Next Article in Journal
Progress in Modeling and Applications of Solid Electrolyte Interphase Layers for Lithium Metal Anodes
Previous Article in Journal
Pulsed Alternating Fields Magnetic Hyperthermia in Combination with Chemotherapy (5-Fluorouracil) as a Cancer Treatment for Glioblastoma Multiform: An In Vitro Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Factors Influencing Removal of Trichloroethylene in a Zero-Valent Iron Fenton System

1
College of Geographical Science, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150000, China
2
Cooperative Economic Guidance Department, Suihua Agriculture and Rural Bureau, Suihua 152000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(7), 558; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15070558
Submission received: 26 February 2025 / Revised: 28 March 2025 / Accepted: 29 March 2025 / Published: 5 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Energy and Catalysis)

Abstract

:
Trichloroethylene (TCE), a volatile organic compound commonly used as a solvent, is frequently detected in contaminated groundwater. In the zero-valent iron (ZVI) Fenton process, TCE can be eventually dechlorinated into non-toxic products, which is mainly caused by hydroxyl radicals derived from H2O2. However, some key factors in the dechlorination of TCE in the zero-valent iron Fenton process have not been studied clearly. In the present study, the effects of the initial TCE concentration, initial H2O2 concentration, dosage of ZVI, initial pH, and temperature on TCE degradation in the ZVI Fenton process were studied. In addition, the structure and surface morphology of the ZVI used in this study were analyzed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM), N2 adsorption–desorption, and X-ray diffractometry (XRD). The experimental results demonstrated that the dosage of ZVI and initial H2O2 concentration had obvious impacts on TCE degradation. At a ZVI dosage of 2 g/L and an initial H2O2 concentration of 0.53 mol/L, more than 97% of TCE could be degraded within 24 h at 25 °C. We found that the ZVI Fenton process could efficiently degrade TCE at a broad pH range and room temperature, making it applicable to groundwater remediation. TCE degradation was associated with Fe2+ concentration. Spectroscopic analyses indicated that the oxide film formed on the ZVI surface was associated with Fe2+ concentration in enhanced TCE dechlorination. The ZVI Fenton process could work at a wide range of TCE concentrations (0–200 mg/L).

1. Introduction

Trichloroethylene (TCE), a colorless liquid with volatile properties, is extensively used as an organic solvent and is widely used in printing and dyeing processes, the cleaning industry, degreasing processes, and other chemical fields [1]. TCE is one of 129 priority pollutants and has attracted significant attention due to its characteristics of high toxicity, volatility, and long-term residual persistence [2]. Chlorinated organic pollutants have been detected in groundwater and soil in many countries and cities, posing a global ecological problem. These pollutants can persist in the environment for long periods of time and accumulate in organisms through the food chain, leading to significant risks to human health and the environment [3]. Previous studies have verified that humans could suffer from symptoms such as liver damage, paralysis, and cancer under the stress of high TCE levels [4,5]. In numerous species and strains of experimental animals, TCE has been demonstrated to be carcinogenic at multiple sites [4]. Moreover, TCE has been reported to influence the microbial community diversity and nitrogen cycle in Mollisol, which is a deep, organic-rich, and highly fertile soil type known for its black topsoil and excellent agricultural productivity [6,7]. The soil quality deteriorated and the organic matter decomposition and mineral nutrient cycling were impeded in Mollisol when the concentration of TCE exceeded 10 mg/kg, caused by its impact on the soil’s microbial biomass [6]. Therefore, investigating efficient TCE degradation pathways holds great practical significance. Many plans have been proposed to treat and restore chlorine-containing contaminated underground water, including gas stripping, physical adsorption, chemical oxidation or reduction [8,9,10], and hydrodechlorination [11]. Among various chemical oxidation techniques, the Fenton method has garnered significant interest due to its potent oxidizing capabilities [12]. In the classic Fenton method, hydrogen peroxide is catalyzed by ferrous iron to produce hydroxyl radicals that react with pollutants [13].
However, the pH range for the Fenton process is restricted to acidic conditions. Fe(II) is oxidized to Fe(III) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, which acts as the oxidant species. Under alkaline conditions, Fe(III) ions hydrolyze and form ferric hydroxide precipitates. This precipitation removes Fe(III) from the solution, preventing further catalytic reactions with hydrogen peroxide, thereby terminating the Fenton reaction prematurely [14]. Moreover, hydroxyl radicals from the Fenton process, as powerful and non-selective oxidants that can even corrode cement [15], are destructive to the environmental medium itself. Therefore, a number of studies, including Fenton-like reactions and modified Fenton reactions, have been carried out to improve the limitations of the classic Fenton process.
Fenton processes using catechol [16] and thioglycolic acid [17] have been reported to degrade organic complexes at a neutral pH by accelerating the Fe(III)/Fe(II) redox cycle. Heterogeneous Fenton processes using solid iron sources such as goethite [18], magnetite [19], hematite [20], etc., have been a new research direction. Heterogeneous Fenton processes based on schwertmannite can enhance sludge’s dewaterability over a wide pH range [21].
Recently, ZVI has gained widespread attention for groundwater remediation due to its high reactivity and large surface area [22]. Pure ZVI has difficulty completely dechlorinating chlorine-containing contaminants, so it is usually combined with other chemical agents in contaminant degradation. Hydrodechlorination reactions with ZVI provide a fresh perspective for the degradation of chlorine-containing contaminants [23,24,25]. Wang et al. demonstrated that the heterogeneous Fenton process using goethite is highly pH-dependent, with optimal performance at pH 3, as higher pH levels lead to Fe precipitation and reduced catalytic efficiency [23]. In addition, Tiar et al. further confirmed that both homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton degradation of 4-nitrophenol are most effective under acidic conditions, with the degradation ratios declining significantly as the pH increases due to Fe(OH)₃ formation [24]. Moreover, heterogeneous Fenton processes using zero-valent iron (ZVI) instead of aqueous Fe(II) can reduce the disadvantages of metal loss in the classic Fenton process. ZVI acts as a slow-release source of aqueous Fe(II) [26]. The ZVI Fenton process has been reported to be used to treat organic wastewater produced by pharmaceutical factories. Using the ZVI Fenton process, the removal efficiency of sulfamethazine at pH 3 greatly exceeded that at other pH values [27,28]. However, the difference in initial pH scarcely influences the dechlorination ratio of molinate [29]. Thus, the influence of initial pH on the dechlorination ratio of TCE need to be further investigated.
In addition, some other key factors in dechlorination of TCE in the zero-valent iron Fenton process have not been investigated clearly; those that have been investigated were demonstrated to have effects on TCE dechlorination in the Cu(II) Fenton process [30] and sulfide-modified nZVI process [26]. Thus, studying the efficient TCE degradation in the ZVI Fenton process under different conditions is of a great importance.
This study aims to systematically investigate the key factors influencing the degradation and dechlorination efficiency of trichloroethylene (TCE) in the ZVI/H2O2 system, including initial TCE concentration, initial H2O2 concentration, ZVI dosage, initial pH, and temperature. Additionally, it explores the underlying mechanisms of TCE degradation in the ZVI-Fenton process. To gain deeper insights into the reaction process, advanced characterization techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), N2 adsorption–desorption analysis, and X-ray diffractometry (XRD) were employed to compare the morphology and structural changes in ZVI before and after the reaction. By monitoring TCE degradation ratios, dechlorination efficiency, and Fe(II) variations throughout the experimental process, this study seeks to identify optimal conditions for maximizing TCE removal efficiency. The findings not only contribute to a better understanding of the ZVI-Fenton system but also provide a scientific basis for developing more effective and sustainable remediation strategies for TCE-contaminated environments.

2. Experimental

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

All chemicals and reagents used in this study were of analytical grade or higher. ZVI was purchased from Höganäs Environmental Solutions, LLC. Trichloroethylene (TCE, C2HCl3 ≥ 99.0%) purchased from Benchmark Chemical Reagent Ltd. Co., Tianjin, China. Hydrogen peroxide was purchased from Beilian Fine Chemicals Ltd. Co., Tianjin, China. Sodium hydroxide and Anhydrous sodium carbonate were purchased from Yongda Chemical Reagent Ltd. Co., Tianjin, China. Hydrochloric acid and Nitric acid were purchased from Jingfeng Chemical Engineering Ltd. Co., Tianjin, China. Ferrous ammonium sulfate, glacial acetic acid, and ammonium acetate were purchased from Haiyi Scientific & Trading Ltd. Co., Shanghai, China. Silver nitrate was purchased from Binhai Chemical Engineering Ltd. Co., Tianjin, China. Sodium thiosulfate was purchased from Ruijing Chemical Reagent Ltd. Co., Tianjin, China. Potassium iodide was purchased from Comeo Chemical Reagent Ltd. Co., Tianjin, China. ZVI was stored in a sealed black airtight bag and placed in an anaerobic box for storage before use. The water solution used for testing is an artificial water distribution system designed to simulate polluted water conditions. It does not contain all the diverse ions present in actual polluted water.

2.2. Characterization of ZVI

Scanning electron microscopy (S-4800, Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used to examine the surface morphology of ZVI surface particles before and after reaction. The test voltage was 5 kV. The samples were dried at 50 °C in vacuum box for 24 h. Specific surface area and distribution of pore size of ZVI were obtained by using specific surface area and pore size analyzer(ASAP-2020, Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, Norcross, GA, USA) The samples were degassed at 30 °C for 4 h, and the N2 adsorption volume was measured at 77.249K. Surface area, particle, and pore size were detected with Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. Moreover, X-ray diffraction,(XRD-6100 Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) analysis was carried out to assess changes in the crystalline structure of ZVI before and after reaction. (2θ range 10~90°, scan step size of 0.02°, scanning frequency of 8°/min).

2.3. Experimental Process

A number of experiments were carried out to compare the degradation and dechlorination efficiency of TCE under various condition. (TCE concentration, dosage of ZVI, H2O2 concentration, initial pH and temperature). Dissolve a certain volume of TCE standard solution in methanol and then dilute it into 500 mg/L TCE methanol stock solution. Adjust the solution by using 1 mol/L NaOH or HCl. In the present study, solution pH was recorded by a pH meter (PWR-351N, Osho Ltd. Co., Shanghai, China) in all experiments. Vials containing the solution that meets the experimental requirements were transferred to a gas bath thermostatic oscillator, (ED-85A Shanghai Precision Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) operating at 150 rpm. TCE in aqueous suspensions was periodically sampled and detected by a Gas Chromatograph–Flame Ionization Detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), which is equipped with a GS-GasPro (30 m × 0.32 mm) capillary column. The aqueous Cl concentration in the experimental process was obtained by the silver nitrate titration method. Moreover, a UV spectrophotometerTU-11810, Puxuan General Instrument Ltd. Co., Beijing, China) was used to investigate the aqueous Fe(II) concentration.
The level of hydroxyl radical was measured by fluorescence spectrophotometry to study the mechanisms of ZVI Fenton process. Briefly, 83.0 mg terephthalic acid powder was added into a vial with 2.0 mmol/L sodium hydroxide solution (5.0 mmol/L terephthalic acid). TCE in aqueous suspensions was periodically sampled and filtered with 0.45 μm filter membrane. Fluorescence peak intensity of 2-hydroxyterephthalic acid (Proportional to the level of hydroxyl radical) in the filtrate was detected with fluorescence spectrophotometry.
To ensure accuracy, all experiments were performed in triplicate. The reported data represent the average values from three independent experiments.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characteristics of ZVI

3.1.1. Surface Morphological Characteristics of SEM

The SEM image (Figure 1A) shows that ZVI particles are smooth and aggregated into spherical or chain-like structures. After 24 h of reaction, the surface of the ZVI particles becomes rough and porous (Figure 1B), primarily due to surface oxidation, a phenomenon also reported by Peng [31]. The surface of ZVI particles covered with oxidized ZVI was likely to decrease the level of Fe(II), thereby inhibiting TCE degradation. This is attributed to the barrier effect of the oxidized layer, which impedes electron transfer and limits Fe(II) release.

3.1.2. BET Analysis of ZVI

Figure 2A presents the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm of zero-valent iron (ZVI). The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm of ZVI zero-valent iron presents an obvious hysteresis loop. According to IUPAC, it can be determined that the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm of ZVI is type IV, and the hysteresis loop is type H4. This indicates an irregular pore structure with no well-defined adsorption saturation plateau. The BET surface area and pore size distribution were analyzed both before and after the reaction to examine structural changes. Before the reaction, the BET surface area of ZVI was 0.2 m2/g, with adsorption and desorption pore sizes of 15.7 nm and 11.7 nm, respectively. The pore size distribution ranged from 2.2 nm to 50 nm, suggesting a mix of mesoporous and non-porous structures (Figure 2B). After the reaction, the BET surface area showed a significant reduction, while the average pore size increased, indicating structural changes due to surface oxidation and pore collapse. This suggests a decrease in available reactive sites, which could affect the reactivity of ZVI.

3.1.3. X-Ray Spectroscopy (XRD) Analysis of ZVI

The reactivity of ZVI has been reported to be closely related to its surface composition [32]. Therefore, XRD analysis was conducted to characterize ZVI before and after the reaction. The XRD pattern in Figure 3 shows that the peaks of Fe0 in the after-reaction ZVI could not be distinctly discerned in the diagram. This is because of its low degree of crystallinity [33]. In contrast, the pre-reaction ZVI exhibits a prominent peak at 45°, indicating a high degree of crystallinity and phase purity (PDF: 06-0696). After the reaction, the X-ray diffraction intensity significantly decreased, which can be attributed to the formation of oxidized ZVI. The peaks corresponding to Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 became obvious, and the peak of Fe0 receded, which verifies the surface composition and physical and chemical properties transformation of ZVI after reaction. These XRD results are consistent with the surface morphological characteristics observed in the SEM analysis.

3.2. Effects of TCE Concentration, Dosage of ZVI, H2O2 Concentration, Solution Temperature, and Initial pH on the Removal Efficiency of TCE by ZVI/H2O2

3.2.1. TCE Concentration

TCE degradation and dechlorination ratio as well as the level of aqueous Fe(II) was monitored to evaluate the effect of initial TCE concentration on TCE removal efficiency (including degradation efficiency and dechlorination efficiency) using the ZVI Fenton process. As shown in Figure 4A, the TCE degradation ratio initially increased and then declined with increasing initial TCE concentrations. At an initial TCE concentration of 80 mg/L, the degradation ratio reached its peak at the maximum value of 94.56%. Similarly, the TCE dechlorination trend in Figure 4B aligns with the degradation pattern in Figure 4A, with a maximum dechlorination ratio of 93.47% observed at an initial TCE concentration of 100 mg/L. Figure 4C shows that aqueous Fe(II) concentration was positively correlated with the initial TCE concentration. Aqueous Fe(II) concentration reached its peak at 8 h before gradually decreasing. As the TCE concentration increased 10 times to 200 mg/L, the aqueous Fe(II) concentration increased 9.23 times to 200 mg/L, indicating effect of initial TCE concentration indicating a significant impact on aqueous Fe(II) released from ZVI. However, at 200 mg/L, the TCE degradation and dechlorination ratios increased only by 4.92% and 6.03%, respectively, likely due to surface oxidation of ZVI. At this concentration, ZVI surfaces rapidly became covered with oxidized layers, leading to reaction termination. The reason for the difference in corrosion ratios between oxidized and granular ZVI particles is the formation of passivating precipitates on their surfaces, as previously observed in granular ZVI systems [34].

3.2.2. Dosage of ZVI

Figure 5A shows TCE removal efficiency using Fenton process at five different dosage of ZVI. Initially, the TCE degradation efficiency increased with higher ZVI dosages but declined beyond a certain threshold. After 24 h, the degradation ratio reached 64.97% at 1 g/L ZVI, while at 2 g/L ZVI, it peaked at 90.37%, representing a 39% increase when the ZVI dosage doubled.
Figure 5B indicates that TCE dechlorination ratio increased as the dosage of ZVI increased to 2g/L and reaching the maximum state with an insignificant decrease in degradation ratio. This trend aligns with the findings of Harada et al. [35]. Specifically, when the ZVI dosage doubled to 2 g/L, the dechlorination ratio increased by 38.4%, reaching a maximum value of 89.81%. This can be attributed to the significant presence of aqueous Fe(II) in the system.
Figure 5C demonstrates that the concentration of aqueous Fe(II) consistently increased in correlation with the dosage of ZVI, which indicated that the decrease in degradation ratio (2~3 g/L ZVI) might be caused by a quenching reaction. The level of aqueous Fe(II) continued to increase and then reached a maximum condition as the dosage of ZVI increased to 2g/L. When the active sites of TCE are occupied, the excessive aqueous Fe(II) can consume the ·OH produced during the ZVI Fenton process [36], which is described in Equations (1) and (2). This phenomenon may explain the slight decrease in TCE degradation and dechlorination at higher ZVI concentrations.
2OH + 2OH → 2H2O + 2O
H2O2 + ·OH → HO2· + H2O

3.2.3. H2O2 Concentration

Figure 6A indicates oxidative degradation of TCE with time under different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. The TCE degradation efficiency initially increased with rising H2O2 concentrations but declined beyond a certain threshold. TCE degradation ratio reached 65.34% at 0.17 mol/L H2O2, while TCE degradation increased by 38.31% and reached the maximum value of 90.37% at 0.53 mol/L H2O2. TCE dechlorination diagram showed in Figure 6B showed an increased trend initially until the concentration of H2O2 increased to 0.53 mol/L. When the hydrogen peroxide concentrations were 0.17 mol/L and 0.53 mol/L, respectively, the dechlorination ratios of TCE were 69.86% and 89.81%, respectively. The latter increased by 38.46% compared with the former. The level of aqueous Fe(II) increased by 81.13% (0.509 mol/L) as the concentration of H2O2 increased from 0.17 mol/L to 0.53 mol/L (Figure 6C), indicating that increasing the concentration of H2O2 could significantly increase aqueous Fe(II) released from the ZVI surface, thereby expanding the reaction area of H2O2. Additionally, an increase in the concentration of H2O2 could result in a higher abundance of hydroxyl radicals as a source. The concentration of hydroxyl radicals increases, thereby improving the efficiency of the reaction. However, the removal of TCE showed a decrease in the removal trend at a higher concentration of H2O2, which might be due to the excessive hydroxyl radicals released from H2O2. Once TCE active sites become saturated, excessive hydroxyl radicals could react with H2O2 and form hydroperoxide radicals [37]. These hydroperoxide radicals can subsequently react with hydroxyl radicals, leading to the consumption of hydroxyl radicals. The reaction between hydroperoxide radicals and hydroxy radicals is described in Equation (3).
HO2·+·OH—H2O + O2

3.2.4. Solution Temperature

Temperature plays a critical role in the Fenton oxidation reaction, influencing the reactivity of ZVI toward contaminants. The removal efficiency of TCE was detected to study the efficiency of solution temperature on the degradation ratio of TCE, and the results were showed in Figure 7A. Using the ZVI Fenton process, the degradation ratio was greatly inhibited in the first hour under solution temperature of 15 °C and 25 °C. However, by the end of the reaction, the degradation ratio only increased by 6.8% when the temperature rose from 15 °C to 25 °C, and no further significant increase was observed at higher temperatures. It was found that the TCE removal efficiency seemed to be slightly influenced by solution temperature. TCE dechlorination efficiency was examined to further investigate the influence of solution temperature on TCE removal efficiency by ZVI/H2O2. As shown in Figure 7B, the TCE dechlorination ratio varyingly increased as solution temperature increased from 15 °C to 25 °C, while, the dechlorination ratio reached a limiting value with solution temperature of 30 °C and kept constant from 30 °C to 35 °C. Notably, these trends contrast with the findings of Metzgen [38]. It seemed that the degradation efficiency and dechlorination efficiency could not represent the TCE removal efficiency in the ZVI Fenton process.
To better understand the reaction mechanism, the kinetic parameters of TCE degradation were analyzed (Figure 7D, Table 1). The kinetic parameters of TCE removal by ZVI/H2O2 showed an increased trend as the solution temperature increased, indicating that solution temperature was in direct proportion to TCE removal efficiency, and the removal experiment was an endothermic reaction, in which kinetic energy of molecules increased as the solution temperature increased, intensifying the collision between H2O2 and aqueous Fe(II). Similar result was also observed by Fan [39]. However, considering the process cost, the solution temperature of 25 °C is enough to maintain a high reactivity of ZVI/H2O2 during the process.

3.2.5. Initial pH

Previous studies have demonstrated that TCE removal efficiency by the ZVI Fenton process varies by different experimental substrates [28,29,30]. Therefore, it is of great value to study the degradation efficiency of TCE influenced by initial pH (Figure 8). The results indicate that TCE removal was only slightly affected by initial pH, as all tested conditions resulted in over 90% removal after 24 h. The trend of TCE removal with pH was consistent with a previous study [29]. TCE degradation slightly decreased as the solution pH increased to pH 3, 5, 7, and 9. The degradation ratio reached the maximum value of 93.71% at pH 3. To further examine the effect of solution pH on TCE removal, TCE dechlorination was monitored. Figure 8B shows that TCE residual increased as the solution pH increased, which is consistent with TCE degradation. The dechlorination ratio reached the maximum value of 94.80% at pH 3, and the minimum value of 86.48% at pH 9. Figure 8C illustrates that the level of Fe(II) decreased as the solution pH increased, the level of Fe(II) reached the maximum concentration of 1.518 μg/mL far beyond pH of 5, 7, 9. The reactivity of ZVI is highly sensitive to solution pH, primarily due to the surface of ZVI covered with oxidized ZVI (Fe2O3, Fe3O4 [31]) under alkaline conditions. Conversely, under acidic conditions, ZVI undergoes rapid corrosion, leading to higher reactivity [40]. A similar pattern was also observed in the study carried out by Choi, in which explained that the TCE removal ratio by ZVI Fenton with Cu(II) decreased with solution pH from 3 to 6, which might be caused by a decrease in the reduction potential of reactive surface species as the increase in solution pH occurs [26]. Therefore, under acidic conditions, ZVI can supply sufficient Fe(II) to catalyze the decomposition of H2O2 into active free radicals, promoting the removal of TCE. Under alkaline conditions, H2O2 tends to behave as a reductant, which may reduce its oxidative capacity and consequently lower the removal efficiency. Moreover, under alkaline conditions, the level of hydroxyl radicals will reduce because OH can consume H2O2, leading to a low TCE dechlorination ratio.
Heterogeneity tests were applied to discriminate between homogeneous (aqueous Fe2⁺) and heterogeneous (ZVI surface-mediated) pathways, specifically assessing whether Fe2⁺ remains active after physical separation from ZVI. ZVI was removed from the reaction mixture by a pre-warmed 0.1 μm PTFE membrane after a reaction time of 0.5 h, and filtration occurs for another 7.5 h under identical conditions. As shown in Figure 8D, the removal efficiencies of TCE in the filtrate under pH 5 and pH 9 conditions were 54.27% and 20.42%, respectively. The TCE in the filtrate of pH 5 continued to degrade, which corresponded to 68% of the removal efficiency observed in the original solution, indicating that the catalytic reaction is a homogeneous process under acidic conditions. Under alkaline conditions (pH 9), minimal TCE degradation was observed in the filtrate, which corresponded to 29% of original solution.

3.3. TCE Degradation Mechanisms in ZVI Fenton Process

Figure 9 indicates the variation in TCE removal efficiency at different addition materials reactions. Reaction with bare H2O2 did not show any significant loss of TCE after 24 h, suggesting no significant Fenton oxidation throughout the reaction. This is because hydrogen radical generation from H2O2 alone, without a catalyst, was insufficient to effectively degrade TCE. There was only a slight decrease in TCE by bare ZVI, and the removal of TCE was mainly attributed to minor adsorption. A similar pattern was also observed by H. Dong [30]. The removal of TCE efficiency by ZVI/H2O2 reached 91.37%, verifying that TCE could be degraded efficiently in the ZVI Fenton process. In order to examine the production of hydroxyl radical, fluorescence spectroscopy detections using terephthalic acid as probes were carried out. The results are included in the Supplementary Materials.

4. Conclusions

This study examined the effects of TCE concentration, ZVI dosage, H2O2 concentration, initial pH, and temperature on the removal efficiency of TCE in the ZVI-Fenton process. Additionally, TCE degradation mechanisms and ZVI characterizations before and after reactions were analyzed. The findings indicate that while TCE concentration had a limited effect on degradation efficiency, ZVI dosage and H2O2 concentration significantly influenced removal ratios. The process demonstrated high efficiency (>90%) across a wide pH range (3–9), suggesting its potential applicability for groundwater purification. Reaction temperature positively correlated with TCE degradation ratios. SEM analysis reveal that the surface of ZVI particles after the reaction became rough and porous and had consisted of surface-oxidized ZVI, which is also observed by Zhao et al. [41]. XRD analysis shows that the surface crystallinity of ZVI is low, which could decrease the enhanced reactivity. Future research should extend these findings by conducting experiments using real water samples rather than aqueous solutions, as natural water sources contain various compounds that may compete with TCE for degradation, which is also supported by Guo et al. [42]. Investigating the influence of environmental factors such as pH, temperature, and organic matter on degradation efficiency will further enhance practical applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano15070558/s1, Figure S1: Fluorescence spectra of terephthalic acid in ZVI Fenton system. (TCE = 20 mg/L, ZVI = 2 g/L, H2O2 = 0.53 mol/L, pH = 7, T = 25 °C).

Author Contributions

Y.S.: Writing—original draft, Software, Data curation, Investigation, Formal analysis. S.L.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Supervision. P.L.: Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Research Business Projects of Provincial Higher Education Institutions in Heilongjiang Province (2021-KYYWF-0182).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kube, M.; Beck, A.; Zinder, S.H.; Kuhl, H.; Reinhardt, R.; Adrian, L. Genome sequence of the chlorinated compound–respiring bacterium Dehalococcoides species strain CBDB1. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 1269–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wu, Z.; Man, Q.; Niu, H.; Lyu, H.; Song, H.; Li, R.; Ren, G.; Zhu, F.; Peng, C.; Li, B.; et al. Recent advances and trends of trichloroethylene biodegradation: A critical review. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1053169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Doherty, R.E. A History of the Production and Use of Carbon Tetrachloride, Tetrachloroethylene, Trichloroethylene and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane in the United States: Part 2—Trichloroethylene and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane. Environ. Forensics 2000, 1, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wartenberg, D.; Reyner, D.; Scott, C.S. Trichloroethylene and cancer: Epidemiologic evidence. Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Milks, M.M.; Couri, D. Trichloroethylene effects on the formation of enzyme-altered foci in rat liver. Arch. Toxicol. 1984, 56, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, P.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, Q.; Liu, Y.; Tuyiringire, D.; Chen, Z.; Liang, S. Effects of trichloroethylene stress on the microbiological characteristics of Mollisol. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 184, 109595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, P.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, Q.; Liu, Y.; Liang, S. Trichloroethylene inhibits nitrogen transformation and microbial community structure in Mollisol. Ecotoxicology 2020, 29, 801–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. An, J.; Li, G.; Si, W.; Chen, W.; He, J.; Feng, H.; Chen, J.; Fu, H. Highly efficient degradation of antibiotic residues with reagent-free photoelectro-Fenton via hollow fiber gas diffusion electrode. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 477, 147259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gu, Y.; Meng, J.; Duo, J.; Khim, J.S.; Wang, T.; Su, G.; Li, Q.; Shi, B.; Sun, B.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Environmental fate and transformation mechanisms of chlorinated organic pollutants from the petrochemical industry: Insights for pollution control and remediation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 480, 136329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, X.; Yang, H.; Xu, J.; Cheng, T.; Li, Y. Bimetallic PdAu Nanoframes for Electrochemical H2O2 Production in Acids. ACS Mater. Lett. 2021, 3, 996–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, N.; Rioux, R.M.; Ribeiro, F.H. Investigation of Reaction Steps for the Hydrodechlorination of Chlorine-Containing Organic Compounds on Pd Catalysts. J. Catal. 2002, 211, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Smith, B.A.; Teel, A.L.; Watts, R.J. Mechanism for the destruction of carbon tetrachloride and chloroform DNAPLs by modified Fenton’s reagent. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2006, 85, 229–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Walling, C.; Cheves, F. Fenton’s reagent revisited. Acc. Chem. Res. 1975, 8, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pignatello, J.; Oliveros, E.; MacKay, A. Advanced Oxidation Processes for Organic Contaminant Destruction Based on the Fenton Reaction and Related Chemistry. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 36, 1–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Feng, W.; Li, J.; Gao, K.; An, H.; Wang, Y. A comparison of spent resin degradation by Fenton and O3-Fenton process. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2020, 130, 103566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xiao, J.; Wang, C.; Lyu, S.; Liu, H.; Jiang, C.; Lei, Y. Enhancement of Fenton degradation by catechol in a wide initial pH range. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 169, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Subramanian, G.; Madras, G. Remarkable enhancement of Fenton degradation at wide pH range promoted by thioglycolic acid. Chem. Commun. 2016, 3, 1136–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aline, M.M.; Iara, R.G.; Guilherme, M.M.d.C.; Mateus, A.G.; Teodorico, C.R.; Mário, C.G. Boron as a promoter in the goethite (α-FeOOH) phase: Organic compound degradation by Fenton reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2016, 192, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Anaëlle, G.; Charlotte, G.; Arezou, F.; Hélène, M.; Christine de, B.; Marcello, B.; Gilles, M. The ability of recycled magnetite nanoparticles to degrade carbamazepine in water through photo-Fenton oxidation at neutral pH. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 317, 123877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Dong, K.; Liu, Z.; Wang, H.; Ma, S.; Zhang, A.; Li, M.; Yu, L.; Li, Y. Sulfurized hematite for photo-Fenton catalysis. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2017, 27, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, K.; Sun, C.; Chen, H.; Baig, S.A.; Sheng, T.; Xu, X. Enhanced catalytic hydrodechlorination of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by nanoscale zero-valent iron with electrochemical technique using a palladium/nickel foam electrode. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 223, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, T.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Du, X.; Fang, D.; Liang, J.; Li, J.; Zhou, L. Schwertmannite-based heterogeneous Fenton for enhancing sludge dewaterability over a wide pH range. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 459, 132240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H. Goethite as an efficient heterogeneous Fenton catalyst for the degradation of methyl orange. Catal. Today 2015, 252, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tiar, K.; Soualah, A.; Bisio, C.; Guidotti, M. Effect of initial solution pH on 4-nitrophenol oxidation through homogeneous/heterogeneous photo-Fenton process using goethite/H2O2 system. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2024, 447, 115184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, G.S.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Li, T.; Yuan, Y.X.; Wang, P. Effects of organic acids and initial solution pH on photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A (BPA) in a photo-Fenton-like process using goethite (α-FeOOH). Photoch. Photobio. Sci. 2024, 15, 1046–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Choi, K.; Lee, W. Enhanced degradation of trichloroethylene in nano-scale zero-valent iron Fenton process with Cu(II). J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 211–212, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gao, J.; Zhang, L.; Xu, Z.; Sheng, X.; Li, D.; Chen, Y.; Habib, M.; Lyu, S. Degradation of 1,2,3-trichloropropane in aqueous solution by ZVI-enhanced Fenton process: Performances and mechanisms. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 110432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, C.-C.; Cheng, Y.-J. Effectiveness of using nanoscale zero-valent iron and hydrogen peroxide in degrading sulfamethazine in water. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2021, 118, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Feitz, A.J.; Joo, S.H.; Guan, J.; Sun, Q.; Sedlak, D.L.; Waite, T.D. Oxidative transformation of contaminants using colloidal zero-valent iron. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2005, 265, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dong, H.; Zhang, C.; Deng, J.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, Y.; Hou, K.; Tang, L.; Zeng, G. Factors influencing degradation of trichloroethylene by sulfide-modified nanoscale zero-valent iron in aqueous solution. Water Res. 2018, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Peng, X.; Xi, B.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, Q.; Meng, X.; Mao, X.; Jiang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Tan, W.; Liu, H.; et al. Effect of Arsenic on the Formation and Adsorption Property of Ferric Hydroxide Precipitates in ZVI Treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 10100–10108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, J.; Dou, X.; Qin, H.; Sun, Y.; Yin, D.; Guan, X. Characterization methods of zerovalent iron for water treatment and remediation. Water Res. 2018, 148, 70–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, E.-J.; Kim, J.-H.; Azad, A.-M.; Chang, Y.-S. Facile Synthesis and Characterization of Fe/FeS Nanoparticles for Environmental Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 1457–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Velimirovic, M.; Auffan, M.; Carniato, L.; Micić Batka, V.; Schmid, D.; Wagner, S.; Borschneck, D.; Proux, O.; von der Kammer, F.; Hofmann, T. Effect of field site hydrogeochemical conditions on the corrosion of milled zerovalent iron particles and their dechlorination efficiency. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 618, 1619–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Harada, T.; Yatagai, T.; Kawase, Y. Hydroxyl radical generation linked with iron dissolution and dissolved oxygen consumption in zero-valent iron wastewater treatment process. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 303, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Duesterberg, C.K.; Waite, T.D. Process Optimization of Fenton Oxidation Using Kinetic Modeling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 4189–4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fontmorin, J.M.; Burgos Castillo, R.C.; Tang, W.Z.; Sillanpää, M. Stability of 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide as a spin-trap for quantification of hydroxyl radicals in processes based on Fenton reaction. Water Res. 2016, 99, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Metzgen, A.D.; Dahmke, A.; Ebert, M. Significance of temperature as a key driver in ZVI PRB applications for PCE degradation. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2023, 258, 104236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fan, C.; Zheng, N.; Zheng, J.; Xiao, L.; Liu, Y. Kinetic-molecular theory optimization algorithm using opposition-based learning and varying accelerated motion. Soft Comput. 2020, 24, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Matheson, L.J.; Tratnyek, P.G. Reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated methanes by iron metal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28, 2045–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, J.; Tobler, D.J.; Yin, W.; Hansen, H.C.B. ZVI-biochar granules for reactive chlorinated solvent filters generated by high temperature pyrolysis of iron(III) amended biomass. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 357, 129979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guo, J.; Gao, F.; Zhang, C.; Ahmad, S.; Tang, J. Sulfidation of zero-valent iron for enhanced reduction of chlorinated contaminants: A review on the reactivity, selectivity, and interference resistance. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 477, 147049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM diagrams of zero-valent iron (A) before reaction and of zero-valent iron (B) after reaction (enlarged 50,000 times).
Figure 1. SEM diagrams of zero-valent iron (A) before reaction and of zero-valent iron (B) after reaction (enlarged 50,000 times).
Nanomaterials 15 00558 g001
Figure 2. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm of zero-valent iron (A) and pore size distribution of zero-valent iron (B).
Figure 2. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm of zero-valent iron (A) and pore size distribution of zero-valent iron (B).
Nanomaterials 15 00558 g002
Figure 3. XRD diagram of ZVI before and after Reaction.
Figure 3. XRD diagram of ZVI before and after Reaction.
Nanomaterials 15 00558 g003
Figure 4. The effects of initial TCE on TCE degradation (A) and dechlorination (B). Concentration profile of aqueous Fe(II) released from ZVI surface (C). (ZVI = 2 g/L, pH = 3, H2O2 = 0.53 mol/L, T = 25 °C).
Figure 4. The effects of initial TCE on TCE degradation (A) and dechlorination (B). Concentration profile of aqueous Fe(II) released from ZVI surface (C). (ZVI = 2 g/L, pH = 3, H2O2 = 0.53 mol/L, T = 25 °C).
Nanomaterials 15 00558 g004
Figure 5. The effects of dosage of ZVI on TCE degradation (A) and dechlorination (B). Concentration profile of aqueous Fe(II) released from ZVI surface (C). (TCE = 20 mg/L, pH = 3, H2O2 = 0.53 mol/L, T = 25 °C).
Figure 5. The effects of dosage of ZVI on TCE degradation (A) and dechlorination (B). Concentration profile of aqueous Fe(II) released from ZVI surface (C). (TCE = 20 mg/L, pH = 3, H2O2 = 0.53 mol/L, T = 25 °C).
Nanomaterials 15 00558 g005
Figure 6. The effects of hydrogen peroxide concentration on TCE degradation (A) and dechlorination (B). Concentration profile of aqueous Fe(II) released from ZVI surface (C). (TCE = 20 mg/L, ZVI = 2g/L, pH = 3, T = 25 °C).
Figure 6. The effects of hydrogen peroxide concentration on TCE degradation (A) and dechlorination (B). Concentration profile of aqueous Fe(II) released from ZVI surface (C). (TCE = 20 mg/L, ZVI = 2g/L, pH = 3, T = 25 °C).
Nanomaterials 15 00558 g006
Figure 7. Effects of temperature on TCE degradation (A) and dechlorination (B). Concentration profile of aqueous Fe(II) released from the ZVI surface (C). Variation in kinetic constants of different temperature contents (D) (TCE = 20 mg/L, ZVI = 2 g/L, pH = 3, H2O2 = 0.53 mol/L).
Figure 7. Effects of temperature on TCE degradation (A) and dechlorination (B). Concentration profile of aqueous Fe(II) released from the ZVI surface (C). Variation in kinetic constants of different temperature contents (D) (TCE = 20 mg/L, ZVI = 2 g/L, pH = 3, H2O2 = 0.53 mol/L).
Nanomaterials 15 00558 g007
Figure 8. The effects of initial pH on TCE degradation (A) and dechlorination (B), Concentration profile of aqueous Fe(II) released from ZVI surface (C), Heterogeneity tests (D) (TCE = 20 mg/L, ZVI = 2 g/L, H2O2 = 0.53 mol/L, T = 25 °C).
Figure 8. The effects of initial pH on TCE degradation (A) and dechlorination (B), Concentration profile of aqueous Fe(II) released from ZVI surface (C), Heterogeneity tests (D) (TCE = 20 mg/L, ZVI = 2 g/L, H2O2 = 0.53 mol/L, T = 25 °C).
Nanomaterials 15 00558 g008
Figure 9. Effect of different addition materials on TCE degradation ratio. (TCE = 20 mg/L, ZVI = 2 g/L, H2O2 = 0.53 mol/L, pH = 7, T = 25 °C).
Figure 9. Effect of different addition materials on TCE degradation ratio. (TCE = 20 mg/L, ZVI = 2 g/L, H2O2 = 0.53 mol/L, pH = 7, T = 25 °C).
Nanomaterials 15 00558 g009
Table 1. Kinetic parameters of TCE degradation.
Table 1. Kinetic parameters of TCE degradation.
T (°C)Reaction Kinetics Constant (/h)R2
150.09470.9760
250.12500.9902
300.13470.9907
350.15370.9846
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, Y.; Liang, S.; Li, P. Factors Influencing Removal of Trichloroethylene in a Zero-Valent Iron Fenton System. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15070558

AMA Style

Sun Y, Liang S, Li P. Factors Influencing Removal of Trichloroethylene in a Zero-Valent Iron Fenton System. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(7):558. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15070558

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Yangyang, Shichao Liang, and Pengfei Li. 2025. "Factors Influencing Removal of Trichloroethylene in a Zero-Valent Iron Fenton System" Nanomaterials 15, no. 7: 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15070558

APA Style

Sun, Y., Liang, S., & Li, P. (2025). Factors Influencing Removal of Trichloroethylene in a Zero-Valent Iron Fenton System. Nanomaterials, 15(7), 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15070558

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop