Next Article in Journal
Magnetometry for Agriculture and Animal Systems: From Classical Sensors to Quantum-Enabled Biosensing
Previous Article in Journal
Progress and Perspectives of Molecular Imprinting Methods in the Development of Electrochemical Protein Biosensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Immunochromatographic Test Strip and Its Application in Rapid Screening of Pepper Mild Mottle Virus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Comprehensive Review of Analysis Strategies for 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3: Mechanisms, Platforms, and Future Perspectives

Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiopulmonary-Cerebral Resuscitation Innovation and Translation, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2026, 16(6), 314; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16060314
Submission received: 10 April 2026 / Revised: 23 May 2026 / Accepted: 26 May 2026 / Published: 1 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Biosensors Based on Molecular Recognition)

Abstract

Vitamin D3 is an essential fat-soluble vitamin for the human body. Its metabolite, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3), serves as the primary biomarker to assess vitamin D levels. The monitoring of 25(OH)D3 concentration is crucial for human health assessment. While traditional detection methods offer high sensitivity and accuracy, they are operationally complex and costly. This review systematically summarizes the most recent progress in 25(OH)D3 detection technologies. Special attention is given to the recognition modes of 25(OH)D3 by antibodies, nucleic acids, and molecularly imprinted recognition elements. Subsequently, the design strategies of diverse types of biosensors, including fluorescent, colorimetric, and electrochemical biosensors, are analyzed. Moreover, the development of portable devices, smartphone software, and flexible wearable devices for detection applications is also examined. Biosensing detection platforms are compared from the perspectives of target recognition, signal conversion, signal output, and application scenarios. Additionally, the potential of biosensor detection platforms in clinical diagnosis, health management, and community health surveillance is further investigated. Finally, the future trends of intelligent, portable, accurate, and home-use 25(OH)D3 detection systems are delineated. This review offers a comprehensive reference for researchers developing next-generation 25(OH)D3 diagnostic sensors and provides insights for the early prevention and treatment of vitamin D deficiency-related diseases.

1. Introduction

Vitamin D, an indispensable fat-soluble steroid compound, assumes a pivotal role in upholding calcium and phosphorus homeostasis, regulating bone remodeling, and modulating the functions of diverse organ systems [1,2,3]. Vitamin D manifests in two principal forms, vitamin D3 (VD3, cholecalciferol) and vitamin D2 (VD2, ergocalciferol), which jointly constitute the core system for assessing the vitamin D status within the human body. Nevertheless, VD3 and its metabolite demonstrate notably higher biological activity compared to VD2. Vitamin D insufficiency is widespread across all age cohorts globally and may give rise to diverse health problems, encompassing rickets, elevated infection susceptibility, and cardiovascular disorders, as well as emotional and cognitive impairments [4]. Consequently, in the fields of clinical diagnostics and scientific research, there is an increasing requirement for the quantitative detection and structural analysis of vitamin D and its metabolites. This requirement has propelled the progress of analytical detection technologies, promoting the development of methods featuring higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) serves as the primary circulating metabolite of vitamin D (VD) following hepatic hydroxylation. It encompasses both cutaneous synthesis and exogenous intake. Consequently, the concentration of 25(OH)D3 mirrors the VD level within the body and can serve as a diagnostic parameter for VD deficiency and a means for therapeutic surveillance [5]. Traditional detection methods for 25(OH)D3 include enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS), chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Although these methods possess distinct advantages respectively, they are still constrained by various issues, including intricate sample preparation, protracted processing durations, elaborate operations, substantial equipment costs, and potential risks related to reagents, which impede their extensive application.
Aptamer, a type of single-stranded oligonucleotide screened from random libraries using the systematic evolution of exponentially enriched ligand (SELEX) technique, specifically recognizes target molecules with high affinity [6,7]. It has been extensively employed as recognition elements within the domain of analysis and detection. Aptasensors are highly sensitive biosensors that can transform into diverse detectable signals (e.g., optical or electrical signals) through the conformational alterations of the aptamer upon binding to the target molecule. In the context of the continuous technological advancement, novel detection methods, such as portable devices, smartphone-integrated platforms, and flexible and wearable devices, are emerging. These technologies not only overcome the spatiotemporal limitations of traditional methods, making detection more convenient and efficient, but also provide strong support for personal health management and public health surveillance.
Although the impacts of VD deficiency have been investigated, there lacks a comprehensive review that systematically summarizes the diverse detection platforms targeting 25(OH)D3. This review delineates the recognition mechanism, detection performance, and practical applications of each method via different molecular recognition elements, namely antibodies, aptamers, and molecularly imprinted polymers. The limitations of traditional methods are comprehensively examined, and the trends of aptasensor and other emerging detection technologies are explored (Figure 1). This review aims to offer novel insights and directions for the further development of 25(OH)D3 detection technologies, thus contributing to the progress of precision medicine and personalized health management.

2. Overview of 25(OH)D3

2.1. Anabolic and Catabolic Pathways of 25(OH)D3 in the Body

The human organism obtains VD3 from animal-based food sources, including deep-sea fish, egg yolks, and fortified dairy products. These dietary items generally contain abundant 7-dehydrocholesterol, which exists in the basal layer of the epidermis and enters the circulatory system through intestinal absorption. When exposed to ultraviolet (UV) B radiation (290–315 nm), 7-dehydrocholesterol undergoes photolytic decomposition to generate pre-vitamin D3, which subsequently undergoes isomerization into VD3 (cholecalciferol) under the effect of body temperature [8]. 25(OH)D3 is biosynthesized in the liver through the hydroxylation of VD3 catalyzed by the enzyme cytochrome P450 27 (CYP27). It functions as the principal circulating form for evaluating vitamin D status within the body [9]. The vitamin D-binding protein (DBP), responsible for transporting VD3 to the liver, exerts a crucial function in the circulation of vitamin D. Once 25(OH)D3 binds to DBP, it is conveyed to the proximal tubular cells of the kidneys. Within the mitochondria, 25(OH)D3 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) catalyzes the hydroxylation of 25(OH)D3 at the 1α position, transforming it into the active form, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) [10]. 1,25(OH)2D3 subsequently binds to the vitamin D receptor (VDR) within target cells. Therein, it modulates gene expression to facilitate calcium and phosphorus absorption in the intestine, promote bone mineralization, and regulate immune function. Ultimately, CYP24A1 hydroxylates 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 to yield their inactive forms, 24,25(OH)2D3 and 1,24,25(OH)3D3, which are eventually excreted in the bile [11] (Figure 2).

2.2. Diseases Associated with 25(OH)D3 Deficiency

25(OH)D3 represents the principal metabolite of VD3 within the human organism. The concentrations of 25(OH)D3 are modulated by parathyroid hormone, blood calcium, and blood phosphorus, and its plasma concentration functions as a crucial indicator for evaluating the VD3 status in the body. Based on serum levels, the VD3 status can be categorized as deficient (<50 nM), insufficient (50–75 nM), or sufficient (≥75 nM) [12,13,14]. In pediatric populations, a deficiency of 25(OH)D3 stands as a predominant etiology of rickets. This insufficiency leads to a reduction in the intestinal absorption of calcium and phosphorus, thereby resulting in diminished blood concentrations of these minerals. Consequently, bone development is impaired, leading to skeletal deformities, including a quadrangular skull, pigeon chest, funnel chest, genu varum, or genu valgum. Additional manifestations may encompass hyperhidrosis, night terrors, and irritability. In adult populations, especially pregnant women, lactating females, and the elderly, a lack of 25(OH)D3 impedes the normal mineralization of the bone matrix, leading to bone softening and pain, and thereby heightening the susceptibility to fractures. Patients frequently encounter generalized bone pain and weakness, particularly in the lower back and extremities, significantly impacting their quality of life. Insufficient and deficient levels of 25(OH)D3 are strongly correlated with an elevated risk of various diseases, affecting systems including the skeletal, respiratory, reproductive, immune, metabolic, and cardiovascular systems. A deficiency can increase the incidence of these diseases by 30–50% [15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
Recent research has underscored the substantial role of 25(OH)D3 in the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is observed among patients with severe COVID-19, which elevates the risk of intensive-care-unit admission and mortality. Adequate elevation of serum 25(OH)D3 levels may enhance the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 [22,23,24]. Consequently, supplementing VD and regularly monitoring its levels represents an economical, accessible, and safe strategy for the prevention and treatment of related diseases, which holds considerable significance [25]. In this context, the development of a highly efficient and precise 25(OH)D3 aptamer biosensor is crucial for clinical diagnosis and possesses significant value in formulating early prevention and treatment strategies.

3. Traditional Methods for 25(OH)D3 Detection

3.1. Precision Detection Techniques Based on Instrumental Analysis

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is highly suitable for the separation and detection of 25(OH)D3 in biological samples. When coupled with an ultraviolet–visible (UV-Vis) diode-array detector, accurate detection of 25(OH)D3 could be realized. For instance, the limit of detection (LOD) could reach up to 2.92 nM. Consequently, the HPLC-UV method for determining 25(OH)D3 levels had been widely acknowledged and utilized internationally [26]. Therefore, the HPLC-UV method for detecting 25(OH)D3 levels had gained extensive international recognition and application. To enhance the accuracy of 25(OH)D3 detection in serum, an ultra-HPLC (UHPLC) column packed with pentafluorophenylpropyl stationary phase was employed to conduct high-precision analysis of deuterium-labeled 25(OH)D3. The limits of quantitation/limits of detection were 4.61/1.38 nmol/L for 25(OH)D3 [27]. Mass spectrometry (MS) quantifies the mass-to-charge ratio of charged particles to ascertain crucial information, including the composition, structure, and relative content of a substance. Jiang et al. devised a detection technique for 25(OH)D3, which was based on immunoaffinity purification in combination with MS. This method utilized antibody-modified magnetic beads to selectively enrich 25(OH)D3 from complex biological samples and precisely identify via MS [28].
Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) showcases the complementary merits of chromatography and mass spectrometry, integrating the high separation capacity of chromatography for intricate samples with the high selectivity, sensitivity, and the capacity of MS spectrometry to offer relative molecular-weight and structural information. LC-MS/MS has been extensively utilized in the analysis of 25(OH)D3 and is regarded as the optimal approach for determining serum 25(OH)D3 levels, as it can separate and precisely quantify both 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 [29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Accurate detection of 25(OH)D3 in serum was achieved using 2D-UPLC separation coupled with MS/MS [29]. Wang et al. precipitated proteins in serum with acetonitrile, centrifuged and derivatized with diacetoxyiodobenzene and DMAT, and achieved quantitative detection of 25(OH)D3 using LC-MS/MS, which was successfully used to analyze the levels of metabolites in the serum of 109 healthy individuals. The LOD for the method was 12.5 pM [30]. Lin et al. innovatively employed electrospray ionization in positive-ion mode to quantify the serum levels of 25(OH)D3 in diabetic patients via an ACE5 C18 column under a methanol gradient, thereby attaining effective separation. The limit of quantification of 25(OH)D3 was 1.25 nM in this study. This offers data support for the research on the association between diabetes and vitamin D, facilitating the exploration of the pathological mechanisms and preventive strategies of diabetes [34].
Sample pretreatment is a crucial component of instrumental analysis and accounts for over 50% of the time in the LC-MS/MS analysis process. The pretreatment methods for samples analyzed by LC-MS/MS encompass protein precipitation (PPT), liquid–liquid extraction (LLE), and solid-phase extraction (SPE). By leveraging a stable lithium adduct and a highly sensitive tandem mass spectrometer, sample preparation could be streamlined into a single protein precipitation step, obviating the necessity for derivatization. The achieved limit of quantification was at a level of 37 pM. And this approach could notably enhance detection efficiency and facilitate the quantitative analysis of 1,25(OH)2D3 in serum samples [36]. SPE was incorporated into the sample processing to enhance the automation level of traditional LC-MS. Deuterated 25(OH)D3 was employed as an internal standard. Subsequently, protein precipitation with methanol, centrifugation, and sample purification were carried out. The purification was achieved via a six-step SPE procedure executed by a robotic system. Quantification was then conducted through LC-MS combined with MS/MS in multiple-reaction-monitoring mode. The lower limit of quantitation was 4.0 nM for 25(OH)D3. Tailored for routine laboratory applications, this method enables a daily throughput of 300 samples, reduced manual operations to a minimum, and guaranteed efficient and accurate detection [37]. In SPE preprocessing, the packing material played a crucial role in the extraction of target analytes. Precise detection could be accomplished by selecting SPE column packing with suitable adsorption characteristics. Carsten et al. developed an LLE-LC-MS/MS method for the high-throughput detection of 25(OH)D3. This was achieved by mixing acetonitrile-denatured serum with a deuterated 25(OH)D3 internal standard and performing heptane extraction through a 96-well filtration plate filled with inert diatomaceous earth. The LOD was 10 nM for 25(OH)D3 [38]. Zhang et al. first used membrane-emulsified hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (ME HLB) solid-phase extraction microspheres prepared by membrane emulsification technology as SPE packing materials for sample pretreatment, combined with UPLC-MS/MS to achieve accurate detection of 25(OH)D3 in serum. The LOD of ME HLB plate for 25(OH)D3 was 0.5 nM, meaning that the ME HLB microspheres exhibited better results than other HLBs [39]. Furthermore, Le et al. devised a simplified sample preprocessing approach for the concurrent detection of fat-soluble vitamins (comprising vitamins A, D, and E) through acetonitrile protein precipitation, obviating the necessity for conventional liquid–liquid or SPE treatments. The method demonstrated outstanding linearity (2.5–100 nM), precision, and accuracy when analyzed by LC-MS/MS [40].
In recent years, LC-MS technology has been redefining the scope of analytical science via multi-dimensional innovations. Moreover, its collaborative development with a diverse range of analytical tools offers a more comprehensive solution for the analysis of complex samples [38,41,42,43,44]. LC coupled with ESI or atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization (APCI)–MS/MS demonstrates a high degree of sensitivity, specificity, and versatility. Higashi et al. developed a detection technology for 25(OH)D3 in neonatal dried blood spots based on the principle of LC/ESI-MS/MS, using 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazolin-3,5-dione and an acetylating reagent for two-step derivatization, combined with an Oasis HLB® SPE column and 25(OH)D3 as the internal standard. The developed method facilitated the specific quantification of 25(OH)D3 in neonatal dried blood spots, with a limit of quantitation of 7.5 nM [41]. Ahmed et al. developed an ultrasensitive UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS technique for 25(OH)D3 in patients with COVID-19, using 2-nitrosopyridine as a derivatizing reagent via a controlled microwave-assisted derivatization reaction. The lower limit of quantitation was 0.05 nM in human plasma [43]. Nevertheless, notwithstanding the high precision, this category of methods exhibits certain limitations. These include relatively substantial sample volume requirements, low throughput, and the necessity for specialized technicians, thus restricting, to some extent, its extensive application.

3.2. Rapid Immunoassays Based on Antibody Recognition

The introduction of antibodies targeting 25(OH)D3 has enabled the development of more straightforward and rapid immunoassays for the detection of 25(OH)D3. Immunoassays founded on antibody recognition can be classified into radioimmunoassays (RIAs), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), and chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIAs). RIA was the initial immunoassay approach employed for the estimation of 25(OH)D3. Antibodies specific to 25(OH)D3 were prepared, facilitating rapid detection via specific antigen–antibody binding. Owing to its minimal sample requirement, this method was appropriate for scenarios where the sample volume was restricted [45]. Additionally, immunodiagnostic systems radioimmunoassay (IDS-RIA) has often been used to measure the levels of 25(OH)D3 in plasma. In this method, 125I-labeled 25(OH)D3 competed with 25(OH)D3 in the plasma sample for antibody binding sites. The content of 25(OH)D3 was then assessed based on the radioactivity intensity of 125I [46]. When compared with LC, RIA can achieve comparable results and may potentially have advantages in terms of operational convenience. However, given that RIA can produce hazardous radioactive waste and involves high detection costs, ELISA technology, which is safer and more cost-effective, has gradually become the mainstream detection technology [47].
ELISA can be classified into four prevalent types: direct ELISA, indirect ELISA, sandwich ELISA, and competitive ELISA. Among these, competitive ELISA obviates the need for sample preprocessing, rendering the detection more flexible and stable. A rapid competitive ELISA for the detection of 25(OH)D3 was developed. This was achieved by leveraging biotin-labeled 25(OH)D3 and competition antibodies specific to 25(OH)D3 in the sample, with chloramine T added as a coupling reagent. The detection limit of this approach reached 0.1 μM, substantially enhancing both the efficiency and reproducibility of the assay. The results obtained from this method were compared with those of the radioimmunoassay method, and it was demonstrated that this method met the detection requirements well [48]. ELISA exhibits exceptionally high accuracy, repeatability, and high specificity. Nevertheless, a limitation persists in its development: specifically, the operational procedures are relatively numerous and time-consuming. Consequently, certain assays integrate highly sensitive chemiluminescent detection techniques with ELISA, thereby facilitating the development of CLIA.
CLIA is a simple, sensitive, and cost-efficient approach for high-throughput quantitative analysis of samples. A series of CLIA assays have been developed for the quantitative determination of 25(OH)D3 in human serum that exhibit favorable performance and stability [49,50,51]. Moreover, fully automated CLIA systems have been extensively utilized in clinical diagnostics. Certain diagnostic manufacturers launched automated 25(OH)D3 immunoassays, such as products from Abbott (Architect), DiaSorin (LIAISON), IDS (ISYS), Roche (E170, monoclonal 25(OH)D3 assay), and Siemens (Centaur). These systems facilitate both qualitative and quantitative analyses of 25(OH)D3 in samples, substantially improving the efficiency and accuracy of testing. In automated systems, there exist two categories of antibodies. One is a specific antibody that binds to 25(OH)D3, and the other is a secondary antibody labeled with a luminescent substance. When excited, the luminescent substance emits a light signal. The instrument then calculates the concentration of 25(OH)D3 in the sample according to the intensity of this light signal [52].
In accordance with the CLIA, the electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assay leverages the robust streptavidin–biotin binding interaction to establish complexes among 25(OH)D3, antibodies, and a reporter system. Prominent advantages encompass the avoidance of secondary antibodies, thereby curtailing analysis expenses. Wang and colleagues reported a direct competitive ECL assay. Biotin-25(OH)D3 engaged in competition with 25(OH)D3 in the sample for binding to the ruthenium-labeled antibody. Subsequently, the competitive antigen was captured by streptavidin-coated magnetic microparticles. These magnetic microparticles were magnetically isolated on the electrode, and chemiluminescence was triggered upon the application of voltage [53]. All of these methods were applicable in routine clinical laboratories. Nevertheless, the disparities between their results and those acquired from LC-MS/MS methods call for the resolution of the standardization problem [54,55].

3.3. Summary of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Traditional Methods

There exist diverse traditional approaches for the detection of 25(OH)D3, with each presenting distinct advantages and disadvantages. Although HPLC exhibits superior linearity, low detection and quantification thresholds, high recovery rates, and reliability, its extensive application is constrained by multiple factors. These encompass the necessity for large sample volumes, low throughput capacity, the capability to process only a small number of samples per analysis, and the requirement for high-level professional expertise and strict operational procedures. LC-MS/MS offers extremely high precision in detecting 25(OH)D3 in serum. Despite improvements that have enhanced its automation level, its elevated equipment costs and ion-suppression effects, which disrupt detection results, undermine data accuracy.
In protein binding assays, outcomes from different protein binding techniques may display certain variations. RIA shows advantages under specific criteria; however, in practical applications, the variability among methods complicates clinical diagnoses. ELISA exhibits superior accuracy, repeatability, and specificity and can detect free 25(OH)D3. Nevertheless, ELISA harbors a potential risk of cross-reactions, as other substances in the sample may interfere with the detection process. Moreover, the sensitivity of this method may be inadequate in complex samples or when detecting extremely low concentrations, thereby affecting the reliability and accuracy of the results. CLIA is an automated detection method; however, discrepancies exist between its results and those of LC-MS/MS, and the absence of standardized protocols complicates cross-laboratory comparisons.

4. Biosensor Analysis Platform for 25(OH)D3 Detection

Conventional methods typically exhibit complexity, entailing labor-intensive and time-consuming procedures for sample preparation and storage. In the past few years, biosensor-based detection technologies have emerged as a focal point of research. Owing to their merits of high sensitivity, rapid response, and portability, they present an appealing substitute for traditional chromatography and immunoassays. At present, researchers have successfully devised numerous biosensors for the detection of 25(OH)D3, providing novel technological approaches and prospects for relevant detection applications.
Biosensor technology is a technique for detecting biological substances by converting their concentrations into readable signals. Its core principle is founded on the synergistic interplay between biological recognition elements and signal converters. The system acquires information via specific biological reactions and employs physical or chemical transducers to convert biological signals into quantifiable signals, thus facilitating the detection of target substances. Its working principle is generally classified into three principal components: signal recognition, signal conversion, and signal output. In the signal recognition stage, diverse methods are employed to detect 25(OH)D3, such as antigen–antibody binding, aptamer binding, molecular imprinting, and other techniques for capturing and recognizing 25(OH)D3. Signal conversion is usually integrated with signal output. For instance, identified signals can be converted into optical signals, electrical signals, etc. Future advancements should incorporate more intelligent and convenient approaches for signal output.

4.1. Antibody-Based Biosensor for Detecting 25(OH)D3

Immunometric assays employing specific antibodies were the primary techniques that guided the design of immunosensors. In these techniques, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies were generally prepared using a hapten of 25(OH)D3, which was conjugated to a carrier protein at the 3-position. Nevertheless, these antibodies exhibited a lack of specificity for the A-ring structure of the metabolites, as evidenced by a high degree of cross-reactivity with 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, whereas the side-chain structure was recognized appropriately [56]. The utilization of hapten carriers conjugated with metabolites containing A rings and side chains can generate highly specific antibodies. Based on this, Kobayashi et al. linked 11α-hemiglutaryloxy-25(OH)D3 with bovine serum albumin to form a new immunogenic conjugate, which had induced three polyclonal antibodies that exhibit high affinity for 25(OH)D3 (Ka = 0.96–2.6 × 109 M−1) [57]. With the progress of technology, antibody preparation had become increasingly sophisticated, and the antibodies employed in detection are predominantly commercial products.
Antibody-based detection of 25(OH)D3 predominantly transforms molecular recognition into electrochemical signals via alterations in electron transfer throughout the detection procedure. The electrochemical immunosensor designed for 25(OH)D3 is capable of utilizing three signal output techniques: differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), square wave voltammetry (SWV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).
DPV is well-suited for monitoring subtle electrochemical alterations and represents a highly sensitive and remarkably useful technique for the detection of trace analytes. This electrochemical biosensor based on DPV analysis exhibits substantial enhancements compared to other biosensors in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and detection range for 25(OH)D3. For example, Chauhan et al. reported an efficient electrochemical biosensor for 25(OH)D3 detection using gadolinium oxide nanorods (Gd2O3NRs) (Figure 3A). Gd2O3 NRs were functionalized using aspartic acid (Asp), and subsequently deposited onto a glass substrate coated with indium tin oxide (ITO), resulting in the fabrication of the Asp-Gd2O3 NRs/ITO electrode. The monoclonal antibody of VD (Ab-VD) was immobilized on the surface of the Asp-Gd2O3NRs/ITO electrode. When 25(OH)D3 bound itself to Ab-VD, it facilitated the charge transfer of [Fe (CN)6]3–/4–, resulting in a change in current value. The results of the response study exhibited a linear range of 25.0–2500 nM for 25(OH)D3 detection, and an LOD of 0.25 nM was obtained. This immunosensor showed a satisfactory response to commercially available VD3 oral solution [58]. Anusha et al. simplified the electrode design by using graphene nanoribbon (GNR)-modified electrodes to develop an electrochemical biosensor. They prepared an electrochemical probe by conjugating ferrocene-carbaldehyde (Fc-CHO) with antibodies (Ab-25(OH)D3), enabling target recognition and signal generation. DPV was used to monitor the electrochemical signal changes in Fc, allowing the detection of 25(OH)D3 within a concentration range of 2.5–2500 nM, with a detection limit of 0.25 nM [59]. SWV can effectively improve background issues. By further optimizing the electroactive layer and working conditions, it can further enhance detection sensitivity. In a flexible, label-free electrochemical immunosensor utilizing tree-like gold dendrites (AuDdrites), SWV achieved ultra-sensitive detection of 25(OH)D3 within 15 min, with an LOD of 0.07 nM [60]. Although DPV and SWV are more commonly used for quantitative analysis in electrochemical sensors, EIS can detect detailed changes in the charge transfer resistance (Rct) at the electrode interface under smaller-amplitude alternating voltage. And Rct can reflect the electrochemical changes occurring at the surface of the sensing electrode. Anusha et al. developed a novel label-free electrochemical immunosensor using a GCN-β-CD/Au nanocomposite. During detection, an antigen–antibody complex layer forms, impeding electron transfer and increasing the Rct value, thereby enabling accurate measurement of 25(OH)D3 in serum samples. The detection range was 0.25–1250 nM, with an LOD of 0.02 nM [61]. In addition, chronopotentiometry techniques can also be used for electrochemical response and can be combined with practical and portable electrochemical devices. In a hydrophilic and insoluble electrospun cellulose acetate fiber-based biosensor, 25(OH)D3 was analyzed by chronoamperometry response. A conducting paper substrate (RCP) was prepared by depositing reduced graphene oxide onto ivory paper, and decorated with electrospun cellulose acetate fibers (CAEFs) to form CAEF/RCP electrodes. The electrode was subsequently modified with antibodies specific to 25(OH)D3, resulting in a robust interaction between the negatively charged CAEFs and the positively charged amine terminus (NH2) of Ab-25(OH)D3. All electrochemical studies were conducted in a [Fe(CN)6]3–/4– solution. The presence of 25(OH)D3 induced a significant rearrangement on the electrode surface due to the antibody–antigen interaction, enhancing charge transfer via [Fe(CN)6]3–/4– and resulting in increased current. The fabricated electrochemical immunosensor exhibited a detection range of 25–250 nM and a low detection limit of 25 nM. This paper-based biosensor platform, characterized by cost-effectiveness, environmental friendliness, and disposability, holds promise for pioneering new approaches in biological detection [62].
Furthermore, certain antibody-based optical analysis methods are also employed in the detection of 25(OH)D3. Lateral flow strips (LFSs) fulfill the requirement for rapid detection, are straightforward to operate, and represent a mainstream technology in optical biosensors. Wen et al. introduced a method based on colorimetric LFS, which captured 25(OH)D3 using antibodies, leading to the aggregation of AuNPs at the test line, thereby enabling visual detection [63]. Anandita et al. synthesized CdS@ZIF-67 nanocomposites using cadmium sulfide (CdS) quantum dots and a zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF)-67, which were used as reporter molecules to construct a competitive LFS for the detection of 25(OH)D3. The CdS@ZIF-67 nanocomposite was a nanoenzyme with peroxidase-like activity. It was coupled with an antibody, and upon binding to the antigen on the test line, produced a distinct colorimetric response in the presence of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and H2O2. The LOD was 67.35 nM, and in spiked serum samples, the LOD was 62.23 nM. The CdS@ZIF67 nanozyme-assisted LFSs hold significant potential for developing highly sensitive and portable biosensing platforms. However, to achieve large-scale applications, safety and environmental friendliness might be considered. More secure nanozyme alternatives should be developed to replace CdS [64].
When nanomaterials on the LFS are substituted with fluorescent materials, the LFS can exhibit enhanced sensitivity. Wang et al. developed a quantum dot nanoparticle-based fluorescent immunochromatographic assay (QDs-FICA), achieving rapid visual and quantitative detection of 25(OH)D3, which holds significant potential significance for clinical diagnosis and VD-related diseases (Figure 3B). However, the QDs-FICA exhibited cross-reactivity rates of 26%, 11%, and 25% with 25(OH)D3, 1,25(OH)D3, and 1,25(OH)D2, respectively. To achieve specific detection of 25(OH)D3, further improvements were needed in the antibody [65]. Moreover, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) technology had emerged in the domain of fluorescence analysis, particularly the Cas12a system. Cas12a demonstrated endonuclease activity, which allowed it to randomly cleave single-stranded probes labeled with fluorescent and quencher groups, thus leading to fluorescence alterations upon activation. Sun et al. proposed a novel antibody-controlled Cas12a biosensor, which regulated the activity of the Cas12a trans-cleavage enzyme through antibody–small-molecule binding to achieve highly sensitive detection of non-nucleic-acid small molecules. Upon antibody binding, steric hindrance blocked Cas12a’s recognition of PAM, thereby inhibiting enzyme activity. The serum detection system for 25(OH)D3 achieved a sensitivity of 650 pM, with detection completed within 30 min [66].
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) serves as a dependable platform for label-free and real-time biomolecular interaction monitoring in clinical analysis. Its merits encompass real-time analyte surveillance, label-free and parallel analysis, minimal sample preprocessing, quantitative response, high sensitivity, and reproducibility. Cusano et al. reported a highly sensitive biosensing platform based on plasmonic-enhanced MSs integrated onto the tip of a single-mode optical fiber (OF) (Figure 3C). The platform achieved label-free detection of 25(OH)D3 through SPR analysis, with a detection limit of 2.10 nM [67]. Esposito et al. developed an OF biosensor for 25(OH)D3 detection based on the principle of fiber Bragg grating sensing, using a double-clad fiber (DCF) with a W-type refractive index profile as the substrate. The sensor optimized the DCF structure through chemical etching to enhance sensitivity to the surrounding medium, coated a nanosized GO layer on the surface of a long-period grating transducer, and grafted antibodies as biological recognition elements. Detection was accomplished via the alteration of the refractive index induced by the binding of antibodies to targets, leading to a shift in the grating resonance band. The biosensor achieved a low LOD below 2.5 nM and demonstrated excellent anti-protein interference performance in complex culture media [68].
Nevertheless, the anti-25(OH)D3 antibody demonstrates cross-reactivity with 25(OH)D2. This disparity in antibody affinity unavoidably gives rise to false-positive outcomes in the detection of 25(OH)D3. This represents a limitation of most immunoassay methods for 25(OH)D3.
Figure 3. Construction and detection mechanisms of immunosensor and aptasensor for 25(OH)D3. (A) An efficient electrochemical biosensor based on Gd2O3NRs (adapted with permission from Ref. [58]). (B) The QDs-FICA (adapted with permission from Ref. [65]). (C) A novel label-free Lab-on-Fiber biosensing platform (adapted with permission from Ref. [67]). (D) Colorimetric aptasensor based on gold nanoparticles (adapted with permission from Ref. [69]). (E) The TSA system (adapted with permission from Ref. [70]).
Figure 3. Construction and detection mechanisms of immunosensor and aptasensor for 25(OH)D3. (A) An efficient electrochemical biosensor based on Gd2O3NRs (adapted with permission from Ref. [58]). (B) The QDs-FICA (adapted with permission from Ref. [65]). (C) A novel label-free Lab-on-Fiber biosensing platform (adapted with permission from Ref. [67]). (D) Colorimetric aptasensor based on gold nanoparticles (adapted with permission from Ref. [69]). (E) The TSA system (adapted with permission from Ref. [70]).
Biosensors 16 00314 g003

4.2. Aptamer-Based Biosensor for Detecting 25(OH)D3

Analogous to antibodies, aptamers exhibit high specificity and affinity for their designated target molecules. Aptamers are short, single-stranded oligonucleotides selected from artificial random nucleotide libraries via the SELEX technique. In the detection of 25(OH)D3, the aptamer acted as a custom-designed “biological key”, accurately recognizing and binding to the target molecule. In 2012, Bruno et al. employed SELEX technology to successfully acquire 98 candidate aptamer sequences for 25(OH)D3. Via sequence alignment, they identified the core stem-loop structure and designed the first aptamer beacon [71]. In 2017, Wen et al. used an exponential enrichment ligand system evolution method based on non-fixed graphene oxide (GO-SELEX) to develop aptamer sequences capable of highly specific and affinity binding to 25(OH)D3. Among these nine aptamer sequences, VDBA14 aptamer exhibited high affinity for 25(OH)D3, with a Kd value of 11 nM, making it the most widely applied aptamer in aptamer sensor applications [72]. Subsequently, Wen et al. utilized SELEX and AuNP-based analysis to screen and characterize the first aptamer for 25(OH)D3 (without disclosing the sequence information) and combined it with an antibody to achieve competitive capture of 25(OH)D3 [63].
The aptamer sequences acquired via SELEX technology generally have a length ranging from 50 to 100 nucleotides. Ascertaining the binding region of the aptamer to the target and the target recognition sites could efficiently eliminate redundant sequences, thus enhancing the probability of three-dimensional conformation formation. Gachpazan et al. reasonably truncated VDBA14, resulting in shorter sequences of VDBA14-23, VDBA14-27, and VDBA14-35, thereby significantly enhancing recognition flexibility. Among them, the VDBA14-35 aptamer containing G-quadruplexes exhibited higher sensitivity and specificity compared to the original VDBA14 [73]. However, previous studies conducted structural analyses using CD spectroscopy, which excluded the possibility that VDBA14 forms G-quadruplexes, instead indicating it adopts a typical B-form DNA double helix. Furthermore, after VDBA14 was bound with 25(OH)D3, there was no significant structural change in the aptamer, suggesting that 25(OH)D3 may bind to a preformed structure [74]. During the molecular docking process of 25(OH)D3 with VDBA14, it was found that they mainly bind through groove structures. The two hydroxyl groups of 25(OH)D3 act as hydrogen bond donors and form hydrogen bonds with the aptamer. One hydroxyl group formed a hydrogen bond with the oxygen of the phosphodiester bond between DG-20 and DG-19, while the other hydroxyl group formed a hydrogen bond with the carbonyl oxygen of DG-33 [75].
The aptamer-based biosensor for detecting 25(OH)D3 is predominantly based on the transformation of molecular recognition events into optical, electrical, or spectral signals via the fluorescence alterations of the probe, the optical characteristics of nanomaterials, and the electrode electrochemical properties. The primary detection strategies are classified into optical biosensors and electrochemical biosensors. Optical biosensors can be further classified into fluorescent, colorimetric, and spectroscopic biosensors according to their signal transduction mechanisms.

4.2.1. Fluorescence Biosensor

Among diverse biosensors, fluorescent sensors present high sensitivity and a broad dynamic range. Fluorescence-based detection can be classified into direct detection and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). In direct detection, fluorescence sensing strategies frequently depend on the specific binding of the target molecule to fluorescent probes (e.g., organic dyes and quantum dots), leading to fluorescence quenching or enhancement. For example, PicoGreen (PG) reagent is an asymmetric cyanine dye that does not emit fluorescence in its free state but exhibits high intensity when bound to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). In a PG-based fluorescence biosensor designed by Qiao et al., the fluorescent signal of PG generated by the dsDNA formed between the aptamer and its complementary strand. Upon the binding of 25(OH)D3, the aptamer underwent structural changes, releasing the complementary strand into a single-stranded state, which resulted in a decrease in fluorescence [76]. Badrakhi et al. designed a novel material, cadmium telluride quantum dots modified with thioglycolic acid (CdTe-TGA QDs), which exhibited high intensity effects and was first applied in the fluorescent quantum dot detection of 25(OH)D3. Then the CdTe-TGA QD-based biosensor was developed after functionalization with thiol-25(OH)D3–aptamers. When the aptamers bound to 25(OH)D3, it caused a conformational change in the aptamers and formed non-conductive complexes. Upon re-excitation by photons, the presence of the non-conductive complexes interfered with the electron transfer process, leading to fluorescence quenching [77]. FRET is a non-radiative energy transfer process that occurs when the donor–acceptor pair is in optimal proximity. On this basis, Badrakhi et al. further improved CdTe QDs and replaced TGA with aptamers to construct a novel high-intensity fluorescent probe for ultrasensitive detection of 25(OH)D3. This probe was sequentially assembled from CdTe QDs, thiol-25(OH)D3 aptamer, and Cy3-labeled nucleic acid. Energy was transferred from the contact between donors (QDs) to the acceptor (Cy3, cyanine 3), resulting in FRET-mediated quenching of QDs’ emission. When 25(OH)D3 bound itself to the aptamer, the contact between QDs and Cy3 was disrupted, enhancing the FRET effect, which lead to a decrease in fluorescence intensity. Thanks to this high-sensitivity fluorescent probe, the LOD for 25(OH)D3 reaches 8.05 × 10−9 M, demonstrating great potential in the development of fluorescent probes for detecting low-concentration analytes [78]. In addition, graphene oxide (GO) is a one-atom-thick sheet of oxidized graphite with excellent solubility, inertness, and specific surface area, and has become a typical fluorescent quencher in the FERT system. In the GO and fluorescent aptamer-based novel biosensor, FAM-labeled aptamers were adsorbed by π–π interaction on the GO sheets, leading to quenching of the fluorescence due to FRET. Target recognition by 25(OH)D3 triggered aptamer release from GO and fluorescence recovery. The biosensor achieved a detection limit of 0.37 µM through changes in fluorescence [79]. In the future, enhancing the specificity of aptamers and alleviating fluorescence limitations to improve the sensitivity and practicality of this method will contribute to the development of chip models and their utilization as point-of-care testing (POCT) devices.

4.2.2. Colorimetric Biosensor

Colorimetric approaches are based on the alterations in visible-light absorption induced by nanomaterials (such as gold nanoparticles, AuNPs) or enzyme-catalyzed color reactions, which facilitate intuitive, naked-eye detection. Typically, the negatively charged aptamer sequence undergoes non-specific adsorption on the surface of AuNPs. When the aptamer specifically bound itself to the target, it triggered a conformational change. This conformational change usually diminishes the affinity of the aptamer for the AuNPs’ surface, resulting in its desorption [80,81,82]. For example, upon binding of aptamers to 25(OH)D3, the quantity of nucleic acids on the surface of AuNPs diminishes, resulting in aggregation when exposed to salt ions. The aggregation of AuNPs results in a change in optical properties, turning the solution from red to purple-blue (Figure 3D). This biosensor achieved highly sensitive detection of 25(OH)D3, with a detection limit of 1 nM [69]. Another frequently employed colorimetric approach leverages the peroxidase-like activity of nanozymes, which catalyzed the oxidation of TMB to generate a stable and specific colorimetric signal. Lee et al. successfully prepared mesoporous platinum nanozymes (MPNs) with a high specific surface area using a surfactant-assisted self-assembly method. The lattice spacing of MPNs was highly aligned with the platinum crystal plane, resulting in significantly enhanced peroxidase-like activity to catalyze the chromogenic reaction of TMB, achieving a catalytic efficiency 3.8 times greater than that of traditional horseradish peroxidase. Therefore, a competitive immunoassay method was developed for the sensitive detection of 25(OH)D3, with a linear range of 4.0–250 nM and an LOD as low as 2.5 nM [83]. This method was simple to operate and suitable for on-site detection, although its sensitivity was limited by the aggregation kinetics of the nanomaterials. Zhang et al. designed a novel nanoenzyme, HOFs-g-C3N4-CeO2 (HCC), and established a colorimetric biosensor for the detection of 25(OH)D3. The aptamer VDBA14 and HCC-modified complementary single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) were sequentially assembled on magnetic microspheres (MBs). Upon binding of 25(OH)D3 to the aptamer, the HCC-modified ssDNA was displaced from the magnetic microspheres. The released HCC then catalyzed the colorimetric reaction of TMB, resulting in an LOD of 18 nM for 25(OH)D3 [84]. Nevertheless, to facilitate the clinical application of this biosensor, specific limitations must be overcome. These include eliminating the comparison between substrate color development and standard color charts, and mitigating the influence of ambient light. Moreover, HCC was not merely an exceptional nanozyme with peroxidase-like characteristics but also an outstanding ECL emitter, which had been successfully utilized in ECL biosensors.

4.2.3. Physical Optical Biosensor

Target substances are analyzed through optical principles, including the investigation of the interactions between aptamers and the substances or their specific spectral features. Illustrations of these principles encompass Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), biolayer interferometry (BLI), localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). In an aptasensor based on a microcantilever, FTIR is employed to verify the binding of aptamers to 25(OH)D3. FTIR was used to detect bases in nucleic acids, which had characteristic peaks in the range of 1200–1800 cm−1. In this aptasensor, characteristic peaks of the VDBA14 aptamer were found at 1363, 1531, 1550, and 1750 cm−1. After adding 25(OH)D3, the FTIR spectrum showed a decrease in or disappearance of the characteristic peaks corresponding to the aptamers. This proved that the interaction between the aptamers and the 25(OH)D3 caused the aptamers to detach from the microcantilever surface [85]. SPR technology characterizes molecular-binding events by monitoring refractive index changes on a metal surface in real time. LSPR had recently emerged as a highly efficient method for detecting target molecules owing to its label-free assays, and high sensitivity and selectivity. In an LSPR aptasensor, aptamers were immobilized on gold nanorods (AuNRs) that were free of polyethylene glycol. When 25(OH)D3 bound itself to these aptamers, the absorbance peak resulting from the LSPR effect shifted toward longer wavelengths, enabling the direct detection of 25(OH)D3. The LSPR aptasensor enabled highly sensitive and selective detection of 25(OH)D3 across a broad concentration range, with a detection limit of 0.25 nM [86]. BLI is another optical “dip-and-read” biosensor technique that enables real-time analysis of biomolecular interactions. It provides a direct assessment of binding kinetics and offers high-throughput capabilities. Although BLI has slightly reduced reproducibility, it stands out from SPR with higher throughput. Notably, unlike SPR, BLI does not require a microfluidic system for sample delivery to the biosensor surface, thus minimizing instrument maintenance [87]. In a trident scaffold-assisted aptamer biosensor (TSA) system, the aptamers were immobilized on an optical layer coated with streptavidin (Figure 3E). BLI was employed to analyze the interaction between 25(OH)D3 and the aptamer, assessing their binding affinity. In the presence of 25(OH)D3, the aptamer region of the TSA system recognized and bound to 25(OH)D3 in solution, resulting in a shift in the wavelength of light interference. The TSA system could detect 25(OH)D3 over a wide concentration range (17.4–12,800 nM), with a detection limit of 17.4 nM. Furthermore, the TSA system also could monitor 25(OH)D3 levels dynamically in living cells, providing an efficient platform for researching drug interactions [70]. LSPR is a nanophotonic phenomenon where metallic nanoparticles or nanostructures interact with incident light. In contrast, SERS is a powerful analytical technique that amplifies molecular Raman signals through proximity to specialized nanostructures [88]. Generally, SERS typically employs noble metals as substrates to amplify the Raman signal through the generation of localized electromagnetic fields in hotspots. Biomimetic materials, which feature high-density hotspots, serve as more efficient SERS substrates. A bio-inspired Ag nanovilli-based sandwich-type SERS aptasensor was developed for the detection of 25(OH)D3, leveraging the villi structure. The densely packed Ag nanovilli (AgNV) structure enhances the Raman signal by creating hotspots due to its extensive surface area. A 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione (PTAD)–methylene blue (MB) complex served as the Raman indicator. In this SERS aptasensor, aptamers and antibodies were used together to create an aptamer/25(OH)D3/antibody–PTAD-MB complex on the AgNVs. This facilitated the conversion of vitamin signals into Raman signals. The LOD of the aptasensor for 25(OH)D3 was 2.5 pM [89].

4.2.4. Electrochemical Biosensor

Electrochemical biosensors are employed to detect alterations in electron transfer at the electrode interface. These sensors have various merits, including high sensitivity, facile miniaturization, and low cost. Beyond antibodies, aptamers have emerged as an optimal recognition element for electrochemical sensors owing to their high affinity and design flexibility. For instance, Yin et al. developed an electrochemical aptasensor for the detection of 25(OH)D3 by immobilizing the VDBA14 aptamer on a gold electrode surface via disulfide bond conjugation (Figure 4). The formation of aptamer–25(OH)D3 complexes effectively reduced the electrocatalytic effect of thiolate aptamer on the redox activity of ferri/ferrocyanide. The biosensor monitored electrochemical responses using CV, SWV, and EIS, featuring a linear detection range of 1–1000 nM for 25(OH)D3, with an LOD as low as 0.085 nM [90]. In addition to gold electrodes, carbon-based materials [73], AuNP-modified glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs) [75], and nanomaterials [91,92] have been extensively used in electrochemical biosensors, enhancing the electrical conductivity and specific surface area of the electrodes. Meysam et al. developed a novel biosensor based on a CuCo2O4/nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube (N-CNT) nanocomposite (Figure 4). The aptamer was non-covalently attached to N-CNT via π-π interactions between the heterocyclic rings of nucleotides and the honeycomb structure of the carbon nanotube. When 25(OH)D3 bound to the aptamer, it triggered a conformational change, and the concentration of 25(OH)D3 was quantified by detecting the attenuation of the current signal of the redox probe [Fe(CN)6]3–/4– via DPV. With a sensitivity of 0.063 pM, this biosensor offered high selectivity and affordability, providing an efficient tool for clinical VD detection [73]. To further augment the sensitivity of the aptasensor, a series of signal-amplification strategies, especially nucleic acid amplification strategies, were employed during its construction. Building on previous research, Yin et al. developed a novel electrochemical aptamer biosensor for detecting 25(OH)D3 based on catalytic hairpin assembly (CHA) and DNA tetrahedron structures (Figure 4). Hairpin probes were modified on the gold electrode surface using DNA tetrahedrons. In the presence of 25(OH)D3, the aptamer beacon recognized the target and formed a complex, exposing a free tail. This tail then participated in a CHA reaction with the Fc-labeled hairpin and the hairpin probe on the gold electrode. Consequently, Fc docked at the electrode surface, facilitating efficient electron transfer and amplifying the electrochemical signal. CV, SWV, and EIS were employed to investigate the electrochemical properties of the developed biosensor. The electrochemical aptasensor demonstrated a wide linear range of 0.1–1000 nM, with an LOD as low as 0.026 nM. It exhibited high selectivity, stability, and reproducibility [93]. Although the label-free strategy simplifies the preparation process, the long-term stability, anti-interference ability in complex biological matrices, and large-scale production costs still require systematic evaluation. In addition to nucleic acid amplification, signal amplification can also be achieved through the modification of nanomaterials. Amandeep et al. developed an ultrasensitive electrochemical aptasensor powered by carboxylate graphitic carbon nitride/zinc ferrite composite (ZFCN) as a support material and palladium-doped cobalt nanoparticles (Pd-Co NPs) as a signal enhancer (Figure 4). Using EIS, the biosensor demonstrated exceptional performance, achieving a detection limit of 0.16 pM and a wide linear range of 2.5–250 nM while remaining stable for up to 60 days [94]. Zhang et al. developed an HCC composite material, modified with aptamers and Au NRs-modified complementary aptamer strands (csDNA), to detect 25(OH)D3 via ECL. After 25(OH)D3 bound to the aptamer, csDNA was released, blocking the ELC-resonance energy transfer (ECL-RET) between HCC and Au NRs, thereby restoring the ECL response. This method exhibited good response for 25(OH)D3 in the linear range of 50–200 nM, with an LOD of 40 nM. In this biosensor, the ECL intensity of the HCC composite was enhanced by more than twice, significantly improving the detection sensitivity. However, the actual energy transfer efficiency between HCC and Au NRs was still limited by the distance, orientation, and surface modification of the nanoparticles, thus requiring further optimization [84].

4.3. Detection of 25(OH)D3 Based on MIP-Based Molecular Recognition

The application of antibodies is restricted by different factors, including a short shelf-life, high cost, and complex storage conditions. Aptamers also encounter problems such as intricate conformational change design and inadequate selectivity and specificity. Nevertheless, these issues can be surmounted through the utilization of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), which exhibit greater stability and durability. MIPs are polymers specifically engineered to conform to the shape of template molecules. They can be based on host–guest polymerization with target molecules through covalent or non-covalent bonding [95]. Kia et al. developed a molecularly imprinted polymer for VD3 using an inorganic–organic adsorbent for the first time. Due to the high structural similarity between 25(OH)D3 and VD3, the synthesized polymer also exhibits a binding affinity for 25(OH)D3. However, VD3 was unsuitable as a template for common organic MIP due to its large molecule and two active double bonds. Consequently, the sol–gel method was selected for MIP-based solid-phase extraction of VD3. First, the template was captured through an acid-catalyzed reaction within the SiO2 network. The organic polymer then underwent polymerization around the network and the template. Finally, after the template was removed, binding sites are formed. During the recognition process, one of VD3’s hydroxyl groups became bound to the MIP via hydrogen bonding [96]. However, when MIPs based on hydrogen bonding were used to recognize 25(OH)D3, the limited number of functional groups in its chemical structure restricted the number of 25(OH)D3 molecules that could bind within the MIP cavity, thus limiting detection sensitivity. To address this issue, researchers often used Diels–Alder reactions to derivatize 25(OH)D3, thereby increasing its size and enhancing its binding affinity with the MIP. For instance, Jamilan et al. utilized the reaction between 25(OH)D3 and 2-nitropyridine derivatives to generate primary and secondary derivatives of the enantiomers of 25(OH)D3, successfully preparing MIPs (styrene-co-N-(3-aminopropyl) methacrylamide). This process prevented interfering compounds from binding to the MIPs’ cavity through hydrogen bonding, significantly enhancing detection specificity [97].
MIPs are frequently employed as recognition elements in the design of electrochemical biosensors. Leveraging biomimetic principles, they can specifically recognize and sensitively detect target substances. Nevertheless, the detection performance of electrochemical sensors is affected by certain drawbacks of MIPs, such as a limited number of imprinted sites, a sluggish binding rate, and an uneven distribution of binding sites. To enhance the application of electrochemical sensors, MIPs are typically encapsulated on nanoparticles owing to their high conductivity and large surface area (Figure 5A) [98]. Sheikh et al. prepared an MIP layer for 25(OH)D3 using a highly conductive polymer, polypyrrole (PPy). They then designed an electrochemical biosensor based on modifying GCE with a nanocomposite of CuCo2O4/nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes and phosphorus-doped graphene oxide (CuCo2O4/N-CNTs/P-GO), which was coated with the 25(OH)D3-PPy layer. In the absence of 25(OH)D3, the ferricyanide redox reaction proceeded normally on the electrode surface. However, when 25(OH)D3 bound to the PPy layer, it obstructed the ferricyanide redox reaction, resulting in a change in the electrical signal. The biosensor demonstrates a linear detection range for 25(OH)D3 from 0.002 to 10 μM, with an LOD of 0.38 nM [99].

4.4. Detection of 25(OH)D3 Based on Enzyme-Based Molecular Recognition

Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) belongs to a class of heme-thiolate monooxygenases in the heme protein superfamily. It possesses the capability to metabolize a wide range of chemicals through various biotransformation reactions and has applications in fields such as biochips, bioreactors, and biosensors. CYP450s are in the ferric (Fe3+) form at rest. One-electron reduction of the ferric form leads to the ferrous (Fe2+) state, which is widely used in electrochemical design [101]. Design mechanisms for biosensors using enzyme-catalyzed CYP450 reactions include two approaches. One approach involved electron transfer via NADPH–adrenodoxin reductase and adrenodoxin, which allowed the electrochemistry of the NADPH/NADP+ redox couple to be detected at the electrode. The other approach used non-native redox mediators to facilitate direct electron transfer while the enzymes were modified on the electrode. CYP27B1 was a CYP450 enzyme located in the mitochondria that catalyzes the conversion of 25(OH)D3 to 1,25(OH)2D3 in the kidney [10]. However, the level of extracellular expression of CYP27B1 was extremely low and unstable. Ozbakir et al. modified human CYP27B1 by deleting the first 31 amino acids and replacing Ser32 with Met32. Mature recombinant CYP27B1 was successfully expressed in E. coli and efficiently converts 25(OH)D3 into both 1,25(OH)2D3 and an isomer of (OH)2D3 (Figure 5B). The recombinant CYP27B1 was then immobilized on a GCE using pH-regulated Nafion® and tris(1,10-phenanthroline) cobalt (III) chloride (Co(sep)3+) as the redox mediator. CV and SWV were then used to characterize the electrode performance by converting the reaction into a detectable electrical signal. This enabled the detection of 25(OH)D3 within the physiological concentration range of 12.5–500 nM [100].
From another perspective, 25(OH)D3 was converted into 1,25(OH)2D3 by CYP27B1. 1,25(OH)2D3 was a high-affinity agonist of the VDR. Therefore, the level of 25(OH)D3 could be indirectly determined by observing the interaction between 1,25(OH)2D3 and VDR. Mano et al. achieved the successful expression of a chimeric protein composed of luciferase and the VDR ligand-binding domain (LBD), and constructed a split-luciferase vitamin D biosensor (SLDB) based on LucC-LBD-LucN. When an agonist was bound to the SLDB, it induced a conformational change in helix 12 (H12) of the LBD. This disruption led to the interruption of the interaction between the LucN and LucC fragments of the split luciferase. Consequently, there was a rapid and considerable reduction in the luminescence intensity of the luciferase. Conversely, upon binding with an antagonist, the light intensity of the luciferase increased instantaneously and significantly. Both 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 acted as antagonists of VDR. Consequently, while SLDB detected 25(OH)D3 in serum, it could not differentiate it from 1,25(OH)2D3 [102]. To distinguish between the two, Mano et al. enhanced the SLDB design by inserting several LXXLL motif-containing peptides between LucN and LBD to create a new LucN-LXXLL-LBD-LucC biosensor. When 25(OH)D3 bound to the LBD, the biosensor emitted a low intensity. However, upon conversion of 25(OH)D3 to 1,25(OH)2D3 by CYP27B1, the biosensor emitted a strong light. This biosensor could respond to 1,25(OH)2D3 at picomolar levels with increased light intensity, overcoming the sensitivity limitations of previous SLDBs [103].

4.5. Detection of 25(OH)D3 Based on Nanomaterials

Beyond the conventional recognition methods, label-free (antibody/aptamer/MIPs/enzymes) techniques are also employed in the fabrication of biosensors for the direct detection of 25(OH)D3. In this context, the output signal of the biosensor undergoes variation owing to the affinity between specific nanomaterials and 25(OH)D3. Fathima et al. developed an Ag-Ag2O/CNT-modified glassy carbon electrode (AgCNT/GCE) biosensor for the nanomolar detection of 25(OH)D3. The high affinity of AgCNT toward 25(OH)D3 led to complex formation and a decrease in the AgCNT/GCE electrode Rct value (Figure 5C). The proposed biosensor exhibited excellent sensitivity in the range of 20–100 nM, with a remarkably low detection limit of 7.9 nM. It demonstrated excellent response stability, repeatability, and reproducibility, with minimal interference, providing a new approach to the label-free detection of 25(OH)D3 [104]. Almalki et al. used 25(OH)D3–tetraphenylborate ion association complexes to modify graphene quantum dots (GQDs), preparing functionalized GQDs that could be used as fluorescent probes. These probes emitted a high intensity when excited at 350 nm. When the functionalized GQDs interacted with 25(OH)D3, the fluorescence was significantly reduced. This alteration in fluorescence facilitated the detection of 25(OH)D3 in serum specimens and had been utilized to compare the plasma 25(OH)D3 levels between autistic and healthy children [105].

4.6. Summary of Biosensor Detection Technologies

Biosensor detection technologies have made significant advancements in the detection of 25(OH)D3, demonstrating substantial advantages over traditional methods (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3). Among these technologies, aptasensors based on optical and electrochemical principles exhibit unique capabilities. In optical aptasensors, fluorescence sensing demonstrated high sensitivity; however, certain mechanisms and applications required further optimization. The colorimetric method was simple but vulnerable to the influence of nanomaterials. Meanwhile, despite its advantages, SPR technology faced challenges in the detection of low-molecular-weight substances. Electrochemical aptasensors exhibit high sensitivity, are easily miniaturized, and have low costs. They can be categorized into labeled and label-free types, each with its own unique advantages. Moreover, biosensors utilizing antibody and MIPs recognition also display distinct characteristics. These diverse biosensor types, whether aptamer-based or operating under other recognition mechanisms, together form a comprehensive system for the detection of 25(OH)D3. Their continuous research and application constantly expand the scope of 25(OH)D3 detection, offering broader prospects for clinical diagnosis, health monitoring, and other fields. The advent of biosensors has provided a more convenient and rapid approach for detecting 25(OH)D3. Nevertheless, most existing detection techniques remain confined to the laboratory phase. With the increasing daily demand and technological advancement, the limitations of traditional biosensor detection methods have become more prominent, while the advantages of emerging detection technologies are attracting increasing attention.
Table 1. Performance comparison of different biosensors.
Table 1. Performance comparison of different biosensors.
BiosensorRecognizeLinear RangeLODReference
Electrochemical immunosensorAntibody on the Asp-Gd2O3NRs/ITO electrode25.0–2500 nM0.25 nM[58]
Electrochemical immunosensorAntibody on the GCN-β-CD/Au nanocomposite0.25–1250 nM0.02 nM[61]
Optical immunosensorAntibody on the CdS@ZIF-67 nanocomposite/67.35 nM[64]
OF biosensorAntibody and double-clad fiber2.5–2500 nM2.5 nM[68]
Fluorescence aptasensorAptamer and CdTe QDs0.06–6 × 107 nM8.05 nM[78]
Colorimetric aptasensorAptamer and mesoporous platinum nanozymes4.0–250 nM2.5 nM[83]
LSPR aptasensorAptamer and gold nanorods0.25–2.5 × 105 nM0.25 nM[86]
SERS aptasensorAptamers, antibodies, and Ag nanovilli0.0025–250 nM2.5 pM[89]
Electrochemical aptasensorAptamer on a gold electrode1–1000 nM0.085 nM[90]
Electrochemical aptasensorAptamer with CHA on a gold electrode0.1–1000 nM0.026 nM[93]
Electrochemical biosensorsMIPs and CuCo2O4/N-CNTs/P-GO0.002 to 10 μM0.38 nM[99]
Electrochemical biosensorsCYP27B1 enzyme on a GCE12.5–500 nM/[100]
Electrochemical biosensorsAgCNT and GCE20–100 nM7.9 nM[104]
Table 2. Biosensor vs. chromatography.
Table 2. Biosensor vs. chromatography.
Comparison DimensionsHPLC/LC-MSBiosensorAdvantages of Biosensor
Sensitivity
[30,36,106,107]
High—at the pM levelModerate to high—it can reach the fM level after optimizationSignal enhancement by nanomaterials—such as gold nanoparticles and quantum dots
Detection speed [106]Slow—30 to 60 min for a single sampleFast—5 to 15 minReal-time monitoring capability, which is suitable for dynamic analysis
Equipment cost [106]Costly—the cost of the instrument plus maintenance exceeds 100,000 US dollarsLow—the cost of the miniaturized biosensor is less than 5000 US dollarsSuitable for primary healthcare and home-based testing
Sample pretreatment [106]Complex—extraction and derivatization are requiredSimple—it can directly detect saliva and whole bloodReduces human errors and improves throughput
PortabilityNone—fixed laboratory equipmentHigh—handheld or wearable devicesOn-site detection—for example, outdoor health screening
Table 3. Biosensor vs. traditional immunoassay methods.
Table 3. Biosensor vs. traditional immunoassay methods.
Comparison DimensionsCLIA/ELISABiosensorAdvantages of Biosensor
Recognition element [108]Antibody—prone to inactivation, large batch differencesDiversified—aptamers, enzymes, molecularly imprinted polymersResistant to high temperature, acid and alkali, long-shelf-life aptamers > 1 year
Detection window period [109]Reaction needs to be terminated (endpoint method)Real-time continuous monitoring—for example, surface plasmon resonance technologyDynamically track metabolic changes (e.g., postoperative recovery of vitamin D)
Multiplex detection [110]Limited-dependent on a combination of multiple antibodiesEasy to achieve—multichannel biosensor arraySimultaneously detect related indicators such as 25(OH)D3, calcium, PTH, etc.
Regenerative capacity [111]DisposableReversible binding—aptamer biosensor can be reused > 50 timesReduce the cost of a single test < 1 dollar per test
Anti-interference abilityProne to interference from rheumatoid factorsAnti-pollution interfaces can be designed—for example, anti-protein adsorption coatingsDirectly detect complex samples—for example, undiluted serum

5. Portable and Intelligent Equipment-Assisted Biosensor for 25(OH)D3 Detection

Laboratory-based high-precision detection technologies are increasingly unable to fully meet the demands for convenient, rapid, and real-time testing. POCT, which can promptly generate test results on-site, is characterized by simple operation and portable equipment. It notably improves the efficiency and timeliness of testing, thus emerging as a vital development direction for modern detection technology. In the field of 25(OH)D3 detection, the integration of intelligent and portable devices has instigated a revolutionary change in testing methods. These novel detection technologies not only overcome the limitations of time and space but also make the detection process more streamlined and effective, providing significant support for personal health management and public health surveillance.

5.1. Portable Device Detection Platform

With the progress in POCT research, paper-based biosensors, particularly LFS, have emerged as rapid detection instruments. They present multiple benefits for users, such as cost-efficiency, flexibility, user-friendliness, and portability. Vemulapati et al. devised a diagnostic testing system for the precise and quantitative evaluation of 25(OH)D3 using a smartphone-assisted portable imaging device. This diagnostic testing system comprised a competitive type LFS, a custom-fabricated cassette for housing the test, and a portable reader (TIDBIT, Figure 6A). In this LFS, when 25(OH)D3 was present, AuNPs were captured by the test line; conversely, they were captured by the control line, as the control line was pre-deposited with 25(OH)D3. The TIDBIT encompassed a complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor camera, a focusing lens, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), a Raspberry Pi board, a rechargeable lithium-ion battery, a slide-out cassette tray, and a three-dimensional (3D)-printed light-impenetrable container. Owing to the 3D-printed technology, compact smartphone imaging devices had been devised, which effectively integrated the advanced biosensor technology with the convenience of contemporary mobile applications [112]. Weng et al. devised a portable paper-based microfluidic device for the expeditious quantification of 25(OH)D3. The device incorporated a smartphone accessory, a specialized application, and LFS. The accessory was equipped with an amber LED (λ = 592 nm) to illuminate the LFS during the analytical process. To more effectively actualize the practicality and precision of the portable device, the design emphasis was placed on the hardware within the device. This hardware comprised an integrated sensor network consisting of parameter monitoring apparatuses, environmental monitoring sensors, gateways, local storage units, and a user interface. This portable device accomplished the quantitative analysis of 25(OH)D3 by assessing the luminance disparity between the detection area and the reference area on the LFS [63].
Electrochemical biosensors exhibit considerable potential in terms of high sensitivity, rapid response, stability, and instrument miniaturization. Through electrode improvement, they can be developed into portable devices. For instance, flexible electrodes can be employed in wearable devices. Moreover, the integration of microfluidic technology with electrochemical biosensors has facilitated device fabrication, which can effectively reduce costs, minimize reagent consumption, and better fulfill the requirements of portable device detection. Chauhan et al. developed a novel microfluidic nanobioplatform (MNBP) by depositing ITO on a glass substrate and incorporating gadolinium nanoparticles (GdNPs) to enable the precise detection of 25(OH)D3. Photoresist materials were applied to the surfaces of Si-wafers and ITO substrates. Leveraging CleWin software, master molds with microfluidic channel patterns and W-R-C three-electrode system patterns were then fabricated. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was cast onto the Si-wafer mold to generate a PDMS substrate equipped with 200 μm microfluidic channels. The ITO mold was etched using an ITO etchant to create the three-electrode system. GdNPs were deposited in the W region to prepare CS@Gd NPs/ITO, and subsequently, its surface was functionalized with antibodies. After blocking with BSA, this was fabricated into a working electrode, BSA/AB/CS@Gd NPs/ITO. Finally, PDMS was combined with ITO to form the MNBP through semi-covalent bonds via UV/ozone plasma treatment. This portable MNBP facilitated the POCT of 25(OH)D3 within the physiological range, exhibiting an LOD of 11 nM and an analysis time of 30 min, rendering it highly appropriate for rural and resource-constrained areas [113].
Furthermore, SERS is an effective tool for developing POCT, particularly when integrated with portable devices. It offers significant advantages, such as reduced sample pretreatment needs, higher diagnostic accuracy, and lower costs. Nevertheless, the preparation of SERS substrates encounters challenges owing to intricate and costly manufacturing procedures, rendering large-scale promotion unfeasible. To tackle this problem, Annasamy et al. devised a simpler and more cost-efficient SERS substrate. A SERS substrate was fabricated through the sequential deposition of graphene oxide–gold nanocomposites (GOAu), 2-mercaptoethanol, and glutaraldehyde onto a glass substrate, followed by antibody coating to yield the GOAu immunosubstrate. Upon the binding of 25(OH)D3 to the antibody, characteristic Raman peaks at 1223, 1253, and 1527 cm−1 were detectable under 785 nm excitation light. In comparison with the bare substrate, the SERS intensity of this GOAu immunosubstrate was enhanced by approximately fivefold. When integrated with portable devices and deep learning, this GOAu immunosubstrate was expected to expedite the clinical automated detection of 25(OH)D3 [114].
Figure 6. Construction and detection mechanisms of portable and wearable devices for 25(OH)D3. (A) A portable and smartphone platform for the visual detection (adapted with permission from Ref. [112]). (B) A screen-printed chip for wearable sensors (adapted with permission from Ref. [115]).
Figure 6. Construction and detection mechanisms of portable and wearable devices for 25(OH)D3. (A) A portable and smartphone platform for the visual detection (adapted with permission from Ref. [112]). (B) A screen-printed chip for wearable sensors (adapted with permission from Ref. [115]).
Biosensors 16 00314 g006

5.2. Smartphone-Assisted Imaging Platform

Smartphone-assisted imaging offers an innovative approach for the surveillance and quantitative assessment of substances, and it is anticipated to evolve into the next-generation portable diagnostic platforms.
Lee et al. devised an immunoassay apparatus termed vitaAID, which enables the rapid quantitative detection of 25(OH)D3 through the utilization of a smartphone. The vitaAID system encompasses iPhone accessories, a mobile application, and silver-enhanced LFSs. An iPhone was employed to capture the image data from both the test zone and the reference zone on the LFSs. The test zone was scanned to recognize the silver enhancement area, and a 100-pixel × 100-pixel area was selected around it. Subsequently, the average luminance of all pixels within this area was calculated. The identical procedure was replicated for the reference zone to ascertain its average luminance. By analyzing the luminance disparity between the test and reference zones and implementing the corresponding algorithm, the concentration of 25(OH)D3 was calculated [116]. Vemulapati et al. devised a TIDBIT for the purpose of capturing images on LFS and conducting an analysis of the T/C ratio (intensity of the test line to that of the control line). Utilized through a smartphone or computer in conjunction with the Nutriphone application, a Python script was employed to crop images and compute the T/C ratio. The T/C ratio was correlated with 25(OH)D3 by means of a pre-established calibration curve derived from samples with known characteristics. Through the integration of smartphone imaging technology and an alternative elution buffer, detection could be accomplished within 15 min, utilizing merely 40 μL of fingertip blood. Nevertheless, there remained a necessity for further enhancement in aspects such as the variability of image acquisition, the constraints of annotated datasets, and the achievement of accurate and precise quantitative analysis [112]. Anandita et al. devised a comprehensive algorithm for LFS diagnosis by utilizing ResNet-50 convolutional neural networks. This algorithm had the capacity to automatically scan, interpret, and quantify test images. By utilizing the smartphone camera, the results could be objectively documented and transmitted through a network connection for real-time reporting. When tested on commercial kits using images from controlled and smartphone environments, ResNet-50 demonstrated the highest accuracy (76.2%), a mean squared error of 0.00291, and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9398, outperforming other models in terms of robustness. It was implemented for the quantification of 25(OH)D3 based on smartphones, thus laying the foundation for portable diagnostic applications in low-resource settings [117].
Smartphone-based biosensor analysis is not only applicable to LFSs but also stands as a State-of-the-Art innovation in the realm of electrochemical analyte detection. Sharma et al. devised a GO-modified electrode that can be inserted into a mobile phone, which was coupled with an Android system application to realize the quantitative detection of 25(OH)D3. GO was coated on the surface of a screen-printed paper electrode (SPPE), and subsequently, antibodies were modified on the electrode. CV and DPV were employed to detect the changes in the response current. Through integration with mobile devices and utilization of the application for real-time data analysis, the electrochemical analysis process was notably simplified. Owing to the integration of intelligent devices, this electrochemical platform facilitated on-site detection of 25(OH)D3 with a detection limit of 15 nM, offering a convenient and efficient approach for 25(OH)D3 detection [118].

5.3. Flexible Materials for Wearable Devices

Wearable sensors play a crucial role in personalized medicine, facilitating continuous data acquisition for the monitoring of health alterations to implement preventive interventions. Flexible electrode materials belong to a class of functional materials distinguished by remarkable mechanical flexibility and the ability to stably transmit electrical signals or support electrochemical reactions. They constitute the core basis for the development of electronic devices in the direction of “lightweight, flexible, and portable” designs and have been the focus of extensive and continuous research, particularly in the realm of wearable sensors. Screen printing enables the large-scale production of flexible electrodes on diverse substrates, rendering it highly suitable for applications in the wearable technology field. Martins et al. fabricated screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs) on a flexible polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate. The SPCEs consisted of two carbon working electrodes and auxiliary electrodes, along with an Ag/AgCl electrode as a pseudoreference. L-cysteine was selectively adsorbed on gold planes to generate tree-like gold dendrites, which were then electrodeposited onto the SPCEs. AuDdrites demonstrate high electrical conductivity and biocompatibility, offering a large surface area for antibody immobilization, thereby facilitating the identification and capture of 25(OH)D3. The current during the detection process stems from the electro-oxidation of the redox probe ([Fe (CN)6]3–/4–). Upon the binding of the antibody to 25(OH)D3, the resultant immune complex functions as an insulating layer, partially impeding the diffusion of the redox probe, consequently leading to a current alteration [60]. SPCEs could be directly incorporated into immunosensor chips. By affixing the chip onto a mouthguard, it could serve as a wearable sensor. To further optimize flexible electrodes, encompassing enhancing precision, improving efficacy, and reducing expenses, Martins et al. reintroduced a disposable, label-free, or redox probe-free flexible bioelectronic chip based on PET. This chip integrated graphitic carbon nitride (CN) with Black Pearls 2000 carbon for the purpose of monitoring the level of 25(OH)D3 (Figure 6B). The chip was fabricated on a flexible polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate and comprised a working electrode, an auxiliary electrode, and pseudoreference electrodes (Cpse). The working electrode was prepared using graphitic CN modified with toluidine blue (TB) and adorned with electrodeposited gold nanoparticles (Au-TB/CN), and was coated with a layer of anti-25(OH)D3 antibodies. Following gold electrodeposition, the Cpse was modified using Ag/AgCl conductive ink. 25(OH)D3 bound to antibodies to form a complex, which adhered to the electrode and creates an insulating layer, thus impeding electron transfer on the surface of the Au-TB/CN nanocomposite. By means of chronoamperometry, 25(OH)D3 could be detected at concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 1747 nM, with a detection limit of 0.025 nM. The low-cost characteristic significantly enhanced the appeal of this new flexible electrode as a real-time monitoring wearable device [115]. Beyond these PET-based flexible chips, carbon cloth (CC) could also be employed in wearable devices to realize real-time monitoring. CC, a flexible textile material, facilitates electrolyte diffusion. It was distinguished by high conductivity, chemical stability, light weight, low cost, and a three-dimensional structure. CC was mainly utilized in supercapacitor applications. Chauhan et al. fabricated a cerium nitrate (nCeO2)-anchored carbon cloth (CC) electrode for the electrochemical, label-free detection of 25(OH)D3. The nCeO2 was anchored onto the carbon cloth substrate to acquire a nanoelectrode (nCeO2/CC). Subsequently, antibodies and bovine serum albumin were immobilized on the nCeO2/CC for the recognition and capture of 25(OH)D3. The complex formed through the binding of the antibodies to 25(OH)D3 generated an electrically insulating layer on the electrode surface, impeding electron transfer. This modified CC-based nanobioplatform exhibited a detection limit of 11.6 nM and a response time of 15 min, conferring advantages on the fabrication of wearable sensors [119]. Flexible substrates and probe-free characteristic chips exhibited substantial potential in the advancement of wearable sensors. These investigations would stimulate researchers to devise wearable electrochemical immunoassay sensors with an extended detection scope, offering a prospective approach for the continuous surveillance of in vivo biological or chemical constituents. Nevertheless, augmenting the anti-interference ability in complex matrices persists as a challenge.

6. Conclusions and Outlook

The deficiency of vitamin D has emerged as a global epidemic, and the demand for monitoring its levels within the human body has been on the rise. As a pivotal biomarker for evaluating vitamin D levels in humans, the accurate detection of 25(OH)D3 is of utmost significance for the early diagnosis of metabolic bone diseases, including rickets and osteoporosis, as well as for promoting research in immune regulation and cardiovascular health. Although the existing literature has discussed the progress of detection methods for 25(OH)D3, there is a certain dearth of summarization and comparison of these methods, along with exploration of their practical application scenarios. This paper focuses on a systematic review of the latest advancements in 25(OH)D3 detection technologies based on antibody, aptamer, and molecularly imprinted recognition technologies. It identifies the areas requiring improvement in different detection and analysis methods and elaborates on the advantages and limitations of the existing techniques. Traditional detection technologies necessitate skilled personnel, specialized environments, and advanced equipment, which may be inaccessible in resource-constrained or emergency situations. In contrast, biosensors present multiple advantages in terms of sensitivity, selectivity, stability, and cost, and hold the potential for miniaturization and integration into portable devices. Nevertheless, further research is still required to optimize these biosensors to enhance their detection performance and practicality.
Biosensor-based detection methods for 25(OH)D3 possess substantial scientific significance and practical applicability in medical diagnostics and health management. Nevertheless, the detection process generally depends on blood samples. For test-subjects, blood collection is invasive and frequently painful, especially for infants, the elderly, and those who undergo frequent tests, thereby augmenting their susceptibility to infection. Moreover, the stability of blood samples is another crucial factor. If not processed in a timely manner, alterations in sample composition can influence its stability, resulting in compromised test outcomes and misjudgment of vitamin D levels, which can have a considerable impact on diagnosis and treatment. Consequently, the advancement of non-invasive sampling technologies has emerged as an urgent imperative.
In comparison to antibody-based biosensors, aptamer-based biosensors surmount the constraints of antibody instability and stringent storage prerequisites through the utilization of high-affinity nucleic acid aptamers for specific binding to target molecules. These biosensors significantly curtail detection expenses and operational intricacy. Their miniaturized configuration facilitates the analysis of microsamples (e.g., fingertip blood and saliva), augmenting the convenience of testing, particularly for primary care environments and at-home self-testing. However, in terms of sensitivity, both antibody-based and aptamer-based recognition, when combined with electrochemical techniques, can achieve picomolar-level detection. In contrast, MIPS recognition can only reach micromolar-level detection. Overall, although biosensors have demonstrated good performance, there is still room for improvement in detecting low-concentration samples. To further elevate sensitivity, nucleic acid amplification techniques can be integrated with aptamer sensors. These amplification technologies can amplify the nucleic acid signals associated with the aptamer, thereby heightening the detection sensitivity for low levels of 25(OH)D3. This advancement would fulfill the clinical requirement for high-sensitivity detection in early diagnosis and disease prevention, thus paving new paths for the development of 25(OH)D3 detection technologies.
Portable and intelligent detection technologies relying on smartphones and wearable devices are anticipated to become a key area of future research. These devices not only enable real-time and non-invasive monitoring of 25(OH)D3 but also promote integration with cloud-based medical systems via the Internet of Things, thereby facilitating the establishment of personalized health management ecosystems. For instance, the combination of wearable biosensors with smartwatches is expected to enable continuous surveillance of vitamin D levels in the body and offer personalized supplementation suggestions. Micro-detection modules incorporated into smartphones, connected to cloud servers, can automatically upload home self-test data to medical platforms for remote diagnosis by medical professionals. Additionally, we must consider that vitamin D deficiency in older adults may lead to atherosclerosis [120], and cardiovascular and metabolic disorders [121]. The design of intelligent devices tailored for older adults, who might encounter operational challenges, necessitates a balance between user-friendly simplicity and intelligent functionality.
Looking forward, the standardization and harmonization of 25(OH)D3 detection methods ought to be continuously enhanced to augment the comparability of results among diverse techniques. This is expected to offer unified data support for global research on vitamin D in relation to health and disease prevention. Ranging from laboratory-based investigations to home health surveillance, and from clinical diagnoses to public health governance, the advancements in 25(OH)D3 detection technologies are anticipated to empower the broader health domain, driving precision medicine and personalized health management to new levels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.X.; investigation, D.B., Y.C. and X.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.B.; writing—review and editing, Y.X.; supervision, Y.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
1,25(OH)2D31,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
25(OH)D325-hydroxyvitamin D3
3Dthree-dimensional
Abmonoclonal antibody
AgCNT/GCEAg-Ag2O/CNT-modified glassy carbon electrode
AgNVAg nanovilli
APCIatmospheric-pressure chemical ionization
Aspaspartic acid
AuNPsgold nanoparticles
AuNRsgold nanorods
BLIBiolayer Interferometry
CAEFelectrospun cellulose acetate fiber
CCcarbon cloth
CdScadmium sulfide
CHAcatalytic hairpin assembly
CLIAchemiluminescent immunoassay
CNcarbon nitride
COVID-19coronavirus disease 2019
Cpsepseudoreference electrode
CRISPRclustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats
CYP27cytochrome P450 27
CYP450cytochrome P450
DBPD-binding protein
DCFdouble-clad fiber
DPVdifferential pulse voltammetry
dsDNAdouble-stranded DNA
ECLelectrochemiluminescence
ELISAenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
EISelectrochemical impedance spectroscopy
Fc-CHOferrocene-carbaldehyde
FTIRFourier-transform infrared spectroscopy
FRETFörster resonance energy transfer
GCEsglassy carbon electrodes
GdNPsgadolinium nanoparticles
Gd2O3NRsgadolinium oxide nanorods
GNRgraphene nanoribbon
GOgraphene oxide
GOAugraphene oxide–gold nanocomposites
GQDsgraphene quantum dots
HCCHOFs-g-C3N4-CeO2
HPLChigh-performance liquid chromatography
IDS-RIAimmunodiagnostic systems radioimmunoassay
ITOindium tin oxide
LBDligand-binding domain
LC-MSliquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
LC-MS/MSliquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
LEDlight-emitting diode
LFSlateral flow strip
LLEliquid–liquid extraction
LODlimit of detection
LSPRlocalized surface plasmon resonance
MBmethylene blue
ME HLBmembrane-emulsified hydrophilic–lipophilic balance
MIPsmolecularly imprinted polymers
MNBPmicrofluidic nanobioplatform
MPNsmesoporous platinum nanozymes
MSmass spectrometry
N-CNTCuCo2O4/nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube
OFoptical fiber
Pd-Co NPspalladium-doped cobalt nanoparticles
PDMSpolydimethylsiloxane
PETpolyethylene terephthalate
PGPicoGreen
POCTpoint-of-care testing
PPTprotein precipitation
PPypolypyrrole
PTAD4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione
QDs-FICAdot nanoparticle-based fluorescent immunochromatographic assay
RIAradioimmunoassay
RCPconducting paper substrate
Rctcharge transfer resistance
SELEXsystematic evolution of exponentially enriched ligands
SERSsurface-enhanced Raman scattering
SLDBsplit-luciferase vitamin D biosensor
SPCEsscreen-printed carbon electrodes
SPEsolid-phase extraction
SPPEscreen-printed paper electrode
SPRsurface plasmon resonance
SWVsquare wave voltammetry
TMB3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine
TSAtrident scaffold-assisted aptamer biosensor
TBtoluidine blue
UVultraviolet
UV-visultraviolet–visible spectroscopy
VDvitamin D
VD2vitamin D2
VD3vitamin D3
VDRvitamin D receptor

References

  1. Anderson, P.H.; Turner, A.G.; Morris, H.A. Vitamin D actions to regulate calcium and skeletal homeostasis. Clin. Biochem. 2012, 45, 880–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Akimbekov, N.; Digel, I.; Sherelkhan, D.; Razzaque, M. Vitamin D and Phosphate Interactions in Health and Disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2022, 1362, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Jehan, F.; Voloc, A. Actions classiques de la vitamine D: Apport de la génétique humaine et de modèles de souris génétiquement modifiées. Biol. Aujourd’hui 2014, 208, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Holick, M.F.; Chen, T.C. Vitamin D deficiency: A worldwide problem with health consequences. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 1080S–1086S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ramasamy, I. Vitamin D metabolism and guidelines for vitamin D supplementation. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 2020, 41, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tuerk, C.; Gold, L. Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Science 1990, 249, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Darmostuk, M.; Rimpelova, S.; Gbelcova, H.; Ruml, T. Current approaches in SELEX: An update to aptamer selection technology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1141–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lips, P. Vitamin D physiology. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Bio. 2006, 92, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Keane, J.T.; Elangovan, H.; Stokes, R.A.; Gunton, J.E. Vitamin D and the liver-correlation or cause? Nutrients 2018, 10, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sakaki, T.; Kagawa, N.; Yamamoto, K.; Inouye, K. Metabolism of vitamin D3 by cytochromes P450. Front. Biosci. 2005, 10, 134. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bouillon, R.; Norman, A.W.; Lips, P. Vitamin D deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 1980–1981. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bouillon, R.; Carmeliet, G.; Daci, E.; Segaert, S.; Verstuyf, A. Vitamin D metabolism and action. Osteoporos. Int. 1998, 8, S13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Göring, H. Vitamin D in nature: A product of synthesis and/or degradation of cell membrane components. Biochemistry 2018, 83, 1350–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Holick, M.F.; Binkley, N.C.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Gordon, C.M.; Hanley, D.A.; Heaney, R.P.; Murad, M.H.; Weaver, C.M. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 1911–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dawson-Hughes, B.; Heaney, R.P.; Holick, M.F.; Lips, P.; Meunier, P.J.; Vieth, R. Estimates of optimal vitamin D status. Osteoporos. Int. 2005, 16, 713–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Abe, S.; Kashii, M.; Shimada, T.; Suzuki, K.; Nishimoto, S.; Nakagawa, R.; Horiki, M.; Yasui, Y.; Namba, J.; Kuriyama, K. Relationship between distal radius fracture severity and 25-hydroxyvitamin-D level among perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Bone Jt. Open 2022, 3, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xu, H.J.; Wang, L.H.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, C.R.; Zhang, Y.G. Effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 on growth performance, fecal scores, vitamin D3 metabolites, antioxidant status, and inflammatory and stress-related parameters in weaning calves. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2021, 281, 114946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dunn, J.A.; Jefferson, K.; MacDonald, D.; Iqbal, G.; Bland, R. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is associated with increased bladder cancer risk: A systematic review and evidence of a potential mechanism. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 188, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Grant, W.B.; Al Anouti, F.; Boucher, B.J.; Dursun, E.; Gezen-Ak, D.; Jude, E.B.; Karonova, T.; Pludowski, P. A narrative review of the evidence for variations in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration thresholds for optimal health. Nutrients 2022, 14, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Annweiler, G.; Corvaisier, M.; Gautier, J.; Dubée, V.; Legrand, E.; Sacco, G.; Annweiler, C. Vitamin D supplementation associated to better survival in hospitalized frail elderly COVID-19 patients: The GERIA-COVID quasi-experimental study. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Targher, G.; Byrne, C.D. Lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels and increased risk of liver diseases: Is there a causal link? Endocrine 2014, 47, 3–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  22. Jain, A.; Chaurasia, R.; Sengar, N.S.; Singh, M.; Mahor, S.; Narain, S. Analysis of vitamin D level among asymptomatic and critically ill COVID-19 patients and its correlation with inflammatory markers. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Akbar, M.R.; Wibowo, A.; Pranata, R.; Setiabudiawan, B. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (vitamin D) level is associated with susceptibility to COVID-19, severity, and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 660420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pal, R.; Banerjee, M.; Bhadada, S.K.; Shetty, A.J.; Singh, B.; Vyas, A. Vitamin D supplementation and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Eedocrinol. Investig. 2022, 45, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fabregat-Cabello, N.; Farre-Segura, J.; Huyghebaert, L.; Peeters, S.; Le Goff, C.; Souberbielle, J.C.; Cavalier, É. A fast and simple method for simultaneous measurements of 25 (OH) D, 24, 25 (OH) 2D and the Vitamin D Metabolite Ratio (VMR) in serum samples by LC-MS/MS. Clin. Chim. Acta 2017, 473, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tijerina, A.; Garza, A.; López, A.; Cavazos, N.; Romo, A.; Heya, M.S.; Bouzas, C.; Tur, J.A.; Salas, R. An HPLC-UV Method to Assess Human Plasma 25 (OH) D3. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mineva, E.M.; Schleicher, R.L.; Chaudhary-Webb, M.; Maw, K.L.; Botelho, J.C.; Vesper, H.W.; Pfeiffer, C.M. A candidate reference measurement procedure for quantifying serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D 2 using isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 5615–5624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. CN111366646B; 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Analysis Method Based on Immune Purification and Mass Spectrometry Detection. CNIPA: Beijing, China, 2022.
  29. Clarke, M.W.; Tuckey, R.C.; Gorman, S.; Holt, B.; Hart, P.H. Optimized 25-hydroxyvitamin D analysis using liquid-liquid extraction with 2D separation with LC/MS/MS detection, provides superior precision compared to conventional assays. Metabolomics 2013, 9, 1031–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Z.Q.; Hao, L.P.; Meng, Z.X.; Zhang, H.R.; Kang, W.J.; Ai, L.F. Simultaneous determination of 25 (OH) D2, 25 (OH) D3 and 1α, 25 (OH)2D3 in human serum by derivatization-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 2025, 701, 115821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lyu, H.Y.; Wang, S.P.; Jin, Y.; Shen, R.; Chen, J.Y.; Zhu, C.Y.; Chen, B.B.; Wu, C.S. Simultaneous determination of VD2, VD3, 25 (OH) D2, and 25 (OH) D3 in human plasma using electrospray LC-MS/MS as well as its application to evaluate VD plasma levels in depressive, schizophrenic patients and healthy individuals. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2020, 34, e4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, S.; Ni, R.; Lv, L.H.; Chen, R.; Chen, Y.; Huang, F.J.; Xu, Z.R. Simultaneous determination of vitamin D metabolites 25 (OH) D3 and 1α, 25 (OH)2D3 in human plasma using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. Adv. Clin. Lab 2022, 24, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, S.W.H.; Jian, W.Y.; Sullivan, S.; Sankaran, B.; Edom, R.W.; Weng, N.D.; Sharkey, D. Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS based method for quantification of 25 hydroxyvitamin D2 and 25 hydroxyvitamin D3 in human serum and plasma. J. Chromatogr. B 2014, 961, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lin, Y.C.; Lee, H.H.; Tseng, S.C.; Lin, K.D.; Tseng, L.P.; Lee, J.F.; Lee, Y.H.; Chen, B.H. Quantitation of serum 25 (OH) D2 and 25 (OH) D3 concentrations by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in patients with diabetes mellitus. J. Food Drug Anal. 2019, 27, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. van den Ouweland, J.M.; Beijers, A.M.; van Daal, H. Fast separation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 from 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in human serum by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: Variable prevalence of 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in infants, children, and adults. Clin. Chem. 2011, 57, 1618–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Casetta, B.; Jans, I.; Billen, J.; Vanderschuerenb, D.; Bouillonb, R. Development of a Method for the Quantification of 1α,25(OH)2–Vitamin D3 in Serum by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry without Derivatization. Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 16, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Knox, S.; Harris, J.; Calton, L.; Wallace, A.M. A simple automated solid-phase extraction procedure for measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and D2 by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2009, 46, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Højskov, C.S.; Heickendorff, L.; Møller, H.J. High-throughput liquid-liquid extraction and LCMSMS assay for determination of circulating 25 (OH) vitamin D3 and D2 in the routine clinical laboratory. Clin. Chim. Acta 2010, 411, 114–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, J.; Gong, Z.; Tie, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhai, W.; Guo, Q.; Wu, W.; Liu, J.; Xu, L. Characterization and application of membrane-emulsified HLB Microspheres for quantification of 25-hydroxy vitamin D2 and 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 in serum by UPLC-MS/MS. Chromatographia 2024, 87, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Le, J.; Yuan, T.F.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.T.; Li, Y. New LC-MS/MS method with single-step pretreatment analyzes fat-soluble vitamins in plasma and amniotic fluid. J. Lipid Res. 2018, 59, 1783–1790. [Google Scholar]
  41. Higashi, T.; Suzuki, M.; Hanai, J.; Inagaki, S.; Min, J.Z.; Shimada, K.; Toyo’Oka, T. A specific LC/ESI-MS/MS method for determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in neonatal dried blood spots containing a potential interfering metabolite, 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3. J. Sep. Sci. 2011, 34, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fu, X.y.; Dolnikowski, G.G.; Patterson, W.B.; Dawson-Hughes, B.; Zheng, T.; Morris, M.C.; Holland, T.M.; Booth, S.L. Determination of vitamin D and its metabolites in human brain using an Ultra-Pressure LC-Tandem Mass Spectra method. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2019, 3, nzz074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ahmed, S.A.; Khojah, H.M.J.; Al-Thagfan, S.S.; Alahmadi, Y.M.; Mohammed, Y.A. An ultrasensitive UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS method augmented with a controlled microwave derivatization reaction for quantitation of vitamin D3 and its major metabolites in COVID-19 patients. Talanta 2022, 246, 123497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tai, S.S.C.; Bedner, M.; Phinney, K.W. Development of a candidate reference measurement procedure for the determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 in human serum using isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 1942–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hollis, B.W.; Napoli, J.L. Improved radioimmunoassay for vitamin D and its use in assessing vitamin D status. Clin. Chem. 1985, 31, 1815–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Barake, M.; Daher, R.T.; Salti, I.; Cortas, N.K.; Al-Shaar, L.; Habib, R.H.; Fuleihan, G.E.H. 25-hydroxyvitamin D assay variations and impact on clinical decision making. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 835–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sempos, C.T.; Lindhout, E.; Heureux, N.; Hars, M.; Parkington, D.A.; Dennison, E.; Durazo-Arvizu, R.; Jones, K.S.; Wise, S.A. Towards harmonization of directly measured free 25-hydroxyvitamin D using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2022, 414, 7793–7803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lind, C.; Chen, J.w.; Byrjalsen, I. Enzyme immunoassay for measuring 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in serum. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, 943–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Han, S.; Qiu, W.; Zhang, J.; Bai, Z.; Tong, X. Development of a Chemiluminescence Immunoassay for Quantification of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D in Human Serum. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2020, 2020, 9039270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lu, M.; Hollis, B.W.; Carey, V.J.; Laranjo, N.; Singh, R.J.; Weiss, S.T.; Litonjua, A.A. Determinants and measurement of neonatal vitamin D: Overestimation of 25 (OH) D in cord blood using CLIA assay technology. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 105, e1085–e1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xing, Y.; Wang, K.; Ma, X.; Zhang, H.; Tian, X. Correlation and consistency between two detection methods for serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D levels in human venous blood and capillary blood. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1291799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Farrell, C.-J.L.; Martin, S.; McWhinney, B.; Straub, I.; Williams, P.; Herrmann, M. State-of-the-art vitamin D assays: A comparison of automated immunoassays with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. Clin. Chem. 2012, 58, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Leino, A.; Turpeinen, U.; Koskinen, P. Automated measurement of 25-OH vitamin D3 on the Roche Modular E170 analyzer. Clin. Chem. 2008, 54, 2059–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Carter, G.D.; Berry, J.L.; Gunter, E.; Jones, G.; Jones, J.C.; Makin, H.L.J.; Sufi, S.; Wheeler, M.J. Proficiency testing of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) assays. J. Steroid. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 121, 176–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Snellman, G.; Melhus, H.; Gedeborg, R.; Byberg, L.; Berglund, L.; Wernroth, L.; Michaelsson, K. Determining vitamin D status: A comparison between commercially available assays. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Norihiro, K.; Kaoru, U.; Junichi, K.; Kazutake, S. Production and specificity of antisera raised against 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-[C-3]-bovine serum albumin conjugates. Steroids 1992, 57, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kobayashi, N.; Hisada, A.; Shimada, K. Specificity of the polyclonal antibodies raised against a novel 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-bovine serum albumin conjugate linked through the C-11α position. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1994, 48, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chauhan, D.; Kumar, R.; Panda, A.K.; Solanki, P.R. An efficient electrochemical biosensor for Vitamin-D3 detection based on aspartic acid functionalized gadolinium oxide nanorods. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 5490–5503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Anusha, T.; Bhavani, K.S.; Hassan, R.Y.; Brahman, P.K. Ferrocene tagged primary antibody generates electrochemical signal: An electrochemical immunosensing platform for the monitoring of vitamin D deficiency in clinical samples. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 239, 124269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Martins, T.S.; Bott-Neto, J.L.; Machado, S.A.; Oliveira, O.N., Jr. Label-free electrochemical immunosensor made with tree-like gold dendrites for monitoring 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 metabolite. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 31455–31462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Anusha, T.; Bhavani, K.S.; Kumar, J.S.; Brahman, P.K.; Hassan, R.Y. Fabrication of electrochemical immunosensor based on GCN-β-CD/Au nanocomposite for the monitoring of vitamin D deficiency. Bioelectrochemistry 2022, 143, 107935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Chauhan, D.; Solanki, P.R. Hydrophilic and insoluble electrospun cellulose acetate fiber-based biosensing platform for 25-hydroxy vitamin-D3 detection. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2019, 1, 1613–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Weng, C.H.; Chou, H.Y.; Chen, M.H.; Lin, Y.S. A portable platform for the quantification of vitamin D levels by using paper-based microfluidic. In 2018 11th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  64. Anandita, A.; Rath, D.; Singh, P.; Pathak, P.K.; Salunkhe, R.R. Engineered CdS@ZIF67 nanozyme-assisted detection of vitamin D deficiency. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2026, 297, 118379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, J.; Sun, G.; Li, F.; Zhu, Z.; Sun, L.; Lv, P.; Yue, H. Development of ZnCdSe/ZnS quantum dot-based fluorescence immunochromatographic assay for the rapid visual and quantitative detection 25-hydroxyvitamins D in human serum. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1326254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sun, T.Q.; Wang, W.; Wang, F.; Shen, W.L.; Geng, L.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Bi, M.; Gong, T.T.; Liu, C.; Guo, C.J. A novel universal small-molecule detection platform based on antibody-controlled Cas12a switching. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 246, 115897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cusano, A.M.; Quero, G.; Vaiano, P.; Cicatiello, P.; Principe, M.; Micco, A.; Ruvo, M.; Consales, M.; Cusano, A. Metasurface-assisted Lab-on-fiber optrode for highly sensitive detection of vitamin D. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 242, 115717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Esposito, F.; Sansone, L.; Srivastava, A.; Cusano, A.M.; Campopiano, S.; Giordano, M.; Iadicicco, A. Label-free detection of vitamin D by optical biosensing based on long period fiber grating. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 347, 130637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Alsager, O.A.; Alotaibi, K.M.; Alswieleh, A.M.; Alyamani, B.J. Colorimetric aptasensor of vitamin D3: A novel approach to eliminate residual adhesion between aptamers and gold nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, R.; Yun, Y.F.; Feng, Z.Y.; Chen, M.H.; Zhang, J.J. Rational Design of Trident Aptamer Scaffold for Rapid and Accurate Monitoring of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Metabolism in Living Cells. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 10322–10329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bruno, J.G.; Carrillo, M.P.; Phillips, T.; Edge, A. Serum inverts and improves the fluorescence response of an aptamer beacon to various vitamin D analytes. Luminescence 2012, 27, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lee, B.H.; Gu, M.B. Highly sensitive detection of 25-HydroxyvitaminD3 by using a target-induced displacement of aptamer. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 88, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gachpazan, M.; Hatamluyi, B.; Meshkat, Z.; Rezayi, M.; Sany, S.B.T.; Gholoobi, A.; Ghayour-Mobarhan, M.; Rahimi, H.R. 25-Hydroxy vitamin D3 electrochemical biosensor mediated by a truncated aptamer and CuCo2O4/N-CNTs. Microchem. J. 2023, 193, 109186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Prante, M.; Schüling, T.; Roth, B.; Bremer, K.; Walter, J. Characterization of an Aptamer directed against 25-hydroxyvitamin D for the development of a competitive aptamer-based Assay. Biosensors 2019, 9, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Cai, T.; Chen, M.; Yang, J.; Tang, C.; Lu, X.; Wei, Z.; Jiang, H.; Hou, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yu, P. An AuNPs-based electrochemical aptasensor for the detection of 25-hydroxy vitamin D3. Anal. Sci. 2024, 40, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Qiao, L.; Yu, W.; Wang, H.; He, J.; Yang, S.; Wang, Z.; Chen, A. Highly sensitive fluorescent detection of 25-HydroxyvitaminD3 using truncated affinity-improved DNA aptamers. Authorea Prepr. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bardajee, G.R.; Tahriri, F.; Vancaeyzeele, C. Characterization and Application of the Fluorescent APTA-Nanobiosensors Based on CdTe-TGA QDs for Determination of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3. BioNanoScience 2025, 15, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bardajee, G.R.; Tahriri, F.; Chahrogh, A.R.; Atashkadi, M. Design and characterization of an APTA biosensor/Cy3 fluorescent probe consisting of CdTe quantum dots and aptamers for the detection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. New J. Chem. 2026, 50, 1831–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gupta, R.; Kaul, S.; Singh, V.; Kumar, S.; Singhal, N.K. Graphene oxide and fluorescent aptamer based novel biosensor for detection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 23456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Chávez, J.L.; MacCuspie, R.I.; Stone, M.O.; Kelley-Loughnane, N. Colorimetric detection with aptamer-gold nanoparticle conjugates: Effect of aptamer length on response. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Alsager, O.A.; Kumar, S.; Zhu, B.C.; Travas-Sejdic, J.; McNatty, K.P.; Hodgkiss, J.M. Ultrasensitive colorimetric detection of 17β-estradiol: The effect of shortening DNA aptamer sequences. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 4201–4209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gopinath, S.C.; Lakshmipriya, T.; Awazu, K. Colorimetric detection of controlled assembly and disassembly of aptamers on unmodified gold nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 51, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lee, H.B.; Son, S.E.; Gupta, P.K.; Venkatesan, J.; Hur, W.; Park, J.; Kim, S.N.; Seong, G.H. Mesoporous platinum nanozyme-based competitive immunoassay for sensitive detection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Mater. Lett. 2023, 330, 133286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, M.; Li, Y.; Xu, D.; Wang, W.; Zhou, H.; Yang, X. Electrochemiluminescent/colorimetric monitoring 25 (OH) D3 based on HOFs-g-C3N4-CeO2 functional composite. Microchim. Acta 2025, 192, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Alzahrani, K.E.; Al-Gawati, M.; Assaifan, A.K.; Alodhayb, A.; Alotaibi, K.; Alswieleh, A.; Albrithen, H.; Alanazi, A.F. Label free detection of vitamin D by microcantilever-based aptasensor. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2023, 35, 102951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Jo, S.; Lee, W.; Park, J.; Park, H.; Kim, M.; Kim, W.; Hong, J.; Park, J. Wide-range direct detection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 using polyethylene-glycol-free gold nanorod based on LSPR aptasensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 181, 113118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jug, A.; Bratkovič, T.; Ilaš, J. Biolayer interferometry and its applications in drug discovery and development. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2024, 176, 117741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gil, B.; Keshavarz, M.; Wales, D.; Darzi, A.; Yeatman, E. Orthogonal Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering/Field-Effect Transistor Detection of Breast and Colorectal Cancer-Derived Exosomes using Graphene as a Tag-Free Diagnostic Template. Adv. Nanobiomed Res. 2023, 3, 2300055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kim, W.; Park, J.; Kim, W.; Jo, S.; Kim, M.; Kim, C.; Park, H.; Bang, D.; Lee, W.; Park, J. Bio-inspired Ag nanovilli-based sandwich-type SERS aptasensor for ultrasensitive and selective detection of 25-hydroxy vitamin D3. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 188, 113341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yin, S.; Li, Y.x.; Hossain, M.N.; Sun, C.j.; Kraatz, H.B. Electrochemical detection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 using an oligonucleotide aptasensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 340, 129945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kaur, A.; Kumar, R.; Chaudhary, G.R.; Prabhakar, N. Electrochemical determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 using conductive porous template based on gold-modified metal organic framework@ mesoporous silica particles. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2024, 54, 791–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bandi, L.; Brahman, P.K.; Anusha, T. Electrochemical sensors and biosensors for vitamin D detection: A comprehensive review. ChemistrySelect 2026, 11, e06881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yin, S.; Hossain, M.N.; Li, Y.X.; Sun, C.J.; Kraatz, H.B. Development of a novel electrochemical aptasensor based on catalytic hairpin assembly and DNA tetrahedron for the detection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 354, 131217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kaur, A.; Rohilla, R.; Rani, S.; Chaudhary, G.R.; Prabhakar, N. Fabrication of Pd-Co nanoparticles decorated graphitic carbon nitride/zinc ferrite platform for electrochemical estimation of vitamin D. Microchem. J. 2025, 211, 113114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Jamilan, M.A.; Kamarudin, B.; Mohd Zain, Z.; Sambasevam, K.P.; Mehamod, F.S.; Md Noh, M.F. A Scoping Review of Vitamins Detection Using Electrochemically Polymerised, Molecularly Imprinted Polymers. Polymers 2025, 17, 1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kia, S.; Fazilati, M.; Salavati, H.; Bohlooli, S. Preparation of a novel molecularly imprinted polymer by the sol–gel process for solid phase extraction of vitamin D3. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 31906–31914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Jamilan, M.A.; Zain, Z.M.; Sambasevam, K.P.; Mehamod, F.S.; Kamarudin, B.; Noh, M.F.M. Electropolymerised molecularly-imprinted polymer for the detection of serum Vitamin D using Box-Behnken design. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2025, 7, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Marinangeli, A.; Chianella, I.; Radicchi, E.; Maniglio, D.; Bossi, A.M. Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Electrochemical Sensing: The Effect of Inhomogeneous Binding Sites on the Measurements. A Comparison between Imprinted Polyaniline versus nanoMIP-Doped Polyaniline Electrodes for the EIS Detection of 17β-Estradiol. ACS Sens. 2024, 9, 4963–4973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sheikh Beig Goharrizi, M.A.; Kazemi Oskuee, R.; Aleyaghoob, G.; Mohajeri, T.; Mohammadinejad, A.; Rezayi, M. A new molecularly imprinted polymer electrochemical sensor based on CuCo2O4/N-doped CNTs/P-doped GO nanocomposite for detection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in serum samples. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2023, 70, 357–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ozbakir, H.F.; Sambade, D.A.; Majumdar, S.; Linday, L.A.; Banta, S.; West, A.C. Detection of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 with an Enzyme modified Electrode. J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 7, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Shumyantseva, V.V.; Bulko, T.V.; Archakov, A.I. Electrochemical reduction of cytochrome P450 as an approach to the construction of biosensors and bioreactors. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2005, 99, 1051–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mano, H.; Ikushiro, S.; Saito, N.; Kittaka, A.; Sakaki, T. Development of a highly sensitive in vitro system to detect and discriminate between vitamin D receptor agonists and antagonists based on split-luciferase technique. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 178, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mano, H.; Ikushiro, S.; Takano, M.; Kittaka, A.; Sakaki, T. Development of a split luciferase biosensor that dramatically increases light intensity in response to VDR ligands. Vitamins 2020, 94, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Fathima, T.S.; Ramaprabhu, S. An Antibody-Free, Silver-Silver Oxide-Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposite-Based Impedimetric Sensor for the Nanomolar Detection of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2023, 170, 087513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Almalki, A.H.; Alaqel, S.I.; Alharbi, A.; Abduljabbar, M.H.; Bamaga, A.K.; Alsenani, F.; Ramzy, S. Spectrofluorimetric determination of vitamin D in the serum of autistic and healthy children using functionalized graphene quantum dots. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2024, 309, 123842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. He, X.H.; Yan, B. “One-stone-two-birds” modulation for Na3ScF6-based novel nanocrystals: Simultaneous morphology evolution and luminescence tuning. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 3257–3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Xiao, D.; Zhang, W.; Guo, X.T.; Liu, Y.D.; Hu, C.X.; Guo, S.T.; Kang, Z.Q.; Xu, X.Z.; Ma, C.Q.; Gao, C. A d-2-hydroxyglutarate biosensor based on specific transcriptional regulator DhdR. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 7108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pfeiffer, F.; Mayer, G. Selection and biosensor application of aptamers for small molecules. Front. Chem. 2016, 4, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Špringer, T.; Piliarik, M.; Homola, J. Real-time monitoring of biomolecular interactions in blood plasma using a surface plasmon resonance biosensor. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 398, 1955–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Shamlee, J.K.; Swamy, V.; Rajamani, A.S.; Mukherji, S.; Satija, J.; Janakiraman, V.; Sai, V. A U-bent fiberoptic absorbance biosensor array (ArFAB) for multiplexed analyte detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. X 2022, 12, 100271. [Google Scholar]
  111. Huang, C.L.; Kou, F.X.; Tu, T.Z.; Peng, K.D.; Li, S.; Guo, M.T.; Wang, J.X.; Zhou, Y.W.; Wang, J. Reusable aptamer sensors based on long period fiber gratings for detecting bisphenol a at ultralow concentrations. Opt. Laser Technol. 2023, 165, 109572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Vemulapati, S.; Rey, E.; O’dell, D.; Mehta, S.; Erickson, D. A quantitative point-of-need assay for the assessment of vitamin D3 deficiency. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chauhan, D.; Hashmi, Z.; Raj, R.; Solanki, P.R. Microfluidic Nanobioplatform-Based Immunosensor for Monitoring of 25-Hydroxy Vitamin-D3. ECS Sens. Plus 2024, 3, 041601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Annasamy, G. Graphene oxide gold nanocomposites coated SERS based immunosensor for detection of vitamin D. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2025, 157, 112572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Martins, T.S.; Bott-Neto, J.L.; Oliveira, O.N., Jr. Label-and redox probe-free bioelectronic chip for monitoring vitamins C and the 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 metabolite. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 4938–4945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Lee, S.; Oncescu, V.; Mancuso, M.; Mehta, S.; Erickson, D. A smartphone platform for the quantification of vitamin D levels. Lab A Chip 2014, 14, 1437–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Anandita, A.; Kapoor, M.; Pandey, A.; Rath, D.; Subudhi, B. Towards portable and accurate quantification of lateral flow assays using smartphone imaging and deep learning. ChemRxiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sharma, S.; Gupta, S.; Saini, A.K.; Chakrabarti, S.; Ram, S.; Gupta, R.K.; Shukla, K.; Saini, R.V.; Kaushal, A. Portable graphene oxide modified immunosensor for the detection of Vitamin D3. Microchem. J. 2024, 197, 109745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chauhan, D.; Yadav, A.K.; Solanki, P.R. Carbon cloth-based immunosensor for detection of 25-hydroxy vitamin D3. Microchim. Acta 2021, 188, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Assantachai, P.; Lekhakula, S. Epidemiological survey of vitamin deficiencies in older Thai adults: Implications for national policy planning. Public Health Nutr. 2007, 10, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Meinshausen, M.; Rieckert, A.; Renom-Guiteras, A.; Kröger, M.; Sommerauer, C.; Kunnamo, I.; Martinez, Y.V.; Esmail, A.; Sönnichsen, A. Effectiveness and patient safety of platelet aggregation inhibitors in the prevention of cardiovascular disease and ischemic stroke in older adults—A systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2017, 17, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Summary of 25(OH)D3 detection methods.
Figure 1. Summary of 25(OH)D3 detection methods.
Biosensors 16 00314 g001
Figure 2. The synthesis and metabolic process of 25(OH)D3 in the body. VD3 in food is absorbed into the circulatory system through the intestine and converted to 25(OH)D3 in the liver.
Figure 2. The synthesis and metabolic process of 25(OH)D3 in the body. VD3 in food is absorbed into the circulatory system through the intestine and converted to 25(OH)D3 in the liver.
Biosensors 16 00314 g002
Figure 4. Construction and detection mechanisms of electrochemical aptasensor for 25(OH)D3.
Figure 4. Construction and detection mechanisms of electrochemical aptasensor for 25(OH)D3.
Biosensors 16 00314 g004
Figure 5. Recognition mechanisms of other aptasensor for 25(OH)D3. (A) Scheme depicting the heterogeneity of binding sites formed by means of the molecular imprinting process (adapted with permission from Ref. [98]). (B) Electron transfer mechanisms in CYP450s (adapted with permission from Ref. [100]). (C) Changes before and after the combination of AgCNT/GCE with 25(OH)D3.
Figure 5. Recognition mechanisms of other aptasensor for 25(OH)D3. (A) Scheme depicting the heterogeneity of binding sites formed by means of the molecular imprinting process (adapted with permission from Ref. [98]). (B) Electron transfer mechanisms in CYP450s (adapted with permission from Ref. [100]). (C) Changes before and after the combination of AgCNT/GCE with 25(OH)D3.
Biosensors 16 00314 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bi, D.; Cheng, Y.; Sun, X.; Xu, Y. A Comprehensive Review of Analysis Strategies for 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3: Mechanisms, Platforms, and Future Perspectives. Biosensors 2026, 16, 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16060314

AMA Style

Bi D, Cheng Y, Sun X, Xu Y. A Comprehensive Review of Analysis Strategies for 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3: Mechanisms, Platforms, and Future Perspectives. Biosensors. 2026; 16(6):314. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16060314

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bi, Dehui, Yiran Cheng, Xinyang Sun, and Yuancong Xu. 2026. "A Comprehensive Review of Analysis Strategies for 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3: Mechanisms, Platforms, and Future Perspectives" Biosensors 16, no. 6: 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16060314

APA Style

Bi, D., Cheng, Y., Sun, X., & Xu, Y. (2026). A Comprehensive Review of Analysis Strategies for 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3: Mechanisms, Platforms, and Future Perspectives. Biosensors, 16(6), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16060314

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop