Next Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Resistance and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Elizabethkingia anophelis subsp. endophytica Isolated from Raw Milk
Previous Article in Journal
Swedish Efforts to Contain Antibiotic Resistance in the Environment—A Qualitative Study among Selected Stakeholders
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study of Ocular Pharmacokinetics of Topical 0.3% Gatifloxacin Eye Gel and Solution in Rabbits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ophthalmic Antimicrobial Prescribing in Australian Healthcare Facilities

National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(5), 647; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050647
Submission received: 12 April 2022 / Revised: 6 May 2022 / Accepted: 9 May 2022 / Published: 12 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anti-infectious Drugs in Ophthalmology)

Abstract

The National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (NAPS) is a web-based, standardized tool, widely adopted in Australian healthcare facilities to assess the reasons for, the quantity of, and the quality of antimicrobial prescribing. It consists of multiple modules tailored towards the needs of a variety of healthcare facilities. Data regarding ophthalmological antimicrobial use from Hospital NAPS, Surgical NAPS, and Aged Care NAPS were analysed. In Hospital NAPS, the most common reasons for inappropriate prescribing were incorrect dose or frequency and incorrect duration. Prolonged duration was also common in Aged Care prescribing: about one quarter of all antimicrobials had been prescribed for greater than 6 months. All three modules found chloramphenicol to be the most prescribed antimicrobial with a high rate of inappropriate prescribing, usually for conjunctivitis.
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial stewardship; antimicrobial prescribing surveillance; quality; safety; ophthalmology; eye; surgical prophylaxis antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial stewardship; antimicrobial prescribing surveillance; quality; safety; ophthalmology; eye; surgical prophylaxis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fang, X.; Bennett, N.; Ierano, C.; James, R.; Thursky, K. Ophthalmic Antimicrobial Prescribing in Australian Healthcare Facilities. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050647

AMA Style

Fang X, Bennett N, Ierano C, James R, Thursky K. Ophthalmic Antimicrobial Prescribing in Australian Healthcare Facilities. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(5):647. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050647

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fang, Xin, Noleen Bennett, Courtney Ierano, Rodney James, and Karin Thursky. 2022. "Ophthalmic Antimicrobial Prescribing in Australian Healthcare Facilities" Antibiotics 11, no. 5: 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050647

APA Style

Fang, X., Bennett, N., Ierano, C., James, R., & Thursky, K. (2022). Ophthalmic Antimicrobial Prescribing in Australian Healthcare Facilities. Antibiotics, 11(5), 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050647

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop