Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Enhancement of Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic H2O2 Production over g-C3N4/ZnCdS by Zn Vacancies and Heterointerface Engineering
Previous Article in Journal
Rhodamine B Dye-Functionalized Hydrophobic Carbon Quantum Dots with Dual Emission for White-Light Organic Optoelectronic Devices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Ayurvedic Medicinal Plants and Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

1
Exolab Italia S.R.L., Technopolo d’Abruzzo, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
2
Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi “Gabriele d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2026, 16(8), 483; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16080483
Submission received: 27 February 2026 / Revised: 2 April 2026 / Accepted: 16 April 2026 / Published: 18 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Biology and Medicines)

Abstract

Plant-derived extracellular vesicles (PDEVs) are nanoscale carriers produced through conserved plant mechanisms, including multivesicular body (MVB) formation and consequent extracellular vesicle release. MVBs are formed through repeated rounds of intracellular vesicles’ fusion, thus leading to the incorporation into PDEVs of lipids, proteins, miRNAs, nucleic acids, and secondary metabolites, derived from different cellular compartments. PDEVs possess a bilayer lipid membrane, which protects their cargo from degradation and facilitates membrane–membrane fusion with target cells. Ayurvedic medicinal plants are renowned for their extensive phytochemical diversity and enduring efficacy in addressing inflammation, infections, metabolic disorders, cancer, and neurodegeneration. However, the clinical translation of traditional herbal preparation is severely bottlenecked by batch-to-batch variability, restricted compound bioavailability, mechanistic uncertainties, and limitations of conventional large-scale extractions. This perspective research study critically proposes PDEVs as an innovative interpretation for Ayurvedic medicinal plants utilization. We identify and evaluate medicinal plants with established therapeutic characteristics that remain unexamined in PDEV research, hence presenting compelling opportunities for future investigation. By establishing a synergistic bridge between ancient Ayurvedic knowledge and modern nanomedicine, this perspective provides a methodological roadmap to guide health-efficient plant selection and accelerate translational research in next-generation therapeutics.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a family of vesicles released extracellularly with a size ranging from nano to micrometers in average diameter. They are characterized by a lipid bilayer structure, and, to date, they lack the ability to self-replicate. They can also be classified through their biogenesis and physical traits [1]. Exosomes are nanovesicles derived from repeated rounds of fusion between endosomal vesicles; then, they are released upon the fusion of multivesicular bodies with the plasma membrane. Proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and metabolites are among the bioactive substances that are normally carried by these vesicles [2]. Figure 1 shows a representation of the biogenesis and composition of PDEVs. These molecules not only reflect the properties of the parent cell but also act as an intercellular communicator to alter physiological and pathological processes in the recipient cells [3,4,5,6]. The cells of all living beings release EVs, including plant cells.
In the last decade, a great deal of interest in plant-derived extracellular vesicles (PDEVs) has been observed. They offer several benefits, including easy isolation, low cost, widely available sources, and, most of all, their safety, since they are derived from sources consumed daily worldwide as foods. Researchers have reported PDEVs to prevent or treat diseases, including cancer, inflammation, and degenerative disorders [7,8,9,10,11,12]. This suggests that PDEVs could be one of the most promising medications to take into serious account in biopharmaceutical research. Specifically, the potential of PDEVs as natural or manufactured drug carriers is appealing, particularly for delivering medicines with specific therapeutic effects directly into damaged cells for disease treatment. A key advantage is the capacity of PDEVs to transport a range of therapeutic agents, including chemotherapeutic bioactives, DNA expression vectors, siRNA, and novel therapeutic molecules like antibodies, both in vitro and in vivo [13,14]. Significantly, PDEVs can be engineered for precise cellular targeting, indicating that these nanovesicles are exceptional prospects for the delivery of a diverse array of therapeutic medicines. It should be noted that PDEVs facilitate enhanced bioavailability of the secondary metabolites, which are generally known to have low bioavailability due to different issues such as low water solubility, reduced stability, and low ability to overcome natural body barriers [15,16,17,18]. Hence, it is a prerequisite that plant sources must be cultivated organically, free from synthetic agrochemicals, pesticides, and herbicide treatment, to guarantee that their PDEVs are devoid of chemical substances [19]. This is a significant benefit in utilizing PDEVs for many therapeutic applications, including nutrition, dermo-cosmetics, and therapeutics [20,21]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that PDEVs derived from identical fruits exhibit both qualitative and quantitative variations depending on whether they are sourced from intensive or organic agriculture [22]. Another significant advantage of PDEVs is their direct extraction from fresh fruits and vegetables, eliminating the necessity for large-scale cell factories required for human cell-derived exosomes, synthetic bioparticles like liposomes, or nanomaterials like metal and organic nanoparticles. This benefit can significantly lower production expenses [20,23].
It is now well-established through preclinical and emerging clinical evidence that PDEVs demonstrate therapeutic potential in preventing or treating diseases such as cancer, inflammation, and degenerative disorders. PDEVs’ utilizations are primarily focused on disease prevention and progression, using innate anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory cargos to hinder early pathogenic cascades. This preventive framework designates PDEVs as potential candidates for prophylactic measures both against and also in patients with pathological conditions [24,25]. This approach is in perfect harmony with the fundamental principle of Ayurveda, Swasthasya Swasthya Rakshanam (protection of health in the healthy), which emphasizes the preservation of doshic balance through seasonal routines (Ritucharya), individualized diet and lifestyle (Dinacharya), and phytotherapeutic interventions to prevent the onset of disease [26]. Ayurveda’s system for preventing disease is based on three main ideas: daily routines to keep Vata, Pitta, and Kapha in check; seasonal changes to adapt to changes in the environment; and herbal remedies to boost immunity (Ojas) and energy (Bala), which stop imbalances from turning into disease. In this management, plants play a pivotal role in modulating medicinal therapy. Ayurveda utilizes an impressive array of plants—more than 1200 species recorded in the classical literature, such as Charaka Samhita and Sushruta Samhita—in its formulations, harnessing their synergistic bioactives to restore balance when prevention is inadequate [26,27,28]. Thus, PDEVs could be an excellent candidate to bridge the gap between traditional preventive principles and contemporary nanomedicine, representing a state-of-the-art application of Ayurveda’s age-old phytotherapeutic expertise. Through the utilization of PDEVs’ inherent strength, modern research can not only reinterpret and support centuries-old methods but also open avenues for novel, bioavailable solutions that prioritize maintaining health first in a variety of applications comprehended in nutrition, preventive medicine, and therapeutics, and even cosmetics.
The current study concentrates on investigating the Ayurvedic plant sources utilized in PDEVs’ research, which are recognized for their substantial therapeutic activities. It also evaluates the formulation employed in Ayurvedic medicine for its limitations, which can be effectively addressed through the isolation of PDEVs. The current study, unlike other investigations, proposes Ayurvedic medicinal plants as an efficient and potential source of PDEVs. In conclusion, we advocate for PDEVs as a synergistic link between traditional Ayurvedic phytotherapy and modern nanomedicine.

2. Isolation and Characterization Techniques of Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles (PDEVs)

Plant-derived extracellular vesicles are fundamentally distinct from crude plant extracts in terms of structure, composition, extraction techniques, and functional characteristics. In contrast to heterogeneous plant extracts—derived from basic grinding, solvent extraction, or juicing—which produce polydisperse mixes of soluble phytochemicals (such as polyphenols and flavonoids), cellular debris, enzymes, and polysaccharides lacking vesicular order [29], PDEVs are intact, nanoscale lipid bilayer vesicles (often 30–150 nm) actively released by plant cells by multivesicular bodies and/or exocyst pathways. This membrane structure safeguards and enhances cargos, including miRNAs, proteins, lipids, and metabolites, facilitating tailored intercellular signaling and improved bioavailability [30]. This bilayer membrane stands as a characteristic feature when compared to other synthetic nanoparticles, organic nanoparticles, as well as plant extracts. The advantage of the isolation of PDEVs focuses purely on “concentrating the bioactive cargos into physiological spheric membranes” naturally produced by plant cells for intercellular communication without having bioactive preparations obtained by means of chemical moiety intervention [31].

2.1. Isolation of PDEVs

The isolation and purification of PDEVs can be accomplished using five standard methods. They are classified into five primary categories based on their separation principles: ultracentrifugation, ultrafiltration, immunoaffinity capture, size exclusion chromatography (SEC), and polymer precipitation techniques [32,33].
Differential ultracentrifugation is the most popular and oldest centrifugation method, since it is simple to use and gives a lot of results. The separation mechanism primarily relies on the principle that particles of varying sizes exhibit distinct sedimentation coefficients when subjected to centrifugal force. The first step is to use low-speed centrifugation (<10,000 g) to get rid of plant fibers and large cellular debris in the sample solution. As the speed and length of the centrifugation slowly rise, tiny vesicles are forced to the bottom by the high centrifugal force (>100,000 g) [15]. To obtain a pure collection of extracellular vesicles, density gradient separation is employed. After centrifugation, a density gradient made up of different sucrose solutions (8%, 15%, 30%, 45%, and 60%) is commonly made. Vesicles are sorted by size and density and mostly collected in the 30%/45% layer of sucrose solution [33], although it is time-consuming and not scalable. The ultrafiltration process can enhance the purification of PDEVs according to particle size or molecular weight. Small molecular particles will traverse the filter, whilst high molecular weight particles will be trapped by the membrane. Immunoaffinity isolation can further separate vesicles by employing specialized antibodies to capture appropriate protein markers on the EV surface, including tetraspanin proteins, CD63, CD9, and CD81, therefore preventing contamination from cytoplasmic proteins or RNA. The lack of specific antibodies that can recognize PDEVs’ surface proteins limits the use of immuno-affinity isolation. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) is a technique for the separation of molecules or particles according to their size disparities. As the extract passes a chromatography column containing a porous resin stationary phase, vesicles will have distinct retention times due to their differing sizes. Consequently, when subjected to the elution buffer, PBS, soluble contaminants, including free proteins and tiny molecular compounds, are momentarily retained inside the column matrix, while larger extracellular vesicles rapidly traverse and are eluted in the initial fraction. Coprecipitation typically uses polymers, specifically Polyethylene Glycol (PEG), as a precipitation agent [32]. The hydrophilic PEG interacts with the water molecules surrounding vesicles, creating a hydrophobic microenvironment where EVs precipitate due to reduced solubility [34]. Table 1 summaries the techniques mentioned above in the PDEVs’ research.
A single current method for isolating and purifying PDEVs is significantly limited. Considering the properties of each separation technique, the majority of researchers employ a combination of the following procedures. Consequently, standardized isolation methods are essential for further investigations into the structure, functions, and biological properties of the PDEVs.

2.2. Characterization of PDEVs

A broad array of bioactive substances, including proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and small-molecule metabolites, is encapsulated in their membrane structures and has a wide range of applications. The characterizations of PDEVs are essential for clarifying their roles and enhancing their clinical application. A standardized study of PDEVs always includes morphological characterization, physicochemical property characterization, and characterization of functional bioactive components.
Size distribution, zeta potential, and polydispersity index (PDI) are the primary indicators for assessing the stability of preparation procedures and batch-to-batch consistency of PDEVs. The size distribution and polydispersity index of PDEVs can be characterized using dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis. Along with that, nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) provides information about the size and the concentration of individual extracellular vesicles in addition to precisely tracing their movements. It is hence beneficial for complex systems. NTA has been established as a benchmark method and a prerequisite for the characterization of extracellular vesicles. NTA analysis is critical when considering the scalability and reproducibility of PDEVs. Unlike DKS, NTA reports the particle size of the vesicle population rather than the hydrodynamic size of the vesicles. This allows for more accurate characterization of the extracellular vesicle. Nanoflow cytometry (NanoFCM) enables the sensitive investigation of several characteristics on a single particle; nevertheless, it requires fluorescent labeling and is costly to set up and run. To discover molecular markers, Western blotting can identify certain marker proteins in extracellular vesicles. Nevertheless, it is labor-intensive and time-consuming, and it is limited to recognized markers [35]. Zeta potential indicates the colloidal stability of PDEVs and allows for the assessment of their cellular membrane absorption by evaluating the polarity of the potential. Morphological characterization serves as the basis for identifying PDEVs, largely through the examination of vesicle morphology, size distribution, and integrity [36].
Presently, the primary methodologies for morphological characterization encompass transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM). TEM is regarded as the benchmark for the morphological examination of PDVs, requiring negative staining techniques to distinctly elucidate the spherical or quasi-spherical structure, bilayer membrane attributes, and internal hollow morphology of vesicles. SEM is primarily used to evaluate the surface appearance and aggregation state of PDEVs, and it is frequently used in conjunction with TEM to thoroughly examine the structural properties of vesicles. Functional bioactive components are identified utilizing mass spectrometry and electrophoresis methods as the molecular foundation of PDEVs’ biological activity. For protein profiling, SDS-PAGE in conjunction with LC-MS/MS allows for thorough identification of protein composition; RNAseq and qRT-PCR enable precise quantification of RNA components in PDEVs; and GC-MS/LC-MS/MS enable the systematic characterization of small-molecule metabolites (such as terpenes, flavonoids, and phenolic acids) and lipid species (such as phospholipids, triglycerides, and sterols), which are essential for understanding functional mechanisms [37,38].
Standardized techniques for isolating and purifying PDEVs are crucial for maintaining consistency and efficacy in medicinal formulations. The current isolation techniques are time-consuming and have limited yields. It is necessary to have detailed investigations to fulfill the isolation of PDEVs on a large scale, while maintaining the quality of the vesicles. The lack of a consistent technique leads to significant variability in particle size, morphology, purity, and composition, even with the same plant source. Inconsistent isolation approaches cause heterogeneity, which is a significant challenge [39]. Furthermore, it is unclear if PDEVs isolated from distinct parts of the same plant have similar composition and therapeutic properties. Controlled genetic background, abiotic (light, temperature, and humidity), biotic (pathogens and probiotics), and processing factors should be considered to standardize the composition of PDEVs. Furthermore, the quality and origin of raw materials must be clearly defined [39]. The lack of biomarkers impacts the characterization and confirmation of isolated PDEVs, preventing the formation of a consistent nomenclature scheme [40]. Through established procedures for preparation, separation, and characterization, the quality control and storage for PDEVs guarantee purity, integrity, and functionality. In accordance with regulations and plant-specific consensus, these actions reduce pollutants, structural damage, and variability. Understanding the biological mechanisms of PDEVs is challenging because of their complicated makeup [41].
Hence, it is a prerequisite to study the quality control of the PDEVs with respect to their origin, sources, and biochemical and physical characterizations to maintain uniformity in the isolation and utilization of PDEVs for functional applications.

3. Background of Ayurvedic Herbal Preparations

Until the 19th century, Ayurvedic medications were likely made by practitioners in their residences. This approach persists in highly specific preparations transmitted through familial traditions. Domestic medicine preparation utilizing traditional techniques and methods is insufficient to satisfy the increasing demand for herbal products, both in quantity and in dose convenience. The 20th century, however, initiated efforts to industrialize Ayurveda. Currently, there are about 9000 traditional medicine production plants in the nation [42,43]. The employed procedures have primarily involved a direct mechanization of conventional processing apparatus or have been modified from the food, chemical, or pharmaceutical industries. This occasionally renders Ayurvedic production difficult and exhausting. The primary goal of traditional medicine research is to comprehend how medicinal plants can be employed to create novel herbal and allopathic medications. Understanding the fundamental processing techniques used in Ayurvedic medicine preparations opens a world of possibilities for improvements in pharmaceutical dosage forms [28,44,45].
The preparation can be categorized into primary and secondary dosage forms. The principal dose forms are svarasa (juice), kalka (bolus/paste), kvātha (decoction), hima (cold infusion), phāṇṭa (hot infusion), and cūrna (powder). They are the dosage forms in which the herbs are utilized directly. All these medications, except for cūrṇa, have a brief shelf life of up to one day. Secondary dosage forms include vaṭi (pills), avaleha (linctures), sneha (medicated oils/ghee), and sandhāna (fermented medications). These medicines possess an extended shelf life of up to one year. The preparation process follows two principal methods: (1) Extraction: membrane rupture and solute diffusion, including hot solvent, microwave-assisted solvent extraction, Soxhlet extraction, and ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction, and (2) Separation: volatility, adsorption, and size-exclusion for separation [45,46].
The manufacturing encounters considerable deficiencies attributed to inconsistencies in raw materials, the absence of standardization, and the selective use of chemical solvents. Along with these, the herbal constituent varies according to region, climate, harvest timing, and cultivation techniques, resulting in variations in active chemicals from batch to batch. Furthermore, pharmacologically significant medicinal plants demonstrate constraints such as poor single-drug delivery, low water solubility, low bioavailability, and poor targeting, resulting in limited clinical use. Adulteration or substitution with substandard botanicals is prevalent because of resource scarcity and inadequate verification [47]. Heavy metals (lead, mercury, and arsenic), microorganisms, pesticides, and fungal proliferation result from inadequate sourcing, processing, or storage. These concerns frequently result in variable potency, contamination hazards, and difficulties in clinical validation [48,49]. The main obstacles to the clinical use of Ayurvedic herbal medicinal plants include safety profiles, batch variability, production scalability, and regulatory frameworks. Shortages of medicinal plants brought on by overharvesting, habitat loss, climate variability, and inadequate cultivation infrastructure limit large-scale production. This results in erratic supply chains, rising raw material costs, production halts, and increased adulteration risks with inferior substitutes. Chromatographic fingerprinting and multivariate analyses show that batch-to-batch variability results in inconsistent active constituent levels due to geographical/climatic influences on phytochemical profiles, non-standard harvesting/processing protocols, and raw material heterogeneity [50]. Due to high cost and time scale, as well as inclusion/exclusion issues in comprehensive patient-centric approaches, the provisions in some markets circumvent stringent testing, making global harmonization and clinical trial design more difficult [51,52].
PDEVs can provide a modern alternative that can deliver bioactive cargos (as miRNAs, lipids, etc.) with enhanced stability, targeted uptake, and reproducibility from Ayurvedic medicinal plants [53]. PDEVs have been established in the field and exhibit significant advantages as follows: (i) their bilipid membranes preserve bioactives of cargo specific to their plant sources from external factors, such as pH fluctuations, thermal changes, and light exposure; (ii) naturally occurring nanovesicles that serve as effective tools for intercellular communication; (iii) they are immunologically tolerated, as they are present in foods commonly consumed by humans; (iv) they utilize a natural cellular uptake mechanism via membrane fusion, enabling them to traverse barriers, including the blood–brain barrier and the placenta; (v) they exhibit confirmed scalability, making them suitable for industrial applications; and (vi) they are non-toxic, originating from plants cultivated through organic farming practices and chemical-free isolation, which is entirely focused on physical (differential centrifugation and ultracentrifugation) method isolation [54,55,56,57,58].

4. Ayurvedic Plants as Sources of Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles

4.1. Plants Utilized for PDEVs Isolation

Plants used as curative medicines may represent valuable sources of PDEVs with great potential in health management. Figure 2 represents various branches of therapeutics touched by PDEVs. In fact, these plants are particularly enriched in specialized metabolomes, high levels of secondary metabolites, and diverse regulatory biomolecules, which are known to be selectively sorted into vesicular compartments. Experimental evidence has shown consistent vesicle size distributions, lipid bilayer architecture, conserved marker proteins, and functional cargo stability, supporting cross-species similarity in vesicle characteristics [59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. Given that bioactive compound biosynthesis and vesicle-mediated secretion are both linked to active metabolic and defense-related pathways, plants with established pharmacological profiles have a higher probability of yielding PDEVs with biologically relevant cargo [53]. Table 2 lists the plant sources associated with different health concerns.
Table 2. Overview of PDEVs’ botanical sources and their therapeutic potential for targeted diseases.
Table 2. Overview of PDEVs’ botanical sources and their therapeutic potential for targeted diseases.
DiseasePlant SourcesCommon NameMethods of IsolationEffectsRef.
Digestive HealthUlcerative
Colitis (UC)
Portulaca oleraceaPurslane, Kulfa, LoniDifferential
Ultracentrifugation
Modulate the inflammatory
microenvironment
[66]
  Morus albaMulberryDifferential ultracentrifugation followed by sucrose density gradient purificationInhibits inflammation[67]
  Pueraria lobata rootsKudzuDifferential
ultracentrifugation
Promotes intestinal tissue repair and modulate the immune
microenvironment
[62]
  Curcuma longaTurmeric, HaridraDifferential ultracentrifugation followed by
sucrose density gradient purification
- Inflammatory suppressor, reduce oxidative stress in tissues
- Regulate macrophage balance, protects intestinal barrier function, regulate the abundance of intestinal flora
[68,69]
  Allium sativumGarlic, LashunaDifferential
Ultracentrifugation
Reduce intestinal inflammatory damage and regulate the
abundance of intestinal flora
[63,70]
  Centella asiaticaIndian pennywort, Mandukaparni,Enzymatic pre-processing + double ultracentrifigation + density gradient
ultracentrifugation
Attenuate inflammatory responses and enhance the functions of immune cells in the intestinal
Milieu
[71]
 Hepatocellular cancerAsparagus spp.  Inducing apoptosis of cancer cells[60]
  Morus nigra L. leavesBlack Mulberry, Krishna TootSequential
centrifugation
[72]
 Acute hepatic
failure
Allium sativumGarlic, Lashuna Prevents liver inflammation
decrease macrophage infiltration
[63]
Musculoskeletal disordersOsteoporosisPueraria lobataKudzuDifferential
Ultracentrifugation
Reduce osteoclastogenic factor, Block osteoblast
calcification, improve osteoclast autophagy,
Enhance bone differentiation
[73]
  Morinda officinalisMorinda Root, NoniEnzyme-assisted
extraction followed by
differential
ultracentrifugation
Promotes MC3T3-E1 cell proliferation[74]
  Dioscorea spp.Yam, SuranDifferential
Ultracentrifugation
Promote MC3T3-E1 cell differentiation and proliferation[75]
   GinsengCentrifugation followed by sucrose gradient
ultracentrifugation
Inhibition of osteoclast differentiation[76]
 OsteogenesisCissus quadrangularisveldt grape, HadjodDifferential ultracentrifugation from plant
callus
Ameliorate wounds and oxidative stress in the cells[77]
 Muscle AtrophyLycium barbarumGoji berriesSucrose density gradient differential
ultracentrifugation
Increase muscle grip strength[78]
 OsteoarthritisAllium sativumGarlicDifferential
Ultracentrifugation
Decreases inflammation[79]
Respiratory
Diseases
Acute Lung Injury Artemisia spp.Mug wort, DhavanamSequential
Ultracentrifugation
Decreases inflammatory cell infiltration while maintaining pulmonary immune equilibrium[80]
 PneumoniaHouttuynia cordataChameleon plant, MatsyagandhaDifferential
Ultracentrifugation
Inhibited Influenza A virus
replication, reduce inflammatory factors, reduce lung
inflammation
[81]
  Pueraria lobataKudzuDifferential
ultracentrifugation
Regulate lung M1/M2 type
macrophage balance
[62]
  Zingiber officinaleGingerDifferential
ultracentrifugation
Inhibition of cytopathic effects and reduce inflammatory
factors
[82]
Endocrine
system
Myocardial injuryMomordica charantia L.Bitter gourdDifferential
Ultracentrifugation
Ameliorates DOX-associated cardiomyocyte apoptosis and redox imbalance[83]
 Type 2 DiabetesVigna radiata sproutsMung bean Differential
ultracentrifugation
Promotes glucose absorption and glycogen synthesis,
reduce oxidative stress
[84]
  Allium sativumGarlicDifferential
ultracentrifugation
followed by sucrose
gradient purification
Stimulate outer membrane vesicle (OMV) release from A. mucinophilus[65]
 Parkinson’s
Disease
Pueraria lobataKudzuDifferential centrifugation combined with membrane filtrationRestores mitochondrial dysfunction and mitochondrial
autophagy
[85]
  Salvia officinalis rootsCommon sageDifferential
ultracentrifugation
Preserved metabolic homeostasis, mitigated cellular oxidative stress and inhibited autoxidation[86]
 Neuroglioma GinsengSucrose gradient
ultracentrifigation combined with differential
centrifugation
Promotes glioma cell apoptosis Inhibition of M2 macrophages[87]
  Momordica charantia L.Bitter gourdDifferential ultracentrifugation followed by
sucrose density gradient purification
Penetrated the BBB and
suppressed the glioma growth and metastasis
[88]
 NeuroblastomaBacopa monnieri L.Waterhyssop, BrahmiDifferential
ultracentrifugation
Suppress neuroblastoma cell growth and induce
morphological alterations
[89]
 Breast CancerCamellia sinensis flowersFresh TeaDifferential
ultracentrifugation
Stimulate ROS amplification and modulate gut microbiota.[90]
  Acorus calamusSweet flag, Bach Increases apoptotic activation[91]
 Pancreatic CancerOcimum basilicumBasil, SabjaUltracentrifugationInduces apoptotic ability[92]
 Tumor regressionArtemisia annuaSweet wormwood, DamanDifferential
ultracentrifugation
Inhibit tumor growth and remolding the tumor microenvironment[93]
  Moringa oleiferaDrumstick treeLow-force filtration + centrifugatioExhibit proapoptotic effects of Hela and Jurkat cells[94]
 Glioblastoma Citrus limon L.LemonSequential
centrifugation
Cytotoxic effects on tumor cells, minimizing endothelial toxicity and oxidative stress.[95]
 ImmunostimulatoryCatharanthus roseusPeriwinkle,
Sadabahar
Differential
ultracentrifugation
Promotes polarization and phagocytosis of macrophages as well as lymphocyte[96]
  Crocus sativus flowersSaffron, KesarUltracentrifugation with density gradientSelectively activate macrophages, increasing the
expression of surface markers and pro-inflammatory cytokines
[97]
  Solanum nigrumBlack lampshade, KakamachiPEG-based
precipitation
Decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine gene IL-6, and IL-6 protein[98]
Skin DiseasesMelanoma GinsengDifferential
ultracentrifugation
Induced macrophage polarization, improves tumoricidal function[99]
  Aloe spp. Differential
ultracentrifugation
Activity by increasing oxidative stress in melanoma[100]
 Skin DamageDendrobium spp.Stalk orchidsDifferential
Ultracentrifugation
Improve inflammatory microenvironment[101]
  Triticum aestivum L.WheatExo-spin™ exosome purification kit + size-exclusion chromatography (SEC)Promote wound healing[102]
  Centella asiaticaIndian pennywort, MandukaparniDifferential
ultracentrifugation
Improved skin hydration, elasticity and brightening[61]
 AlopeciaAllium sativumGarlicExo-spin™ Exosome
Purification Kit
Stimulates hair follicle cell genesis and regeneration[64]
 Wound HealingNelumbo nucifera leavesLotusCompared all the isolation techniques, with tangential flow filtration (TFF) as optimalPotential for wound healing, promotes the migration of
HaCaTcells
[103]
  Morinda officinalisMorinda rootsEnzyme-based cell wall digestion vs. Differential ultracentrifugationActivates MAPK/YAP1
signaling pathway and accelerating wound healing
[104]
 Hair GrowthWithania somniferaAshwagandhaDifferential
ultracentrifugation
Increased secretion of VEGF-A from dermal papilla fibroblasts, increased anagen and decreased telogen hair rate[105]
Aside from the plants currently studied, several Ayurvedic species remain unknown in the context of extracellular vesicle biology and constitute promising possibilities for future research.

4.2. Potential Ayurvedic Medicinal Plants for PDEVs Exploration

Edible fruits, medicinal herbs, and bioactive crop species of ayurvedic origins are among the various plant groups that may be considered to obtain PDEVs with similar structural traits but different molecular cargo. These source-dependent functional variations and cross-species vesicle structural similarities emphasize how crucial it is to methodically investigate several plant sources in order to find the best candidates for PDEVs’ purification. We analyzed some plants and the historical principles underlying their activity, which have the potential to be valuable sources for PDEVs and their potential applications in nutraceuticals, cosmetics, and therapeutics.
Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera), family Solanaceae, is popularly referred to as “Indian Winter Cherry” or “Indian Ginseng.” It is one of the most significant herbs in Ayurveda, the traditional medicine of India. The findings of some studies provide credence to the Ayurvedic theory of tonics, vitalizers, and rejuvenators, which suggests the clinical application of Withania somnifera in the prevention and treatment of numerous stress-related illnesses, including cancer, diabetes, arthritis, arteriosclerosis, premature aging, and hypertension [106,107]. Neural atrophy has also been identified as a major contributing factor in the etiology of patients with other neurodegenerative disorders, including Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, and Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Numerous studies demonstrate that Ashwagandha reduces, prevents, reverses, or eliminates synapse loss and neural atrophy. Consequently, Ashwagandha may be exploited to cure the above diseases and other neurodegenerative disorders at any stage, including prior to diagnosis, during the phase of moderate amnesia [108,109]. The advantageous impact of Ashwagandha root extract may be attributed to its GABA mimic properties. Ashwagandha and its ingredients, together with their metabolites, facilitate nerve development following a 7-day administration. Research substantiates the application of Ashwagandha as a mood stabilizer in clinical contexts of anxiety and depression [110,111]. Furthermore, Withaferin A and 3-b-hydroxy-2,3-dihydrowithanolide F, extracted from Ashwagandha, have antibacterial, antitumoral, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory effects, which serve in the prevention of numerous diseases [112].
Shatavari (Asparagus racemosus), family Asparagaceae, is a prominent medicinal plant recognized for its adaptogenic, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antibacterial, and gastroprotective properties. It is abundant in bioactive chemicals, including steroidal saponins (shatavarins), flavonoids, alkaloids, and polysaccharides, which enhance its therapeutic efficacy [113]. It has been extensively utilized in Ayurveda for female reproductive health, lactation assistance, digestive wellness, and stress alleviation [114,115,116]. Research substantiates its efficacy in addressing hormonal imbalances, stomach ulcers, diabetes, and neurological diseases. In addition, it possesses diuretic, antidiarrheal, and analgesic properties. By reducing oxidative stress, controlling neuroinflammation, and inhibiting the formation of amyloid beta, it has been shown to exhibit neuroprotective effects that can lessen the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease [117,118].
Giloy (Tinospora cordifolia) is a herbaceous vine of the family Menispermaceae. The medicinal properties of the Tinospora plant are attributed to its phytochemical elements, including alkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, aliphatic compounds, diterpenoids, vitamins, tannins, lactones, steroids, coumarins, lignans, triterpenes, and nucleosides [119,120]. The alkaloid-rich fraction from the stem, comprising palmatine, jatrorrhizine, and magnoflorine, has been documented to exhibit insulin-mimicking and insulin-releasing effects both in vitro and in vivo. Isolated alkaloids from the plant exhibited an insulin-related response in the production of hypoglycemic action [121]. The phytoconstituents extracted from Giloy, including magnoflorine, tinocordioside, 11-hydroxymuskatone, cordifolioside A, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, and N-formylannonain, exhibited cytotoxic and immunomodulatory properties. Isolated phytoconstituents augmented the phagocytic capacity of macrophages, enhancing nitric oxide (NO) synthesis through splenocyte activation and increasing the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in neutrophil immune cells [122]. The anticancer efficacy of T. cordifolia has been documented against multiple tumors or malignancies. Ethanolic extracts from all sections of the plants demonstrated hepatoprotective effects against carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury in rats. The extracts demonstrated an osteoprotective activity in vitro in human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells and primary osteoblasts obtained from rat femurs [123]. Additionally, it is conventionally employed in the management of asthma, and its juice is utilized for addressing persistent coughs [121]. The aqueous extract of T.cordifolia mitigates mast cell-mediated allergy responses in rats through antihistaminic properties. Furthermore, reduced symptoms of allergic rhinitis, including sneezing, nasal discharge, nasal obstruction, and nasal pruritus, were also documented [124].
Manjishtha (Rubia cordifolia) is a climber herb with little greenish-white blooms gathered around purplish, meaty fruits. It is known for its hepatoprotective, anti-oxidative, cardioprotective, gastroprotective, anticancer, nephroprotective, and wound healing activities [125]. Mayurshikha (Actiniopteries dichotoma) is a pretty fern, possesing anti-inflammatory, antihistaminic, antimicrobial, antihelmintic, anticholinergic, analgesic, and antitubercular activities [126]. Yashtimadhu, Liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra), commonly known as liquorice, which is utilized to address respiratory conditions (cough and asthma), improves digestion by alleviating ulcers and acidity, and strengthens immunity. It serves as an anti-stress agent, enhances skin health by diminishing pigmentation, and improves cognitive performance [127]. Owing to these advantages, Chavan et al. studied the lipid-based ayurvedic formulation of liquorice to analysis chromatographic and stability study with the intention to enhance the shelf life of the formulation [128]. Dhatki Kurz (Woodfordia fruticosa) is classified within the Lythraceae family. This plant contains several isolated phytochemicals, including tannins, flavonoids, anthraquinones, glycosides, and polyphenols. The extracts of its flowers and leaves are linked to beneficial medicinal effects. These phytochemical substances possess numerous pharmacological activities, including antibacterial, hepatoprotective, cardioprotective, antioxidant, antiulcer, analgesic, antihyperglycemic, immunomodulatory, and anti-tumor effects [129]. Tulsi (Ocimum sanctum L. and Ocimum tenuiflorum L.) from family Lamiaceae is usually referred to as holy basil. It possesses anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antidiabetic, and anti-stress properties, attributed to bioactive substances such as eugenol, rosmarinic acid, and ursolic acid. Tulsi demonstrates adaptogenic properties via regulating the HPA axis, decreasing cortisol levels, and improving stress resilience in rodent models, akin to antidepressants. Leaf extracts exhibit antibacterial activity, anticancer potential through the activation of apoptosis and suppression of angiogenesis, and antidiabetic action by the inhibition of α-glucosidase. The anti-inflammatory effects compete via NF-κB inhibition, while hepatoprotective and radioprotective functions arise from the overexpression of antioxidants (SOD and CAT). Tulsi targets lifestyle diseases, an adjuvant in type 2 diabetes mellitus (with glibenclamide), metabolic syndrome, psychological stress, and infections. Organic cultivation increases eugenol and terpenoid yields, facilitating nutraceutical synthesis [130,131,132]. Shankhapushpi Choisy (Convolvulus pluricaulis) is recognized for its neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties for enhancing cognitive functions and supporting mental health. Secondarily, anticonvulsant, antithyroid, antihyperglycemic, hypolipidemic, and analgesic effects are reported for this plant [133]. Other numerous plant sources are Amla or Indian Gooseberry (Phyllanthus emblica), Haritaki or Chebulic Myrobalan (Terminalia chebula), Beheda or Beleric myrobalan (Terminalia bellirica), Arjuna (Terminalia arjuna), Bhringraj, Eclipta (Eclipta prostrata), Hibiscus (Hibiscus sabdariffa), Olibanum (Boswellia serrata), Babool (Acacia nilotica), Neem (Azadirachta indica), which is known to be a blood purifier and has antimicrobial properties, Bael (Aegle marmelos), Cyperus rotundus, and many more [134].
In spite of the abovementioned positive effects of plants like Ashwagandha, shatavari, and others being exploited by ethnobiological research and industry, their use in PDEVs’ research is limited to a few reports. They result from ethanolic extraction, large-scale solvent manufacturing, and variable batch consistency [45]. In summary, the combined biological, biochemical, and pharmacological attributes of the chosen plant sources robustly endorse their potential as candidates for the extraction and examination of PDEVs [20]. Diverse plant sources would be inherently able to produce extracellular vesicle populations, as evidenced by the growing understanding of vesicle secretion in plants as a conserved and physiologically significant process connected to endosomal trafficking, membrane remodeling, and stress-responsive signaling. Since PDEVs are known to be selectively incorporated into vesicular cargo and may directly influence downstream functional consequences, plants that are rich in secondary metabolites, regulatory biomolecules, and bioactive lipids are especially appealing in this context [19]. PDEVs would be helpful to have an enhanced delivery of the secondary metabolites and the cargo from the sources when compared to the plant extract [22]. While species-specific variations in vesicle yield, size distribution, surface makeup, and molecular loading are expected, this diversity offers a strategic benefit for application-focused selection and source optimization. A systematic and comparative assessment of these plant possibilities would enhance the comprehension of PDEVs’ biogenesis and cargo heterogeneity, while also aiding in the identification of source-dependent functional markers [56]. Consideration of these plants as a source of PDEVs would be interesting and synergistic to its existing effects. This source-guided method should speed up the creation of PDEVs’ platforms that can be used for therapeutic delivery, immunomodulation, and regenerative research that are repeatable, biologically active, and suited to specific applications.

5. Future Perspectives

Ayurvedic medications, while proven to be effective for centuries, may have problems related to the way of their preparation and their standardization in terms of cargo and physicochemical features. A key point is that the currently used ayurvedic preparations are obtained through an alcoholic method of extraction. This reduces the level of bioavailability of the plants’ content. More research is needed to obtain effective and safe products. Unquestionably, Ayurvedic medicinal herbs have been used successfully to prevent and treat a wide range of ailments, and in preventive medicine, healthcare, and rehabilitation. However, the constraints of traditional preparations, such as poor single-drug delivery, low water solubility, lower bioavailability, and poor targeting, have greatly limited the clinical use of pharmacologically essential medicinal plants. The extraction of PDEVs from traditional Ayurvedic medicinal herbs aims to augment medical efficacy by enhancing activity, bioavailability, and targeting, hence improving the shortcomings of conventional formulations. A few considerations must be seen:
(1)
The effectiveness of the extracted extracellular vesicles differs based on the specific plant sections, requiring the identification of the most efficient part. The isolation of PDEVs should be considered while aiming for targeted utilizations.
(2)
Since traditional herbal medicines undergo specific processing, it remains unclear whether PDEVs extracted directly from source plants can fully replicate their therapeutic benefits. Addressing this gap requires comprehensive characterization, methodological standardization, and formal validation of these PDEVs.
(3)
Given that PDEVs’ biogenesis entails the selective scavenging and encapsulation of bioactive metabolites, nucleic acids, and proteins from their sources into extracellular release, it is imperative to source plant materials from organic farming to avoid contamination by synthetic agrochemicals, pesticides, and herbicides commonly used in either conventional or intensive farming.
(4)
It is still not clear whether using plant extracellular vesicles together can have the same effects as herbal medicine. It is also not clear whether using PDEVs from these sources will cause adverse immunogenic responses when compared to traditional preparations.
However, previous results on PDEVs’ preparation, obtained with either single or mixed fruits and vegetables, have shown that PDEVs have always demonstrated a superior efficacy when compared to commercially available bioactive molecules [135,136]. Moreover, we know that PDEV-based products are currently used in Italy as nutraceuticals and sold in pharmacies with no evidence of side effects. This, of course, is an important guarantee for the setup of new PDEV-based products.
With PDEVs, we should consider that their content in a single biomolecule may be increased by artificially uploading it. In fact, PDEVs are considered the ideal delivery system for any kind of molecule, due to the natural property of EVs to deliver any molecule through the body and between different species [137]. The current study proposes PDEVs as a synergistic link between traditional Ayurvedic phytotherapy and modern nanomedicine. This would surely supply solutions in translational research. Isolating PDEVs out of Ayurvedic medicinal plants will probably be intriguing in scaling up for the global healthcare sector.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.F.; methodology, M.B. and T.P.; formal analysis, M.B.; data curation, M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.B.; writing—review and editing, T.P., M.L. and S.F.; visualization, M.B., T.P., M.L. and S.F.; supervision, S.F.; project administration, M.L. and S.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this manuscript/study, the authors used https://BioRender.com for the purposes of graphics and figures. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

ExoLab Italia is an innovative start-up that, in Europe and in Italy, is obliged to perform basic research to generate new compounds in the future. Moreover, ExoLab Italia’s activity is based on the purification and concentration of extracellular vesicles from fruits and vegetables originating from Italian organic farms and with an ethical purpose of not producing waste from each potential product. ExoLab maintains close collaborations with universities; Manasi Bhabal and Tiziana Pietrangelo are associated with the Università degli Studi “Gabriele d’Annunzio”, Italy. Mariantonia Logozzi and Stefano Fais are employees and founders with company stock, and they have scientific curricula that highlight their desire to produce research without any pressure from the business side. Influence on Research: The company did not have any influence over the content of the article, including the study design, data interpretation, or publication decisions; it only provided the preparations of plant-derived extracellular vesicle mixes.

References

  1. De Sousa, K.P.; Rossi, I.; Abdullahi, M.; Ramirez, M.I.; Stratton, D.; Inal, J.M. Isolation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles and Future Directions in Diagnosis and Therapy. WIREs Nanomed. Nanobiotechnology 2023, 15, e1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Arya, S.B.; Collie, S.P.; Parent, C.A. The Ins-and-Outs of Exosome Biogenesis, Secretion, and Internalization. Trends Cell Biol. 2024, 34, 90–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Welsh, J.A.; Goberdhan, D.C.I.; O’Driscoll, L.; Buzas, E.I.; Blenkiron, C.; Bussolati, B.; Cai, H.; Di Vizio, D.; Driedonks, T.A.P.; Erdbrügger, U.; et al. Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (MISEV2023): From Basic to Advanced Approaches. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2024, 13, e12404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. van Niel, G.; D’Angelo, G.; Raposo, G. Shedding Light on the Cell Biology of Extracellular Vesicles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wiklander, O.P.B.; Brennan, M.Á.; Lötvall, J.; Breakefield, X.O.; Andaloussi, S.E. Advances in Therapeutic Applications of Extracellular Vesicles. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaav8521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shao, M.; Jin, X.; Chen, S.; Yang, N.; Feng, G. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles—A Novel Clinical Anti-Inflammatory Drug Carrier Worthy of Investigation. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 169, 115904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alfieri, M.; Leone, A.; Ambrosone, A. Plant-Derived Nano and Microvesicles for Human Health and Therapeutic Potential in Nanomedicine. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sundaram, K.; Miller, D.P.; Kumar, A.; Teng, Y.; Sayed, M.; Mu, J.; Lei, C.; Sriwastva, M.K.; Zhang, L.; Yan, J.; et al. Plant-Derived Exosomal Nanoparticles Inhibit Pathogenicity of Porphyromonas gingivalis. iScience 2019, 21, 308–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cong, M.; Tan, S.; Li, S.; Gao, L.; Huang, L.; Zhang, H.-G.; Qiao, H. Technology Insight: Plant-Derived Vesicles—How Far from the Clinical Biotherapeutics and Therapeutic Drug Carriers? Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2022, 182, 114108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rutter, B.D.; Innes, R.W. Extracellular Vesicles Isolated from the Leaf Apoplast Carry Stress-Response Proteins. Plant Physiol. 2016, 173, 728–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sarvarian, P.; Samadi, P.; Gholipour, E.; Asenjan, K.S.; Hojjat-Farsangi, M.; Motavalli, R.; Khiavi, F.M.; Yousefi, M. Application of Emerging Plant-Derived Nanoparticles as a Novel Approach for Nano-Drug Delivery Systems. Immunol. Investig. 2022, 51, 1039–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, Q.; Zhuang, X.; Mu, J.; Deng, Z.-B.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, L.; Xiang, X.; Wang, B.; Yan, J.; Miller, D.; et al. Delivery of Therapeutic Agents by Nanoparticles Made of Grapefruit-Derived Lipids. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Maas, S.L.N.; Breakefield, X.O.; Weaver, A.M. Extracellular Vesicles: Unique Intercellular Delivery Vehicles. Trends Cell Biol. 2017, 27, 172–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, M.; Viennois, E.; Xu, C.; Merlin, D. Plant Derived Edible Nanoparticles as a New Therapeutic Approach against Diseases. Tissue Barriers 2016, 4, e1134415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fang, Z.; Liu, K. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Oral Drug Delivery Carriers. J. Control. Release 2022, 350, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, Z.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, K.; Liu, Y.; Liang, Q.; Thakur, A.; Liu, W.; Yan, Y. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles (PDEVs) in Nanomedicine for Human Disease and Therapeutic Modalities. J. Nanobiotechnology 2023, 21, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kürtösi, B.; Kazsoki, A.; Zelkó, R. A Systematic Review on Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Drug Delivery Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pan, K.; Ju, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, R.; Jiang, X.; Zhao, S. Extracellular Vesicles in Reproductive Medicine: From “Animal-Led” to “Plant-Enabled”. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2025, 13, 1718643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Logozzi, M.; Mizzoni, D.; Bocca, B.; Raimo, R.D.; Petrucci, F.; Caimi, S.; Alimonti, A.; Falchi, M.; Cappello, F.; Campanella, C.; et al. Human Primary Macrophages Scavenge AuNPs and Eliminate It through Exosomes. A Natural Shuttling for Nanomaterials. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2019, 137, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Logozzi, M.; Di Raimo, R.; Mizzoni, D.; Fais, S. The Potentiality of Plant-Derived Nanovesicles in Human Health—A Comparison with Human Exosomes and Artificial Nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, N.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Li, T.; Lu, M.; Lu, R. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Facial Aesthetics. Extracell. Vesicles Circ. Nucleic Acids 2025, 6, 651–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Logozzi, M.; Di Raimo, R.; Mizzoni, D.; Fais, S. Nanovesicles from Organic Agriculture-Derived Fruits and Vegetables: Characterization and Functional Antioxidant Content. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Stremersch, S.; Vandenbroucke, R.E.; Van Wonterghem, E.; Hendrix, A.; De Smedt, S.C.; Raemdonck, K. Comparing Exosome-like Vesicles with Liposomes for the Functional Cellular Delivery of Small RNAs. J. Control. Release 2016, 232, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tiwari, A.; Soni, N.; Dongre, S.; Chaudhary, M.; Bissa, B. The Role of Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Ameliorating Chronic Diseases. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2025, 52, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, F.; Bao, R.; Yang, W.; Lu, Y.; Guo, J.; Chen, W.; Li, J.; Feng, K.; Zhang, W.; Di, L.; et al. Engineered Plant Extracellular Vesicles: Emerging Nanoplatforms for Combinational Cancer Immunotherapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2025, 15, 5663–5701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chisti, A.; Jena, R.; Mishra, A.A.; Tonni, S.S. Preventive Principles of Ayurveda with Special Reference to Seasonal Prophylaxis. Int. J. Ayurveda Pharma Res. 2023, 11, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kumar, S.; Dobos, G.J.; Rampp, T. The Significance of Ayurvedic Medicinal Plants. J. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 22, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Joshi, V.K.; Joshi, A.; Dhiman, K.S. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, Development and Perspectives. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 197, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lian, M.Q.; Chng, W.H.; Liang, J.; Yeo, H.Q.; Lee, C.K.; Belaid, M.; Tollemeto, M.; Wacker, M.G.; Czarny, B.; Pastorin, G. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Recent Advancements and Current Challenges on Their Use for Biomedical Applications. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2022, 11, 12283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ravitchandirane, H.; Singh, V.; Rajavel, A.; Sella, R.N. Characterization and Metabolomic Analysis of Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles (PdEVs) Isolated from Indigenous Medicinal Plants. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 2024, 12, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alsaid, F.; Davila, B.; He, B. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles and Nanoparticles: Origins, Functions, and Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2026, 14, 1758558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Boriachek, K.; Islam, M.N.; Möller, A.; Salomon, C.; Nguyen, N.-T.; Hossain, M.S.A.; Yamauchi, Y.; Shiddiky, M.J.A. Biological Functions and Current Advances in Isolation and Detection Strategies for Exosome Nanovesicles. Small 2018, 14, 1702153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Konoshenko, M.Y.; Lekchnov, E.A.; Vlassov, A.V.; Laktionov, P.P. Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles: General Methodologies and Latest Trends. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 8545347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ly, N.P.; Han, H.S.; Kim, M.; Park, J.H.; Choi, K.Y. Plant-Derived Nanovesicles: Current Understanding and Applications for Cancer Therapy. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 22, 365–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, J.; Wang, Y.; Fu, Y.; Wang, S.; Luo, Y.; Cui, X.; Sun, C.; Ji, J.; Mo, J.; Wang, Y.; et al. Plant Extracellular Vesicles: A Promising Bionic Medicine Platform for Disease Treatment and Drug Delivery. Interdiscip. Med. 2025, 3, e20240101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, C.; Zeng, A.; Li, L.; Zhao, W. Emerging Roles of Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Biotherapeutics: Advances, Applications, and Future Perspectives. Adv. Biol. 2025, 9, 2500008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Langellotto, M.D.; Rassu, G.; Serri, C.; Demartis, S.; Giunchedi, P.; Gavini, E. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: A Synergetic Combination of a Drug Delivery System and a Source of Natural Bioactive Compounds. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2025, 15, 831–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; Du, X.; Pang, X. Plant-Derived Vesicles: Isolation Strategies and Therapeutic Applications. Front. Plant Sci. 2026, 16, 1660579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shu, F.; Hu, Y.; Sarsaiya, S.; Jin, L.; Yang, X.; Liu, F.; Zhu, J.; Chen, G.; Chen, J. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Quality Control: Key Process Progress and Future Research Directions. Discov. Nano 2025, 20, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pinedo, M.; de la Canal, L.; de Marcos Lousa, C. A Call for Rigor and Standardization in Plant Extracellular Vesicle Research. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2021, 10, e12048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kameli, N.; Dragojlovic-Kerkache, A.; Savelkoul, P.; Stassen, F.R. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Current Findings, Challenges, and Future Applications. Membranes 2021, 11, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Patwardhan, B. Ayurveda for All: 11 Action Points for 2011. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 2010, 1, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mukherjee, P.K.; Harwansh, R.K.; Bahadur, S.; Banerjee, S.; Kar, A.; Chanda, J.; Biswas, S.; Ahmmed, S.M.; Katiyar, C.K. Development of Ayurveda—Tradition to Trend. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 197, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Doss, A. Preliminary Phytochemical Screening of Some Indian Medicinal Plants. Anc. Sci. Life 2009, 29, 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  45. Jain, R.; Venkatasubramanian, P. Proposed Correlation of Modern Processing Principles for Ayurvedic Herbal Drug Manufacturing: A Systematic Review. Anc. Sci. Life 2014, 34, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gupta, R.B.; Mauri, R.; Shinnar, R. Liquid-Liquid Extraction Using the Composition-Induced Phase Separation Process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35, 2360–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sahu, T.; Chandrkar, L.; Shahi, S. The Double-Edged Sword: Exploring the Potential and Peril of Catastrophic Medicinal Plants. Afr. J. Biol. Sci. 2024, 6, 2704–2709. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sikder, M.M. Ayurvedic Medicine: A Traditional Medical System and Its Heavy Metal Poisoning. Chonnam Med. J. 2024, 60, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Patwardhan, K.; Pathak, J.; Acharya, R. Ayurveda Formulations: A Roadmap to Address the Safety Concerns. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 2017, 8, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xiong, H.; Yu, L.X.; Qu, H. Batch-to-Batch Quality Consistency Evaluation of Botanical Drug Products Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis of the Chromatographic Fingerprint. AAPS PharmSciTech 2013, 14, 802–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Manohar, P.R. Toxicity of Ayurveda Medicines and Safety Concerns: The Need to Revive the Branch of Toxicology in Ayurveda. Anc. Sci. Life 2014, 34, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sharma, A.K.; Kumar, R.; Mishra, A.; Gupta, R. Problems Associated with Clinical Trials of Ayurvedic Medicines. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2010, 20, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nueraihemaiti, N.; Dilimulati, D.; Baishan, A.; Hailati, S.; Maihemuti, N.; Aikebaier, A.; Paerhati, Y.; Zhou, W. Advances in Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Extraction Methods and Pharmacological Effects. Biology 2025, 14, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, C.; Zhang, M.; Merlin, D. Advances in Plant-Derived Edible Nanoparticle-Based Lipid Nano-Drug Delivery Systems as Therapeutic Nanomedicines. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 1312–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huang, D.; Chen, J.; Zhao, M.; Shen, H.; Jin, Q.; Xiao, D.; Peng, Z.; Chen, T.; Zhang, Y.; Rao, D.; et al. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Composition, Function and Clinical Potential. J. Transl. Med. 2025, 23, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Rajasekaran, B.; Lo, K.-J.; Pan, M.-H. Recent Advances in PDEVs as Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery: Loading Techniques, Engineering Strategies and Future Directions. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2026, 23, 145–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhang, X.; Dong, Y.; Tian, Q.; Yang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, M.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, Q.; Guo, D.; et al. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as a Promising Nanomedicine Platform: Engineering Strategies and Biomedical Applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2026, 531, 173834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zuo, Y.; Zhang, J.; Sun, B.; Wang, X.; Wang, R.; Tian, S.; Miao, M. A New Perspective on Regenerative Medicine: Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Di Raimo, R.; Mizzoni, D.; Spada, M.; Dolo, V.; Fais, S.; Logozzi, M. Oral Treatment with Plant-Derived Exosomes Restores Redox Balance in H2O2-Treated Mice. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhang, L.; He, F.; Gao, L.; Cong, M.; Sun, J.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Asghar, S.; Hu, L.; et al. Engineering Exosome-Like Nanovesicles Derived from Asparagus cochinchinensis Can Inhibit the Proliferation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells with Better Safety Profile. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 1575–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kim, M.-H.; Yoon, E.J.; Kim, J.S.; Park, S.J.; Lee, H. Comparative Analysis of the Transcriptome and Efficacy of Bioactive Centella Asiatica Exosomes on Skin Cells. Res. Sq. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lu, Y.; Xu, J.; Tang, R.; Zeng, P.; Li, Z.; You, J.; Li, T.; Zhang, T.; Ma, X.; He, Y.; et al. Edible Pueraria Lobata-Derived Exosome-like Nanovesicles Ameliorate Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis Associated Lung Inflammation through Modulating Macrophage Polarization. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 170, 116098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhao, X.; Yin, F.; Fu, L.; Ma, Y.; Ye, L.; Huang, Y.; Fan, W.; Gao, W.; Cai, Y.; Mou, X. Garlic-Derived Exosome-like Nanovesicles as a Hepatoprotective Agent Alleviating Acute Liver Failure by Inhibiting CCR2/CCR5 Signaling and Inflammation. Biomater. Adv. 2023, 154, 213592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Inan Yuksel, E.; Cicek, D.; Demir, B.; Sahin, K.; Tuzcu, M.; Orhan, C.; Ozercan, I.H.; Sahin, F.; Kocak, P.; Yildirim, M. Garlic Exosomes Promote Hair Growth Through the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway and Growth Factors. Cureus 2023, 15, e42142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sundaram, K.; Teng, Y.; Mu, J.; Xu, Q.; Xu, F.; Sriwastva, M.K.; Zhang, L.; Park, J.W.; Zhang, X.; Yan, J.; et al. Outer Membrane Vesicles Released from Garlic Exosome-like Nanoparticles (GaELNs) Train Gut Bacteria That Reverses Type 2 Diabetes via the Gut-Brain Axis. Small 2024, 20, 2308680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhu, M.; Xu, H.; Liang, Y.; Xu, J.; Yue, N.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, C.; Yao, J.; Wang, L.; Nie, Y.; et al. Edible Exosome-like Nanoparticles from Portulaca Oleracea L Mitigate DSS-Induced Colitis via Facilitating Double-Positive CD4+CD8+T Cells Expansion. J. Nanobiotechnology 2023, 21, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sriwastva, M.K.; Deng, Z.; Wang, B.; Teng, Y.; Kumar, A.; Sundaram, K.; Mu, J.; Lei, C.; Dryden, G.W.; Xu, F.; et al. Exosome-like Nanoparticles from Mulberry Bark Prevent DSS-induced Colitis via the AhR/COPS8 Pathway. EMBO Rep. 2022, 23, EMBR202153365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gao, C.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, H.; Xiao, Y.; Hao, W.; Zhu, Y.; Vong, C.T.; Farag, M.A.; Wang, Y.; et al. Turmeric-Derived Nanovesicles as Novel Nanobiologics for Targeted Therapy of Ulcerative Colitis. Theranostics 2022, 12, 5596–5614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Liu, C.; Yan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, M.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Q.; Tu, K.; Zhang, M. Oral Administration of Turmeric-Derived Exosome-like Nanovesicles with Anti-Inflammatory and pro-Resolving Bioactions for Murine Colitis Therapy. J. Nanobiotechnology 2022, 20, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhu, Z.; Liao, L.; Gao, M.; Liu, Q. Garlic-Derived Exosome-like Nanovesicles Alleviate Dextran Sulphate Sodium-Induced Mouse Colitis via the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB Pathway and Gut Microbiota Modulation. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 7520–7534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Shi, R.; Tan, W.; Jin, H.; Chan, S.I.; Li, W.; Lei, S.S.; Cui, G.; Wang, Y.; Yang, D.-H.; Zhong, Z. MicroRNA-Enriched Plant-Derived Exosomes Alleviate Colitis by Modulating Systemic Immunity, Metabolic Homeostasis, and Gut Microbiota. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e05921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Gao, Q.; Chen, N.; Li, B.; Zu, M.; Ma, Y.; Xu, H.; Zhu, Z.; Reis, R.L.; Kundu, S.C.; Xiao, B. Natural Lipid Nanoparticles Extracted from Morus nigra L. Leaves for Targeted Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma via the Oral Route. J. Nanobiotechnology 2024, 22, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhan, W.; Deng, M.; Huang, X.; Xie, D.; Gao, X.; Chen, J.; Shi, Z.; Lu, J.; Lin, H.; Li, P. Pueraria Lobata-Derived Exosome-like Nanovesicles Alleviate Osteoporosis by Enhacning Autophagy. J. Control. Release 2023, 364, 644–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cao, Y.; Tan, X.; Shen, J.; Liu, F.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, S.; Qiu, T.; Li, D.; Zhao, Q.; et al. Morinda Officinalis-Derived Extracellular Vesicle-like Particles: Anti-Osteoporosis Effect by Regulating MAPK Signaling Pathway. Phytomedicine 2024, 129, 155628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hwang, J.-H.; Park, Y.-S.; Kim, H.-S.; Kim, D.; Lee, S.-H.; Lee, C.-H.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, J.-E.; Lee, S.; Kim, H.M.; et al. Yam-Derived Exosome-like Nanovesicles Stimulate Osteoblast Formation and Prevent Osteoporosis in Mice. J. Control. Release 2023, 355, 184–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Seo, K.; Yoo, J.H.; Kim, J.; Min, S.J.; Heo, D.N.; Kwon, I.K.; Moon, H.-J. Ginseng-Derived Exosome-like Nanovesicles Extracted by Sucrose Gradient Ultracentrifugation to Inhibit Osteoclast Differentiation. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 5798–5808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gupta, R.; Gupta, S.; Gupta, P.; Nüssler, A.K.; Kumar, A. Establishing the Callus-Based Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles from Cissus quadrangularis and Elucidating Their Role in Osteogenic Differentiation. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Zhou, X.; Xu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, M.; Meng, Z.; Peng, Z.; Liao, Y.; Yang, X.; Nüssler, A.K.; Liu, L.; et al. Gouqi-Derived Nanovesicles (GqDNVs) Inhibited Dexamethasone-Induced Muscle Atrophy Associating with AMPK/SIRT1/PGC1α Signaling Pathway. J. Nanobiotechnology 2024, 22, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Liu, Y.; Nie, M.; Li, X.; Wang, H.; Ren, S.; Zou, D.; Liu, J.; Li, R. Garlic-Derived Exosomes Alleviate Osteoarthritis Through Inhibiting the MAPK Signaling Pathway. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2025, 197, 518–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ye, L.; Gao, Y.; Mok, S.W.F.; Liao, W.; Wang, Y.; Chen, C.; Yang, L.; Zhang, J.; Shi, L. Modulation of Alveolar Macrophage and Mitochondrial Fitness by Medicinal Plant-Derived Nanovesicles to Mitigate Acute Lung Injury and Viral Pneumonia. J. Nanobiotechnology 2024, 22, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhu, H.; Chang, M.; Wang, Q.; Chen, J.; Liu, D.; He, W. Identifying the Potential of miRNAs in Houttuynia Cordata-Derived Exosome-Like Nanoparticles Against Respiratory RNA Viruses. Int. J. Nanomed. 2023, 18, 5983–6000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Teng, Y.; Xu, F.; Zhang, X.; Mu, J.; Sayed, M.; Hu, X.; Lei, C.; Sriwastva, M.; Kumar, A.; Sundaram, K.; et al. Plant-Derived Exosomal microRNAs Inhibit Lung Inflammation Induced by Exosomes SARS-CoV-2 Nsp12. Mol. Ther. 2021, 29, 2424–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ye, C.; Yan, C.; Bian, S.-J.; Li, X.-R.; Li, Y.; Wang, K.-X.; Zhu, Y.-H.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.-C.; Wang, Y.-Y.; et al. Momordica charantia L.-Derived Exosome-like Nanovesicles Stabilize P62 Expression to Ameliorate Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity. J. Nanobiotechnology 2024, 22, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. He, C.; Wang, K.; Xia, J.; Qian, D.; Guo, J.; Zhong, L.; Tang, D.; Chen, X.; Peng, W.; Chen, Y.; et al. Natural Exosomes-like Nanoparticles in Mung Bean Sprouts Possesses Anti-Diabetic Effects via Activation of PI3K/Akt/GLUT4/GSK-3β Signaling Pathway. J. Nanobiotechnology 2023, 21, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Xu, Y.; Yan, G.; Zhao, J.; Ren, Y.; Xiao, Q.; Tan, M.; Peng, L. Plant-Derived Exosomes as Cell Homogeneous Nanoplatforms for Brain Biomacromolecules Delivery Ameliorate Mitochondrial Dysfunction against Parkinson’s Disease. Nano Today 2024, 58, 102438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Vestuto, V.; Conte, M.; Vietri, M.; Mensitieri, F.; Santoro, V.; Di Muro, A.; Alfieri, M.; Moros, M.; Miranda, M.R.; Amante, C.; et al. Multiomic Profiling and Neuroprotective Bioactivity of Salvia Hairy Root-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in a Cellular Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Nanomed. 2024, 19, 9373–9393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kim, J.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, D.; Zhang, S.; Xia, J.; Li, S.; Qiu, Q.; Lee, H.; Wang, J. Anti-Glioma Effect of Ginseng-Derived Exosomes-like Nanoparticles by Active Blood–Brain-Barrier Penetration and Tumor Microenvironment Modulation. J. Nanobiotechnology 2023, 21, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Wang, B.; Guo, X.-J.; Cai, H.; Zhu, Y.-H.; Huang, L.-Y.; Wang, W.; Luo, L.; Qi, S.-H. Momordica Charantia-Derived Extracellular Vesicles-like Nanovesicles Inhibited Glioma Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion by Regulating the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 90, 104968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Khongkla, E.; Boonsnongcheep, P.; Suwanchaikasem, P.; Promthep, K.; Srisaisup, M.; Charuraksa, T.; Makarathut, P.; Chetsawang, B. Bacopa monnieri (L.) Wettst-Derived Nanovesicles Are Enriched with Bioactive Cargo and Exhibit Anti-Neuroblastoma Activity. bioRxiv 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chen, Q.; Li, Q.; Liang, Y.; Zu, M.; Chen, N.; Canup, B.S.B.; Luo, L.; Wang, C.; Zeng, L.; Xiao, B. Natural Exosome-like Nanovesicles from Edible Tea Flowers Suppress Metastatic Breast Cancer via ROS Generation and Microbiota Modulation. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2022, 12, 907–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Gupta, S.; Gupta, S.; Singh, M.; Patel, A.K. Anticancer Potential of Exosome-like Nanoparticles Isolated from Acorus Calamus in Breast Cancer. 3 Biotech 2025, 15, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Chintapula, U.; Oh, D.; Perez, C.; Davis, S.; Ko, J. Anti-cancer bioactivity of sweet basil leaf derived extracellular vesicles on pancreatic cancer cells. J. Extracell. Biol. 2024, 3, e142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Liu, J.; Xiang, J.; Jin, C.; Ye, L.; Wang, L.; Gao, Y.; Lv, N.; Zhang, J.; You, F.; Qiao, H.; et al. Medicinal Plant-Derived mtDNA via Nanovesicles Induces the cGAS-STING Pathway to Remold Tumor-Associated Macrophages for Tumor Regression. J. Nanobiotechnology 2023, 21, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Potestà, M.; Roglia, V.; Fanelli, M.; Pietrobono, E.; Gismondi, A.; Vumbaca, S.; Nguedia Tsangueu, R.G.; Canini, A.; Colizzi, V.; Grelli, S.; et al. Effect of Microvesicles from Moringa oleifera Containing miRNA on Proliferation and Apoptosis in Tumor Cell Lines. Cell Death Discov. 2020, 6, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Cui, L.; Perini, G.; Minopoli, A.; Palmieri, V.; De Spirito, M.; Papi, M. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as a Natural Drug Delivery Platform for Glioblastoma Therapy: A Dual Role in Preserving Endothelial Integrity While Modulating the Tumor Microenvironment. Int. J. Pharm. X 2025, 10, 100349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ou, X.; Wang, H.; Tie, H.; Liao, J.; Luo, Y.; Huang, W.; Yu, R.; Song, L.; Zhu, J. Novel Plant-Derived Exosome-like Nanovesicles from Catharanthus Roseus: Preparation, Characterization, and Immunostimulatory Effect via TNF-α/NF-κB/PU.1 Axis. J. Nanobiotechnology 2023, 21, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Martínez Fajardo, C.; López-Jiménez, A.J.; López-López, S.; Morote, L.; Moreno-Giménez, E.; Diretto, G.; Díaz-Guerra, M.J.M.; Rubio-Moraga, Á.; Ahrazem, O.; Gómez-Gómez, L. Characterization of Exosome-like Nanoparticles from Saffron Tepals and Their Immunostimulatory Activity. Biology 2025, 14, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Emmanuela, N.; Muhammad, D.R.; Iriawati; Wijaya, C.H.; Ratnadewi, Y.M.D.; Takemori, H.; Ana, I.D.; Yuniati, R.; Handayani, W.; Wungu, T.D.K.; et al. Isolation of Plant-Derived Exosome-like Nanoparticles (PDENs) from Solanum nigrum L. Berries and Their Effect on Interleukin-6 Expression as a Potential Anti-Inflammatory Agent. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0296259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Cao, M.; Yan, H.; Han, X.; Weng, L.; Wei, Q.; Sun, X.; Lu, W.; Wei, Q.; Ye, J.; Cai, X.; et al. Ginseng-Derived Nanoparticles Alter Macrophage Polarization to Inhibit Melanoma Growth. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Calzoni, E.; Bertoldi, A.; Cesaretti, A.; Alabed, H.B.R.; Cerrotti, G.; Pellegrino, R.M.; Buratta, S.; Urbanelli, L.; Emiliani, C. Aloe Extracellular Vesicles as Carriers of Photoinducible Metabolites Exhibiting Cellular Phototoxicity. Cells 2024, 13, 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tu, J.; Jiang, F.; Fang, J.; Xu, L.; Zeng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Ba, L.; Liu, H.; Lin, F. Anticipation and Verification of Dendrobium-Derived Nanovesicles for Skin Wound Healing Targets, Predicated Upon Immune Infiltration and Senescence. Int. J. Nanomed. 2024, 19, 1629–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Şahin, F.; Koçak, P.; Güneş, M.Y.; Özkan, İ.; Yıldırım, E.; Kala, E.Y. In Vitro Wound Healing Activity of Wheat-Derived Nanovesicles. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 188, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Lo, K.-J.; Wang, M.-H.; Kuo, C.-Y.; Pan, M.-H. Optimizing Isolation Methods and Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Lotus-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Modulating Inflammation and Promoting Wound Healing. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2025, 11, 4424–4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zhao, Q.; Hu, Q.-X.; Li, J.-P.; Su, H.-B.; Li, Z.-Y.; He, J.; You, Q.; Yang, Y.-L.; Zhang, H.-T.; Zhao, K.-W. Morinda officinalis—Derived Extracellular Vesicle-like Particles Promote Wound Healing via Angiogenesis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 30454–30464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Le Riche, A.; Nienhaus, J.; Erdmann, H.; Piccini, I.; Bertolini, M.; Edelkamp, J.; Acqua, G.D. LB1010 Ashwagandha-Derived Exosome-like Nanoparticles Significantly Promote Human Hair Growth Ex Vivo and in Vivo by Stimulating the Production of the Anagen Promoting Growth Factor VEGF-A. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2024, 144, S178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Nigade, G.N.; Chorghe, D.S.; Yewale, P. Exploring The Efficacy and Delivery of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) Lozenges: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. 2024, 2, IJPS/240206229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Archana, R.; Namasivayam, A. Antistressor Effect of Withania somnifera. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1998, 64, 91–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zahiruddin, S.; Basist, P.; Parveen, A.; Parveen, R.; Khan, W.; Gaurav; Ahmad, S. Ashwagandha in Brain Disorders: A Review of Recent Developments. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 257, 112876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Arumugam, V.; Vijayakumar, V.; Balakrishnan, A.; Bhandari, R.B.; Boopalan, D.; Ponnurangam, R.; Thirupathy, V.S.; Kuppusamy, M. Effects of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) on Stress and Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Explore 2024, 20, 103062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mikulska, P.; Malinowska, M.; Ignacyk, M.; Szustowski, P.; Nowak, J.; Pesta, K.; Szeląg, M.; Szklanny, D.; Judasz, E.; Kaczmarek, G.; et al. Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera)—Current Research on the Health-Promoting Activities: A Narrative Review. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Guo, S.; Rezaei, M.J. The Benefits of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) Supplements on Brain Function and Sports Performance. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1439294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Singh, N.; Bhalla, M.; De Jager, P.; Gilca, M. An Overview on Ashwagandha: A Rasayana (Rejuvenator) of Ayurveda. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 8, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Akhtar, S.; Gupta, A.K.; Naik, B.; Kumar, V.; Ranjan, R.; Jha, A.K.; Rather, M.A.; Rustagi, S. Exploring Pharmacological Properties and Food Applications of Asparagus racemosus (Shatavari). Food Chem. Adv. 2024, 4, 100689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mahajan, S.; Avad, P.; Langade, J. Efficacy and Safety of Shatavari (Asparagus racemosus) Root Extract for Perimenopause: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Int. J. Womens Health 2025, 17, 4057–4073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Pandey, A.K.; Gupta, A.; Tiwari, M.; Prasad, S.; Pandey, A.N.; Yadav, P.K.; Sharma, A.; Sahu, K.; Asrafuzzaman, S.; Vengayil, D.T.; et al. Impact of Stress on Female Reproductive Health Disorders: Possible Beneficial Effects of Shatavari (Asparagus racemosus). Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 103, 46–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Pingali, U.; Nutalapati, C.; Wang, Y. Ashwagandha and Shatavari Extracts Dose-Dependently Reduce Menopause Symptoms, Vascular Dysfunction, and Bone Resorption in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. J. Menopausal Med. 2025, 31, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Pandey, A.R.; Kurkute, P.; Tyagi, B.; Pundir, A. A Comprehensive Review on Role of Phytoconstituents from the Roots of Asparagus racemosus (Queen of Herbs). Phytomedicine Plus 2026, 6, 100916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Singh, A.K.; Srivastava, A.; Kumar, V.; Singh, K. Phytochemicals, Medicinal and Food Applications of Shatavari (Asparagus racemosus): An Updated Review. Nat. Prod. J. 2018, 8, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kumar, P.; Kamle, M.; Mahato, D.K.; Bora, H.; Sharma, B.; Rasane, P.; Bajpai, V.K. Tinospora cordifolia (Giloy): Phytochemistry, Ethnopharmacology, Clinical Application and Conservation Strategies. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2020, 21, 1165–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Mukherjee, S.; Pawar, N.; Kulkarni, O.; Nagarkar, B.; Thopte, S.; Bhujbal, A.; Pawar, P. Evaluation of Free-Radical Quenching Properties of Standard Ayurvedic Formulation Vayasthapana Rasayana. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 11, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Gupta, A.; Gupta, P.; Bajpai, G. Tinospora cordifolia (Giloy): An Insight on the Multifarious Pharmacological Paradigms of a Most Promising Medicinal Ayurvedic Herb. Heliyon 2024, 10, e26125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Panneer Selvam, K.; Payyappallimana, U.; Ravikumar, K.; Venkatasubramanian, P. Can Guduchi (Tinospora cordifolia), a Well-Known Ayurvedic Hepato-Protectant Cause Liver Damage? J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 2023, 14, 100658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Abiramasundari, G.; Sumalatha, K.R.; Sreepriya, M. Effects of Tinospora cordifolia (Menispermaceae) on the Proliferation, Osteogenic Differentiation and Mineralization of Osteoblast Model Systems in Vitro. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 141, 474–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Nayampalli, S.S.; Desai, N.; Ainapure, S. Antiallergic Properties of Tinospora cordifolia in Animal Models. Indian J. Pharmacol. 1986, 18, 250–252. [Google Scholar]
  125. Kumari, I.; Kaurav, H.; Choudhary, G. Rubia cordifolia (Manjishtha): A Review Based upon Its Ayurvedic and Medicinal Uses. Himal. J. Health Sci. 2021, 6, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Patil, A.; Gaonkar, V.P.; Chimagave, S.S.; Hullatti, K. Pharmacognostical and Biological Evaluation of Mayurshikha (Actiniopteries Dichotoma Bedd): An Ayurvedic Medicinal Plant. Int. J. Ayurvedic Med. 2022, 13, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Menon, D.S.; Lavagale, D.P.; Maru, D.S.; Bari, D.K.; Dasmohapatra, D.A. An Ayurvedic Drug Review of Yashtimadhu (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.). J. Neonatal Surg. 2025, 14, 742–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Chavan, S.; Bhuvad, S.; Kumbhalkar, B.; Walunj, T.; Gupta, V.; Deshmukh, V.; Sardeshmukh, S.; Sardeshmukh, S. Lipid-based ayurvedic formulations of a single herb-Yashtimadhu (Glycyrrhiza glabra): Pharmaceutical standardization, shelf-life estimation and comparative characterization. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 2023, 14, 100711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Thakur, S.; Kaurav, H.; Chaudhary, G. A Review on Woodfordia fruticosa Kurz (Dhatki): Ayurvedic, Folk and Modern Uses. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2021, 11, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Thakur, S.; Choudhary, S.; Walia, B. Tulsi—A Review Based Upon Its Ayurvedic and Modern Therapeutic Uses. Int. J. Res. Rev. 2021, 8, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Baliga, M.S.; Jimmy, R.; Thilakchand, K.R.; Sunitha, V.; Bhat, N.R.; Saldanha, E.; Rao, S.; Rao, P.; Arora, R.; Palatty, P.L. Ocimum sanctum L. (Holy Basil or Tulsi) and Its Phytochemicals in the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer. Nutr. Cancer 2013, 65, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Jamshidi, N.; Cohen, M.M. The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tulsi in Humans: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 9217567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Dev, R.; Singh, D.A.P.; Singh, D.A.P.; Bala, K. A Comprehensive Review of Shankhpushpi: Exploring Its Pharmacological Properties and Therapeutic Potential. Adv. J. Pharm. Res. Rev. 2024, 1, 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  134. Kaushik, P.; Ahlawat, P.; Singh, K.; Singh, R. Chemical Constituents, Pharmacological Activities, and Uses of Common Ayurvedic Medicinal Plants: A Future Source of New Drugs. Adv. Tradit. Med. 2023, 23, 673–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Di Raimo, R.; Mizzoni, D.; Aloi, A.; Pietrangelo, G.; Dolo, V.; Poppa, G.; Fais, S.; Logozzi, M. Antioxidant Effect of a Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles’ Mix on Human Skin Fibroblasts: Induction of a Reparative Process. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Castelli, G.; Logozzi, M.; Mizzoni, D.; Di Raimo, R.; Cerio, A.; Dolo, V.; Pasquini, L.; Screnci, M.; Ottone, T.; Testa, U.; et al. Ex Vivo Anti-Leukemic Effect of Exosome-like Grapefruit-Derived Nanovesicles from Organic Farming—The Potential Role of Ascorbic Acid. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Orefice, N.S.; Raimo, R.D.; Mizzoni, D.; Logozzi, M.; Fais, S. Purposing Plant-Derived Exosomes-like Nanovesicles for Drug Delivery: Patents and Literature Review. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2023, 33, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Biogenesis and structural composition of PDEVs.
Figure 1. Biogenesis and structural composition of PDEVs.
Nanomaterials 16 00483 g001
Figure 2. Therapeutic applications of PDEVs.
Figure 2. Therapeutic applications of PDEVs.
Nanomaterials 16 00483 g002
Table 1. The isolation techniques utilized in PDEVs’ research.
Table 1. The isolation techniques utilized in PDEVs’ research.
TechniquePrincipleAdvantagesDrawbacks
UltracentrifugationSize selective
sedimentation
High particle yield; methodological standardization Time-consuming,
protein co-pelleting
Density gradient centrifugationBuoyant density
separation
Exceptional purityLong runtime, equipment intensive and
non-scalable
UltrafiltrationMolecular weight cutoff filtrationScalable and rapidMembrane fouling, shear-induced
vesiculation
Immunoaffinity Antigen–antibody surface recognitionMarker-specific enrichment,
high specificity
Costly reagents; low yield, epitope masking 
Size Exclusion chromatographyHydrodynamic radius-based elutionPreserved integrity,
polydispersity reduction
Requires dilution,
column capacity limited
Polymer precipitationHydrophobic/salting-out aggregationRapid,
no complex instrumentation required
Polymer
residues, compromised purity
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bhabal, M.; Pietrangelo, T.; Logozzi, M.; Fais, S. Ayurvedic Medicinal Plants and Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Nanomaterials 2026, 16, 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16080483

AMA Style

Bhabal M, Pietrangelo T, Logozzi M, Fais S. Ayurvedic Medicinal Plants and Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Nanomaterials. 2026; 16(8):483. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16080483

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bhabal, Manasi, Tiziana Pietrangelo, Mariantonia Logozzi, and Stefano Fais. 2026. "Ayurvedic Medicinal Plants and Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives" Nanomaterials 16, no. 8: 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16080483

APA Style

Bhabal, M., Pietrangelo, T., Logozzi, M., & Fais, S. (2026). Ayurvedic Medicinal Plants and Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Nanomaterials, 16(8), 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16080483

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop