Next Article in Journal
Clinical Features and Molecular Characteristics of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Ocular Infection in Taiwan
Next Article in Special Issue
Bis-Thiourea Quaternary Ammonium Salts as Potential Agents against Bacterial Strains from Food and Environmental Matrices
Previous Article in Journal
Hospital Pharmacists and Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Qualitative Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Evaluation of the Potential Pharmacological Activity and Molecular Targets of New Benzimidazole-Based Schiff Base Metal Complexes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/antibiotics10121444
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antibacterial, Immunomodulatory, and Lung Protective Effects of Boswelliadalzielii Oleoresin Ethanol Extract in Pulmonary Diseases: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

by
Badriyah Alotaibi
1,†,
Walaa A. Negm
2,*,†,
Engy Elekhnawy
3,*,
Thanaa A. El-Masry
4,
Walaa S. Elseady
5,
Asmaa Saleh
1,6,
Khalid N. Alotaibi
7 and
Suzy A. El-Sherbeni
2
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 84428, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta 31111, Egypt
3
Pharmaceutical Microbiology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta 31111, Egypt
4
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta 31111, Egypt
5
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta 31111, Egypt
6
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al Azhar University, Cairo 11311, Egypt
7
Health Services Directorate, Ministry of Defense, Riyadh 84428, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors equally contributed to this work.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(12), 1444; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121444
Submission received: 7 October 2021 / Revised: 14 November 2021 / Accepted: 17 November 2021 / Published: 25 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue What’s New: Natural and Synthetic Antibacterials and/or Agents with Multiple Activities?)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lung diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, and pneumonia are causing many global health problems. The COVID-19 pandemic has directed the scientific community’s attention toward performing more research to explore novel therapeutic drugs for pulmonary diseases. Herein, gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry tentatively identified 44 compounds in frankincense ethanol extract (FEE). We investigated the antibacterial and antibiofilm effects of FEE against Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria, isolated from patients with respiratory infections. In addition, its in vitro immunomodulatory activity was explored by the detection of the gene expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), cycloxygenase-2 (COX-2), and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). In addition, its anticancer activity against the A549 lung cancer cell line and human skin fibroblast (HSF) normal cell line was studied. Moreover, the in vivo lung protective potential of FEE was explored histologically and immunohistochemically in mice using a benzo(a)pyrene induced lung damage model. FEE exhibited antibacterial and antibiofilm activities besides the significant inhibition of gene expression of TNFα, IL-6, and NF-κB. FEE also exerted a cytotoxic effect against A549 cell line. Histological and immunohistochemical investigations with morphometric analysis of the mean area percentage and color intensity of positive TNF-α, COX-2, and NF-κB and Bcl-2 reactions revealed the lung protective activity of FEE. This study outlined the promising therapeutic activity of oleoresin obtained from B. dalzielii in the treatment of different pulmonary diseases.

1. Introduction

There are many pulmonary diseases of the upper and lower respiratory tract, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD), asthma, bronchitis, pneumonia, and cystic fibrosis [1]. Despite the presence of many drugs for pulmonary diseases, these disorders cause a significant number of deaths every year worldwide, especially in the current time due to the pandemic disease COVID-19 [2,3]. In addition, many drugs currently used in the treatment of different pulmonary diseases can cause severe adverse effects. On the other hand, many plants are used for the treatment of asthma, cough, respiratory tract infections, and pneumonia all over the world [4]. Plants contain various safe secondary metabolites, such as phenol, alkaloids, resins, essential oils, and gum, which are responsible for their therapeutic effects [5,6,7,8,9].
Oleogum resin, or frankincense, is produced as a whitish exudate from the tree bark of different Boswellia species [10]. Oleoresin protects the trees against infections and pests. It has been used since ancient times for medicine and incense [11]. The present study investigated the frankincense (oleogum resin) of Boswellia dalzielii Hutch., family Burseraceae [12]. It is a tree, up to 13 m high, of the wooded savanna, which inhabits the northern Ivory Coast of Nigeria, Cameroun, and Ubangi-Shari. Frankincense oozes out from the tree bark as a milky fluid, which is gradually solidified by exposure to air. The gum part includes bassorin, while boswellic acids are found in the resin part, besides the volatile oil part with different terpenes and terpenoids which give the frankincense its characteristic odor. It was reported that frankincense had precious, ubiquitous, and important biological activities, such as anti-inflammatory, tumor suppressor [13], antimicrobial, antioxidant [14], and immunomodulatory [15] activities, as well as its ability to treat heart diseases and improve learning and memory in neurological diseases [16].
The present study investigated the effect of the oleoresin of Boswellia dalzielii, or frankincense ethanol extract (FEE), against Gram-negative P. aeruginosa clinical isolates and their biofilm. The opportunistic pathogen, P. aeruginosa, is a common etiological agent for many lung infections, particularly in patients suffering from impaired lung defenses such as patients with cystic fibrosis and COPD [17]. It commonly causes pulmonary diseases such as community or hospital acquired pneumonia, in addition to ventilator associated pneumonia [18]. Several researchers have screened different plant extracts for their antibiofilm activity against P. aeruginosa isolates, as they have an extraordinary ability to form biofilms [19,20].
The immune system (innate and adaptive) plays an important role in sustaining human life through protection against pathogenic organisms such as viruses, bacteria, and fungi. Thus, any disturbance in the functions of the immune system could lead to many diseases [21]. Immunomodulation causes either the induction or inhibition of any phase of the immunological response. Many immunomodulators have been obtained from diverse sources, such as plants, microorganisms, and fungi [22]. In the current study, the immunomodulatory activity of FEE on LPS induced PBMC was elucidated.
Benzo(a)pyrene or B(a)P, a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, is one of the major constituents of tobacco smoke which has a main role in the induction of lung damage and carcinogenesis [23]. It results in many changes in the lung, leading to the development of many chronic disorders in the lung, including inflammation, edema, COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, and lung cancer [24,25].
The oleoresin of Boswellia dalzielii or frankincense ethanol extract (FEE) has not biologically investigated before, according to our knowledge. Therefore, we aimed to examine the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of FEE against the opportunistic pathogen, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, isolated from patients suffering from pulmonary diseases, which was performed for the first time. In addition, the anticancer activity on human nonsmall cell lung cancer cell line A549, and the immunomodulatory activity were studied in vitro. Moreover, the in vivo lung protective effect of FEE against induced lung damage by benzo(a)pyrene or B(a)P was elucidated in mice for the first time, to make a sufficient coverage about the ability of FEE to protect and treat the lung against different ailments in human beings.

2. Results

2.1. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy (GC/MS) Analysis of FEE

Table 1 and Figure 1 and Figure 2 demonstrated the different compounds established by mass spectrometry.

2.2. In Vitro Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activities of FEE

2.2.1. Antibacterial Activity

FEE exhibited antibacterial activity against the tested Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates with a range of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values from 250 to 1000 µg/mL.

2.2.2. Antibiofilm Activity

FEE displayed antibiofilm activity against the biofilm-forming P. aeruginosa isolates, as it caused a significant reduction in biofilm formation in 38.46% of the tested isolates, as shown in Figure 3, using P. aeruginosa PAO1 standard isolate, which is a biofilm-producing isolate, as a control. In addition, its impact on the biofilm morphology was studied using a bright field microscope, after staining of the biofilm with crystal violet, and scanning electron microscopes (SEM); a representative example is shown in Figure 4.

2.3. Immunomodulatory Activity of FEE

2.3.1. Cell Viability Assay

The effect of FEE, at concentrations of 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300 and 400 μg/mL, on the cell viability of PBMC was investigated using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. IC50 against peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was determined at 343.49 ± 20.47, as shown in Figure 5.

2.3.2. Assessment of FEE Effect on Genes Expression by Quantitative Real Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

The mRNA expression of the bioactive molecules that are related to inflammation includes cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as well as enzymes such as nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), in addition to the transcription factor, nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB), was found to be induced in PBMC treated with lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Interestingly, FEE treatment, at 0.5 IC50, significantly attenuated the upregulation of the relative gene expression of TNF-α, IL-6, and NF-κB, compared to the nontreated LPS induced PBMCs, as shown in Figure 6.

2.4. In Vitro Anticancer Effect of FEE

Different doses of FEE (0.03, 0.3, 3, 30, 300 μg/mL) were tested by sulforhodamine B (SRB) cytotoxicity assay against A549 and HSF cell lines. IC50 against A549 lung cancer cell line and HSF normal cell line was determined at 21.8 ± 1.921 and 134.1 ± 2.442 μg/mL, respectively, as shown in Figure 7.

