Next Article in Journal
Advance Nanomaterials for Biosensors
Next Article in Special Issue
Label-Free miRNA-21 Analysis Based on Strand Displacement and Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase-Assisted Amplification Strategy
Previous Article in Journal
3D Concentric Electrodes-Based Alternating Current Electrohydrodynamics: Design, Simulation, Fabrication, and Potential Applications for Bioassays
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables

1
Institute of Electronics and Photonics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Slovak University of Technology, Ilkovicova 3, 81219 Bratislava, Slovakia
2
Institute of Medical Physics, Biophysics, Informatics and Telemedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Sasinkova 2, 81272 Bratislava, Slovakia
3
Department of Simulation and Virtual Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Sasinkova 4, 81272 Bratislava, Slovakia
4
Department of Genetics, Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy Sciences, Dubravska Cesta 9, 84505 Bratislava, Slovakia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2022, 12(4), 217; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040217
Submission received: 16 March 2022 / Revised: 31 March 2022 / Accepted: 4 April 2022 / Published: 6 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Optical Sensing Techniques for Applications in Biomedicine)

Abstract

:
Optical sensors play an increasingly important role in the development of medical diagnostic devices. They can be very widely used to measure the physiology of the human body. Optical methods include PPG, radiation, biochemical, and optical fiber sensors. Optical sensors offer excellent metrological properties, immunity to electromagnetic interference, electrical safety, simple miniaturization, the ability to capture volumes of nanometers, and non-invasive examination. In addition, they are cheap and resistant to water and corrosion. The use of optical sensors can bring better methods of continuous diagnostics in the comfort of the home and the development of telemedicine in the 21st century. This article offers a large overview of optical wearable methods and their modern use with an insight into the future years of technology in this field.

1. Introduction

The development of mankind reflects the efforts of doctors, scientists, and others to maintain and strengthen health, to implement social measures and prevent disease. New and improving diagnostic methods for real-time and long-term health monitoring are constantly being established. Early accurate diagnosis is the key to maintaining a high quality of life [1,2]. Older methodologies based on invasive sampling with the use of heavy equipment are nowadays being transformed into simple scanning methods that do not require demanding manipulation and also make people feel more comfortable [3]. With the advancement of technology, miniaturization, the development of advanced materials, and the advent of the internet, wearable electronics are gaining prominence [2]. As the healthcare regime moves more toward personalized medicine, the wearable medical market is projected to grow by around 26.4% worldwide to $195.57 milliards between 2020 and 2027 [4]. The arrival of intelligent and wirelessly connected wearable monitoring devices brings a revolution in healthcare. The trend began with simple fitness straps and developed rapidly in the form of variable advanced health accessories such as watches, smart clothing, glasses, contact lenses, rings, and various body extensions and inserts [5,6]. These devices can closely monitor life functions, human health, and report long-term a change in the patient’s health indicators. Ideal wearable sensors must be non-invasive, compact, easily portable, easy to manufacture, and low cost [7,8,9]. However, human health monitoring with wearable electronics has its pitfalls, and the sensory principles often differ significantly from conventional laboratory measurements. There are hundreds of these sensory principles and they have been described in many publications [8,9,10], but on many occasions they do not consider their use in real life. In our article, we decided to focus more deeply only on a narrow group of promising sensors, specifically those that use optical phenomena for detection. We deal with basic physiological parameters and quantities measurable using optical wearable electronics, and their relationship to human health. In the following chapters, we describe the types of optical sensors and the latest selected and most promising trends.

1.1. Advantages of Optical Measurement

Optical sensors are, in principle, detectors that capture the physical amount of light or its variations. In our article, we focus on optical sensors that enable continuous and highly sensitive measurement of parameters about our health and the environment for medical diagnostics and physiological health assessment [11]. Such progressive sensors are manufactured applying fundamental optical technologies such as photoplethysmography (PPG), optical fibers with Bragg gratings (FBG), interferometers often woven in smart textiles, various radiation sensors, plasmonic and fluorometric sensors, and colorimetry, as well as the development of prospective new materials and organic components (Figure 1).
Optical sensors are currently gaining great recognition and are becoming an increasing alternative to traditional electrical or mechanical sensors. Overall, they offer unique advantages in recording human health compared to electrical sensors. They propose excellent metrological properties such as low zero and low sensitivity drift, good accuracy, sensitivity, and large usable bandwidth [24]. They are immune to electromagnetic interference, electrically safe, can achieve outstanding miniaturization, and they are capable of capturing nanoscale volumes, allowing the non-invasive examination of biological matter with relatively large penetration depths. Sensing elements, whether in the form of optical fibers or optically transparent encapsulated photoplethysmographic and biochemical sensors, are often inexpensive, water- and corrosion-resistant [25]. As microelectronic technologies are driven by requirements for wearable devices towards higher sensitivity, faster response, better robustness, and higher integration, they may ultimately reach their limits, which are inherent in the very nature of low-frequency electromagnetic fields [26,27,28,29,30,31]. The response time is limited by parasitic effects and in high-density electronic circuits by signal crosstalk. These limitations can be avoided by using photons as a signal carrier [32]. In many cases, the optical sensors do not even have to be in direct contact with the human body or do not require a high quality of contact. Other significant advantages include the possibility of implementing distributed sensors, which allow quantities not only to be read but also to be transmitted directly. Due to these features, optical sensors become a great and advanced solution for monitoring physiological parameters with wearable devices and for medicine in general. Today, about 15% of the market for wearable devices is based on optical sensors and this number is constantly growing [24]. Another not negligible benefit is the great progress of flexible technologies in the field of optical sensors, thus the newly discovered highly flexible and soft optical sensors are expected to provide a reliable and safe alternative for the next generation of intelligent wearable medical devices. Organic semiconductor devices have many attractive properties. These include simple production on flexible substrates, the possibility of miniaturization, the simultaneous ability to generate and detect an optical signal, and tunable light emission in a wide range of values [33,34,35]. The potential of optical sensors in medicine has even begun to be explored. They serve in this field not only as sensors but also as manipulators of biological activity, for example, biosensors such as lab-on-chip spectrometers [36,37], plasmonic spectrometers [38], and flexible e-skin [39,40,41].

1.2. Health and Optical Wearables

Optical sensors in medicine have a broad spectrum of capabilities. They can be used to increase the intelligence of medical equipment, implants, and to monitor human physiology remotely even without direct contact with the patient. Monitoring the processes in the human body allows easier detection of vital signs such as heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), blood pressure, etc., allowing early rapid diagnosis and prevention to be performed, and generally helping people to monitor their physiological parameters and inform the doctor in case of change.
HR measurement is a common method for determining the physical activity and condition of the body. It can predict cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a very reliable and easily accessible way. HR reflects the overall activity of the autonomic nervous system and provides a suitable indicator of a person’s condition and mood. HR variability (HRV) is derived from HR and is a time variance between heartbeats. It is a good sign of physical fitness. When the HRV is high, the nervous system is balanced, and the body can adapt to the environment and function well. Low HRV indicates that the body is working hard, it is tired, dehydrated, stressed, or sick [42,43]. As the HR arises as a wave in the blood vessel walls caused by tensioning and accelerating blood flow, it then spreads from there through other arteries throughout the body. These changes can be easily and reliably detected by optical sensors, mostly PPG or optical fiber.
Respiration monitoring is also a crucial physiologic parameter in inpatient examination. Breathing, along with pulse, blood pressure, and body temperature, is one of the vital signs. Healthy, normal breathing is regular, evenly deep, soundless, and odorless. The respiratory impulse increases with decreasing oxygen content, increasing carbon dioxide content, and decreasing pH. Deviations may indicate certain diseases, such as anxiety and potential hypoxia. Respiratory disorders occur not only in respiratory diseases but also in cardiovascular diseases and metabolic disorders. RR monitoring is important in detecting symptoms of sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, or children’s pulmonary diseases [44]. RR can be measured using various devices and physiological principles such as spirometry, capnometry, impedance pneumography, acceleration sensors, etc. Today, a very progressive method is the algorithms’ extraction from the captured photoplethysmography signal.
Blood pressure (BP) demonstrates the pressure exerted by the blood on the arterial wall, which provides information on blood flow during heart contraction (systole) and relaxation (diastole), and may also indicate cellular oxygen supply. Its value is affected by cardiac output, blood viscosity, vascular elasticity, and resistance. Hypertension is a modern epidemic and is the most important risk factor for cardiovascular disease, leading to an increase in overall mortality. BP is traditionally measured using inflatable pressure cuffs, but this is completely impractical in wearable electronics. Thus, great efforts are made to measure BP based on the pulse wave transition time (PTT), whether from the shape of the PPG curve or the time shift between ECG and PPG in the periphery [44].
Body temperature (BT) is essential for maintaining all vital functions and metabolic processes. In humans, BT is usually constant, but various external and internal influences, especially inflammation, can affect it. From a medical point of view, the measurement of BT is very important, because many diseases are accompanied by characteristic changes. Different values of the temperature control center are related to the immune response of the organism defending itself against the progression of the disease. BT is divided into body core and peripheral temperature, where the peripheral temperature is more variable. The temperature is affected by blood circulation, HR, stress, metabolism, and external microclimatic factors [44]. Among the innovative methods of measuring BT is the use of radiation sensors or optical fibers.
Human fluids also offer an important source of information about the human body. Non-invasive and continuous measurement of biomarkers such as sodium, chlorine, potassium, lactate, calcium, glucose, ammonia, ethanol, urea, cortisol, and various neuropeptides and cytokinesis is possible from sweat or saliva. For example, excessive drinking leads to hyponatremia (low serum sodium) and conversely, hypohydration leads to a higher risk of disease (e.g., dementia) and body failure (e.g., sunburn). Proper hydration is important and therefore measurements and warnings of non-compliance can help prevent the associated problems [45]. Lack of drinking can be easily detected from urine or blood, but collection cannot be performed while moving, but this measurement problem can be solved with the help of optical sensors together with a set of sensors that allow to measure the indirect method of hydration [46]. Various biochemical optical sensors are most useful in this area.
The incidence of diabetes mellitus is growing to epidemic proportions in today’s developed world. Continuous monitoring of blood glucose levels is important for people with this disease. In this case, the sensors offer a non-invasive method of continuous measurement, unlike current glucometers, which require blood collection from a finger. The accuracy of home glucometers also varies ±15%. The development of optic sensors today focuses on the rapid, continuous and simple determination of glucose in surrounding body fluids, for example, the use of a photonic crystal that responds to glucose levels has been described, the sensor bends light, and the diffracted band shifts as the glucose concentration changes [47].
In today’s modern age, the total physical activity of the population is falling below the recommended levels, so the incidence of population-related diseases such as obesity and diabetes is increasing. Monitoring of childhood obesity is known, where accelerometers offer objective measurement of normal activity independently of self-report [48,49], or the monitoring of seniors in in-home care, where the system records their activities, events, and potentially important health symptoms [50,51]. Nowadays, sensors based on optical sensors are coming to the forefront that help to better monitor patients, which helps to improve the quality of life.

2. Photoplethysmography

In healthcare, one of the most widely used optical imaging methods is photoplethysmography (PPG) (Table 1), which is used to monitor blood flow in real-time. It is used to determine the physiological parameters such as oxygen saturation, blood pressure, cardiac output, respiration but also to evaluate autonomic function, depth of anesthesia, as well as detection of peripheral vascular disease [52]. In essence, this method can measure changes in volume throughout the body. It measures the amount of light that is absorbed or reflected by blood vessels in living tissue. As blood flows, a cardiovascular pulse wave emanates from the heart, propagating through the body and periodically dilating the arteries and arterioles in the subcutaneous tissue. The PPG signal is a mixture of blood flow in the veins and arteries and generally consists of a pulsating and non-pulsating component of the blood volume [53]. The pulsating component is related to changes in arterial blood volume and is synchronous with the heartbeat, while the non-pulsating component is a function of basal blood volume, respiration, sympathetic nervous system activity, and thermoregulation [54]. Light in the spectrum from the visible to the near-infrared (NIR) region can only reach human tissues to a depth of a few millimeters, and its penetration is limited due to the absorption of light by blood, melanin, fat, water, and light scattering. The actual interaction of light with the tissue depends not only on the composition of the tissue but also on the wavelength. These differences allow the detection of different information from the PPG signal. For example, green light is immediately absorbed by the body, so it is only suitable for measuring in places where a lot of blood is in the tissue, but it is less affected by ambient light interference. On the contrary, red light and NIR penetrate deeper into the human body and thus provide a wider range of information about the physiological signal [55,56]. This phenomenon is also related to the composition of the skin and evolutionary development, where the epidermis performs a protective function of the underlying soft tissue against harmful UV radiation. Skin pigmentation absorbs shorter wavelengths, UV, and to some degree also visible light. Water in tissues, on the contrary, absorbs in areas with long wavelengths. In the literature is also mentioned an “optical window” for wavelengths of 600 to 1300 nm [57,58,59].
The PPG signal can be measured in two geometric configurations. If the light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and the photodiode (PD) are facing each other and the light passes through the tissue, where we measure the non-absorbed light, we speak of the transmission principle. This configuration is most suitable for areas with high capillary density, such as fingers or the earlobe. Red (680 nm) or near-infrared (810 nm) lights are usually used and deep penetration is required [60,61]. Such measurements are more stable, repetitive, and less sensitive to position changes. Transmission PPG configurations increase the perfusion index by 40 dB to 60 dB [45,62]. If the LED and PD are on the same side and use reflection from the internal structures of the skin, we speak of reflective PPG [63,64,65,66,67]. This configuration has a lower signal quality, but it is more suitable for nonstop wearing. Since the maxima of the pulsating component of the reflected light occurs in the range between 510 and 590 nm [68], the green (565 nm) or yellow (590 nm) light is usually used [69].
The PPG measurement can be performed in all parts of the human body, which provides sufficient availability of blood vessels and a sufficient pulsating component, especially when using the reflective method. Very common used areas for the reflective method are around the wrist [3,70], mostly in the form of various smart bracelets and watches, at the forehead [71], areas around the biceps, and the calf muscles or chest [72], often in the form of patches. In medicine, the fingers and ear lobes are very often used, where devices in the form of pliers working on the transmission principle are used. When designing the sensor, we must consider that the skin structure may slightly differ depending on the person and location on the body. Age, gender, and pathological conditions can cause various reflections, scattering, and light absorption [73]. For example, if you try to use a PPG sensor optimized for measurement on the wrist (in a smartwatch) and place it on the chest, you will find that the optical performance is insufficient and the sensor does not reach the required penetration. Some progressive PPG sensors are introduced to the use of organic materials. There is a systematic study of the reflective PPG sensor, where different printed OLEDs (RED and NIR) were utilized and compared, and the organic photodetector geometries, spacing, and barriers to maximize sensor performance. Finally, they also used inverse-variance weighting and template matching algorithms to improve the HR detection from the multichannel PPG signals [74]. A comprehensive review of the most up-to-date wearable PPGs was described by Daniel Ray et al. [45], who focused on multi-wavelength PPG sensing, technology, physiological parameter estimation, motion artifact reduction [75], and recommendations for standardization and overall theoretical details. Tarara et al. [73] described their challenges, and Bent et al. [76] examined the sources of inaccuracy such as different skin types, movement, and signal crossover. PPG technology is very successful but still not ideal. There are still challenges and improvements to be made. PPG is not fully reliable, the limitations are in the measurement’s standardization, the setting up of regularizing ranges of data to correlate with patients, and the evaluation of different treatment actions.

2.1. Heart Pulse Measurement

The skin consists of seven main layers, and each layer exhibits a different thickness, absorption, and scattering coefficients. The layer that determines pulse detection is the sixth layer called the inferior blood net dermis layer. For reliable detection in these skin layers, the used LEDs (respectively, light sources) and photodiodes PDs must ideally operate in the wavelength range of the absorption peaks of blood hemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin, i.e., between 540 and 570 nm [77]. PDs and the LEDs must be optically isolated [78], for example, using a raised mesa, and the whole optical system must be surrounded by optical separation techniques to reduce the impact of ambient light [79]. For a more reliable result, modern chips also include an ambient light sensor. The PPG signal, when recorded in a real environment, often contains movement artifacts and is also affected by the changing pressure of the sensor on the skin [80]. To minimize these artifacts, accelerometric sensors or multiple optical paths using two photodiodes are therefore included in modern PPG chips. The output of the accelerometer and the two PPG signals are then processed using motion compensation algorithms, a Kalman filter, and an adaptive notch filter [81]. HR measuring using PPG is well characterized and works seamlessly; however, we must take into account that the amount of data processing for healthcare applications is large and requires considerable computing power and continuous energy supply [11].
Ishikawa et al. [82] introduced the PPG HR sensor, which overcame motion artifacts, in the form of a wristband that can be worn daily during various activities. A FIR filter was used to cancel arm-related motion artefact, and for finger and wrist-related motion a band-pass filter based on the body tissue HR was used. Finally, pulse noise-free detection signals were obtained using peak detection and autocorrelation methods. This calibration achieved noise-free HR detection [78]. Tison’s group has made progress in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF). They used a PPG sensor and an accelerometer of a commercial smartwatch to obtain HR data and the number of steps. Thanks to the algorithm based on heuristic pretraining and deep neural network training, their device can detect the fibrillation with sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 90.2% [83]. An interesting project was the smart pulse sensing glasses with Bluetooth low energy connectivity designed by Nicholas Constant et al. This device used a PPG sensor located on the nose for unobtrusive and continuous monitoring of HR [84]. Devices using NFC communication represent a very promising version of HR monitors [85]. In this particular case, it can also measure temperature via a thermistor. The sensing device is activated only when a reader-device, such as a smartphone or tablet, is approaching, for example during a call. The reader-devices supply all the necessary energy for measurement via a coil at the edge of the sensing-device. It resembles contactless ATM cards, only instead of sending data about your identity and bank transaction, it performs a quick physiology measurement [86]. Such devices represent an interesting alternative to conventional battery powered devices. Optical sensors for HR detection can be in the form of wide variety of daily wear items that do not interfere with humans and fulfill their diagnostic role.

2.2. Detection of Blood Oxygen and Glucose

Arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) indicates the percentage of the total hemoglobin in the blood that is saturated with oxygen. The SpO2 provides information on lung efficiency and is an important indicator of overall human health. These measurements are similar to those using LEDs and PDs, but the estimation of SpO2 level is based on the different spectral characteristics of hemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin, thus two LEDs are used. Deoxyhemoglobin absorbs red light better than oxyhemoglobin, while oxyhemoglobin absorbs infrared (IR) radiation better. Blood oxygenation is proportional to reflected red light (622–780 nm) and IR (780–2400 nm) [87]. However, some researchers have identified that orange and green lights perform better because of their resistance to motion artifacts [88,89]. A very promising design is the flexible concept (Figure 1a) [12], which incorporates advanced optoelectronic functions for PPG wireless NFC monitoring applications, including SpO2, HR, and HRV. The device works on the reflectance principle and since it is battery-free, it was possible to achieve a miniature, thin, and flexible construction that can be mounted on a thumbnail or ear lobe. In particular, it uses the reflectance principle in conjunction with near-field communication (NFC) capabilities, which allows operation in a thin, miniaturized, flexible device. A similar flexible device was presented by Polat et al. [90], who designed a patch to record HR, SpO2, and respiration. Again, the communication is via NFC, but the photodiode in this case is based on graphene sensitized with semiconducting quantum dots.
Another very important component in the bloodstream indicating health is glucose. The researchers tried to estimate blood glucose levels [91] from green and red light on fingers using machine learning and a random forest regression algorithm. The next approach extracted blood glucose levels by applying four wavelengths of light (green, red, and two IRs) on the wrist using a partial least squares algorithm as the calibration [92]. Both approaches use signal splitting into time frames (29 and 10 s, respectively), and parameterization of time courses also using the Teager–Kaiser energy operator (22 and 24 parameters), and calibration using a reference glucose device. The achieved maximum correlation coefficient of blood glucose determination is 0.91 and 0.86, respectively, which represents a standard prediction error of approximately 6.16 mg/dl.

2.3. Calculation of Respiration

The PPG signal is affected by several vital functions and physiological activities, mainly modulated by the heart and respiration. Hence, these activities can be determined by reverse demodulation. Monitoring cardiorespiratory activities using a PPG signal is a well-established non-invasive technique [44,93]. We can use continuous wavelet transform and autoregressive modeling, or a method proposed by Chon et al., which uses variable-frequency complex demodulation and provides slightly better results [94,95]. Breathing manifests itself in PPG in three ways. Pulse wave amplitudes are affected by the blood vessel flexibility, the variation in pulse shape, and a decrease in intrathoracic pressure that leads to increased venous return during inspiration [96,97]. Therefore, we can extract the RR and amplitude of respiration [98,99,100]. PPG technology is used not only in hospitals in intensive care units, during respiratory diseases, or anesthesia, but today it is very often and successfully implemented in wearable health facilities for the general public [101].

2.4. Blood Pressure Estimation

Many algorithms are known where systolic and diastolic BP are estimated from the shape of the PPG curve [55,102]. It is possible to use progressive neural learning methods [103,104], FFT-based neural networks [105], or Poincare section analysis [106]. The reliability is continuously growing [107,108,109]. Today, devices that determine blood pressure from the delay of the PPG curve from the ECG signal, the so-called pulse transient time (PTT), have come into use [110,111,112,113]. The correlation of PTT with systolic and diastolic blood pressure is high. By involving multiple wavelengths in the determination, we can even increase accuracy. For example, in a study by Liu et al., where instead of using a single wavelength PPG, three wavelengths were used, the accuracy was increased about two times [114].
Great efforts and promising results are also shown in the extraction of BP without an ECG signal from the so-called local PTT, which is determined by the time difference between the different wavelengths of the PPG signal, for example, from the reflectance mode multi-wavelength PPG sensing at three different locations (fingertip, radial artery and dorsal surface of wrist) using 4 different wavelengths (green 525 nm, orange 595 nm, red 650 nm, and IR 870 nm) [115] or even using 15 different reflectance mode wavelengths and the cross-correlation method [87]. The combination of the described methods, PPG shape recognition and PTT delay methods, processed by deep neural networks, appears to be very promising in the future [77,116]. Today, optical blood pressure monitoring is a complete tool that can be built directly into the firmware or subsequent software, allowing it to be possible to continuously measure blood pressure without using a cuff for virtually any type of PPG sensor. In addition, these algorithms are adapted to analyze PPG signals acquired in different parts of the body and with different sensor topologies [117].

2.5. Others

There are also attempts to use PPG signals from wearables for carrier biometric authentication. They assume that the PPG signal is individual for each person and either uses classification algorithms extracting pulse features [118,119], or deep learning frameworks [120,121]. Monitoring absolute cerebral blood flow based on a combination of time-resolved dynamic contrast-enhanced near-infrared spectroscopy and diffuse correlation spectroscopy [122], which uses a configuration similar to multiwavelength (MW) PPG, looks very interesting. In Kooman et al. [123], there are even studies investigating the use of PPG wearables in hemodialysis patients, and Lima et.al. [124] monitored peripheral perfusion. Adhikari et al. [125] developed a multi-wavelength transmission mode PPG method to monitor drug delivery. They examined the concentration of therapeutic gold nanoparticles, quinine, and amphotericin B in mice possessing absorption peaks in the 350–1100 nm range.
A muscle contraction sensor has also been developed to measure signals from intact muscles, which can then be used in robotics and prosthetics [39]. The principle is that the sensor measures the amount of incident light backscattered from the muscles with the intensity of the light varying from whether the muscle is contracted or stretched. The myosin protein in muscle sarcomeres has liquid crystalline properties and is responsible for the anisotropic behavior of muscles [39]. During contraction, the muscle fibers slide along this myosin, and the muscle fiber becomes short and wide, causing anisotropic scattering of incident light. The light that propagates parallel to the muscle fibers is scattered differently to the light traveling perpendicular to the fibers. This anisotropy can be detected utilizing a surface light source and detectors placed longitudinally and perpendicular to the muscle fiber, which represents only a certain modification of the PPG sensor [126,127]. In this research, the authors specifically used a wavelength range from 610 to 700 nm.
Table 1. Photoplethysmography sensors.
Table 1. Photoplethysmography sensors.
Sensor typeApplicationSensing ElementKey ParametersRef.
Wrist-worn
reflectance LED
Motion artifact reductionPP: Four x OSRAM SFH7050, Motion Sensor: InvenSense MPU9250Wavelengths 530, 660, 940 nm[75]
Chest reflectance LED PPG sensorHR, BP from PPG and PCGPPG: Osram SFH 7060, PCG 1 NXP Semiconductors MPXV7002Wavelengths 3 × 530, 660, 950 nm[56]
Body-worn reflectance LED PPGSkin and muscle perfusionEight x LED, Three x PD
line/circle configuration
Wavelengths 560, 880 nm[61]
PPG hands and legs measurementPPG and ECG system for cardiovascularSeven PPG probes: STMicroelectronics SiPM detector, Roither LasetTechnick SMC940 LEDWavelength 940 nm[63]
Finger-worn organic pulse meterHROLED 2, OPD 3Wavelength 625 nm, 46 dB SNR, a constant current of 93.6 µA[70]
Wrist-worn watch with LED PPGHR, SpO2PPG: Analog Devices ADPD144RI, Accelerometer: Analog Devices ADXL362Wavelengths 660, 880 nm, Power consumption 30 μW for a 75 dB, 25 Hz output[72]
Wrist-worn printed organic HR, SpO2OLED 2, OPD 3
multichannel PPG
Wavelengths: Red and IR[74]
PPG probePPG and ECG patternOSRAM LT M673 LEDs, STMicroelectronics SiPM detectorWavelength 529 nm[77]
PPG reflection sensorsHR, SpO2Maxim Integrated MAX86140/MAX86141Wavelengths 530, 560, 570, 590 nm[81]
Ear-worn reflectance LED sensorPPG during hypothermiaExcelitas technologies CR 50 IRH and CR 50 1M LEDs, 10 BP-BH PDWavelengths 658, 870 nm[128]
GlassesHRReflectance PPG on the nose-[84]
Flexible body
attachment
HR, BTReflectance PPG with thermistorNFC, placed on wrist, fingertip, temple, or neck[85]
Flexible body
attachment
HR, SpO2Reflectance PPGWavelengths 625, 950 nm, NFC, placed on thumbnail, or ear lobe[12]
Flexible plasterHR, SpO2, RRReflectance PPGWavelengths 633, 940 nm NFC, graphene PDs[90]
Mobile phone HR, RR, SpO2Motorola Droid phone cameraAdvanced signal processing[93]
Laboratory deviceHR, ECG, SpO2, BPPPG: HKG-07B, ECG: HKD-10C: Pressure HK-2000 (all Hefei Huake Information Technology)Integrated PPG, ECG, and pressure pulse wave for cardiovascular disease[113]
MW 4-PPG padMW 4-PPG spectrometer15 channels MW 4-PPG sensor,
plasmonic filters integrated CMOS imager
Wavelengths 505, 510, 515, 520, 525, 620, 625, 630, 635, 640, 930, 935, 940, 945, 950 nm[87]
Finger-worn reflectance LED MW 4-PPG spectrometerPPG: plasmonic filters integrated onto a regular photodetectorWavelengths 515, 630, 940 nm[87]
Opto-electronic patch sensorMW 4 -PPG
movement
PPG: Four channel board Dialog Devices DISCO4Wavelengths 525, 590, 650, 870 nm[88,89,115]
MW 4-PPG sensorHR, BPFour channels MW 4-PPG sensorWavelengths 470, 570, 590, 940 nm, Sampling frequency 1 kHz[114]
Flexible wearablesHR, RR, SpO2OLED 2, OPD 3, POF 5 for signal transportPD current 0.05–4 μA, Signal frequency 0.05–30 Hz[1,6]
Electrooptical muscle sensorMuscle contractionOne x LEDs Rodan HIRL 8810, 4x PD Siemens BPW34Wavelength 880 nm, 4 PDs around LED[126]
Wearable Organic Optoelectronic Muscle contraction, SpO2OLED 2, PDsWavelengths 610, 700 nm[39]
Sensor for a skin evaluationGlucose levelC8 MediSensorsRaman spectroscopy sensor[7]
Finger-wornGlucose level, HR, SpO2Two x LED, PD, Arduino
transmission and reflectance
Wavelengths 525, 615 nm, 22 features from 29 s frames, Random Forest regression algorithm[91]
Wrist-wornGlucose level, HRFour x LED (OSRAM SFH7060 and Vishay VSMY2853), PD (400–1000 nm)Wavelengths 530, 660, 850, 950 nm, 24 features from 10 s frames, Partial least squares calibration algorithm[92]
1 Phonocardiology; 2 Organic LED; 3 Organic photodiodes; 4 Multi-wavelength; 5 Polymer optical fiber.

3. Radiation Sensors

In this article, we describe three types of radiation sensors (Table 2). The first two, thermometers and thermal cameras, capture the infrared radiation emitted by the human body. The next one, the Daysimeter, in turn records and measures circadian light exposure, it senses the amount of radiation received by the human body.
Nowadays, radiation sensors are popularly used to detect body temperature in association with infectious diseases [129,130]. These sensors can be found in various forms. The cheapest form is a passive infrared (PIR) sensor used in handheld non-contact thermometers [131]. Another type of radiation sensor is a thermal camera. The only difference between a thermal camera and a PIR sensor is that a thermal camera captures multiple points while a PIR sensor senses only one. The basic principle of sensing these sensors use is to measure the intensity of emitted radiation in a limited infrared spectrum [132,133].
Internal body temperature is different from the body temperature of peripherals such as limbs, and the boundary between them is indeterminate and varies with ambient temperature [134]. Core temperature changes are affected by circadian rhythms. In the early morning, the temperature is lower with the greatest increase in the afternoon, which can be up to a 1 °C difference [135,136,137,138,139,140]. Several factors need to be considered when determining internal body temperature by indirectly measuring peripheral temperature [141]. The surface temperature of the skin depends on the vascularity and anatomical location where the measurement is performed [142]. The best places to determine body temperature, the forehead and chest, were resolved experimentally [143]. However, the determination of core body temperature by indirect measurement can be accomplished using several signal processing methods [144,145]. The most used processing method is an artificial neural network, but a Kalman filter can also be used. These methods process data such as temperature at a particular anatomical location, respiration, physical activity, atmospheric temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and infrared radiation intensity for proper evaluation. From these data, the internal core body temperature is evaluated with a high accuracy of ±0.03 °C [129,140,146,147,148,149].
The measurement of the human body temperature, whether it is core body temperature or peripheral temperature, can be divided into two categories, namely continuous measurement and instantaneous measurement. Instantaneous measurement of body temperature is one of the oldest and most common methods of determining a patient’s condition. A single temperature measurement can tell us whether the patient has a fever or hypothermia [150,151,152,153,154]. From continuous measurements of core body temperature, we can determine the circadian cycle of the patient. The circadian cycle is a regularly recurring cycle of core body temperature change dependent on metabolism and physical activity, and when the cycle changes, we can indicate the onset of the patient’s disease and recommend medical examination [134,135,136,139,140]. Another use of continuous measurement of the patient’s core body temperature is to determine the stage of the ongoing disease [155,156].

3.1. Infrared Thermometers

During the COVID-19 pandemic, we became acquainted with non-contact PIR thermometers. At that time, these thermometers became part of our daily routine, and several studies discussed measurement accuracy, proper measurement techniques, or anatomical sites for measuring body temperature [131,132,143,144,148,152].
Commercially available PIR thermometers work with wavelengths from 8 μm to 14 μm, thus the sensor must be adapted to the radiation wavelength of human body temperature [130,157]. This spectral range is almost identical to thermal cameras, where it is in the range of 7.5–14 μm [146]. Due to infrared thermometers’ compactness, these devices can be classified as wearable devices [158]. Innovative body temperature monitors based on PIR sensors include the Youbiquo easy check, which is one of the miniature personal body temperature monitors with built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth [159]. Other innovative thermometers are various SMART bracelets such as Tempwatch [160], which in addition to conventional PPG measurement also allows continuous monitoring of body temperature via a built-in IR thermometer. For unattended body temperature measurement, another research team produced a wall-mounted automatic BT measurement device based on the ARDUINO platform and PIR sensor [161]. Handheld PIR body thermometers such as ARC Instatemp [162], Withings Thermo (Figure 1d) [15], and others [158] which are enriched with wireless communication, have also become among the innovative meters.

3.2. Thermocameras

In addition to non-contact thermometers, thermal imaging cameras have also received admiration. They also began to be mass-used for the rapid detection of people suffering from fever during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recently, several studies describing the measurement methodology with a non-contact thermometer as well as the accuracy of data evaluation from this measurement have been published [142,146,151,153,154]. Instantaneous methods of measuring body temperature also include methods that process temperature scans of the patient’s body surface. The basis of these methods is to detect mainly temperature asymmetries from which a wide range of diseases can be indicated. A breast thermogram is one of the most common additional examinations. From this thermal scan, the doctor may indicate potential breast cancer in case of asymmetric breast temperature [163,164,165,166,167,168]. Other thermographic methods include ocular thermography [169,170,171], diabetic feet detection [172,173,174,175], injury status [176,177,178,179], or even respiratory detection based on a change in temperature around the nose. The accuracy of this method is 97%. Thermography can also be used to localize the site of Frey’s disease [180], to determine the proper function of the thyroid gland [181], the stages and type of cellulitis [182], skin cancer [183], inflammation of the teeth or glands in the oral cavity, or to check the condition of the sympathetic nerve after spinal surgery [184].
One of the most massive innovations is the expansion of an economical solution for thermal cameras connected to conventional smartphones. Basically, cell phones contain a lot of hardware that can be used (screen, processor, memory storage). Therefore, simplified modules with minimized electronics (electronics for thermal imager sensors and communication) have been produced, which are connected via a USB to a mobile phone and thus form one unit capable of thermal imaging. The largest manufacturers of such extensions include FLIR, SEEK, Hti, and others [185,186,187]. Interesting solutions for thermal cameras are also glasses with built-in thermal cameras from Axonim (Figure 1f) [17], or AR02T glasses from Dynacom, which display the thermal image on the glass and thus create a kind of augmented reality [188]. Thermal cameras can also be used for photoplethysmography imaging (PPGI) and infrared thermographic imaging (IRTI), where contactless measurement of a wide range of basic vital parameters is performed. The PPGI method is an extension of the PPG method, so we can use PPG algorithms. From PPGI measurements, the algorithm can determine HR, HRV, RR, respiratory variability (RV), and vasomotion activity. The IRTI method records the temperature distribution of the entire observed object. From the time evolution of temperature changes in the nasal region, it is also possible to determine basic vital parameters such as RR and RV. Both monitoring methods represent unobtrusive data acquisition and the ability to evaluate the spatial association between vital parameters and body area. Hence, these methods allow long-term monitoring or monitoring of effects with special local characteristics [189].

3.3. Daysimeters

Nowadays monitoring of external influences on the patient is also required, which helps us to identify potential causes of changes in the vital parameters. These devices usually record the intensity and also type of the light radiation that hits the person. We can evaluate the exposure of the human body to sunlight or artificial lighting, where changes in hormone production, circadian stimuli, or circadian levels are monitored [190]. Devices that make such evidence measurements are called Daysimeters. The word ‘daysimeter’ refers to the ability of 24-h or daily dosimeter of this device [191]. From a wider range, we selected a few that can be worn, such as the wearable light and UV data logger by Rhudy et al. [192], the chrome fibers textile for monitoring IR, UV index, and environment radiation temperature by Wei et al. [193], the portable “Eco-Mini” device for ambient light color balance by Fletcher et al. [194], the personal light exposures devices by Bierman et al. [191], Higgins et al. [195], Jardim et al. [196], a simple UV sensor by L’Oréal in the form of a pendant (Figure 1e) [16], a worn miniaturized microclimate station by Pigliautile et al. [197], a tattoo-based UV exposure sensor [198] which contains colorimetric photosensitive dyes and can be read by smartphone camera [199].
Table 2. Radiation sensors.
Table 2. Radiation sensors.
Sensor TypeApplicationSensing ElementKey ParametersRef.
IR thermometerBTThermopile array sensorRange 35–43.2 °C, Accuracy ±0.2 °C, Resolution 0.1 °C,
Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
[15]
IR thermometerBTPIR sensorRange 32–42.8 °C, Accuracy ±0.2 °C, Resolution 0.1 °C[200]
IR thermometerBT, screeningPIR sensorWi-Fi, Bluetooth[159]
SmartwatchBTPIR sensorPPG sensor for HR and SpO2[160]
Wall sensorBT, clinical screeningPIR sensor: GY-906 MLX90614Range −70–380 °C,
Accuracy 0.5 °C
[161]
IR spectrometerIR radiation spectrumPrecision FT-IR spectrometer Vertex 80vSpectral range 1.33–16.67 μm[130]
Thermal cameraEmissivity of the human skinThermal camera HY-S280 SATIR (uncooled microbolometer)Resolution 384 × 288,
Spectral range 7–13 μm, Sensitivity 0.08 °C
[133]
Thermal cameraEmissivity of the human skinThermal camera FLIR B200 equipped with focal plane
array microbolometer
Resolution 200 × 150, Spectral range 7.5–13 μm, Accuracy ±2 °C or ±2%, Sensitivity 0.08 °C[146]
Thermal cameraThermal analyses, daily rhythmThermal camera
Fluke TIR-25 Imager
Resolution 160 × 120, 9 fps, Spectral range 7.5–14 µm, Accuracy ± 2 °C or 2%, Sensitivity 0.1 °C[135]
Thermal cameraBT distribution from thermal face mapThermal camera FLIR Systems, T5000 (uncooled microbolometer)Resolution 464 × 348, 30 fps, Accuracy ±2 °C, Sensitivity 0.03 °C, 17 μm pixel pitch[153]
Thermal cameraBT distribution from thermal face mapThermal camera Optotherm42
(uncooled amorphous silicon)
Resolution 640 × 480 pixels, 60 fps, Accuracy ±0.3 °C, Sensitivity 0.04 °C, 17 μm pixel pitch[153]
Smartphone-based thermal cameraThermal
analyses
Smartphone-based thermal camera FLIR ONE Gen 2Resolution 160 × 120, 9 fps, Spectral range −20–300 °C, Accuracy ± 3 °C or 5%, Sensitivity 0.1 °C[184,187]
Smartphone-based thermal cameraThermal
analyses
Smartphone-based thermal camera Hti HT 301Resolution 384 × 288, 25 fps, Spectral range 8–14 µm,
Accuracy ± 3 °C or 3%,
Sensitivity 0.5 °C
[185]
Smartphone- based thermal cameraThermal
analyses
Smartphone-based thermal camera Seek CompactPRO XRResolution 320 × 240, 9 fps,
Spectral range 7.5–14 µm,
Sensitivity 0.07 °C
[186]
Glasses with
thermal camera
IR
thermography
Dynacom AR02T wearable thermal cameraResolution 80 × 60, 9 fps,
Accuracy ±5 °C or 5%
[188]
Glasses with
thermal camera
IR
thermography
Axonim wearable thermal cameraSpectral range 7–14 µm[17]
Hybrid optical imaging PPG and IR thermography,
HR, RR
Pulse oximeter, IR cameraHybrid optical technology for monitoring skin perfusion and temperature behavior[189]
Wearable light data loggerEffects of light on humanAdafruit UV Light Sensor GUVA-S12SD, Adafruit RGB Sensor with IR filter TCS34725UV, RGB[192]
Chromic fibers textileIR, UV, environment thermal radiationDual-responsive Janus chromic fibers, color spectrophotometer CS-820N, FLIR A300Temperature 15–40 °C, UV intensity 0–250 mW/m2[193]
DaysimeterRadiation
exposure
Hamamatsu S1223-01 silicon PDSensitivity 0.13 µA/lux[191]
Optical sensorGlucose and dehydrationLaser, cameraTemporal changes of reflected secondary speckles produced in the wrist illuminated by a laser with a change in the magnetic[46]

4. Optical Fiber Sensors

Optical fibers (Table 3) are widely used in wearable sensors, especially in chest belts, smart clothing, textiles, pillows, mattresses, etc. They are used mostly in the form of conventional sensors or based on interferometric principles such as fiber Bragg grating (FBG). Due to the high applicability of optical fibers for long-term medical measurements, easy production, long-term stability, and high sensitivity, they have found themselves in the sight of several research groups. Optical fibers can function as inconspicuous flexible systems monitoring human vital signs such as respiration, cardiac activity, blood pressure and flow, oxygen saturation, shear stress, mobility, gait, temperature, and electrolyte balance. The most flexible variants are also capable of monitoring the joints of the human body [201,202].
Chest belts were one of the first wearable electronics used in health and sports care. Nowadays classic chest electric sensors are gradually being replaced by more modern ones that use optical fibers. Smart textiles and clothing for medical applications are experiencing a huge increase in popularity due to efforts to increase the mobility of patients who need to constantly monitor their physiological parameters. Smart textiles are one of the major innovative types of wearable devices. The development of flexible sensors is important in this industry to make fabrics comfortable for the wearer [203]. Several research groups have focused their efforts and made significant progress in the development of smart textiles and the implementation of fiber optic technology [201,204,205,206,207]. Smart beds, pillows, and mattresses are used especially in areas where for some reason it is not appropriate to use other electrical devices, such as MRI due to high electromagnetic field intensities, or in hospitals in intensive care units, where the optical fiber serves not only as a sensing unit but also for signal transmission and creates a distributed network. Scientific advances are also gradually beginning to permeate the home environment.

4.1. Optical Fibers

Silica fiber sensors have the advantage of being electrically insulated, resistant to electromagnetic fields, small in size and easy to connect to networks. Hetero-core optical fiber woven together with wool fibers [208] offers a simple and cost-effective system for monitoring HR and RR. Benneth et al. [209] experimented with 400 µm multimode optical fiber (MOF) without coating and obtained a very good combination of sensitivity and SNR. It was the first time that a MOF sensor was used to evaluate pulse wave velocity-time, which is a good prognostic biomarker of arteriosclerosis and systolic blood pressure estimation. Another approach uses a non-core fiber with optimal length as a sensing head, as well as a filter in a ring cavity to construct a type of fiber laser to sensitively detect RR and HR signals from the shifts of lasing wavelength [210]. Nowadays, marked by COVID-19, sensors placed in face masks have also come to the fore. One example is a breathing sensor attached to a thin plastic film in a bending-sensitive oxygen mask distinguishing different types of breathing conditions (Figure 1i) [20]. Silica fibers are often used in the form of micro/nanofibers (MNFs), thus they are capable of guiding light with greater flexibility [211]. By incorporating MNFs into polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) thin layers, it is possible to produce skin-like optical sensors with ultrahigh sensitivity, low detection limit, and fast response for pressure sensing [212]. MNFs are also interesting for optical trapping and biomolecular detection [213].
Because silica-fiber-based sensors have limited sensitivity, comfort, and safety, alternative solutions are sought. An excellent alternative is polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) sensors, also called polymer optical fiber (POF) sensors, which are cheaper, lightweight, more flexible, robust and can measure high strain values without damage. Applications in smart textiles such as HR and RR PDMS sensors with a focus on signal processing and analysis in the frequency domain and the application of various filters in research offers errors below 4 bpm and 2 rpm (respiration per minute) with good accuracy applicable in ballistocardiography in different areas of the human body [214]. In another study, researchers integrated D-shaped cross-section plastic optical fiber into an elastic band [215] to create a respiratory sensing system and focus on reliable recording in different states of motion. Motion artifacts were minimalized by signal processing (wavelet decomposition, FFT, and scalogram methods). In addition, experiments with a novel photonic-based platform—a hybrid plasmonic microfiber knot resonator embedded in a PDMS membrane—were performed and high sensitivity was confirmed when sensing wrist/finger pulse and respiration [216]. The obtained sensitivity was more than one order of magnitude higher, as exhibited by traditional electronic devices or other fiber devices, including Bragg gratings. We can also mention the highly flexible POFs [217] used in the chest belts or POFs fabricated using a 3:2 elastomer/gel combination tested in human biomechanical movement analysis, specifically in the evaluation of skeletal joint angles [218].
Interesting research in a recent period has been completed on the application of POF sensors in smart beds. First, a POF is embedded in mattresses to measure respiration and HR to monitor sleep performance, which was tested on 10 subjects [219]. Its absolute error was less than 1 rpm and 2 bpm. In addition, it can distinguish between four behavioral states related to sleep (on a bed, lying, moving, and leaving bed). This approach can be extended to chairs. Another study is the monitoring of a patient´s vital signs through their bedding using multimode POFs placed under the bed linen [220]. Furthermore, it is a smart cushion based on the SFS (single-mode-few-mode-single-mode) structure [221], where the sensing unit is a sandwich structure consisting of a piece of fiberglass mesh, an SFS structure layer, and a PVC layer and can achieve a maximum error of 1 bpm. Research on the prevention of pressure ulcers in sensitive skin conditions that can detect early changes in skin perfusion, oxygen saturation, HR, blood flow, and pressure on the tissue, and subsequent therapeutic intervention in which POFs are embroidered into a moisture-wicking fabric appears to be very advanced [222]. These devices also withstand disinfection with hospital-type laundry cycles and are of a lower static coefficient of friction than commonly used bedsheets. In another piece of research, a smartphone was integrated with a plastic optical fiber for the diagnosis of respiratory diseases [223]. The flashlight acted as a source, the camera as a photodetector, and the 3D-printed connector performed light coupling. Various matrix structures are sometimes used to increase reliability, such as a 4 × 4 matrix embedded in the mattress [224] which is connected to an Arduino board. The use of fiber optic sensors for in vivo pH measurement is possible using ratiometric sensors based on a hybrid sol-gel pH sensing material deposited on a highly flexible POF tip capable of operating in the physiological pH range with a resolution of 0.0013 pH units. The advantages are excellent sensor-to-sensor reproducibility, long-term stability, and short response time [225].
To increase the sensitivity of optical fiber sensors, they are often pre-bent. The first sensing device is a mat embedded with a macro bending optical fiber sensor [226]. The second and third are microbending fiber optic sensors for perioperative pediatric vital signs monitoring placed under a barrier sheet on the operating table that was tested on 10 subjects [227] and intensity-modulated microbending fiber for non-invasive monitoring of respiration in strong electromagnetic interference environments during MRI [228]. The fourth is the chest belt with a single mode-multimode-single mode (SMS) fiber structure, where six different SMS fiber sensors were tested on six subjects using a short-time Fourier transform and achieved a Pearson Correlation Coefficient with p = 0.88 [229]. Another approach uses a stretchable and ultrathin optical sensor with a self-assembled wavy microfiber (Figure 1h) [19]. It can monitor a pulse on the wrist with a high signal-to-noise ratio or, with the combination of an ECG, BP derived from pulse arrival time.
There is also a great deal of effort in the challenge of achieving large stretchability and high sensitivity. One experiment is assembling plasmonic gold nanoparticles (GNPs) into stretchable elastomer-based optical fibers with a core/cladding structure with a step-index configuration. This configuration can obtain strong localized surface plasmon resonance effects and can produce strain sensors that can measure large strains with a low detection limit, fast responsivity, and high reproducibility [230]. They can be used in clothing or attached to the skin surface and detect signals from weak levels (such as a wrist pulse) to large motions (joint bending and hand gestures). This research can be applied, for example, in the analysis of motor disorders such as Parkinson’s disease. Another interesting method is to coat fiber sensors with graphene and attach them to several joints of the human body so that they can track movements during sports. The obtained data indicated ultrahigh sensitivity, wide sensing range, high reproducibility, and fast response [231].

4.2. Interferometers

Interferometric sensors represent a large class of extremely sensitive optical fiber sensors. They primarily function by sensing the phase change induced by light, which propagates along with the single-mode optical fiber. Fiber Bragg grating, Mach–Zehnder (MZI), and occasionally Fabry–Perot interferometers are mostly used for wearable devices. The MZI fiber-optic sensor is primarily a transmission interferometer that also involves two closely spaced optical fibers, where localization is achieved by introducing an additional length element into the sensing optical fiber. If the input and the output interfaces are on the same side of the structure, the optical fibers form two closely spaced loops and the sensing area becomes a small difference in length between the two loops. The Fabry–Perot fiber-optic sensor involves a single monomode optical fiber with a sensing area defined by a cavity containing two mirror surfaces that are parallel to each other and perpendicular to the axis of the optical fiber. Changing the optical path length between the mirrors leads to a shift in the frequencies of the cavity modes [232].
From the application in smart clothing, single-mode in-fibers MZI can be introduced to detect HR, respiration, and pulse wave velocity in the shirt [233]. The device uses a new implanted scheme of inserting discontinuities in the fiber to break the total internal reflection and scatter/collect light. Thus, it is not necessary to have an initial calibration or MZI, fabricated by a couple of up-tapers, in a common single-mode fiber used in a chest belt [234]. Other articles are focused on applications in smart beds, specifically in thin mats [235,236] using twin-core fiber-based sensors fabricated by sandwiching single-mode fiber attached under a mattress with a sensitivity of 18 nm/m−1 for monitoring of HR and RR. The other research is fiber inserted between two elastic covering layers with a sandwich structure. They applied a three × three coupler-based differentiate and cross-multiplying method [237] to achieve good reproducibility and accuracy with max. errors 2 bpm and 1 rpm in monitoring HR, HR amplitude, RR, and respiration amplitude. The design was tested on 18 subjects, Bland–Altman analysis was applied for detecting body movement, clinical diagnosis of bradycardia, tachycardia, polypnea, and apnea. We were also very interested in the photonic biosensor, developed to acquire multi-bioelectric signals such as ECG, EMG, and EEG [238]. Where the basic sensing technology is based on a Lithium Niobate MZI modulator, which response to the bioelectric signal by modulating the input light intensity. For interconnections only optical fibers are used, and the signal processing is centralized. This solution allows record bioelectric signals from several locations, without compromising the real-time and long-term monitoring.
Applications are also known where Fabry–Perot sensors based on ethyl alpha cyanoacrylate fibers are used to monitor HR [239]. A new technique for the construction of a microscale extrinsic fiber-optic sensor with a confined air cavity and sub-micron geometric resolution—low-coherence interferometry is especially progressive [240]. The confined air cavity is enclosed between a 3 μm thick pressure-sensitive distal diaphragm and a proximal temperature-sensitive plano-convex microlens segment unresponsive to changes in external pressure. It can also simultaneously measure pressure and temperature. A final example is the temperature-sensitive polymer dome at the distal end of a single-mode optical fiber [241] as an intravascular flow sensor, which allowed time-of-flight measurements by upstream thermal labeling of blood and a new optical active fiber sensing technique based on the laser wavelength demodulation, where no core fiber (NCF) with optimal length is selected to function as a sensing head.

4.3. Fiber Bragg Gratings Sensors

FBGs have been one of the most studied optical components in the last decade. They are formed by a periodic modulation of the index of refraction of the fiber core along the longitudinal direction [242]. They are used in various applications for temperature, pressure, liquid level, strain, and refractive index sensing. FBG technology is one of the most admired options due to its simple manufacturing, relatively strong signal reflection, and resistance to optical signal intensity modulation, which is possible due to their spectral coding, as well as excellent multiplexing and self-referencing capabilities allowing addressing of multiple sensors with a single optical cable [243]. FBG sensors are small, portable, yarn compatible, and easy to weave into fabrics, and have become the most promising material for sensing elements in creating intelligent clothing [242,244,245].
The use of Bragg grating sensors in smart textiles is very common. For example, we can use a FBG-based smart textile [246], or a respiration belt with an embedded FBG sensor [18] (Figure 1g) for chest motion analysis. To measure body temperature, we can implant FBG sensors into the fabric by combining large and small pipes, which are combined during manufacture. Thus, they reach a temperature sensitivity of 150 pm/°C, which is almost 15 times higher than in bare FBG. They used a mathematical model of heat transfer and a body temperature weighed model and measured temperature using FBGs distributed to five places [247]. The method for 3D skin temperature mapping based on an improved neural network genetic algorithm-back propagation with an absolute error of 0.11 °C is also interesting [248]. Furthermore, the commercial T-shirts equipped with a single fiber optic housing two FBGs for RR and HR waves’ monitoring, where the FBGs were glued on the textile with silicone rubber were reported [249,250,251]. Jia et al. [252] used an FBG sensor for the radial artery pulse waveform measurement and achieved a sensitivity of 8.236 nm/N.
The logical continuation is a combination of FBGs and PDMS. FBGs encapsulated inside PDMS can work as a multichannel sensor for body temperature, RR, and HR estimation [253], or evaluation of the cardiac functions from carotid HR waveform [254]. In essence, they compared the accuracy of this approach with FBG either glued on the plexiglass pad [255] or manufactured as a stretchable sensor by embedding sinuous-shaped FBG at an off-center position of a stretchable PDMS substrate, which enables measurement of a tensile strain up to 50%. In addition, due to the off-center configuration of the embedded FBG, the designed SFO sensor can also be used to detect bending and torsional deformations with the capability to discriminate directionally. Such sensors could find a wide range of applications in human-machine interfaces, robotics, and health care [256]. Sometimes researchers combined even 12 fiber Bragg grating sensors into one smart textile [257] to perform a detailed thoracic-abdominal motion pattern analysis and achieved good accuracy of the respiratory period (error 0.2 rpm) and tidal volume (error 0.09 L). A very practical design used a FBG sensor embedded in a soft polymer matrix (to optimize adhesion) for control of breathing and HR in the shooting position of archers [258]. They offer a low mean absolute percentage error for RR and HR estimation (≤1.97% and ≤5.74%).
From the application of FBG in smart beds, we can mention a sensor placed under a patient’s body lying supine in an MRI, which was tested on five subjects [259], or the research of various vital parameters such as HR, RR, and pulse oximetry combined with different textile processes such as weaving, knitting, crochet, and stitching with an optical sensor embedded into the textile fabric [260,261]. Another study mentions an alert system for the care of residents in nursing homes [221] where the residents’ HR, RR, temperature, movement, and bed exit are monitored using an optical network with IoT. The results promise HR and RR with a mean error below 1 bpm and can also reveal a sudden onset of high fever and unexpected bed exit during the nights. In the next research, the plate FBG sensor is mounted inside the cushion, which is on the back of the seat and HR monitoring with a maximum error of ±3 bpm and RR with ±1.2 rpm is possible [262].
It is also fascinating to use five FBG sensors simultaneously in different body areas where the breathing pattern was obtained by combining all outputs using a simple algorithm [263]. The approach where FBG is glued to the silicone membrane of a ventilated mask [264] is also interesting, as well as FBG in a face mask for temperature measurement and with a tip coating whose refractive index changes with humidity and thus evaluation of breath to breath changes is available. In vitro, drug level monitoring has also been demonstrated using a long-term grating coated with molecularly imprinted fentanyl-sensitive polymer nanoparticles (detection limit 50 ng/mL) [265].
The application of FBGs in wearables is very wide. An alternative study [266] presents measurement results of multiple vital signals at several pulsating points (temple, finger, ankle, and dorsum pedis). They achieved high accuracy at HR, but disappointing results are calculated when estimating blood pressure. Another multiparametric wearable system based on a double-stranded Bragg grating is monitoring neck movements and breathing activity [267]. The sensing elements were placed on the neck, in the frontal and sagittal planes. The system was tested on five subjects and RR was monitored with percentage errors of ≤6.09% and ≤1.90%, during silent tachypnea breathing. In a different study, Martinek et al. [268] detected RR, HR, and body temperature using the LabVIEW evaluation unit and signal processing using frequency-selective filters. Xiang et al. [269] examined the pressure in a pneumatic compression therapy device. The individual phases of the respiratory pattern in the clinical environment were investigated in another study by Pant et al. [270] and pressure and temperature using diffuse optical broadband link technique based on laser Li-Fi technology were described by Murdas et al. [271]. Blood pressure waveform monitoring and the testing of temperature sensor with absolute percentage error (MAPE) (0.003131%, 0.00216581%, 0.000378%), sensitivity (1 Pm/mmHg 0.5 Pm/mmHg, 18.9 Pm/°C) for diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure and human temperature were performed in an article by Majeed et al. [272]. In a separate study by Massaroni et al. [273], they even analyze the temperature, respiration, and relative humidity of gases in mechanical ventilation to achieve optimal conditions for patients. The probe consists of a needle in which an FBG sensor coated with a hygroscopic material is incorporated. Relative humidity (RH) and so respiration can also be monitored by depositing graphene oxide onto tilted fiber grating [274]. Thus, it offers an ultrafast response within ∼42 ms and a sensitivity of 18.5 pm/%RH and 0.027 dB/%RH in the range of 30∼80% RH by monitoring the wavelength and intensity of the specific cladding mode resonance. The MRI-compatible multi-sensor is advanced and practical [275], which uses graded-index (GRIN) lenses on the tip of the fiber cables and three light sources for imaging pressure, localization, and temperature sensing during assisted surgery. Pressure sensing is performed by applying a released polymer-metal hybrid membrane having a diffraction grating interferometer readout scheme. Temperature sensing is based on the change in absorption and permeability in semiconductors, and localization of the medical device is acquired based on the magneto-optical Kerr phenomenon. The miniature sensor offers a temperature accuracy of ±0.22 °C, a pressure resolution of 1 mmHg, and a localization resolution of 3 mm.
Table 3. Optical fiber sensors.
Table 3. Optical fiber sensors.
Sensor TypeApplicationSensing ElementKey ParametersRef.
TextileHR, RRWoven hetero-core silica OFError 4 bpm, SD of 1% on a full scale of 2.3 dB (0.2 N) [208]
Chest beltHR, RR, BP, PWT400 µm multimode OFLaboratory testing, HRV 2.5%, [209]
Sensing headHR, RRNo-core fiber laserShifts of lasing wavelength [210]
Respiratory maskRRSMS fiber structurePower variations in OF, fast and reliable response, long lifetime[20]
Skin-like wearableMotion, pressureGlass MNF in PDMS layerbending radius 30 μm, fast response for pressure sensing[212]
TextileHR, RRPOF sensorHigh dynamic range and sensitivity, Error 4 bpm and 2 rpm[214]
Chest beltRRD-shaped POF sensorRR under different movement st[215]
Elastic bandHR, RRHybrid plasmonic microfiber knot resonator embedded in PDMS membranePlanar strain 1 ‰, Sensitivity 0.83 kPa−1, Minimum 30 Pa,
Ascending time 20 ms
[216]
Chest beltRRPOF sensor woven in textileError 3 rpm[217]
AttachmentJoin angle detectionPOF sensor (3:2 elastomer/gel)Strain up to 60% (loss of 30 dB)[218]
MattressHR, RR, activityPOF sensorError 2 bpm and 1 rpm[219]
Smart bedHR, RRMultimode POF sensorComparative between analysis methods (FTT vs Hilbert trans.)[220]
CushionRRSFS structure
Fiberglass mesh/SFS/PVC layer
Error 1 bpm,
Enhanced sensitivity
[221]
BedsheetsSkin perfusion, SpO2, HR,
pressure on tissue
POF sensors embroidered into moisture-wicking fabricLow static friction, Withstands disinfection with hospital-type laundry cycles [222]
MattressRR4 × 4 matrix structures of POFs embedded in the mattress, Arduino645 nm and silicon PD,
Resolution 2.2–4.5%/N.
[224]
pH sensorpHRatiometric sensor based on hybrid sol-gel pH sensing material
deposited on a POF tip
Excellent sensor reproducibility, long-term stability, response time 2 min, drift 0.003 pH (22 h)[225]
MattressHR, RRMacrobend small core OFHigh vibration sensitivity,
reliability, and good stability
[227]
Pediatric
vital signs
HR, RRMicrobend fiber optic sensor under barrier sheetMash structure,
monitoring of babies
[226]
Chest beltRRSMS microbend fiber structureSix different SMS fiber sensors were tested on six subjects[229]
Skin-like wearableHR, BPUltrathin optical sensor based on a self-assembled wavy microfiber combined with ECGSensitivity ≈ 257 per unit strain, good repetition (SD 1.7% over 100 cycles)[19]
Human
motion
MotionPlasmonic gold nanoparticles into stretchable elastomer-based OF with a core/cladding structure with step-index configurationStrains 100%, Detection limit ±0.09%, Responsivity < 12 ms, Reproducibility over 6000 cycles[230]
Human
motion
MotionGraphene-coated fiber sensorsHigh sensitivity, Broad sensing range, High reproducibility[231]
Vital
parameters
BP, BT, RR, HRFBG twin Fabry–Perot
interferometer
Mean values within ±5 mmHg, SD 1 ±8 mmHg[206]
T-shirtsHR, RR, BPSingle-mode fibers MZI Inserting discontinuities in OF to break total internal reflection and scatter/collect light[233]
Chest beltRRSingle-mode fibers MZI-[234]
MattressHR, RRTwin-core fiber-based sensor
Sandwich single-mode fiber
Sensitivity 18 nm/m−1 [235,236]
Thin padHR, RR, respiration amplitudeMZI inserted between two elastic layersErrors 2 bpm and 1 rpm, 3 × 3 coupler based differentiate and cross-multiplying method [237]
Wearable photonicEMG, ECG, EEGLithium Niobate MZIWavelength 1530–1565 nm, Gain 1 to 4 mV/μV, Sensitivity 20 μV [238]
DeviceHRFabry-Perot interferometerStrain sensitivity 2.57 pm/μN, Good responses to LF vibrations[239]
Probe for
intravascular sensing
BP, BTFiber-optic sensor with a confined air cavity and sub-micron geometric resolution Resolution 0.11 mmHg
(760 to 1060 mmHg)
Resolution 0.036 °C (34 to 50 °C)
[240,241]
Smart textileHR, RRFBG sensorThree volunteers, three locations[246]
Chest beltRRFBG sensorTested wavelengths 525, 660, 850, 1310, 1550 nm[18]
Intelligent clothingBTFBG sensorSensitivity 0.15 nm/°C
(33–42 °C), 15x of the bare FBG
[247]
Temperature mappingSkin temperature 3D mappingFBG temperature sensors, light source, circulator, fiber couplerAbsolute error 0.11 °C[248]
T-shirtHR, RRThree FBGs glued on the textile with silicone rubberHighly stretchable
and compressible
[249]
TextileRRTwo FBGsSleep apnea, RR during sport[250]
T-shirtHR, RRFBGsSensitivity 0.35 nm⋅L1, RR accuracy 0.045 s, Error 2.7 bpm[242]
Radial artery sensorBP,
pulse waveform
FBG sensor, interrogator, light source, circulatorSensitivity 8.236 nm/N[252,254]
Multichannel hybrid FOHR, RR, BTTwo FBGs encapsulated inside PDMS-[253]
Skin-like Muscle motionsFBG-based SFO strain sensorMold dimension 2 × 10 × 20 mm[256]
TextileRR
motion pattern
12 FBGs RR error 0.2 rpm,
RV error 0.09 l
[257]
Smart bedECG, HR, BP, PPG, BT, Inspired O2FBG in fabricMonitoring patient under magnetic resonance imaging[261]
Smart bedHR, RR, BT, motionFBGs in bedAlert system for residents, Optical network, Error 1 bpm[193]
CushionHR, RRFBG mounted inside cushionThe error of ±3 bpm and ±1.2 rpm [262]
Respiratory maskRRFBG bonded over a respiratory maskRemote and continuous RR monitoring[264]
Multi-parametricRR, neck movementTwo custom flexible sensors based on FBG technology-[267,268]
Nasal flowRRFBGs, cantileversNasal airflow into a cantilever [269]
Wrist-worn deviceBT, BPFBGSensitivity 1 pm/mmHg, 0.5 pm/mmHg, 18.9 pm/°C[272]
Breath
humidity monitor
RR
relative humidity
Needle, which houses graphene oxide deposited FBG sensor Response ∼42 m, Sensitivities 18.5 pm/%RH, 0.027 dB/%RH (30∼80%RH)[274]
Multi-sensor platformBT, pressure,
localization
Lenses at the tip of OF
three light sources: 637, 780, 875 nm
BT precision ±0.22 °C, pressure 1 mmHg, localization 3 mm[275]

5. Biochemical Analysis Methods: Colorimetry, Fluorescence, Luminescence

The optical analysis is also represented in biochemistry (Table 4). In the field of wearable electronics the analyses of sweat, saliva, and tears are mainly performed and in addition to recording their amount, the pH, lactate, glucose, Na+, Cl, Ca2+, Zn2+, and other chemical elements are detected [276]. Compared to amperometric devices, colorimetric, fluorescence and luminescence sensors have the advantages of simple structure, low cost, and portable design usually without power operation. The technical design of the sensing part is not a challenge, they often suffice with a simple mobile camera. However, the challenge is the preparation of chemical detergents that indicate the presence of the analytes by changing their optical properties [74,277,278]. For reducing samples and solvents, microfluidics technology has become prominent in wearable intelligent sensor platforms [279,280,281]. All wearable biochemical sensors have some limitations, such as frequent calibration, readout drift due to biofouling, and biweekly sensor replacement [11]. An interesting project for the future is also the research and development of paper modified with nanomaterials, which offers unique physical and chemical properties which then leads to improved quality of paper-based equipment, low cost, biocompatible surface, easy paper disposal (environmental friendliness), flexibility, and low weight. Its use in biosensors looks promising due to the increased separation of analytes, better color contrast, and anchoring of biomolecules [282].
Another area of research that is useful for the future is meta-surfaces with the potential for their development for optical sensors and device. Meta-surfaces can be either structured or unstructured with subwavelength-scaled patterns in the horizontal dimensions. They allow several applications such as achieving strong colorimetry and enhancing fluorescence. Plasmonic meta-surfaces can be prepared by color printing using laser post-writing with sub-diffraction-limit resolution. Nanoimprinted meta-surfaces consist of a 20 nm aluminum film buried in a thin-film polymer that is flexible, economical, and recyclable [283]. Radiation from the red color spectrum is most commonly used in medicine and medical applications. The meta-surface represented by Si nanoantenna array with two quasi–bound-states-in-the-continuum (q-BIC) modes can achieve an ideal Schrödinger’s red pixel [284]. Other colors can be achieved by Si meta-surfaces with various geometries and different lattice sizes of different geometric shapes [285,286]. These materials and structures can be used as cost-effective colorimetric chemical detection devices for biochemical analysis methods or can substitute expensive spectrometers [287]. Meta-surfaces as a „structural color” can achieve strong static or dynamic colorimetry. These are tunable by external stimuli, such as mechanical stress, temperature change, electrical voltage, and optical excitation [288]. Various mechanisms are employed to tune the optical system response, essentially a change in scattered size or orientation and a change in the optical properties of the local environment of optical elements, and material phase transitions. This is applicable in sensory medical applications. Meta-surfaces based on the plasmonic mechanism have high optical losses due to absorption in the metal, significantly limiting real-world applications. Via the realization of a novel nanophotonic platform based on dielectric nanostructures to form efficient nanoantennae with ultra-low light-into heat conversion, is demonstrated an approach that overcomes these limitations. Dimer-like silicon-based single nanoantenna produces both high surface enhanced fluorescence and surface enhanced Raman scattering, while generating a negligible temperature increase in their hot spots and surrounding environment at the same time [289,290].

5.1. Colorimetry

Colorimetry refers to the color change of analyte-reactive sensing elements, mostly by measuring the absorbance. Crucial factors of optical specificity and sensitivity are the modified substrates or colorimetric chemical reactions. Wearable devices based on this principle often combine various thin flexible layouts, such as a colorimetric layer, microfluidic construct, and optical analysis modules, which are non-irritating and offer robust interfaces with the human body. The choice of material is important for uniform skin contact, for example, cell metabolism may interfere with the measuredthea. The reaction and irritation of the skin leading to irritating dermatitis can also be a problem. The use of hypoallergenic surgical stainless steel and its alloys can help [11]. Colorimetry is suitable for many photo-medical applications and biomarker detections including electrolytes, small molecules, and proteins. For accurate sensing and self-calibration in different lighting conditions, wearable colorimetric devices often have integrated reference graphic markers [279].
Typical colorimetric optical devices are sweat pH meters. The first presented by Curto et al. [291] is based on a wearable chemical barcode micro-fluidic platform incorporating ionic liquids and can be easily incorporated into clothing, head- or wristband. The second is a textile patch which uses a passive pump to gather sweat and moved it through a pre-defined channel for analysis using optical detectors on the waistband by Morris et al. [292]. A very thoughtful wristband by Escobedo et al. [293] with custom-designed μCAD consisting of a sampling area to collect the sweat, a colorimetric sensing area, a passive pump path, and an absorption pad that allows continuous operation for up to 100 min. The readout module consists of a low-power microcontroller unit with a white LED, a digital color sensor, and a Bluetooth communication module. The fourth is a belt placed on the lumbar region made of cotton fabric treated with an organically modified pH-sensitive silicate (ORMOSIL) together with miniaturized and low-power electronics including a wireless interface [294]. The fifth was a thread/fabric-based microfluidic band by Zhao et al. [295] determining pH and glucose. The sixth nonwoven-textile-based platform is fabricated via a photolithography technique which can measure pH and H2O2 concentration [296]. The seventh is an advanced platform in which optimized chemistries, microfluidic designs, and device layouts enabled accurate assessments of not only total loss of sweat and sweating rate, but also of quantitatively accurate pH values and sweat temperature, and chloride, glucose, and lactate concentrations across physiologically relevant ranges [297]. An interesting step forward is that of Tang et al., who dyed silk fabric with anthocyanin and used it as a pH sensor with great reusability and stability [298] or Promphet et al. with their cotton fabric dyed by a pH-sensitive mixture of methyl orange and bromocresol green, and lactate enzymatic assay [299]. A facile and low-cost strategy is the paper-based wearable system. The one from Xiao et al. [300] can simultaneously monitor sweat, pH, and lactate. The readout is performed by a smartphone-compatible light-shielding box. Another device is skin-interfaced PDMS microfluidic/electronic systems for simultaneous electrochemical, colorimetric, and volumetric analysis of sweat by Bandodkar et al. (Figure 1j) [21] which used photographing the color reactions and NFC communication with smartphones, and can accurately detect the content of glucose, lactate, and pH.
A different wide range of colorimetric wearable devices are contact lenses measuring glucose in tears. Photonic crystals formed by a face-centered cubic arrangement of colloidal particles in a hydrogel are applied for non-invasive glucose sensing [47]. The newer representatives include, for example, where the sensor is built onto commercial contact lenses (Figure 1k) [22]. The sensing part is fabricated on the surface of a glucose-sensitive hydrogel network using a simple stamping method, and the sensor can detect the reflectance of the primary diffractive light. Smartphones can record this light through applications. The next device for glucose determination is presented by Ruan et al. [301]. During the analysis, the diffracted wavelength has a relative linear correlation to glucose concentration as a result of the dielectric periodicity of the polystyrene particles in a crystalline colloidal array. However, in all such measurements, we must take into account that glucose concentration in interstitial fluid is associated with a lag time as compared to blood glucose [11].
From the socio-economic point of view, chronic wounds’ monitoring is also one important part of colorimetry applications. Kassal et al. [302] constructed a wireless smart bandage based on immobilizing cellulosic particles, covalently modified with a pH indicator dye, in a biocompatible hydrogel. The electronics have built-in RFID and are ready for readout by smartphone. Zhu et al. [303] proposed a multifunctional zwitterionic hydrogel for simultaneous monitoring of pH and glucose in diabetic wound treatment. The pH indicator dye and two glucose-sensing enzymes (glucose oxidase and horseradish peroxidase) are encapsulated in the anti-biofouling and biocompatible zwitterionic poly-carboxy betaine hydrogel matrix. To collect the data, a smartphone camera was used. A similar approach was chosen by Wang et al. [304]. They presented a flexible, self-healable, adhesive, and wearable hydrogel patch for on-demand sweat colorimetric detection usable in point-of-care diagnostics and personalized medicine. This wearable hydrogel patch shows excellent reliability and stability for measuring pH (4–9), glucose (0–2 mM), Cl (0–100 mM), and Ca2+ (0–16 mM) in human sweat through integration with smartphones.
Saliva sensors are another area of colorimetry, for example, a biosensor for the determination of urea in saliva working on the principle of immobilization of urease enzyme together with a pH indicator on a strip of filter paper [305]. The readout is obtained by using the smartphone RGB profiling. Vega et al. [306] developed “The Dermal Abyss” for interfacing with the skin by tattooing biosensors. It combines advances in biotechnology with traditional methods in tattoo artistry. In the present work, they replaced traditional inks with colorimetric and fluorescent biosensors that can report on the concentration of sodium, glucose, and pH in the interstitial fluid of the skin. Gao et al. have developed ultrathin photonic devices by combining colorimetric temperature indicators with wireless flexible electronics. The device is based on thermochromic liquid crystals formed from a large pixel array on a thin elastomeric substrate [307]. The read-out is performed by a digital camera, which analyzes color patterns. The original is the approach chosen by Rodin et al. [308], where they incorporated the biosensor into the standard Samsung Gear 2S™ smartwatch. The black glass of the PPG sensor panel contains a compound that changes optical characteristics in presence of various metabolites (such as water, pyruvate, carbonate, lactate, potassium, sodium, ketones) and the result is calculated using a proprietary algorithm from changes in PPG signal. A good overview of soft wearable systems for colorimetric analysis of biofluids was written by Ghaffari et.al [309].

5.2. Fluorescence

The main disadvantage of colorimetry is that colorimetric tests exist only for a relatively narrow range of biomarkers. Fluorescence analysis of biomarkers can therefore serve as a good extension. The sensing method is based on changing the fluorescence intensity of dyes containing optically active molecules in response to a change in the concentration of different analytes. To react with physiological analytes and to identify and detect molecules are usually required fluorescent derivatives containing suitable chemical reactive groups. Fluorescence analysis provides short response times, minimal instrumentation requirements, and overall low cost. This method is predominantly used in laboratories. At present, there are already several wearable optical devices using the fluorescence method for health assessment or detection of biomarker concentration [279].
Sekine et al. [23] developed a wearable fluorometric sensor in the form of a soft, skin-interfaced microfluidic system to detect Na+, Cl, and zinc (Zn2+) from eccrine sweat(Figure 1l). The collected sweat is spontaneously directed to serpentine channels connected to the micro reservoirs pre-filled with the specified ions’ probes, which cause changes in the intensity of the fluorescence excitation. After pairing with the smartphone imaging module, we can monitor sweat biomarkers with an accuracy comparable to conventional laboratory equipment. This system allows for quantitative, rapid analysis that can reveal the exact health status. A fluorescence wearable platform for sweat Cl- analysis is presented also by Xu et al. [310]. The device consists of two fluorescent materials on cotton pieces worn on the skin. In another study, Yang et al. [311] introduces a novel bandage-like wearable detector of nucleic acids. The sensor uses flexible microfluidic recombinase polymerase amplification and offers excellent sensitivity and selectivity with a detection limit of 10 copies/μL. This sensor is likely to be of great significance in the field of online pathogen detection for wounds, tumor biomarker diagnosis, and the detection of epidermal cell molecular lesions. March et al. designed a contact lens for glucose monitoring [312]. Contact lenses are made of liquid hydrogel nanospheres containing tetramethyl-rhodamine isothiocyanate concanavalin and fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran. As the glucose concentration increases, the glucose pushes the dextran out of position, and thus the fluorescent intensity begins to increase. The result is read by the designed hand-held photo-fluorometer and can be very useful in the treatment of diabetes. Further research is a fluorescence-based pH sensor with microfluidic mixing and fiber optic detection for a wide range of pH measurements designed by Moradi et al. [313]. They use a single biocompatible and photostable fluorescence indicator named 8-hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt (HPTS). For the excitation they used 100 mW 445 nm blue laser and emission at wavelength 520 nm was detected using an inexpensive IF-D91 photodiode. The excitation and emission lights are transmitted by multi-mode optical fiber, so they can simply and inexpensively detect pH in a wide range from 2.5 to 9.0. Interesting and useful is also the research by Ryu et al. [36] where they demonstrated a compact, inexpensive, and practical fluorescence detection system for lab-on-a-chip applications, consisting of 501 nm commercially available InGaN LED, an organic or silicon photodiode, absorptive dye-coated color filters, polarizers, and an injected polystyrene microfluidic chip. The system can detect the cardiac markers myoglobin and CK-MB from the human plasma. Another interesting research is the determination of urinary human serum albumin on a disposable diagnostic microchip with integrated fluorescence detection based on thin-film organic LEDs with an emission wavelength of 540 nm [37]. After illumination of the fluorescence assay, a strong emission is generated at 620 nm, so we can linearly detect concentrations in the range of 10 to 100 mg/L. Ozcan’s group [314] has developed a portable smartphone-based device to measure albumin concentration in urine. The increased risks of diabetes, cardiovascular, and autoimmune diseases are related to the Cr3+ disorder, which can be monitored using a portable fluorescence detection system developed by Zhen et al. [315].

5.3. Luminescence

Luminescence refers to the process of absorbing external energy inside an object at the ground state, reaching the excited state, and then releasing the energy through light emission to get back to the ground state. According to the kind of energy absorbed, luminescence can be divided into photoluminescence (PL), electroluminescence (EL), chemiluminescence (CL), and sonoluminescence (SL) [316].
Luminescent optical devices operate on the principle of intensity variations between emitted light and received light which is related to concentration changes of different types of used analyte. Devices that use these concentrations of analytes e.g., oxygen, halides, various metals, bio-fluids and crystals can be measured with great results. Dominantly, these devices are designed for very accurate measurement of those substances. Luminescence-based optical devices are particularly attractive due to their good sensitivity and very high selectivity [279]. Protein biomarkers, such as cytokines, play a key role in the diagnosis and treatment of a wide range of diseases. Compared to colorimetry, fluorescence-based protein assays have advantages such as rapid assay time, higher stability, better detection sensitivity, and can examine multiple analytes simultaneously [316].
The first presented device (Figure 1c) is an ultra-thin flexible oximeter array with silicon-integrated circuits that can monitor a pulsatile arterial blood signal [14]. The authors use organic printed optoelectronics, which senses reflected light from tissue. OLED and PD arrays are fabricated on indium tin oxide patterned polyethylene naphthalate substrates. Four red OLEDs and four NIR OLEDs emit light. The red LED coupled with the PDs measures the changes of blood hemoglobin absorbance by infrared emission module and receiving module. Additional green LEDs associated with PDs measure blood density in the vessels on changes in transmittance. This skin-sensor system has the potential to transform the oxygenation monitoring of tissues, wounds, skin grafts, and transplanted organs. A similar approach to measuring pulse oxygenation based on the principle of photoluminescence was used also by Yokota et al. in his ultrathin skin-like systems (Figure 1b) [13]. After the light passes through the body, the OPD can detect red and green light emitted by the polymer LEDs and the device can unobtrusively measure the oxygen concentration on the finger. What is more, seven-segment digital displays and color indicators, with a total thickness of only 3 μm, can visualize data precisely on the body. In further research by Lim et al. [314] transcutaneous O2 pressure was monitored. The sensor consists of three components: a luminescent sensing film attached onto skin with carbon tape, OLED, and OPD. All components are integrated in a plane in a bandage-like configuration. Another device by Mohr et al. is a cloth shirt for pH and oxygen monitoring. It uses a combination of two luminescent indicator dyes with one fluorescent reference dye for digital cameras’ imaging. Absorbance and luminescence-based dyes have also been combined, e.g., in fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based optical sensors [317]. Roda et al. [318] integrated luminescence assays using 3D printing into a smartphone platform. Specifically, they report an assay for total bile acids and blood cholesterol. Guo et al. [319] presented a stretchable and multifunctional optical sensor (SMOS) with simultaneous readout of BT and strain for wearable physiological monitoring of the human body. The SMOS consists of a stretchable optical sensing fiber made of polymeric nanocomposites containing lanthanide-based conversion nanoparticles. The temperature is read by radiometric intensity measurements of the dual emission upon NIR excitation and stretching is presented in light transmission. Qi et al. show us developed gel-based luminescent conductive material. These two materials have a perfect combination of various properties such as adjustable mechanical strength, biocompatibility, luminescence, and conductivity. The synergistic collection of these properties means that gel-based luminescent conductive materials benefit from these properties in the application and have the advantage of synergistic properties [320].
Table 4. Biochemical sensors.
Table 4. Biochemical sensors.
Sensor TypeApplicationSensing ElementKey ParametersRef.
Chemical barcodeSweat pHColorimetric micro-fluidic platform incorporating ionic liquidsAdhesive plaster, sweat rate 0.85 ± 0.41 mg min−1 cm−2[291,292,293]
Textile fabricSweat pHColorimetric sensor based on covalently bonded litmus-3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane coating, PDAccuracy 0.5 pH [294]
Thread fabricpH, glucoseIntegrates hydrophilic dot-patterns with a hydrophobic surface via embroidering thread into fabric5.0–6.0, 25–80 mM, 50–200 μM Color comparison with reference markers[295]
Skin-interfaced microfluidic
device
Rate of sweating, BT, concentrations of electrolytesThermochromic liquid crystal Full capabilities in measuring sweat loss/rate and analyzing multiple sweat biomarkers and temperature[297]
Paper-based
system coupled with a smartphone
Sweat lactate, pHPaper-based colorimetric sensors, absorbent pad and paper-based sensor are connected with
a hydrophilic silk thread
pH—linear detection range (pH 4.0 to 8.0),
sensitivity 10.43Lactate range 0 to 25 mM,
sensitivity −3.07 mM−1
[300]
Skin-interfaced microfluidicSweat glucose, lactate, pHColorimetric microfluidic platform combined with electronicsNFC communication[21]
Textile channelpH, H2O2Colorimetric sensor, absorbent
microfibrous nonwoven substrate
Range 3–7 pH,
0.1–0.6 μM H2O2
[296]
Silk fabricpHUV-vis spectroscopy,
fabric dyed with anthocyanin
Range 4.5–8 pH[298]
Cotton fabricSweat lactate,
pH
Colorimetric sensorRange 1–14 pH,
0–25 mM lactate
[299]
Contact lensGlucosePhotonic crystals—face-centered cubic arrangement of colloidal particles embedded in hydrogel Glucose range 0–50 mM, sensitivity 12 nm/mM–1, saturation response time 30 min[22,301]
Contact lensGlucose in tear fluidPhotonic glucose-sensing material0–150 nm shift,
glucose level 1–100 μmol/L
[5,7,47]
Smart bandageWound pHColorimetric RFID-based smart bandagepH indicator dye,
biocompatible hydrogel
[302,303]
Smart bandage with wireless connectivitypH, glucose, Ca2+ in woundsFlexible, self-healable, adhesive and wearable hydrogel patch for on-demand sweat colorimetric detectionSmartphone based, pH (4–9), glucose (0–2 mM), Cl− (0–100 mM) and Ca2+ (0–16 mM) [304]
Saliva biosensorUrea in salivaColorimetric pH indicatorSensitivity −0.005 pixels sec−1/mgdL−1 (10–260 mgdL−1)[305]
Epidermal
photonic device
BTUltrathin device, combining colorimetric temperature indicators with
wireless flexible electronics
Multilayer design for accurate colorimetric evaluation of the TLC materials[307]
Smart watchHR, SpO2,
H+, Na+, K+, Cl
Biochemical colorimetric sensor in combination with PPG sensor of smartwatchPPG panel contains a compound that changes optical characteristics in presence of metabolites [309]
Skin-interfaced microfluidicSweat Na+, Cl, Zn2+Array of microchannels and a collection of microreservoirs pre-filled with fluorescent probesSmartphone read-out, accuracy matches conventional laboratory techniques[23]
Skin-interfacedCl- from sweatTwo fluorescent materials on cotton piece worn on the skin Lanthanide metal–organic frameworks (MOFs): DUT-101 and Ag+/Eu3+@UiO-67[310]
Contact lensGlucoseLiquid hydrogel nanospheres containing tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate concanavalin and fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran Read-out by hand-held photo-fluorometer[312]
Fluorescence
pH sensor
pHFiber optic detection for wide range pH measurementsLinear (5.7–9.0; 4.2–5.7; 3.4–4.2), Polynomial (2.5–3.3)[313]
Portable fluorescence detection Trivalent chromium (Cr3+) LED, fiber, spectrometerPractically monitored using portable fluorescence detection [315]
Organic
oximeter array
2D oxygenation mapsOrganic printed in a flexible array configuration, OLED, OPDPrinted organic electronics[14]
Organic photonic skinTensile strainOLED, OPDExtreme flexibility,
Device total thickness 3 μm
[13]
Cloth shirt for pH and oxygen monitoringpH, SpO2Absorbance and luminescence-based dyes combined in fluorescence resonance energy transfer based optical sensorsA wide pH range buffer, visual color changes of indicator dyes from green to red by combining indicator and inert dyes[317]

6. Conclusions

In this review, we conducted an extensive review of optical sensors and devices related to human physiology. We have identified four areas: photoplethysmography, radiation sensors, fiber sensors, and biochemical analyzers. Although we have focused only on the selected and most promising types, the review is quite exhaustive. It is clear that the applications of optical sensors in telemedicine are almost endless.
However, it can still be moved forward. Areas of constant interest are in the use of camera systems to record physiology [321,322,323,324] and all available optical methods for detecting human stress, which we have also addressed in our research, including the detection of cortisol in eccrine sweat [325,326,327], circulatory shock or vasoconstriction evaluation [328], and related changes in peripheral body temperature and PPG signal [128,329,330].
It is obvious that optical sensors are widely usable in various types of devices for measuring a wide range of physiological parameters. Due to their many benefits, they are highly preferred in wearable electronics and are the future of telemedicine. However, the interference of ambient light with signal measurements, the short penetration depth into the skin and other bioliquids are some of the drawbacks of optical bio-sensors that limit their widespread use in the biosensing area. The stability of sensors, especially electrochemical ones, can be a problem, where passivation and biological contamination of the electrode can lead to an incorrect response [203]. On the other hand, a general challenge of using optical fiber sensors could be damage of the system while locating it in the field or within its working lifetime which must be controlled and requires further research in this area [331]. It is also possible to move forward in the field of materials, where innovative materials can improve the interaction of the device with the body and thus improve the delivered signal, such as wearable devices with skin-like properties, which are still under development. Nanomaterials may also be a suitable component of flexible sensors and increase scanning performance, but it is still not entirely clear whether they are completely biocompatible and non-toxic to cells [203]. Flexible battery designs and energy management systems would also contribute to a more comfortable fit [11]. Optimizations related to energy sources lead to a small, flexible, stable, comfortable and ideal source ensuring sufficient energy [203]. The discussion is still ongoing about the protection of personal information and data about patients using wearable devices. Protecting medical data is very important so that they are not misused, and therefore the development and implementation of security features in the device are essential for manufacturers and IT infrastructure. The use of optical sensors can help reduce healthcare costs through the continuous monitoring of physiologically important parameters. For example, athletes have improved their performance [332]. It will be important to improve remote biomedical imaging in the future. Today, we have technologies such as machine learning, artificial intelligence, 5G networks, the Internet of Things (IoT) that help improve the technical side, and we will certainly be implementing it in future research [333]. Ultimately, all research leads to more stable, accurate, robust sensing mechanisms and components that will withstand long-term use [203]. We believe that this study opens some possible springboards for further research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.V. and H.K.; investigation, E.V., H.K., N.E.E., M.H., V.R. and A.K.; resources, E.V., H.K., N.E.E., M.H., V.R. and A.K.; data curation, E.V. and A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, E.V., H.K.; writing—review and editing, E.V., H.K., N.E.E. and M.H.; visualization, E.V.; supervision, E.V., M.D. and H.K.; funding acquisition, M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Research Agency of the Slovak Republic under the Operational Program Integrated Infrastructure for the project “TeleCovid” ITMS code: 313011ASY8.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khan, Y.; Ostfeld, A.E.; Lochner, C.M.; Pierre, A.; Arias, A.C. Monitoring of Vital Signs with Flexible and Wearable Medical Devices. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 4373–4395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pantelopoulos, A.; Bourbakis, N.G. A Survey on Wearable Sensor-Based Systems for Health Monitoring and Prognosis. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 2010, 40, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Kazanskiy, N.L.; Butt, M.A. Recent Advances in Wearable Optical Sensor Automation Powered by Battery versus Skin-like Battery-Free Devices for Personal Healthcare—A Review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fortune Business Insights Wearable Medical Devices Market Size Worth USD 195.57 Bn by 2027. With Stunning 26.4% CAGR. Available online: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/02/03/2378221/0/en/Wearable-Medical-Devices-Market-Size-worth-USD-195-57-Bn-by-2027-With-stunning-26-4-CAGR.html (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  5. Yao, H.; Shum, A.J.; Cowan, M.; Lähdesmäki, I.; Parviz, B.A. A contact lens with embedded sensor for monitoring tear glucose level. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 3290–3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhu, X.; Liu, W.; Shuang, S.; Nair, M.; Li, C.Z. Intelligent tattoos, patches, and other wearable biosensors. Med. Biosens. Point Care Appl. 2017, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bandodkar, A.J.; Wang, J. Non-invasive wearable electrochemical sensors: A review. Trends Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Patel, S.; Park, H.; Bonato, P.; Chan, L.; Rodgers, M. A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2012, 9, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Guk, K.; Han, G.; Lim, J.; Jeong, K.; Kang, T.; Lim, E.K.; Jung, J. Evolution of wearable devices with real-time disease monitoring for personalized healthcare. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kim, J.; Campbell, A.S.; de Ávila, B.E.F.; Wang, J. Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 389–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yetisen, A.K.; Martinez-hurtado, J.L.; Khademhosseini, A. Wearables in Medicine. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, J.; Gutruf, P.; Chiarelli, A.M.; Heo, S.Y.; Cho, K.; Xie, Z.; Banks, A.; Han, S.; Jang, K.; Lee, J.W.; et al. Miniaturized Battery-Free Wireless Systems for Wearable Pulse Oximetry. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1604373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Yokota, T.; Zalar, P.; Kaltenbrunner, M.; Jinno, H.; Matsuhisa, N.; Kitanosako, H.; Tachibana, Y.; Yukita, W.; Koizumi, M.; Someya, T. Ultraflexible organic photonic skin. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Khan, Y.; Han, D.; Pierre, A.; Ting, J.; Wang, X.; Lochner, C.M.; Bovo, G.; Yaacobi-Gross, N.; Newsome, C.; Wilson, R.; et al. A flexible organic reflectance oximeter array. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E11015–E11024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Withings Thermo. Smart Temporal Thermometer. The Hottest Thermometer. The Coolest Technology. Available online: https://www.withings.com/sk/en/thermo (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  16. Bitanga, M. La Roche-Posay. My Skin Track UV Sensor. Available online: https://hiconsumption.com/la-roche-posay-my-skin-track-uv-sensor/ (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  17. Axonim Devices System That Makes Smart Glasses See Heat. Available online: https://axonim.com/works/thermal-imaging-device.html (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  18. Witt, J.; Narbonneau, F.; Schukar, M.; Krebber, K.; De Jonckheere, J.; Jeanne, M.; Kinet, D.; Paquet, B.; Depre, A.; D’Angelo, L.T.; et al. Medical Textiles with Embedded Fiber Optic Sensors for Monitoring of Respiratory Movement. IEEE Sens. J. 2012, 12, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, H.T.; Zhan, L.W.; Dai, Q.; Xu, B.; Chen, Y.; Lu, Y.Q.; Xu, F. Self-Assembled Wavy Optical Microfiber for Stretchable Wearable Sensor. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, X.; Liu, D.; Kumar, R.; Ng, W.P.; Fu, Y.Q.; Yuan, J.; Yu, C.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, G.; Farrell, G.; et al. A simple optical fiber interferometer based breathing sensor. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2017, 28, 035105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bandodkar, A.J.; Gutruf, P.; Choi, J.; Lee, K.H.; Sekine, Y.; Reeder, J.T.; Jeang, W.J.; Aranyosi, A.J.; Lee, S.P.; Model, J.B.; et al. Battery-free, skin-interfaced microfluidic/electronic systems for simultaneous electrochemical, colorimetric, and volumetric analysis of sweat. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Elsherif, M.; Hassan, M.U.; Yetisen, A.K.; Butt, H. Wearable Contact Lens Biosensors for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Using Smartphones. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 5452–5462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sekine, Y.; Kim, S.B.; Zhang, Y.; Bandodkar, A.J.; Xu, S.; Choi, J.; Irie, M.; Ray, T.R.; Kohli, P.; Kozai, N.; et al. A fluorometric skin-interfaced microfluidic device and smartphone imaging module for: In situ quantitative analysis of sweat chemistry. Lab Chip 2018, 18, 2178–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hayward, J. Wearable Sensors 2021–2031. Available online: http://www.idtechex.com/en/research-report/wearable-sensors-2021-2031/780 (accessed on 26 January 2022).
  25. Ballard, Z.S.; Ozcan, A. Wearable Optical Sensors. In Mobile Health; Rehg, J.M., Murphy, S.A., Kumar, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 313–342. ISBN 978-3-319-51393-5. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kang, D.; Pikhitsa, P.V.; Choi, Y.W.; Lee, C.; Shin, S.S.; Piao, L.; Park, B.; Suh, K.-Y.; Kim, T.; Choi, M. Ultrasensitive mechanical crack-based sensor inspired by the spider sensory system. Nature 2014, 516, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yin, D.; Feng, J.; Ma, R.; Liu, Y.F.; Zhang, Y.L.; Zhang, X.L.; Bi, Y.G.; Chen, Q.D.; Sun, H.B. Efficient and mechanically robust stretchable organic light-emitting devices by a laser-programmable buckling process. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Miyamoto, A.; Lee, S.; Cooray, N.F.; Lee, S.; Mori, M.; Matsuhisa, N.; Jin, H.; Yoda, L.; Yokota, T.; Itoh, A.; et al. Inflammation-free, gas-permeable, lightweight, stretchable on-skin electronics with nanomeshes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 907–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Takei, K.; Takahashi, T.; Ho, J.C.; Ko, H.; Gillies, A.G.; Leu, P.W.; Fearing, R.S.; Javey, A. Nanowire active-matrix circuitry for low-voltage macroscale artificial skin. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 821–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Larson, C.; Peele, B.; Li, S.; Robinson, S.; Totaro, M.; Beccai, L.; Mazzolai, B.; Shepherd, R. Highly stretchable electroluminescent skin for optical signaling and tactile sensing. Science 2016, 351, 1071–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Kim, Y.; Chortos, A.; Xu, W.; Liu, Y.; Oh, J.Y.; Son, D.; Kang, J.; Foudeh, A.M.; Zhu, C.; Lee, Y.; et al. A bioinspired flexible organic artificial afferent nerve. Science 2018, 360, 998–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Miller, D.A.B. Rationale and challenges for optical interconnects to electronic chips. Proc. IEEE 2000, 88, 728–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sessolo, M.; Khodagholy, D.; Rivnay, J.; Maddalena, F.; Gleyzes, M.; Steidl, E.; Buisson, B.; Malliaras, G.G. Easy-to-fabricate conducting polymer microelectrode arrays. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2135–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Forrest, S.R. The path to ubiquitous and low-cost organic electronic appliances on plastic. Nature 2004, 428, 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, G.; Zhu, R.; Yang, Y. Polymer solar cells. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ryu, G.; Huang, J.; Hofmann, O.; Walshe, C.A.; Sze, J.Y.Y.; McClean, G.D.; Mosley, A.; Rattle, S.J.; Demello, J.C.; Demello, A.J.; et al. Highly sensitive fluorescence detection system for microfluidic lab-on-a-chip. Lab Chip 2011, 11, 1664–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hofmann, O.; Wang, X.; DeMello, J.C.; Bradley, D.D.C.; DeMello, A.J. Towards microalbuminuria determination on a disposable diagnostic microchip with integrated fluorescence detection based on thin-film organic light emitting diodes. Lab Chip 2005, 5, 863–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ramuz, M.; Leuenberger, D.; Bürgi, L. Optical biosensors based on integrated polymer light source and polymer photodiode. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2011, 49, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bansal, A.K.; Hou, S.; Kulyk, O.; Bowman, E.M.; Samuel, I.D.W. Wearable Organic Optoelectronic Sensors for Medicine. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7638–7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Guo, J.; Yang, C.; Dai, Q.; Kong, L. Soft and stretchable polymeric optical waveguide-based sensors for wearable and biomedical applications. Sensors 2019, 19, 3771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mannsfeld, S.C.B.; Tee, B.C.K.; Stoltenberg, R.M.; Chen, C.V.H.H.; Barman, S.; Muir, B.V.O.; Sokolov, A.N.; Reese, C.; Bao, Z. Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ernst, G. Heart-Rate Variability—More than Heart Beats? Front. Public Health 2017, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shaffer, F.; Ginsberg, J.P. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front. Public Health 2017, 5, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Dias, D.; Paulo Silva Cunha, J. Wearable Health Devices—Vital Sign Monitoring, Systems and Technologies. Sensors 2018, 18, 2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ray, D.; Collins, T.; Woolley, S.; Ponnapalli, P. A Review of Wearable Multi-wavelength Photoplethysmography. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ozana, N.; Arbel, N.; Beiderman, Y.; Mico, V.; Sanz, M.; Garcia, J.; Anand, A.; Javidi, B.; Epstein, Y.; Zalevsky, Z. Improved noncontact optical sensor for detection of glucose concentration and indication of dehydration level. Biomed. Opt. Express 2014, 5, 1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Alexeev, V.L.; Das, S.; Finegold, D.N.; Asher, S.A. Photonic crystal glucose-sensing material for noninvasive monitoring of glucose in tear fluid. Clin. Chem. 2004, 50, 2353–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Elmesmari, R.; Martin, A.; Reilly, J.J.; Paton, J.Y. Comparison of accelerometer measured levels of physical activity and sedentary time between obese and non-obese children and adolescents: A systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2018, 18, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Robertson, W.; Stewart-Brown, S.; Wilcock, E.; Oldfield, M.; Thorogood, M. Utility of accelerometers to measure physical activity in children attending an obesity treatment intervention. J. Obes. 2011, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Manchanda, S.; Ehsanullah, M. Suspected Cardiac Syncope in Elderly Patients: Use of the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram to Select Patients for Holter Monitoring. Gerontology 2001, 47, 195–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gokalp, H.; Clarke, M. Monitoring Activities of Daily Living of the Elderly and the Potential for Its Use in Telecare and Telehealth: A Review. Telemed. e-Health 2013, 19, 910–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shelley, K.H. Photoplethysmography: Beyond the Calculation of Arterial Oxygen Saturation and Heart Rate. Anesth. Analgesia 2007, 105, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Lee, C.; Sik Shin, H.; Lee, M. Relations between ac-dc components and optical path length in photoplethysmography. J. Biomed. Opt. 2011, 16, 077012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Utami, N.; Setiawan, A.W.; Zakaria, H.; Mengko, T.R.; Mengko, R. Extracting blood flow parameters from Photoplethysmograph signals: A review. In Proceedings of the 2013 3rd International Conference on Instrumentation, Communications, Information Technology and Biomedical Engineering (ICICI-BME), Bandung, Indonesia, 7–8 November 2013; pp. 403–407. [Google Scholar]
  55. Elgendi, M.; Fletcher, R.; Liang, Y.; Howard, N.; Lovell, N.H.; Abbott, D.; Lim, K.; Ward, R. The use of photoplethysmography for assessing hypertension. NPJ Digit. Med. 2019, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Marzorati, D.; Bovio, D.; Salito, C.; Mainardi, L.; Cerveri, P. Chest Wearable Apparatus for Cuffless Continuous Blood Pressure Measurements Based on PPG and PCG Signals. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 55424–55437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ash, C.; Dubec, M.; Donne, K.; Bashford, T. Effect of wavelength and beam width on penetration in light-tissue interaction using computational methods. Lasers Med. Sci. 2017, 32, 1909–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Anderson, R.R.; Parrish, J.A. The optics of human skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1981, 77, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Young, A.R. Chromophores in human skin. Phys. Med. Biol. 1997, 42, 789–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Lindberg, L.G.; Tamura, T.; Öberg, P.Å. Photoplethysmography. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1991, 29, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Sandberg, M.; Zhang, Q.; Styf, J.; Gerdle, B.; Lindberg, L.G. Non-invasive monitoring of muscle blood perfusion by photoplethysmography: Evaluation of a new application. Acta Physiol. Scand. 2005, 183, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kyriacou, P.A.; May, J.M. Photoplethysmography: New trends and future directions. In Photoplethysmography; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 469–487. [Google Scholar]
  63. Perpetuini, D.; Chiarelli, A.M.; Vinciguerra, V.; Vitulli, P.; Rinella, S.; Cardone, D.; Bianco, F.; Perciavalle, V.; Gallina, S.; Fallica, G.; et al. Integrated Multi-channel PPG and ECG System for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment. Proceedings 2019, 27, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. König, V.; Huch, R.; Huch, A. Reflectance pulse oximetry—Principles and obstetric application in the Zurich system. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 1998, 14, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mendelson, Y.; Ochs, B.D. Noninvasive Pulse Oximetry Utilizing Skin Reflectance Photoplethysmography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1988, 35, 798–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lee, H.; Ko, H.; Lee, J. Reflectance pulse oximetry: Practical issues and limitations. ICT Express 2016, 2, 195–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Kumar, S.; Buckley, J.L.; Barton, J.; Pigeon, M.; Newberry, R.; Rodencal, M.; Hajzeraj, A.; Hannon, T.; Rogers, K.; Casey, D.; et al. A Wristwatch-Based Wireless Sensor Platform for IoT Health Monitoring Applications. Sensors 2020, 20, 1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Cui, W.; Ostrander, L.E.; Lee, B.Y. In vivo reflectance of blood and tissue as a function of light wavelength. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1990, 37, 632–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lai, P.H.; Kim, I. Lightweight wrist photoplethysmography for heavy exercise: Motion robust heart rate monitoring algorithm. Healthc. Technol. Lett. 2015, 2, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Elsamnah, F.; Bilgaiyan, A.; Affiq, M.; Shim, C.H.; Ishidai, H.; Hattori, R. Reflectance-based organic pulse meter sensor for wireless monitoring of photoplethysmogram signal. Biosensors 2019, 9, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Mendelson, Y.; Duckworth, R.J.; Comtois, G. A Wearable Reflectance Pulse Oximeter for Remote Physiological Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, New York, NY, USA, 30 August–3 September 2006; pp. 912–915. [Google Scholar]
  72. Finnerty, R. How to Design a Better Pulse Oximeter: Implementation. Available online: https://www.embedded.com/how-to-design-a-better-pulse-oximeter-implementation/ (accessed on 26 January 2022).
  73. Tarar, A.A.; Mohammad, U.; Srivastava, S.K. Wearable skin sensors and their challenges: A review of transdermal, optical, and mechanical sensors. Biosensors 2020, 10, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Khan, Y.; Han, D.; Ting, J.; Ahmed, M.; Nagisetty, R.; Arias, A.C. Organic Multi-Channel Optoelectronic Sensors for Wearable Health Monitoring. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 128114–128124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lee, J.; Kim, M.; Park, H.-K.; Kim, I.Y. Motion Artifact Reduction in Wearable Photoplethysmography Based on Multi-Channel Sensors with Multiple Wavelengths. Sensors 2020, 20, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Bent, B.; Goldstein, B.A.; Kibbe, W.A.; Dunn, J.P. Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors. npj Digit. Med. 2020, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Rundo, F.; Conoci, S.; Ortis, A.; Battiato, S. An Advanced Bio-Inspired PhotoPlethysmoGraphy (PPG) and ECG Pattern Recognition System for Medical Assessment. Sensors 2018, 18, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. L’Her, E.; N’Guyen, Q.T.; Pateau, V.; Bodenes, L.; Lellouche, F. Photoplethysmographic determination of the respiratory rate in acutely ill patients: Validation of a new algorithm and implementation into a biomedical device. Ann. Intensive Care 2019, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Li, K.H.C.; White, F.A.; Tipoe, T.; Liu, T.; Wong, M.C.; Jesuthasan, A.; Baranchuk, A.; Tse, G.; Yan, B.P. The Current State of Mobile Phone Apps for Monitoring Heart Rate, Heart Rate Variability, and Atrial Fibrillation: Narrative Review. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2019, 7, e11606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Horton, J.F.; Stergiou, P.; Fung, T.S.; Katz, L. Comparison of Polar M600 Optical Heart Rate and ECG Heart Rate during Exercise. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2017, 49, 2600–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Maxim Integrated Products. Guidelines to Enhancing the Heart-Rate Monitoring Performance of Biosensing Wearables. Available online: https://www.maximintegrated.com/en/design/technical-documents/app-notes/6/6768.html (accessed on 26 January 2022).
  82. Ishikawa, T.; Hyodo, Y.; Miyashita, K.; Yoshifuji, K.; Komoriya, Y.; Imai, Y. Wearable Motion Tolerant PPG Sensor for Instant Heart Rate in Daily Activity. In Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, SCITEPRESS—Science and Technology Publications. Porto, Portugal, 21–23 February 2017; pp. 126–133. [Google Scholar]
  83. Tison, G.H.; Sanchez, J.M.; Ballinger, B.; Singh, A.; Olgin, J.E.; Pletcher, M.J.; Vittinghoff, E.; Lee, E.S.; Fan, S.M.; Gladstone, R.A.; et al. Passive detection of atrial fibrillation using a commercially available smartwatch. JAMA Cardiol. 2018, 3, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Constant, N.; Douglas-Prawl, O.; Johnson, S.; Mankodiya, K. Pulse-Glasses: An unobtrusive, wearable HR monitor with Internet-of-Things functionality. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN), Cambridge, MA, USA, 9–12 June 2015; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  85. Kang, M.H.; Lee, G.J.; Yun, J.H. NFC-Based Wearable Optoelectronics Working with Smartphone Application for Untact Healthcare. Sensors 2021, 21, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Faulkner, C. What is NFC? Everything You Need to Know. Available online: https://www.techradar.com/news/what-is-nfc (accessed on 29 March 2022).
  87. Chang, C.C.; Wu, C.T.; Choi, B.I.; Fang, T.J. MW-PPG sensor: An on-chip spectrometer approach. Sensors 2019, 19, 3698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Blanos, P.; Hu, S.; Mulvaney, D.; Alharbi, S. An applicable approach for extracting human heart rate and oxygen saturation during physical movements using a multi-wavelength illumination optoelectronic sensor system. In Proceedings of the Design and Quality for Biomedical Technologies XI; Raghavachari, R., Liang, R., Pfefer, T.J., Eds.; SPIE: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2018; p. 27. [Google Scholar]
  89. Alharbi, S.; Hu, S.; Mulvaney, D.; Barrett, L.; Yan, L.; Blanos, P.; Elsahar, Y.; Adema, S. Oxygen Saturation Measurements from Green and Orange Illuminations of Multi-Wavelength Optoelectronic Patch Sensors. Sensors 2018, 19, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Polat, E.O.; Mercier, G.; Nikitskiy, I.; Puma, E.; Galan, T.; Gupta, S.; Montagut, M.; Piqueras, J.J.; Bouwens, M.; Durduran, T.; et al. Flexible graphene photodetectors for wearable fitness monitoring. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Gupta, S.S.; Hossain, S.; Haque, C.A.; Kim, K.-D. In-Vivo Estimation of Glucose Level Using PPG Signal. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Jeju, Korea, 21–23 October 2020; pp. 733–736. [Google Scholar]
  92. Rachim, V.P.; Chung, W.-Y. Wearable-band type visible-near infrared optical biosensor for non-invasive blood glucose monitoring. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2019, 286, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Scully, C.G.; Lee, J.; Meyer, J.; Gorbach, A.M.; Granquist-Fraser, D.; Mendelson, Y.; Chon, K.H. Physiological parameter monitoring from optical recordings with a mobile phone. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 59, 303–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Chon, K.H.; Dash, S.; Ju, K. Estimation of Respiratory Rate from Photoplethysmogram Data Using Time–Frequency Spectral Estimation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 56, 2054–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ghamari, M. A review on wearable photoplethysmography sensors and their potential future applications in health care. Int. J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 4, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Akbar, U.; Akbari, A.; Alinia, P.; Amato, F.; Amendola, S.; Balaban, E.; Beach, C.; Bertschi, M.; Braun, F.; Caldani, L.; et al. Wearable Sensors: Fundamentals, Implementation and Applications. In Wearable Sensors; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. xi–xiii. ISBN 9780128192467. [Google Scholar]
  97. Madhav, K.V.; Ram, M.R.; Krishna, E.H.; Komalla, N.R.; Reddy, K.A. Estimation of respiration rate from ECG, BP and PPG signals using empirical mode decomposition. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Hangzhou, China, 10–12 May 2011; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  98. Karlen, W.; Raman, S.; Ansermino, J.M.; Dumont, G.A. Multiparameter Respiratory Rate Estimation from the Photoplethysmogram. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 60, 1946–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nemati, S.; Malhotra, A.; Clifford, G.D. Data Fusion for Improved Respiration Rate Estimation. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2010, 2010, 926305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Shokoueinejad, M.; Fernandez, C.; Carroll, E.; Wang, F.; Levin, J.; Rusk, S.; Glattard, N.; Mulchrone, A.; Zhang, X.; Xie, A.; et al. Sleep apnea: A review of diagnostic sensors, algorithms, and therapies. Physiol. Meas. 2017, 38, R204–R252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Lei, R.; Ling, B.W.K.; Feng, P.; Chen, J. Estimation of heart rate and respiratory rate from ppg signal using complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition with both independent component analysis and non-negative matrix factorization. Sensors 2020, 20, 3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Hosanee, M.; Chan, G.; Welykholowa, K.; Cooper, R.; Kyriacou, P.A.; Zheng, D.; Allen, J.; Abbott, D.; Menon, C.; Lovell, N.H.; et al. Cuffless Single-Site Photoplethysmography for Blood Pressure Monitoring. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. He, K.; Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; Sun, J. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, June 27–30 2016; Volume 2016-Decem, pp. 770–778. [Google Scholar]
  104. Hardoon, D.R.; Szedmak, S.; Shawe-Taylor, J. Canonical correlation analysis: An overview with application to learning methods. Neural Comput. 2004, 16, 2639–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Xing, X.; Sun, M. Optical blood pressure estimation with photoplethysmography and FFT-based neural networks. Biomed. Opt. Express 2016, 7, 3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Shoeibi, F.; Najafiaghdam, E.; Ebrahimi, A. Poincaré’s section analysis of Photoplethysmography signals for cuff-less non-invasive blood pressure measurement. Preprint 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Rundo, F.; Ortis, A.; Battiato, S.; Conoci, S. Advanced bio-inspired system for noninvasive cuff-less blood pressure estimation from physiological signal analysis. Computation 2018, 6, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Liang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Ward, R.; Elgendi, M. Photoplethysmography and deep learning: Enhancing hypertension risk stratification. Biosensors 2018, 8, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Slapničar, G.; Mlakar, N.; Luštrek, M. Blood Pressure Estimation from Photoplethysmogram Using a Spectro-Temporal Deep Neural Network. Sensors 2019, 19, 3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Jeon, G.-R.; Jung, D.-K.; Kim, G.-R.; Shin, B.-J. The Development of Integrated Sensor System for Measuring Simultaneously ECG, PPG and PPW. J. Korea Acad. Coop. Soc. 2009, 10, 992–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yoon, Y.; Cho, J.H.; Yoon, G. Non-constrained blood pressure monitoring using ECG and PPG for personal healthcare. J. Med. Syst. 2009, 33, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Shin, W.; Cha, Y.D.; Yoon, G. ECG/PPG integer signal processing for a ubiquitous health monitoring system. J. Med. Syst. 2010, 34, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Liu, W.; Fang, X.; Chen, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, T. Reliability analysis of an integrated device of ECG, PPG and pressure pulse wave for cardiovascular disease. Microelectron. Reliab. 2018, 87, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Liu, J.; Ping-yen Yan, B.; Dai, W.; Ding, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, N.; Baker, W.B.; Parthasarathy, A.B.; Busch, D.R.; Mesquita, R.C.; et al. Multi-wavelength photoplethysmography method for skin arterial pulse extraction. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2016, 7, 4313–4326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Pasta, S.; Blanos, P.; Yan, L.; Hu, S.; Scardulla, F.S.; D’Acquisto, L.; Barrett, L. A novel multi-wavelength procedure for blood pressure estimation using opto-physiological sensor at peripheral arteries and capillaries. In Proceedings of the Design and Quality for Biomedical Technologies XI; Raghavachari, R., Liang, R., Pfefer, T.J., Eds.; SPIE: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2018; p. 39. [Google Scholar]
  116. Liu, S.-H.; Liu, L.-J.; Pan, K.-L.; Chen, W.; Tan, T.-H. Using the Characteristics of Pulse Waveform to Enhance the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement by a Multi-Dimension Regression Model. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Sola, J.; Bertschi, M.; Krauss, J. Measuring Pressure. Available online: https://www.embs.org/pulse/articles/optical-blood-pressure-monitoring/ (accessed on 26 January 2022).
  118. Reşit Kavsaoglu, A.; Polat, K.; Recep Bozkure, M.; Muthusamy, H. Fotopletismografi sinyalleri ile biyometrik tanlmaya yönelik özellilk çlkarlml. In Proceedings of the 2013 21st Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), Haspolat, Turkey, 24–26 April 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Al Sidani, A.; Cherry, A.; Hajj-Hassan, H.; Hajj-Hassan, M. Comparison between K-Nearest Neighbor and Support Vector Machine Algorithms for PPG Biometric Identification. In Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME), Tripoli, Lebanon, 17–19 October 2019; pp. 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Biswas, D.; Everson, L.; Liu, M.; Panwar, M.; Verhoef, B.-E.; Patki, S.; Kim, C.H.; Acharyya, A.; Van Hoof, C.; Konijnenburg, M.; et al. CorNET: Deep Learning Framework for PPG-Based Heart Rate Estimation and Biometric Identification in Ambulant Environment. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2019, 13, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hwang, D.Y.; Taha, B.; Hatzinakos, D. PBGAN: Learning PPG Representations from GAN for Time-Stable and Unique Verification System. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2021, 16, 5124–5137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. He, L.; Baker, W.B.; Milej, D.; Kavuri, V.C.; Mesquita, R.C.; Busch, D.R.; Abramson, K.; Jiang, J.Y.; Diop, M.; Lawrence, K.S.; et al. Noninvasive continuous optical monitoring of absolute cerebral blood flow in critically ill adults. Neurophotonics 2018, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kooman, J.P.; Wieringa, F.P.; Han, M.; Chaudhuri, S.; Van Der Sande, F.M.; Usvyat, L.A.; Kotanko, P. Wearable health devices and personal area networks: Can they improve outcomes in haemodialysis patients? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2020, 35, II43–II50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lima, A.; Bakker, J. Noninvasive monitoring of peripheral perfusion. Intensive Care Med. 2005, 31, 1316–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Adhikari, P.; Magaña, I.B.; O’Neal, P.D. Multi-Wavelength Pulse Plethysmography for Real-Time Drug Delivery Monitoring; Coté, G.L., Ed.; SPIE: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2014; 89510p. [Google Scholar]
  126. Chianura, A.; Giardini, M.E. An electrooptical muscle contraction sensor. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2010, 48, 731–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Huxley, A.F.; Niedergerke, R. Structural Changes in Muscle During Contraction: Interference Microscopy of Living Muscle Fibres. Nature 1954, 173, 971–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Budidha, K.; Kyriacou, P.A. In vivo investigation of ear canal pulse oximetry during hypothermia. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2018, 32, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Hussain, A.S.; Hussain, H.S.; Betcher, N.; Behm, R.; Cagir, B. Proper use of noncontact infrared thermometry for temperature screening during COVID-19. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Yu, W.L.; Wang, Z.; Jin, L. The experiment study on infrared radiation spectrum of human body. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of 2012 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics BHI 2012, Hong Kong, China, 5–7 January 2012; Volume 25, pp. 752–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Fang, J.-S.; Hao, Q.; Brady, D.J.; Shankar, M.; Guenther, B.D.; Pitsianis, N.P.; Hsu, K.Y. Path-dependent human identification using a pyroelectric infrared sensor and fresnel lens arrays. Opt. Express 2006, 14, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Law, J.; Morris, D.E.; Budge, H.; Symonds, M.E. Infrared Thermography. In RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 26, pp. 259–282. ISBN 978-3-319-74230-4. [Google Scholar]
  133. Sanchez-Marin, F.J. A new method for determining the emissivity of the human skin in vivo. In Proceedings of the 2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Chengdu, China, 18–20 June 2010; pp. 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Ogoina, D. Fever, fever patterns and diseases called “fever”—A review. J. Infect. Public Health 2011, 4, 108–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Costa, C.M.A.; Moreira, D.G.; Sillero-Quintana, M.; Brito, C.J.; de Azambuja Pussieldi, G.; de Andrade Fernandes, A.; Cano, S.P.; Bouzas Marins, J.C. Daily rhythm of skin temperature of women evaluated by infrared thermal imaging. J. Therm. Biol. 2018, 72, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Baschieri, F.; Guaraldi, P.; Provini, F.; Chiogna, M.; Barletta, G.; Cecere, A.; De Scisciolo, G.; Cortelli, P.; Calandra-Buonaura, G. Circadian and state-dependent core body temperature in people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2021, 59, 538–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Baker, F.C.; Driver, H.S. Circadian rhythms, sleep, and the menstrual cycle. Sleep Med. 2007, 8, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Honma, K. [Circadian rhythms in body temperature and sleep]. Nihon Rinsho. 2013, 71, 2076–2081. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  139. Edwards, B.J.; Reilly, T.; Waterhouse, J. Zeitgeber-effects of exercise on human circadian rhythms: What are alternative approaches to investigating the existence of a phase-response curve to exercise? Biol. Rhythm Res. 2009, 40, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Chen, W. Thermometry and interpretation of body temperature. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 2019, 9, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Huang, F.; Magnin, C.; Brouqui, P. Ingestible sensors correlate closely with peripheral temperature measurements in febrile patients. J. Infect. 2020, 80, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Neves, E.B.; Salamunes, A.C.C.; de Oliveira, R.M.; Stadnik, A.M.W. Effect of body fat and gender on body temperature distribution. J. Therm. Biol. 2017, 70, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Shajkofci, A. Correction of human forehead temperature variations measured by non-contact infrared thermometer. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 20, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Chen, H.Y.; Chen, A.; Chen, C. Investigation of the impact of infrared sensors on core body temperature monitoring by comparing measurement sites. Sensors 2020, 20, 2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Hymczak, H.; Gołąb, A.; Mendrala, K.; Plicner, D.; Darocha, T.; Podsiadło, P.; Hudziak, D.; Gocoł, R.; Kosiński, S. Core temperature measurement—principles of correct measurement, problems, and complications. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Bernard, V.; Staffa, E.; Mornstein, V.; Bourek, A. Infrared camera assessment of skin surface temperature—Effect of emissivity. Phys. Medica 2013, 29, 583–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Shourav, M.K.; Salsabila, S.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, J.K. Estimation of core body temperature by near-infrared imaging of vein diameter change in the dorsal hand. Biomed. Opt. Express 2021, 12, 4700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Wang, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Ghassemi, P.; McBride, D.; Casamento, J.P.; Pfefer, T.J. Infrared thermography for measuring elevated body temperature: Clinical accuracy, calibration, and evaluation. Sensors 2022, 22, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Foster, J.; Lloyd, A.B.; Havenith, G. Non-contact infrared assessment of human body temperature: The journal Temperature toolbox. Temperature 2021, 8, 306–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Dell’isola, G.B.; Cosentini, E.; Canale, L.; Ficco, G.; Dell’isola, M. Noncontact body temperature measurement: Uncertainty evaluation and screening decision rule to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Sensors 2021, 21, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Chin, J.W.; Long Wong, K.; Chan, T.T.; Suhartono, K.; So, R.H.Y. An infrared thermography model enabling remote body temperature screening up to 10 meters. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), Nashville, TN, USA, 19–25 June 2021; pp. 3870–3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Švantner, M.; Lang, V.; Kohlschutter, T.; Skála, J.; Honner, M.; Muzika, L.; Kosová, E. Study on Human Temperature Measurement by Infrared Thermography. Eng. Proc. 2021, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Khaksari, K.; Nguyen, T.; Hill, B.Y.; Perrault, J.; Gorti, V.; Blick, E.; Gonzalez Cano, T.; Shadgan, B.; Quang, T.; Malpani, R.; et al. Review of the efficacy of infrared thermography for screening infectious diseases with applications to COVID-19. J. Med. Imaging 2021, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ng, E.Y.K. Is thermal scanner losing its bite in mass screening of fever due to SARS? Med. Phys. 2005, 32, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Daskalos, A.-C.; Theodoropoulos, P.; Spandonidis, C.; Vordos, N. Wearable Device for Observation of Physical Activity with the Purpose of Patient Monitoring Due to COVID-19. Signals 2022, 3, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Facente, S.N.; Hunter, L.A.; Packel, L.J.; Li, Y.; Harte, A.; Nicolette, G.; McDevitt, S.; Petersen, M.; Reingold, A.L. Feasibility and effectiveness of daily temperature screening to detect COVID-19 in a prospective cohort at a large public university. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Hardy, J.D.; Muschenheim, C. the Radiation of Heat from the Human Body. Iv. the Emission, Reflection, and Transmission of Infra-Red Radiation By the Human Skin. J. Clin. Investig. 1934, 13, 817–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Tamura, T.; Huang, M.; Togawa, T. Body temperature, heat flow and evaporation. Seamless Healthc. Monit. Adv. Wearable Attach. Invis. Devices 2017, 1, 281–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Youbiquo Easy Check, the Digital Infrared Wearable Thermometer Designed by Youbiquo. Available online: https://www.youbiquo.eu/easy-check-the-digital-infrared-wearable-thermometer-designed-by-youbiquo/ (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  160. Youneedthisgadget Tempwatch, the Smartwatch with Infrared Thermometer. Available online: https://youneedthisgadget.com/tempwatch-the-smartwatch-with-infrared-thermometer/ (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  161. Abuzairi, T.; Imaniati Sumantri, N.; Irfan, A.; Maulana Mohamad, R. Infrared thermometer on the wall (iThermowall): An open source and 3-D print infrared thermometer for fever screening. HardwareX 2021, 9, e00168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. ARC Devices Ltd. InstaTemp. Non-touch Thermometer. In User Manual; ARC Devices: West Palm Beach, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  163. De Souza, G.A.G.R.; Brioschi, M.L.; Vargas, J.V.C.; Morais, K.C.C.; Neto, C.D.; Neves, E.B. Reference breast temperature: Proposal of an equation. Einstein 2015, 13, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Torres-Galván, J.C.; Guevara, E.; Kolosovas-Machuca, E.S.; Oceguera-Villanueva, A.; Flores, J.L.; González, F.J. Deep convolutional neural networks for classifying breast cancer using infrared thermography. Quant. Infrared Thermogr. J. 2021, 1, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Mukhmetov, O.; Igali, D.; Mashekova, A.; Zhao, Y.; Ng, E.Y.K.; Fok, S.C.; Teh, S.L. Thermal modeling for breast tumor detection using thermography. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2021, 161, 106712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Min, S.; Heo, J.; Kong, Y.; Nam, Y.; Ley, P.; Jung, B.K.; Oh, D.; Shin, W. Thermal infrared image analysis for breast cancer detection. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 2017, 11, 1134–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Magalhaes, C.; Mendes, J.; Vardasca, R. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the application of machine learning classifiers in biomedical applications of infrared thermography. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Köşüş, N.; Köşüş, A.; Duran, M.; Simavli, S.; Turhan, N. Comparison of standard mammography with digital mammography and digital infrared thermal imaging for breast cancer screening. J. Turkish Ger. Gynecol. Assoc. 2010, 11, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Shah, A.M.; Galor, A. Impact of ocular surface temperature on tear characteristics: Current insights. Clin. Optom. 2021, 13, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Faust, O.; Rajendra Acharya, U.; Ng, E.Y.K.; Hong, T.J.; Yu, W. Application of infrared thermography in computer aided diagnosis. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2014, 66, 160–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Tkáčová, M.; Živčák, J.; Foffová, P. A Reference for Human Eye Surface Temperature Measurements in Diagnostic Process of Ophthalmologic Diseases. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference Measurement 2011, Smolenice, Slovakia, 27–30 April 2011; pp. 406–409. [Google Scholar]
  172. Liu, C.; van Netten, J.J.; van Baal, J.G.; Bus, S.A.; van der Heijden, F. Automatic detection of diabetic foot complications with infrared thermography by asymmetric analysis. J. Biomed. Opt. 2015, 20, 026003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Van Netten, J.J.; Van Baal, J.G.; Liu, C.; Van Der Heijden, F.; Bus, S.A. Infrared thermal imaging for automated detection of diabetic foot complications. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2013, 7, 1122–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Peregrina-Barreto, H.; Morales-Hernandez, L.A.; Rangel-Magdaleno, J.J.; Avina-Cervantes, J.G.; Ramirez-Cortes, J.M.; Morales-Caporal, R. Quantitative estimation of temperature variations in plantar angiosomes: A study case for diabetic foot. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2014, 2014, 585306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Mendes, R.; Sousa, N.; Almeida, A.; Vilaça-Alves, J.; Reis, V.M.; Neves, E.B. Thermography: A technique for assessing the risk of developing diabetic foot disorders. Postgrad. Med. J. 2015, 91, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Sillero-Quintana, M.; Fernández-Jaén, T.; Fernández-Cuevas, I.; Gómez-Carmona, P.M.; Arnaiz-Lastras, J.; Pérez, M.-D.; Guillén, P. Infrared Thermography as a Support Tool for Screening and Early Diagnosis in Emergencies. J. Med. Imaging Health Inform. 2015, 5, 1223–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Chojnowski, M. Infrared thermal imaging in connective tissue diseases. Reumatologia 2017, 55, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Priego Quesada, J.I.; Kunzler, M.R.; Carpes, F.P. Methodological Aspects of Infrared Thermography in Human Assessment; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; ISBN 9783319474106. [Google Scholar]
  179. Hildebrandt, C.; Zeilberger, K.; John Ring, E.F.; Raschner, C. The Application of Medical Infrared Thermography in Sports Medicine. An Int. Perspect. Top. Sport. Med. Sport. Inj. 2012, 14, 257–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Choi, H.G.; Kwon, S.Y.; Won, J.Y.; Yoo, S.W.; Lee, M.G.; Kim, S.W.; Park, B. Comparisons of three indicators for Frey’s syndrome: Subjective symptoms, Minor’s starch iodine test, and infrared thermography. Clin. Exp. Otorhinolaryngol. 2013, 6, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Law, J.; Chalmers, J.; Morris, D.E.; Robinson, L.; Budge, H.; Symonds, M.E. The use of infrared thermography in the measurement and characterization of brown adipose tissue activation. Temperature 2018, 5, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Bauer, J.; Hoq, M.N.; Mulcahy, J.; Tofail, S.A.M.; Gulshan, F.; Silien, C.; Podbielska, H.; Akbar, M.M. Implementation of artificial intelligence and non-contact infrared thermography for prediction and personalized automatic identification of different stages of cellulite. EPMA J. 2020, 11, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Magalhaes, C.; Tavares, J.M.R.S.; Mendes, J.; Vardasca, R. Comparison of machine learning strategies for infrared thermography of skin cancer. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2021, 69, 102872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Germi, J.W.; Mensah-Brown, K.G.; Chen, H.I.; Schuster, J.M. Use of smartphone-integrated infrared thermography to monitor sympathetic dysfunction as a surgical complication. Interdiscip. Neurosurg. Adv. Tech. Case Manag. 2022, 28, 101475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Hti HT 301 Mobile Phone Thermal Imager (384 × 288). Available online: https://hti-instrument.com (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  186. Seek Powerful Thermal Imaging Cameras Designed for Your Smartphone. Available online: https://www.thermal.com/compact-series.html (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  187. Teledyne Professional Thermal Camera for iOSTM and Android® Smartphones. FLIR ONE Gen 3. Available online: https://www.flir.eu/products/flir-one-gen-3/ (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  188. Dynacom Communications. Thermal Glasses AR02T-Wearable Thermal Camera. Available online: http://dynacom.tw/product-detail-portable--wearable-thermal-glasses-ar02t-203.html (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  189. Blanik, N.; Abbas, A.K.; Venema, B.; Blazek, V.; Leonhardt, S. Hybrid optical imaging technology for long-term remote monitoring of skin perfusion and temperature behavior. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014, 19, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  190. Salamone, F.; Masullo, M.; Sibilio, S. Wearable Devices for Environmental Monitoring in the Built Environment: A Systematic Review. Sensors 2021, 21, 4724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Bierman, A.; Klein, T.R.; Rea, M.S. The Daysimeter: A device for measuring optical radiation as a stimulus for the human circadian system. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2005, 16, 2292–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Rhudy, M.B.; Greenauer, N.; Mello, C. Wearable light data logger for studying physiological and psychological effects of light data. HardwareX 2020, 8, e00157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Wei, Y.; Zhang, W.; Hou, C.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, H. Independent dual-responsive Janus chromic fibers. Sci. China Mater. 2021, 64, 1770–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Fletcher, R.R.; Oreskovic, N.M.; Robinson, A.I. Design and clinical feasibility of personal wearable monitor for measurement of activity and environmental exposure. In Proceedings of the 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Chicago, IL, USA, 26–30 August 2014; pp. 874–877. [Google Scholar]
  195. Higgins, P.A.; Hornick, T.R.; Figueiro, M.G. Rest-Activity and Light Exposure Patterns in the Home Setting: A Methodological Case Study. Am. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. Other Dement. 2010, 25, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Jardim, A.C.N.; Pawley, M.D.M.; Cheeseman, J.F.; Guesgen, M.J.; Steele, C.T.; Warman, G.R. Validating the Use of Wrist-Level Light Monitoring for In-Hospital Circadian Studies. Chronobiol. Int. 2011, 28, 834–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Pigliautile, I.; Pisello, A.L. A new wearable monitoring system for investigating pedestrians’ environmental conditions: Development of the experimental tool and start-up findings. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 630, 690–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Zheng, Y.; Panatdasirisuk, W.; Liu, J.; Tong, A.; Xiang, Y.; Yang, S. Patterned, Wearable UV Indicators from Electrospun Photochromic Fibers and Yarns. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2020, 5, 2000564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Yetisen, A.K.; Martinez-Hurtado, J.L.; Garcia-Melendrez, A.; Da Cruz Vasconcellos, F.; Lowe, C.R. A smartphone algorithm with inter-phone repeatability for the analysis of colorimetric tests. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 196, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Comstock, J. Wireless-Connected Thermometer to Roll out via Video Telemedicine System Provider. Available online: https://www.mobihealthnews.com/content/wireless-connected-thermometer-roll-out-video-telemedicine-system-provider (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  201. Massaroni, C.; Saccomandi, P.; Schena, E. Medical Smart Textiles Based on Fiber Optic Technology: An Overview. J. Funct. Biomater. 2015, 6, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Trung, T.Q.; Le, H.S.; Dang, T.M.L.; Ju, S.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, N.-E. Freestanding, Fiber-Based, Wearable Temperature Sensor with Tunable Thermal Index for Healthcare Monitoring. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, 1800074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Hatamie, A.; Angizi, S.; Kumar, S.; Pandey, C.M.; Simchi, A.; Willander, M.; Malhotra, B.D. Review—Textile Based Chemical and Physical Sensors for Healthcare Monitoring Review—Textile Based Chemical and Physical Sensors for Healthcare Monitoring. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 037546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Ghosh, S.; Amidei, C.; Furrow, K. Development of a sensor-embedded flexible textile structure for apparel or large area applications. Indian J. Fibre Text. Res. 2005, 30, 42–48. [Google Scholar]
  205. Krebber, K. Smart Technical Textiles Based on Fiber Optic Sensors. In Current Developments in Optical Fiber Technology; InTech: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  206. Quandt, B.M.; Scherer, L.J.; Boesel, L.F.; Wolf, M.; Bona, G.L.; Rossi, R.M. Body-Monitoring and Health Supervision by Means of Optical Fiber-Based Sensing Systems in Medical Textiles. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2015, 4, 330–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Grillet, A.; Kinet, D.; Witt, J.; Schukar, M.; Krebber, K.; Pirotte, F.; Depré, A. Optical fiber sensors embedded into medical textiles for healthcare monitoring. IEEE Sens. J. 2008, 8, 1215–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Koyama, Y.; Nishiyama, M.; Watanabe, K. Smart textile using hetero-core optical fiber for heartbeat and respiration monitoring. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 18, 6175–6180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Bennett, A.; Beiderman, Y.; Agdarov, S.; Beiderman, Y.; Hendel, R.; Straussman, B.; Zalevsky, Z. Monitoring of Vital Bio-Signs by Multimode Speckle Based Optical Fiber Sensor. Clin. Transl. Biophoton. 2020, 28, TW4B.5. [Google Scholar]
  210. Li, K.; Xia, L.; Yi, H.; Li, S.; Wu, Y.; Song, Y. Optical active fiber sensing technique based on the lasing wavelength demodulation for monitoring the human respiration and pulse. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2019, 296, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Tong, L.; Gattass, R.R.; Ashcom, J.B.; He, S.; Lou, J.; Shen, M.; Maxwell, I.; Mazur, E. Subwavelength-diameter silica wires for low-loss optical wave guiding. Nature 2003, 426, 816–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Zhang, L.; Pan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, H.; Yao, N.; Cai, D.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Sun, G.; Wang, L.; et al. Ultrasensitive skin-like wearable optical sensors based on glass micro/nanofibers. Opto-Electron. Adv. 2020, 3, 19002201–19002207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Daly, M.; Sergides, M.; Nic Chormaic, S. Optical trapping and manipulation of micrometer and submicrometer particles. Laser Photon. Rev. 2015, 9, 309–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Leal-Junior, A.G.; Diaz, C.A.R.; Avellar, L.M.; Pontes, M.J.; Marques, C.; Frizera, A. Polymer optical fiber sensors in healthcare applications: A comprehensive review. Sensors 2019, 19, 3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  215. Wang, Y.L.; Liu, B.; Pang, Y.N.; Liu, J.; Shi, J.L.; Wan, S.P.; He, X.D.; Yuan, J.; Wu, Q. Low-Cost Wearable Sensor Based on a D-Shaped Plastic Optical Fiber for Respiration Monitoring. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Li, J.H.; Chen, J.H.; Xu, F. Sensitive and Wearable Optical Microfiber Sensor for Human Health Monitoring. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2018, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Krehel, M.; Schmid, M.; Rossi, R.; Boesel, L.; Bona, G.-L.; Scherer, L. An Optical Fibre-Based Sensor for Respiratory Monitoring. Sensors 2014, 14, 13088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  218. D’Mello, Y.; Skoric, J.; Moukarzel, L.; Hakim, S.; Plant, D.V. Wearable Fiber Optic Sensors for Biomechanical Sensing via Joint Angle Detection. In Proceedings of the 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Berlin, Germany, 23–27 July 2019; pp. 32221–32225. [Google Scholar]
  219. Han, P.; Li, L.; Zhang, H.; Guan, L.; Marques, C.; Savović, S.; Ortega, B.; Min, R.; Li, X. Low-cost plastic optical fiber sensor embedded in mattress for sleep performance monitoring. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2021, 64, 102541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Reyes González, L.; Anabitarte García, F.; Real, E.; Rodriguez Cobo, L.; Lomer, M.; López Higuera, J.M. POF-based specklegram sensor post processing comparative: Methods for extracting breath and heart rate. In Proceedings of the Seventh European Workshop on Optical Fibre Sensors; Kalli, K., Brambilla, G., O’Keeffe, S.O., Eds.; SPIE: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2019; Volume 11199, p. 28. [Google Scholar]
  221. Han, S.; Xu, W.; You, S.; Dong, B.; Tan, F.; Yu, C.; Zhao, W.; Wang, Y. Investigation on Smart Cushion Based on SFS Structure and its Application in Physiological and Activity Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2020 Opto-Electronics and Communications Conference (OECC), Taipei, Taiwan, 4–8 October 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Quandt, B.M.; Braun, F.; Ferrario, D.; Rossi, R.M.; Scheel-Sailer, A.; Wolf, M.; Bona, G.L.; Hufenus, R.; Scherer, L.J.; Boesel, L.F. Body-monitoring with photonic textiles: A reflective heartbeat sensor based on polymer optical fibres. J. R. Soc. Interface 2017, 14, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  223. Aitkulov, A.; Tosi, D. Optical Fiber Sensor Based on Plastic Optical Fiber and Smartphone for Measurement of the Breathing Rate. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 19, 3282–3287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Sartiano, D.; Sales, S. Low-cost plastic optical fiber pressure sensor embedded in mattress for vital signal monitoring. Sensors 2017, 17, 2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  225. Wencel, D.; Kaworek, A.; Abel, T.; Efremov, V.; Bradford, A.; Carthy, D.; Coady, G.; McMorrow, R.C.N.; McDonagh, C. Optical Sensor for Real-Time pH Monitoring in Human Tissue. Small 2018, 14, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Zhao, T.; Fu, X.; Zhan, J.; Chen, K.; Li, Z. Vital signs monitoring using the macrobending small-core fiber sensor. Opt. Lett. 2021, 46, 4228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Chen, Z.; Hee, H.I.; Ng, S.H.; Teo, J.T.; Yang, X.; Wang, D. Microbend fiber optic sensor for perioperative pediatric vital signs monitoring. Opt. Fibers Sens. Med. Diagn. Treat. Appl. XVII 2017, 10058, 100580L. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Lau, D.; Chen, Z.; Teo, J.T.; Ng, S.H.; Rumpel, H.; Lian, Y.; Yang, H.; Kei, P.L. Intensity-Modulated Microbend Fiber Optic Sensor for Respiratory Monitoring and Gating During MRI. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 60, 2655–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Pang, Y.-N.; Liu, B.; Liu, J.; Wan, S.P.; Wu, T.; He, X.-D.; Yuan, J.; Zhou, X.; Long, K.; Wu, Q. Wearable Optical Fiber Sensor Based on a Bend Singlemode-Multimode-Singlemode Fiber Structure for Respiration Monitoring. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 4610–4617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Guo, J.; Zhou, B.; Zong, R.; Pan, L.; Li, X.; Yu, X.; Yang, C.; Kong, L.; Dai, Q. Stretchable and Highly Sensitive Optical Strain Sensors for Human-Activity Monitoring and Healthcare. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 33589–33598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Zhang, J.; Cao, Y.; Qiao, M.; Ai, L.; Sun, K.; Mi, Q.; Zang, S.; Zuo, Y.; Yuan, X.; Wang, Q. Human motion monitoring in sports using wearable graphene-coated fiber sensors. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2018, 274, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Measures, R.M. Fiber-Optic-Based Smart Structures. In Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 769–802. [Google Scholar]
  233. Sirkis, T.; Beiderman, Y.; Agdarov, S.; Beiderman, Y.; Zalevsky, Z. Blood Pulse Wave Velocity and Pressure Sensing via Fiber Based and Free Space Based Optical Sensors; Cartwright, A.N., Nicolau, D.V., Fixler, D., Eds.; SPIE: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2017; p. 100770A. [Google Scholar]
  234. Wang, K.; Xu, W.; Zhang, N.; Li, K.; Yu, C.; Yu, C. Fiber-optic in-line Mach-Zehnder modal interferometer for breathing monitoring application. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Pacific Rim (CLEO-PR), Singapore, 31 July–4 August 2017; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  235. Chen, Y.; Fu, A.K.Y.; Ip, N.Y. Pharmacology & Therapeutics Synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 195, 196–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Tan, F.; Chen, S.; Lyu, W.; Liu, Z.; Yu, C.; Lu, C.; Tam, H.-Y. Non-invasive human vital signs monitoring based on twin-core optical fiber sensors. Biomed. Opt. Express 2019, 10, 5940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Wang, S.; Ni, X.; Li, L.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, L.; Sun, Q. Noninvasive Monitoring of Vital Signs Based on Highly Sensitive Fiber Optic Mattress. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 6182–6190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Fernandes, M.S.; Correia, J.H.; Mendes, P.M. Photonic Sensing of Electrophysiological Activity for Wearable Applications. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2014, 20, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Li, Y.; Dong, B.; Chen, E.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y. Heart-Rate Monitoring with an Ethyl Alpha-Cyanoacrylate Based Fiber Fabry-Perot Sensor. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2021, 27, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Poduval, R.K.; Coote, J.M.; Mosse, C.A.; Finlay, M.C.; Desjardins, A.E.; Papakonstantinou, I. Precision-Microfabricated Fiber-Optic Probe for Intravascular Pressure and Temperature Sensing. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2021, 27, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Carr, E.; Mackle, E.C.; Finlay, M.C.; Mosse, C.A.; Coote, J.M.; Papakonstantinou, I.; Desjardins, A.E. Optical interferometric temperature sensors for intravascular blood flow measurements. Opt. InfoBase Conf. Pap. 2019, 11075, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Sahota, J.K.; Gupta, N.; Dhawan, D. Fiber Bragg grating sensors for monitoring of physical parameters: A comprehensive review. Opt. Eng. 2020, 59, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Majumder, M.; Gangopadhyay, T.K.; Chakraborty, A.K.; Dasgupta, K.; Bhattacharya, D.K. Fibre Bragg gratings in structural health monitoring—Present status and applications. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2008, 147, 150–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Li, K. Review of the Strain Modulation Methods Used in Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors. J. Sens. 2016, 2016, 1284520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  245. Campanella, C.E.; Cuccovillo, A.; Campanella, C.; Yurt, A.; Passaro, V.M.N. Fibre Bragg Grating based strain sensors: Review of technology and applications. Sensors 2018, 18, 3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  246. Presti, D.L.; Massaroni, C.; Di Tocco, J.; Schena, E.; Formica, D.; Caponero, M.A.; Longo, U.G.; Carnevale, A.; D’Abbraccio, J.; Massari, L.; et al. Cardiac monitoring with a smart textile based on polymer-encapsulated FBG: Influence of sensor positioning. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), Istanbul, Turkey, 26–28 June 2019; pp. 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Li, H.; Yang, H.; Li, E.; Liu, Z.; Wei, K. Wearable sensors in intelligent clothing for measuring human body temperature based on optical fiber Bragg grating. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 11740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  248. Liu, W.; Jia, D.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y. An Optical Fiber-Based Data-Driven Method for Human Skin Temperature 3-D Mapping. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2019, 23, 1141–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Lo Presti, D.; Massaroni, C.; D’Abbraccio, J.; Massari, L.; Caponero, M.; Longo, U.G.; Formica, D.; Oddo, C.M.; Schena, E. Wearable System Based on Flexible FBG for Respiratory and Cardiac Monitoring. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 19, 7391–7398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Ciocchetti, M.; Massaroni, C.; Saccomandi, P.; Caponero, M.A.; Polimadei, A.; Formica, D.; Schena, E. Smart textile based on fiber bragg grating sensors for respiratory monitoring: Design and preliminary trials. Biosensors 2015, 5, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  251. Massaroni, C.; Zaltieri, M.; Lo Presti, D.; Nicolo, A.; Tosi, D.; Schena, E. Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors for Cardiorespiratory Monitoring: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 14069–14080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Jia, D.; Chao, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, H.; Yan, Y.; Liu, T.; Sun, Y. A Fiber Bragg Grating Sensor for Radial Artery Pulse Waveform Measurement. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2018, 65, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Fajkus, M.; Nedoma, J.; Martinek, R.; Vasinek, V.; Nazeran, H.; Siska, P. A non-invasive multichannel hybrid fiber-optic sensor system for vital sign monitoring. Sensors 2017, 17, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Padma, S.; Umesh, S.; Srinivas, T.; Asokan, S. Carotid Arterial Pulse Waveform Measurements Using Fiber Bragg Grating Pulse Probe. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2018, 22, 1415–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Fajkus, M.; Nedoma, J.; Martinek, R.; Walendziuk, W. Comparison of the FBG sensor encapsulated into PDMS and FBG sensor glued on the plexiglass pad for respiratory and heart rate monitoring. Photonics Appl. Astron. Commun. Ind. High Energy Phys. Exp. 2017, 10445, 104450B. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Guo, J.; Zhao, K.; Zhou, B.; Ning, W.; Jiang, K.; Yang, C.; Kong, L.; Dai, Q. Wearable and Skin-Mountable Fiber-Optic Strain Sensors Interrogated by a Free-Running, Dual-Comb Fiber Laser. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1900086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Massaroni, C.; Venanzi, C.; Silvatti, A.P.; Lo Presti, D.; Saccomandi, P.; Formica, D.; Giurazza, F.; Caponero, M.A.; Schena, E. Smart textile for respiratory monitoring and thoraco-abdominal motion pattern evaluation. J. Biophotonics 2018, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  258. Lo Presti, D.; Romano, C.; Massaroni, C.; D’Abbraccio, J.; Massari, L.; Caponero, M.A.; Oddo, C.M.; Formica, D.; Schena, E. Cardio-respiratory monitoring in archery using a smart textile based on flexible fiber bragg grating sensors. Sensors 2019, 19, 3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  259. Nedoma, J.; Fajkus, M.; Martinek, R.; Vašinek, V. Analysis of non-invasive FBG sensor for monitoring patient vital signs during MRI. In Proceedings of the Optical Materials and Biomaterials in Security and Defence Systems Technology XIV; Zamboni, R., Kajzar, F., Szep, A.A., Matczyszyn, K., Eds.; SPIE: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2017; p. 18. [Google Scholar]
  260. Lmberis, A.; Dittmar, A. Advanced Wearable Health Systems and Applications—Research and Development Efforts in the European Union. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 2007, 26, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. De Jonckheere, J.; Jeanne, M.; Grillet, A.; Weber, S.; Chaud, P.; Logier, R.; Weber, J. OFSETH: Optical Fibre Embedded into technical Textile for Healthcare, an efficient way to monitor patient under magnetic resonance imaging. In Proceedings of the 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Lyon, France, 22–26 August 2007; pp. 3950–3953. [Google Scholar]
  262. Dziuda, Ł.; Skibniewski, F.W.; Krej, M.; Baran, P.M. Fiber Bragg grating-based sensor for monitoring respiration and heart activity during magnetic resonance imaging examinations. J. Biomed. Opt. 2013, 18, 057006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  263. Issatayeva, A.; Beisenova, A.; Tosi, D.; Molardi, C. Fiber-optic based smart textiles for real-time monitoring of breathing rate. Sensors 2020, 20, 3408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Das, A.; Ambastha, S.; Sen, S.; Samanta, S. Wearable system for Real-time Remote Monitoring of Respiratory Rate during COVID-19 using Fiber Bragg Grating. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 17th India Council International Conference (INDICON), New Delhi, India, 10–13 December 2020; pp. 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Morgan, S.P.; Korposh, S.; Liu, L.; Hernandez, F.U.; Correia, R.; Norris, A.; Sinha, R.; Hayes-Gill, B.R.; Piletsky, S.A.; Canfarotta, F.; et al. Optical fiber sensors for monitoring in critical care. In Proceedings of the 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Berlin, Germany, 23–27 July 2019; pp. 1139–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Chino, S.; Ishizawa, H.; Hosoya, S.; Koyama, S.; Fujimoto, K.; Kawamura, T. Research for wearable multiple vital sign sensor using fiber Bragg Grating—Verification of several pulsate points in human body surface. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), Turin, Italy, 22–25 May 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  267. Presti, D.L.; Carnevale, A.; D’Abbraccio, J.; Massari, L.; Massaroni, C.; Sabbadini, R.; Zaltieri, M.; Di Tocco, J.; Bravi, M.; Miccinilli, S.; et al. A multi-parametric wearable system to monitor neck movements and respiratory frequency of computer workers. Sensors 2020, 20, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  268. Martinek, R.; Kahankova, R.; Fajkus, M.; Nedoma, J.; Novák, M.; Jargus, J. Fiber-optic Bragg grating sensors signal processing for vital signs monitoring. In Proceedings of the Fiber Optic Sensors and Applications XV; Du, H.H., Mendez, A., Baldwin, C.S., Eds.; SPIE: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2018; p. 49. [Google Scholar]
  269. Xiang, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Z.; Ma, Z.; Gong, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chan, C.C. Wearable Real-Time Monitoring System Based on Fiber Bragg Grating Pressure Sensor for Compression Therapy Applications; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 1217, AISC; ISBN 9783030518271. [Google Scholar]
  270. Pant, S.; Umesh, S.; Asokan, S. Fiber Bragg Grating Respiratory Measurement Device. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), Rome, Italy, 11–13 June 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  271. Murdas, I.A.; Jabbar, A.N. Online healthcare monitor system based on optical wireless and FBG sensors. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Majeed, A.F.; Murdas, I.A. Modern System for Blood Pressure and Temperature Monitoring Based on FBG Sensor. In Proceedings of the 2019 1st AL-Noor International Conference for Science and Technology (NICST), Sulimanyiah, Iraq, 25–29 October 2019; pp. 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Massaroni, C.; Lo Presti, D.; Saccomandi, P.; Caponero, M.A.; D’Amato, R.; Schena, E. Fiber Bragg Grating Probe for Relative Humidity and Respiratory Frequency Estimation: Assessment During Mechanical Ventilation. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 18, 2125–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Jiang, B.; Bi, Z.; Hao, Z.; Yuan, Q.; Feng, D.; Zhou, K.; Zhang, L.; Gan, X.; Zhao, J. Graphene oxide-deposited tilted fiber grating for ultrafast humidity sensing and human breath monitoring. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 293, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Zolfaghari, P.; Erden, O.K.; Ferhanoglu, O.; Tumer, M.; Yalcinkaya, A.D. MRI Compatible Fiber Optic Multi Sensor Platform for Real Time Vital Monitoring. J. Light. Technol. 2021, 39, 4138–4144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Zhu, D.; Liu, B.; Wei, G. Two-dimensional material-based colorimetric biosensors: A review. Biosensors 2021, 11, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Cheng, S.; Gu, Z.; Zhou, L.; Hao, M.; An, H.; Song, K.; Wu, X.; Zhang, K.; Zhao, Z.; Dong, Y.; et al. Recent Progress in Intelligent Wearable Sensors for Health Monitoring and Wound Healing Based on Biofluids. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  278. Purohit, B.; Kumar, A.; Mahato, K.; Chandra, P. Smartphone-assisted personalized diagnostic devices and wearable sensors. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 13, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Wang, J.; Dong, J. Optical waveguides and integrated optical devices for medical diagnosis, health monitoring and light therapies. Sensors 2020, 20, 3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. Roda, A.; Michelini, E.; Zangheri, M.; Di Fusco, M.; Calabria, D.; Simoni, P. Smartphone-based biosensors: A critical review and perspectives. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 79, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Yan, T.; Zhang, G.; Chai, H.; Qu, L.; Zhang, X. Flexible Biosensors Based on Colorimetry, Fluorescence, and Electrochemistry for Point-of-Care Testing. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  282. Kumar, S.; Pandey, C.M.; Hatamie, A.; Simchi, A.; Willander, M.; Malhotra, B.D. Nanomaterial-Modified Conducting Paper: Fabrication, Properties, and Emerging Biomedical Applications. Glob. Chall. 2019, 3, 1900041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Asger, N.; Version, D. Plasmonic colour laser printing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  284. Dong, Z.; Jin, L.; Rezaei, S.D.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Tjiptoharsono, F.; Ho, J.; Gorelik, S.; Jia, R.; Ng, H.; et al. Schrödinger’ s red pixel by quasi-bound-states- in-the-continuum. Sci. Adv. 2022, 4512, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  285. Yang, W.; Xiao, S.; Song, Q.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, S.; Yu, J.; Han, J.; Tsai, D. All-dielectric metasurface for high-performance structural color. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  286. Dong, Z.; Ho, J.; Yu, Y.F.; Fu, Y.H.; Paniagua-Dominguez, R.; Wang, S.; Kuznetsov, A.I.; Yang, J.K.W. Printing Beyond sRGB Color Gamut by Mimicking Silicon Nanostructures in Free-Space. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 7620–7628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Daqiqeh Rezaei, S.; Ho, J.; Naderi, A.; Tavakkoli Yaraki, M.; Wang, T.; Dong, Z.; Ramakrishna, S.; Yang, J.K.W. Tunable, Cost-Effective, and Scalable Structural Colors for Sensing and Consumer Products. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1900735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Daqiqeh Rezaei, S.; Dong, Z.; You En Chan, J.; Trisno, J.; Ng, R.J.H.; Ruan, Q.; Qiu, C.-W.; Mortensen, N.A.; Yang, J.K.W. Nanophotonic Structural Colors. ACS Photonics 2021, 8, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Caldarola, M.; Albella, P.; Cortés, E.; Rahmani, M.; Roschuk, T.; Grinblat, G.; Oulton, R.F.; Bragas, A.V.; Maier, S.A. Non-plasmonic nanoantennas for surface enhanced spectroscopies with ultra-low heat conversion. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  290. Dong, Z.; Gorelik, S.; Paniagua-Dominguez, R.; Yik, J.; Ho, J.; Tjiptoharsono, F.; Lassalle, E.; Rezaei, S.D.; Neo, D.C.J.; Bai, P.; et al. Silicon Nanoantenna Mix Arrays for a Trifecta of Quantum Emitter Enhancements. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 4853–4860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Curto, V.F.; Fay, C.; Coyle, S.; Byrne, R.; O’Toole, C.; Barry, C.; Hughes, S.; Moyna, N.; Diamond, D.; Benito-Lopez, F. Real-time sweat pH monitoring based on a wearable chemical barcode micro-fluidic platform incorporating ionic liquids. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 171–172, 1327–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  292. Morris, D.; Coyle, S.; Wu, Y.; Lau, K.T.; Wallace, G.; Diamond, D. Bio-sensing textile based patch with integrated optical detection system for sweat monitoring. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2009, 139, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  293. Escobedo, P.; Ramos-Lorente, C.E.; Martínez-Olmos, A.; Carvajal, M.A.; Ortega-Muñoz, M.; de Orbe-Payá, I.; Hernández-Mateo, F.; Santoyo-González, F.; Capitán-Vallvey, L.F.; Palma, A.J.; et al. Wireless wearable wristband for continuous sweat pH monitoring. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 327, 128948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Caldara, M.; Colleoni, C.; Guido, E.; Re, V.; Rosace, G. Optical monitoring of sweat pH by a textile fabric wearable sensor based on covalently bonded litmus-3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane coating. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 222, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Zhao, Z.; Li, Q.; Chen, L.; Zhao, Y.; Gong, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J. A thread/fabric-based band as a flexible and wearable microfluidic device for sweat sensing and monitoring. Lab Chip 2021, 21, 916–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Baysal, G.; Önder, S.; Göcek, I.; Trabzon, L.; Kizil, H.; Kök, F.N.; Kayaoʇlu, B.K. Design and fabrication of a new nonwoven-textile based platform for biosensor construction. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 208, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Choi, J.; Bandodkar, A.J.; Reeder, J.T.; Ray, T.R.; Turnquist, A.; Kim, S.B.; Nyberg, N.; Hourlier-Fargette, A.; Model, J.B.; Aranyosi, A.J.; et al. Soft, Skin-Integrated Multifunctional Microfluidic Systems for Accurate Colorimetric Analysis of Sweat Biomarkers and Temperature. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  298. Tang, B.; He, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Zhou, J.; Ye, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, X. Kinetic investigation into pH-dependent color of anthocyanin and its sensing performance. Dye. Pigment. 2019, 170, 107643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Promphet, N.; Rattanawaleedirojn, P.; Siralertmukul, K.; Soatthiyanon, N.; Potiyaraj, P.; Thanawattano, C.; Hinestroza, J.P.; Rodthongkum, N. Non-invasive textile based colorimetric sensor for the simultaneous detection of sweat pH and lactate. Talanta 2019, 192, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Xiao, G.; He, J.; Qiao, Y.; Wang, F.; Xia, Q.; Wang, X.; Yu, L.; Lu, Z.; Li, C.-M. Facile and Low-Cost Fabrication of a Thread/Paper-Based Wearable System for Simultaneous Detection of Lactate and pH in Human Sweat. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2020, 2, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Ruan, J.L.; Chen, C.; Shen, J.H.; Zhao, X.L.; Qian, S.H.; Zhu, Z.G. A gelated colloidal crystal attached lens for noninvasive continuous monitoring of tear glucose. Polymers 2017, 9, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  302. Kassal, P.; Zubak, M.; Scheipl, G.; Mohr, G.J.; Steinberg, M.D.; Murković Steinberg, I. Smart bandage with wireless connectivity for optical monitoring of pH. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 246, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Song, J.; Yang, J.; Du, Z.; Zhao, W.; Guo, H.; Wen, C.; Li, Q.; Sui, X.; et al. A Multifunctional Pro-Healing Zwitterionic Hydrogel for Simultaneous Optical Monitoring of pH and Glucose in Diabetic Wound Treatment. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1905493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Wang, L.; Xu, T.; He, X.; Zhang, X. Flexible, self-healable, adhesive and wearable hydrogel patch for colorimetric sweat detection. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 14938–14945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Soni, A.; Surana, R.K.; Jha, S.K. Smartphone based optical biosensor for the detection of urea in saliva. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 269, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Vega, K.; Jiang, N.; Liu, X.; Kan, V.; Barry, N.; Maes, P.; Yetisen, A.; Paradiso, J. The dermal abyss: Interfacing with the skin by tattooing biosensors. Proc. Int. Symp. Wearable Comput. ISWC 2017, F1305, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Gao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Malyarchuk, V.; Jia, L.; Jang, K.I.; Chad Webb, R.; Fu, H.; Shi, Y.; Zhou, G.; Shi, L.; et al. Epidermal photonic devices for quantitative imaging of temperature and thermal transport characteristics of the skin. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  308. Rodin, D.; Kirby, M.; Sedogin, N.; Shapiro, Y.; Pinhasov, A.; Kreinin, A. Comparative accuracy of optical sensor-based wearable system for non-invasive measurement of blood glucose concentration. Clin. Biochem. 2019, 65, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  309. Ghaffari, R.; Choi, J.; Raj, M.S.; Chen, S.; Lee, S.P.; Reeder, J.T.; Aranyosi, A.J.; Leech, A.; Li, W.; Schon, S.; et al. Soft Wearable Systems for Colorimetric and Electrochemical Analysis of Biofluids. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1907269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Xu, X.-Y.; Yan, B. A fluorescent wearable platform for sweat Cl—Analysis and logic smart-device fabrication based on color adjustable lanthanide MOFs. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 1863–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Yang, B.; Kong, J.; Fang, X. Bandage-like wearable flexible microfluidic recombinase polymerase amplification sensor for the rapid visual detection of nucleic acids. Talanta 2019, 204, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. March, W.; Lazzaro, D.; Rastogi, S. Fluorescent Measurement in the Non-Invasive Contact Lens Glucose Sensor. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2006, 8, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Moradi, V.; Akbari, M.; Wild, P. A fluorescence-based pH sensor with microfluidic mixing and fiber optic detection for wide range pH measurements. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2019, 297, 111507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Coskun, A.F.; Nagi, R.; Sadeghi, K.; Phillips, S.; Ozcan, A. Albumin testing in urine using a smart-phone. Lab Chip 2013, 13, 4231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Hu, H.; Wan, R.; Yao, Y. Highly sensitive and portable fluorescence detection system for Cr3+. Opt. Int. J. Light Electron Opt. 2015, 126, 2087–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Singh, M.; Truong, J.; Reeves, W.B.; Hahm, J.I. Emerging cytokine biosensors with optical detection modalities and nanomaterial-enabled signal enhancement. Sensors 2017, 17, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Mohr, G.J.; Müller, H. Tailoring colour changes of optical sensor materials by combining indicator and inert dyes and their use in sensor layers, textiles and non-wovens. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 206, 788–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Roda, A.; Michelini, E.; Cevenini, L.; Calabria, D.; Calabretta, M.M.; Simoni, P. Integrating Biochemiluminescence Detection on Smartphones: Mobile Chemistry Platform for Point-of-Need Analysis. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 7299–7304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  319. Guo, J.; Zhou, B.; Yang, C.; Dai, Q.; Kong, L. Stretchable and upconversion-luminescent polymeric optical sensor for wearable multifunctional sensing. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 5747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  320. Qi, J.; Su, G.; Li, Z. Gel-based luminescent conductive materials and their applications in biosensors and bioelectronics. Materials 2021, 14, 6759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Orimoto, A.; Haneishi, H.; Kawata, N.; Tatsumi, K. Monitoring and analysis of body surface motion caused by respiration. IEICE 2009, 1, 523–526. [Google Scholar]
  322. Marchionni, P.; Scalise, L.; Ercoli, I.; Tomasini, E.P. An optical measurement method for the simultaneous assessment of respiration and heart rates in preterm infants. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2013, 84, 121705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Scalise, L.; Marchionni, P.; Ercoli, I. Optical method for measurement of respiration rate. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Medical Measurements and Applications, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 30 April–1 May 2010; pp. 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  324. Wiesner, S.; Yaniv, Z. Monitoring Patient Respiration using a Single Optical Camera. In Proceedings of the 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Lyon, France, 22–26 August 2007; pp. 2740–2743. [Google Scholar]
  325. Jia, M.; Chew, W.M.; Feinstein, Y.; Skeath, P.; Sternberg, E.M. Quantification of cortisol in human eccrine sweat by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Analyst 2016, 141, 2053–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  326. Parlak, O.; Keene, S.T.; Marais, A.; Curto, V.F.; Salleo, A. Molecularly selective nanoporous membrane-based wearable organic electrochemical device for noninvasive cortisol sensing. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  327. Seshadri, D.R.; Li, R.T.; Voos, J.E.; Rowbottom, J.R.; Alfes, C.M.; Zorman, C.A.; Drummond, C.K. Wearable sensors for monitoring the physiological and biochemical profile of the athlete. npj Digit. Med. 2019, 2, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  328. Filho, R.R.; de Freitas Chaves, R.C.; Assunção, M.S.C.; Neto, A.S.; De Freitas, F.M.; Romagnoli, M.L.; Silva, E.; Lattanzio, B.; Dubin, A.; Corrêa, T.D. Assessment of the peripheral microcirculation in patients with and without shock: A pilot study on different methods. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2020, 34, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  329. Jeong, I.C.; Yoon, H.; Kang, H.; Yeom, H. Effects of skin surface temperature on photoplethysmograph. J. Healthc. Eng. 2014, 5, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  330. Vavrinsky, E.; Stopjakova, V.; Brezina, I.; Majer, L.; Solarikova, P.; Tvarozek, V. Electro-Optical Monitoring and Analysis of Human Cognitive Processes. In Semiconductor Technologies; InTech: London, UK, 2010; pp. 465–490. ISBN 978-953-307-080-3. [Google Scholar]
  331. Ferreira, M.F.S.; Castro-Camus, E.; Ottaway, D.J.; López-Higuera, J.M.; Feng, X.; Jin, W.; Jeong, Y.; Picqué, N.; Tong, L.; Reinhard, B.M.; et al. Roadmap on optical sensors. J. Opt. 2017, 19, 083001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  332. Koydemir, H.C.; Ozcan, A. Wearable and Implantable Sensors for Biomedical Applications. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2018, 11, 127–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  333. Kapassa, E.; Touloupou, M.; Mavrogiorgou, A.; Kiourtis, A.; Giannouli, D.; Katsigianni, K.; Kyriazis, D. An Innovative eHealth System Powered by 5G Network Slicing. In Proceedings of the 2019 Sixth International Conference on Internet of Things: Systems, Management and Security (IOTSMS), Granada, Spain, 22–25 October 2019; pp. 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Wearable optical sensors for measuring of human physiology: (a) Miniaturized battery-free NFC enabled wireless systems for wearable pulse oximetry (unencapsulated device and device during operation mounted on a thumbnail) [12]; (b) Ultra-flexible organic PPG sensor attached to finger (smart e-skin system) [13]; (c) Printed reflectance oximeter array composed of four red and IR OLEDs and eight OPDs placed on the forearm for 2D oxygenation mapping [14]; (d) Contactless infrared medical grade thermometer composed from 16 IR sensors for forehead measurement with smartphone connectivity [15]; (e) Battery-free skin UV exposure tracker in form of fashion clip button with smartphone connectivity [16]; (f) Smart glasses with thermal camera for precise temperature measurement and scanning ideal for medical, industrial, and environmental use [17]; (g) Respiration belt with embedded silica fiber optical sensor for thoracic movement analysis [18]; (h) Self-assembled wavy optical microfiber for stretchable wearable sensor (schematic diagram and sensor stuck on the wrist) for monitoring of radial artery pulse wave [19]; (i) Optical fiber interferometer based breathing sensor built into oxygen mask [20]; (j) Skin-interfaced microfluidic battery-free systems for simultaneous electrochemical, colorimetric, and volumetric analysis of sweat [21]; (k) Contact lens integrated glucose monitoring using smartphones [22]; (l) Skin-wearable fluorometric microfluidic device (emitted by blue light) for measuring of Cl, Na and Zn sweat concentrations [23].
Figure 1. Wearable optical sensors for measuring of human physiology: (a) Miniaturized battery-free NFC enabled wireless systems for wearable pulse oximetry (unencapsulated device and device during operation mounted on a thumbnail) [12]; (b) Ultra-flexible organic PPG sensor attached to finger (smart e-skin system) [13]; (c) Printed reflectance oximeter array composed of four red and IR OLEDs and eight OPDs placed on the forearm for 2D oxygenation mapping [14]; (d) Contactless infrared medical grade thermometer composed from 16 IR sensors for forehead measurement with smartphone connectivity [15]; (e) Battery-free skin UV exposure tracker in form of fashion clip button with smartphone connectivity [16]; (f) Smart glasses with thermal camera for precise temperature measurement and scanning ideal for medical, industrial, and environmental use [17]; (g) Respiration belt with embedded silica fiber optical sensor for thoracic movement analysis [18]; (h) Self-assembled wavy optical microfiber for stretchable wearable sensor (schematic diagram and sensor stuck on the wrist) for monitoring of radial artery pulse wave [19]; (i) Optical fiber interferometer based breathing sensor built into oxygen mask [20]; (j) Skin-interfaced microfluidic battery-free systems for simultaneous electrochemical, colorimetric, and volumetric analysis of sweat [21]; (k) Contact lens integrated glucose monitoring using smartphones [22]; (l) Skin-wearable fluorometric microfluidic device (emitted by blue light) for measuring of Cl, Na and Zn sweat concentrations [23].
Biosensors 12 00217 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vavrinsky, E.; Esfahani, N.E.; Hausner, M.; Kuzma, A.; Rezo, V.; Donoval, M.; Kosnacova, H. The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables. Biosensors 2022, 12, 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040217

AMA Style

Vavrinsky E, Esfahani NE, Hausner M, Kuzma A, Rezo V, Donoval M, Kosnacova H. The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables. Biosensors. 2022; 12(4):217. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040217

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vavrinsky, Erik, Niloofar Ebrahimzadeh Esfahani, Michal Hausner, Anton Kuzma, Vratislav Rezo, Martin Donoval, and Helena Kosnacova. 2022. "The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables" Biosensors 12, no. 4: 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040217

APA Style

Vavrinsky, E., Esfahani, N. E., Hausner, M., Kuzma, A., Rezo, V., Donoval, M., & Kosnacova, H. (2022). The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables. Biosensors, 12(4), 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040217

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop