Next Article in Journal
Correction: Shen et al. Black Phosphorus Nano-Polarizer with High Extinction Ratio in Visible and Near-Infrared Regime. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 168
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on the Influence and Mechanism of Mineral Admixtures and Fibers on Frost Resistance of Slag–Yellow River Sediment Geopolymers
Previous Article in Journal
Laser-Ablative Structuring of Elastic Bandages—An Experimental Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Coarse-Grained Monte Carlo Simulations of Graphene-Enhanced Geopolymer Nanocomposite Nucleation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effect of Nanosilica on the Undrained Shear Strength of Organic Soil

Nanomaterials 2025, 15(9), 702; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15090702
by Carlos Solórzano-Blacio 1 and Jorge Albuja-Sánchez 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(9), 702; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15090702
Submission received: 5 April 2025 / Revised: 26 April 2025 / Accepted: 1 May 2025 / Published: 7 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology in Civil Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript (entitled: Effect of Nanosilica on the Undrained Shear Strength of Organic Soil) pays main attention on the undrained shear strength of organic soil from Quito by adding Nanosilica. Their work indicate that increasing the nanosilica content leads to higher plasticity, lower maximum dry density, and higher optimum moisture content. This work is interesting and meaningful. Yet, I still think the authors should improve the manuscript in content. My detail comments are listed as following points.

1) The content of the “Introduction” can be simplified partly.

2) The figure 5 should be revised.

3) In the section 3, the authors carried out detail tests. Yet, can the shear face of failure face be observed?

4) I think the CT test can be used to find the micro- inner failure of Organic Soil and Nanosilica- Organic Soil, as similar case in reference “Application of computerized tomographic scanning to the study of water-induced weakening of mudstone”.

5) The conclusion section should be revised to highlight the innovative work and findings.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

No, I consider this MS is fine to be accepted.

The location map could be showing clearly and the experiment methods could be described more detailedly. How many samples have been carried out that should be listed in a table.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is a very interesting paper on the use of nanosilica for improving the physical properties of soils for construction bases. I do have some comments
1) Please include some information on the diversity of nanospecies that can be includes as soil improvement amendments. What other nanomaterials can function in this role? Why has nano silica been favored in this study.
2) You use mechanical mixing to add nanosilica to homogenized soil samples. Is this the expected method for the application of this material? How would other application methods such as the application of nano silica in a liquid slurry affect the physical properties of treated soil? Can you talk about this in the discussion?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This revision is acceptable.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

This revision is acceptable.

Back to TopTop