Next Article in Journal
Gold Nanoprobes for Detection of a Crucial EGFR Deletion for Early Diagnosis of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Pulse Feature-Enhanced Classification of Microalgae and Cyanobacteria Using Polarized Light Scattering and Fluorescence Signals
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Chamber-Based Digital PCR Based on a Microfluidic Chip for the Absolute Quantification and Analysis of KRAS Mutation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biosensors
Volume 14
Issue 4
10.3390/bios14040161
biosensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancing Glucose Biosensing with Graphene Oxide and Ferrocene-Modified Linear Poly(ethylenimine)

by
Jirawan Monkrathok
1,
Pattanaphong Janphuang
2,
Somphong Suphachiaraphan
2,
Sastiya Kampaengsri
1,
Anyanee Kamkaew
1,
Kantapat Chansaenpak
3,
Sireerat Lisnund
4,
Vincent Blay
5,* and
Piyanut Pinyou
1,*
1
School of Chemistry, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, 111 University Ave., Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
2
Synchrotron Light Research Institute (Public Organization), 111 University Ave., Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
3
National Nanotechnology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand Science Park, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
4
Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, 744 Suranarai Rd., Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
5
Department of Microbiology and Environmental Toxicology, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2024, 14(4), 161; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14040161
Submission received: 15 January 2024 / Revised: 25 March 2024 / Accepted: 26 March 2024 / Published: 28 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosensing for Point-of-Care Diagnostics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We designed and optimized a glucose biosensor system based on a screen-printed electrode modified with the NAD-GDH enzyme. To enhance the electroactive surface area and improve the electron transfer efficiency, we introduced graphene oxide (GO) and ferrocene-modified linear poly(ethylenimine) (LPEI-Fc) onto the biosensor surface. This strategic modification exploits the electrostatic interaction between graphene oxide, which possesses a negative charge, and LPEI-Fc, which is positively charged. This interaction results in increased catalytic current during glucose oxidation and helps improve the overall glucose detection sensitivity by amperometry. We integrated the developed glucose sensor into a flow injection (FI) system. This integration facilitates a swift and reproducible detection of glucose, and it also mitigates the risk of contamination during the analyses. The incorporation of an FI system improves the efficiency of the biosensor, ensuring precise and reliable results in a short time. The proposed sensor was operated at a constant applied potential of 0.35 V. After optimizing the system, a linear calibration curve was obtained for the concentration range of 1.0–40 mM (R2 = 0.986). The FI system was successfully applied to determine the glucose content of a commercial sports drink.

1. Introduction

Glucose biosensors are an essential tool in medical diagnostics and monitoring, playing a crucial role in managing and understanding conditions such as diabetes [1,2]. Electrochemical biosensors are particularly suitable for measuring physiological glucose levels as they can be miniaturized and integrated into wearable devices [3] and are compatible with different biofluids, such as blood, interstitial fluid, saliva, sweat, and urine [4,5].
A key component of electrochemical glucose biosensors is the biorecognition element, which selectively catalyzes the electrooxidation of glucose [6]. Oxidoreductase enzymes of different classes have been used, such as glucose oxidase (GOx), which has excellent substrate specificity and thermal stability [7,8,9] but requires molecular oxygen and leads to H2O2 formation and enzyme deactivation [10]. Another class is glucose dehydrogenases (GDHs). Instead of oxygen, they leverage a cofactor (PQQ, FAD, or NAD) [11]. While PQQ- and FAD-dependent GDHs suffer from broad substrate specificity [12], NAD-dependent GDHs possess a better selectivity towards glucose oxidation [11]. Unlike PQQ and FAD-GDHs, the NAD+ cofactor binds transiently to the protein [13,14].
The NADH molecule is rich in electrons and forms in stoichiometric relationship to the oxidized glucose. Harvesting electrons from NADH thus enables the quantification of glucose and the regeneration of NAD+. The redox reaction involving the NAD+ cofactor involves two electrons and one proton.
NAD+ + H+ + 2e− ⇌ NADH
β-D-glucose + NAD+ ⇌ D-glucono-1,5-lactone + NADH + H+
The direct oxidation of NADH on the bare electrode surface requires the application of high overpotentials, which leads to undesired fouling [15,16]. One solution is to employ redox mediators, which enable the oxidation of NADH at lower overpotentials [17]. Redox mediators can be freely diffused or immobilized on the electrode surface [18]. There are multiple immobilization options, including electropolymerization [19,20], mediator-loaded electrospun nanofibers [21], and mediator-enriched carbon paste [22]. One approach is to covalently attach the mediator as pedant groups in a polymer backbone [23]. Several redox mediators have been bound to polymer backbones and co-entrapped with NAD-dependent redox enzymes, including phenazines [23,24] and metal complexes [13,25,26,27]. Among these, ferrocene has high chemical stability and low reorganization energy, which allows for a fast electron transfer through a self-exchange reaction [28,29].
Using ferrocene and its derivatives as freely diffusing redox mediators can result in unstable operation, as they do not stably adsorb on the electrode and their oxidized forms are very soluble [30,31]. Thus, they are frequently immobilized on the electrode surface instead [32,33]. Ferrocene has been immobilized on a glassy carbon electrode using Nafion, conferring improved stability to an electrode modified with glucose oxidase [31]. Ferrocene can be covalently bound to multiple polymer backbones, allowing flexibility in the design of biosensors [34]. Linear poly(ethylenimine) (LPEI) offers a positively charged polymer backbone to immobilize enzymes or nanomaterials with opposite charges [35] and amino groups for polymer crosslinking [36]. Several redox enzymes have been successfully employed with ferrocene-modified LPEI as a redox mediator [28,37,38].
Another strategy to improve sensor performance is to introduce nanomaterials [39,40,41,42] that increase the electroactive surface area and improve the electrical communication between the enzyme and the electrode surface [14,43]. Graphene oxide (GO) is often favored because of its biocompatibility and hydrophilicity [44,45], and its carboxylic groups can also interact with polycationic polymers [46]. Due to the abundance of oxygen-containing functional groups, GO is a negatively charged particle [47]. This enables the electrostatic interaction between GO and positively charged materials [48]. GO has been combined with a range of nanomaterials to improve the performance of electrochemical biosensors [49].
In this study, we designed and optimized a glucose biosensor utilizing a screen-printed electrode (SPE) modified with the GDH enzyme. To increase the electroactive surface area and the electron transfer efficiency, we introduced GO and ferrocene-modified linear poly(ethylenimine) (LPEI-Fc) on the biosensor surface. This design exploits the electrostatic interaction between both materials to obtain a stable enzyme–polymer film attached to the electrode. Moreover, GO also improves electrical conductivity and provides a large area for enzyme immobilization. The result is an overall improvement in glucose sensitivity. We also integrated the developed glucose sensor into a flow injection system. This integration can mitigate the risk of contamination and improve the precision and reliability of the measurements [50].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Materials

Glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) from Pseudomonas sp. (≥200 U mg−1), nanocolloidal graphene oxide (2 mg mL−1), and Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. D-glucose, β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide in oxidized form (NAD+, >95.0%), borane tert-butylamine complex, 3-Bromopropionyl chloride, dimethylferrocene, and ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (EGDE) were obtained from TCI Chemicals (Tokyo, Japan). Ferrocene-modified linear poly(ethylenimine) (LPEI-Fc), a redox polymer, was prepared according to a previously established procedure [51]. The screen-printed electrodes used in this work were 4 mm diameter carbon working electrodes from Metrohm Dropsens (Oviedo, Spain) (commercial reference DRP-110).

2.2. Apparatus

Electrochemical measurements (cyclic voltammetry and amperometry) were performed using an EmStat3+ Blue potentiostat (Palmsens, Houten, The Netherlands). A three-electrode setup was used, comprising a carbon working electrode, a carbon auxiliary electrode, a silver (Ag) reference electrode, and the modified GDH/Fc-LPEI/GO on carbon SPE as the working electrode. Cyclic voltammetry of the modified electrodes was carried out at a scan rate of 10 mV s−1 and an electrolyte volume of 10 mL. The potentials reported in this work correspond to potentials vs. an Ag pseudo-reference electrode. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the modified electrodes was performed using a Palmsens4 potentiostat. EIS of the electrode with different modifications was performed in a redox couple solution containing 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− in 0.1 M KCl at an open-circuit potential of 0.140 V. The charge transfer resistance of the electrodes was evaluated at frequencies in the range of 100,000–0.05 Hz with an AC amplitude of 5 mV. The surface topology of the modified electrodes was investigated with a field-emission scanning electron microscope (Zeiss AURIGA FE-SEM/EDX, Carl Zeiss NTS GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany) at 1 kV acceleration voltage and 30 μm aperture. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was performed in transmission mode and used to characterize the chemical functionalities on the GO surface using a Spectrum 100 FT-IR spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
The prepared glucose biosensor SPE was incorporated into a flow injection (FI) system, as depicted in Scheme 1. A peristaltic pump and a sample injector equipped with a 20 µL sample loop (Rheodyne, model 7725, IDEX Health & Science, Morrisville, NC, USA) were employed in the FI system. The modified SPE was placed in a custom-made electrochemical flow cell with a volume of 50 µL. The carrier solution used during the experiment was PBS buffer pH 7.4 containing 5 mM NAD+. The catalytic current response resulting from glucose oxidation was monitored amperometrically using an EmStat3+ Blue potentiostat at a constant applied potential of 0.35 V (vs. Ag). Signals were recorded as current vs. time profiles. Unless indicated otherwise, the peak height from individual injections was used to compare electrode performances. In all FI experiments, three injections were performed for each glucose solution measurement.

2.3. Preparation of the GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO-Modified Electrode

The GO suspension was diluted in DI water to attain a concentration of 1 mg mL−1. The GO suspension was sonicated for 90 min before being used for electrode modification. The GO/SPE was prepared by drop-casting 5 µL of the GO suspension on each SPE electrode. The electrodes were left to dry at room temperature prior to further modification.
The solutions used to further modify the electrodes were prepared to have the following concentrations: GDH 10 mg mL−1, LPEI-Fc (12 mg mL−1), and EGDE (10% (v/v)) in a microcentrifuge tube (5 µg GDH, 30 µg LPEI-Fc, and 0.5 µg EGDE). The mixture of LPEI-Fc, GDH, and EGDE was thoroughly mixed using a vortex for 20 s and drop-casted on the GO/SPE or the SPE. The GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO electrodes thus prepared were allowed to dry at room temperature and stored overnight at 4 °C prior to measurement. Scheme 2 depicts the components used for the biosensor preparation in this work.

2.4. Measurement of Real Samples

The developed system was applied to the analysis of glucose contents in commercial sports drinks (SPONSOR, original, 250 mL, Prachin Buri, Thailand). The beverage samples were diluted by a factor of 20- to 30-fold with 5 mM NAD+ in PBS buffer pH 7.4 before measurement. The glucose concentration was determined by the standard addition method. The obtained values were compared with the results from a commercial glucometer (ACCU-CHEK Active, Roche Diabetes Care GmbH, Mannheim, Germany).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Electrochemical Characterization of the Electrodes with Different Modifications

Our NAD-GDH-modified electrode leverages a redox mediator to regenerate NADH from NAD+ during the measurement. Ferrocene (Fc) is incorporated into the side chain of the backbone of positively charged linear poly(ethylenimine) (LPEI). Fc serves as the redox mediator and facilitates the NADH oxidation process at a reasonably low potential. The electron transfer between the GDH enzyme and electrode surface is enhanced by a mediated electron transfer (MET) mechanism, through collisions of pendant ferrocene groups along the polymer backbone [52]. The electron transfer pathway of the modified electrode is depicted in Figure 1A.
In Figure 1B, the GDH/LPEI-Fc/SPE was investigated in the presence and absence of glucose in an electrolyte containing 5 mM NAD+. In the absence of glucose, the modified electrode showed a reversible redox potential of LPEI-Fc with an E1/2 of 0.20 V, excellent redox reversibility of ferrocene, and good agreement with previous reports [53,54]. Upon glucose addition, there were two oxidation peaks at 0.20 and 0.39 V. The first peak is attributed to the redox polymer, while the second one corresponds to the electrocatalytic oxidation of NADH facilitated by LPEI-Fc.
To improve the current response for NADH oxidation, we incorporated nanocolloidal graphene oxide (GO) onto the carbon surface of the SPE. This addition increases the specific surface area of the electrode, enabling the immobilization of a larger amount of GDH. Moreover, GO possesses oxygenated functional groups on its surface, such as epoxides, phenolic hydroxyl, carboxylic, and carbonyl groups. FT-IR measurements confirmed the availability of oxygen-containing functionalities on GO, as shown in Figure S1. The presence of these groups results in a hydrophilic surface favorable for the enzyme [44]. At neutral pH, GO displays a negatively charged surface [45], leading to a favorable electrostatic interaction between the GO surface and the positively charged LPEI redox polymer. The cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of the GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE are shown in Figure 1C. The oxidation redox peaks exhibited the same potential as those for the GDH/LPEI-Fc/SPE, but the catalytic currents significantly increased. This improvement is associated with the presence of nanocolloidal GO: its hydrophilicity and large surface area may improve enzyme dispersion and immobilization. Therefore, the SPE modified with GO was used for further experiments.

3.2. Surface Morphology of the Electrodes with Different Modifications

We investigated the effect of introducing GO on the surface of the carbon screen-printed electrode. Figure 2A shows that, in the absence of GO, the GDH–polymer film was partially adsorbed on the electrode surface. Notably, when GO was introduced, the GDH–polymer film adsorbed more uniformly and was more dispersed, as shown in Figure 2B. We interpret this as follows: in the absence of GO, the interaction between the film and the electrode surface is unfavorable. When GO is introduced, a more favorable electrostatic interaction between GO and the LPEI backbone is established. At the same time, GO can interact strongly with the carbon electrode surface by π-stacking interactions. The result is that the GDH–polymer film can strongly attach to the surface modified with GO.
An improved distribution of the GDH–polymer facilitates the stable interaction of the GDH enzyme with the polymer surface and the harvest of electrons during glucose oxidation. The results from this study agree well with the electrochemical characterization of the electrode.

3.3. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) Study

EIS is an electrochemical technique that allows for studying the impedance characteristics of electrical systems by applying a sinusoidal voltage perturbation whose frequency is varied over time [44]. The charge transfer resistance (Rct) of the electrodes with different modifications was evaluated by EIS. Measurements were conducted under a KCl electrolyte containing equimolar amounts of the redox couple probes hexacyanoferrate (III)/(II). The Nyquist plots obtained for each modification are shown in Figure 3.
To determine the Rct values for each modification, we modeled our three-electrode system as a Randles circuit (inset). The results are shown in Table 1. The bare carbon SPE showed the largest Rct value. After the incorporation of GO on the SPE surface, the Rct value drastically decreased thanks to the improved electrical conductivity and increased specific surface area conferred by GO [42]. Upon introduction of the LPEI-Fc redox polymer on the GO/SPE, the Rct value decreased further, evidencing an improved electrical conductivity compared to the GO/SPE setup. It is possible that the positively charged backbone of LPEI-Fc interacts favorably with the negatively charged redox couple and facilitates its diffusion to the electrode surface. By contrast, when the GDH enzyme was modified on the LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE, the Rct value slightly increased, which is attributed to the non-conductive protein component increasing the interfacial resistance. The EIS results show that both GO and LPEI-Fc had a positive effect on improving electrical conductivity.

3.4. Optimization of the Modified Electrodes

The effects of varying the load of GO, the GDH enzyme, LPEI-Fc, and EGDE on the sensor performance were studied in a sequential manner for a few levels of each parameter to conduct a heuristic optimization as shown in Figure 4. The current signal was recorded after injecting 40 mM glucose in the FI system at a potential of 0.35 V. We chose this potential to achieve a sufficiently high current. Notice that the applied potential must be more positive than that of the redox polymer to enable the electron transport process. However, very high potentials should be avoided to prevent direct oxidation of NADH, electrode fouling, and secondary oxidation reactions. The optimized component loads for electrode modification are summarized in Table 2.

3.4.1. Effect of GO Loading

The GO loading on the SPE surface was varied from 2.5 to 10 µg by drop-casting. Although some GO on the SPE can increase the electroactive surface area, an excessive amount could block the electrode and decrease the current response. As shown in Figure 4A, upon increasing the GO loading from 2.5 to 5 µg, the current response almost doubled. However, when the GO loading was further increased (>5 µg) the current response decreased. Therefore, we selected a GO load of 5 mg for further optimizations.

3.4.2. Effect of GDH

Next, we optimized the GDH loading on the GO/SPE. While a higher loading of GDH will increase the number of reaction centers on the electrode, GDH is a non-conductive material. Thus, an excessive amount could decrease the current response. Indeed, this is observed in Figure 4B. By increasing GDH from 2 µg to 5 µg, the catalytic current increased, but when the GDH load exceeded 5 µg, the current started to decrease. Therefore, 5 µg of GDH was chosen for further experiments.

3.4.3. Effect of Redox Polymer

An optimum LPEI-Fc amount was investigated by varying the polymer loading from 20 to 40 µg. The results are shown in Figure 4C. An increase in polymer loading from 20 µg to 30 µg led to an improvement in catalytic current. However, a higher loading seemed to hinder substrate diffusion across the polymer film. Thus, a loading of 30 µg LPEI-Fc was selected.

3.4.4. Effect of EGDE Crosslinker

EGDE is a bi-functional crosslinker whose epoxy groups react with amino groups in the polymer backbone and increases the mechanical stability of the GDH–polymer film [55,56]. We varied the amount of EGDE introduced from 0.25 to 2 µg. The results, shown in Figure 4D, reveal that the crosslinker rapidly decreases the catalytic current. While the stability of the film was enhanced via crosslinking, its flexibility decreased, which may impact the rates of electron transfer and substrate diffusion. We compared the stability of the current signal obtained with 0.25 and 0.5 µg EGDE (Figure S2). Although the initial current response with 0.25 µg was higher, the electrode response with 0.5 µg was more stable after several measurements. Therefore, 0.5 µg was selected as the EGDE loading.

3.5. Effect of Flow Rate on Peak Current and Sample Throughput

The effect of the flow rate on the signal from glucose oxidation was investigated by injecting 40 mM glucose solution at various flow rates. As shown in Figure 5B, low flow rates provided a higher signal; however, they also reduced sample throughput. Therefore, we selected 1.0 mL min−1 to have sufficient sensitivity and reasonable sample throughput [47].

3.6. Calibration Graph and Analytical Features

The optimized FI-GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE sensor was used to analyze samples of varying glucose concentrations. The amperogram for standard glucose solutions between 1.0 and 80 mM is depicted in Figure 6A. We observe a sublinear dependence, which may be attributed to saturating reaction kinetics taking place on the electrode (e.g., hyperbolic Michaelis–Menten, see also [57]). Peak height values were obtained upon subtracting the baseline. A linear calibration curve (Figure 6B) was obtained for the concentration range explored as follows: y = 0.07355X + 0.4398 for X ∈ [1.0, 40.0] mM (R2 = 0.986), where y is baseline-subtracted peak height in µA and X is the glucose concentration in mM. The limit of detection (LOD) was estimated from 3Sb/slope was 0.28 mM, where Sb is the standard deviation of blank measurements. Table 3 surveys some electrochemical glucose biosensors based on NAD-GDH in the previous literature. Importantly, the physiological range of glucose concentration is 2.8–22.2 mM [58], which is well covered by the proposed sensor. The quantification range of our sensor also compares well to that of commercial glucometers (0.6–33.3 mM).

3.7. Reproducibility, Repeatability, and Interference Studies

The reproducibility of the optimized design (Table 2) and repeatability of measurements were also examined by recording three replicate injections from five electrodes prepared independently on the same day with a 10 mM glucose solution. This resulted in a relative standard deviation (RSD) across all measurements of 10.7%. For a given electrode, the average repeatability for successive measurements was 5% RSD (Table S1).
The effect of potentially interfering substances on the sensor readout was investigated by adding a 10-fold excess (100 mM) of different sugars, including fructose, sucrose, xylose, and ribose, in the presence of 10 mM glucose as the analyte. The results, summarized in Table S2, show no significant interfering effect from these compounds (<5% deviation).
We also explored the potential impact of ascorbic acid on the measurements (Table S2). In this case, the interference was substantial. This is not surprising since ascorbic acid is capable of oxidation at a low applied potential [65]. This should not be a problem for the measurement of glucose in many beverages or, particularly, in plasma, where the concentration of glucose is more than two orders of magnitude higher than that of ascorbic acid [66,67]. However, it is a potential interferer that must be kept in mind. One workaround for samples with high ascorbate levels could be to use the electrode in potential measurement mode. In this case, instead of applying a voltage to the working electrode, the open circuit potential (OCP) could be measured, which would depend on the enzymatic reaction, and, therefore, the glucose concentration, but not on the non-enzymatic oxidation of ascorbic acid.

3.8. Application of the Proposed System to Real Samples Analysis

The proposed FI-GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE sensor was used to analyze the glucose concentration in a sports drink sample (Table 4). The sample was diluted 25-fold with 5 mM NAD+ in PBS buffer pH 7.4. The sample glucose concentration was quantified using the standard addition method [68]. The results obtained are in excellent agreement with the readout from the commercial glucometer, demonstrating that the sensor design can accurately determine the glucose concentration in a real sample.

4. Conclusions

We demonstrated the fabrication and application of a glucose biosensor based on a composite of graphene oxide and ferrocene-modified linear poly(ethylenimine) (LPEI-Fc) to improve the electron transfer from the glucose oxidation catalyzed by NAD-GDH. The sensor can be prepared in a facile manner by drop-casting on a screen-printed electrode. Thanks to the favorable electrostatic interaction between graphene oxide and LPEI-Fc, which possess opposite charges, the catalytic current extracted from NAD-GDH was significantly enhanced. The sensor was integrated into a simple flow injection system for amperometric sensing at a constant applied potential of 0.35 V. The sensor responded linearly to glucose concentration across a wide concentration range. The sensor exhibits good selectivity towards glucose and no significant interference from other carbohydrates. The sensor also provided good reproducibility and repeatability. The device was applied to analyze a sports drink, and the glucose measurement agreed well with the stated sugar content as well as an independent readout from a commercial glucometer. Given its performance, the electrode design might also be suitable as the bioanode for a biofuel cell-based self-powered sensor.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bios14040161/s1, Figure S1: FT-IR spectra of (a) graphite powder and (b) GO.; Figure S2: Comparison of the electrode current responses to repeated measurements of 40 mM glucose.; Table S1: Amperometric signal values of 10 mM glucose obtained from five independent biosensors for reproducibility and repeatability studies.; Table S2: Effect of potentially interfering substances on the FI-GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE amperometric response to 10 mM glucose.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.P., K.C., S.L. and V.B.; methodology, P.P., P.J., A.K., S.L. and V.B.; validation, P.P., J.M., S.S., K.C., S.L. and V.B.; formal analysis, P.P., S.K. and J.M.; investigation, J.M., S.K., K.C., S.L. and P.P.; resources, P.J., S.S., A.K., K.C., S.L. and P.P.; data curation, J.M., P. J. and P.P.; writing—original draft preparation, P.P., S.L. and V.B.; writing—review and editing, J.M., P.P., V.B., P.J., S.S., S.K., A.K., K.C. and S.L.; visualization, J.M., V.B., S.L. and P.P.; supervision, P.P. and V.B.; project administration, P.P.; funding acquisition, P.P., K.C. and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of this manuscript.

Funding

This work received funding support from (i) the Suranaree University of Technology, Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI), National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF) and (ii) the NSRF via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation (PMU-B) [grant number B13F660067]. This research project was partially supported by the Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund, Contract No. FF-66-P1-020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Kewalee Prompiputtanapon (Center for Scientific and Technological Equipment, Suranaree University of Technology) for technical support during the SEM experiment. Scheme 1 and Scheme 2B, and Figure 1A created with Biorender.com.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study, in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, in the writing of this manuscript, or in the decision to publish these results.

Abbreviations

EGDEethylene glycol diglycidyl ether
FIflow injection
GDHglucose dehydrogenase
GOxglucose oxidase
GOgraphene oxide
NAD+nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (oxidized form)
NADHnicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (reduced form)
FADflavin adenine dinucleotide
PQQpyrroloquinoline quinone
LPEI-Fcferrocene-modified linear poly(ethylenimine)
SPEscreen-printed electrode
PBSphosphate-buffered saline

References

  1. Teymourian, H.; Barfidokht, A.; Wang, J. Electrochemical Glucose Sensors in Diabetes Management: An Updated Review (2010–2020). Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 7671–7709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Das, S.K.; Nayak, K.K.; Krishnaswamy, P.R.; Kumar, V.; Bhat, N. Review—Electrochemistry and Other Emerging Technologies for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices. ECS Sens. Plus 2022, 1, 031601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ray, T.R.; Choi, J.; Bandodkar, A.J.; Krishnan, S.; Gutruf, P.; Tian, L.; Ghaffari, R.; Rogers, J.A. Bio-Integrated Wearable Systems: A Comprehensive Review. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 5461–5533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kim, D.-M.; Kim, M.; Reddy, S.S.; Cho, J.; Cho, C.; Jung, S.; Shim, Y.-B. Electron-Transfer Mediator for a NAD-Glucose Dehydrogenase-Based Glucose Sensor. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 11643–11649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Singh, A.; Sharma, A.; Arya, S. Human Sweat-Based Wearable Glucose Sensor on Cotton Fabric for Real-Time Monitoring. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2022, 13, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Heller, A.; Feldman, B. Electrochemical Glucose Sensors and Their Applications in Diabetes Management. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2482–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bartlett, P.N.; Al-Lolage, F.A. There Is No Evidence to Support Literature Claims of Direct Electron Transfer (DET) for Native Glucose Oxidase (GOx) at Carbon Nanotubes or Graphene. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 819, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bauer, J.A.; Zámocká, M.; Majtán, J.; Bauerová-Hlinková, V. Glucose Oxidase, an Enzyme “Ferrari”: Its Structure, Function, Production and Properties in the Light of Various Industrial and Biotechnological Applications. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Aini, B.N.; Siddiquee, S.; Ampon, K.; Rodrigues, K.F.; Suryani, S. Development of Glucose Biosensor Based on ZnO Nanoparticles Film and Glucose Oxidase-Immobilized Eggshell Membrane. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2015, 4, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Greenfield, P.F.; Kittrell, J.R.; Laurence, R.L. Inactivation of Immobilized Glucose Oxidase by Hydrogen Peroxide. Anal. Biochem. 1975, 65, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ferri, S.; Kojima, K.; Sode, K. Review of Glucose Oxidases and Glucose Dehydrogenases: A Bird’s Eye View of Glucose Sensing Enzymes. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2011, 5, 1068–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Karyakin, A.A. Glucose Biosensors for Clinical and Personal Use. Electrochem. Commun. 2021, 125, 106973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Otero, F.; Mandal, T.; Leech, D.; Magner, E. An Electrochemical NADH Biosensor Based on a Nanoporous Gold Electrode Modified with Diaphorase and an Osmium Polymer. Sens. Actuators Rep. 2022, 4, 100117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Stolarczyk, K.; Rogalski, J.; Bilewicz, R. NAD(P)-Dependent Glucose Dehydrogenase: Applications for Biosensors, Bioelectrodes, and Biofuel Cells. Bioelectrochemistry 2020, 135, 107574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Moiroux, J.; Elving, P.J. Mechanistic Aspects of the Electrochemical Oxidation of Dihydronicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NADH). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 6533–6538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Elving, P.J.; Bresnahan, W.T.; Moiroux, J.; Samec, Z. NAD/NADH as a Model Redox System: Mechanism, Mediation, Modification by the Environment. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1982, 9, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gorton, L.; Domínguez, E. Electrocatalytic Oxidation of NAD(P)H at Mediator-Modified Electrodes. Rev. Mol. Biotechnol. 2002, 82, 371–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bollella, P.; Katz, E. Enzyme-Based Biosensors: Tackling Electron Transfer Issues. Sensors 2020, 20, 3517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Silber, A.; Hampp, N.; Schuhmann, W. Poly(Methylene Blue)-Modified Thick-Film Gold Electrodes for the Electrocatalytic Oxidation of NADH and Their Application in Glucose Biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1996, 11, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pinyou, P.; Blay, V.; Monkrathok, J.; Janphuang, P.; Chansaenpak, K.; Pansalee, J.; Lisnund, S. A Facile Method for Generating Polypyrrole Microcapsules and Their Application in Electrochemical Sensing. Microchim. Acta 2022, 189, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Guven, N.; Apetrei, R.-M.; Camurlu, P. Next Step in 2nd Generation Glucose Biosensors: Ferrocene-Loaded Electrospun Nanofibers. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 128, 112270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ivanova, E.V.; Sergeeva, V.S.; Oni, J.; Kurzawa, C.; Ryabov, A.D.; Schuhmann, W. Evaluation of Redox Mediators for Amperometric Biosensors: Ru-Complex Modified Carbon-Paste/Enzyme Electrodes. Bioelectrochemistry 2003, 60, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Al-Jawadi, E.; Pöller, S.; Haddad, R.; Schuhmann, W. NADH Oxidation Using Modified Electrodes Based on Lactate and Glucose Dehydrogenase Entrapped between an Electrocatalyst Film and Redox Catalyst-Modified Polymers. Microchim. Acta 2012, 177, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ruff, A.; Pinyou, P.; Nolten, M.; Conzuelo, F.; Schuhmann, W. A Self-Powered Ethanol Biosensor. ChemElectroChem 2017, 4, 890–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Takahashi, S.; Anzai, J. Recent Progress in Ferrocene-Modified Thin Films and Nanoparticles for Biosensors. Materials 2013, 6, 5742–5762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Haque, A.-M.J.; Nandhakumar, P.; Yang, H. Specific and Rapid Glucose Detection Using NAD-Dependent Glucose Dehydrogenase, Diaphorase, and Osmium Complex. Electroanalysis 2019, 31, 876–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Martin, A.F.; Nieman, T.A. Chemiluminescence Biosensors Using Tris(2,2′-Bipyridyl)Ruthenium(II) and Dehydrogenases Immobilized in Cation Exchange Polymers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1997, 12, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Meredith, M.T.; Hickey, D.P.; Redemann, J.P.; Schmidtke, D.W.; Glatzhofer, D.T. Effects of Ferrocene Methylation on Ferrocene-Modified Linear Poly(Ethylenimine) Bioanodes. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 92, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hu, M.-L.; Abbasi-Azad, M.; Habibi, B.; Rouhani, F.; Moghanni-Bavil-Olyaei, H.; Liu, K.-G.; Morsali, A. Electrochemical Applications of Ferrocene-Based Coordination Polymers. ChemPlusChem 2020, 85, 2397–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Brooks, S.L.; Ashby, R.E.; Turner, A.P.F.; Calder, M.R.; Clarke, D.J. Development of an On-Line Glucose Sensor for Fermentation Monitoring. Biosensors 1987, 3, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dong, S.; Wang, B.; Liu, B. Amperometric Glucose Sensor with Ferrocene as an Electron Transfer Mediator. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1992, 7, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ghica, M.E.; Brett, C.M.A. Development of a Carbon Film Electrode Ferrocene-Mediated Glucose Biosensor. Anal. Lett. 2005, 38, 907–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Şenel, M. Construction of Reagentless Glucose Biosensor Based on Ferrocene Conjugated Polypyrrole. Synth. Met. 2011, 161, 1861–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, Y.; Chu, L.; Liu, W.; Jiang, L.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y. The Screening of Metal Ion Inhibitors for Glucose Oxidase Based on the Peroxidase-like Activity of Nano-Fe3O4. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 47309–47315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. DeLuca, J.L.; Hickey, D.P.; Bamper, D.A.; Glatzhofer, D.T.; Johnson, M.B.; Schmidtke, D.W. Layer-by-Layer Assembly of Ferrocene-Modified Linear Polyethylenimine Redox Polymer Films. ChemPhysChem 2013, 14, 2149–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kurth, D.G.; Broeker, G.K.; Kubiak, C.P.; Bein, T. Surface Attachment and Stability of Cross-Linked Poly(Ethylenimine)-Epoxy Networks on Gold. Chem. Mater. 1994, 6, 2143–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Merchant, S.A.; Tran, T.O.; Meredith, M.T.; Cline, T.C.; Glatzhofer, D.T.; Schmidtke, D.W. High-Sensitivity Amperometric Biosensors Based on Ferrocene-Modified Linear Poly(Ethylenimine). Langmuir 2009, 25, 7736–7742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chuang, C.L.; Wang, Y.J.; Lan, H.L. Amperometric Glucose Sensors Based on Ferrocene-Containing B-Polyethylenimine and Immobilized Glucose Oxidase. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 353, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jafari, F.; Salimi, A.; Navaee, A. Electrochemical and Photoelectrochemical Sensing of Dihydronicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide and Glucose Based on Noncovalently Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide-Cadmium Sulfide Quantum Dots/Poly-Nile Blue Nanocomposite. Electroanalysis 2014, 26, 1782–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Barsan, M.M.; Ghica, M.E.; Brett, C.M.A. Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors Based on Redox Polymer/Carbon Nanotube Modified Electrodes: A Review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 881, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Manusha, P.; Yadav, S.; Satija, J.; Senthilkumar, S. Designing Electrochemical NADH Sensor Using Silver Nanoparticles/Phenothiazine Nanohybrid and Investigation on the Shape Dependent Sensing Behavior. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 347, 130649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tığ, G.A. Highly Sensitive Amperometric Biosensor for Determination of NADH and Ethanol Based on Au-Ag Nanoparticles/Poly(L-Cysteine)/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite. Talanta 2017, 175, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Blay, V.; Galian, R.E.; Muresan, L.M.; Pankratov, D.; Pinyou, P.; Zampardi, G. Research Frontiers in Energy-Related Materials and Applications for 2020–2030. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2020, 4, 1900145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Krishnan, S.K.; Singh, E.; Singh, P.; Meyyappan, M.; Nalwa, H.S. A Review on Graphene-Based Nanocomposites for Electrochemical and Fluorescent Biosensors. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 8778–8881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shahriari, S.; Sastry, M.; Panjikar, S.; Raman, R.S. Graphene and Graphene Oxide as a Support for Biomolecules in the Development of Biosensors. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2021, 14, 197–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yuan, B.; Xu, C.; Liu, L.; Shi, Y.; Li, S.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, D. Polyethylenimine-Bridged Graphene Oxide–Gold Film on Glassy Carbon Electrode and Its Electrocatalytic Activity toward Nitrite and Hydrogen Peroxide. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 198, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gosai, A.; Khondakar, K.R.; Ma, X.; Ali, M.A. Application of Functionalized Graphene Oxide Based Biosensors for Health Monitoring: Simple Graphene Derivatives to 3D Printed Platforms. Biosensors 2021, 11, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wu, P.-C.; Chen, H.-H.; Chen, S.-Y.; Wang, W.-L.; Yang, K.-L.; Huang, C.-H.; Kao, H.-F.; Chang, J.-C.; Hsu, C.-L.L.; Wang, J.-Y.; et al. Graphene Oxide Conjugated with Polymers: A Study of Culture Condition to Determine Whether a Bacterial Growth Stimulant or an Antimicrobial Agent? J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Devi, K.S.S.; Prakash, J.; Tsujimura, S. Graphene Oxide-Based Nanomaterials for Electrochemical Bio/Immune Sensing and Its Advancements in Health Care Applications: A Review. Hybrid Adv. 2024, 5, 100123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kaewjua, K.; Nakthong, P.; Chailapakul, O.; Siangproh, W. Flow-Based System: A Highly Efficient Tool Speeds Up Data Production and Improves Analytical Performance. Anal. Sci. 2021, 37, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Hickey, D.P. Ferrocene-Modified Linear Poly(Ethylenimine) for Enzymatic Immobilization and Electron Mediation. In Enzyme Stabilization and Immobilization: Methods and Protocols; Minteer, S.D., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 181–191. ISBN 978-1-4939-6499-4. [Google Scholar]
  52. Jiang, Z.; Shangguan, Y.; Zheng, Q. Ferrocene-Modified Polyelectrolyte Film-Coated Electrode and Its Application in Glucose Detection. Polymers 2019, 11, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Godman, N.P.; DeLuca, J.L.; McCollum, S.R.; Schmidtke, D.W.; Glatzhofer, D.T. Electrochemical Characterization of Layer-By-Layer Assembled Ferrocene-Modified Linear Poly(Ethylenimine)/Enzyme Bioanodes for Glucose Sensor and Biofuel Cell Applications. Langmuir 2016, 32, 3541–3551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Estrada-Osorio, D.V.; Escalona-Villalpando, R.A.; Gutiérrez, A.; Arriaga, L.G.; Ledesma-García, J. Poly-L-Lysine-Modified with Ferrocene to Obtain a Redox Polymer for Mediated Glucose Biosensor Application. Bioelectrochemistry 2022, 146, 108147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Calvo, E.J.; Etchenique, R.; Danilowicz, C.; Diaz, L. Electrical Communication between Electrodes and Enzymes Mediated by Redox Hydrogels. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 4186–4193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Díaz-González, J.M.; Escalona-Villalpando, R.A.; Arriaga, L.G.; Minteer, S.D.; Casanova-Moreno, J.R. Effects of the Cross-Linker on the Performance and Stability of Enzymatic Electrocatalytic Films of Glucose Oxidase and Dimethylferrocene-Modified Linear Poly(Ethyleneimine). Electrochim. Acta 2020, 337, 135782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lopes, J.P.; Cardoso, S.S.S.; Rodrigues, A.E. Bridging the Gap between Graetz’s and Lévêque’s Analyses for Mass/Heat Transfer in a Channel with Uniform Concentration or Flux at the Wall. AIChE J. 2012, 58, 1880–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liakat, S.; Bors, K.A.; Huang, T.-Y.; Michel, A.P.M.; Zanghi, E.; Gmachl, C.F. In Vitro Measurements of Physiological Glucose Concentrations in Biological Fluids Using Mid-Infrared Light. Biomed. Opt. Express 2013, 4, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lei, R.; Wang, X.; Zhu, S.; Li, N. A Novel Electrochemiluminescence Glucose Biosensor Based on Alcohol-Free Mesoporous Molecular Sieve Silica Modified Electrode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 158, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bremle, G.; Persson, B.; Gorton, L. An Amperometric Glucose Electrode Based on Carbon Paste, Chemically Modified with Glucose Dehydrogenase, Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide, and a Phenoxazine Mediator, Coated with a Poly(Ester Sulfonic Acid) Cation Exchanger. Electroanalysis 1991, 3, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hedenmo, M.; Narváez, A.; Domínguez, E.; Katakis, I. Reagentless Amperometric Glucose Dehydrogenase Biosensor Based on Electrocatalytic Oxidation of NADH by Osmium Phenanthrolinedione Mediator. Analyst 1996, 121, 1891–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dilgin, D.G.; Gökçel, H.İ. Photoelectrochemical Glucose Biosensor in Flow Injection Analysis System Based on Glucose Dehydrogenase Immobilized on Poly-Hematoxylin Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 990–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hiratsuka, A.; Fujisawa, K.; Muguruma, H. Amperometric Biosensor Based on Glucose Dehydrogenase and Plasma-Polymerized Thin Films. Anal. Sci. 2008, 24, 483–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chansaenpak, K.; Kamkaew, A.; Lisnund, S.; Prachai, P.; Ratwirunkit, P.; Jingpho, T.; Blay, V.; Pinyou, P. Development of a Sensitive Self-Powered Glucose Biosensor Based on an Enzymatic Biofuel Cell. Biosensors 2021, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kucukkolbasi, S.; Erdogan, Z.O.; Baslak, C.; Sogut, D.; Kus, M. A Highly Sensitive Ascorbic Acid Sensor Based on Graphene Oxide/CdTe Quantum Dots-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Russ. J. Electrochem. 2019, 55, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. McCall, S.J.; Clark, A.B.; Luben, R.N.; Wareham, N.J.; Khaw, K.T.; Myint, P.K. Plasma Vitamin C Levels: Risk Factors for Deficiency and Association with Self-Reported Functional Health in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer-Norfolk. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Slaughter, G.; Kulkarni, T. Detection of Human Plasma Glucose Using a Self-Powered Glucose Biosensor. Energies 2019, 12, 825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gergov, M.; Nenonen, T.; Ojanperä, I.; Ketola, R.A. Compensation of Matrix Effects in a Standard Addition Method for Metformin in Postmortem Blood Using Liquid Chromatography–Electrospray–Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2015, 39, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biosensors 14 00161 sch001
Scheme 1. Flow injection system equipped with a GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO-modified electrode for the amperometric detection of glucose. The operating conditions include the following: applied potential = 0.35 V; carrier solution = 5 mM NAD+ in PBS buffer pH 7.4; and flow rate = 1.0 mL min−1.
Scheme 1. Flow injection system equipped with a GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO-modified electrode for the amperometric detection of glucose. The operating conditions include the following: applied potential = 0.35 V; carrier solution = 5 mM NAD+ in PBS buffer pH 7.4; and flow rate = 1.0 mL min−1.
Biosensors 14 00161 sch001
Biosensors 14 00161 sch002
Scheme 2. (A) Structure of the redox polymer ferrocene-modified linear poly(ethylenimine) (LPEI-Fc). (B) Components used for the GDH biosensor modification on a carbon screen-printed electrode. The modification leverages the electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged GO nanocolloid and the positively charged backbone of LPEI-Fc.
Scheme 2. (A) Structure of the redox polymer ferrocene-modified linear poly(ethylenimine) (LPEI-Fc). (B) Components used for the GDH biosensor modification on a carbon screen-printed electrode. The modification leverages the electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged GO nanocolloid and the positively charged backbone of LPEI-Fc.
Biosensors 14 00161 sch002
Biosensors 14 00161 g001
Figure 1. (A) Electron transfer pathway in the GDH glucose biosensor. The regeneration of NADH is facilitated by redox relays (ferrocene, Fc) in the LPEI-Fc polymer. Cyclic voltammograms of the GDH/LPEI-Fc/SPE (B) and the GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE (C) in the absence (black) and presence (red) of 50 mM glucose in 5 mM NAD+ in PBS buffer pH 7.4. Scan rate = 10 mV/s; air-equilibrated electrolyte.
Figure 1. (A) Electron transfer pathway in the GDH glucose biosensor. The regeneration of NADH is facilitated by redox relays (ferrocene, Fc) in the LPEI-Fc polymer. Cyclic voltammograms of the GDH/LPEI-Fc/SPE (B) and the GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE (C) in the absence (black) and presence (red) of 50 mM glucose in 5 mM NAD+ in PBS buffer pH 7.4. Scan rate = 10 mV/s; air-equilibrated electrolyte.
Biosensors 14 00161 g001
Biosensors 14 00161 g002
Figure 2. FE-SEM images of the SPCEs with different modifications at different magnifications: (A) GDH/LPEI-Fc/SPE and (B) GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE.
Figure 2. FE-SEM images of the SPCEs with different modifications at different magnifications: (A) GDH/LPEI-Fc/SPE and (B) GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE.
Biosensors 14 00161 g002
Biosensors 14 00161 g003
Figure 3. Nyquist plots of the SPE with different modifications and probed with a 5 mM redox couple of Fe(CN)63−/4− in 0.1 M KCl. The inset shows the equivalent Randles circuit used for modeling.
Figure 3. Nyquist plots of the SPE with different modifications and probed with a 5 mM redox couple of Fe(CN)63−/4− in 0.1 M KCl. The inset shows the equivalent Randles circuit used for modeling.
Biosensors 14 00161 g003
Biosensors 14 00161 g004
Figure 4. Effect of different component loadings on the current response to 40 mM glucose measured with the GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE: (A) GO (5 µg GDH, 30 µg LPEI, 0.25 µg EGDE), (B) GDH (5 µg GO, 30 µg LPEI, 0.25 µg EGDE), (C) LPEI-Fc (5 µg GO, 5 µg GDH, 0.25 µg EGDE), and (D) crosslinker EGDE (5 µg GO, 5 µg GDH, 30 µg LPEI-Fc). Amperometric measurements were performed at an applied potential of 0.35 V in 5mM NAD+ in PBS buffer pH 7.4, air-equilibrated electrolyte with the flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1.
Figure 4. Effect of different component loadings on the current response to 40 mM glucose measured with the GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE: (A) GO (5 µg GDH, 30 µg LPEI, 0.25 µg EGDE), (B) GDH (5 µg GO, 30 µg LPEI, 0.25 µg EGDE), (C) LPEI-Fc (5 µg GO, 5 µg GDH, 0.25 µg EGDE), and (D) crosslinker EGDE (5 µg GO, 5 µg GDH, 30 µg LPEI-Fc). Amperometric measurements were performed at an applied potential of 0.35 V in 5mM NAD+ in PBS buffer pH 7.4, air-equilibrated electrolyte with the flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1.
Biosensors 14 00161 g004
Biosensors 14 00161 g005
Figure 5. (A) Amperometric signal from glucose injection at varying flow rates (annotated numbers indicate the flow rate in mL min−1). (B) Effect of the operating flow rate on the current response peak heights and sample throughput. Measurements were conducted with the FIGDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE sensor for a 40 mM glucose in PBS buffer pH 7.4.
Figure 5. (A) Amperometric signal from glucose injection at varying flow rates (annotated numbers indicate the flow rate in mL min−1). (B) Effect of the operating flow rate on the current response peak heights and sample throughput. Measurements were conducted with the FIGDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE sensor for a 40 mM glucose in PBS buffer pH 7.4.
Biosensors 14 00161 g005
Biosensors 14 00161 g006
Figure 6. (A) Signals obtained from glucose at various concentrations (1.0–30 mM) measured with the optimized FI−GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE amperometric setup. (B) Linear calibration curve obtained between the peak height and glucose concentration. The operating conditions were as follows: applied voltage = 0.35 V; electrolyte = 5 mM NAD+ in PBS buffer pH 7.4; and air-equilibrated electrolyte; flow rate = 1.0 mL s−1.
Figure 6. (A) Signals obtained from glucose at various concentrations (1.0–30 mM) measured with the optimized FI−GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE amperometric setup. (B) Linear calibration curve obtained between the peak height and glucose concentration. The operating conditions were as follows: applied voltage = 0.35 V; electrolyte = 5 mM NAD+ in PBS buffer pH 7.4; and air-equilibrated electrolyte; flow rate = 1.0 mL s−1.
Biosensors 14 00161 g006
Table 1. Comparison of the charge transfer resistance (Rct) measurements for different modified electrodes.
Table 1. Comparison of the charge transfer resistance (Rct) measurements for different modified electrodes.
ElectrodeRct (Ω)
Bare SPE1745
GO/SPE191
LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE0.1
GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPE7.9
Table 2. Optimized component loads for electrode modification.
Table 2. Optimized component loads for electrode modification.
ComponentWeight Loaded (µg)
GO5
GDH5
LPEI-Fc30
EGDE0.5
Table 3. Comparison of the proposed FI glucose sensing system’s performance with that of previously reported biosensors based on the NAD-GDH enzyme.
Table 3. Comparison of the proposed FI glucose sensing system’s performance with that of previously reported biosensors based on the NAD-GDH enzyme.
Electrode ModificationDetection
Mode		Eapp (V)Linear RangeDetection LimitRef.
GDH/[Ru(bpy)3]2+-doped in silica sol–gel film/ITOECL/batch1.325–2000 µM0.5 µM[59]
GDH/FePhenTPy/rGO/SPCEAmp/batch0.551.67–24 mM0.67 mM[4]
GDH/Medola blue/poly (ester sulfonic acid)Amp/FI0.100.15–20 mM0.080 mM[60]
GDH/Osphendione/CPEAmp/batch0.150.2–20 mM-[61]
GDH/Poly-HT/PAMAM/GCEAmp/FI0.300.005–1.0 mM1.5 µM[62]
PPF/GDH/PPF/AuAmp/batch0.602.5–26 mM-[63]
GDH/Os(bpy)2Cl2/DI/ITOAmp/batch0.000.1–30 mM0.2 mM[26]
GDH/poly(TB)/ERGO/GCEBFC/batch-0.1–0.7 mM-[64]
GDH/LPEI-Fc/GO/SPEAmp/FI0.351.0–40 mM0.28 mMThis work
ECL = electrochemiluminescence; Amp = amperometry; BFC = biofuel cell; ITO = indium tin oxide; GCE = glassy carbon electrode; Au = gold electrode; CPE = carbon paste electrode; [Ru(bpy)3]2+ = tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) FePhenTyr = 5-[2,5-di (thiophen-2-yl)-1H-pyrrol-1-yl]-1,10-phenanthroline iron(III) chloride; PAMAM = Poly-amidoamine; Osphendione = Os(4,4′-dimethyl, 2,2′-bipyridine)2(1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione); Poly-HT = Poly-Hematoxylin; PPF = plasma-polymerized thin film, rGO = reduced graphene oxide; ERGO = electrochemically reduced graphene oxide; DI = Diaphorase; Os(bpy)2Cl2 = bis(2,2-bipyridyl)dichloro osmium(II); Poly(TB) = poly-Toluidine blue.
Table 4. Application of the proposed system to a real sample.
Table 4. Application of the proposed system to a real sample.
SampleFI System (g dL−1)Glucometer (g dL−1)Label (g dL−1)
Sports drink1.69 ± 0.031.68 ± 0.471.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Monkrathok, J.; Janphuang, P.; Suphachiaraphan, S.; Kampaengsri, S.; Kamkaew, A.; Chansaenpak, K.; Lisnund, S.; Blay, V.; Pinyou, P. Enhancing Glucose Biosensing with Graphene Oxide and Ferrocene-Modified Linear Poly(ethylenimine). Biosensors 2024, 14, 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14040161

AMA Style

Monkrathok J, Janphuang P, Suphachiaraphan S, Kampaengsri S, Kamkaew A, Chansaenpak K, Lisnund S, Blay V, Pinyou P. Enhancing Glucose Biosensing with Graphene Oxide and Ferrocene-Modified Linear Poly(ethylenimine). Biosensors. 2024; 14(4):161. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14040161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Monkrathok, Jirawan, Pattanaphong Janphuang, Somphong Suphachiaraphan, Sastiya Kampaengsri, Anyanee Kamkaew, Kantapat Chansaenpak, Sireerat Lisnund, Vincent Blay, and Piyanut Pinyou. 2024. "Enhancing Glucose Biosensing with Graphene Oxide and Ferrocene-Modified Linear Poly(ethylenimine)" Biosensors 14, no. 4: 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14040161

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop