Metal–Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture: Improving Adsorption Performance Through Modification Methods
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Synthesis of Metal–Organic Frameworks
2.1. Architectures and Design Objectives
2.2. Synthetic Pathways and Morphological Control
2.3. Economic Assessment and Feasibility
2.4. Regeneration and Desorption Considerations
3. Modification Methods
3.1. Aperture Adjustment
3.2. Doped Metal Ions
3.2.1. Single-Metal Doping
3.2.2. Multimetallic Doping
3.3. Functional Group Doping
3.3.1. Amine
3.3.2. Oxygen-Containing Functional Groups
3.3.3. Halogen Incorporation
3.3.4. Alkyl Chains and Bulky Non-Polar Groups
3.4. Synergistic Effects
4. Computational Screening
5. Current Challenges and Future Perspectives
6. Conclusions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, F.; Harindintwali, J.D.; Wei, K.; Shan, Y.; Mi, Z.; Costello, M.J.; Grunwald, S.; Feng, Z.; Wang, F.; Guo, Y.; et al. Climate Change: Strategies for Mitigation and Adaptation. Innov. Geosci. 2023, 1, 100015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Calvin, K.; Dasgupta, D.; Krinner, G.; Mukherji, A.; Thorne, P.W.; Trisos, C.; Romero, J.; Aldunce, P.; Barrett, K.; et al. Climate Change 2023; Synthesis Report; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedlingstein, P.; O’Sullivan, M.; Jones, M.W.; Andrew, R.M.; Hauck, J.; Landschützer, P.; Le Quéré, C.; Li, H.; Luijkx, I.T.; Olsen, A.; et al. Global Carbon Budget 2024. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2025, 17, 965–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, D.Y.; Deutz, S.; Winter, B.A.; Baumgärtner, N.; Leenders, L.; Bardow, A. The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage to Achieve Net-Zero Energy Systems: Trade-Offs between Economics and the Environment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 178, 113246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamada, H. Amine-Based Capture of CO2 for Utilization and Storage. Polym. J. 2020, 53, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, R.; Fong, C.; Freeman, B.D.; Hill, M.R.; Xie, Z. Current Status and Advances in Membrane Technology for Carbon Capture. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 300, 121863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, C.; Liu, Q.; Deng, S.; Li, H.; Kitamura, Y. Cryogenic-Based CO2 Capture Technologies: State-of-the-Art Developments and Current Challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 101, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blamey, J.; Anthony, E.J.; Wang, J.; Fennell, P.S. The Calcium Looping Cycle for Large-Scale CO2 Capture. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36, 260–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raganati, F.; Miccio, F.; Ammendola, P. Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide for Post-Combustion Capture: A Review. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 12845–12868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, Z.; Tian, Y.; Wu, W.; Liu, Z.; Fu, W.; Kung, C.-W.; Shang, J. Development of Zeolite Adsorbents for CO2 Separation in Achieving Carbon Neutrality. npj Mater. Sustain. 2024, 2, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, M.; Flaig, R.W.; Jiang, H.L.; Yaghi, O.M. Carbon Capture and Conversion Using Metal-Organic Frameworks and Mof-Based Materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 2783–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, M.; Wang, X.; Gao, F.; Xu, M.; Fan, W.; Xu, B.; Sun, D. Synthesis Strategies of Metal-Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture. Microstructures 2023, 3, 2023032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, M.; Rong, W.; Wang, Y.; Kong, S.; Yao, J. Pore Engineering of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Boosting Low-Pressure CO2 Capture. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 25784–25802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demir, H.; Daglar, H.; Gulbalkan, H.C.; Aksu, G.O.; Keskin, S. Recent Advances in Computational Modeling of Mofs: From Molecular Simulations to Machine Learning. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 484, 215112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Zhou, T. Computer-Aided Metal–Organic Framework Screening and Design Approaches toward Efficient Carbon Capture Processes. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 2025, 10, 1005–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choe, J.H.; Kim, H.; Hong, C.S. Mof-74 Type Variants for CO2 Capture. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5, 5172–5185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, Y.G.; Haldoupis, E.; Bucior, B.J.; Haranczyk, M.; Lee, S.; Zhang, H.; Vogiatzis, K.D.; Milisavljevic, M.; Ling, S.; Camp, J.S.; et al. Advances, Updates, and Analytics for the Computation-Ready, Experimental Metal–Organic Framework Database: Core Mof 2019. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2019, 64, 5985–5998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kancharlapalli, S.; Snurr, R.Q. High-Throughput Screening of the Core-Mof-2019 Database for CO2 Capture from Wet Flue Gas: A Multi-Scale Modeling Strategy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 28084–28092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, S.A.; Zhao, D.; Jiang, J. Integrating Stability Metrics with High-Throughput Computational Screening of Metal–Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture. Commun. Mater. 2023, 4, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahajan, S.; Lahtinen, M. Recent Progress in Metal-Organic Frameworks (Mofs) for CO2 Capture at Different Pressures. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegelman, R.L.; Kim, E.J.; Long, J.R. Porous Materials for Carbon Dioxide Separations. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 1060–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.R.; Sculley, J.; Zhou, H.C. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Separations. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 869–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, L.; Niu, Z.; Jin, X.; Tang, L.; Zhu, L. Effect of Lithium Doping on the Structures and CO2 Adsorption Properties of Metal-Organic Frameworks Hkust-1. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 12865–12870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, G.; Jhung, S.H. CO2 Capture Using Functionalized Mil-101(Cr) Metal–Organic Frameworks: Functionality Nanoarchitectonics of Nanospace for CO2 Adsorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 354, 129514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, L.; Xue, C.; Xia, H.; Qiu, S.; Sun, L.; Chen, H. Effects of Alkali Metal (Li, Na, and K) Incorporation in NH2-Mil125Ti on the Performance of CO2 Adsorption. Materials 2019, 12, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Ying, L.; Gong, F.; Lu, J.; Wang, W.; Ding, J.; Yan, J. Aminosilane-Functionalized Ti-Based Metal–Organic Framework for Efficient and Selective CO2 Adsorption. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, M.; Zhou, A.; Hong, T.; Jia, X.; Liu, M. Tailored Porous Structure and CO2 Adsorption Capacity of Mg-Mof-74 Via Solvent Polarity Regulation. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 476, 146845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, C.; Hou, S.; Yu, L.; Zhou, X.; Fu, Y.; Yang, X.; Sun, W.; Yang, F.; Wang, X.; Liu, L. Controlled Synthesis of Mg-Mof-74 and Its CO2 Adsorption in Flue Gas. Coatings 2024, 14, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, H.; Tian, W.; Lu, X.; Yuan, H.; Yang, L.; Zhang, H.; Shen, H.; Bai, H. Boosting the CO2 Adsorption Performance by Defect-Rich Hierarchical Porous Mg-Mof-74. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 469, 144052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazemi, A.; Pordsari, M.A.; Tamtaji, M.; Zainali, F.; Keshavarz, S.; Baesmat, H.; Manteghi, F.; Ghaemi, A.; Rohani, S.; Goddard, W.A., III. Eco-Friendly Synthesis and Morphology Control of Mof-74 for Exceptional CO2 Capture Performance with Dft Validation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 361, 131328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, X.-R.; Qiao, M.; Wei, Y.; Yun, L.-X.; Wang, J.-X.; Chen, J.-F. Green, Efficient and Controllable Synthesis of High-Quality Mof-74 with High Gravity Technology. Green Chem. 2024, 26, 6209–6218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, S.; Gu, Y.; Shao, Y.; Zhong, W. Experimental Research of Alkali Metals Modified Mg/Dobdc Metal Organic Framework as High Capacity CO2 Adsorbent. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 331, 125471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, S.; Bustam, M.A.; Sagir, M.; Raza, M.R.; Nawaz, S.; Assiri, M.A.; Al-Sehemi, A.G.; Mukhtar, A.; Feng, C.L.; Ayoub, M. Synthesis and Doping of Alkali Metals on Mof-74 for CO2 and CH4 Pure and Binary Mixtures Adsorption. Gas Sci. Eng. 2025, 134, 205502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Kosari, M.; Jing, M.; He, C. Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Bimetallic Nico-Mof-74 with Enhanced Open Metal Site for Efficient CO2 Capture. Environ. Funct. Mater. 2022, 1, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazemi, A.; Pordsari, M.A.; Tamtaji, M.; Manteghi, F.; Ghaemi, A.; Rohani, S.; Goddard, W.A. Environmentally Friendly Synthesis and Morphology Engineering of Mixed-Metal Mof for Outstanding CO2 Capture Efficiency. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 505, 158951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Li, G.; Hong, M.; Ban, H.; Yang, L.; Liu, X.; Li, F.; Matus, E.V.; Li, C.; Li, L. Development of Ni/Mg1-Mof-74 for Highly Efficient CO2/N2 Separation. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2024, 52, 1745–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farmahini, A.H.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Friedrich, D.; Brandani, S.; Sarkisov, L. Performance-Based Screening of Porous Materials for Carbon Capture. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 10666–10741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahlen, M.; Cheung, O.; Xu, C. Low-Concentration CO2 Capture Using Metal-Organic Frameworks-Current Status and Future Perspectives. Dalton Trans. 2023, 52, 1841–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazemi, A.; Moghadaskhou, F.; Pordsari, M.A.; Manteghi, F.; Tadjarodi, A.; Ghaemi, A. Enhanced CO2 Capture Potential of Uio-66-NH2 Synthesized by Sonochemical Method: Experimental Findings and Performance Evaluation. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 19891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peh, S.B.; Farooq, S.; Zhao, D. Techno-Economic Analysis of Mof-Based Adsorption Cycles for Postcombustion CO2 Capture from Wet Flue Gas. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2023, 268, 118390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Fan, D.; Pinto, R.V.; Dovgaliuk, I.; Nandi, S.; Chakraborty, D.; Garcia-Moncada, N.; Vimont, A.; McMonagle, C.J.; Bordonhos, M.; et al. A Scalable Robust Microporous Al-Mof for Post-Combustion Carbon Capture. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2401070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegelman, R.L.; Milner, P.J.; Forse, A.C.; Lee, J.H.; Colwell, K.A.; Neaton, J.B.; Reimer, J.A.; Weston, S.C.; Long, J.R. Water Enables Efficient CO2 Capture from Natural Gas Flue Emissions in an Oxidation-Resistant Diamine-Appended Metal-Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 13171–13186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alivand, M.S.; Mazaheri, O.; Wu, Y.; Zavabeti, A.; Christofferson, A.J.; Meftahi, N.; Russo, S.P.; Stevens, G.W.; Scholes, C.A.; Mumford, K.A. Engineered Assembly of Water-Dispersible Nanocatalysts Enables Low-Cost and Green CO2 Capture. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, G.; Ahmed, I.; Jhung, S.H. CO2 Adsorption Using Functionalized Metal–Organic Frameworks under Low Pressure: Contribution of Functional Groups, Excluding Amines, to Adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 481, 148440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di, T.; Yoshida, Y.; Otake, K.I.; Kitagawa, S.; Kitagawa, H. Increased CO2/N2 Selectivity by Stepwise Fluorination in Isoreticular Ultramicroporous Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Sci. 2024, 15, 9641–9648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venturi, D.M.; Notari, M.S.; Bondi, R.; Mosconi, E.; Kaiser, W.; Mercuri, G.; Giambastiani, G.; Rossin, A.; Taddei, M.; Costantino, F. Increased CO2 Affinity and Adsorption Selectivity in Mof-801 Fluorinated Analogues. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 40801–40811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazemi, A.; Pordsari, M.A.; Tamtaji, M.; Afshari, M.H.; Keshavarz, S.; Zeinali, F.; Baesmat, H.; Zahiri, S.; Manteghi, F.; Ghaemi, A.; et al. Unveiling the Power of Defect Engineering in Mof-808 to Enhance Efficient Carbon Dioxide Adsorption and Separation by Harnessing the Potential of Dft Analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 494, 153049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agueda, V.I.; Delgado, J.A.; Uguina, M.A.; Brea, P.; Spjelkavik, A.I.; Blom, R.; Grande, C. Adsorption and Diffusion of H2, N2, CO, CH4 and CO2 in Utsa-16 Metal-Organic Framework Extrudates. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 124, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaikwad, S.; Han, S. Shaping Metal-Organic Framework (Mof) with Activated Carbon and Silica Powder Materials for CO2 Capture. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grande, C.A.; Blom, R.; Middelkoop, V.; Matras, D.; Vamvakeros, A.; Jacques, S.D.M.; Beale, A.M.; Di Michiel, M.; Anne Andreassen, K.; Bouzga, A.M. Multiscale Investigation of Adsorption Properties of Novel 3d Printed Utsa-16 Structures. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 402, 126166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henrotin, A.; Heymans, N.; Duprez, M.E.; Mouchaham, G.; Serre, C.; Wong, D.; Robinson, R.; Mulrooney, D.; Casaban, J.; De Weireld, G. Lab-Scale Pilot for CO2 Capture Vacuum Pressure Swing Adsorption: Mil-160(Al) Vs Zeolite 13x. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 2024, 12, 100224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Bai, Y.; Wang, Z.; Gong, Q.; Li, M.; Bo, Y.; Xu, H.; Jiang, G.; Chi, K. Exquisitely Constructing a Robust Mof with Dual Pore Sizes for Efficient CO2 Capture. Molecules 2023, 28, 6276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Min, H.J.; Choi, M.K.; Kim, K.C.; Kim, B.; Kang, M.; Lee, N.; Eum, K.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, D.W. Polymer-in-Cage Strategy for Pore Tuning of High-Aspect Ratio Zif Nanoplate: Toward Sub-Micrometer-Thick Large Area CO2 Separation Membranes. Adv. Sci. 2026, 13, e19351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berdichevsky, E.K.; Downing, V.A.; Hooper, R.W.; Butt, N.W.; McGrath, D.T.; Donnelly, L.J.; Michaelis, V.K.; Katz, M.J. Ultrahigh Size Exclusion Selectivity for Carbon Dioxide from Nitrogen/Methane in an Ultramicroporous Metal-Organic Framework. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 7970–7979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, Y.; Xie, Y.; Cui, H.; Alothman, Z.A.; Alduhaish, O.; Lin, R.-B.; Chen, B. An Ultramicroporous Metal–Organic Framework with Dual Functionalities for High Sieving Separation of CO2 from CH4 and N2. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 137101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Farooq, S.; Zhao, D. A Highly Stable Metal-Organic Framework with Optimum Aperture Size for CO2 Capture. AIChE J. 2017, 63, 4103–4114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Åhlén, M.; Zhou, Y.; Hedbom, D.; Cho, H.S.; Strømme, M.; Terasaki, O.; Cheung, O. Efficient SF6 capture and separation in robust gallium- and vanadium-based metal–organic frameworks. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 26435–26441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.N.; Wang, S.M.; Tao, Z.P.; Liu, L.; Xu, W.G.; Gu, X.J.; Han, Z.B. Green Synthesis of Mof-801(Zr/Ce/Hf) for CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 Separation. Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 7853–7860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, M.; Huang, Y.; Yuan, S. Precision Pore Engineering Via Fit-Topology Assembly in a Zn-Porphyrin Mof for Selective C2H2 Capture. Chem. Sci. 2025, 16, 22638–22646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, T.; Chen, D.-L.; Sullivan, J.E.; Kozlowski, M.T.; Johnson, J.K.; Rosi, N.L. Systematic Modulation and Enhancement of CO2: N2 Selectivity and Water Stability in an Isoreticular Series of Bio-Mof-11 Analogues. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 1746–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, T.; Xiao, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zhou, M.; He, G. Ultramicroporous Metal–Organic Framework Qc-5-Cu for Highly Selective Adsorption of CO2 from C2H4 Stream. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 3153–3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gebremariam, S.K.; Varghese, A.M.; Ehrling, S.; Al Wahedi, Y.; AlHajaj, A.; Dumee, L.F.; Karanikolos, G.N. Hierarchically Porous Structured Adsorbents with Ultrahigh Metal-Organic Framework Loading for CO2 Capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 50785–50799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Humby, J.D.; Benson, O.; Smith, G.L.; Argent, S.P.; da Silva, I.; Cheng, Y.; Rudic, S.; Manuel, P.; Frogley, M.D.; Cinque, G.; et al. Host-Guest Selectivity in a Series of Isoreticular Metal-Organic Frameworks: Observation of Acetylene-to-Alkyne and Carbon Dioxide-to-Amide Interactions. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 1098–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolotov, V.A.; Kovalenko, K.A.; Samsonenko, D.G.; Han, X.; Zhang, X.; Smith, G.L.; McCormick, L.J.; Teat, S.J.; Yang, S.; Lennox, M.J.; et al. Enhancement of CO2 Uptake and Selectivity in a Metal-Organic Framework by the Incorporation of Thiophene Functionality. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 5074–5082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demakov, P.A.; Volynkin, S.S.; Samsonenko, D.G.; Fedin, V.P.; Dybtsev, D.N. A Selenophene-Incorporated Metal-Organic Framework for Enhanced CO2 Uptake and Adsorption Selectivity. Molecules 2020, 25, 4396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ethiraj, J.; Bonino, F.; Vitillo, J.G.; Lomachenko, K.A.; Lamberti, C.; Reinsch, H.; Lillerud, K.P.; Bordiga, S. Solvent-Driven Gate Opening in Mof-76-Ce: Effect on CO2 Adsorption. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, H.D.; Nandi, S.; Chakraborty, D.; Singh, K.; Vinod, C.P.; Vaidhyanathan, R. Coordination Flexibility Aided CO2 -Specific Gating in an Iron Isonicotinate Mof. Chem. Asian J. 2022, 17, e202101305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, H.-Y.; Zhang, X.-M. Enhanced Selective CO2 Capture Upon Incorporation of Dimethylformamide in the Cobalt Metal–Organic Framework [CO3(OH)2(Btca)2]. Energy Fuels 2015, 30, 526–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah Khan, A.; Samuel, O.; Othman, M.H.D.; Younas, M.; Kamaludin, R.; Puteh, M.H.; Kurniawan, T.A.; Yinn Wong, K.; Kadirkhan, F.; Yoshida, N. Enhancing CO2 Adsorption Selectivity of Mof-199: Investigating the Synergistic Effect of Mg Metal Doping and Polyethyleneimine Impregnation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 347, 127511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Tian, J.; Thallapally, P.K.; McGrail, B.P. Selective CO2 Capture from Flue Gas Using Metal–Organic Frameworks―A Fixed Bed Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 9575–9581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Remy, T.; Peter, S.A.; Van der Perre, S.; Valvekens, P.; De Vos, D.E.; Baron, G.V.; Denayer, J.F.M. Selective Dynamic CO2 Separations on Mg-Mof-74 at Low Pressures: A Detailed Comparison with 13×. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 9301–9310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Benin, A.I.; Jakubczak, P.; Willis, R.R.; LeVan, M.D. CO2/H2O Adsorption Equilibrium and Rates on Metal-Organic Frameworks: Hkust-1 and Ni/Dobdc. Langmuir 2010, 26, 14301–14307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, S.; Shao, Y.; Zhong, W. Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Bimetallic Mg-Ca/Dobdc Metal—Organic Frameworks as a High Stability CO2 Adsorbent. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 474, 145018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rafati Jolodar, A.; Abdollahi, M.; Fatemi, S.; Mansoubi, H. Enhancing Carbon Dioxide Separation from Natural Gas in Dynamic Adsorption by a New Type of Bimetallic Mof; MIL-101(Cr-Al). Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 334, 125990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, V.N.; Nguyen, V.C.; Nguyen, H.T.; Tran, H.D.; Tu, T.N.; Kim, W.-S.; Kim, J. Facile Synthesis of Bimetallic Mil-100(Fe, Al) for Enhancing CO2 Adsorption Performance. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2023, 360, 112716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, R.; Ren, X.; Feng, X.; Li, X.; Hu, C.; Wang, B. A Highly Stable Metal- and Nitrogen-Doped Nanocomposite Derived from Zn/Ni-ZIF-8 Capable of CO2 Capture and Separation. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 6894–6897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raptopoulou, C.P. Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthetic Methods and Potential Applications. Materials 2021, 14, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jampaiah, D.; Shah, D.; Chalkidis, A.; Saini, P.; Babarao, R.; Arandiyan, H.; Bhargava, S.K. Bimetallic Copper-Cerium-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks for Selective Carbon Dioxide Capture. Langmuir 2024, 40, 9732–9740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abid, H.R.; Rada, Z.H.; Li, Y.; Mohammed, H.A.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Arandiyan, H.; Tan, X.; Liu, S. Boosting CO2 Adsorption and Selectivity in Metal-Organic Frameworks of MIL-96(Al) Via Second Metal Ca Coordination. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 8130–8139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cui, P.; Tang, Y.; Guo, A.; Wang, C.; Liu, M.; Peng, W.; Yu, F. Enhanced CO2 Adsorption Properties with Bimetallic Znce-Mof Prepared Using a Microchannel Reactor. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2024, 19, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denning, S.; Majid, A.A.; Lucero, J.M.; Crawford, J.M.; Carreon, M.A.; Koh, C.A. Metal-Organic Framework Hkust-1 Promotes Methane Hydrate Formation for Improved Gas Storage Capacity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 53510–53518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, C.H.; Babarao, R.; Hill, M.R. A Route to Drastic Increase of CO2 Uptake in Zr Metal Organic Framework Uio-66. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 3634–3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, R.; Shen, W.; Yang, Z.; Jin, H.; Chai, W.; Guo, X.; Ge, H.; Jin, D. Enhanced CO2 Adsorption in Cux-Mof-5: Optimal Doping and Regeneration Performance. Mater. Today Sustain. 2025, 31, 101181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mutyala, S.; Yu, Y.-D.; Jin, W.-G.; Wang, Z.-S.; Zheng, D.-Y.; Ye, C.-R.; Luo, B. CO2 Capture Using Amine Incorporated Uio-66 in Atmospheric Pressure. J. Porous Mater. 2019, 26, 1831–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pirzadeh, K.; Esfandiari, K.; Ghoreyshi, A.A.; Rahimnejad, M. CO2 and N2 Adsorption and Separation Using Aminated Uio-66 and Cu3(Btc)2: A Comparative Study. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 37, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaikwad, S.; Kim, Y.; Gaikwad, R.; Han, S. Enhanced CO2 Capture Capacity of Amine-Functionalized Mof-177 Metal Organic Framework. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jun, H.J.; Yoo, D.K.; Jhung, S.H. Metal-Organic Framework (Mof-808) Functionalized with Ethyleneamines: Selective Adsorbent to Capture CO2 under Low Pressure. J. CO2 Util. 2022, 58, 101932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, H.Y.; Lee, G.; Jhung, S.H. Selective CO2 Adsorption over a Zr-Based Metal–Organic Framework Functionalized with Tris(2-Aminoethyl)Amine. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 494, 153072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esfahani, H.J.; Shahhosseini, S.; Ghaemi, A. Improved Structure of Zr-Btc Metal Organic Framework Using NH2 to Enhance CO2 Adsorption Performance. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 17700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quan, W.; Holmes, H.E.; Zhang, F.; Hamlett, B.L.; Finn, M.G.; Abney, C.W.; Kapelewski, M.T.; Weston, S.C.; Lively, R.P.; Koros, W.J. Scalable Formation of Diamine-Appended Metal-Organic Framework Hollow Fiber Sorbents for Postcombustion CO2 Capture. JACS Au 2022, 2, 1350–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hughes, R.; Yancy-Caballero, D.; Zamarripa-Perez, M.; Omell, B.; Matuszewski, M.; Bhattacharyya, D. Modeling and Techno-Economic Optimization of a Tetraamine-Appended Metal–Organic Framework for Ngcc-Based CO2 Capture Using Fixed Bed Contactors. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 2511–2524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Z.; Godfrey, H.G.; da Silva, I.; Cheng, Y.; Savage, M.; Tuna, F.; McInnes, E.J.; Teat, S.J.; Gagnon, K.J.; Frogley, M.D.; et al. Modulating Supramolecular Binding of Carbon Dioxide in a Redox-Active Porous Metal-Organic Framework. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.M.; Yoo, D.K.; Jhung, S.H. Selective CO2 Adsorption over Functionalized Zr-Based Metal Organic Framework under Atmospheric or Lower Pressure: Contribution of Functional Groups to Adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 402, 126254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finsy, V.; Ma, L.; Alaerts, L.; De Vos, D.E.; Baron, G.V.; Denayer, J.F.M. Separation of CO2/CH4 Mixtures with the MIL-53(Al) Metal–Organic Framework. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 120, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Y.; Ji, C.; Lou, Y.; Li, R.; He, M.; Yuan, D.; Han, Z. Topology-Directed Cage Engineering in Mofs for Efficient C2H2/CO2/C2H4 Separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 19262–19271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Liu, J.; Hu, J. Effects of Functional Groups for CO2 Capture Using Metal Organic Frameworks. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2020, 15, 437–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S.; Suresh, V.M.; Maji, T.K. Self-Cleaning Mof: Realization of Extreme Water Repellence in Coordination Driven Self-Assembled Nanostructures. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 2251–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.; Yu, C.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Ye, K.-Y. Introducing Alkyl Chains to Realize the Construction of Superhydrophobic/Superoleophilic Mofs and the Transformation from Three-Dimensional to Two-Dimensional Structure. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2024, 11, 1123–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudhari, A.K.; Mukherjee, S.; Nagarkar, S.S.; Joarder, B.; Ghosh, S.K. Bi-Porous Metal–Organic Framework with Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Channels: Selective Gas Sorption and Reversible Iodine Uptake Studies. CrystEngComm 2013, 15, 9465–9471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, D.K.; Jhung, S.H. Selective CO2 Adsorption at Low Pressure with a Zr-Based Uio-67 Metal–Organic Framework Functionalized with Aminosilanes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 8856–8865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham, T.; Space, B. Insights into the Gas Adsorption Mechanisms in Metal-Organic Frameworks from Classical Molecular Simulations. Top. Curr. Chem. 2020, 378, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colon, Y.J.; Snurr, R.Q. High-Throughput Computational Screening of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5735–5749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, Z.; Zhang, K.; Jiang, J. In Silico Screening of 4764 Computation-Ready, Experimental Metal–Organic Frameworks for CO2 Separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 2105–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Chung, Y.G.; Snurr, R.Q. High-Throughput Screening of Metal-Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture in the Presence of Water. Langmuir 2016, 32, 10368–10376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, Z.; Peng, C.; Zhou, J.; Jiang, J. High-Throughput Computational Screening of 137953 Metal–Organic Frameworks for Membrane Separation of a CO2/N2/CH4 Mixture. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 15904–15912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, C.; Zhang, K. Computational Screening of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separation of CO2 and N2 from Wet Flue Gas. J. Mater. Sci. 2024, 59, 9371–9383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyd, P.G.; Chidambaram, A.; Garcia-Diez, E.; Ireland, C.P.; Daff, T.D.; Bounds, R.; Gladysiak, A.; Schouwink, P.; Moosavi, S.M.; Maroto-Valer, M.M.; et al. Data-Driven Design of Metal-Organic Frameworks for Wet Flue Gas CO2 Capture. Nature 2019, 576, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daglar, H.; Keskin, S. Recent Advances, Opportunities, and Challenges in High-Throughput Computational Screening of Mofs for Gas Separations. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 422, 213470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Zhang, K.; Yoo, H.; Lee, Y. Machine Learning-Driven Discovery of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Efficient CO2 Capture in Humid Condition. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 2872–2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mashhadimoslem, H.; Abdol, M.A.; Karimi, P.; Zanganeh, K.; Shafeen, A.; Elkamel, A.; Kamkar, M. Computational and Machine Learning Methods for CO2 Capture Using Metal-Organic Frameworks. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 23842–23875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]














| Name | Index | Conditions | Value | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRI-1 | CO2 adsorption | 298 K, 1 bar | 71.0 mg/g | [52] |
| Polymer-in-Cage ZIF-8 | CO2/N2 Selectivity | 298 K | 80 | [53] |
| Zn3 MOF | CO2/N2 Selectivity | 298 K, 1.0 bar | 4800 | [54] |
| Cu-F-pymo | CO2/N2 Selectivity | 298 K, 1.0 bar (15:85) | >107 | [55] |
| opt-UiO-66(Zr)-(OH)2 | CO2 adsorption | 298 K, 0.15 bar | 2.50 mmol/g | [56] |
| UU-201 | CO2 adsorption | 293 K, 1.0 bar | 3.52 mmol/g | [57] |
| MIL-120(Al)-AP | CO2/N2 Selectivity | 298 K, 0.1 bar (15:85) | 95 | [41] |
| MOF-801(Ce) | CO2 adsorption | 298 K, 1.0 bar | 3.30 mmol/g | [58] |
| Zn-TCPP-dmtrz | CO2 adsorption | 298 K, 1.0 bar | 2.61 mmol/g | [59] |
| bio-MOF-12 | CO2/N2 Selectivity | 298 K, 1.0 bar (10:90) | 52 | [60] |
| Qc-5-Cu | CO2 adsorption | 298 K, 1.0 bar | 2.48 mmol/g | [61] |
| UiO-66@PAN10 | CO2/N2 Selectivity | 298 K (15:85) | 17 | [62] |
| Strategy | Structure Before and After Doping | Index | Values Before and After Doping | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linker skeleton engineering | MFM-136 → MFM-126 | CO2/N2 selectivity | 37.0 → 65.4 | [63] |
| [Zn2(bdc)2(dabco)] → [Zn2(tdc)2(dabco)] | CO2 uptake | 46.0 → 67.4 cm3 g−1 | [64] | |
| [Zn2(bdc)2(dabco)] → [Zn2(sedc)2(dabco)] | CO2/CH4 selectivity | 11.9 → 15.1 | [65] | |
| Window-edge functionalization | DMOF-0F →DMOF-2F | CO2/N2 selectivity | 12.4 → 21.9 | [45] |
| bio-MOF-11 → bio-MOF-12 | CO2/N2 selectivity | 73 → 123 | [60] | |
| Flexibility/gate-opening control | MOF-76-Ce →MOF-76-Ce | CO2 uptake | 2.87 → 17.83 cm3 g−1 | [66] |
| closed-pore Fe(4-PyC)2(OH) → gate-open Fe(4-PyC)2(OH) | CO2/N2 selectivity | 325 → 3131 | [67] | |
| [Co3(OH)2(btca)2] → [Co3(OH)2(btca)2]·0.5DMF | CO2/N2 selectivity | 46.3 → 79.6 | [68] |
| Strategy | Structure Before and After Doping | Values Before and After Doping | Index | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Composition-balanced bimetallic synergy | Ni-MOF-74 → Ni1Co1-MOF-74 | 3.99 → 8.30 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [34] |
| MIL-100(Fe) → MIL-100(Fe, Al) | 2.60 → 3.27 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [75] | |
| ZIF-8-1000 → Zn/Ni-ZIF-8-1000 | 102 → 124 | CO2/N2 selectivity | [76] | |
| CPM-200-In/Mg → CPM-200-Fe/Mg | 190.9 → 207.6 cm3 g−1 | CO2 uptake | [77] | |
| Ce-BTC → CuCe-BTC-1:2 | 0.10 → 0.74 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [78] | |
| Heterometal substitution | MIL-96(Al) → MIL-96(Al)-Ca1 | 8.09 → 10.22 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [79] |
| MIL-101(Cr) → MIL-101(Cr-Al) | 1.82 → 4.2 | CO2/CH4 selectivity | [67] | |
| Zn-MOF → Zn Ce-MOF | 0.66 → 0.74 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [80] | |
| HKUST-1(Cu) → HKUST-1(Cu, Mg) | 12.02 → 16.66 | CO2/CH4 selectivity | [81] | |
| UiO-66(Zr) → Ti-exchanged UiO-66 | 2.3 → 4.0 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [82] | |
| MOF-5 → Cu0.05-MOF-5 | 3.52 → 4.61 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [83] |
| Material | CO2 Uptake (mmol/g) | Relative Adsorption Ratio * | CO2/N2 Selectivity ** | CO2/N2 Selectivity ** | −ΔHst (kJ/mol) *** | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| at 0.15 atm | at 1.0 atm | at 0.15 atm | at 1.0 atm | |||
| M808 | 0.29 | 1.38 | 0.21 | 72 | 40 | 34 |
| M808-EDTA | 0.33 | 1.46 | 0.23 | 80 | 48 | 40 |
| M808-EDTA-ED(0.6) | 0.22 | 1.23 | 0.18 | – | – | – |
| M808-EDTA-ED(1.2) | 0.13 | 0.63 | 0.2 | 23 | 19 | 24 |
| M808-EDTA-ED(1.8) | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.36 | – | – | – |
| M808-EDTA-ED-R(1.2) | 0.62 | 1.62 | 0.38 | 431 | 197 | 48 |
| SBET a (m2 g−1) | Vtotal b (cm3 g−1) | Qst (kJ mol−1) | Selectivity (Initial Slope) | Selectivity c (IAST) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMOF-0F | 949 | 0.41 | 19.3 | 8.4 | 12.4 |
| DMOF-1F | 1123 | 0.48 | 20.2 | 11.3 | 14.5 |
| DMOF-2F | 1225 | 0.48 | 23.3 | 14.8 | 21.9 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Pan, H.; Xu, L.; Xu, T.; Zhu, B. Metal–Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture: Improving Adsorption Performance Through Modification Methods. Nanomaterials 2026, 16, 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16080454
Pan H, Xu L, Xu T, Zhu B. Metal–Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture: Improving Adsorption Performance Through Modification Methods. Nanomaterials. 2026; 16(8):454. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16080454
Chicago/Turabian StylePan, Hongyu, Li Xu, Tong Xu, and Bin Zhu. 2026. "Metal–Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture: Improving Adsorption Performance Through Modification Methods" Nanomaterials 16, no. 8: 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16080454
APA StylePan, H., Xu, L., Xu, T., & Zhu, B. (2026). Metal–Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture: Improving Adsorption Performance Through Modification Methods. Nanomaterials, 16(8), 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16080454

