Next Article in Journal
Biomedical Applications of Liquid Metal Nanoparticles: A Critical Review
Next Article in Special Issue
An Electrochemical Aptasensor for Pb2+ Detection Based on Metal–Organic-Framework-Derived Hybrid Carbon
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Review of Food Allergy: Nanobiosensor and Food Allergen Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Label-Free and Sensitive Determination of Cadmium Ions Using a Ti-Modified Co3O4-Based Electrochemical Aptasensor

1
School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2
Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 200240, China
3
Bor S. Luh Food Safety Research Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2020, 10(12), 195; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10120195
Submission received: 30 October 2020 / Revised: 20 November 2020 / Accepted: 26 November 2020 / Published: 30 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Developments for Efficient Rapid Bioassays)

Abstract

:
The current work demonstrates an electrochemical aptasensor for sensitive determination of Cd2+ based on the Ti-modified Co3O4 nanoparticles. In this unlabeled system, Ti-modified Co3O4 nanoparticles act as current signal amplifiers modified on the screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) surface, while the derivative aptamer of Cd2+ works as a target recognizer. In addition, the sensing is based on the increase in electrochemical probe thionine current signal due to the binding of aptamer to Cd2+ via specific recognition. In the current study, key parameters, including aptamer concentration, pH, and incubation time were optimized, respectively, to ensure sensing performance. Cyclic voltammetry was used not only to characterize each preparation and optimization step, but also to profile the bindings of aptamer to Cd2+. Under optimal conditions, Cd2+ can be determined in a linear range of 0.20 to 15 ng/mL, with a detection limit of 0.49 ng/mL, significantly below the maximum concentration limit set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Based on comparative analysis and the results of recovery test with real samples, this simple, label-free but highly selective method has considerable potential and thus can be used as an in-situ environmental monitoring platform for Cd2+ testing.

1. Introduction

Cadmium (Cd2+) is a bioaccumulative, non-biodegradable and highly toxic heavy metal, which causes a variety of human health disorders [1,2,3]. To minimize the associated potential health risks, the maximum concentration in drinking water for Cd2+ is set at 5 ng/mL, as defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Likewise, due to the high concern for determination and monitoring of Cd2+, a range of highly sensitive conventional techniques have been used, including electrothermal atomization atomic absorption spectroscopy (ET-AAS) [4,5], graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) [6,7] and inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) [8,9,10]. All these conventional techniques are sensitive and accurate, but there are some limitations, such as laborious, time-consuming operation, and limited applicability for in-situ determination. In this regard, it is of paramount importance to develop a simple, convenient, and robust method for Cd2+ determination.
In recent decades, there has been a high level of attention for single-stranded oligonucleotide—aptamer since they were selected for the first time through the systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) system [11,12]. Additionally, due to its high specificity, compatibility, environment-friendly properties, reliability and ease of synthesis and modification, aptamer opens up novel insights into both qualitative and quantitative determination of organic and inorganic targets such as pesticides [13,14], proteases [15], toxins [16,17], antibiotics [18], and heavy metals [19,20,21,22]. For instance, heavy metals including Pb2+, Hg2+, and Ag+ can be sensed and quantified through specific dimensional structures of aptamer/target complex as “G-quadruplex”, “T-Hg2+-T”, or “C-Ag+-C”, respectively [23,24,25]. Currently, two different aptamers of Cd2+ have been respectively selected by two independent groups [26,27]. Then, colorimetric [28] and fluorescent methods [26,29] were exploited to determine Cd2+. As for electrochemical methods, they are sensitive, and some portable devices are already commercial and available, including pocketSTAT2 (Ivium Technologies, Netherlands), PalmSens4 (Palmsens, Netherlands), μStat-i 400 (Metrohm, Switzerland) and CHI1200C (CH Instruments, China). In particular, electrochemical biosensors benefit a lot from screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE), due to disposability, low cost, portability, customized fabrication and mass production [30,31]. They have considerable potential for environmental monitoring of targets in field. However, there is very limited data available in the literature regarding electrochemical biosensors based on SPCE and unlabeled aptamer for Cd2+ determination.
Generally, there are two essential indicators for a robust aptasensor, i.e., selectivity and sensitivity. The former one is basically ensured by high affinity of aptamer. As far as sensitivity is concerned, it is usual to have electrodes modify with functional nanomaterials. Their large surface area and unique nanostructure could boost electrons transfer rate, amplify electrical response, and enhance performance of biosensors [32,33]. Co3O4, a transition metal oxide with attractive electrocatalytic, electronic, and electrochemical properties, has been widely used in a wide range of applications [34]. In addition, most of the Co3O4-based nanocomposites developed to date have shown great potential in applications of Li-ion batteries [35], supercapacitor [36], electrocatalysts [37], and electrochemical sensors [38]. It has also been reported that their electron transfer and other electrochemical properties can be further promoted through modification with other transition metal oxides [35,39]. Anatase TiO2, on the other hand, is the most widely explored functional metal oxide [40], which has demonstrated importance in many electrochemical applications due to its large specific surface area and uniform nanopore distribution [41,42]. Its nanohybrids have also presented great advantages in electrical biosensors with high performance [43]. However, the synergetic effect of Ti-modified Co3O4 on electrochemical aptasensor was insufficiently investigated.
Based on the above, we have proposed a label-free electrochemical aptasensor for highly selective as well as sensitive determination of Cd2+, which consists of the derived aptamer and Ti-modified Co3O4 as a recognizer and a signal amplifier, respectively. The electrochemical properties and selectivity of the aptasensor are characterized under optimal conditions. Furthermore, aptamer-based methods and a recovery test with environmental samples will be compared and performed, respectively, to assess its practical feasibility at field level. Scheme 1 shows the architecture and signaling mechanism of the label-free electrochemical aptasensor.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Ti-modified Co3O4 was synthesized as per the following steps. Briefly, Co(NO3)2·6H2O and Ti[O(CH2)3CH3]4 were dissolved in 80 mL of ultrapure water and 20 mL ethanol, respectively. Then, they were mixed with different molar ratios of Co:Ti (1:1 and 2:1) by stirring continuously for 3 h. Afterward, 10 mL of ammonia water was added dropwise and continuously stirred for 2 h. The resulting precipitates were finally rinsed three times with ultrapure water and separated using suction filtration followed by 10 h drying at 90 °C and 3 h calcination at 500 °C. Co3O4 was also prepared from Co(NO3)2·6H2O by following the same procedures with the omission of Ti[O(CH2)3CH3]4. According to the initial molar ratios of Co:Ti (1:1 and 2:1) mixed, samples obtained were marked as Co1Ti1 and Co2Ti1, respectively. [44]. The cadmium aptamer sequence originated from its parent [27] by subtly adding 5 nucleotides at 3′: 5′-GGA CTG TTG TGG TAT TAT TTT TGG TTG TGC AGT CC-3′, which was synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co. Standard solution of Cd2+ (1000 mg/L) was purchased from Merck Co., Inc. (Darmstadt, Germany). Thionine was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. (Beijing, China). The detection buffer, a 0.1 M HAc-NaAc solution (containing 1.0 mM thionine), consisted of different volumes of thionine, sodium acetate and glacial acetic acid. Ammonia water was purchased from Shanghai Lingfeng Reagent Co. (Shanghai, China). All other reagents purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) were used (in the current study) without further purification.

2.2. Apparatus

CHI1030A Electrochemical Workstation (CH Instruments, Shanghai, China) was used for electrochemical characterizations with an SPCE system (Jiangsu Rongbin Biotech Co., Nanjing, China), which contained (i) a carbon auxiliary electrode, (ii) Ag/AgCl reference electrode and (iii) a 2.0 mm diameter working electrode, respectively. All the ultrapure water utilized in this work was prepared by a Millipore-MilliQ system (Millipore Inc., Bedford, MA, USA). Scanning electron microscope (SEM, NOVA NanoSEM 230, Hillsboro, OR, USA), transmission electron microscope (TEM, TALOS F200X, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, TALOS F200X, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) were employed for characterization of as-prepared Co3O4 and Ti-modified Co3O4. X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) were conducted on a D8 Advance Da Vinci Poly-functional X-Ray Diffractometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA).

2.3. Aptasensor Fabrication Procedures

For drop-coating evenly on a bare electrode, the homodisperse of nanoparticles in water was required. Thus, only Co2Ti1 was adequate and then used for the aptasensor fabrication. 5.0 mg Co2Ti1 were added into 5.0 mL of ultrapure water and then ultrasonicated for 45 min. From this homogeneous dispersion mixture, 2.5 μL was drop-coated on the working electrode, followed by drying at room temperature for 1~2 h. Afterward, 2.5 μL of 2.0 μM Cd2+ aptamer was evenly introduced on the surface of the resulting electrode and dried for another 1~2 h to form a sensing interface, which was subsequently rinsed with ultrapure water to remove unbound ssDNA. Eventually, the aptasensor for Cd2+ determination was prepared after drying.

2.4. Electrochemical Measurements

The electrochemical measurements were performed by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in detection buffer (pH 5.5), which was swept from −0.65 to 0.00 V with a scan rate of 100 mV/s. Each measurement was repeated at least three times.

2.5. Determination of Cd2+ in Environmental Samples

Freshwater samples from a tributary of the Huangpu River and tap water at Minhang campus at Shanghai Jiao Tong University were collected to assess the reliability and operational capability of the proposed aptasensor through a recovery test. These samples were filtered through 0.22 µm membranes after adding various concentrations of Cd2+, followed by target determination via the proposed apparatus and procedure. Meanwhile, a standard approach, AAS, was employed as a contrast. Each measurement was repeated at least three times.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Co3O4 and Co2Ti1

The microscopic morphologies of Co3O4 and Co2Ti1 were respectively characterized by SEM, TEM, EDS, and XRD. As presented in Figure 1a,b, pure Co3O4 was up to 50 nm in size, while the size of Co2Ti1 varied from 10 to 20 nm after the incorporation of Ti (Figure 1c,d). As a consequence, the specific surface area enlarged remarkably, boosting both loading capacity and conductivity. The XRD patterns of Co3O4 and Co2Ti1 were also demonstrated in Figure 2a. It was easy to observe that the diffraction peaks of Co2Ti1 were weaker than those of pure Co3O4, indicating that the size of Co3O4 decreased obviously after the incorporation of Ti. Meanwhile, several weak peaks appeared in the diffraction pattern of Co2Ti1. Those peaks located at 27.4°, 32.7°, 48.9°, 63.6°, and 35.4°, 62.0° could be respectively assigned to CoTiO3 and Co2TiO4 [45,46], suggesting the formation of Co-O-Ti solid solutions. Finally, as shown in the images of EDS elemental mapping (Figure 2b,c), these three elements were distributed homogeneously. However, the content of Ti in Co2Ti1 was lower than that of Co and O (Figure 2c), which might be ascribed to the initial molar ratio of Co:Ti mixed in preparation.

3.2. Electrochemical Characterization of the Aptasensor

Cyclic voltammetry is a convenient and effective technique for the characterization of modified electrode. Therefore, the behaviors of the electrochemical probe after each assembly procedure were studied by this technique. As shown in line a of Figure 3, the thionine presented an insignificant response on bare electrode because of poor conductivity. However, after the Co2Ti1 modification, the peak currents increased significantly (line b of Figure 3), due to its impact on specific surface area expansion and electron-transfer promotion. As a result, the sensitivity changed positively together with the detection limit of the aptasensor. The peak current increased slightly since the introduction of the aptamer (line c of Figure 3), indicating that it was successfully immobilized on working electrode. The possible reason for the current difference may be ascribed to the weak electrostatic attraction between the positively charged thionine and the negatively charged phosphate groups of the DNA backbone [47,48], resulting in its adsorption along with adhesion of aptamer to electrode, thus gently facilitating electron-transfer. Finally, after incubating the aptasensor with Cd2+ (line d of Figure 3), a significant peak current was observed, indicating the formation of Cd2+-aptamer complex through specific recognition. In short, a weak current signal could only be observed in absence of Cd2+, while a strong electrochemical signal could be detected in the presence of Cd2+ due to the Cd2+-aptamer complex, thereby confirming that the aptasensor was successfully prepared.

3.3. Optimization of Experimental Conditions

In addition to a profiling technique, CV also served as a sensitive electrochemical analysis method. In this regard, the experimental conditions including aptamer concentration, pH value and incubation time were optimized to achieve optimal performance. Respective data about the optimization results are presented in the Supplementary Material (Figure S1). In brief, the optimal conditions obtained were: (a) aptamer concentration: 2.0 μM; (b) pH value: 5.5; (c) incubation time: 40 min.

3.4. Analytical Performance

The analytical performance of the aptasensor was evaluated under the aforementioned optimal experimental conditions, where a series of Cd2+ determinations were performed to estimate the sensitivity. The ΔI value (variation of peak current signal before and after the introduction of Cd2+ to electrode) decreased as increasing concentration of Cd2+, which also presented a good linearity from 0.20 to 15 ng/mL (Figure 4b). The linear regression equations determined were:
I = −0.1105C + 3.8092 (R2 = 0.99)
(C: the concentration of Cd2+; R2: correlation coefficient).
The limit of detection (LOD) was estimated as 0.49 ng/mL (3σ/slope), which is significantly lower than the maximum concentration limit set by EPA. Moreover, on the basis of the comparative analysis of aptamer-based approaches (Table 1), this aptasensor is more sensitive than most of the others. It is noteworthy that the LOD of this method is about 21-fold lower than that of another electrochemical aptasensor, demonstrating its high sensitivity. Although a fluorescent aptasensor has a significantly lower LOD, it is unable to quantify Cd2+ below 100 ng/mL, to which the current electrochemical aptasensor is well complementary.

3.5. Selectivity and Reproducibility

The selectivity performance of the current method was determined by recording current signal variations (ΔI) of potential interfering ions in the absence and presence of Cd2+. The concentrations of interferences (e.g., Pb2+, Cu2+, Mn2+, Ag+, Zn2+, Fe2+, As(III), As(V) and Hg2+) were 50.0 ng/mL, while Cd2+ concentration was 2.0 ng/mL. As shown in Figure 5, the ΔI values of sensing systems containing a higher concentration of interfering ions were significantly less than that added with Cd2+. Nevertheless, those recovered sharply after the introduction of Cd2+ to the sensing system containing interfering ions. These results enabled confirmation that the interfering ions could negligibly affect Cd2+ determination, even if their concentrations were 25 times higher than that of Cd2+, which confirmed excellent selectivity of the proposed aptasensor for Cd2+ determination.
Furthermore, according to possible secondary structures predicted preliminarily by UNAfold (https://sg.idtdna.com/UNAfold/) (Figure S2), the subtle addition with 5 nucleotides at 3′ of this aptamer successfully induced its preferential configuration of a stem-loop structure (Figure S2a) from a random coil sequence (Figure S2b) via conformational switching. Meanwhile, Cd2+ was incorporated and buried with the binding pocket of this structure, underlying its high sensitivity and selectivity. As structures of “G-quadruplex” and “T-Hg2+-T” have been sufficiently studied, we are able to develop various aptasensors for Pb2+ and Hg2+ detection. Unfortunately, the mechanism of how aptamer bind Cd2+ is not yet fully understood. To elucidate the fundamental and further development of Cd2+ aptasensor, a lot of effort is still needed.
Under the same conditions, reproducibility was also examined at a Cd2+ concentration of 2.0 ng/mL using 10 identically prepared SPCEs. The obtained results of the relative standard deviation (RSD) of 4.37% indicated that the reproducibility of this aptasensor was quite acceptable.

3.6. Application in Environmental Samples

As demonstrated in the selectivity investigation previously, the proposed aptasensor presented strong anti-interference capability against heavy metal ions. However, environmental samples were more complicated, in which various species of interferences might exist, e.g., microorganisms, biometabolites, and antibiotics. To assess the applicability of a new method to those complicated samples, a recovery test was widely adopted and accepted. Therefore, the recovery test with real samples was performed to analyze the validity of the current method, while AAS was employed as a contrast. Table 2 exhibited the mean recoveries of the Cd2+ and RSD values in two Cd2+ spiked samples obtained with the proposed aptasensor and AAS. The amounts of Cd2+ added were set according to the EPA limit (5 ng/mL). As shown in Table 2, the recoveries of this method ranged from 98.71% to 109.95% with RSD values of 5.75% to 8.24%. In consideration of its simplicity, convenience, analytical performance and application scenarios, these comparable recoveries with AAS were well acceptable. All of the above results substantiated its practicability and promising future for in-situ monitoring of Cd2+ in field.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the effectiveness of a robust electrochemical aptasensor based on the derivative aptamer and Ti-modified Co3O4 was summarized, which was designed for highly sensitive and selective determination of Cd2+ in environmental samples. The basic principle for Cd2+ determination underlies an increase in the current signal of electrochemical probe thionine due to the formation of Cd2+-aptamer complex through specific recognition. The detection limit obtained (0.49 ng/mL) is significantly lower than the limit set by the U.S. EPA, indicating its possible use as an environmental monitoring platform for Cd2+. Although the system possesses merits as aforementioned, there are still some limitations existing. For example, only one target can be detected in a measurement. Extra and tedious pretreatment is also needed for complex samples. Its availability can be improved if either simultaneous measurements of multiple heavy metal ions or integration with auto-pretreatment into a portable device is realized. Furthermore, the proposed aptasensor was based on an SPCE system, which meant each channel was one-off. The capability of being regenerated should be taken into serious consideration along with aptasensor development. Therefore, our future work will be carried out to address the above issues.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/10/12/195/s1, Figure S1: Optimization of the experimental parameters: (a) aptamer concentration, (b) pH of buffer, (c) incubation time on aptasensor with Cd2+ by CV in detection buffer (0.1 M HAc-NaAc solution containing 1.0 mM thionine), Figure S2: Possible secondary structures of aptamer predicted by UNAfold (https://sg.idtdna.com/UNAfold/): (a) most stable stem-loop structure form and (b) most stable random coil sequence form.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.Z.; Data curation, J.D.; Formal analysis, Y.L. (Yang Liu) and D.Z. (Dongwei Zhang); Funding acquisition, P.Z.; Investigation, Y.L. (Yang Liu); Methodology, Y.L. (Yang Liu), J.D. and X.Z.; Project administration, X.Y. and D.Z. (Dan Zhang); Resources, X.Z.; Supervision, D.Z. (Dan Zhang), Y.L. (Yitong Lu) and P.Z.; Validation, D.Z. (Dongwei Zhang); Writing—original draft, Y.L. (Yang Liu); Writing—review & editing, K.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program, China (Grant No. T20170201) and Shanghai “Project of Science and Technology Innovation Action” for Agriculture, China (Grant No. 20392001000).

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the efforts of Mei (Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China) in synthesis of Ti-modified Co3O4.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bansod, B.; Kumar, T.; Thakur, R.; Rana, S.; Singh, I. A review on various electrochemical techniques for heavy metal ions detection with different sensing platforms. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 94, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Afkhami, A.; Soltani-Felehgari, F.; Madrakian, T.; Ghaedi, H.; Rezaeivala, M. Fabrication and application of a new modified electrochemical sensor using nano-silica and a newly synthesized Schiff base for simultaneous determination of Cd2+, Cu2+ and Hg2+ ions in water and some foodstuff samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 771, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Darwish, I.A.; Blake, D.A. Development and validation of a one-step immunoassay for determination of cadmium in human serum. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Alvarez, M.A.; Carrillo, G. Simultaneous determination of arsenic, cadmium, copper, chromium, nickel, lead and thallium in total digested sediment samples and available fractions by electrothermal atomization atomic absorption spectroscopy (ET AAS). Talanta 2012, 97, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ashrafzadeh Afshar, E.; Taher, M.A.; Fazelirad, H. Ultra-trace determination of thallium(I) using a nanocomposite consisting of magnetite, halloysite nanotubes and dibenzo-18-crown-6 for preconcentration prior to its quantitation by ET-AAS. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Paixao, L.B.; Brandao, G.C.; Araujo, R.G.O.; Korn, M.G.A. Assessment of cadmium and lead in commercial coconut water and industrialized coconut milk employing HR-CS GF AAS. Food Chem. 2019, 284, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dos Santos, J.M.; Quinaia, S.P.; Felsner, M.L. Fast and direct analysis of Cr, Cd and Pb in brown sugar by GF AAS. Food Chem. 2018, 260, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nawab, J.; Khan, S.; Xiaoping, W. Ecological and health risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in the major rivers of Pakistan: General population vs. Fishermen. Chemosphere 2018, 202, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, M.; Ma, H.; Chi, Q.; Li, Q.; Li, M.; Zhang, H.; Li, C.; Fang, H. A monolithic copolymer prepared from N-(4-vinyl)-benzyl iminodiacetic acid, divinylbenzene and N,N′-methylene bisacrylamide for preconcentration of cadmium(II) and cobalt(II) from biological samples prior to their determination by ICP-MS. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Y.; Guo, W.; Hu, Z.; Jin, L.; Hu, S.; Guo, Q. Method Development for Direct Multielement Quantification by LA-ICP-MS in Food Samples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tuerk, C.; Gold, L. Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Science 1990, 249, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ellington, A.D.; Szostak, J.W. In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nature 1990, 346, 818–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shi, X.J.; Sun, J.F.; Yao, Y.; Liu, H.M.; Huang, J.C.; Guo, Y.M.; Sun, X. Novel electrochemical aptasensor with dual signal amplification strategy for detection of acetamiprid. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 705, 135905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fu, J.; Dong, H.; Zhao, Q.; Cheng, S.; Guo, Y.; Sun, X. Fabrication of refreshable aptasensor based on hydrophobic screen-printed carbon electrode interface. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 712, 136410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cheng, W.; Pan, J.; Yang, J.; Zheng, Z.; Lu, F.; Chen, Y.; Gao, W. A photoelectrochemical aptasensor for thrombin based on the use of carbon quantum dot-sensitized TiO2 and visible-light photoelectrochemical activity. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. He, Y.; Tian, F.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, Q.; Fu, R.; Jiao, B. Colorimetric aptasensor for ochratoxin A detection based on enzyme-induced gold nanoparticle aggregation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 388, 121758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, C.; Zhang, G.; Huang, Y.; Yang, S.; Ren, S.; Gao, Z.; Chen, A. Dual-competitive lateral flow aptasensor for detection of aflatoxin B1 in food and feedstuffs. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Song, J.L.; Huang, M.H.; Jiang, N.; Zheng, S.Y.; Mu, T.W.; Meng, L.J.; Liu, Y.B.; Liu, J.Y.; Chen, G. Ultrasensitive detection of amoxicillin by TiO2-g-C3N4@AuNPs impedimetric aptasensor: Fabrication, optimization, and mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 391, 122024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ding, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yu, M.; Zhan, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, P. An electrochemical aptasensor based on gold@polypyrrole composites for detection of lead ions. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Memon, A.G.; Xing, Y.P.; Zhou, X.H.; Wang, R.Y.; Liu, L.H.; Zeng, S.Y.; He, M.; Ma, M. Ultrasensitive colorimetric aptasensor for Hg2+ detection using Exo-III assisted target recycling amplification and unmodified AuNPs as indicators. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 384, 120948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Y.Y.; Cai, Z.X.; Sheng, L.; Ma, M.H.; Wang, X.Y. A magnetic relaxation switching and visual dual-mode sensor for selective detection of Hg2+ based on aptamers modified Au@Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 388, 121728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Peng, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, L.; Zhu, J.J. A label-free aptasensor for ultrasensitive Pb2+ detection based on electrochemiluminescence resonance energy transfer between carbon nitride nanofibers and Ru(phen)32+. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 359, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhou, W.; Ding, J.; Liu, J. 2-Aminopurine-modified DNA homopolymers for robust and sensitive detection of mercury and silver. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 87, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Solra, M.; Bala, R.; Wangoo, N.; Soni, G.K.; Kumar, M.; Sharma, R.K. Optical pico-biosensing of lead using plasmonic gold nanoparticles and a cationic peptide-based aptasensor. Chem. Commun. 2019, 56, 289–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Memon, A.G.; Zhou, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, R.; Liu, L.; Yu, B.; He, M.; Shi, H. Utilization of unmodified gold nanoparticles for label-free detection of mercury(II): Insight into rational design of mercury-specific oligonucleotides. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 321, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, H.; Cheng, H.; Wang, J.; Xu, L.; Chen, H.; Pei, R. Selection and characterization of DNA aptamers for the development of light-up biosensor to detect Cd(II). Talanta 2016, 154, 498–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, Y.; Zhan, S.; Wang, L.; Zhou, P. Selection of a DNA aptamer for cadmium detection based on cationic polymer mediated aggregation of gold nanoparticles. Analyst 2014, 139, 1550–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, L.; Liang, J.; Wang, Y.; Ren, S.; Wu, J.; Zhou, H.; Gao, Z. Highly Selective, Aptamer-Based, Ultrasensitive Nanogold Colorimetric Smartphone Readout for Detection of Cd(II). Molecules 2019, 24, 2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Luan, Y.X.; Lu, A.X.; Chen, J.Y.; Fu, H.L.; Xu, L. A Label-Free Aptamer-Based Fluorescent Assay for Cadmium Detection. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Smart, A.; Crew, A.; Pemberton, R.; Hughes, G.; Doran, O.; Hart, J.P. Screen -printed carbon based biosensors and their applications in agri-food safety. Trac Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 127, 115898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hughes, G.; Westmacott, K.; Honeychurch, K.; Crew, A.; Pemberton, R.; Hart, J. Recent Advances in the Fabrication and Application of Screen-Printed Electrochemical (Bio)Sensors Based on Carbon Materials for Biomedical, Agri-Food and Environmental Analyses. Biosensors 2016, 6, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Farzin, L.; Shamsipur, M.; Sheibani, S. A review: Aptamer-based analytical strategies using the nanomaterials for environmental and human monitoring of toxic heavy metals. Talanta 2017, 174, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ramnani, P.; Saucedo, N.M.; Mulchandani, A. Carbon nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors for label-free sensing of environmental pollutants. Chemosphere 2016, 143, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Li, W.Y.; Xu, L.N.; Chen, J. Co3O4 nanomaterials in lithium-ion batteries and gas sensors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2005, 15, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Regier, T.; Dai, H. Covalent hybrid of spinel manganese-cobalt oxide and graphene as advanced oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 3517–3523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Dong, X.C.; Xu, H.; Wang, X.W.; Huang, Y.X.; Chan-Park, M.B.; Zhang, H.; Wang, L.H.; Huang, W.; Chen, P. 3D graphene-cobalt oxide electrode for high-performance supercapacitor and enzymeless glucose detection. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 3206–3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wu, Z.S.; Ren, W.; Wen, L.; Gao, L.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, G.; Li, F.; Cheng, H.M. Graphene anchored with Co3O4 nanoparticles as anode of lithium ion batteries with enhanced reversible capacity and cyclic performance. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3187–3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Haldorai, Y.; Kim, J.Y.; Vilian, A.T.E.; Heo, N.S.; Huh, Y.S.; Han, Y.K. An enzyme-free electrochemical sensor based on reduced graphene oxide/Co3O4 nanospindle composite for sensitive detection of nitrite. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 227, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, J.; Jiang, J.; Cheng, C.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Gong, H.; Fan, H.J. Co3O4 Nanowire@MnO2 ultrathin nanosheet core/shell arrays: A new class of high-performance pseudocapacitive materials. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2076–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Z.; Zhou, L.; Lou, X.W. Metal oxide hollow nanostructures for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 1903–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lin, H.G.; Ji, X.B.; Chen, Q.Y.; Zhou, Y.K.; Banks, C.E.; Wu, K.B. Mesoporous-TiO2 nanoparticles based carbon paste electrodes exhibit enhanced electrochemical sensitivity for phenols. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 1990–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bao, S.J.; Li, C.M.; Zang, J.F.; Cui, X.Q.; Qiao, Y.; Guo, J. New nanostructured TiO2 for direct electrochemistry and glucose sensor applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nadzirah, S.; Gopinath, S.C.B.; Parmin, N.A.; Hamzah, A.A.; Mohamed, M.A.; Chang, E.Y.; Dee, C.F. State-of-the-Art on Functional Titanium Dioxide-Integrated Nano-Hybrids in Electrical Biosensors. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mei, J.; Huang, W.; Qu, Z.; Hu, X.; Yan, N. Catalytic oxidation of dibromomethane over Ti-modified Co3O4 catalysts: Structure, activity and mechanism. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 505, 870–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, S.; Ye, M.; Han, A.; Liu, C. Preparation and characterization of Co2TiO4 and doped Co2−xMxTiO4 (M = Zn2+, Ni2+)-coated mica composite pigments. Appl. Phys. A 2016, 122, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Acharya, T.; Choudhary, R.N.P. Structural, dielectric and impedance characteristics of CoTiO3. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 177, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Huang, K.J.; Wu, Z.W.; Wu, Y.Y.; Liu, Y.M. Electrochemical immunoassay of carcinoembryonic antigen based on TiO2-graphene/thionine/gold nanoparticles composite. Can. J. Chem. Rev. Can. Chim. 2012, 90, 608–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, C.Y.; Wang, Q.; Xiang, Y.; Yuan, R.; Chai, Y.Q. Target-induced strand release and thionine-decorated gold nanoparticle amplification labels for sensitive electrochemical aptamer-based sensing of small molecules. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 197, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lotfi Zadeh Zhad, H.R.; Rodríguez Torres, Y.M.; Lai, R.Y. A reagentless and reusable electrochemical aptamer-based sensor for rapid detection of Cd(II). J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 803, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic view of fabrication and principle of a label-free electrochemical aptasensor used for Cd2+ determination in the current study.
Scheme 1. Schematic view of fabrication and principle of a label-free electrochemical aptasensor used for Cd2+ determination in the current study.
Biosensors 10 00195 sch001
Figure 1. SEM and TEM images of Co3O4 (a,b) and Co2Ti1 (c,d).
Figure 1. SEM and TEM images of Co3O4 (a,b) and Co2Ti1 (c,d).
Biosensors 10 00195 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns and EDS elemental mapping images of (b) Co3O4 and (c) Co2Ti1.
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns and EDS elemental mapping images of (b) Co3O4 and (c) Co2Ti1.
Biosensors 10 00195 g002
Figure 3. CV of electrode under each assembly procedure from −0.65 to 0.00 V (scan rate: 100 mV/s): (a) bare electrode, (b) electrode modified with Co2Ti1, (c) electrode modified with Co2Ti1/aptamer, (d) electrode modified with Co2Ti1/aptamer/Cd2+.
Figure 3. CV of electrode under each assembly procedure from −0.65 to 0.00 V (scan rate: 100 mV/s): (a) bare electrode, (b) electrode modified with Co2Ti1, (c) electrode modified with Co2Ti1/aptamer, (d) electrode modified with Co2Ti1/aptamer/Cd2+.
Biosensors 10 00195 g003
Figure 4. (a) CV responses to aptasensor upon various concentrations of Cd2+ from a to g: (a) 0.2, (b) 1.0, (c) 3.0, (d) 5.0, (e) 7.5, (f) 10.0, (g) 15.0 ng/mL in detection buffer (pH = 5.5); (b) Calibration plots of ΔI versus concentration of Cd2+.
Figure 4. (a) CV responses to aptasensor upon various concentrations of Cd2+ from a to g: (a) 0.2, (b) 1.0, (c) 3.0, (d) 5.0, (e) 7.5, (f) 10.0, (g) 15.0 ng/mL in detection buffer (pH = 5.5); (b) Calibration plots of ΔI versus concentration of Cd2+.
Biosensors 10 00195 g004
Figure 5. Selectivity of the aptasensor for Cd2+ determination. The concentrations of interfering ions were 50.0 ng/mL, and Cd2+ concentration was 2.0 ng/mL.
Figure 5. Selectivity of the aptasensor for Cd2+ determination. The concentrations of interfering ions were 50.0 ng/mL, and Cd2+ concentration was 2.0 ng/mL.
Biosensors 10 00195 g005
Table 1. Comparison of different aptamer-based approaches for Cd2+ determination.
Table 1. Comparison of different aptamer-based approaches for Cd2+ determination.
ApproachesLinear Range (ng/mL)LOD (ng/mL)Reference
fluorometry0.00~112.414.50[26]
100.00~10,000.000.04[29]
colorimetry1.00~400.001.00[28]
1.12~44.960.52[27]
electrochemistry28.10~112.4110.34[49]
0.20~15.000.49This work
Table 2. Determination of Cd2+ in environmental samples (n = 3).
Table 2. Determination of Cd2+ in environmental samples (n = 3).
SampleBackground (ng/mL)Spiked (ng/mL)Proposed Electrochemical AptasensorAAS
Found (ng/mL)Recovery (%)RSD (%)Found (ng/mL)Recovery (%)RSD (%)
River water0.023.003.18105.248.173.09102.170.66
6.006.12101.735.755.9999.480.46
12.0013.03108.436.1112.75106.031.50
Tap water0.073.003.0398.718.243.20104.220.18
6.006.22102.437.436.29103.690.82
12.0013.27109.957.6412.82106.192.48
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Ding, J.; Hayat, K.; Yang, X.; Zhan, X.; Zhang, D.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, P. Label-Free and Sensitive Determination of Cadmium Ions Using a Ti-Modified Co3O4-Based Electrochemical Aptasensor. Biosensors 2020, 10, 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10120195

AMA Style

Liu Y, Zhang D, Ding J, Hayat K, Yang X, Zhan X, Zhang D, Lu Y, Zhou P. Label-Free and Sensitive Determination of Cadmium Ions Using a Ti-Modified Co3O4-Based Electrochemical Aptasensor. Biosensors. 2020; 10(12):195. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10120195

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yang, Dongwei Zhang, Jina Ding, Kashif Hayat, Xijia Yang, Xuejia Zhan, Dan Zhang, Yitong Lu, and Pei Zhou. 2020. "Label-Free and Sensitive Determination of Cadmium Ions Using a Ti-Modified Co3O4-Based Electrochemical Aptasensor" Biosensors 10, no. 12: 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10120195

APA Style

Liu, Y., Zhang, D., Ding, J., Hayat, K., Yang, X., Zhan, X., Zhang, D., Lu, Y., & Zhou, P. (2020). Label-Free and Sensitive Determination of Cadmium Ions Using a Ti-Modified Co3O4-Based Electrochemical Aptasensor. Biosensors, 10(12), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10120195

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop