. monocytogenes is lacking.
Thus, this work focused on the potential impact of the natural compound, linalool, on the mitigation of virulence factors of L. monocytogenes, but also in the attenuation of tolerance to adverse conditions. For that, the subinhibitory concentrations of linalool of 0.625 mg/mL and 0.312 mg/mL were used, ensuring that the selected concentrations would not hinder growth, as confirmed by the growth curves assay (Figure 1).
Considering quorum sensing as a mechanism used by bacteria to coordinate communal behaviour and that can regulate bacterial population’s physiological features or even virulence factors, such as motility, biofilm formation, extracellular enzyme secretion amongst others [39,40,41], the effect of linalool on this communication process was assessed. C. violaceum is commonly used as a biosensor organism for studying quorum-sensing inhibition due to its sensitivity to quorum sensing signals and the ease of monitoring violacein production [41]. Based on the results, linalool appears to have an anti-quorum sensing activity, due to the strong inhibition of violacein production observed in linalool’s presence (Figure 2). In fact, this anti-quorum-sensing inhibition was previously suggested in other studies using C. violaceum as a biosensor, but also in P. aeruginosa [31,40]. Despite a certain amount of inhibition being associated with a reduction in cell density, the inhibition of violacein is not only associated with this trend. A possible explanation for this is the ability of linalool to downregulate violacein biosynthetic genes and of attenuating quorum sensing by controlling the cell density through cviI/R downregulation [41]. In turn, a two-hours exposure of L. monocytogenes to linalool led to an increase in the expression of genes participating in quorum sensing, thus activating this mechanism, while inhibiting motility and chemotaxis [37].
In line with the role of quorum sensing as a signalling mechanism in bacteria that is associated with the modulation of virulence mechanisms and pathogenicity, later in this study, motility and biofilm formation were investigated. These features were also considered as a key factor in the surface colonization, increased resistance to antimicrobial agents, survival and persistence of L. monocytogenes [42,43,44]. Consistent with findings in other bacteria, a decrease in L. monocytogenes motility was observed in the presence of linalool, which may be associated with a down-regulation of FliN by linalool treatment, which may hinder flagellar synthesis and motility [37]. A study has shown that Cinnamomum camphora essential oil, in which linalool is one of the main components, inhibited motility in C. violaceum [42], while isolated linalool inhibited swarming and swimming motility of Vibrio harveyi [45]. Likely associated with the observed inhibition of quorum sensing and motility, a significant inhibitory effect on L. monocytogenes biofilm formation was also found with both subinhibitory concentrations of linalool tested. This phenomenon aligns with findings in other microorganisms, such as Acinetobacter baumannii, Shigella flexneri, Candida albicans, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [31,46,47,48]. Moreover, previously, other study demonstrated that linalool at minimum inhibitory concentration could eradicate a 72-h-old L. monocytogenes’ biofilm. The authors propose that this eradication may be attributed to the formation hollows and holes in the biofilm by linalool, as well as a reduction in the biofilm thickness upon treatment with linalool [33]. In our work, the observed effect may be due to inhibition of energy acquisition pathways or action on specific targets or key enzymes [29,37,38], rather than structural biofilm modifications. This could potentially explain the lack of difference in effect between the two tested concentrations. The consistency between the results of this study and previous findings suggests the potential of linalool in inhibiting biofilm formation and reducing the persistence of L. monocytogenes in the food industry.
Associated with the pathogenicity of L. monocytogenes, is Listeriolysin O (LLO), a pH-dependent haemolysin. LLO facilitates internalization in phagosomes and erythrocytes, allowing the bacteria to escape through membrane rupture and release into the cytoplasm [49,50]. For this reason, LLO and haemolysis are key virulence factors of L. monocytogenes. Given that LLO activity may be detected through an in vitro haemolysis assay [51], we initiated with an assessment of linalool-induced haemolysis in erythrocytes, followed by an evaluation of the inhibition of haemolysis by pre-incubation of L. monocytogenes with linalool. Our research findings indicated that subinhibitory concentrations of linalool showed low haemolytic activity. However, a notable decrease in the haemolytic activity of L. monocytogenes was observed following pre-exposure to linalool, suggesting that it likely directly targets the LLO, thereby reducing the haemolytic activity of the bacterium, which will attenuate the impact of this virulence factor. Indeed, linalool have shown to act through different mechanisms and targeting different structures, such as cell membranes, cell walls, nucleoids, and ribosomes [14,33], being able to disrupt cellular function and lead to cell death by acting on the cell membrane, but also inhibiting pathways related with energy obtention, leading in turn to metabolic disfunctions and inhibition of key enzymes [29,37,38].
L. monocytogenes exhibits remarkable resilience, thriving in adverse conditions and adapt to environmental stress commonly encountered in food production or storage, such as temperature or osmotic stress. Therefore, we further assessed how linalool could affect the susceptibility of this bacterium to such adverse conditions. Heat treatment, a method commonly used in food processing to preserve and prevent contamination [47], has sometimes be shown ineffective due to the resistance of L. monocytogenes to temperatures above 45 °C [52]. Hence, we evaluated the impact of the subinhibitory concentrations of linalool on the bacterium’s tolerance to 55 °C for 45 min, noting a significant reduction in survival at all time points tested, indicating a potentiation of the effect of temperature on the L. monocytogenes. Considering that L. monocytogenes is a successful bacterium in adapting to stress conditions, having the capacity to thrive in environments containing on average 12 to 20% NaCl [53], its osmoadaptation in the presence of linalool was studied. It was found that in the presence of linalool, the strain became more susceptible to osmotic stress.
The ability of L. monocytogenes to survive and succeed at low temperatures is well described [54,55]. This growth ability at low temperatures for long period times was observed in this work, with this bacterium surviving to low temperatures and 12% of NaCl for at least 84 days, simulating long-term storage conditions relevant to certain environmental or industrial scenarios. Nonetheless, when in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of linalool, a reduction in growth or even increase in death was observed at a cold temperature or cold temperature and osmotic stress, respectively.
In fact, linalool showed the capacity to increase susceptibility to all the adverse conditions tested, which may be correlated to the capability of linalool to target cell membranes and walls [14,29] and thus acting synergistically with temperature and osmotic stresses, or influence the cell metabolism, targeting nucleoids and ribosomes [14] and thus making it harder for L. monocytogenes to adapt to the adverse conditions. The capacity of linalool to enhance the susceptibility of L. monocytogenes to various adverse conditions underscores the potential efficacy of linalool in preventing food contamination, in addition to its ability to reduce the virulence of this foodborne pathogen.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Linalool, Bacterial Strain and Growth Conditions

Linalool, (±)-3,7-dimethyl-3-hydroxy-1,6-octadiene), ((CH3)2C=CHCH2CH2C(CH3)(OH)CH=CH2) was purchased at Sigma-Aldrich (L2602, St. Louis, MO, USA). All the assays were performed using two linalool subinhibitory concentrations (0.625 mg/mL and 0.312 mg/mL). Its antimicrobial activity was evaluated against Listeria monocytogenes LMG 13305 (serotype 4b) from BCCM/LMG collection (Ghent, Belgium). The strain was cultured in Tryptic soy agar (TSA, VWR International, Leuven, Belgium) at 37 °C for 24 h prior to testing.

4.2. Growth Curves Determination in Presence of Linalool

For the determination of the time-kill curves, first, a culture was prepared by suspending a colony of L. monocytogenes in 10 mL of Tryptic soy broth (TSB) and incubating at 37 °C for 16 h at 250 rpm. After the overnight incubation, the inoculum was diluted to a final cell concentration of about 106 cfu/mL and exposed to linalool concentrations of 0.625 and 0.312 mg/mL (DMSO at 0.5% (v/v)). Solvent and growth controls were performed. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and cell counts were made at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 h, by drop-plate method. This experiment was performed three independent times.

4.3. Quorum-Sensing Inhibition by Linalool

For this assay, the biosensor bacterium Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 12472 was used to evaluate the effect of linalool in quorum sensing [15,56]. An overnight culture of C. violaceum was prepared at 30 °C, 250 rpm for 16 h with Luria Bertani medium (LB). After the incubation, in a 48-wells plate, the bacterial suspension was exposed to 0.625 and 0.312 mg/mL of linalool at a final cell concentration of ~1 × 106 cfu/mL, in a volume of 1 mL by well. A growth control, solvent control (DMSO 0.06% (v/v)) and control of quorum-sensing inhibition (resveratrol at 19.5 µg/mL) were performed [15]. The plate was incubated for 48 h at 30 °C. For the evaluation of violacein inhibition, after the incubation, 750 µL of each well was centrifuged at 6800× g for 3 min. The pellet was then suspended in 750 µL of DMSO for extracting violacein. This suspension was then centrifuged at 8000× g for 5 min to obtain a supernatant with violacein and a pellet of bacterial cells. From this supernatant, 200 µL were collected in triplicate to a 96-well plate for the reading of absorbance at 585 nm. To assess if inhibition of violacein could occur due to the bacterial inhibition, the pellet was then resuspended in 750 µL of distilled water and the optical density at 600 nm was read. Three independent assays were performed in triplicate. The percentage of violacein inhibition was calculated through the formula:
  Violacein   inhibition   ( % )   = 100     sample   O D 585   Growth   control   O D 585 × 100

4.4. Evaluation of Listeria monocytogenes Motility When Exposed to Linalool

The effect of linalool on the motility of L. monocytogenes LMG 13305 was assessed as described by [25]. From the overnight culture, the inoculum was adjusted to a OD600 nm = 1 (~109 cfu/mL). Then, 5 µL of this suspension was pipetted to TSB with 0.3% (w/v) of agar and 0.625 or 0.312 mg/mL of linalool. Motility control and solvent control with a 0.128% (v/v) concentration of DMSO were also included. The plates were incubated for 72 h at 30 °C, and the motility diameter measured in millimetres (mm) at 24, 48 and 72 h. This experiment was performed four independent times.

4.5. Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes Biofilm Formation in the Presence of Linalool

The analysis of the effect of linalool in biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes was performed based on [15,57] with modifications, such as the use of 48-well plates. After an overnight culture, the inoculum was adjusted to a OD600 nm = 0.1 (~108 cfu/mL) and was subsequently added to a 48-well plate together with the compound’s solution, thus reaching a final concentration 0.625 and 0.312 mg/mL of linalool, to a cell density of ~107 cfu/mL on a 500 µL final volume. Wells of solvent (DMSO at 0.06% (v/v)) and growth control were also made. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. After the incubation, the wells were carefully washed twice with 500 µL of distilled water and then fixed with 500 µL of methanol for 20 min. The methanol was removed and, after the plates had dried, 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet was added and left to rest for 10 min. After this time, the crystal violet was removed, and the wells were washed three times with distilled water. Then, 500 μL of 33% (v/v) acetic acid was added to dissolve the dye and finally the absorbance was read at 570 nm. Four replicates were made six independent times. The percentage of biofilm formation inhibition was calculated considering the control.

4.6. Haemolytic Activity of Linalool in Humans’ Erytrocytes

The haemolysis caused by linalool on human erythrocytes was analysed, as previously described [58]. For this, in a 96-well plate with U bottom, serial dilutions of linalool in PBS were prepared (a range of concentrations from 2.5 to 0.312 mg/mL, with a maximum of 0.5% (v/v) of DMSO) and 100 µL of human erythrocytes obtained from blood collected from a healthy volunteer from the research team at 2% (v/v) were added, achieving a final volume of 200 µL in each well. The 96-well plate was then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. After this period, the plates were centrifuged at 1000× g for 5 min and the supernatant was collected into another 96-well plate to be read at 543 nm. A negative control (PBS) and a positive control (1% (v/v) Triton X 100) were also performed. This assay was completed three independent times.

4.7. Study of the Inhibitory Capabilities of Linalool on Human Erythrocytes Haemolysis Caused by Listeria monocytogenes

The inhibition of haemolysis by Listeria monocytogenes was assessed as previously described [59], with minor modifications. Listeria monocytogenes LMG 13305 was incubated overnight at 37 °C with shaking, and then subcultured in TSB containing 0.625 and 0.312 mg/mL of linalool and a final cell concentration of 106 CFU/mL, for 10 h at 37 °C. After this period, the cultures were centrifuged at 9000× g at 4 °C for 10 min, from which 100 µL of supernatant were obtained and added to 100 µL of erythrocytes 2% (v/v) and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. After the incubation, the plate was centrifuged at 1000× g for 5 min. Then, 100 µL of the supernatant was removed from each well to a new 96-well plate to be read at 543 nm. A solvent control, positive control (supernatant from non-exposed bacteria), negative control (without bacterial growth) and a positive control of total haemolysis (1% (v/v) Triton X 100) were also included. This assay was performed three independent times.

4.8. Evaluation of Linalool on the Tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes to Adverse Conditions

The effect of linalool on the tolerance of L. monocytogenes to adverse conditions, such as osmotic stress, high and low temperatures, was assessed [25,60]. A bacterial suspension was prepared from the overnight culture and adjusted to an OD600 nm = 0.1 (~108 cfu/mL). Then, 30 µL was added to tubes with 2970 µL of TSB medium, TSB with DMSO (0.06% (v/v), or with 0.625 or 0.312 mg/mL of linalool.
(i)
To assess the effect on osmotic stress, the tubes were supplemented with NaCl at 12% (w/v). The tubes were incubated for 24 h and measurements were made at 0 and 24 h.
(ii)
The effect of a high temperature was evaluated by incubating tubes at 55 °C, and samples collected at 0, 15, 30 and 45 min.
(iii)
The effect of low temperature was assessed also in absence or presence of osmotic stress; thus, the experiment was conducted using TSB or TSB with 12% NaCl (w/v), respectively; in this case, in a final volume of 1 mL. The tubes were incubated at a low storage temperature of 4 °C for 84 days. The viable count measurements were performed by drop-plate methods, and the assays repeated at least two independent times.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

The Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis by using GraphPad Prism v8.0.2 software. A two-way ANOVA, with a Tukey multiple comparison test, was performed to test the levels of bacteria cell counts for growth curves, and when testing linalool at cold and cold with osmotic stress conditions. Significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated by asterisks in all figures, with * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

5. Conclusions

Subinhibitory concentrations of linalool were found to effectively counteract virulence of L. monocytogenes by targeting key factors, such as quorum sensing, motility, biofilm formation and haemolysis. In addition, it may increase the susceptibility of L. monocytogenes to adverse conditions, such as those typically used in the food industry. In sum, these results highlight the potential of linalool even at lower concentrations to overcome some of the problems posed by L. monocytogenes in the field of food safety. Nonetheless, more studies are needed to validate the application of this compound in the food industry, namely through the inclusion of strains isolated from food or evaluation of the potential interaction of linalool with food components.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C.D. and S.F.; formal analysis, J.P.D. and S.F.; investigation, J.P.D.; resources, F.C.D. and S.F.; writing—original draft preparation, J.P.D.; writing—review and editing, F.C.D. and S.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by funds from the CICS-UBI base funding with DOI 10.54499/UIDB/00709/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/00709/2020) and program funding with DOI 10.54499/UIDP/00709/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/00709/2020) with national funds registered in the budget of the Foundation for Science and Technology.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Susana Ferreira acknowledges UBI and FCT by the contract of Scientific Employment according to DL57/2016.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Food Safety. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/food-safety (accessed on 27 November 2023).
  2. Shamloo, E.; Hosseini, H.; Moghadam, A.Z.; Larsen, H.M.; Haslberger, A.; Alebouyeh, M. Importance of Listeria monocytogenes in food safety: A review of its prevalence, detection, and antibiotic resistance. Iran. J. Vet. Res. 2019, 20, 241. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Kannan, S.; Balakrishnan, J.; Govindasamy, A. Listeria monocytogens—Amended understanding of its pathogenesis with a complete picture of its membrane vesicles, quorum sensing, biofilm and invasion. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 149, 104575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Freitag, N.E.; Port, G.C.; Miner, M.D. Listeria monocytogenes—From saprophyte to intracellular pathogen. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. McDougal, C.E.; Sauer, J.D. Listeria monocytogenes: The Impact of Cell Death on Infection and Immunity. Pathogens 2018, 7, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tricoli, M.R.; Massaro, C.; Arrigo, I.; Diquattro, O.; Di Bernardo, F.; Galia, E.; Palermo, M.; Fasciana, T.; Giammanco, A. Characterization of Listeria monocytogenes Strains Isolated in Palermo (Sicily and Italy) during the Years 2018–2020 from Severe Cases of Listeriosis. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA); European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The European Union One Health 2019 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lomonaco, S.; Nucera, D.; Filipello, V. The evolution and epidemiology of Listeria monocytogenes in Europe and the United States. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015, 35, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hernandez-Milian, A.; Payeras-Cifre, A. What is new in Listeriosis? Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 358051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Todd, E.C.D.; Notermans, S. Surveillance of listeriosis and its causative pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control 2011, 22, 1484–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Duze, S.T.; Marimani, M.; Patel, M. Tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes to biocides used in food processing environments. Food Microbiol. 2021, 97, 103758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Matle, I.; Mbatha, K.R.; Madoroba, E. A review of Listeria monocytogenes from meat and meat products: Epidemiology, virulence factors, antimicrobial resistance and diagnosis. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2020, 87, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Silva, L.N.; Zimmer, K.R.; Macedo, A.J.; Trentin, D.S. Plant Natural Products Targeting Bacterial Virulence Factors. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9162–9236. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Gao, Z.; Zhong, W.; Liu, T.; Zhao, T.; Guo, J. Global proteomic analysis of Listeria monocytogenes’ response to linalool. Foods 2021, 10, 2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Carvalho, F.; Coimbra, A.T.; Silva, L.; Duarte, A.P.; Ferreira, S. Melissa officinalis essential oil as an antimicrobial agent against Listeria monocytogenes in watermelon juice. Food Microbiol. 2023, 109, 104105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fasciana, T.; Gargano, M.L.; Serra, N.; Galia, E.; Arrigo, I.; Tricoli, M.R.; Diquattro, O.; Graceffa, G.; Vieni, S.; Venturella, G.; et al. Potential activity of albino Grifola frondosa mushroom extract against biofilm of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gargano, M.L.; Zervakis, G.I.; Isikhuemhen, O.S.; Venturella, G.; Calvo, R.; Giammanco, A.; Fasciana, T.; Ferraro, V. Ecology, Phylogeny, and Potential Nutritional and Medicinal Value of a Rare White “Maitake” Collected in a Mediterranean Forest. Diversity 2020, 12, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abdelhamid, A.G.; El-Dougdoug, N.K. Controlling foodborne pathogens with natural antimicrobials by biological control and antivirulence strategies. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lu, G.; Xu, L.; Zhang, P.; Dou, X.; Yu, J.; Feng, H. Betulin efficiently suppresses the process of an experimental Listeria monocytogenes infection as an antagonist against listeriolysin O. Fitoterapia 2019, 139, 104409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Gowrishankar, S.; Sivaranjani, M.; Kamaladevi, A.; Ravi, A.V.; Balamurugan, K.; Karutha Pandian, S. Cyclic dipeptide cyclo(l-leucyl-l-prolyl) from marine Bacillus amyloliquefaciens mitigates biofilm formation and virulence in Listeria monocytogenes. Pathog. Dis. 2016, 74, ftw017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, M.; Lv, Q.; Xu, J.; Liu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, S.; Shen, X.; Wang, L. Isoflavone glucoside genistin, an inhibitor targeting Sortase A and Listeriolysin O, attenuates the virulence of Listeria monocytogenes in vivo and in vitro. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2023, 209, 115447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nwabor, O.F.; Vongkamjan, K.; Voravuthikunchai, S.P. Antioxidant Properties and Antibacterial Effects of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Ethanolic Leaf Extract on Biofilm Formation, Motility, Hemolysin Production, and Cell Membrane of the Foodborne Pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2019, 16, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Song, M.; Teng, Z.; Li, M.; Niu, X.; Wang, J.; Deng, X. Epigallocatechin gallate inhibits Streptococcus pneumoniae virulence by simultaneously targeting pneumolysin and sortase A. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2017, 21, 2586–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, J.; Qiu, J.; Tan, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, X.; Liu, S.; Feng, H.; Li, W.; Niu, X.; et al. Fisetin Inhibits Listeria monocytogenes Virulence by Interfering with the Oligomerization of Listeriolysin O. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 211, 1376–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Coimbra, A.; Carvalho, F.; Duarte, A.P.; Ferreira, S. Antimicrobial activity of Thymus zygis essential oil against Listeria monocytogenes and its application as food preservative. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2022, 80, 103077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, D.; Gan, R.Y.; Zhang, J.R.; Farha, A.K.; Li, H.B.; Zhu, F.; Wang, X.H.; Corke, H. Antivirulence properties and related mechanisms of spice essential oils: A comprehensive review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 1018–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Awad, A.H.R.; Parmar, A.; Ali, M.R.; El-Mogy, M.M.; Abdelgawad, K.F. Extending the shelf-life of fresh-cut green bean pods by ethanol, ascorbic acid, and essential oils. Foods 2021, 10, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. CFR—Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Food and Drugs, Chapter I-Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Subchapter B—Food for Human Consumption, Part 182-Substances Generally Recognized as Safe, Sec. 182.60 Synthetic. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=182.60&SearchTerm=linalool (accessed on 27 November 2023).
  29. Mączka, W.; Duda-Madej, A.; Grabarczyk, M.; Wińska, K. Natural Compounds in the Battle against Microorganisms—Linalool. Molecules 2022, 27, 6928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. An, Q.; Ren, J.N.; Li, X.; Fan, G.; Qu, S.S.; Song, Y.; Li, Y.; Pan, S.Y. Recent updates on bioactive properties of linalool. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 10370–10389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Alves, S.; Duarte, A.; Sousa, S.; Domingues, F.C. Study of the major essential oil compounds of Coriandrum sativum against Acinetobacter baumannii and the effect of linalool on adhesion, biofilms and quorum sensing. Biofouling 2016, 32, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Manoharan, R.K.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, Y.G.; Kim, S.-I.; Lee, J. Inhibitory effects of the essential oils α-longipinene and linalool on biofilm formation and hyphal growth of Candida albicans. Biofouling 2017, 33, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gao, Z.; Van Nostrand, J.D.; Zhou, J.; Zhong, W.; Chen, K.; Guo, J. Anti-listeria Activities of Linalool and Its Mechanism Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome Analysis. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 496012. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fisher, K.; Phillips, C.A. The effect of lemon, orange and bergamot essential oils and their components on the survival of Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli O157, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and in food systems. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 101, 1232–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lopes-Luz, L.; Mendonça, M.; Fogaça, B.; Kipnis, A.; Bhunia, A.K.; Bührer-Sékula, S.; Mendonc¸a, M.; Bernardes Fogaça, M.; Kipnis, A.E.; B€ Uhrer-S Ekula, S. Listeria monocytogenes: Review of pathogenesis and virulence determinants-targeted immunological assays. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 47, 647–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Matereke, L.T.; Okoh, A.I. Listeria monocytogenes Virulence, Antimicrobial Resistance and Environmental Persistence: A Review. Pathogens 2020, 9, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, R.; Zhong, Q.; Chen, W.; Zhang, M.; Pei, J.; Chen, H.; Chen, W. Transcriptomic and proteomic investigation of metabolic disruption in Listeria monocytogenes triggered by linalool and its application in chicken breast preservation. LWT 2023, 176, 114492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. He, R.; Chen, W.; Chen, H.; Zhong, Q.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, M.; Chen, W. Antibacterial mechanism of linalool against L. monocytogenes, a metabolomic study. Food Control 2022, 132, 108533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abisado, R.G.; Benomar, S.; Klaus, J.R.; Dandekar, A.A.; Chandler, J.R. Bacterial quorum sensing and microbial community interactions. MBio 2018, 9, e02331-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lahiri, D.; Nag, M.; Dutta, B.; Dey, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Joshi, S.J.; Ray, R.R. Antibiofilm and anti-quorum sensing activities of eugenol and linalool from Ocimum tenuiflorum against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 131, 2821–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kanekar, S.; Devasya, R.P. Growth-phase specific regulation of cviI/R based quorum sensing associated virulence factors in Chromobacterium violaceum by linalool, a monoterpenoid. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, W.; Li, D.; Huang, X.; Yang, H.; Qiu, Z.; Zou, L.; Liang, Q.; Shi, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wu, S.; et al. Study on Antibacterial and Quorum-Sensing Inhibition Activities of Cinnamomum camphora Leaf Essential Oil. Molecules 2019, 24, 3792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, Y.; Kong, J.; Xie, Y.; Guo, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Qian, H.; Yao, W. Essential oil components inhibit biofilm formation in Erwinia carotovora and Pseudomonas fluorescens via anti-quorum sensing activity. LWT 2018, 92, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Carpentier, B.; Cerf, O. Review—Persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in food industry equipment and premises. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 145, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sowndarya, J.; Farisa Banu, S.; Madhura, G.; Yuvalakshmi, P.; Rubini, D.; Bandeira Junior, G.; Baldisserotto, B.; Vadivel, V.; Nithyanand, P. Agro food by-products and essential oil constituents curtail virulence and biofilm of Vibrio harveyi. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 135, 103633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ngome, M.T.; Alves, J.G.; de Oliveira, A.C.; da Silva Machado, P.; Mondragón-Bernal, O.L.; Piccoli, R.H. Linalool, citral, eugenol and thymol: Control of planktonic and sessile cells of Shigella flexneri. AMB Express 2018, 8, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hsu, C.C.; Lai, W.L.; Chuang, K.C.; Lee, M.H.; Tsai, Y.C. The inhibitory activity of linalool against the filamentous growth and biofilm formation in Candida albicans. Med. Mycol. 2013, 51, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kim, Y.G.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, S.I.; Baek, K.H.; Lee, J. Cinnamon bark oil and its components inhibit biofilm formation and toxin production. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 195, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Schnupf, P.; Portnoy, D.A. Listeriolysin O: A phagosome-specific lysin. Microbes Infect. 2007, 9, 1176–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Vadia, S.; Arnett, E.; Haghighat, A.C.; Wilson-Kubalek, E.M.; Tweten, R.K.; Seveau, S. The Pore-Forming Toxin Listeriolysin O Mediates a Novel Entry Pathway of L. monocytogenes into Human Hepatocytes. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Liu, Z.; Meng, R.; Zhao, X.; Shi, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, N. Inhibition effect of tea tree oil on Listeria monocytogenes growth and exotoxin proteins listeriolysin O and p60 secretion. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 63, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arioli, S.; Montanari, C.; Magnani, M.; Tabanelli, G.; Patrignani, F.; Lanciotti, R.; Mora, D.; Gardini, F. Modelling of Listeria monocytogenes Scott A after a mild heat treatment in the presence of thymol and carvacrol: Effects on culturability and viability. J. Food Eng. 2019, 240, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bucur, F.I.; Grigore-Gurgu, L.; Crauwels, P.; Riedel, C.U.; Nicolau, A.I. Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes to Stress Conditions Encountered in Food and food processing environments. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 417209. [Google Scholar]
  54. Tasara, T.; Stephan, R. Cold Stress Tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes: A Review of Molecular Adaptive Mechanisms and Food Safety Implications. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 1473–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cabrita, P.; Trigo, M.J.; Ferreira, R.B.; Brito, L. Differences in the Expression of Cold Stress–Related Genes and in the Swarming Motility Among Persistent and Sporadic Strains of Listeria monocytogenes. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2015, 12, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Asensio, C.M.; Quiroga, P.R.; Al-Gburi, A.; Huang, Q.; Grosso, N.R. Rheological Behavior, Antimicrobial and Quorum Sensig Inhibition Study of an Argentinean Oregano Essential Oil Nanoemulsion. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 569913. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Stepanović, S.; Ćirković, I.; Ranin, L.; Švabić-Vlahović, M. Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on plastic surface. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 38, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Duarte, A.F.; Ferreira, S.; Oliveira, R.; Domingues, F.C. Effect of Coriander Oil (Coriandrum sativum) on Planktonic and Biofilm Cells of Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2013, 8, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Du, W.; Zhou, M.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, R. Inhibition effects of low concentrations of epigallocatechin gallate on the biofilm formation and hemolytic activity of Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control 2018, 85, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Oliveira, A.R.; Domingues, F.C.; Ferreira, S. The influence of resveratrol adaptation on resistance to antibiotics, benzalkonium chloride, heat and acid stresses of Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control 2017, 73, 1420–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Growth curves for L. monocytogenes LMG 13305, incubated with 0.625 and 0.312 mg/mL of linalool, with growth and solvent controls. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Asterisks represent significant differences to the growth control, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001 between the assay and the growth control.
Figure 1. Growth curves for L. monocytogenes LMG 13305, incubated with 0.625 and 0.312 mg/mL of linalool, with growth and solvent controls. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Asterisks represent significant differences to the growth control, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001 between the assay and the growth control.
Antibiotics 13 00474 g001
Figure 2. Quorum-sensing inhibition, represented by violacein percentage inhibition (columns) and microbial density (OD600 nm) (●) by 0.625 and 0.312 mg/mL of linalool, 19.5 µg/mL of resveratrol used as positive control and 0.06% of DMSO as a solvent control. The results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the means (SEM). Asterisks represent significant differences, in comparison to the control * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); **** (p < 0.0001).
Figure 2. Quorum-sensing inhibition, represented by violacein percentage inhibition (columns) and microbial density (OD600 nm) (●) by 0.625 and 0.312 mg/mL of linalool, 19.5 µg/mL of resveratrol used as positive control and 0.06% of DMSO as a solvent control. The results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the means (SEM). Asterisks represent significant differences, in comparison to the control * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); **** (p < 0.0001).
Antibiotics 13 00474 g002
Figure 3. Inhibitory effect of 0.625 and 0.312 mg/mL of linalool in motility of L. monocytogenes LMG 13305, at 24, 48 and 72 h. The results are presented as the mean ± SD. ns (p > 0.05); * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); *** (p < 0.001); **** (p < 0.0001).
Figure 3. Inhibitory effect of 0.625 and 0.312 mg/mL of linalool in motility of L. monocytogenes LMG 13305, at 24, 48 and 72 h. The results are presented as the mean ± SD. ns (p > 0.05); * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); *** (p < 0.001); **** (p < 0.0001).
Antibiotics 13 00474 g003
Figure 4. Inhibition of L. monocytogenes LMG 13305 biofilm formation by 0.625 and 0.312 mg/mL of linalool. The results are presented as the mean ± SEM. ns (p > 0.05); **** (p < 0.0001).
Figure 4. Inhibition of L. monocytogenes LMG 13305 biofilm formation by 0.625 and 0.312 mg/mL of linalool. The results are presented as the mean ± SEM. ns (p > 0.05); **** (p < 0.0001).
Antibiotics 13 00474 g004
Figure 5. Evaluation of the haemolysis caused by different concentrations of linalool in humans’ erythrocytes.
Figure 5. Evaluation of the haemolysis caused by different concentrations of linalool in humans’ erythrocytes.
Antibiotics 13 00474 g005
Figure 6. Haemolysis of humans’ erythrocytes by pre-exposure of L. monocytogenes LMG 13305 with 0.625 mg/mL and 0.312 mg/mL concentration of linalool. The results are presented as the mean ± SEM. Asterisks represent significant differences, in comparison to the control ** (p < 0.01); **** (p < 0.0001).
Figure 6. Haemolysis of humans’ erythrocytes by pre-exposure of L. monocytogenes LMG 13305 with 0.625 mg/mL and 0.312 mg/mL concentration of linalool. The results are presented as the mean ± SEM. Asterisks represent significant differences, in comparison to the control ** (p < 0.01); **** (p < 0.0001).
Antibiotics 13 00474 g006
Figure 7. Evaluation of the effect of linalool on tolerance to: (A) osmotic stress (12% (w/v) NaCl); (B) high temperature (55 °C), (C) cold temperature (4 °C) and (D) cold temperature (4 °C) and 12% NaCl, by L. monocytogenes LMG 13305. The results are presented as the mean ± SD or SEM. Asterisks represent significant differences to the growth control, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 between the assay and the control.
Figure 7. Evaluation of the effect of linalool on tolerance to: (A) osmotic stress (12% (w/v) NaCl); (B) high temperature (55 °C), (C) cold temperature (4 °C) and (D) cold temperature (4 °C) and 12% NaCl, by L. monocytogenes LMG 13305. The results are presented as the mean ± SD or SEM. Asterisks represent significant differences to the growth control, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 between the assay and the control.
Antibiotics 13 00474 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dias, J.P.; Domingues, F.C.; Ferreira, S. Linalool Reduces Virulence and Tolerance to Adverse Conditions of Listeria monocytogenes. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 474. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13060474

AMA Style

Dias JP, Domingues FC, Ferreira S. Linalool Reduces Virulence and Tolerance to Adverse Conditions of Listeria monocytogenes. Antibiotics. 2024; 13(6):474. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13060474

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dias, Joel P., Fernanda C. Domingues, and Susana Ferreira. 2024. "Linalool Reduces Virulence and Tolerance to Adverse Conditions of Listeria monocytogenes" Antibiotics 13, no. 6: 474. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13060474

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop