Next Article in Journal
A Coupled Refined Model of Atomistic and Continuum Parameters of Diatomic Covalent Bonds
Previous Article in Journal
Interface-Controlled GO–CoFe2O4–Silicone Nanocomposite with Magnetic and Adsorptive Functionality
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Zirconia Ceramics Doped with Ferrite for Solar Thermal Systems

1
Management and Economic Engineering Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Physics and Chemistry Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2026, 16(6), 346; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16060346
Submission received: 13 February 2026 / Revised: 6 March 2026 / Accepted: 10 March 2026 / Published: 11 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Solar Energy and Solar Cells)

Abstract

This paper investigates a ceramic material based on ferrite-doped zirconia intended for use as a solar absorber in systems designed for the conversion of solar energy into thermal energy. The experimental study details the synthesis procedure of the ferrite-doped zirconia ceramic and its structural, morphological, optical, and magnetic characterization using X-Ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), UV–Vis spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and optical band gap energy determination. XRD analysis confirms the presence of the crystalline ferrite phase, which is responsible for the enhanced solar absorption properties. UV–Vis investigations reveal intense absorption bands across the ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared regions, indicating high solar radiation absorptivity. These properties recommend the investigated ceramic as a promising solar receiver material for solar thermal power plants comparable to conventional materials such as carbides and nitrides.

1. Introduction

The growing global demand for energy and the negative environmental impact of fossil fuels necessitate the accelerated development of renewable energy sources. Among these, solar energy represents one of the most promising alternatives due to its inexhaustible nature, wide availability, and low environmental impact. The amount of solar energy reaching the Earth’s surface in a single hour exceeds the annual energy consumption of the entire global population, highlighting the exceptional potential of this resource [1]. However, the main challenge remains the efficient and cost-effective conversion of solar radiation into usable energy. Modern solar technologies include photovoltaic cells, solar thermal systems, and photocatalytic applications. Among these, solar thermal systems are distinguished by their ability to directly convert solar radiation into thermal energy, which can be exploited in residential as well as industrial, medical, desalination, and environmental purification applications. The performance of these systems critically depends on the properties of the solar receiver material, particularly its ability to efficiently absorb solar radiation and to withstand high temperatures.
Solar energy is one of the most promising options of renewable energy available for obtaining a considerable amount of energy, producing electricity and heat without polluting the earth, reducing carbon emissions and replacing fossil fuels.
Solar absorbers are key components of the performance of various solar thermal systems such as thermal power plants and solar thermo-photovoltaics. Theoretical analysis indicates that the ideal solar absorbers are black materials.
The ideal solar absorber would be a single material that absorbs visible light and converts it into heat [2,3,4]. High-tech approaches in this field indicate that the main problem lies in the optimizing of the absorption.
In this context, various metallic and ceramic materials have been investigated for applications as solar receivers. The best performances have been obtained by oxide ceramics, such as alumina, Al2O3, and zirconia, ZrO2, due to their excellent thermal behavior at high temperatures, high oxidation stability and extremely low-cost processing methods [5,6]. Alumina is a white ceramic material with excellent thermal properties and oxidation resistance, but it has a poor absorption of solar radiation, which negatively affects the efficiency of the absorber materials and the entire solar panel system. Alumina (Al2O3) was extensively studied as a solar receiver material because it offers excellent chemical stability but exhibits low solar absorptance due to its white coloration [7].
Ceramic materials stand out due to their thermal stability, oxidation resistance, durability, and superior reliability at elevated temperatures. Among non-oxide materials, silicon carbide (SiC)- [8] and aluminum nitride (AlN)-based composites [9] have exhibited high solar absorptance; however, their application is limited by poor oxidation resistance, high synthesis costs, and the need for special processing conditions.
In recent years, research efforts have increasingly focused on oxide-based ceramics with enhanced solar absorptance as a viable alternative to non-oxide materials [10]. These materials offer major advantages, including low production costs, high thermal stability, chemical inertness, and superior oxidation resistance. Furthermore, reducing the cost of the solar receiver is essential as it accounts for approximately 20–30% of the total cost of a solar thermal system.
Zirconia (ZrO2) is an oxide ceramic of major importance due to its high melting point, thermal stability, oxidation resistance, excellent mechanical properties, and ability to work in severe conditions and it is widely used in a broad range of industrial and technological applications [6]. However, pure zirconia exhibits low solar absorptance, which is primarily limited to the ultraviolet region, thereby restricting its direct use in photothermal applications. They are the absorber materials of the future for the production of energy from concentrated solar radiation with high efficiency and durability. Consequently, the development of zirconia-based ceramics with enhanced solar absorptance represents a current and highly relevant research direction in the field of functional materials for solar energy applications.
Despite the attractive characteristics of these oxides, they do not have the ability to absorb solar radiation and lack sufficient performance to transform it into thermal or electrical energy because of poor optical properties and low thermo-solar efficiency [6]. One of the attempts to reduce the impact these disadvantages of zirconia ceramics is to produce them in black color [2].
On the other hand, varied techniques were used to produce materials used as solar absorbers such as plasma sintering, hot pressing, chemical vapor deposition, self-propagating combustion synthesis and others [11]. These techniques are complicated and require very expensive raw materials. For example, solar absorbers such as SiC, AlN and other composites require high temperature for their sintering (above 2000–2200 °C) and complicated techniques (hot pressing, plasma sintering, and special furnaces operating in an inert atmosphere [12]). In addition, zirconia-based composites have offered promising optical, thermal and mechanical properties compared to SiC- and Al2O3-based ceramics.
The development of a rapid and efficient method for the synthesis of black solar absorbers has become a necessity in this area. Oxide ceramics are not expensive compared to non-oxide ceramics [10]. In contrast, sintering is a simple and low-cost method. From an industrial point of view, the sintering and sol–gel processes are suitable and preferred as preparation methods of advanced materials with high efficiency and low cost.
The high costs and the complicated processing methods of carbide- and nitride-based absorber materials recommend black zirconia as a promising material for high-temperature solar receivers with high efficiency and durability [13].
The main problems of black zirconia ceramics prepared by different synthesis methods are that (i) the phase structure of black ceramics is disordered such that it leads to drastic changes in volume, cracks, and involves the reduction of mechanical properties; and (ii) instability at high temperature and poor color saturation [14].
Zirconia has three polymorphic forms: monoclinic, tetragonal and cubic crystalline phases. At higher temperatures (>1150 °C) zirconia undergoes a tetragonal to monoclinic transformation which is characterized by volume expansion (4%) and the formation of microcracks in zirconia compacts upon cooling. By incorporating of stabilizing dopants such as Y2O3, CeO2, MgO, and CaO, the tetragonal and cubic polymorphs in zirconia are retained upon cooling and the microcrackings are reduced. Zirconia stabilized with 15–24% MgO is comparatively cheaper compared with other oxides; for example, ZrO2–Y2O3 (with 7–8% Y2O3). The fabrication of crack-free zirconia compacts with in situ MgO doping reveals that MgO nanoparticles cause a reduction of the stress and cracking [15].
Recent studies have demonstrated that doping zirconia with metal oxides such as Fe2O3 and MnO2 leads to the formation of black ceramics with high solar absorptance, achieved through simple and cost-effective processing methods. Achieving bulk blackening of zirconia not only enhances the efficiency of solar radiation absorption but also improves its thermal and mechanical properties, which are essential for applications in solar thermal systems.
Functional analysis reveals that the effectiveness of Fe2O3 is determined not only by band gap or electron affinity but also by adaptability to the device, charge transport and phase stability [16,17].
In this study, iron trioxide was selected for the blackening of zirconia because it can produce ferrite in the host matrix. In this context, the present study aims to develop a black zirconia material having the 40Fe2O3·60[ZrO2·MgO] composition in the mole % with advanced crystallinity and desired phases that provide the color intensity required in solar thermal applications. The preparation of ferrite-doped zirconia was realized by solid-state reactions at high temperatures. The structural and optical characterization of prepared materials were realized by X-Ray diffraction (XRD), micrographs SEM, ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy.

2. Experimental Procedure

The solar absorber was obtained in the form of a ZrO2–MgO-based ceramic doped with 40% Fe2O3. For comparative purposes, an undoped ZrO2–MgO reference ceramic was also prepared. Both ceramic systems, ZrO2–MgO–Fe2O3 and ZrO2–MgO, were synthesized using the high-temperature solid-state reaction method, employing high-purity analytical-grade metal oxides (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Loius, MO, USA) as the starting materials.
For the synthesis of the ZrO2–MgO ceramic doped with 40 mole % Fe2O3, appropriate amounts of powders were accurately weighed using an analytical balance: 0.4563 g ZrO2, 0.1492 g MgO, and 0.3945 g Fe2O3. The powders were homogenized by fine grinding in an agate mortar, followed by additional milling in a ball mill. The resulting mixture was uniaxially pressed into pellets with a thickness of approximately 2 mm and a diameter of 9 mm using a 50 t hydraulic press. The pellets were placed in an alumina crucible and sintered in an electric furnace at 1400 °C for a dwell time of 1 h. After sintering, the samples were rapidly cooled by removing the crucible from the furnace and transferring the pellets onto a stainless-steel plate at room temperature. In order to prepare the ZrO2–MgO reference ceramic, 0.7335 g ZrO2 and 0.2465 g MgO were used. Figure 1 shows a typical process flow chart outlining all the steps along with the starting process time.
After sintering, a clear color change was observed, from white for the undoped ceramic to black for the Fe2O3-doped samples, indicating the formation of absorbing phases responsible for the enhanced solar absorptance [18].
The crystalline or amorphous characteristics of the synthesized samples were investigated using a Rigaku X ray diffractometer (Hong Kong, China) equipped with a graphite monochromator and a copper anode tube (λ = 1.54 Å). UV–VIS spectra were recorded with a UV–VIS spectrometer of Perkin–Elmer Lambda 45 type (Waltham, MA, USA), equipped with an integrating sphere and an accuracy of the wavelength of ±2 nm. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements were conducted in the X-band frequency range (9.52 GHz) using a Bruker ELEXSYS 500 spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA).

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. The Investigation of the Structural Properties of Ceramic Materials by X-Ray Diffraction (Xrd)

The X-ray diffraction patterns of the obtained ceramic samples are presented in Figure 2. XRD analysis reveals the presence of the following crystalline phases in the zirconia-based ceramic structure: ZrO2 with monoclinic and tetragonal structures, MgO with a cubic structure, and the MgFe2O4 (ferrite) phase with a cubic structure. The introduction of high iron oxide contents, up to 40 mol%, into the ZrO2–MgO ceramic matrix leads to a progressive reduction of the crystalline MgO phase and the emergence of the MgFe2O4 crystalline phase. The magnesium ferrite MgFe2O4 crystalline phase have overlaps in XRD with the Fe3O4 crystalline phase (see Figure S1). The presence of the ferrite phase accounts for the chromatic transition of the ceramic from white to black.
The parameter of the unit cell, (a, b, c), proportion of phases and the effective crystallite mean size, Deff (nm), were determined using a Rietveld refinement which provide a more reliable evaluation of crystallite size and phase fractions. The crystal structure parameters obtained by Warren-Averbach Fourier analysis by using the POWDER CELL 2.3 computational program are listed in Table 1.
Table 1 also presents the values of the average particle size for all crystalline phases of the prepared material considering both individual ferrite phases. For the iron sample, the average particle size ranges from 27.01 to 80.87 nm. The particle size of the ferrite crystalline phase is responsible of photothermal conversion. These values indicate that the ferrite phase consists of nanometer-sized crystallites which contribute to the optical and magnetic properties of ceramic material. Consequently, a ceramic absorber with average particle sizes below 100 nm was obtained, a feature that is important for enhancing solar absorption properties.
The contents of monoclinic zirconia, tetragonal zirconia and MgFe2O4 phases were found to be 65%, 6.8% and 28.2%, respectively.
The volume fraction of monoclinic zirconia, R, can also be estimated using the calculation of the intensity ratio described from the quantitative analysis of the monoclinic and tetragonal zirconia system by XRD [19]. For the monoclinic, the used XRD peaks for (111) planes are located at 28.2° and 31.5°, while for tetragonal phase, the peak is labeled at 30.2°.
R = I m ( 28.2 0 ) + I m ( 31.5 0 ) I m ( 28.2 0 ) + I m ( 31.5 0 ) + I m ( 30.2 0 )
Volume fraction, R, for monoclinic zirconia is estimated at 68.55%.
Spinels have two main metal–oxygen vibrational bands in IR spectra and they can be differentiated by these. The Fe3O4 crystalline phase shows the higher frequency A-site vibrations of around 570–580 cm−1 and lower frequency B-site vibrations of around 380–400 cm−1. For the MgFe2O4 phase, the Mg2+ on A-site shifts the A-site IR band downward to 540–560 cm−1 while B-site IR band can shift upward slightly to 410–430 cm−1. For our sample, three individual IR bands centered at about 425, 432 and 540 cm−1 appear comparatively with host matrix (see Figure 3) which can be assigned with the formation of the MgFe2O4 crystalline phase. The intensity of the IR bands situated between 380 and 400 cm−1 do not change by doping with iron (III) oxide. The intensity of IR bands centered at about 580 cm−1 was increased by the addition of iron (III) oxide. The results can be associated with the presence of a mixed ferrite phase in the zirconia matrix.
At 1400 degrees under air atmosphere, the stabilization of magnetite (Fe3O4) is thermodynamically unfavorable, whereas the formation of MgFe2O4 in the presence of MgO is expected. A detailed study of both crystalline phases is discussed in the Supplementary Information (see Table S1).
Numerous studies have demonstrated that the suspension of solid particles in fluids leads to an increase in their thermal conductivity, which in turn enhances heat transfer efficiency [20,21]. In the past, fluids containing micron-sized or larger particles exhibited significant drawbacks, such as particle sedimentation, channel blockage, and equipment wear [4,22]. To overcome these limitations, the use of nanoparticles was proposed, giving rise to a new class of fluids with enhanced thermal conductivity. With the rapid development of nanotechnology, nanoparticles with sizes below 100 nm have been produced, enabling the formation of stable suspensions and the improvement of the thermal properties of the base fluid [23,24]. Furthermore, it has been shown that the addition of small concentrations of metallic or metal oxide nanoparticles to a fluid can significantly increase its thermal conductivity.
In conclusion, magnesium oxide enters in the form of a solid solution and can contribute to the host structure with a dual role as a stabilizer of monoclinic zirconia and as a ferrite former. The prepared absorber material consisting of nanoparticles smaller than 100 nm can be recommended for use as a nanofluid in photothermal energy conversion systems.

3.2. Infrared (Ir) Spectra

Infrared spectra of the prepared samples are shown in Figure 3. In the ZrO2–MgO ceramics, the broadening IR bands located in the region between 360 and 750 cm−1 are attributed to the presence of the ZrO2 crystalline phases with monoclinic and tetragonal structures (~600 cm−1) [25]. The IR band located at about 520 cm−1 can be correlated to the stretching vibrations of Mg–O bonds and the bending vibrations of O–Mg–O angles, and overlap with the stretching vibrations of Fe–O bonds. The IR bands located at about 435 and 580 cm−1 correspond to the Fe–O vibrations from [FeO6] and [FeO4] structural units.
By adding iron trioxide in the host matrix, typical IR bands of ferrite and zirconia appear. The first IR bands situated in the range between 350 and 470 cm−1 show some splitting due to the ferrite crystalline phase. In ferrite, the characteristic absorption bands of the tetrahedral complexes are higher than that of the corresponding octahedral modes. The IR band evidenced at around 410 cm−1 corresponds to the octahedral of ferrite and the split into sub-bands observed at 425 and 435 cm−1 are assigned to the tetrahedral band position. The absorption bands assigned to tetrahedral metal ions can be seen at 535, 665 and 725 cm−1. The presence of Fe2+ ions in ferrites can produce the splitting of the absorption bands or can cause new shoulders. These structural evolutions can be due to the Jahn Teller distortion caused by Fe2+ ions and local deformations in the crystal fields.
The second region of IR bands centered at about 540 and 580 cm−1 are associated with stretching vibrations of Zr–O bonds in the monoclinic and tetragonal ZrO2 crystalline phases. The intensity of the last band increases by doping with Fe2O3, suggesting the improvement of the host matrix with the tetragonal ZrO2 phase in agreement with the XRD analysis. This evolution can be explained considering that MgO plays the role of a stabilizer of zirconia.
The covalency of the Fe–O bond is stronger than that of the Zr–O or Mg–O bond because the values of the electronegativities for Fe, Zr, Mg and O are 1.8, 1.4, 1.2 and 3.5. By adding an excess of oxygen in the host matrix, iron has a higher affinity to attract oxygen atoms and to produce [FeO4] and [FeO6] structural units than that of its analogs. The accommodation of the lattice with oxygen atoms occurs through the formation of higher-coordination iron which results in the appearance of the ferrite crystalline phase. Further, the excess of oxygen will be responsible for the stabilization of the tetragonal zirconia phase. These mechanisms explain the partial conversion of the monoclinic into the tetragonal zirconia phase.
In conclusion, the magnesium–zirconia system is converted in iron–magnesium–zirconia systems by doping with higher Fe2O3 content. The addition of an excess of oxygen in the host matrix implies two mechanisms: (i) the formation of octahedral and tetrahedral [FeOn] structural units due to the higher affinity of iron towards oxygen which produce the ferrite crystalline phase; and (ii) the increase in fractions of the tetragonal ZrO2 crystalline phase by the diminishing of the monoclinic zirconia phase. The system behaves as a magnesium–zirconia glass ceramic enriched with ferrite.

3.3. Characterization of the Optical Properties of Zirconia Ceramics

Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the Uv–Vis absorption and reflectance spectra of the prepared ceramic products.
From the UV–Vis absorption spectrum recorded in the 300–800 nm range for the ZrO2–MgO ceramic, a distinct absorption band is observed, with a maximum located at 235 nm in the ultraviolet region. This UV–Vis band is attributed to O2− → Zr4+ charge-transfer transitions in zirconia [26]. Zirconia absorbs exclusively in the ultraviolet region, which makes it inefficient for harvesting solar radiation in the visible range [27]. In this region, a maximum optical absorption of approximately 56% is obtained, with no significant absorption bands observed in the visible domain.
The addition of Fe2O3 to the zirconia matrix significantly modifies the UV–Vis absorption characteristics of the ceramic. As a result, broader absorption bands appear in the 250–800 nm range. The UV–Vis band centered at approximately 388 nm, with an optical absorbance of 77%, is attributed to isolated Fe3+ ions located in sites with an octahedral coordination. The intense UV–Vis band at 460 nm corresponds to electronic transitions of Fe3+ ions located in distorted octahedral geometries, while the band in the 585–785 nm range originates from electronic transitions of Fe3+ ions arranged in both octahedral and tetrahedral geometries with oxygen ions [28]. The strong and extended absorption in the ultraviolet and visible regions is attributed to direct O2− → Fe3+ charge-transfer transitions in the UV region and to 3d → 3d electronic transitions of Fe3+ ions in the visible region.
Fe3+ ions located in octahedral geometries involve t2g → eg electronic transitions, generating UV–Vis bands in the 850–1100 nm range. The increase in the intensity of UV–Vis bands in the 300–1100 nm range can be correlated with the presence of both Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions, as well as with the formation of the MgFe2O4 ferrite crystalline phase.
Consequently, the addition of Fe2O3 leads to a maximum optical absorption of approximately 80% in the visible light region, highlighting the beneficial role of iron (III) oxide in enhancing the optical properties of the black ceramic [29].
A similar trend of improved solar light absorption for iron-containing ceramics can also be observed from the diffuse reflectance spectra shown in Figure 6.
The Fe2O3-based ceramic exhibited lower diffuse reflectance values over the entire 200–1100 nm range compared to the undoped sample. In the visible region, the ferrite-doped ceramic showed a maximum reflectance of 21.27%, compared to 28.97% for the undoped ceramic. In the ultraviolet region, the maximum diffuse reflectance values were 3.59% and 6.36% for the doped and undoped samples, respectively. In the infrared region (at 1100 nm), the maximum reflectance values were 24.24% for the doped ceramic and 51.37% for the undoped ceramic.
These results indicate that the addition of iron (III) oxide significantly enhances solar light absorption in the visible and infrared regions compared to the undoped ceramic, which absorbs efficiently only in the ultraviolet region. Consequently, ferrite-doped ceramics can be considered efficient solar absorber materials with high potential for solar energy harvesting applications.
In the literature data, the black ZrO2/Fe2O3/MnO2 composites with 10–30 wt % Fe2O3 were prepared by the sintering method at a temperature of 1700 °C for 2 h [10]. The ZrO2/MgO/Fe2O3 ceramics with 40 mole% Fe2O3 are produced by high temperature solid-state reactions which combine the sintering method with the melt quenching method at a temperature of 1400 °C for 1 h. Our sample was produced at high efficiency with low processing costs.

3.4. Estimation of the Optical Band Gap Energy of the Prepared Material

The optical band gap energy (Eg) values can be determined from plots of (αhν)n versus , where n = 1/2 corresponds to indirect transitions and n = 2 corresponds to direct transitions [27]. The corresponding plots for the ferrite-based ceramic, (αhν)1/2 or (αhν)2 versus , are shown in Figure 6. Both direct and indirect band gaps for multiphase ceramic systems are generally determined by the present of the individual phases or by the modifications in composition (for example, in doping).
The values of Eg were estimated from the extrapolation of the tangent fit of these curves corresponding to the edge of fundamental absorption. The error of the estimated Eg values can be between 0.5 and 1 eV [30].
The optical band gap energy of the ferrite-doped ceramic was determined to be Eg = 1.81 eV for indirect transitions and Eg = 1.96 eV for direct transitions. These values indicate a semiconducting behavior [31], as the optical band gap energy is lower than 3 eV, a characteristic that is relevant for photothermal applications.
For the ZrO2–MgO ceramic, the optical band gap energy values were determined to be 4.1 eV (for n = 1/2) and 4.7 eV (for n = 2). The significant reduction in the band gap energy to 1.81 eV (indirect transitions) and 1.96 eV (direct transitions) in the case of the iron-ion-doped ceramic can be attributed to increased octahedral distortions and Fe–O rearrangements of octahedral molecular orbitals.
These band gap modifications also contribute to the enhanced solar light absorption observed for the iron-containing ceramic.

3.5. Photoluminescence (Pl) Spectra of the Studied Samples

The PL spectra recorded for undoped and doped zirconia ceramics are indicated in Figure 7. The PL spectra reveal distinct emission characteristics which reflect the influence of Fe2O3 content on lattice modifications and the defect chemistry on ferrite structure. An inspection of photoluminescence spectra of the undoped and doped zirconia ceramics suggests an abrupt decrease by adding Fe2O3 content in the host matrix. This evolution is expected due to the change in the crystallite sizes in agreement with XRD data or/and the accumulation of oxygen vacancy numbers.
The shape of the emission peaks seem to have the same similarities for both samples. The highest emission peak situated at 730 nm is caused by oxygen interstitials. The presence of iron atoms in this sample causes smaller photoluminescence and a decrease in luminescence intensity in the ZrO2–MgO–Fe2O3 sample. The position of the PL band shifts to the near-infrared wavelength region situated at 732 nm for the doped samples. This evolution leads to the conclusion that the photoluminescence mechanism in iron–zirconia ceramic is different from that of zirconia ceramic. The photoluminescence intensity in the near-infrared region is more dominated because it is associated with radioactive recombination.
In conclusion, by doping with iron trioxide, the decline in luminescence can be due to the formation of secondary phase (ferrite crystalline phases) and pronounced microstructural changes.

3.6. Structural Characterization by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (Epr) Spectroscopy

Iron ions can exist in ceramics in the +2 or +3 oxidation states. However, only Fe3+ ions generate EPR signals due to their 3d5 electronic configuration [32]. Fe3+ ions possess unpaired electrons in their 3d orbital configuration and thus exhibit paramagnetic properties.
The EPR spectra of iron (III) oxide used as a raw material and of iron-based zirconia ceramics are presented in Figure 8.
In the case of iron (III) oxide powder, a resonance line centered at a gyromagnetic factor, g~2, is observed, which is characteristic of isolated Fe3+ ions arranged in octahedral geometries with a weak crystal field or presented as clustered entities [33]. The narrower signal at g~2 indicates weakly interacting Fe+3 ions. The dramatic broadening of the signal in the iron-based ceramic shows the formation of spinel ferrite, ferromagnetic ordering and strong superexchange interactions.
For the ZrO2–MgO–Fe2O3-based ceramic, a broad and strong resonance signal centered at g~2.22 was detected. Line width and value of gyromagnetic factor, g, are influenced by magnetic dipolar and superexchange interactions. This signal is assigned to the clustered Fe3+ ions too.
Strong dipolar interactions give large values of gyromagnetic factor, g, and peak-to-peak line width (Hpp), whereas strong superexchange interactions give smaller values of g and Hpp. The increase in the value of the g and Hpp are, respectively, g~2.22 and Hpp = 1318 G for iron–zirconia ceramic when compared with Fe2O3 powder results in the improvement of dipol–dipol interactions. The shape and position of these absorption features suggest that in the case of the studied samples, the dipole–dipole interactions are predominant relative to superexchange interactions.
The EPR spectrum clearly differentiates the MgFe2O4 crystalline phase from the Fe3O4 crystalline phase. It shows a ferrimagnetic-type line with a broad signal, with g~2.0–2.22 and a peak-to-peak line width of Hpp~1318 G, is consistent with MgFe2O4 spinel formation, and shows no clear evidence of Fe3O4 mixed valence behavior. Furthermore, the line width of ~1318 G is very typical for MgFe2O4 nanoparticles. If Fe3O4 were dominant, a stronger asymmetry of a more collapsed broad line with intense superexchange interactions should be observed. That evolution favors the MgFe2O4 crystalline phase rather than the Fe3O4 crystalline phase.
In conclusion, zirconia–iron (III) oxide-based ceramics can be identified as a more cost-efficient alternative to other black absorbing materials, which typically require sintering temperatures above 2000 °C and highly demanding processing conditions. Iron-doped zirconia systems allow densification at significantly lower temperatures (approximately 1400 °C) using conventional air-fired furnaces, thereby reducing both energy consumption and technological complexity.

3.7. Structural Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Based on the obtained results, the ceramic material prepared for photothermal system applications exhibits the following characteristics:
  • An average particle size below 90 nm.
  • An optical band gap energy, E g < 3   eV , that confers semiconducting properties.
  • An optical absorbance of approximately 80% in the visible light region.
  • A diffuse reflectance of about 20% in the visible region.
The developed product shows selectivity dependent on the type of ions present and indicates high efficiency as a solar absorber.
Figure 9 shows the SEM images of the structure of the prepared materials. The ZrO2-based ceramic was obtained via a solid-state reaction route at 1400 °C and is available in the form of disks with a diameter of 9 mm and a thickness of 2 mm. The SEM images show agglomerated grains with homogeneous regions and well-defined crystallites, with sizes below 100 nm, in agreement with the data obtained from XRD analysis.
The SEM images at high and low magnification show an increase in the irregular or parallelepiped agglomerates by the doping of iron (III) oxide in the host matrix. The average sizes of the agglomerates have a non-uniform and random dimensional distribution. The growth of agglomerates can be attributed to the diffusion of ions along grain boundaries, as the host matrix decreases in agglomerate size are associated with a reduction in crystallite boundary mobility. The smaller grains have an effect on the absorbance spectrum.
SEM images (Figure 9e) show that by doping, a shift in the pore size distribution to smaller values during the grain growth can be observed, which is favorable for densification. The diffusion of the iron ions corresponds to the crystallite boundary mobility.
The presence of micropores in the host matrix produces a decreasing trend in the absorption spectrum in the visible region. The microstructural modifications of the host network by doping and the presence of new crystalline phases are related to the quenching effect of the photoluminescence.
The adding of Fe2O3 to the ZrO2–MgO matrix results in a clear enhancement of absorbance, a decline of a photoluminescence and a change in the ceramic microstructure.

3.8. The Role of Nanofluids in Enhancing Thermal Efficiency and the Design of a Photothermal System Based on Ferrite-Doped Zirconia

Solar water heating systems utilize solar radiation energy to heat the working fluids, whose temperature increases, allowing this energy to be used for domestic purposes. In indirect systems, heat transfer occurs by natural convection, with thermal energy being transferred from the solar collector to the working fluid and subsequently to the domestic circuit through a heat exchanger. The low thermal conductivity of conventional working fluids limits the heat absorption and reduces heat transfer efficiency [34]. The most-used fluids are water and ethylene glycol, with thermal conductivities of 0.608 W·m−1·K−1 and 0.257 W·m−1·K−1, respectively [35]. Therefore, the thermophysical properties of the working fluid play a crucial role in heat transfer efficiency. The thermal conductivity of the base fluid can be enhanced by dispersing metallic or metal oxide nanoparticles with high thermal conductivity, leading to an increased heat transfer capability of the fluid.
The suspension of solid particles in fluids enhances the effective thermal conductivity and heat transfer efficiency, enabling a reduction in the size of heat exchange systems. Initially, the use of micron-sized suspended particles led to issues such as sedimentation, channel clogging, and equipment abrasion. In this context, nanofluids—fluids containing nanoparticles with sizes below 100 nm—were developed as a class of engineered fluids with enhanced thermal conductivity [36].
Studies have shown that the addition of small amounts of nanoparticles can significantly enhance the thermal conductivity of a fluid. For example, a copper-based nanofluid containing 10 nm particles exhibited a greater increase in thermal conductivity than an aluminum oxide nanofluid with 35 nm particles [37]. The thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol increased by 40% after the addition of 0.3 vol.% copper nanoparticles with an average diameter below 10 nm.
The proposal to enhance the thermal properties of fluids through the use of nanoparticles was introduced by Choi in 1995 [36], and since then, research has focused on the development of nanofluids with superior thermophysical properties, including thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, and viscosity [36]. Various types of nanoparticles have been investigated, including metals (Au, Ag, Cu, Al, and Fe), metal oxides (Al2O3, CuO, Fe3O4, SiO2, TiO2, and ZnO), carbides (SiC, TiC), and carbon-based materials (diamond, graphite, and carbon nanotubes) dispersed in base fluids such as water, water/ethylene glycol mixtures, ethylene glycol, and oils.
Table 2 presents a selection of nanofluids with low nanoparticle concentrations and the corresponding increases in thermal conductivity, demonstrating the potential of nanofluids to enhance heat transfer efficiency. For example, 0.3 vol.% copper nanoparticles dispersed in ethylene glycol increased the thermal conductivity by 40%, while 5 vol.% CuO nanoparticles in water resulted in an increase of approximately 60%.
However, not all studies report consistent enhancements in thermal conductivity. For example, an iron/ethylene glycol-based nanofluid containing 0.55 vol.% Fe nanoparticles exhibited an increase of 18%, whereas copper-based nanofluids showed increases of only 2% and 14% for nanoparticle concentrations of 0.1 vol.% and 0.55 vol.%, respectively [37]. These results suggest that Fe-based nanofluids may exhibit higher heat transfer efficiency than Cu-based ones, even though the intrinsic thermal conductivity of Fe crystals (80 W·m−1·K−1) is significantly lower than that of Cu (398 W·m−1·K−1).
Nanofluids containing ceramic nanoparticles generally exhibit more modest enhancements in thermal conductivity compared to metallic nanofluids. For instance, the addition of 1 vol.% Al2O3 nanoparticles resulted in an increase of only 4%, whereas the same volume fraction of TiO2 nanoparticles led to an increase of 14.4%, despite the fact that the thermal conductivity of TiO2 crystals (8.37 W·m−1·K−1) is lower than that of Al2O3 (77 W·m−1·K−1). The highest reported enhancement, exceeding 100%, was achieved using carbon nanotubes as nanoparticles. These results highlight the growing interest of the scientific community in nanofluids tailored for photothermal systems.
A photothermal system that employs Fe2O3-doped ZrO2 ceramics is proposed, combining two absorbing components within a single material, zirconia and ferrite, by ensuring efficient solar absorption and enhanced thermal conductivity. Modern photothermal systems utilize nanofluids to improve thermal efficiency, and the integration of a nanofluid circuit into an existing panel enables a reduction in the amount of absorbing material while maintaining low production costs through the simple replacement of the nanofluid (see Figure 10).
Photothermal systems incorporating a nanofluid circuit represent an advanced generation of solar thermal panels. The use of Fe2O3-doped ZrO2 ceramics as a nanofluid introduces a novel approach, enabling the development of innovative photothermal panels that are currently absent from the commercial market. This concept combines the functional properties of ceramic absorbers with the enhanced heat transfer performance of nanofluids. The nanofluid can be produced by the dispersion of the ceramic powder in water, followed by an ultrasonication process to ensure stable suspension [39].
In conclusion, the enhancement of the thermal conductivity is discussed only based on literature data. The development of a nanofluid and investigations regarding thermal conductivity of these materials represent a perspective for future research.

4. Conclusions

This paper presents the development and characterization of a new ceramic product based on black zirconia doped with ferrite, intended for use as a solar receiver in photothermal systems or as an active component in nanofluids. The structure and properties of the obtained ferrite-doped zirconia ceramic were investigated using X-Ray diffraction (XRD), UV–Vis spectroscopy, electron spin resonance (ESR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and optical band gap energy determination.
  • XRD analysis revealed the presence of monoclinic and tetragonal zirconia crystalline phases, as well as of crystalline phases of ferrite and magnesium oxide. The average particle size was below 90 nm.
  • SEM micrographs showed homogeneous regions with well-defined grains.
  • UV–Vis spectra indicated high absorption in the ultraviolet, visible, and infrared regions, with an absorption of about 80% and a less than 20% reflectance in the visible range.
  • The optical band gap energy values confirmed the semiconducting nature of the obtained ceramic.
  • Ferrite doping significantly improves the optical properties of zirconia compared to the undoped (white) zirconia, resulting in the recommendation of this material for solar absorber applications in photothermal panels.
  • EPR spectra revealed resonance lines characteristic of Fe3+ ions.
  • The implementation of a nanofluid circuit for future applications can reduce the amount of the required absorbing material and will enable the development of new innovative photothermal panels that are currently available on the market.
  • This study demonstrates the feasibility of using ferrite-doped zirconia as an efficient and versatile solar receiver material.
  • The obtained results provide a solid foundation for the development of next generation photothermal systems with enhanced absorption and reduced costs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano16060346/s1, Figure S1: The Fe3O4 or MgFe2O4 phase identification from X-ray powder diffraction data using MATCH! software for the ZrO2-MgO-Fe2O3 sample; Table S1: Some properties of the MgFe2O4 and Fe3O4.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-L.U., V.R. (Vasile Rednic) and E.C.; Methodology, M.-L.U., V.R. (Vasile Rednic) and F.L.; Validation, V.R. (Vasile Rednic) and F.L.; Investigation, V.R. (Vlad Rada), V.R. (Vasile Rednic), S.R., F.L. and E.C.; Resources, E.C.; Writing—original draft, V.R. (Vlad Rada) and M.-L.U.; Writing—review & editing, S.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This paper was supported by the “Nucleu project” 2022–2027 with the number PN 23240201.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict or interest.

References

  1. Silvestroni, L.; Sciti, D.; Zoli, L.; Balbo, A.; Zanot, F.; Orru, R.; Licheri, R.; Musa, C.; Mercatelli, L.; Sani, E. An overview of ultrrefractory ceramics for thermodynamic solar energy generation at high temperature. Renew. Energy 2019, 133, 1257–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bishop, A. Vacuum Deposition onto Webs, Film and Foils, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tian, Y.; Liu, X.; Ghanekar, A.; Chen, F.; Caractenuto, A.; Zheng, Y. Blackbody-cavity ideal absorbers for solar energy harvesting. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sani, E.; Mercatelli, L.; Sans, J.L.; Sciti, D. Optical properties of black and white ZrO2 for solar receiver applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2015, 140, 477–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mazzei, A.C.; Rodrigues, J.A. Alumina–mullite–zirconia composites obtained by reaction sintering, Part I: Microstructure and mechanical behavior. J. Mater. Sci. 2000, 35, 2807–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Theunissen, G.S.A.M.; Bouma, J.S.; Winnubst, A.J.A.; Burggraaf, A.J. Mechanical properties of ultrafine grained zirconia ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 4429–4438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, W.; Liu, W.; Yang, X. Fabrication of blak colored CuO–Al2O3–ZrO2 ceramics via heterogeneous nucleation method. Ceram. Int. 2012, 38, 2851–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mey, S.; Caliot, C.; Flamant, G.; Kribus, A.; Gray, Y. Optimization of high temperature SiC volumetric solar absorber. Energy Procedia 2014, 49, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, C.; Shi, J.; Geng, Z.; Ling, X. Polychromic Al–AlN cermet solar absorber coating with high absorption efficiency and excellent durability. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 144, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Besisa, D.H.A.; Ewais, E.M.M. Black zirconia composites with enhanced thermal, optical and mechanical performance for solar energy applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2021, 225, 111063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Besisa, D.H.A.; Ewais, E.M.M.; Ahmed, Y.M.Z. A comparative study of thermal conductivity and thermal emissivity of high temperature solar absorber of ZrO2/Fe2O3 and Al2O3/CuO ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 28252–28259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Besisa, D.H.A.; Ewais, E.M.M.; Ahmed, Y.M.Z.; Elhosiny, F.I.; Kuznetsov, D.V.; Fend, T. Densification and characterization of SiC-AlN composites for solar energy applications. Renew. Energy 2018, 129, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yoshitomi, Y.; Arahori, T.; Mori, K.; Etoh, S.; Nakagawa, K. Machinable Ceramic of Blackish Color Used in Probe Guides Comprises Solid Particles of Boron Nitride, Zirconia and Silicon Nitride, Sintering Aid Coloring Additive. U.S. Patent Number US 07160825 B2; Patent Publication Number US20050130829A1, 22 September 2004. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lv, H.; Bao, J.; Ruan, F.; Zhou, F.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Guo, W.; Zhang, Y.; Song, X.; An, S. Preparation and properties of black Ti-doped zirconia ceramics. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 6201–6208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chanudhri, S.G.; Samanta, R.; Kansara, A.M.; Rowthu, S. Facile colloidal route to prepare hierarchical micro–nanoporous MgO stabilized ZrO2. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 56896–56908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Suchikova, Y.; Nazarovets, S.; Konuhova, M.; Popov, A.I. Binary oxide ceramics (TiO2, ZnO, Al2O3, SiO2, CeO2, Fe2O3, and WO3) for solar cell applications: A comparative and bibliometric analysis. Ceramics 2025, 8, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maltoni, P.; Varvaro, G.; Yaacoub, N.; Barucca, G.; Murillo, J.P.M.; Tirabzonlu, J.; Laureti, S.; Fiorani, D.; Mathiue, R.; Omelyanchik, A.; et al. Structural and magnetic properties of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles in an α-Fe2O3 matrix. J. Phys. Chem. C 2024, 129, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, Z.; Sun, Q.; Hong, M. Reversible oxygen vacancy generation on black zirconia ceramic surfaces via laser modification for solar energy harvesting. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 8599–8606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Toraya, H.; Yoshimura, M.; Somiya, S. Calibration curve for quantitative analysis of the monoclinic–tetragonal ZrO2 system by X-ray diffraction. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1984, 67, C119–C121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ajeena, A.M.; Farkas, I.; Vig, P. Experimental approach on the effect of ZrO2/DW nanofluid on flat plate solar colletor thermal and energy efficiencies. Energy Rep. 2023, 10, 4733–4750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schlichting, K.W.; Padture, N.P.; Klemens, P.G. Thermal conductivity of dense and porous ytria–stabilized zirconia. J. Mater. Sci. 2001, 36, 3003–3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Eastman, J.A.; Choi, S.U.S.; Li, S.; Yu, W.; Thomson, L.J. Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 718–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, A. Thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Def. Sci. J. 2008, 58, 600–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rada, S.; Culea, E.; Rada, M. Novel ZrO2 based ceramics stabilized by Fe2O3, SiO2 and Y2O3. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2018, 696, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Poobalan, R.K.; Barshilia, H.C.; Basu, B. Recent trends and challenges in developing boride and carbide–based solar absorbers for concentrated solar power. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2022, 245, 11876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lv, H.; Bao, J.; Qi, S.; Jin, Q.; Guo, W. Optical and mechanical properties of purple zirconia ceramics. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2019, 7, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sani, E.; Sciti, D.; Capiani, C.; Silvestroni, L. Colored zirconia with high absorbance and solar selectivity. Scr. Mater. 2020, 186, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. He, D.; Wang, Z.; Ma, S.; Yang, L.; Tong, L.; Zhou, X.; Fan, T. Enhanced solar absorbance and infrared emittance in Co-doped BaTiO3. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2024, 44, 3824–3832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rada, S.; Unguresan, M.; Rada, M.; Cuibus, D.; Zhang, J.; Pengfei, A.; Suciu, R.; Bot, A.; Culea, E. Manganese–lead-lead dioxide glass ceramics as electrode materials. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, A3987–A3996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brik, M.G.; Srivastava, A.M.; Popov, A.I. A few common misconceptions in the interpretation of experimental spectroscopic data. Opt. Mater. 2022, 127, 112276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rada, S.; Unguresan, M.; Zagrai, M.; Popa, A. Structural, Optical, and Magnetic Studies of the Metallic Lead Effect on MnO2-Pb-PbO2 Vitroceramics. Materials 2022, 15, 8061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Piscoiu, D.N.; Rada, S.; Vermesan, H. Enhancing Electrochemical Properties of Vitreous Materials Based on CaO–Fe2O3–Fe–Pb and Recycled from Anodic Plate of a Spent Car Battery. Materials 2025, 18, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Karabulut, M.; Popa, A.; Grosan, C.B.; Ertap, H.; Yuksek, M.; Ozturk, S.T.; Stefan, R. On the structural features of iron–phosphate glasses by Raman and EPR: Observation of superparamagnetic behavior differences in HfO2 or CeO2 containing glasses. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1191, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Elsheikh, A.H.; Sharshir, S.W.; Mostafa, M.E.; Essa, F.A.; Ali, M.K.A. Applications of nanofluids in solar energy: A review of recent advances. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 3483–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yoo, D.H.; Hong, K.S.; Yang, H.S. Study of thermal conductivity of nanofluids for the application of heat transfer fluids. Thermochim. Acta 2007, 455, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Choi, S.U.S.; Eastman, J.A. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles, developments and applications of non-Newtonian flows. J. Heat Transf.-ASME 1995, 66, 99–105. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sezer, N.; Atieh, M.A.; Koç, M. A comprehensive review on synthesis, stability, thermophysical properties, and characterization of nanofluids. Powder Technol. 2019, 344, 404–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chamsa-ard, W.; Brundavanam, S.; Fung, C.C.; Fawcett, D.; Poinern, G. Nanofluid types, their synthesis, properties and incorporation in direct solar thermal collectors: A review. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ajith, K.; Muthuvijayan Enoch, I.V.; Brusly Solomon, A.; Pillai, A.S. Characterization of magnesium ferrite nanofluids for heat transfer applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 27, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The chart flow of the preparation of ceramic products.
Figure 1. The chart flow of the preparation of ceramic products.
Nanomaterials 16 00346 g001
Figure 2. X-Ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the prepared ceramic samples. All peaks of the Fe3O4 crystalline phase are overlapped with the diffraction peaks of the MgFe2O4 crystalline phase.
Figure 2. X-Ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the prepared ceramic samples. All peaks of the Fe3O4 crystalline phase are overlapped with the diffraction peaks of the MgFe2O4 crystalline phase.
Nanomaterials 16 00346 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of the zirconia ceramics.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of the zirconia ceramics.
Nanomaterials 16 00346 g003
Figure 4. UV–Vis spectra of undoped ZrO2–MgO ceramics and ZrO2–MgO ceramics doped with 40% Fe2O3.
Figure 4. UV–Vis spectra of undoped ZrO2–MgO ceramics and ZrO2–MgO ceramics doped with 40% Fe2O3.
Nanomaterials 16 00346 g004
Figure 5. UV–Vis reflectance spectrum of the prepared ceramics.
Figure 5. UV–Vis reflectance spectrum of the prepared ceramics.
Nanomaterials 16 00346 g005
Figure 6. Graphical representation of (a) (αhν)1/2 versus hν and (b) (αhν)2 versus for the ZrO2–MgO–Fe2O3 ceramic. The red line represents the extrapolation used to determine the optical band gap energy, Eg.
Figure 6. Graphical representation of (a) (αhν)1/2 versus hν and (b) (αhν)2 versus for the ZrO2–MgO–Fe2O3 ceramic. The red line represents the extrapolation used to determine the optical band gap energy, Eg.
Nanomaterials 16 00346 g006
Figure 7. PL spectra of the prepared samples.
Figure 7. PL spectra of the prepared samples.
Nanomaterials 16 00346 g007
Figure 8. EPR spectra of iron(III) oxide used as a raw material and of iron-based ceramics.
Figure 8. EPR spectra of iron(III) oxide used as a raw material and of iron-based ceramics.
Nanomaterials 16 00346 g008
Figure 9. SEM micrographs of the (a), (c) ZrO2–MgO, (b), (d) ZrO2–MgO–Fe2O3, and (e) ZrO2–MgO–Fe2O3 and ZrO2–MgO samples at 10 µm.
Figure 9. SEM micrographs of the (a), (c) ZrO2–MgO, (b), (d) ZrO2–MgO–Fe2O3, and (e) ZrO2–MgO–Fe2O3 and ZrO2–MgO samples at 10 µm.
Nanomaterials 16 00346 g009aNanomaterials 16 00346 g009b
Figure 10. Functional schematic of a photothermal system incorporating a nanofluid circuit. Adapted from Ref. [38].
Figure 10. Functional schematic of a photothermal system incorporating a nanofluid circuit. Adapted from Ref. [38].
Nanomaterials 16 00346 g010
Table 1. Lattice parameters (a, b and c) and effective crystallite mean size (Deff) of iron–zirconia ceramics.
Table 1. Lattice parameters (a, b and c) and effective crystallite mean size (Deff) of iron–zirconia ceramics.
Crystalline
Phase
Proportion
[%vol]
a
[Å]
b
[Å]
c
[Å]
β
[Degrees]
Deff
[nm]
MgFe2O428.28.39478.39478.3947 66.88
m—ZrO2655.15165.20205.312999.07780.87
t—ZrO26.83.60833.60835.1999 27.01
MgO6.64.18934.18934.1893 9.37
t—ZrO25.43.60713.60715.2114 26.21
m—ZrO244.45.14875.20165.311799.05888.2
Fe3O443.58.39538.39538.3953 73.9
Table 2. Thermal conductivity reported for different nanofluids [37,38]. The nanofluids were prepared by the dispersing of the nanoparticles in the working fluid and ultrasonic treatment.
Table 2. Thermal conductivity reported for different nanofluids [37,38]. The nanofluids were prepared by the dispersing of the nanoparticles in the working fluid and ultrasonic treatment.
NanoparticleParticle Size (nm)Working FluidNanoparticle
Concentrations (vol.%)
Thermal Conductivity
Enhancement (%)
Ag<100Water0.3–0.9from 30 la 50 °C
Ag100–500Ethylene glycol0.1–1.018
Cu50–100Apă0.124
Cu<10Ethylene glycol0.01–0.0541
Fe10Ethylene glycol0.1–0.5518
Al2O3650–1000Oil0.5–420
CuO100Water7.552
SiO212Ethylene glycol1–423
TiO215Water0.5–530
Carbon190Water4.4–7.7from 10 to 35 °C
Carbon nanotubes 25 nm × 50 µm, diameter 10 nmOil1150
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rada, V.; Ungureşan, M.-L.; Rednic, V.; Rada, S.; Lungu, F.; Culea, E. Zirconia Ceramics Doped with Ferrite for Solar Thermal Systems. Nanomaterials 2026, 16, 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16060346

AMA Style

Rada V, Ungureşan M-L, Rednic V, Rada S, Lungu F, Culea E. Zirconia Ceramics Doped with Ferrite for Solar Thermal Systems. Nanomaterials. 2026; 16(6):346. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16060346

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rada, Vlad, Mihaela-Ligia Ungureşan, Vasile Rednic, Simona Rada, Florin Lungu, and Eugen Culea. 2026. "Zirconia Ceramics Doped with Ferrite for Solar Thermal Systems" Nanomaterials 16, no. 6: 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16060346

APA Style

Rada, V., Ungureşan, M.-L., Rednic, V., Rada, S., Lungu, F., & Culea, E. (2026). Zirconia Ceramics Doped with Ferrite for Solar Thermal Systems. Nanomaterials, 16(6), 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16060346

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop