Next Article in Journal
Microfluidic Bio-Sensors and Their Applications
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Approach to Monitor the Concentration of Phosphate Buffers in the Range of 1 M to 0.1 M Using a Silicon-Based Impedance Sensor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biosensing Platform for the Detection of Biomarkers for ALI/ARDS in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid of LPS Mice Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Recent Progress in Biosensors Based on Biorecognition Molecules

School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
Biosensors 2023, 13(9), 842; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13090842
Submission received: 21 August 2023 / Accepted: 23 August 2023 / Published: 24 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioassays and Biosensors for Rapid Detection and Analysis)
Biosensors are considered a popular technology to rapidly detect targets, and are generally composed of biorecognition molecules that specifically capture analytes and signal elements. In terms of methodology, measurements are carried out in a limited time without sophisticated sample pre-treatments, implying obvious advantages over traditional instrument methods for rapid analysis [1].
Considering that biosensors are widely applied in environmental pollutant monitoring, detecting hazardous substances in foods and disease diagnosis [2,3,4], their advances and future trends should be highlighted, so we have organized this Special Issue entitled “Bioassays and Biosensors for Rapid Detection and Analysis”. Among the 10 papers published, 6 are articles, 3 are communications and 1 is a review.
Huang et al. believe that electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) is a powerful tool for sensitive and accurate detection of biological analytes and summarize the recent advances in this field. Moreover, some future trends and challenges of ECL biosensors are also discussed. They believe that after integration with low-cost photodetectors, ECL biosensors will have great potential in commercial applications [5]. Meanwhile, several works focus on contaminant determination in food and environments, like sulfadiazine (SDZ) [6], deoxynivalenol (DON) [7] and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) [8]. With regard to the detection systems, antibodies or aptamers were used to recognize the targets, which contributed to good selectivity. In addition, some novel strategies for signal amplification were employed to improve their analytical performance [8]. At the same time, sensitive biosensors were fabricated for the rapid detection of the biomarkers related to some diseases, which could be achieved easily [9,10].
Most studies focus on the sensitivity improvement of biosensors through introducing new functional materials or simplifying the measurement procedure, which are definitely important. However, more attention should be paid to real applications, increasing tolerances against various matrices that potentially influence the performance of biosensors. Interestingly, in this Special Issue, two papers are related to commercial products using bioassays or biosensors [11,12]. In short, biosensors will be widely used in various fields after some problems have been overcome, including achieving satisfactory sensitivity and accuracy and maintaining enzyme activity in varied harsh environments.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Z.; Zeng, K.; Liu, J. Immunochemical detection of emerging organic contaminants in environmental waters. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2017, 87, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pilolli, R.; Monaci, L.; Visconti, A. Advances in biosensor development based on integrating nanotechnology and applied to food-allergen management. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2013, 47, 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Iwanaga, M.; Tangkawsakul, W. Two-Way Detection of COVID-19 Spike Protein and Antibody Using All-Dielectric Metasurface Fluorescence Sensors. Biosensors 2022, 12, 981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Niehues, J.; McElroy, C.; Croon, A.; Pietschmann, J.; Frettlöh, M.; Schröper, F. Bacterial Lighthouses— Real-Time Detection of Yersinia enterocolitica by Quorum Sensing. Biosensors 2021, 11, 517. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Huang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Zeng, Y.; Li, L.; Guo, L. Strategies for Enhancing the Sensitivity of Electrochemiluminescence Biosensors. Biosensors 2022, 12, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zheng, X.; Yang, L.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, L.; Le, T. Development and Validation of Aptasensor Based on MnO2 for the Detection of Sulfadiazine Residues. Biosensors 2023, 13, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zeng, K.; Yang, J.; Su, H.; Yang, S.; Gu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, H. Enhanced Competitive Immunomagnetic Beads Assay Assisted with PAMAM-Gold Nanoparticles Multi-Enzyme Probes for Detection of Deoxynivalenol. Biosensors 2023, 13, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Meng, H.; Yao, N.; Zeng, K.; Zhu, N.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, Z. A Novel Enzyme-Free Ratiometric Fluorescence Immunoassay Based on Silver Nanoparticles for the Detection of Dibutyl Phthalate from Environmental Waters. Biosensors 2022, 12, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Alekhmimi, N.K.; Cialla-May, D.; Ramadan, Q.; Eissa, S.; Popp, J.; Al-Kattan, K.; Zourob, M. Biosensing Platform for the Detection of Biomarkers for ALI/ARDS in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid of LPS Mice Model. Biosensors 2023, 13, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Khan, A.; Di, K.; Khan, H.; He, N.; Li, Z. Rapid Capturing and Chemiluminescent Sensing of Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expressing Extracellular Vesicles. Biosensors 2022, 12, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dobrynin, D.; Polischuk, I.; Pokroy, B. A Comparison Study of the Detection Limit of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid by Various Rapid Antigen Tests. Biosensors 2022, 12, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Johannsen, B.; Baumgartner, D.; Karkossa, L.; Paust, N.; Karpíšek, M.; Bostanci, N.; Zengerle, R.; Mitsakakis, K. ImmunoDisk—A Fully Automated Bead-Based Immunoassay Cartridge with All Reagents Pre-Stored. Biosensors 2022, 12, 413. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z. Recent Progress in Biosensors Based on Biorecognition Molecules. Biosensors 2023, 13, 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13090842

AMA Style

Zhang Z. Recent Progress in Biosensors Based on Biorecognition Molecules. Biosensors. 2023; 13(9):842. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13090842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Zhen. 2023. "Recent Progress in Biosensors Based on Biorecognition Molecules" Biosensors 13, no. 9: 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13090842

APA Style

Zhang, Z. (2023). Recent Progress in Biosensors Based on Biorecognition Molecules. Biosensors, 13(9), 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13090842

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop