Next Article in Journal
Digitalization of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay with Graphene Field-Effect Transistors (G-ELISA) for Portable Ferritin Determination
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review Study on Molecularly Imprinting Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors for Food Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Automated Uniform Spheroid Generation Platform for High Throughput Drug Screening Process
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thiram Determination in Milk Samples by Surface Plasmon Resonance Based on Molecularly Imprinted Polymers and Sulphur-Doped Titanium Dioxide
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biosensors
Volume 14
Issue 8
10.3390/bios14080393
biosensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Single-Nanoparticle Electrochemical Collision for Monitoring Self-Assembly of Thiol Molecules on Au Nanoparticles

by
Yiyan Bai
Department of Chemistry, Yuncheng University, Yuncheng 044000, China
Biosensors 2024, 14(8), 393; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14080393
Submission received: 8 July 2024 / Revised: 9 August 2024 / Accepted: 14 August 2024 / Published: 15 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Plasmonic Biosensing Technology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A precise understanding of the self-assembly kinetics of small molecules on nanoparticles (NPs) can give greater control over the size and architecture of the functionalized NPs. Herein, a single-nanoparticle electrochemical collision (SNEC)-based method was developed to monitor the self-assembly processes of 6-mercapto-1-hexanol (6-MCH) and 1-hexanethiol (MCH) on Au NPs at the single-particle level, and to investigate the self-assembly kinetics exactly. Results showed that the self-assembly processes of both consisted of rapid adsorption and slow recombination. However, the adsorption rate of MCH was significantly lower than that of 6-MCH due to the poorer polarity. Also noteworthy is that the rapid adsorption of 6-MCH on Au NPs conformed to the Langmuir model of diffusion control. Hence, the proposed SNEC-based method could serve as a complementary method to research the self-assembly mechanism of functionalized NPs.

1. Introduction

The use of small molecules such as amino acids and thiol compounds to form self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) on the surface of nanoparticles (NPs) is a common method to obtain functionalized NPs for sensing, catalysis, molecular recognition and molecular electronics [1,2,3,4,5]. Therefore, it is necessary to accurately monitor the self-assembly processes of small molecules on the surface of NPs by detecting assemblies in solution at the single-particle level. However, sample pretreatments and vacuum operation processes of traditional electron microscopy methods can greatly affect the true morphology of the assemblies. At this time, some in situ characterization techniques have been developed, such as liquid-phase transmission electron microscopy (LP-TEM, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) [6,7], small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS, Forvis Technologies, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) [8,9], and dynamic light scattering (DLS, Malvern, UK) [10]. However, the purchase and maintenance costs of LP-TEM are relatively high, making it difficult to promote their applications. SAXS and DLS show the average scattered light intensity of multiple particles. As the scattering power is inversely proportional to the sixth power of the radius for spherical NPs [11,12], it is not suitable for characterizing size polydisperse samples generated in the self-assembly processes.
With the development of micro/nano processing technology and analytical methods, it is possible to detect dispersed NPs in solution at the single-particle level. Among them, single-nanoparticle electrochemical collision (SNEC) has attracted researchers’ attention due to their advantages of high sensitivity, high throughput, fast response, and low cost [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Based on different reaction modes, SNEC can be classified as electrocatalytic amplification (ECA) [21], particle self-electrolysis [22], diffusion blocking [23], and capacitive impact [24]. The principle of ECA is based on inner-sphere heterogeneous electrode reactions (ISERs). Specifically, in ISERs (e.g., hydrogen evolution reaction), the reactants, products, and intermediates interact strongly with the electrode surface, so the reaction performance is closely related to the electrode surface structure. Due to the significant difference in surface structure between the substrate electrode and the NPs, although there is almost no Faraday reaction of the electroactive substance on the substrate electrode at a specific voltage, when a single NP collides with the substrate electrode, it can catalyze the reaction of the electroactive substance as a nanoelectrode, resulting in a current transient corresponding to the single NP [25,26]. Recently, SNEC has been used to monitor the self-assembly process of nanomaterials. For example, Zhang et al. utilized SNEC to, in real-time, monitor the aggregation of α-Synuclein (α-Syn), and found that vitamin D (VD) can reduce the probability of early aggregation of α-Syn [27]. Compton et al. investigated the effect of magnetic fields on the aggregation of Fe3O4 NPs based on SNEC, and showed that even in high salt environments, Fe3O4 NPs did not undergo significant aggregation when there was no magnetic field [28].
Herein, Au–S bonding was used to modify thiol small molecules such as 6-mercapto-1-hexanol (6-MCH) and 1-hexanethiol (MCH), on the surface of Au NPs. Based on the influence of the electroactive area of Au NPs on the current intensity, the dynamic processes of the self-assembly of thiol molecules on Au NPs were monitored in solution at the single-particle level (Scheme 1).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Self-Assembly of Thiol Molecules on Au NPs

Au NPs were synthesized following a modifying sodium citrate reduction method [29], and the average diameter was found to be 40 nm (Figure S1). The stocked Au NP solution was washed with ultrapure water three times by ultrafiltration (4000 rpm, 2 min), and the concentration was about 60 pM. To achieve the self-assembly of thiol molecules on Au NPs, after adding 10 µL of a certain concentration of thiol molecules to 100 µL of Au NPs (60 pM), the mixture was eddied at room temperature for a period of time.

2.2. SNEC Tests for Self-Assembled Au NPs

After adding 110 µL of the above self-assembled Au NPs to 10 mL of 0.8 mM HClO4, the mixture was sonicated for 30 s to disperse uniformly for the further SNEC tests which were conducted according to our previous work [30]. Specifically, a conventional three-electrode setup with a carbon fiber microelectrode (CFME, d = 7 µm, Figure S2) as a working electrode [31], Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) as reference electrode, and a Pt wire as a counter electrode were used. The spikes were recorded and magnified by an EPC-10 patch-clamp amplifier (HEKA Electronics, Stuttgart, Germany), and the signals were sampled at 10 kHz. The amplifier’s internal low-pass Bessel filter and I_Bessel filter was set to 10 kHz and 0.1 KHz, respectively. The potential was held at −0.6 V where the CFME is inert toward hydrogen evolution reaction and the current intensity and collision frequency of Au NPs are the highest. Additionally, all collision experiments were performed in a Faraday cage within 30 min to minimize agglomerate effects [17].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Feasibility of Self-Assembly Detection of Thiol Molecules on Au NPs Based on SNEC

To investigate the feasibility of self-assembly, DLS characterizations were performed before and after injection of 6-MCH into Au NPs solutions. It was found that the hydrated particle size and polydispersity (PDI) were significantly increased after injection of 6-MCH (Figure 1A), indicating that 6-MCH successfully self-assembled on Au NPs. Considering that the monodispersing of NPs in collision experiments is vital for the self-assembly detection of thiol molecules on Au NPs based on SNEC, the stability of Au NPs in 0.8 mM HClO4 solution was investigated. The current intensity, which was measured before and after Au NPs dispersed in 0.8 mM HClO4 for 30 min, had essentially the same distributions, indicating that Au NPs can basically exist stably in 0.8 mM HClO4 for 30 min (Figure S3). Hence, SNEC tests were conducted for the above two samples within 30 min to avoid agglomerative effects, and peak-type current transients with an average current intensity of 95 pA appeared when only Au NPs existed in the system (Figure 1B,C). Whereas, after Au NPs and 6-MCH (73 μM) co-incubation at room temperature for 10 min, the average current intensity markedly decreased to 37 pA. Considering that the cyclic voltammetry (CV) of CFME in 0.8 mM HClO4 before and after 6-MCH added into Au NPs solutions were similar (Figure S4), the interaction between CFME and 6-MCH was ignored. So, the relatively noticeable distinction in current intensity caused by 6-MCH occupied some active sites of Au NPs [29], indicating that SNEC can detect the self-assembly of thiol molecules on Au NPs sensitively.

3.2. Effect of the C6-MCH/CAu NPs on the Assembly Efficiency

The effect of the C6-MCH/CAu NPs on the assembly degree was explored with 60 pM of Au NPs and a relatively wide range of 6-MCH concentrations, from 0.73 pM (C6-MCH/CAu NPs = 1.2 × 10−2) to 73 μM (C6-MCH/CAu NPs = 1.2 × 106). After co-incubation at room temperature for 10 min, more small signals appeared with the increase of the concentration of 6-MCH (Figure 2A), coinciding with the current intensity decrease with the increasing of the concentration of 6-MCH (Figure 2B). As shown in Figure 2C, the average current intensity decreased to the lowest value (ip ≈ 37 pA) when C6-MCH = 730 nM (C6-MCH/CAu NPs = 1.2 × 104), suggesting that the self-assembly degree of Au NPs reached its highest at this point.

3.3. Self-Assembly Monitoring of Thiol Molecules on Au NPs Based on SNEC

As shown in Figure 3A, the self-assembly process of 6-MCH on Au NPs was monitored by SNEC under the condition of C6-MCH/CAu NPs = 1.2 × 103, and the uneven peak-type current transients were caused by the heterogeneity of Au NPs and self-assembly efficiency of 6-MCH on Au NPs. Figure 3B showed that the current intensity significantly decreased when the incubation time was only 3 s, then the current intensity slowly decreased with the extension of incubation time. To further investigate the kinetics of the assembly process, we converted the current intensity into the percentage of adsorbed species in the entire area of Au NPs (Γ) by Equation (1).
Γ = i p , t − i p , t = 0 i p , t = 600 − i p , t = 0
where ip,t=0 is the current intensity of the bare Au NPs, and ip,t is the current intensity measured at one time point in the self-assembly process. The current intensity measured at the last time, ip,t=600, was used as the value when Au NPs was completely covered by 6-MCH.
As shown in Figure 3C, two regions of change in Γ were observed during the self-assembly process: the rapid assembly process before 3 s, and the gradual increase in surface coverage to one over a longer period of time. This indicated that the self-assembly of 6-MCH on Au NPs consists of two processes: rapid adsorption and slow recombination [32,33]. Au–S bonds were rapidly formed between 6-MCH and Au NPs in solution through chemical adsorption [34]. At this time, 6-MCH has no orientation on the surface of Au NPs, causing a large amount of 6-MCH to quickly adsorb disorderly on Au NPs. After that, due to the van der Waals force between the 6-MCH molecules [35], the chemisorbed 6-MCH molecules slowly rearranged from an irregular configuration to an upright configuration, forming an ordered and dense SAM. In addition, we also found that t1/2 was linearly associated with −ln(1 − Γ), −ln(1 − Γ) = 0.29t1/2 + 1.05 (R2 = 96%), indicating that the rapid adsorption of 6-MCH on Au NPs coincided with the Langmuir model of diffusion control Equation (2) [36].
Γ = 1 − exp(−kact1/2)
where ka is the adsorption kinetic constant, and c is the concentration of 6-MCH molecules. ka was calculated to be 3.97 × 106 L/mol, which was of the typical order of magnitude for the alkanethiol systems [37].

3.4. Effect of Thiol Molecular Structure on the Packing Efficiency of SAMs

To further illustrate the effect of thiol molecular structure on the packing efficiency of SAMs, the self-assembly results of 6-MCH and MCH on Au NPs were compared under the same conditions (C6-MCH or MCH/CAu NPs = 1.2 × 103, t = 6 min). As shown in Figure 4A,B, the current intensity of MCH-functionalized Au NPs was significantly larger than that of 6-MCH-functionalized Au NPs, indicating that the assembly efficiency of MCH on Au NPs was lower than that of 6-MCH. The hydrated particle size of MCH-functionalized Au NPs being smaller than that of 6-MCH-functionalized Au NPs also proved this (Figure S5). Considering that the polarity of the solvent has already been proved to be related to the packing efficiency of SAMs [3], it can be hypothesized that the different polarity of 6-MCH and MCH caused the discernible SAM packing efficiencies. Moreover, a similar trend was observed in the self-assembly process of MCH on Au NPs (CMCH/CAu NPs = 1.2 × 103, Figure 4C and Figure S6): a rapid assembly process before 30 min, and a slow recombination process after 30 min, where the current intensity slowly increased with the prolongation of incubation time. The reason might be the reorganization of disorderly adsorbed MCH, which transited from irregular to upright configurations, resulting in an increase in exposed Au atoms.

4. Conclusions

In summary, SNEC-based method was developed to monitor the self-assembly processes of thiol small molecules on Au NPs in solution at the single-particle level. Results showed that both the self-assembly of 6-MCH and MCH on Au NPs contained two processes: rapid adsorption and slow recombination. However, the assembly efficiency of MCH was significantly lower than that of 6-MCH due to the poorer polarity. Further, the Langmuir model of diffusion control was proved to be suitable for the rapid assembly process of 6-MCH Au NPs, and the calculated adsorption kinetic constant (ka = 3.97 × 106 L/mol) was correspondent with the reported value for the alkanethiol systems. Therefore, the proposed SNEC-based method holds great potential to investigate the self-assembly mechanism of small molecule functionalized NPs in solution at the single-particle level, and provide effective guidance for the design and synthetise of functionalized NPs. Considering that the shape of current transients is informative in particle properties, further exploration of current shape-based SNEC sensors should be carried out to effectively study the self-assembly mechanism.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bios14080393/s1, Figure S1: TEM images for the synthesized Au NPs, and corresponding histograms showing statistical size distributions determined from TEM images (n = 300); Figure S2: SEM images of disk CFME (d = 7 µm), and cyclic voltammograms of 5.0 mM K3Fe(CN)6/0.1 M KCl with a 50 mV/s scan rate for CFME; Figure S3: Current intensity of Au NPs (d = 40 nm) after being added into 0.8 mM HClO4 solution for different times; Figure S4: Cyclic voltammetry scans of CFME in 0.8 mM HClO4 before and after 6-MCH was added into Au NPs solutions; Figure S5: Hydrated particle size of 6-MCH-functionalized Au NPs and MCH-functionalized Au NPs; Figure S6: Violin plots of current intensity of Au NP assemblies with MCH (CMCH/CAu NPs ≈ 1.2 × 103) at different times.

Funding

This research was funded by the Applied Basic Research Programs of Science and Technology Department of Shanxi Province (202203021212173), Reward Program for Coming to Shanxi (QZX-2022001), and Yuncheng University Doctoral Research Launch Project (YQ-2021032).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, Y.; Xianyu, Y.; Jiang, X. Surface modification of gold nanoparticles with small molecules for biochemical analysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Watkins, Z.; Karajic, A.; Young, T.; White, R.; Heikenfeld, J. Week-long operation of electrochemical aptamer sensors: New insights into self-assembled monolayer degradation mechanisms and solutions for stability in serum at body temperature. ACS Sens. 2023, 8, 1119–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Thiagarajan, S.; Price, E.; Connors, L.; Dettman, A.; Koh, A.S. Study of n-alkanethiol self-assembly behavior on iron particles: Effect of alkyl chain length and adsorption solvent on resulting iron-based magnetorheological fluids. Langmuir 2022, 38, 13506–13521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Häkkinen, H. The gold–sulfur interface at the nanoscale. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guo, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y.; He, H.; Zhu, Y. Thiol- and alkyne-functionalized copper nanoparticles as electrocatalysts for bisphenol a (BPA) oxidation. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2018, 23, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, J.; Jones, M.R.; Ou, Z.; Chen, Q. In situ electron microscopy imaging and quantitative structural modulation of nanoparticle superlattices. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 9801–9808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Woehl, T. Refocusing in situ electron microscopy: Moving beyond visualization of nanoparticle self-assembly to gain practical insights into advanced material fabrication. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 12272–12279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Weidman, M.C.; Smilgies, D.M.; Tisdale, W.A. Kinetics of the self-assembly of nanocrystal superlattices measured by real-time in situ x-ray scattering. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 775–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhu, H.; Nagaoka, Y.; Hills-Kimball, K.; Tan, R.; Yu, L.; Fang, Y.; Wang, K.; Li, R.; Wang, Z.; Chen, O. Pressure-enabled synthesis of hetero-dimers and hetero-rods through intraparticle coalescence and interparticle fusion of quantum-dot-au satellite nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 8408–8411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Z.; Chen, M.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, Y.L.; Guo, C.; Wang, H.; Qin, Y.; Fang, F.; Wang, D.; Su, C.; et al. Non-equilibrium nanoassemblies constructed by confined coordination on a polymer chain. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 22651–22661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Sannomiya, T.; Voros, J. Single plasmonic nanoparticles for biosensing. Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Qiu, D.; Wang, S.; Zheng, Y.; Deng, Z. One at a time: Counting single-nanoparticle/electrode collisions for accurate particle sizing by overcoming the instability of gold nanoparticles under electrolytic conditions. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 505707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, J.H.; Zhou, Y.G. Nano-impact electrochemistry: Analysis of single bioentities. Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 123, 115768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Davis, C.; Wang, S.X.; Sepunaru, L. What can electrochemistry tell us about individual enzymes? Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 25, 100643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Goines, S.; Dick, J.E. Review—electrochemistry’s potential to reach the ultimate sensitivity in measurement science. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, e037505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lu, S.M.; Li, M.Y.; Long, Y.T. Dynamic chemistry interactions: Controlled single-entity electrochemistry. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 4653–4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bai, Y.Y.; Yang, Y.J.; Xu, Y.; Yang, X.Y.; Zhang, Z.L. Current lifetime of single-nanoparticle electrochemical collision for in situ monitoring nanoparticles agglomeration and aggregation. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 4429–4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bai, Y.Y.; Feng, Z.T.; Yang, Y.J.; Yang, X.Y.; Zhang, Z.L. Current lifetime of single-nanoparticle collision for sizing nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 1302–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, W.; Zheng, J.J.; Li, Y.A.; Gao, X.; Ji, X.; Zhou, Y.G. Nano-impact electrochemistry reveals kinetics information of metal-ion battery materials with multiple redox centers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202306185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Azimzadeh Sani, M.; Tschulik, K. Unveiling colloidal nanoparticle properties and interactions at a single entity level. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2023, 37, 101195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xiao, X.Y.; Bard, A.J. Observing single nanoparticle collisions at an ultramicroelectrode by electrocatalytic amplification. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9610–9612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhou, Y.G.; Rees, N.V.; Compton, R.G. The electrochemical detection and characterization of silver nanoparticles in aqueous solution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4219–4221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Quinn, B.M.; Van ’t Hof, P.G.; Lemay, S.G. Time-resolved electrochemical detection of discrete adsorption events. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8360–8361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Azimzadeh Sani, M.; Pavlopoulos, N.G.; Pezzotti, S.; Serva, A.; Cignoni, P.; Linnemann, J.; Salanne, M.; Gaigeot, M.P.; Tschulik, K. Unexpectedly high capacitance of the metal nanoparticle/water interface: Molecular-level insights into the electrical double layer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 61, e202112679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bard, A.J. Inner-sphere heterogeneous electrode reactions. Electrocatalysis and photocatalysis: The challenge. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 7559–7567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xiao, X.Y.; Fan, F.R.F.; Zhou, J.P.; Bard, A.J. Current transients in single nanoparticle collision events. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16669–16677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Ji, W.; Zhang, S.; Gao, N.; Xu, T.; Wang, X.; Zhang, M. Vitamin d inhibits the early aggregation of alpha-synuclein and modulates exocytosis revealed by electrochemical measurements. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202111853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tschulik, K.; Compton, R.G. Nanoparticle impacts reveal magnetic field induced agglomeration and reduced dissolution rates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 13909–13913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Frens, G. Controlled Nucleation for the Regulation of the Particle Size in Monodisperse Gold Suspensions. Nat. Phys. Sci. 1973, 241, 20–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bai, Y.Y. Single-nanoparticle electrochemical collision for study of the size-dependent activity of Au nanoparticles during hydrogen evolution reaction. Electroanalysis 2024, 36, e202300354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Y.T.; Zhang, S.H.; Wang, L.; Xiao, R.R.; Liu, W.; Zhang, X.W.; Zhou, Z.; Amatore, C.; Huang, W.H. Nanoelectrode for amperometric monitoring of individual vesicular exocytosis inside single synapses. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 12456–12460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bain, C.D.; Troughton, E.B.; Tao, Y.T.; Evall, J.; Whitesides, G.M.; Nuzzo, R.G. Formation of monolayer films by the spontaneous assembly of organic thiols from solution onto gold. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ulman, A. Formation and structure of self-assembled monolayers. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1533–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Inkpen, M.S.; Liu, Z.F.; Li, H.; Campos, L.M.; Neaton, J.B.; Venkataraman, L. Non-chemisorbed gold–sulfur binding prevails in self-assembled monolayers. Nat. Chem. 2019, 11, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Reimers, J.R.; Ford, M.J.; Marcuccio, S.M.; Ulstrup, J.; Hush, N.S. Competition of van der waals and chemical forces on gold–sulfur surfaces and nanoparticles. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dannenberger, O.; Buck, M.; Grunze, M. Self-assembly of n-alkanethiols: A kinetic study by second harmonic generation. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 2202–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hong, H.G.; Park, W. A study of adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics of Ω-mercaptoalkylhydroquinone self-assembled monolayer on a gold electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2005, 51, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biosensors 14 00393 sch001
Scheme 1. SNEC-based method for monitoring the self-assembly processes of thiol molecules on the surface of Au NPs.
Scheme 1. SNEC-based method for monitoring the self-assembly processes of thiol molecules on the surface of Au NPs.
Biosensors 14 00393 sch001
Biosensors 14 00393 g001
Figure 1. Comparisons of hydrated particle size (A) chronoamperometry curves (B) and current intensity (C) before and after 6-MCH added into Au NPs. The inserts in (B) are typical current transients measured before (black star) and after (red star) 6-MCH added into Au NPs.
Figure 1. Comparisons of hydrated particle size (A) chronoamperometry curves (B) and current intensity (C) before and after 6-MCH added into Au NPs. The inserts in (B) are typical current transients measured before (black star) and after (red star) 6-MCH added into Au NPs.
Biosensors 14 00393 g001
Biosensors 14 00393 g002
Figure 2. (A) Chronoamperometry curves of Au NPs’ assemblies with different concentrations of 6-MCH. (B) Current intensity of Au NPs assemblies with different concentrations of 6-MCH. (C) The curve of current intensity changing with log[C6-MCH].
Figure 2. (A) Chronoamperometry curves of Au NPs’ assemblies with different concentrations of 6-MCH. (B) Current intensity of Au NPs assemblies with different concentrations of 6-MCH. (C) The curve of current intensity changing with log[C6-MCH].
Biosensors 14 00393 g002
Biosensors 14 00393 g003
Figure 3. Chronoamperometry curves (A), current intensity (B), and surface coverage (C) of Au NP assemblies with 6-MCH (C6-MCH/CAu NPs = 1.2 × 103) at different times. The insert showed the curve of −ln(1 − Γ) changing with t1/2.
Figure 3. Chronoamperometry curves (A), current intensity (B), and surface coverage (C) of Au NP assemblies with 6-MCH (C6-MCH/CAu NPs = 1.2 × 103) at different times. The insert showed the curve of −ln(1 − Γ) changing with t1/2.
Biosensors 14 00393 g003
Biosensors 14 00393 g004
Figure 4. Chronoamperometry curves (A) and frequency distributions of current intensity (B) of Au NPs assemblies with 6-MCH and MCH. (C) Current intensity of Au NPs assemblies with MCH (CMCH/CAu NPs = 1.2 × 103) at different times.
Figure 4. Chronoamperometry curves (A) and frequency distributions of current intensity (B) of Au NPs assemblies with 6-MCH and MCH. (C) Current intensity of Au NPs assemblies with MCH (CMCH/CAu NPs = 1.2 × 103) at different times.
Biosensors 14 00393 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bai, Y. Single-Nanoparticle Electrochemical Collision for Monitoring Self-Assembly of Thiol Molecules on Au Nanoparticles. Biosensors 2024, 14, 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14080393

AMA Style

Bai Y. Single-Nanoparticle Electrochemical Collision for Monitoring Self-Assembly of Thiol Molecules on Au Nanoparticles. Biosensors. 2024; 14(8):393. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14080393

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bai, Yiyan. 2024. "Single-Nanoparticle Electrochemical Collision for Monitoring Self-Assembly of Thiol Molecules on Au Nanoparticles" Biosensors 14, no. 8: 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14080393

APA Style

Bai, Y. (2024). Single-Nanoparticle Electrochemical Collision for Monitoring Self-Assembly of Thiol Molecules on Au Nanoparticles. Biosensors, 14(8), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14080393

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop