Next Article in Journal
A First-Principles Study on the Multiferroic Property of Two-Dimensional BaTiO3 (001) Ultrathin Film with Surface Ba Vacancy
Next Article in Special Issue
Raman Study of Strain Relaxation from Grain Boundaries in Epitaxial Graphene Grown by Chemical Vapor Deposition on SiC
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Convection Heat Transfer Analysis of a Nano-Enhanced Industrial Coolant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Drain Current Model for Double Gate Tunnel-FETs with InAs/Si Heterojunction and Source-Pocket Architecture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tunable Electronic Properties of Nitrogen and Sulfur Doped Graphene: Density Functional Theory Approach

1
Department of Organic Material Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, 2, Busandaehak-ro 63beon gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan 46241, Korea
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University, 2, Busandaehak-ro 63beon gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan 46241, Korea
3
Division of Biotechnology, Advanced institute of Environment and Bioscience, College of Environmental and Bioresource Sciences, Chonbuk National University, Iksan 54596, Korea
4
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, 2, Busandaehak-ro 63 Beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan 46241, Korea
5
Department of Organic and Nano Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(2), 268; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020268
Submission received: 7 January 2019 / Revised: 13 February 2019 / Accepted: 13 February 2019 / Published: 15 February 2019

Abstract

:
We calculated the band structures of a variety of N- and S-doped graphenes in order to understand the effects of the N and S dopants on the graphene electronic structure using density functional theory (DFT). Band-structure analysis revealed energy band upshifting above the Fermi level compared to pristine graphene following doping with three nitrogen atoms around a mono-vacancy defect, which corresponds to p-type nature. On the other hand, the energy bands were increasingly shifted downward below the Fermi level with increasing numbers of S atoms in N/S-co-doped graphene, which results in n-type behavior. Hence, modulating the structure of graphene through N- and S-doping schemes results in the switching of “p-type” to “n-type” behavior with increasing S concentration. Mulliken population analysis indicates that the N atom doped near a mono-vacancy is negatively charged due to its higher electronegativity compared to C, whereas the S atom doped near a mono-vacancy is positively charged due to its similar electronegativity to C and its additional valence electrons. As a result, doping with N and S significantly influences the unique electronic properties of graphene. Due to their tunable band-structure properties, the resulting N- and S-doped graphenes can be used in energy and electronic-device applications. In conclusion, we expect that doping with N and S will lead to new pathways for tailoring and enhancing the electronic properties of graphene at the atomic level.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Graphene consists of two-dimensional sheets of sp2-bonded carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb lattice [1,2,3]. It is a zero bandgap semiconductor or semimetal with a large surface area of 2630 m2 g−1 [4,5], which is larger than other carbon-based materials [5,6]. Graphene also has exceptional charge-carrier mobility of 2 × 105 cm2 V s−1 [7], good thermal conductivity of ~5000 W m−1K−1 [8] and high mechanical strength with ~1 TPa of Young’s modulus [9]. Due to its fascinating properties, graphene is considered to be a promising candidate material for applications in a wide range of fields, such as nanoelectronics [10], optoelectronics [11], energy-storage and conversion devices [12,13,14], sensors [15], and catalysts [16]. It is essential that the intrinsic electronic properties of graphene are tailorable for use in a range of nanoelectronics devices. Tremendous effort has been dedicated to the tuning of the electronic properties of graphene, and various techniques have been proposed [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. As the zero bandgap, at the Fermi level, is attributed to the sub-lattice symmetry of the graphene structure, breaking this symmetry will induce bandgap widening. Substitutional doping and the formation of atomistic defects such as vacancies are simple and effective methods for opening the bandgap and altering the band structure of graphene. The band structure can subsequently be tuned by controlling the degree of heteroatom doping or the number of vacancies. The electronic properties of graphene have been found to change considerably when doped with single heteroatoms, such as B, N, O, P, or S [17,18,19,23,24,28,29,30,33]. Because of the relative differences in the electronegativities of the atomic dopants with respect to that of C, heteroatom doping is expected to induce changes in the band structure, charge distribution, and magnetic properties of graphene. Both experimental and theoretical studies have revealed that graphitic N atoms lead to n-type behavior, whereas pyridinic and pyrrolic N atoms give rise to p-type behavior [22,23,24]. Therefore, controlling the bonding configurations of the N atoms in graphene may provide a mechanism for tuning the electronic characteristics from n-type to p-type. Recently, co-doping with multiple heteroatoms has become popular because co-doping creates a unique, synergistically coupled, electronic structure. However, there are few reports that provide a fundamental understanding of the alternating electronic structure and accompanying performance of co-doped graphene [25,26,27,28,31,32,33]. Among the atoms possible as N co-dopants, the S atom is considered to be an attractive doping material due to its similar electronegativity and van der Waals radius to those of C, while possessing two lone pairs of electrons. Herein, we present a spin-polarized density functional theory (DFT) study on the electronic properties of N- and S-doped graphene in which we characterize changes in band structure and charge-density distribution by controlling the concentrations of the N and S dopants.

2. Computational Details

First-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out using the Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package (VASP) [34,35]. Geometries were optimized, and the total energies and forces were calculated using a planewave basis set with the projector augmented wave (PAW) method [36]. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange-correlation functional [37] was used, and the planewave cutoff energy was set to 500 eV; the GGA-PBE functional has been successfully used to describe carbon-based systems [38,39,40,41,42,43]. All structures were optimized such that the total energy converged to less than 1.0 × 10−6 eV per atom and the maximum force converged to below 0.05 eV Å−1. The graphene model used in our simulation consisted of a 12.3 × 12.3 × 15.0 Å, 5 × 5 supercell with a vacuum thickness of 15 Å, which avoids interference between adjacent graphene layers. Brillouin-zone integrations were carried out using a 4 × 4 × 1 Monkhorst–Pack Κ-point grid. The effects of van der Waals (vdW) interactions were included using the empirical DFT-D3 correction within the Grimme scheme [44]. All atomic charge distributions in our study were calculated by Mulliken population analysis from Materials Studio [45,46].

3. Results and Discussion

Various configurations exist for the doped and defective graphene chosen as the anode material in a lithium-ion battery (LIB). For instance, N-doped graphene exists in distinct forms that include graphitic, pyridinic, and pyrrolic N atoms [47]. Among these nitrogen types, pyridinic N-doped graphene is believed to be associated with high electrocatalytic activity and excellent reversible capacity [29,48,49]. Pyridinic Ns are located at the edges of graphene planes, and arise from sp2-hybridized N atoms bonded to two neighboring sp2-hybridized C atoms. Using this configuration as the starting point, different configurations of N- and S-doped graphene with mono-vacancy defects were built as simulation models. Three C atoms around a mono-vacancy defect were substituted with different numbers of atomic N and/or S dopants. Regarding model structures in this investigation, research groups successfully reported the synthesis of N- and S-doped graphene [22,43,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64]. In order to analyze the effects of the N and S doping levels on electronic properties, we first fixed the doping concentration to three dopant atoms at the mono-vacancy defect. We constructed four configurations with different N and S doping ratios; the graphene doped with three nitrogen atoms is designated as “3N-gra”, that doped with two nitrogens and one sulfur as “2N1S-gra”, while the graphene doped with one nitrogen and two sulfur atoms is “1N2S-gra”, and the three sulfur-doped graphene is “3S-gra”. The optimized structures of the N- and S-doped graphenes are displayed in Figure 1, with the calculated band structures shown in Figure 2, which reveal clear changes in electronic structure following doping with N and S. Pristine graphene is a zero bandgap semiconductor with its Dirac point located at the Fermi energy [38].
The bandgap clearly opens after doping with N or S, and/or the introduction of a mono-vacancy defect, which is ascribable to the effects of the atomic dopant and/or vacancy defect on the π electrons in the hexagonal rings. Mono-vacancy defects lead to shortages of whole charges compared to pristine graphene, which downshift the Fermi energy, indicating that the mono-vacancy defect acts as a hole dopant with missing π electrons. As shown in Figure S1, the band structure for pristine graphene and graphene with a single vacancy were calculated that the band gap of graphene with a single vacancy is opened at the Dirac point and the Fermi level is downshifted compared to pristine graphene.
On the other hand, N and S atoms have one and two additional valence electrons, respectively; hence, doping with N or S results in an upward shift in the Fermi energy. Table 1 reveals that the bandgap energies also change when the band structures are altered by the atomic dopant and/or vacancy defect. In moving from 3N-gra to 3S-gra, the bandgap energy was observed to gradually decrease with increasing levels of the sulfur dopant. The Fermi level is substantially shifted downward from the Dirac point of pristine graphene in 3N-gra. This downward shift indicates that the 3N-doped graphene exhibits p-type behavior and has an affinity for gaining electron density. In addition, flat bands appeared around the Fermi level. Meanwhile, the Fermi level for 3N-doped graphene is somewhat upshifted compared to the mono-vacancy defective graphene because nitrogen has more available electrons than carbon and can replenish some of the electron deficiency. Nevertheless, doping the mono-vacancy defective graphene with three N atoms is unable to completely compensate for the charge deficiency of the mono-vacancy defect. The energy band gradually becomes narrower, that is to say, the Fermi level is upshifted in moving from 3N-gra to 3S-gra, with increasing levels of the sulfur dopant. Indeed, the energy band for 2N1S-gra is slightly narrower than that of the 3N-gra system. In addition, the band structure of the 1NS2-gra system, which is more doped with sulfur than nitrogen, features visible changes in band energies that are shifted below the Fermi level; hence, this system can be considered to exhibit n-type behavior. Interestingly, the p-type to n-type conversion can be induced through control of the N and S doping levels (e.g., by increasing the S-to-N doping ratio). The 3S-gra system also exhibits n-type character, with slightly downward shifted band energies compared to the 1N2S-gra system; however, the level of downward shift induced by moving from 1N2S-gra to S3-gra is very marginal. The degree in the downward shift in band energy tends to decrease with decreasing nitrogen atom concentration.
Finally, we studied the charge-density distribution of each atom around the mono-vacancy defect for each N- and S-doped graphene system by Mulliken population analysis because the charge distributions on the carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur atoms are important for determining the origin of the alternating electronic properties. Figure 3 displays the charge on each atom around the mono-vacancy defect; positive charges are shown in black, while negative charges are shown in red. The difference in the electronegativity of the N atom (3.04) and the C atom (2.55), which is referred to Pauling scale [65], polarizes the hexagonal ring. Therefore, all of the N atoms inside the mono-vacancy for each system are negatively charged. The average charges on the N atoms in these systems were determined to be −0.176e, −0.341e, and −0.401e for 3N-gra, 2N1S-gra, and 1N2S-gra, respectively. Meanwhile, most of the compensating positive charges are distributed on the adjacent C atoms connected to the atomic N dopants. As shown in Figure 2a (3N-gra system), the charges on the three C atoms connected to the N atoms in the range between +0.043 and +0.044e. Unlike the N-doped systems, the C–S bond is negligibly polarized because the electronegativities of the S (2.58) and C (2.55) atoms are similar. Moreover, the S atom has two additional valence electrons compared to carbon, which provide positive charge and lone pairs of electrons. The average charges on the S atoms in these systems were determined to be +0.475e, +0.374e, and +0.302e for 2N1S-gra, 1N2S-gra, and 3S-gra, respectively. In contrast, most of the compensating negative charges are distributed on the adjacent C atoms bonded to the doping S atoms. As displayed in Figure 2b (the 2N1S-gra system), the C atoms bonded to the N atoms bear positive charges, with values of +0.081e and +0.146e on the CN1′ and CN1′′ atoms, and +0.143e and +0.082e on the CN2′ and CN2′′ atoms, respectively. The charges on the C atoms on each side of the N atom are almost identical. On the other hand, the C atoms bonded to the S atom exhibit negative charges, at −0.242e on CS1′, and −0.246e on CS1′′. Likewise, the 1N2S-gra system showed a similar trend. As shown in Figure 2c, the C atoms bonded to the N atoms, namely CN1′ and CN2′′, bear charges of +0.109e and +0.110e, which are almost identical. The C atoms adjacent to the S atoms exhibit negative charges, with charges of −0.248e and −0.240e on CS1′ and CS1′′, and −0.238e and −0.250e on the CS2′ and CS2′′ atoms, respectively. Finally, the 3S-gra system exhibited charges on the C atoms bonded to the S atoms that were in the −0.245e to −0.233e range. It seems that polarization in the doped region increases with increasing S concentration. The transformed charge-density distribution following doping, as well as the vacancy defect, affects the electronic properties of the graphene system.

4. Conclusions

The present density functional theory study aimed to reveal details of the electronic structures of several N- and S-doped graphenes in order to understand the effects of the N and S dopants on the graphene electronic structure. We found that the band structure of graphene can easily be tuned by doping with N and S atoms. The roles of the atomic N and S dopants on the band energies were clearly revealed; these dopants noticeably perturb the band shapes and open the bandgap at the Dirac point, compared to graphene itself. The band energies of 3N-doped graphene were upward shifted below the Fermi level compared with those of pure graphene, and showed p-type behavior. The band structure exhibits a remarkable electronic transition, from “p-type” to “n-type”, in moving from 3N-gra to 3S-gra (with increasing numbers of S atoms) with a downshifting of the band energy below the Fermi level. Moreover, Mulliken population analysis revealed that the atomic N dopants bear negative charges, whereas the atomic S dopants bear positive charges in N- and/or S-co-doped graphene systems, which is ascribable to differences in the electronegativities and numbers of valence electrons among the C, N, and S atoms. In each N- and/or S-co-doped graphene system, all of the N atoms bear negative charges, whereas all of the S atoms bear positive charges. The average charge on the N atoms gradually increases with decreasing numbers of N atoms in the N- and/or S-co-doped graphene system. In contrast, the average charge on the S atoms decreases with increasing numbers of S atoms in the co-doped graphene system. Due to their tunable band-structure properties, the resulting N- and S-co-doped graphenes can be used in energy and electronic-device applications. In conclusion, we expect that doping with N and S will lead to new pathways for tailoring and enhancing the electronic properties of graphene at the atomic level.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/2/268/s1, Figure S1: Calculated band structures of the (a) pristine graphene and (b) graphene with mono-vacancy.

Author Contributions

S.G.L., K.H.K., and T.H.H. conceived the research idea. J.H.L, S.K., M.C., and S.G.L. wrote the main manuscript text. J.H.L. and S.H.K. performed the experiments. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (Nos. NRF-2016M1A2A2937151 and NRF-2016R1A6A1A03013422). This research was funded by the Global Frontier Program through the Global Frontier Hybrid Interface Materials (GFHIM) of the NRF of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (No. 2013M3A6B1078882).

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (Nos. NRF-2016M1A2A2937151 and NRF-2016R1A6A1A03013422). This research was supported by the Global Frontier Program through the Global Frontier Hybrid Interface Materials (GFHIM) of the NRF of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (No. 2013M3A6B1078882).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Castro Neto, A.H.; Guinea, F.; Peres, N.M.R.; Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Modern Phys. 2009, 81, 109–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Geim, A.K. Graphene: Status and Prospects. Science 2009, 324, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stankovich, S.; Dikin, D.A.; Dommett, G.H.B.; Kohlhaas, K.M.; Zimney, E.J.; Stach, E.A.; Piner, R.D.; Nguyen, S.T.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 2006, 442, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Peigney, A.; Laurent, C.; Flahaut, E.; Bacsa, R.R.; Rousset, A. Specific surface area of carbon nanotubes and bundles of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2001, 39, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhu, Y.W.; Murali, S.; Stoller, M.D.; Ganesh, K.J.; Cai, W.W.; Ferreira, P.J.; Pirkle, A.; Wallace, R.M.; Cychosz, K.A.; Thommes, M.; et al. Carbon-Based Supercapacitors Produced by Activation of Graphene. Science 2011, 332, 1537–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bolotin, K.I.; Sikes, K.J.; Jiang, Z.; Klima, M.; Fudenberg, G.; Hone, J.; Kim, P.; Stormer, H.L. Ultrahigh electron mobility in suspended graphene. Solid State Commun. 2008, 146, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Balandin, A.A.; Ghosh, S.; Bao, W.Z.; Calizo, I.; Teweldebrhan, D.; Miao, F.; Lau, C.N. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 902–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, C.; Wei, X.D.; Kysar, J.W.; Hone, J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 2008, 321, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Freitag, M. Graphene—Nanoelectronics goes flat out. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 455–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bonaccorso, F.; Sun, Z.; Hasan, T.; Ferrari, A.C. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nat. Photon. 2010, 4, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hou, J.B.; Shao, Y.Y.; Ellis, M.W.; Moore, R.B.; Yi, B.L. Graphene-based electrochemical energy conversion and storage: Fuel cells, supercapacitors and lithium ion batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 15384–15402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Choi, H.J.; Jung, S.M.; Seo, J.M.; Chang, D.W.; Dai, L.M.; Baek, J.B. Graphene for energy conversion and storage in fuel cells and supercapacitors. Nano Energy 2012, 1, 534–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bonaccorso, F.; Colombo, L.; Yu, G.H.; Stoller, M.; Tozzini, V.; Ferrari, A.C.; Ruoff, R.S.; Pellegrini, V. Graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems for energy conversion and storage. Science 2015, 347, 1246501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shao, Y.Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, H.; Liu, J.; Aksay, I.A.; Lin, Y.H. Graphene Based Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors: A Review. Electroanalysis 2010, 22, 1027–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, C.C.; Li, C.; Shi, G.Q. Graphene based catalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 8848–8868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, H.T.; Liu, Y.Q.; Zhu, D.B. Chemical doping of graphene. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 3335–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nigar, S.; Zhou, Z.F.; Wang, H.; Imtiaz, M. Modulating the electronic and magnetic properties of graphene. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 51546–51580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.W.; Sun, G.Z.; Routh, P.; Kim, D.H.; Huang, W.; Chen, P. Heteroatom-doped graphene materials: Syntheses, properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7067–7098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, L.L.; Qing, M.Q.; Wang, Y.B.; Chen, S.M. Defects in Graphene: Generation, Healing, and Their Effects on the Properties of Graphene: A Review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2015, 31, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Banhart, F.; Kotakoski, J.; Krasheninnikov, A.V. Structural Defects in Graphene. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Schiros, T.; Nordlund, D.; Palova, L.; Prezzi, D.; Zhao, L.Y.; Kim, K.S.; Wurstbauer, U.; Gutierrez, C.; Delongchamp, D.; Jaye, C.; et al. Connecting Dopant Bond Type with Electronic Structure in N-Doped Graphene. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4025–4031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fujimoto, Y.; Saito, S. Formation, stabilities, and electronic properties of nitrogen defects in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 245446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hou, Z.F.; Wang, X.L.; Ikeda, T.; Terakura, K.; Oshima, M.; Kakimoto, M. Electronic structure of N-doped graphene with native point defects. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 165401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, T.; Wang, L.X.; Wu, D.L.; Xia, W.; Jia, D.Z. Interaction between Nitrogen and Sulfur in Co-Doped Graphene and Synergetic Effect in Supercapacitor. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, J.X.; Dong, G.F.; Jin, C.H.; Huang, M.H.; Guan, L.H. Sulfur and Nitrogen Co-Doped, Few-Layered Graphene Oxide as a Highly Efficient Electrocatalyst for the Oxygen-Reduction Reaction. ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, Z.S.; Winter, A.; Chen, L.; Sun, Y.; Turchanin, A.; Feng, X.L.; Mullen, K. Three-Dimensional Nitrogen and Boron Co-doped Graphene for High-Performance All-Solid-State Supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 5130–5135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Panchokarla, L.S.; Subrahmanyam, K.S.; Saha, S.K.; Govindaraj, A.; Krishnamurthy, H.R.; Waghmare, U.V.; Rao, C.N.R. Synthesis, Structure, and Properties of Boron- and Nitrogen-Doped Graphene. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 4726–4730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reddy, A.L.M.; Srivastava, A.; Gowda, S.R.; Gullapalli, H.; Dubey, M.; Ajayan, P.M. Synthesis Of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Films For Lithium Battery Application. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 6337–6342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, C.Z.; Mahmood, N.; Yin, H.; Liu, F.; Hou, Y.L. Synthesis of Phosphorus-Doped Graphene and its Multifunctional Applications for Oxygen Reduction Reaction and Lithium Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4932–4937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Choi, C.H.; Chung, M.W.; Kwon, H.C.; Park, S.H.; Woo, S.I. B, N- and P, N-doped graphene as highly active catalysts for oxygen reduction reactions in acidic media. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 3694–3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, X.L.; Ning, G.Q.; Qi, C.L.; Xu, C.G.; Gao, J.S. Phosphorus and Nitrogen Dual-Doped Few-Layered Porous Graphene: A High-Performance Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 2014, 6, 14415–14422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Paraknowitsch, J.P.; Thomas, A. Doping carbons beyond nitrogen: An overview of advanced heteroatom doped carbons with boron, sulphur and phosphorus for energy applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2839–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kresse, G.; Furthmuller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169–11186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kresse, G.; Furthmuller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comp. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6, 15–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, J.H.; Kang, S.G.; Moon, H.S.; Park, H.; Kim, I.T.; Lee, S.G. Adsorption mechanisms of lithium oxides (LixO2) on a graphene-based electrode: A density functional theory approach. App. Surf. Sci. 2015, 351, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pham, N.N.T.; Park, J.S.; Kim, H.-T.; Kim, H.-J.; Son, Y.-A.; Kang, S.G.; Lee, S.G. Catalytic performance of graphene quantum dot supported manganese phthalocyanine for highly efficient oxygen reduction: A DFT+U approach. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, H.W.; Moon, H.S.; Hur, J.; Kim, I.T.; Park, M.S.; Yun, J.M.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, S.G. Mechanism of sodium adsorption on N-doped graphene nanoribbons for sodium ion battery applications: A density functional theory approach. Carbon 2017, 119, 492–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hwang, D.G.; Jeong, E.; Lee, S.G. Density functional theory study of CH4 and CO2 adsorption by fluorinated graphene. Carbon Lett. 2016, 20, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moon, H.S.; Yun, J.M.; Kim, K.H.; Jang, S.S.; Lee, S.G. Investigations of the band structures of edge-defect zigzag graphene nanoribbons using density functional theory. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 39587–39594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, J.; Yang, Z.X.; Qiu, J.Y.C.; Lee, H.W. Design and synthesis of nitrogen and sulfur co-doped porous carbon via two-dimensional interlayer confinement for a high-performance anode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 5802–5809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Materials Studio; BIOVIA: San Diego, CA, USA, 2018.
  46. Mulliken, R.S. Citation Classic—Electronic Population Analysis on Lcao-Mo Molecular Wave-Functions. Curr. Contents/Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. 1985, 18. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang, H.B.; Maiyalagan, T.; Wang, X. Review on Recent Progress in Nitrogen-Doped Graphene: Synthesis, Characterization, and Its Potential Applications. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 781–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wu, J.J.; Ma, L.L.; Yadav, R.M.; Yang, Y.C.; Zhang, X.; Vajtai, R.; Lou, J.; Ajayan, P.M. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene with Pyridinic Dominance as a Highly Active and Stable Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 2015, 7, 14763–14769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, L.J.; Dai, P.C.; Gu, X.; Wang, Y.; Yan, L.T.; Zhao, X.B. High oxygen reduction activity on a metal-organic framework derived carbon combined with high degree of graphitization and pyridinic-N dopants. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 789–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sun, D.F.; Yang, J.; Yan, X.B. Hierarchically porous and nitrogen, sulfur-codoped graphene-like microspheres as a high capacity anode for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 2134–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wohlgemuth, S.A.; Vilela, F.; Titirici, M.M.; Antonietti, M. A one-pot hydrothermal synthesis of tunable dual heteroatom-doped carbon microspheres. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Qiu, Z.Z.; Lin, Y.M.; Xin, H.L.; Han, P.; Li, D.Z.; Yang, B.; Li, P.C.; Ullah, S.; Fan, H.S.; Zhu, C.Z.; et al. Ultrahigh level nitrogen/sulfur co-doped carbon as high performance anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Carbon 2018, 126, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xiong, J.W.; Pan, Q.C.; Zheng, F.H.; Xiong, X.H.; Yang, C.H.; Hu, D.L.; Huang, C.L. N/S Co-doped Carbon Derived From Cotton as High Performance Anode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ruan, J.F.; Yuan, T.; Pang, Y.P.; Luo, S.N.; Peng, C.X.; Yang, J.H.; Zheng, S.Y. Nitrogen and sulfur dual-doped carbon films as flexible free-standing anodes for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries. Carbon 2018, 126, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wei, T.Y.; Wei, X.L.; Yang, L.W.; Xiao, H.P.; Gao, Y.; Li, H.M. A one-step moderate-explosion assisted carbonization strategy to sulfur and nitrogen dual-doped porous carbon nanosheets derived from camellia petals for energy storage. J. Power Sources 2016, 331, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cai, D.D.; Wang, C.S.; Shi, C.Y.; Tan, N. Facile synthesis of N and S co-doped graphene sheets as anode materials for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 731, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ai, W.; Luo, Z.M.; Jiang, J.; Zhu, J.H.; Du, Z.Z.; Fan, Z.X.; Xie, L.H.; Zhang, H.; Huang, W.; Yu, T. Nitrogen and Sulfur Codoped Graphene: Multifunctional Electrode Materials for High-Performance Li-Ion Batteries and Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6186–6192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xing, L.B.; Xi, K.; Li, Q.Y.; Su, Z.; Lai, C.; Zhao, X.S.; Kumar, R.V. Nitrogen, sulfur-codoped graphene sponge as electroactive carbon interlayer for high-energy and -power lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 303, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Usachov, D.; Vilkov, O.; Gruneis, A.; Haberer, D.; Fedorov, A.; Adamchuk, V.K.; Preobrajenski, A.B.; Dudin, P.; Barinov, A.; Oehzelt, M.; et al. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene: Efficient Growth, Structure, and Electronic Properties. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 5401–5407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, Y.F.; Jin, S.; Zhang, Z.; Du, Z.Z.; Liu, H.R.; Yang, J.; Xu, H.X.; Ji, H.X. Nitrogen-Doped Hollow Carbon Nanospheres for High-Performance Li-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 2017, 9, 14180–14186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Guo, P.P.; Xiao, F.; Liu, Q.; Liu, H.F.; Guo, Y.L.; Gong, J.R.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.Q. One-Pot Microbial Method to Synthesize Dual-Doped Graphene and Its Use as High-Performance Electrocatalyst. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yang, Z.; Nie, H.G.; Zhou, X.M.; Yao, Z.; Huang, S.M.; Chen, X.H. Investigation of Homologous Series as Precursory Hydrocarbons for Aligned Carbon Nanotube Formation by the Spray Pyrolysis Method. Nano 2011, 6, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ji, J.Y.; Zhang, G.H.; Chen, H.Y.; Wang, S.L.; Zhang, G.L.; Zhang, F.B.; Fan, X.B. Sulfonated graphene as water-tolerant solid acid catalyst. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 484–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Park, J.E.; Jang, Y.J.; Kim, Y.J.; Song, M.S.; Yoon, S.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, S.J. Sulfur-doped graphene as a potential alternative metal-free electrocatalyst and Pt-catalyst supporting material for oxygen reduction reaction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pauling, L. Citation Classic—The Nature of the Chemical-Bond and the Structure of Molecules and Crystals—An Introduction to Modern Structural Chemistry. Curr. Contents/Phys. Chem. Earth Sci. 1985, 16. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Optimized structures of the (a) 3N-gra, (b) 2N1S-gra, (c) 1N2S-gra, and (d) 3S-gra systems. Blue, gray, and yellow denote nitrogen, carbon, and sulfur, respectively.
Figure 1. Optimized structures of the (a) 3N-gra, (b) 2N1S-gra, (c) 1N2S-gra, and (d) 3S-gra systems. Blue, gray, and yellow denote nitrogen, carbon, and sulfur, respectively.
Nanomaterials 09 00268 g001
Figure 2. Calculated band structures of the (a) 3N-gra, (b) 2N1S-gra, (c) 1N2S-gra, and (d) 3S-gra systems.
Figure 2. Calculated band structures of the (a) 3N-gra, (b) 2N1S-gra, (c) 1N2S-gra, and (d) 3S-gra systems.
Nanomaterials 09 00268 g002
Figure 3. Calculated charge-density distributions on the atoms around the doped mono-vacancy region for the (a) 3N-gra, (b) 2N1S-gra, (c) 1N2S-gra, and (d) 3S-gra systems. Blue, gray, and yellow denote nitrogen, carbon, and sulfur, respectively.
Figure 3. Calculated charge-density distributions on the atoms around the doped mono-vacancy region for the (a) 3N-gra, (b) 2N1S-gra, (c) 1N2S-gra, and (d) 3S-gra systems. Blue, gray, and yellow denote nitrogen, carbon, and sulfur, respectively.
Nanomaterials 09 00268 g003
Table 1. The band gap energies Eg (in eV) for 3N-gra, 2N1S-gra, 1N2S-gra and 3S-gra systems.
Table 1. The band gap energies Eg (in eV) for 3N-gra, 2N1S-gra, 1N2S-gra and 3S-gra systems.
3N-gra2N1S-gra1N2S-gra3S-gra
Bandgap (eV)0.4730.3500.2750.255

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.H.; Kwon, S.H.; Kwon, S.; Cho, M.; Kim, K.H.; Han, T.H.; Lee, S.G. Tunable Electronic Properties of Nitrogen and Sulfur Doped Graphene: Density Functional Theory Approach. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020268

AMA Style

Lee JH, Kwon SH, Kwon S, Cho M, Kim KH, Han TH, Lee SG. Tunable Electronic Properties of Nitrogen and Sulfur Doped Graphene: Density Functional Theory Approach. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(2):268. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020268

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Ji Hye, Sung Hyun Kwon, Soonchul Kwon, Min Cho, Kwang Ho Kim, Tae Hee Han, and Seung Geol Lee. 2019. "Tunable Electronic Properties of Nitrogen and Sulfur Doped Graphene: Density Functional Theory Approach" Nanomaterials 9, no. 2: 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020268

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop