You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Biosensors
  • Review
  • Open Access

20 March 2025

Piezoelectric Chemosensors and Biosensors in Medical Diagnostics

Military Faculty of Medicine, University of Defence, Trebesska 1575, 500 01 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano Biosensors and Their Applications for In Vivo/Vitro Diagnosis—2nd Edition

Abstract

This article explores the development and application of innovative piezoelectric sensors in point-of-care diagnostics. It highlights the significance of bedside tests, such as lateral flow and electrochemical tests, in providing rapid and accurate results directly at the patient’s location. This paper delves into the principles of piezoelectric assays, emphasizing their ability to detect disease-related biomarkers through mechanical stress-induced electrical signals. Various applications of piezoelectric chemosensors and biosensors are discussed, including their use in the detection of cancer biomarkers, pathogens, and other health-related analytes. This article also addresses the integration of piezoelectric materials with advanced sensing technologies to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, offering a comprehensive overview of current advances and future directions in medical diagnostics.

1. Introduction

Bedside tests, also known as point-of-care tests, play a crucial role in modern diagnostics by providing rapid and accurate results directly at the patient’s location [1]. These tests significantly reduce the time between sample collection and diagnosis, enabling timely medical interventions [2,3]. They are particularly valuable in emergency settings, where quick decision-making can be lifesaving. Additionally, point-of-care tests enhance patient convenience and compliance, as they eliminate the need for multiple visits to healthcare facilities. By facilitating the early detection and management of diseases, bedside tests contribute to improved patient outcomes and more efficient healthcare delivery. New materials and analytical platforms are emerging and make point-of-care tests highly competitive with standard analytical procedures [4,5,6].
Currently, there is only a small number of accessible devices that can be used for point-of-care tests. Lateral flow tests (formerly known as lateral flow immunoassays) and electrochemical tests are essential tools in point-of-care diagnostics, offering portability and ease of use for detecting various pathological and physiological states. Lateral flow tests, commonly used for pregnancy tests, detect the presence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in urine, providing quick and reliable results [7,8]. Currently, a wide number of applications based on the lateral flow test principle are available [9,10,11,12]. Further improvements are ongoing based on a combination of lateral flow tests with smartphone cameras [13,14,15]. Electrochemical tests, on the other hand, are widely used to monitor glucose levels in diabetic patients [16,17]. These tests measure the electrical current produced by the reaction between glucose and specific enzymes, allowing for accurate and immediate glucose readings. Both types of tests enhance patient care by allowing rapid diagnosis and monitoring outside traditional laboratory settings, thus improving accessibility and convenience.
Piezoelectric chemosensors and biosensors are valuable tools for field use and point-of-care testing due to their simplicity and efficiency [18,19]. While piezoelectric biosensors combine a piezoelectric sensor with a recognition element of natural origin, such as an antibody, piezoelectric chemosensors are composed of a piezoelectric sensor and a recognition chemical quality in an analyte. These sensors utilize the piezoelectric principle, where certain materials generate an electrical charge in response to mechanical stress. When a chemical or biological substance interacts with the sensor, it causes mechanical deformation, producing an electrical signal that can be measured. This straightforward mechanism allows for the rapid and accurate detection of various analytes without the need for complex laboratory equipment, which is generally based on the direct detection of the mass attached to the piezoelectric biosensor or chemosensor surface [20,21,22]. Their portability and ease of use make them ideal for on-site testing in medical, environmental, and industrial applications, providing timely and reliable results even in resource-limited settings. Although piezoelectric biosensors and chemosensors represent a good outcome for point-of-care tests, their practical applications are limited, and most of the promising findings remain as scientific papers without practical impact. The situation may change as the more traditional sensor platforms, such as the optical and voltametric, reach their physical limits and particular applications by other methods provide additional benefits.
This paper aims to explore the development and application of innovative piezoelectric sensors in the detection of disease-related biomarkers and to help to simplify the diagnosis of various diseases at any site where patients are present, including home care. It aims to highlight the sensitivity and specificity of these sensors in the identification of pathological markers, which are crucial for the early diagnosis and monitoring of various health conditions. This research focuses on the integration of piezoelectric materials with chemosensing and biosensing technologies to improve the accuracy and efficiency of assays. Furthermore, the objective of this paper is to address the potential challenges and future directions in the field, providing a comprehensive overview of current advancements and their implications for medical diagnostics.

2. Principles of the Piezoelectric Assays

Piezoelectricity is a physical phenomenon in which certain materials generate an electric charge (voltage, dipole) in response to applied mechanical stress, and the effect also works in the reverse way, where mechanical deformation follows applied voltage on the piezoelectric material. Mechanical deformation or generated voltage can oscillate when the input voltage or mechanical stress changes over time. The common principle of the piezoelectric effect is depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1. The effect of a mechanical stress on a piezoelectric material (A), and the effect of an electrical charge produced on a piezoelectric material followed by a mechanical stress (B).
Piezoelectricity, also known as the piezoelectric effect, was discovered by the Curie brothers who proved it on quartz and potassium sodium tartrate tetrahydrate (Rochelle salt) in 1881 [23]. This effect is not only reversible but also highly efficient, allowing these materials to mechanically deform when subjected to an electric field and the repeated emergence of an electric field leads to mechanical oscillations [24,25,26]. The underlying mechanism involves the alignment of dipole moments within the crystal lattice, which results in the separation of positive and negative charges. This unique property enables the conversion of mechanical energy into electrical energy and vice versa, making piezoelectric materials indispensable in a wide range of applications, from precision sensors and actuators to advanced energy harvesting systems. Typical biosensor or chemosensor applications use the Sauerbrey equation which gives the relation between the change of oscillation frequency and the mass directly attached to the piezoelectric oscillator [27,28,29]. A possible arrangement of a biosensor or chemosensor containing a piezoelectric platform can be described as follows. The piezoelectric material is applied to a circuit where it acts as a resonator, and oscillation frequency, or another parameter, is measured [30,31,32]. A recognition molecule is tightly connected to the piezoelectric material. The measured physical parameter changes its value once the analyte interacts with the recognition molecule. For example, the oscillation frequency drops when an analyte becomes attached to the recognition molecule. The scale of change of the measured parameter is proportional to the concentration of the analyte.
Piezoelectric materials are typically composed of crystals or ceramics without a center of symmetry, also known as anisotropic, that exhibits this remarkable property [33,34,35,36]. There are known inorganic, organic, and even structures of biological origin that can be used for piezoelectric materials, which means that they generate an electric charge when they are mechanically stressed. Though theoretically the number of materials can be infinitive, some of them gained broader application potency or are available in such quantities and qualities that can lead to their practical use. Notable examples include quartz [37], lead zirconate titanate [38], aluminum nitride [39], wurtzite [40], lithium niobate [41], barium titanate and barium zirconate [42], and the calcium titanium oxide mineral perovskite [43], each known for their distinct piezoelectric characteristics. Some organic polymers also exert piezoelectric properties [44]. Poly-y-benzyl-L-glutamate [45], polyvinylidene fluoride [46], polyvinylidene fluoride, and the trifluoroethylene co-polymer [47] are examples. The various materials can be combined and composites prepared. A material consisting of calcium titanate perovskite-based polymeric composite and polyvinylidene fluoride is an example [48]. Significant piezoelectricity was even found in tobacco mosaic viruses [49] and DNA-adsorbed films on cantilevers [50]. These materials possess noncentrosymmetric crystal structures, which are crucial for the piezoelectric effect, as they allow for the displacement of charge centers under mechanical stress [51,52,53]. The efficiency and effectiveness of these materials in practical applications are largely determined by their crystal structure and the degree of polarization they can achieve. This makes them highly valuable in various technological and industrial domains, where precise control and measurement are paramount.
One prominent application of piezoelectric materials is the quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), a highly sensitive instrument used to measure mass changes with a combination of good precision and low manufacturing costs. A QCM assay operates on the principle that the oscillation frequency of a quartz crystal is affected by the mass of the material attached to the surface of the electrode adjacent to the quartz disc. When a substance binds to the sensor surface, it adds mass, causing a decrease in the oscillation frequency [54,55]. This relationship is quantitatively described by the Sauerbrey equation, which states that the change in frequency is directly proportional to the added mass [56,57,58]. The Sauerbrey equation is named according to its author Gunter Hans Sauerbreay who discovered it in the 1950s [59]. Equation (1) uses the change of mass attached to the crystal surface Δm, basic oscillation frequency f0, the crystal density of the crystal ρq equal to 2.648 g/cm3 [60], the shear modulus of quartz μq equal to 2.947 × 10 11 g/cm.s2 [60], and the active area A, which are applied to the balance with the change of frequency Δf.
f = 2 f 0 m A ρ q μ q 2
The Sauerbrey equation does not calculate the effect of viscous solutions, and there can be some problems with measurement solutions when the sample has a viscosity other than the blank medium. This effect was documented by Kanazawa and Gordon in the 1980s [61]. They derived Equation (2). From a general point of view, the contact of the QCM with a liquid will cause a change in oscillations proportional to the absolute viscosity ηl of the liquid and density of the liquid ρl. QCM sensors can be used in assays where such physical specification is measured [62]. For example, Wang et al. [57] performed an assay of glycerol concentration by measuring the sample viscosity, and the QCM test was performed by Wang and coworkers [63]. On the other hand, the liquid viscosity and density must be considered when an analytical device is developed for an assay of an attached mass because the effect can cause changes in oscillation frequencies and complicate the distinction between the effect of the attached mass and the effect of the liquid specifications.
f = 2 f 0 3 2 η l ρ l π ρ q μ q
By measuring the frequency shift, the amount of material bound to the sensor can be precisely determined, making QCM a powerful tool for studying molecular interactions and surface phenomena. This technology is widely utilized in scientific research, particularly chemistry and biology, for monitoring thin-film deposition, molecular interactions, and other processes involving subtle mass variations. An example of a QCM sensor is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Example of QCM sensor with basic frequency of oscillations 10 MHz, 20 mm diameter, and gold electrodes. Depicted QCM was manufactured by Krystaly Hradec Kralove (Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic).

6. Specific Medical Applications of Piezoelectric Biosensors and Chemosensors

The developed point-of-care tests based on piezoelectric biosensors or chemosensors are summarized in the following paragraphs, where significant studies are cited. A survey of the main conclusions from the studies is provided in Table 1. The first described paper, focusing on the acoustic biosensor for early cancer diagnosis, presents a novel method for the rapid immunodetection of heat shock proteins using a compact acoustic sensor [136]. This sensor employs a piezoelectric resonator and specific phage antibodies developed against heat shock proteins from P3 × 63Ag8.653 mouse myeloma cells. The interaction between phage antibodies and heat shock proteins generates an analytic signal, measured as a change in the electric impedance modulus of the resonator. The assay time is notably short, taking less than 5 min. The method demonstrates high sensitivity with a detection limit of 7.5 pg/mL. This innovative approach offers a promising tool for early cancer diagnosis, enabling the screening of numerous samples quickly and non-invasively.
Table 1. Survey of major conclusions and specifications from cited papers.
A novel method for isolating and detecting exosomes from cancer cells was described in a paper by Su Bin Han and Soo Suk Lee [137]. The study introduces a unique paddle screw device for immunoaffinity-based exosome isolation and a surface acoustic wave biosensor to detect miR-106b, a microRNA associated with various cancers. A 36° YX-LiTaO3 piezoelectric substrate with an immobilized hairpin loop capture probe, which further interacts with gold nanoparticles in combination with isolation through a 3D printed platform containing specific antibodies, was chosen. The surface acoustic wave biosensor demonstrated high sensitivity, with a limit of detection of 0.0034 pmol/L for miR-106b, and a linear detection range from 0.1 pmol/L to 1.0 μmol/L. The assay time for the biosensor was relatively short, allowing for rapid and efficient detection. The method showed comparable performance to commercial polymerase chain reaction RT-qPCR techniques, highlighting its potential for clinical diagnostics and biomedical research.
Another paper explores the development and evaluation of a piezoelectric biosensor designed for the rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus in fresh dairy products [138]. This biosensor utilizes an antifouling nanolayer to enhance its resistance to biofouling, a common issue in the testing of dairy products. QCM sensors with a basic oscillation frequency of 10 MHz and gold electrodes covered with antibodies specific to S. aureus were used in the assay. The study compares the performance with four conventional cultivation-based methods, demonstrating that the biosensor can deliver results in just 30 min, significantly faster than the 24 h required by traditional methods. The biosensor showed a high correlation with the Baird-Parker test results and was able to detect S. aureus at concentrations as low as 10 CFU/mL. This rapid and sensitive detection method highlights the potential of antifouling biosensors for efficient, point-of-care testing in the dairy industry.
A piezoelectric point-of-care biosensor designed for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, created by Mandal et al. [139], utilizes a 128° YX lithium niobate piezoelectric wafer, shaped into a multithreaded comb with cantilever beams, to achieve high sensitivity and selectivity. The surface of the piezoelectric wafer was coated with gold nanoparticles, the polyclonal anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein, and the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein. Finally, it was used for the assay of samples with antibodies with sensitivity to the COVID Spike protein. The sensor operates by generating guided ultrasonic waves that interact with the cantilever beams to detect antigen–antibody binding events. Analytical specifications include an assay time ranging from a few minutes to several hours, depending on the specific experimental setup and conditions. The limit of detection is highly sensitive, capable of detecting changes at the micro-nanogram level, making it suitable for early-stage disease diagnostics and potential applications in detecting various other pathogens. The sensor’s design allows for real-time, in vitro analysis, providing a rapid and reliable diagnostic tool.
A series of piezoelectric quartz crystal sensors are used for the locus-specific detection of N6-methyladenine in DNA, utilizing transcription-activator-like effectors for specific recognition [140]. The sensor uses a hybridization chain reaction and silver staining to improve detection sensitivity, achieving a detection limit of 0.63 pmol/L. The piezoelectric material used in the sensor platform is a quartz crystal and the recognition element is the transcription-activator-like effector protein, which binds specifically to the target N6-methyladenine. The time of the assay involves an incubation period of approximately 1 h for transcription-activator-like effectors with the target DNA, followed by additional steps for the hybridization chain reaction and silver staining, making the total assay time around 3 h. This sensor demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity and is capable of distinguishing single-base mismatches and detecting N6-methyladenine in real biological samples, offering a promising tool for studying cancer, bacterial toxin secretion, and drug resistance. Although the sensor is not a typical point-of-care device, due to the overall time per one assay, it can be further adapted for a final product where the specifications are optimized.
In another paper, the authors describe the development of a QCM immunosensor designed for the highly sensitive detection of a prostate-specific antigen in human serum [141]. This sensor uses the piezoelectric properties of quartz crystals to measure changes in resonance frequency, which correspond to changes in mass on the sensor surface. The detection mechanism involves a sandwich immunoassay using gold nanoparticle-conjugated anti-prostate-specific antigen antibodies, further enhanced by gold staining to amplify the signal. This amplification significantly improves the sensor’s sensitivity, reducing the limit of detection from 687 pg/mL without gold staining to 48 pg/mL with it. The assay time includes the initial immunoassay steps followed by the gold staining process, making it a comprehensive yet efficient method for prostate-specific antigen detection. The use of quartz crystal as the piezoelectric material and anti-prostate-specific antigen antibodies as the recognition element ensures high specificity and reproducibility in the detection of prostate-specific antigen levels in human serum.
The prostate-specific antigen was also analyzed using the QCM combined with surface-enhanced Raman scattering and it was described as a novel approach for the diagnosis of prostate cancer by analyzing glycosylation patterns on the antigen [142]. The study integrates the QCM with dissipation and surface-enhanced Raman scattering to achieve real-time, label-free detection and detailed glycan profiling. The piezoelectric material used in the sensor platform is a quartz crystal, which provides a high sensitivity to mass changes. The recognition element of the biosensor is a nucleic acid aptamer specific to the prostate-specific antigen, ensuring high specificity and reduced cross-reactivity. The assay time is optimized for rapid detection, with significant results obtained within minutes. The limit of detection for the prostate-specific antigen is determined to be 1.9 ng/mL, which is within the clinically relevant range for prostate cancer diagnosis. This dual-sensing platform offers a promising tool for the early detection and monitoring of prostate cancer by providing both quantitative and qualitative insights into the prostate specific-antigen, glycosylation.
A QCM biosensor was designed for the detection of procalcitonin, a blood protein that increases due to bacterial infections, sepsis, and related conditions [143]. This biosensor utilizes a piezoelectric quartz crystal as the sensing material and employs a conjugate of gold nanoparticles and antibodies as the recognition element. The assay is suitable for point-of-care testing and offers a reliable alternative to traditional immunochemical methods. The biosensor demonstrates a limit of detection of 37.8 ng/L and a limit of quantification of 104 ng/L for a 25 μL sample, with a dynamic range from 37.8 ng/L to 30.0 μg/L. The total assay time is relatively short, making it practical for rapid diagnostics. While the measurements are taken in few minutes, the incubation lasted half an hour. The total time of an assay, including sample processing, was less than one hour. The study highlights the high sensitivity, specificity, and potential of the biosensor in detecting other biomarkers, emphasizing its practical relevance and versatility in clinical settings.
A molecularly imprinted polymer-based chemosensor for the selective detection of the toxin N-nitroso-l-proline was developed by Lach et al. [144]. The chemosensor design involved modeling the polymerization complex using density functional theory (and electropolymerizing this complex to form a thin film with an imprint of N-nitroso-l-proline). The N-nitroso-l-proline template was then extracted using 0.1 M NaOH. The sensor utilizes piezoelectric microgravimetry on an electrochemical QCM, along with differential pulse voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, to detect N-nitroso-l-proline binding. The limits of detection were approximately 80.9 nmol/L with differential pulse voltammetry and 36.9 nmol/L with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, while piezoelectric microgravimetry under flow injection analysis conditions achieved a limit of detection of 10 μmol/L. The assay time includes the electropolymerization and extraction steps followed by the detection process, making it suitable for practical applications. The sensor demonstrated high selectivity, with a significant resistance to interference from substances, such as urea, glucose, creatinine, and adrenaline, making it effective for detecting N-nitroso-l-proline in protein-rich food products.
A chemosensor designed for the selective recognition of biotinyl moieties was prepared using an electropolymerized film specific to various biotinylated targets [145]. The chemosensor features biotin molecularly imprinted polymer nanowires as the recognition element, which are overlaid on gold-coated quartz transducers. The nanostructured molecularly imprinted polymer and reference systems were prepared through the electrochemical copolymerization of a stabilized complex involving biotin, 4-aminobenzoic acid as the functional monomer, and aniline as the cross-linker. Thermal density functional studies confirmed the formation of a stable hydrogen-bonded complex between biotin and 4-aminobenzoic acid. Scanning electron microscopy revealed uniformly grown, densely packed polyaniline hierarchical structures. The sensor’s performance was evaluated using piezoelectric microgravimetry under flow injection analysis conditions, demonstrating the selective binding of biotin methyl ester with a limit of detection of 50 nmol/L. The sensor exhibited high selectivity for biotinylated targets, such as biotin-labeled cytochrome C, dextran, oxytocin, and obestatin, and effectively distinguished biotin methyl ester from structural analogues, like thiamine and pyridoxamine. The total assay time and the sensor’s high sensitivity and specificity make it a promising tool for detecting biotinylated compounds in various applications.
A QCM chemosensor of an aptasensor type was designed for the detection of K562 cells associated with chronic myeloid leukemia [146]. The sensor uses a T2-KK1B10 aptamer as the recognition element, which is immobilized on a gold electrode surface of the QCM sensor. The assay time for the detection process is approximately 40 min per sample. The aptasensor demonstrates a limit of detection of 263 K562 cells. The piezoelectric material used in the sensor platform is quartz, which enables the detection of changes in mass upon the binding of target cells. The study highlights the sensor’s high sensitivity and specificity, validated through tests with synthetic human plasma and clinical samples, showcasing its potential for early and accurate CML detection in clinical settings.
A high-frequency piezoelectric quartz aptamer chemosensor was developed for the detection of lactoferrin [147]. This chemosensor utilizes a thiol-modified aptamer immobilized on a gold electrode surface of a QCM to specifically bind lactoferrin. The principle of the assay is based on the molecular bond rupture technique, where the aptamer–magnetic bead complex is used to amplify the mass signal. When a high excitation voltage is applied, the strong binding bond between the aptamer–magnetic bead complex and lactoferrin is broken, resulting in an increase in the quartz crystal resonance frequency. This change in frequency is proportional to the concentration of lactoferrin. The chemosenor demonstrates high sensitivity with a linear detection range of 10–500 ng/mL and a limit of detection of 8.2 ng/mL. This method offers a simple, fast, and highly specific approach for detecting lactoferrin in various samples.
A piezoelectric biosensor using a barium titanate/polyvinylidene fluoride composite material for the detection of pathogen-specific biopolymers was developed by Takeda et al. [148]. The biosensor operates on the principle of detecting changes in the relaxation behavior of the β- polyvinylidene fluoride signal transducer due to the immobilization of biopolymers like avidin. The barium titanate aggregates enhance the dielectric properties and mechanical stability of the polyvinylidene fluoride, allowing the biosensor to function effectively at a low frequency and nearly neutral pH. The mechanism involves the creation of dipole and interface polarizations within the composite material, which shifts the relaxation behavior to lower frequencies upon biopolymer adsorption. The biosensor demonstrates improved sensitivity and temperature characteristics, with the ability to detect biopolymers at temperatures up to 338 K. This makes it suitable for the rapid and cost-effective detection of infectious diseases in various environments.
Recent advances in the construction of piezoelectric and chemosensors provide a solid platform for practical applications. When considering the material used for biosensors and chemosensors, it is obvious that antibodies and artificial recognition molecules such as aptamers are used. When the analytical specifications are compared, both antibodies and artificial receptors are possible outcomes for analytical devices and significant differences between these recognition molecules are observed. The final decision of which type of recognition molecule will be chosen should also be based on manufacturing costs. Unfortunately, this specification cannot be quantified from scientific reports. Biosensors and chemosensors can be based on multiple piezoelectric materials. The QCM sensors prevail, which is probably due to their good availability as they are common in electrotechnology. It can be expected that practical applications and products of piezoelectric biosensors and chemosensors will preferentially use QCMs to make mass production faster and cheaper. Nevertheless, further development can cause other materials to replace QCMs since some of them, like for instance piezoelectric polymers, may finally be cheaper as no expensive material, such as noble metal, is necessary for the manufacturing process.

7. Conclusions

The research presented in this manuscript underscores the transformative potential of piezoelectric sensors in point-of-care diagnostics. These sensors offer significant advantages in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and rapid response times, making them invaluable tools for early disease detection and monitoring. The integration of piezoelectric materials with chemosensing and biosensing technologies has led to the development of highly efficient diagnostic assays that can be used in various settings, including homecare and resource-limited environments. Future research should focus on addressing the challenges associated with the widespread adoption of these technologies, such as improving the robustness and scalability of sensors. In general, advances in piezoelectric sensor technology hold great promise in enhancing healthcare delivery and patient outcomes.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic “Long Term Organization Development Plan”—Healthcare Challenges of WMD II of the Military Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove, University of Defence, Czech Republic (Project No: DZRO-FVZ22-ZHN II).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented in this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Moerman, A.; De Waele, J.J.; Boelens, J. An overview of point-of-care testing for infections in critically ill patients. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2024, 24, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Raj, R.; Khan, M.F.; Shariq, M.; Ahsan, N.; Singh, R.; Basoya, P.K. Point-of-care optical devices in clinical imaging and screening: A review on the state of the art. J. Biophotonics 2023, 16, e202200386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Plata-Menchaca, E.P.; Ruiz-Rodriguez, J.C.; Ferrer, R. Early diagnosis of sepsis: The role of biomarkers and rapid microbiological tests. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2024, 45, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mousavi, S.M.; Kalashgrani, M.Y.; Gholami, A.; Omidifar, N.; Binazadeh, M.; Chiang, W.H. Recent Advances in quantum dot-based lateral flow immunoassays for the rapid, point-of-care diagnosis of COVID-19. Biosensors 2023, 13, 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Najib, M.A.; Selvam, K.; Khalid, M.F.; Ozsoz, M.; Aziah, I. Quantum dot-based lateral flow immunoassay as point-of-care testing for infectious diseases: A narrative review of its principle and performance. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Surucu, O.; Öztürk, E.; Kuralay, F. Nucleic acid integrated technologies for electrochemical point-of-care diagnostics: A comprehensive review. Electroanalysis 2022, 34, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Targonskaya, A.; Maslowski, K. Gonadotropin and ovarian hormone monitoring: Lateral flow assays for clinical decision making. Women 2023, 3, 471–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mattiello, C.J.; Stickle, D.F. Characterization by image analysis of the dose vs response curve for a qualitative serum hCG lateral flow immunoassay. Clin. Chim. Acta 2023, 538, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tel, O.Y.; Gurbilek, S.E.; Keskin, O.; Yucetepe, A.G.; Karadenizli, A. Development of lateral flow test for serological diagnosis of tularemia. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2022, 28, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Peto, T.; Uk, C.-L.F.O. COVID-19: Rapid antigen detection for SARS-CoV-2 by lateral flow assay: A national systematic evaluation of sensitivity and specificity for mass-testing. EClinicalMedicine 2021, 36, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Machiesky, L.; Cote, O.; Kirkegaard, L.H.; Mefferd, S.C.; Larkin, C. A rapid lateral flow immunoassay for identity testing of biotherapeutics. J. Immunol. Methods 2019, 474, 112666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Morinaga, Y.; Yamada, H.; Yoshida, Y.; Kawasuji, H.; Yamamoto, Y. Analytical sensitivity of six lateral flow antigen test kits for variant strains of SARS-CoV-2. J. Infect. Chemother. 2023, 29, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kumar, S.; Ko, T.; Chae, Y.; Jang, Y.; Lee, I.; Lee, A.; Shin, S.; Nam, M.H.; Kim, B.S.; Jun, H.S.; et al. Proof-of-concept: Smartphone- and cloud-based artificial intelligence quantitative analysis system (SCAISY) for SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG antibody lateral flow assays. Biosensors 2023, 13, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Park, J. Smartphone based lateral flow immunoassay quantifications. J. Immunol. Methods 2024, 533, 113745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kalligosfyri, P.M.; Tragoulias, S.S.; Tsikas, P.; Lamprou, E.; Christopoulos, T.K.; Kalogianni, D.P. Design and validation of a three-dimensional printer-based system enabling rapid, low-cost construction of the biosensing areas of lateral flow devices for immunoassays and nucleic acid assays. Anal. Chem. 2023, 96, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pohanka, M. Glucose electrochemical biosensors: The past and current trends. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2021, 16, 210719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, H.S.; Kuo, B.I.; Hwu, C.M.; Shih, K.C.; Kwok, C.F.; Ho, L.T. Technical and clinical evaluation of an electrochemistry glucose meter: Experience in a diabetes center. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 1998, 42, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bonyadi, F.; Kavruk, M.; Ucak, S.; Cetin, B.; Bayramoglu, G.; Dursun, A.D.; Arica, Y.; Ozalp, V.C. Real-time biosensing bacteria and virus with quartz crystal microbalance: Recent advances, opportunities, and challenges. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2023, 12, 2888–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Behyar, M.B.; Mirzaie, A.; Hasanzadeh, M.; Shadjou, N. Advancements in biosensing of hormones: Recent progress and future trends. Trac-Trends Anal. Chem. 2024, 173, 117600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ramasamy, M.S.; Bhaskar, R.; Han, S.S. Piezoelectric biosensors and nanomaterials-based therapeutics for coronavirus and other viruses: A mini-review. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2023, 23, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guliy, O.I.; Zaitsev, B.D.; Borodina, I.A. Electroacoustic biosensor systems for evaluating antibiotic action on microbial cells. Sensors 2023, 23, 6292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tyskiewicz, R.; Fedorowicz, M.; Nakonieczna, A.; Zielinska, P.; Kwiatek, M.; Mizak, L. Electrochemical, optical and mass-based immunosensors: A comprehensive review of Bacillus anthracis detection methods. Anal. Biochem. 2023, 675, 115215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zak, A.K.; Yazdi, S.T.; Abrishami, M.E.; Hashim, A.M. A review on piezoelectric ceramics and nanostructures: Fundamentals and fabrications. J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 2024, 60, 723–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. De Marqui, C.; Tan, D.; Erturk, A. On the electrode segmentation for piezoelectric energy harvesting from nonlinear limit cycle oscillations in axial flow. J. Fluids Struct. 2018, 82, 492–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fallahpasand, S.; Dardel, M. Piezoelectric energy harvesting from highly flexible cantilever beam. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part K J. Multi-Body Dyn. 2019, 233, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bansevicius, R.; Navickaite, S.; Jurenas, V.; Mazeika, D.; Zvironiene, A. Excitation of 2D resonant oscillations in piezoelectric plate with additional masses. J. Vibroeng. 2017, 19, 1930–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lau, O.W.; Shao, B. Determination of glucose using a piezoelectric quartz crystal and the silver mirror reaction. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 407, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vélez-Cordero, J.R.; Flores, S.J.; Soto, B.Y. Finite element simulations of quartz crystal microbalances (QCM): From Sauerbrey to fractional viscoelasticity under water. Phys. Scr. 2024, 99, 115963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, H.H.; Guo, A.H.; Gao, Y.; Liu, T.T. Influence of external swelling stress on the frequency characteristics of a volatile organic compound (VOC) sensor based on a polymer-coated film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR). Instrum. Sci. Technol. 2020, 48, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saffari, Z.; Ghavidel, A.; Cohan, R.A.; Hamidi-Fard, M.; Khobi, M.; Aghasadeghi, M.; Norouzian, D. Label-free real-time detection of HBsAg using a QCM immunosensor. Clin. Lab. 2022, 68, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sharma, P.; Chauhan, R.; Pande, V.; Basu, T.; Kumar, A. Rapid sensing of Tilletia indica—Teliospore in wheat extractby apiezoelectric label free immunosensor. Bioelectrochemistry 2022, 147, 108175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, H.; Long, M.; Su, H.Y.; Tan, L.; Shi, X.W.; Du, Y.M.; Luo, Y.; Deng, H.B. Carboxymethyl chitosan assembled piezoelectric biosensor for rapid and label-free quantification of immunoglobulin Y. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 290, 119482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gui, Z.Z.; Shao, Z.J.; Zhang, F.; Shen, T.; Zou, T.; Zhang, J.H. Effect of material anisotropy on the first-order vibration of piezoelectric oscillators in circular plate configurations. Sens. Actuator A-Phys. 2024, 379, 115918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Burdin, D.A.; Ekonomov, N.A.; Gordeev, S.N.; Fetisov, Y.K. Anisotropy of magnetoelectric effects in an amorphous ferromagnet-piezoelectric heterostructure. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2021, 521, 167530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, H.J.; Jung, M.S.; You, C.Y.; Hong, J.I. Controllable magnetic anisotropy of ferromagnet/antiferromagnet bilayers coupled with piezoelectric strain. Acta Mater. 2019, 171, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhao, H.B.; Ding, L.H.; Ren, N.; Yu, X.; Wang, A.Z.; Zhao, M.W. Multiferroic properties and giant piezoelectric effect of a 2D Janus WO3F monolayer. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2024, 26, 26594–26602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Imran, M.; Windmann, T.; Vrabec, J. Speed of sound measurements for liquid squalane up to a pressure of 20 MPa. Int. J. Thermophys. 2024, 45, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qiao, H.M.; Jones, J.L.; Balke, N. Effect of sub-coercive degradation on the local piezoelectric properties in lead zirconate titanate ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2024, 11, e20277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qu, Y.H.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.X.; Gu, X.Y.; Wei, M.; Huang, X.M.; Liu, Z.S.; Ding, J.Q.; Wen, Z.W.; et al. Novel AlN/ScAlN composite film SAW for achieving highly sensitive temperature sensors. Sens. Actuator A-Phys. 2025, 381, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lemine, A.S.; Bhadra, J.; Sadasivuni, K.K.; Popelka, A.; Yempally, S.; Ahmad, Z.; Al-Thani, N.J.; Hasan, A. 3D printing flexible Ga-doped ZnO films for wearable energy harvesting: Thermoelectric and piezoelectric nanogenerators. J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. Electron. 2024, 35, 1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Du, Y.; Zou, Y.S.; Zhu, B.X.; Jiang, H.; Chai, Y.; Tsoi, C.C.; Zhang, X.M.; Wang, C.X. Asymmetric proton-exchange-enhanced lithium niobate and silicon low-temperature direct bonding with an ultrathin heterogeneous interface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 10, 64287–64296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Makhare, S.B.; Jadhav, T.K.; Kapadi, N.J.; Darvade, T.C.; Dhotre, A.V.; Kolekar, Y.D.; Dindore, U.B.; Kambale, R.C. Ferroelectric fatigue and stabilized piezoelectric properties of BaTiO3–BaZrO3 electroceramics with optimized electric poling conditions. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2024, 14, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wekalao, J.; Patel, S.K.; Kumar, O.P.; Al-zahrani, F.A. Machine learning optimized design of THz piezoelectric perovskite-based biosensor for the detection of formalin in aqueous environments. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 4498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kaczmarek, H.; Królikowski, B.; Klimiec, E.; Chylinska, M.; Bajer, D. Advances in the study of piezoelectric polymers. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2019, 88, 749–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fukada, E. Recent developments of polar piezoelectric polymers. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2006, 13, 1110–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Amiri, M.T.H.; Kermanshahi, P.K.; Bagherzadeh, R.; Yousefzadeh, M.; Fakhri, P. A multilayer piezoelectric nanogenerator based on PVDF and BaTiO3 nanocomposite with enhanced performance induced by simultaneously electrospinning and electrospraying. J. Ind. Text. 2024, 54, 15280837241302259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Poudel, A.; Fernandez, M.A.; Tofail, S.A.M.; Biggs, M.J.P. Boron nitride nanotube addition enhances the crystallinity and cytocompatibility of PVDF-TrFE. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Panda, S.; Hajra, S.; Jeong, H.; Panigrahi, B.K.; Pakawanit, P.; Dubal, D.; Hong, S.K.; Kim, H.J. Biocompatible CaTiO3-PVDF composite-based piezoelectric nanogenerator for exercise evaluation and energy harvesting. Nano Energy 2022, 102, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kalinin, S.V.; Jesse, S.; Liu, W.L.; Balandin, A.A. Evidence for possible flexoelectricity in tobacco mosaic viruses used as nanotemplates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 153902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, Y.; Zhang, N.H.; Liu, H.L.; Ling, J.W.; Tan, Z.Q. Piezoelectric and flexoelectric effects of DNA adsorbed films on microcantilevers. Appl. Math. Mech.-Engl. Ed. 2023, 44, 1547–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lin, S.J.; Yu, Y.Y.; He, C.Y.; Zhang, Z.H.; Yang, J.W.; Yang, Z.M.; Zhang, L.; Kan, J.W. A novel pendulum-like deformation-limited piezoelectric vibration energy harvester triggered indirectly via a smoothly plucked drive plate. Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 2025, 224, 112154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Abdur-Rashid, K.; Saha, S.K.; Mugisha, J.; Teale, S.; Wang, S.S.; Saber, M.; Lough, A.J.; Sargent, E.H.; Fekl, U. Organic polar crystals, second harmonic generation, and piezoelectric effects from heteroadamantanes in the space group R3m. Chem.-Eur. J. 2024, 30, e202302998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Iwanski, J.; Korona, K.P.; Tokarczyk, M.; Kowalski, G.; Dabrowska, A.K.; Tatarczak, P.; Rogala, I.; Bilska, M.; Wójcik, M.; Kret, S.; et al. Revealing polytypism in 2D boron nitride with UV photoluminescence. npj 2d Mater. Appl. 2024, 8, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Diaz, J.O.T.; Velásquez, A.F. QCM Biosensorsfor pathogen detection in water and food: Review of published literature. Ing. Solidar. 2024, 20, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Barrias, S.; Fernandes, J.R.; Martins-Lopes, P. Newly developed QCM-DNA biosensor for SNP detection in small DNA fragments: A wine authenticity case study. Food Control 2025, 169, 111036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Higuchi, R.; Kanno, Y. New analysis from the strength of materials of Sauerbrey’s equation concerning the quartz crystal microbalance. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 1-Regul. Pap. Brief Commun. Rev. Pap. 2006, 45, 4232–4233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, X.H.; Li, M.; Chen, S.Y. Long memory from Sauerbrey equation: A case in coated quartz crystal microbalance in terms of ammonia. Math. Probl. Eng. 2011, 2011, 758245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ding, X.; Li, J.; Chen, X.D.; Zhang, J.S.; Zhu, M.X. Derivation for mass-frequency relationship of a quartz crystal microbalance based on an equivalent circuit network analysis method. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2022, 71, 9510208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sauerbrey, G. Verwendung von Schwingquarzen zur Wägung dünner Schichten und zur Mikrowägung. Z. Phys. 1959, 155, 206–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Huang, X.; Chen, Q.; Pan, W.; Yao, Y. Advances in the mass sensitivity distribution of quartz crystal microbalances: A review. Sensors 2022, 22, 5112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kanazawa, K.K.; Gordon, J.G. Frequency of a quartz microbalance in contact with liquid. Anal. Chem. 1985, 57, 1770–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bai, Q.S.; Huang, X.H. Using quartz crystal microbalance for field measurement of liquid viscosities. J. Sens. 2016, 2016, 7580483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Zhao, B.R. Measurement of liquid viscosity using series resonant resistance response of quartz crystal microbalance. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2022, 61, 046503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wasilewski, T.; Kamysz, W.; Gebicki, J. AI-assisted detection of biomarkers by sensors and biosensors for early diagnosis and monitoring. Biosensors 2024, 14, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Matsuo, T.; Wurster, S.; Hoenigl, M.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Current and emerging technologies to develop point-of-care diagnostics in medical mycology. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2024, 24, 841–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sani, A.; Khan, M.I.; Shah, S.; Tian, Y.L.; Zha, G.H.; Fan, L.Y.; Zhang, Q.; Cao, C.X. Diagnosis and screening of abnormal hemoglobins. Clin. Chim. Acta 2024, 552, 117685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lee, S.; Bi, L.Y.; Chen, H.; Lin, D.; Mei, R.C.; Wu, Y.X.; Chen, L.X.; Joo, S.W.; Choo, J. Recent advances in point-of-care testing of COVID-19. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52, 8500–8530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Khan, A.I.; Khan, M.; Khan, R. Artificial Intelligence in point-of-care testing. Ann. Lab. Med. 2023, 43, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Theriault-Lauzier, P.; Cobin, D.; Tastet, O.; Langlais, E.L.; Taji, B.; Kang, G.S.; Chong, A.Y.; So, D.; Tang, A.; Gichoya, J.W.; et al. A responsible framework for applying artificial intelligence on medical images and signals at the point of care: The PACS-AI platform. Can. J. Cardiol. 2024, 40, 1828–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Haghayegh, F.; Norouziazad, A.; Haghani, E.; Feygin, A.A.; Rahimi, R.H.; Ghavamabadi, H.A.; Sadighbayan, D.; Madhoun, F.; Papagelis, M.; Felfeli, T.; et al. Revolutionary point-of-care wearable diagnostics for early disease detection and biomarker discovery through intelligent technologies. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2400595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. El Amrani, S.; Tossens, B.; Van Belle, L.; Gonda, J.; Midoun, S.; Beauloye, C.; Gruson, D. Point of care testing for high-sensitive troponin measurement: Experience from a tertiary care hospital clinical laboratory. Adv. Lab. Med.-Av. Med. Lab. 2024, 4, 455–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Santarelli, G.; Marcos, P.S.; Talavera, J.; Aznar-Cervantes, S.D.; del Palacio, J.F. Evaluation of a rapid test for point-of-care detection of cardiac troponin I in serum of healthy and diseased dogs and cats. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 2024, 6, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pickering, J.W.; Joyce, L.R.; Florkowski, C.M.; Buchan, V.; Hamill, L.; Than, M.P. Emergency department use of a high-sensitivity point-of-care troponin assay reduces length of stay: An implementation study preliminary report. Eur. Heart J.-Acute Cardiovasc. Care 2024, 5, 838–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hatherley, J.; Dakshi, A.; Collinson, P.; Miller, G.; Davies, S.; Bailey, L.; Fearon, H.; Phillips, S.; Lambert, A.; Sekulska, K.; et al. Imprecision and real-time clinical performance of a whole blood high sensitivity point of care troponin i: Ready for prime time? Heart J. 2024, 45, ehae666-1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Pañero-Moreno, M.; Guix-Comellas, E.M.; Villamor-Ordozgoiti, A. Clinical trial protocol for continuous glucose monitoring in critical care at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (CGM-UCI23). Nurs. Crit. Care, 2024; early view. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mader, J.K.; Baumstark, A.; Tüting, J.; Sokol, G.; Schuebel, R.; Tong, Y.H.; Roetschke, J.; Slingerland, R.J. Monitoring of the analytical performance of four different blood glucose monitoring systems: A post-market performance follow-up study. Diabetes Ther. 2024, 15, 2525–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Castaño, R.A.; Granados, M.A.; Trujillo, N.; Bernal, J.P.; Trujillo, J.F.; Trasmondi, P.; Maestre, A.F.; Cardona, J.S.; Gonzalez, R.; Larrarte, M.A.; et al. Does performing a Point-Of-Care HbA1c test increase the chances of undertaking an OGTT among individuals at risk of diabetes? A randomized controlled trial. Prim. Care Diabetes 2024, 18, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Çelik, M.; Polat, M.R.; Avkan-Oguz, V. Diagnostic utility of rapid antigen testing as point-of-care test for influenza and other respiratory viruses in patients with acute respiratory illness. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2025, 111, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Savolainen, L.E.; Peltola, J.; Hilla, R.; Åman, T.; Broas, M.; Junttila, I.S. Clinical performance of two commercially available rapid antigen tests for influenza, RSV, and SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 7, e01630-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Boegner, D.J.; Rzasa, J.R.; Benke, E.H.; White, I.M. Saliva-STAT: Sample-to-answer saliva test for COVID-19. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2024, 421, 136510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Domnich, A.; Massaro, E.; Icardi, G.; Orsi, A. Multiplex molecular assays for the laboratory-based and point-of-care diagnosis of infections caused by seasonal influenza, COVID-19, and RSV. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2024, 12, 997–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Reilly, C.; Mylonakis, E.; Dewar, R.; Young, B.; Nordwall, J.; Bhagani, S.; Chia, P.Y.; Davis, R.; Files, C.; Ginde, A.A.; et al. Evaluation of the feasibility and efficacy of point-of-care antibody tests for biomarker-guided management of coronavirus disease 2019. J. Infect. Dis. 2024, 7, jiae452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ansu-Mensah, M.; Ginindza, T.G.; Amponsah, S.K.; Shimbre, M.S.; Bawontuo, V.; Kuupiel, D. Geographical access to point-of-care diagnostic tests for diabetes, anaemia, Hepatitis B, and human immunodeficiency virus in the Bono region, Ghana. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2024, 24, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Futschik, M.E.; Tunkel, S.A.; Turek, E.; Chapman, D.; Thorlu-Bangura, Z.; Kulasegaran-Shylini, R.; Blandford, E.; Dodgson, A.; Klapper, P.E.; Sudhanva, M.; et al. Double testing with lateral flow antigen test devices for COVID-19: Does a second test in quick succession add value? J. Virol. Methods 2024, 329, 115000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Geuer, L.; Otteny, A.; Wagner, D.; Menne, S.; Mukametov, S.; Ulber, R. Educational models in analytical chemistry lab: The story behind lateral flow immunoassays in the context of COVID-19. J. Chem. Educ. 2024, 10, 5251–5260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, X.N.; Cheyne, C.P.; Jones, C.; Humann, M.; Leeming, G.; Smith, C.; Hughes, D.M.; Burnside, G.; Dodd, S.; Penrice-Randal, R.; et al. Can self-testing be enhanced to hasten safe return of healthcare workers in pandemics? Random order, open label trial using two manufacturers’ SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow devices concurrently and nested viral culture study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, 1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, G.; Li, Q.M.; Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.H.; Li, R.; Guo, J.Q.; Zhang, G.P. Lateral flow immunoassays for antigens, antibodies and haptens detection. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 125186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Nan, X.X.; Yang, L.; Cui, Y. Lateral flow immunoassay for proteins. Clin. Chim. Acta 2023, 544, 117337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Boehringer, H.R.; O’Farrell, B.J. Lateral flow assays in infectious disease diagnosis. Clin. Chem. 2022, 68, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Amini, R.; Zhang, Z.J.; Li, J.X.; Gu, J.; Brennan, J.D.; Li, Y.F. Aptamers for SARS-CoV-2: Isolation, characterization, and diagnostic and therapeutic developments. Anal. Sens. 2022, 2, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. He, H.H.; Zheng, J.; Su, J.; Xia, L.; Tang, Y.; Wu, Y.E. Ionic polymers as double-capture agents in an aptamer lateral flow assay strip for point-of-care detection of ethyl carbamate using peroxidase-like activity of bimetallic NiCo2O4 nanoparticles. Talanta 2025, 283, 127139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yue, X.; Yang, H.L.; Li, J.Z.; Zhu, Z.J.; Ouyang, H.; Guo, T.; Fu, Z.F. Fluorescent lateral flow assay strip for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium smegmatis based on mycobacteriophage tail protein and aptamer. Talanta 2025, 282, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Bruno, J.G. Preliminary development of DNA aptamer quantum dot-based competitive lateral flow assays for saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin. J. Fluoresc. 2024, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fan, L.Z.; Luo, Y.; Yan, W.N.; Han, H.X.; Zhang, P.F. Fluorescent lateral flow immunoassay based on quantum dots nanobeads. J. Vis. Exp. 2024, 11, e67000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tang, X.Y.; Xia, W.W.; Han, H.X.; Wang, Y.C.; Wang, B.L.; Gao, S.H.; Zhang, P.F. Dual-fluorescent quantum dot nanobead-based lateral flow immunoassay for simultaneous detection of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2024, 7, 7659–7665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Jing, Y.Z.; Chang, S.J.; Chen, C.J.; Liu, J.T. Review-glucose monitoring sensors: History, principle, and challenges. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 057514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Clark, L.C.; Lyons, C. Electrode systems for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1962, 102, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wang, J. Glucose biosensors: 40 years of advances and challenges. Electroanalysis 2001, 13, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nemati, S.S.; Dehghan, G.; Rashtbari, S.; Tan, T.N.; Khataee, A. Enzyme-based and enzyme-free metal-based glucose biosensors: Classification and recent advances. Microchem. J. 2023, 193, 109038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Dua, A.; Debnath, A.; Kumar, K.; Mazumder, R.; Mazumder, A.; Singh, R.K.; Mangal, S.; Sanchitra, J.; Khan, F.; Tripathi, S.; et al. Advancements of glucose monitoring biosensor: Current state, generations of technological progress, and innovation dynamics. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2024, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vesali-Naseh, M.; Rastian, Z.; Moshakker, H. Review-carbon nanotube-based electrochemical glucose biosensors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2024, 171, 077508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Suriyanarayanan, S.; Mandal, S.; Ramanujam, K.; Nicholls, I.A. Electrochemically synthesized molecularly imprinted polythiophene nanostructures as recognition elements for an aspirin-chemosensor. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2017, 253, 428–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Saadatidizaji, Z.; Sohrabi, N.; Mohammadi, R. Development of a simple polymer-based sensor for detection of the Pirimicarb pesticide. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 10293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ali, G.K.; Omer, K.M. Molecular imprinted polymer combined with aptamer (MIP-aptamer) as a hybrid dual recognition element for bio(chemical) sensing applications. Review. Talanta 2022, 236, 122878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Akhtar, N.; Muzaffar, N.; Imran, M.; Afzal, A.M.; Iqbal, M.W.; Safdar, S.; Bahajjaj, A.A.A.; Mumtaz, S.; Iqbal, M.Z.; Azeem, M. Design and optimization of WSe2@NiCo-MOF for dual-mode applications: Energy storage and chemosensing. Phys. Scr. 2024, 99, 125992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Asha, J.B.; Suresh, P. Covalently modified graphene oxide as highly fluorescent and sustainable carbonaceous chemosensor for selective detection of zirconium ion in complete aqueous medium. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 14301–14311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Yao, J.; He, Y.; Li, L.; Li, P.F.; Yang, M. Magnified fluorescent aptasensors based on a gold nanoparticle-DNA hybrid and DNase I for the cycling detection of mercury(II) ions in aqueous solution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 21201–21207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Xie, Q.; Tan, Y.Y.; Guo, Q.P.; Wang, K.M.; Yuan, B.Y.; Wan, J.; Zhao, X.Y. A fluorescent aptasensor for sensitive detection of human hepatocellular carcinoma SMMC-7721 cells based on graphene oxide. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 6809–6814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Chang, K.L.; Sun, P.; Dong, X.; Zhu, C.N.; Liu, X.J.; Zheng, D.Y.; Liu, C. Aptamers as recognition elements for electrochemical detection of exosomes. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2022, 38, 879–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Guillois-Bécel, Y.; Tron, I.; Le Strat, Y.; Gagnière, B.; Verrier, A.; Gourier-Fréry, C.; Briand, A. Assessment of the reliability of a carbon monoxide detector for preventing poisoning. Environ. Risque Sante 2011, 10, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Christensen, G.M.; Creswell, P.D.; Theobald, J.; Meiman, J.G. Carbon monoxide detector effectiveness in reducing poisoning, Wisconsin 2014–2016. Clin. Toxicol. 2020, 58, 1335–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wu, D.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Akkaya, E.U.; Yoon, J.; James, T.D. Fluorescent chemosensors: The past, present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 7105–7123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Neri, G. First fifty years of chemoresistive gas sensors. Chemosensors 2015, 3, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhao, M.Q.; Wang, M.; Zhang, X.G.; Zhu, Y.G.; Cao, J.; She, Y.X.; Cao, Z.; Li, G.Y.; Wang, J.; Abd El-Aty, A.M. Recognition elements based on the molecular biological techniques for detecting pesticides in food: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 4942–4965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yang, F.; Zuo, X.L.; Fan, C.H.; Zhang, X.E. Biomacromolecular nanostructures-based interfacial engineering: From precise assembly to precision biosensing. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2018, 5, 740–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Morales, M.A.; Halpern, J.M. Guide to selecting a biorecognition element for biosensors. Bioconjug. Chem. 2018, 29, 3231–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Luong, J.H.T.; Male, K.B.; Glennon, J.D. Biosensor technology: Technology push versus market pull. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008, 26, 492–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Sun, K.; Zhou, H.; Yang, Y.K.; Wu, C.F. Research advances in blood glucose monitoring system. Chin. J. Lasers 2018, 45, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Peterson, K.L.; Shukla, R.P.; Daniele, M.A. Percutaneous wearable biosensors: A brief history and systems perspective. Adv. Sens. Res. 2024, 16, 2400068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bhuiyan, M.S.A.; Das Gupta, S.; Silip, J.J.; Talukder, S.; Haque, M.H.; Forwood, J.K.; Sarker, S. Current trends and future potential in the detection of avian coronaviruses: An emphasis on sensors-based technologies. Virology 2025, 604, 110399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Agar, M.; Laabei, M.; Leese, H.S.; Estrela, P. Multi-template molecularly imprinted polymeric electrochemical biosensors. Chemosensors 2025, 13, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Dabrowski, M.; Reculusa, S.; Thuau, D.; Ayela, C.; Kuhn, A. Macroporous polymer cantilever resonators for chemical sensing applications. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2023, 11, 2300771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Cave, J.W.; Wickiser, J.K.; Mitropoulos, A.N. Progress in the development of olfactory-based bioelectronic chemosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 123, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. He, J.H.; He, C.H.; Qian, M.Y.; Alsolami, A.A. Piezoelectric biosensor based on ultrasensitive MEMS system. Sens. Actuator A-Phys. 2024, 376, 115664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Juste-Dolz, A.; Teixeira, W.; Pallás-Tamarit, Y.; Carballido-Fernández, M.; Carrascosa, J.; Morán-Porcar, A.; Redón-Badenas, M.A.; Pla-Roses, M.G.; Tirado-Balaguer, M.D.; Remolar-Quintana, M.J.; et al. Real-world evaluation of a QCM-based biosensor for exhaled air. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2024, 416, 7369–7383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Chen, Y.; Shi, H.S. Rapid and label-free analysis of antigen-antibody dynamic binding of tumor markers using piezoelectric quartz crystal biosensor. Biosensors 2023, 13, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Leng, J.L.; Zhang, Y.W.; Zhang, Y.F.; Tan, Z.B.; Zhao, Y.C.; Yao, H.; Chong, H.; Wang, C.Y. Construction of AuNPs/UiO-66-NH2 decorated microcantilever immunosensor for efficient detection of procalcitonin. ChemistrySelect 2023, 8, e202304023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Bizina, E.V.; Polosina, A.A.; Farafonova, O.V.; Eremin, S.A.; Ermolaeva, T.N. Detection of aristolochic acid using a piezoelectric immunosensor based on magnetic carbon nanocomposites. Inorg. Mater. 2024, 8, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Yen, V.H.; Zyablov, A.N. Application of MIP sensors to the determination of preservatives in nonalcoholic drinks. Inorg. Mater. 2023, 59, 1437–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zyablov, A.N.; Yen, V.H. Determination of sodium benzoate in liquids using a piezoelectric sensor modified by a molecularly imprinted polymer. J. Anal. Chem. 2022, 77, 1607–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Akgonullu, S.; Ozgur, E.; Denizli, A. Quartz crystal microbalance-based aptasensors for medical diagnosis. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Tian, Y.L.; Zhu, P.; Chen, Y.T.; Bai, X.Y.; Du, L.P.; Chen, W.; Wu, C.S.; Wang, P. Piezoelectric aptasensor with gold nanoparticle amplification for the label-free detection of okadaic acid. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2021, 346, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zhang, X.Q.; Feng, Y.; Duan, S.Y.; Su, L.L.; Zhang, J.L.; He, F.J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Rv electrochemical sensor mediated by aptamer and AuNPs-DNA. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 849–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Duah, J.A.; Lee, K.S.; Kim, B.G. A self-powered wireless temperature sensor platform for foot ulceration monitoring. Sensors 2024, 24, 6567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Elorika, P.; Anwar, S.; Roy, A.; Anwar, S. Flexible PVDF-Ba0.97Ca0.03TiO3 polymer-ceramic composite films for energy storage, biosensor, mechanosensor, and UV-visible light protection. Mater. Res. Bull. 2025, 181, 113116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Guliy, O.I.; Zaitsev, B.D.; Borodina, I.A.; Staroverov, S.A.; Vyrshchikov, R.D.; Fursova, K.K.; Brovko, F.A.; Dykman, L.A. Phage display-based acoustic biosensor for early cancer diagnosis. Microchem. J. 2024, 207, 111661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Han, S.B.; Lee, S.S. Isolation and characterization of cxosomes from cancer cells using antibody-functionalized paddle screw-type devices and detection of exosomal miRNA using piezoelectric biosensor. Sensors 2024, 24, 5399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Forinová, M.; Seidlová, A.; Pilipenco, A.; Lynn, N.S., Jr.; Oborilová, R.; Farka, Z.; Skládal, P.; Saláková, A.; Spasovová, M.; Houska, M.; et al. A comparative assessment of a piezoelectric biosensor based on a new antifouling nanolayer and cultivation methods: Enhancing S. aureus detection in fresh dairy products. Curr. Res. Biotechnol. 2023, 6, 100166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Mandal, D.; Indaleeb, M.M.; Younan, A.; Banerjee, S. Piezoelectric point-of-care biosensor for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) antibodies. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2022, 37, 100510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Liu, Y.; Liu, S.; Huang, J.; Zhou, J.; He, F. Development of SPQC sensor based on the specific recognition of TAL-effectors for locus-specific detection of 6-methyladenine in DNA. Talanta 2024, 277, 126279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kwak, J.; Lee, S.S. Highly sensitive piezoelectric immunosensors employing signal amplification with gold nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 445502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Armero, L.; Plou, J.; Valera, P.S.; Serna, S.; García, I.; Liz-Marzán, L.M. Multiplex determination of glycan profiles on urinary prostate-specifics antigen by quartz-crystal microbalance combined with surface-enhanced Raman scattering. ACS Sens. 2024, 9, 4811–4821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Pohanka, M. Quartz crystal microbalance biosensor for the detection of procalcitonin. Talanta 2023, 257, 124325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Lach, P.; Sharma, P.S.; Golebiewska, K.; Cieplak, M.; D’Souza, F.; Kutner, W. Molecularly imprinted polymer chemosensor for selective determination of an N-nitroso-l-proline food toxin. Chemistry 2017, 23, 1942–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Mandal, S.; Suriyanarayanan, S.; Nicholls, I.A.; Ramanujam, K. Selective sensing of the biotinyl moiety using molecularly imprinted polyaniline nanowires. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, B669–B678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Domsicova, M.; Kurekova, S.; Babelova, A.; Jakic, K.; Oravcova, I.; Nemethova, V.; Razga, F.; Breier, A.; Gal, M.; Poturnayova, A. Advancements in chronic myeloid leukemia detection: Development and evaluation of a novel QCM aptasensor for use in clinical practice. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2024, 39, 101816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Wu, H.Z.; Si, S.H.; Li, Z.; Su, J.Y.; Jia, S.G.; He, H.; Peng, C.C.; Cheng, T.Q.; Wu, Q. Determination of lactoferrin using high-frequency piezoelectric quartz aptamer biosensor based on molecular bond rupture. Molecules 2024, 29, 5699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Takeda, M.; Yoshino, H.; Yamazaki, H.; Hirata, T.; Kuroiwa, T.; Nakajima, C.; Suzuki, Y.; Munakata, F. Development of a piezo biosensor for pathogen-specific biopolymer detection using a self-assembly barium titanate/polyvinylidene fluoride composite material. Sens. Actuator A-Phys. 2023, 360, 114545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.