Using a Stakeholder Analysis to Implement the Belgian One Health National Report for Antimicrobial Use and Resistance
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe comments and suggestions are tracked in the annotated PDF document attached.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageSatisfactory.
Some sections such as 'Materials and methods' should be revised for conciseness.
There are some redundancies to be corrected e.g. Table 1, Table after Figure & Table 7. These tables present the same information.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
We sincerely appreciate your time and thoughtful review of our scientific article. Your detailed and relevant feedback has been invaluable.
We have carefully considered each of your suggestions and incorporated them into the revised version of our manuscript. Your expertise has significantly enhanced the quality of our work, and we are confident that the adjustments made will contribute to the overall strength of the article.
We are grateful for your dedication to advancing scientific quality.
Thank you once again for your insightful feedback.
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsDear Authors,
I have read with great interest and attention your excellent survey which represents a "primum movens" of an important line of research but above all a topic that could have great resonance among all scholars who deal with AMR and among those who work in the field find themselves having to fight this cosmopolitan problem, in addition to the important impact on politics.
Also of great value is the amount of data and information that emerged from the questionnaires and the possibility of communication between users and organizers.
In my opinion, only the keywords should be rechecked, checking that there are no repetitions with those of the title, and the formatting of the bibliographical references.
Certainly, this study could represent a reference model for other study groups and a further aid in monitoring the use of antimicrobials, counteracting their abuse or misuse which increases the global problem of AMR.
Having said that, I believe the article can be accepted in present form since there are only some minimal editing corrections that the journal staff will improve.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you for your thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate your positive assessment and insightful suggestions. We will promptly address the minor edits you've highlighted.
Thank you again