2.5. In Vivo Lung Protective Activity of FEE

2.5.1. Effect of FEE on Lung Histological Characters

The hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections of the lung specimens of the control group (group I) revealed the normal histological lung architecture: alveoli with thin walls, alveolar sacs, clear alveolar spaces, and thin-walled blood vessels. The epithelial lining of the alveoli was composed of attenuated squamous alveolar cells with densely flat nuclei (type I pneumocytes) and large alveolar cells with large, rounded nuclei (type II pneumocytes) (Figure 8A). Sections from group II (diseased) revealed a marked loss of lung architecture. The alveoli were distorted, and its epithelial lining depicted pyknotic nuclei and degenerated the vacuolization of its cytoplasm. Some alveoli were collapsed, with thickening of the alveolar septa. Severe congestion of the blood vessels and interstitial hemorrhage could be observed (Figure 8B). In the case of mice treated with 50 mg/kg b. w. of FEE; group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE) showed a non-noticeable effect on the histopathological picture compared to group II (Figure 8C). Treatment with 100 mg/kg b. w. of FEE in group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE) resulted in partial improvement of the histological picture of the lung; alveolar spaces appeared clear with thin-walled alveoli. However, some distorted alveoli with partially thick walls and congested blood vessels could be detected (Figure 8D). Nevertheless, the mice sections treated with 150 mg of FEE, group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE), showed obvious protection of its architecture to become close to the controls, however, few collapsed alveoli with thick walls could be detected (Figure 8E). The lung sections of mice administered with 150 mg/kg b. w. of FEE and not taken the single oral dose of B(a)P, group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only), showed normal histological appearance evidenced by normal thickening of most alveolar walls and normal epithelial lining, which indicated the drug safety at the maximum dose (Figure 8F).

2.5.2. Immunohistochemical Studies

TNF-α Immunohistochemical Staining

The control group immunostained sections (group I) exposed a few cells with cytoplasmic TNF-α positive immunohistochemical reaction expressed by brownish coloration (Figure 9A). However, the group II (diseased) sections showed frequent cells having a strong positive cytoplasmic TNF-α reaction (Figure 9B). At the same time, the group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE) sections displayed multiple cells having a strong positive cytoplasmic TNF-α reaction (Figure 9C). However, the group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE) sections revealed certain cells having a moderately positive cytoplasmic TNF-α reaction (Figure 9D). However, the group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE) sections depicted a nearly normal cytoplasmic TNF-α reaction (Figure 9E). The group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only) sections exhibited few cells with positive cytoplasmic TNF-α reaction (Figure 9F). Morphometric examination of the mean area percentage and the color strength of the positive TNF-α reaction exhibited a significant rise in these parameters in groups II and group III in comparison with the control group, nevertheless, in group IV, a significant decrease in both parameters was depicted, as compared to the diseased group II. In addition, a decrease was detected in these parameters in groups V and VI, which was nonsignificant in comparison with the control group and significant in comparison with the diseased group (Table 2).

COX-2 Immunohistochemical Staining

Immunostained sections from the control group (group I) exhibited a low number of cells having a positive immunohistochemical reaction of cytoplasmic COX-2 depicted by a brownish coloration (Figure 10A). However, sections from group II (diseased) showed several cells having a strong positive COX-2 (Figure 10B). On the other hand, group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE) sections revealed many cells with a moderately positive COX-2 reaction (Figure 10C). Nevertheless, group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE) sections showed some cells having a positive COX-2 reaction (Figure 10D). Sections from group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE) exhibited a near normal COX-2 reaction (Figure 10E). However, sections of group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only) showed few cells with a positive cytoplasmic COX-2 reaction, similar to the control (Figure 10F). Morphometric analysis of the mean area percentage and the color strength of the positive COX-2 reaction represented a significant increase in these parameters in group II and group III, in comparison with the control group. While group IV revealed a significant decrease in both parameters compared to the control group. A nonsignificant alteration was detected in these parameters in groups V and VI in comparison with the control group, though a significant alteration was observed in comparison with the diseased group (group II) (Table 2).

NF-κB (P65) Antigen Immunohistochemical Staining

In the control group NF-κB-immunostained sections (group I), a small number of cells displayed a weak positive brown nuclear with or without perinuclear cytoplasmic NF-κB immunoreactions (Figure 11A). Sections of group II (diseased) had many cells having a very strong positive nuclear with or without perinuclear cytoplasmic NF-κB immunoreaction (Figure 11B). At the same time, group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE) immunostained sections exhibited only a moderate positive nuclear, with or without perinuclear cytoplasmic NF-κB immunoreaction in certain cells (Figure 11C). In group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE), sections showed certain cells with a positive nuclear, with or without perinuclear cytoplasmic NF-κB immunoreaction (Figure 11D). Sections from group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE) exhibited a near normal NF-κB reaction (Figure 11E). However, sections of group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only) showed few cells with a weak positive nuclear, with or without a perinuclear cytoplasmic NF-κB immunoreaction, similar to the control (Figure 11F). Morphometric analysis of both the mean area percentage and the color strength of the positive NF-κB reaction unveiled a significant rise in these parameters in group II and group III in comparison with the control group, whereas group IV displayed a significant reduction in these parameters in comparison with the control. Groups V and VI displayed a significant lessening in these parameters in comparison with the diseased group (group II) and a nonsignificant alteration was detected according to control (group I) (Table 2).

B-Cell Lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) Immunohistochemical Staining

The Bcl-2 immuno-stained sections of the control group (group I) displayed a strong positive cytoplasmic Bcl-2 immunoreaction (Figure 12A). Sections of group II (diseased) showed a very weak Bcl-2-immunoreaction in its cytoplasm (Figure 12B). Group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE) revealed a mild positive Bcl-2-immunoreaction (Figure 12C). A moderate immunostaining reaction for Bcl-2 was detected in group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE) (Figure 12D). Nevertheless, sections from group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE) depicted a stronger Bcl-2 immunostaining (Figure 12E). Sections from group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only) revealed a strong positive cytoplasmic Bcl-2 reaction (Figure 12F). Morphometric examination of the mean area percentage and the color strength of positive Bcl-2 immunoreaction revealed a significant reduction in group II and group III, in comparison with the control group. Meanwhile, a significant increase was detected in groups IV, V and VI, in comparison with the diseased group. No statistically significant alteration between group V and the control group was revealed (Table 2).

3. Discussion

There is a significant need for the development of novel therapeutic compounds for lung disorders, as many of them could lead to lung failure and subsequent death. The recent pandemic disease, COVID-19, has focused the world’s attention on the importance of the presence of new alternatives to the currently present drugs, to be able to treat the nonresponding cases. Thus, we decided to explore the antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of frankincense ethanol extract (FEE) against P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from patients suffering from respiratory tract infections. The linkage between inflammation induced cancer and pathogenic infectious organisms was confirmed. The bacterial pathogens cause chronic inflammatory conditions characterized by irritation and tissue damage, which lead to malignant changes (cancers) [26]. Therefore, experimental studies of its in vitro immunomodulatory and anti-lung cancer effects were performed. Moreover, the in vivo lung protective influence of FEE on the lung damage resulting from B(a)P in mice was carried out for the first time.
Different Boswellia trees are the source of frankincense oleogum resin, which contains a complex mixture of compounds, e.g., essential oils of monoterpenes, diterpenes, and others, as well as penta- and tetracyclic terpenoids, e.g., α- and β-boswellic acids (BA), acetyl-α-boswellic acid (ABA), 11-keto-β-boswellic acid and 3-O-acetyl-11-keto-β- boswellic acid (AKBA) [27], in addition to lupeolic acids, incensole, cembrenes and triterpenediol [13]. In addition, it contains other compounds, such as polyphenols, alkaloids, saponins, and polysaccharides [28]. The reported remarkable biological activities of frankincense oleogum resin are mostly attributed to the pentacyclic boswellic acids of the resin especially AKBA [16], and the monoterpenes of the essential oils of Boswellia species [15]. The active parts are the oil and resin as previously mentioned, therefore in this study, they were extracted with ethanol to obtain FEE from B. dalzielii. Little attention has been paid to the study of the biological effects of the oleoresin of B. dalzielii, besides, it was reported that the oil content varies between different Boswellia species in different countries according to the environment’s climate and harvest conditions. [29].
The dissimilar commercial varieties of frankincense could be distinguished by the GC/MS profile of the essential oil, which is used as a chemotaxonomical marker [30]. The current study investigated FEE phytochemically by GC/MS analysis, which revealed the identity of 44 different terpenes, (tentatively) of terpenoids and other compounds. The major compounds were limonene oxide, cis-ocimene, α-pinene, α-cyclocitral, α-elemene, limonene, neryl nitrile, p-menth-8(10)-en-9-ol, α-thujene, isopinocarveol, verbenone, myrcene, and p-cymene. A previous study [10] concerning the essential oil of the oleoresin of B. dalzielii trees from northern Nigeria revealed that the major terpenes were α-pinene, limonene, α- thujene, and myrcene with a lower level of p-cymene. It was noticed that the essential oil contains mostly monoterpenes and nearly lacks sesquiterpenes. The previous study confirmed the oleoresin biological source, as the volatile oil composition of frankincense is consistent with the reported data for the oleogum resin obtained from B. dalzielii [10]. The essential oil possessed immunomodulatory [15], anticancer [31], and antimicrobial effects [14]. In addition, it was found that the volatile oil from the frankincense oleoresin of B. carterii exerted antimicrobial activities against various microorganisms [32]. The α- and β- boswellic acids, as well as their derivatives, exerted outstanding anti-inflammatory effects, in addition to anticancer, immunomodulatory, and antimicrobial effects [16]. Acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid (AKBA), a highly active component of the therapeutic frankincense from Boswellia species, is a pentacyclic terpenoid effective against many inflammatory diseases, including asthma, arthritis, Crohn’s disease, chronic and ulcerative colitis [16]. In a previous study, it was found that BAs influence the cellular defense system via their interaction with the release of cytokines. Boswellic acids suppress activation of NF-κB, resulting in a decrease in proinflammatory cytokine production [33].
Owing to the capability of P. aeruginosa to resist several antibiotics and its biofilm-forming ability, developing new nonantibiotic antimicrobials is a priority. This study revealed that FEE had MIC values that ranged from 250 to 1000 µg/mL against the tested isolates. In addition, it showed antibiofilm activity against the biofilm-forming P. aeruginosa isolates. Biofilm is a bacterial aggregation enclosed in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances. It is one of the bacterial strategies to survive in the changes of the living conditions such as fluctuation in temperature and availability of nutrients [34].
Macrophages are considered the main cells of the innate immune system, as they afford a first line defense for protecting the body from different infections. LPS, a main constituent of the Gram-negative bacterial outer membrane, is a strong activator for macrophages [35]. When macrophages are activated in response to a stimulus such as LPS, they produce inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, in addition to inflammatory mediators such as nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins (PGs). NO is produced from the activity of iNOS on the amino acid, L-arginine, and PGs are produced by the action of COX-2 enzyme on arachidonic acid [36]. Activated macrophages overexpress these enzymes (iNOS and COX-2), resulting in the production of vast amounts of NO and PGs. Besides, NF-κB is a transcription factor that induces the proinflammatory genes, to produce large amounts of the proinflammatory mediators such as iNOS and COX-2 in LPS induced macrophages [37]. All these bioactive compounds have a host defensive action during the inflammatory process. Overexpression of such molecules could be detrimental to the tissues as it could result in many autoimmune diseases that could lead to death. Thus, inhibition of such interactions offers a new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of infectious diseases, e. g., lungs infected with P. aeruginosa [38] as well as against many autoimmune diseases [39]. The use of immunomodulators from natural products, such as antimicrobial drugs, could solve the problem of bacterial resistance against traditional antibiotics, because they do not deal with microorganisms directly. Along with this, they could help the immunocompromised patients, who suffer from inactivity of antimicrobials to treat their infections [38].
Herein, we determined the relative gene expression of TNF-α, IL-6, iNOS, COX-2, and NF-κB in LPS induced PBMC after treatment with FEE. FEE exhibited a significant decrease in the upregulation of the relative expression of the tested genes of TNF-α, IL-6, and NF-κB when compared to the untreated LPS-induced PBMCs. Many researchers have investigated the impact of plant extracts on the relative gene expression of inflammation-related enzymes and cytokines [40,41].
It was reported that the direct link between cancer and an infectious disease due to aberrant pathogenic microbial colonization occurred in about 20% of all cancer cases [42]. We should consider the possibility that patients who suffer from COPD and secondary infections caused by P. aeruginosa may have lung cancer. Therefore, in vitro anti-lung cancer activity of FEE was investigated. SRB cell viability assay of FEE against A549 lung cancer cell line and HSF normal cell line was conducted. IC50 of FEE was 21.8 ± 1.921 and 134.1 ± 2.442 μg/mL, respectively. This indicated a possible anti-lung cancer effect of FEE, with a selectivity index of 6.15. The linkage between chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer was established [43]. The anticancer effect of frankincense was reported to be due to modification in signaling transduction, resulting in the inhibition of proliferation and metastasis [13].
In this study, short-term exposure of the mice lungs to B(a)P was utilized as a model to induce lung damage to study the potential lung protective effect of FEE by histological assessment of the lung tissues and measuring inflammatory and apoptosis markers such as TNF-α, COX-2, NF-κB, and Bcl-2. It was found that the FEE dose of 150 mg/kg b.w. showed the best effect in comparison with the control group. Concerning safety, the maximum dose of FEE of group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only), without taking the single oral dose of B(a)P, showed normal lung histology with normal thickening of alveolar walls and normal epithelial lining.
The histology of mice lung sections was affected differently according to the treatment type. Mice sections were normal in control group I, while the diseased group II showed severe lung distortion. The treated groups IV and V with FEE 100 and 150 mg/kg b.w., respectively, showed better lung architecture, especially group V. Normal alveolar sacs, clear alveolar spaces, thin-walled alveoli, normal type I pneumocytes and type II pneumocytes, and small thin-walled blood vessels, were noticed in group V.
The immune stained lung sections of mice of groups I, VI, V, and VI exhibited a normal reaction of few cells with positive cytoplasmic TNF-α, Cox-2, NF-κB reactions. On the other hand, groups II and III showed many cells with strong and moderate positive cytoplasmic TNF-α, Cox-2, NF-κB reactions, respectively, expressed by a brownish color. Morphometric analysis revealed that treatment with 150 mg/kg b.w., with or without administration of a single dose of B(a)P, in groups V and VI reduced the mean area percentage and the color strength of positive TNF-α, Cox-2, NF-κB reactions significantly in comparison to the diseased group II. On the other hand, treatment with 100 mg/kg b.w. (group IV, diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE) decreased both mean area percentage and the color intensity of positive TNF-α, Cox-2, NF-κB reactions significantly, compared with the control and the diseased groups. Mice of group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE) showed multiple cells with strong positive cytoplasmic TNF-α Cox-2, NF-κB reactions. Bcl-2 immunohistochemical staining of lung sections of mice demonstrated a strong positive reaction in groups I, V, and VI, while it displayed a moderate reaction in group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE). Groups II (diseased) and III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE) showed weak to mild positive Bcl-2 immunoreaction. Morphometric examination of the mean area percentage and the color strength of positive Bcl-2 immunoreaction exhibited a highly significant reduction in group II (diseased) and group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE) in comparison with the control group. Meanwhile, a significant increase was noticed in group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE) in comparison with the diseased group. Groups V and VI showed no statistically significant difference according to the control group, but they displayed a significant increase when compared to the diseased group II. Bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic protein that is known to be an oncogene as when its level is increased it stops the mitochondrial discharge of cytochrome C resulting in inhibition of the apoptosis process [44].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. The Utilized Chemicals

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Anti-TNF-α antibody (ab6671), anti-COX-2 antibody (ab15191), anti-NF-κB p65 antibody (ab17742), and anti-Bcl-2 antibody were purchased from Abcam corporation (Waltham, MA, USA).

4.2. Preparation of Frankincense Ethanol Extract

Frankincense oleogum resin (200 g) was purchased in May 2019 from a herbal store located at Al Farwaniyah in Kuwait. It was obtained from trees of B. dalzielii Hutch. growing in Nigeria. The tree description was consistent with that of B. dalzielii Hutch. [45]. A voucher specimen (PG-U-00416) was deposited at the Herbarium of Pharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University. It was powdered and macerated in ethanol 100% (300 mL × 3 times) at RT. Evaporation of combined ethanol extract was performed with a rotary evaporator at 40 °C under vacuum to have 8.5 g of yellow semisolid mass.

4.3. GC/MS Data Analysis

Thermo Scientific, Trace GC Ultra / ISQ Single Quadrupole MS for GC/MS analysis of frankincense ethanol extract. The column type was TG-5MS fused silica capillary column (30 m, 0.251 mm, 0.1 mm film thickness, Waltham, MA, USA). The ionization mode, which was used for GC/MS detection, was an electron ionization system of 70 eV ionization energy. The carrier gas was helium, which was used at a constant flow rate of 1mL/min. The temperature of the injector and MS transfer line was set at 280 °C. The temperature programming of the oven was set at an initial temperature of 40 °C for 3 min, then was increased to a final temperature of 280 °C by an increasing rate of 5 °C/min and held for 5 min.
The percent relative peak area was used for the quantitative determination of the identified components. The characterization of compounds was performed tentatively, based on the comparison of their relative retention times and mass spectra with those of the NIST, WILEY library data of the GC/MS system.

4.4. In Vitro Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activities of FEE

4.4.1. Collection and Identification of P. aeruginosa Clinical Isolates

Thirty-nine P. aeruginosa isolates were collected from tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage, and sputum samples from patients suffering from cystic fibrosis and COPD, as previously described [46]. Isolates were identified by Gram stain and biochemical tests [47]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used as a standard strain.

4.4.2. Screening of the Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of FEE was tested against P. aeruginosa clinical isolates using the agar well diffusion method [48]. The surfaces of tryptic soya agar (TSA) plates were flooded with 100 µL of bacterial suspension of each isolate. Wells of 5 mm diameter were filled with 100 µL of FEE (1000 µg/mL). The plates were then incubated overnight at 37 °C. The diameters of the inhibition zones were determined in mm.

4.4.3. MIC Determination

The FEE MICs were determined by the broth microdilution method as previously described [49].

4.4.4. Antibiofilm Activity

This was performed according to [50], before and after treatment with 0.5 MIC values of FEE (with a range from 125 to 500 µg/mL). In brief, after inoculation of 100 µL of P. aeruginosa suspensions into a 96-well microtitration plate at 37 °C for 24 h, the cells that did not adhere to the bottom of the wells were gently removed by washing with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) three times and then were left for drying for 1 h. Crystal violet (0.1%) was used to stain the formed biofilms and the samples were thoroughly washed using distilled water. Finally, 125 µL acetic acid (30%) was added to each well and left for 15 min and optical density (OD) values were measured at 492 nm using ELISA Auto Reader (Sunrise Tecan, Austria). The biofilm reduction percentage was detected by the equation:
B i o f i l m   i n h i b i t i o n   p e r c e n t a g e = 100 × O D   b e f o r e   t r e a t m e n t − O D   a f t e r   t r e a t m e n t O D   b e f o r e   t r e a t m e n t

4.4.5. Effect of FEE on Biofilm Morphology Using Bright Field and SEM

Biofilm morphology was investigated before and after treatment with 0.5 MIC values of FEE (ranged from 125 to 500 µg/mL) by a bright field microscope and SEM. After allowing each biofilm-forming bacteria to grow on 2 glass slides overnight, the first glass slide was stained with crystal violet for examination by a bright field microscope according to Attallah, N.G.M et al. [51]. Besides, the second glass slide was prepared according to the method mentioned in [52] for examination by SEM.

4.5. Immunomodulatory Effect of FEE

4.5.1. Isolation of PBMCs

These were attained from a healthy human subject. They were isolated from the human blood by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation and then cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI 1640) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution in flat bottom 6-well plates and then incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 24 h.

4.5.2. MTT Cell Viability Test

Toxicity of FEE, at concentrations 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, and 400 µg/mL, was assessed on PBMC using the MTT cell viability test. Mean inhibitory concentration (IC50) of FEE on PBMC was calculated, and half IC50 was utilized to explore the immunological responses in LPS induced PBMC, as previously described [53]. PBMC were regularly cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM). This medium contained glucose, L-glutamine, 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum, and 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin/amphotericin B. They were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 [54]. The cells were then seeded (at a concentration of 1 × 104 cells/mL) into 96-well cell culture plates and incubated for 24 h in DMEM with the previously mentioned supplements till reaching the exponential growth. They were incubated for 48 h with different concentrations of FEE, after that the medium was removed and 5 mg/mL of MTT reagent was added to each plate and incubated for three to four hours. An ELISA microplate reader was used to assess the absorbance at 630 nm after dissolving formazan crystals in 100 μL acidified isopropanol [55].

4.5.3. qRT-PCR

The quantitative detection of the gene expression of TNF-α, IL-6, iNOS, COX-2, and NF-κB in LPS induced PBMC model after treatment with FEE was performed to examine the in vitro immunomodulatory impact of FEE on human macrophages. In brief, 2 × 106 cells/mL of PBMCs in RPMI 1640 medium were seeded into 6-well plates with a flat bottom for 24 h. Then, 100 μL of Escherichia coli LPS (20 ng/mL) was added to the cells for 24 h in the presence and absence of FEE (with a concentration of 0.5 IC50) [40]. The effect of FEE on the gene expressions of TNF-α, IL-6, iNOS, COX-2, and NF-κB was evaluated using qRT-PCR and the utilized primers are shown in Table S1. After extraction of total RNA from PBMCs using RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), it was retrotranscribed to complementary DNA (cDNA) using SensiFAST™ cDNA kit (Bioline, London, UK) and GAPDH was utilized as a housekeeping gene. SensiFAST™ SYBR green PCR master mix (Bioline, London, UK) was used. The fold change in the gene expression relative to the control (untreated cells) was detected using the 2−ΔΔCT method [50].

4.6. In Vitro Anti-Lung Cancer Effect of FEE (SRB Assay)

Nawah Scientific Inc., (Mokatam, Cairo, Egypt) provided A549 (lung cancer) and HSF (human skin fibroblast) cell lines. In humidified, 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. The SRB cell viability assay was performed. Aliquots of 100 μL cell suspension (5 × 103 cells) were cultured in 96-well plates for 24 h. Other aliquots of 100 μL media containing different concentrations (0.03, 0.3, 3, 30, 300 µg/mL) of FEE were put to the cells. The drug treatment lasted for 72 h, after that, the cells were fixed by exchanging the medium with 150 μL of 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and the incubation process was performed for one hour at the refrigerator. The TCA solution was excluded from the equation, and the cells were washed five times with distilled water. 70 μL SRB solution (0.4% w/v) was included in aliquots and left at room temperature for 10 min in a dark place. Plates were washed with 1% acetic acid and left to dry in the air overnight. Then, the proteinbound SRB stain was dissolved by 150 μL of TRIS (10 mM); the OD values were determined at 540 nm using Omega ELISA reader (Ortenberg, Germany) [45].

4.7. In Vivo Lung-Protective Effect of FEE

4.7.1. Animals

Healthy, male Swiss albino mice 10–12 weeks old that weighed 28–35 g were utilized for this study. The protocol of the experiment was approved and accredited by the Research Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Egypt (FPTU-REC, 105/2020/321). Mice stayed in rooms with good ventilation, and the temperature was kept at room temperature with a 12 h light/dark cycle. Mice were housed in plastic (polypropylene) cages in groups of six mice per cage in the animal house of the Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University. They were provided with free access to the standard laboratory water and feed.

4.7.2. Induction of Lung Damage in Mice by Benzo (a) Pyrene

Groups of 6 mice each were administered orally with different solutions of 30 μL or 0.03 mL per mouse as follows: Group I or control group was administered 70% ethanol daily for 7 days, Group II or diseased group took 70% ethanol daily for 7 days, then a single oral dose of 0.4 mL of B(a)P in corn oil (125 mg/kg b. w.) on 7th day only, Groups III, IV, and V were treated with 50, 100, 150 mg/kg b.w. of FEE in 70% ethanol, respectively, daily for 7 days, then a single oral dose of 0.4 mL of B(a)P in corn oil (125 mg/kg b. w.) on the 7th day, Group VI was administered 150 mg/kg b. w. of FEE in 70% ethanol daily to study the safety of this drug. Following 24 h, the studied animals were anesthetized using mild ether anesthesia and then sacrificed by cervical dislocation technique. Samples of lung tissues were acquired for histological investigations and immunohistochemistry studies.

4.7.3. Preparation of the Specimens for Histological Examination

Lung specimens were immediately extracted and fixed in 10% buffered formalin. Lung specimens were processed and embedded in paraffin blocks and stained with H&E as previously described [49].

4.7.4. Specimen Preparation for Immunohistochemistry Investigations

Serial 5 μm sections were deparaffinized and hydrated, then trypsin solution was added to the sections for 15 min for retrieval of the antigens. Hydrogen peroxide solution in methanol was used for blocking the endogenous peroxidase activity. Then, the sections were thoroughly washed with PBS and incubated in normal goat serum for blocking any unspecific binding. The sections were then stained using the primary antibodies for 12 h and they were rinsed again using PBS and allowed to be left with the biotinylated secondary antibodies for 1 h. After that, they were allowed to be left with peroxidase conjugated streptavidin for 1 h. The color reaction was attained by allowing the sections to be incubated with diaminobenzidine (DAB) and hydrogen peroxide for 5 min using hematoxylin as a counterstain. Negative controls were prepared by excluding the primary antibodies [50]. The reaction appears as brown cytoplasmic deposits in the case of anti-TNF-α and anti-COX-2. NF-κB immunostained lung sections were regarded as positive when showing obvious brown nuclear with or without perinuclear cytoplasmic coloration. Cells were considered positive when showing brown cytoplasmic precipitation with Bcl-2.

4.7.5. Morphometrical Examination

The sections were examined using Leica light microscope (DM500, AG, 9435 Heerbrugg, Swizterland) and photographed using a digital camera (ICC50, Wild Heerbrugg, Swizterland) fixed to the microscope using Image J software, version 1.48v, (Bethesda, Maryland, MD, USA) for image analysis. Ten diverse nonoverlapping fields from the slides were inspected using a magnification of 400 for quantitative estimation of the percentage of the mean area and color strength of TNF-α, COX-2, NF-κB, and Bcl-2 positive immunohistochemical reactions.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

The results were revealed as mean ± SD. The differences between the different tested groups were established using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a post hoc test (Tukey). p values < 0.05 were regarded to be statistically significant. All statistics were carried out using SPSS, version 23.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).

5. Conclusions

This study was carried out to reveal some of the active components of the frankincense ethanol extract (FEE) of B. dalzielii. by the GC/MS profile. FEE could treat lungs against various disorders, e. g., infectious disease, cancer, and lung damage induced by B(a)P. It showed antibacterial and antibiofilm effects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from patients with diseased lungs. FEE exhibited a significant immunomodulatory downregulation effect on TNF-α, IL-6, and NF-κB gene expression in LPS induced PBMC. This could be a promising strategy for new antimicrobial drugs. FEE as an immunomodulator may solve the problem of bacterial resistance. In addition, it may expand the treatment options for immunocompromised patients suffering from poor traditional antimicrobials effect. Moreover, the anti-inflammatory effect of FEE by reducing the NF-κB, COX-2, and TNF-α immunoreactions in mice, with B(a)P- induced lung damage, could be considered in the prevention of inflammation induced cancer of the lung.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics10121444/s1, Table S1: Sequences of the utilized primers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.A.; data curation, B.A.; formal analysis, E.E.; funding acquisition, B.A., and A.S.; investigation, W.A.N. and A.S.; methodology, W.A.N., E.E., W.S.E. and S.A.E.-S.; project administration, T.A.E.-M.; resources, K.N.A. and S.A.E.-S.; software, W.S.E. and K.N.A.; supervision, T.A.E.-M.; visualization, A.S. and K.N.A.; writing—original draft, W.A.N., E.E., W.S.E. and S.A.E.-S.; writing—review and editing, T.A.E.-M., W.A.N., E.E. and S.A.E.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, through the Research Groups Program Grant no. (RGP-1440-0022)(2).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University (Approval code 34947), and the approval date was 21 March 2021.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), through the Research Groups Program Grant no. (RGP-1440-0022)(2). The authors, therefore, gratefully acknowledge the DSR technical and financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Park, H.; Shin, J.W.; Park, S.-G.; Kim, W. Microbial Communities in the Upper Respiratory Tract of Patients with Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, 109710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nishiga, M.; Wang, D.W.; Han, Y.; Lewis, D.B.; Wu, J.C. COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease: From basic mechanisms to clinical perspectives. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020, 17, 543–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Claxton, S.; Porter, P.; Brisbane, J.; Bear, N.; Wood, J.; Peltonen, V.; Della, P.; Smith, C.; Abeyratne, U. Identifying acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using patient-reported symptoms and cough feature analysis. NPJ Digit. Med. 2021, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alamgeer Younis, W.; Asif, H.; Sharif, A.; Riaz, H.; Bukhari, I.A.; Assiri, A.M. Traditional medicinal plants used for respiratory disorders in Pakistan: A review of the ethno-medicinal and pharmacological evidence. Chinese Med. 2018, 13, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Gupta, I.; Gupta, V.; Parihar, A.; Gupta, S.; Lüdtke, R.; Safayhi, H.; Ammon, H.P. Effects of Boswellia serrata gum resin in patients with bronchial asthma: Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-week clinical study. Eur. J. Med. Res. 1998, 3, 511–514. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang, H.; Song, L.; Ju, W.; Wang, X.; Dong, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ya, P.; Yang, C.; Li, F. The acute airway inflammation induced by PM2.5 exposure and the treatment of essential oils in Balb/c mice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, srep44256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shen, T.; Lou, H.X. Bioactive constituents of Myrrh and frankincense, two simultaneously prescribed gum resins in Chinese traditional medicine. Chem. Biodivers. 2008, 5, 540–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Impellizzeri, D.; Talero, E.; Siracusa, R.; Alcaide, A.; Cordaro, M.; Maria Zubelia, J.; Bruschetta, G.; Crupi, R.; Esposito, E.; Cuzzocrea, S.; et al. Protective effect of polyphenols in an inflammatory process associated with experimental pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 114, 853–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mitra, S.; Prova, S.R.; Sultana, S.A.; Das, R.; Nainu, F.; Emran, T.; Bin Tareq, A.M.; Uddin, M.S.; Alqahtani, A.M.; Dhama, K.; et al. Therapeutic potential of indole alkaloids in respiratory diseases: A comprehensive review. Phytomedicine 2021, 90, 153649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. DeCarlo, A.; Johnson, S.; Okeke-Agulu, K.I.; Dosoky, N.S.; Wax, S.J.; Owolabi, M.S.; Setzer, W.N. Compositional analysis of the essential oil of Boswellia dalzielii frankincense from West Africa reveals two major chemotypes. Phytochemistry 2019, 164, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Langenheim, J.H. Plant Resins: Chemistry, Evolution, Ecology, and Ethnobotany. Timber Press, Inc.: Portland, OR, USA, 2003; ISBN 978-0881925746. [Google Scholar]
  12. Boswellia Dalzielii in Global Plants. Available online: https://plants.jstor.org/compilation/Boswellia.dalzielii (accessed on 14 July 2021).
  13. Efferth, T.; Oesch, F. Anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer activities of frankincense: Targets, treatments and toxicities. In Seminars in Cancer Biology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Soliman, A.M.; Majeed, R.R.; Himyari, H.F.A.; Um, D.; Khan, S.A. In Vitro Cytotoxic, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Alcoholic and Chloroform Extracts of Dhofari Frankincense. Dhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 19, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mikhaeil, B.R.; Maatooq, G.T.; Badria, F.A.; Amer, M.M.A. Chemistry and immunomodulatory activity of frankincense oil. Z. Für. Nat. C. 2003, 58, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hamidpour, R.; Hamidpour, S.; Hamidpour, M.; Shahlari, M. Frankincense (Rǔ Xiāng; Boswellia species): From the selection of traditional applications to the novel phytotherapy for the prevention and treatment of serious diseases. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2013, 3, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Davies, G.; Wells, A.U.; Doffman, S.; Watanabe, S.; Wilson, R. The effect of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on pulmonary function in patients with bronchiectasis. Eur. Respir. J. 2006, 28, 974–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Garcia-Clemente, M.; Rosa, D.; de la Máiz, L.; Girón, R.; Blanco, M.; Olveira, C.; Canton, R.; Martinez-García, M.A. Impact of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection on Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Airway Diseases. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Deepika, M.S.; Thangam, R.; Sakthidhasan, P.; Arun, S.; Sivasubramanian, S.; Thirumurugan, R. Combined Effect of a Natural Flavonoid Rutin from Citrus Sinensis and Conventional Antibiotic Gentamicin on Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Biofilm Formation. Food Control. 2018, 90, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Selim, S.A.; Adam, M.E.; Hassan, S.M.; Albalawi, A.R. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of the essential oil and methanol extract of the Mediterranean cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L.). BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 14, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zheng, D.; Liwinski, T.; Elinav, E. Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 492–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, S.; Gao, Q.; Rong, C.; Wang, S.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, Y.; Xu, J. Immunomodulatory effects of edible and medicinal mushrooms and their bioactive immunoregulatory products. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Piccardo, M.T.; Stella, A.; Valerio, F. Is the smokers exposure to environmental tobacco smoke negligible? Environ. Health 2010, 9, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Shahid, A.; Ali, R.; Ali, N.; Hasan, S.K.; Rashid, S.; Majed, F.; Sultana, S. Attenuation of genotoxicity, oxidative stress, apoptosis and inflammation by rutin in benzo(a)pyrene exposed lungs of mice: Plausible role of NF-κB, TNF-α and Bcl-2. J. Complement. Integr. Med. 2016, 13, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Qamar, W.; Khan, A.Q.; Khan, R.; Lateef, A.; Tahir, M.; Rehman, M.U.; Ali, F.; Sultana, S. Benzo(a)pyrene-induced pulmonary inflammation, edema, surfactant dysfunction, and injuries in rats: Alleviation by farnesol. Exp. Lung Res. 2012, 38, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Samaras, V.; Rafailidis, P.I.; Mourtzoukou, E.G.; Peppas, G.; Falagas, M.E. Chronic bacterial and parasitic infections and cancer: A review. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2010, 4, 267–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ammon, H. Modulation of the immune system by Boswellia serrata extracts and boswellic acids. Phytomedicine 2010, 17, 862–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Morikawa, T.; Matsuda, H.; Yoshikawa, M. A review of anti-inflammatory terpenoids from the incense gum resins frankincense and myrrh. J. Oleo Sci. 2017, 66, 805–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Al-Harrasi, A.; Al-Saidi, S. Phytochemical Analysis of the Essential Oil from Botanically Certified Oleogum Resin of Boswellia sacra (Omani Luban). Molecules 2008, 13, 2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hayashi, S.; Amemori, H.; Kameoka, H.; Hanafusa, M.; Furukawa, K. Comparison of Volatile Compounds from Olibanum from Various Countries. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2011, 10, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Frank, M.B.; Yang, Q.; Osban, J.; Azzarello, J.T.; Saban, M.R.; Saban, R.; Ashley, R.A.; Welter, J.C.; Fung, K.M.; Lin, H.K. Frankincense oil derived from Boswellia carteri induces tumor cell specific cytotoxicity. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2009, 9, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Camarda, L.; Dayton, T.; Di Stefano, V.; Pitonzo, R.; Schillaci, D. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of some oleogum resin essential oils from Boswellia spp. (Burseraceae). Ann. Chim. 2007, 97, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Raja, A.F.; Ali, F.; Khan, I.A.; Shawl, A.S.; Arora, D.S.; Shah, B.A.; Taneja, S.C. Antistaphylococcal and biofilm inhibitory activities of acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid from Boswellia serrata. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Thi, M.T.T.; Wibowo, D.; Rehm, B.H. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pidwill, G.R.; Gibson, J.F.; Cole, J.; Renshaw, S.A.; Foster, S.J. The Role of Macrophages in Staphylococcus Aureus Infection. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Viola, A.; Munari, F.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, R.; Scolaro, T.; Castegna, A. The Metabolic Signature of Macrophage Responses. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Dong, J.; Li, J.; Cui, L.; Wang, Y.; Lin, J.; Qu, Y.; Wang, H. Cortisol modulates inflammatory responses in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells via the NF-κB and MAPK pathways. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Committee on New Directions in the Study of Antimicrobial Therapeutics Promising. Approaches to the Development of Immunomodulation for the Treatment of Infectious Diseases: Immunomodulation. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK19846/ (accessed on 2 October 2021).
  39. Sharifi-Rad, M.; Anil Kumar, N.V.; Zucca, P.; Varoni, E.M.; Dini, L.; Panzarini, E.; Rajkovic, J.; Tsouh Fokou, P.V.; Azzini, E.; Peluso, I.; et al. Lifestyle, Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidants: Back and Forth in the Pathophysiology of Chronic Diseases. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ezzat, M.I.; Hassan, M.; Abdelhalim, M.A.; El-Desoky, A.M.; Mohamed, S.O.; Ezzat, S.M. Immunomodulatory effect of Noni fruit and its isolates: Insights into cell-mediated immune response and inhibition of LPS-induced THP-1 macrophage inflammation. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 3170–3179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tomé-Carneiro, J.; Larrosa, M.; Yáñez-Gascón, M.J.; Dávalos, A.; Gil-Zamorano, J.; Gonzálvez, M.; García-Almagro, F.J.; Ruiz Ros, J.A.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A.; Espín, J.C.; et al. One-year supplementation with a grape extract containing resveratrol modulates inflammatory-related microRNAs and cytokines expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of type 2 diabetes and hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease. Pharmacol. Res. 2013, 72, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Elinav, E.; Nowarski, R.; Thaiss, C.A.; Hu, B.; Jin, C.; Flavell, R.A. Inflammation-induced cancer: Crosstalk between tumours, immune cells and microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 759–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Multhoff, G.; Molls, M.; Radons, J. Chronic Inflammation in Cancer Development. Front. Immunol. 2011, 2, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Hardwick, J.M.; Soane, L. Multiple Functions of BCL-2 Family Proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5, a008722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kew Science. Boswellia Dalzielii Hutch. Plants of the World Online. Available online: http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:127040-1 (accessed on 3 October 2021).
  46. El-Sayed, N.R.; Samir, R.; Abdel-Hafez, L.J.M.; Ramadan, M.A. Olive Leaf Extract Modulates Quorum Sensing Genes and Biofilm Formation in Multi-Drug Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ozer, B.; Duran, N.; Onlen, Y.; Savas, L. Efflux Pump Genes and Antimicrobial Resistance of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Lower Respiratory Tract Infections Acquired in an Intensive Care Unit. J. Antibiot. 2012, 65, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Cooper, K.E. Theory of Antibiotic Inhibition Zones in Agar Media. Nat. Cell Biol. 1955, 176, 510–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Weinstein, M.P.; Patel, J.B.; Bobenchik, A.M.; Campeau, S.; Cullen, S.K.; Galas, M.F.; Gold, H.; Humphries, R.M.; Kirn, T.J.; Lewis Ii, J.S.; et al. M100 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing A CLSI Supplement for Global Application. In Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2020; ISBN 9781684400324. [Google Scholar]
  50. Elekhnawy, E.A.; Sonbol, F.I.; Elbanna, T.E.; Abdelaziz, A.A. Evaluation of the impact of adaptation of Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates to benzalkonium chloride on biofilm formation. Egypt. J. Med. Hum. Genet. 2021, 22, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Attallah, N.G.M.; Negm, W.A.; Elekhnawy, E.; Altwaijry, N.; Elmongy, E.I.; El-Masry, T.A.; Alturki, E.A.; Yousef, D.A.; Shoukheba, M.Y. Antibacterial Activity of Boswellia Sacra Flueck. Oleoresin Extract against Porphyromonas Gingivalis Periodontal Pathogen. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Attallah, N.G.M.; Negm, W.A.; Elekhnawy, E.; Elmongy, E.I.; Altwaijry, N.; El-Haroun, H.; El-Masry, T.A.; El-Sherbeni, S.A. Elucidation of Phytochemical Content of Cupressus macrocarpa Leaves: In Vitro and In Vivo Antibacterial Effect against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chan-Zapata, I.; Canul-Canche, J.; Fernández-Martín, K.; Martín-Quintal, Z.; Torres-Romero, J.C.; Lara-Riegos, J.C.; Ramírez-Camacho, M.A.; Arana-Argáez, V.E. Immunomodulatory effects of the methanolic extract from Pouteria campechiana leaves in macrophage functions. Food Agric. Immunol. 2017, 29, 386–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Lanucara, F.; Eyers, C.E. Mass spectrometric-based quantitative proteomics using SILAC. Methods Enzymol. 2011, 500, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Alley, M.C.; Scudiero, D.A.; Monks, A.; Hursey, M.; Czerwinski, M.J.; Fine, D.L.; Abbott, B.J.; Mayo, J.G.; Shoemaker, R.; Boyd, M.R. Feasibility of Drug Screening with Panels of Human Tumor Cell Lines Using a Microculture Tetrazolium Assay. Cancer Res. 1988, 48, 584–588. [Google Scholar]
Antibiotics 10 01444 g001 550
Figure 1. Mass spectrum of GC/MS analysis of frankincense ethanol extract (FEE).
Figure 1. Mass spectrum of GC/MS analysis of frankincense ethanol extract (FEE).
Antibiotics 10 01444 g001
Antibiotics 10 01444 g002a 550Antibiotics 10 01444 g002b 550
Figure 2. Structures of compounds identified by GC/MS analysis of FEE.
Figure 2. Structures of compounds identified by GC/MS analysis of FEE.
Antibiotics 10 01444 g002aAntibiotics 10 01444 g002b
Antibiotics 10 01444 g003 550
Figure 3. A chart showing the percentages of biofilm reduction by P. aeruginosa isolates after treatment with FEE.
Figure 3. A chart showing the percentages of biofilm reduction by P. aeruginosa isolates after treatment with FEE.
Antibiotics 10 01444 g003
Antibiotics 10 01444 g004 550
Figure 4. An illustrative example of the significant decline in the formation of biofilms by P. aeruginosa isolates after treatment with FEE (125 µg/mL). A bright field microscope was utilized to examine the formed biofilm: (a) before and (b) after treatment with FEE. SEM was utilized to observe the formed biofilm (c) before and (d) after treatment with FEE.
Figure 4. An illustrative example of the significant decline in the formation of biofilms by P. aeruginosa isolates after treatment with FEE (125 µg/mL). A bright field microscope was utilized to examine the formed biofilm: (a) before and (b) after treatment with FEE. SEM was utilized to observe the formed biofilm (c) before and (d) after treatment with FEE.
Antibiotics 10 01444 g004
Antibiotics 10 01444 g005 550
Figure 5. Cell viability assay of FEE on PBMC following 48 h incubation period. Different concentrations of FEE of 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, and 400 µg/mL were used to treat PBMC, and MTT was utilized to determine the cell viability. IC50 was determined as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments.
Figure 5. Cell viability assay of FEE on PBMC following 48 h incubation period. Different concentrations of FEE of 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, and 400 µg/mL were used to treat PBMC, and MTT was utilized to determine the cell viability. IC50 was determined as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments.
Antibiotics 10 01444 g005
Antibiotics 10 01444 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of FEE on the expression of TNF-α, IL-6, iNOS, COX-2, and NF-κB in LPS induced PBMCs. * represents a significant reduction.
Figure 6. Effect of FEE on the expression of TNF-α, IL-6, iNOS, COX-2, and NF-κB in LPS induced PBMCs. * represents a significant reduction.
Antibiotics 10 01444 g006
Antibiotics 10 01444 g007 550
Figure 7. SRB cytotoxicity assay of FEE on A549 lung cancer cell line (A), and HSF human skin fibroblast normal cell line (B), after an incubation period of 72 h. Different concentrations of 0.03, 0.3, 3, 30 and 300 µg/mL of FEE were used. IC50s values were expressed as mean ± SD of three performed assays.
Figure 7. SRB cytotoxicity assay of FEE on A549 lung cancer cell line (A), and HSF human skin fibroblast normal cell line (B), after an incubation period of 72 h. Different concentrations of 0.03, 0.3, 3, 30 and 300 µg/mL of FEE were used. IC50s values were expressed as mean ± SD of three performed assays.
Antibiotics 10 01444 g007
Antibiotics 10 01444 g008 550
Figure 8. Photomicrographs of sections of the lung tissues of adult male mice stained with H&E showing: (A) Group I (control): alveolar sacs (s), alveoli with thin walls (arrows) formed of flat cells with densely stained nuclei type I pneumocytes (P1) and type II pneumocytes (P2) with large rounded nuclei, clear alveolar spaces (A), small thin-walled blood vessels (BV). (B) Group II (diseased): the lung architecture is disordered; some alveoli appear collapsed (star) with very thick alveolar walls (black arrows). Many alveolar epithelial lining cells show vacuolar cytoplasmic necrosis with pyknotic nuclei (red arrows). Severely congested blood vessels (BV) and interstitial hemorrhages (hg) could be seen. (C) Group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE): moderate disorganization of alveoli; collapsed alveoli (star) with moderate thickening of the alveolar wall (black arrow) and many epithelial linings of the alveoli with pyknotic nuclei and vacuolated cytoplasm (red arrows). Moderately congested blood vessels (BV) and interstitial hemorrhages (hg) could be observed. (D) Group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE): some normal alveolar sacs (S) and alveoli (A) with thin walls (thin arrows). Notice, mild thickening of alveolar walls (thick arrows), congested blood vessels (BV), and minimal interstitial hemorrhages (hg). (E) Group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE): the lung architecture is relatively near to the normal with alveolar sacs (S), clear alveolar spaces (A), thin-walled alveoli (thin arrows), normal type I pneumocytes (P1), as well as type II pneumocytes (P2) and small thin-walled blood vessels (BV). Few alveoli are collapsed (star) with minimal thick walls (thick arrow). (F) Group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only): the architecture of the lung is well organized. The alveolar sacs (S), alveolar spaces (A), the alveolar walls (arrows), type I pneumocytes (P1) and type II pneumocytes (P2) and blood vessels (BV) appear normal. [H&E ×400, scale bar = 50 μm].
Figure 8. Photomicrographs of sections of the lung tissues of adult male mice stained with H&E showing: (A) Group I (control): alveolar sacs (s), alveoli with thin walls (arrows) formed of flat cells with densely stained nuclei type I pneumocytes (P1) and type II pneumocytes (P2) with large rounded nuclei, clear alveolar spaces (A), small thin-walled blood vessels (BV). (B) Group II (diseased): the lung architecture is disordered; some alveoli appear collapsed (star) with very thick alveolar walls (black arrows). Many alveolar epithelial lining cells show vacuolar cytoplasmic necrosis with pyknotic nuclei (red arrows). Severely congested blood vessels (BV) and interstitial hemorrhages (hg) could be seen. (C) Group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE): moderate disorganization of alveoli; collapsed alveoli (star) with moderate thickening of the alveolar wall (black arrow) and many epithelial linings of the alveoli with pyknotic nuclei and vacuolated cytoplasm (red arrows). Moderately congested blood vessels (BV) and interstitial hemorrhages (hg) could be observed. (D) Group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE): some normal alveolar sacs (S) and alveoli (A) with thin walls (thin arrows). Notice, mild thickening of alveolar walls (thick arrows), congested blood vessels (BV), and minimal interstitial hemorrhages (hg). (E) Group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE): the lung architecture is relatively near to the normal with alveolar sacs (S), clear alveolar spaces (A), thin-walled alveoli (thin arrows), normal type I pneumocytes (P1), as well as type II pneumocytes (P2) and small thin-walled blood vessels (BV). Few alveoli are collapsed (star) with minimal thick walls (thick arrow). (F) Group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only): the architecture of the lung is well organized. The alveolar sacs (S), alveolar spaces (A), the alveolar walls (arrows), type I pneumocytes (P1) and type II pneumocytes (P2) and blood vessels (BV) appear normal. [H&E ×400, scale bar = 50 μm].
Antibiotics 10 01444 g008
Antibiotics 10 01444 g009 550
Figure 9. Photomicrographs representing TNF-α immunoexpression in lung sections of adult male mice displaying: (A) in group I (control): few cells having weak positive immunoreaction (arrows) represented by brown cytoplasmic coloration, (B) in group II (diseased): multiple cells with a very strong positive immunoreaction (arrows), (C) in group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE): multiple cells with strong positive immunoreaction (arrows), (D) in group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE): certain cells with moderate positive immunoreaction, (E) in group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE): few cells with weak positive immunoreaction and (F) in group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only): few cells with weak positive immunoreaction (arrows). [TNF-α immunostaining ×400, scale bar = 50 μm].
Figure 9. Photomicrographs representing TNF-α immunoexpression in lung sections of adult male mice displaying: (A) in group I (control): few cells having weak positive immunoreaction (arrows) represented by brown cytoplasmic coloration, (B) in group II (diseased): multiple cells with a very strong positive immunoreaction (arrows), (C) in group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE): multiple cells with strong positive immunoreaction (arrows), (D) in group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE): certain cells with moderate positive immunoreaction, (E) in group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE): few cells with weak positive immunoreaction and (F) in group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only): few cells with weak positive immunoreaction (arrows). [TNF-α immunostaining ×400, scale bar = 50 μm].
Antibiotics 10 01444 g009
Antibiotics 10 01444 g010 550
Figure 10. Photomicrographs representing COX-2 immunoexpression in lung sections of adult male mice displaying: (A) in group I (control): very weak positive immunoreactions in the cytoplasm of the lining alveolar epithelial cells (arrows), (B): in group II (diseased): very strong positive immunoreactions in the cytoplasm of the alveolar epithelium (arrows), (C) in group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE): many cells having strong positive immunoreaction (arrows), (D) in group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE): certain cells exhibit moderate strong immunoreactions (arrows), (E) in group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE): few cells with very weak positive cytoplasmic immunoreaction (arrows) and (F) in group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only): few cells with very weak positive immunoreaction (arrows). [COX-2 immunostaining ×400, scale bar = 50 μm].
Figure 10. Photomicrographs representing COX-2 immunoexpression in lung sections of adult male mice displaying: (A) in group I (control): very weak positive immunoreactions in the cytoplasm of the lining alveolar epithelial cells (arrows), (B): in group II (diseased): very strong positive immunoreactions in the cytoplasm of the alveolar epithelium (arrows), (C) in group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE): many cells having strong positive immunoreaction (arrows), (D) in group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE): certain cells exhibit moderate strong immunoreactions (arrows), (E) in group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE): few cells with very weak positive cytoplasmic immunoreaction (arrows) and (F) in group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only): few cells with very weak positive immunoreaction (arrows). [COX-2 immunostaining ×400, scale bar = 50 μm].
Antibiotics 10 01444 g010
Antibiotics 10 01444 g011 550
Figure 11. Photomicrographs representing NF-κB (P65) immune stained lung sections of adult male mice exhibiting: (A) in group I (control): weak positive brown nuclear immunoreaction for NF-κB in a very low number of cells, (B) in group II (diseased): very strong positive NF-κB (P65) nuclear immunoreaction for in a large number of cells (arrows), (C) in group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE): moderate positive NF-κB (P65) nuclear immunoreaction in certain cells (arrows), (D) in group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE): moderate positive NF-κB (P65) nuclear immunoreaction in a low number of cells (arrows), (E) in group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE): weak positive nuclear NF-κB (P65) immunoreaction in a very low number of cells (arrows) and (F) in group VI (150 mg/kg only): weak positive nuclear NF-κB (P65) immunoreaction in a low number of cells (arrows). [NF-κB immunostaining×400, scale bar = 50 μm].
Figure 11. Photomicrographs representing NF-κB (P65) immune stained lung sections of adult male mice exhibiting: (A) in group I (control): weak positive brown nuclear immunoreaction for NF-κB in a very low number of cells, (B) in group II (diseased): very strong positive NF-κB (P65) nuclear immunoreaction for in a large number of cells (arrows), (C) in group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE): moderate positive NF-κB (P65) nuclear immunoreaction in certain cells (arrows), (D) in group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE): moderate positive NF-κB (P65) nuclear immunoreaction in a low number of cells (arrows), (E) in group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE): weak positive nuclear NF-κB (P65) immunoreaction in a very low number of cells (arrows) and (F) in group VI (150 mg/kg only): weak positive nuclear NF-κB (P65) immunoreaction in a low number of cells (arrows). [NF-κB immunostaining×400, scale bar = 50 μm].
Antibiotics 10 01444 g011
Antibiotics 10 01444 g012 550
Figure 12. Photomicrographs of Bcl-2 immuno-expression in adult male lung sections revealing: (A) in group I (control): many cells having strong positive immunoreaction (arrows) represented by the brown color of the cytoplasm, (B) in group II (diseased): very weak immunoreaction (arrows), (C) in group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE): few cells with positive Bcl-2 immunoreaction (arrows), (D) in group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE): certain cells with strong positive immunoreaction, (E) in group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE): multiple cells with strong positive immunoreaction and (F) in group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only): frequent cells with strong positive immunoreaction (arrows). [Bcl-2 immunostaining ×400, scale bar = 50 μm].
Figure 12. Photomicrographs of Bcl-2 immuno-expression in adult male lung sections revealing: (A) in group I (control): many cells having strong positive immunoreaction (arrows) represented by the brown color of the cytoplasm, (B) in group II (diseased): very weak immunoreaction (arrows), (C) in group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE): few cells with positive Bcl-2 immunoreaction (arrows), (D) in group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE): certain cells with strong positive immunoreaction, (E) in group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE): multiple cells with strong positive immunoreaction and (F) in group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only): frequent cells with strong positive immunoreaction (arrows). [Bcl-2 immunostaining ×400, scale bar = 50 μm].
Antibiotics 10 01444 g012
Table
Table 1. GC/MS analysis of frankincense ethanol extract.
Table 1. GC/MS analysis of frankincense ethanol extract.
No.Rt (min.)Peak Area %CompoundLibrary
18.166.38cis-OcimeneWiley
28.265.99α-PineneWiley
38.620.65CampheneWiley
49.462.85MyrceneWiley
510.033.50α-ThujeneWiley
611.020.74p-CymeneWiley
711.134.26(+)-LimoneneWiley
812.830.62VerbenolWiley
913.420.43LinaloolWiley
1013.503.63p-Menth-8(10)-en-9-olMainlib and Wiley
1113.570.61cis-SalveneWiley
1213.790.60ThujoneWiley
1314.091.42α-CampholenealdehydeWiley
1414.533.15IsopinocarveolWiley
1514.805.80α-CyclocitralWiley
1615.180.59PinocarvoneMainlib and Wiley
1715.451.08cis-SabinolWiley
1815.760.82Verbenyl, ethyl etherMainlib
1916.140.48MyrtenalWiley
2016.261.08MyrtenolWiley
2116.562.99VerbenoneWiley
2216.881.22CarveolWiley
2318.190.583,5-DimethoxytolueneMainlib and Wiley
2418.630.53AnetholeWiley
2518.690.60Bronyl acetateMainlib
2619.390.865,5-Dimethyl bicyclo [2.1.1] hexane-1-carboxylic acidWiley
2724.360.692,6-Octadiene-1,8-diol- 2,6-dimethylMainlib and Wiley
2832.990.32trans-CaryophylleneWiley
2933.674.05Neryl nitrileMainlib and Wiley
3033.924.61α-ElemeneWiley
3134.292.09Geranyl-alpha-terpineneMainlib
3234.760.57γ-ElemeneMainlib
3336.610.54cis-α-Bisabolene epoxideMainlib
3437.265.24Methyl arachidonateWiley
3537.344.15Germacrene BWiley
3637.506.71Limonene oxideMainlib and Wiley
3737.635.9315-Oxabicyclo [12.1.0] pentadeca-6,10-diene-7-methanolWiley
3837.950.99Nerolidyl propionateMainlib
3938.561.509-(3,3-Dimethyloxiran-2-yl)-2,7-dimethylnona-2,6-dien-1-olMainlib and Wiley
4038.630.55Z-5-Methyl-6-heneicosen-11-oneMainlib
4138.810.45Nerolidol-epoxy acetateWiley
4239.636.526-Methyl-5-octen-2-oneMainlib
4339.920.734,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diolMainlib and Wiley
4440.080.9519-Di-torulosolWiley
Table
Table 2. Morphometric and statistical investigation of the tested groups.
Table 2. Morphometric and statistical investigation of the tested groups.
ItemGroup I *Group II *Group III *Group IV *Group V *Group VI *
Area percentage of TNF-α14.301 ± 3.590
b,c,d		48.562 ± 5.654 a,c,d,e,f36.804 ± 2.674
a,b,d,e,f		19.008 ± 2.102
a,b,c,e,f		16.741 ± 1.755
b,c,d		15.141± 2.097
b,c,d
The color intensity of TNF-α10.468 ± 1.746
b,c,d		56.555 ± 4.648 a,c,d,e,f49.781 ± 2.667
a,b,d,e,f		13.634 ± 2.172
a,b,c,f		12.491 ± 3.164
b,c		10.077 ± 1.548
b,c,d
Area percentage of COX-214.468 ± 1.744
b,c,d		48.885 ± 4.942
a,c,d,e,f		35.416 ± 2.972
a,b,d,e,f		17.931 ± 2.49
a,b,c		16.611 ± 2.27
b,c		15.618 ± 1.959
b,c
The color intensity of COX-211.623 ± 1.873
b,c,d		46.024 ± 9.21
a, d,e,f		44.313 ± 8.778
a,d,e,f		14.315 ± 1.568
a,b,c,e,f		12.007 ± 2.172
b,c,d		11.777 ± 1.726
b,c,d
Area percentage of NF-κb10.102 ± 1.359
b,c,d		35.093 ± 2.94
a,c,d,e,f		26.957 ± 4.768
a,b,d,e,f		11.879 ± 0.905
a,b,c,f		11.770 ± 1.137
b,c		9.797 ± 2.204
b,c,d
The color intensity of NF-κb15.016 ± 3.119
b,c,d		57.511 ± 6.423
a,c,d,e,f		43.3 ± 2.281
a,b,d,e,f		20.808 ± 5.3
a,b,c,f		17.722 ± 3.62
b,c		15.764 ± 3.459
b,c,d
Area percentage of Bcl-248.329 ± 4.509
b,c,d		15.460 ± 3.666
a,d,e,f		21.161 ± 4.128 a,b,d,e,f42.01 ± 4.137
a,b,c,f		45.047 ± 3.435
b,c		45.933 ± 3.992
b,c,d
The color intensity of Bcl-246.524 ± 3.213
b,c,d		17.404 ± 4.283
a,d,e,f		25.372 ± 3.233
a,b,d,e,f		42.52 ± 2.448
a,b,c,f		44.091 ± 3.846
b,c		45.465 ± 3.395
b,c,d
* Data are displayed as mean ± SD of the studied group. The letter a denotes significance compared to group I (control); b denotes significance in comparison with group II (diseased); c denotes significance in comparison with group III (diseased, 50 mg/kg FEE); d denotes significance in comparison with group IV (diseased, 100 mg/kg FEE); e denotes significance in comparison with group V (diseased, 150 mg/kg FEE); and f denotes significance in comparison with group VI (150 mg/kg FEE only).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alotaibi, B.; Negm, W.A.; Elekhnawy, E.; El-Masry, T.A.; Elseady, W.S.; Saleh, A.; Alotaibi, K.N.; El-Sherbeni, S.A. Antibacterial, Immunomodulatory, and Lung Protective Effects of Boswelliadalzielii Oleoresin Ethanol Extract in Pulmonary Diseases: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1444. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121444

AMA Style

Alotaibi B, Negm WA, Elekhnawy E, El-Masry TA, Elseady WS, Saleh A, Alotaibi KN, El-Sherbeni SA. Antibacterial, Immunomodulatory, and Lung Protective Effects of Boswelliadalzielii Oleoresin Ethanol Extract in Pulmonary Diseases: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(12):1444. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121444

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alotaibi, Badriyah, Walaa A. Negm, Engy Elekhnawy, Thanaa A. El-Masry, Walaa S. Elseady, Asmaa Saleh, Khalid N. Alotaibi, and Suzy A. El-Sherbeni. 2021. "Antibacterial, Immunomodulatory, and Lung Protective Effects of Boswelliadalzielii Oleoresin Ethanol Extract in Pulmonary Diseases: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies" Antibiotics 10, no. 12: 1444. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121444

APA Style

Alotaibi, B., Negm, W. A., Elekhnawy, E., El-Masry, T. A., Elseady, W. S., Saleh, A., Alotaibi, K. N., & El-Sherbeni, S. A. (2021). Antibacterial, Immunomodulatory, and Lung Protective Effects of Boswelliadalzielii Oleoresin Ethanol Extract in Pulmonary Diseases: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Antibiotics, 10(12), 1444. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121444

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop