MoS2 Nanosheet/ZnO Nanowire-Functionalized Optical Fiber LSPR Biosensor for Sensitive Detection of 2,4-D Herbicide Residues
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Materials
2.2. Instruments and Measurements
2.3. Sensing Mechanism of the Probe
2.4. Fabrication Mechanism of the Probe
2.5. Simulation of Fiber Sensor Structure
2.6. Synthesis of AuNPs, MoS2-NSs, and ZnO-NWs
2.7. Immobilization of AuNPs, MoS2-NSs, and ZnO-NWs over Fiber Structure
2.8. Experimental Setup for 2,4-D Detection
2.9. Preparation of 2,4-D Detection
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Optimization of Optical Fiber Structure
3.2. Nanomaterial Characterization of the Fiber Probe
3.3. Analytical Performance and Calibration for ALP and 2,4-D Detection
| Number of Tapered Sections | Sensitivity |
|---|---|
| Four | 0.876 nm/(mg/L) |
| Five | 0.980 nm/(mg/L) |
| Six | 0.952 nm/(mg/L) |
3.4. Reliability, Selectivity, and Environmental Stability of the Developed Biosensor
3.5. Testing of Real Samples
3.6. Performance Comparison of Proposed Sensors
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ji, Z.; Huang, W.; Liu, T.; Yang, W.; Xu, W. A novel molecularly imprinted photoelectrochemical sensor utilizing Ag/SnO2 for the highly sensitive and selective detection of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Microchem. J. 2024, 200, 110278. [Google Scholar]
- Freisthler, M.S.; Robbins, C.R.; Benbrook, C.M.; Young, H.A.; Haas, D.M.; Winchester, P.D.; Perry, M.J. Association between increasing agricultural use of 2,4-D and population biomarkers of exposure: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2014. Environ. Health 2022, 21, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, Y. Insight into the mode of action of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) as an herbicide. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2014, 56, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Vinayagam, R.; Ganga, S.; Murugesan, G.; Rangasamy, G.; Bhole, R.; Goveas, L.C.; Varadavenkatesan, T.; Dave, N.; Samanth, A.; Radhika Devi, V.; et al. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) adsorptive removal by algal magnetic activated carbon nanocomposite. Chemosphere 2023, 310, 136883. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Islam, F.; Wang, J.; Farooq, M.A.; Khan, M.S.S.; Xu, L.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, M.; Munos, S.; Li, Q.X.; Zhou, W. Potential impact of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on human and ecosystems. Environ. Int. 2018, 111, 332–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barros do Nascimento, A.C.; Nhampossa, N.A.; Felix, T.P.; Itabaiana, I., Jr.; do Nascimento, R.P. Exploring Fungal Biodegradation Pathways of 2,4-D: Enzymatic Mechanisms, Synergistic Actions, and Environmental Applications. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 39398–39414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Valente, L.C.; de Matos Manoel, B.; Reis, A.C.C.; Stein, J.; Jorge, B.C.; Barbisan, L.F.; Romualdo, G.R.; Arena, A.C. A mixture of glyphosate and 2,4-D herbicides enhances the deleterious reproductive outcomes induced by Western diet in obese male mice. Environ. Toxicol. 2024, 39, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Aira, J.; Olivares, T.; Delicado, F.M. SpectroGLY: A Low-Cost IoT-Based Ecosystem for the Detection of Glyphosate Residues in Waters. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2022, 71, 6005610. [Google Scholar]
- Samanth, A.; Chandrasekar, R.; Vinayagam, R.; Selvaraj, R. Density functional theory insights into the adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by mesoporous biochar. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2025, 54, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinayagam, R.; Jogi, S.; Murugesan, G.; Goveas, L.C.; Varadavenkatesan, T.; Samanth, A.; Selvaraj, R. Mesoporous carbon from Vateria indica fruit for efficient 2,4-D herbicide removal: Mechanistic insights from double-layer statistical physics modelling and regeneration studies. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2025, 154, 112149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sridevi, H.; Vinayagam, R.; Murugesan, G.; Selvaraj, R. Mesoporous activated carbon from Tabebuia aurea leaves for effective adsorptive removal of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 17110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tyagi, K.; Kumari, R.; Venkatesh, V. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activatable small molecule-based prodrugs for cancer theranostics. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2023, 21, 4455–4464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mazzei, F.; Botrè, F.; Montilla, S.; Pilloton, R.; Podestà, E.; Botrè, C. Alkaline phosphatase inhibition based electrochemical sensors for the detection of pesticides. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004, 574, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botrè, C.; Botrè, F.; Mazzei, F.; Podestà, E. Inhibition-based biosensors for the detection of environmental contaminants: Determination of 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2009, 19, 2876–2881. [Google Scholar]
- Bollella, P.; Fusco, G.; Tortolini, C.; Sanzo, G.; Antiochia, R.; Favero, G.; Mazzei, F. Inhibition-based first-generation electrochemical biosensors: Theoretical aspects and application to 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid detection. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 3203–3211. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Mohan, S.; Banoo, F.; Singh Negi, M.; Paul, D. LSPR-Based Optical Fiber Sensor Utilizing GO-ZnO Nanocomposite for Relative Humidity Measurement. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2025, 37, 145–148. [Google Scholar]
- Butt, M.A. Surface Plasmon Resonance-Based Biodetection Systems: Principles, Progress and Applications—A Comprehensive Review. Biosensors 2025, 15, 35. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Moorthy, D.N.; Dhinasekaran, D.; Rebecca, P.N.B.; Rajendran, A.R. Optical Biosensors for Detection of Cancer Biomarkers: Current and Future Perspectives. J. Biophotonics 2024, 17, e202400243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, P.; Lalam, N.; Badar, M.; Liu, B.; Chorpening, B.T.; Buric, M.P.; Ohodnicki, P.R. Distributed optical fiber sensing: Review and perspective. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2019, 6, 041302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, R.-J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, K.-J.; Zhao, Y. Surface Plasmon Resonance Optical Fiber Sensor for Refractive Index Detection Without Temperature Crosstalk. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2022, 71, 7002806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moslemi, A.; Sansone, L.; Esposito, F.; Campopiano, S.; Giordano, M.; Iadicicco, A. Optical fiber probe based on LSPR for the detection of pesticide Thiram. Opt. Laser Technol. 2024, 175, 110882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, P.; Ge, K.; Dai, X.; Xue, D.; Luo, Y.; Dai, S.; Xu, T.; Jiang, T.; Zhang, P. Fiber Optic SERS Sensor with Silver Nanocubes Attached Based on Evanescent Wave for Detecting Pesticide Residues. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 30998–31008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sequeira, F.; Reis, S.; Oliveira, R.; Veríssimo, M.I.S.; Gomes, M.T.S.R.; Rudnitskaya, A.; Bilro, L. Glyphosate Detection Through Piezoelectric and Fiber Optic Sensors Based on Molecular Imprinted Polymers. IEEE Sens. J. 2024, 24, 20331–20342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asha, A.B.; Narain, R. Nanomaterials properties. In Polymer Science and Nanotechnology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 343–359. [Google Scholar]
- Tai, J.; Fan, S.; Ding, S.; Ren, L. Gold Nanoparticles Based Optical Biosensors for Cancer Biomarker Proteins: A Review of the Current Practices. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 877193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Semwal, V.; Gupta, B.D. Experimental studies on the sensitivity of the propagating and localized surface plasmon resonance-based tapered fiber optic refractive index sensors. Appl. Opt. 2019, 58, 4149–4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dormeny, A.A.; Sohi, P.A.; Kahrizi, M. Design and simulation of a refractive index sensor based on SPR and LSPR using gold nanostructures. Results Phys. 2020, 16, 102869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Wang, J.; Su, D.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, H.; Yan, X.; Bai, J.; Gao, Y.; Lu, G. The DNA controllable peroxidase mimetic activity of MoS 2 nanosheets for constructing a robust colorimetric biosensor. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 19420–19428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mphuthi, N.; Sikhwivhilu, L.; Ray, S.S. Functionalization of 2D MoS2 Nanosheets with Various Metal and Metal Oxide Nanostructures: Their Properties and Application in Electrochemical Sensors. Biosensors 2022, 12, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Desai, A.V.; Haque, M.A. Mechanical properties of ZnO nanowires. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2007, 134, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, X.; Lei, F.; Liang, X.; Jiao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, C.; Yu, J. Quantitative detection of trace nanoplastics (down to 50 nm) via surface-enhanced Raman scattering based on the multiplex-feature coffee ring. Opto-Electron. Adv. 2025, 8, 240260. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, H.; He, Y.; Qiao, S.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Y. Highly sensitive and real-simultaneous CH4/C2H2 dual-gas LITES sensor based on Lissajous pattern multi-pass cell. Opto-Electron. Sci. 2024, 3, 240013. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Y.; Sun, T.; Shao, M.; Ji, C.; Li, C.; Zhang, C.; Li, Z. Pyroelectrically Driven Charge Transfer and its Advantages on SERS and Self-Cleaning Property. Laser Photonics Rev. 2024, 19, 2401152. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Singh, R.; Li, G.; Marques, C.; Zhang, B.; Kumar, S. WaveFlex Biosensor-Using Novel Tri-Tapered-in-Tapered Four-Core Fiber With Multimode Fiber Coupling for Detection of Aflatoxin B1. J. Light. Technol. 2023, 41, 7432–7442. [Google Scholar]
- Cano Perez, J.L.; Gutierrez-Gutierrez, J.; Perezcampos Mayoral, C.; Perez-Campos, E.L.; Del Socorro Pina Canseco, M.; Tepech Carrillo, L.; Mayoral, L.P.; Vargas Trevino, M.; Apreza, E.L.; Rojas Laguna, R. Fiber Optic Sensors: A Review for Glucose Measurement. Biosensors 2021, 11, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, J.X.; Siriwardana, K.; Zhou, Y.; Zou, S.; Zhang, D. Quantification of Gold Nanoparticle Ultraviolet-Visible Extinction, Absorption, and Scattering Cross-Section Spectra and Scattering Depolarization Spectra: The Effects of Nanoparticle Geometry, Solvent Composition, Ligand Functionalization, and Nanoparticle Aggregation. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 785–793. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Sharma, U.; Pal, D.; Prasad, R. Alkaline phosphatase: An overview. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2014, 29, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Lyu, Z.; Ding, S.; Tieu, P.; Fang, L.; Li, X.; Li, T.; Pan, X.; Engelhard, M.H.; Ruan, X.; Du, D. Single-atomic site catalyst enhanced lateral flow immunoassay for point-of-care detection of herbicide. Research 2022, 2022, 9823290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Eunen, K.; Bouwman, J.; Daran-Lapujade, P.; Postmus, J.; Canelas, A.B.; Mensonides, F.I.; Orij, R.; Tuzun, I.; Van Den Brink, J.; Smits, G.J. Measuring enzyme activities under standardized in vivo-like conditions for systems biology. FEBS J. 2010, 277, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Vial, J.; Jardy, A. Experimental comparison of the different approaches to estimate LOD and LOQ of an HPLC method. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 2672–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taleuzzaman, M. Limit of blank (LOB), limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantification (LOQ). Org. Med. Chem. Int. J. 2018, 7, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Jiao, B.; Su, X.; Zhao, Q.; Sun, D. Dissipation and residue of 2,4-D in citrus under field condition. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dognani, G.; Fuenzalida, F.B.; Leopoldo Constantino, C.J.; Sanchez-Cortes, S. Overcoming Detection Challenges of 2,4-D Herbicides via SERS through a Simple Modification of Citrate-Reduced Silver Nanoparticles. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 36015–36024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dhar Divedi, R.; Kumar, P.; Singh, R.; Kanti Bhattacharyya, T.; Sasmal, M. Synthesis of DNA Conjugated MoS2 for Ultralow Level of 2,4-D Detection. IEEE Sens. J. 2026, 26, 94–102. [Google Scholar]
- Mukhametova, L.I.; Kolokolova, M.K.; Shevchenko, I.A.; Tupertsev, B.S.; Zherdev, A.V.; Xu, C.; Eremin, S.A. Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay for Rapid, Sensitive Detection of the Herbicide 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid in Juice and Water Samples. Biosensors 2025, 15, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, M.; Li, S.; Wang, L.; Chen, H.; Lei, M. Rapid and sensitive detection of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid residual on fruit surface via SERS-tape sampling. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2023, 55, 65–74. [Google Scholar]
- Santilio, A.; Girolimetti, S.; Picardo, V. Simple and Rapid High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for Simultaneous Determination of Picloram and 2,4-D in Pesticide Formulations. Analytica 2022, 3, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Experiment | Number of Repetitions | 95% Confidence Interval (nm) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repeatability | N = 3 | 652.6–653.6 644.3–644.8 | 0.030 0.029 |
| Same batch reproducibility | N = 5 | 645.3–645.6 | 0.022 |
| Different batches reproducibility | N = 5 | 652.2–652.5 | 0.026 |
| Samples | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Apple | 96.2–100.4 | 3.1 |
| Chinese cabbage | 83.8–108.8 | 6.3 |
| Mechanism | Materials Used | Linear Range (mg/L) | Sensitivity | LOD (mg/L) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluorescence | n.r. a | 3.3 × 10−3–0.304 | n.r. a | 0.4 | [45] |
| Electrochemistry | MWCNTs b | 2.1–110 | 0.84% inhibition/(μg/L) | 1 | [15] |
| SERS c | AgNPs | 2.21 × 10−5–2.21 | 0.001 Arbitr.Units/(mg/L) | 0.08 | [46] |
| HPLC-DAD | n.r. a | 10–28 | n.r. a | 0.53 | [47] |
| LSPR | AuNPs/MoS2-NSs/ZnO-NWs | 1–10 | 0.980 nm/(mg/L) | 0.29 | This work |
| Sensor Probe | Detection Range (mg/L) | Sensitivity (nm/(mg/L)) | LOD (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AuNPs-coated probe | 1–10 | 0.472 | 0.62 |
| AuNPs/MoS2-NSs-coated probe | 1–10 | 0.678 | 0.43 |
| AuNPs/ZnO-NWs-coated probe | 1–10 | 0.559 | 0.52 |
| AuNPs/MoS2-NSs/ZnO-NWs | 1–10 | 0.996 | 0.29 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Han, H.; Wang, S.; Min, R.; Singh, R.; Zhang, B.; Kumar, S. MoS2 Nanosheet/ZnO Nanowire-Functionalized Optical Fiber LSPR Biosensor for Sensitive Detection of 2,4-D Herbicide Residues. Nanomaterials 2026, 16, 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16130829
Han H, Wang S, Min R, Singh R, Zhang B, Kumar S. MoS2 Nanosheet/ZnO Nanowire-Functionalized Optical Fiber LSPR Biosensor for Sensitive Detection of 2,4-D Herbicide Residues. Nanomaterials. 2026; 16(13):829. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16130829
Chicago/Turabian StyleHan, Huibo, Shuai Wang, Rui Min, Ragini Singh, Bingyuan Zhang, and Santosh Kumar. 2026. "MoS2 Nanosheet/ZnO Nanowire-Functionalized Optical Fiber LSPR Biosensor for Sensitive Detection of 2,4-D Herbicide Residues" Nanomaterials 16, no. 13: 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16130829
APA StyleHan, H., Wang, S., Min, R., Singh, R., Zhang, B., & Kumar, S. (2026). MoS2 Nanosheet/ZnO Nanowire-Functionalized Optical Fiber LSPR Biosensor for Sensitive Detection of 2,4-D Herbicide Residues. Nanomaterials, 16(13), 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16130829

