Magnetoelastic Sensors-Based Pumpless Microfluidic Chip for Point-of-Care Coagulation Kinetics Monitoring
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Reagents and Equipment
2.2. Measurement Principle
2.3. Design of ME Sensing Chip
2.4. Fabrication of ME Sensing Chip
2.5. Measurement Setup
2.6. Sample Reparation
2.7. Heparin Anticoagulation Assessment
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Fluid Dynamic Analysis and Blood Flow Evaluation
3.2. Performance Validation of the Chip
3.3. Heparin Assessment of Clinical Samples
3.4. Sensitivity of Clotting Parameters to Blood Components
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bianchi, P.; Beccaris, C.; Norbert, M.; Dunlop, B.; Ranucci, M. Use of Coagulation Point-of-Care Tests in the Management of Anticoagulation and Bleeding in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review. Anesth. Analg. 2020, 130, 1594–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Crochemore, T.; Görlinger, K.; Lance, M.D. Early Goal-Directed Hemostatic Therapy for Severe Acute Bleeding Management in the Intensive Care Unit: A Narrative Review. Anesth. Analg. 2024, 138, 499–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zeibi Shirejini, S.; Carberry, J.; McQuilten, Z.K.; Burrell, A.J.C.; Gregory, S.D.; Hagemeyer, C.E. Current and Future Strategies to Monitor and Manage Coagulation in ECMO Patients. Thromb. J. 2023, 21, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lim, H.Y.; O’Malley, C.; Donnan, G.; Nandurkar, H.; Ho, P. A Review of Global Coagulation Assays—Is There a Role in Thrombosis Risk Prediction? Thromb. Res. 2019, 179, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tynngård, N.; Lindahl, T.L.; Ramström, S. Assays of Different Aspects of Haemostasis—What Do They Measure? Thromb. J. 2015, 13, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tanaka, K.A.; Henderson, R.A.; Strauss, E.R. Evolution of Viscoelastic Coagulation Testing. Expert Rev. Hematol. 2020, 13, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Helmer, P.; Hottenrott, S.; Steinisch, A.; Röder, D.; Schubert, J.; Steigerwald, U.; Choorapoikayil, S.; Meybohm, P. Avoidable Blood Loss in Critical Care and Patient Blood Management: Scoping Review of Diagnostic Blood Loss. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koch, C.G.; Reineks, E.Z.; Tang, A.S.; Hixson, E.D.; Phillips, S.; Sabik, J.F.; Henderson, J.M.; Blackstone, E.H. Contemporary Bloodletting in Cardiac Surgical Care. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2015, 99, 779–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harris, L.F.; Castro-López, V.; Killard, A.J. Coagulation Monitoring Devices: Past, Present, and Future at the Point of Care. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2013, 50, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diamond, S.L.; Rossi, J.M. Point of Care Whole Blood Microfluidics for Detecting and Managing Thrombotic and Bleeding Risks. Lab Chip 2021, 21, 3667–3674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Demailly, Z.; Wurtz, V.; Barbay, V.; Surlemont, E.; Scherrer, V.; Compère, V.; Billoir, P.; Clavier, T.; Besnier, E. Point-of-Care Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays in Cardiac Surgery Patients: Comparison of Thromboelastography 6S, Thromboelastometry Sigma, and Quantra. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2023, 37, 948–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sahli, S.D.; Rössler, J.; Tscholl, D.W.; Studt, J.D.; Spahn, D.R.; Kaserer, A. Point-of-Care Diagnostics in Coagulation Management. Sensors 2020, 20, 4254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gurbel, P.A.; Bliden, K.P.; Tantry, U.S.; Monroe, A.L.; Muresan, A.A.; Brunner, N.E.; Lopez-Espina, C.G.; Delmenico, P.R.; Cohen, E.; Raviv, G.; et al. First Report of the Point-of-Care TEG: A Technical Validation Study of the TEG-6S System. Platelets 2016, 27, 642–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adelmann, D.; Hartmann, J.; Moore, H.B.; Yockelson, S.R.; Dageforde, L.A.; Chitilian, H.; Little, M.B.; Bliden, K.P.; Gurbel, P.A.; Tantry, U.S.; et al. TEG® 6s Heparin Neutralization Cartridge for Hemostatic Assessment of Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Surgery. Anesthesiology 2026, 144, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Korpi-Steiner, N.L.; Walz, J.M.; Schanzer, A.; Rao, L.V. Comparison of Point-of-Care Activated Clotting Time Methods in Different Clinical Settings in a Large Academic Medical Center. J. Appl. Lab. Med. 2017, 2, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ryan, F.; O’shea, S.; Byrne, S. The Reliability of Point-of-Care Prothrombin Time Testing. A Comparison of CoaguChek S® and XS® INR Measurements with Hospital Laboratory Monitoring. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2010, 32, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, H.; Yan, R.; Zhou, L. Stability Enhanced, Repeatability Improved Parylene-C Passivated on QCM Sensor for APTT Measurement. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 98, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hussain, M.; Wendel, H.P.; Schmidt, K.; Langer, E.; Körber, M.K.; Faul, O.; Northoff, H.; von Heymann, C.; Gehring, F.K. QCM-D Surpassing Clinical Standard for the Dose Administration of New Oral Anticoagulant in the Patient of Coagulation Disorders. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 104, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.; Wang, M.; Zhao, G. Point-of-Care Assessment of Hemostasis with a Love-Mode Surface Acoustic Wave Sensor. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cakmak, O.; Ermek, E.; Kilinc, N.; Bulut, S.; Baris, I.; Kavakli, I.H.; Yaralioglu, G.G.; Urey, H. A Cartridge Based Sensor Array Platform for Multiple Coagulation Measurements from Plasma. Lab Chip 2015, 15, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Padovani, F.; Duffy, J.; Hegner, M. Nanomechanical Clinical Coagulation Diagnostics and Monitoring of Therapies. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 17939–17947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Padovani, F.; Duffy, J.; Hegner, M. Microrheological Coagulation Assay Exploiting Micromechanical Resonators. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sekar, P.K.; Liang, X.M.; Jin, Y.; Zhou, X.; Hu, M.; Wu, Y.; Gao, D. Comprehensive Multiparameter Evaluation of Platelet Function Using a Highly Sensitive Membrane Capacitance Sensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 228, 115192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, H.J.; Kim, J.; Zandieh, O.; Chae, M.S.; Kim, T.S.; Lee, J.H.; Park, J.H.; Kim, S.; Hwang, K.S. Piezoelectric Layer Embedded-Microdiaphragm Sensors for the Determination of Blood Viscosity and Density. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 153504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Song, S.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, P.; Liu, W.; Guo, Q. Micro-Electromechanical Film Bulk Acoustic Sensor for Plasma and Whole Blood Coagulation Monitoring. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 91, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davie, E.W.; Fujikawa, K.; Kisiel, W. The Coagulation Cascade: Initiation, Maintenance, and Regulation. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 10363–10370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tripathi, M.M.; Hajjarian, Z.; Van Cott, E.M.; Nadkarni, S.K. Assessing Blood Coagulation Status with Laser Speckle Rheology. Biomed. Opt. Express 2014, 5, 817–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmitt, C.; Hadj Henni, A.; Cloutier, G. Characterization of Blood Clot Viscoelasticity by Dynamic Ultrasound Elastography and Modeling of the Rheological Behavior. J. Biomech. 2011, 44, 622–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, F.; Mu, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, C.; Zhou, H.; Yang, J.; Bai, L.; Xu, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, S. Temperature Monitorable Kinetics Study of Human Blood Coagulation by Utilizing a Dual-Mode AlN-Based Acoustic Wave Resonator. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2020, 67, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, W.; Hobson, E.C.; Bunch, C.M.; Miller, J.B.; Nehme, J.; Kwaan, H.C.; Walsh, M.M.; McCurdy, M.T.; Aversa, J.G.; Thomas, A.V.; et al. Resonant Acoustic Rheometry to Measure Coagulation Kinetics in Hemophilia A and Healthy Plasma: A Novel Viscoelastic Method. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2023, 49, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hendren, C.; Li, W.; Stegemann, J.P.; Hall, T.L.; Deng, C.X. Multichannel Resonant Acoustic Rheometry System for Quantification of Coagulation of Multiple Human Plasma Samples. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 19237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, W.; Bunch, C.M.; Zackariya, S.; Patel, S.S.; Buckner, H.; Condon, S.; Walsh, M.R.; Miller, J.B.; Walsh, M.M.; Hall, T.L.; et al. Resonant Acoustic Rheometry for Assessing Plasma Coagulation in Bleeding Patients. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 5124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bosio, G.; Destrempes, F.; Yazdani, L.; Roy Cardinal, M.H.; Cloutier, G. Resonance, Velocity, Dispersion, and Attenuation of Ultrasound-Induced Shear Wave Propagation in Blood Clot In Vitro Models. J. Ultrasound Med. 2024, 43, 535–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hsiao, W.C.; Yeh, C.L.; Kao, Y.C.J.; Chu, S.Y.; Hsieh, B.Y. Spatiotemporal Monitoring of Tissue Coagulation Treated by Continuous High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound with Pulse-Inversion Shear Wave Elastography. Ultrasonics 2025, 156, 107766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saiz, P.G.; Fernández De Luis, R.; Lasheras, A.; Arriortua, M.I.; Lopes, A.C. Magnetoelastic Resonance Sensors: Principles, Applications, and Perspectives. ACS Sens. 2022, 7, 1248–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, C.; Zeng, Z.; Peng, S.; Shuai, C. Magnetostrictive Alloys: Promising Materials for Biomedical Applications. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 8, 177–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cao, Y.; Wang, Q.; Han, M.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Zhuo, K.; Zhang, H.; Xing, Z.; Jin, H.; Zhao, C. A Smartphone-Based Multichannel Magnetoelastic Immunosensor for Acute Aortic Dissection Supplementary Diagnosis. Talanta 2025, 281, 126915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.; Wang, Q.; Deng, J.; Hu, N.; Liao, Y.; Yang, J. An Amplitude Analysis-Based Magnetoelastic Biosensing Method for Quantifying Blood Coagulation. Biosensors 2025, 15, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Qian, J.; Song, Y.; Wang, B.; Sun, H. Equivalent Circuit Models for Magnetoelastic Resonance Sensors With Various Surface Loadings. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 3675–3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Zhang, T.; Huang, X.; Huan, X.; Li, Y. Evaluating the Impact of Transient Shear Stress on Platelet Activation, Adhesion, and Aggregation with Microfluidic Chip Technique. Artif. Organs 2024, 48, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Panteleev, M.A.; Korin, N.; Reesink, K.D.; Bark, D.L.; Cosemans, J.M.E.M.; Gardiner, E.E.; Mangin, P.H. Wall Shear Rates in Human and Mouse Arteries: Standardization of Hemodynamics for in Vitro Blood Flow Assays: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Biorheology. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2021, 19, 588–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeong, S.K.; Rosenson, R.S. Shear Rate Specific Blood Viscosity and Shear Stress of Carotid Artery Duplex Ultrasonography in Patients with Lacunar Infarction. BMC Neurol. 2013, 13, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Levy, J.H.; Sniecinski, R.M.; Maier, C.L.; Despotis, G.J.; Ghadimi, K.; Helms, J.; Ranucci, M.; Steiner, M.E.; Tanaka, K.A.; Connors, J.M. Finding a Common Definition of Heparin Resistance in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Perioperative and Critical Care Thrombosis and Hemostasis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2024, 22, 1249–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martinez-Torres, C.; Grimbergen, J.; Koopman, J.; Koenderink, G.H. Interplay of Fibrinogen AEC Globular Domains and Factor XIIIa Cross-Linking Dictates the Extensibility and Strain Stiffening of Fibrin Networks. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2024, 22, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michael, C.; Pancaldi, F.; Britton, S.; Kim, O.V.; Peshkova, A.D.; Vo, K.; Xu, Z.; Litvinov, R.I.; Weisel, J.W.; Alber, M. Combined Computational Modeling and Experimental Study of the Biomechanical Mechanisms of Platelet-Driven Contraction of Fibrin Clots. Commun. Biol. 2023, 6, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tutwiler, V.; Litvinov, R.I.; Lozhkin, A.P.; Peshkova, A.D.; Lebedeva, T.; Ataullakhanov, F.I.; Spiller, K.L.; Cines, D.B.; Weisel, J.W. Kinetics and Mechanics of Clot Contraction Are Governed by the Molecular and Cellular Composition of the Blood. Blood 2016, 127, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Driever, E.G.; Muntz, I.; Patel, V.; Adelmeijer, J.; Bernal, W.; Koenderink, G.H.; Lisman, T. Fibrin Clots from Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Are Weaker than Those from Healthy Individuals and Patients with Sepsis without Underlying Liver Disease. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2023, 21, 2747–2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poole, L.G.; Pant, A.; Baker, K.S.; Kopec, A.K.; Cline-Fedewa, H.M.; Iismaa, S.E.; Flick, M.J.; Luyendyk, J.P. Chronic Liver Injury Drives Non-Traditional Intrahepatic Fibrin(Ogen) Crosslinking via Tissue Transglutaminase. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2019, 17, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ząbczyk, M.; Ariëns, R.A.S.; Undas, A. Fibrin Clot Properties in Cardiovascular Disease: From Basic Mechanisms to Clinical Practice. Cardiovasc. Res. 2023, 119, 94–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gosselin, A.R.; White, N.J.; Bargoud, C.G.; Hanna, J.S.; Tutwiler, V. Hyperfibrinolysis Drives Mechanical Instabilities in a Simulated Model of Trauma Induced Coagulopathy. Thromb. Res. 2022, 220, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ryu, J.K.; Yan, Z.; Montano, M.; Sozmen, E.G.; Dixit, K.; Suryawanshi, R.K.; Matsui, Y.; Helmy, E.; Kaushal, P.; Makanani, S.K.; et al. Fibrin Drives Thromboinflammation and Neuropathology in COVID-19. Nature 2024, 633, 905–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, F.; Wang, X.; Hua, L.; Guo, T. Non-Newtonian Effects of Blood Flow on Hemodynamics in Pulmonary Stenosis: Numerical Simulation. Appl. Bionics Biomech. 2023, 2023, 1434832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Lu, Y.; Liang, W.; Qian, J.; Li, J.; Wu, S.; Xia, M.; Sun, H. Magnetoelastic Sensors-Based Pumpless Microfluidic Chip for Point-of-Care Coagulation Kinetics Monitoring. Biosensors 2026, 16, 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16080429
Lu Y, Liang W, Qian J, Li J, Wu S, Xia M, Sun H. Magnetoelastic Sensors-Based Pumpless Microfluidic Chip for Point-of-Care Coagulation Kinetics Monitoring. Biosensors. 2026; 16(8):429. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16080429
Chicago/Turabian StyleLu, Yao, Weiguo Liang, Jun Qian, Junpo Li, Shengpeng Wu, Mao Xia, and Haixuan Sun. 2026. "Magnetoelastic Sensors-Based Pumpless Microfluidic Chip for Point-of-Care Coagulation Kinetics Monitoring" Biosensors 16, no. 8: 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16080429
APA StyleLu, Y., Liang, W., Qian, J., Li, J., Wu, S., Xia, M., & Sun, H. (2026). Magnetoelastic Sensors-Based Pumpless Microfluidic Chip for Point-of-Care Coagulation Kinetics Monitoring. Biosensors, 16(8), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16080429

