Next Article in Journal
Effect of Cephalosporin Treatment on the Microbiota and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Feces of Dairy Cows with Clinical Mastitis
Next Article in Special Issue
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Decompensated Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review on Safety and Efficacy
Previous Article in Journal
Antimicrobial and Antibiotic Resistance from the Perspective of Polish Veterinary Students: An Inter-University Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/antibiotics11010116
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Doxycycline in Decreasing the Severity of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Mice

by
Bo-Yang Tsai
1,†,
Yi-Hsin Lai
1,†,
Chun-Wei Chiu
2,
Chih-Yu Hsu
3,
Yi-Hsuan Chen
3,
Yueh-Lin Chen
3,
Pei-Jane Tsai
3,4,5,*,
Yuan-Pin Hung
2,6,7,* and
Wen-Chien Ko
6,7,*
1
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704, Taiwan
2
Departments of Internal Medicine, Tainan Hospital, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Tainan 700, Taiwan
3
Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704, Taiwan
4
Center of Infectious Disease and Signaling Research, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704, Taiwan
5
Department of Pathology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704, Taiwan
6
Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704, Taiwan
7
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(1), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010116
Submission received: 18 November 2021 / Revised: 5 January 2022 / Accepted: 11 January 2022 / Published: 17 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Next-Generation Interventions for Clostridioides difficile Infections to Minimize Microbiota Disturbance, Increase Efficacy, and Decrease Recurrence)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Doxycycline possesses antibacterial activity against Clostridioides difficile and anti-inflammatory effects. Materials and Methods: The influence of doxycycline on the development of CDI was studied in an established animal model of CDI using C57BL/6 mice. Results: Mice intraperitoneally administered doxycycline had higher cecum weight (1.3 ± 0.1 vs. 0.5 ± 0.1 g; p < 0.001) and less body weight reduction (0.7 ± 0.5 g vs. −17.4 ± 0.2 g; p < 0.001) than untreated mice infected with C. difficile. Oral doxycycline, metronidazole, or vancomycin therapy resulted in less body weight reduction in mice with CDI than in untreated mice (1.1 ± 0.1 g, 1.3 ± 0.2 g, 1.2 ± 0.1 g, vs. 2.9 ± 0.3 g; p < 0.001). Doxycycline therapy led to lower expression levels of inflammatory cytokines, such as macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (0.4 ± 0.1 vs. 2.9 ± 1.3, p = 0.02), and higher levels of zonula occludens-1 (1.2 ± 0.1 vs. 0.8 ± 0.1, p = 0.02) in colonic tissues than in untreated mice. Conclusions: Concurrent intraperitoneal administration of doxycycline and oral C. difficile challenge does not aggravate the disease severity of CDI, and oral doxycycline may be a potential therapeutic option for CDI.

1. Introduction

Clostridioides difficile is one of the most common gastrointestinal pathogens, especially in nosocomial infections, with clinical symptoms ranging from mild diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis to toxic megacolon, with a mortality of up to 25–40% [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin have been suggested to replace metronidazole as therapeutic choices for either mild-moderate or severe Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in the clinical guidelines recommended by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Health Care Epidemiology of America (SHEA) in 2017 [10]. Vancomycin, besides a direct anti-C. difficile effect, had no anti-inflammatory effect [11]. In the mouse model of CDI, vancomycin therapy results in the mitigation of weight loss and diarrhea during acute infection but is associated with CDI recurrence and late-onset death, indicative of the need for other therapeutic agents [11]. However, administration of vancomycin plus an anti-inflammatory agent, for example, A2A adenosine receptor (A2AAR) agonist, decreased inflammation and improved survival rates [11]. In contrast, fidaxomicin and its primary metabolite OP-1118 were found to significantly inhibit C. difficile toxin A-mediated intestinal inflammation via inhibition of NF-κB Activity, and thus decreased tissue damage in the human colon [12]. Therefore, antibiotics with both and anti-C. difficile effect and anti-inflammation effect would be an excellent surrogate for treatment of CDI.
Doxycycline, a second-generation tetracycline antibiotic, has been shown to exhibit anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antiapoptotic, neuroprotective, and immunomodulatory effects beyond antimicrobial effects [13]. Although the occurrence of CDI was noted after doxycycline prophylaxis for malaria [14], doxycycline was associated with a decreased incidence of CDI in recent studies [15,16,17]. A pharmacotherapy review concluded that doxycycline might have protective effects on the development of CDI based on evidence from retrospective studies [17]. The direct linkage of doxycycline exposure to CDI remains unresolved.
For clinical C. difficile isolates, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of doxycycline ranged from 0.016 μg/mL to ≥32 μg/mL with a resistance rate of 0–40% if resistance was defined as an MIC ≥ 8 μg/mL [18,19,20]. Higher doxycycline MICs were noted among some C. difficile isolates, especially the RT078 lineage isolates [20]. For C. difficile isolates with low doxycycline MICs, the clinical utility of doxycycline as a therapeutic option for CDI warrants further investigation. In this study, the potential role of doxycycline as a preventive or therapeutic choice for CDI was explored.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. C. difficile Strain

A toxigenic C. difficile strain, VPI 10463 (CCUG 19126/ATCC 43255), belonging to ribotype 087 and toxinotype 0, without binary toxin, with a doxycycline MIC of 0.25 μg/mL was used in the animal experiments.

2.2. Concurrent Doxycycline Exposure and C. difficile Challenge in Mice

Six- to 8-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were exposed to an antibiotic cocktail, which included 0.045 mg/mL vancomycin, 0.215 mg/mL metronidazole, 0.4 mg/mL kanamycin, 0.035 mg/mL gentamicin, and 850 U/mL colistin, from 5 days to 1 day before oral inoculation of vegetative C. difficile bacteria [21] (Scheme 1).
A proton pump inhibitor, esomeprazole (40 mg/kg/day), was added by oral gavage for 2 days [21]. In our published article about the mouse model of CDI [21], severe CDI was associated with frequent diarrhea, body weight loss, and less fecal content in cecum. The latter was reflected by a decrease in cecum weight. Therefore, in our study, body weight and cecum weight were measured to reflect the disease severity of CDI in the mouse model.
Each mouse received intraperitoneal administration of doxycycline (5 mg/kg) or control (vehicle: PBS, phosphate-buffered saline) and was concurrently challenged with vegetative cells of C. difficile in an oral inoculum of 3.5 × 107 CFU at 3 h after antibiotic exposure (Scheme 1) [22,23]. Uninfected mice were administrated with 5 days of an antibiotic cocktail but treated with PBS as the negative control group. All mouse studies with five mice in each group were repeated at least three times to confirm the results.

2.3. One Dose of Oral Antibiotic Therapy for CDI in Mice

Drinking water containing the antibiotic cocktail was administered from 5 days to 1 day and then esomeprazole (40 mg/kg/day) was given to mice orally, twice daily for 2 days before oral inoculation of C. difficile [21]. The mice were intraperitoneally administered clindamycin (4 mg/kg) and then challenged orally with C. difficile VPI 10463. After oral challenge with C. difficile for 24 h, one dose of doxycycline (125 mg/kg), metronidazole (250 mg/kg), vancomycin (50 mg/kg), or control (vehicle: PBS, phosphate-buffered saline) was administered by oral gavage (Figure 1) (i.p., intraperitoneally; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PPI, proton pump inhibitor).
All mouse studies with five mice in each group were repeated at least three times to confirm the results. This study was approved by IACUC of the National Cheng Kong University (Approval No. 102296).

2.4. Phenotypic Analysis of CDI

Reported signs of colitis in mice included weight loss and diarrhea [21,24]. Diarrhea was scored by stool consistency, as 0 = well-formed pellets, 1 = semiformed stools that did not adhere to the anus, 2 = semiformed stools that adhered to the anus, and 3 = liquid stools. Thus, the changes of body weight, stool consistency, gross view of gut, and cecal weight were selected to estimate the disease severity of CDI in mice [21,24].

2.5. Bacterial Burden

Bacterial loads of C. difficile in feces were measured to correlate with disease progression. To quantify bacterial loads, feces were collected and cultured. CFUs were counted in cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA) (CREATIVE LIFE SCIENCE CO., LTD., Taipei, Taiwan) at 37 °C in an incubator anaerobically for 2 days.

2.6. Expression of Inflammatory Cytokines and Tight Junction Proteins in Colonic Tissues

The mRNA expression levels of inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin [IL]-1β, macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2, also known as C-X-C motif chemokine 2), IL-18, and tight junction proteins, including tight junction protein (TJP)-1, occludin (OCLN), and zonula occludens (ZO)-1, in colonic tissues were measured using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT–PCR). Total RNA was extracted with REzol isolation reagent (Protech Technology Enterprise, Taipei, Taiwan), followed by affinity chromatography (RNeasy Plus Mini Kit) (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), and the complementary DNA (cDNA) of these samples was synthesized using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). To quantify the expression of genes, cDNA was mixed with SYBR green (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) and specific primers for the genes coding for IL-1β, CXCL-2, IL-18, Zo-1, and OCLN. PCR was run according to the standard protocol, and the emission of fluorescence was detected with StepOnePlus™ (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Relative expression of the targeted genes was primarily normalized to a housekeeping gene, beta-actin (ACTB), followed by the 2−Δct method analysis.

2.7. Histopathologic Examination

Mice were sacrificed 2 days after infection, and their colonic tissues were harvested for histopathologic examination. The colons were cut longitudinally and fixed with 10% formaldehyde (Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, St Louis, MO, USA). The colonic tissue was embedded in paraffin and sectioned (5 µm) prior to hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E stain). The stained, sectioned tissue was imaged through microscopy, and the integrity of the tissue was assessed. For pathological scoring, six fields per sample were examined and scored. Average counts of neutrophils in the six high-power fields (HPFs) in tissues were determined. The severity of colitis was scored, ranging between zero and three points for each of the following parameters: (1) polymorphonuclear infiltrate; (2) mononuclear infiltrate; (3) edema; (4) erosion and ulcerations; (5) crypt abscess; (6) crypt destruction; and (7) distribution of inflammation (mucosa = 1, mucosa and submucosa = 2, transmural inflammation = 3). Based on the total score (ranging from 0 to 21), the extent of tissue inflammation was graded as mild (1–5 points), moderate (6–10 points), or severe (>10 points) [25]. The markers of inflammation, including neutrophil infiltration, epithelial damage, and irregular shape of colon mucosa, were analyzed.

2.8. Statistical Method

Data were analyzed using the SPSS version 17.0.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), and Prism version 6.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), statistical software packages. Statistical comparisons among groups were made using unpaired Student’s t-test. Multiple intergroup comparisons were made through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparison test. Statistical significance was set at a p value of < 0.05 for all analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Doxycycline Exposure before C. difficile Infection

The mice with doxycycline exposure had higher cecum weight (1.3 ± 0.1 g vs. 0.5 ± 0.1 g; p < 0.001) and less body weight reduction (0.7 ± 0.5 g vs. −17.4 ± 0.2 g; p < 0.001) than the control mice, in which PBS was administered intraperitoneally (Figure 2A,B). Furthermore, doxycycline-exposed mice had higher expression levels of OCLN (1.4 ± 0.1 vs. 0.6 ± 0.2, p < 0.01) and IL-18 (1.85 ± 0.2 vs. 1.0 ± 0.2, p = 0.05) and lower expression levels of IL-1β (0.2 ± 0.04 vs. 1.0 ± 0.4, p = 0.04) in colonic tissues than control mice (Figure 2C).
Characters of epithelial inflammation, including neutrophil infiltration, epithelial damage, and irregular shape of colon mucosa, were noted in the pathology control (PBS) (red arrow in Figure 3). In contrast, in doxycycline-exposure mice, these epithelial inflammation characters were not obvious. After calculating the pathologic score, fewer neutrophil infiltrations (1.8 ± 0.8 vs. 4.4 ± 0.9/HPF, p = 0.001) and lower pathologic scores (2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 4.3 ± 1.3, p = 0.02) were observed in the colonic tissues of doxycycline-exposed mice than in control mice (Figure 3).

3.2. Therapeutic Effect of Oral Doxycycline on C. difficile Infection

While the animal was having diarrhea, due to the continuity discharge of gut contents, the cecum weight and body weight significantly decreased. All C. difficile infected mice, compared to mice without infection, showed symptoms of CDI, including loss of cecum weight at day 2 (Figure 4).
The C. difficile-infected mice treated with oral doxycycline, metronidazole, or vancomycin had fewer body weight changes than the untreated mice (1.1 ± 0.1 g, 1.3 ± 0.2 g, 1.2 ± 0.1 g, vs. 2.9 ± 0.3 g, all p < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, there were no differences in terms of body weight changes among the mice treated with doxycycline therapy and those treated with metronidazole (p = 0.44) or vancomycin therapy (p = 0.82) (Figure 4). Similarly, the cecum weights of infected mice treated with oral doxycycline or vancomycin therapy were higher than those of untreated mice (1.0 ± 0.1 g and 1.0 ± 0.1 g vs. 0.4 ± 0.03 g, p < 0.0001, respectively), but there were no differences between those of mice treated with metronidazole and untreated mice (0.6 ± 0.1 g vs. 0.4 ± 0.03 g; p = 0.15). The fecal C. difficile bacterial load was similar among mice treated with oral doxycycline, metronidazole, or vancomycin but lower than the control (PBS) mice.
Regarding inflammatory cytokines, significantly lower expression levels of MIP-2 in colonic tissues were noted in the mice treated with doxycycline, metronidazole, or vancomycin than in the untreated mice (0.4 ± 0.1, 0.5 ± 0.1, 0.2 ± 0.02 vs. 2.9 ± 1.3, p = 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, respectively) (Figure 5).
The expression levels of IL-18 were similar in the three treatment groups and untreated mice (p = 0.35). In terms of tight junction proteins, the expression level of ZO-1 in colonic tissue from the doxycycline-treated mice was higher than that in untreated mice (1.2 ± 0.1 vs. 0.8 ± 0.1, p = 0.02), and the expression levels of occludin in the doxycycline- or vancomycin-treated mice were higher than those in the untreated mice (1.4 ± 0.1 or 1.5 ± 0.2 vs. 0.5 ± 0.1, p < 0.0001).
Characters of epithelial inflammation, including neutrophil infiltration, epithelial damage, and irregular shape of colon mucosa, were noted in the pathology control (PBS) (red arrow in Figure 6). In contrast, for doxycycline-, vancomycin-, or metronidazole-treated mice, these epithelial inflammation characters were not obvious. After calculating the pathologic score, fewer neutrophil infiltrations (mean neutrophil number: 2.4 ± 0.5, 2.6 ± 0.9, 2.2 ± 0.8 vs. 5.2 ± 1.3, p < 0.001) per HPF and lower pathologic scores (2.2 ± 0.8, 2.4 ± 0.5, 2.6 ± 0.5 vs. 6.2 ± 1.5, p < 0.001) were noted in the doxycycline-, vancomycin-, or metronidazole-treated mice than in the untreated mice. However, there were no differences among the three antibiotic-treated groups (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

In the “Concurrent doxycycline exposure and C. difficile challenge in mice” part in our study, doxycycline exposure did not predispose mice to the development of CDI. This result is compatible with the clinical finding, suggesting that doxycycline protects against the development of CDI [17]. In a retrospective, case-control study of 1142 cases of hospital-acquired CDI from 1999 to 2005, doxycycline was associated with a reduced risk of CDI (odds ratio, 0.41) [15]. In another study, doxycycline receipt was associated with a 27% decrease in the incidence of CDI [16]. Of note, the intraperitoneal administration of doxycycline was concurrent with the oral challenge of vegetative C. difficile cells in our study. Therefore, the reduced disease severity of CDI in doxycycline-exposed mice may be due to its inhibitory ability against C. difficile and anti-inflammatory effects [26,27,28]. Almost all classes of antimicrobial agents have been associated with the disruption of normal colonic flora, predisposition to C. difficile colonization, and infection [29,30,31,32]. Most antibiotics decrease the density of intestinal bacteria and disrupt the intestinal microbiota. Such a disturbing effect on the microbiota may last for more than 8 weeks after the cessation of antibiotics [33]. Furthermore, exposure to more than one class of antibiotics had a higher rate of C. difficile colonization [34]. Although doxycycline has been reported to induce dysbiosis and decrease diversity in gut microbiota [27,28], concurrent exposure to doxycycline with C. difficile challenge in our study may lessen the influence of microbiota change induced by doxycycline on the development of CDI. Therefore, based on our study findings and clinical reports [15,16,17], doxycycline exposure did not aggravate the disease severity of CDI.
Furthermore, in the “Therapeutic effect of oral doxycycline on C. difficile infection” part in our study, concurrent intraperitoneal administration of doxycycline at the time of gastrointestinal challenge of C. difficile alleviates the disease severity of CDI through inhibiting fecal C. difficile bacterial load. The measurement of fecal C. difficile bacterial loads in our study support that the intraperitoneal doxycycline revealed antibacterial activity. Such a finding provides further in vivo evidence to suggest the application of doxycycline for the treatment of CDI in humans. The resistance rates of doxycycline in C. difficile isolates from animal products, animal stools, or soil were regarded to be low, ranging from 0% to 2.1% [35,36,37]. In a clinical setting, according to the multicenter study of 1112 clinical C. difficile isolates in Taiwan, the doxycycline resistance rate ranged from 7.7% to 17.3% in five hospitals [20]. The fecal C. difficile-inhibiting effect in a mice model and relatively low resistance rate among clinical C. difficile isolates make doxycycline a good surrogate for therapy for CDI.
The therapeutic role of doxycycline for CDI showed not only antimicrobial effects but also anti-inflammatory effect in our study. Doxycycline had been regarded as an antibiotic with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-apoptotic, and immunomodulatory effects [13]. Doxycycline may be beneficial for C. difficile-induced inflammation, which was evidenced by reports that C. difficile toxin could enhance the production of MIP-2 and TNF-α in macrophages to drive colonic inflammation, and the anti-inflammatory effect of doxycycline can enhance its therapeutic role in acute CDI [38,39,40,41]. In the polymicrobial infection sepsis mice model, doxycycline could ameliorate systemic and pulmonary inflammation through reducing the plasma and lung pro-inflammatory cytokines [40]. In a mice macrophages’ ex vivo study, doxycycline revealed an inhibitory effect on the production of IL-1β when stimulated with Leptospira interrogans or lipopolysaccharide [41]. The C57BL/6 mouse study by Hansen et al. showed that doxycycline administration decreased the transcription of inflammatory genes, including IL-1β, IL-10, IL-18, CXCL-1, MIP-2, and tissue necrosis factor (TNF) in the ileum and IL-18 in the colon [26]. These results were in accordance with the result of our study: Lower expression levels of inflammatory cytokines, such as MIP-2, and higher expression levels of tight junction proteins, such as ZO-1, were evident in mice treated with doxycycline. Thus, the net effect of oral doxycycline therapy for CDI was similar to that of metronidazole or vancomycin therapy, which was probably related to both the anti-inflammatory and antibacterial effects of doxycycline. The therapeutic role of oral doxycycline alone or in combination with metronidazole or vancomycin warrants more animal or clinical investigations.
There were some limitations in our study. First, the therapeutic effects of doxycycline on different C. difficile ribotypes were not studied. As mentioned, C. difficile RT078 lineage isolates had higher doxycycline MICs, and the therapeutic effect of doxycycline against CDI caused by the former isolates needs further evaluation. Second, a pressing issue of the current CDI therapy is the high recurrence rate after the end of antimicrobial therapy; CDI recurrence and the impact on gut microbiota by the doxycycline-containing regimen were not analyzed. Third, one of the difficulties in the treatment of CDI was recurrence; we did not assess the efficacy of doxycycline therapy for recurrent CDI. Fourth, doxycycline exposure was concurrent with oral C. difficile challenge in our study; the clinically unmet need for preventing the development of CDI through antibiotic prophylaxis was not evaluated here. Finally, oral doxycycline, metronidazole, or vancomycin was administered twice for only 1 day, but not for 10 days as the clinical recommendation for the treatment of CDI. A longer duration of doxycycline therapy may lead to a better therapeutic or pathogenic outcome and warrants further animal and clinical investigations.
In conclusion, our mouse model of CDI suggests that concurrent intraperitoneal administration of doxycycline and oral C. difficile challenge does not aggravate the disease severity of CDI. The anti-inflammatory effect and antibacterial activity of doxycycline may render it a potential therapeutic option in the treatment of CDI.

Author Contributions

Y.-P.H., P.-J.T. and W.-C.K. designed the animal studies; B.-Y.T., Y.-H.L., C.-Y.H. and Y.-L.C. performed the experiments; C.-W.C., Y.-H.C. and Y.-H.L. participated in the draft writing; P.-J.T. and W.-C.K. edited and approved the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was supported by research grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 108-2321-B-006-004, 108-2320-B-006-043-MY3, 109-2314-B-006- 089-MY3, 110-2320-B-006-024, and 110-2314-B-675-001), and Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (MOHW 110-TDU-B-211-124003).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) also serves as a resource for investigators, technicians, and staff, further ensuring that all research and testing are conducted in accordance with the highest scientific, humane, and ethical principles. Regarding The policy of the ethics board in Taiwan, a mice study without human subjects needs the “IACUC document“, instead of an “institutional review board document”. This study was approved by the IACUC of the National Cheng Kong University (Approval No. 102296).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No dataset is available.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors report no conflict of interest relevant to this article.

References

  1. Kuijper, E.J.; van Dissel, J.T.; Wilcox, M.H. Clostridium difficile: Changing epidemiology and new treatment options. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 20, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, R.F.; Man, Y.X.; Bai, Y.Y.; Shao, C.H.; Liu, C.M.; Wang, C.H.; Lei, Y.X.; Wang, Y.; Jin, Y. Molecular characterization of Clostridioides difficile ribotype 027 in a major Chinese hospital. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2021, 54, 1179–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lee, J.C.; Hung, Y.P.; Tsai, B.Y.; Tsai, P.J.; Ko, W.C. Severe Clostridium difficile infections in intensive care units: Diverse clinical presentations. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2020, 54, 1111–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chang, T.H.; Hsu, W.Y.; Yang, T.I.; Lu, C.Y.; Hsueh, P.R.; Chen, J.M.; Lee, P.I.; Huang, L.M.; Chang, L.Y. Increased age and proton pump inhibitors are associated with severe Clostridium difficile infections in children. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2020, 53, 578–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hung, Y.P.; Lee, J.C.; Tsai, B.Y.; Wu, J.L.; Liu, H.C.; Liu, H.C.; Lin, H.J.; Tsai, P.J.; Ko, W.C. Risk factors of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in hospitalized adults: Vary by hospitalized duration. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2019, 54, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hung, Y.P.; Tsai, C.S.; Tsai, B.Y.; Tsai, P.J.; Lee, Y.T.; Lee, J.C.; Liu, H.C.; Hsueh, P.R.; Lee, C.C.; Ko, W.C. Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with hematological malignancy: A multicenter study in Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2021, 54, 1101–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lin, T.C.; Hung, Y.P.; Ko, W.C.; Ruan, J.W. Fecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection in Taiwan: Establishment and implementation. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2019, 52, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, K.S.; Syue, L.S.; Cheng, A.; Yen, T.Y.; Chen, H.M.; Chiu, Y.H.; Hsu, Y.L.; Chiu, C.H.; Su, T.Y.; Tsai, W.L.; et al. Recommendations and guidelines for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection in Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2020, 53, 191–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chang, F.C.; Liu, C.P.; Sun, F.J.; Lin, C.C. Optimizing laboratory workflow for the diagnosis of Clostridiodes difficile infection in a medical center in Northern Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2021, 54, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McDonald, L.C.; Gerding, D.N.; Johnson, S.; Bakken, J.S.; Carroll, K.C.; Coffin, S.E.; Dubberke, E.R.; Garey, K.W.; Gould, C.V.; Kelly, C.; et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 66, 987–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Y.; Figler, R.A.; Kolling, G.; Bracken, T.C.; Rieger, J.; Stevenson, R.W.; Linden, J.; Guerrant, R.L.; Warren, C.A. Adenosine A2A receptor activation reduces recurrence and mortality from Clostridium difficile infection in mice following vancomycin treatment. BMC Infect. Dis. 2012, 12, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Koon, H.W.; Wang, J.; Mussatto, C.C.; Ortiz, C.; Lee, E.C.; Tran, D.H.; Chen, X.; Kelly, C.P.; Pothoulakis, C. Fidaxomicin and OP-1118 Inhibit Clostridium difficile Toxin A- and B-Mediated Inflammatory Responses via Inhibition of NF-kappaB Activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01513-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Singh, S.; Khanna, D.; Kalra, S. Minocycline and doxycycline: More Than Antibiotics. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Golledge, C.L.; Riley, T.V. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea after doxycycline malaria prophylaxis. Lancet 1995, 345, 1377–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Baxter, R.; Ray, G.T.; Fireman, B.H. Case-control study of antibiotic use and subsequent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2008, 29, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Doernberg, S.B.; Winston, L.G.; Deck, D.H.; Chambers, H.F. Does doxycycline protect against development of Clostridium difficile infection? Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 55, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Turner, R.B.; Smith, C.B.; Martello, J.L.; Slain, D. Role of doxycycline in Clostridium difficile infection acquisition. Ann. Pharmacother. 2014, 48, 772–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Schmidt, C.; Loffler, B.; Ackermann, G. Antimicrobial phenotypes and molecular basis in clinical strains of Clostridium difficile. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007, 59, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Castagliuolo, I.; Keates, A.C.; Wang, C.C.; Pasha, A.; Valenick, L.; Kelly, C.P.; Nikulasson, S.T.; LaMont, J.T.; Pothoulakis, C. Clostridium difficile toxin A stimulates macrophage-inflammatory protein-2 production in rat intestinal epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 1998, 160, 6039–6045. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hung, Y.P.; Tsai, P.J.; Lee, Y.T.; Tang, H.J.; Lin, H.J.; Liu, H.C.; Lee, J.C.; Tsai, B.Y.; Hsueh, P.R.; Ko, W.C. Nationwide surveillance of ribotypes and antimicrobial susceptibilities of toxigenic Clostridium difficile isolates with an emphasis on reduced doxycycline and tigecycline susceptibilities among ribotype 078 lineage isolates in Taiwan. Infect. Drug Resist. 2018, 11, 1197–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Hung, Y.P.; Ko, W.C.; Chou, P.H.; Chen, Y.H.; Lin, H.J.; Liu, Y.H.; Tsai, H.W.; Lee, J.C.; Tsai, P.J. Proton-Pump Inhibitor Exposure Aggravates Clostridium difficile-Associated Colitis: Evidence From a Mouse Model. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 212, 654–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Jump, R.L.; Li, Y.; Pultz, M.J.; Kypriotakis, G.; Donskey, C.J. Tigecycline exhibits inhibitory activity against Clostridium difficile in the colon of mice and does not promote growth or toxin production. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 546–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Borriello, S.P.; Barclay, F.E. An in-vitro model of colonisation resistance to Clostridium difficile infection. J. Med. Microbiol. 1986, 21, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Johansson, M.E.; Gustafsson, J.K.; Sjoberg, K.E.; Petersson, J.; Holm, L.; Sjovall, H.; Hansson, G.C. Bacteria penetrate the inner mucus layer before inflammation in the dextran sulfate colitis model. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Verdu, E.F.; Bercik, P.; Cukrowska, B.; Farre-Castany, M.A.; Bouzourene, H.; Saraga, E.; Blum, A.L.; Corthesy-Theulaz, I.; Tlaskalova-Hogenova, H.; Michetti, P. Oral administration of antigens from intestinal flora anaerobic bacteria reduces the severity of experimental acute colitis in BALB/c mice. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2000, 120, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hansen, A.K.; Malm, S.A.; Metzdorff, S.B. The cre-inducer doxycycline lowers cytokine and chemokine transcript levels in the gut of mice. J. Appl. Genet. 2017, 58, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Boynton, F.D.D.; Ericsson, A.C.; Uchihashi, M.; Dunbar, M.L.; Wilkinson, J.E. Doxycycline induces dysbiosis in female C57BL/6NCrl mice. BMC Res. Notes 2017, 10, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Angelakis, E.; Million, M.; Kankoe, S.; Lagier, J.C.; Armougom, F.; Giorgi, R.; Raoult, D. Abnormal weight gain and gut microbiota modifications are side effects of long-term doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine treatment. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3342–3347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chung, C.H.; Wu, C.J.; Lee, H.C.; Yan, J.J.; Chang, C.M.; Lee, N.Y.; Chen, P.L.; Lee, C.C.; Hung, Y.P.; Ko, W.C. Clostridium difficile infection at a medical center in southern Taiwan: Incidence, clinical features and prognosis. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2010, 43, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hung, Y.P.; Lin, H.J.; Wu, T.C.; Liu, H.C.; Lee, J.C.; Lee, C.I.; Wu, Y.H.; Wan, L.; Tsai, P.J.; Ko, W.C. Risk factors of fecal toxigenic or non-toxigenic Clostridium difficile colonization: Impact of Toll-like receptor polymorphisms and prior antibiotic exposure. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Riggs, M.M.; Sethi, A.K.; Zabarsky, T.F.; Eckstein, E.C.; Jump, R.L.; Donskey, C.J. Asymptomatic carriers are a potential source for transmission of epidemic and nonepidemic Clostridium difficile strains among long-term care facility residents. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45, 992–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ryan, J.; Murphy, C.; Twomey, C.; Paul Ross, R.; Rea, M.C.; MacSharry, J.; Sheil, B.; Shanahan, F. Asymptomatic carriage of Clostridium difficile in an Irish continuing care institution for the elderly: Prevalence and characteristics. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2010, 179, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ubeda, C.; Taur, Y.; Jenq, R.R.; Equinda, M.J.; Son, T.; Samstein, M.; Viale, A.; Socci, N.D.; van den Brink, M.R.; Kamboj, M.; et al. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus domination of intestinal microbiota is enabled by antibiotic treatment in mice and precedes bloodstream invasion in humans. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 4332–4341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hung, Y.P.; Tsai, P.J.; Hung, K.H.; Liu, H.C.; Lee, C.I.; Lin, H.J.; Wu, Y.H.; Wu, J.J.; Ko, W.C. Impact of toxigenic Clostridium difficile colonization and infection among hospitalized adults at a district hospital in southern Taiwan. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kouassi, K.A.; Dadie, A.T.; N’Guessan, K.F.; Dje, K.M.; Loukou, Y.G. Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile in cooked beef sold in Cote d’Ivoire and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Anaerobe 2014, 28, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Simango, C.; Mwakurudza, S. Clostridium difficile in broiler chickens sold at market places in Zimbabwe and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 124, 268–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Simango, C. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in the environment in a rural community in Zimbabwe. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2006, 100, 1146–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McKee, H.K.; Kajiwara, C.; Yamaguchi, T.; Ishii, Y.; Shimizu, N.; Ohara, A.; Tateda, K. Clostridioides difficile toxins enhanced the in vitro production of CXC chemokine ligand 2 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha via Toll-like receptors in macrophages. J. Med. Microbiol. 2021, 70, 001342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. McDermott, A.J.; Falkowski, N.R.; McDonald, R.A.; Frank, C.R.; Pandit, C.R.; Young, V.B.; Huffnagle, G.B. Role of interferon-gamma and inflammatory monocytes in driving colonic inflammation during acute Clostridium difficile infection in mice. Immunology 2017, 150, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Patel, A.; Khande, H.; Periasamy, H.; Mokale, S. Immunomodulatory Effect of Doxycycline Ameliorates Systemic and Pulmonary Inflammation in a Murine Polymicrobial Sepsis Model. Inflammation 2020, 43, 1035–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, W.; Xie, X.; Wu, D.; Jin, X.; Liu, R.; Hu, X.; Fu, Y.; Ding, Z.; Zhang, N.; Cao, Y. Doxycycline Attenuates Leptospira-Induced IL-1beta by Suppressing NLRP3 Inflammasome Priming. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Antibiotics 11 00116 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of doxycycline, compared with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), predisposed C56BL/6 mice to the development of Clostridioides difficile infection after retreatment with a 5-day antibiotic cocktail followed by oral proton pump inhibitor (PPI).
Scheme 1. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of doxycycline, compared with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), predisposed C56BL/6 mice to the development of Clostridioides difficile infection after retreatment with a 5-day antibiotic cocktail followed by oral proton pump inhibitor (PPI).
Antibiotics 11 00116 sch001
Antibiotics 11 00116 g001 550
Figure 1. A protocol of oral doxycycline, metronidazole, or vancomycin therapy in Clostridioides difficile-infected mice.
Figure 1. A protocol of oral doxycycline, metronidazole, or vancomycin therapy in Clostridioides difficile-infected mice.
Antibiotics 11 00116 g001
Antibiotics 11 00116 g002 550
Figure 2. Cecum weight (A) and body weight (B) reduction and mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokine and tight junction protein genes (C) in colonic tissue from mice receiving doxycycline followed by oral challenge of vegetative cells of a toxigenic Clostridioides difficile strain. The values are expressed as means ± standard errors. (A: ****, p < 0.001; B: ****, p < 0.001; C: *, p = 0.04; **, p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Cecum weight (A) and body weight (B) reduction and mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokine and tight junction protein genes (C) in colonic tissue from mice receiving doxycycline followed by oral challenge of vegetative cells of a toxigenic Clostridioides difficile strain. The values are expressed as means ± standard errors. (A: ****, p < 0.001; B: ****, p < 0.001; C: *, p = 0.04; **, p < 0.01).
Antibiotics 11 00116 g002
Antibiotics 11 00116 g003 550
Figure 3. Epithelial inflammation (neutrophil infiltration, epithelial damage, and irregular shape of colon mucosa) in mice receiving phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or doxycycline followed by oral challenge with Clostridioides difficile. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of resected colons in the PBS and doxycycline groups (magnification 400×).
Figure 3. Epithelial inflammation (neutrophil infiltration, epithelial damage, and irregular shape of colon mucosa) in mice receiving phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or doxycycline followed by oral challenge with Clostridioides difficile. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of resected colons in the PBS and doxycycline groups (magnification 400×).
Antibiotics 11 00116 g003
Antibiotics 11 00116 g004 550
Figure 4. Therapeutic effect of oral doxycycline on C. difficile infection model: Cecum weights (A), body weight changes (B), and fecal Clostridioides difficile bacterial load (C) of C. difficile-infected mice receiving PBS, doxycycline, metronidazole, or vancomycin therapy. The results of the uninfected group are demonstrated by a dashed line. The values are expressed as the means ± standard errors (***, p < 0.0001).
Figure 4. Therapeutic effect of oral doxycycline on C. difficile infection model: Cecum weights (A), body weight changes (B), and fecal Clostridioides difficile bacterial load (C) of C. difficile-infected mice receiving PBS, doxycycline, metronidazole, or vancomycin therapy. The results of the uninfected group are demonstrated by a dashed line. The values are expressed as the means ± standard errors (***, p < 0.0001).
Antibiotics 11 00116 g004
Antibiotics 11 00116 g005 550
Figure 5. RNA expression of cytokines (A: interleukin [IL]-1β, macrophage inflammatory protein [MIP]-2, and IL-18) and tight junction proteins (B: zonula occludens [ZO]-1 and occludin) genes in colonic tissue of Clostridioides difficile-infected mice receiving PBS, doxycycline, metronidazole, or vancomycin therapy. The values are expressed as the means ± standard errors (A: *, p = 0.035; **, p = 0.033; ***, p = 0.018; B: *, p = 0.024; ***, p < 0.0001).
Figure 5. RNA expression of cytokines (A: interleukin [IL]-1β, macrophage inflammatory protein [MIP]-2, and IL-18) and tight junction proteins (B: zonula occludens [ZO]-1 and occludin) genes in colonic tissue of Clostridioides difficile-infected mice receiving PBS, doxycycline, metronidazole, or vancomycin therapy. The values are expressed as the means ± standard errors (A: *, p = 0.035; **, p = 0.033; ***, p = 0.018; B: *, p = 0.024; ***, p < 0.0001).
Antibiotics 11 00116 g005
Antibiotics 11 00116 g006 550
Figure 6. Epithelial inflammation (neutrophil infiltration, epithelial damage, and irregular shape of colon mucosa) in the colons of Clostridioides difficile-infected mice orally receiving phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), doxycycline, metronidazole, or vancomycin therapy (hematoxylin and eosin staining of colons, magnification 400×).
Figure 6. Epithelial inflammation (neutrophil infiltration, epithelial damage, and irregular shape of colon mucosa) in the colons of Clostridioides difficile-infected mice orally receiving phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), doxycycline, metronidazole, or vancomycin therapy (hematoxylin and eosin staining of colons, magnification 400×).
Antibiotics 11 00116 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsai, B.-Y.; Lai, Y.-H.; Chiu, C.-W.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Chen, Y.-H.; Chen, Y.-L.; Tsai, P.-J.; Hung, Y.-P.; Ko, W.-C. Effect of Doxycycline in Decreasing the Severity of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Mice. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010116

AMA Style

Tsai B-Y, Lai Y-H, Chiu C-W, Hsu C-Y, Chen Y-H, Chen Y-L, Tsai P-J, Hung Y-P, Ko W-C. Effect of Doxycycline in Decreasing the Severity of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Mice. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(1):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsai, Bo-Yang, Yi-Hsin Lai, Chun-Wei Chiu, Chih-Yu Hsu, Yi-Hsuan Chen, Yueh-Lin Chen, Pei-Jane Tsai, Yuan-Pin Hung, and Wen-Chien Ko. 2022. "Effect of Doxycycline in Decreasing the Severity of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Mice" Antibiotics 11, no. 1: 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010116

APA Style

Tsai, B. -Y., Lai, Y. -H., Chiu, C. -W., Hsu, C. -Y., Chen, Y. -H., Chen, Y. -L., Tsai, P. -J., Hung, Y. -P., & Ko, W. -C. (2022). Effect of Doxycycline in Decreasing the Severity of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Mice. Antibiotics, 11(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010116

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop