Next Article in Journal
Co-Delivery of Glucose Oxidase and Iron-Doped ZIF-8 as a pH-Responsive Ferroptosis and Starvation Agent for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Eco-Friendly Synthesis of L-Carnitine-Loaded β-Cyclodextrin-Functionalized N-Doped Carbon Dots Using Rhododendron Species: Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities and In Vivo Acute Toxic Effects on Nauplii
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

HY Zeolite-Supported Monometallic Oxide Catalysts and Insight into the Mechanism of Chlorobenzene Decomposition via Thermal Catalysis

1
Key Laboratory of Superlight Materials and Surface Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Chemistry for NBC Hazards Protection, Beijing 102205, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2026, 16(9), 531; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16090531
Submission received: 24 March 2026 / Revised: 20 April 2026 / Accepted: 24 April 2026 / Published: 28 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Nanoscience and Nanotechnology)

Abstract

Here, we report a highly efficient and stable catalytic system based on monometallic oxides supported on HY zeolites for the catalytic oxidation of chlorobenzene (CB). Among the transition and rare-earth metal oxides screened, the 30Cu/HY catalyst demonstrates exceptional performance, achieving near 100% CB conversion at 300 °C (500 ppm CB, 10,000 h−1) alongside outstanding 24 h continuous stability without deactivation. Quantitative Py-IR analysis reveals that this superior activity is fundamentally driven by extensive solid-state ion exchange, forming robust Lewis acid centers (Cu-Y structures) that synergize with zeolitic Brønsted acid sites to efficiently polarize and cleave C-Cl bonds. Through an integrated approach combining in situ DRIFTS, real-time mass spectrometry, TGA, and NLDFT pore size analysis, we elucidate that the exceptional deep-oxidation capability of Cu/HY continuously mineralizes carbonaceous intermediates. This property minimizes coke deposition (2.91 wt%) and preserves the hierarchical pore architecture, preventing the coverage of active sites and severe pore blockage by partially oxidized intermediates (such as phenolic, aldehydic, and quinonic species) and stable carbonate species responsible for the deactivation of other metal oxides. These insights provide a mechanistic framework for the rational design of robust, chlorine-resistant catalysts for the sustainable abatement of persistent organic pollutants.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Chlorinated volatile organic compounds (Cl-VOCs), prevalent in construction and decoration materials as volatile gases at ambient temperature, pose substantial risks to human health and the environment due to their persistence, bioaccumulative nature, and toxicity [1,2,3]. The critical challenge in their elimination is the development of catalysts that combine high activity, selectivity, and resistance to chlorine poisoning. The mineralization of carbon to CO2 via reactive oxygen species offers an effective pathway for complete pollutant abatement [4]. Thermal catalytic decomposition, which utilizes heated solid catalysts to lower the activation energy for oxidation, operates effectively at moderate temperatures (200–400 °C). This represents a significant energy saving of 300–500 °C compared to direct combustion [5]. A key challenge, however, is incomplete oxidation at lower temperatures, which can lead to the formation of secondary pollutants often more toxic than the parent compounds. Recent studies categorize these by-products into six groups: chlorinated aromatics, chlorinated alkanes/alkenes, oxygenated chlorinated aliphatics, non-chlorinated oxygenated small molecules, oxygenated chlorinated aromatics, and carbon-chlorine radicals [6,7,8]. Notably, compounds such as vinyl chloride (C2H3Cl), dioxins (2,3,7,8-TCDD) [6], chlorobenzoquinones [7], and epichlorohydrin [8] are of particular concern due to their high toxicity. Maintaining the reaction temperature within a 250–350 °C window is crucial to minimize the generation of these hazardous substances [9,10]. Thus, designing catalysts that achieve high efficiency and selectivity within this specific temperature range, thereby preventing secondary pollution, remains a paramount objective.
Transition metal oxides (TMOs) and rare-earth metal oxides are widely reported as effective catalysts for Cl-VOCs abatement. Typical TMOs, including MnOx [11], Fe2O3 [12], CuO [13], and Co3O4 [14], facilitate oxidation through efficient oxygen cycling. Rare-earth oxides like CeO2 offer high activity driven by abundant oxygen vacancies, which confer excellent oxygen storage capacity and redox properties [15]. A major limitation of bulk metal oxides, however, is their susceptibility to sintering and deactivation. The latter often results from the formation of stable metal-chlorine (M-Cl) bonds that permanently occupy active sites [16]. To address these limitations and enhance catalyst durability, supporting metal oxides on zeolites has emerged as a superior strategy. Compared to conventional amorphous supports like silica or alumina, zeolites possess a unique crystalline porous framework that offers distinct structural and chemical advantages. First, the remarkable spatial confinement effect of zeolitic channels effectively anchors active metal species, promoting the formation of ultrasmall, highly dispersed nanoparticles while suppressing their severe sintering and unfavorable element migration under harsh thermal conditions [17,18]. Second, zeolites feature highly tunable Brønsted and Lewis acidity. The intimate proximity and strong interaction between the variable-valence metal oxides and the zeolitic acid sites create a powerful bifunctional synergistic effect. This synergy is crucial for simultaneously enhancing target molecule activation, optimizing shape-selectivity, and boosting the overall resistance to halogen poisoning [19]. Building upon these unique traits, zeolites such as H-ZSM-5 [11], Beta [20], and MFI [21] have become favored supports, wherein their inherent acidity synergizes with the redox properties of the active phase to maximize catalytic performance. For instance, a study on H-ZSM-5, H-BEA, and H-MOR for trichloroethylene (TCE) oxidation revealed that deactivation correlated with the loss of hydroxyl groups linked to strong Brønsted acid sites, lowering HCl and CO2 selectivity. This could be mitigated by introducing H2O, which regenerates protonic sites and facilitates chlorine removal as HCl [22]. For example, Lin et al. reported that MnOx supported on H-ZSM-5 exhibited superior activity for oxidizing CB, 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE), and TCE, attributing this to the zeolite’s synergistic combination of acid sites and microporous structure, which enhances adsorption and mineralization [11]. Conversely, optimizing the active phase loading is critical. Liu et al. found that while Cu/H-ZSM-5 is active for DCE oxidation, high Cu loadings promote the formation of bulky CuOx clusters leading to rapid initial deactivation, whereas low loadings result in deactivation via coking [13]. Similarly, Shi et al. achieved high DCE oxidation activity (T90 = 255 °C) with a Cr-Pt/ZSM-5 catalyst but noted that excessive Cr loading degraded the zeolite framework and caused metal aggregation [23]. Sun et al. demonstrated that a bimetallic Cu-Nb/H-ZSM-5 catalyst prepared by impregnation was effective for CB oxidation and could be regenerated after deactivation at 400 °C [24]. These studies underscore the importance of the synergistic interplay between the redox-active metal centers and the zeolite’s acidic properties in designing robust catalysts for Cl-VOC removal.
In this study, we prepare a series of catalysts comprising variable-valence metal oxides (CuO, CeO2, MnOx, Fe2O3) supported on HY zeolite via impregnation, with metal loadings ranging from 5–40 wt%. Their catalytic performance for CB oxidation is systematically evaluated in terms of activity, stability, and CO2 selectivity. A suite of characterization techniques, including XRD, SEM, XPS, H2-TPR, and O2-TPD, is employed to elucidate their physicochemical properties. Furthermore, the reaction mechanism, intermediate pathways, and causes of deactivation are investigated through mass spectrometry and in situ DRIFTS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Catalyst Preparation

The supported catalysts were prepared via a wet impregnation method. Precursor solutions were obtained by dissolving calculated amounts of Cu(NO3)2, Ce(NO3)3·6H2O, Mn(NO3)2·4H2O, and Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) in 20 mL of anhydrous ethanol. Then, 2 g of HY zeolite (SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio = 12, Zhuoran Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) was added to the solution. The nominal metal loadings were defined as the mass percentage of the metal element relative to the mass of the HY support (i.e., 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 wt%). Consequently, the corresponding mass of metal atoms used was 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 g, respectively. The resulting slurries were stirred at room temperature for 6 h to ensure adsorption equilibrium. Subsequently, the resulting residues were dried in an oven at 100 °C for 12 h. The dried powders were calcined in static air at 550 °C for 4 h (heating rate: 10 °C/min). Finally, the catalysts were ground and denoted as xM/HY (x = 5–40; M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe). The HY support was treated under identical conditions for reference. Prior to evaluation, all samples were pelletized, crushed, and sieved to a 20–40 mesh size.

2.2. Catalytic Activity Evaluation

Catalytic performance for CB decomposition was evaluated in a laboratory-scale fixed-bed reactor. A 500 ppm CB gas stream was generated by passing one flow of compressed air through a temperature-controlled bubbler containing liquid CB. This stream was subsequently diluted and homogenized with a second air flow in a mixing chamber. The concentration was precisely regulated by adjusting both the water bath temperature of the bubbler and the flow rates of the two air streams. The total gas flow corresponded to a GHSV of 10,000 h−1. For each test, the catalyst (20–40 mesh) was loaded into a quartz tubular reactor, yielding a fixed catalyst bed height of 4 cm. The reactor temperature was programmable from 30 to 450 °C. All gas lines and the mixing chamber were heated to 100 °C to prevent any condensation of CB. The composition of the effluent gas was monitored online using a gas chromatograph (SHIMADZU GC-2014C, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with both a flame ionization detector (FID) and a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). A DB-FFAP capillary column was installed. CB concentration was quantified using the FID, while CO2 was analyzed using the TCD. Blank experiments (i.e., without catalyst) confirmed the thermal stability of CB under the applied reaction temperatures, ensuring that any conversion was attributable to catalytic action. CB conversion and CO2 selectivity were calculated using the following Equations (1) and (2), respectively, where CCB-in and CCB-out are the inlet and outlet concentrations of CB, and CCO2-out and CCO2-Air are the outlet CO2 concentration and the background CO2 concentration in the feed air, respectively. The factor 6 corresponds to the stoichiometric number of CO2 molecules produced from the complete oxidation of one CB molecule.
CB conversion = (1 − CCB-out/CCB-in) × 100%
CO2 selectivity = (CCO2-outCCO2-Air)/[(CCB-inCCB-out) × 6] × 100%

2.3. Catalyst Characterization

Detailed experimental protocol (XRD, SEM, TEM, XPS, etc. analysis) used for the characterization of developed catalysts is provided in the Supplementary Material.

2.4. In Situ DRIFTS Experiments

In situ DRIFTS experiments were performed on a Bruker INVENIO S spectrometer. Spectra were recorded in the range of 800–4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 8 cm−1, accumulating 64 scans per spectrum. Prior to reaction, the catalyst sample was loaded into a high-temperature DRIFTS cell and pretreated under a 50 mL/min Ar flow while heating to 350 °C at 10 °C/min. Background spectra were collected at selected temperatures between 200 and 350 °C. After cooling to room temperature, the reactant gas mixture (500 ppm CB and 20% O2, balanced with Ar) was introduced at a total flow rate of 50 mL/min. The temperature was then ramped according to the desired program, and spectra were acquired at specific temperatures to monitor the evolution of surface species.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Selection of the Active Metal Oxide Component

Figure 1 presents the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the synthesized xM/HY catalysts (x = 5, 10, 20, 30, 40; M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe). All observed diffraction peaks can be indexed to the crystalline phases of the HY zeolite support (JCPDS 45-0112) and the respective metal oxides—CuO (JCPDS 80-1916), CeO2 (JCPDS 34-0394), Mn2O3 (JCPDS 24-0508), MnO2 (JCPDS 42-1169), and Fe2O3 (JCPDS 33-0644). The absence of extraneous peaks confirms the successful preparation of the intended series of supported metal oxide catalysts.
To identify the most effective active component for CB decomposition, we evaluated the catalytic performance of a series of xM/HY catalysts (x = 5, 10, 20, 30, 40; M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe). Figure 2 presents the CB conversion as a function of time on stream (up to 200 min) for these catalysts. For the Cu/HY series (Figure 2a), all catalysts exhibited an initial conversion ≥99%, demonstrating that the initial activity is independent of the Cu loading. However, a rapid deactivation was observed for the catalysts with lower loadings: the conversion for 5Cu/HY and 10Cu/HY dropped steeply to ~40% within the first 30 min for CB, respectively. In stark contrast, catalysts with higher Cu loadings (20–40 wt%) maintained stable and high activity, sustaining ~97% conversion. This indicates that a lower CuO loading results in a sparser distribution of active sites, rendering the catalyst more susceptible to rapid deactivation. For the Ce/HY series (Figure 2b), the catalytic activity increased progressively with higher metal loadings in the 20–40 wt% range. In the cases of Mn/HY and Fe/HY, the optimal loading was found to be 30 wt%; however, even at this optimum, their CB conversion levels remained lower than those achieved by 30Cu/HY and 30Ce/HY catalysts. This comparative analysis identifies Cu/HY and Ce/HY as the most active systems among the four metal oxides screened. Furthermore, an examination of the entire dataset in Figure 2 highlights the exceptional catalytic stability of the Cu/HY catalysts throughout the 200 min test. Based on these activity and stability assessments, Cu/HY and Ce/HY were selected as the most promising catalyst systems. Therefore, the catalysts of 30M/HY (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe) were selected for subsequent comparative characterization and mechanistic studies.

3.2. Analysis of Catalyst Morphology

Figure 3 presents representative scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM/TEM) images of the HY zeolite and the 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe). The HY support (Figure 3a) displays an irregular morphology consisting of flakes and particles with dimensions between 200 nm and 1 μm, providing ample sites for metal anchoring. TEM analysis at lower magnification (Figure 3b) reveals a highly porous architecture with irregular pore sizes predominantly in the 10–50 nm range. This extensive porosity affords a high specific surface area, promoting efficient diffusion of reactant molecules to internal active and acid sites [25]. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM, Figure 3c) confirms the crystalline nature of HY, showing lattice fringes with a measured d-spacing of 0.37 nm, indexed to the (533) plane. The SEM image of 30Cu/HY (Figure 3d) shows that CuO nanoparticles are deposited on the zeolite flakes without severe large-scale aggregation. TEM images at different magnifications (Figure 3e,f) reveal that the CuO particles exhibit better dispersion performance on the HY surface with an average size of approximately 5 nm. Due to the small particle size, the lattice fringes of CuO observed in high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images are not distinct; however, this nanometric dimension is conducive to exposing a greater number of active sites, thereby enhancing catalytic activity. For 30Ce/HY, the SEM image (Figure 3g) indicates a tendency for CeO2 to form agglomerates on the zeolite surface. This is corroborated by higher-magnification TEM (Figure 3h,i), which reveals a non-uniform distribution; some regions (e.g., h1) show significant aggregation, while others (e.g., h2) retain a relatively good dispersion of CeO2 particles. This suggests a coexistence of agglomerated and well-dispersed CeO2 phases on the support. In stark contrast, both MnOx and Fe2O3 displayed pronounced aggregation and non-uniform distribution on the HY support (Figure 3j,m). TEM analysis at varying magnifications (Figure 3k,l for 30Mn/HY; Figure 3n,o for 30Fe/HY) confirms the formation of large, irregular clusters of metal oxides with no defined morphology. This severe aggregation likely contributes to their inferior catalytic performance. We speculate that during impregnation, Mn2+ and Fe3+ ions may compete less effectively with the framework protons (H+) of HY for exchange sites compared to Cu2+ or Ce3+, leading to preferential deposition and growth on the external surface rather than within the zeolite channels [26]. Elemental mapping by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, Figure S1) provides further evidence: Cu and Ce elements are uniformly distributed across the HY support, whereas Mn and Fe signals are concentrated in dense clusters. The improved dispersion and uniform distribution of CuO and CeO2 facilitate the optimal exposure of active sites, serving as a critical factor for their superior catalytic performance.

3.3. Specific Surface Area and Elemental Content of Catalyst

The textural properties of the catalysts were investigated by N2 physisorption. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas (SBET), derived from the isotherms shown in Figure S2, are compiled in Table 1. Loading with metal oxides significantly reduces the SBET from 686.47 m2/g for HY to 416.06 (30Cu/HY), 408.24 (30Ce/HY), 387.26 (30Mn/HY), and 385.69 m2/g (30Fe/HY). This decrease is expected and can be primarily ascribed to two factors: (i) the partial occupation or blocking of the micropores by the deposited metal oxide nanoparticles, and (ii) potential structural alterations or partial collapse of the zeolite framework due to interaction with the metal precursors during calcination [27]. Notably, the more pronounced SBET reduction for Mn/HY and Fe/HY aligns with their observed severe metal oxide aggregation on the external surface (Figure 3j,m), which contributes less to the internal porosity. Furthermore, it is critical to highlight the distinct but synergistic roles of microporosity and mesoporosity in the catalytic oxidation of CB. The native micropores (<2 nm) of the HY zeolite provide a robust spatial confinement effect and host a high density of Brønsted acid sites, which serve as the primary micro-environments for the strong adsorption and initial electrophilic activation of the CB molecules. However, relying solely on micropores often leads to severe mass-transfer limitations for the bulky aromatic intermediates generated during the reaction. The presence of mesopores (2–50 nm), primarily arising from the inter-particle voids formed during metal oxide loading, addresses this limitation by providing efficient diffusion pathways. These mesoporous channels significantly enhance the internal diffusion kinetics, facilitating the rapid migration of bulky intermediates to accessible active sites for complete mineralization, or allowing their timely desorption before they polymerize into polyaromatic coke. Therefore, maintaining this hierarchical (micro-mesoporous) pore architecture is a prerequisite for achieving sustained catalytic activity and preventing rapid deactivation.
The actual metal loadings of the 30M/HY (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe) catalysts were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Table 1 compares the measured values (Ca) with the theoretical metal content (Ct), the latter calculated assuming complete conversion of the precursors to their respective oxides (CuO, CeO2, Mn2O3, Fe2O3). The measured loadings (19.18% Cu, 21.35% Ce, 18.03% Mn, 20.93% Fe) are consistently lower than the corresponding theoretical values (21.81% Cu, 21.92% Ce, 20.97% Mn, 20.99% Fe). This minor deviation is commonly observed for impregnated zeolite catalysts and can be attributed to losses during drying and calcination, such as precursor migration or incomplete retention on the support.

3.4. Redox Properties of the Catalyst

The surface chemical states of the active metals in the 30M/HY (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe) catalysts were investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), with deconvoluted spectra and peak assignments presented in Figure 4. The Cu 2p spectrum for the 30Cu/HY catalyst (Figure 4a) was deconvoluted into multiple components. The main spin–orbit doublet (Cu 2p3/2 at 933.58 eV and Cu 2p1/2 at 953.38 eV) along with its pronounced shake-up satellite features are characteristic of Cu2+ species. A minor component at a slightly lower binding energy (~933.4 eV) suggested the presence of reduced copper (Cu+/Cu0). Since Cu 2p spectra alone cannot unambiguously discriminate between Cu+ and Cu0, complementary Cu LMM Auger electron spectroscopy was performed (Figure S3). The Auger parameter confirmed the existence of Cu+ on the catalyst surface. The Ce 3d spectrum for 30Ce/HY (Figure 4b) exhibits the complex multiplet structure typical of cerium oxides. Deconvolution yields ten peaks, conventionally labeled V and U for the 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 spin–orbit doublets, respectively. Peaks labeled V0, V3, V4, U0, U3, and U4 are characteristic of Ce4+ species (3d104f0 final state), while peaks V1, V2, U1, and U2 are attributed to Ce3+ species (3d104f1 final state), indicating a mixed Ce4+/Ce3+ valence state. The Mn 2p spectrum for 30Mn/HY (Figure 4c) was fitted with four components. The Mn 2p3/2 and Mn 2p1/2 envelopes suggest the presence of mixed manganese oxidation states, primarily Mn3+ and Mn4+. This finding corroborates the XRD analysis (Figure 1), which identified the co-existence of Mn2O3 and MnO2 crystalline phases. The Fe 2p spectrum for 30Fe/HY (Figure 4d) was deconvoluted into six peaks within the Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2 regions. The peak positions and their relative intensities indicate the co-existence of both Fe2+ and Fe3+ oxidation states on the catalyst surface, consistent with the reported values for iron oxides [28,29]. In summary, XPS analysis reveals that the surface metal species in all four M/HY catalysts exist in mixed oxidation states (Cu2+/Cu+, Ce4+/Ce3+, Mn4+/Mn3+, Fe3+/Fe2+). The presence of lower-valent cations is intrinsically linked to the formation of oxygen vacancies within the metal oxide phases. These vacancies are crucial for enhancing lattice oxygen mobility and facilitating the redox cycles that underpin the catalytic activity in oxidation reactions, highlighting a key merit of using metal oxides as active components.
The chemical nature of oxygen species on the catalyst surfaces was further investigated by XPS. As shown in Figure 5, the O1s spectra for all four 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe) were deconvoluted into three distinct components, denoted as Oα, Oβ, and Oγ. The Oα peak is attributed to lattice oxygen within the metal oxides. The Oβ component corresponds to surface-adsorbed oxygen species, including reactive oxygen (e.g., O, O2), oxygen vacancies, and surface hydroxyl groups (-OH). The Oγ peak is assigned to physically adsorbed water and the framework oxygen (Si-O-Si, Si-O-Al) of the HY zeolite. Notably, the surface-active oxygen species represented by the Oβ component (such as oxygen vacancies and chemisorbed oxygen) are strictly crucial for catalytic oxidation, as they act as the primary active sites for the deep mineralization of reactant molecules. To quantitatively compare the abundance of these crucial species, the relative atomic ratios of the oxygen components were calculated and summarized in Table 1. Remarkably, the 30Cu/HY catalyst exhibits the highest proportion of surface-active oxygen (Oβ/Oall = 0.54), significantly surpassing those of 30Fe/HY (0.33), 30Ce/HY (0.31), and 30Mn/HY (0.28). This exceptionally high relative concentration of reactive oxygen species on the outermost layer of 30Cu/HY ensures a continuous and abundant supply of highly reactive surface oxygen.
The redox properties and oxygen mobility of the catalysts were probed by H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) and O2 temperature-programmed desorption (O2-TPD) experiments, as shown in Figure 6a and Figure 6b, respectively. The H2-TPR profile of the HY zeolite (Figure 6a) shows no reduction features up to 550 °C, confirming its redox inactivity. In contrast, distinct reduction peaks appear for all metal oxide-loaded catalysts. For 30Cu/HY, a broad, asymmetric reduction feature is observed between 100 and 250 °C, with a maximum at 240 °C and a distinct shoulder at 205 °C. This profile signifies multiple CuO species with different dispersions and interactions with the support. The low-temperature shoulder (205 °C) is assigned to the reduction of highly dispersed CuO clusters strongly interacting with the zeolite framework. The main peak at 240 °C corresponds to the reduction of larger, yet well-dispersed, CuO nanoparticles (Cu2+ → Cu0) [30]. The H2-TPR profile of 30Ce/HY features two peaks at 415 °C and 503 °C, characteristic of ceria reduction. The lower-temperature peak is typically assigned to the removal of surface-adsorbed and labile lattice oxygen (e.g., O22−/O), while the peak at 503 °C corresponds to the reduction of bulk-like (subsurface) oxygen and the associated reduction of Ce4+ to Ce3+ [31]. The reduction of 30Mn/HY proceeds in three consecutive steps, with peaks at 334, 398, and 448 °C. This stepwise profile is consistent with the sequential reduction of mixed manganese oxides (MnO2 and Mn2O3) as follows: MnO2 → Mn2O3 (334 °C), Mn2O3 → Mn3O4 (398 °C), and Mn3O4 → MnO (448 °C) [32]. In contrast, the H2-TPR profile of 30Fe/HY presents a single, broad reduction peak centered at 363 °C. This is characteristic of the overlapping, multi-step reduction of Fe2O3 to metallic Fe (Fe2O3 → Fe3O4 → FeO → Fe0) [33], consistent with the hematite phase identified by XRD. The broadness of the peak indicates a distribution of particle sizes or reduction kinetics. A comparative analysis of the H2-TPR profiles (Figure 6a) reveals that the 30Cu/HY catalyst initiates reduction at the lowest temperature among the monometallic catalysts. This lower reduction temperature signifies a higher intrinsic redox activity, which correlates well with its superior low-temperature catalytic performance.
The O2-TPD profile of the HY zeolite (Figure 6b) exhibits three desorption features at 274, 383, and 695 °C. The low-temperature peak (274 °C) is assigned to the desorption of physisorbed or weakly bound molecular oxygen (O2). The peak at 383 °C likely corresponds to the removal of hydroxyl groups associated with framework defects. The high-temperature peak at 695 °C is attributed to the evolution of lattice oxygen from the zeolite framework, a process potentially linked to severe dealumination and structural rearrangement at elevated temperatures [34]. For 30Cu/HY, two distinct O2 desorption peaks are observed at 392 and 547 °C (Figure 6b). The lower-temperature peak (392 °C) is characteristic of desorbing surface chemisorbed oxygen species, which are crucial as active oxygen sources for low-temperature oxidation. The prominence of this peak aligns with the catalyst’s facile reducibility observed in H2-TPR (main peak at ~240 °C), collectively underscoring its high low-temperature redox activity [35]. The higher-temperature peak (547 °C) is associated with the release of strongly bound lattice oxygen (O2−) from bulk-like CuO or from interfacial sites between CuO and the zeolite support [36]. The O2-TPD profile of 30Ce/HY features two peaks at 414 and 647 °C. The peak at 414 °C is assigned to surface-adsorbed reactive oxygen, which serves as the primary active oxygen pool for catalytic reactions on ceria. The high-temperature peak at 647 °C corresponds to the release of bulk lattice oxygen (O2−). Its evolution at such a high temperature indicates a process involving the diffusion of O2− through the lattice via oxygen vacancies and is intimately linked to the reduction of Ce4+ to Ce3+, reflecting the material’s bulk oxygen mobility and storage capacity [37]. In the case of 30Mn/HY, desorption occurs at 389 and 517 °C. The lower-temperature signal (389 °C) originates from surface chemisorbed oxygen. The dominant peak at 517 °C is attributed to the release of lattice oxygen (O2−) from the bulk of the manganese oxide phases (Mn2O3/MnO2) [38], consistent with the mixed oxidation states identified by XPS. The O2-TPD profile for 30Fe/HY is complex, showing three peaks at 278, 425, and 669 °C. This multiplicity is characteristic of bulk-like iron oxide (Fe2O3). The peak at 278 °C is ascribed to weakly bound surface chemisorbed oxygen. The intermediate peak at 425 °C may arise from more strongly bound surface oxygen or the release of oxygen from near-surface layers. The high-temperature peak at 669 °C corresponds to the evolution of bulk lattice oxygen from Fe2O3, consistent with its reduction profile in H2-TPR. A quantitative comparison of the low-temperature O2 desorption peaks (representing reactive surface oxygen species) reveals the following order in peak area: 30Ce/HY > 30Cu/HY > 30Fe/HY > 30Mn/HY (Figure 6b). This trend suggests that the CeO2 phase in 30Ce/HY possesses the highest capacity for supplying reactive surface oxygen, followed by CuO in 30Cu/HY. However, although 30Ce/HY possesses a larger capacity for reactive oxygen, its higher reduction temperature (observed in H2-TPR) limits the utilization of these species at lower temperatures compared to 30Cu/HY. The abundance of these readily available oxygen species correlates directly with the catalytic activity, explaining why 30Ce/HY and 30Cu/HY exhibit superior performance in the low-temperature oxidation of CB compared to their Mn and Fe counterparts.

3.5. Brønsted and Lewis Acid Concentrations on the Catalyst

The type, concentration, and thermal stability of acid sites on the catalysts, which are crucial for the adsorption and activation of CB, were evaluated using pyridine-adsorption infrared spectroscopy (Py-IR) at desorption temperatures of 25, 300, and 350 °C. As shown in Figure 7, all spectra exhibit characteristic bands at approximately 1450 cm−1 and 1540 cm−1, which are assigned to pyridine coordinately bound to Lewis acid (L-acid) sites and pyridinium ions (PyH+) adsorbed on Brønsted acid (B-acid) sites, respectively. The quantitative results derived from the peak integrations are summarized in Table 2. The pure HY zeolite is dominated by abundant B-acid sites (199.36 μmol/g at 300 °C) originating from its framework hydroxyls (≡Si–OH–Al≡), with a relatively low L-acid concentration.
Upon the introduction of metal oxides, the acid site distribution undergoes significant alterations. Among the impregnated catalysts, the 30Cu/HY sample presents a striking and highly anomalous acid profile. At the catalytic reaction temperature (300 °C), 30Cu/HY possesses the highest L-acid concentration (143.98 μmol/g) among all samples, accompanied by a drastic depletion of B-acid sites (dropping to merely 18.79 μmol/g) compared to the pure HY support. Consequently, its B/L ratio plummets to 0.13. This anomalous massive consumption of B-acid sites with the concurrent generation of highly stable L-acid sites provides unequivocal evidence for the occurrence of extensive ion exchange during the preparation process [39]. Rather than merely accumulating as bulk CuO particles on the external surface, a substantial fraction of Cu2+ precursor ions migrate into the zeolite channels and undergo solid-state ion exchange with the framework protons (H+). This interaction replaces the zeolitic Brønsted acid sites with isolated Cu2+ or [Cu-OH]+ species, thereby forming robust Cu-Y structures [40]. These exchanged copper species act as strong Lewis acid centers that exhibit remarkable thermal stability, retaining a high L-acid concentration (93.35 μmol/g) even at a harsh desorption temperature of 350 °C. In contrast, the 30Mn/HY catalyst exhibits a severe loss of L-acidity at elevated temperatures, dropping to only 25.51 μmol/g at 300 °C. This indicates that the Mn species predominantly exist as bulk manganese oxides (corroborating the XRD and SEM results) which only provide weak surface acidity and fail to construct stable L-acid sites. During the reaction at 300 °C, the abundant and thermally stable L-acid sites (exchanged Cu2+) on 30Cu/HY serve as potent anchoring points for the nucleophilic chlorine atom of CB, deeply polarizing the C-Cl bond. Simultaneously, the residual B-acid sites provide the necessary protons for the rapid desorption of dissociated chlorine as HCl. This optimal balance and stability of acid sites distinctly set 30Cu/HY apart as the most efficient catalyst for CB destruction.

3.6. Evaluation of Catalytic Stability and Coking Behavior

To assess the practical application potential of the catalysts, long-term stability tests for CB decomposition were conducted continuously for 24 h at 300 °C. As depicted in Figure 8a, the 30Cu/HY catalyst exhibited exceptional durability. Its CB conversion rapidly reached over 95%, maintaining this remarkable activity without any sign of degradation throughout the entire 24 h period. In parallel, its CO2 selectivity steadily increased and stabilized at ~45% (Figure 8b), indicating a sustained and robust deep oxidation capability. In contrast, the 30Ce/HY catalyst suffered from noticeable deactivation, with its conversion dropping from an initial ~60% to ~45%. The 30Mn/HY and 30Fe/HY catalysts exhibited lower steady-state CB conversions of approximately 35% and 24%, respectively, accompanied by inferior CO2 selectivities (<35%). To contextualize this exceptional durability, the performance of 30Cu/HY was benchmarked against recently reported state-of-the-art catalysts. For instance, while noble metal-based catalysts (e.g., Ru systems) can achieve CB conversion at lower temperatures, they are notoriously susceptible to rapid chlorine poisoning and structural deactivation within a few hours [41]. Conversely, typical non-noble transition metal oxides (such as bulk Mn/Ce-based systems) generally require significantly higher operating temperatures (often >350 °C) to reach comparable conversions and frequently suffer from severe carbonaceous deposition (coking) during prolonged continuous operation [42,43]. By achieving near 100% CB conversion at a relatively mild 300 °C while maintaining peak performance over a 24 h period, the 30Cu/HY system successfully bridges these critical performance gaps. Although the 30Cu/HY catalyst exhibits superior low-temperature activity for CB conversion, its CO2 selectivity (~44%) indicates a need for enhanced deep oxidation capabilities. Future strategies to improve complete mineralization could involve constructing multimetallic synergistic systems. For instance, integrating Cu with Ce and Mn could combine the powerful low-temperature reducibility of Cu, the exceptional oxygen storage capacity of Ce, and the multivalent redox properties of Mn to facilitate deep oxidation. Additional strategies, such as noble metal doping or hierarchical pore engineering of the zeolite support, could also be explored to promote the rapid mass transfer and deep mineralization of bulky intermediate species.
To elucidate the fundamental causes of deactivation, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on the spent catalysts (Figure 9). The weight loss in the critical high-temperature region (300–600 °C), which corresponds to the combustion of hard coke, provides a quantitative measure of catalyst coking. Notably, the mass loss in this region followed the order: 30Cu/HY (2.91 wt%) < 30Fe/HY (3.35 wt%) < 30Mn/HY (4.25 wt%) < 30Ce/HY (4.80 wt%). The 30Cu/HY-24h catalyst exhibited the minimum amount of carbonaceous deposition, confirming that its superior redox property effectively facilitates the deep oxidation of intermediates, thereby inhibiting coke precursor formation. Conversely, the significantly higher weight losses for 30Ce/HY-24h (4.80 wt%) and 30Mn/HY-24h (4.25 wt%) corroborate their more pronounced deactivation, as excessive coke accumulation physically encapsulates active centers.
The structural impact of this coking is further evidenced by the NLDFT pore size distributions (Figure 10). While the fresh catalysts (Figure 10a) possess a well-defined hierarchical pore structure, the spent catalysts (Figure 10b) show dramatic changes. For 30Ce/HY-24h and 30Mn/HY-24h, which suffered from the heaviest coking (4.80 and 4.25 wt%, respectively), the characteristic micropore peaks (Log(dp) < 0.5) were almost completely obliterated. This confirms that the accumulated coke occupies the internal zeolite channels, leading to severe pore blockage. In stark contrast, 30Cu/HY-24h, with its minimal carbon deposit (2.91 wt%), successfully preserved its primary microporous architecture. This integrated analysis demonstrates that the high chlorine-resistance and stability of Cu/HY originate from its ability to maintain an open pore network by minimizing carbonaceous residues through efficient deep oxidation. Furthermore, the exceptional preservation of the intrinsic microporous framework in the spent 30Cu/HY catalyst also indirectly confirms its robust structural resistance against potential dealumination caused by the in situ generated HCl.

3.7. Exhaust Continuity Monitoring

The evolution of key gaseous products (H2O, CO, HCl, CO2) during the catalytic decomposition of CB over the 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe) was monitored in real-time using a CATLAB microreactor system coupled with mass spectrometry, across a temperature range of 50 to 350 °C (Figure 11). During the temperature ramp, the signal intensities for all four products exhibited considerable variation. When the temperature stabilized at 350 °C, a steady-state product distribution was achieved. This dynamic behavior suggests a temperature-dependent shift in the dominant reaction mechanism. At lower temperatures, the reaction is primarily mediated by surface-adsorbed reactive oxygen species (e.g., O, O2). With increasing temperature, surface lattice oxygen (O2−) becomes mobile and contributes directly to the oxidation process. CO and CO2 are formed via the incomplete and complete oxidation of the aromatic ring, respectively, reflecting the local availability of active oxygen at the catalyst surface. A characteristic transient spike in the CO (and correspondingly, a lower intensity spike for CO2) signal was observed immediately upon CB introduction for all catalysts, followed by rapid decay. This is attributed to a transient local depletion of active oxygen upon initial contact with the high concentration of reactant, which temporarily limits the deep oxidation of CO to CO2. H2O is generated via the reaction of hydrogen atoms from the decomposing CB molecule with either lattice oxygen or gaseous O2. HCl formation follows the cleavage of the C-Cl bond. The Brønsted acid sites on the HY zeolite, along with protons from co-generated water, facilitate the combination of chlorine species with H+ to form HCl, thereby promoting its desorption and mitigating catalyst chlorination.

3.8. In Situ DRIFTS Spectra and Mechanism Discussion

Figure 12 presents the in situ DRIFTS spectra acquired on the surfaces of the 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe) during CB decomposition over a temperature range of 200 to 350 °C. A broad feature in the region of 3734–3613 cm−1 is assigned to O–H stretching vibrations of surface silanol (Si-OH) and aluminol (Al-OH) groups [25,34]. The evolution of this band with temperature reflects hydrogen bonding with water produced from the reaction, which modulates the apparent concentration of surface hydroxyls. The aromatic C-H stretching vibrations, observed around 3005 cm−1 [41,42], serve as a probe for surface aromatic intermediates. For 30Cu/HY, the near-constant intensity of this band with rising temperature indicates a steady-state concentration, suggesting efficient conversion of these species. In stark contrast, the progressive intensity increase observed for 30Ce/HY, 30Mn/HY, and 30Fe/HY points to significant accumulation of aromatic intermediates on these surfaces. The emergence of characteristic aliphatic bands confirms aromatic ring-opening. These include methylene asymmetric/symmetric stretches (2981–2963 cm−1, 2898–2858 cm−1), methyl asymmetric stretches (2935–2932 cm−1), and methylene bending vibrations (1456–1451 cm−1) [42]. For 30Cu/HY, 30Ce/HY, and 30Fe/HY, the intensities of the methylene bands first increase (accumulation > consumption) and then diminish at 350 °C, signifying their subsequent deep oxidation. In contrast, for 30Mn/HY, these bands intensify continuously with temperature, suggesting a slower consumption rate relative to accumulation. A similar trend is observed for the methyl group bands: stable intensity on 30Cu/HY versus a progressive increase on the other catalysts, highlighting the more efficient processing of aliphatic fragments on 30Cu/HY. A broad, complex absorption spanning 2572–2073 cm−1, characteristic of cumulated C≡C and conjugated C=C stretching vibrations [41,42], is prominent for 30Ce/HY, 30Mn/HY, and 30Fe/HY but negligible for 30Cu/HY. This indicates significant formation of unsaturated carbonaceous deposits on the former catalysts. Bands in the 2003–1805 cm−1 region correspond to C=O stretches of aldehyde/ketone carbonyls [41,42]. A notable red shift of this band for 30Ce/HY suggests a perturbation of the carbonyl group’s electronic environment, likely due to strong interaction with the ceria surface or extended conjugation [41]. Vibrations in the 1692–1591 cm−1 range are characteristic of quinoid C=O groups [42], confirming the formation of benzoquinone-type intermediates via partial ring oxidation. These carbonyl-containing intermediates are detected on all catalyst surfaces. Further oxidation leads to the formation of carboxylate species (COO), evidenced by asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations at ~1417.5 cm−1 and 1318–1303 cm−1, respectively [41,42]. An additional band at ~1554 cm−1, assigned to the carbonyl vibration of metal-coordinated carboxylates [41], confirms the binding of these intermediates to the respective metal centers (Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe). Finally, the appearance of C-O stretching vibrations in the regions of 1258–1246 cm−1 (phenol/alcohol), 1193–1189 cm−1 (ether/alcohol), and 1121–1061 cm−1 (primary alcohol) [41] signifies the formation of various oxygenates (phenols, alcohols, ethers) as products of progressive ring oxidation and cleavage.
Integrated analysis of online mass spectrometry and in situ DRIFTS reveals that the primary gaseous products are H2O, CO, HCl, and CO2. Surface-bound intermediates from incomplete oxidation include phenols, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, esters, and ketones, while carbonates are identified as terminal surface species from complete oxidation. Drawing upon these observations and supporting literature, we propose the predominant reaction pathways and elucidate the deactivation mechanisms for CB decomposition over the 30M/HY catalysts. The proposed dominant reaction pathway (Pathway I in Figure 13) initiates with the adsorption and activation of CB. The aromatic ring interacts with Brønsted acid sites (≡Si–OH–Al≡) of the HY zeolite, while the chlorine atom coordinates to Lewis acid sites (metal cations, Mn+). This dual interaction significantly polarizes and weakens the C-Cl bond, rendering the aromatic carbon electrophilic. Rather than undergoing complete heterolytic cleavage to form an unstable phenyl cation, the activated aromatic ring is concurrently attacked by adjacent reactive surface oxygen species in a concerted nucleophilic-like substitution. This process facilitates the cleavage of the C-Cl bond and directly yields a surface phenolate intermediate (which acts as the precursor to phenol [41]), while the dissociated chloride ion combines with a proton from a neighboring Brønsted acid site to form and desorb as HCl. Subsequent oxidation converts phenol to p-benzoquinone, isomerizing to o-benzoquinone. Ring-opening of o-benzoquinone produces muconic acid, whose C=C bonds are cleaved by oxidative attack to yield short-chain dicarboxylic acids (e.g., glyoxylic acid) [42]. Further oxidation of aldehydes generates carboxylic acids (R–COOH). These acids can esterify with surface hydroxyls, and the resulting esters undergo oxidative decarboxylation (via β-ketoester intermediates) to release CO2 and shorten the carbon chain. This cycle continues until formate is formed and ultimately oxidized to surface carbonate. Parallel side pathways (Pathways II and III, Figure 13) contribute to product distribution and deactivation. In Pathway II, phenolic/quinoid intermediates from Pathway I can be over-oxidized to yield a mixture of carboxylic acids, anhydrides, aldehydes, and ketones. While some acids re-enter the main oxidation cycle, aldehydes and ketones may undergo decarbonylation to release CO, which can subsequently be oxidized to CO2 if sufficient active oxygen is available. Concurrently, Pathway III involves the polymerization and condensation of phenolic/quinone species, leading to the formation of polyaromatic coke precursors. Catalyst deactivation is primarily attributed to the coverage of active sites by residual surface species. These include partially oxidized intermediates and stable carbonate deposits originating from incomplete combustion, as well as the polymeric carbonaceous species formed via Pathway III, which collectively block access to the active metal centers and acid sites.

4. Conclusions

A series of xM/HY catalysts (x = 5, 10, 20, 30, 40; M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe) were synthesized via wet impregnation. Initial activity screening identified Cu/HY and Ce/HY as the most promising catalysts for CB decomposition. Among them, the optimized 30Cu/HY catalyst demonstrated the most exceptional performance, achieving near 100% CB conversion at 300 °C alongside outstanding 24 h continuous stability. Comprehensive characterization revealed that the superior performance of Cu/HY fundamentally originates from a powerful dual-site synergy. Quantitative Py-IR analysis confirmed extensive solid-state ion exchange, generating robust Lewis acid centers (Cu-Y structures) that synergize with zeolitic Brønsted acid sites to efficiently polarize and cleave C-Cl bonds. Moreover, XPS and H2-TPR analyses indicated that 30Cu/HY possesses an exceptionally high relative concentration of surface-active oxygen (Oβ/Oall = 0.54), ensuring a continuous and abundant supply of highly reactive surface oxygen which underpins its exceptional low-temperature deep-oxidation capability. Based on an integrated analysis of online mass spectrometry, in situ DRIFTS, and relevant literature, we propose a detailed reaction network for CB decomposition over these catalysts. Key surface-bound intermediates detected include phenols, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, esters, and ketones, with carbonates identified as terminal oxidation products. While catalyst deactivation in other metal oxides is primarily attributed to the blocking of active sites by the accumulation of partially oxidized intermediates and stable carbonaceous deposits (originating from incomplete combustion), TGA and NLDFT analyses clearly demonstrate that the strong deep-oxidation capacity of Cu/HY continuously mineralizes these carbonaceous precursors. This efficiently minimizes coke deposition and preserves the hierarchical pore architecture, ultimately ensuring its outstanding long-term durability.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19203955 (accessed on 23 April 2026), Figure S1: SEM-EDS mapping of 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe).; Figure S2: N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of HY (a) and 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu (b), Ce (c), Mn (d), Fe (e)); Figure S3: Cu LMM spectra of 30Cu/HY.

Author Contributions

P.S.: Investigation, formal analysis, visualization, writing—original draft preparation; Z.Z.: Data curation, validation; S.R.: Validation; C.W.: Data curation; Y.L.: Formal analysis; Z.W.: Visualization; P.Y.: Formal analysis, data curation; S.Z.: Project administration, writing—review and editing; Y.D.: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21701186) and the Fundamental Research Funds from State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian (SKLNBC 2019-04), China.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ding, S.; Wu, S.; Fang, N.; Chu, Y.; Wang, P. Recent advances in chlorinated volatile organic compounds’ oxidation over multiple noble metal catalysts: A review based on rational manipulation of redox-acidity balance. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 350, 127859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, B.; Lei, C.; Wei, C.; Zeng, G. Chlorinated volatile organic compounds (Cl-VOCs) in environment—Sources, potential human health impacts, and current remediation technologies. Environ. Int. 2014, 71, 118–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jia, H.; Xing, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Su, W. Progress of catalytic oxidation of typical chlorined volatile organic compounds (CVOCs): A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 865, 161063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lin, H.; Liu, Y.; Deng, J.; Jing, L.; Wang, Z.; Wei, L.; Wei, Z.; Hou, Z.; Tao, J.; Dai, H. The advancement of supported bimetallic catalysts for the elimination of chlorinated volatile organic compounds. Catalysts 2024, 14, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, Y.; Fang, S.; Tian, M.; Jiang, Z.; Wu, Y.; He, C. Chlorine-resistant hollow nanosphere-like VOx/CeO2 catalysts for highly selective and stable destruction of 1, 2-dichloroethane: Byproduct inhibition and reaction mechanism. Processes 2021, 9, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Meng, F.; Chen, T.; Wang, L.; Ma, X.; Ma, Y.; Wang, R.; Cai, P.; Zhou, F.; Yu, Z.; Sun, C. Manipulation of Mn/Ce ratio for deep chlorobenzene oxidation: Catalytic mechanisms and byproducts analysis. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 355, 129666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gao, X.; Wang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Kong, D.; Pan, X.; Ma, J.; Liu, Y. Chloro- and bromo-benzoquinone formation and transformation mechanisms in a drinking water-distribution system. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 461, 132692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuniak, L.; Marchessault, R.H. Study of the crosslinking reaction between epichlorohydrin and starch. Starch 1972, 24, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ren, M.; Zhang, H.; Fan, Y.; Zhou, H.; Cao, R.; Gao, Y.; Chen, J. Suppressing the formation of chlorinated aromatics by inhibitor sodium thiocyanate in solid waste incineration process. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 798, 149154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Samara, F.; Darra, R.; Mohamed, A.A.; Ahmad, W.; Abu-Farha, N.; Lee, H.; Han, C.; Kanan, S. Applicability of Titanium-Based Catalysts in the Photocatalytic Degradation of 2, 3, 7, 8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran. Molecules 2023, 28, 7488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lin, F.; Zhang, Z.; Xiang, L.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, Z.; Wang, Z.; Yan, B.; Chen, G. Efficient degradation of multiple Cl-VOCs by catalytic ozonation over MnOx catalysts with different supports. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 435, 134807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ma, X.; Sun, Q.; Feng, X.; He, X.; Guo, J.; Sun, H.; Cao, H. Catalytic oxidation of 1, 2-dichlorobenzene over CaCO3/α-Fe2O3 nanocomposite catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 450, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, W.; Ying, Q.; Wu, Z. Effects of different copper species on the combustion of dichloromethane over Cu/HZSM-5 zeolite nanoporous catalysts. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 1733–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gil-Barbarin, A.; Gutierrez-Ortiz, J.I.; Lopez-Fonseca, R.; Bivas, B. Co3O4 hollow nanotubes for the catalytic oxidation of C2-chlorinated VOCs. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, R.; Hou, K.; Jin, X.; Yang, L.; Song, L.; Ouyang, C.; Hou, J.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, R. Synergistic Removal of NO and Chlorobenzene on CeO2 Catalyst in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Reactor at Low Temperature. Catal. Lett. 2025, 155, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. He, L.; Guan, C.; Bulushev, D.A.; Xiang, Q. Regulation of Metal-Support Interaction in Single-Atom Catalysis. Small 2024, 2410976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, Q.; Wang, N.; Yu, J. Advances in Catalytic Applications of Zeolite-Supported Metal Catalysts. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2104442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Wang, G.; van der Wal, L.I.; Cheng, K.; Zhang, Q.; de Jong, K.; Wang, Y. Visualizing Element Migration over Bifunctional Metal-Zeolite Catalysts and its Impact on Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 25263–25271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cao, K.L.A.; Kautsar, D.B.; Kume, K.; Cao, K.A.L.; Septiani, E.L.; Hirano, T.; Tsunoji, N.; Matsukata, M.; Ogi, T. Preparation of hierarchical porous zeolite particles with multiscale pore architectures through a template-assisted spray process for enhanced toluene adsorption rate. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 24310–24326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Gallastegi-Villa, M.; Romero-Sáez, M.; Aranzabal, A.; González-Marcos, J.A.; González-Velasco, J.R. Strategies to enhance the stability of h-bea zeolite in the catalytic oxidation of Cl-VOCs: 1, 2-Dichloroethane. Catal. Today 2013, 213, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qiu, S.; Lu, W.; Zeng, Z.; Su, X.; Lai, Y.; Liu, X.; Gao, X.; Kawi, S. Zeolite-Based Materials for Catalytic Oxidation of Volatile Organic Compounds. ChemCatChem 2025, 17, e202401443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aranzabal, A.; Romero-Sáez, M.; Elizundia, U.; González-Velasco, J.R.; González-Marcos, J.A. Deactivation of H-zeolites during catalytic oxidation of trichloroethylene. J. Catal. 2012, 296, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shi, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Kong, F.; Zhou, R. Synergistic effect in bimetal Cr-Pt/ZSM-5 catalysts with high activity for CVOCs low-temperature removal. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, P.; Chen, S.; Xie, M.; Cheng, L.; Wang, J.; Dong, F.; Dong, X.; Weng, X. H-zeolite supported multi-interface metal catalysts for the catalytic destruction of chlorinated organics. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 503, 158510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, X.; Liu, M.; Tian, Z.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Q.; Ning, P. Tuning hydrophobicity of HY zeolite by suppressing dealumination process for toluene adsorption in humid conditions. Colloids Surf. A 2022, 655, 130251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ghasemian, N.; Falamaki, C. Zn2+, Fe2+, Cu2+, Mn2+, H+ Ion-exchanged and raw clinoptilolite zeolite catalytic performance in the propane-SCR-NOx Process: A comparative study. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 2018, 16, 20160192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Corma, A. From microporous to mesoporous molecular sieve materials and their use in catalysis. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2373–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Biesinger, M.C.; Payne, B.P.; Grosvenor, A.P.; Lau, L.W.M.; Gerson, A.R.; Smart, R.S.C. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 2717–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yamashita, T.; Hayes, P. Analysis of XPS spectra of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in oxide materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 2441–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fierro, G.; Jacono, M.L.; Inversi, M.; Porta, P.; Cioci, F.; Lavecchia, R. Study of the reducibility of copper in CuO/ZnO catalysts by temperature-programmed reduction. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1996, 137, 327–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, J.; Ryou, Y.S.; Chan, X.; Kim, T.J.; Kim, D.H. How Pt interacts with CeO2 under the reducing and oxidizing environments at elevated temperature: The origin of improved thermal stability of Pt/CeO2 compared to CeO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 25870–25879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stobbe, E.R.; Boer, B.A.; Geus, J.W. The reduction and oxidation behaviour of manganese oxides. Catal. Today 1999, 47, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Wei, W.; Yang, X.; Wei, F. Reduction of Fe and Ni in Fe-Ni-O systems. J. Min. Metall. B 2013, 49, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kerr, G.T. The intracrystalline rearrangement of constitutional water in hydrogen zeolite Y. J. Phys. Chem. 1967, 71, 4155–4158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yashnik, S.A.; Ismagilov, Z.R. Catalytic properties and electronic structure of copper ions in Cu-ZSM-5. Catal. Today 2005, 110, 310–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hassan, N.S.; Jalil, A.A.; Satar, M.A.H.; Hitam, C.N.C.; Aziz, F.F.A.; Fauzi, A.A.; Aziz, M.A.A.; Bahruji, H. Novel fabrication of photoactive CuO/HY zeolite as an efficient catalyst for photodecolorization of malachite green. Top. Catal. 2020, 63, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiao, Y.; Tan, S.; Wang, D.; Wu, J.; Jia, T.; Liu, Q.; Qi, Y.; Qi, X.; He, P.; Zhou, M. CeO2/BiOIO3 heterojunction with oxygen vacancies and Ce4+/Ce3+ redox centers synergistically enhanced photocatalytic removal heavy metal. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 530, 147116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, S.; Li, A.; Yang, C.; Ouyang, F.; Zhou, J.; Liu, X. MnO2/Mn2O3 with self-triggered oxygen-defects for superior pseudocapacitive energy storage. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 571, 151306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mitta, H.; Seelam, P.K.; Ojala, S.; Keiski, R.L.; Balla, P. Tuning Y-zeolite based catalyst with copper for enhanced activity and selectivity in vapor phase hydrogenolysis of glycerol to 1, 2-propanediol. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2018, 550, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bindu, G.H.; Vittal, S.; Shanti, M.; Shylaja, S.; Krishna, T.; Chilivery, R. Engineering Cu supported Y-zeolite catalysts for the selective conversion of γ-valerolactone to methyl tetrahydrofuran. Waste Biomass Valori. 2025, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dai, Q.; Bai, S.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; Lu, G. Catalytic combustion of chlorobenzene over Ru-doped ceria catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 126, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Weng, X.; Sun, P.; Long, Y.; Meng, Q.; Wu, Z. Catalytic oxidation of chlorobenzene over MnxCe1–xO2/HZSM-5 catalysts: A study with practical implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 8057–8066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhao, P.; Wang, C.; He, F.; Liu, S. Effect of ceria morphology on the activity of MnOx/CeO2 catalysts for the catalytic combustion of chlorobenzene. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 45665–45672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of HY and xM/HY catalysts (x = 5, 10, 20, 30, 40; M = Cu (a), Ce (b), Mn (c), Fe (d)).
Figure 1. XRD patterns of HY and xM/HY catalysts (x = 5, 10, 20, 30, 40; M = Cu (a), Ce (b), Mn (c), Fe (d)).
Nanomaterials 16 00531 g001
Figure 2. Catalytic performance of xM/HY catalysts (x = 5, 10, 20, 30, 40; M = Cu (a), Ce (b), Mn (c), Fe (d)) within 200 min at 300 °C. Conditions: 500 ppm CB, GHSV = 10,000 h−1.
Figure 2. Catalytic performance of xM/HY catalysts (x = 5, 10, 20, 30, 40; M = Cu (a), Ce (b), Mn (c), Fe (d)) within 200 min at 300 °C. Conditions: 500 ppm CB, GHSV = 10,000 h−1.
Nanomaterials 16 00531 g002
Figure 3. SEM and TEM images of HY (ac), 30Cu/HY (df), 30Ce/HY (gi), 30Mn/HY (jl), and 30Fe/HY (mo).
Figure 3. SEM and TEM images of HY (ac), 30Cu/HY (df), 30Ce/HY (gi), 30Mn/HY (jl), and 30Fe/HY (mo).
Nanomaterials 16 00531 g003
Figure 4. XPS spectra of 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe); Cu 2p spectra (a), Ce 3d spectra (b), Mn 2p spectra (c), and Fe 2p spectra (d).
Figure 4. XPS spectra of 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe); Cu 2p spectra (a), Ce 3d spectra (b), Mn 2p spectra (c), and Fe 2p spectra (d).
Nanomaterials 16 00531 g004
Figure 5. O1s XPS spectra of 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu (a), Ce (b), Mn (c), Fe (d)).
Figure 5. O1s XPS spectra of 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu (a), Ce (b), Mn (c), Fe (d)).
Nanomaterials 16 00531 g005
Figure 6. (a) H2-TPR and (b) O2-TPD curves of HY and 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe).
Figure 6. (a) H2-TPR and (b) O2-TPD curves of HY and 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe).
Nanomaterials 16 00531 g006
Figure 7. Py-IR spectra of HY and 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe) recorded at different desorption temperatures (25, 300, and 350 °C): (a) HY, (b) 30Cu/HY, (c) 30Ce/HY, (d) 30Mn/HY, and (e) 30Fe/HY.
Figure 7. Py-IR spectra of HY and 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe) recorded at different desorption temperatures (25, 300, and 350 °C): (a) HY, (b) 30Cu/HY, (c) 30Ce/HY, (d) 30Mn/HY, and (e) 30Fe/HY.
Nanomaterials 16 00531 g007
Figure 8. Long-term catalytic performance of 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe) over 24 h at 300 °C: (a) CB conversion and (b) CO2 selectivity. Conditions: 500 ppm CB, GHSV = 10,000 h−1.
Figure 8. Long-term catalytic performance of 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe) over 24 h at 300 °C: (a) CB conversion and (b) CO2 selectivity. Conditions: 500 ppm CB, GHSV = 10,000 h−1.
Nanomaterials 16 00531 g008
Figure 9. TGA curves of the spent 30M/HY-24h (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe) catalysts after 24 h of continuous reaction. The red line represents the temperature programming profile.
Figure 9. TGA curves of the spent 30M/HY-24h (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe) catalysts after 24 h of continuous reaction. The red line represents the temperature programming profile.
Nanomaterials 16 00531 g009
Figure 10. Full-range pore size distribution curves (NLDFT model) of (a) fresh 30M/HY catalysts and (b) spent 30M/HY-24h catalysts after 24 h of reaction (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe).
Figure 10. Full-range pore size distribution curves (NLDFT model) of (a) fresh 30M/HY catalysts and (b) spent 30M/HY-24h catalysts after 24 h of reaction (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe).
Nanomaterials 16 00531 g010
Figure 11. Variation in product distribution during CB catalytic decomposition of 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu (a), Ce (b), Mn (c), Fe (d)) across the temperature range of 50 to 350 °C.
Figure 11. Variation in product distribution during CB catalytic decomposition of 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu (a), Ce (b), Mn (c), Fe (d)) across the temperature range of 50 to 350 °C.
Nanomaterials 16 00531 g011
Figure 12. In situ DRIFTS spectra of 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu (a), Ce (b), Mn (c), Fe (d)) for CB over a temperature range of 200 to 350 °C.
Figure 12. In situ DRIFTS spectra of 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu (a), Ce (b), Mn (c), Fe (d)) for CB over a temperature range of 200 to 350 °C.
Nanomaterials 16 00531 g012
Figure 13. Schematic illustration of the reaction mechanism for the catalytic decomposition of 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe).
Figure 13. Schematic illustration of the reaction mechanism for the catalytic decomposition of 30M/HY catalysts (M = Cu, Ce, Mn, Fe).
Nanomaterials 16 00531 g013
Table 1. Textural properties (SBET), actual metal loadings (ICP-OES), and relative atomic ratios of surface oxygen species (XPS) for the HY and 30M/HY catalysts.
Table 1. Textural properties (SBET), actual metal loadings (ICP-OES), and relative atomic ratios of surface oxygen species (XPS) for the HY and 30M/HY catalysts.
CatalystSBET (m2/g)Ca (wt%)Ct (wt%)Oα/OallOβ/OallOγ/Oall
HY686.47/////
30Cu/HY416.0619.1821.810.130.540.33
30Ce/HY408.2421.3521.920.210.310.48
30Mn/HY387.2618.0320.970.160.280.56
30Fe/HY385.6920.9320.990.240.330.43
Table 2. Quantitative analysis of Brønsted (B) and Lewis (L) acid site concentrations and B/L ratios for HY and 30M/HY catalysts at varying desorption temperatures.
Table 2. Quantitative analysis of Brønsted (B) and Lewis (L) acid site concentrations and B/L ratios for HY and 30M/HY catalysts at varying desorption temperatures.
CatalystTemperature (°C)L-Acid (μmol/g)B-Acid (μmol/g)B/L
HY25720.3269.850.37
30055.59199.363.58
35045.23178.343.94
30Cu/HY25191.7024.720.12
300143.9818.790.13
35093.358.570.09
30Ce/HY25400.92199.360.49
300122.10143.131.17
35030.19110.093.64
30Mn/HY25113.9113.660.11
30025.5112.230.47
3507.5510.371.37
30Fe/HY25406.1690.650.22
300117.4375.980.64
35043.1567.141.55
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, P.; Zhao, Z.; Ran, S.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yang, P.; Zhou, S.; Dong, Y. HY Zeolite-Supported Monometallic Oxide Catalysts and Insight into the Mechanism of Chlorobenzene Decomposition via Thermal Catalysis. Nanomaterials 2026, 16, 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16090531

AMA Style

Sun P, Zhao Z, Ran S, Wang C, Liu Y, Wang Z, Yang P, Zhou S, Dong Y. HY Zeolite-Supported Monometallic Oxide Catalysts and Insight into the Mechanism of Chlorobenzene Decomposition via Thermal Catalysis. Nanomaterials. 2026; 16(9):531. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16090531

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Peng, Ziwang Zhao, Shuai Ran, Chunyu Wang, Yimeng Liu, Ziyan Wang, Piaoping Yang, Shuyuan Zhou, and Yanchun Dong. 2026. "HY Zeolite-Supported Monometallic Oxide Catalysts and Insight into the Mechanism of Chlorobenzene Decomposition via Thermal Catalysis" Nanomaterials 16, no. 9: 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16090531

APA Style

Sun, P., Zhao, Z., Ran, S., Wang, C., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Yang, P., Zhou, S., & Dong, Y. (2026). HY Zeolite-Supported Monometallic Oxide Catalysts and Insight into the Mechanism of Chlorobenzene Decomposition via Thermal Catalysis. Nanomaterials, 16(9), 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16090531

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop