Next Article in Journal
Improved Performance Fiber Bragg Grating Hydrogen Sensor Based on Pt/WO3 Nanosheets and Nafion Hybrid Coatings
Previous Article in Journal
Zeolite-Based Composite Nanomaterials for Organic Micropollutant Removal: Structure–Property–Performance Relationships and Practical Challenges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphology-Dependent Antibacterial Activity of Cu2-xS Nanostructures: Nanoplates Versus Superparticles

1
School of Modern Fashion, Anhui University of Applied Technology, Hefei 230011, China
2
Key Laboratory of Functional Molecular Solids, Ministry of Education College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China
3
Huzhou Key Laboratory of Green Energy Materials and Battery Cascade Utilization, School of Intelligent Manufacturing, Huzhou College, Huzhou 313000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2026, 16(10), 636; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16100636
Submission received: 21 April 2026 / Revised: 14 May 2026 / Accepted: 19 May 2026 / Published: 20 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Synthesis, Interfaces and Nanostructures)

Abstract

Non-stoichiometric copper sulfide (Cu2-xS) nanomaterials are promising antibacterial agents, but the role of morphology in regulating their bactericidal performance remains poorly understood. Herein, we rationally design two types of Cu2-xS nanostructures, namely nanoplates (NPs) and superparticles (SPs). Both materials were prepared via a ligand-directed synthesis method with the comparable sizes, surface ligands, and crystal phase. The antibacterial behaviors of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs against Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) were investigated under dark and 808 nm near-infrared (NIR) light irradiation. The results showed that under NIR light irradiation, Cu2-xS SPs exhibit a markedly higher bactericidal efficiency against both E. coli and S. aureus than Cu2-xS NPs, leading to almost complete eradication of bacterial colonies. Notably, S. aureus shows more sensitive than E. coli, and significant growth inhibition is observed even in the absence of laser irradiation. Mechanistic investigations reveal that hierarchical assembly of primary nanoparticles in SPs can promote multiple internal light scatterings, thereby significantly enhancing light harvesting efficiency and further improving the photothermal conversion efficiency. In addition, the SPs exhibited higher peroxidase-like activity, resulting in enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and aggravated oxidative damage, and the accelerated Cu2+ release kinetics strengthens ionic toxicity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The rapid and persistent spread of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections poses severe challenges to conventional antibiotic therapies [1,2]. It is urgent to develop alternative antibacterial agents. In recent years, nanomaterials have emerged as promising alternatives to traditional small-molecule antibiotics [3]. Nanomaterials exhibit therapeutic potential that transcends that of traditional agents, owing to their precisely tailorable physicochemical properties as follows: size, surface functionality, and morphological architecture [4,5,6].
Among the various nanomaterial candidates, non-stoichiometric copper sulfides (Cu2-xS) have attracted widespread attention [7,8,9,10,11]. The partial copper deficiency in Cu2-xS endows it with strong near-infrared (NIR) localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) property, enabling efficient photothermal therapy (PTT). Meanwhile, the Cu+/Cu2+ redox couple in these materials can trigger a Fenton-like reaction, which can produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) [12,13,14,15]. These combined properties make Cu2-xS a promising candidate for developing multifunctional antibacterial platforms, particularly for light-triggered sterilization. However, despite the rapid progress in Cu2-xS-based antibacterial systems, most existing studies have mainly focused on compositional optimization, defect engineering, or surface functionalization, whereas the influence of morphology itself remains insufficiently clarified. The antibacterial performance of Cu2-xS is determined by a complex interplay of factors [16,17,18,19,20]. Although parameters such as size, surface chemistry, chemical doping and surface functionalization have been broadly investigated [21,22,23], elucidating the specific contribution of geometric morphology remains highly challenging. This difficulty primarily arises from the fact that altering the shape of a nanomaterial often inevitably changes its size, crystal phase, surface ligands, and so on [24,25,26]. Thus, it is difficult to isolate morphology as the sole variable.
To better position the present study, representative CuS-based antibacterial systems reported in the literature were compared, with particular emphasis on morphology-dependent effects (Table S1). Previous studies have shown that reducing particle size, introducing porous/amorphous structures, and tailoring crystal shape can all improve the antibacterial activity of CuS materials by enhancing photothermal conversion, ROS generation, and/or Cu2+ release. For example, ultrasmall CuS nanodots exhibited stronger bactericidal performance than larger nanoparticles [8], while CuS nanosheets and nanoparticles outperformed microspheres in light-driven antibacterial assays [18]. Porous amorphous CuS-based nanoparticles have also been reported to combine improved light absorption with enhanced ROS-related killing [21]. However, in most of these studies, multiple physicochemical parameters changed simultaneously, making it difficult to distinguish the intrinsic contribution of morphology from those of size, surface area, colloidal stability, or surface chemistry. In comparison, the present work provides a more controlled evaluation of the morphology effect because Cu2-xS nanoplates and superparticles were designed with comparable size, surface ligand environment, and crystal phase, thereby minimizing interference from other physicochemical factors. Under these matched conditions, Cu2-xS superparticles still exhibited substantially enhanced antibacterial activity relative to nanoplates, indicating that morphology plays an important role in regulating the antibacterial performance of Cu-based nanomaterials. In this sense, our study complements previous reports and provides a clearer perspective for understanding morphology-dependent structure–activity relationships than systems relying primarily on compositional modification or surface functionalization.
Based on the previous work [27], we employ a ligand-directed synthetic strategy to fabricate two morphologies of Cu2-xS nanostructures, namely nanoplates (NPs) and hierarchical superparticles (SPs). In this strategy, the same ligand environment (cysteine and sodium citrate) was used to regulate the nucleation, growth, and assembly behavior of Cu2-xS during synthesis, thereby minimizing variations in size, surface chemistry, and crystal phase between the two samples. The Cu2-xS SPs are formed through the self-assembly of primary nanocrystals under these ligand-directed conditions. Their detailed formation process and structural evolution have been systematically reported in our previous study [27]; therefore, the present work focuses on morphology-dependent antibacterial behavior rather than the assembly mechanism itself. These two nanostructures were systematically characterized via transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and ζ-potential measurements. The characterization results confirmed that Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs exhibited comparable sizes, surface ligands environments (cysteine and sodium citrate), and crystal phase, but different morphologies. Plate counting antibacterial assay revealed an obvious morphology-dependent antibacterial activity of the two nanostructures. Furthermore, three core factors, including photothermal conversion efficiency, peroxidase (POD)-like ROS burst, and cumulative Cu2+ release kinetics, were compared to clarify the factors contributing to the differing antibacterial activities of the two nanostructures against Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, E. coli) and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus, S. aureus) bacteria (Scheme 1). This study systematically demonstrated that the hierarchical structure significantly enhanced the antibacterial effect, providing a useful strategy for designing the structure of a new generation of highly efficient antibacterial nanomaterials.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Materials

CuSO4·5H2O, NaOH, sodium citrate and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 30%) were purchased from Shanghai Reagent Company (Shanghai, China). Cysteine and thioacetamide (TAA) were acquired from Aladdin. 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) was purchased from Macklin. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM), penicillin-streptomycin, and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Gibco Invitrogen. Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) and bacterial live/dead staining kit (DMAO/PI) were purchased from Beyotime Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). Luria–Bertani (LB) broth medium and LB broth agar medium were obtained from Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Milli-Q deionized water was used to prepare all solutions.

2.2. Characterizations

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were taken by a HT-7800 electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan). High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images were carried out on a Tecnai F20 TEM (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Extinction spectra were recorded by a U-2910 spectrometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The hydrodynamic particle sizes and ζ-potential values were examined on a Zetasizer Nano ZS series instrument (Malvern Instruments Co., Ltd., Malvern, UK). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra (4000–1000 cm−1) were measured by a Magna-560 spectrometer (Nicolet, Madison, WI, USA). The amounts of Cu were recorded by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Thermo Elemental, Winsford, UK). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was characterized with the ESCALAB 250Xi photoelectron spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained on a Shimadzu XRD-6000 X-ray diffractometer equipped (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Photothermal irradiation was conducted by an 808 nm laser with 0.75 W cm−2 (CNI, Changchun, China) and the temperature was measured by an infrared thermal imaging instrument (FLIR, A65, Wilsonville, OR, USA). Cell imaging was performed using an automated inverted optical microscope (Olympus IX83, Tokyo, Japan). Fluorescent images of cells were taken by a confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscope (TCS SP8, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

2.3. Fabrication of the Cu2-xS NPs

First, sodium citrate solution (0.1 M, 1 mL) and deionized water (40 mL) were introduced into a three-necked flask. The above solution was deaerated by bubbling nitrogen for 20 min under magnetic stirring to remove dissolved oxygen. Next, pre-mixed solution of cysteine (0.1 M, 3 mL) and CuSO4 (0.4 M, 125 μL) was added. Then, NaOH (0.5 M) solution was added into the above solution to adjust the pH to 10.0, followed by stirring for 10 min. Subsequently, TAA (1 mL, 0.01 M) was introduced into the reaction mixture. Finally, the resulting solution was heated to 70 °C and refluxed under a nitrogen atmosphere for 22 h. Monodisperse Cu2-xS NPs with an average size of 16.03 nm were obtained. The Cu2-xS NPs solution was purified using 8000–14,000 Da MWCO dialysis bags in double deionized water for 30 h.

2.4. Fabrication of the Cu2-xS SPs

First, citrate solution (0.1 M, 1 mL) and deionized water (40 mL) were introduced into a three-necked flask. The above solution was deaerated by bubbling nitrogen for 20 min under magnetic stirring to remove dissolved oxygen. Next, pre-mixed cysteine (0.1 M, 3 mL) and CuSO4 (0.4 M, 125 μL) was added into the above solution. Then, NaOH (0.5 M) solution was added into the above solution to adjust the pH to 10.0, follow by stirring for 10 min. Subsequently, TAA (1 mL, 0.01 M) was introduced into the reaction mixture. Thereafter, the resulting solution was heated to 70 °C and refluxed under a nitrogen atmosphere for 5 h. Next, the cysteine–CuSO4 mixture (cysteine, 3 mL, 0.1 M; CuSO4, 125 μL, 0.4 M) was injected, and the pH was readjusted to 10.0. Finally, the resulting reaction mixture was heated to 70 °C and refluxed under nitrogen atmosphere for 16 h. The Cu2-xS SPs solution was purified using 8000–14,000 Da MWCO dialysis bags in double deionized water for 24 h.
In both syntheses, the same ligand system consisting of cysteine and sodium citrate was employed to regulate the formation process of Cu2-xS nanostructures. This design was intended to minimize variations in surface ligand environment and crystal phase between the Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs, so that the effect of morphology on antibacterial performance could be more reliably evaluated.

2.5. Preparation of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs in PBS

After dialysis purification, the Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs were freeze-dried to obtain solid powders. For experiments performed in PBS, the dried powders were redispersed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) to the desired concentrations before use.

2.6. Cytotoxicity Assays

The viabilities of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and mouse fibroblasts (3T3) cells treated with Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs were investigated using the CCK-8 assays. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of approximately 9 × 103 cells per well and incubated for 12 h. The culture medium was then replaced with medium containing Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs at various concentrations (0, 7.5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 μg·mL−1). After 24 h of incubation, the medium was removed, and the cells were washed three times with PBS (pH 7.4). Next, 200 μL of culture medium supplemented with 5% CCK-8 was added to each well, and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 3 h. Cell viability was finally measured on a microplate reader (Thermo Varioskan Flash, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.7. Antibacterial Assays

E. coli (Gram-negative) and S. aureus (Gram-positive) were cultured in LB broth at 37 °C to logarithmic phase (106 CFU mL−1). Bacteria were incubated with Cu2-xS NPs or SPs (120 μg mL−1) with/without 808 nm laser irradiation (0.75 W cm−2, 10 min). Colony-forming unit (CFU) counting and live/dead staining (DMAO/PI) were used to evaluate antibacterial efficiency.

2.8. POD-like Activity Assay

The generation of ROS (·OH) was measured using TMB-H2O2 colorimetric assay. Measurements were carried out in 2 mL of PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) containing Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs at the same concentration (120 μg mL−1), H2O2 (1 mM), and TMB (0.5 mM). The mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 10 min, and the absorbance spectra were recorded using a UV–vis–NIR spectrometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

2.9. The Release of Copper Ions

To monitor Cu2+ release kinetics, 200 μg of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs were dispersed in 2 mL of PBS (pH 7.4), respectively. The above two dispersions were dialysed at 37 °C. The release medium was taken out at different time points (0, 2, 6, 12 and 24 h); an aliquot of the release medium was collected and replaced with an equal volume of fresh PBS. The concentration of Cu2+ in the collected medium was determined by ICP-MS.

3. Results

3.1. Structural and Morphological Characterization

Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs were synthesized via a ligand-directed approach based on our previous work [27]. The two materials were prepared in a one-pot aqueous system using the same ligand type, copper and sulfur precursors, and reaction temperature (70 °C), while varying only the sodium citrate concentration. Figure 1a,b show TEM images of the as-prepared Cu2-xS NPs at different magnifications. As illustrated in Figure 1a, the products exhibit a typical monodisperse plate-shaped morphology. Most particles lie flat on the substrate, while only a small number are oriented on their sides. There are two typical morphologies, namely circular and rectangular (marked by red and blue circles, respectively). The average diameter of the circular structure is 16.03 nm (Figure 1d), and the thickness of the rectangular structure is 6.75 nm (Figure S1). According to the dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements, the average hydrodynamic diameter of Cu2-xS NPs is 20.11 nm (Figure S2a), which is slightly larger than the size measured by TEM. This discrepancy can be attributed to the hydration shell formed around the Cu2-xS NPs, as well as the inherent bias of DLS toward larger particles. Subsequently, by carefully tuning interparticle interactions through the sodium citrate concentration, the primary nanoparticles were induced to assemble into monodisperse hierarchical superparticles. Notably, although the overall dimensions of the Cu2-xS SPs are comparable to those of the Cu2-xS NPs, the Cu2-xS SPs represent hierarchically assembled architectures composed of primary nanocrystals rather than single platelet-like nanostructures. Thus, the term “superparticle” in this work refers to the internal assembled structure rather than necessarily a much larger particle size. This structural assignment is consistent with our previous study on Cu2-xS supraparticle formation [27]. As shown in Figure 1e,f, Cu2-xS SPs were formed through self-assembly of primary nanoparticles, presenting a monodisperse rough spherical-like structure. The statistical size distribution of Cu2-xS SPs is 16.48 nm (Figure 1h). The hydrodynamic diameter of Cu2-xS SPs is 20.74 nm (Figure S2b). In Figure 1c,g, HRTEM images clearly show that the lattice plane spacings of both are 0.32 nm, corresponding to the (0015) crystal plane of the rhombohedral Cu9S5 (JCPDS No. 47-1748) [28].
After confirming the morphology and size, the optical properties and structure features were further verified to ensure that morphology was the primary variable. As shown in Figure 2a, both Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs exhibit broad extinction characteristics in NIR regions, which corresponds to the LSPR originating from the collective oscillation of free holes driven by the electromagnetic field of incident light [29]. Moreover, at the same mass concentration, Cu2-xS SPs display a stronger absorption peak than Cu2-xS NPs. This enhancement effect is likely attributed to the hierarchical structure of Cu2-xS SPs, which promotes internal multiple light scattering, thereby significantly improving the overall light capture efficiency. Additionally, as described in Figure S3a,c, the extinction spectra of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs were recorded at varying concentrations (7.5 to 120 μg mL−1). The extinction intensity at 808 nm increased linearly with the increase in their concentration (Figure S3b,d). This result confirms that both samples can maintain stable monodispersity in aqueous media and exhibit high anti-aggregation properties.
To investigate the crystal structure of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs, XRD analyses were carried out. As shown in Figure 2b, the two samples exhibit distinctly broadened peaks, which is attributed to the small size of the products [30]. Despite the pronounced noise signals, the main diffraction peaks can be clearly indexed to the (0015) and (1120) planes and can be accurately indexed to the rhombohedral phase of Cu9S5 (JCPDS No. 47-1748), in agreement with the HRTEM characterization. To further investigate the composition and oxidation state of the surface elements, XPS was employed. The Cu 2p spectrum of Cu2-xS NPs (Figure 2c) can be fitted into the following four peaks: the signals at 931.4 eV and 951.7 eV correspond to Cu2+ (Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2), while the peaks at 932.7 eV and 952.6 eV are assigned to Cu+ (Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2). Similarly, the Cu 2p spectrum of Cu2-xS SPs exhibits four well-resolved peaks at 931.5 eV, 951.7 eV (Cu2+), and 932.6 eV, 952.5 eV (Cu+), respectively [28]. These results demonstrate that the surface copper species in both nanostructures exhibit very similar Cu+/Cu2+ oxidation state distributions.
As shown in Figure 2e, the absorption peak at 1630 cm−1 corresponds to the bending vibration of adsorbed water and surface hydroxyl groups (−OH), while the broad band at 3430 cm−1 is attributed to the O−H stretching vibrations of surface-adsorbed water and terminal −OH species [31]. Both nanostructures also display a characteristic band at 1350 cm−1 corresponding to C–N stretching. Crucially, the characteristic −SH stretching vibration of free cysteine (~2500 cm−1) is completely absent in the spectra of both Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs, confirming that cysteine is covalently anchored to the Cu2-xS surface via strong S–Cu bonds [32]. The above FTIR data unambiguously verify that both nanostructures were successfully modified with cysteine and sodium citrate, demonstrating their identical and effective surface functionalization. Finally, in Figure 2f, the purified Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs demonstrate highly comparable ζ-potential values of −38.6 mV and −37.5 mV, respectively. The ζ-potential values indicate that the two nanostructures have very similar surface charge densities and comparable ligand coverage. Taken together, the above results demonstrate that the Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs have comparable sizes, surface ligand environments, and the same crystal phase. Therefore, the differences observed in subsequent biological experiments can be mainly attributed to their distinct morphologies.

3.2. Biocompatibility

In practical antibacterial applications, ensuring the biological safety is essential. Therefore, the CCK-8 assays were employed to determine the viability of HUVECs and 3T3 cells treated with Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs. As shown in Figure 3, neither nanostructure exhibit significant cytotoxicity after 24 h incubation; even the concentration reached up to 120 μg mL−1, and the survival rates remained above 80%. These results indicate that both Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs exhibit acceptable in vitro cytocompatibility, providing preliminary support for their potential use in antibacterial-related biomedical applications.

3.3. Antibacterial Performance

To reveal the respective contributions of the nanomaterials and photothermal activation, we systematically evaluated their antibacterial efficacy using standard CFU assays. A comprehensive comparison was conducted against typical Gram-negative (E. coli) and Gram-positive (S. aureus) strains across the following six parallel groups: PBS, Cu2-xS NPs, and Cu2-xS SPs, each test with or without 808 nm NIR laser irradiation.
The representative agar plate images are displayed in Figure 4. For E. coli (Figure 4a), dense bacterial colonies were observed in the PBS, Cu2-xS NPs, and Cu2-xS SPs groups under dark conditions. This phenomenon indicates that both nanostructures exhibited negligible intrinsic dark toxicity against E. coli. Upon 808 nm laser exposure, the PBS + laser group showed no obvious reduction in colony number, confirming that the laser treatment itself had little effect on bacterial viability. In contrast, the Cu2-xS NPs + laser group exhibited a significant decrease decreased in colony number, although substantial residual growth remained. In sharp contrast, the Cu2-xS SPs + laser group displayed almost completely eradicated the colonies, resulting in a clear agar plate. These results demonstrate that Cu2-xS SPs has an extremely significant photothermal-activated antibacterial effect against E. coli. compared with Cu2-xS NPs. S. aureus exhibited a different sensitivity characteristic from E. coli (Figure 4b). Even without laser irradiation (in the dark), Cu2-xS SPs exhibited a sparser distribution of bacteria compared to Cu2-xS NPs. This enhanced dark toxicity toward S. aureus, likely associated with the absence of an outer membrane barrier in Gram-positive bacteria, which may facilitate stronger interactions with released Cu2+, ROS, and the Cu2-xS SP surface [4]. Upon NIR irradiation, the number of bacterial colonies in Cu2-xS NPs group further decreased but still remained. In contrast, the Cu2-xS SPs + laser group achieved nearly complete elimination of S. aureus. These results indicate that Cu2-xS SPs possess superior antibacterial activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, particularly against S. aureus.
To further confirm the differences in antibacterial behavior between Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs, we assessed bacterial membrane integrity of E. coli and S. aureus using the live/dead bacterial staining kit with DMAO/PI [33]. DMAO (N, N-dimethylaniline N-oxide) is a green fluorescent dye for nucleic acids. It is suitable for both E. coli and S. aureus and can stain both live and dead cells simultaneously. In contrast, PI (propidium iodide) cannot penetrate the biologically active cytoplasmic membrane and only stain bacteria with compromised membranes. Accordingly, bacteria with intact membranes show strong green fluorescence from DMAO alone, while those with compromised membranes show both green and red signals, appearing yellow in merged fluorescence images. As shown in Figure 5a under dark conditions, E. coli treated with the PBS, Cu2-xS NPs, and Cu2-xS SPs exhibited dominant green fluorescence with minimal yellow signal, indicating that neither nanostructure caused significant membrane damage to E. coli in the absence of laser irradiation. After 808 nm laser irradiation (Figure 5d), no obvious yellow fluorescence was observed in the PBS + laser group, confirming that the laser dose alone did not damage bacterial membranes. In contrast, a substantial part of bacteria (approximately 50%) of in the Cu2-xS NPs + laser bacterial exhibited yellow fluorescence in the merge group, whereas the Cu2-xS SPs + laser group showed an almost complete yellow fluorescence. These results indicate that both Cu2-xS SPs and Cu2-xS NPs can effectively damage the bacterial membrane of E. coli under laser irradiation, with Cu2-xS SPs demonstrating a markedly stronger effect.
For S. aureus, as shown in Figure 5c, even without laser irradiation, the Cu2-xS SPs group exhibited a noticeable increase in yellow fluorescence compared to PBS and Cu2-xS NPs group. This finding is consistent with CFU results (Figure 4b) and suggests that the hierarchical Cu2-xS SPs induce obvious membrane damage to S. aureus even without laser irradiation. Upon 808 nm laser irradiation (Figure 5d), the PBS + laser group showed negligible yellow signal, whereas both nanostructure-treated groups displayed enhanced yellow signals. Notably, the Cu2-xS SPs + laser group showed a stronger yellow fluorescence intensity than the Cu2-xS NPs + laser group, indicating that Cu2-xS SPs have a more significant photothermal destructive effect on the membrane of S. aureus.

3.4. Antibacterial Mechanism Investigation

To clarify the origin of the morphology-dependent antibacterial properties, we systematically investigated the following three synergistic mechanisms: NIR-induced photothermal conversion efficiency, ROS generation, and Cu2+ release. The photothermal properties of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs were evaluated by monitoring the temperature changes under 808 nm irradiation (0.75 W cm−2). As shown in Figure 6a,e, the temperature of both solutions gradually increased with increasing concentration from 7.5 to 120 μg mL−1. The data are presented as mean values from three independent measurements. At an identical mass concentration (120 μg mL−1), the temperature of the Cu2-xS SPs suspension reached a maximum of 62.7 °C after 8 min of irradiation, while that of the Cu2-xS NPs system was only 52.8 °C under the same laser conditions. In addition, the stability of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs in PBS under the photothermal treatment conditions was evaluated. After 8 min of 808 nm irradiation, both samples retained nearly unchanged UV–vis–NIR absorption spectra and hydrodynamic size distributions (Figure S4), indicating good colloidal stability in PBS without obvious aggregation during laser exposure.
This enhanced photothermal effect is closely related to the morphology. The hierarchical assembly of primary nanoparticles in the Cu2-xS SPs can promote multiple internal light scattering, thereby significantly improving light harvesting and non-radiative relaxation. Compared with the relatively flat Cu2-xS NPs, the three-dimensional Cu2-xS SPs architecture provides more internal interfaces and more complex optical pathways, which can prolong the propagation path of incident NIR light and increase the probability of photon absorption. As a result, more absorbed optical energy is dissipated through non-radiative relaxation, leading to a faster temperature rise and a higher photothermal conversion efficiency. Figure 6b,f show the corresponding infrared thermal images of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs, respectively. In these images, whiter colors indicate higher temperatures, while darker colors represent lower temperatures. The results clearly show that Cu2-xS SPs exhibit stronger and faster heating properties. Furthermore, the photothermal conversion efficiencies were determined from the cooling profiles following laser shut-off (Figure 6c,d for Cu2-xS NPs and Figure 6g,h for Cu2-xS SPs). The determined thermal relaxation time (τs) was calculated to be 418.1 s for NPs and 365.1 s for SPs, indicating faster heat dissipation for the latter. The photothermal conversion efficiencies of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs are 42.95% and 60.08%, respectively (Figure S4), demonstrating that Cu2-xS SPs convert absorbed NIR light into heat more efficiently than Cu2-xS NPs. The higher photothermal conversion efficiency of Cu2-xS SPs provides a solid foundation for their superior antibacterial performance under NIR irradiation.
Next, the POD-like performances of the Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs were investigated. The Cu+/Cu2+ redox couples can catalyze Fenton-like reactions to convert H2O2 into ·OH. In Figure 6i, after the H2O2 + TMB + Cu2-xS NPs or Cu2-xS SPs systems were maintained for 10 min at 37 °C and pH 7.4, both solutions’ color changed from colorless to blue, and the color of the H2O2 + TMB + Cu2-xS SPs system was darker. Both systems showed an obvious characteristic absorbance peaks at 652 nm, corresponding to oxidized TMB. Moreover, the absorbance intensity of the Cu2-xS SPs system was higher than that of the Cu2-xS NPs. These results indicate that both Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs can catalyze the H2O2-mediated generation of ·OH and the subsequent TMB oxidation. These phenomena indicate that Cu2-xS SPs exhibit stronger POD-like catalytic activity.
The Cu2+ release behaviors of both nanostructures were further compared. Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs (200 μg each) were dispersed in 2 mL of PBS (pH = 7.4), and dialyzed at 37 °C, respectively. The release medium was collected at different time points (0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h), and the Cu2+ concentrations were determined by ICP-MS. As shown in Figure 6j, Cu2-xS SPs exhibited faster Cu2+ release kinetics, reaching a cumulative release of 2.5 μg mL−1 at 24 h, compared with 1.6 μg mL−1 for Cu2-xS NPs. This accelerated ion release provides a higher level of bioavailable copper species, which can adsorb onto the bacterial surface, disrupt membrane function, and induce intracellular oxidative stress. Therefore, the faster Cu2+ release from the SPs provides an additional contribution to their enhanced antibacterial activity. Together with their superior photothermal performance and stronger ROS generation capability, the increased Cu2+ release helps explain why Cu2-xS SPs exhibit significantly stronger antibacterial effects than Cu2-xS NPs. Overall, as summarized in Figure 6k, the antibacterial ability of Cu2-xS SPs is significantly improved relative to that of Cu2-xS NPs, which can be mainly attributed to 1.40 times increase in its photothermal conversion efficiency (η), 1.42 times increase in ROS generation, and 1.56 times increase in cumulative Cu2+ release.

4. Conclusions

In this work, Cu2-xS NPs and hierarchical Cu2-xS SPs were successfully fabricated via a ligand-directed strategy, enabling a systematic investigation of morphology-dependent antibacterial behavior. By maintaining comparable size, surface ligand environment, and crystal phase between the two nanostructures, the effect of morphology was effectively isolated. The results demonstrate that Cu2-xS SPs exhibit significantly enhanced antibacterial activity compared with Cu2-xS NPs under both dark and NIR irradiation conditions. This superior performance is attributed to the synergistic effects of enhanced photothermal conversion, increased ROS generation, and accelerated Cu2+ release.
Importantly, this study highlights that rational morphology engineering, under well-controlled physicochemical parameters, provides an effective strategy to optimize the antibacterial performance of Cu-based nanomaterials. Compared with conventional approaches that rely on compositional modification or surface functionalization, the present method offers a more controlled platform to elucidate structure–activity relationships. Overall, this work not only provides insights into the role of morphology in antibacterial nanomaterials but also offers valuable guidance for the design of high-performance photothermal antibacterial systems.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano16100636/s1, Table S1: Comparison of representative CuS-based antibacterial systems. Figure S1: TEM of the Cu2-xS NPs. Figure S2: The hydrodynamic sizes of the Cu2-xS NPs (a) and Cu2-xS SPs (b). Figure S3: LSPR bands (a,c) and extinction coefficient at 808 nm (b,d) of the Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs, respectively. Figure S4: Stability of Cu2-xS NPs and SPs in PBS before and after 8 min of 808 nm laser irradiation. Absorption spectra of Cu2-xS NPs (a) and SPs (c), respectively. DLS size distributions of Cu2-xS NPs (b) and SPs (d), respectively. Calculation of the photothermal conversion efficiency.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z. and N.S.; methodology, H.Z. and M.Z.; software, Y.C.; validation, H.Z., J.Y. and Q.Y.; formal analysis, H.Z. and N.S.; investigation, H.Z. and N.S.; resources, Y.C.; data curation, Y.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.Z.; visualization, M.Z.; supervision, N.S.; project administration, H.Z. and N.S.; funding acquisition, H.Z. and N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Major Projects of Scientific Research in Higher Educational Institutions in Anhui Province (2024AH040130), the Zhejiang Province Science Foundation for Youth (ZCLQN25F0402), the Anhui Provincial Quality Engineering Project for Higher Education (2024sfxf008), and the Green and Intelligent Textile and Garment Technology Innovation Platform (2024XJPT05).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article and supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors. Details can be found at: https://susy.mdpi.com/user/assigned/process_form/89d93197ccbd9d75a4981e4a34bbeabc (accessed on 20 April 2026).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Murray, C.J.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Aguilar, G.R.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E.; et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Salam, M.A.; Al-Amin, M.Y.; Salam, M.T.; Pawar, J.S.; Akhter, N.; Rabaan, A.A.; Alqumber, M.A. Antimicrobial resistance: A growing serious threat for global public health. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Makabenta, J.M.V.; Nabawy, A.; Li, C.H.; Schmidt-Malan, S.; Patel, R.; Rotello, V.M. Nanomaterial-based therapeutics for antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gupta, A.; Mumtaz, S.; Li, C.H.; Hussain, I.; Rotello, V.M. Combatting antibiotic-resistant bacteria using nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 415–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, L.; Hu, C.; Shao, L. The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: Present situation and prospects for the future. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 1227–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xie, M.; Gao, M.; Yun, Y.; Malmsten, M.; Rotello, V.M.; Zboril, R.; Akhavan, O.; Kraskouski, A.; Amalraj, J.; Cai, X.; et al. Antibacterial nanomaterials: Mechanisms, impacts on antimicrobial resistance and design principles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202217345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, M.; Liu, Y.; Gu, B.; Wei, X.; Xu, G.; Wang, X.; Swihart, M.T.; Yong, K.T. Recent advances in copper sulphide-based nanoheterostructures. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 4950–4965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, C.; Gao, F.; Tong, Y.; Chang, F.; Han, H.; Liu, C.; Xu, M.; Li, H.; Zhou, J.; Li, X.; et al. NIR-II window triple-mode antibacterial nanoplatform: Cationic copper sulfide nanoparticles combined vancomycin for synergistic bacteria eradication. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 628, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lesyuk, R.; Klein, E.; Yaremchuk, I.; Klinke, C. Copper sulfide nanosheets with shape-tunable plasmonic properties in the NIR region. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 20640–20651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ermini, M.L.; Voliani, V. Antimicrobial nano-agents: The copper age. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 6008–6029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Goel, S.; Chen, F.; Cai, W. Synthesis and biomedical applications of copper sulfide nanoparticles: From sensors to theranostics. Small 2014, 10, 631–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huo, J.; Jia, Q.; Huang, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, P.; Dong, X.; Huang, W. Emerging photothermal-derived multimodal synergistic therapy in combating bacterial infections. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 8762–8789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xie, Y.; Qian, Y.; Li, Z.; Liang, Z.; Liu, W.; Yang, D.; Qiu, X. Near-infrared-activated efficient bacteria-killing by lignin-based copper sulfide nanocomposites with an enhanced photothermal effect and peroxidase-like activity. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 6479–6488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qiao, Y.; Ping, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, B.; Liu, F.; Yu, Y.; Xie, T.; Li, W.; Zhong, D.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Laser-activatable CuS nanodots to treat multidrug-resistant bacteria and release copper ion to accelerate healing of infected chronic nonhealing wounds. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 3809–3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Naskar, A.; Kim, K.-S. Photo-stimuli-responsive CuS nanomaterials as cutting-edge platform materials for antibacterial applications. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, L.; Ma, X.; Cai, K.; Li, X. Morphological effect of copper sulfide nanoparticles on their near infrared laser activated photothermal and photodynamic performance. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 105406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.; Su, M.; Yan, T.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J. Near-infrared copper sulfide hollow nanostructures with enhanced photothermal and photocatalytic performance for effective bacterial sterilization. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2023, 6, 2468–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mutalik, C.; Okoro, G.; Krisnawati, D.I.; Jazidie, A.; Rahmawati, E.Q.; Rahayu, D.; Hsu, W.; Kuo, T.R. Copper sulfide with morphology-dependent photodynamic and photothermal antibacterial activities. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 607, 1825–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cai, L.; Yang, J.; Shao, X.; Zhu, X.; Liu, Y.; Wan, C.; Wang, F.; Chen, J. Copper-doped nanostructured MoS2 with distinct nanoscale morphology for efficient bacteria inactivation and catalytic degradation of antibiotics. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 111537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Su, M.; Wu, Z.; Yan, T.; Li, N.; Li, X.; Hou, T.; Liu, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, C.; Wang, Z.; et al. Atomic-thin 2D copper sulfide nanocrystals with over 94% photothermal conversion efficiency as superior NIR-II photoacoustic agents. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2409580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Liu, W.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, D. Amino acid-mediated amorphous copper sulphide with enhanced photothermal conversion efficiency for antibacterial application. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 657, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zou, Z.; Sun, J.; Li, Q.; Pu, Y.; Liu, J.; Sun, R.; Wang, L.; Jiang, T. Vancomycin modified copper sulfide nanoparticles for photokilling of vancomycin-resistant enterococci bacteria. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 189, 110875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mo, S.; Song, Y.; Lin, M.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, J.; Guo, D.; Liu, L. Near-infrared responsive sulfur vacancy-rich CuS nanosheets for efficient antibacterial activity via synergistic photothermal and photodynamic pathways. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 608, 2896–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tao, A.R.; Habas, S.; Yang, P. Shape control of colloidal metal nanocrystals. Small 2008, 4, 310–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xia, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Lim, B.; Skrabalak, S.E. Shape-controlled synthesis of metal nanocrystals: Simple chemistry meets complex physics? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 60–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Niu, W.; Xu, G. Crystallographic control of noble metal nanocrystals. Nano Today 2011, 6, 262–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, H.; Guo, G.; Xia, Y. Cross-scale modulation for aqueous fabrication of monodisperse Cu2−xE (E = S, Se, Te) nanocrystals and supraparticles. Nano Res. 2023, 16, 1448–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kundu, A.; Chakraborty, B. Surface structure to tailor the electrochemical behavior of mixed-valence copper sulfides during water electrolysis. JACS Au 2024, 4, 642–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luther, J.M.; Jain, P.K.; Ewers, T.; Alivisatos, A.P. Localized surface plasmon resonances arising from free carriers in doped quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zou, L.; Hu, H.S.; Zhang, M.X.; Dai, J.W. Facile-synthesized ultrasmall CuS nanocrystals as drug nanocarriers for highly effective chemo-photothermal combination therapy of cancer. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 20949–20960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Y.; Liu, C.L.; Deng, Q.; Yu, Y.; Tang, X.; Li, L.; Grimes, C.; Yang, S.; Cai, Q.; Zhen, D. A β-keto-enamine covalent organic framework fluorescent switch for selective and sensitive UO22+ detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2025, 433, 137564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, B.J.; Wang, S.; Liu, F.; Zhang, S.; Duan, J.Z.; Li, Z.; Kong, Y.; Sang, Y.H.; Liu, H.; Bu, W.B. Self-assembled copper-amino acid nanoparticles for in situ glutathione “AND” H2O2 sequentially triggered chemodynamic therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 141, 849–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Huang, W.-C.; Tsai, P.-J.; Chen, Y.-C. Multifunctional Fe3O4@Au nanoeggs as photothermal agents for selective killing of nosocomial and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Small 2009, 5, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the ligand-directed formation of Cu2-xS NPs and hierarchically assembled SPs, as well as the proposed mechanism underlying the enhanced antibacterial activity of Cu2-xS SPs.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the ligand-directed formation of Cu2-xS NPs and hierarchically assembled SPs, as well as the proposed mechanism underlying the enhanced antibacterial activity of Cu2-xS SPs.
Nanomaterials 16 00636 sch001
Figure 1. Morphological characteristics of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs. (a,b) TEM images of Cu2-xS NPs at different magnifications, the red and blue circles indicate the circular and rectangular morphologies, respectively; (c) HRTEM image of Cu2-xS NPs; (d) size distribution of Cu2-xS NPs; (e,f) TEM images of Cu2-xS SPs at different magnifications; (g) HRTEM image of Cu2-xS SPs; (h) size distribution of Cu2-xS SPs.
Figure 1. Morphological characteristics of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs. (a,b) TEM images of Cu2-xS NPs at different magnifications, the red and blue circles indicate the circular and rectangular morphologies, respectively; (c) HRTEM image of Cu2-xS NPs; (d) size distribution of Cu2-xS NPs; (e,f) TEM images of Cu2-xS SPs at different magnifications; (g) HRTEM image of Cu2-xS SPs; (h) size distribution of Cu2-xS SPs.
Nanomaterials 16 00636 g001
Figure 2. Structural and surface characterization of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs. (a) Extinction spectra; (b) XRD patterns; (c,d) Cu 2p XPS spectra of NPs and SPs, respectively; (e) FTIR spectra; (f) ζ-potential distributions.
Figure 2. Structural and surface characterization of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs. (a) Extinction spectra; (b) XRD patterns; (c,d) Cu 2p XPS spectra of NPs and SPs, respectively; (e) FTIR spectra; (f) ζ-potential distributions.
Nanomaterials 16 00636 g002
Figure 3. Cytotoxicity of HUVECs and 3T3 cells treated with Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs after 24 h incubation.
Figure 3. Cytotoxicity of HUVECs and 3T3 cells treated with Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs after 24 h incubation.
Nanomaterials 16 00636 g003
Figure 4. Antibacterial activity of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs against (a) E. coli and (b) S. aureus under different treatments (PBS, PBS + laser, Cu2-xS NPs, Cu2-xS NPs + laser, Cu2-xS SPs, Cu2-xS SPs + laser).
Figure 4. Antibacterial activity of Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs against (a) E. coli and (b) S. aureus under different treatments (PBS, PBS + laser, Cu2-xS NPs, Cu2-xS NPs + laser, Cu2-xS SPs, Cu2-xS SPs + laser).
Nanomaterials 16 00636 g004
Figure 5. Fluorescence microscopy images of (a,b) E. coli and (c,d) S. aureus after treatment with PBS, Cu2-xS NPs, or Cu2-xS SPs, with (a,c) or without 808 nm irradiation (b,d). Live bacteria were stained with DMAO and showed green fluorescence, while membrane-damaged or dead bacteria were stained with PI and showed red fluorescence; the merged yellow signal indicates bacteria stained by both DMAO and PI.
Figure 5. Fluorescence microscopy images of (a,b) E. coli and (c,d) S. aureus after treatment with PBS, Cu2-xS NPs, or Cu2-xS SPs, with (a,c) or without 808 nm irradiation (b,d). Live bacteria were stained with DMAO and showed green fluorescence, while membrane-damaged or dead bacteria were stained with PI and showed red fluorescence; the merged yellow signal indicates bacteria stained by both DMAO and PI.
Nanomaterials 16 00636 g005
Figure 6. Photothermal and chemical synergistic properties of Cu2-xS nanostructures. Photothermal effects of Cu2-xS NPs (a,b) and Cu2-xS SPs (e,f) after 808 nm laser irradiation (0.75 W cm−2). Photothermal heating and cooling profiles of Cu2-xS NPs (c) and Cu2-xS SPs (g) under the fixed concentration (120 µg mL−1). The linear relationships between cooling time and −ln θ of Cu2-xS NPs (d) and Cu2-xS SPs (h). (i) Extinction spectra of the H2O2 + TMB + Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs for 10 min at pH 7.4 (inset: photos of the corresponding solutions). (j) The release behavior of Cu2+ from Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs incubated in PBS. (k) Comparison between Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs: photothermal conversion efficiency (η), ROS generation, and Cu2+ release.
Figure 6. Photothermal and chemical synergistic properties of Cu2-xS nanostructures. Photothermal effects of Cu2-xS NPs (a,b) and Cu2-xS SPs (e,f) after 808 nm laser irradiation (0.75 W cm−2). Photothermal heating and cooling profiles of Cu2-xS NPs (c) and Cu2-xS SPs (g) under the fixed concentration (120 µg mL−1). The linear relationships between cooling time and −ln θ of Cu2-xS NPs (d) and Cu2-xS SPs (h). (i) Extinction spectra of the H2O2 + TMB + Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs for 10 min at pH 7.4 (inset: photos of the corresponding solutions). (j) The release behavior of Cu2+ from Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs incubated in PBS. (k) Comparison between Cu2-xS NPs and Cu2-xS SPs: photothermal conversion efficiency (η), ROS generation, and Cu2+ release.
Nanomaterials 16 00636 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, H.; Zhao, M.; Chao, Y.; Yao, J.; Yu, Q.; Sun, N. Morphology-Dependent Antibacterial Activity of Cu2-xS Nanostructures: Nanoplates Versus Superparticles. Nanomaterials 2026, 16, 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16100636

AMA Style

Zhu H, Zhao M, Chao Y, Yao J, Yu Q, Sun N. Morphology-Dependent Antibacterial Activity of Cu2-xS Nanostructures: Nanoplates Versus Superparticles. Nanomaterials. 2026; 16(10):636. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16100636

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Hui, Mengzhe Zhao, Yang Chao, Jun Yao, Qin Yu, and Na Sun. 2026. "Morphology-Dependent Antibacterial Activity of Cu2-xS Nanostructures: Nanoplates Versus Superparticles" Nanomaterials 16, no. 10: 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16100636

APA Style

Zhu, H., Zhao, M., Chao, Y., Yao, J., Yu, Q., & Sun, N. (2026). Morphology-Dependent Antibacterial Activity of Cu2-xS Nanostructures: Nanoplates Versus Superparticles. Nanomaterials, 16(10), 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16100636

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop