Next Article in Journal
Metal/Semiconductor Nanocomposites for Photocatalysis: Fundamentals, Structures, Applications and Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Facile Synthesis of SnO2 Aerogel/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites via in Situ Annealing for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 9
Issue 3
10.3390/nano9030360
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hexagonal CuCo2O4 Nanoplatelets, a Highly Active Catalyst for the Hydrolysis of Ammonia Borane for Hydrogen Production

by
Jinyun Liao
,
Yufa Feng
,
Shiqi Wu
,
Huilong Ye
,
Jin Zhang
,
Xibin Zhang
,
Feiyan Xie
and
Hao Li
*
School of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(3), 360; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030360
Submission received: 24 December 2018 / Revised: 24 February 2019 / Accepted: 25 February 2019 / Published: 4 March 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Catalytic hydrolysis of ammonia borane (AB) has been considered as an effective and safe method to generate hydrogen. Development of highly active and low-cost catalysts is one of the key tasks for this technology. In this work, hexagonal CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets with a thickness of approximately 55 nm were prepared. In AB hydrolysis, those nanoplatelets exhibited ultrahigh catalytic activity with turnover frequency (TOF) of 73.4 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1. As far as we know, this is one of the highest TOF values ever reported for non-noble metal catalysts. In addition, the effects of viscosity and different alkalis on the hydrolysis were also investigated. It is revealed that high viscosity of the reaction medium will retard the hydrolysis reaction. The presence of NaOH, KOH, and Na2CO3 in the reaction solution is favorable for hydrolytic process. In contrast, NH3·H2O will slow down the hydrolysis rate of ammonia borane. This work can provide some novel insight into the design of catalysts with both high performance and low cost. Besides, some findings in the present study can also offer us some information about how to improve the hydrolysis rates by optimizing the hydrolysis condition.

1. Introduction

Hydrolysis of ammonia borane (AB) is a very promising way to provide hydrogen for mobile hydrogen-oxygen fuel cells [1,2,3], which can find many important applications in new energy vehicles in the near future. According the reaction equation,
H3NBH3(aq) + 2H2O(l) → NH4+(aq) + BO2−(aq) + 3H2(g)
per mole AB can produce 3 moles hydrogen by a simple hydrolytic reaction at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. In this hydrogen-production technology, a catalyst is necessary in view of the slow kinetic of the hydrolysis process. Since Xu’s pioneering works on AB hydrolysis catalyzed by transition metals was reported [4,5], a number of heterogeneous catalysts have been developed for that hydrolytic reaction [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Among these catalysts, noble metal based catalysts are too expensive despite their high catalytic performance [6,7,8]. In contrast, non-noble-metal catalysts are very cheap, but their activity is far from satisfactory [9,10,11]. Therefore, it is highly desirable to develop some catalysts with high catalytic performance and low cost, which is crucial for large-scale applications of this technology.
Generally speaking, there are three main routes to enhance the reaction rate of a catalytic process. The first one is development of a new type of catalyst with high catalytic activity. The second one is to increase the activity of the catalyst by surface decoration, foreign element doping, etc. The third one is to optimize the reaction conditions, such as temperature, pH value, viscosity, substrate/catalyst ratio. As for the third point, many parameters in the hydrolytic reaction of AB, such as reaction temperatures, catalyst dosages, substrate concentrations, have been extensively investigated in previous works [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. However, other factors—including viscosity of the medium, alkali—have been seldom concerned, which may significantly affect the hydrolysis rate of AB. As for the effect of alkali on AB hydrolysis, we have found in our previous work that a proper amount of NaOH in the reaction medium can significantly enhance AB hydrolysis [9]. However, the effects of the concentration of the alkali on the rate of AB hydrolysis have not been systematically investigated. Thus, whether there is an optimal concentration of alkali for AB hydrolysis remains unclear. In the practical application of AB hydrolysis, many factors—such as temperature, additive in solution, and the byproduct of the reaction—may affect the viscosity of the reaction medium, which will affect the reaction rate of AB hydrolysis. Thus, it is of importance for us to know the impact of the viscosity to hydrolysis reaction.
In this work, hexagonal CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets with a thickness of about 55 nm were prepared by a hydrothermal approach followed by a calcination process. Vijayakumar et al. have prepared CuCoO4 nanobelts by using Co(NO3)2/Cu(NO3)2 as Co/Cu resource, urea as precipitant, and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as surfactant, respectively [19]. Jadhav et al. have grown the flower-like CuCo2O4 on Ni foam by hydrothermal method followed by heat treatment [20]. Sun et al. have reported the synthesis of 3D free-standing hierarchical CuCo2O4 nanowires by a hydrothermal method [21]. As far as we know, CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets have not been reported yet in the literature. In AB hydrolysis, those nanoplatelets exhibited ultrahigh catalytic activity with turnover frequency (TOF) of 73.4 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1, which is higher than those of CoP nanoparticles (72.7 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1) [22], Cu0.8Co0.2O/Graphene oxide (70.0 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1) [23], Ni0.9Mo0.1/graphene (66.7 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1) [24], CuCo/diamine-functionalized reduced graphene oxide 51.5 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1) [25], NiCo2O4/Ti (50.1 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1) [12], CoP nanoarray (42.8 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1) [26], Co/CTF(42.3 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1) [27], Ni nanoparticles supported on three-dimensional N-doped graphene (41.7 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1) [28], CuCo@MIL-101(19.6 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1) [29], and CoNi/Graphene (16.8 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1) [30], However, this TOF value is still lower than that of Cu0.6Ni0.4Co2O4 nanowires (119.5 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1) [2], Ni/ZIF-8 nanocatalyst (85.7 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1) [31], and CuCo/g-C3N4-1(75.1 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1) [32]. In the viscosity range from 1.08 to 32.95 mPa·s, high viscosity has a negative effect on AB hydrolysis. In addition, it is revealed that NaOH and Na2CO3 can enhance AB hydrolysis but NH3·H2O will retard that hydrolytic reaction.

2. Experimental Section

In a typical process, 4.0 mmol Co(CH3COO)2 and 2.0 mmol CuSO4 were mixed in 20 mL water by stirring. Subsequently, 20 mol ethanolamine was added to a beaker containing 20 mL water. After the two solutions were blended, 40 mL NaOH solution (2.5 M) was added slowly into the mixture. The obtained suspension was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless autoclave, which was sealed and placed into a drying oven. The temperature was maintained at 160 °C for 8 h. When the hydrothermal treatment finished, the resultant solid products were collected, rinsed and subjected to a heat treatment of 600 °C for 2 h. The heating rate was 10 °C/min and the calcination was carried out in the air.
Rigaku TTR3 X-ray powder diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) with a Cu K radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) was applied to record the powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples. Hitachi SU-8100 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan) was utilized to observe the morphology of the catalysts. Tecnai G2 F20 S-TWINT transmission electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was used to obtain TEM and HRTEM images. Kratos Axis Ultra (DLD) X-ray photoelectron spectroscope was applied to analyze the elements and chemical states on the surface of the sample. Viscosity was determined with a NDJ-5S Digital Viscometer (Shanghai Lichen Bangxi Instrument Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China).
Typically, 10.0 mg catalyst (ca. 0.0435 mmol) was dispersed 5.0 mL water by ultrasonication treatment in the reaction vessel, which was then put into a water bath for maintaining the reaction temperature of 298 K. After that, 15 mL mixture solution containing NaOH (20.0 mmol) and AB (2.6 mmol) was added into the vessel, which was connected to a graduated gas burette. The volume of produced hydrogen was determined by water displacement in the burette. In order to investigate that effect of viscosity of solution on the release rate of hydrogen, a glycerol/water mixture instead of water was used a solution, and viscosity was measured at 298 K.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern of the as-prepared CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets. As shown, eight characteristic peaks at 2θ = 31.1°, 36.6°, 38.3°, 44.5°, 55.5°, 59.0°, 65.0°, and 77.1° are observed, corresponding to the diffraction from (220), (311), (222), (400), (422), (511), (440), and (533) planes of spinel phase of CuCo2O4 (PDF#76-1887). According to the Scherrer equation, the crystallite size is calculated to be 16.6 nm based on the (311) peak width at half-height, which is the peak with highest intensity. In the basic reaction medium, Co2+ and Cu2+ ions will be changed into Co(OH)2 and Cu(OH)2, respectively. During the calcination process, CuCo2O4 is formed. The reaction can be formulated as
2Co2+ + Cu2+ + 6OH− → 2Co(OH)2 + Cu(OH)2
2Co(OH)2 + Cu(OH)2 + 1/2O2 → CuCo2O4 + 3H2O
Figure 2a,b are the low-magnification SEM images of the CuCo2O4 samples, indicating that a large amount of CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets can be obtained by our synthetic route. Figure 2c shows that the typical thickness and size of the hexagonal nanoplatelets are around 55 nm. Particle size distribution in Figure 2d indicates that the mean size of the nanoplatelets is around 400 nm. Figure 3a,b are the TEM images of the CuCo2O4 sample, which further confirms the hexagonal structure of nanoplatelets. HRTEM image in Figure 3c displays the crystal distance of 0.46, 0.24 nm, corresponding to the (111) and (311) planes of spinel phase of CuCo2O4 [33,34,35]. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern demonstrates that the CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets are well crystalized.
To know more about the formation of CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets, we carried out some control experiments. First, we synthesized the CuCo2O4 sample in the absence of ethanolamine. SEM image (Figure S1a) indicates the product is the aggregation composed of irregularly shaped nanoparticles. When the sodium citrate instead of ethanolamine is used as complexing agent, nanoparticles and nanoplatelets coexist in the sample (Figure S1b). These observations hint that ethanolamine plays an important role in determining the final morphology of the sample.
Figure 4 is the FTIR spectrum of CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets, in which two peaks at 573 and 659 cm−1 can be observed. These two peaks can be indexed to the Co3+-O2− and Cu2+-O2− functional groups in the CuCo2O4, further demonstrating that our sample is CuCo2O4 [36].
The elements on the surface of CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets were analyzed with XPS and the results shown in Figure 5. Figure 5a is the XPS spectrum of Co2p of the CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets. As it can be seen in Figure 5a, the Co (2p1/2) peak can be decomposed into two peaks at 796.6 eV and 794.8 eV. Meanwhile, the Co (2p3/2) peak can be decomposed into two peaks at 781.3 eV and 779.8 eV. The peaks at 796.6 eV and 781.3 eV are attributed to the Co2+ state and those at of 794.8 eV and 779.8 eV are indexed to the Co3+ state [19]. It should be mentioned that the spin-orbit splitting for the Co2+ doublet is 15.3 eV and for the Co3+ doublet is 15.0 eV, hinting that the these Co species are presented as cobalt oxides instead of cobalt hydroxides [37]. Similarly, two peaks at 954.3 eV and 934.2 eV are observable in the Cu 2p region of the XPS spectra (Figure 5b), which is related to the Cu (2p1/2) and Cu (2p3/2) peaks, respectively [19]. Besides, two peaks at 962.3 eV and 942.2 eV can be seen, which are the satellite peaks of Cu 2p. All these peak values are in good agreement with those for Cu2+ (CuCo2O4) in previous works [19,38]. In summary, Cu2+, Co2+, and Co3+ have been detected with XPS on the surface of the CuCo2O4 sample. This observation is coincident with those XPS results reported for CuCo2O4 in the literature.
Viscosity is a very important parameter in the reaction medium, which may significantly affect the reaction rate. However, to the best of our knowledge, the effect of viscosity on the hydrolysis of AB has not been reported yet. In this work, for the purpose of investigating viscosity effect, 0–12 mL glycerol is introduced into the reaction medium. It should be mentioned that the total volume of water and glycerol before mixing is fixed at 20 mL. Note that the 2.6 mmol AB will react with 5.2 mmol water (0.094 mL). Thus, the water in the reaction medium is remarkably excessive even in the case of only 8 mL water in the mixed solvent. On the other aspect, although AB can react with methanol to produce hydrogen by a catalytic methanolysis process, we found that nearly no hydrogen was produced when AB/glycerol was solvent and CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets acted as a catalyst in a preliminary experiment. This indicates that glycerol can hardly react with AB, but it can adjust the viscosity of the reaction medium. Therefore, the effect of glycerol on the hydrolysis can be attributed to the viscosity. As shown in Figure 6a, the hydrogen generation rate decreases when the volume of glycerol increases. In addition, the induction time of the hydrolysis reaction will increase as the increase of the volume of glycerol. For example, when the volume of glycerol is no more than 4 mL, it will take less than 10 s to produce hydrogen after the catalyst comes into contact with the reaction solution. In contrast, when the volume of glycerol in reaction medium increases to 12 mL, the induction time reaches about 60 s. Table 1 shows the data of viscosity of reaction medium, the corresponding TOF values and induction time. Figure 6b shows the relationship between the TOF values and the viscosity. According to the mechanism for AB hydrolysis proposed by Mahyari et al., the transportation of the AB molecule to the catalyst surface to form an activated complex species are the key step in AB hydrolysis [28]. Thus, the AB transportation rate and the desorption rate of the intermediates from catalyst surface will influence the overall hydrolysis rate. Evidently, high viscosity will lower the mass transportation rate and therefore the TOF values decrease and meantime the induction time increases.
To exclude the possibility of the activity loss of the catalyst caused by surface poisoning via glycerol adsorption, we carried out a series of contrast experiments, in which the viscosity of the reaction medium was adjusted with ethylene glycol instead of glycerol. The total volume of water and ethylene glycol before mixing is still fixed at 20 mL. When the volume of ethylene glycol is 2, 6, and 12 mL, the viscosity of the reaction medium is 1.52, 2.83, and 8.33, and the corresponding TOF values are 48.7, 31.1, and 15.6 molH2 min−1 molcat−1, respectively. Additionally, we also adjusted the viscosity of reaction medium by polyacryamide. It is found that when the viscosity of the reaction medium is 3.25, 4.3, 6.4, and 9.3 mPa·s, and the corresponding TOF values are 12.1, 9.3, 8.8, and 7.1 molH2 min−1 molcat−1, respectively. These observations further imply that it is the high viscosity of reaction medium that cause the activity decrease.
In this work, we have investigated the influence of NaOH, Na2CO3 and ammonia on AB hydrolysis. Figure 7a,b show the hydrogen release curves from reaction medium with different NaOH concentration and the corresponding TOF values. Evidently, the introduction of NaOH will remarkably affect the rate of hydrogen production. In the absence of NaOH in the reaction medium, the TOF is only 5.47 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1. In contrast, the TOF increase to 73.4 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1 at NaOH concentration of 1.0 M. A further increase of NaOH concentration will result in a slight decrease of TOF value. According to reaction (1), NH4+ will be formed during the hydrolytic process. When OH− is added into the reaction medium, it will react with NH4+ by the following reaction. NH4+ + OH− → NH3·H2O. Thus, from the viewpoint of shift of chemical equilibrium, the hydrolysis reaction may be enhanced by introducing OH− into the reaction system. In addition, the introduction of OH− into the reaction system can improve the electronic properties of the catalyst, which is favorable for the interaction with catalyst and AB [18]. However, excessive NaOH (>1 M) has a negative effect on AB hydrolysis. We find that the viscosity of the reaction medium increases as NaOH concentration increases (please see the relationship between the viscosity and NaOH concentrations in Figure S2), which will lead to the slow transportation of AB from bulk solution to the surface of the catalyst. Therefore, the hydrolytic process is hindered and the reaction rates decrease. We also investigate the effect of KOH concentration on AB hydrolysis and find that KOH concentration has almost the same influence on AB hydrolysis as NaOH. This implies that it is the anions (OH-) instead of the cations (Na+ or K+) that affect the hydrolysis reaction. Figure 7c,d show the hydrogen release curve in the presence of Na2CO3 with different concentrations and the corresponding TOF values variation. Although Na2CO3 can also improve the hydrolysis of AB, its impact is significantly lower than those of NaOH and KOH. This is understandable because Na2CO3 is a weak alkali and can provide less OH- than NaOH and KOH. Note that ammonia gas may be generated in basic solution, which will contaminate the collected hydrogen. However, the obtained gas could be easily depurated with water or an acidic solution, which will absorb ammonia gas. As for the effect of ammonia on AB hydrolysis, the TOF value will decrease when the concentration of ammonia is larger than 0.25 M (Figure 7e). As shown in Figure 7f, TOF will decrease linearly with the increase of the concentration of ammonia. Quite different with the effects of other alkalis on AB hydrolysis, NH3·H2O shows negative influence on the hydrolytic reaction of AB. NH3·H2O will produce NH4+ via a dissociation reaction, NH3·H2O → NH4+ + OH−, which may retard AB hydrolysis.
In our previous work, we have found that the active species of Cu0.6Ni0.4Co2O4 in AB hydrolysis is metallic Co, Ni, and Cu on the catalyst surface, which were formed by the reduction of Cu0.6Ni0.4Co2O4 with AB [2]. In the present study, it is highly believed that metallic Co and Cu on the catalyst surface, which were formed by the similar process, can serve as the active species. Actually, XPS data of the used catalyst (Figure 8) demonstrates that the formation of metallic Co and Cu on the surface of the catalyst. The synergistic effect of resultant metallic Co and Cu on CuCo2O4 surface can be attributed to the relatively high catalytic activity of our catalyst in AB hydrolysis. In addition, metallic Co and Cu on the catalyst surface, and the internal CuCo2O4 can form a metal−support interaction, which is favorable for AB hydrolysis [1]. This may be another reason for the high activity of our CuCo2O4 catalyst. SEM image of the used catalyst (Figure S3) indicates that the morphology of the nanoplatelets is still retained after reaction.

4. Conclusions

In summary, CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets with a thickness of about 55 nm were prepared by a hydrothermal approach followed by a calcination process. In AB hydrolysis, those nanoplatelets exhibited superior catalytic activity with TOF of 73.4 molhydrogen min−1 molcat−1. To know the optimal conditions for AB hydrolysis catalyzed by CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets, we also investigated the effects of alkali with different concentration and viscosity on the hydrolytic reaction. It was revealed that both NaOH, and Na2CO3 in the reaction medium could improve the hydrolysis rate of AB. In particular, the TOF value in the presence of a suitable concentration of NaOH is more than 10 times as high as that in the absence of NaOH. In contrast, ammonia would retard the hydrolytic reaction. In addition, high viscosity of reaction medium had a significant negative effect on AB hydrolysis. These observations are helpful for us to select the proper reaction conditions for AB hydrolysis in practical applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/3/360/s1, Figure S1: SEM images of the sample prepared in the absence of ethanolamine and the sample prepared by using sodium citrate instead of ethanolamine as complexing agent, Figure S2: Effect of NaOH concentrations on the viscosity of the medium, Figure S3: SEM image of the CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets after catalytic reaction.

Author Contributions

Synthesis of the sample, writing—original draft preparation, J.L.; Investigation of the catalytic performance, Y.F., S.W., and H.Y.; Characterization and analysis of the sample, J.Z. and F.X.; Supervision, X.Z.; Design of the work, funding acquisition, and writing—review and editing, H.L.

Funding

This work was funded by the Major Project of Fundamental and Application Research of the Department of Education of Guangdong Province (no. 2017KZDXM079), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (nos. 2018A030313859 and 2016A030313118), the Science & Technology project of Huizhou City (nos. 2017C0412028 and 2016X0421036), the Natural Science Foundation of Huizhou University (no. 20180927172750326), and the Science and Technology Innovation Foundation for College Student of Guangdong Province (no. PDJHB0482)

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liao, J.; Lu, D.; Diao, G.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, M.; Li, H. Co0.8Cu0.2MoO4 microspheres composed of nanoplatelets as a robust catalyst for the hydrolysis of ammonia borane. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5843–5851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lu, D.; Liao, J.; Zhong, S.; Leng, Y.; Ji, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, R.; Li, H. Cu0.6Ni0.4Co2O4 nanowires, a novel noble-metal-free catalyst with ultrahigh catalytic activity towards the hydrolysis of ammonia borane for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 5541–5550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lu, D.; Li, J.; Lin, C.; Liao, J.; Feng, Y.; Ding, Z.; Li, Z.; Liu, Q.; Li, H. A facile and scalable route to synthesis CoxCu1-xCo2O4@CoyCu1-yCo2O4 yolk-shell microspheres, high performance catalyst of hydrolyze ammonia borane for hydrogen production. Small 2019, 15, 1805460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chandra, M.; Xu, Q. A high-performance hydrogen generation system: Transition metal-catalyzed dissociation and hydrolysis of ammonia-borane. J. Power Source 2006, 156, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, Q.; Chandra, M. Catalytic activities of non-noble metals for hydrogen generation from aqueous ammonia-borane at room temperature. J. Power Source 2006, 163, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yan, J.M.; Zhang, X.B.; Akita, T.; Haruta, M.; Xu, Q. One-step seeding growth of magnetically recyclable Au@Co core-shell nanoparticles: Highly efficient catalyst for hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5326–5327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rej, S.; Hsia, C.F.; Chen, T.Y.; Lin, F.C.; Huang, J.S.; Huang, M.H. Facet-dependent and light-assisted efficient hydrogen evolution from ammonia borane using gold-palladium core-shell nanocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7222–7226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hu, L.; Zheng, B.; Lai, Z.P.; Huang, K.W. Room temperature hydrogen generation from hydrolysis of ammonia-borane over an efficient NiAgPd/C catalyst. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 20031–20037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, J.J.; Liao, J.Y.; Li, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, R.F. Magnetic field induced synthesis of amorphous CoB alloy nanowires as a highly active catalyst for hydrogen generation from ammonia borane. Catal. Commun. 2016, 84, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liao, J.Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.B. Preparation of Ti supported Co film composed of Co nanofibers as catalyst for the hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Catal. Commun. 2015, 67, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, X.P.; Liao, J.Y.; Li, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, R.F. Solid-state-reaction synthesis of cotton-like CoB alloy at room temperature as a catalyst for hydrogen generation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 475, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liao, J.Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.B.; Feng, K.J.; Yao, Y.L. Fabrication of a Ti-supported NiCo2O4 nanosheet array and its superior catalytic performance in the hydrolysis of ammonia borane for hydrogen generation. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 3893–3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, X.P.; Liao, J.Y.; Li, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, R.F. Preparation of pompon-like Co-B nanoalloy by a room-temperature solid-state-reaction as a catalyst for hydrolysis of borohydride solution. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 6646–6656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meng, X.Y.; Yang, L.; Cao, N.; Du, C.; Hu, K.; Su, J.; Luo, W.; Cheng, G.Z. Graphene-supported trimetallic core-shell Cu@CoNi nanoparticles for catalytic hydrolysis of amine borane. ChemPlusChem 2014, 79, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, Q.; Zhang, S.; Liao, J.; Huang, X.; Zheng, Y.; Li, H. MnCo2O4 film composed of nanoplates: Synthesis, characterization and its superior catalytic performance in the hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 3573–3579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhong, W.D.; Tian, X.K.; Yang, C.; Zhou, Z.X.; Liu, X.W.; Li, Y. Active 3D Pd/graphene aerogel catalyst for hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of ammonia-borane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 15225–15235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lu, D.; Feng, Y.; Ding, Z.; Liao, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, H.-R.; Li, H. MoO3-doped MnCo2O4 microspheres consisting of nanosheets: An inexpensive nanostructured catalyst to hydrolyze ammonia borane for hydrogen generation. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yao, Q.; Yang, K.; Hong, X.; Chen, X.; Lu, Z.-H. Base-promoted hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane catalyzed by noble-metal-free nanoparticles. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 870–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vijayakumar, S.; Lee, S.-H.; Ryu, K.-S. Hierachical CuCo2O4 nanobelts as a supercapacitor electrode with high areal and specific capacitance. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 182, 979–986. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jadhav, H.S.; Pawar, S.M.; Jadhav, A.H.; Thorat, G.M.; Seo, J.G. Hierarchical mesoporous 3D flower-like CuCo2O4/NF for high-performance electrochemical energy storage. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sun, W.; Wang, Y.; Wu, H.; Wang, Z.; Rooney, D.; Sun, K. 3D Free-standing hierarchical CuCo2O4 nanowire cathodes for rechargeable lithium-oxygen batteries. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 8711–8714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fu, Z.C.; Xu, Y.; Chan, S.L.F.; Wang, W.W.; Li, F.; Liang, F.; Chen, Y.; Lin, Z.S.; Fu, W.F.; Che, C.M. Highly efficient hydrolysis of ammonia borane by anion (−OH, F−, Cl−)-tuned interactions between reactant molecules and CoP nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 705–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Feng, K.; Zhong, J.; Zhao, B.H.; Zhang, H.; Xu, L.; Sun, X.H.; Lee, S.T. CuxCo1-xO nanoparticles on graphene oxide as a synergistic catalyst for high-efficiency hydrolysis of ammonia-borane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 11950–11954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yao, Q.L.; Lu, Z.H.; Huang, W.; Chen, X.S.; Zhu, J. High Pt-like activity of the Ni-Mo/graphene catalyst for hydrogen evolution from hydrolysis of ammonia borane. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 8579–8583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Song, F.Z.; Zhu, Q.L.; Yang, X.C.; Xu, Q. Monodispersed CuCo nanoparticles supported on diamine-functionalized graphene as a non-noble metal catalyst for hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane. ChemNanoMat 2016, 2, 942–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tang, C.; Qu, F.L.; Asiri, A.M.; Luo, Y.L.; Sun, X.P. CoP nanoarray: A robust non-noble-metal hydrogen-generating catalyst toward effective hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2017, 4, 659–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Z.; He, T.; Liu, L.; Chen, W.; Zhang, M.; Wu, G.; Chen, P. Covalent triazine framework supported non-noble metal nanoparticles with superior activity for catalytic hydrolysis of ammonia borane: From mechanistic study to catalyst design. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 781–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mahyari, M.; Shaabani, A. Nickel nanoparticles immobilized on three-dimensional nitrogen-doped graphene as a superb catalyst for the generation of hydrogen from the hydrolysis of ammonia borane. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 16652–16659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, J.; Zhu, Z.Q.L.; Xu, Q. Non-noble bimetallic CuCo nanoparticles encapsulated in the pores of metal-organic frameworks: Synergetic catalysis in the hydrolysis of ammonia borane for hydrogen generation. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, J.K.; Chen, C.Q.; Yan, W.J.; Duan, F.F.; Zhang, B.; Gao, Z.; Qin, Y. Ni nanoparticles supported on CNTs with excellent activity produced by atomic layer deposition for hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 2112–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, C.L.; Tuninetti, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Ciganda, R.; Salmon, L.; Moya, S.; Ruiz, J.; Astruc, D. Hydrolysis of ammonia-borane over Ni/ZIF-8 nanocatalyst: High efficiency, mechanism, and controlled hydrogen release. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 11610–11615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, H.; Gu, X.J.; Liu, P.L.; Song, J.; Cheng, J.; Su, H.Q. Highly efficient visible-light-driven catalytic hydrogen evolution from ammonia borane using non-precious metal nanoparticles supported by graphitic carbon nitride. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 2288–2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bikkarolla, S.K.; Papakonstantinou, P. CuCo2O4 nanoparticles on nitrogenated graphene as highly efficient oxygen evolution catalyst. J. Power Source 2015, 281, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhu, J.K.; Gao, Q.M. Mesoporous MCo2O4 (M = Cu, Mn and Ni) spinels: Structural replication, characterization and catalytic application in CO oxidation. Microporous Mesoporous Mat. 2009, 124, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Serov, A.; Andersen, N.I.; Roy, A.J.; Matanovic, I.; Artyushkova, K.; Atanassov, P. CuCo2O4 ORR/OER Bi-functional catalyst: Influence of synthetic approach on performance. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, F449–F454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shanmugavani, A.; Selvan, R.K. Improved electrochemical performances of CuCo2O4/CuO nanocomposites for asymmetric supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 188, 852–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Koninck, M.D.; Poirier, S.C.; Marsan, B. CuxCo3−xO4 used as bifunctional electrocatalyst physicochemical properties and electrochemical characterization for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006, 153, A2103–A2110. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, Q.B.; Zhang, S.J.; Liao, J.Y.; Feng, K.J.; Zheng, Y.Y.; Pollet, B.G.; Li, H. CuCo2O4 nanoplate film as a low-cost, highly active and durable catalyst towards the hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane for hydrogen production. J. Power Source 2017, 355, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD pattern of the CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets.
Figure 1. XRD pattern of the CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets.
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g001
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images (a–c) and the size distribution (d) of the CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets.
Figure 2. SEM images (a–c) and the size distribution (d) of the CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets.
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g002
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g003 550
Figure 3. TEM images (a,b), HRTEM image (c) and SAED pattern (d) of the CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets.
Figure 3. TEM images (a,b), HRTEM image (c) and SAED pattern (d) of the CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets.
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g003
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g004 550
Figure 4. FTIR spectrum of the CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets.
Figure 4. FTIR spectrum of the CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets.
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g004
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g005 550
Figure 5. XPS spectra of the CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets in Co2p (a) and Cu2p (b) regions.
Figure 5. XPS spectra of the CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets in Co2p (a) and Cu2p (b) regions.
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g005
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g006 550
Figure 6. Hydrogen release curves in mixed solvent with different volume of glycerol. The total volume of water and glycerol before mixing is fixed at 20 mL.
Figure 6. Hydrogen release curves in mixed solvent with different volume of glycerol. The total volume of water and glycerol before mixing is fixed at 20 mL.
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g006
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g007 550
Figure 7. Hydrogen release curves in the presence of NaOH (a), Na2CO3 (c), and NH3·H2O (e), and the corresponding TOF values at different concentrations (b,d,f).
Figure 7. Hydrogen release curves in the presence of NaOH (a), Na2CO3 (c), and NH3·H2O (e), and the corresponding TOF values at different concentrations (b,d,f).
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g007
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g008 550
Figure 8. XPS specta of the CuCo2O4 catalyst in Co2p (a) and Cu2p (b) regions after catalytic reaction.
Figure 8. XPS specta of the CuCo2O4 catalyst in Co2p (a) and Cu2p (b) regions after catalytic reaction.
Nanomaterials 09 00360 g008
Table
Table 1. Data of viscosity of reaction medium and the corresponding TOF values and induction times.
Table 1. Data of viscosity of reaction medium and the corresponding TOF values and induction times.
Volume of Glycerol in Reaction Medium (mL)Viscosity (mPa·s)TOF (molH2 min−1 molcat−1)Induction Time(s)
01.0873.42
21.5449.58
42.3533.28
63.6727.720
86.5221.035
1012.4513.647
1232.955.256

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liao, J.; Feng, Y.; Wu, S.; Ye, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Xie, F.; Li, H. Hexagonal CuCo2O4 Nanoplatelets, a Highly Active Catalyst for the Hydrolysis of Ammonia Borane for Hydrogen Production. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030360

AMA Style

Liao J, Feng Y, Wu S, Ye H, Zhang J, Zhang X, Xie F, Li H. Hexagonal CuCo2O4 Nanoplatelets, a Highly Active Catalyst for the Hydrolysis of Ammonia Borane for Hydrogen Production. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(3):360. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030360

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liao, Jinyun, Yufa Feng, Shiqi Wu, Huilong Ye, Jin Zhang, Xibin Zhang, Feiyan Xie, and Hao Li. 2019. "Hexagonal CuCo2O4 Nanoplatelets, a Highly Active Catalyst for the Hydrolysis of Ammonia Borane for Hydrogen Production" Nanomaterials 9, no. 3: 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030360

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop