Next Article in Journal
Mixed-Solvent Polarity-Assisted Phase Transition of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals with Improved Stability at Room Temperature
Next Article in Special Issue
In Situ Copolymerized Polyacrylamide Cellulose Supported Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanocomposites for Adsorptive Removal of Pb(II): Artificial Neural Network Modeling and Experimental Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Super Ductility of Nanoglass Aluminium Nitride
Previous Article in Special Issue
Removal of Mercury (II) by EDTA-Functionalized Magnetic CoFe2O4@SiO2 Nanomaterial with Core-Shell Structure
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/nano9111536
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Silver Quantum Dot Decorated 2D-SnO2 Nanoflakes for Photocatalytic Degradation of the Water Pollutant Rhodamine B

by
Nadavala Siva Kumar
1,*,
Mohammad Asif
1,
T. Ranjeth Kumar Reddy
2,
Gnanendra Shanmugam
3,* and
Abdelhamid Ajbar
1
1
Department of Chemical Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Physics, Presidency University, Bengaluru 560064, India
3
Department of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(11), 1536; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111536
Submission received: 30 September 2019 / Revised: 25 October 2019 / Accepted: 28 October 2019 / Published: 30 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology in Wastewater Treatment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Decoration of 2D semiconductor structures with heterogeneous metal quantum dots has attracted considerable attention due to advanced optical, electrical, and catalytic properties that result from the large surface-to-volume ratio associated with these structures. Herein, we report on silver quantum dot decorated 2D SnO2 nanoflakes for the photocatalytic abatement of water effluents, the synthesis of which was achieved through a straightforward and mild hydrothermal procedure. The photocatalysts were systematically investigated using UV–Vis, XRD, electron microscopy (SEM, HR-TEM), EDX, XPS and FTIR. The photocatalytic activity of the nanostructures was evaluated for the abatement of water pollutant rhodamine B (RhB), under light irradiation. The mild hydrothermal synthesis (100 °C) proved highly efficient for the production of large scale Ag quantum dot (QD)/SnO2 nanoflakes for a novel photocatalytic application. The decoration of SnO2 with Ag QDs significantly enhances the synergetic charge transfer, which diminishes the photo-induced electron-hole reunion. Moreover, the plasmonic effect from Ag QDs and 2D-SnO2 structures acts as an electron tank to collect the photo-induced electrons, generating a Schottky barrier between the SnO2 structures and quantum dots. Overall, this resulted in a facile and efficient degradation of RhB, with a rate double that of pristine SnO2.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The preparation of heterostructured 2D-nanosized oxide materials with wide bandgaps has been an active area of research for the past three decades, as their structural shape and size influence their physical, chemical, optical, catalytic, and electronic properties [1,2,3,4]. In particular, 2D semiconductors (graphene oxide, g-C3N4, cobalt oxide, ZnO nanosheets, TiO2, MoS2, WS2, and SnO2) have been used as photocatalysts for the improved treatment of polluted water [5,6]. In recent years, among the wide bandgap semiconductors, SnO2 nanomaterials have risen to the fore due to favorable properties such as a very large bandgap (Eg = 3.6 eV at 27 °C), good chemical and biological inertness, non-toxicity, high electron mobility, environmental friendliness, and low cost and ease of production [7,8]. Owing to the above-mentioned properties, SnO2 nanomaterials have numerous applications in gas sensors, solar cells, lithium ion batteries, and catalysts [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. For low dimension SnO2 nanostructures, various morphologies such as zero dimensional nanoparticles, one dimensional nanorods, nanowires, nanotubes, two dimensional nanosheets, and 3D hierarchical self-assembled nanostructures have been reported [16,17,18]. Among those, due to their very large fraction of distinct exposed surface facets, 2D nanosheets are favorable for applications in catalysis and photocatalysis [7,8]. However, despite the good performance of SnO2 as a photocatalyst, its efficiency is generally low due to the facile recombination rate of photo-generated electron-hole pairs, and its failure to function within the visible region of light [19]. It has been suggested that the doping of SnO2 with plasmonic noble metal nanoparticles (NPs) could overcome this limitation, as the combination of wide bandgap semiconductor nanostructures and plasmonic noble metals has excellent properties such as increased light absorption and fast transfer of photo induced charge carriers; these properties stem from the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of noble metals [20,21]. Such a combination allows the photo-generated electrons to delocalize over the excitation levels of both the dopant and the semiconductor. The above-mentioned properties may reduce the recombination of photo-induced holes and electrons, resulting in an increased availability of these carriers to degrade water pollutants [22]. In recent years, researchers have investigated SnO2 nanomaterials doped with different metal nanostructures. J. Pan et al. fabricated carbon quantum dot (QD) modified SnO2 nanotubes for photocatalysis applications achieved within the visible spectrum [14]. Dutta et al. synthesized SnO2 QDs decorated with SiO2 nanoparticles and studied the degradation of methyl blue (MB) dye under visible light [13]. M. Hu et al. synthesized Ag decorated SnO2 microspheres and evaluated their catalytic performance for the conversion of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol [8], and Babu et al. reported on Ag–SnO2 quantum dots (plasmonic photocatalyst) for the reduction of water pollutants and studied the effect of Ag composition on photo catalytic efficiency [23].
To the best of our knowledge, Ag QD decorated 2D SnO2 nanoflakes/sheets have not been reported thus far. As above-mentioned, due to the large surface area of distinct exposed facets, 2D nanosheets are favorable for photocatalytic applications. With these factors in mind, we synthesized Ag QD decorated 2D SnO2 nanoflakes, and studied their structural, optical, and photo-catalytic properties.

2. Materials and Methods

Tin (II) chloride dihydrate, glucose, silver nitrate, and organic dye (RhB) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and hexadecylamine (HDA) was procured from TCI Chemicals (Seoul, Korea).
Ag QDs/2D-SnO2 nanoflakes were synthesized by the following procedure: tin chloride dihydrate (100 mg), silver nitrate (20 mg), and HDA (180 mg) were added to deionized water (20 mL) in a 20 mL vial. Then, glucose (100 mg) was added to the solution and the resulting mixture was stirred at 35 °C for 2 h. The glass vial was then wrapped with paraffin tape, and oven heated at 102 °C for 12 h. During the formation of the 2D-nanoflakes, the amine moiety of HDA binds to the surface of tin oxide in the aqueous medium. For comparison, the same synthetic procedure was used to fabricate 2D-SnO2 nanoflakes, with the exception of silver nitrate addition.
Morphological features and the shapes and sizes of fabricated structures were studied using scanning and transmission electron microscopes (SEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan; FE-TEM, FEI Tecnai G2 F20, respectively). Optical studies were performed using UV–Vis spectroscopy (Jobin Varian Carry 5000 spectrophotometer). The crystallinity of the prepared 2D structures was analyzed by powder x-ray diffraction (PXRD) and the results obtained were compared with standard data. Oxidation states and elemental composition were analyzed using energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and x-photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Scientific-Al K α1 radiation source).
Photocatalytic reactions were conducted under artificial solar irradiation (A Solar simulator, ABET technologies, LS series light source, Gyeonggi-do, Korea), and the average light intensity was calculated at approximately 120,000 lux, which was measured by a digital lux meter. The photocatalytic reduction kinetics of RhB (5 ppm) were determined under an artificial solar illuminator in aqueous media. The prepared catalyst (20 mg) was dispersed in a prepared dye solution (100 mL) by stirring the mixture for 30 min in the dark, in order to maintain the adsorption/desorption stabilities of the dye and catalyst. Degradation kinetics were measured with a UV–Vis absorption spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Genesys10S).

3. Results and Discussion

The crystalline nature of the Ag QD decorated 2D SnO2 nanoflakes and pristine 2D-SnO2 nanoflakes were investigated by PXRD, and the results are represented in Figure 1. The results revealed that the characteristic Bragg diffraction peaks correlated well with the tetragonal rutile phase of SnO2 (JCPDS NO: 41-1445); the patterns of Ag QD decorated SnO2 contained peaks for both SnO2 and Ag, with the diffraction peaks of Ag matching well with the face centered cubic facets of Ag (JCPDS-04-0783). Moreover, the low content of silver in the Ag QD decorated SnO2 gave rise to small, intense significant diffraction peaks associated with the silver, due to the silver atoms anchoring on SnO2 lattice planes. Likewise, the presence of additional peaks at the smaller angles was attributed to the attachment of Ag ions with Sn ions.
The SEM images in Figure 2 illustrate the morphological appearances of pristine and Ag QD decorated SnO2 nanoflakes. Figure 2a,b depict the SEM images of SnO2 nanoflakes under different magnifications. Pristine SnO2 displays a flower architecture, consisting of large nanoflakes approximately 20 nm in thickness. Ag QDS/SnO2 nanostructures contain nanolamellae of Ag quantum dots, which were not observable by SEM (Figure 2c,d). Following Ag loading onto the SnO2 structure, there was no evidence of a morphological change in the SnO2 nanoflakes, which was further verified by high-magnification images (TEM images, Figure 3). Nonetheless, the presence of Ag in the composite was confirmed in the EDX spectrum represented in Figure 4. From the TEM images, it can be seen that the Ag QDs (<5 nm) were decorated among the SnO2 nanoflakes. Moreover, the Ag QDs were uniformly distributed throughout the SnO2 nanoflakes, suggesting the formation of heterostructures. In a typical high resolution TEM (HRTEM) image, lattice fringes of d = 0.26 nm spacing can be assigned to the Ag (111) planes, while the lattice fringes of d = 0.33 nm can be assigned to the (110) plane of SnO2. Furthermore, energy dispersive spectrometry (EDX) analysis suggested the existence of Ag, Sn, and O elements, as represented in Figure 5.
The surface composition and oxidation states of Ag QD decorated SnO2 nanoflakes were analyzed through XPS (Figure 6). The presence of Sn 3d, Ag 3d, and O 1s was confirmed in the XPS survey scan. Here, we used a carbon contamination peak (284.8 eV) as an internal reference to estimate all remaining peaks. In Figure 6b, the spin orbit doublet peaks observed at approximately 497.95 and 489.61 eV were ascribed to the Sn 3d3/2 and Sn 3d5/2 binding energies (BEs), respectively. The BE difference between Sn 3d3/2 (497.95 eV) and Sn 3d5/2 (489.61 eV) was 8.34 eV, which clearly implies the presence of Sn4+ [24]. In addition, two satellite peaks appeared at 494. and 486.61 eV, which likely arose from the binding energy between Ag and Sn [16,24]. Furthermore, in Figure 6c, doublet peaks are visible at 376.95 and 371.09 eV, corresponding to the Ag 3d3/2 and Ag 3d5/2 BEs for Ag0 in the prepared sample. The small peaks at approximately 373.84 and 367.98 eV suggest Ag 3d BE in Ag QD decorated SnO2 nanoflakes [25]. The energy variation between Ag 3d3/2 and Ag 3d5/2 was 5.86 eV, indicating the establishment of metallic silver [26]. Small shifts in elemental BEs were observed for the Ag QD decorated SnO2 nanoflakes, which indicates that the solid interaction between Ag QDs and SnO2 nanoflakes arises from the transfer of an electron between Ag and SnO2. Figure 6d shows the O 1s spectra; the peak at 530.5 eV corresponds to the host lattice oxygen, and the peak at 533.5 eV implies the presence of hydroxyl groups (O2−, OH−) on the surface of the SnO2 nanoflakes [27,28,29].
The optical absorption properties of synthesized SnO2 and Ag QD decorated SnO2 nanoflakes are represented in Figure 7. SnO2 nanoflakes exhibited an absorption band in the UV region, while the Ag QD decorated SnO2 nanoflake absorption shifted toward a higher wavelength, and included tailing in the visible region. The SnO2 nanoflakes exhibited an absorption band at 320 nm in the UV region, while for the Ag QD decorated SnO2 nanoflakes, the absorption band shifted by 5 nm and the intensity of the band decreased. This can be attributed to the charge transfer between Ag and SnO2 nanoflakes, which is expected to bring about an enhancement in photocatalytic activity. Analysis of UV–Vis absorption spectra was performed in order to evaluate the bandgap of the prepared samples by using the simplified equation: αhν = A(hν − Eg)2, where α is the absorption coefficient; ν is the frequency; A is the constant; and Eg is the energy gap. The bandgap of SnO2 and Ag QD/SnO2 structures was 3.2 and 3.1 eV, respectively. The results suggest that the Ag–SnO2 nanoparticle size was smaller when compared to that of SnO2, due to the introduction of an impurity level developed in the bandgap of the composite, resulting in a reduction in electron transition energy. Moreover, absorption band shifts and optical bandgap reduction have an impact on the photo-induced electron-hole recombination rate, which influences photocatalytic activity. Furthermore, the SPR band of silver was attributed to the perpendicular vibrations of dipoles between particles and individual optical vibrations.
To examine the role of HDA in the preparation of SnO2 nanoflakes and Ag QD decorated SnO2 nanoflakes, FTIR spectra were recorded and analyzed, as illustrated in Figure 8. For both the SnO2 and Ag QDs/SnO2 samples, the peaks at 2918 and 2849 cm−1 represent the stretching vibrations of CH3, and symmetric and asymmetric C–H vibrations of CH2 in HDA, respectively. The peak at 1311 cm−1 in the Ag QDs/SnO2 sample represents the attachment of an N–H group onto the silver tin oxide nanostructures. Moreover, less intense peaks were observed in the region of 1200–1700 cm−1 in samples with HDA. The peaks shifted approximately 30 cm−1 due to surface interaction between the nanomaterials and HDA. The stretching vibrations in the region of 600–1000 cm−1 were attributed to the antisymmetric molecular vibrations of Sn–O–Sn and O–Sn–O [30].
The photocatalytic performances of the pristine and Ag QD decorated SnO2 nanoflakes were evaluated by studying RhB degradation under light irradiation. The kinetics of RhB degradation were determined by the pseudo-first order model. The results of the degradation by Ag QD decorated SnO2 nanoflakes are illustrated in Figure 9a. The rate of degradation was calculated using the following Langmuir–Hinshelwood pseudo-first order kinetic equation [31]
ln (At/A0) = −kt
where k is the apparent rate constant, and A0 and At are the dye concentrations at the initial time and at time t, respectively. The photocatalytic reaction exhibits a linear relationship of photodegradation with respect to time (Figure 9b). From the results, it is evident that the reaction rate constant (k) is higher for the Ag QDs/SnO2 catalyst when compared to that for the SnO2 nanoflakes. Therefore, we can conclude that the degradation efficiency of the Ag QD decorated sample was higher than that of the pristine SnO2 nanoflakes.
Comparisons of the obtained results with recent literature [23,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] are shown in Table 1. In our case, under light illumination, RhB was 96% decomposed within 40 min (Figure 9c). This may be due to the plasmon effect of Ag QDs, which acts as an electron supplier to receive the photogenerated electrons. The stability toward the recycling of Ag QDs decorated SnO2 nanoflakes was studied for five cycles, and the results are shown in Figure 9d. Based on the recycling results, RhB decomposition was at 94% in the fifth cycle, which was marginally lower when compared to that in the first cycle. The decreasing efficiency of the photocatalyst can be attributed to the diminished surface interaction between the reaction intermediates in the dye oxidation process.
A plausible mechanism for the formation of photo-induced carriers and their separation, transportation, and associated reduction process of dye pollutants under light irradiation is shown in Figure 10. Under light irradiation, photonic energy was more than or equal to the bandgap of SnO2; the photo-induced generated electron-hole pair and work functions of SnO2 and silver differ, which creates a Schottky barrier between the metal and semiconductor in the nanocomposite [41]. Under light irradiation, Ag QDs/SnO2 was in the excited state because of the SPR of the Ag, and the generated electrons were transferred to the conduction band (CB) of SnO2. Dissolved oxygen molecules in water form superoxide radical anions (O2*), and hydroxyl radicals (OH*), which scavenge the electrons in the CB of SnO2. In the case of RhB degradation, the radical molecules react with the central carbon of RhB and initiate the deethylation process. Furthermore, primary oxides such as phthalic acid, adipic acid, and terephthalic acid are created form this intermediate state. The intermediate compounds degrade into smaller compounds such as propane-1,2,3-triol and butane-1,3 diols, among others. Ultimately, these compounds are mineralized to form H2O and CO2 [42].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we prepared silver quantum dot decorated 2D SnO2 nanoflakes for the photocatalytic abatement of water pollutants by using a straightforward and mild hydrothermal protocol. The Ag QD (<5 nm) decorated SnO2 and SnO2 nanoflakes exhibited a flower architecture, consisting of large 2D-nanoflakes approximately 20 nm in thickness. The photocatalytic activity of Ag QDs on the 2D-SnO2 nanostructures was determined to be double that of the 2D-SnO2 nanostructures. The association of Ag on SnO2 nanostructures may decrease contact resistance, which enhances light harvesting through plasmonic resonance by noble metals. Moreover, it suppresses the photo-induced electron-hole pair recombination rate, all of which lead to increased catalytic efficiency. Furthermore, we believe that this method of metal QDs-modified semiconductor synthesis can meet the requirements of industrial effluent treatment.

Author Contributions

N.S.K. and G.S. performed the experiments and characterization tests as well as wrote the manuscript; M.A., T.R.K.R., and A.A. carried out the literature review and proofread; N.S.K. and G.S. analyzed the data, finalized the paper and N.S.K. was the main corresponding author during the review process.

Funding

The Researchers Supporting Project at King Saud University, project no. (RSP-2019/42).

Acknowledgments

The authors from King Saud University would like to thank the Researchers Supporting Project, RSP-2019/42, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xu, X.; Zhuang, J.; Wang, X. SnO2 quantum dots and quantum wires: Controllable synthesis, self-assembled 2D architectures, and gas-sensing properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12527–12535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chen, X.; Liu, L.; Yu, P.Y.; Mao, S.S. Increasing solar absorption for photocatalysis with black hydrogenated titanium dioxide nanocrystals. Science 2011, 331, 746–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, Z.; Luan, D.; Boey, F.Y.; Lou, X.W. Formation of SnO2 hollow nanospheres inside mesoporous silica nanoreactors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 4738–4741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Ge, M.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, J.Z. Large-scale synthesis of SnO2 nanosheets with high lithium storage capacity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 132, 46–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Han, X.; Jin, M.; Xie, S.; Kuang, Q.; Jiang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Xie, Z.; Zheng, L. Synthesis of tin dioxide octahedral nanoparticles with exposed high-energy {221} facets and enhanced gas-sensing properties. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9180–9183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pan, Z.W.; Dai, Z.R.; Wang, Z.L. Nanobelts of semiconducting oxides. Science 2001, 291, 1947–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, H.G.; Sun, C.H.; Qiao, S.Z.; Zou, J.; Liu, G.; Smith, S.C.; Cheng, H.M.; Lu, G.Q. Anatase TiO2 single crystals with a large percentage of reactive facets. Nature 2008, 453, 638–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, H.; Rogach, A.L. Hierarchical SnO2 nanostructures: Recent advances in design, synthesis, and applications. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Maiti, A.; Rodriguez, J.A.; Law, M.; Kung, P.; McKinney, J.R.; Yang, P. SnO2 nanoribbons as NO2 sensors: Insights from first principles calculations. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1025–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qian, J.F.; Liu, P.; Xiao, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Cao, Y.L.; Ai, X.P.; Yang, H.X. TiO2-coated multilayered SnO2 hollow microspheres for dye-sensitized solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 3663–3667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ding, S.; Luan, D.; Boey, F.Y.C.; Chen, J.S.; Lou, X.W. SnO2 nanosheets grown on graphene sheets with enhanced lithium storage properties. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 7155–7157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Deng, D.; Lee, J.Y. Hollow Core–shell mesospheres of crystalline SnO2 nanoparticle aggregates for high capacity Li+ ion storage. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 1841–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dutta, S.K.; Mehetor, S.K.; Pradhan, N. Metal semiconductor heterostructures for photocatalytic conversion of light energy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 936–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pan, J.; Zhou, Y.; Cao, J.; Sheng, Y.; Wu, Y.; Cui, C.; Li, C.; Feng, B. Fabrication of carbon quantum dots modified granular SnO2 nanotubes for visible light Photocatalysis. Mater. Lett. 2016, 170, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pincella, F.; Isozaki, K.; Miki, K. A visible light-driven plasmonic photocatalyst. Light Sci. Appl. 2014, 3, e133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, D.F.; Sun, L.D.; Yin, J.L.; Yan, C.H. Low-temperature fabrication of highly crystalline SnO2 nanorods. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 1022–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Xia, Y. A solution-phase, precursor route to polycrystalline SnO2 nanowires that can be used for gas sensing under ambient conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16176–16177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Zeng, H.C.; Lee, J.Y. Synthesis of new-phased VooH hollow “dandelions” and their application in lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 645–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, S.; Yu, Y.; Zuo, Y.; Li, C.; Yang, J.; Lu, C. Synthesis and photocatalysis of hierarchical heteroassemblies of ZnO branched nanorod arrays on Ag core nanowires. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 5895–5901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, S.; Yun, J.H.; Luo, B.; Butburee, T.; Peerakiatkhajohn, P.; Thaweesak, S.; Wang, S. Recent Progress on Visible Light Responsive Heterojunctions for Photocatalytic Applications. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2017, 33, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hong, J.W.; Wi, D.H.; Lee, S.; Han, S.W. Metal-semiconductor heteronanocrystals with desired configurations for plasmonic photocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 15766–15773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shahar, Y.B.; Banin, U. Hybrid semiconductor-metal nanorods as photocatalysts. Top. Curr. Chem. 2016, 374, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Babu, B.; Cho, M.; Byon, C.; Shim, J. One pot synthesis of Ag-SnO2 quantum dots for highly enhanced sunlight-driven photocatalytic activity. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 731, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, X.; Ji, G.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, Y.; Shi, D.; Zhang, P.; Cao, X.; Wang, B. The role of Sn in enhancing the visible-light photocatalytic activity of hollow hierarchical microspheres of the Bi/BioBr heterojunction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 8078–8086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, Q.R.; Gao, Y.; Bai, X.; Wu, C.Z.; Xie, Y. Facile synthesis of SnO2 hollow nanospheres and applications in gas sensors and electrocatalysts. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 8, 1643–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ansari, S.; Khan, M.; Ansari, M.; Lee, J.; Cho, M. Visible light-driven photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical studies of AgSnO2 nanocomposites synthesized using an electrochemically active biofilm. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 26013–26021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ramgir, N.S.; Mulla, I.S.; Vijayamohanan, K.P. Effect of RuO2 in the shape selectivity of submicron-sized SnO2 structures. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005, 109, 12297–12303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ansari, S.A.; Khan, M.M.; Ansari, M.O.; Lee, J.; Cho, M.H. Highly photoactive SnO2 nanostructures engineered by electrochemically active biofilm. New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 2462–2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Luo, C.; Qiao, X. One-pot green synthesis of Ag-decorated SnO2 microsphere: An efficient and reusable catalyst for reduction of 4-Nitrophenol. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kaur, H.; Bhatti, H.S.; Singh, K. Dopant incorporation in ultra-small quantum dots: A case study on the effect of dopant concentration on lattice and properties of SnO2 QDs. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 2246–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mallikarjuna, K.; Kotesh Kumar, M.; Subba Reddy, B.V.; Kim, H. Hydrogen Production from Water Splitting: Fabrication of ZnO Nanorod Decorated Cu NW Heterogeneous Hybrid Structures for Photocatalytic Applications. J. Clust. Sci. 2019, 30, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Prakasha, K.; Senthil Kumar, P.; Latha, P.; Stalin Durai, K.; Shanmugam, R.; Karuthapandian, S. Dry synthesis of water lily flower like SrO2/g-C3N4 nanohybrids for the visible light induced superior photocatalytic activity. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 93, 112–122. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bathula, B.; Koutavarapu, R.; Harish, V.V.N.; Shim, J.; Yoo, K. Novel in-situ synthesis of Au/SnO2 quantum dots for enhanced visible-light driven photocatalytic applications. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 5743–5750. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sun, L.; Wu, W.; Yang, S.; Zhou, J.; Hong, M.; Xiao, X.; Ren, F.; Jiang, C. Template and silica interlayer tailorable synthesis of spindle-like multilayer α-Fe2O3/Ag/SnO2 ternary hybrid architectures and their enhanced photocatalytic activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 1113–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Qin, L.; Yang, L.; Zhu, L.; Tang, P.; Gao, T.; Huang, Y.; Sha, Z.; et al. Visible light induced photocatalysis on CdS quantum dots decorated TiO2 nanotube arrays. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2015, 498, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Akhundi, A.; Yangieh, A.H. A simple large-scale method for preparation of g-C3N4/SnO2 nanocomposite as visible–light-driven photocatalyst for degradation of an organic pollutant. Mater. Exp. 2015, 5, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yu, H.-B.; Rong, Z.J.; Lu, Y.; Wang, X.H.; Luo, X.B. Preparation of CeO2 quantum dots/Cu2O nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic properties. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 18, 5794–5798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, X.; Chen, K.; Shim, J.J.; Huang, J. Facile synthesis of porous Fe2O3 nanorods and their photocatalytic properties. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2015, 19, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, Y.; Yang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Wang, G.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, D. Rapid fabrication of SnO2 nanoparticle photocatalyst: Computational understanding and photocatalytic degradation of organic dye. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 3005–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Albiter, E.; Valenzuela, M.A.; Alfaro, S.; Valverde-Aguilar, G.; Martínez-Pallares, F.M. Photocatalytic deposition of Ag nanoparticles on TiO2: Metal precursor effect on the structural and photoactivity properties. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2015, 19, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, H.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, X.; Jia, H.; Xu, B. Synthesis of spherical Ag/ZnO heterostructural composites with excellent photocatalytic activity under visible light and UV irradiation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 355, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yu, K.; Yang, S.; He, H.; Sun, C.; Gu, C.; Ju, Y. Visible Light-Driven Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B over NaBiO3: Pathways and Mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 10024–10032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g001 550
Figure 1. Powder x-ray diffraction (PXRD) spectra of the SnO2 and Ag QD/SnO2 nanostructures.
Figure 1. Powder x-ray diffraction (PXRD) spectra of the SnO2 and Ag QD/SnO2 nanostructures.
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g001
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g002 550
Figure 2. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images (a,b) SnO2 nanoflakes (c,d) Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures.
Figure 2. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images (a,b) SnO2 nanoflakes (c,d) Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures.
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g002
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g003 550
Figure 3. TEM images at different magnification of the Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures and their selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern. (a) Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures at 50 nm; (b) Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures at 20 nm; (c) High resolution image Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures at 5 nm; (d) SAED pattern of Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures.
Figure 3. TEM images at different magnification of the Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures and their selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern. (a) Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures at 50 nm; (b) Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures at 20 nm; (c) High resolution image Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures at 5 nm; (d) SAED pattern of Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures.
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g003
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g004 550
Figure 4. EDX spectrum of the Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures: (a) SEM image; (b) EDX data of Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures; (c) EDX spectrum of Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures.
Figure 4. EDX spectrum of the Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures: (a) SEM image; (b) EDX data of Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures; (c) EDX spectrum of Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures.
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g004
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g005 550
Figure 5. High-angle annular dark-field imaging (HAADF) and elemental mapping of Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures: (a) HAADF image; (b) Tin; (c) Silver;(d) Oxygen; (e) EDX spectrum of Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures.
Figure 5. High-angle annular dark-field imaging (HAADF) and elemental mapping of Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures: (a) HAADF image; (b) Tin; (c) Silver;(d) Oxygen; (e) EDX spectrum of Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures.
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g005
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g006 550
Figure 6. XPS spectra of the SnO2 and Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures (a) Survey scan, (b) Tin, (c) Silver, and (d) Oxygen elements.
Figure 6. XPS spectra of the SnO2 and Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures (a) Survey scan, (b) Tin, (c) Silver, and (d) Oxygen elements.
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g006
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g007 550
Figure 7. UV–Vis absorption spectra of the SnO2 and Ag QDS/SnO2 nanostructures.
Figure 7. UV–Vis absorption spectra of the SnO2 and Ag QDS/SnO2 nanostructures.
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g007
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g008 550
Figure 8. FTIR spectra of the SnO2 and Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures.
Figure 8. FTIR spectra of the SnO2 and Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures.
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g008
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Photocatalytic dye (RhB) degradation by the Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures. (b) Photocatalytic activity comparison of the Ag QDs/SnO2 and SnO2 nanostructures. (c) Reduction of RhB at specific time intervals with various catalysts. (d) Ag QDs/SnO2 nanoflake stability: photocatalyst recycling under light illumination.
Figure 9. (a) Photocatalytic dye (RhB) degradation by the Ag QDs/SnO2 nanostructures. (b) Photocatalytic activity comparison of the Ag QDs/SnO2 and SnO2 nanostructures. (c) Reduction of RhB at specific time intervals with various catalysts. (d) Ag QDs/SnO2 nanoflake stability: photocatalyst recycling under light illumination.
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g009
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g010 550
Figure 10. Schematic representation of the photocatalytic reaction progression and charge transfer of Ag QDs/SnO2 nanoflakes under light irradiation.
Figure 10. Schematic representation of the photocatalytic reaction progression and charge transfer of Ag QDs/SnO2 nanoflakes under light irradiation.
Nanomaterials 09 01536 g010
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the Ag QDs/ SnO2 nanoflakes photocatalytic activity with recent literature examples.
Table 1. Comparison of the Ag QDs/ SnO2 nanoflakes photocatalytic activity with recent literature examples.
S. NOPhotocatalystSynthesis MethodDyeLight SourceDegradation Time (min)Ref.
1Ag/SnO2 QDsOne-pot RhBSunlight180[23]
2SrO2/g-C3N4Dry RhBVisible60[32]
3Au/ SnO2 QDsSolvothermalRhBVisible200[33]
4α-Fe2O3/Ag/SiO2/SnO2TemplateRhBUV & Visible180[34]
5CdS QDs/TiO2ElectrochemicalRhBVisible300[35]
6g-C3N4/ SnO2RefluxingRhBVisible420[36]
7CeO2-QDs/Cu2OHydrothermalRhBSimulated sunlight180[37]
8Fe2O3 NanorodsChemicalRhBSimulated solar270[38]
9SnO2ChemicalRhBUV light270[39]
10Ag-TiO2-P25SonochemicalRhBSimulated solar100[40]
11Ag/ZnOChemicalRhBVisible & UV90[41]
12Ag QDs/SnO2HydrothermalRhBSimulated solar40(Present Study)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Siva Kumar, N.; Asif, M.; Ranjeth Kumar Reddy, T.; Shanmugam, G.; Ajbar, A. Silver Quantum Dot Decorated 2D-SnO2 Nanoflakes for Photocatalytic Degradation of the Water Pollutant Rhodamine B. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111536

AMA Style

Siva Kumar N, Asif M, Ranjeth Kumar Reddy T, Shanmugam G, Ajbar A. Silver Quantum Dot Decorated 2D-SnO2 Nanoflakes for Photocatalytic Degradation of the Water Pollutant Rhodamine B. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(11):1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111536

Chicago/Turabian Style

Siva Kumar, Nadavala, Mohammad Asif, T. Ranjeth Kumar Reddy, Gnanendra Shanmugam, and Abdelhamid Ajbar. 2019. "Silver Quantum Dot Decorated 2D-SnO2 Nanoflakes for Photocatalytic Degradation of the Water Pollutant Rhodamine B" Nanomaterials 9, no. 11: 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111536

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop